ML20148C640
| ML20148C640 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 10/17/1996 |
| From: | Jordan E NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD) |
| To: | Kennedy K, Lloyd R, Madison A, Martin T, Rosenthal J, West O NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148C622 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9705270176 | |
| Download: ML20148C640 (2) | |
Text
_
bbOIb pt ero O
t UNITED STATES g
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555-0001 o
8 p
October 17, 1996
{
l MEMORANDUM T0:
Ronald L. Lloyd, Maintenance and Testing Team Leader Maine Ya kee Independent Safety Assessment Team FROM:
<f 60 ctor Offi for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data
SUBJECT:
PARTICIPATION ON THE MAINE YANKEL uiDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT TEAM I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the leadership you provided to the Maine Yankee Independent Safety Assessment (ISA) Team.
Your efforts contributed substantially to the success of this assessment.
This was a particularly challenging assignment due to its scope, team size, innovative approach, ambitious schedule, and interface with the State of Maine.
Your inspection experience, leadership, and willingness to work towards a consensus were instrumental in allowing us to meet those challenges.
You did an outstanding job of managing the Maintenance and Testing team to cover the broad scope of review efficiently.
Your findings in the area of testing provided key insights into the roots of the performance problems at Maine Yankee.
Of particular note is the leadership you provided the team in terms of assuring integrity of the root cause development process.
Your extensive experience and thoughtful guidance contributed significantly to the quality and accuracy of the final product.
The information requests developed by your team were clear and concise, and typically resulted in clear answers.
Your written work was exceptional.
The effort you ex9rted to produce a consistent cohesive input was apparent in the quality of your uritten product.
The ability of the team to produce a high quality written report on time in only 35 days after leaving the site was a direct result of your efforts in both the drafting and reviewing processes.
You worked well with the technical and process teams from the State of Maine.
The working relationship and protocols established with the State have set the standard for future efforts of this type.
The ISA represented a new approach to assessment which used the Diagnostic Evaluation methodology as a point of departure for an innovative, broad based assessment.
Your insights, experience, and flexibility contributed substantially the development of this new and powerful regulatory assessment tool.
/
9705270176 970516 PDR ADOCK 05000309 H
l o
Ronald L. Lloyd 2
It was a pleasure having you as the functional area leader for Maintenance and Testing, and I greatly appreciate the work you did for the Agency.
Thank you for a job well done.
cc:
C. E. Rossi, AE00 J. Rosenthal, AE00 l
l
~
s p snec p
UNITED STATCS j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 0001 Q
l 1
2
.,g.
October 17, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO:
Thomas 0. Martin, Engineering Team Leader MapeY-e Independent Safety Assessment Team FROM:
Mw C Nr Director n
i Officel or Analysis and Evaluation of 0 erational Data
SUBJECT:
PARTICIPATION ON THE MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT TEAM i
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the leadership you provided to the Maine Yankee Independent Safety Assessment (ISA) Team.
Your efforts contributed substantially to the success of this assessment.
This was a particularly challenging assignment due to its scope, team size, innovative l
approach, ambitious schedule, and interface with the State of Maine.
Your inspection experience, leadership, and willine-ss to work towards a consensus were instrumental in allowing us to meet those challenges.
)
You did an outstanding job of managing the Engineering Team to cover the broad i
scope of review efficiently.
Your work in the areas of containment spray, component cooling water, and ventilation system performance identified significant safety issues which necessitated prompt action to assure adequate safety of the facility.
Additicnally, your findings in the area of testing provided key insights into the roots of the performance problems at Maine Yankee.
Your extensive experience in performing detailed Engineering
]
assessments was an essential factor in the success of this effort.
The information requests developed by your team were clear and concise, and typically resulted in clear answers.
Your written work was exceptional.
The effort you exerted to produce a consistent cohesive input was apparent in the 4
quality of your written product.
The ability of the team to produce a high quality written report on time in only 35 days after leaving the site was a direct result of your efforts in both the drafting and reviewing processes.,
You worked well with the technical and process teams from the State of Maine.
The working relationship and protocols established have set the standard for future efforts of this type.
I The ISA represented a new approach to assessment which used the Diagnostic Evaluation methodology as a point of departure for an innovative, broad based assessment.
Your insights, experience, and flexibility contributed substantially to the development of this new and powerful regulatory assessment tool.
h
Thomas 0. Martin 2
It was a pleasure having you as the functional area leader for Engineering, and I greatly appreciate the work you did for the Agency.
Thank you for a job well done, cc:
D. Morrison, RES/0D W. Morris, RES/DRA l
l sp Hou l
O 1
UNITED STATES s
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20566-4001 l
/
October 17, 1996
.....j MEMORANDUM T0:
Kriss Kennedy, Operations Team Leader Y kee Ir) dependent Safety Assessment Team FROM:
dd' d
E Director Offic for Analysis and Evaluation of perational Data
SUBJECT:
PARTICIPATION ON THE MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT TEAM I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the leadership you provided to the Maine Yankee Independent Safety Assessment (ISA) Team.
Your efforts contributed substcntially to the success of this assessment.
This was a particularly challenging assignment due to its scope, team size, innovative approach, ambitious schedule, and interface with the State of Maine.
Your inspection experience, leadership, and willingness to work towards a consensus were instrumental in allowing us to meet those challenges.
In particular, you did an outstanding job of managing the operations team to cover the broad scope of review efficiently.
Your willingness to return to the site ahead of the team in order to observe a scheduled start up, to observe shift operation around the clock, and to serve as the prime point of contact between the site and the team for operation occurrences is greatly appreciated and substantially improved the effectiveness of the overall assessment.
The information requests developed by your team were clear and concise, and typically resulted in clear answers.
Your written work was exceptional.
The effort you exerted to produce a consistent cohesive input was apparent in the quality of your written product.
The ability of the team to produce a high quality w itten report on time in only 35 days after leaving the site was a direct result of your efforts in both the drafting and reviewing processes.
You worked well with the technical and process teams from the State of Maine.
The working relationship and protocols established have set the standard for future efforts of this type.
The ISA represented a new approach to assessment which used the Diagnostic j
Evaluation methodology as a point of departure for an innovative, broad based assessment.
Your insights, experience, and flexibility contributed substantially to the development of this new and powerful regulatory assessment tool.
l
~
1 i
1 Kriss Kennedy 2
It was a pleasure having you as.the functional area leader for Operations, and I greatly appreciate the work you did for the Agency.
Thank you for a job well done.
i i
cc:
L. J. Callan, RA/RIV l
J. E. Dyer, DRP/RIV i
I 4
1 2
1 i
l i
1 s
+
1 l
I l
s hneg e p UNITED STATES 3
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 17, 1996 MEMORANDUM T0:
Alan L. Madison, Management and Organization Team Leader MpeY kee Independent Safety Assessment Team FROM:
-Idward' sTn, Director Offic for Analysis and Evaluation of' perational Data
SUBJECT:
PARTICIPATION ON THE MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT TEAM I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the leadership you provided to the Maine Yankee Independent Safety Assessment (ISA) Team.
Your efforts contributed substantially to the success of this assessment.
This was a particularly challenging assignment due to its scope, team size, innovative 4;,proach, ambitious schedule, and interface w ti h the State of Maine.
Your inspection experience, leadership, and willingness to work towards a consensus were instrumental in allowing us to meet those challenges.
You did an outstanding job of managing the Management and Organization team to cover the broad scope of review efficiently.
Your close coordination with the other functional area leaders was the primary cause of the exceptional degree of integration of findings which this team enjoyed.
Your work resulted in the identification of one of the assessments key safety findings and the development of the ultimate root causes of significant safety findings.
Additionally, your extensive experience in the assessment process was inval"able in establishing the framework within which this large team was able to achieve consensus on the key findings.
The information requests developed by your team were clear and concise, and typically resulted in clear answers.
Your written work was exceptional.
The effort you exerted to produce a consistent cohesive input was apparent in the quality of your written product. The ability of the team tn produce a high quality written report on time in only 35 days after leaving the site was a direct result of your efforts in both the drafting and reviewing processes.
You worked well with the technical and process teams from the State of Maine.
The working relationship and protocols established with the State have set the standard for future efforts of this type.
The ISA represented a new approach to assessment which used the Diagnostic Evaluation methodology as a point of departure for an innovative, broad based assesment.
Your insights, experience, and flexibility contributed substantially the development of this new and powerful regulatory assessment tool.
l Alan L. Madison 2
It was a pleasure having you as the functional area leader for Management and Organization, and I greatly appreciate the work you did for the Agency.
Thank you for a job well done.
cc:
F. Congel, IRD/AE00 l
l l
i et* "%
UNITED STATES y
e E
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 0001 October 17, 1996
+
MEMORANDUM T0:
Jack E. Ro nthal, Analytic Code Team Leader Maine Y Independent Safety Assessment Team M/
n.
t. 'bo'r# ad, h tor
<E5ad,forAnalysisandEvaluation FROM:
Of fice]
of Operational Data
SUBJECT:
PARTICIPATION ON THE MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT TEAM l
i I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the leadership you provided to the Maine Yankee Independent Safety Assessment (ISA) Team.
Your efforts contributed substantially to the success of this assessment.
This was a particularly challenging assignment due to its scope, team size, innovative approach, ambitious schedule, and interface with the State of Maine.
Vo ir inspection experience, leadership, and willingness to work towards a consensus were instrumental in allowing us to meet those challenges.
You did an outstanding job of managing the Analytic Code team to cover the broad scope of review efficiently.
The leadership you brought to this area of the assessment was a key factor in its success.
Your team was, by necessity, isolated geographically from the balance of the assessment team, yet you maintained an exceptional degree of communication and coordination with the other functional area leaders.
Your efforts were, quite literally, unprecedented within the NRC, in terms of the scope, depth, and methods of review.
Additionally, your conclusions were fully endorsed by an independent panel of world class experts in the field of analytic codes.
The overall success of the ISA is in large part do to your efforts in the Analytic Code area.
The information requests developed by your team were clear and concise, and typically resulted in clear answers.
Your written work was exceptional. The effort you exerted to produce a consistent cohesive input was apparent in the quality of your written product.
The ability of the team to produce a high quality written report on time in only 35 days after leaving the site was a direct result of your efforts in both the drafting and reviewing processes.
You worked well with the technical and process teams from the State of Maine.
The working relationship and protocols established by this team with the State have set the standard for future efforts of this type.
The ISA represented a new approach to assessment which used the Diagnostic Evaluation methodology as a point of departure for an innovative, broad based assessment.
Your insights, experience, and flexibility contributed substantially the development of this new and powerful regulatory assessment tool.
t Jack E. Rosenthal 2
i It was a pleasure having you as the functional area leader for Analytic Codes, and I greatly appreciate the work you did for the Agency.
Thank you for a job well done.
cc:
C. E. Rossi, AEOD/SPD l
l l
i t& VECy yg 4
UNITED STATES o
g(
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
t WASHINGTON. o.C. 20555-0001
/
October 17, 1996 MEMORANDUM T0:
Ola 8. West, Administrative Assistant Y
ee Independent Safety Assessment Team
'Edwa b -J
UTTveto r FROM:
Office or Analysis and Evaluation of erational Data
SUBJECT:
PARTICIPATION ON THE MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT TEAM I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation on the Maine Yankee Independent Safety Assessment (ISA). team.
Your efforts contributed substantially to the success of this assessment.
This was a particularly challenging assignment due to its scope, team size, innovative approach, ambitious schedule, and interface with the State of Maine.
Your experience and willingness to overcome any obstacle to success were instrumental in allowing us to meet those challenges.
In particular, the discipline and organization you brought to all aspects of the administration of this assessment were exceptional.
The travel plans and arrangements for the 25 person team were executed flawlessly.
Additionally, your organization of the vast technical library established during the course of this assessment directly contributed to its success.
The extensive coordination, initiative, and independent action you exhibited to achieve the necessary degree of coordination with the licensee throughout this five month effort have been exceptional.
The ISA represented a new approach to assessment which used the Diag.'estic Evaluation methodology as a point of departure for an innovative, broad based assessment.
While the team focused on the technical aspects of the assessment, you were singly responsible for the development and implementation of the administrative protocols for this new initiative.
Your success was impressive, and essential to the success of the ISA.
It was a pleasure having you as an administrative assistant to the Team Leader, and I greatly appreciate the work you did for the Agency.
Thank you for a job well done.
cc:
S. D. Ebneter, RA/RII A. F. Gibson, DRS/RII k
}
MEMORANDUM 0F UNDERSTANDING As part of my participation in the NRC's independent safety assessment (ISA) of the Maine Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, I agree to the following protocols:
I will make advance arrangements with the licensee for site access
=
training and badging (subject to fitness-for-duty requirements), prior j
to the actual on-site period.
j My communication with the licensee will be through the appropriate NRC
=
team member, usually the functional area team leader or the ISA team leader.
i When informed of an unannounced assessment activity, I will not release information concerning its time and purpose.
I will remain in the company of NRC personnel throughout the course of the assessment.
I understand that my participation may be terminated by the NRC if my 3
conduct interferes with a fair and orderly inspection.
l I will not be provided with proprietary or safeguards information.
I will not remove any material from the site without NRC or licensee approval.
)
I understand that, in accompanying NRC personnel, I do so at my own risk.
NRC will not be responsible for injuries or exposures to harmful a
i substances which may occur during the assessment and will assume no liability for any incidents associated with my accompaniment.
I agree to adhere to the same standards of conduct as NRC personnel during this assessment.
If I become aware of any apparent non-conformance with safety or regulatory requirements during the assessment, I will make those observations promptly known to the ISA team leader or functional area team leader.
Likewise, when my overall conclusions or views are substantially different from those of NRC team members, I will advise the ISA team leader and forward those views, in writing, to the Mr. E.L.
Jordan.
This will allow NRC to take any necessary regulatory actions.
Under no circumstances will state communications regarding the results 1
of these inspections be released to the public or the licensee before they are reviewed by the NRC and the inspection report is issued.
State i
communications may be made publicly available, similar to NRC inspection reports, after they have been transmitted to and reviewed by NRC.
Name:
David Decrow Signature:
Date:
y ff-27-9 i
~~
= _ - - -
~
l l
MEMORANDUM 0F UNDERSTANDING As part of my participation in the NRC's independent safety assessment (ISA) of the Maine Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, I agree to the following protocols:
I will make advance arrangements with the licensee for site access training and badging (subject to fitness-for-duty requirements), prior to the actual on-site period.
My communication with the licensee will be through the appropriate NRC l
team member, usually the functional area team leader or the ISA team e
leader.
When informed of an unannounced assessment activity, I will not release 4
information concerning its time and purpose, 4
I will remain in the company of NRC personnel throughout the course of the assessment.
I understand that my participation may be terminated by the NRC if my conduct interferes with a fair and orderly inspection.
?
I will not be provided with proprietary or safeguards information.
I will not remove any material from the site without NRC or licensee approval.
I understand that, in accompanying NRC personnel, I do so at my own risk. NRC will not be responsible for injuries or exposures to harmful substances which may occur during the assessment and will assume no liability for any incidents associated with my accompaniment.
j I agree to adhere to the same standards of conduct as NRC personnel during this assessment.
If I become aware of any apparent non-conformance with safety or regulatory requirements during the assessment, I will make those observations promptly known to the ISA team leader or functional area team leader.
Likewise, when my overall cenclusions or views are substantially different from those of NRC team members, I will advise the ISA team leader and forward those views, in writing, i.a the Mr. E.L.
Jordan.
This will allow NRC to take any necessary regulatory actions.
Under no circumstances will state communications regarding the results of these inspections be released to the public or the licensee before they are reviewed by the NRC and the inspection report is issued.
State communications may be made publicly available, similar to NRC inspection reports, after they have been transmitted to and reviewed by NRC.
Name: Uldis Vanags Date: fr a /9f[
Signature:
j,
q j i MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING As part of my participation in the NRC's independent safety assessment (ISA) of the Maine Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, I agree to the following protocols:
I will make advance arrangements with the licensee for site access training and badging (subject to fitness-for-duty requirements), prior l
to the actual on-site period.
My communication with the licensee will be through the appropriate NRC team member, usually the functional area team leader or the ISA team leader.
When informed of an unannounced assessment activity, I will not release information concerning its time and purpose.
I will remain in the company of NRC personnel throughout the course of the assessment.
I understand that my participation may be terminated by the NRC if my I
conduct interferes with a fair and orderly inspection.
I will not be provided with proprietary or s'afeguards information.
I will not remove any material from the site without NRC or licensee approval.
I understand that, in accompanying NRC personnel, I do so at my own risk.
NRC will not be responsible for injuries or exposures to harmful substances which may occur during the assessment and will assume no liability for any incidents associated with my accompaniment.
I agree to adhere to the same standards of conduct as NRC personnel during this assessment.
If I become aware of any apparent non-conformance with safety or regulatory requirements during the assessment, I will make those observations promptly known to the ISA team leader or functional area i
team leader.
Likewise, when my overall conclusions or views are substantially different fron; those of NRC team members, I will advise the ISA team leader and forward those views, in writing, to the Mr. E.L.
Jordan.
This will allow NRC ;o take any necessary regulatory actions.
Under no circumstances will state communications regarding the results of these inspections be released to the public or the licensee before they are reviewed by the NRC and the inspection report is issued.
State communications may be made publicly available, similar to NRC inspection reports, after they have been transmitted to and reviewed by NRC.
Name:
Patr'c J.
ostie Signature:
Date:
d 6 [b
i l
OVERVIEW l
l OF THE i
l MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT i
i SAFETY ASSESSMENT i
i i
l LICENSEE BRIEFING i
JUNE 20,1996
)
~. - -.... - ~ - _ _ _. _ -....... -. -,. - - -.
5 l
MISSION OF THE MAINE YANKEE ISAT i
I
{
1.
Provide an independent assessment of the conformance of Maine Yankee Atomic Power station to its di sign and licensing bases j
including appropriate reviews at the s.te and corporate offices.
{
2.
Provide an independent assessment of operational safety j
performance providing risk perspectives where appropriate.
r j'
3.
Evaluate the effectiveness of licensee self-assessments, corrective j
actions and improvement plans.
I
{
4.
Determine the root cause(s) of safety significant findings and draw
]
conclusions on overall performance.
i i
i I
4 2
i i.
e.
-._,,,,,.-...,,..,,,,,,__,-,.........,.,._-_.......,._,,-.._,_..._._,,-_m.._
, ~,., ~,,,,
l i
Maine Yankee 4
l Independent Safety Assessment Team Edward L. Jordan Team Manager i
AEOD i
Ellis W. Merschoff i
Team Leader Region ll i
U! dis Vanags Ola B. West Patrick Dostie l
Peter Wiley Ad"A"egfon gtant si State Represeritat,ves i
Kriss M. Kennedy Ronald Lloyd Thomas O. Martin Alan L. Madison OPS / Training Maint/ Testing Eng. Design / Tech.
Management & Organization 4
Region IV AEOD RES AEOD i-Larry Bell Russell Bywater John Boardman Harold Christensen j
TTC e
Region 111 AEOD Region ll i
John Kauffman Peter Prescott George Hausman Contractor AEOD AEOD Region 111 Jack E. Rosenthal i
Contractor Contractor Analytic Code Support AEOD
~
Contractor G. Norman Lauben RES Contractor 3
i
i 1
i MADE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT i
SPECIAL FEATURES 1
CHAIRMAN REQUESTED THE SAFETY ASSESSMENT l
CHAIRMAN APPROVES THE TEAM AND THE EVALUATION t
PLAN i
l TEAM MANAGER, TEAM LEADER, AND TWO FUNCTIONAL AREA LEADERS ARE FROM THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE l
TEAM MEMBERS ARE INDEPENDENT OF REGION I AND THE l
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION i
l MEMBERS ARE INDEPENDENT OF SIGNIFICANT PRIOR l
INVOLVEMENT WITH THE LICENSEE i
l THE TEAM MANAGER REPORTS DIRECTLY TO THE CHAIRMAN i
l 4
i l
MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT l
(Continued) i l
SPECIAL FEATURES 4
i l
e CONTRACTORS WILL BE USED IN EACH FUNCTIONAL AREA, EXCEPT OPERATIONS l
i e
STATE REPRESENTATIVES WILL PARTICIPATE AS MEMBERS OF THE TEAM UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF FR 57.6462 POLICY STATEMENT i
l e
THE INSPECTION WILL BE CONDUCTED AT THE SITE, THE l
CORPORATE OFFICES, THE YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY OFFICES, AND MAY INCLUDE OTHER VENDOR OFFICES j
THE AREAS OF MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION, l
OPERATIONS AND TRAINING, MAINTENANCE AND TESTING, J
ENGINEERING AND LICENSING, AND ANALYTIC CODE j
SUPPORT WILL BE ASSESSED.
i l...
5
i i
l MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT i
SPECIAL FEATURES i
i INTERVIEWS OF VENDOR AND LICENSEE PERSONNEL WILL BE i
CONDUCTED i
i j
ROOT-CAUSES FOR PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS WILL BE ASSESSED THE CHAIRMAN TRANSMITS THE TEAM REPORT TO THE l
LICENSEE i
i 4
4 e
i i
6 l
.-.,--.3..,.,.--,
,,.,,.,.,,_,-...,..,-----w,e o,--.
-,,s.
-r,
.-mg---,.
c,
-.,,..,,,-,.,,...-...,,,.,-----,..t
l MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT l
THE TEAM WILL PLAN AND PREPARE EXTENSIVELY i
i e
NRC AND LICENSEE BACKGROUND INFORMATION WILL BE COLLECTED AND REVIEWED e
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE, PROGRAMS AND NRC ACTIONS WILL BE REVIEWED l
e BRIEFINGS WILL BE PROVIDED BY NRC HEADQUARTERS AND i
REGIONAL STAFFS i
l e
SELECTED SYSTEMS WILL BE EVALUATED IN DETAIL i
l e
DETAILED EVALUATION PLANS WILL BE PREPARED FOR EACH l
EVALUATION AREA o
PREPARATION AND PLANNING WILL SPAN SEVERAL WEEKS l
i 7
i
^.
i MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT 1
i l
FUNCTIONAL AREAS OBSERVED AND EVALUATED PLANT OPERATIONS AND TRAINING MAINTENANCE AND TESTING i
ENGINEERING AND LICENSING 4
MANAGEMENT CONTROLS AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECnVENESS i
e ANALYTIC CODE SUPPORT 8
i a '
MAINE YANKEE INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCESS i
i i
SOURCES OF INFORMATION DOCUMENT REVIEWS OBSERVATIONS OF ACTIVITIES FORMAL PERSONNEL INTERVIEWS
}
9 4
6
,,,,._,.,,,_,,,,,___.___,.,_..,.,_.,__.-___3.
ON-SITE SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCESS
)
LICENSEE MANAGEMENT / STAFF INTERVIEWS l
e ABOUT 100 FORMAL INTERVIEWS e
USED TO UNDERSTAND AND EVALUATE:
e TECHNICAL PROGRAMS e
WORK PROCESS o
PERFORMANCE ISSUES e
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES o
ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES 4
e CONDUCTED BY ALL TEAM MEMBERS l
PRESIDENT TO WORKING LEVEL o
FORMAL INTERVIEWS LAST ONE-TO-TWO HOURS o
SCHEDULES BASED ON INTERVIEWEE AVAILABILITY 10
,-,,-,,-,,,,-----e
,w-w
v--'
e
-c-="v
'-w
-v"'**C-~*-*
ON-SITE SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCESS COMMUNICATIONS OF TEAM OBSERVATIONS AND FINDINGS i
i l
DAILY FEEDBACK BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL AREA COUNTERPARTS i
DAILY FEEDBACK BETWEEN TEAM LEADER AND MAINE l
YANKEE MANAGEMENT SAFETY ISSUES AFFECTING EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY WILL l
BE RESOLVED PROMPTLY WITH REGIONAL INVOLVEMENT INTERIM " EXIT" ON PROGRESS AND PLANS AFTER THE FIRST ONSITE PERIOD INTERIM " EXIT AFTER THE SECOND TWO WEEKS TO PROVIDE THE STATUS OF FINDINGS AND ISSUES i
11 i
m.
,,.. - ~.,. - -.. _,. -... _ -., _. -.,,
,._.,._m
i ON-SITE SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCESS i
e SPECIAL EVALUATION ON-SITE SCHEDULE (DAIIM NORMAL WORKING HOURS:
SHIFI' COVERAGE / SIMULATOR TRAINING:
(AS REQUIRED)
TEAM MANAGER DEBRIEF TIME TBD TEAM LEADERS FEEDBACK TIME TBD DAILY TEAM MEETINGS:
e m
---s-
+
,w,em,.
,-,v--,,,--,
,n.-,-mn,.,,-,-,.,,,,,m-mw-. ~ ~,, - --,..
,,-ns.--..,_,w,.--v,+
ON-SITE SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCESS SPECIAL EVALUATION SCHEDULE (OVERALL) e ADVANCE SITE TRIP:
JUNE 20 - 21,1996 l
e PUBLIC ENTRANCE MEETING:
JULY 15,1996 i
e ISAT ON-SITE PERIODS:
JULY 15-26,1996
-l AUGUST 12-23,1996 e
PUBLIC EXIT MEETING:
WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 30, i
1996 e
REPORT ISSUED SHORTLY AFTER THE EXIT MEETING 4
1 13 O
I O
-,-3
---.-3
,.,..-,,-,,,---,--.y
-.m,_
,,., _... -,.,..,, _, _,-3,..
v.,,,,pyy..
.,,..m,..m_,_,,.,_,
_.,,.,-o-,_,_,._
e,-
,- ~ ~, - - -,,
1 1
i SPECIAL EVALUATION FOLLOWUP ACTIVITIES i
4 i
ITEMS OF NONCOMPLIANCE e
IDENTIFIED BY REGION THROUGH REVIEW OF THE TEAM REPORT l
I REGIONAL FOLLOWUP PER NRC ENFORCEMENT POLICY i
i k
i l
14
?
....._.,-..__..._m__,,_
_ _ _, _ _ _, _. _., _ - _, _, _ _ - _.. _., _. _.. _ _,. -,.. _,,, _ _, _., _ - _,,, _ _ _. -, _.