ML20148C104
| ML20148C104 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/23/1979 |
| From: | Minogue R NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT |
| To: | Haller N NRC OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM ANALYSIS (MPA) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148C069 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 8001250089 | |
| Download: ML20148C104 (1) | |
Text
.
f
^
m.*. t C,,,4, gr c-UNITED STATE 3 f
- 7. +.: T t.
NUCLEAR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION C
- 4.c.3,,,,, r-..'"..>
a WASWNGTON C. C. 2ns55
. ~., : n.
%,. '.. n Nove-ber 23, 1979 l'EMORANDU'i FOR:
Norman M. Haller, Director
~.
Office of Management and Program Analysis s
FR0u:
Robert B. Minogue, Director
?*
Office of Standards Development
SUBJECT:
DRAFT PAPER ON NRC ORGANIZATIONAL OPTIONS FOR f
-,e..,. R r L (t w s,rv --
n.-
nn ee L.
Q Yh rnhLun.4J As recues ted in your memorandum dated October 31, 1979, we have reviewed the draf t paper on NRC organizational options for emergency preparedness.
i :eiieve t,.at t.ne gevelopment anc..1mpiemen ation of cocorehensive emergency 01anning involves a very broad score of censicerations and disciplines.
On ti is basis, for reactors, I agree with your recommendation of option number 3, :cnsolica icn cf emergency pre:aredness functions in two program offices, a n,., 1 where varied encineerinc, sa ting, anc emergency planning n--
ex:ertise are available or can easily be develoced.
Aisc, this woul d allow N:: anc IE to cen*.inue present eff:-ts to upgrade emergency response plans anc prc:ecures, as well as make i: possibie for NRR to ensure an orderly t ans fe" of CP anc OL concurrence reviews c FEMA.
1 M c '. e v e r, for o:ner fuel cycle facilities, the o; tion should be included for N..55 to retain cer.ain emergency :reparedness functions analogous to those of NE:.
The dra #t ca:.er seems te dismiss this cotion by referring to the
- re. i ous conscii da.i cn o f sa fec.ua rcs revi ews i n NY.55.
It can be arc.ued that
\\
- e e are many sir'iarities between sa feguarcs f r react:Ps and safecuards e,. -. E n..-
fa.4.14.*.iz..e.
' o w e. v e. r, =. ~. a. *.
- c. m
- v ". ' * "m*. #..,~ " ^
- e i.dc. ". c- *. 4. o a..e
- . ^ Y. r e & * * * *. s
..o.
a rs.uc. dif fet en: fr r c:nsidera-icns fer fusi cycle facilities, because tre
- =-tial a:-idents anc their consecuences are cor. letely different.
1: seems
- vs that N".55 coulc approcriateiv retain emercencv planning functions for the fe'
- fuel fac111:1es under its Jurisdiction, with a minimal resource ccmmitment.
We assu e that uncer any reorgani:ation, be Office of Standards Development acui d re.ain resrcnsibili y f0r wri-ing emergency :ianning standards as i. c. s. in e*-.=.
- x ;.. e.
.x.
- m... e..
,....: 4
..i
..c e..
i.. :. e.
e %. m., ) ;.%,
e i.3, r i #. 4i a s.,
4
.n s
in
'he.
,r s 8 '
In fE2er $nI be b) unC ons 5 eb a kChend X shCu e eXoab 6
- " 'aciude not On'y ceVelo0 men: Of regulatiCns, bu*. all ty?es Of s ta0 Cards s: -- s s " c aul a tc *y 3'. i ce s a nc NURE G E e Po,rk s.
- is:,, J :Dendi x I. sn0uld be
..,....fe,..::i,
,e..
/
..Io.
e...
..a ne..e
.y>r
,..--o.. --:n..
n i
.i....y i
g.
w
.w wai.
ws.lw
/
/
f'
/ :...s a.
v e. ~.... e., S.i*e"w**r ggh
- e. e e s, -..e e.i..:
.e.
N,,.I-.
e.....
v v
-