ML20148A254
| ML20148A254 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1996 |
| From: | Passwater A UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| ULNRC-3573, NUDOCS 9705080156 | |
| Download: ML20148A254 (113) | |
Text
-
1901 Chouteau Avenue Post Omce &n 149 St Inun, Masoon 63166 314 621-3222 EukTfiE
',4,g May 1, 1997
)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk i
Washington, DC 20555
)
Gentlemen:
ULNRC-3573 DOCKET NUMBER 50-483 CALIAWAY PLANT FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NPF-30 1996 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT Please find enclosed the 1996 Annual Environmental Operating Report for the Callaway Plant.
This report is submitted in accordance with Section 6.9.1.6 of the Technical Specifications and Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
Very truly yours, 4
Alan C. Passwater Manager, Licensing and Fuels BFH/plr Enclosure f
,i C0D h l
070107 9705000156 961231 ll',.lllilll ill',ll'l{'l 2kk' PDR ADOCK 05000483 R
l l
cc:
T. A. Baxter, Esq.
l Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N. Street, N.W.
Washington,' D.C. 20037 l
M. H. Fletcher Professional Nuclear Consulting, Inc.
19041 Raines Drive i
~Derwood, MD 20855-2432 l
L. Joe Callan Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 Senior Resident. Inspector Callaway Resident Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 8201 NRC Road Steedman, MO 65077 Kristine M. Thomas (2)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 White Flint, North, Mail Stop 13E16 11555 Rockville Pike i
Rockville, MD 20852-2738 i
Manager, Electric Department Missouri Public Service Commission P.O. Box.360 Jefferson City, MO 65102 Bob Hentges Regional Administrator Department of Natural Resources Central Regional Office P.O.~ Box 176 Jefferson City, MO 65102 Gerhard K. Samide ANI Account Engineer l
Town Center, Suite 3005 29 S. Main St.
West Hartford, CT 06107-2445 l
i
CALLAWAY PLANT ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1996
/
- )
W.
l
~[
y,
')2 s
^
^
x
.J
,u p i 9-DOCKET NO. 50-483 EUEPAic n
i.
.j
)
i CALLAWAY PLANT ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1996 DOCKET NO. 50-483 Unxon Etscrarc s
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Conclusion 3.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 4.0 Nonradiological Environmental Mcaituring Program i
S i
i I
f
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Callaway Plant received an Operating License on June 11, 1984.
This report presents analytical data from the environmental monitoring programs with appropriate interpretation for 1996 and environmental evaluations for plant modifications completed during 1996.
1 The third section of this report summarizes and interprets results of the radiological environmental monitoring program conducted in accordance with Administrative Procedure APA-ZZ-01003, 'OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL", Section 9.11.
s.
l Section four describes the conduct and results of the activities associated with the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) contained in Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
This Annual Environmental Operating Report is submitted in accordance with Section 6.9.1.6 of the i
Technical Specifications and Appendix B to the Callaway. Plant Operating License.
i
2.0 CONCLUSION
The third section of this report contains results of radiological environmental monitoring conducted in the vicinity of the Callaway Plant during 1996.
Comparison of results for 1996 to preoperational data and data from previous years of operation showed no significant or adverse effects from operation of Callaway Plant on the environment.
There were no Environmental Protection Plan noncompliances or reportable events identified during 1996.
There were no plant modifications completed during 1996 with an unreviewed environmental question as discussed in section four of this report.
SECTION 3.0 RADIOLdGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI CALLAWAY PLANT
\\
SECTION 3.0 l
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
+
)
ANNUAL REPORT 1996 l
l l
CONTENTS Pagg Sg.91i9.0 Titig a
Abstract 1
1.0 Introduction 2
2.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 2
21 Program Design 2
2.2 Program Description 3
2.3 Program Execution 16 2.4 Analytical Procedures 18 2.5 Program Modifications 23 3.0 Isotopic Detection Limits and Activity Determinations 23 4.0 Quality Control Program 25 5.0 Data Interpretations 25 6.0 Results and Discussion 26 l
i 6.1 Waterborne Pathway 26 6.2 Airborne Pathway 27 6.3 Ingestion Pathway 28 6.4 Direct Radiation 30 Appendix A:
1996 Land Use Census Al Appendix B:
EPA Cross-check Results B1 Appendix C:
Isotopic Detection Limits and Activity Determinations Cl f
Appendix D:
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary DI Appendix E:
Individual Sample Results El l
r
-i-
TABLES Number Title Page I
Sampling Locations 7
11 Collection Schedule 13 III Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Ans. lysis 24 i
f i
4
- ii -
FIGURES Number Title Page 1
Distant Collection Locations 4
2 Near Site Collection Locations 5
3 On-Site Collection Locations 6
- iii -
]
Abstract This report presents the Callaway Pir.nt Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) data obtained from analysis of environmental samples collected in 1996.
Evaluation of radiation levels in the environs around Union Electric Company's (UEC) Callaway Plant involved sampling at strategic points in various exposure pathways. The following types of samples were collected and analyzed: milk, vegetation, surface water, well water, bottom sediment, shoreline sediment, fish, airborne particulates, airborne radiciodine, direct radiation (TLD), soil and wetlands.
Analytical results are presented and discussed along with other pertinent information. Possible trends and anomalous results, as interpreted by Union Electric Company personnel, are discussed.
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents an analysis of the results of the REMP conducted during 1996 for' Union Electric Company, Callaway Plant.
In accordance with federal and state regulations and the desire to maintain the quality of the local environment, UEC began its radiological monitoring program in April,1982.
The objectives of the REMP are to monitor potential critical pathways of radioeffluent to man and determine the radiological impact on the environment caused by operation of Callaway Plant.
E Callaway Plant consists of one 1239 MWe pressurized water reactor, which achieved initial criticality on October 2,1984. The plant is located on a plateau approximately ten g
miles southeast of the City of Fulton in Callaway County, Missouri and approximately 3
eighty miles west of the St. Louis metropolitan area. The Missouri River flows by the site in an easterly direction approximately five miles south of the site at its closest point.
2.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PROGRAM 2.1 Pronram Desian The purpose of the operational REMP at Callaway Plant is to assess the impact of plant operation on the environment. For this purpose, samples are collected from waterborne, airborne, ingestion and direct radiation pathways. Sampling media are selected which are likely to show effects of plant efiluents and which are sensitive to changes in radioactivity levels. The types of sample media collected are: milk, surface water, groundwater, shoreline sediment, bottom sediment, soil, wetlands, fish, vegetation, airborne particulate, airborne radiciodine and direct radiation (TLD).
Samples are collected by Union Electric personnel and shipped to Teledyne Isotopes E
Midwest Laboratory (TIML) for analysis. TLD's are analyzed by Union Electric 3,
personnel. The data obtained are reported monthly and summarized in the annual report.
Environmental sample locations are divided into two types, indicator and control.
Indicator samples are those collected from locations which would be expected to manifest plant effects, if any. Control samples are collected at locations which are expected to be unaffected by plant operation.
Il I
I' --
2.2 Program Description Sample locations for the REMP are shown in Figures 1,2 and 3. Table I describes the sample locations, direction and distance from the plant, which are control and which are indicator locations, and the types of samples collected at each location. Sample collection frequencies and required analyses for each sample type are given in Table II.
The collections and analyses that comprise the program are described in the following pages.
Identification of sample type codes used in Table I are as follows:
CgsLe Samnie Collected AIO Air Iodine APT Air Particulate AQF Fish AQS Sediment FPL Leafy Green Vegetables IDM TLD MLK Milk SOL Soil SWA Surface Water WWA Ground Water 2.2.1 Waterbome Pathway Sirface Water Monthly composite samples of surface water from the Missouri River are collected from one indicator location (SO2) and from one control location (sol). The samples are analyzed for tritium and by gamma spectrometry.
Ground Water Ground water samples are collected quarterly from two on-site wells (F05 and F15) and one off-site well used for drinking water (D01). The on-site ground water samples are collected using a manual grab sampler which is lowered into the well. The off-site ground water sample is collected from a faucet after allowing the line to flush for two minutes. Ground water samples are analyzed for Tritium and gamma emitting nuclides.
s 3
5$
8 h
y u
J g
d' E
8 C 3
e a!
5 s
3 e
s e m1 h
gl z
8 I
l2 y
'l I
~2-I:
1 s
l N
8
\\
l
, \\5
/
- /
~'(
3_,(
i "a
4 gi s
i k p h-l
/
i 1
I 1
a y
M
~
7
\\-
e
-3,
{
l
\\
V k I
\\\\.
!l, J
II.
x I
y a
/
~
@7 s 4_
I FN1'k J)
I, g
r i
E E
e 8$
h 3
W5 8
m$ U 5
Ai 5s ta 8 P
oa
- 5 Eg z C$
w hU d
8
(
L ' !a m(
3 IJ1 I
\\
/
e,h
{
as i
e s i
=
I
'lh__
4
[
.l..
49 l
u l
j N-
\\ d ps m
.\\
=
[
[ g d,' 1 I
{
I 5
t
' g; I
i, s
/
_\\
g'
~
~~
~
l
\\
v l.
1 E
['
JJ h5 S
$$g!
I 3I
=
w *<s m
6 6
d I b
~
w s a e
8 I
a
,5 Sm
$5 UU 8
M4 g
~
s
_/
i g
s a
g g
lEl,~
,e r
~)
i I
{l ll
,~m
=
- \\
4 g
- j" g
x
/
5 I
g 5
i a
l
=
/
E
_g_ q g,
4 TAHlEI S AM PI,ING I,0 CATIONS Location Sample Code Description Types la 10.8 mi NW; City of Fulton on Hwy Z,0.65 mi East of IDM Business 54, West of Campus Apartments 2
6.6 mi NW; County Road 111,0.6 mi South of Hwy UU, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.17571.
3 1.3 mi NW; 0.1 mi West of' Hwy CC on Gravel Road,0.8 mi IDM f
South IIwy 0, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.
18559.
f 4,B3 1.9 mi N; 0.3 mi East of the O and CC Junction, Callaway IDM, APT, AIO Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.18892.
5, Al 1.3 mi ENE; Primary Meteorological Tower.
IDM, APT, AIO i
j 6
2.0 mi W; County Road 428,1.2 mi West of Hwy CC, IDM l
Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.18609.
7 1.3 mi S; County Road 459,2.6 mi North of Hwy 94, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No 35097 8
2.9 mi S; County Road 459,1.4 mi North ofHwy 94, IDM Callaway Electrical Cooperative Utility Pole No 06823.
9 3.7 mi S; NW Side of the County Road 459 and 94 Junction, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 06754.
10 4.0 mi SSE; Hwy 94,1.8 mi East of County Road 459, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.12182, Ila 4.9 mi SE; City of Portland, Callaway Electric Cooperative IDM Utility Pole No.12110.. _ - _ _ - _ _
l TAHLE I (Cont'd.)
SA MPl.ING I,0 CATIONS l
Location Sample Code Description Types Il 12a 5.2 mi SE; East Side of Hwy 94,0.6 mi South of Hwy D, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 27536.
gl ul 13 5.6 mi ESE; Hwy 94,0.75 mi East of Hwy D, Kingdom IDM Telephone Pole No. 2XI.
14 5.0 mi ESE; SE Side ofIntersection D and 94, Ce" sway IDM Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. I1940.
15a 4.6 mi ESE; East Side of Hwy D,3.8 mi South of Hwy 0, IDM Kingdom Telephone Pole No. 2Yl. (Initiated 7/6/95) 16a 3.7 mi E; West Side of Hwy D,1.6 mi South of Hwy 0, IDM Kingdom Telephone Pole No. 3x9.
l 17 4.0 mi E; County Road 4053,0.3 mi East of Hwy 94, IDM Kingdom Telephone Company Pole No. 3X12.
18a 3.9 mi ENE; East side of Hwy D,0.5 mi South of O. Callaway IDM gl Wl Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 38579.
19 4.2 mi NE; Hwy D, 0.3 mi North of Hwy 0, Callaway Electric IDM Cooperative Utility Pole No.12918.
20 4.8 mi NE; City of Readsville, Callaway Electric Cooperative IDM Utility Pole No.12830.
l 21 4.0 mi NNE; County Road 155,1.9 mi North of Hwy 0, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.19100.
l 22a 2.0 mi NNE; North Side of Hwy 0,100 feet East of County IDM Road 150, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.
31094.
23 6.7 mi NNE; City of Yucatan, Callaway Electric Cooperative IDM Utility Pole No.12670 E
g
.s.
TABLE I (Cont'd.)
SAMPLING LOCATIONS Location Sample Code Description Types 24 7.0 mi NE; County Road 191,2.1 mi_ North of Hwy K, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.12498.
25 8.7 mi E; County Road 289,0.3 mi South of County Road IDM 287, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.11295.
26**-
12.1 mi E; Town of Americus, Callaway Electri Cooperative IDM Utility Pole No. Ii159.
27**
9.5 mi ESE; Town of BlufRon, Callaway Electric Cooperative IDM j.
Utility Pole No. I1496 28 3.3 mi SE; County Road 469,2.0 mi North of Hwy 94, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 06896.
29 2.7 mi SSW; County Road 448,1.2 mi North of County Road IDM f
459, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 06851.
30a 4.4 mi SSE; City of Steedman, N side of Belgian Dr.,150 feet IDM East of Hwy CC, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 06557.
31a 7.8 mi SW; City of Mokane, Junction Hwy C and County IDM Road 400,0.9 mi Nonh of Hwy 94, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole 32 5.4 mi WSW; Hwy VV,0.6 mi West of County Road 447, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 27031.
33 7.3 mi W; City of Hams Prairie, SE of Hwy C and AD IDM Junction.
34 9.7 mi WNW: NE Side of Hwy C and County Road 408 IDM Junction.
35 5.8 mi NNW; City of Toledo, Callaway Electric Cooperative IDM Utility Pole No.17684.
)
I
I;l TA BII I (Cont'd.)
SAMPLING LOCATIONS Location Sample Code Description Types 36 5.2 mi N; County Road 155,0.8 mi South of County Road IDM 132, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.19137.
37 0.7 mi SSW; County Road 459,0.9 mi South of Hwy CC, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 35077 j
38 4.8 mi NNW; County Road 133,1.5 mi South of Hwy UU, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 34708.
39 5.4 mi NW; County Road 112,0.7 mi East of County Road IDM 111, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.17516.
I 40 4.2 mi WNW; NE Side of County Road 112 and Hwy 0, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 06326.
I 41 4.8 mi W; Hwy AD,2.8 mi East of Hwy C, Callaway Electric IDM Cooperative Utility Pole No.18239.
42 4.4. mi SW; County Road 447,2.6 mi North of County Road IDM 463, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 06326.
43 0.5 mi SW; County Road 459,0.7 mi South of Hwy CC, IDN1 Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 35073.
44 1.7 mi WSW; Hwy CC,1.0 mi South of County Road 459, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.18769.
g 45 1.0 mi WNW; County Road 428,0.1 mi West of Hwy CC, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.18580.
46 1.5 mi NNW; NE Side of Hwy CC and County Road 466 IDM Intersection, Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No.
28242.
47 0.9 mi NNE; County Road 448,0.9 mi South of Hwy 0, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility pole No. 28151.
48 0.4 mi NE; County Road 448,1.5 mi South of Hwy 0, Plant IDM Security Sign Post.
I.
2 TABLE I (Cont'd.)
l SAMPLING LOCATIONS l
Location Sample 4
Code Description Types i
49 1.7 mi E; County Road 4G, Callaway Electric Cooperative IDM Utility pole No. 06959, Reform Wildlife Management Parking Area.
50 0.9 mi SSE; County Road 459,3.3 mi North of Hwy 94, IDM Callaway Electric Cooperative Utility Pole No. 35086.
Sla 0.3 mi SE; Owner Control Fence, SE of the Water Treatment IDM Plant.
l 52 0.4 mi ESE; Light Pole Near the East Plant Security Fence.
IDM A7 9.5 mi NW; C. Bartley Farm.
APT, AIO A8 0.9 mi NNE; County Road 448,0.9 miles South of Hwy O.
APT, AIO A9 1.7 mi NNW; Community of Reform.
APT, AIO D01 5.1 mi SE; Holzhouser Grocery Story /ravern (Portland, MO).
WWA F05 1.0 mi SSE; Onsite Groundwater Monitoring Well.
WWA F15 0.5 mi NE; Onsite Groundwater Monitoring Well.
WWA M5 3.1 mi NW; Schneider Farm (Goats' milk).
MLK M6 2.7 mi NW; Pierce Farm (Cows' milk).
MLK M7'*
14.8 mi SW; Kissock Farm (Cows' milk)
MLK V3 "
15.0 mi SW; Beaz'ey Farm.
FPL, SOL V9 2.0 mi WNW; Meehan Farm.
FPL A**
4.9 mi SSE; 0.6 River Miles Upstream of Discharge North AQS, AQF Bank.
C 5.1 mi SE; 1.0 River Miles Downstream of Discharge North AQS, AQF Bank.
TAHLE I (Cont'd.)
SAMPLING LOCATIONS Location Sample Code Description Types S0l**
4.8 mi SE; 105 feet Upstream of Discharge North Bank.
SWA S02 5.2 mi SE; 1.1 River Miles Downstream of Discharge North SWA Bank.
F1 0.98 mi S; Callaway Plant Forest Ecology Plot Fl.
SOL F2 1.64 mi SW; Callaway Plant Forest Ecology Plot F2.
SOL F6 1.72 mi NE; Callaway Plant Forest Ecology Plot F6.
SOL F8 1.50 mi NE; Callaway Plant Forest Ecology Plot F8.
SOL F9 1.45 mi NNW; Callaway Plant Forest Ecology Plot F9.
SOL E
PR3 1.02 mi ESE; Callaway Plant Prairie Ecology Plot PR3.
SOL PR4 1.34 mi ESE; Callaway Plant Prairie Ecology Plot PR4.
SOL PR5 1.89 mi NE; Callaway Plant Prairie Ecology Plot PR5.
SOL PR7 0.45 mi NNW; Callaway Plant Prairie Ecology Plot PR7.
SOL PRIO 1.55 mi NNW; Callaway Plant Prairie Ecology Plot PRIO.
SOL WI**
0.61 mi SE; Callaway Plant Wetlands, High Ground SOL W2 0.60 mi SE; Callaway Plant Wetlands, Inlet Area SOL I
W3 0.72 mi SSE; Callaway Plant Wetlands, Discharge Area SOL W4 0.68 mi SSE; Callaway Plant Wetlands, SW Bank SOL
- All distances are measured from the center line of the reactor Control locations I
I 5
TABLEII i
REMP SAMPI,E COLLECTION FREOUENCIES AND REOUIRED ANALYSES i
Sample Sample Type Code Collection Frequency Required Analysis i
l Airborne Iodine AIO Weekly I-131 weekly Air Particulate APT Weekly Gross Beta weekly' Sr-89/90 and Gamma Isotopic of quarterly filter composite Fish AQF Semiannually SR-89/90 and Gammt Isotopic Sediment AQS Semiannually Gamma iso +opic Leafy Green FPL Monthly during the growing season Gross A:pha, Gross Beta, Vegetables I-131, and Gamma Isotopic TLD IDM Quarterly and yearly Gamma Dose Milk MLK Semimonthly when animals are on I-131, Sr-89/90, Ca, and Pasture; monthly otherwise Gamma Isotopic Soil SOL Annually Gross Alpha, Gross Beta and Gamma Isotopic Surface Water SWA Monthly composite H-3 and Gamma Isotopic Ground Water WWA Quarterly Grab H-3 and Gamma Isotopic Note: 1) If gross beta activity is greater than the established baseline activity level gamma isotopic analysis is performed on the individual sample.
I f
Bottom Sediment Bottom sediment samples are collected semi-annually from one indicator location (C) and one controllocation (A). The samples are taken from water at least 2 meters deep to prevent influence of bank erosion. A Ponar dredge is used to obtain the samples, consisting of the uppermost layer of sediment. Each sample is placed, without preservative, in a plastic bag and sealed. Bottom sediment samples are analyzed for gamma emitting isotopes.
I Shoreline Sediment Shoreline sediment samples are collected semi-annually in the same area as bottom.
l sediment. The samples are collected within two feet of the waters edge and consist of 2 six inch diameter by two inch deep sediment plugs. Each sample is placed in a plastic g
bag and sealed. Shoreline sediment samples are analyzed for gamma emitting isotopes.
g Wetlands Soil Wetlands Soil Samples are collected annually from 3 indicator locations (W2, W3, and W4) and one control location (Wl). Two 6 inch square soil plugs consisting of the uppermost two-inch layer of soil are taken at each location. The samples are placed in plastic bags and sealed. Wetlands soil samples are analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, and gamma emitting isotopes.
2.2.2 Airborne Pathway I
Airborne Particulates Airborne particulate samples are collected on a 47mm diameter glass fiber filter type A/E (99 percent removal efficiency at 1 micron particulate) at a volumetric rate of one and one-half cubic feet per minute at five locations. The particulate filters are collected g
weekly and shipped to TIML for analyses. The filters are analyzed for gross beta 5
activity approximately five days after collection to allow for decay of naturally-occurring short-lived radionuclides. Quarterly composites of filters by location are gamma-scanned and analyzed for Strontium-89 and Strontium-90. All five sample locations are considered indicator locations (Al, A7, A8, A9, and B3). One of the indicators (A9) is located at the community with the highest D/Q.
Airborne Iodine i
Each airborne particulate air sampler is equipped with a charcoal cartridge in-line after the particulate filter holder. The charcoal cartridge at each location is collected at the same time as the particulate filter and analyzed for Iodine-131 within eight days after collection.
I 2.2.3 Ingestion Pathway Milk Two gallon milk samples are collected semi-monthly during the pasture season (April through September) and monthly during the winter from one goat and one cow milk location near the Plant (M5 and M6) and one cow milk location away from the Plant (M7). Milk samples are shipped in ice to be received by TIML within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> of collection. Analyses for lodine-131, elemental calcium, Strontium-89, Strontium-90, and gamma emitting nuclides are performed on all milk samples.
Fish The five most abundant recreational or commercial fish species are collected s'emi-annually from one indicator location (C) and one control location (A). Fish samples are filleted and are analyzed for Strontium-89, Strontium-90 and gamma emitting isotopes.
Vegetation Monthly, during the growing season, green leafy vegetation is collected from two indicator locations (V6 and V9) and from one contro! location (V3). Vegetation samples consist of mustard greens, turnip greens, cabbage, lettuce, and spinach. The vegetation samples are analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, Iodine-131, and by gamn a spectrometry.
Soil Once a year soil samples are collected from ten indicator locations (F1, F2, PR3, PR4, PR5, F6, PR7, F8, F9, and PRIO) and one control location (V3). To ensure only the most recent deposition is sampled, the uppermost two-inch layer of soil is taken at each location. Samples consist of 2 six inch square soil plugs. The litter at the surface and the root mat is considered part of the sample. The samples are placed in plastic bags and sealed. Each soil sample is analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta, and gamma emitting isotopes.
2.2.4 Direct Radiation Thermoluminescent Dosimetrv Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD) is employed to determine direct radiation levels in and around the Callaway site. Panasonic model UD-814 TLDs sealed in plastic bags are placed in polypropylene mesh cylindrical holders at fifty-two locations and exchanged quarterly and annually. Fifty of the fifty-two locations are indicators (2 through 33 and 35 through 52) and two locations are controls (1, la and 34).,
E 2.3 Program Execution The program was executed as described in the preceding section with the following exceptions; 4
Surface Water 1.
The downstream composite sampler was out of service from 01/01/96 to 01/10/96 to replace a failed sample pump.
2.
During the period of 01/27/96 to 02/10/96 the downstream composite sampler was inoperable due to a frozen sample line.
3.
The upstream compositor sampler was out of service from 01/27/96 to 03/08/96 g
for replacement of a broken sample line and sample pump..
W 4.
From 03/19/96 to 03/28/96 the downstream composite sampler was taken out of g
service for replacement of a pump hose and implementation of sampler W
modifications to improve availability.
5.
Due to a break in the sample line, the downstream composite sampler was inoperable from 05/14/96 to 05/24/96.
I 6.
The downstream composite sampler was removed from service on 05/29/96 through 06/06/96 due to Missouri River conditions.
I 7.
The downstream sampler was taken out of service from 11/15/96 to 11/19l96 due to a plugged sample line.
8.
During the period of 12/26/96 to 12/29/96 the downstream composite sampler was inoperable due to frozen sample line.
9.
The upstream sampler was taken out of service from 12/06/96 to 12/20/96 so j
that the intake punm bay receiving the sampler discharge could be dewatered for gl routine maintenance.
j While the composite samplers were inoperable, daily grab samples were taken and composited monthly, except as noted below:
il I:
I 10.
Location SO2 daily grab samples were not collected from 01/08/96 to 01/10/96 due to unsafe ice conditions on the river bank at the sample location..
I 1.
Daily grab samples were not collected at location sol on 02/01/96 through 02/08/96 due to unsafe weather conditions.
Airborne 1.
The air particulate and airborne iodine sample results from location A8 for the collection periods ending 08/15/96 and 09/26/96 were questionable because of sampler power loss during the entire sampling period.
Milk 1.
Milk samples were unavailable from location M5 during the months ofJanuary, February, March, October, November and December. Goats were not producing milk during these months.
2.
Milk samples were unavailable from location M7 for the months of September, October, November and December. Cows were either not producing milk or were nursing calves during these months.
Vegetation 1.
Green leafy vegetation was unavailable from location V3 during the month of May due to lack of plant growth.
2.
There were no green leafy vegetation samples collected from location V3 for the months of August, September, October, and November due to weather related
).
lack of plant growth or loss.
3.
No green leafy vegetation was available from location V9 during the month of September due to dry weather conditions. t
I Direct Radiation 1.
There was no direct radiation data from location 49 for the first quarter because g
of TLD station vandalism.
W 2.
There was no direct radiation data from location 28 for the second quarter because ofTLD station vandalism.
3.
Annual TLD's from locations 24 and 28 were missing from the TLD holder l
during the second quarter TLD changcout. New annual TLDs were installed at these locations.
I 4.
The annual direct radiation data from location 15 is questionable due to the pressence of visible moisture in all TLD elements used for dose determination.
2.4 Analytical Procedures Analytical procedures and counting methods employed by the contractor laboratory follow those recommended by the U.S. Public Health Service publication, Radioassay Procedures for Environmental Samples. January 1967; and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Health and Safety Laboratory, HASL Procedures Manual, (HASL-300),
1972.
Ii A synopsis of the routinely used analytical procedures for sample analyses is presented below.
I 2.4.1 Airborne 2.4.1.1 Gross Deta The glass fiber filter type A/E (99 percent removal efliciency at I micron particulate), is g
placed into a stainless steel planchet and counted for gross beta radioactivity using a g
proportional counter.
I I
.5 I
I 2.4.1.2 Gamma Snectrometrv Filters are composited according to location and counted using a germanium detector coupled to a computer based, multi-channel analyzer. The resulting spectrum is analyzed by computer and specitic nuclides, if present, identified and quantified.
2.4.1.3 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 The composited filters, with stable strontium and barium carriers added, are leached in nitric acid to bring deposits into solution. After filtration, filtrate is reduced in volume by evaporation. The residue is purified by adding iron and rare earth carriers and precipitating them as hydroxides. After a second strontium nitrate precipitation from nitric acid, the nitrates are dissolved in acid again with yttrium carrier and stored for ingrowth. The yttrium is precipitated as hydroxide and separated from strontium with the strontium being in the supernate. Each fraction is precipitated separately as an oxalate (yttrium) and carbonate (strontium) and collected on a No. 42 (2.4 cm)
Whatman filter. The filters are counted using a low background proportional counter and the Strontium-90 activity is calculated from the oxalate data. The Strontium-89 activity is determined by subtracting the calculated Strontium-90 activity from the measured gross strontium activity calculated from the carbonate.
2.4.1.4 Iodine-131 Each Charcoal cartridge is placed on the germanium detector and counted. A peak of 0.36 MeV is used to calculate the concentration at counting time. The equilibrium concentration at the end of collection is then calculated. Decay correction for the time interval between sample collection and counting is then made.
2.4.2 Direct Radiation Direct radiation measurements are taken by UEC using Thermoluminescent Dosimet m.
-J I
+
l i
i 1
e APPENDIX B EPA CROSS-CHECK RESULTS i
1996
}
4 TABLE B1 4
EPA INTERCONPARISON STUDY RESULTS 1996 j
SANPLE STUDY TINL RESULTS EPA RESULTS" i
TYPE DATE ANALYSIS t 2oi Is. N=1 CONTROL LINITS UNITS l
WATER JAN 1996 GR. ALPHA 19.5 i 1.5 12.1 i 5.0 3.4 - 20.8 pC1/1 GR. BETA 7.9 1 0.7 7.0 t 5.0 0.0 - 15.7 pC1/1 l
j WATER FEB 1996 I-131 70.7 i 1.5 67.0 i 7.0 54.9 - 79.1 pC1/1 WATER MAR 1996 H-3 22777 i 185.0 22002 i 2200 18185 - 25819 pC1/1 I
WATER
'APR 1996 GR. ALPHA 63.8 i 2.4 74.8 i 18.7 42.4 - 107.2 pc /1 l
RA-226 2.9 i 0.1 3.0 t 0.5 2.1 - 3.9 pc /1 RA-228 4.6 i 0.2 5.0 1 1.3 2.7 - 7.3 pc /1 URANION 57.9 i 0.5 58.4 i 5.8 48.3 - 68.5 pc /1 j
WATER APR 1996 CO-60 32.7 1 0.6 31.0 1 5.0 22.3 - 39.7 pC /1 CS-134 43.0 i 1.0 46.0 i 5.0 37.3 - 54.7 pc /1 CS-137 52.3 2.1 50.0 i 5.0 41.3 - 58.7 pc /1 i
GR. BETA 154.9 i 6.8 166.9 2 25.0 123.5 - 210.3 pc /1 SR-89 42.0 i 3.6 43.0 t 5.0 34.3 - 51.7 pC /1 SR-90 15.3 1 2.9 16.0 1 5.0 7.3 - 24.7 pCi/1 l
WATER JUN 1996 BA-133 745.0 i 19.5 745.0 i 75.0 614.9 - 875.1 pCi/1 C0-60 97.0 t 3.6 99.0 t 5.0 90.3 - 107.7 pC 1
{
CS-134 72.3 i 1.2 79.0 t 5.0 70.3 - 87.7 pC 1 CS-137 201.3 i 2.3 197.0 i 10.0 179.7 - 214.3 pC 1 l
ZN-65 298.0 1 6.2 300.0 1 30.0 248.0 - 352.0 pC 1 i
WATER JUN 1996 RA-226 4.8 i 0.1 4.9 i 0.7 3.7 - 6.1 pC /1 i
RA-228 8.7 1 0.5 9.0 1 2.3 5.0 - 13.0 pC /1 l
URANION 20.4 i 0.8 20.2 i 3.0 15.0 - 25.4 pc /1 i'
WATER JUL 1996 SR-89 24.0 1 2.0 25.0 2 5.0 16.3 - 33.7 pCi/1 i
SR-90 11.3 i 1.2 12.0 t 5.0 3.3 - 20.7 pCi/1 WATER JUL 1996 GR. ALPHA 20.1 1 2.0 24.4 1 6.1 13.8 - 35.0 pCi/1 GR. BETA 40.4 i 3.2 44.8 i 5.0 36.1 - 53.5 pCi/1 WATER SEP 1996 RA-226 13.6 i 0.4 14.0 t 2.1 10.4 - 17.6 pC1/1 i
RA-228 5.4 1 0.4 4.7 i 1.2 2.6 - 6.8 pCi/1 URANIUN 10.0 1 0.2 10.1 t 3.0 4.9 - 15.3 pCi/1 B-1 4
I TABLE B1 (Cont.)
EPA INTERCOMPARISON STUDY RESULTS 1996 SAMPLE STUDY TIML RESULTS EPA RESULTS" TYPE DATE ANALYSIS i 2oa 1s. N=1 CONTROL l.IMITS UNITS WATER OCT 1996 I-131 26.7
- 2.3 27.0 2 6.0 16.6 - 37.4 pCi/1 WATER OCT 1996 GR. ALPHA 10.2 1 2.1 10.3
- 5.0 1.6 - 19.0 pC1/1 GR. BETA 32.0
- 1.6 34.6
- 5.0 25.9 - 43.3 pC1/1 a Unless otherwise indicated, the TIML results are given as the mean i 2 standard deviations for three determinations.
b EPA results are presented as the known value and expected laboratory precision (1s, 1 determination) and control limits as defined by EPA.
c See Addendum to appendix B for explanation of the reason why the sample results were outside the control limits specified by EPA.
I 4
I I
I I
I B-2
i APPENDIX C ISOTOPIC DETECTION LIMITS AND ACTIVITY DETERMINATIONS
j isotopic Detection Limits and Activity Determination Making a reasonable estimate of the limits of detection for a counting procedure or a radiochemical method is usually complicated by the presence of significant background.
It must be considered that the background is not a fixed value but a series of replicates normally distributed. The desired net activity is thus the difTerence between the gross sample activity and background activity distributions.
The interpretation of this difference becomes a problem if the two distributions intersect as indicated in the diagram.
BACKGROUND GROSS
_y.
,ge,
.. gg-If a sufEcient number of replicate analyses are run, it is to be expected that results would fall in a normal Gaussian distribution. In routine analysis such replication is not carried out. Standard statistics allow an estimate of the probability of any particular deviation from the mean value. It is common practice to report the mean
- one or two standard deviations as the final result.
Analytical detection limits are governed by a number of factors including:
1.
Sample Size 2.
Counting Efficiency The fundamental quality in the measurement of a radioactive substance is the number of disintegrations per unit time. As with most physical measurements in analytical chemistry, it is seldbm possible to make an absolute measurement of the disintegrations rate, but rather,it is necessary to compare the sample with one or more standards. The standards determine the counter efUciency which may then be used to convert sample counts per minute (cpm) to disintegrations per minute (dpm)
C-1
E' 3.
Background Copnt Rate a
Any counter will show a certain counting rate without a sample in position. This background counting rate comes from several sourws: 1) natural environmental radiation from the surroundings,2) cosmic radiation, and 3) the natural radioactivity in the counter material itself. The background counting rate will depend on the amount of these types of radiation and sensitivity of the counter to radiation.
4.
Background and Sample Count Time l
The amount of time devoted to counting background depends on the level of the activity a
being measured. In general, with low level samples, this time should be about equal to E
that devoted to counting a sample.
5.
Time Interval Between Samole Collection and Counting Decay measurements are useful in identifying certain short-lived isotopes. Tlus disintegration constant is one of the basic characteristics of a specific radionuclide and is readily determined, if the half-life is sufficiently short.
I 6.
Chemical Recovery of the Analytical Procedure Most radiochemical analyses are carried out in such a way that losses occur during the separations. These losses occur due to a large number of contaminants that may be preser.t and interfere during chemical separations. Thus it is necessary to include a technique for estimating these losses in the development of the analytical procedure.
The foi!owing method was used to determine lower limit of detection (LLD) as per NRC g
Regulatory Guide 4.1, Rev.1, " Program for Monitoring Radioactivity in the Environs of Nuclear 3
Power Plants", and the NRC Branch Technical Position, November 1979, "An acceptable radiological Environmental Monitoring Program" The LLD is defined, for purposes of this g
guide, as the smallest concentration of radioactivity material in a sample that will yield a net count E
(above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability with cnly 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.
For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):
I' 4.66*s6 LLD = E
- V
- 2.22
- Y
- exp(-Mt)
I I
I' C.2
Where:
" A priorilower limit of detection as defmed above (pCi per unit mass or LLD
=
volume).
sb Standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a
=
blank sample as appropriate (counts per minute).
Counting efliciency (counts per disintegration).
E
=
V Sample size (units of mass or volume).
=
Number of disintegrations per minute per picoeurie.
2.22
=
Y Fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable).
=
A, Radioactive decay constant for the particular radioisotope.
=
Elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection At
=
period) and time of counting.
The value of sb used in the calculation of the LLD for a particular measurement system is based on the actual observed variance of the background count rate, or, the counting rate of the blank sample, (as appropriate), rather than an unverified theoretically predicated variance.
In calculating the LLD for a radionuclide determined by gamma-ray spectrometry, the background includes the typical contributions of other nuclides normally present in the samples.-
Sincie Measurements Each single measurement is reported as follows:
x s
' where:
x = Va! : of the measurement; s = 2a counting uncertainty (corresponding to the 95% confidence level).
In cases where the activity is found to be below the lower limit of detection L it is reported as
<L where L = the lower limit of detection based on 4.66c uncertainty for a background sample.
C-3
I Dunlicate Analysis 1.
Individual results:
xi isi x2 i s2 Reported result:
x s
where X = (V2 )(X + X 2) s = (% h(si + s!)
2.
Individual results:
<L i
<L2 Reported results:
<L I
where L = lower of L and L:
i 3.
Individual results:
x s
<L Benorted results x i s if x 21;
< L othenvise I
Comnutation of Averace and Standard Deviations Average and standard deviations listed in the tables are computed from all individual measurements over the period averuged; for example, an annual standard deviation would not be the average of quarterly standard deviations. The average x and standard deviation (s) of a set of E
n numbers xi, x2...x are defined as follows:
3 n
x=1Ix l,
n x( x-x, )*
n1 If all values in the averaging gruup are less than the lower limit of detection, the highest LLD is reported.
If all but one of the values are less than the lower limit of detection, the single value x and j
associated two sigma error is reported.
I l
C-4
In rounding off, the following rules are followed:
1.
If the figure following those to be retained is less than 5, the figure is dropped, and the retained figures are unchanged. As an example,11.443 is rounded off to 11.44.
2.
If the figure following those to be retained is greater than 5, the figure is dropped and the last retained figure is raised by 1. As an example,11.446 is rounded off to 11.45.
3.
If the figure following those to be retained is 5, and if there are not figures other than zeros beyond the five, the figure 5 is dropped, and the last-place figure retained is increased by one ifit is an odd number or unchanged if an even number.
As an example,11.435 is rounded off to 11.44, while 11.425 is rounded off to 11.42.
C-5
1 i
k i
4 3
4 i
i i
i i
i i
i i
4 i
1 l
i APPENDIX D i
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM I
ANNUAL
SUMMARY
1996
+
I d
I 1
l l
APPENDIX D RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Callaway Plant Docket No.: 50-483 Location of Facility: Callaway Ceinty Misseinri Reporting Period: 1996 (commty, state)
TYPE AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROlJTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION 8 MEAN (f)*
NAME MEAN (f)*
MEAN (f)*
REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE DISTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION A. Waterborne Pat *iway Surface Water 11-3 (24) 146 198 G/12) 5.2 mi. SE; 1.1 mi 198 G/12)
- (0/12) 0 (pCi/1)
(165 - 227) downstream (165 - 227) ofdischarge Gamma (24)
- (0/24)
NA NA
- (0/12) 0 l
Ground Water 11-3 (12) 149
- (0/8)
NA NA
- (0/4) 0 (pci/1)
Gamma (13)
- (0/8)
NA NA
- (0/4) 0 llottom Sediment Gamma (4)
- (0/8)
NA NA
- (0/4) 0 (pCi/kg)
=.
APPENDII D (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Callaway Plant Docket No.: 50-133 Location of Facility: Callaway County Missouri Reporting Period: 1996 (county, state)
TYPE AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITil HIGilEST CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATilWAY TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTIOPP MEAN (f)*
NAME MEAN (f)*
MEAN (f)*
REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE DISTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION A. Waterhorne Pathway (Cont.)
9 Shoreline Sediment Gamma (4)
(pCi/kg)
Cs-137 15
- (0/2) 4.9 mi SSE; 92 (1/2) 92 (1/2) 0 0.6 mi upstream ofdischarge Wetlands Gross Alpha (4) 11435 (3/3) 0.72 mi SSE; I3710 (1/1) 9280 (1/1) 0 (pCi/kg)
(9661 - 13710)
Wetlands discharge area Gmss Beta (4) 18744 (3/3) 0.60 mi SE; 21476 (1/l) 17498 (1/l) 0 (16615 -21476)
- Wetlands, inlet area Gamma (4)
K-40 12347 (3/3) 0.60 mi SE; 16590 (1/I) 14555 (1/1) 0
-(9606 - 16530)
Wetlands.
inlet area m
W W
W W
W W
W W
W W
W W
W W
W W
m
APPENDIX D (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Callaway Plant Docket No.: 50-483 Location of Facility: _C_aBaway County. Missouri Reporting Period: 1996 (county, state)
TYPE AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION' MEAN (f)$
NAME MEAN (f)*
MEAN (f)$
REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE DISTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION A. Waterhorne Pathway (Cont.)
9 Wetlands (Cont.)
Cs-137 18 209 (1/3) 0.60 mi SE; 209 (1/1) 63 (1/l) 0 (pCi/kg)
(100 -292)
- Wetlands, inlet area B. Airborne Pathwmy Airbome Particulate Gross Beta (260) 0.024 (260/260) 1.3 mi ENE 0.026 (52/52)
NA 0
(pCi/m')
(0.009 - 0.060) Callaway Primar)(0.014 - 0.060)
Meteorological Tower Gamma (20)
Be-7 0.100 (20/20) 1.3 mi ENE 0.128 (4/4)
NA 0
(0.067 - 0.200) Callaway Primar)(0.081 - 0.200)
Meteorological Tower
APPENDIX D (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Callaway Plant Docket No.: 50-483 Location of Facility: Callaway County. Missouri Reporting Period: 1996 (county, state)
TYPE AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITilllIGilEST CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION' MEAN (f)2 NAME MEAN (f)2 MEAN (f)2 REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE
'bTSTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION B. Airborne Pathway (Cont.)
Airbome Particulate (Cont.)
Sr-89 (20) 0.0003
- (0/16)
NA NA
- (0/4) 0 (pCi/m')
Sr-90 (20) 0.0001
- (0/16)
NA NA
- (0/4) 0 Ai: borne lodine 1-131 (260) 0.070
- (0/208)
NA NA
- (0/52) 0 (pCi/m')
C. Ingestion Pathway Milk I-131 (43) 0.1
- (0/33)
NA NA
- (0/15) 0 (pCi/l)
I Gamma (43)
K-40 1484 (30/30) 3.1 mi NW 1889 (12/12) 1332 (13/13) 0 (1050 - 2050)
Goats milk (1670 -2050)
(1210 - 1450)
Schneiders farm l
l Sr-89 (43) 0.6
- (0/33)
NA NA
- (0/15)
O E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E W
W W
W W
APPENDIX D (Cont.).
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Callaway Plant Docket No.: 50-483 Location of Facility: Callaway County, Missouri Reporting Period: 1996 (county, state)
TYPE AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION' M EAN (f)*
NAME MEAN (f)*
MEAN (f)*
REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
~ RANGE DISTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION C. Ingestion Pathway (Cont.)
Milk (Cont.)
(pCi/l)
Sr-90 (43) 4.0 (30/30) 3.1 mi NW 5.2 (12/12) 1.6 (13/13) 0 (1.7 - 7.7)
Goats milk (2.5 - 7.0)
(0.6 - 2.6)
Schneiders farm (grams / liter)
Ca (43) 0.92 (30/30) 14.8 mi SW; 0.% (13/13) 0.% (13/13) 0 (0.81 - 1.10)
Cows milk (0.82 - 1.10)
(0.82 - 1.10)
Kissock farm Fish Gamma (20)
(pCi/kg - wet)
K-40 2863 (10/10) 5.1 mi. SE; 1.0 mi2863 (10/10) 2767 (10/10) 0 (2537 -3242) downstream (2537 -3242)
(2093 -3377) ofdischarge Co-58 6.3 361 (1/l) 5.1 mi. SE; 1.0 mi 361 (1/l) 0 downstream ofdischarge
APFENDIX D (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONIIORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Callaway Plant Docket No.: 50483 Location of Facility: Callaway County Missouri Reporting Period: 1996 (county, state)
TYPE AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITil filGilEST CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATilWAY TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION' MEAN (f)*
NAME MEAN (f)*
MEAN (f)"
REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE DISTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION C. Ingestion Pathway (Cont.)
O Fish (Cont.)
Sr-89 (20) 5.8
- (0/10)
NA NA
- (0!10) 0 (pCi/kg -wet)
Sr-90 (20) 1.4
- (0/10) 4.9 mi SSE; 4 (1/1) 4 (1/l) 0 0.6 mi upstream ofdischarge Vegetation Gross Alpha (18) 27 199 (10/15) 2.0 mi WNW; 199 (10/15) 135 (3/3) 0 (pCi/kg - u et)
(89 -441)
Meehans farm (89 -44l)
(59 - I83)
Gmss Beta (20) 4690 (15/15) 2.0 mi WNW; 4690 (15/15) 3377 (3/3) 0 l
(2173 -7813)
Mechans farm (2173 - 7813)
(2001 -4265) 1-131 (20) 8.7
- (0/16)
NA NA
- (0/4)
O E
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
g g
g g
u
'n m
n x __
APPENDIX D (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Canaway Plant Docket No.: 50-483 Location of Facility: Callaway County. Missouri Reporting Period: 1996 (county, state)
TYPE AND LOWER ALLINDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER LlMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION' MEAN (f)*
NAME MEAN (f)"
MEAN (f)*
REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE DISTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION C. Ingestion Pathway (Cont.)
Vegetation (Cont.)
Gamma (20)
(pCi/kg - wet)
K-40 4840 (16/16) 2.0 mi WNW: 4840 (16/16) 4103 (3/3) 0 (2295 -8387)
Meehan farm (2295 - 8387)
(2327 - 5449)
Soil Gross Alpha (Il) 15582 (10/10) 1.50 mi NE; 26097 (1/l) 13119 (1/1) 0 (pCi/kg)
(10848 -26097)
Forest ecology plot F8 Gross Beta (11) 25111 (10/10) 15.0 mi SW 29800 (1/1) 29800 (1/1) 0 (21439 - 29440)
Beazley farm l
Gamma (11)
I K-40 11001 (10/10) 15.0 mi SW; 17097 (1/l) 17097 (1/l) 0 (4849 - 13232)
Beazley fram
APPENDIX D (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Callaway Plant Docket No.: 50-4R3 Location of Facility: Callaway County, Missouri Reporting Period: 1996 (county, state)
TYPE AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITil filGilEST CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATilWAY TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLFD OF ANALYSES DETECTION' MEAN (f)*
NAME M EAN (f)*
MEAN (f)2 REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE DISTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION C. Ingestion Pathway (Cont.)
9 Soil (Cont.)
Cs-137 832 (10/10) 0.98 mi S; 1351 (1/1) 268 (1/1) 0 (pCi/kg)
(410 - 1351)
Forest ecology plot F1 D. Direct Radiation Quarterly 11.Ds Gamma Dose (206) 10 17.5 (198/198) 2.9 mi S; 19.1 (4/4) 15.3 (8/8) 0 (mrem / Standard Quarter)
(12.9 -20.5)
County Rd. 459, (17.8 - 20.0)
(I l.8 - 19.2) 1.4 mi N ofIlWY 94 Annual TI.Ds Gamma Dose (52) 10 17.5 (50/50) 2.9 mi S; 19.6 (l/1) 15.9 (2/2) 0
(
(mrem / Standard Quarter)
(12.7 - 19.6)
County Rd. 459, (12.4 - 19.3) 1.4 mi N ofilWY 94 i
n ----
APPENDIX D (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility: Callaway Plant Docket No.: 50-483 Location of Facility: Callaway County, Missouri Reporting Period: 1996 (county, state)
TVPE AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH IIIGITEBT CONTROL NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION' MEAN (f)*
NAME MEAN (f)*
MEAN (f)*
REPORTED UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (LLD)
RANGE DISTANCE & RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DIRECTION Notes:
9 (1) ne LLDs quoted are the lowest actual LLD obtained in the various media during the reporting period. The required LLDs for radiological environmental sample e
analysis is found in Table 111. Where all nuclides were LLD for a specific media, no LLD was listed.
(2) Mean and range are based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements is indicated in parentheses.
~^
^
1 1
APPENDIX E INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE RESULTS DATA TABLES 1996
)
APPENDIX E LIST OF TABLES NO.
TITLE PAGE El
. Airborne Iodine-131 and Gross Beta in Air Particulate Filter E-2 E2 Airborne Particulate, Quarterly Composites E-4 E3 Milk E-6 E4 Vegetation E-15 E5 Soil E-19 E6 Wetlands Soil Samples E-21 E7 Surface Water E-22 E8 Ground Water E-28 E9 Bottom Sediment E-30 E10 Shoreline Sediment E-31 El1 Fish E-32 E12 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry E-34
_m.___.__
Defmition of terms used in the data tables are as follows:
Wet Weight A reporting unit used with organic tissue samples such as vegetation and animal samples in which the amount of sample is taken to be the weight as received from the field with no moisture removed.
Dry Weight A reporting unit used for soil and sediment in which the amount of sample is taken to be the weight of the sample after removal of moisture by drying in an oven.
pCi/m3 A reporting unit used with air particulate and radiciodine data
~
which refers to the radioactivity content expressed in picoeuries per cubic meter of air passed through the filter and/or the charcoal trap.
Note the volume is not corrected to standard conditions.
Gamma Emitters Samples were analyzed by high resolution (GeLi) gamma spectrometry. The resulting spectrum is analyzed by a computer or Gamma Isotopic program which scans from about 50 to 2000 kev and lists the energy peaks of any nuclides present in concentrations exceeding the sensitivity limits set for that particular sample.
Error Terms Figures following " " are error terms based on counting uncertainties at the 95 percent confidence level. Values preceded by the "<" symbol were below the stated concentration at the 99 percent confidence level.
Sensitivity In general, all analyses meet the sensitivity requirements of the program as given in Table III. For the few samples that do not (because ofinadequate sample quantities, analytical interference, etc.) the sensitivity actually obtained in the analysis is given.
4 E-1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
t 0 0 0 0 0 0 o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c c c c < c c c c c c c c < < < < < < < < < < < < <
3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
T 8
E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B
T 2 2 2 2 t t 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t 2
- 2 e 2 2 a 2 s t P
S A
S 6 8 0 7 5 0 3 5 1 8 4 0 0 6 8 8 5 1 6 4 7 3 3 9 9 6 5 O
2 2 3 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 A
R C
C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
)
{r 8 8 2 0 1 1 8 1 6 6 1 8 6 1 6 3 1 1 6 8 1 6 6 1 8 1 2 o
2 2 9 7 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 6 V
(
4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
)
3 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
m I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
/
i C
3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 p
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(
A T
E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S
T 8
P 2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t t 2 2 2 t 2 2 2 2 a 2 t t R
A M
1 9 1 7 6 7 5 6 4 9 6 8 0 5 0 2 6 1 6 5 7 5 5 2 4 0 4 E
T A
O 3 2 3 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
R L
C I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F
)
1 8 2 7 8 6 6 1 3 3 8 1 6 1 6 1 3 1 6 8 1 6 8 8 8 1 4
{r o
3 2 9 6 1 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 6 E
V
(
4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 TA L
U 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
3 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I
1 T
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R
AP 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R
A S
T I
A E
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
A B
E T
2 2 2 2 2 2 t 2 t t t 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 e t 2 P
S n6 A
S 0 1 6 6 7 1 5 1 3 0 5 0 1 5 1 6 7 1 9 7 0 8 7 6 7 3 0 O
3 3 2 2 2 4 1
3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 E
i9 L
9 A
R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
C B
A1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A
T T
E
)
6 3 9 2 1 1 6 3 8 8 8 1
3 1 8 1 1 1 6 1 1 6 6 1 6 3 2 B
{r o
2 3 8 7 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 6 V
(
4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 S
SO 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R
G 3
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0
d na 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 3
7 T
A E
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
B T
2 2
2 2 2 2 t 2 2 2 2 t 2 t t 2 2 2 t 2 2 t 2 e E
P S
A S
1 9 7 9 6 2 2 2 0 7 6 4 2 2 9 8 4 2 5 4 1 5 7 5 7 2 6 N
O 3 2 2 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 I
A R
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D
C C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
)
1 8 3 3 1 3 6 3 8 8 6 3 1 3 6 3 3 8 3 1 1 6 6 1 6 1 7 gr o
3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 6 E
N V
(
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 RO B
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R
I 3
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A
1 T
A E
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B
T 2
2 2 2 e 2 2 t t 2 2 2 2 e 2 t 2 2 2
2 1 P
S A
S 0 0 6 8 7 3 4 8 5 9 8 4 1 9 4 9 5 4 9 9 1 9 7 5 7 2 8 O
3 3 2 2 2 4 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2
1 1 1 2 2 2 A
R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
)
gr 8 3 9 0 1 3 6 1 8 8 8 1 3 1 8 8 1 1 6 1 8 8 6 8 8 1 4 o
2 3 8 7 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 6 V
(
4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 NO 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 M9 6
I 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 T E
/ / /////////////////////////
C T 4
1 9 5 1 8 5 2 9 7 4 1 8 4 1 8 5 2 9 6 3 0 6 3 0 7 3 :
E A 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 0 s L D
/ /// / / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / e L
1 1 1
1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 t O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C
N
TABLE El (Cont.)
3 AIRBORNE 10 DINE-131 and GROSS BETA in AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS.(pCi/m )
1996 CA-APT-A1 CA-APT-A7 CA-APT-A8 CA-APT-A9 CA-APT-83 COLLECTION Vog.
Vog.
Voj.
Voj.
Voj.
DATE (r)
GROSS BETA 1-131 (r) GROSS BETA l-131 (r)
GROSS sETA 1-131 (C) GROSS SETA l-131 (r) GROSS BETA l-131 07/11/96 487 0.020 2 0.002 <0.070 487 0.017 e 0.002 <0.070 489 0.020 2 0.002 <0.070 487 0.023 s 0.002 <0.070 487 0.022 2 0.002 <0.070 07/18/96 487 0.023 s 0.002 <0.070 487 0.021
- 0.002 <0.070 489 0.023 2 0.002 <0.070 487 0.019 2 0.002 <0.070 487 0.022 t 0.002 <0.070 07/25/96 426 0.015 2 0.002 (0.070 423 0.012 2 0.002 <0.070 426 0.014 2 0.002 <0.070 423 0.013
- 0.002 <0.070 423 0.014 2 0.002 <0.070 08/01/96 428 0.025 s 0.003 <0.070 428 0.023 0.002 <0.070 428 0.021 2 0.002 <0.070 428 0.021 2 0.002 <0.070 428 0.021 0.002 <0.070 08/08/96 428 0.026 2 0.003 <0.070 426 0.024 0.003 <0.070 428 0.026
- 0.003 <0.070 431 0.022 2 0.002 <0.070 431 0.024 2 0.003 <0.070 08/15/96 428 0.026 2 0.003 <0.070 428 0.025 t 0.003 <0.070 370 0.024 2 0.003 <0.070 428 0.028 0.003 <0.070 428 0.027 2 0.003 <0.070 08/22/96 428 0.028 s 0.003 <0.070 431 0.029 0.003 <0.070 423 0.031 s 0.003 <0.070 423 0.027 2 0.003 <0.070 426 0.029 0.003 <0.070 08/29/96 431 0.034 s 0.003 <0.070 431 0.032 s 0.003 <0.070 433 0.032 2 0.003 <0.070 451 0.031 2 0.003 <0.070 433 0.033 a 0.003 <0.070 6
09/05/96 431 0.060 2 0.004 <0.070 426 0.047 t 0.003 <0.070 428 0.053 2 0.003 <0.070 408 0.056 2 0.003 <0.070 426 0.053 2 0.003 <0.070 g
09/12/96 426 0.037 2 0.003 <0.070 428 0.030 2 0.003 <0.070 428 0.032 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.031 e 0.003 <0.070 428 0.030 2 0.003 <0.070 09/19/96 426 0.021 2 0.002 <0.070 426 0.019 2 0.002 <0.070 426 0.016 2 0.002 <0.070 426 0.015 s 0.002 <0.070 426 0.018 s 0.002 <0.070 09/26/96 428 0.030 t 0.003 <0.070 428 0.024 t 0.002 <0.070 245 0.025 0.004 <0.070 428 0.022 2 0.002 <0.070 428 0.029 2 0.003 <0.070 10/03/96 431 0.028 2 0.003 <0.070 428 0.025 2 0.003 <0.070 418 0.024 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.022 0.002 <0.070 431 0.027 0.003 <0.070 10/10/96 431 0.030 0.003 <0.070 431 0.022 2 0.002 <0.070 431 0.027 e 0.003 <0.070 428 0.023 2 0.002 <0.070 428 0.031 2 0.003 <0.070 10/17/ % 436 0.033 2 0.003 <0.070 436 0.028 2 0.003 <0.070 436 0.028 t 0.003 <0.070 438 0.027 2 0.003 <0.070 438 0.033 2 0.003 <0.070 i
10/24/96 418 0.027
- 0.003 <0.070 418 0.024 2 0.002 <0.070 418 0.024 2 0.002 <0.070 415 0.022 0.002 <0.070 415 0.029 2 0.033 <0.070 10/31/96 433 0.020 2 0.003 <0.070 433 0.021 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.016 t 0.003 <0.070 431 0.017 2 0.003 <0.070 433 0.018 t 0.003 <0.070 11/07/96 431 0.028 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.021 2 0.002 <0.070 433 0.021 2 0.002 <0.070 433 0.023 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.028 t 0.003 <0.070 11/14/% 301 0.023 2 0.003 <0.070 423 0.018 2 0.003 <0.070 423 0.014 2 0.002 <0.070 423 0.017 2 0.002 <0.070 423 0.018 2 0.003 <0.070 l
11/21/% 428 0.051 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.054 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.035 2 0.003 <0.070 433 0.050 2 0.003 <0.070 428 0.055 t 0.003 <0.070 11/29/ % 492 0.020 0.003 <0.070 484 0.021 0.003 <0.070 489 0.019 0.003 <0.070 487 0.021 a 0.003 <0.070 489 0.021 2 0.003 <0.070 12/04/% 306 0.027 2 0.004 <0.070 308 0.032 2 0.004 <0.070 308 0.028 2 0.004 <0.070 308 0.028 2 0.004 <0.070 306 0.031 t 0.004 <0.070 12/12/% 489 0.025 2 0.002 <0.070 489 0.024 a 0.002 <0.070 487 0.023 2 0.002 <0.070 489 0.025 2 0.003 <0.070 489 0.025 2 0.002 <0.070 12/19/% 428 0.031 2 0.003 <0.070 426 0.029 t 0.003 <0.070 426 0.030 2 0.003 <0.070 426 0.031 2 0.003 <0.070 428 0.028 t 0.003 <0.070 12/26/M 431 0.024 2 0.003 <0.070 433 0.021 t 0.003 <0.070 431 0.024 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.027 2 0.003 <0.070 431 0.026 e 0.003 <0.070 Notes:
i
TABLE E2 3
AIRBORNE PARTICULATE - QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m )
1996 I!
l JANUARY - MARCH 1996 CA-APT-Al CA-APT-A7 CA-APT-A8 CA-APT-A9 CA-APT-B3 g
Volume (Cubic Feet): 5995 5990 5995 6001 5994 Analysis Sr-89
<0.0003
<0.0004
<0.0004
<0.0007
<0.0003 Sr-90
<0.0001
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0003
<0.0001 I
Be-7 0.1100 2 0.0110 0.0910 t 0.01LO 0.1100
- 0.0110 0.1000 2 0.0070 0.0910 2 0.0090 g
Co-58
<0.0003
<0.0004
<0.0006
<0.0002
<0.0004 Co-60
<0.0007
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.0004
<0.0004 3
Zr-95
<0.0007
<0.0010
<0.0015
<0.0005
<0.0008 Cs-134
<0.0005
<0.0002
<0.0003
<0.0003
<0.0002 Cs-137
<0.0006
<0.0004'
<0.0007
<0.0004
<0.0003 Ba-La-140
<0.0009
<0.0011
<0.0007
<0.0006
<0.0006 Ce-144
<0.0024
<0.0032
<0.0029
<0.0010
<0.0017 I
I.
APRIL - JUNE 1996 CA-APT-Al CA-APT-A7 CA-APT-A8 CA-APT-A9 CA-APT-B3 Volume (Cubic Feet): 5929 5935 5934 5932 5931 Analysis l
Sr-89
<0.0007
<0.0007
<0.0007
<0.0009
<0.0005 Sr-90
<0.0003
<0.0003
<0.0003
<0.0004
<0.0003 W
Be-7 0.1200 s 0.0110 0.1000 t 0.0120 0.1000 2 0.0090 0.1000 2 0.0090 0.0870 2 0.0090 Co-58
<0.0003
<0.0005
<0.0004
<0.0003
<0.0001 Co-60
<0.0003
<0.0007
<0.0004
<0.0003
<0.0003 Zr-95
<0.0006
<0.0013
<0.0007
<0.0009
<0.0010 Cs-134
<0.0004
<0.0005
<0.0003
<0.0002
<0.0002 Cs-137
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.0004
<0.0004
<0.0004 Ba-La-140
<0.0010
<0.0003
<0.0009
<0.0007
<0.0006 l,
Ce-144
<0.0017
<0.0024
<0.0016
<0.0022
<0.0014 gl 8
Notes:
I E-4
m.
TABLE E2 (Cont.)
3 AIRBORNE PARTICULATE - QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m )
1996 JULY - SEPTEMBER 1996 CA-APT-Al CA-APT-A7 CA-APT-A8 CA-APT-A9 CA-APT-E3 Volume (Cubic Feet): 5685 5677 5431 5682 5682 Analysis Sr-89
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.0013
<0.0006
<0.0005 Sr-90
<0.0003
<0.0003
<0.0005
<0.0003
<0.0003 Be-7
'0.2000 s 0.0170 0.1000 2 0.0090 0.1100 s 0.0100 0.1000 s 0.0140 0.1100 s 0.0130 Co-58
<0.0011
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0006
<0.0005 Co-60
<0.0006
<0.0002
<0.0004
<0.0003
<0.0005 2r-95
<0.0028
<0.0015
<0.0005
<0.0013
<0.0011 Cs-134
<0.0010
<0.0005
<0.0003
<0.0004
<0.0006 Cs-137
<0.0005
<0.0004
<0.0002
<0.0008
<0.0003 Ba-La-140
<0.0009
<0.0016
<0.0007
<0.0010
<0.0016 Co-144
<0.0035
<0.0009
<0.0026
<0.0041
<0.0037 OCTOBER - DECEMBER 1996 CA-APT-Al CA-APT-A7 CA-APT-A8 CA-APT-A9 CA-APT-83 volune (Cubic Feet): 5445 5566 5570 9658 5565 Analysis Sr-89 so.0004
<0.0003
<0.0004
<0.0004
<0.0004
. 0.0003
<0.0003
<0.0003
<0.0004 Sr-90
<0.0004 Be-7 0.0810 2 0.0090 0.0670 2 0.0090 0.0770 2 0.0110 0.0730 2 0.0100 0.0720 2 0.0080
' 0.0006
<0.0004
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.0002 Co-58 Co-60
<0.0003
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0006
<0.0003 Zr-95
<0.0012
<0.0007
<0.0011
<0.0016
<0.0006 Cs-134
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.0005 Cs-137
<0.0003
<0.0004
<0.0005
<0.0007
<0.0003 Ba-La-140
<0.0006
<0.0006
<0.0005
<0.0005
<0.0005
'C3-144
<0.0016
<0.0030
<0.0034
<0.0022
<0.0022 Notss:
E-5
I TABLE E3 MILK (pCi/kg dry)
E d
1996 W
CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (01/09/96)
(01/09/96)
(01/09/96)
I-131 ND
<0.4
<0.3 Sr-89 ND
<0.8
<1.0 5
Sr-90 ND 4.0 1 0.6 2.610.6 5
K-40 ND 1390.0 1 160.0 1300.0 1 160.0
~
Zn-65 ND
<13.0
<13.9 Cs-134 ND
<6.2
<7.5 Cs-137 ND
<8.0
<7.6 Ba-La-140 ND
<2.5
<2.3 Ca (g/l)
ND 0.83 0.85 l
4
\\
g CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysi s (02/13/96)
(02/13/96)
(02/13/96) 1-131 ND
<0.3
<0.3 Sr-89 ND
<1.6
<1.3 Sr-90 ND 4.011.0 1.210.5 I'
K-40 ND 1300.0 1 150.0 1360.0 1 120.0 Zn-65 ND
<6.4
<6.9 Cs-134 ND
<6.4
<3.3 Cs-137 ND
<7.9
<3.9 El Ba-La-140 ND
<5.4
<1.3 g,
Ca (g/1)
ND 1.10 0.82 Notes:
E ND = No Data. See section 2.3 for explanation.
5 I
E-6
k i
TABLE E3 (Cont.)
MILK (pCi/kg dry) i 1996 CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (03/12/96)
(03/12/96)
(03/12/96) i I-131 ND
<0.4
<0.4 Sr-89 ND
<1.1
<0.9 i
ND 1.8 1 0.5 1.3 1 0.4 K~40 ND 1260.0 i 130.0 1450.0 i 160.0 Zn-65 ND
<20.3
<7.2 Cs-134 ND
<4.1
<6.3 Cs-137 ND
<6.5
<5.2 Ba-La-140 ND
<4.2
<2.4 Ca (g/1)
ND 0.93 0.86 CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (04/09/96)
(04/09/96)
(04/09/96)
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3 Sr-89
<1.2
<0.9
<0.9 Sr-90 7.7 i 0.9 3.7 i 0.6 1.3 1 0.4 K-40 1770.0 1 160.0 1250.0 1 120.0 1380.0 1 150.0 Zn-65
<11.0
<6.9-
<10.2 Cs-134
<3.5
<4.6
<8.3 Cs-137
<5.0
<3.9
<5.9 Ba-La-140
<2.0
<1.4
<1.9 Ca (g/1) 0.94 1.01 0.90 Notes:
ND = No Data. See section 2.3 for explanation.
E-7
I j
TABLE E3 (Cont.)
MILK (pCi/kg dry) 1996 CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (04/23/96)
(04/23/96)
(04/23/96) e 1-131
<0.2
<0.5
<0.4 Sr-89
<0.8
<0.8
<0.8 3
Sr-90 5.7 1 0.8 3.2 1 0.5 2.0 1 0.5 5
f K-40 1760.0 120.0 1130.0 1 100.0 1440.0 1 80.0 l
Zn-65
<8.0
<7.1
<5.9 Cs-134
<4.2
<3.9
<3.3 Cs-137
<4.2
<4.3
<3.6 Ba-La-140
<3.7
<3.3
<2.9 Ca (g/1) 0.81 0.93 1.03 t
I 1
g CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7
~i Analysis (05/13/96)
(05/14/96)
(05/14/96)
~
1-131
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4 Sr-89
<1.1
<l.1
<l.0 l
Sr-90 6.5 i 0.7 3.4 1 0.5 2.6 1 0.5 K-40 1860.0 190.0 1220.0 1 170.0 1340.0 1 120.0 Zn-65
<7.6
<8.5
<5.6 m
Cs-134
<7.1
<8.0
<4.0 Cs-137
<6.8
<8.5
<2.4 3
Ba-la-140
<2.8
<3.0
<2.3 3
Ca (g/1) 0.98 0.95 0.93 Notes:
I E-8
J i
TABLE E3 (Cont.)
MILK (pCi/kg dry) 4 1996 CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (05/28/96)
(05/28/96)
(05/28/96) i I-131
<0.5
<0.5
<0.3 f
l Sr-89
<1.0
<0.9
<0.9 Sr-90 5.1 1 0.7 6.0 1 0.7 1.2 1 0.4 K-40 1890.0 i 210.0 1300.0 1 120.0 1370.0 i 140.0 Zn-65
<9.4
<4.3
<11.3 4
Cs-134
<7.6
<4.4
<7.2 Cs-137
<8.5
<5.8
<3.8 Ba-La-140
<5.3
<3.3
<2.7 P
Ca (g/1) 0. G',
1.07 0.91 1
l CA-M'.K-MSB C4-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (06/11/96) 106/11/96)
(06/11/96)
<0.1
<0.1
<0.3 Sr-89
<0.7
<0.8
<0.9 Sr-90 5.6 1 0.7 3.8 1 0.6 1.7 1 0.5 K-40 2020.0 1 190.0 1240.0 i 150.0 1350.0 i 130.0 Zn-65
<10.6
<12.0
<8.7 Cs-134
<6.2
<5.5
<2.7 Cs-137
<6.0
<8.0
<5.7 Ba-La-140
<2.3
<4.0
<6.2 Ca (g/l) 1.03 1.02 0.99 Notes:
l E-9
I TABLE E3 (Cont.)
MILK (pCi/kg dry) 1996 y
CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M'6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (06/25/96)
(06/25/96)
(06/25/96) 1-131
<0.2
<0.3
<0.4 Sr-89
<0.8
<0.8
<0.7 g;
Sr-90 6.2 1 0.7 3.3 1 0.6 1.7 1 0.5 W
K-40 1670.0 1 180.0 1280.0 1 150.0 1230.0 1 130.0 Zn-65
<18.3
<9.1
<9.8 Cs-134
<4.8
<6.9
<3.2 Cs-137
<5.7
<7.0
<5.4 Ba-La-140
<2.4
<2.5
<1.8 Ca (g/1) 0.87 1.00 1.02 CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (07/09/96)
(07/09/96)
(07/09/96) 1-131
<0.2
<0.2
<0.4 Sr-89
<0.9
<0 A
<0.9 Sr-90 3.1 1 0.4 1.7 1 0.3 0.9 1 0.2 K-40 1850.0 190.0 1240.0 110.0 1210.0 1 170.0 g,
<7.4
<11.5
<5.3 51 Cs-134
<6.0
<4.3
<5.5 Cs-137
<6.0
<8.2
<3.8 g
Ba-La-140
<2.6
<2.8
<2.3 E
Ca (g/l) 0.84 0.89 1.06 Notes:
I, ll E-10
TABLE E3 (Cont.)
MILK (pCi/kg dry) 1996 CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M7 CA-MLK-M6 Analysis (07/22/96)
(07/22/96)
(07/23/96) 1-131
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4 Sr-89
<1.4
<0.6
<1.3 Sr-90 3.9 i 0.6 0.6 1 0.2 3.1 1 0.5 K-40 2050.0 1 190.0 1250.0 140.0 1230.0 i 140.0 Zn-65
<15.3
<16.0
<11.7 Cs-134
<8.2
<3.8
<5.4 1
<4.5
<6.3
<6.3 Ba-La-140
<2.2
<3.7
<2.1 Ca (g/1) 0.82 1.06 0.90 CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (08/13/96)
(08/13/96)
(08/13/96) 1-131
<0.3
<0.2
<0.5 Sr-89
<1.3
<1.1
<1.1.
Sr-90 5.6 1 0.7 2.9 i 0.5 1.8 i 0.4 K-40 1960.0 i 190.0 1210.0 i 150.0 1420.0 t'170.0 2n-65
<13.6
<10.6
<13.1 Cs-134
<6.8
<6.0
<6.7 Cs-137
<7.3
<4.3
<9.9 Ba-La-140
<4.8
<2.4
<2.7 Ca (g/1) 0.85 1.02 1.10 Notes:
E-11
TABLE E3 (Cont.)
MILK (pCi/kg dry) l 1996 m
CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-H7 Ana' lysis (08/26/96)
(08/27/96)
(08/27/96) l 1-131
<0.2
<0.3
<0.5 Sr-89
<0.9
<0.9
<0.9 Sr-90 5.8 1 0.7 2.3 1 0.5 1.4 1 0.4 5
K-40 1890.0 180.0 1110.0 1 150.0 1210.0 1 150.0 Zn-65
<14.6
<6.3
<11.4 Cs-134
<7.4
<3.4
<4.3 Cs-137
<8.9
<6.2
<4.8 Ba-La-140
<2.4
<4.2
<2.4 Ca (g/1) 0.82 0.83 1.00 I
El CA-MLK-M58 CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (09/09/96)
(09/09/96)
(09/09/96) 1-131
<0.3
<0.4 ND Sr-89
<1.5
<1.5 ND Sr-90 2.5 1 0.6 3.8 1 0.6 ND K-40 2050.0 1 140.0 1160.0 i 140.0 ND Zn-65
<11.5
<9.8 ND E
Cs-134
<6.1
<6.0 ND Cs-137
<4.6
<6.4 ND g
Ba-La-140
<2.3
<2.9 ND g
Ca (g/1) 0.85 0.88 ND Notes:
g ND - No Data. See section 2.3 for explanation.
5 I
l E-12
TABLE E3 (Cont.)
MILK (pCi/kg dry) 1996 4
CA-MLK-MSB CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (09/24/96)
(09/24/96)
(09/24/96) 1-131
<0.5
<0.3 ND Sr-89
<1.1
<1.0 ND Sr-90 4.2 1 0.6 3.2 1 0.5 ND K-40 1900.0 1 150.0 1050.0 1 110.0 ND Zn-65
<11.6
<7.0 ND Cs-134
<5.0
<4.3 ND Cs-137
<4.7
<3.5 ND Ba-La-140
<1.5
<1.8 ND Ca (g/1) 0.83 0.93 ND CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (10/08/96)
(10/08/96)
(10/08/96)
I-131 ND
<0.2 ND Sr-89 ND
<1.0 ND Sr-90 ND 2.9 1 0.5 ND i
K-40 ND 1100.0 1 80.0 ND Zn-65 ND
<4.9 ND Cs-134 ND
<1.7 ND Cs-137 ND
<3.6 ND Ba-La-140 ND
<1.3 ND Ca (g/1)
ND 0.97 ND Notes:
ND = No Data. See section 2.3 for explanation.
E-13
I TABLE E3 (Cont.)
MILK (pC1/kg dry) 1996 CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Anal ysis (11/12/96)
(11/12/96)
(11/12/96) 1-131 ND
<0.5 ND Sr-89 ND
<0.7 ND Sr-90 ND 3.3 ! 0.5 ND E
K-40 ND 1170.0 140.0 ND Zn-65 ND
<14.8 ND Cs-134 ND
<l.8 ND Cs-137 ND
<4.5 ND Ba-La-140 ND
<4.6 ND Ca (g/l)
ND 0.91 ND I
CA-MLK-M5B CA-MLK-M6 CA-MLK-M7 Analysis (12/10/96)
L12/10/96)
(12/10/96)
I-131 ND
<0.5 ND Sr-89 ND
<0.7 ND Sr-90 ND 2.5 1 0.5 ND K-40 ND 1210.0 ! 150.0 ND E
Zn-65 ND
<12.1 ND W<
Cs-134 ND
<7.1 ND Cs-137 ND
<7.4 ND Ba-La-140 ND
<5.8 ND Ca (g/1)
ND 0.91 ND Notes:
3I ND = No Data. See section 2.3 for explanation.
Wj I
E-14
u TABLE E4 i
VEGETATION (pCi/kg wet) 1996 CA-FPL-V3 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V9 SPINACH LETTUCE Analysis (05/27/96)
(05/27/96)
(05/27/96)
Gross Alpha ND 311.4 1 154.9 441.1 1 123.5 Gross Beta ND 6129.3 i 312.5 4136.3 1 172.5 I-131 ND
<12.6
<7.6 K-40 ND 6018.0 1 480.0 4338.0 1 224.0 Mn-54 ND
<15.2
<8.6 Co-58 ND
<6.9
<3.6 Co-60 ND
<8.7
<13.4 Cs-134 ND
<17.0
<5.1 Cs-137 ND
<18.9
<8.3 l
CA-FPL-V3 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V9 i
LETTUCE LETTUCE CABBAGE Analysis (06/25/96)
(06/24/96)
(06/24/96)
Gross Alpha 183.3 i 64.2 235.4 1 73.2 216.2 1 78.5 Gross Beta 4265.1 1 139.6 5348.3 160.1 4216.0 1 143.4 I-131
<15.8
<16.3
<19.7 K-40 5449.0 1 386.0 5838.0 1 444.0 4158.0 1 371.0 Mn-54
<10.4
<12.0
<11.6 Co-58
<11.2
<7.1
<8.5 Co-60
<?0.5
<28.4
<20.6 Cs-134
<15.1
<15.8
<16.0 Cs-137
<13.4
<10.6
<17.9 Notes:
ND - No Data. See section 2.3 for explanation.
E-15
TABLE E4 (Cont.)
VEGETATION (pCi/kg wet) 1996 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V3 CA-FPL-V3 MUSTARD TURNIPS GREENS CABBAGE GREENS i
Analysis (06/24/96)
(07/23/96)
(07/23/96)
Gross Alpha 186.9 i 81.3 59.2 1 32.9 161.2 1 62.0 Gross Beta 5261.6 i 177.0 2001.1 i 85.3 3863.3 i 127.9 I-131
<11.9
<6.5
<15.0 K-40 5586.0 371.0 2327.0 263.0 4534.0 1 465.0 Mn-54
<5.6
<4.8
<20.8 Co-58
<6.2
<9.9
<l4 9 Co-60
<16.9
<12.7
<23.0
$l Cs-134
<13.1
<5.9
<16.7 Cs-137
<13.5
<5.5
<20.4 5;
CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V9 MUSTARD 1
GREENS LETTUCE CABBAGE Analysis (07/08/96)
(07/08/96)
(07/08/96)
Gross Alpha
<87.7
<112.7
<131.8 i
Gross Beta 5271.4 i 186.3 7812.7 246.5 5528.4 1 208.9 ll 1-131
<29.4
<23.6
<12.9 X-40 5725.0 560.0 8387.0 1 534.0 4145.0 1 340.0 Mn-54
<19.0
<14.1
<9.7 g1 Co-58
<17.8
<13.3
<8.4 g
<29.6
<7.8
<8.4 Cs-134
<25.8
<17.3
<11.8 Cs-137
<17.3
<18.3
<9.3 Notes:
I ll E-16
TABLE E4 (Cont.)
VEGETATION (pCi/kg wet) 1996 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V9 MUSTARD CABBAGE LETTUCE GREENS Analysis (07/22/96)
(07/22/96)
(07/22/96)
Gross Alpha
<26.6 89.1 1 57.5 119.3 1 79.3 Gross Beta 2173.2 64.0 4931.7 1 170.4 3233.0 1 179.1 1-131
<12.6
<10.8
<12.9 K-40 2295.0 328.0 5113.0 1 252.0 4324.0 1 302.0 Mn-54
<11.4
<9.1
<11.0 Co-58
<9.5
<6.5
<8.4 Co-60
<16.8
<14.2
<5.5 Cs-134
<14.1
<9.5
<10.2 Cs-137
<11.8
<6.5
<9.8 CA-FPL-V3 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V3 CABBAGE Analysis (08/13/96)
(08/13/96)
(09/30/96)
Gross Alpha ND 162.1 1 60.1 ND Gross Beta ND 3719.0 1 121.8 ND I-131 ND
<7.1 ND K-40 ND 4108.0 1 185.0 ND Mn-54 ND
<7.4 ND Co-58 ND
<6.3 ND Co-60 ND
<5.1 ND Cs-134 ND
<7.4 ND Cs-137 ND
<7.9 ND Notes:
ND = No Data. See section 2.3 for explanation.
E-17
I TABLE E4 (Cont.)
VEGETATION (pCi/kg wet) 1996 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V3 CA-FPL-V9 MUSTARD GREENS Analysis (09/30/96)
(10/08/96)
(10/08/96)
Gross Alpha ND ND 129.8 i 81.2 Gross Beta ND ND 4943.1 i 212.1 I-131 ND ND
<16.4 I
K-40 ND ND 4564.0 1 273.0 Mn-54 ND ND
<12.0 Co-58 ND ND
<6.3 Co-60 ND ND
<8.0 Cs-134 ND ND
<5.9 g
Cs-137 i!D ND
<10.5 gl CA-FPL-V3 CA-FPL-V9 CA-FPL-V9 g
MUSTARD W
CABBAGE GREENS Analysis (11/12/96)
(11/12/96)
(11/12/96)
Gross Alpha ND 95.2 56.2
<106.3 Gross Beta ND 2660.3 1 130.0 4983.1 1 211.0' I
I-131 ND
<17.5
<26.1 I
K-40 ND 2352.0 1 304.0 5642.0 1 534.0 Mn-54 ND
<13.4
<20.0 g:
gll Co-58 ND
<5.9
<19.4 Co-60 ND
<8.6
<28.8 Cs-134 ND
<9.5
<21.7 Cs-137 ND
<5.7
<23.0 Notes:
ND = No Data. See section 2.3 for explanation.
l E-18
TABLE E5 S0ll (pCi/kg dry) 1996 CA-SOL-F1 CA-SDL-F2 CA-S0L-F6
~
Analysis (12/05/96)
(12/05/96)
(12/05/96)
Gross Alpha 11090.0 4008.0 18636.0 1 4938.0 13741.0 1 4411.0 Gross Beta 24082.0 1 3009.0 24124.0 1 3209.0 29440.0 1 3388.0 K-40 11890.0 i 043.0 12810.0 1 669.0 11629.0 1 627.0 Mn-54
<20.0
<21.5
<17.9 Co-58
<32.9
<32.8
<35.4 Co'-60
<l5.1
<16.8
<16.5 Cs-134
<25.0
<30.3'
<31.9 Cs-13/
1350.9 i 56.5 943.2 1 48.7 1258.8 i 57.2 CA-SOL-F8 CA-50L-F9 CA-50L-PR10 Analysis (12/05/96)
(12/05/96)
(12/05/96)
Gross Alpha 26097.0 5589.0 16000.0 1 4815.0 14210.0 1 4042.0 Gross Beta 27371.0 1 3164.0 25748.0 1 3182.0 26005.0 1 3026.0 K-40 10822.0 648.0 12181.0 1 628.0 10398.0 1 581.0 Mn-54
<20.8
<21.8
<24.0 Co-58
<16.6
<27.6
<33.0 Co-60
<18.0
<l5.7
<18.4 Cs-134
<29.7
<32.6
<26.5 Cs-137 1333.4 1 58.9 740.3 1 48.9 599.3 1 40.6 Notes:
I E-19
I TABLE E5 (Cont.)
SOIL (pC1/kg dry)
E 1996 5
CA-SOL-PR3 CA-SOL-PR4 CA-SOL-PRS Analysis (12/05/96)
(12/05/96)
(12/05/96)
Gross Alpha 15309.0 1 4693.0 15940.0 1 4565.0 10848.0 1 4170.0 Gross Beta 24328.0 1 3172.0 22251.0 1 2959.0 26317.0 1 32/2.0 K-40 4849.0 412.0 11254.0 1 629.0 13232.0 1 628.0 Mn-54
<27.8
<19.0
<20.7 Co-58
<19.2
<8.5
<31.5 Co-60
<18.8
<l5.1
<15.4 i
Cs-134
<28.0
<31.6
<33.4 i
C3-137 409.8 1 35.4 519.5 1 42.6 703.9 i 42.6 i!
i EI CA-SOL-PR7 CA-SOL-V3 g
Analysis (12/05/96)
(12/05/96) gy Gross Alpha 13945.0 2932.0 13219.0 1 4163.0 g
Groe:; Beta 21439.0 2128.0 29800.0 1 3473.0 3
K-40 10946.0 1 452.0 17097.0 1 718.0 Mn-54
<18.7
<20.2 Co-58
<23.7
<10.7 Co-60
<17.6
<16.7 3
Cs-134
<23.3
<31.8 5
Cs-137 459.2 1 28.1 267.8 i 36.9 I
I Notes:
I E 20
TABLE E6 WETLANDS (pCi/kg dry) 1996 CA-SOL-W1 CA-SOL-W2 Analysis (12/05/96)
(12/05/96)
Gross Alpha 9280.0 1 3686.0 9661.0 1 3506.0 Gross Beta 17498.0 1 3011.0 21476.0 2931.0 K-40 14555.0 1 607.0 16590.0 1 686.0 Mn-54
<20.8
<20.2 Co-58
<18.6
<25.9 Co-60
<16.7
<19.0 Cs-134
<29.4
<35.0 Cs-137 63.4 1 25.7 209.1 1 36.7 CA-50L-W3 CA-50L-W4 Analysis (12/05/96)
(12/05/96)
Gross Alpha 13710.0 1 4589.0 10934.0 1 3831.0 Gross Beta 16615.0 1 2812.0 18141.0 1 2741.0 K-40 10846.0 1 492.0 9606.0 i 552.0 Mn-54
<15.3
<22.4 Co-58
<10.7
<27.6 Co-60
<18.3
<18.6 Cs-134
<l5.2
<32.3 Cs-137
<18.4
<19.1 Notes:
E-21
TABLE E7 SURFACE WATER (pCi/1) a 1996 g,
LA-5WA-501 LA-5WA-502 m
Analysis (01/09/96)
(01/09/96)
E H-3
<157.0
<l57.0 i
<3.6
<2.1 Fe-59
<6.6
<11.7 Co-58
<4.8
<2.9 Co-60
<4.3
<2.2 Zr-Nb-95
<5.7
<6.4 Cs-134
<4.2
<5.0 Cs-137
<4.1
<5.2 m
Ba-La-140
<12.7
<6.5 g
I LA-5WA-5UI LA-5WA-502 Analysis (02/13/96)
(02/13/96)
<146.0
<148.0 Mn-54
<3.7
<3.5 Fe-59
<8.3
<9.0 Co-58
<2.1
<2.1 Co-60
<3.0
<3.2 Zr-Nb-95
<3.3
<3.6 Cs-134
<3.5
<6.3 Cs-137
<4.6
<2.8 Ba-La-140
<l.9
<3.5 I
Notes:
I I
E 22
TABLE E7 (Cont.)
SURFACE WATER (pCi/1) 1996 CA-5WA-bul LA-5WA-bU2 Analysis (03/12/96)
(03/12/96)
<187.0 195.0 i 101.0 Mn-54
<1.9
<4.5 Fe-59
<2.5
<4.3 Co-58
<2.4
<3.1 Co-60
<2.0
<4.9 Zr-Nb-95
<3.0
<l.9 Cs-134
<l.8
<4.1 Cs-137
<3.4
<2.5 Ba-La-140
<l.8
<3.1 UA-bWA-bOl LA-bWA-bU2 Analysis (04/11/96)
(04/11/96)
<152.0 168.0 1 83.0 Mn-54
<5.6
<3.5 Fe-59
<7.9
<3.2 Co-58
<5.7
<5.2 Co-60
<3.8
<5.2 Zr-Nb-95
<3.0
<2.3 Cs-134
<4.8
<2.8 Cs-137
<5.9
<7;l Ba-La-140
<3.7
<3.0 Notes:
t l
f f
E-23 j
I TABLE E7 (Cont.)
SURFACE WATER (pCi/1) 1996
}
CA-5WA-5UI LA-5WA-50Z l
Analysis (05/14/96)
(05/14/96)
}
<160.0 217.0 1 89.0 Mn-54
<4.9
<3.4 Fe-59
<7.7
<4.3 Co-58
<2.3
<3.6 Co-60
<2.4
<l.8 I
Zr-Nb-95
<5.0
<4.8 m.
Cs-134
<4.7
<3.5 Cs-137
<2.6
<2.8 Ba-La-140
<4.8
<5.0 i
1 1
I LA-5WA-5UI LA-5WA-5U2 Analysis (06/11/96)
(06/11/96) f H-3
<l52.0 203.0 1 85.0 Mn-54
<2.6
<4.8 Fe-59
<3.1
<7.5 Co-58
<3.8
<5.5 Co-60
<4.4
<5.5 Zr-Nb-95
<4.4
<6.2 Cs-134
<2.5
<7.1 Cs-137
<2.9
<5.9 Ba-La-140
<3.3
<10.1 J
l
- l Notes:
l I
E-24
i TABLE E7 (Cont.)
SURFACE WATER (pCi/1) 1996 UA-bWA-bUI LA-bWA-dUZ Analysis (07/09/96)
(07/09/96)
<156.0
<l56.0 Mn-54
<2.8
<2.8 Fe-59
<3.5
<7.3 Co-58
<2.6
<3.9 Co-60
<2.7
<3.0 Zr-Nb-95
<2.6
<4.2 Cs-134
<2.9
<3.0 Cs-137
<2.6
<2.5 Ba-La-140
<3.6
<2.5 LA-bWA-bUI LA-dWA-bUZ Analysis (08/13/96)
(08/13/96)
<150.0 227.0 t 84.0 Mn-54
<3.1
<4.5 Fe-59
<10.4
<10.6 Co-58
<2.4
<4.1 Co-60
<l.3
<2.0 Zr-Nb-95
<2.3
<3.0 Cs-134
<3.1
<2.6 Cs-137
<3.3
<5.3 Ba-La-140
<2.8
<4.2 Notes:
E-25
I TABLE E7 (Cont.)
SURFACE WATER (pCi/1) 1996 CA-5WA-5UI CA-5WA-5U2 Analysis (09/10/96)
(09/10/96)
<162.0
<162.0 Hn-54
<l.4
<3.9 Fe-59
<5.9
<4.3 Co-58
<4.4
<6.6 Co-60
<2.3
<3.5 Zr-Nb-95
<3.8
<4.0 Cs-134
<5.0
<2.2 Cs-137
<5.6
<2.3 Ba-La-140
<6.6
<6.0 t
E\\
CA-bWA-5UI CA-bWA-bOZ Analysis (10/08/96)
(10/08/96) l H-3
<l57.0 165.0 1 85.0 Mn-54
<4.5
<6.2 Fe-59
<13.6
<7.9 Co-58
<3.2
<6.9 Co-60
<5.5
<4.5 Zr-Nb-95
<4.3
<9.9 Cs-134
<5.8
<2.9 Cs-137
<5.2
<5.7 Ba-La-140
<10.4
<6.5 I
I Notes:
I I
E-26
TABLE E7 (Cont.)
SURFACE WATER (pCi/1) 1996 CA-5WA-5UI CA-5WA-5U2 Analysis (11/12/96)
(11/12/96)
<154.0 210.0 i 86.0 Mn-54
<2.7
<2.4 Fe-59
<6.6
<4.4 Co-58
<3.9
<3.3 Co-60
<3.0
<2.0 Zr-Nb-95
<2.8
<4.3 Cs-134
<3.3
<2.8 Cs-137
<2.4
<3.1 Ba-La-140
<6.6
<5.6 CA-5WA-5UI CA-5WA-5UZ Analysis (12/10/96)
(12/10/96)
<158.0
<l58.0 Mn-54
<2.8
<6.2 Fe-59
<6.8
<10 3 Co-58
<5.5
<6.7 Co-60
<4.2
<2.4 Zr-Nb-95
<8.1
<6.8 Cs-134
<7.0
<4.3 Cs-137
<7.3
<6.3 Ba-La-140
<6.0
<5.6 Notes:
)
-E-27
l' TABLE E8 GROUND WATER (pCi/1) 1996 LA-WWA-UUl CA-WWA-Flb CA-WWA-FUb I
Analysis (01/29/96)
(01/27/96)
(01/27/96)
<197.0
<197.0
<197.0 Hn-54
<2.2
<4.2
<3.3 Fe-59
<8.3
<7.5
<7.1 Co-58
<2.2
<3.5
<3.8 Co-60
<3.2
<5.7
<2.3 l
Zr-Nb-95
<4.1
<6.9
<3.9 Cs-134
<4.1
<6.1
<2.0 1
<4.5
<4.6
<3.5 Ba-La-140
<4.4
<6.8
<5.4 i
I' 5l LA-wwA-Uul CA-wwA-tid cA-wwA-tud Analysis (04/23/96)
(04/26/96)
(04/30/96)
<150.0
<149.0
<149.0 gl Mn-54
<4.0
<2.4
<3.2 3 -
Fe-59
<5.2
<1.9
<3.3 Co-58
<5.6
<3.4
<2.9 Co-60
<5.2
<l.2
<1.5 Zr-Nb-95
<4.3
<l.8
<4.1 3
Cs-134
<3.1
<2.8
<2.7 g
<3.5
<2.1
<3.4 Ba-La-140
<5.7
<2.9
<6.7 I
Notes:
I I
E-28 l
TABLE E8 (Cont.)
GROUND WATER (pCi/1) 1996 CA-WWA-UUI LA-WWA-tib LA-WWA-tub AnalVSiS (07/29/96)
(07/26/96)
(07/26/96)
<169.0
<169.0
<169.0 Mn-54
<3.7
<3.5
<3.0 Fe-59
<6.1
<12.3
<4.4 Co-58
<3.7
<4.0
<2.5 Co-60
<0.9
<2.9
<2.9 Zr-Nb-95
<4.2
<4.4
<3.6 Cs-134
<3.8
<3.2
<4.3 Cs-137
<4.9
<6.6
<3.4 Ba-La-140
<3.7
<13.5
<3.4
)
\\
LA-WWA-UUl LA-WWA-tib LA-WWA-tub Analysis (10/08/96)
(10/04/96)
(10/04/96) f H-3
<155.0
<157.0
<156.0 i
<3.5
<3.7
<3.7 f
Fe-59
<5.2
<4.7
<9.7 Co-58
<6.5
<3.6
<4.1 Co-60
<4.1
<1.5
<3.9 Zr-Nb-95
<3.7
<5.3
<5.3 Cs-134
<5.1
<2.4
<3.2 Cs-137
<4.6
<2.9
<4.2 Ba-La-140
<7.2
<10.5
<14.8 Notes:
l E-29
I:
TABLE E9 l
BOTTOM SEDIMENT (pCi/kg dry) 1996 i
CA-A 5-A CA-A 5-C Analysis (04/1 /96)
(04/1 /96) l Mn-54
<49.9
<45.0 I
Fe-59
<85.8
<48.8 l
Co-58
<46.8
<48.8 E
<25.2
<28.7 5
Zr-Nb-95
<48.5
<37.7 Cs-134
<44.4
<41.1 Cs-137
<40.3
<29.4 Ba-La-140
<114.0
<62.1 I
i1 I
CA-AQ5-A CA-Ay5-G Analysis (10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
<13.8
<31.6 Fe-59
<21.0
<59.2 Co-58
<17.9
<37.7 Co-60
<8.2
<19.7 Zr-Nb-95
<20.4
<40.2 Cs-134
<12.9
<28.9 Cs-137
<9.8
<26.2 Ba-La-140
<48.5
<71.5 Il g
m es:
i i!
I 3l e.30
TABLE E10 SHORELINE SEDIMENT (pCi/kg dry) 1996
-CA-Ay3-A CA-Al b-C Analysis (04/18/96)
(04/lE /96)
<44.7
<41.1 Fe-59
<100.0
<84.0 Co-58
<28.1
<25.9 Co-60
<30.7
<27.4 Zr-Nb-95
<77.2
<43.3 Cs-134
<48.4
<45.9 Cs-137 92.2 1 29.5
<25.9 Ba-La-140
<163.0
<67.7 UA-Ay5-A LA-Ay5-G Analysis (10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
<20.3
<33.6 Fe-59
<45.0
<47.6 Co-58
<23.2
<34.1 Co-60
<20.0
<27.2 Zr-Nb-95
<37.9
<44.5 Cs-134
<22.0
<30.7 Cs-137
<14.5
<23.1 Ba-La-140
<96.0
<l49.0 Notes:
t l
E-31
I TABLE Ell FISH, CA-AQF-A (pCi/kg WET) 1996 CHANNEL FRESHWATER RIVER 81GMOUTH CATFISH DRUM CARP CARPSUCKER 8UFFALO Analysis (04/18/96)
(04/18/96)
(04/18/96)
(04/18/96)
(04/18/96)
Sr-89
<8.0
<15.0
<6.2 49.0
<10.2 l
<4.7
<5.7
<3.3
<4.7 4.0 2 2.6 K-40 2544.0
- 254.0 2573.0 2 362.0 2744.0 2 279.0 2631.0 403.0 3023.0 t 387.0 1
Hn-54
<3.5
<12.8
<7.9
<7.4
<8.5 Fe-59
<29.0
<17.0
<21.7
<45.5
<30.3 Co-58
<6.3
<15.2
<13.0
<14.6
<13.5 Co-60
<14.0
<19.2
<11.0
<13.7
<18.6 Cs-134
<10.9
<15.4
<7.6
<9.1
<10.3 Cs-137
<8.5
<14.8
<9.4
<21.4
<14.1 1'
I CHANNEL RIVER FRESHWATER 8LUE CATFISH CARO CARPSUCKER ORUM SUCKER gl Analysis (10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
EJ W l Sr-89
<9.9
<5.8
<12.5
<13.3
<12.1 3r-90
<3.7
<2.5
<4.9
<4.7
<4.1 K-40 3066.0 2 333.0 2600.0 t 326.0 2093.0 t 350.0 3019.0 2 364.0 3377.0
- 418.0 Mn-54
<11.5
<!2.8
<8.8
<6.7
<15.9 l
Fe-59
<30.5
<65.7
<60.7
<13.7
<45.7 g'
Co-58
<14.2
<15.7
<17.6
<12.8
<14.7 g
<12.8
<12.9
<10.0
<18.4
<11.7 Cs-134
<13.1
<9.3
<12.5
<13.4
<9.8 Cs-137
<13.4
<13.1
<!4.1
<8.8
<10.6 l
Notes:
1 I
I I
E-32
TABLE Ell (Cont.).
FISH, CA-AQF-C (pCi/kg WET) 1996 DANNEL FRESWATER RIVER B1GNOUTH CATFISH ORUM CARP CARP $UCKER BUFFALO Analysis (04/18/96)
(04/18/96)
(04/18/96)
(04/18/96)
(04/18/96)
Sr-89
<8.8
<11.5
<11.8
<10.4
<6.9 Sr-90
<2.9
<4.8
<4.6
<4.6
<2.1 K-40 2537.0 s 342.0 3167.0 2 387.0 3242.0 s 430.0 2798.0 s 322.0 3074.0 s 357.0 Mn-54
<19.1
<17.1
<19.1
<9.3
<7.9 Fe-59
<50.4
<56.9
<27.7
<32.5
<26.9 Co-58
<28.3
<23.5
<25.5
<16.9
<13.5 Co-60
<20.0
<16.0
<24.6
<12.6
<6.9 Cs-134
<14.3
<7.7
<16.9
<12.0
<14.2 Cs-137
<14.1
<22.1
<20.6
<12.8
<11.4 CHANNEL RIVER FRESWATER BLUE CATFISH CARP CARPSUCKER ORUM SUCKER Analysis (10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
(10/22/96)
Sr-89
<8.5
<10.5
<16.3
<11.1
<12.0 Sr-90
<3.0
<4.7
<6.7
<4.2
<4.9 K-40 2562.0 353.0 2117.0 2 373.0 2867.0 2 356.0 2907.0 2 245.0 2759.0 314.0 Mn-54
<8.5
<18.0
<15.6
<10.2
<4.8 Fe-59
<63.5
<39.5
<30.0
<32.0
<45.2 Co-58
<10.3
<24.9 361.0 46.0
<14.9
<13.6 Co-60
<8.7
<21.4
<20.3
<10.7
- 12.8
!s-134
<11.9
<7.9
<19.0
<9.4
<7.0 Cs-137
<6.5
<12.6
<!8.0
<9.7
<8.9 Notes:
1 E-33
TABLE E12 THERM 0 LUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY 1996 FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER ANNUAL NET NET NET NET NET FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE LOCAfl0N TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD CODE (DAYS) (MREM t 20) OTR t 2o)
(DAYS) (MREM t 20) QTR t 2o) (DAYS) (MREM e 2o) QTR t 2o)
(DAYS) (MREM t 2o) QTR t 20) (DAYS) (MREM t 20) OTR t 20)
CA !DM-01a 90.8 17.320.8 17.120.8 91.1 18.0 2 0.5 17.8 2 0.5 90.0 18.4 2 0.4 18.4 2 0.4 94.2 17.6 1.0 16.8 0.9 366.0 73.4 r 0.2 18.0 2 0.0 CA-IDH-02 89.9 17.620.7 17.720.7 91.1 18.1 2 0.8 17.9 0.8 90.2 18.2 2 0.4 18.2 a 0.3 94.0 17.9 1.2 17.1 2 1.1 365.1 66.6 t 1.8 16.4 2 0.4 CA-IDM-03 90.0 18.0 2 0.6 18.0 a 0.6 91.0 18.4 1.0 18.2 1.0 91.1 19.6 2 0.7 19.4
'0.7 93.9 17.0 2 0.7 16.3 2 0.7 366.0 76.0 2 2.4 18.7 0.6 CA-IDM-04 90.0 15.2 e 0.7 15.2 2 0.7 91.0 16.0 2 0.5 15.9 0.5 91.1 16.0 2 0.7 15.8 0.7 93.9 16.8 0.4 16.1 : 0.4 366.0 67.1 8.3 16.5 e 2.0 CA IDM-05 90.0 14.9 t 0.6 14.9 2 0.6 91.0 15.0 2 0.6 14.9 0.6 91.1 16.4 0.5 16.2 2 0.5 93.9 13.6 2 0.7 13.0 2 0.7 366.0 61.1 2 1.5 15.0 2 0.4 IT1 CA-tDM-06 90.0 17.3 0.6 17.3 2 0.6 91.0 17.7 0.6 17.5 e 0.6 91.1 18.9 2 0.6 18.6 2 0.6 93.9 16.9 0.4 16.2 2 0.3 366.0 73.8 5.0 18.2 1.2 (h
CA-IDM-07 90.0 17.5 0.4 17.520.4 91.0 19.0 1.8 18.8 1.7 91.0 18.9 1.9 18.6 e 1.8 94.0 16.7 2 0.5 16.0 t 0.5 366.0 71.6 2 4.4 17.6 e 1.1 CA-IDM-08 90.0 18.9 0.3 18.9 e 0.3 91.0 20.2 2 0.3 20.0 t 0.2 91.1 20.1 0.5 19.8 0.4 94.0 18.6 t 1.6 17.821.5 366.0 79.8 1.4 19.6 2 0.4 CA-IDM-09 90.0 16.1 2 0.7 16.1 2 0.7 91.0 17.0 a 0.4 16.8 0.4 91.1 17.1 0.4 16.9 0.4 93.9 17.020.7 16.3 2 0.7 366.0 71.4 e 6.2 17.6 e 1.5 CA-IDM-10 90.0 18.2 2 0.4 18.2 2 0.4 91.0 18.9 2 0.3 18.7 2 0.2 91.1 18.6 2 0.5 18.4 2 0.5 93.9 15.8 2 0.5 15.1 2 0.5 366.0 73.1 2 4.1 18.0 1.0 CA-IDM-11a 90.0 18.2 2 0.5 18.2 2 0.5 91.0 18.1 0.4 17.9 2 0.4 91.1 19.4 2 0.6 19.2 2 0.6 93.9 18.1 2 1.4 17.4 1.3 366.0 73.1 2 0.6 18.0 2 0.1 CA-IDM-12a 90.0 17.4 2 0.5 17.420.5 91.0 18.5 2 0.8 18.3 2 0.8 91.1 18.1 0.4 17.8 0.3 94.0 17.9 t 1.2 17.1 t 1.2 366.0 70.1 2 3.4 17.2 2 0.8 CA-IDH-13 90.0 18.3 t 0.7 18.3 2 0.7 91.0 19.8 0.5 19.6 2 0.5 91.1 20.1 2 0.7 19.9 t 0.7 93.9 18.4 2 0.7 17.720.7 366.0 78.7 2 3.0 19.4 2 0.7 CA-IDM-14 90.0 18.8 2 0.5 18.8 2 0.5 71.0 18.4 t 0.7 18.2 2 0.7 91.1 20.1 0.8 19.9 e 0.8 93.9 17.3 2 0.6 16.6 2 0.6 366.0 73.6 2 3.6 18.1 t 0.9 CA-IDM-15e 90.0 18.5 t 0.8 18.5 0.8 91.0 19.5 2 1.2 19.3 1.2 91.1 20.1 0.8 19.9 0.7 93.9 18.3 a 2.0 17.5 2 1.9 366.0 79.5 2 3.6 19.5 t 0.9 CA-IDM-16e 89.9 18.5 2 0.7 18.6 0.7 90.1 19.0 t 0.8 19.0 2 0.8 91.1 19.5 t 0.6 19.2 2 0.6 93.9 19.0 2 0.9 18.2 2 0.8 365.0 71.1 2 4.0 17.5 e 1.0 CA-IDM-17 90.0 18.1 0.4 18.1 0.4 91.0 16.8 2 0.3 16.6 2 0.3 91.1 19.2 2 0.8 19.0 2 0.8 93.9 18.2 2 0.8 17.5 t 0.7 366.0 70.6 e 1.1 17.4 2 0.3 CA-IDM-18a 90.0 18.1 0.6 18.1 2 0.6 91.0 18.0 t 0.4 17.6 t 0.4 91.1 19.4 2 0.5 19.1 0.5 93.9 16.5 t 0.6 15.8 2 0.6 366.0 74.1 2 3.9 18.2 t 0.9 CA-IDM-19 90.0 18.4 0.6 18.4 2 0.6 91.0 18.6 e 0.7 18.4 2 0.6 91.1 19.3 0.4 19.1 2 0.4 94.0 17.5 0.6 16.8 2 0.6 366.0 72.7 t 4.4 17.9 e 1.1 CA-IDM-20 90.0 18.1 0.8 18.1 m 0.8 91.c 19.1 2 0.9 18.9 2 0.9 91.1 19.6 e 0.6 19.4 2 0.6 93.9 17.8 z 1.6 17.1 1.6 366.0 75.1 a 2.6 18.5 2 0.6 CA-IDM-21 90.0 19.7 2 0.9 19.7 2 0.9 91.0 18.6 2 0.6 18.4 2 0.6 91.1 18.8 t 1.1 18.6 t 1.1 93.9 16.7 2 1.1 16.0 1.1 366.0 74.4 t 3.4 18.3 2 0.8 CA-IDM-22a 90.0 17.9 e 1.0 17.9 a 1.0 91.0 17.4 a 0.8 17.2 e 0.8 91.1 18.6 3 0.5 18.4 2 0.5 93.9 16.4 a 0.5 15.7 a 0.5 366.0 70.1 e 1.8 17.2 a 0.4 CA-IDM-23 90.0 18.4 2 0.7 18.4 2 0.7 91.0 19.2 e 0.9 19.0 2 0.9 91.1 18.6 0.7 18.4 2 0.7 93.9 17.8 0.6 17.1 a 0.6 366.0 70.1
- 5.6 17.2 1.4 CA-IDM-24 90.0 19.3 2 0.8 19.3 2 0.8 91.0 18.4 e 1.0 18.2 1.0 91.1 19.0 2 0.8 18.8 t 0.8 93.9 17.8 0.5 17.1 t 0.5 183.8 36.8 s 2.1 18.0 1.0 CA-IDM-25 90.0 18.0 2 0.5 18.0 2 0.5 91.0 18.6 e 1.0 18.4 t 1.0 91.1 18.9 z 0.9 18.7 2 0.8 93.9 16.5 1.1 15.8 a 1.1 366.0 77.7 a 11.1 19.1 e 2.7 CA-IDM-26 90.0 12.4 a 0.4 12.4 : 0.4 91.0 13.0 2 0.5 12.9 2 0.5 91.1 13.1 t 0.2 12.9 0.2 93.9 12.3 a 0.7 11.8 0.7 366.0 50.2 a 1.7 12.4
0.4 Notes
M M
g g
I l
TABLE $12 (Cont.)
THERM 0 LUMINESCENT 00SIMETRY 1996 l
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRO QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER ANNUAL NET NET NET NET NET FIELO TOTAL EXPOSURE FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE FIELD TOTAL EXPOSURE LOCATION TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD TIME EXPOSURE (MREM /STD CODE (DAYS) (MREM t 20) QTR t 20)
(DAYS) (MREM t 20) QTR t 2o) (DAYS) (MREM t 2o) QTR t 2o)
(DAYS) (MREM t 20) OTR t 20) (DA)S) (MPEM t 20) QTR r 2o)
CA-!DM-27 90.0 19.0 t 0.9 19.0 t 0.9 91.0 19.0 t 0.8 18.8 0.8 91.1 19.5 2 0.7 19.2 2 0.7 93.9 16.2 2 0.6 15.5 t 0.6 366.0 78.6 a 2.5 19.3 2 0.6 CA-!DM-28 90.0 18.7 0.6 18.7 0.6 91.0 ND ND 91.1 19.3 2 0.5 19.1 2 0.5 94.0 16.8
- 2.2 16.1 2 2.1 183.9 38.2 s 1.8 18.7 2 0.9 CA-IDM-29 90.0 16.8 2 0.3 16.8 2 0.3 91.0 17.3 1.0 17.1 0.9 91.1 17.9 2 0.5 17.720.5 93.9 16.9 a 1.3 16.2 e 1.2 366.0 64.8 e 2.8 15.9 0.7 CA-IDM-30a 90.0 17.420.6 17.4 2 0.6 91.9 18.4 2 0.8 18.0 s 0.8 90.2 18.2 1.2 18.1 2 1.2 94.0 16.8 2 0.5 16.1 0.5 366.0 69.9 e 3.2 17.2 a 0.8 CA-IDH-31a 90.0 19.3 2 0.7 19.3 2 0.7 91.8 19.4 2 0.7 19.0 2 0.6 90.2 19.3 2 0.4 19.3 s 0.4 94.0 19.8 a 1.1 19.0 e 1.1 366.0 77.1 1.8 19.0 2 0.4 IT1 CA-IDM-32 90.0 18.2 t 1.5 18.2 1.5 91.9 18.1 2 0.6 17.720.6 90.2 19.5 2 0.7 19.5 2 0.7 94.0 15.3 2 0.8 14.7 2 0.8 366.0 70.5 2 3.7 17.320.9
[J CA-IDM-33 90.0 16.8 2 0.4 16.8
- 0.4 91.9 18.1 0.6 17.7 2 0.6 90.2 18.4 0.5 18.4 2 0.5 94.0 16.9 z 0.7 16.2 2 0.7 366.0 70.6 2 4.5 17.4 1.1 CA-!DM-34 90.0 17.2 0.5 17.220.5 91.9 16.9 2 0.5 16.6 2 0.5 90.2 17.2 2 0.3 17.2 a 0.3 94.0 17.0 2 0.8 16.3 2 0.8 366.0 65.2 2 3.0 16.0 t 0.7 CA-IDM-35 90.8 16.3 2 0.5 16.2 a 0.5 91.1 16.9 2 0.4 16.7 t 0.4 90.1 17.4 2 0.7 17.320.7 94.0 14.8 2 0.4 14.1 : 0.4 366.0 66.4 e 1.6 16.3 2 0.4 CA-tDM-36 90.0 18.0 2 0.6 18.0 s 0.6 91.0 18.3 2 0.5 18.1 2 0.5 91.1 18.4 2 0.4 18.2 2 0.4 93.9 16.6 1.8 15.9 e 1.7 366.0 66.9 s 2.9 16.4 t 0.7 CA-IDM-37 90.0 18.720.8 18.7 0.8 91.0 17.7 : 0.7 17.5 s 0.7 91.0 18.2 2 0.4 18.0 2 0.4 94.0 14.2 2 0.9 13.6 2 0.9 366.0 71.8 2 4.7 17.7 2 1.2 CA-!DM-33 90.8 13.1 2 0.5 13.0 t 0.5 91.1 13.8 t 0.6 13.6 2 0.6 90.1 13.6 2 0.6 13.6 2 0.6 94.0 13.4
- 0.6 12.9 0.6 366.0 51.4 2 1.7 12.7 2 0.4 CA-!DM-39 89.9 17.4 a 0.3 17.4 2 0.3 91.1 18.6 0.6 18.4 2 0.6 90.1 18.5 2 0.3 18.5 0.3 94.0 19.5 2 0.6 18.6 2 0.6 365.1 73.8 2 5.9 18.2 2 1.5 CA-!DM-40 89.9 19.0 2 0.5 19.0 2 0.5 91.1 20.8 2 0.9 20.5 2 0.9 90.1 19.4 2 0.7 19.3 a 0.7 94.0 18.4 2 0.6 17.6 2 0.5 365.1 75.9 e 6.0 18.7 t 1.5 CA-IDM-41 90.0 18.2 2 0.5 18.2 2 0.5 91.9 17.8 2 0.4 17.520.4 90.2 18.1 2 0.6 18.1 t 0.6 94.0 17.9 a 1.3 17.2 a 1.2 366.0 71.3 2 0.6 17.520.2 CA-!DM-42 90.0 15.0 t 0.5 15.0 2 0.5 91.9 16.0 2 0.4 15.6 2 0.4 90.2 15.6 2 0.7 15.6 2 0.7 94.0 14.6 2 0.5 14.0 2 0.5 366.0 61.1 2 1.3 15.0
- 0.3 CA-IDM-43 90.0 17.7 2 0.5 17.7 2 0.5 91.0 18.4 t 1.0 18.2 a 1.0 91.0 19.0 t 0.8 18.7 0.7 94.0 17.8 e 1.0 17.021.0 366.0 69.6 2 0.2 17.120.1 i
l CA-IDM-44 90.0 19.0 2 0.7 19.0 t 0.7 91.9 18.1 2 0.4 17.720.4 90.2 18.8 2 0.7 18.7 0.7 94.0 16.9 0.5 16.2 2 0.5 366.0 72.3 5.4 17.821.3 CA-IDM-45 90.0 17.120.4 17.1
- 0.4 91.0 17.7 e 0.4 17.6 e 0.3 91.1 16.9 2 0.4 16.7 2 0.4 93.9 16.3 2 0.6 15.6 0.5 366.0 69.2 2 2.0 17.0 2 0.5 l
CA-IDM-46 90.0 18.1 t 0.8 18.1 2 0.8 91.0 19.0 t 0.6 18.8 2 0.6 91.1 18.8 2 0.7 18.6 t 0.7 93.9 17.120.3 16.4 s 0.3 366.0 72.6 t 5.7 17.921.4 CA-IDM-47 90.0 17.2 2 0.5 17.2 2 0.5 91.0 17.0 2 0.4 16.8 0.4 91.1 18.1 a 0.5 17.
t 0.4 93.9 14.9
- 0.6 14.2 2 0.6 366.0 70.8 2 4.6 17.4 e 1.1 CA-IDM-48 90.0 17.2 0.4 17.2 2 0.4 91.0 18.9 2 0.5 18.7 0.5 91.1 18.8 t 0.5 18.3 2 0.5 93.9 18.6
- 2.8 17.8 2 2.7 366.0 71.6 2 4.4 17.6 1.1 CA-IDM-49 90.0 ND ND 91.0 17.4
- 0.5 17.220.5 91.117.620.7 17.4 e 0.7 93.9 13.9 2 0.4 13.3 2 0.4 366.0 70.9 2 0.7 17.4 a 0.2 CA-IDM-50 90.0 18.0 2 0.6 18.0 2 0.6 91.0 18.4 2 0.6 18.2 2 0.6 91.0 18.8 t 0.3 18.6 0.3 94.0 17.7 0.7 17.0 t 0.7 366.0 72.2 2 3.0 17.8 z 0.7 CA-IDM-51e 90.0 18.3 2 0.6 18.3 2 0.6 91.0 18.9
- 0.7 18.7 0.7 91.1 19.2
- 0.7 18.9 0.7 93.9 17.8 0.7 17.1 0.7 366.0 72.6 e 2.6 17.920.6 CA-IDM-52 90.0 17.5 e 0.4 17.5 2 0.4 91.0 17.720.5 17.5 t 0.5 91.1 19.1 0.5 18.9 2 0.5 93.9 17.4 0.5 16.7
- 0.5 366.0 71.8 2 3.3 17.7 e 0.8 Notes: 1. ND = No Data. See section 2.3 for explinetton.
1 A
SECTION 4.0 NONRADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING G
4
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI CALLAWAY PLANT SECTION 4.0 s
NONRADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM t
ANNUAL REPORT 1996 3
4 t
I N'49( (
A
CONTENTS Section Iille Page 1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Unusual or Important Events 1
3.0 EPP Noncompliances 1
4.0 Nonroutine Reports 1
Plant Design and Operat on Envirorunental Evaluations 1
i 5.0 I
h f
l
1.0 INTRODIICTION t
Union Electric Company (UEC), in accordance with federal regulations and the desire to maintain the quality of the local environment around the Callaway Plant, has implemented an Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) contained in Appendix B of the r
Callaway Plant Operating License.
The objective of the EPP is to provide for protection of nonradiological environmental values during operation of the Callaway Pbnt.
This report describes the conduct of the t!PP for the Callaway Plant during 1996.
2.0 ITNIISITAL OR IMPORTANT EVENTS No unusual or important events reportable under EPP Section 4.1 were identified i
during 1996.
3.0 EPP NONCOMPLIANCES 1
During 1996 there were no noncompliances with the EPP.
4.0 NONROUTINE REPORTS There were no nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with EPP, Section 5.4.2 in l
1996.
5.0 PLANT DESIGN AND OPERATION ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIONS This section lists all changes in plant design, operation, tests or experiments j
completed during 1996 which could have involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question in accorelance with section 3.1 of Appendix B, During 1996 there were seven plant design and operation changes that could have involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question. The interpretations and conclusions regarding these plant design and operation changes aloo; with a description of the changes are presented below.
)
I I
5.1 Callaway Modification Packaee 94-3006 5.1.1 Description of Chance This change involved the installation of a permanent pumpir.g system for draining groundwater and precipitation from the unit #2 excavation. Tids change involved the installation of a submersible pump on an existing concrete pad and routing the pump discharge to the existing piping used during Plant construction to discharge water from the excavation. The water is discharge into the ditch near the main access facility that dmins to storm water outfall 012.
5.1.2 Evaluation of Chance The constmetion of the access ramp and installation of the sump pump did not result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact, since all measurable non-radiological effects were confined to the areas previously disturbed during site preparation and plant construction. The discharge of ws;er from the unit
- 2 excavation to storm water outfall 012 is included in the existing NPDES permit.
Therefore, this change did not constitute an unreviewed environmental question per Section 3.1 of Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
5.2 Reauest for Resolution 15739B 5.2.1 Description of Chance This change involved the addition of NALCO 1250 Plus (Carbohydrazide) to the steam generators for wet lay-up during refueling. Carbohydrazide was used in place of hydraz ne as an oxygen scavenger to reduce feedwater iron transport during l
i startup.
I 5.2.2 Evaluation of Changg Carbohydrazid. at a concentration of 100 ppm, was added to each steam generator during wet lay-up. Following wet lay-up, two of the s:eam generators were drained to the discharge monitor tanks for discharge. Thi.: resulted in the release of 66,000 g
gallons of water containing low concentrations of carbohydrazide through Outfall B
001 to the Missouri River. Carbohydrazide is less toxic than hydrazine which was used in the past and therefore does not create an increased environmental impact g
5 above that which already exists.
I I,
~.
Although the use of carbohydrazide was not described in the Callaway NPDES Permit, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources was notified of our intent to use NALCO 1250 Plus and had no objections. Therefore, this change did not constitute an unreviewed environmental question per Section 3.1 of Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
5.3 Reauest for Resolution 16063B 1
5.3.1 Descrirtion of Change This change allows the processing of the spent chemical cleaning solutions from the steam generator chemical cleaning by an evaporation unit. The spent solutions 1
were dewatered using the evaporator unit. Condensate from the evaporator was returned to radwaste for analysis and disposition. The evaporator bottoms were incorporated into a shippable media and shipped offsite for funher processing.
5.3.2 Evaluation of Chance j
The evaporation process was located plant east of the radwaste building inside a berm. The evaporator used was a closed evaporator that does not emit pollutants to the atmosphere. The condensate from the evaporator was routed to radwaste where it was analyzed and dispositioned. The evaporator concentrates were solidified inside the radwaste building using a non-reactive organic heel.
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources was notified of our intent to p,rocess this waste using an evaporator and had no objections as long as the total iron and copper in the evaporator condensate were maintained at less than 1 ppm.
Therefore, this change did not constitute an unreviewed environmental question per Section 3.1 of Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
5.4 Plant Procedure CTP-KC-06001. Rev. 0 5.4.1 Description of Change This procedure was prepared to allow for chemical treatment of the Fire Protection System for mitigation of microbiologically induced corrosion (MIC). This procedure provides instructions for a one time initial shock treatment, annual treatments and weekly maintenance treatments of the fire protection system..
i!
5.4.2 Evaluation of Change The three types of treatments willinvolve the use of five different Buckman products, BULAB 6067, a gluteraldhyde, BULAB 8006 and 8031, biopenetrants, BULAB 7034, a copolymer, and BULAB 6002, a biostat. The chemicals are added to the fire protection sump which provides makeup to the fire water storage tanks.
During the initial treatment and annual treatments, a portion of the water will be flushed from the system to stormwater outfalls 010,011, and 012 to distribute the chemicals within the system. It was determined that flushing a portion of the chemicals added to the fire protection system to the stormwater ponds would not I'
create an aquatic toxicity condition.
E The discharge of water from the fire protection system to storm water outfalls 010, I'
011, and 012 is mentioned in the existing NPDES permit. Therefore, this change 7
did not constitute an unreviewed environmental question per Section 3.1 of Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
5.5 Plant Procedure CTP-ZZ-06000. Rev.1 I
5.5.1 Description of Change This procedure revision allows the addition of BULAB 6002 at the water treatment plant to help control biological growth in the clarifiers. This treatment will be used in addition to sodium hypochlorite that is currently being used to treat algae growth in the clarifiers.
5.5.2 Evaluation of Change Ten gallons of BULAB 6002 is added to the stilling basin or rapid mixer section at the water treatment plant on a weekly basis or as needed to control algae grov,th.
l This results in small quantities of product being released through outfall 016 and outfall 002. Before addition, the cooling tower makeup bypass valve is closed and g
remains closed for a period of time to allow the chemicals to react. It is expected g
that most of the BULAB 6002 will be consumed in the clarifiers and in the cooling tower. The residual chemical concentration was estimated to average less than 1 g
ppm in both outfalls. This concentration would not be expected to cause acute B
toxicity conditions in the Missouri River.
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources was notified of our intent to use BULAB 6002 for algae control and had no objections. Therefore, this change did not constitute an unreviewed environmental question per Section 3.1 of Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
I g;
4
5.6 Suggestion Occurrence Solution 96-0188 5.6.1 Description of Change
' An environmental impact review was completed for the patential release of tritium from the discharge monitoring tank (DMT) dike to Logan Creek by way of stormwater outfall 011. The DMT dike collects rainwater that is routinely sampled and analyzed for pH, visual oil and gamma emitters prior to pumping the dike contents to stormwater. On February 9,1996, tritium analysis was perfonned along with the normal analysis and tritium was identified. The tritium in the dike was determined to be from water spraying out of the tank vent when the DMT is placed in recirculation with low tank level. This evaluation was for potential release of tritium from the DMT dike prior to February 9,1996.
5.6.2 Evaluation of Change Past practice of pumping the DMT dike contents to stormwnter potentially could have resulted in the release oflow levels of tritium to Logan Creek by way of stormwater outfall 011. The evaluation determined that any tritium released would have been witlua the NRC regulatory limits and plant administrative limits specified in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (APA-ZZ-01003). The potential dose received by an individual due to these releases is insignificant when compared to the dose limits for liquid releases. Therefore, this change did not constitute an unreviewed environmental question per Section 3.1 of Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
I 5.7 Final Safety Analysis Report Channe Notice 94-M1 a
5.7.1 Description of Change In an effort to simplify radioactive waste processing, reduce Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) burial volume and reduce worker radiation exposure, UE elected to i
switch from evaporation to demineralization and filtration ofliquid discharges in August of 1996. Final Safety Analysis Change Notice 94-061 allows the use of this process instead of evaporation to treat some of the waste generated in the plant.
'5.7.2 Evaluation of Change While some radionuclides in the discharge have increased, all discharges continue to be at a small fraction of regulatory limits. It has been demonstrated that ion-selective resin can be used to limit offsite doses to a small fraction of the regulatory limits. Therefore, this change did not constitute an unreviewed environmental question per Section 3.1 of Appendix B to the Callaway Plant Operating License.
f l
.s-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _