ML20141K824
| ML20141K824 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 05/15/1997 |
| From: | Jaudon J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Richard Anderson FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9705300166 | |
| Download: ML20141K824 (60) | |
Text
i May 15, 1997 Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Energy Complex Mr. Roy A. Anderson (SA2A)
Sr. VP. Nuclear Operations ATTN:
Mgr.
Nuclear Licensing 15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River. FL 34428-6708
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
ENGINEERING - EXTENT OF CONDITION CRYSTAL RIVER 3 - DOCKET NO, 50-302
Dear Mr. Anderson:
This refers to the meeting on May 8,1997 at the Region II office in Atlanta.
The aurpose of the meeting was Engineering - Extent of Condition requested by t1e NRC.
It is our opinion, that this meeting was beneficial.
Enclosed is a L'ist of Attendees and Florida Power Corporation Handout.
The discussions included the following topics:
Modifications. System Readiness Review Program. Accident Management (Chapter 14). Emergency Operating Procedures, and Configuration Document Program.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of NRC's " Rules of Practice. "Part 2.
Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, a co)y of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.
Sincerely.
Orig signed by Johns P. Jaudon Johns P. Jaudon. Director Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
1.
List of Attendees 2.
FPC Handout Docket No. 50-302 License No. DPR-72 cc w/encls: John P. Cowan. Vice President Nuclear Production (SA2C)
Florida Power Corporation i
Crystal River Energy Complex
\\
15760 West Power Line Street 200010 Crystal River. FL 34428-6708
(
Nllkl$flfflfflll]hlfflllfl}lll cc w/encls: Continued see page 2 OFFICIAL COPY 0500h02 D
D P
PDR 3GYS' h
FPC 2
cc w/ encl:
Continued B. J. Hickle. Director Nuclear Plant Operations (NA2C)
Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Energy Complex i
15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River, FL 34428-6708 David F. Kunsemiller. Director (SA2A) l Nuclear Operations Site Support Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Energy Complex 3
15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River, FL 34428-6708 R. Alexander Glenn Corporate Counsel Florida Power Corporation MAC - ASA P. O. Box 14042 St. Petersburg, FL 33733-4042 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32304 Bill Passetti Office of Radiation Control i
De)artment of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee. FL 32399-0700 Joe Myers, Director Div. of Emergency Preparedness Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Chairman Board of County Commissioners Citrus County 110 N. Apopka Avenue Inverness, FL 34450-4245 Robert B. Borsum Framatome Technologies 1700 Rockville Pike, Suite 525 Rockville, MD 20852-1631
~...
4.
i 4
~ FPC 3
i-Distribution:
K. Landis, RII i
L Raghavan, NRR B. Crowley, RII G. Hopper, RII i
PUBLIC 1
j NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com.
6745 N. Tallahassee Road Crystal River, FL 34428 i
I i
l i
}
i 1
l 1
i 4
1 i
l i
i i
i i
SEND TO PUBt10 00CWENT W f VES)
NO v
0FFICE n
$!GNATURE NAME Kland s
OATE 014h / 97 05 /
/ 97 05 /
/ 97 05 /
/ 97 05 /
/ 97 05 /
/ 97 COPY?
(YES'/
NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO OFFICIA KELUKU COPY DOCUMLNI NAM-.
G;\\ CRY 5IAL\\PLLilNG\\CRNOID4.]B l
4 4'
i t
i i
d 1
t l
I i
EXTENT OF CONDITION 1
f 3
i e-4 y
l
^
4 s t
z m., s s
^
l l
y 1
1 Design and Licensing j
Basis Activities FloridatPowerfCorporationL j
. May 8,1997 l
1
r AGENDA
+
9 unawan + ---
~a- - -n
+ --n~-o hyn&xcuk. :ga&
==w5
- h=L - M
~T
~ d zi=ue W e
- w GM-
' &" M = m tC & '*= M k M & "
+:"
=wuax@
1 9
- j j
- Introduction John Holden u
a 9
n 3
li e]
- Modifications Fran Sullivan d
k N
id a
4 j
j
- System Readiness Review Program Jim Terry /
1 3
i, i
Mike Donovan a
a o
j
]t
- Accident Management (Chapter 14) i a
Paul Fleming n
a
)
)y
- Emergency Operating Procedures a
Gary Becker -
a
- j d
j 3
- Configuration Document Program Greg Halnon a
s 1
1 j
j
- Summary John Holden s} 5/8/97 1
4a
}&;c/$.surc Z l-
-a
..__........m._.,
it
.H OBJECTIVE M
___m________.
Efa6 j, inuui41saxWdA6MM424_-_' 3ht- ' Mad 21siMess?srdid nWiMedkW
...? Ja
- _ AL/ws-M&EWMi edis?f_:_ carh.a s Amr fBJ N
~l
-b, k
a w
1 a
e i
il Reasonable Assurance that
,?-j
.,3 tj id j
j CR-3, will operate within its
~)
1 b
2]l 2
]
j Licensing and Design Basis a
a a
- t M
a
.]
d a
a
-1 a
'Yi h
j
$t i,l5/8/97 ?!
s M
tM
-i
............---.--i-.,...__.-
i 'a MODIFICATIONS m
9
__ = -
',a paw gmagawaaraswaggumso e emceM_1ge _ =+m e aca ^oYgememwqws+rm== smeg n
a d
)
a g
g h
- 1 fj i
i,l
> EFW Cavitating Venturis ys 2
1, j
j
> Diesel Power Supply for FWP-7 a
s 1
> EFV-12 Motor Operator kb l.Ih t
i f
')
il 4
> EFIC Mods 1
1
?j j
Level Transmitters y,
4
>> Flow Control 2
a j
y Compensation Module hl
$ 5/8/97 3
J
T r- - m m
m g --
OTSG Steam Supply
.Sv.m
.Sv-e A
^
Jek X4 Steam Driven EFP-2 V
EFV-12 Non-Safety
~
FWP-7
~
X Jem<
ven
- E MODIFICATIONS eww wu asu.wwira.aL-6.naaadWWai:duMmmsakaa:La:nkG.i& sus 2&i?6.as&6ak%:4:kndQ&MGs MGhlid a
1
]
1 EDG Load Capability o
l i
1 j
> Loac CapacityIncrease
]
j Engine Modifications (150 kW) kW Meters
~
> Load Management P-T-L Control Handles EFP-1 Trip Defeat Switch i
> Load Removal / Reduction
'?
lj 5/8/97 a
- 4 Diesel Generator Load WP
--___--=--=--a
- M&unkiwa%akdu%hM%d
- kMMnGiknaududasamEZhdh:awiaL%e3 O A-
-@a4%G,a.wsaM4J v aa.swaa j
l Sept '96 May '97 4
4 i
Ok. EDG Ratings New EDG Ratings i,
I 30 Min 3500 kW 30 Min 3500 kW i.
i, 2 0 0 H r 3250 kW 200 Hr 3400 kW a
a
- ! 2 0 0 0 H r 3000 kW 2000 Hr 3200 kW 4
] Contin.
2850 kW Contin.
2850 kW 4
1
[i 1
1 Auto Connect Load Auto Connect Load 4
.a
+
i 3
3159 kW 3033 kW 45/8/97 1
O J
Ik Diesel Generator Load 9e
- =-
a u w= ~
-w w w - - - - au a
.-,m mam u d dss h a # A amesuss a u: a ai h eaama wam M aa m anussm.a w m ais
- -usos..-.
, _.~.w 30 Min. Rating 1
j
- j 4
m y
j u
s A
]
1 3
a 4
200 Hr. Rating
-i MARGIN
- kW a
-i s
N
_i 3
i A
1 2000 Hr. Rating 4
a Auto Connect Load
-5 1
4 1
1 1
Contin. Rating 4
4 2
a 5/8/97 i
Sept. '96 May '97 s
a
?
MODIFICATIONS
=~9
.ga;wsA ihshnvM'w&Mwa%2ais+uhiMMiii Mnssei4+sawkiianidi Js 52 n% Q
[;f
- =-dJAgh%d;se - --
j jl$
SignificantImprovements 4
e 3
5 a
ij j
> HPI Recire Line (Piggy-Back Ops) a a
n j
j
> Xormal Makeup Line Auto-Closure a
ti j
]
> HPI Cavitating Venturis s
a
~ -;
- }
il 1
> LPI Pump Mission Time a
a X
~j d
j!
> BSP XPSH
~
.;y
,j j,
> Containment Penetrations 2
~!
j 5/8/97
>> Thermal Reliefs / Expansion Chambers
\\
i W
- y-SYSTEM READINESS REVIICW a-- ~~-na eObh dLi&&Y G3s '~~~=-k&*-~r -- W = r = ~- -A FA j,u M & ikahd G a % A 2 % X % & W :duki M La%'idhdisdEi.5 M 41.ibissus W ~
];&aka+
i i
3 a
I'b b
ij d
. -4 g
lif
?.3 k$
)sg I
q N
ii 9
d Fj 11 a
y j
j Conduct reviews to assure that safety related 1
a
[(S
?]
a e
i;j ll systems are in compliance with the licensing a
4:
1, 1,
2 i
and design basis of the facility 2
1
.a 3
';f i
k k
1 9
?1
-1 G
li
[
ij ji 4
is i
h 2
5 3
- j 5/8/97 j s
o, o
1 -
l
(
'y*
SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW
_____m
_ gkwJanig A6ssasiL&OwaikOMs4*XAJWhsa45A224h 4 -- ~
' -- 1-idkniD A
- M M mildsdish,0Ne h MdSdo=Mc : rid
.'.h t
!q'i
!,-g Level of Effort a
wa
.e 3-l 3
1 1
> Over 90 PersonnelInvolved a
- 1 1
1
!]
((
> Integrated Team a
4 2
j j
> Investment - Level 1 Discovery a
a in
- 1
]
Over 10,000 man-hours Vi d
h-1 1
N
)d
- j i
i ti j 5/8/97 ({
J b
-...............--....---n-
.ir r
-.4
PROGRAM OVERVTEW
=
naa=--nn-nox--=-an=--
- s
? n M s.ib $ 4 M MusadSObsersn&W4 M sWiki2Lesk h id:lbblefdi,$sid hisis kii$4150sussir3k;L M M J
^ tie 4dduisidl
@Orn A2 Adi W e
0a
- 1 Il (j
]
j
> Graded approach assessment of 105 systems a
a
- a g
j j,
> Evaluation ofresults e,
?:
si g
.-j ij i
> Disposition and track restart requirements a
a g
1 a
a i
- j
> Operations acceptance of systems
,a o,
j L}
j
- !j
> Startup performance monitoring s
a.;
3 if 1
3
- a 1
51
.g 4
- q i
9 i
- j
-j gg 5/8/97 a
ss J
i f
hi f
=g-IMPLKWKSTATION ELEMENTS swa_-----___-
, quhkaR fL4akasmawkannwSth+4s&&:lazwahaiksukai%hn=~ =2G&MhlkC
!x, ALL t%w%= : 61Mu=hw
- a:G wm sR W Q
d.
x k
_l t
j ij
> Initial System Readiness Reviews
,s a,
]
]a (Discovery phase)
A 3
j j
> Outage Activities Monitoring phase i
i a
j j
> Final System Readiness Reviews 4
i,
(< Closure phase; a
s a
s 2
j j
>Startup and Power Ascension phase j
a k
13
,i:
I
~,
- ]
t
~$
l f
- i al jj f
(
'A
- !)*
Tj li,5/8/97 N, 1
is j
i
!?
t eJ+
Licensing &
i
<-e l
-f Design Basis y-- -==s
_ mm _ e
_m
,-m-mem il a
Documentation 2
3 1
a s
1 3
Familiarization 1
3 a
i si 9
i 3
> FSAR 2
i
.cj d
j j
> Enhanced Design Basis j
a 4
3;,
il Documentation
.d J4 7
2 44 1
1,
> Improved Technical l
g.
3 1,
il Specifications & Bases i
2 1
c]i 11 4
r s
a i
h 3
4 3 5/8/97 I!!
J a
i
1 E mm-LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 4
- g'*
Reviews Reviews w w s w a u m u m a a m w w su= = w w e ua w== =ax=a m u m w = w aa
=~-M iGaus J.deM440ss2bk.5AEdd OM NNCMbA j
h 1
AC Electrical Distribution j
j 2
Emergency Feedwater Initiation &
2 DC Electrical Distribution 9j 1l4 Control 3
Air Handling Subsystems n
4 j
Nuclear Services Closed Cycle Cooling Water s
3 J.;
j 4
Emergency Diesel Generators & EDG System j
support systems 5
Raw Water System
-j
'j 5
Decay Heat System 6
Decay Heat Closed Cycle Cooling Water System
[j j
6 Makeup and Purification System 7
Control Rod Drive System jj j
7 Core Flood System 8
Main Steam System 9
j 8
Engineered Safeguards System 9
Waste Disposal System y
3
}
j 10 Radiation Monitoring System
- j 11 Annunciator System a
@y j
12 Building Spray System a
fj
-1 13 Feedwater System i,j
)s; 14 Chemical Addition System 4
j l
15 Spent Fuel System j
}
16 Nuclear Instrumentation System
}j
[j 17 Reactor Protection System a
~
j fj 18 Containment Access 0 5/8/97 i J
3
ATTRIBUTE NUMBER X
4 ^w H
5@
B lc M
CE E
G @i s
0 X
Electrical Calcs / Analysis X
1 & C Calcs / Analysis y
X Mech & Struct Cales / Analysis w
X Accident Analysis a
e X
Drawings g
u X
Safety Funct / Logic Diagrams k
e 7
e X
CMIS 5
N y
N @q X
Specifications M
X EDBDs /TBDs / ABDs
>p e
X Change Documents /50.59 Reviews g
C N X
Temporary Mods p
~
yM E
X FSAR Review p
g yR Og 6
X ITS / Basis o
O-lh z
O2 X
Licensing Commitments eM o
X Notices / Bulletins pg o
H 2M l
X Procedures d
a m
O
{
x Operator Work Arounds e
1 M
X Industry Operating Experience z
X Maintenance Procedures f
n H*
5 I
2 g
X Vendor Technical Information g
g p p m
M X
Preventive Maintenance w
g X
Surveillance Test & Inspections 9
5 GC H X
Section XI IST / Performance Tests u
X As-Built Verifications w
X 302 / 208 Drawings 5
X Surveillance Programs y
X PC / REA / PR Corrective Actions g
f ll f X
QA Audits & Other Assessments w
i neo X
Training Lesson Plans g
(
~~
X Open items (Backlog) g
1 c -m is I
=_
_m
'Wf SSFI Assessment m.mmf
~,
~m e of System Attributes
~
_=m_,
,_mmm um j,
j for 12 Topics c,1
!)
4
- i i
ll 3
r, b
f 3
il
> Licensing Documents A
a:a e
i?$
i$
j j
> Design Documents a,
y 1,
11
> Procedure Conformance 4
M d
i]l 1,
> Configuration Validation 3
A 1
a Il li S
fi d
i l!
b Q 5/8/97 tj 44
)
p--
l ATTRIBUTE NUMBER H "W H@
- s*
C E l
-i m J
5k O > X Electrical Cales / Analysis
@ e$,E w
s_.
5'
=
=-
- c. E' I
w a ;
____=
=_
]
E 3-Z E
2 o
e c
=!
C E
9 Drawings u
B g n
l a
B Safety Funct / Logic Diagrams Ie 8
Go m o F
I e
4 U CMIS Iw 5
M m o i
2 y Ch k 3-Specifications gH
=
=
=
g
,R F
____=
=_
Og g
? :C
____=
=_
OzN a
w
=
~
MM l
E $
R c>
l a g g q g
=_
cm o
O
_w w
je Og a
Notices / Bulletins G
F cc
______m g g 5
O
______________=
=_
e
~
t O
3 g
O Industry Operating Experience
,4 O
M 5
T Z
Vendor Technical Information 8
y Q$
Preventive Maintenance l[f r./)
< 3 Surveillance Test & Inspections lN g
my=y Sudon xi IsT/ Performance Tests e 5
H
--m
,p
~~
,5 a
9 E,-
- Q E
^
Surveillance Programs y _'-
w
___.._________.. _.._____=--
=_
N O
______.____________.._._=
=_
ggg
$3E e
4
-g*
SYSTEM READINESS REVIICW wn----
---=
n = ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ w as
_ } dam:
Jpsed.us::ak:2C%SiilwL-bw6+M%2MueSaOSinulEnds?AE Wl- $2MisSMi+ 2T O2-=- %dk M SNL ~2= ~ d u TE O M 5 12i L nE ddidE M U$
21 j
5f Ni h
a xj ti
- j i
ii Assessment Goal s
4 s:t g
j Q
')
- 4
}
q 4
4 4
4] j Conduct reviews to assure that safety related 3
4 4
- yj systems are in compliance with the licensing q
e,
!ij u'j and design basis of the facility
- g 9
((
1:Y l
3
!J1 ti is
-f 14
- ,i
- 4 4
sd j
r3 s
- j 5/8/97 f a a
.,z g
4 l
YA
.t..gs'*
SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW
. _ - _ _ = = - _ _
-a
- .5+a-aiA 74
- ;. -bui.c.
-,_ Juan, ada.,,.42:&4:sawa;a.aas%cs.<;sJAi shisisussafAi;G4.aw;,hns;mrenwhuagLsja 2
j
! Overview of an Assessment during Phase 1
> Four Topics of Review Licensing q
s l
Design Procedures 2
]
Configuration j
> Several Sections per Topic
> Cross Check Between Topics J--
l5/8/97 a
a
1 n:t 4
sums - ung aus um wm SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW PROCESS License Design Procedures Configuration FSAR EDBDs Procedures Walkdowns gp p,,Egp, ITS ABDsSection XI Open items PCs/REAs/ prs Commitments PMs A
ent Analy s Notices /
~
I ain enance Bulletins Specifications Calculations l&C/ Mech /Elec Drawings
y*
SYSTEM READINESS REVIICW
-au--m-nu-~~ww-an
- -a-
[ Anih Janin nusw.w M a SAtsm du:ne. # A Ls=ussW h dhadsdinasGG2&al W 44* w %e'uei M sAw M s w J 4
,9 n
1 Status of Assessments
?
4
[
- j
'}
z:
ij j > Systems Completed j
a I
f a
a Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 i
1i s
4 Reactor Building i Air Handling l
q 1
Core Flood i
j fi 2 Chilled Water 2
Decay Heat Fans 3 Circulating Water f
j j
2 Annunciator System 3
Emerg. Feedwater 4
EFIC 3 Decay Heat Closed l
3 4 Demineralized Water 1
il Cycle Cooling i
si 5
Emergency Diesel 5 Non-Nuclear j
j Generator 4 Main Steam Instrumentation 6
5 RB Airlocks Engineered 3
i, Safeguards 6 Reactor Protection 7
Make-up and System f
Waste Disposal j
j Purification 7
3 4
t
?.j 5/8/97 1 8
a
44 ATTRIBUTE EVALUATION
- mmmmm_m _ _
-mmm. ____ _mm
.:.me2asam.awaw.w xe
- m :... -: ar.
~ s;_ : m ~.
, :au umaa.
,_ A g a u g g u a
]:a%;A a
1
- i Attribute 2
d i;
Checks 8835 g
a
':1
- 1 a4
?
1
.' t 1
J
]
Aj SAT Discrepancy Reportablity 1
ij 8032 803 Operability j
j, N
4 a
j
- ]
J 1
Work Controls Restart l
Ji Process Issue i
i 676 127 n 5/8/97
r LEVEL 1 SYSTEM CIllCCKS sammau w.a m a.m u mimea msw a u ma %ssa e
\\mL Cid
- dda+ca N.M L A-A
~ME 'ed SE" i:M d O-L dai?=
M S:d ZZ -- MM
' ddhash;&N g
1 i
ij System Readiness Review Attribute Check Status
't g4
- j y
LEVEL 1 Systems a
9 7000 a
q
===================================================
1 9
6500 4;
9 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ::
- ~~ 6474 ::::::::
a 6000
- EEEEEEEE
)'
j
~
l n
5500
==========================
==============
j 5000 5555555555555555555555555555555555= 555555555555555555555555555EEE p
====-==============
====================
(El 4500
- ~ -
g' 4000 a
=
~
3500
========================:===================================:=:==:=:
y j,
i 3000
- 222 22 222 222 22 2 222:2222 22 22 222 22 22:22 22 22:222
$g
~
1 2500
- ~ :::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
a 4
4 2000
=======
============================--=
i EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE a
1500 a
========-==========================================
,i 1000 22 222 22 22 22 22 222 222 22 2 2 222:222:222 222 a
__-g g _------__-.
j
]
0 ;;
k5
==
==
=
a w
e y
w w
m v
e m
m m
en e
n a
1 se N
N n
C U
Q 4
C C
Q B
B C
U 52 M"
M M
n n
n w
v w
m o
m 4
J4 s
s j
_a__ ActualChecks + Discrepancies 4 5/8/97 d I
g 2
i_.
.r.
.i.. - -..... -
ii...-
N LEVEL 2 SYSTEM CIiECKS
.mam. m.m mesmsa-ammmmamaawan mmm.s m ~
,u-
} -ww U.
mkW AA.
%Yn.Mn a.r~MN
'~
System Readiness Review Attribute Check Status t
LEVEL 2 Systems 4000 i
- ::::: :::~: ::: :::::: :: :::- :::::::::::::::: : :::: ::::::::
3500
-~~~--- --~~~~~--------------------------------
3000
---~~~~~~~~-----~~~-----~~~-~~~~-----------------------------~~~
- : : ::::::::::::~: :-_:: ::::::: :- :::: :::::~::::::
4 I
2500
~--~~~~~~~~~~- ------ ~~--------~~-~~~-~---~~------~~-----------~
_____---_-------_------_----_.2361--------------.
2000
--~~~~~~~-~~---------------------
--------~~~
~
1500
~~--------- -
~~-------- ----
-- ------~~---------~~~~---~~~~~~~~~~~------
1000
~~~~-----~~~~~ ~
500
--~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----~~~~~-~~----~~---------------~~~~-~~
4
---------------- -------------- ----- g4,---- _ --..--
I 0 :,
1 2/28 3/7 3/14 3/21 3/28 4/4 4/11 4/18 4/25 5/2 5/9 5/16 5/23 5/30
--m-Actual Checks + Discrepanc'es j 5/8/97
je SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW
=
Mr n~ _ ---
Anun
.pw&aYeWarsastmassmAintant&hLRssihwaci;,dawdLKsWAklakhhwnabish hd4 it a
a i
li SRR Assessment Summary 2
y 14, a,
.5
- f$
j l,
> Topic cross checks and resolution of
.h N
);
j discrepancies provide reasonable assurance 4
ij j
that the systems are in compliance with the j
a
.f
't s,
?!
Licensmg and Design Basis.
2
- s A
i e
lj
]
> Increase in System Engineer knowledge of i
a e
m;
-3 j
j system Licensing and Design Basis Y
d 3
il j
a a
4 5/8/97
?!
j
.y i
l t
c.
t b
4 6
EDG /EFW UPDATE
= -
/
- iguMMsMndMMdMQiMIN9S i-ish-d$$A' mal.OAl-XnrJdM&hi?Kikdil252NgMiS'hM30 !^f24dN%3gdSei:1ddtdhi%D r,.:2muswaxuuwaamwwasunawaa+=awsu -:maambunaw :+2mam '- ammaa
- 22
.a
- a,3 a
t a3
'3 y#i 1
SOLUTION SET i
a 4
FLOW PATH S
i li LOBA y
if jj INITIAL yj 1
CONDITIONS Loss of"A" Battery i
1 ll c
4 3
RX TRIP 1
MODE SINGLE "sj
?
-> SBLOCA +
+
> LOBB l
4 4
i FAILURES LOOP Loss of"B" Battery y==
l fj 4
a it C
l J
J i
4; S
a ti
- 4
' EFP-2 A
r m
n
.h
)
y g
i a
n i
A 2
31 9]
2 a
a n
- u
- n a
1 5/8/97 e 2
b l
I T1 n
n n
Fm m
m ' 'M tc 9+
EDG /EFW UPDATE
~
- 6u m scussagnaw w & mm:xcasss m u wunnun.w
-1M+w.aaxs *:sstpr,anu= tea :::w2:2
~.
Mm gs;m ag;,As;u a,j q m mes;fam, wgg h 3;enn u msrLtuu n m -s mste wezas;2aacuaciggg;g;p b
o
$1 14 r
4 F
- 1
'4 1 HPI l
MUP-1B or MUP-1C W
?*
PUMP "g
J
-j A
t 4
- 4. -
a s
Ej
- (
--a t!
d d
M 3
U d
F
.d is MITIGATION
%g
-4 (9
q:c STRATEGY C
pj
}
LOBA9 1 HPI PUMP i
3
?
EFP-2
+
ADMIN + AND &
9]
EFW FLOW L
g c
fa q
+
?j 4
" EFWT E
sj ri FLOW "i
-d, 4
i s
s
?]<
a r
m 3
ij r
FWP-7 DEFENSE IN DEPTH 43 i
M FWP-7
==5 DIESEL S
3 y
J MOD
- 4 y
L 1
4,
- 4
.s
.,3 ga'i
?]
SUCCESS PATH y
N
]
CHALLENGES
$5/8/97 3 DEFENSE IN DEPTH
-p n
i
.h
e-r-,
m e,
c, c-m
.g-EDG /EFW UPDATE
=
a.s & a n e m2 alsifakhts h ide n
- 4 %EsdimismsW4at~4Kn h ;az&DF*% sha+W4 - s w 2neacmtas
);;Whk
..;t h244d4di&TMReaA% UMLia= e O~2&sse;isEML:E CWR;.ssWh4he22W1MEEC2=Ea?dN4h;.2%idf'dlan * ' - 35U 4
Q d
r
(
MUP-1A or MUP-1B
)
PUMP 3
a m
A L 71 n.
INSUFFICIENT OPERATIONAL j
j EFP-1 M EDG
+
~ ~
UMITATiON
~~1 Q
w W
CAPACITY Q
a l L
- 3 n
g d
- i. -
- CONTROL COMPLEX e
O 3j i
F COOUNG (-1.0 hr) l p s
- BWST DEPLETION I
S T Y TIME DEPEN,DE,NCY D
U kU q
4 a
LOBB+
e
l R (Operator Cooldown) s A
C
%:1 q
g EFW FLOW 7
T
.]
9 l l j
if gO 2
q h
N C
f{
'j 1
P Y
3 r y;
ej EFW '
r
~~
d jj FLOW EFP-2 =D CROSSTIE EFW TRAINS p
ADMIN p AND >
A a
w q
s n
3 y
4 S
3g
- t 1
A a}
rp c
- 1
-u l
53 d
y q
p
=a "j
']
m FWP-7 DEFENSE IN DEPTH i
?'
W FWP-7 DIESEL
]
igj SUCCESS PATH w
MOD a
4 CHALLENGES V
d 5/8/97 fj DEFENSE IN DEPTH Q
h
?
T l
i
=v EDG /EFW UPDATE w
us: ~-:aca m w a g a w;n a:axxenx1; m g w ri w m m "-: 2:omkwmanskcsan:as;;ug i
"d.Maszah A a.I n a d h iussM h M M ST ~GMd@MME >RbN e v ~EMM? *C%&Oume-dWu
-Eal: O Mi
=J ri2EsW 8
- 1 2
a 2
a j
PUMPS
.1
.: j q
a t it
- i.
S a
d M.g q
3 r
it a
U 1
=*d MITIGATION t
I a
N d
STRATEGY 3
3 ff 2 HPI PUMPS C
{
-3
-9 EFP-2-9 Ti is I
d 1
EFW FLOW E]
J C
F m
-g m
r r
1 r n
EFP-1 TRIP
==
'j OPERATIONAL LOAD j
Q)
"+
DEFEAT
--> AND + ADMIN +
l LIMITATION MANAGEMENT w
j SWITCH Y
w e
u d
E r
si eFw
if M
FLOW
- BWST
.g DEPLEDON
?l d
[
tj Jj
- 500 Psig 1
zi (Operator Cocidown) i e
M j%
j S
j
=
- A 1
- g r
7
~
hh
[d
~
DEFENSE IN DEPTH i
FWP-7 -->
DIESEL
$j MOD
[
SUCCESS PATH t
A
?
':2 CHALLENGES f,j 1,)
DEFENSE IN DEPTH V
i d5/8/97 i,
8 4
.:i/
J i
i E
it i
ACCIDENT MANAGEMKS T
__m___________
)
'qps1%
s a m g 4G;b % e:u d e; J - M M M ue:252&BMRvdGA6C=a MMsEG a-at=CeakiDhEDubh'LMM =+e:i
- &"S n'
%;E3LG%hai$
[
g 3
if j
j FSAR Chapter 14 (Safety Analysis) j a,
>4 a;
a j,
)]
> Verify Assumptions si s1 7,
n 1
j
> Verify and Update Analysis Basis i
s n
d, a
j j
> Verify and Update Licensing Basis a
- s a
-9 i
]
}l
> FTI-- FPC Partnership a
3 G
- i
]
]
> Include Specific Set of EOP Actions a
[j n]
l1 fl 5/8/97
'd d
1 a
w
-l
?
t ACCIDENT MANAGEMKST
=
~
__a--_._=____,
wmm w. m am m _m m aa m m m m m m m -mm a m
--u i
6 a
a
-fj
- j i
~3
- ]
l q
a a
- 4
.+
q 1
i structures T w i m q ~ M-FSAR
=
i s
. rh A B
ii 1
Systems as CH 14 i
y i
Components t
l 1
j 9
i 1
n a
n 3
a a) l
-r 4
d b
t d
i a
a?
r si J
3 1
d
[
- j
]
9 Enhanced Technical Analysis a
1_
ri Des.ign i
i Basis Basis s
7:
Basis t
4
- j Document Document a
Document y
1 5/8/97 3
x il
,.A t
t h
l 'a
?
ACCIDKN T MANAGEMKN T 9
-_ _--~._ ------
i hh&&6iL%
k&JudiMkGdMOA2+MNM'ikNMM5siik$1&WN"A MW$n5hE2 %
' E'n'Y?UN-6 " '- 5_
- E*
' 25" '- Cu@hk5L&&5e)
]
f d
']
'y, i
l4 A
i
!d
-]
i 4
--g
]
7; f
hk h$
t 1
Jj j
j Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) i a
31 l}
A i
q g
1 a
a 4,-
j j
> Compare FSAR Chapter 14 to EOPs j
2 2
sj j
Assurance to Mitigate DBAs j
14 i
l i
3 5
F$
d
)]
j j
- q
- 4 a{
1 d
j j
l}
i a
ii d 5/8/97 I'a a
J s
i I
l5 i
ACCIDENT MANAGEM KNT Ww au;a w a:su w w ia; w s 4%uwasard m e m 4;=2=
Mene a:Gaux-:=c whwdu?20:a:~ maut v:Wa:a: ~ +9 s
il
!)
Summarv u
a t
f4
- g
?
Q
> EOPs provide the Operator guidance to J,
s i,
1, mitigate DBAs a
a
> Use of Qualified Equipment i
il j>
a 1
.A j
]
> Defense-In-Depth e
a; 1
i, i
> Chapter 14 Describes DBAs 4
a!!
s Sufficient Detail l
a 2
a
)[}
l i
>> Accurate i
a na
$ 5/8/97 It J
s Y
l l
o "g7 ACCIDENT MANAGEMKNT
-~.--~~~~-_--=_-o ja sss b a M mea.tnacunia hk e oa6daesA44aL&aLA m idaMa2m e u w buabs1 =%42nnenar M1RsAsMsend
.saa.
v y
,)
e i
+,
.j 1
mi a
3
- (
-it r.
a 4
j a
a a
4 1
,3 i
Structures FSAR twwyn T-i 4
systems n
a 4u CH.14 ti Components s
g
(-
~#
.1
.k U
j
.;}
'q.
.. y e
"I'.
[y 4
j 5/8/97 j a
i fi EOP Program Elements
~_ -,-w --n -_,
" Sahi taf h s?4l;ciM h nMaR OeAAA=" ' - i ':c2WCMQuwwzMcaMhla='< M4 CamoE~2 nii4:Kui2&ehs&Aaw+44Ls1 fj j
j
> Setpoint Basis Document 3
3 J
1
> Step Basis Evaluation a
s
- s j
]
> Cross-Step Document j
]9
> Resolve Open Comments f5 e
a
.a
?q i
n!
> Writers Guide / Human Factors 4
j
])$
> Simulator and Field Validations
- )
a a
j j
> Licensing Documents Review kk Y
3
,s,,, j
> Programmatic Improvements ils a
ic 9+
SETPOINT BASIS
=
ana~--=_
}sawaan y A h m m MGAscaan naL W A G iss.ou%M b - mA& M a an
- E 2A:st_RJEdsdMhte h W "m-ahrG w x w=e 4. ewe 3
j j
Setpoint Basis
),
il Document
~
s la l
h fj r,d l
s i
EOP j
1, CriticalValue n
,Sh l
9 n
l 2
4 M) 3 y
. :a a
1 1
1 Engineering Enhanced si a
Technical a;i
- 4jCalculations Instrument Design Basis
?
j and Error Basis M
Document 1
j Analysis Document a
a j 5/8/97 $
s x
.g
.<4
it STEP BASIS 9
n-___________,
'faL%&i ;_% 4@&aliana M :% % e A & W:h^iikw&u= M % kiMua%&'
- Ma&w'dikbMndM'iLikaakuk&MtMiM3:W lb,
[b n!
1, a
- 9 j
j
> Evaluation of Each Step q,
a 3
Il.,
3 c
j l3l
> Sequencing (as assumed in Design Basis) a ga a
i SA i
> Time CriticalNature t
f N
~
M;a a
sa j
j
> Supports Lesson Plan Development i
l}
A l
7-g
,)j l
5l h
[
w 24 l}
i
'1
- j e
a a
t
- s a
i A,5/8/97$)
a e
o l
I l
~
c-m CROSS-STEP DOCUMKNT 9
__---n--_~_~-,
%2R skawae&aw. Musek:.2w wuM4mw=L5:
===4 a2Waana.6@ 2 4*a % L M e a = = 3 ::=aiseabsb@u m A
?!.;
1 q
Sf]
j j Compares accident mitigation strategy from
?!
j XSSS vendor to plant specific procedures a
a N
[ff$
in i
j
?
]
3 n
q A
Jh i
1,
> Documents and Justifies Differences s
y1
- 71 ti n
1 a
1 i
> Controlled Document e
o
.f
- q 35/8/97 3
a
gr OPEN COMWKN TS
.gleiliv4h pSLMilbdMakuh664%Gh+MMOs&N2MA6wsW6 bha nedd2MMidMAM-fidd$AMAd7Mdi"i> +dEdiMGMed heiGdh
{)
k-j 3
j ij Simulator Precursor System Management j
j Training Cards Readiness Observation s
a a
a
?
S
- s 9
m
.s
~4, a
,i 9
u u
A 2
1 1
Open l
- 3. h Comments V
m a
'3 L
n
.. i
.hk l
1, a
u
~
^1 1
j Resolved I
3 l;
1 5/8/97 1
.9 4
Q hs
4 1
it SIMULATOR VALIDATIONS 4F
- ~Lindle G%AEss+.GkGEdsiss&2'C
- inhih'E- - -
221'Ce-
-%a.siidladMMPdMA** ' ' Mfe'?9%Me:~-
5-:ddg.Ld6ELSUM udi <M 2,
a
]
A a
Nb k
il li
> Extensive Validation of EOPS 2
a
- q s>;
4
?k k
- 9 j
!a!
> Design Basis Scenarios Mitigated A
4 i
a i
j j
> Time Critical Steps Validated a
n a
9
~3
- j si i]l
> Operator Burden Reduced 7
i
?3 N
- a
.q d
M l
t,si a
s.g fj 5/8/97 j 4r J
is FIELD VALIDATIONS 9
- = - - _ _.
' asesGm qmmeCeM4&A%' -
ad za um-EMiAiads/t-
+awah?da t ww22M swaiW' 'aM =ucilsEx -='> '- -u/4*
q?
I$a N
$l
$a 1
> Plant Walkdowns m
- q 4;
3 1
i i.
Labeling a,
,m
]
j Lighting a
,2 J.,
s s
a l
j j
> Tools Identified and Staged s
+i y%
{}
Sj j
j
> Operator Response Timing n
m
'h i.
3 A
3 i
g
-1 0
0 245/8/97 3
]
m
4 LICENSING DOCEMKNTS m__________.
.y5iera wn ywilisainadsll2461AGh%wMdA61Esd4 gen-MhiiirGi{ AM
~ EF " ' ' Edn' '44:esT ~ CU
- ~i4 A d & I-1 4 1 6 v - aA'&
5 4
^
j la
> Licensing Commitments a
a 11 13 3
a
- 1
> Docket Letters Reviewed 2
d
- is t
s
- i a
si
!i
> FSAR n
a i
1 ik kg
.lj 43 9
3
~ A,
- f i
i
> Technical Specifications
- g 3
-4
$3
'd Sj 31 a
q 9
1 91 A
jj 5/8/97 ;j J
J
1 1
o i
l l W W
W 4
PROGRAMMATIC 9e
_---_____~_--a
'JersLL nmi-aaa a % A L.htE & n L i si d e4 = % - % hwa a = :nla k h M A % -=="
in % S M u dbb u,:=% C M J1ximit tf
?k n
- g
- g of f
j j
> EOP Change Process a
a a
1 o
q l
i
> Writers Guide
?!
A a
a 1
1
> Verification and Validation i
si fi j
lj
> Conduct of Emergency Operations
- g 2
3 4
d i
i
> 10 CFR 50.59 Process 4
2 l
a}5/8/97
!j
}
a
1 EOP PROGRAM
SUMMARY
__m
&&uTisa j&6~M6mW*'
=;L :kiG9a-a - = :-'
%SS5kk;6uAIL ' ;iAEsk % cw M G L W m is
+hi: TGaiE%u;C&2L :sd
.]
Q M
1 il
- s
> Comprehensive a
3 a
a
- 4
-Q s'!
> Thorou8h 4
3
- s a
il
.3 (f
If$
1, i
> Technically Accurate
,5,5
'?
'?
3 j
> Human Factored a
a
/)
A a
i 1])
> Lono Term Controls Ji y
D 3
- j d
i d 5/8/97 Ill
@y 3
y
.c gg-Licensing Basis
__________m
'g
- uggs~
- w gxgyu:mu.w=c.27:2z; wwl;cne; :sssL & w & &.=sa= b;;;i n ' % 2 2;kW a &,w a n a=c.
mm eiua;5114
.d E$
d j
k j
j Overlapping Evaluations and Identification 4,
4:
ofProblems 4
n li if 3
i >
SBLOCA Evaluation and Solution Sets a
2 3
g j
System Readiness Reviews a
j j >
EOP Enhancement Project ij a
j j >
FSAR Operational Review 2/96-2/97 4
3 Licensin8 Docket Review a
2 1
9
]
j >
Setpoint calculation program 3
il >
CR-3 Staff Sensitivity 4
A 3,
4 a
d
- 4 15/8/97 d 3
dj
gyp Configuration Document Integration
=
_ _ _ =
-- __a_
~~n
-__za u,asids
- i &,L A6M L A n d
- n e h n h de
'6d-Ca-:zLi4 & f W a h M G M d d L G d d h asune22 W aattA G q
j Concept is to integrate the information into j
j a Plant Licensing Basis a
i j > Collect system information into "Syste-m l
Information Sets" a
y N
~j i
si > Reconcile the differences in the information a
a 1
A
.:a j
1, > Release information to the Document 3j 1
Integration Group i
a
.:]
q
~
k q
3 3
4 9
a
~$
~j
]
] 5/8/97.j a
3
{?
gr*
Configuration Document Integration
~ -
i;J OrdeG' ]l$ N DEL $4J W h ib ksid2E N 5 $5-h5Ndu'@-A
- rdMADdMdh 2%:Sd$A'3 O 'I"' MD 'NSEbi ' %d =bDai-
^'-41 5" 242-lC22d a
s:
3 s
i,;
ij There will be over 75 people involved, j
j, upwards of 35 full-time at peak n
ij
?! > Project Steering Team a
M i
j jj Department managers from Ops, Design, Systems, jfl j
Licensing e
i a]> System Ownership Teams
(
a q
j > Three Project Managers with extensive operations j
j backgrounds y
3
,$i i,
a j 5/8/97 [f 2
a
- 4 Project Concept a*
w-
,- w~ =msw wa= = = = = = ~ ~ =
~ = " ~
s.=
r
,,g '
%~~
~iniiUS M Ad$*
d4
,. - _q a,.. : :.
m,-w
.. c 1 Y liT1 - LN
~
G 9
il 4
ii a
a J
1 41 1:s a
1 r4 a
m j
- 4
~
s s
a a
i ti 3
3 w system _ -
Technical e
i lafontions:
- Resolution 4
uset<
3
?3
=. ;
s; a
n 4
WL li e
x A
4 E3 3
(
N
- w
- a 11 i
8l$
j a;j Document integration Group a
~i A
f A
n a
74{ 5 / 8 / 9 7
- f q
J a
il n
.:1 y
J
m
- gp Configuration Document Integration n-n _
-- -n=
%; w s un_
u w -
m
- %eawaga e 2
A;
.hwaughi,uhwaxa
_... mew j
j Goal is to integrate findings from the reviews j
j Follow System Readiness Review Prioritization il i
Level 1 and Level 2 systems a
2 j
]
Individual systems will be formally turned over to a document i
3 integration team (26 systems) 1 y
a i,
j Findings that require long term corrective measures will be a
j j
evaluated for Restart impact a
is Level 3 systems s
2 j
ij Findmgs will be evaluated by Project Steering Team a
m j
i a Effect of EDG loading a
j j;
a Balance will be integrated as they fit into the revised
]
]
chapters and/or schedules f
hj 5/8/97 j a
a
~
!?
t y?
Configuration Document Integration
% ne s c : "waauG;ww
- =x M
z=
L'
- ==&p +
"*Mu
- h
+ ' -
W:
- ===2.k2Wanewcm n
w 3s
~
i Svstem Information J
a a
j]
?
TMEA DC j
Mods Starti Power Team FSXR EOP d
Review Enhanceme a
a Precursors l
u SRR Docket a
.a 1
Reviews Review a
a a
- f 1
S 1
4~
ag a
u 3
3
]
Licensing a
n a
a Bas.is a
a 1
1 (System)
$ 5/8/97) a a
-J
4
- gy*
Configuration Document Integration r
,,%-M
' ' s J
'b Ab
^ '
- bk k
"--'^Ie j
Licensing Bases { System}
i a
a s
3 y _ -mmcmn_.m m.
4 n
m,.m mm
. m.
- mm 3
g i
3 i
Safety l
j I
DC l
l,
)
Su a aort Balance < Electrical l l
s i
_==
Plant g
8 1
4
=----
- j q
g ECCS= =i AC -
g 3,,
zi Instrumentat. Electrical s
ESAS 8
s b
s
=
3 3:
i y
StructuraPi a
y 1
s L_
s a
r j
]
y,
_ = = -
=_-
g
.4 3
1 3
^
s
. 4 3
i
=
s
!j if
- \\
s, si.
Plarit!Eicensingi
?!
- Basist 2
a
,n l;i5/8/97
-11
~
"'2 y
x
,d
.g x
ic Document Integration
.m _
_ W Group a=
mm_
~n.
-c n_,,w
,nn n,,,
ym.mem paaamemm m mm,
.,mmmm,
- 4
- T' s3 a
eactor
$j$
)}
Decay Heat Make Up j
Coolant A
a 4
3~
5 Safety Emergency Engineered j
jlj fj Support Diesels Safeguards
- )
1 g
a 3
3 Building Emergency 9
3 Ventilat. ion 1
Spray Feedwater 2
3
- lj j
w
.x x
3 3
g
' !al
\\dr/
S 3
Te S
c EDBD
[$
,nd and B
k
)
yn :,
Databases A5/8/97 j
~'
'~
w
-2
,15 4
i cc is y-Configuration Document Integration w.:au.
. ::=: = mw w w a x w a m:= w - w a u== w ma===ma i
I Collection of
' msAa maa m am4 y
,m m m acggggummamaag sf 1]
System d
'll Information 13 f
Integrate j
q information by
]
(j system in central j
'I location n
4 j
9 a,
j j
Develop
!j j
Licensing Basis 1
lj by system J
Ti 1
q 3
~_
4 a
1 j
Integrate Plant 5
j System Ownership Licensing Basis
]
I Teams Acceptance P
Documents b
- 3 y
.. ... ;r ; ~: ;-;: ; ; n;;.- ;. :.: -
l u
a er _._
_-mr. _
)
ldl 1
1 Overall l
3 Integrated ll Verification
- s q
g 1 5/8/97 j
a di si
...... ______ j
tt u
";jf Configuration Document Integration awda
.- wa&.euM:L u hke w wsa a u M ais u w M s.ac m k k p =
s%. M asa m,,uad: w s:aw a: nag & wgs?
1 4
]
sj FSAR Chapter 14, Safety Analysis y
]a ij
> Separate and focused group a,
ll 1,
> Charged with ensuring Accident
,j i
Mitigation is clean by showing a clear 2
j
]
path translating from accident to EOP
!a!
?!
o (j
L!
k i
i j
h
?i ff M
b 3
1 3 5/8/97 1
J J
1 1
"g'*
Configuration Document Integration
__m
_____ m
- ML2six
- es.ia d M 6
- a i-aG%2eadbW M ikiKM M dn'+1-M
" i h"G%
%U?: - %w
+ Men ~"W*:Mhs&n%2 kudu %&:kg5 n
- a 74 4
jj
]
]
Project Attributes a]
q] > FSAR Writers assigned by section/ chapter maintain a
a j
current knowledge of changes and content s
a if
(! > 50.59 Writers and Reviewers have central location to l
l obtain up-to-date information
]
]
> Follow System Readiness Review Selection Criteria and i
Restart Criteria for Prioritization ofIssues I
- j j
> Interim product is most current Licensing Bases for safety 1
,h evaluations if j$
effective tool for future safety assessments
]
End product will be accurate documents and j 5/8/97 4
a 2
__a
t 1
m m
rm_
r m
m m - y-
- s EXTENT OF CONDITION 9e ax-- -_== man =_a=-- _ nw
.;&&h:ba wduLQi
'A:;.4G?MG.i;A&bniCddLD-'
e 'Mi;;:43icsdi.Gadi&M-
'ea ~ i=$&2 LEX:aA M J Ms%;
'w:d &QG ~ %:id L. l.'b
- lh Y
3 4
g 1
]
Reasonable assurance that CR-3 will a
a j
fj operate within its design and licensing bases.
m a
- 1 e
j CR-3 can Mitigate all Design Basis Accidents i
a
?
d
.s a
i a
a T4
- 1 ij Modifications System Configuration i,
& Focused Readiness Document d
l]
Review Review Integration j
[i ofPrograms Program Project A
?\\
3
)p D
a Jj tj y
- j
.j e
1 a
3 d 5/8/97 ]
, a,
,,