ML20141F282
| ML20141F282 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1995 |
| From: | EQE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS (FORMERLY EQE ENGINEERING |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141F268 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-46, REF-GTECI-SC, TASK-A-46, TASK-OR 52233-C-004, 52233-C-004-R00, 52233-C-4, 52233-C-4-R, NUDOCS 9705210264 | |
| Download: ML20141F282 (41) | |
Text
.
CALCULATION COVER SHEET ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS us em n.
~ > <
+,
a Calculation No.:
52233-C-004 Project:
Beaver Vallev A-46 Review Calculation
Title:
GE Switchaear Anchorage Evaluation
References:
See Page 7 Attachments:
A (H Pages)
Tctal Number of Pages (including Cover Sheet) 40
^P Description of Revision Originator Checker Approver Nun e D
0 10/3 o Originalissue
@(
$C j
V
,M>
)
g, h '
N., h.'
('
.}
CALC 004 DOC & CALCOO4 MCO 9705210264 970516 PDR ADOCK 05000334 P
~
i i
FQF CALCULATION SHEET
'U
SHEET NO.
1 W
DATE Ml2 /I JOB NO.
52233 Joe Beaver Vallev A-46 Review BY bW CALC NO.
C-004
$UBJECT GE Switchaear Anchorace Evaluation CHK DATE l
PURPOSE l
This calculation will evaluate the seismic adequacy of the anchorage for Low Voltage Switchgear, installed at j
the Beaver Valley Power Station.
j SCOPE I
The evaluation includes General Electnc Battery Breaker Switchgear and Breakmaster Disconnect Switches.
This equipment is installed in the SRVB structure as indicated below.
Locatiott Equipment ID No.
Building Elevation
^
BAT BKR-1 SRVB 713'4" i
BAT-BKR-2 SRVB 713'-6" BAT-BKR-3 SRVB 713'-6*
BAT-BKR-4 SRVB 713'-6*
SW-1-8N1 SRVB 713'-6*
SW-1-9P1 SRVB 713'-6*
METHODOLOGY The Low Voltage Switchgear is evaluated in accordance with the techniques provided in Section 4 and Appendix C of the Generic implementation Procedure (GIP)(Reference 1). Existing analysis for the Disconnect Switches i
(Reference 2) will be reviewed for conformance to the GIP criteria.
Batterv Breaker Switchaear The General Electnc 125 V Battery Breaker Switchgear have 20" wide X 60' deep X 91.5" tall sections with an approximate weight of 1000 lb. Most sections are anchored with three 1/2" $ shell anchors. BAT-BKR-4 has a 4
3/8" $ anchor bolt in the rear location. This limiting configuration of Battery Breaker Switchgear anchorage is shown in the following sketch.
CALCULATION SHEET SHEET NO.
3 JOBNO.
52233 JOB Beaver Vat!ev A-46 Review BY h
DATE f/22/9f f
CALCNO.
C-004 SUBJECT GE Switchaear Anchorace Evaluation CHK A b DATE 'd" $ I
'A
/
(P-(-
h A
z.
g
{^k\\
- %ffby 55% "
( h'$ Succ. naw (treo.no) 4 p /9,SHm Amuoe L
/
M E % T-O K K -4 C All y h
a 4
i 10 $. "
i_ _g
}~.
'I ~h" f(ga 44" i
- 3,,
+
BAT-BKR - x conftSogg7,o,3
FOF CALCULATION SHEET Y
"~"
SHEET NO.
JOB NO.
52233 JOB Beaver Vallev A-46 Review BY DATE F/lE/9I CALC NO.
C-004 SUBJECT GE Switchaear Anchoraae Evaluation CHK h DATEY" M I The Battery Breaker Switchgear will be evaluated as a single cabinet, as each of the General Electric units is anchored in a similar fashion. Per Reference 8, the assembly weight is 1000 lb. Each section (except BAT-BKR-4) is anchored by three 1/2" $ bolts. These anchor bolts will be evaulated in this calculation.
The peak horizontal spectral acceleration for the Service Building is 0.36g at 5% damping for frequencies between approximately 2 and 6 Hz (Reference 2). Assume that the CG is at 1/2 of the cabinet's height, or 45.75" and at the centroid of the 3-bolt pattern for the X-Z plane.
S h = 0.36 g Sy =-S h S v = 0.24 g Wt = 1000 lb h = 45.75 in Determine loads on the anchor bolts Because of the anchor bolt arrangement of two bolts in front and one bolt in the rear, and the additional condition of a 3/8" bolt rather than 1/2" at the rear of BAT-BKR-4, the loading conditions will be determined separately for both the front and the back bolts Bolt loads for seismic forces in the X direction (front to back):
S h Wt h P xf = 2-(55.25)
Xf
- 4' S h Wt V xf = 180 lb (1/2 of load taken by one front bolt)
V xf
'2 S Wth h
P xr = 298 lb P xr
- 55.25 S h Wt V xr "
V xr = 180 lb 2
CALCULATION SHEET SHEET NO.
6 h
DATE..W/21/I JOB NO.
52233 JOB Beaver Vallev A46 Review By CALC NO.
C-004 SUBJECT GE Switchgear Anchorage Evaluation CHK O DATE 3*i' d Bolt loads for seismic forces in the Y direction (vertical):
P y =
y Wt S
P yf = 120 lb (1/2 of load taken by one front bolt) y g-P r:
y Wt S
P yr = 120 lb y
y-Vy=0 V yr = 0 y
Bolt loads for seismic forces in the Z direction (side to side):
S h Wt h P zr = 803 lb (1/2 of load taken by single rear bolt)
P zr * (10.25) 2 S h Wt f
V zr
- V zr = 180 lb 2
i P y= 803 lb (Let load determined for rear bolt represent P zf = P r z
z the load seen by one of two front bolts)
S h Wt v f = 180 lb (1/2 of load taken by one front bolt)
V yf. =
2 Z
Additional Loads due to dead weight:
Wt P dif = -250 lb (1/2 of load taken by two front bolts)
P dig, =
2Ti
- Wt P dir ~
- 3-P d!r = -333 lb (1/3 of load taken by single rear bolt)
V dif =0 V dir = 0
II L
FQF CALCULATION SHEET SHEET NO.
6 DATE I/ZZ-/9f JOB NO.
52233 JOB Beaver Vallev A-46 Review sy CHK M OATES~M"Y I
CALC NO.
C-004 SUBJECT GE Switchaear Anchorace Evaluation SRSS combination of loads:
Pg:,fP[+P yf, p f + P dig 2
x z
V g =,fV xf y g, y f, y d!f 2
2 y
z P g = 576 lb/ bolt V g = 255 lb/ bolt Pr=fP xr
- P yr + P zr + P dir 2
r
- s[V 2
2 2 eV yr + V zr + V dir V
xr P r = 532 lb/ bolt V r = 255 lb/ bolt
CALCULATION SHEET SHEET NO.
7 IN L/I JOS NO.
8i7733 Joe BeaverVallev A-46 Review ey M DATE CALC NO.
C-004 SUBJECT GE Switchgear Anchorage Evaluation CHK OATE3-1T-U i
Determine allowable loads for anchor bolts The nominal allowable capacities for 1/ 2"$ expansion anchor (front) and a 3 / 8"&
expansion anchor (rear) are as follows (Reference 1):
P nom : 2290 lb V fnom = 2380 lb f
P mom.= 1460 lb V mom.= 1420 lb A reduction factor for unknown anchorage will be used since the type of shell anchor is not specified.
The anchor bolts were checked for tightness and none were indicated as having its shell protrude above the concrete.
With the front bolt spacing of 12" for the 20.5" wide sections, the closest bolts are 8.5" between cente lines.
D g.= 0.50 in 10 D g = 5 in. < 8.5" O.K.
The subject anchor bolts are not adjacent to any free edges Concrete strength, f 'e = 4000 psi (Reference 7)
The SEWS indicates that switchgear BAT-BKR-2 may contain essential relays (marked as unknown).
The resulting capacity reduction factors are as follows:
For expansion anchor type, RT p = 0.6 RT s. = 0.6 For short embedmont lengths, RL p = 1.0 RL
= 1.0 i
For closeh spaced anchors, RS p.: 1.0 RS s = 1.0 For near edge anchors.
RE p = 1.0 RE s = 1.0 For low concrete strength, RF p = 1.0 RF s = 1.0 For cracked concrete, RC p.= 1.0 For essential relay anchors, RR p = 0.75 RR s = 0.75
d W
CALCULATION SHEET
~
SHEET NO.
I JOB NO.
52233 JOB Beaver Vallev A48 Review By
/@
DATE ff/tE/9[
CALC NO.
C-004 SUBJECT GE Switchaear Anchorace Evaluation CHK b DATET*U'N P all = P nom RT RL.RS RE RF RC RR p f
f p
p p
p p
p fall = V nom RT s RL s RS s RE s RF s RR V
f s
V all = 1071 lb P all = 1031 lb f
f Similarly for the rear anchor bolt, P rail = P rnom RT RL RS.RE RF.RC RR p p
p p
p p
p V rail = V mom RT s RL s RS s RE s RF RR s s
P rail = 657 lb V rail = 639 lb Comoanng cacacitv and demand.
For the front 1/2" bolts, Pg Vg
= 0.559
= 0.24 < 0.3 P all V fall f
For the rear 3/8" bolt P
V r
r
= 0.81
=04
> 0.3 p
y Pr Vr
= 0.97 0.7 5 rail V rail t
The single 3/8" bolt at the rear of BAT-BKR-4 would be adequate to anchor the Battery Breaker Switchgear along with the two 1/2" bolts in the front.
l h
CALCULATION SHEET
" " " " ^ ' "
SHEET NO.
N JOB NO.
67233 JOB Beaver Vallev A-48 Review BY M
DATE A7EE/ff" CALC NO.
C-004 SUBJECT GE Switchamar Anchorace Evaluation CHK M DATE 9'lT" U Disconnect Switches The anchorage for the General Electric Breakmaster Disconnect Switches is evaluated for seismic loadings in DLC calculation 8700-DSC-6550 (Reference 2). Review of this calculation confirmed that GlP criteria were satisfied.
CONCLUSIONS The anchorage for the subject Battery Breaker Switchgear has beenshown to be adequate to withstand the seismic loadings from an SSE event. Review of existing analysis shows that GlP criteria and methods were utilized for the Disconnect Switches in reference 2.
REFERENCES 1.
SQUG, Generic Impbmentation Procedure (GIP) For Seismic Venfication of Nuclear Plant Equipment, Revision 2, Corrected, June 28,1991, 2.
Draft Calculation 8700-DSC-6550, Anchorage Evaluation of Disconnect Switch SW-1-8N1 and SW-1-9P1 for SOUG Project,1/27/95 l
, 3.
Telecopy from G. S. Ritz to R. W. Cushing dated July 13,1995, EQE log 52233-l-003.
4.
URS/ John A. Blume & Associates Seismic Venfication of Nuclear Plant Equipment Anchorage (Revision 1), EPRI NP-5228-SL, June 1991.
5.
AISC Manual of Steel Construction,9th Edition 6.
ACI 349-90, Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety Related Concrete Structures.
7.
Letter from R.M. Stark to H.A. Van Wassen dated November 19,1979, regarding Beaver Valley Power Station Unit 1 Concrete Strength Evaluation.
8.
Beaver Valle'y Power Station Drawings 8700-RE-27B 8700-1.26-17A (GE/0673D0500) 8700-1.26-19C (GE/0152C9165) 8700-1.18-129A (GE/0183B9261)
FOF CALCULATION SHEET SHEET NO.
Ol n m ' "
JOB NO.
52233 Joe Beaver Vallev A46 Review BY M DATE I/$9f E
CALC NO.
C-004 SUBJECT
' GE Switchgear Anchorace Evaluation CHK_ J A DATE l
l Attachment A Screening Evaluation Work Sheet (SEWS)
Packages (31 pages) 1 e
i
i; M.
SSEL Line No.
8007 Status V N U A
SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 1 of 3 l
l Equip. ID No.
DAT-BKR-1 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear EquiphntDetnption 39/ MAIN DC BUS #1 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER Location:
dg.
SRVB Floor El.
713 Room, Row / Col EMERG SWGR #1 Manufacturen, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
G080 GENERAL ELECTRIC AKD-5 VTI 1, V
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.
Elevation where equipment receives seismic input
_ 71'5 2.
Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Q) N 3.
Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N 4.
Capacity based on:
Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS GERS 5.
Demand based on:
Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum JA al Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
US)
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in
@NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRyM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in earthquake experience N/A
- g'g', j equipment class N U 2.
600 V rating or less N U N/A 3.
Side-to-side restraint of draw-out circuit N U N/A breakers is provided 4.
Adjacent cabinets which are close enough to impact, or sections of multi-bay cabinets, are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U N/A 5.
Attached weight (except conduit) less than about 100 lbs per cabinet assembly N U N/A 6.
Externally attached items rigidly anchored N U N/A 7.
General configuration similar to ANSI C37.20 Standards N U N/A 8.
Cutouts in lower half of cabinet side sheathing less than 30% of width of side panel wide and less than 60% of width of side panel high excluding bus transfer compartment N U N/A i
9.
All doors secured by latch or fastener N U N/A
- 10. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N@N 11.
Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Mo rc. \\c,.
lN U 5
- 12. Have you looked for and found no other adverse corIcerns?
() N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
Y N U N/A
Ab SSEL Line No. 8007 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No.
BAT-BKR-1 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Descrlption 39/ MAIN DC BUS #1 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which~are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A i
2.
Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y.N U N/A 3.
Floor-mounted enclosure Y N U N/A 4.
Manufactured by major vendor (ITE/ Brown Bovert, Westinghouse, or GE)
Y N U N/A 5.
Maximum weight per section less than 1600 lbs Y N U N/A 6.
Base anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N U N/A i
7.
Relays used for breaker function are not on
" Low Ruggedness Relays" list Y N U N/A 8.
Relay evaluation completed for all relays that are essential to other equipment or cause unacceptable j
lockout Y N U N/A i
9.
For 2.5 g level GERS, vertical restraint prevents breaker uplift Y N U N/A 10.
For 2.5 g level GERS, outside corners of end units are reinforced, if needed Y N U N/A 11.
All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assembifes bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS7 Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE 1.
Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation)
Y N @ N/A 2.
Type of anchorage covered by GIP
@N U N/A 3.
Sizes and locations of anchors determined ON U N/A 4.
Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nute and washers, expansion anchor tightness
@N U N/A 5.
Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking
@N U N/A 6.
For bolted. anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch
@N U N/A 7.
Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors
@N U N/A 8.
Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered Y N @ N/A 9.
Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate Y ~N @ N/A 10.
Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U@
Are anchorage requirements met?
Y N U
SSEL'Line No. 8007 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. 10 No.
BIT-BKR-1 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Descrlption 39/ MAIN DC BUS fl BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Soft targets free from impact by nearby a
equipment or structures WN U N/A 2.
If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment tdo edcys free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Y N U@
3.
Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y N U N/A 4.
Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse CY N U N/A 5.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
T N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects?
YNU IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00 ATE 7 YNU COMMENTS j
0.cM ad i s ib boer b hei b hoe ed dc.55 Aclclif teml he*p f 's nch jucts el sisniDcM.Q+Mik.ud 3
e gi:
k Ac kecg t., shed ne.%\\ wh :Jey, v ("~c~
M ine.f ne.ca-ble d w c~,{. ' a p - i - i 6,
L A N k c. been i
e.sedacde-cl ln a c c e -ck c. c.
w;4k IeG5 e, o - t i,
Vak-ho cLAa),
i W/
Evaluated by:
/. ////M J Nx' Date:
I / 30/9c-
/-36-Gd~
i
~ " ~
SAf.[N.-[
g THE FOLLOWING ARE NEAR BLOCK WALLS:
EIN DISTANCE FROH WALL SSW-VITBUS-2 BEYOND PROJECTION OF THE WALL INV-VITBUS-2 84" DC-SWBD-2 BEYOND PROJECTION OF THE WALL BAT-BKR-2 60" BAT-CHG-2 BEYOND PROJECTION OF THE WALL PROJECTION OF THE WALL IS EQUAL TO ITS HEIGHT. (90")
THE BLOCK WALLS ARE IDENTIFIED AS SB-1-11, SB-1-12, SB-1-13.
THE WALLS HAVE BEEN EVALUATED AND FOUND SATISFACTORY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IEB 80-11 REVIEW.
O l
Ra
- r...
ce s o.,
- e..,
- .e re e, e*+e
. t.,,s o
I u ~)
s C
@): G.7- % Y C - \\,._
a (9
4g,>3 //1:
s e
/Grf /?.~.,s
/ 3* )
8 I
."N:~1&Ma :
e s.
31 18 AN.
t,-
-4 s
h4 O*'
i.
is a
rg' #
/
is f
1 p
17
\\
>e A /
M ie "7
s
- B 33 ea i
,Cgf
/
c s
l
,e i
f R P :.r.:
3e iI l
f-.% sk,ll.b ke #... c Jt e
34
/
' 4 0 -'i",.Lt
/
I
/
1
.s
- s. \\,
~-
w.
'L l
0 i
o
.t as i
7,,
a y
el i
l
.s se 9
-.3dre Ze o
e i
se 49 d
MI e
e e
f
,. ? g..
} o' o
.t
~
~
~ ~
0-A7 SSEL Line No. 8008 Status Y N U A
SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 1 of 3 Equip. ID No.
BIT-BKR-2 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear O
kf scrT) tion 39/ MAIN DC BUS #2 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER Equipfept Lccation:
g.
SRV8 Floor El.
713 Room, Row / Col EMERG SWGR #2 Manufdurer,Model,Etc.(optionalbutrecommended)
G080 GENERAL ELECTRIC AKO-5, VTI 1 4
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.
Elevation where equipment receives seismic input
. 7(3 2.
Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade CD N U 3.
Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N U@
4.
Capacity based on:
Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS GERS 5.
Demand based on:
Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
RRS Does capacity exceed demand?
Indicate at right (*) and in
@NU COMMENTS if a special excep(tion to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A Y. 3 2.
600 V rating or less N U N/A 3.
Side-to-side restraint of draw-out circuit N U N/A breakers is provided 4.
Adjacent cabinets which are close enough to imnart.
or sections of multi-bay cabinets,p1FboltedlngethjIo if they contajn essential relays
@N U N/A 5.
Attached weight (except conduit) less than about 100 lbs per cabinet assembly N U N/A 6.
Externally. attached items rigidly anchored N U N/A 7.
General configuration similar to ANSI C37.20 Standards N U N/A 8.
Cutouts in lower half of cabinet side sheathingd C"4
- j5 less than 30% of width of side panel wide and less than 60% of width of side panel high excluding bus transfer compartment
@N U N/A 9.
All doors secured by latch or fastener WN U N/A
- 10. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N dQ N/A 11.
Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N Q,) N/A
- 12. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
Y N U N/A is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
Y N U N/A
A6 SSEL Line No.
8008 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No.
BAT-BKR-2 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Descr_lption 39/ MAIN DC BUS #2 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A 2.
Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N-U N/A 3.
Floor-mounted enclosure Y N U N/A 4.
Manufactured by major vendor (ITE/ Brown Boveri, Westinghouse,-orGE)
Y N U N/A 5.
Maximum weight per section less than 1600 lbs Y N U N/A 6.
Base anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N U N/A 7.
Relays used for breaker function are not on
" Low Ruggedness Relays" list Y N U N/A 8.
Relay evaluation' completed for all relays that are essential to other equipment or cause unacceptable lockout Y N U N/A i
9.
For 2.5 g level GERS, vertical restraint prevents Y N U N/A breaker uplift 10.
For 2.5 g level GERS, outside corners of end units are reinforced, if needed Y N U N/A 11.
All-adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
YNUh ANCHORAGE 1.
Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation)
N @ N/A 2.
Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A 3.
Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A 4.
Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness
@N U N/A 5.
Factors affec. ting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered:
embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking
@N U N/A 6.
For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch
@N U N/A 7.
Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors
@N O N/A 8.
Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered
@N U N/A 9.
Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate
@N U N/A 10.
Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N Uh Nh Are anchorage requirements met?
Y 1
c
i SSEL Line No.
8008 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 3 of 3
~
Equip. ID No.
BAT-BKR-2 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 39/ MAIN DC BUS #2 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Soft targets free from impact by nearby i
equipment or structures bN U N/A 2.
If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from.all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A 3.
Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/Af, 4.
Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse N U N/A 5.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects?
@) N
((
IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE?
YN@
COMMENTS y'
(g go Mt ACHED C#40 0 tif $ *TTi6 TW. (fe) % f'To p,gg fa mar ([
tw 4), z. (K+)j *sh*)t Acg is g
cues b  uumm 3.*m.
mes
- z" " " " E u eu w N41 6,4w.V AufsMC0
- ' Ch d ax eee 5
kLe
(*e, g Q"
Se, 4v? ped ci".
90 <)
M i k n d L @
SLui useLt o^tr (7g73 y,
a g ed w ee % \\e.
j j
cf 9 ADO ihu,l95
I_.
- 67. 6q.5 i
AIC j
1 i
THE F9Li
' MG ARE
~~'
CC" F*.!'S:
ET:1 riSTT."CC F R'*1 ALL 5 " ' '"
-"S-2 PEYOf!D FROJECTIOt1 OF Tl!E '.'.*-LL I.
"S-2 11" DC -'
BEYONO PROJECT!Oti OF T!!E "*.LL g.~.~
~
p, a n BAT-C'
-?
P.EYO!'D PROJF.CTIOti OF THE WALL PROJT TI OF Tl!E '".LL IG EQU?.L TO ITS HEIGHT. (90")
THE T*"'
LLS 7 P5 ICE:! ITIES ;S SP-1-6, SB-1-7, SB-1-8.
THE F
' W Z ' E c.'; E'/ A!.'JAT ED At'0 TC*.'!!D SATISFACTORY IN ACCC" 5'I T H !" ~, IFn ?O-11 E' ' I E".
m
..3 Q Dwevero Lagne Cesaper Laserem thest i
A I I
.e.-
- M#
d
( c.
ca: n -.n.z w.r ik.:
E
/ cVg
. ?*'- r '? x., ;,
e
-~..
1 re.s:. :
e
.9
- 1
.8
]
a.--
ib
+.
g
..g
~
L
/
u.
,/
?
?nt tag I
n n
s.z 08 87*
w
$0 f
"s,
.., s a Oss1,* US 1 *dk
./
NM [F""*
88
/
/
l'
/
I V: a,-. s
,.m
]
n e
W e
39
,j, I
a Mc Ge< escL;b t, C,3 l'
...I d e. <=A:...,
M.'.:*i, V
1
=-
5 L,,,a:,,
k., c,.u,,d k <s( <.&.,
u;%.s&ta,
) C nl 3:0 i
,a 4},
fVi?'sU p
n w.., :p
~, < <.,,
_-A~
f (4h Neid
'T
+8 f
We ain a
J
/
's p
s.
CAL,.c. uker beh u J aste au hmske redal.'*.
A a,,.L.8, eL..k J w'+ be. tw %,,,d,
p 9
.
- jf
~
^
e J
.~
/)l2
)
-SSEL Line No. 8009 Status Y N U A
)
SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 1 of 3 i
p 1
1 Equ I
BAT-BKR-3 Equip. Class 02 - Low voltage Switchgar Equipmens eschption 39/ MAIN DC BUS #3 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER Locat45n: Bldg.
SRVB Floor El.
713 Room, Row / Col EMERG SWGR #1 i
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
G080 GENERAL ELECTRIC AKD-5 VTI 1 i
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND l.
Elevation where equipment receives seismic input
_7IS 2.
Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade (YVN1 3.
Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N GD N/A 4.
Capacity based on:
Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum B
1.5 x Bounding Spectrum Q
GERS G
S 5.
Demand based on:
Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in
@NU COMMENTS ff a special exception to enveloping of seismic l
demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
)
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in earthquake experience N/A y i
equipment class N U 2.
600 V rating or less N U N/A 3.
Side-to-side restraint of draw-out circuit N U N/A breakers is provided 4.
Adjacent cabinets which are close enough to impact, or sections of multi-bay cabinets, are bolted tqgether if they contain essential relays hb e % N rshy*
Y N U@
5.
Attached weight (except conduit) less U ^C
@N U NA than about 100 lbs per cabinet assembly 6.
Externally attached items rigidly anchored Y N U 7.
General configuration similar to ANSI C37.20 Standards
@N U N/A 8.
Cutouts in lower half of cabinet side sheathing less than 30% of width of side panel wide and less than 60% of width of side panel high excluding bus transfer compartment N U N/A i
9.
All doors secured by latch or fastener N.& N/A
]
- 10. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N WNA 11.
Relays mounted on equipment evaluated W rekys, Y N U
/
1
- 12. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
@N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
Y N U N/A
1 Al3 SSEL Line No.
8009 l
SCREE'NING EVALUATION WORK SHEET'(SEWS)
Sheet 2 of 3 1
- [
Equip. ID No.
BAT-BKR-3 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment' Description ~ 39/ MAIN DC BUS #3 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) j 1.
Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A l
2.
Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A j
3.
Floor-mounted enclosure Y N U N/A i
4.
Manufactured by major vendor (ITE/ Brown Boveri, l
Westinghouse,orGE)
Y N U N/A
.5.
Maximum weight per section less than 1600 lbs Y N U N/A
'l 6.
Base anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N U N/A i
7.
Relays used for breaker function are not on l
" Low Ruggedness Relays" list Y N U N/A 8.
Relay evaluation completed for all relays that are essential to other equipment or cause unacceptable lockout Y N U N/A 9.
For 2.5 g level GERS, vertical restraint prevents breaker uplift Y N U N/A 10.
For 2.5.g level GERS, outside corners of end units are reinforced, if needed Y N U N/A i
11.
All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay 4
assemblies bolted.together Y N U N/A P
is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE 1.
Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation)
N U N/A i
2.
Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A 3.
Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A i
4.
Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness
@N U N/A 5.
Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking hN U N/A J'
6.
For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1
1/4-inch bN U N/A 1
7.
Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors
@. N U N/A 8.
Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying a
action on anchors considered LY/ N U N/A 9.
Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate Y N(@N/A 10.
Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete m
pad adequacy evaluated Y N U (3/.9 Are anchorage requirements met?
Y N U
Al4 SSEL Line No. 8009 SCREENINGEVALUATIONWORKSHEET(SEWS)
Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No.-
BAT-BKR-3 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 39/ MAIN DC BUS #3 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER INTERACTION EFFECTS I.
Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures hN U N/A 2.
If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment
- n: b s y
free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures 1N U 3.
Attached lines have adequate flexibility (y) N U N/A 4.
Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse
@N U N/A 5.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
UY N U N/
Is equipment free of interaction effects?
Y' N U IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00 ATE 7 YNU COMMENTS w
M,: J ke9kk eaewls 4A~%& G %
L.
ih ") ~ % M - c=-
L l%~
eks. (37 cf> me,d skcO ~N -
,q e r. t ci d veree is c.a,s d ts L A all 60 (5 WJ k" ev a ded G
4 ke. cey.wA o C e so -'l-
{
lbO[6 Evaluated by:
80 s Date:
xa l
0j w
uentc m
'dAp @#.4 AIf SMEE7
... OF l
FILE NO Joe fitLE OFE W LOCATCN C 0IJ 0 DATE-2b3b SUSJECT OguntMENT gy-DATE mEvrSEO OlvtSCN 8
DATE-
=
A 3 AT-B AR - 3 7,,.
I' b
th y_
15 Sw'SD -]
{N 3 7 Ye i "
i I
l GAT-C-HG-3 33Y2
\\
x:
ui e
i k.
LIKRTG$
l 22 A.
4
,j, g b
~
r h
- V
\\
h wig E+
E 21 s
~'
dl -
4 7
W' s
3 f
A N
ssW -
2e7+ <
\\/iT G a 5 '
+
-2 i
1 I
OACPCC G!k 1
l
.o
, Q thsquesne Lagne Company Anstess Sheet. -.. - -..
e...
e.
~. g. :...-.
A/6
~.
eptse av
$ ate e=te to es ea's a=atv; t =o f
,I 0) 8
' st.
so): Ge-M. 2, l 9
~~
e o,r; s.:
( g o' y l A % 1 M : c:.:
t 5$O5k$ $
l g
r-14 is i-#
ie 5
y ie se
>0 j
j Ia t3 Y
q CS ae IF
/
~
720P :f:=,=.
n se SS n
u i
33
^
b h
L 4*
l I/
M 4 c.d
%;\\,,"f a Io c(O
/,I
&d) 48 as l
e 48 I
2ec zcir.
I c
I 6
O O
4 6
P D
f.
, ' =. 9 e
t
'e s
/.
s
{
AI7 SSEL Line No.
8010 Status Y N U A-
' SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 1 of 3 l
Equfli. }
o.
B5T-BKR-4 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear
- Equ'ipme%Desription 39/ MAIN DC BUS #4 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER i
/
logon: Bldg.
SRVB Floor El.
713 Room, Row / Col EMERG SWGR #2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
G080 GENERAL ELECTRIC AKD-5, VTI 1.
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAhD
- 1. ~
Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 3 d 'b 2.
Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade GLJN 3.
Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N U N/A 4.
Capacity based on:
Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum.
BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS GERS 5.
Demand based on:
Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum 15 4
Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
4W Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
RRS Does capacity exceed demand?
(Indicate at right (*) and in h
COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
f&' EATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COPg1ENTS section below) l.
Equipment is included in earthquake experience j
equipment class N U N/A 2.
600 V rating or less N U N/A 3.
Side-to-side restraint of draw-out circuit N U N/A
~
breakers is provided 4.
f.djacent cabinets which are close er.ough to impact, are bolted tpgether or sections of multi-bay cabinets,A/o e5Ami Fe i
h if they contain essential relays Y N U 5.
Attached weight (except conduit) Tess than about 100 lbs per cabinet assembly N U N QU (
N JL l
6.
Externallyfattached items rigidly anchored 7.
General configuration similar to ANSI C37.20 Standards 4
8.
Cutouts in lower half of cabinet side sheathing less than 30% of width of side panel wide and less than 60% of width of side panel high excluding bus transfer compartment-N U N/A 9.
All doors secured by latch or fastener N IA N/A
- 10. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below,fpr d", tails)80"*
N (19 11.
Relays mounted on equipment evaluated No em1N Y N U
- 12. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
@N U N/A Is the intent 'of all the caveats met for Bounding ',pectrum?
Y Nh/A
(
4 e
AIB SSEL Line No. 8010 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 2 of 3 1
Equip. ID No.
-BKR-4 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear EquipmentDescrjption 39/ MAIN DC BUS #4 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMENTS section below)
Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment @ N 1.
class N/A 2.
Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats N
N/A 3.
Floor-mounted enclosure N
N/A 4.
Manufactured by major vendor (ITE/ Brown Boveri, a
Westinghouse, or GE)
W/N N/A 5.
Maximum weight per section less than 1600 lbs Y N N/A 6.
Base anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N N/A 7.
Relays used for breaker function are not on fq
" Low Ruggedness Relays" Hst Y N UV N/A 4
8.
Relay evaluation completed for all relays that are essential to other equipment or cause unacceptable lockout Y N U 9.
For 2.5 g level GERS, vertical restraint prevents breaker uplift Y N d N/A 4
10.
For 2.5 g level GERS, outside corners of end units are reinforced, if needed Y N h N/A
- 11. Alladjacentcabinetsorsectiobsofmulti-bayr$.% Mym M Y@U N/A l
assemblies bolted together g
Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
YN@l ANCHORAGE 1.
Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation)
N @ N/A 2.
Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A 3.
Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A 4.
Anchorage inctallation adequate, e.g.,
i weld qualit) ud length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightiv.ss CN U N/A 5.
Factors affec. ting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedmontlenathianchorspacing, free-edge. distance, coE rste strength / condition, and concrete cracking Y N h N/A
,/* a, under base less than ON U N/A 6.
For bolted an r
1/4-inch 7.
Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap h
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Y N U 8.
Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered ON U N/A 9.
Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate Cy)N U N/A 10.
Embedded steel, grout pad ~or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U @
Are anchorage requirements met?
Y N U
)
~
AI9 SSEL Line No. 8010 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No.
BAT-BKR-4 Equip. Class 02 - Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Descrlption 39/ MAIN DC BUS #4 BATTERY CIRCUIT BREAKER INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Soft targets free from imp rt b nearby Uh equipment or structures
/c car rv9AdU Y N 2.
If equipment contains iggitive relays, equipment free from all impact by neTrby equipment or structures JL N U A
3.
Attached lines have adequat0 flexibility QJN U N/A 4.
Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse N/A 5.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
N/A L Is equipment free of interaction effects?
YNU IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE7 YN@
COMMENTS l
fop pod J c o~o
't' co M
s -,,,,, c
,8 e,:av h o 3 sq e.,T QVERHSAD CO woY Wf07
~E isc <e-
<~ :14 e a 6:ar.
G re )ye p 4Q3 h eAheh. L ad cd kr,=f d
e ml d Y
.J coweleed a- =WC i
ec h w u-reae hk%,
g hh s'o A. b f*
O*
9 Cckke, keh uceeb h ((
efc'o3 PA O"f b" b
'N W +
7 1
L I EZ <
s t ea 9o37G dass Ly
~2eca (
3
~t Re,u. o( pod 4'-2 " Ge m t,6lc all
'5S 9 6hd "I1 revleded ad c+aIyuA 7
_i G 80- fl, CX Evaluated by: G G,>
/
/A &
Date:
I//3 /fi WM
///1/9 7
'~
' w o-c J
. tr A w '"*
.s,...
n...
e.. e.....
w.
~<....o t
au!
l
(@>
EDnE4 r-gen.d un a.:
t
??eV9 )
. N4E /&c.:. :
I j
D/~fC '4.;., ;
is 18 p
le 14 h
58 f
u 3.
(
88 f
88 is i
a
- 0 A.,
, I
/
rep re.-
,p r
m _
u w
$1 A qq p n
k aa+ -* h '. gt,I
~
EE
- };w sa u
l Id41/tdy
~
2 thc4 ~
/
24$
3.
C4 ---
hbM
~Pgp M X
M ypt.i 3,. mfg-
./
to y
%e
.;c. r _
we
-ce.aJ.~ um L ts f
AGb%6 n~ eaca,s a:,a:,c.cJ,a gs
.s s.
I f
4 n
n Goa C%t 7 *'
h a
l 4
A2l Status Y N U SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 1 of 3 4
Equip. ID No.
SW-1-8
\\
Equip. Class 03 - Medium Voltage Switchgear
^
EquipmentDescrlRCon)36/480VOLTACTRFMDISCONECTSWITCH Location: Bldg.: SRV Floor El, 713 Room, Row / Col AE SWGR 1 %d l
Manufacturer,,Nodel, Etc. (optional) G080 GENERAL ELECTRIC SE-1005, VTI 1.18-129
/
./
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.
Elevation where equipment receives seismic input
'7/ 3 2.
Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade bN U
'J.
Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N U@
4.
Capacity based on:
Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS GERS GER r
5.
Demand based on:
Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec, cGD
{
Realistic H-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
RRS Does capacity exceed demand (7,N U CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A 1
2.
2.4 KV to 4.16 KV rating N U N/A l
3.
Internally mounted potential and/or control power transformers are restrained to prevent damage to or disconnection of contacts Y N U 1A' 4.
Adjacent cabinets which are close enough to impact, e ccWne. c '.a or sections of multi-bay cabinets, are bolted together encasfi fe mF~ J if they contain essential relays Y N U@
5.
Attached weight (excluding conduit) less than about 100 lbs per cabinet bay Cf) N U N/A
~
6.
Externally attached items rigidly anchored Y N U N/A 7.
General configuration similar to ANSI C37.20 Standards
@N L N/A 8.
Cutouts in lower half of cabinet sheathing less than 30% of width of side panel wide and less than 60% of width of side panel high excluding bus transfer compartment N U N/A 9.
All doors secured by latch or fastener N U N/A
- 10. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
N U N U (._Tu/AA.;~s
- 11. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N
- 12. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
[N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
Y N U N/A
m A 27.
i SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 2 of 3 j
Equip. ID No. SW-1-8N1 Equip. Class 03 - Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 36/480 VOLT AC TRFH DISCONECT SWITCH CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A 2.
Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A 3.
Floor-mounted enclosure Y N U N/A 4.
The switchgear is not a specially-designed type Y N U N/A 5.
Circuit breakers are truck-mounted type, not jack-up or vertical-lift Y N U N/A 6.
Average weight per vertical section less than 5000 lbs Y N U N/A 7.
Base anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N U N/A 8.
Relays used for breaker function are not on
" Low Ruggedness Relays" list Y N U N/A 9.
Relay evaluations completed for all relays that are essential to other equipment or cause unacceptable lockout Y N U N/A 10.
For 2.5g level GERS, vertical restraint prevents circuit breaker uplift Y N U N/A
- 11. For 2.5g level GERS, circuit break arc chutes are restrained horizontally Y N U N/A 12.
For 2.5g level GERS, a Beaver Type Z relay is not used in Westinghouse MV switchgear for the "Y" anti-pump relay Y N U N/A 13.
Separate evaluation of breaker racking mechanism completed; seismic positioner or sufficient side-to-side restraints used Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
Y N U@
ANCHORAGE 1.
I.ppropriate equipment characteristics determined I
(mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation)
@N U N/A 2.
Type of anchorage covered by GIP
&N U N/A #-
3.
Sizes and locations of anchors determined d) N U N/A 4.
Adequacy of a.nchorage installation evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
@~,N U N/A 5.
Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking
@N U N/A 6.
For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch
@j N U N/A
i SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No.
SW-1-8N1 Equip. Class 03 - Medium Voltage Switchgear i
Equipment Description 36/480 VOLT AC TRFM DISCONECT SWITCH l
ANCHORAGE (Cont'd) 7.
Factors-affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors
@N U N/A 8.
Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying i
action on anchors considered (T) N U N/A 9.
Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate
@N U N/A i
10.
Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U i
Are anchorage requirements met?
Y N U INTERACTION EFFECT1 1.
Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
@N U N/A 2.
If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment
- , ('/
- g free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
-3.
Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y N U N/A 4.
Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse N U N/A 5.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects?
ONU hN U IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE?
COMMENTS Evaluated by: GTW v
/
.' # /
Date: 4/f6 /Y3
<uw we
~
/
{
J
,geo........ e...
Q Duquesne Light Company An: lysis sheet y
COMPILED BY CATE CWECKED By OATE AN ALY$15 NO
, Era e I
I
(. 4 sp//___
w a.:
% 'r E / '~ A : _
t.
~
- y c e,;4 [.: ~~
nad Assfer~ $6R des 2.9 7 - 9c,42 'l
[y N.o g&
, %5 ua 025~8At968
/
- 1 3
l g " e c A - [m +.
'~
- )
k 7 ce Hst ll od' lt f
I ig
/
i i
33 s
4 gg f
r fC ar
/
/
N rr~
i y;
33
/
V ll 31 n
n ',
u u
~
h.
V 5
sa 1
~~
fil d
0 o
i 9
4.N Al,Y$13 NO E'
?3 r i
j
. Duquesne Light Company PAGE _ ;
Analysis Sheet.
-pkce_ f CMECxEOSY DATE
\\
s.
A 25 i
Bls e.o nne.c.k SM S W - 8 )J l l
2 SW-t - 9 P l 4
?
7 E u c.\\ s ; <.
i
.10 11' 1
V i sc-4 12 4
G '/
ch d ec.>.
2 4-
/ --
1,
_16
- CdM J" J,
N % '3 9
[
(cl,3ceuec)k9~.
27-(eg c<.w a i
i. '.
se 20
/
33 22' ft'
- n le 25 Plaw \\Rev i
28 29 l
bX C4 hke 3 cp d ry 31 j
7C.S C
4,.
C.C4 6' AS k3 0
qs
.ss 36-iss 4,a, a 1
40 g..
'S a2 -
AK4
,s 43
- 44 l$
47
. d4,
49 j
.)
' $0
Azh Status Y N U SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 1 of 3 Equip. ID No.
SW-1-9P1 Equip. Class 03 - Medium Voltage Switchgear i
I Equipment Desc ption 36/480 VOLT AC TRFM DISCONECT SWITCH Locat o :
g SRVB Floor El.
713 Room, Row / Col EMERG SWGR #2 ManuPactur h del, Etc. (optional)
/
\\
V SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.
Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7,l3 2.
Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade CD N U 3.
Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N UQ 4.
Capacity based on:
Existing Documentation Bounding Spectrum GERS GERS' 5.
Demand based on:
Ground Response. Spectrum GRS Q.5xBoundingSpectrum Q
Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. 5pec.
1 Does capacity exceed demand
@NU CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A 2.
2.4 KV to 4.16 XV rating N U N/A 3.
Internally mounted potential and/or control power transformers are restrained to prevent damage to or disconnection of contacts Y N Ud' 4.
Ad.'acent cabinets which are close enough to impact, or ;ections of multi-bay cabinets, are bolted together if they contain essential relWIN Kewp
@N U N/A 5.
Attached weight (excluding c5ndult) less than about 100 lbs per cabinet bay N U N/A 6.
Externally attached items rigidly anchored N U N/A 7.
General configuration similar to ANSI C37.20 Standards N U N/A 8.
Cutouts in lower half of cabinet sheathing less than 30% of width of side panel wide and less than 60% of width of side panel high excluding bus transfer compartment N U N/A 9.
All doors secured by latch or fastener N U N/A
- 10. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
Y N N/A 11.
Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N N/A 12.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
$N U N/A
~
Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
Y N U N/A
(
~ 7;.-
s. _.
/)27 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. SW-1-9P1-Equip. Class 03 - Medium Voltage Switchgear-Equipment Description 36/480 VOLT AC-TRFM DISCONECT SWITCH CAVEATS - GERS.(Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 1.
Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A 2.
Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A 3.
Floor-mounted enclosure Y N U N/A 4.
The switchgear is not a specially-designed type Y N U N/A 5.
Circuit breakers are truck-mounted type, i
not jack-up or vertical-lift Y N U N/A 6.
Average weight per vertical section less than i
5000 lbs Y N U N/A 7.
Base anchorage adequate (See checklist below for' details)
Y N U N/A 8.
Relays used for breaker function are not on
." Low Ruggedness Relays" list Y N U N/A 9.
Relay evaluations completed for all relays that are essential to other equipment or cause unacceptable
~
lockout Y N U N/A 10.
For 2.5g level GERS, vertical restraint prevents I
circuit breaker uplift.
Y N U N/A 11.
For 2.5g level GERS, circuit break arc chutes are restrained horizontally Y N U N/A 12.
For 2.5g level GERS, a Beaver Type Z relay is not
+
used in Westinghouse MV switchgear for the "Y" anti-pump relay Y N U N/A 2
13.
Separate evaluation of breaker racking mechanism i
completed; seismic positioner or sufficient side-to-side restraints used Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
YNUh ANCHORAGE 1.
Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation)
CD N U N/A 2.
Type of anchorage. covered by GIP
@N U N/A 3.
Sizes and locations of anchors determined WN U N/A 4.
Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion t
anchor tightness, etc.)
@N U N/A 5.
Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, t
free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking hl N U N/A 6.
For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch N U N/A
]
.y A 28 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No.
SW-1-9P1 Equip. Class 03 - Medium voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 36/480 VOLT AC TRFM DISCONECT SWITCH ANCHORAGE (Cont!d) 7.
Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors
@N U N/A 8.
Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered
@N U N/A 9.
Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate hN U N/A 10.
Embedded steel _, grout pad or large concrete f
~ pad acequacy evaluated
@N U N/A Are anchorage requirements met?
@N U INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.
Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
@N U N/A 2.
If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures dN U N/A --
3.
Attached lines have adequate flexibility (D N U N/A 4.
Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse
(?) N U N/A 5.
Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
@N U N/
Is equipment free of interaction effects?
NU 15 E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE7 YNU COMMENTS
(
f Y hc e o$ COch,ek.$1 Q h b h 4o ac ccek fo\\
W ~ IDF Sk s's "kcrbc See f ace s,
l 1 Mer do ccdc. b 9W Sul.
4)/[!
n f
5/3 /93
/
Date:
Evaluated by:
'Y h3 f91 ld '!ALde sa y
g
$ Duqueen) Light Company Analysis Sheet M
C2-
'~
.w.,........e..,
COM?f LED SY DATE CHECKED BY DATE ANALYSf 3 NO.
i Me"
'a 9 6 0 2 9 K.1 </?
l ;@,q
-nl:_ sty..' - -...
'z o
OM /Jo.:
/ d**.- E / ' ~ f : _
[
)
I I
gEf/!'!L !._
i f
W ~'
1
\\
f y
4 76, y
i 11 12 d
13 l /
l'
\\
/
p--
n' 4
Y lG6/
g2+
g g
y
!b I
17 ze 1*
20
?
21 l
i 8
0 lW
/t fee +J7~
l0 as f ~.
46 f
h a
/
top Dw~
u
~,
9.
,l. -
)'$
4 g il/
C' l *
/
31 f
3 e
,1.,
1s 36 1
gf,
,i se 1
I i/
l 4
i
.01 CKTBRK N/,A -
g3g SW-1-9P1 ELEV 713 BLDG AREA N/A i
01 36 BLDG SERVICE TRANS 1-9P1 LOAD BREAK
""fIPMENT FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION: DISCONNECT l
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MANUFACTURER G080 SERIAL No N/A MODEL NO SE-1005 SPEC ******** OPEN ITEM **** ORIGINATING NO. Y/N: Y EMP.#
NAME
- TECH REQUEST TIME. NUMBER CTS - 870613 5754 G S RITZ DATE DATE 930503 N/A N/A N/A HOT - WORK IMMEDIATELY. CENTER R AND REPLACE WI INITIAL PROBLEM / FAILURE DESCRIPTION:CHOR IN REAR OF CABIN EMBEDMENT, SIDE CHANNEL ALSO.
TH 1/2" HILTI, MIN.2.5" INSTALL 3/8" BOLTS THRU REAR, OTHER 3. ANCHORS.
4 YOU ARE IN CHANGE MODE "PF3" - RETURN RECORD WAS WRITTEN "PF5" - CONTINUE PROCESSING "PF1" - HELP Appl SysAvl
?w-l-9P w A.y..
i 42+, 4
(
n*
f-f V{"-
/
I
/ 5 "-)
I K
A
/\\
a-ur Q
.L-T-E e
Med -/ -El daU k " ~
x T
~
O ANALv$15 NO Duquesne Light Company PAGE -
Analysis Sheet pNE CMECKEO8V CATE Bisc.ormech 6 Me_.h SW 8M i SW-t - 9 P I e
s._
E d 5 e,c.u_i h.-gp
.10 11 f
V 12 e
ss m
m 1
f G ' << S$ ; % C f
OC
- go-
+-
/
s la
- @ har :,h W.u 'r 5 (el.3eeuec)f*>~.O 17-( n er c a.:. J u
hY.
20 V
J S
21
/
22.
]
e; S 44
]
25 F l u V,' e v 27 23
. 29 30 31 j
l N"
as p
35 36
/
i" 3.
'i 43, i 40 h41 I
J II -
- 5 4 #
44A s g3.
E Cor S
de 47 it i
49.
$3 1.
l
wm a
)
ENCLOSURE 4 b