ML20148C104
| ML20148C104 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/23/1979 |
| From: | Minogue R NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT |
| To: | Haller N NRC OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM ANALYSIS (MPA) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148C069 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 8001250089 | |
| Download: ML20148C104 (1) | |
Text
. .
^
f .
m gr c- .* . t C ,,,4, f , UNITED STATE 3
- 7. +.:. 'T t. NUCLEAR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION -
C
- 4 WASWNGTON C. C. 2ns55
. ~.,.c.3,,,,,
- n. r-..'"..> a ,
% , . '. . n' . Nove-ber 23, 1979 l'EMORANDU'i FOR: Norman M. Haller, Director ~.
Office of Management and Program Analysis .
s FR0u: Robert B. Minogue, Director ?*
Office of Standards Development "
SUBJECT:
DRAFT PAPER ON NRC ORGANIZATIONAL OPTIONS FOR f
-,e.
L. .,. RQr L (t w s,rv -- n.- nn ee -
Yh rnhLun.4J As recues ted in your memorandum dated October 31, 1979, we have reviewed the draf t paper on NRC organizational options for emergency preparedness. .
i :eiieve t,.at t.ne gevelopment anc. .1mpiemen ation of cocorehensive emergency 01anning involves a very broad score of censicerations and disciplines. On ti is basis , for reactors , I agree with your recommendation of option number 3, :cnsolica icn cf emergency pre:aredness functions in two program offices, a n ,., 1 : , where varied encineerinc, sa ting, anc emergency planning n--
ex:ertise are available or can easily be develoced. Aisc , this woul d allow . ,
N:: anc IE to cen*.inue present eff:-ts to upgrade emergency response plans ;
anc prc:ecures , as well as make i: possibie for NRR to ensure an orderly :
t ans fe" of CP anc OL concurrence reviews c FEMA. I l
1 M c '. e v e r , for o:ner fuel cycle facilities , the o; tion should be included for i N..55 to retain cer.ain emergency :reparedness functions analogous to those I of NE:. The dra #t ca:.er seems te dismiss this cotion by referring to the . l
- re . i ous conscii da .i cn o f sa fec.ua rcs revi ews i n NY.55. It can be arc.ued that I
- e e are many sir'iarities between sa feguarcs f r react:Ps and safecuards \
e, . - . E n. .- fa.4.14.*.iz..e.
- ' o w e. v e. r , =. ~. a. *...o.
.. .
- c. m.
- v ". ' ..
- "m*. #. . ,~ " .^ .* .e. i ..dc. ". c- *. 4. o a. .e
. #. ^ Y. r -e -.
, & * * * *. s a rs .uc . dif fet en: fr r c:nsidera-icns fer fusi cycle facilities , because tre
- =-tial a:-idents anc their consecuences are cor. letely different. 1: seems
- vs that N".55 coulc approcriateiv retain emercencv planning functions for the fe'
- fuel fac111:1es under its Jurisdiction, with a minimal resource ccmmitment.
We assu e that uncer any reorgani:ation, be Office of Standards Development acui d re .ain resrcnsibili y f0r wri-ing emergency :ianning standards as *
,....: 4 i . c. s. in e*-.=. :x ;. . e. .x.
, . . ..i m. . . e. . ,r.c.n e..
. i.. :. e. e ..%. m., ) ;.%, .. ei s
.3, r i #. 4i a s., 4 in 'he. -
s 8 ' In fE2er $nI be b) unC ons 5 eb
- a kChend X shCu e eXoab 6
- " 'aciude not On'y ceVelo0 men: Of regulatiCns , bu*. all ty?es Of s ta0 Cards s: -- s s " c aul a tc *y 3'. i ce s a nc NURE G E e Po,rk s . *is: ,, J :Dendi x I. sn0uld be g.
..Io.n -.,,. e... ..a ne. .e . . , ;....fe,..::i i .i....y i w
, ,e.. .w
.y>r ,..--o.. --:n..
. . wai. ws.lw . .
/
/
/
f' %
/ :. . .s.a..
e.
e e s,..- .
v e. ~ . . . .. e. ,
.e< . e.i..: .e.
S.i*e"w**r N,,.I-.
ggh v . . .. . . . v e.....
- $