ML20148C083

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Draft Organizational Options for Emergency Preparedness,Per 791031 Request.Centralization in One or More Ofcs Could Result in Substantial Improvement in NRC Emergency Planning & Response Capability
ML20148C083
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/09/1979
From: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Haller N
NRC OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM ANALYSIS (MPA)
Shared Package
ML20148C069 List:
References
REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 8001250065
Download: ML20148C083 (2)


Text

__

I L.

1:h UNITED R f ATES fN,

je ;c. 3

~..

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i ;

wAmmarou. o. c. re:ss P.

4. Y.;.J

-2

=, M Wf /

1.

'..... f h'UV Hi-}

h#

l

+7 MEMORAHDUM FOR:

Norman M. Haller, Director E.'

Office of Management and Program Analysis E~

=,

i FROM:

William J. Dircks, Director F

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards h-SUSJECI:

DRAFT PAPER ON NRC ORGANIZATIONAL OPTIONS.FOR i

- - G.,Ci. -,--.-,N eS di:n :d rn rastD t.

We have completed our review of MpA's draft entitied "NRC Orcanizational

"?

t Octions for Emergency Preparedness," and acree in principle with the draft conclusions.

Centralization in one or more offices of many of NRC's emergency oiannino anc response functions could result ir : :tt::ential T

ir prevement in emergency planning and response capabild *y i n this agency.

Your dra f t reiterates some of the serious problems which were set out in SECY 79-499 and the Kemeny Commission Report, and recocnires that any prcrosed reorganization will not, in itself, solve NRC's emergency plan-ning problems.

Clearly, tne presen craft could net, because of time and mar. cower ccnstraints, ccm:letely define the complex interrelationships between the Or::: sed " central office" for emergency plannino and tne program Offices an: :neir licensing resconsibilities.

It coes, however, cresent a t.

1 5:arting 00in: for the considerable effort neeced by all the effices i.

er.errsc :c work out the lines of responsibility and fun::ional relation-T 5.

us whi ch must be es ablisnec.

In considering crgar.i:a-icnal Options, F

M r.:

us; be extrerely careful not to lose sigh cf ne.sai-h and safety lice, sing responsibilities of NMSS and NRR.

Tnere are many aspects of

1arnin; fer anc responcing :: emergencies which re:uire an ince::b technical

.m:ers unding of :he licensees ' operations.

For nis reason proposino :

ret:ve fr:m NRR and NMSS those aspects of emercency planning and response unich dsa.1 closely with their respective licensee operations is unacceptable.

!li A major problem in discussine or planninc for emercencies appears to be tha inahility to obtain a simultaneous comprehensien Of the interrelationships

)

Oc*. een se rious ;arti:irants, multiolicity cf phases, and functional c'

" si:ns of the er :lem.

Tne ED" Emerg:ncy Planning Tas: F:r:e cevelc:ed n ccm renensior.s Of NRC : blems in emergency cianning :nrough the 5.

I a-lica: Ton Of a dis:i:linec analytical ap:rgach.

In tha; analy-icci 1

)

f

)

s

/'

L id.

3:

he rman M. Holl et-2 approach, the players or participants are the regulators, the licensees, the State / local participants, and Federal agencies other than URC.

The

?hesis of emergency planning or emergency preparedness are the planning,

_n 7

licensing, ir.clementation and testing, and the actual emercency response.

All of the players and the phases are intertwined by the following dimensions:

responsibilities, needs, objectives, activities, products,

.S r4 crgani:ations, and interface.

Therefore, the various aspects of emergency

lanning can be viewed as a multi-dinensional matrix.

A description of

~

the analytical framework and the resulting matrix used by the Emergency Pianning Task Force Working Group is enclosed.

This enclosure in effect describes NRC's pre-TMI emergency preparedness posture.

The utilization

i..

f of the same analytical approach would facilitate a useful redefinition of erergency planning functions and functional responsibilities and their cptimum disoosition am ng the various participants, including various existing or proposed organi:ations in HRC.

We welcome the opportunity to work with you and others in such an effort.

[

o

, i ; / ! < /:,. i' i 1:,

/

i t /I., :n ki l l i a m J. D'i r ck s, Di redfo r'

Of f.i ce of huelea r Material' Safet~v and Safeg6ards Enciosure:

As stated cc:

H. Denten, NRR

5. Levine, RES R. Minogue, 5 V. Steiic, IE R. :.yan, 50 L. '.

% ssick EDO E. Smitr. D/EDO T. :ehr. Is s t.

te EDO H. Sha:ar. ELD D. Donoghue, ADM l

a l

l l

t

-