ML20148E158
| ML20148E158 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1985 |
| From: | VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148E147 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8801250575 | |
| Download: ML20148E158 (61) | |
Text
_
,?
t 6
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN FOR FIRST AND SECOND QUAR 11Rs 1VPS
^
r (RETS MAditk HLEh QPP-756Q i
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWL3 STATION i
i 8801250575 850926 PDR ADOCK 05000271 R
PDR i.--.
_ ___.--_ _-., _ _ _. _ _ - _ _. _ _ _....... _.., _. _. ~... _ _ _ _. _
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 2.0 METEOROLOGICAL DATA................................................
2 3.0 RADIOACTIVITY RELEASES.............................................
3 3.1 Liquid Releases.............................................
3 3.2 Gaseous Releases............................................
3 4.0 DOSE ASSESSMENT....................................................
4 4.1 Organ Doses to Individuals from Receiving-Water Exposure Pathways................................
4 4.2 Individual Whole-Body and Skin Doses from Noble Gaseous Effluents...........................................
4 4.3 Organ Doses to Individuals from Radioactive Iodine and Particulates in Gaseous Effluents.......................
6 4.4 Whole-Body Doses in Unrestricted Areas from
)
Direct Radiation............................................
8 4.5 Whole-Body Doses to the General Population from all Receiving Water Related Pathways............................
9 4.6 Doses to the General Population and Average Individual within Fifty Miles from Gaseous Effluents...................
9 REFERENCES..............................................................
11 FIGURES................
12-13 TABLES..................................................................
14-43 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION...................................
Al APPENDIX B - LIQUID HOLDUP TANKS........................................
B1 APPENDIX C KADI0 ACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION...............................
Cl APPEllDIX D - RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION............................................
D1 APPENDIX E - RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM..............
El l
(.
l i
l
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) i Page APPENDIX F - LAND USE CENSUS...........................................
F1 AP.MNDIX G - PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM...................................
G1 APPENDIX H - 0FF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL..........................
H1 APPENDIX I - RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS........................................,
11 a
-l I
1
-111-l
_ ~, _,,,.
_,___i
i LIST OF TABLES Table No.
Title 1A Caseous Effluents - Summation of all Releases 1B Gaseous Eff uents - Elevated Releases 1C Gaseous Effluents - Routine Ground Level Releases ID Gaseous Effluents - Non-Routine Releases 2A Liquid Effluents - Summation of all Releases 2B Liquid Effluents - Non-Routine Releases 3
Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments 4-A to 4-H Vermont Yankee Joint Frequency Distribution January - Ma.rch 1985 5-A to 5-H Vermont Yankee Joint Frequency Distribution April - June 1985 6
Quarterly Average X/Q and D/Q Values for Selected Receptors 7
Summary of Radiological Impact on Man
-iv-l
LIST OF FIGUP1S Figure No.
Title 1A Vermont Yankee, January - March 1985, Upper Level Wind Rose 1B Vermont Yankee, April - June 1985, Upper Level Wind Rose
-v-
VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL. REPORT RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS, 1985
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Effective April 1, 1985, new Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) were implemented at Vermont Yankee. Under the new RETS, dose calculations and meteorological data need only be reported in the Semiannual Effluent Release Report that is prepared after January 1 of each year. However, since the first half of this six-month reporting period was under jurisdiction of the crevious Technical Specification reporting requirements, this report ha s been prepared to satisfy the requirements in effect at the start of the reporting period, as well as !..e new RETS reporting provisions.
Using actual measured effluent and meteorological data for the first six months of 1985, this report estimates '<tential doses from radioactive effluents that could affect individuals ar.d the general population near the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. Tables 1 through 3 list the recorded radioactive effluents and solid waste for this semiannual period. Tables 4 and 5 report the cumulative joint frequency distribution of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability observed during the first half of 1985.
Figures 1A and IB summarize wind speed and direction in a wind rose. Table 6 lists the calculated X/Q and D/Q values at different points of interest based on the meteorological record presented in Tables 4 and 5 for both quarters.
Table 7 summarizes the potential radiological dose commitments to individuals and the general population surrounding the plant.
Supplemental information concerning the plant's regulatory release limits and the methods used in measuring released radioactivity is given in Appendix A.
All estimates of potential dose for the first six months of 1985 were within the dose objectives set forth in Appendix I to 10CFR50 and the quarterly dose limits of the new RETS.
During the first half of 1985 the plant realized capacity factore (design NWe) of 98.5 percent and 95.6 vercent for the first and second quarters, respectively.
l.
2.0 METEOROLOGICAL DATA Meteorological data was collected during this reporting period from the sito's 300-foot met tower located approximately 2,200 feet northwest of the reactor building, and about 1,400 feet from the plant stack.
The 300-foot tower is approximately the same height as the primary plant stack (94 meters) and is designed to meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.23 for meteorological monitoring.
Combined data recoverability for the first and second quarters was 56.5 percent and 99.1 percent, respectively.
X/Q and D/Q values were derived for all receptor points from the site meteorological record for each quarter using a straight-line airflow model.
All dispersion and air concentration factors have been calculated employing appropriate source configuration considerations, as described in Regulatory Guide 1.111 (Reference 1), plus a source depletion model as described in "Mettorology and Atomic Energy - 1968" (Reference 2), and deposition velocities as given by Pelletier and Ziebrick (Reference 3).
Changes in terrain elevations in the site environment were also factored into rasteorological models.
A full description of the methods uced to evaluate air dispersion phen menon at the plant sito is given in Vermont Yankee's 10CFR part 50, Appendix I evaluation (Reference 4). _
3.0 RADIOACTIVITY RELEASES l
3.1 Liquid Releases There were no lic.uid releases of radioactivity from the plant during this semiannual period.
J 3.2 Casecus Releases All gaseous effluent recorded for the first half of the year are listed in Tables 1A through 1D.
All gaseous effluents we~e recorded as continuous in nature, and were released to the environment via the 9i meter stack located approximately 875 feet north of the reactor building. As indicated in Table 1A, all gaseous effluents were well within the plants operating Technical Specification for gaseous.aleases of radioactivity.
In addition, there were no unplanned or noncoutine releases of radioactivity in gaseous effluents during this reporting period.
I l
_3 l
_,__..m_
4.0 DOSE ASSESSMENT Following the guidance of NUREG-0473 (Reference 7), nuclides in particulate form which were not detected above the lower limit of detection (LLD) have been reported as "lese than" the LLD and have not been included in the dose calculations. However, the release rate of noble gases from the plant stack, after treatment of the gas stream from the air ejector through the augmented off-gas system, is so low that no noble gases are normally detectable above the LLD.
Therefore, as a conservative approach for the noble gas releases, it has been assumed for dose calculation purposes that the principal noble gasec measured in the off-gas mix at the air ejector are present at the LLD level determined for the plant stack.
4.1 Organ Doses to Individuals f rom ReceivinR-Water Exposure pathways There were no routine or accidental liquid releases from Vermont Yankee during the first half of 1985. As a result, no receiving water exposure pathways could contribute to any whole body or organ doses to individuals in unrestricted areas.
4.2 Individual Whole-Body and Skin Doses from Noble Caseous Effluents Based on the method of sector averaging discussed in "Meteorology and Atomic Energy - 1968" (Reference 2), and utilizing the site meteorological i
data recorded for this reporting period, the point of maximum off-site ground level air concentration of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents was determined for each quarter. Terrain height in the vicinity of the effluent stack was taken into account in calculating these effluent ground level concentrations. For the first and second quarters of 1985 the points of maximum off-site ground level air coacentration were determined to be in the S and NW sectocs, approximately 4000 and 2900 meters, respectively, from the plant stack.
The undepleted X/Q's at these locations were calculated to be 3
3 i
3.9E-07 sec/m and 4.6E-07 sec/m for the first and second quarters of the year, respectively.
l i j l
l l
Whole-body and skin doses were calculated at these off-site points as a result of noble gas releases occurring in both quarters. The methodology applied to the dose calculations is consistent with that of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Reference 5) for an elevated release point.
Dose conversion factors for noble gases and daughters were taken from Table B-1 of this Regulatory Guide. For the beta contribution to the skin dose, a semi-infinite cloud model was used. The whole-body gamma dose was evaluated using a finite cloud sector average model with Gaussian activity distribution in the vertical plane. The samma radiation received at a point of interest from a differential volume of the cloud is calculated. The radiation is then integrated over the entire cloud, taking into account the geometry of the cloud, variation in concentration, attenuation by the interaction of photons with matter in the path between source and the receptor point, and scattering of radiation from material outside the direct path to the point of interest.
An attenuation factor of 0.7 is also applied to the dose calculations to account for the dose reduction due to shielding which would be provided by a residential structure. No additional credit is taken for decay of radionuelides in transit to the receptor point.
For the first quarter, the skin and whole-body doses from exposure to nabic gases at the point of maximum ground level air concentration were calculated to be 6.5E-02 mrem and 2.7E-02 mrem, respectively.
For the noble gas effluents during the second quarter, the skin and whole-body doses at the point of maximum ground level air concentration were calculated to be 9.5E-02 mrem and 3.7E-02 mrem, respectively.
In addition, the maximum nearest resident and maxi num site boundary whole-body and skin doses have been criculated due to noble gas effluents from l
the pisnt stack during the reporting Itriod. The maximum site boundary whole-body and skin doses (1.0E-01 and 1.2E-01 mrem, respectively) for the first quarter of 1985 occurred in the South sector, 400 meters f rom the stack.
The second quarter maximum site boundary whole-body and skin doses (9.7E-02 mrem and 1.1E-01 mrem, respectively) also occurred in the South sector 400 meters from the stack.
For the first quarter, the maximum nearest resident whole-body and skin doses (7.7E-02 mrem and 9.1E-02 mrem, respectively) in any direction were determined to be in the South sector, 550 meters from the plant stack.
As a result of the second quarter meteorology l
)
and noble gas effluents, the maximum nearest resident whole-body and skin doses (7.1E-02 and 8.5E-02 mrem, respectively) in any sector also occurred in the South sector, 550 meters from the plant stack.
The resultant doses due to noble gas effluents for the maximum site boundary location, maximum nearest resident, and point of maximum ground level air concentration are tabulated in Table 7.
All doses are conservative in that they assume 100 percent occupancy at each point. Whole-body doses consider the gamma radiation received from the effluent plume overhead. The skin doses consider both the beta and gamma contributions at the receptor point. All doses from noble gaseous effluents are well below the dose criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix I.
4.3 Orron Doses to Individuals from Radioactive Iodine and particulates in Gaseous Effluents The critical pathway of internal exposure to radioactive iodine and particulates, including tritium, resulting from gaseous effluents for the second quarter is through the grass-milk pathway.
It is assumed that milk animals are free to graze on open pasture during the second quarter with no supplemental feeding. This assumption is conservative since most of the milk animals inventoried in the site vicinity are fed stored feed throughout the entire year with only limited grazing allowed durinJ the growing season.
It has also been assumed that only 50 percent of the iodine deposited fram l
gaseous effluent is in elemental form (I ) and is available for uptake.
2 This assumption is conservative for long-term doses (see p. 26, Reference 5).
During the winter months of the year, the dose commitment through the j
milk pathway and fresh vegetable ingestion is insignificant. The maximum length of annual growing season is approximately six months long in this part of New England. Therefore, the milk pathway and vegetable ingestion doses for the first quarter are the result of activity deposited on feed and vegetables grown during the growing season and allowed to decay while held in storage.
As a result, the critical pathway of exposure for radioactive iodine and particulates during the first quarter is through inhalation.
l 1
As a result of the milk and fresh vegetable pathways, the maximum dose for the second quarter from gaseous releases of radioactive iodine and particulates was determined to occur at a farm 5600 meters south-southeast of the plant. The critical organ was a child's bone with a calculated dose of approximately 3.SE-04 mrem.
For the first quarter, with inhalation being the principal pathway of exposure, the maximum organ dose was projected also to be at the f arm 5600 meters south-southeast of the plant. The critical organ was the bone of a child, with a calculated dose of 1.3E-04 mrem. The pathways of exposure which were assumed to exist during the first quarter at this farm include ground plane exposure, inhalation, and contributions from stored vegetables and milk. The pathways of exposure considered at the maximum farm location during the second quart r include continuous ground plane exposure, inhalation fresh home grown vegeisbles, meat, and cow's milk.
Table 7 shows the maximum calculated quarterly organ doso due to the combination of exposures from all pathways which have been identified at the two farms. Table 7 also shows the calculated organ doses to the highest erposed nearby resident, and potential organ doses to individuals if assumed standing at the highest ground level air concentration point on the site boundary for the entire six-month reporting period.
The site boundary doses include only exposure from inhalation, and direct radiation from the ground plane. The nearest resident is assumed to have a vegetable garden during the j
growing season which contributes to his or her ingestion dose.
For all ground plane exposures, the activity is assumed to accumulate on the ground for 15 years at the rate equivalent to that observed during each quarter. This is a simplified method of approximating the average deposition over the life of the l
plant. The calculated dose from direct exposure to activity on the ground thus represents the dose an individual would see in each quarter if the plant had been operating 15 years.
This approach is conservative, but shows the relative impact the plant would have on the dose commitment over its operating life if the releases were to continue at the levels recorded during this reporting period.
l The maximum critical organ dose for the first quarter for the nearest resident was to the bone of a child.
This dose was calculated to be 9.4E-04 mrem (SSE, 2100 meters). The maximum critical organ doses for the second quarter for the nearest resident were to the bone, and GI(LLI) of a child and l _
teen, respectively.
The doses to these critical organs was calculated to be 1.9E-04 mrom (SSE, 2100 meters).
The critical organ for the first quarter for the maximum site boundary location was to the skin of any individual. The dose to this critic'al organ was calculated to be 3.0E-05 meem (SSE, 850 meters).
The critical organ for the second quarter for the maximum site boundary location was also to the skin of any individual. This dose was calculated to be 1.4E-04 ' rem (SSE, 850 meters).
4.4 Whole-Body Doses in Unrestricted Areas from Direct Radiation The major source of direct radiation (including sky shine) from the station is due to N-16 decay in the turbine building.
Because of the orientation of the turbine building on the site, and the shielding effects of the adjacent reactor building, only the seven westerly sectors (SSW to NNW) see any significant direct radiation.
High pressure ionization chamber (HPIC) measurements have been made in j
the plant area in order to estimate the direct radiation from the station.
The chamber was located at a point along the west site boundary which has been determined to receive the maximum direct radiation from the plant.
Using measurements of dose rate made while the plant operated at different power levels, from shutdown to 100 percent, the total integrated dose from direct radiation over each three month period was determined by considering the c;;arterly gross megawatts generated. Field measurements of exposure, in units of Roentgen, were modified by multiplying by 0.6 to obtain whole-body oose equivalents, in units of rem, in accordance with recommendations of KASL report 305 (Reference 6) for radiation fields resulting from N-16 photons.
Estimates of the population exposure from direct radiation during the first and second quarters have been made out to two miles.
Beyond two miles, the dose from the turbine building is negligible. As a result, the estimated population dose for each of the two quarters respectively was approximately 2.lE-02 and 2.0E-02 person-rem, for a total population of about 424 persons.
The estimated direct radiation dose at the maximum site boundary location was approximately 4.0 mrom for both the first and seSond quarters of 1985. _-
These site boundary doses assume a 100 percent occupancy factor, taking no credit for the shielding effect of any structure. Table 7 summarizes these results.
4.5 Whole-Body Doses to the General Population from all Receiving Water Related Pathways There were no routine or accidental liquid releases from Vermont Yankee during the first half of 1985.
4.6 Doses to the General Population and Average Individual Within Fifty Miles from Gaseous Effluents Using site meteorological data in Tables 4 and 5, quarterly average I/Q values were determined for each sector formed by placing radial rings from the
)
plant at distances of one, two, three, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty j
and fifty miles, and their intersection with radial lines drawn to form each of the sixteen principal compass directions.
For noble gases, whole-body and skin doses were calculated for each sector and multiplied by the estimated population within each sector to determine the sector person-rem. No credit for decay in transit of activity was assumed.
For the approximately 1.56E+06 people within fifty miles of the plant, the first and second quarter whole-body doses f rom noble gas cloud exposure were estimated to be 7.3E-01 person-rem and 9.5E-01 person-rem, respectively.
For the same two quarters, the average individual whole-body doses were 4.9E-04 mrom and 6.4E-04 mrem, respectively.
The skin doses for the two quarters were 1.8 person-rom and 2.4 person-rem, respectively.
The average individual skin dose was 1.3E-03 and 1.6E-03 mrem for the first and second quarters.
Table 7 also indicates the population whole-body and thyroid dose commitments from radioactive iodine and particulates (including tritium) l released from the plant in gaseous waste. The pathways of exposure which have been considered for the 50 mile population include inhalation, inge? tion of vegetables, milk and meat produced within 50 miles, and the direct exposure to activity deposited on the ground plane.
The dose due to iodines in ingested
-9_
food is based on the assumption that only 50 percent of the iodines is elemental and available for uptake. The whole-body and thyroid dose commitments for the first quarter were calculated to be 1.8E-03 person-rem and 2.2E-03 person-rem, respectively. For the second quarter, the whole-body and thyroid dose commitments were 7.0E-03 person-rem and 6.9E-03 person-rem, respectively.
W i
1 l
I i
1
.{
l
! 1
REFERENCES 1.
Regulatory Guide 1.111. "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors", U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office cf Standards Development, March 1976.
Meteorology and Atomic Energy, 1968, Section 5-3.2.2, "Cloud Depletion",
2.
pg. 204. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, July 1968.
3.
C. A. Pelletier, and J. D. Zimbrick, "Kinetics of Environmental Radiciodine Transport Through the Milk-Food Chain" Environmental Surveillance in the Vicinity of Nuclear Facilities, Charles D. Thomas Publishers, Springfield, Illinois, 1970.
"Supplemental Information for the Purposes of Evaluation of 10CFR Part 50, 4.
1976.
Appendix I", Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, June 2, Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man From Routine 5.
Release of Reactor Ef fluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10CFR Part 50, Appendix I", U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Standards Development, Revision 1, October 1977.
6.
W. M. Lowder, P. D. Raft, and G. dePlanque Burke, "Determination of N-16 Gamma Radiation Fields at BWR Nuclear Power Stations", Mealth and Safety Laboratory, Energy Research and Development Administration, Report No.
305, May 1976.
7.
NUREG-0473, "Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for BWR's",
Revision 2, July 1981; Table 4.11-1, Notation f.
t 1
! l
STABILITY CLASS ALL 30%
20 %
D toz N
1 8
SENSOR LEVELS SPEED RANDE WIND SPEED = UPPER IN MPH DIRECTION = UPPER 0 8 -3.0 DELTA TEMP = UPPER j
' 0 -7 0 MISSING 110URS = 940 8.0 -12.0 13.0-18.0
~
19.0-24.0 VERMONT YANKEE JAN-NRR 85 UPPER LEVEL WIND Of 24.0 l !
I i
~ _,
1 i
STABILITY CLASS RLL i
30%
20%
t 10 %
1 i
N W
0 00%
rw D
CALM 8
t SENSOR LEVELS SPEED RANOC WIND SPEED = UPPER IN NPH DIRECTION = UPPER O.tr -3.0 DELTA
= UPPER 4 0 -7.0 MISSING HOURS = 20 8.0 -12 0 13.0-18.0
]190-24.0 VERMONT YRNKEE RPR-JUN 85 i'
OT 24.0 I
l J i
"3 TABLE 1A
{., ' *
~
4 VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS, 1985 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - Sm{HATION OF ALL RELEASES l Unit Quarter Quarter Est. total (1)
(2) error, %
A.
Fission and activation gases
- 1. Total releases C1
< 7. 78E+02
< l. 0 2 E+0 3 1.00E+02l
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/see
< 9. 98E+01
< 1. 30E+02
- 3. Percent of tech. spec. limit *1
< l. 35E-01
<3.70E*00 B.
- 1. Total iodine-131 Ci 3.89E-05
<5.12E-05 5.00E+01]
- 2. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 4.95E-06
<6.51E-06
- 3. Percent of tech. spec. limit *Z 1.03E-93
< 9. 7 3E-0 3 C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates with Th >8 days Ci 1.71E-04 5.76E-04 5.00E+01l
- 2. Average release rate for period pCi/sec 2.18E-05 7.31E-05
- 3. Percent of tech. spec. limit 3.19E-03
- 3
- 4. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci 1.38E-06
<6.0ZE-07 D. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 3.36E+00 2.11E+00 5.00E+01l
- 2. Average release rate for period UCi/sec 4.28E-01 2.68E-01
- 3. Percent of tech. spec. limit
- 3
- Not applicable.
- 1 First quarter percent of technical specification limit is based on supplemental information in Appendix A, section lA.
Second quarter percent of technical specification limit is based on 5 mrad in a quarter gamma air dose limit (Appendix A, section IB).
- 2 Second quarter percent of technical specification limit is based on a maximum dose of 7.5 mrem in a quarter (T.R 3.8.G.1) f rom Iodine-131, Iodine-133, Tritium, and Particulates with Th > 8 days.
- 3 Per technical specification 3.8.G.1, dose contribution from tritium and particulates are included with fodine above in Part B.
e
~K TABLE IB VERMONT YANKEE i
(
EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS, 1985 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - ELEVATED RELEASE Continuous Mode Batch Mode *1 lNuclides Released l Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter (1)
(2)
(1)
(2)
- 1. Fission gases krypton-85 Ci !
- 2
- 2 krypton-85m C1
<l.84E+00
<7.62E+00 krypton-87
! Ci I <l.47E+01
<2.13E+01 I
krypton-88 Ci
< 9. 5 4 E+ 00
< 1_. 31 E+01 xenon-133 i C1 ; <1.82E+00
<2.75E+00 xenon-135 i ci i <2.09E+01
<2.69E+01 xenon-135m i Ci
<l.47E+02
<1.89E+02 E xenon-135 i Ci
<5.87E+62
<7.64E+02 l
i unidentified i Ci i Total for period I Ci i <7.78E+02
<1.0lE+03
- 2. Iodines iodine-131 C1 3.89E-05
<5.12E-05 iodine-133
! C1 4.22E-05
<370iE-04 iodine-135 Ci 5.07E-04
<6.80E-03 Total for period Ci 5.88E-04
<7.16E-03
- 3. Particulates
_ strontium-89 C1 3.75E-05 3.44E-05 strontium-90 Ci
<3.06E-07 2.26E-07
~~~ cesium-134 Ci
<8.22E 03
<8.22E-05 T
cosium-137 Ci 9.26E-06 1.88E-05 barium-lanthanum-140 Ci
<3.00E-04
<3.00E-04 1.6DE-04 4.85E-04j cobalt-60 Ci manganese-54 Ci
<l.12E-04 3.73E-05' l
zinc-6)
Ci 6.20E _05,_< 3. 0 2 E-04l l
~~
- 1 There was no batch mode gaseous releases for this reporting period.
- 2 Not detected in the of fgas mix.
Limit of detectability = 6.97E-07 pC1/cc l.
TABLE IC VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS, 1985 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - GROUND LEVEL RELEASES There were no routine measured ground 1cvel centinuous or batch mode gaseous releases during the first or second quarters of 1985.
l i
l I i t
l
TABLE ID VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT Aht WASTE DISPOSAL SD!IANNUAL REPORT FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS, 1985 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - NONROUTINE RELEASES There were no nonroutine or accidental gaseous releases during the first or second quarters of 1985.
1 l l
1
TABLE 2A VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPdSAL SEMINANNUAL REPORT FIRSi AND SECOND QUARTERS,1985 LIQl'ID EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES There were no liquid releases during the first or second quarters of 1985.
i l
l i
i I
l l
l l
TABLE 2B 4
VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS, 1985 LIQUID EFFLUFNTS-NONROUTINE RELEASES There were no nonroutine or accidental releases during the first er second quarters of 1985.
i l
1 i
TABLE 3 VERMONT YANKEE EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS, 1985 SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS A.
SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not irradiated fuel)
Unit 6-month Est. Total 1.
Type of waste period error, %
3 a.
Spent resins, filter sludges.
m 4.33E+01 Ci 4.63E+01 7.50E+01 J
5.65E+01 b.
Dry compressible waste, contaminated m
equipment,_etc.
C1 2.79E+00 17.50E+01 c.
Irradiated components, control rods, m) 2.23E+00 etc.
Ci 1.70E+04 2.
E' stimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste)
- a. cesium-134 3.94E+00 zine-65 1.34E+01 cesuim-137 5.04E+01 plutonium-241 9.00E-01 cobalt-60 2.35E+01 hydrocen-3 5.10E-01 cobalt-58 5.10E-01 nickel-63 5.30E-01 mannanese-54 5.15E+00 str_ontium-90 3.60E-01
- b. cesium-134 1.84E+00 manganese-54 4.58E+00 cesium-137 3.95E+01 zini-65 1.24E+01 cobalt-60 3.59E+01 zirconium-95 6.10E-01 cobalt-58 1.34E+00 hydrogen-3 1.01E+00 plutonium-241 2.06E+00 carbon-14 I
3.80E-01
- c. cobalt-60 4.58E+01 hydrogen-3 2.98E+00 iron-55 4.55E+01 manzanese-54 2.58E+00 nickel-63 3.10E+00 nickel-59 2.00E-02 cesium-137 2.00E-02 3.
Solid waste disposition Number of shipments Mode of Transportation Destination 12 Truck Barnwell, S.C.
2 Truck Richland, Washington B.IRRADIATEDFUELSHIPMENTS(Disposition}: NO SHIPMENTS Supplemental information for second quarter -
- 1) Class of solid waste containers shipped: 4 C,1 A (stable), and 1 A (unstable)
- 2) Types of containers used: 2 Type A, 3 Type B, and 1 LSA.
l
- 3) No solidification agents were used in the 2nd quarter of 1985, l
l I
TABLE 4A 20NT YAME JAN-fMR 1985 JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION (LPfER LEVEL) 297.0 FT WIM) DATA STABILITY CLASS A CLASS FREQlENCY (PERCENT) = 1.15 WIND DIffCT10N FROM SPEED (lfH)
- NM TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16 4-7 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 (1) 7.14 0.00 7.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 (2)
.08 0.00
.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16 8-12 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
3 (1) 7.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00 21.43 (2)
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.C6 0.00 0.(c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.08 0.00
.25 13-18 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
3 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.43 0.00 21.43 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.25 0.00
.25 19-24 0
0 0
0 6
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
2
(!1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.CC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 0.00
- 14. 29 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.16 0.00
.16 GT 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
2 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 0.00 14.29 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.!6 0.00
.16 ALL SPEGS 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 0
14 (1) 14.29 0.00 7.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.14 0.00 100.00 (2)
.16 0.00
.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.66 0.00 1.15 (1):fERCENT CF ALL 00C0 OBSERVATICNS FCR THIS PVi (214ERCENT OF ALL 0000 OBSERYATICNS FCR THIS PERIOD C= C4.M (WIND SIEED LESS TWN OR E0JAL TO.M t7ti) '
TABLE 4B WR'Oli YAEE JM-MR 1985 JOINT FRE0lENCY DISTRIBllTION (LPPER LEVEL) 297.0 FT WIM) DATA STABILITY CLASS B CLASS FRE0lENCY (PERCENT) =
- 3. !!
WilO DIRECTION FROM SPEED (PPH)
N N PE DE E ESE SE SSE S SSW 9d WSW W N W N VRit TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (l1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C.'4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C.00 C-3 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
3 (1) 2.63 0.00 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 0.00 7.89 (2)
.06 0.00
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0') 0.00 0.00 0.00
.06 0.00
.25 4-7 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.26 5.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.53 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16
.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.33 8-12 3
1 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
9 (1) 7.89 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 0.00 2.63 0.00 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 2.63 0.00 23.68 f2)
.25
.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
.06 0.00
.00 0.00
.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.06
.00 0.00
.74 13-18 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 2
2 0
7 (1) 2.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 0.00 5.26 5.26 0.00
!P. 42 (2)
.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.08 0.00
.16
.16 0.00
.57 19-24 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
5 0
11 (1) 10.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.26 13.16 0.00 28.95 (2)
.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.'c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.!6
.41 0.00
.90 07 24 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
4 (1) 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.09 0.00 10.53 (2)
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.25 0.00
.33 ALL WEEDS 10 1
1 0
0 3
2 2
0 1
0 0
1 0
5 12 0
38 (t) 26.32 2.63 2.63 0.00 0.00 7.89 5.26 5.26 0.00 2.63 0.00 0.00 2.63 0.00 13.16 31.58 0.00 100.00 (2)
.82.06.00 0.00 0.00.25
.16
.16 0.00
.08 0.00 0.00
.09 0.00
.41
.98 0.00 3.!!
(134tRCENT OF ALL C000 OMET4%TICNS FOR THIS PAGE (2): PERCENT OF ALL 0000 CBSOMTIONS FOR THIS ftRIOD C= C/LM (WIND UfED LESS THM CR E0JAL TO.60.TH) - _ - -
TALBE 4C WM0(T YAME JAN-MAR 1985 JOINT FREQWNCY DISTRIBUTION (UPPER LEVEL) 297.0 FT W!2 DATA STAB!LITY C1. ASS C CLASS FRECE NCY (PERCENT) = 5.08 WIND DIRECTICN FROM SPEED (PfH)
N ffE lE DE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W W lW N WBL TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 1
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
5 (1) 1.61 1.61 1.61 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.06 (2)
.00
.08
.08
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.41 4-7 5
0 0
1 0
1 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
11 (1) 8.06 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 1.61 4.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 17.74 (2)
.41 0.00 0.00
.00 0.00
.08
.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.00 0.00
.90 0-12 2
0 0
0 1
0 2
2 0
0 0
3 0
1 2
0 14 (1) 3.23 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 3.23 3.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.84 0.00 1.61 3.23 0.00 22.58 (2)
.!6
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.09 0.00
.16
.16 0.00 0.00 0.00
.25 0.00.08
.16 0.00 1.15 13-18 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
3 2
4 0
16 (1) 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.00 1.61 4.64 3.23 4.45 0.00 25.81 (2)
.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.08 0.00 0.00
.08
.25
.16
.33 0.00 1.31 19-24 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
1 u
10 0
14 (1) 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,61 0.00 1.61 1.61 0.00 16.13 0.00 22.58 (2)
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.00 0.00
.08
.00 0.00
.82 0.00 1.15 GT 24 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 (1) 3.23 0.N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.23 (2)
.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16 M SN EDS 16 2
1 2
0 2
3 2
2 1
1 0
3 17 0
62
\\
(1) 25.81 3.23 1.61 3.23 0.00 3.23 4.84 3.23 3.23 1.61 1.61 0.00 8.06 8.06 4.84 27.42 0.00 100.00 i
(2) 1.31
.16
.08
.16 0.00.16
.25
.16
.16
.08
.08 0.00
.41
.41
.25 !.39 0.00 5.08
)
l I
(114ERCENT Or ALL C000 OPSERVATICNS FM THIS PAGE (2)#fRCENT & ALL C(00 DE@ATIONS FOR THIS KRIOD Ca CALM (WI@ SMED LESS THAN m EQUAL TO.60 FFH)
-23
TABLF. 4D L
WRMENT Y4E JAN-MR 1985 J0!MT FREQtOCY DISTRINTION (LFfER LEWl) 297.0 FT W!2 DATA STABILITY CLASS D CLA% FREQlOCY (PERLINT) = 46.64 WIND DIRECTION FROM SFEED(ffH)
N I4C E EE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WW NW N WBL TOTAL CAut 0
0 0
C 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
(
0 0
0 0
0 0
(1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.(v 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2r 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 4
2 1
2 3
7 6
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
4 0
32 (1)
.70.35
.18
.35
.53 1.23 1.05
.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.18.70 0.00 5.62 (2)
.33
.16
.00
.16
.25.57
.49
.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.08
.33 0.00 2.62 4-7 12 3
0 1
0 4
8 7
7 1
0 0
0 1
5 16 0
65 (1) 2.!!
.53 0.00.18 0, t i
.70 1.41 1.23 1.23
.18 0.00 0.00 0.00
.18
.88 2.81 0.00 11.42 (2)
.9S
.25 0.00.00 0.00.33
.66
.57
.57
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.00
.41 1.31 0.00 5.33 8-12 24 10 2
0 0
2 7
13 33 3
8 0
5 16 6
36 0
165
(!) 4.22 1.76
.35 0.00 0.00
.35 1.23 2.28 5.00.53 1.41 0.00
.88 2.81 1.05 6.33 0.00 29.00 (2) 1.97.82
.16 0.00 0.00
.!6
.57 1.07 2.70.25
.66 0.00 41 1.31
.49 2.95 0.00 13.52 13-18 30 3
0 0
0 0
1 1
20 7
2 0
9 35 31 30 0
169
(!) 5.27
.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.18
.18 3.51 1.23
.35 0.00 1.58 6.15 5.45 5.27 0.00 29.70 (2) 2.46
.25 0.00 OA 0.00 0.00.00
.06 1.64
.57
.!6 0.00
.74 2.87 2.54 2.46 0.00 13.85 19-24 18 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 17 30 41 0
107 (1) 3.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.10 2.99 5.27 7.21 0.00 18.80 (2) 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.08 1.39 2.46 3.36 0.00 8.77 01 24 3
0 0
h 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 9
12 0
31
(!)
.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.23 1s50 2.!! 0.00 5.45 (2)
.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.57
.74
.98 0.00 2.54 i
ALL SPEEDS 91 18 3
3 3
13 22 23 60 10 0
15 76
?? 139 0
569 (1) 15.99 3.16
.53
.53
.53 2.28 3.87 4.04 10.54 1.93 1.76 0.00 2.64 13.36 14.41 24.43 0.00 100.00 (2) 7.44 1.48.25.25
.25 1.07 1.00 1.89 4.92
.90
.82 0.00 1.23 6.23 6.72 !!.3a 0.00 46.14
(!)=PERCD(T (F ALL (000 OfERVATIONS FOR THIS PAGE l
(2)=PERCDif 0F AU. 0000 OEERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD C= CAut (WIND SPEED LESS THAN OR E0tRL TO.60 H) _
TABLE 4E 4DM0NT YAP 0(EE JUH%R 1985 JOINT FREQWNCY DISTRIBUTICN RFPER LIVEL) 297.0 FT WI 2 !%TA STABILITY CLASS E CLASS FREQLENCY (PERCENT) = 31.31 W1 2 DIRECTION FROM i
SFEED(SI)
N ffE E EE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W H P4l N VRBL TOTA.
CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 5
3 6
3 1
6 5
1 2
1 1
2 1
0 7
0 55 (1) 2.88 1.31
.79 1.57
.79
.26 1.57 1.31
.26
.52
.26
.26
.52
.26 0.00 1.83 0.00 14.40 (2)
.90
.41
.25
.49
.25
.08
.49
.41
.08.16
.08
.08
.16
.08 0.00
.57 0.00 4.51 4-7 25 6
0 0
1 3
12 13 5
4 3
0 1
4 5
23 0
105 (1) 6.54 1.57 0.00 0.00
.26
.79 3,14 3.40 1.31 1.05
.79 0.00
.26 1.05 1.31 6.02 0.00 27.49 (2) 2.05
.49 0.00 0.00.08
.25
.98 1.07
.41
.33
.25 0.00
.08
.33
.41 1.89 0.00 8.61 0-12 27 2
1 0
0 0
4 15 19 4
0 1
9 9
12 22 0
125 (1) 7.07
.52
.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 3.93 4.f7 1.05 0.00
.26 2.36 2.36 3.!4 5.76 0.00 32.72 (2) 2.21
.16
.08 0.00 0.00 0.00.33 1.23 1.'.4
.33 0.00.08
.74
.74
.98 1.00 0.00 10.25 13-18 14 2
0 0
0 0
1 6
12 3
1 0
3 13 11 17 0
83 (1) 3.66
.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.26 1.57 3.14
.79
.26 0.00
.79 3.40 2.88 4.45 0.00 21.73 (2) 1.15.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.00
.49
.98
.25
.08 0.00
.25 1.07
.90 1.39 0.00 6.80 19-24 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
1 0
0 0
2 4
0 14 (1) 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.C0 0.00
.52.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
.26
.52 1.05 0.00 3.66 (2)
.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16
.08 0.00 0.00 0.00.08
.16
.33 0.00 1.15 GT 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ALL SFEEDS 81 15 4
6 4
4 23 39 39 14 5
2 15 28 30 73 0
382 (1) 21. M 3.93 1.05 1.57 1.05 1.05 6.02 10.21 10.21 3.66 1.31
.52 3.93 7.33 7.85 19.!! 0.00 100.00 (2) 6.64 1.21
.33
.49
.53
.33 1.89 3.20 3.20 1.15
.41
.16 1.23 2.30 2.46 5.98 0.00 3!.31 l
(llfER NT OF ALL 000D CBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PAGE (3)4tRCENT CF All 0000 OBSGYATIONS FCR THIS FGIOD C CM (WIND SFEED LESS T1W OR EQUAL TO.60 WH) l t _ _ _.
TABl.E 4F 4
M9(T YAME JW-MR 1985 4!NT FREQLOCY DISTRIBUTICN (LFER LEWL) 297.0 FT WIM) DATA STABILITY CLASS F CLASS FREQLOCY (FERCENT) = 8.28 WIND DIRECTION FRCd SPEED (tFH)
$ $$W SW WSW W WNW W N Ef(.
TOTAL CALE 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.M C-3 5
2 2
2 2
5 3
2 3
2 2
0 0
1 0
3 0
34 (1) 4.95 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 4.95 2.97 1.98 2.97 1.98 1.98 0.00 0.00
.99 0.00 2.97 0.00 33.66 (2)
.41
.16
.16
.16
.16
.41
.25
.16
.25
.16
.16 0.00 0.00
.00 0.00.25 0.00 2.79 4-7 4
2 0
0 0
1 6
7 3
2 1
2 1
1 5
9 0
44 (1) 3.96 !.98 0.00 0.00 0.00
.99 5.94 6.93 2.97 1.98
.99 1.99
.99
.99 4.95 8.91 0.00 43.56 (2)
.33
.!6 0.00 0.00 0.00
.08
.49
.57
.25
.16
.00
.16
.08
.08
.41
.74 0.00 3.61 i
8-12 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
6 2
3 0
0 1
3 1
2 0
20 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.98 5.94 1.98 2.97 0.00 0.00
.99 2.97
.99 !.98 0.00 19.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.16
.49
.16
.25 0.00 0.00
.08
.25
.00
.16 0.00 1.64 13-18 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
3 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.99 0.00
.99 0.00 0.00
.99 0.00 0.00 2.97 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.00 0.00
.09 0.00 0.00
.00 0.00 0.00
.25 19-24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GT 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.v0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
i ALL SFfEDS 9
4 2
2 2
6 11 15 8
8 3
3 2
5 7
14 0
101 (1) 8.91 3.96 1.98 1.98 1.98 5.94 10.89 14.85 7.92 7.92 2.97 2.97 1.98 4.95 6.93 13.86 0.(0 100.00 l
(2)
.74
.33
.16
.16.16
.49
.90 1.23
.66
.66
.25
.25
.16
.41
.57 1.15 0.00 8.28 l
l (1)=PERCD(T 0F ALL 0000 OECERVATIONS FOR TH13 PACE l
(2):KMNT OF ALL 0000 OBSEWATICNS FOR THIS PERIOD C= CAU1 (WIND SPEED LESS T)MN OR EQUAL 70.60 ffH),.
TABLE 4G WROT YA*EE JAH%R 1985 JOINT FREOLENCY DISTRiiUTIM (LPPER LEWL) 297.0 FT WIM) DATA STABILITY CLASS 0 CLASS FREQlENCY (KRCENT) = 4.43 WIND DIRECTION FRm SF E D( H )
N ME E EE E ESE SE SSE S $$W SW WSW W WNW W M6I VRR. TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
1 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
9 (1) 1.85 0.00 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.70 1.85 5.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.67 (2)
.05 0.00.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16
.08
.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.74 4-7 0
1 0
0 1
1 5
9 5
3 4
1 0
2 0
2 0
34 (1) 0.00 1.85 0.00 0.00 1.85 1.85 9.26 16.67 f.26 5.56 7.41 1.85 0.00 3.70 0.00 3.70 0.00 62.96 (2) 0.00
.00 0.00 0.00.00
.00
.41
.74
.41
.25
.33.00 0.00
.16 0.00
.16 0.00 2.79 8-12 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 1
1 1
0 1
2 0
9 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 3.70 1.85 1.85 1.85 0.00 1.85 3.70 0.00 16.67 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.00
.16
.08
.00
.00 0.00.00
.16 0.00
.74 13-18 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
2 (1) 0.C0 0.00 0.00 0.(0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.00 3.70 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.N 0.00
.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.00 0.00
.16 l
19-24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 07 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.M 0.00 0.00 Al'. SPEEDb 1
1 2
0 1
1 5
9 8
7 8
2 1
2 1
5 0
54 (1) 1.85 1.85 3.70 0.00 1.85 1.85 9.26 16.67 14.81 12.96 14.81 3.70 1.85 3.70 1.85 9.26 0.00 1C0.00 (2)
.00
.08
.!6 0.00
.08
.00
.41
.74
.66
.57
.66
.16
.08
.16
.08
.41 0.00 4.43 l
(1)=PEPENT & ALL OC00 OBERYATICr6 FOR THIS PAGE (2) GENT & ALL 0000 CBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PEH100 C= CALM (WIND STEID LESS DMN OR EQUAL TO.60 FFH) l - -
TABLE 4H EMONT YAMI JW-f9R 1985 JOINT FRE0TNCY DISTRIBUTION (TPER LEW L) 297.0 FT W!E DATA STABILITY CLASS ALL CLASS FREQT NCY (PERCENT) = 100.00 WIND DIRECTION FROM SPEED (FH)
N N E EE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W N MI N WL TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 22 10 10 8
13 15 9
8 5
6 1
2 3
1 15 0
140 (1) 1.89
.82
.82
.90
.66 1.07 1.23
.74
.66
.41
.49
.08
.16
.25
.08 1.23 0.00 !!.48 (2) 1.89.82
.82
.90
.66 1.07 1.23
.74
.66
.41
.49
.00
.16
.25
.08 1.23 0.00 !!.48 4-7 47 12 1
2 2
12 36 36 20 10 8
3 2
8 15 51 0
265 (1) 3.85
.98
.00
.16
.16
.98 2.95 2.95 1.64
.82
.66
.25
.16
.66 1.23 4.18 0.00 21.72 (2) 3.85
.98
.00
.!6
.16
.98 2.95 2.95 1.64
.82.66
.25.16
.66 1.23 4.18 0.00 21.72 8 12 51 14 3
0 0
4 13 37 58 13 9
2 19 28 22 66 0
345 (1) 4.67 1.15.25 0.00 0.00
.33 1.07 3.03 4.75 1.07
.74
.16 1,56 2.30 1.80 5.41 0.00 28.28 (2) 4.67 1.15.25 0.00 0.00.33 1.07 3.03 4.75 1.07
.74
.16 1.56 2.30 1.80 5.41 0.00 28.28 13-18 50 5
0 0
0 0
2 8
32 13 3
1 14 51 47 57 0
283 (1) 4.10
.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16
.66 2.62 1.07
.25
.08 1.!5 4.18 3.85 4.67 0.00 23.20 (2) 4.10
.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16
.66 2.62 1.07
.25
.08 1.15 4.18 3.85 4.67 0.00 23.20 19-24 27 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 1
1 0
2 19 34 62 0
148 (1) 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16
.00
.00 0.00
.!6 1.56 2.79 5.00 0.00 12.13 (2) 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.16
.08
.00 0.00
.16 1.56 2.79 5.08 0.00 12.13 0T 24 6
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 9
17 0
39 (1)
.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.57
.74 1.39 0.00 3.20 (2)
.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.57
.74 1.39 0.00 3.20 ALL SPEEDS 210 41 14 13 10 29 66 90 120 42 27 7
39 116 128 268 0
1220 (1) 17.21 3.36 1.15 1.07
.82 2.38 5.41 7.38 9.84 3.44 2.21
.57 3.20 9.51 10.49 21.97 0.00 100.00 (2) 17.21 3.36 1.15 1.07
.82 2.38 5.41 7.38 f.84 3.44 2.21
.57 3.20 9.51 10.49 21.97 0.00 100.00 (1)=fEPCENT (F ALL 0000 OBSERVATIOP6 FOR TH!$ FKi (214ERCENT OF ALL G000 082RVATICNS FOR THIS FERIOD C= (A'.M (WIND SFEED LISS T)MN OR EQUAL 70.60 fMi) l l !
TABLE SA VERPOff YAKE M-J.N 1985 JOINT FMQLENCY DISTRIBUTION (LFfG LEVEL) 277.0 FT Wi @ DATA STABILITY CLASS A CLASS FREaENCY (PERCENT) = 2.87 WI@ DIRECTION FROM SFED(W)
N E E ET E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W N W W WL TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
'!)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1*
0 2
(1) 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 3.23 (2)
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05 0.00
.09 4-7 2
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
7 I!) 3.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,61 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.23 0.00 !!.29 (2)
.090.000.000.%
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00.05
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.09 0.00
.32 8-12 3
0 0
0 0
1 1
3 5
0 0
0 0
1 0
4 0
18 I!) 4.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 1.61 4.64 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 6.45 0.00 29.03 (2)
.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05
.05
.14
.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05 o.00
.18 0.00
.83 13-18 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 7
0 0
0 0
2 1
10 0
22 (1) 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 !!.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.23 1.61 16.13 0.00 35.48 (2)
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. N 0.00.05
.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.09
.05
.46 0.00 1.02 19-24 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
4 0
9 (1) 6.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 6.45 0.00 14.52 (2)
.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.05
.!8 0.00
.42 GT 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
4 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.45 0.00 6.45 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.!8 0.00
.18 ALL SPEEDS 11 0
0 0
1 1
1 4
13 1
0 0
0 3
2 25 0
62 (1) 17.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 1.61 1,61 6.45 20.97 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.84 3.23 40.32 0.00 100.00 (2)
.31 0.00 0.00 0.00.05
.05
.05
.18
.60
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
.14
.09 1.16 0.00 2.S7 l
(1)=PER%NT OF ALL 000D OBSEFYATIONS FM THIS PXE l
(2)=fG%NT OF ALL 0000 ORERYATIONS FOR THIS FfRIOD C= CALM (W!@ fPEED LESS T)MN OR EQUAL T3.60 H) 1 1 -
I TABLE 5B WR?O(T YWEE Mft-JLN 1985 60!NT FREQLEY DISTRIBUT!CN (LFfER LEWL) 297c0 FT W!W MTA STABILITY CLASS B CLASS FREGtMY (PERENT) = 4.90 4 t DIREC1!CN FR0rt 1
l l
SPEED (PPH)
N ME lE DE E ESE E SSE S SSW SW WSW W N Mi N VRBL TOT /L CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.C0 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 1
1 1
4 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 (1)
.94
.94
.94 3.77
.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.55 (2)
.05
.05
.05
.18
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.37 4-7 3
2 1
0 0
2 0
1 1
0 1
0 0
0 2
3 0
16
(!) 2.83 1.89
.94 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.00.94
.94 0.00
.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 2.83 0.00 15.09 (2)
.14
.09
.05 0.00 0.00
.09 0.00
.05
.05 0.00
.05 0.00 0.00 0.C0.09
.14 0.00
.74 8-12 2
0 0
0 1
3 2
7 7
2 1
0 1
1 1
10 0
36 (1) 1.89 0.00 0.00 0.00
.94 2.85 1.89 6.60 6.60 1.89
.94 0.C0
.94
.94
.98 9.43 0.00 35.85 l
(2)
.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05
.14
.09
.32
.32
.09
.05 0.00
.(5
.05
.r' 46 0.00 1.76 13-18 4
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 i
0 0
0 1
3 A
6 0
25 (1) 3.77
.94 0, 0 0 (c 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00
.94 2.83 3.Ti 5.66 0.4 23.58 (2)
.!8
.05 0.v0 0.(0 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05
.23 0.00 0.00 0.00.05
.14
.18. 28 '.0 1.16 19-24 3
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
1 1
2 1
5 0
16 (1) 2.83
.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.00 0.00
.94
.94 1.99
.94 4.72 0.00 15.09 (2)
.14
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.07 0.00 0.00.05.05
.09
.05
.23 0.00
.74 W 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 0
3 0
3 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.0c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.C0 0.00 0.00 2.83 0.00 2.83 l
(2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.14 0.00
.14 l
ALL SFEEDS 13 5
2 4
2 5
2 9
15 2
2 1
3 6
8 27 0
106 l
(1) 12.26 4.72 1.89 3.77 1.89 4.72 1.99 8.49 14.15 1.89 1.89
.94 2.83 5.66 7.55 25.4 ' O 00 100.00 (2)
.60.23
.09
.18
.09
.23
.09 42
.69
.09
.09
.05
.14
.28
.37 1.2t 0.00 4.90
(!)=PERCDfT OF ALL SO2 OBERVATIONS FOR THIS PAGE (2)=ffRCENT OF ALL C030 OfERVATICNS Fm THIS ffR100 C= CAlft (WIND SPEED LESS T)MN OR EQUAL TO.60 PFH)
b i
TABLE SC e
VEMNT YAMI APR-JLN 1985 JOINT FREQLXY DISTA!BiJTION (LFPER LEWL) 297.0 FT WIM) DATA STA!!LITY CLASS C CLASS FREQLENCY (PERCENT) = 6.10 W1 2 DIRECTION FROM VTED0ft0 N ME E EE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W H W M WA TCIAL CAUI O
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 2
2 0
1 1
0 0
1 1
1 0
0 1
0 1
1 0
12 (1) 1.52 1.52 0.00
.76
.76 0.00 0.00
.76
.76
.76 0.00 0.00
.76 0.00.76 76 0.00 9.09 (2)
.09
.09 0.00
.05.05 0.00 0.00
.05
.05
.05 0.00 0.00
.05 0.00
.05 05 0.00
.55 v7 4
3 0
1 0
5 5
3 2
0 0
1 0
0 2
2 o
3 i
(1) 3.03 2.27 0.00
.76 0.00 3.79 3.79 2.27 1.52 0. A 0.00
.76 0.00 0.00 1.52 1.52 v 00 21.21 (2)
.!8
.14 0.00 05 0.00.23
.23
.!4
.09 0.00 0.00.05 0.00 0.00.09 09 0.00 1 29 8-12 2
0 0
1 1
2 4
3 4
1 0
0 4
1 2
0 28 (1)
'.52 0.00 0.00
.76
.76 1.52 3.03 2.27 4.55
.71 0.0) 0.00 3.03
.76
.76 1.52 0.00 21.21 (2)
.09 0.00 0.00.05
.05
.09
.18
.34
.28.05 0.00 0.00
.18.05.05 09 0.00 1,29
!J-18 2
0 0
0 0
0 1
3 13 2
0 0
4 5
5 6
0 41 (1) 1.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.76 2.27 9.85 1.52 0.00 0.00 3.03 3.79 3.79 4.55 0.00 31.06 (2)
.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.05
.14
.60
.09 0.00 0.00.!8.23.23
' 8 0.00 1.90 J
19-24 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
1 6
6 0
4 0
22 (1) 2.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.00 0.06
.76 4.55 4.55 0.00 3.03 0.00 16.67 (2)
.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.09 0.0) 0.00.05.29
.28 0.00
!S 0.00 1.02 GT 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.76 0.00 0.00 0.00
.76 (2) 0.000.000.000.000.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05 1
R.L SPEEDS 13 5
0 3
2 7
10 10 24 4
0 2
15 13 9
15 0
132 i
(1) 0.85 3.79 0.00 2.27 1.52 5.30 7.58 7.58 18.16 3.03 0.00 1.52 !!.36 9.85 6.e2 li.36 0.ra 300.00 l
(2)
.60
.23 0.00
.14
.09
.32 46
.46 1.!!
.18 0.00
.09
.69 60
.42 69. 00 6.10 l
(1)=PEKENT OF ALL 0000 OBSERVATICNS FM THIS FAGE f2)=PERCD(T Cr ALL 0000 OBSERVATICNS FOR THIS FERIOD C Ce 4W!e SrEEo LESS Ta m Eat TO.60 en l
l
),
.,._____.m__
..,a.....
.2 TABLE SD J
VERPOG Y#4GI AFE-J.N 1985 JOINT FEQUDCY DISTR!!UTION (LFfER LEVEL) 297.0 FT WIE DATA STABIL!iY CLASS D CLASS FREG'JDCY (FERCENT) = 43.97 WI@ DIRECTION FROM SPEED (ifH)
.N ME E EE E EE SE $$E S SSW SW WSW W iMI NW FNW W3L TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
(!) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.CC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 7
9 3
6 e
15 6
9 1
1 2
1 3
5 8
0 93 (1)
.74
.95
.32
.63
.63 1.16 1.58.63
.95
.21
.32.53
.84 0.00 9.78 (2)
.32
.42
.14
.28
.?S.51
.69
.28 42.05
.05
.09
.05
.14
.23
.37 0.00 4.30 4-7 21 6
8 7
15 21 37 47 15 5
2 2
4 6
8 35 0
739 (1) 2.21
.63
.84
.74 1.58 2.21 3.89 4.94 1.58
.53
.21
.21
.42
.63
.84 3.M 0.00 25.13 (2)
.97
.28
.37.32
.69
.97 !.71 2.17
.69
.23
.09
.09
.18
.28.37 1.62 0.00 !!.05 8-12 28 7
0 5
5 12 22 51 48 17 4
4 22 17 12 54 0
310
(!) 2.94
.74 0.00.53
.53 1.26 2.31 5.36 5.05 1.79
.63
.42 2.31 1,79 1.26 5. M 0.00 32. 2 (2) 1.29.32 0.00.23.23
.55 1.02 2.36 2.22
.79
.28
.!S 1.02
.79
.55 2.50 0.00 1 % 33 t
23-18 25 10 1
0 0
1 9
9 39 5
1 9
19 37 14 43 0
222 6
(1) 2.63 1.05.!! 0.00 0.00.!!
.95
.95 4.10
.53
.95 2.00 3.e9 !. o 4.52 0.00 23.34 (2) 1.16
.46
.05 0.00 f.00
.05
.42
.42 1.6)
.23
.05
.42.83 1.71
.65 1.99 0.00 10.26 19-24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 3
2 1
7 16 6
17 0
71
(!)
1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.6(
.32.21
.74 1.68
.63 1.79 0.00 7.47 (2)
.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00.37
.!4
.09
.05
.32
.74
.28
.79 0.00 3.28 i
l GT 24 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
2 0
7 0
16 (1)
.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.21 0.00 0.00
.21 0.00
.74 0.00 1.68 l
(2)
.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.09 0.00 0.00.09 0.C0.32 0.00
.74
]
AU. SFEEDS 97 32 12 18 26 45 03 !!3 119 31 14 16 53 81 45 164 0
951 l
(1) 10.20 3.36 1.26 1.89 2.73 4.73 8.73 !!.08 12.51 3.26 1.47 1.e9 5.57 8.52 4.73 17.25 0.00 iOO.00 1
(2) 4.48 1.43
.55
.83 1.20 2.08 3.84 5.22 5.50 1.43
.65
.83 2.45 3.74 2.08 7.58 0.00 43.97 (1)4ERCENT CF ALL 0000 OBSERYATICNS FOR THIS PAGE (2)#ERCENT OF ALL C000 OPSERVATIONS FCR THiS FERIOD C= CliR (WIND SPEED LESS T)%N OR EQUAL TO.60 ffH) l,
IABLE SE
\\
\\
VERPONT MEr; gy.y gpSS JWT FRE0(,EXY DISTRifCTIM (LFfER LEWL) 297.0 FT WI @ fATA STWJILITY QASS E CLASS FREC E Y (PERCENT) = 31.16 WI @ f!! RECT!M FROM SPE::D(PFti)
( pee E EE E ESE SE $$E S SSW SW WSW W W NW W VRB'.
TOTAL CALM
-)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.0t 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 (2) 0.00 0.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 15 12 13 9
13 22 16 6
7 4
2 3
6 3
10 10 0
151 (1) 2.23 1.78 1.93 1.34 1.93 3.26 2.37
.89 1.04
.59
.30
.45
.89
.45 1.48 1.48 0.00 22.40 (2)
.69
.55
.60
.42
.60 1.02
.74
.28
.32.18
.09
.14
.28
.14
. 46
.46 0.00 6.9S 4-7 25 6
3 8
8 14 33 46 16 8
5 6
12 8
12 45 0
255 (1) 3.71
.89
.45 1.19 1.19 2.08 4.90 6.82 2.37 1.19
.74
.89 1.78 1.19 1.78 6.68 0.00 37.82 (2) 1.16.28
.14
.37
.37
.65 1.53 2.13
.74
.37
.23
.28.55
.37
.55 2.00 0.00 11.79 8-12 15 1
0 0
1 3
3 33 18 5
3 1
19 29 15 37 0
183 (1) 2.23
.15 0.00 0.00.15
.45
.45 4.90 2.67
.74 45
.15 2.82 4.30 2.23 5.49 0.00 27.15 (2)
.69
.05 0.00 0.00.05
.14
.14 1.53.83.23.14
.05.88 1.34
.69 1.71 0.00 8.46 13-18 2
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 15 1
1 2
10 12 5
10 0
66 (1)
.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.15
.30 2.23
.15
.15
.30 1.48 1.78
.74 2.23 0.00 9.79 (2)
.09 0.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05
.09
.69
.05
.05.09 46
.55
.23
.69 0.00 3.05 19-24 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
3 1
1 0
5 0
3 0
18 (1)
.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.45
.45
.15
.15 0.00
.74 0.00
.45 0.00 2.67 (2)
.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.14
.14
.05
.05 0.00.23 0.00
.14 0.00
.63 OT24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.15 0.00
.15 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.05 0.00
.05 ALL SFEDS 59 19 16 17 22 39 53 87 59 21 12 13 47 57 42 !!!
0 674
(!) 8.75 2.82 2.37 2.52 3.26 5.79 7.86 12.91 8.75 3.12 1.76 1.93 6.97 8.46 6.23 16.47 0.00 100.00 (2) 2.73.88
.74
.79 1.02 1.80 2.45 4.02 2.73
.97
.55
.60 2.17 2.64 1.94 5.13 0.00 31.!6
(!)=fERENT (F ALL (000 OBSEWATIOPS FOR THIS PAGE (s)#fRCENT OF ALL GXO DBSERVATICNS FOR THIS PERIOD Cs CALM (Wi@ SPEED LESS TIMN OR EQUAL TO.60 MPH) l l
l t I
...... -.~
l l
l TABLE 5F EMONT YA*II AfH-J)/1985 JOINT FREQUDCY DISTRIBUTION (lfffR LEVEL.)
??7.0 FT WI2 DATA STABILITY CLASS F CLASS FREQlENCI (FGCENT) = 9.20 WIND DIRECTIM FROM 1
SFTED(ifH)
$ $$W ' SW WSW W N W N WBL TOTAL CU 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 i
(1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 10 7
4 7
3 3
5 4
0 2
2 1
1 3
4 5
0 61 (1) 5.03 3.52 2.01 3.52 1.51 1.51 2.51 2.01 0.00 l a! 1.01
.50
.50 1.51 2.01 2.51 0.00 30.65 (2)
.46
.32
.18.32.14
.14
.23.18 0.00
.09
.09
.05
.05
.14
.18.23 0.00 2.82 4-7 13 5
1 1
1 2
7 14 7
4 6
2 3
0 7
26 0
99 (1) 6.53 2.51
.50
.50
.50 1.01 3.52 7.04 3.52 2.01 3.02 1.01 1,51 0.00 3.52 13.07 0.00 49.75 (2)
.60.23
.05
.05
.05
.09
.32
.65
.32.18.28
.09
.14 0.00.32 1.20 0.00 4.58 8-12 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
5 0
2 4
4 3
2 1
14 0
37 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ;.01 2.51 0.00 1.01 2.01 2.01 1.51 1.01
.50 7.04 0.00 18.59 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.09
.23 0.00
.09
.18
.18
.14
.09
.05
.65 0.00 1.71 13-18 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
2
(!)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.50 0.00 0.00
.50 0.00 1.01 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05 0.00 0.00
.05 0.00
.09 19 ~4 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0) 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GT 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E SFTEDS 23 12 5
8 4
5 14 23 7
8 12 7
8 5
12 46 0
199
(!) !!.'6 6.03 2.51 4.02 2.01 1.51 7.04!!.56 3.52 4.02 6.03 3.52 4.02 2.51 6.03 23.12 0.00 10(.00 (2) 1.06.55.2?
.37
.18
.23
.65 1.06.32
.37
.55
.32
.37
.23.55 2.13 0.00 9.20 l
(!)#9 CENT OF ALL 0000 OBSERWTIONS FOR THIS FACE (2)#fRC3(T OF ALL 0000 OBSERVATIONS FCF TH!S IGIOD C: CM (WIND SFEED LESS T)MN OR E0l1 TO.60 ffH) d j,
TABLE 5G VERMONT YAKE AFR-JLN 1995 JOINT FREQlENCY DISTRIBilTION (LFPER LEVEL) 397.0 FT WI2 DATA STABILITY CLASS 0 CLASS FREQlENCY (FDENT) = 1.80 WIND DIRECTION FROM SPEED (PFH)
N N E EE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W M tel N WBL TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 1
2 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
7 (1) 2.56 5.13 0.00 0.00 2.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.M 2.56 2.56 0.00 17.95 (2)
.05
.09 0.00 0.00.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.05 0.(C 0.00 0.00 0.00.05
.05 0.00
.32 4-7 0
0 0
0 0
1 4
2 0
2 1
2 2
4 0
1 0
19 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.56 10.26 5.13 0.00 5.13 2.56 5.13 5.13 10.26 0.00 2.56 0.00 48.72 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i).00
.05
.18
.09 0.00
.09
.05.09
.09
.18 0.00.05 0.00
.88 8-12 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 5
5 0
1 0
12 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.56 0.00 12.82 12.62 0.00 2.56 0.00 30.77 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.CC 0.00
.05 0.00.23.23 0.00
.05 0.00
.55 13-18 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.CC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 M 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 19-24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0v 2.56 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.03 GT 24 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.Co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.(00.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 0.00 ALL SPEEDS 1
2 0
0 1
1 4
2 1
3 2
2 7
9 1
3 0
39
(!)
2.56 5.13 0.00 0.00 2.56 2.56 10.24 5.13 2.55 7.69 5.13 5.13 17.95 23.08 2.56 7.69 0.00 100.00 (2)
.05
.09 0.00 0.00
.05
.05
.!8
.09
.05
.14
.09
.09
.32 42
.05
.14 0.00 1.80 (1)#9ENT OF ALL Ca'0 OBMTIONS FOR THis PAGE (314 GENT OF ALL C(CD OEGERVATICNS FOR THIS F9100 l
C= CALM (WI@ STEED LESS TW OR E0lAL TO.60 FFH) 1 TABLE 511 20NT YAEEE APR-dN 1985 JOINT FRE9.OCY DISTRIBUTION (t#ER LEWL) 297.0 FT WIW MTA STABILITY CLASS ALL CLASS FRE0lOCY (FERCEhT) = 100.00 WI @ DIRECTION FROM SFEED(WH)
N N E EE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W W W W WA TOTAL CALM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.(0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.C0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-3 37 33 21 27 25 36 36 17 17 9
5 6
9 9
21 26 0
334
(!)
1.71 1.53
.97 1.25 1.16 1.66 1.66
.79
.79
.42
.23
.28
.42
.42
.97 1.20 0.00 15.44 (2) 1.71 1.53
.97 1.25 1.16 1,66 1.66
.79
.79
.42
.23
.28
.42
.42
.97 1.20 0.00 15.44 47 68 22 13 17 25 45 86 !!3 42 20 15 13 21 18 31
!!4 0
663 (1) 3.14 1.02
.60
.79 1.16 2.08 3.98 5.22 1.94
.92
.69
.60
.97
.83 1.43 5.27 0.00 30.65 (2) 3.14 1.02
.60.79 1.16 2.08 3.99 5.22 1.94
.92
.69
.60
.97
.83 1.43 5.27 0.00 30.65 8-12 50 8
0 6
8 21 34 102 84 27 15 9
54 56 30 122 0
626 (1) 2.31
.37 0.00.28.37
.97 1.57 4.72 3.88 1.25
.69
.42 2.50 2.59 1.39 5.64 0.00 28.94 (2) 2.31
.37 0.00.28
.37
.97 1.57 4.72 3.88 1.25
.69
.42 2.50 2.59 1.39 5.64 0.00 28.94 13-18 34 l
0 0
1 16 79 8
2 11 35 59 29 81 0
378 (1) 1.57
.51
.05 0.00 0.00
.05.51
.74 3.65
.37
.09
.51 1,62 2.73 1.34 3.74 0.00 17.48 (2) 1.57.51
.05 0.00 0.00
.05.51
.74 3.65.37
.09
.51 1.62 2.73 1.34 3.74 0.00 17.48 19-24 23 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
16 6
3 4
14 29 8
33 0
137 (1) 1.06
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.74
.28
.14
.18
.65 1.34
.37 1.53 0.00 6.33 (2) 1.06
.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.74
.28
.14
.18
.65 1.34
.37 1.53 0.00 6.33 07 24 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
3 0
15 0
25 (1)
.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.09 0.00 0.00
.14 0.00
.69 0.00 1.16 (2)
.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.09 0.00 0.00
.14 0.00
.69 0.00 1.16 ALL SPEEDS 217 75 35 50 58 103 167 248 238 70 42 43 133 174
!!9 291 0
2163 (1) 10.03 3.47 1.62 2.31 2.68 4.76 7.72 !!.47 !!.00 3.24 1.94 1.99 6.15 8.04 5,50 18.08 0.00 100.00 (2) 10.03 3.47 1.62 2.31 2.68 4.76 7.72 !!.47 11.00 3.24 1.94 1.99 6.15 8.04 5.50 18.08 0.00 100.00
)
(!)=ftRCDT OF ALL 0000 OEER'i%TIONS FOR THis PAGE (3)=PERCD(T (F ALL 0000 O!ER'.%TICNS FOR THIS FER100 l
C= CALM (WIC SFfED LISS THW Cf. EQUAL TO.60 TH) i t
l
\\
TAILE 6 VERMONT YA"KEE QUARTERLY AVERACE 1/Q, D/Q AND CAletA I/Q VALUES FOR SELECTED RECEPTORS FIRST AND SECOND QUARTEkS. 1985 l
l POINT OF INTEREST FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER l
A.
Maximum off-site ground Location:
S 4000 Location:
NW 2900 meters 4
level air concentration I/Q (undepleted)*:
3.9E-07 X/Q (undepleted):
4.6E-07 location X/Q (depleted)*:
3.8E-07 X/Q (depleted):
4.6E-07 D/Q**:
1.6E-09 D/Q:
1.3E-09 Ganuna X/Q:*
2.1E-07 Gamma X/Q:
2.1E-07 B.
For whole body and skin doses from noble gases
- 1) Maximum site boundary Location:
S 400 meters Location:
S 400 meters j'
location I/Q (undepleted):
9.7E-09 X/Q (undepleted):
1.6E-08 X/Q (depleted):
9.7E-09 I/Q (depleted):
- 1. 6 E-08 D/Q:
7.2E-11 D/Q:
1.2E-10 Gamma X/Q:
8.OE-07 Ganuaa X/Q:
5.7E-07
- 2) Maximum nearest Location S
550 meters Location:
S 550 meters residence X/Q (undepleted):
1.9E-08 X/Q (undepleted):
2.3E-08 X/Q (depleted):
1.9E-08 X/Q (depleted):
2.3E-08 D/Q:
1.5E-10 D/Q:
1.6E-10 Ganuna X/Q:
- 5. 9 E-0 7 Gamma X/Q:
4.2E-07 1. -.
.~_
TABLE 6 (continued)
POINT OF INTEREST FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER C.
For organ doses from iodine and particulates in gaseous effluents
- 1) Maximum farm location Location:
SEE 5600 meters Location:
SSE 5600 meters X/Q (undepleted):
- 2. OE-0 7 X/Q (undepleted):
2.OE-07
{
I/Q (depleted):
- 2. OE-0 7 I/Q (depleted):
2.OE-07 D/Q:
1.OE-09 D/Q:
8.4E-10 Camma X/Q:
1.3E-07 Camma X/Q:
1,3E-07 l
I
]
- 2) Maximum nearest Location:
SSE 2100 meters Location:
SSE 2100 meters residence I/Q (undepleted):
9.3E-08 I/Q (undepleted):
6.9E-08 I/Q (depicted):
9.3E-08 I/Q (depleted):
6.9E-08 D/Q:
8.OE-10 D/Q:
4.8E-10 Camma X/Q:
2.2E-07 Camma K/Q:
2.OE-07
- 3) Maximum site boundary Location:
SSE 850 meters Location:
SSE 850 meters location X/Q (undepleted):
- 3. 4 E-08 X/Q (undepleted):
4.5E-08 X/Q (depleted):
3.4E-08 I/Q (depleted):
4.5E-08 y
D/Q:
3.5E-10 D/Q:
3.4E-10 Casse I/Q:
4.1E-07 Camma K/Q:
4.OE-07 3
Depleted and undepleted I/Qs and Gamma I/Q are in units of sec/m Delta (D/Q) in units of 1/m2 1
1 l
l
- i
- L__,
TABLE 7 SCtetARY OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station First and Second Quarters, 1985 POTENTIAL PATHWAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE ESTIP.ATED FIRST ESTIMATED SECOND QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE COf911TMENT CO9911TMENT I.
Maximum individual whole body and No liquid releases No liquid releases critical organ doses from receiving-water exposure pathways from liquid releases (arem).
II.
A.
Whole body and skin doses to individuals exposed at point of maximum of f-site ground level air concentration of radioactive noble gaseous effluents (at S. 4000 meters)
(at NW, 2900 meters) 1.
Skin (aren) 6.5E-02 9.5E-02
- 11. Whole body (mrem) 2.7E-02 3.7E-02 B.
Whole body and skin doses at maximum site boundary location from radioactive noble gaseous effluents (at S. 400 meters)
(at S, 400 meters) 1.
Skin (mrem) 1.2E-01 1.1E-01 11.
Whole body (mrem) 1.0E-01 9.7E-02 C.
Whole body and skin doses at maximum nearest residence from radioactive nobic gaseo's effluents.
(at S. 550 reters)
(at S. 550 meters) 1.
Skin (arem) 9.1E-02 8.5E-02 ii. Whole body (mrem) 7.7E-02 7.1E-02 TASLE 7 (contimJed)
POTENTIAL PATHWAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE ESTIMATED FIRST ESTIMATED SECOND QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE COMMITMENT COMMITMENT III.
Organ doses to individuals from radioactive iodine and particulates in gaseous effluents (including tritium).
A.
Maximum farm location Maximum individual whole body and organ doses from all pathways (at SSE. 5600 meters)
(at SSE 5600 meters) 1.
Bone (mrem) 1.3E-04 (child) 3.5E-04 (child) 11.
Thyroid (mrem) 9.4E-05 (child) 2.9E-04 (all) 111. GI(LLI) (mrem) 9.1E-05 (teen) 3.4E-04 (adult) iv.
Whole body (arem) 8.9E-05 (child) 3.1E-04 (child) v.
Liver (mrem) 9.8E-05 (child) 3.1E-04 (child)
B.
Critical organ doses to maximum nearest resident from the inhalation, ingestion and ground plane exposure of lodine and particulates (at SSE 2100 meters)
(at SSE. 2100 meters) 1.
Bone (mrem) 9.4E-04 (child) 1.9E-04 (child) 11.
Thyroid (mres) 6.8E-05 (child)
- 1. 6 E-04 (all)
I 111. GI(LLI) (mrem) 6.9E-05 (teen) 1.9E-04 (teen) l iv.
Whole body as critical organ (ares) 6.5F-05 (child) 1.7E-04 (child) v.
Liver (mrem) 6.9E-05 (child) 1.7E-04 (child) 1 1
1
!.0-
=,
TABLE 7 (continued)
I POTENTIAL PATHWAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE ESTIMATED FIRST ESTIMATED SECOND QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE COfftITMENT COf9tITMENT i
l C.
Organ doses to individuals at point of maximum ground level air concentration of gaseous effluents from Inhalation and ground exposure 1
of lodine and particulates (at S, 4000 meters)
(at NW, 2900 meters) 1.
Bone (mrem) 1.2E-04 (all) 4.5E-04 (all) 11.
Thyroid (meem) 1.4E-04 (all) 4.5E-04 (all) iii. G1(LLI) (prem) 1.2E-04 (all)
- 4. 5 E-04 (all) iv.
Whole body as critical organ (mrem) 1.2E-04 (all) 4.5E-04 (all) v.
Skin (mren) 1.4E-04 (all) 5.2E-04 (all)
D.
Organ doses to individuals at point of maximum site boundary air concentration of gaseous effluents from inhalation and ground exposure of iodine t
and particulates (at SSE, 850 meters)
(at SSE, 850 meters) 1.
Bone (mrem) 2.6E-05 (all) 1.2E-04 (all) 11.
Thyroid (mrem) 2.9E-05 (child) 1.2E-04 (all) 111. G1(LL1) (mrem) 2.6E-05 (all) 1.2E-04 (all) iv.
Whole body as critical organ (prem) 2.6E-05 (all) 1.2E-04 (all) v.
Skin (mrem) 3.0E-05 (all) 1.4E-04 (all).
TABLE 7 (continued) l POTEP"'i AL PATHWAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE ESTIMATED FIRST ESTIMATED SECOND QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE COfE(ITMENT C0lWIITMENT IV.
Whole body doses to individuals and populations in unrestricted areas from direct radiation from the facility.
A.
Maximum site boundary (mres) l (west of turbine building) 4. C h00 ,
4.OE+00 pf e
B.
Population dose (person-rem) 2,1E-02 2.OE-02
. y_ ? -
V.
Whole body dose to the population tD from all receiving-water related pathways from 11guld releases.
(person-rem).
L 11guld releases No liquid releases
.?
i l %
.~, --. -,
TABLE 7 (continued) i POTENTIAL PATHWAY OR TYPE OF EXPOSURE ESTIMATED FIRST ESTIMATED SECOND QUARTER DOSE QUARTER DOSE COMMITMENT COISIITMENT j
VI.
A.
Whole body doses to the population and average individual out to 50 miles from noble gaseous
]
effluents 1.
Whole body dose to population 2
(person-rem) 7.3E-01 9.5E-01 11.
Average individual whole body dose (arem) 4.9E-04 6. 4 E-04 I
iii. Skin dose to population (person-rem) 1.8E+00 2.4N+00
)
iv.
Average individual skin dose (mrem) 1.3E-03 1.6E.03 j
B.
Organ doses to 50 mile popula-tion, and average individual, from inhalation, ingestion of milk, j
meat, and vegetables, and ground j
exposure to iodine and parti-culates in gaseous effluents i
i 1.
Thyroid population dose (person-rem) 2.28-03 6.9E-03 4
11.
Average individual thyroid dose (mrem) 1.5E-06 4.7E-06 lii. Whole body population dose (person-rem) 1.8E-03 7.0E-03
)
iv.
Average individual whole body dose (mrem) 1.2E-06 4.7E-03 i
_, = _.. -.. _. _.,..
. ~..
i APPENDIX A l
t EFFLUENT AND WASTE O!SPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT Supplemental Information January - June 1985 Facility:
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station i
Licensee: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation lA.
Technical Specification Limits - First Quarter a.
Fission and activation gases:
0.08/E Ci/sec y
b.
lodines: 0.48 uti/sec c.
Particulates, half-lives > 8 days:
1.6E+3 MPC, Ci/sec d.
Liquid effluents:
1.0E-07 uti/ml (HTO: 3.0E-03 uti/ml, dissolved noble gases:
4.0E-05 uti/ml)
Isotopic limits are found in 10CFR20, App. 8 Table !!, Column 2.
3 18.
Technical Specification Limits - Dose 2nd Dose Rate - Second Quarter Technical Specification and Catcaery Limit a.
,N_oble Gases j
3.8.E.1 Total body dose rate 500 mrem /yr i
3.8 E.1 Skin dose rate 3000 mrem /yr 3.8.F.1 Gamma air dose 5 mrad in a quarter 3.8.F.1 Gamma air dose 10 mrad in a year i
3.8.F.1 8 eta air dose 10 mrad in a quarter 3.8 F.1 8 eta air dose 20 mrad in a year f
l i
l
)
-A1-
I b.
todine-131. Iodine-133 Tritium and Radionuclides 4
I in Particulate Form With Half-Lives Greater Than 8 Days 3.8.E.1 Organ dose rate 1500 mrem /yr 3.8.G.1 Organ dose rate 7.5 mrem in a quarter 3.8.G.1 Organ dose rate 15 mrem in a year t
c.
Liouids 3.8.B.1 Total body dose 1.5 mrem in a quarter 3.8.8.1 Total body dose 3 mrem in a year 3.8.B.1 Organ dose 5 mrem in a quarter 3.8.B.1 Organ dose 10 mrem in a year 2A.
Maximum Permissible Concentrations - First Quarter Provided below are the MPC's used in determining allowable release rates or concentrations, a.
Fission and activation gases:
No MPC limits b.
lodines:
No MPC limits c.
Particulates, half-lives > 8 days:
See 10CFR20, App. B. Table II, Column 1.
d.
Liquid effluents: See 10CFR20, App. B, Table II, Column 2.
28.
Technical Specification Limits - Concentration - Second Quarter i
Technical SDecification and Category Limit i
a.
Noble Gases No MPC limits l
-A2-
i
't b.
. lodine-131. Iodine-133. Tritium and Radionu;11 des in Particulate Form With Half-lives Greater Than_8_0ays:
No MPC limits P
c.
Li quid s_
3.8 A.i Total fraction of MPC
^
excludilig noble gases (10CFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2):
51.0 i
l 3.8.A.1 Total noble gas concentration: 52E-04 uti/cc 3.
Average Energy l
Provided below are the average energy (E) of the radionuclide mixture in releases of fission and activation gases, if applicable.
a.
Average gamma energy:
1st Quarter 1.09E+00 MeV/ dis 2nd Quarter 1.09E+00 MeV/ dis 1
l b.
Average beta energy:
Not Applicable
+
4.
Measurements and Approximations of Total Radioactivity t
I i
l Provided below are the methods used to measure or approximate the total radioactivity in ef fluents and the methods used to determine radionuclide composition.
a.
Fission and Activation Gases t
Daily samples are drawn at the discharge of the air ejector, j
!sotopic breakdown of the releases are determined from these samples. A logarithmic chart of the stack gas monitor is read daily to determine the gross release rate. At the very low release rates normally encountered during operation with the augmented of f-gas system the error of release rates may be approximately 1100 percent.
-A3-3--
-,,e.
. ~, _ - -,. -.
w.
..-.m
,,.,..g._,.-
b.
lodines Continuous isokinetic samples are drawn f rom the plant stack through a particulate filter and charcoal cartridge.
The filters and cartridge are removed weekly (if releases are less than 4 percent of the Tech Spec limit), or daily (if they are greater than 4 percent of the limit), and are analyzed for radioiodine 131, 132,133,134, and 135.
The iodines found on the filter are added to those on the charcoal cartridge.
The error involved in these steps may be approximately 150 percent.
c.
Particulates The particulate filters described in b. above are also counted for particulate radioactivity. The error involved in this sample is also approximately 150 percent.
d.
Liquid Effluents Radioactive liquid effluents released from the facility are continuously monitored.
Measurements are also made on a representative sample of each batch of radioactive liquid effluents released.
For each batch, station records are retained of the i
r total activity (mci) released, concentration (pCi/ml) of gross radioactivity, volume (liters), and approximate total quantity of water (liters) used to dilute the liquid effluent prior to release to the Connecticut River.
Each batch of radioactive liquid effluent released is analyzed for gross gamma and gamma isotopic radioactivity.
A monthly i
proportional composite sample, comprising an aliquot of each batch released during a month, is also analyzed for tritium, SR-09, SR-90, gross beta and gross alpha radioactivity, in addition to f
i gamma spectroscopy, i
There were no liquid releases during the reporting period.
l t
-A4-i t
5.
Batch Releases a.
Liquid There were no routine liquid batch releases during the reporting
- period, b.
Gaseous There were no routine gaseous batch releases during the reporting period.
6.
Abnormal Releases a.
Liquid There were no nonroutine liquid releases during the reporting period.
b.
Gaseous There were no nonroutine gaseous releases during the reporting period.
1 I
I
-A5-
I APPEN0ix B l
l LIQUID HOLOUP TANKS i
Reauirement:
Technical Specification 3.8.0.1 limits the quantity of radioactive material contained in any outside tank. With the quantity of radioactive material in any outside tank exceeding the limits of Technical Specification 3.8.0.1, a description of j
the events leading to this condition is required in the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report per Technical Specification 6.L C.1.
t i
Resoonse:
The limits of Technical Specification 3.8.0.1 were not exceeded i
during this reporting period.
i i
i i
I l
i 1
I l
l I
i l
a k
APPENDIX C RA010AC11VE L10010 EFFLUENT MON 110 RING INSTRUMENTATION I
1 Riauirement: Radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels i
l are required to be operable in accordance with Technical l
Specification Table 3.9.1.
If an inoperable radioactive liquid l
ef fluent monitoring instrument is not returned to operable l
4 status prior to a release pursuant to Note 4 of Table 3.9.1, an explanation in the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report of i
the reason (s) for delay in correcting the inoperability are
)
required per Technical Specification 6.7.C.1.
ResDonse:
Since the requirements of Technical Specification Table 3.9.1 governing the operability of radioactive liquid ef fluent i
l monitoring instrumentation were met for this reporting period, l
)
no response is required.
i i
)
^:
l i
)
-Cl-
b r
APPENDIX 0 5
RADI0 ACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION i
j l
Biqyirenwnt: Radioactive gaseous ef fluent monitoring instrumentation channels are required to be operable in accordance with Technical l
Specification Tabic 3.9.2.
If inoperabic gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation is not returned to operabic status i
within 30 days pursuant to Nete 5 of Table 3.9.2, an explanation i
in the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report of the reason (s) for the delay in correcting the inoperability is required pe-Technical Specification 6.7.C.1.
l
Response
Since the requirements of Technical Specification Table 3.9.2 governing the operability of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation were met for this reporting period, no response is required.
l i
i 4
I i
1
-DI-
APPENDIX E RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM r
Reauirement:
The radiological environmental monitoring pro, ram is c~onducted in accordance with Technical Specification 3.9.C.
With milk samples no longer available from one or more of the sample locations required by Technical Specification Table 3.9.3, Technical Specification 6.7.C.1 requires the following to be g',
included it, tne next Semiannual Effluent Release Report:
(1) identify the cause(s) of the sample (s) no longer being available, (2) identify the new location (s) for obtaining available repla:ement samples and (3) include revised 0D04 figure (s) and table (s) reflecting the new location (s).
Response
All required milk samples were available during this reporting period.
i i
dp P
. ([
k
~
L
APPENDIX F LAMD USE CENSUS Requirement: A land use censo; is conducted in accordance with Technical Specification 3.9.D.
With a land use census identifying a location (s) which yields at least a 20 percent grecter dose or dose commitment than the values currently being calcui'ted in Technical Specification 4.8.G.1, Technical Specification 6.7.C.1 requires the identification of the new location (s) in the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report.
Response
As permitted by Technical Specification 4.9.D.1, the annual land use census had not been completed before the end of this reporting period.
The identification of any new locations of grecter dose or dose commitment will be included in the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report.
-F1-
APPENDIX G PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM Reauirement:
Technical Specification 6.12. A.1 requires that licensee initia'.ed changes to the Process Control Program (PCP) be submitted to the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the change (s) was made.
Respons.q:
There was no licensee initiated change (s) to the Process Control Program during this reporting period.
/
-G1-
APPENDIX H OFF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MAflVAL Raouirement:
Technical Specification 6.13. A.1 requires that licensee initiated changes to the Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual (0DCM) be submitted to the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the change (s) was made effective.
Response
There was no licensee initiated change (s) to the Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual during this reporting period.
L
-Hi-
N
~
/
,,x
\\
'N
\\x f
~
fugi h;y V/,13
,,dh//q1,.p4>,},%s.,,,
' % e,', d i ;( ' 4:t i,Do'% (,
I'sy % ; y, O/c, EVig,,,,,,,,
- 91, s
NNx'N
'x r;;;.
' ~
=%
l li
,, J':nt l
,g 9 l
iiIt h
.#'Y 4Nff,;
f
~
/
N'N '
/
,/
/
/
\\
/
y
~ '
.u:
I kl ig l_y, p4 p
Ag,+9l, J -
.;3.,4,,),eg 4-y d.izhy,.,4 4/'>Do/ty, 4
V 4;. ')i 4
t%p
/t 0 ;.* p
'4 /,
l8yy I'O,, ?>;.
'Q;,
?> ??q1,
,s s
N x --
=
[E's-e,-:
uyA.
g e,u..
eA v,g g; g ;.;.
y<.:<... ':.i.
/
j.
x r,...
c.
.,).
,)-
a
,s J.
)
,p _
j y
??
. -W*s
. s C
q s
x...
9 I*e e
eO, 4 1O-w.h.'
VEIO10NT YANKEE NUCLEAll POWEll COllPOIIATION
- e
- Et VEIO10ST YANKEC NUCLEAF: POWElt STATION h.;.
VEllNON, VEIDIONT
'Kh. ' '
. 4 h-'
W -
' ' - j,e _ ;.
l%-
- = ~..
n.,
, s O
,Y, 4
g
,f o
. <: - ~
+
6,., : ? :
,
p*,. %..
v.
.~*2 1
I J,.y.
.. y'e. 6,.
e i
- .c. ~....