ML20141F276
| ML20141F276 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1995 |
| From: | EQE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS (FORMERLY EQE ENGINEERING |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141F268 | List: |
| References | |
| 52233-C-019, 52233-C-019-R01, 52233-C-19, 52233-C-19-R1, NUDOCS 9705210263 | |
| Download: ML20141F276 (180) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:-_ _ _ .. . i (60 --s CALCULATION COVER SHEET ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Calculation No: 2 ~ b'O /T Project: (A Qu CSM E4VGil YQ L.L4Y OW&ll, FAT *'joAf Calculation
Title:
MCARA6i bVA (AA-~loM M2 A Rt 0 4T N ST*R LA M GN U
References:
GC GCriosi .0 Attachments: Total Nurnber of Pages (including Cover Sheed): 9 l Revision Approval Number Date Description of Revision Originator Checker Approver I I05 Okl(s/h/AL [HU( Q & Rc
# / / Rc Cg3L ne :
.1- "% Revue % Fau.swis k ac 09 % ac s'
/ 2 5 3436 37
, / //
12312 OlCoversm (7St) 9705210263 970516 PDR ADOCK 05000334' m" P PDR
Sh::t b of 3'7 Job Ns.: 52233 Job: Quauesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: ac Dsta: n.is U Calc No.: Q12. Chk: (//a _ Date: /I-7 s - 9r -
Subject:
Anchoraan Evaluation for Various Instruments t TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH DESCRIPTION PAGE NUMBER 4 1.0 PURPOSE h
2.0 REFERENCES
b '
. 3.0 ANCHORAGE CALCULATION l '
FOR: FT CH-124, -127, -130, -150 LT-FW-474, -475, -476, -477, 484 LT-FW-485, -486, -495, -496 PT-RC-403 3.1 ANCHORAGE CALCULATION 2l FOR: FT-CH-122 FT-FW-100A, -100B, -100C LT-WT-104A1, -104A2 3.2 ANCHORAGE CALCULATION 3L FOR QS-RACK-4 kRntad 3.3 8 Ahl[CCACTlON 40 lN , EVALUATION 3V FOR QS-RACK-3 3.4 . DISCUSSION OF ITEMS NUTED 35 ON THE SEWS AS BE!NG SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE 4.0
SUMMARY
3(o
n . , Sht:;t of M
' ab No.: 52233 Job: Duauesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: ac Date: m u or Calc No.: Q11. Chk: CAAv Date: lI-L-99
Subject:
Anchoraae Evaluation for Various Instruments
.. TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) ! ATTACHMENTS ;
A SEWS SHEETS FOR A-1 VARIOUS INSTRUMENTS ( lb 2. PAGES IN ATTACHMENT A) , , 2 B DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY B-1
, MASONRY BLOCK WALL ANCHORAGE INFORMATION
( b PAGES IN ATTACHMENT B) 4 e I l l I
Shmst k of D Job No.:.' 52233 Job: Duauanna Beaver Vallev Power Station By: aL .Date: m u fr Calc No.: Ola_ Chk: /AA Date: ll-72-G
Subject:
- Anchorage Evaluation for Various Instruments
- 1.0 PURPOSE THE PURPOSE OF THIS CALCULATION IS TO DEMONSTRATE SEISMIC ANCHORAGE ADEQUACY FOR THE FOLLOWING INSTRUMENTS AT THE
~ DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION:
TAG No. BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION FT-CH-122 AXLB 722 FT-CH 124 SFGB 722 FT-CH-127 SFGB 722 - FT-CH 130 SFGB 722 FT-CH-150 AXLB 722 FT-FW-100A SFGB 735 FT-FW-1 C,0B SFGB 735 FT-FW-100C SFGB 735 LT-FW-474 RCBX 718 LT-FW-475 RCBX 718 l LT-FW-476 RCBX 718 LT-FW-477 RCBX 718 , LT-FW-484 RCBX 738 : LT-FW-485 RCBX 738 LT-FW-486 RCBX 718 LT-FW-495 RCBX 718 LT-FW-496 RCBX 718 LT-WT-104A1 YARD 735 ~ LT-WT-104A2 YARD 735 PT-RC-403 RCBX 701 QS-RACK-4 YARD /RWST 735 I A REVIEW OF THE SEWS SHEETS FOR THE ABOVE INSTRUMENTS INDICATES THAT THE CONCERN IS THE ANCHORAGE. FOR INSTRUMENTS LT-OS-100A, -100B, -100C, and -100D THE SEWS INDICATES THAT THEY ARE LINE MOUNTED AND AS SUCH THE ANCHORAGE IS MARKED AS "N/A". THEREFORE THESE FOUR INSTRUMENTS ARE NOTED HERE FOR COMPLETENESS ONLY. I
, .. -. . . . - - . . . - , . i
-. - - ~. .. __ . __,
Shnt 5 of M Job No.: 52233 Job: Duouesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: at Date: is v <f Cale No.: 019_ Chk: b Date:H-h-15
Subject:
Anchorage Evaluation for Various Instruments
, -. M Wfe ,.
TAG No. BUILDING FLO ATION L '^ .. K-3 -YARD /R 735 > T S INDICATES THAT T ITEM HAS AN "Lv.a e,,x t, t . . i
'A ' - +
TAG No. BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION FIS-FW-151 A SFGB 722 FIS-FW-1518 SFGB 722 PS-MS-101 A SFGB 768 PS-MS-101 B SFGB 768 PS MS-101C SFGB 768 P3-VS 106A AXLB 768 PS-VS-106B AXLB 768 TS-HV-55A SRVB 713 TS HV-558 SRVB 713 PNL-MS-101 A SFGB 751 PNL-MS-101 B SFGB 751 JNL-ffs-101C SEQB __ _7_51 - _
/05 Rc<- 3 YnufRwr 1TS 30 Tits'$MNDifATs31 A TAI IMEABM'TEMS ARE SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE.
)
- . . . . . . .- -. . . . . . . - - - ~ . . . - - . . - . . - . . . . - - - --- ._
Sho::t b of 37 < l Job No.: 52222 Job: Duauanna Reaver Vallev Power Station By: /t t. Date: nav 9r Calc No.: 01S_ Chk: Ctav' Date: //-To -Tf i -
Subject:
Anchormas Evaluation for Various Instruments {
2.0 REFERENCES
4
. 1. SEISMIC QUALIFICATION UTILITY GROUP (SQUG), " GENERIC 2-IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE (GIP)", H2 VISION 2, JUNE 28,1991.
- 2. SEWS SHEETS FOR.EACH INSTRUMENT SHOWN IN SECTION 1.0 ABOVE.
- 3. TELECOPY FROM G.S. RITZ TO R.W. CUSHING dated JULY 13,1995,EQE
-INCOMING LOG NUMBER 52233-I-003.
? . ! 4. 'DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-07.072-0431, ! '" TECHNICAL MANUAL, MODEL 764 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE ELECTRONIC 1 TRANSMITTER". i 5. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-RK-1F-3, j " INSTRUMENT PIPING - SHEET 4". i
- 6. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-6.24-4016 SHEET 1-1, " DEMINERALIZED WATER STORAGE TANK WT-TK-10, TRANSMITTER LT-WT-104A1".
4
- 7. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-6.24-4017-SHEET 1-1, " DEMINERALIZED WATER STORAGE TANK WT-TK-10, TRANSMITTER LT-WT-104A2".
1
- 8. O. W. BLODGETT, " DESIGN OF WELDED STRUCTURES",1966.
9.' DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION CALCULATION p 8700-DSC-0075, "SF8SMIC BLOCK WALLS".
- 10. FAX'ed MASONRY BLOCK WALL INFORMATION, FROM TOM WESTBROOK i (DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY) TO RON CUSHING (EQE). COPIES ARE IN BOTH l THE EQE IRVINE OFFICE QA FILES, AND A COPY IS FOUND IN ATTACHMENT B j OF THIS CALCULATION.
~ 11. TELECON NOTES, CARL NELMAN (EQE) AND TOM WESTBROOK (DUQUESNE
]
LIGHT COMPANY), NOVEMBER 28,1995: FOUND IN EQE 1RVINE OFFICE QA FILES.
.n
l l l Shut 7 of U Job No.: 52233 Job: Duouesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: % Date: 9- 2.4- 4 f l Calc No.: 012. Chk: /W - Date: /vfr/pt- _ l
Subject:
Anchorage Evaluation for Various Instruments 3.0 ANCHORAGE CALC 1LLATION FOR: FT-CH-124. 127. -130. -150: LT-FW-474. -475. -476. -477. 484. -485. -486. -495. -496: I and PT-RC-403 :
----- REFER TO FIGURES 1 THROUGH 8 FOR THIS SECTION. ----- THESE INSTRUMENTS ARE GROUPED TOGETHER BASED ON SIMILAR ,
ANCHORAGE CONFIGURATIONS. THE INSTRUMENT IS MOUNTED ONTO A 2" DIAMETER PIPE. THE PIPE IS WELDED TO A BASEPLATE. THE BASEPLATE IS FASTENED TO THE CONCRETE STRUCTURE WITH EXPANSION ANCHORS.
-- THE MINIMUM ANCHOR BOLT SIZE IS 3/8" DIAMETER " RED HEAD" WHICH IS A PHILLIPS SHELL-TYPE ANCHOR. -- THE SMALLEST ANCHOR BOLT PATTERN IS 4" SQUARE. -- THE GREATEST INSTRUMENT WElGHT IS THE FISHER PORTER FLOW TRANSMITTER, CONSERVATIVELY ESTIMATED AT 50 LB.
i
-- THE SMALLEST PIPE-TO-BASEPLATE WELD = 3/16".
Ox afeev*rN4 , j
-- THE LONGEST 18.25"IJee Fw 8 /Q)ANTILEVER LENGTH FROM BASEPLATE-l -- THE LONGEST VERTICAL OFFSET IS ESTIMATED TO BE 12". -- BASED ON A REVIEW OF FIGURES 1 THROUGH 7, A BOUNDING I CONFIGURATION IS SHOWN IN FIGURE 8.
1 1
N - EGE 04TE'P4NCNAL C? I s SHEET NO. -
;Ce AEzz37 ;OsDonc,c 8a,u lea 6mr ,r-u ey D. O,1E + u.u
/i I ^2 ' / ' ' '
CALC NO. SUBJECT - - CHK'O DATE l '//F/X fr- Cw so kca l foes he lo B 24% P LT
////
ll 4I g ([ //( 1 jA O
*)
"*u O s 4"
/ <- 2"o b (f/9) fIPg' e g "
l 4'lt +- WEd H \ Re-deaos w n va & PL ) kofES
- 1. JKETCH fEtt EW.
- 2. dt ~ 50 L6 (diktutTo PFCR-I21) 3 NJnd $cy-Ilmos lB $
(1Yricat_ of orneu) l Fu,a 1
EGE ceswruro,n i C$ l
- SHEET NO JOB NO $113b JOB llOU6E EA/8C ALN PfA U1NT70M BY d" DATE i'li'N CALC. NO. O /i SUBJECT Nld E/hd N U CHK'D DATE /0//(/fr l LT- FW L}9Q
-ftr Funa hba M , '/y"WELO
%x ~IA"< -
G -
@ s A -< -
N " n n m l if l~'= - ' ,, C - _ ~g* tre) N v h h l
) i lB &$NnoAdtw1 N e0 YIE3J A A N A+
'~
EustVioJ ko1EJ
.A . ETCH ft(L $ERVA YhuG1EefCH bDib-
- 2. Wt ~ 2\ LB Pe Xe5 4.
o (I V bullE L-
l EGE 2CE #4ET/NA!CNAL C1 -~ s . . SHEET NO. /0 JOB NO 1b3 JOB U SU L.7E i[' . 5 5 ' ! ' < /I ' MD BY CfA DATE 'l'M'6 CALC. NO [.4.] $ SUBJECT /A/MGMi'l'l CHKD DATE /a//r/>f T- C-QIb . - l'2.~1 _S - l 3 D R n,n .- AbtsLIIS'HP#6 .
% "f & L ,a c _
Afpo Derat 8,,
/~O D 2'4
\ (c/ gg
""~~
(s af Q k- s> v tvP l ELG/ . v s
\ hen @ j g
+
$ M $$ '
1.ah-:- u :a 2.We w- Err [Nes 4" < 8"x k" P. ~2o ce )
%d // ~
fllb $ hLf1
~ J 01cuanNie
( ( v A sua<cc INTTitUMENT -
- 3 (
f ,- ( 1_./ v 1 H"
% *) ) % .-
w n (2 fL) 2_'/4"oD l hrAit B' hrait 8~ ELev v/EW # Et c'l Vww fT- C H 12.4 (VJct0 - 32/V zoalc ) fT-C/k/.70 fr- Gi- m (wao - 3'V !.u;> )
/
( Paz. JEWS-130) (I bute.E b
I l ECE A'EEAflCNAL C$ SHEET NO.
;ceno.6Z7_37 aos Oaka/vc 8exeA /Atter bdres avJ ' A DATE Y"M*6 CALC. NO. ON SUBJECT [MfT/lWMcMrf CHK'D M DATE /#hr/ST I PP RC-WJ !
Rastnowc IIS/(s?926 3/g"giuri (9ft) l
// I w p _ _.
23 l
~ _
+ -% e a
>x _ _. IA,,
6* s , . - N g ~I6 y Y/sJ 6-A s .
'N _ ELEU VIG)
N A+- 01ES
- 1. &<erca fat Jaw.
- 2. Iartuwur #< ElsV ~]OII 3, TNx1Lamsar ~ 20 L6 (EJnM9) huu Y
M ECE INTER <f 4ADCf4AL j SHEET NO h JOB NO hN33 JOB U b flMI M /6fl dL N !Jd IA1'lM BY -
- DATE Yd'N C ALC. NO. OIN SUBJECT INM/CiMENfl CHKD_.. k DATE eh/dF j
\
L7'- FW-T75 K - V1h 2 - 477__ Trr Faitts/ Noa # 76 4 a ,1" ra - n' - Y A - V '" -
- A ii N < > b l K_8- j +'lu" 2h*e , , ,,
N ;l func j WELoev y"TYf
\ n Pile, (fg gg 7) x :
c-m,-sn) v N e e x ) l+~}lBYHELL ANGkL k- (4 PL) v ,/ q ,6-y ELGV VIS ///
/ /// '
\ _ __
doter ~ g'n I/qQ t.Junn PatJe4C Vs n)
- 2. 4" // TVhCm_ o F ornst V -
Ittlkiluhur hJe 9mC1.
- 3. dc ~ 1.) LB Pe 1M M PLAd \llEW I
ECE tNTEQN AT:OP4AL C1 a JOBNO h1233 JC b(Mb KNsEN'!Ad6YWJL J V I)A/ BY ) A E $~1#~ CALC. NO. bl SUBJECT IA//f/EuN vfl CHKD DATE '#/'I'T LT- FtN AS4 2 - 485 2 - % A -@5 T_TT Baasoit MoocL Alo. ~n4 f/n."d ll-Soc.r(fee Nort 3) (.ygg PaJEW na, '/ (2.PL) /VWELD _ 2_tJd40ft9e
% Aq - -
- @ o ,
? I c :
m n
- 4" SN,
,, Mid
* ~ g* (n?)
~7 ,, : ;
s
- e e
'(24z).
~
f2.
- Aacu kr (noerD Vista n-A
~
- K)
~
N ftQ/s)"Bours & -Yas) Et cv ViaJ brES .
.L. herd Ter Xef 5.
- 2. 8 TYhcat. FER ornciu UceJxerd 6r LT-FW-475).
3.1~1ficRL of oTHtJL Idhncand Uee FT-Cn-1Jo JKerad. 4, k\t ~ 21 L6 Fer bl Y ( M (_TURE O
N ECE #CEWAnCNAL SHEET NO. JoeNo $U31 Josbudh head !4dEY Powdt JT4 n)M sy QA DATE i-I 4' '3 C ALC. NO. OI9 SUBJECT 1 NfffisMe N fl CHK'O M DATE #ft '9F L.T- FW 474 T r r h vad Nioca ~7l 4 koTES 7
/ 1.Jeerca Paz.Jaa J 2. Srwano (o"d*x 'It
xo Y k<fux wirn +%"c
/ Jae L Awcm.
- 3. We =2I LBJ fel EEP Y X
w {
/
(JimmitTo FT-FW-loon) ,
% iNsrRumcnr I.r Wau-Soc vww / Moug7gy pgt gggy, pJuttov O ---.
66 Y $ OllfEKf 1 O
l EGE l I ECE e4fEQNATONAL C'd JOB NO. C2131 JOB Id b Ilbb h kk Ollf N6 M / h BY r] r DATE lE'# cal.C. NO. O /i SUBJECT MJdHMENU CHK'D DATE /9/ef'7' Z"4Ae '
^Y YB ka'b'We.o/
)
gg /
?
N 4~ w , >> s -
}, ,,
y"
>N ;
~12 l (Tff) v' x n s v l
N , x2 b ~/8W" ccavucun
> VIeJ A-A j Eunt w dt~50L.g
%%& FT-CH-ao)
C . 6.1 = /g.25 n C.4. 2 =12"
%8 Bweagcan_a E<
fiaau 1 run 7
Shact lb of 81 Job No.: 52233 Job: Duauesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: & Date: S/rs/# Calc No.: 019. Chk: C64v Dt. s: // af
Subject:
Anchoraae Evaluation for Various Instruments WT = 50
FOR BOUNDING PURPOSES DETERMINE THE LARGEST VALUE OF THE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FOR THESE INSTRUMENTS USING THE SPECTRA PROVIDED IN REFERENCE 3. USE THE 3% DAMPING PLOT.
BLDG. FLOOR ELEV PEAK SPECTRAL ACCEL. SFGB 722 0.63g ' i AXLB 722 0.69g RCBX 701 0.79g (use value for Floor Elev = 738) RCBX 718 0.79g (use value for Floor Elev = 738) ! RCBX 738 0.79g j USE: ah = 0.79 2 iL: av = ah av = 0.53
C.G.'s AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 8:
CGI .= 18.25 CG2 = 12
DETERMINE STRESSES ON THE 3/16" WELD FOR X-DIRECTION, Y-DIRECTION, Z-DIRECTION, AND DEAD LOAD. USE REFERENCE 8 SECTION 7.4 AS A GUIDE:
Aw :n-(2) Aw = 6.28 Svc =
- Sw = 3.14 Jw =
- Jw = 6.28
-- X-DIRECTION: Xaxial ' = Xaxial = 6 BEND _X - , BEND _X = 151 SHR_X =0 SHR_X = 0 Y-DIRECTION: Yaxial = 0 Yaxial = 0 BEND _Y = BEND,,Y a 153
. . - . . ~ . - . . = . . - . - - . . - . ~ . . - - . . . . ..- - . . . . . . . . . . - _ . - - - . . . . . . - .
? 6-Sha;t _ [7; of' 37
- .Jcb N2.:. 52233 Job: Duquesna Beaver Vallev Power Station- By: W Data:9/29/9 7 4 Calc No.: Q19_ . Chk:' % Date: //-n-qf j
Subject:
Anchormoe Evaluation for Various Instruments
-SHR_Y::
SHR_Y '= 4 4
-- Z DIRECTION: .
I ! Zaxial a 0 Zaxial = 0 l BEND _Z : BEND,,Z = 229 (about Y axis) ; 4 l (%T CG2 ah)- (2)y ~
. TORSION,,Z = -
y, TORSION _Z = n (about X ans) , SHR_Z SHR_Z = 6 J - DEAD LOAD:. BENDdi:- BENDdi = 290 g SHRdl: SHRdl = 8 1~ j' i
------ COMBINE WELD STRESSES:
~
l -- X-DIRECTION: i WELDx : Xaxial + BEND _X + BEND _Y
- BENDdi WELDx = 601 (Note that BEND _Z is not included with WELDx. .The bending stresses due to X-dir and Y-dir f loads act at the " top" of the weld.' The bending stress due to the Z-dir load acts at the " side" of ,
weld, i.e., 90 degrees away. The Z-dir bending stress = 0.0 at the " top" of the weld, which is
' neutral axis for the Z-dir bending stress). .
-- Y-DIRECTION:
WELDy = SHR_Y + SHRdl- WELDy = 12
- Z-DIRECTION:
- WELDr : TORsON_Z + SHR_Z - WELDz = B2 ~
--: COMBINED. STRESS ON THE WELD:
2 2 2 r(WELDx + WELDy + WELDz) f = 606 1 L 4 N, ~- - w , -e w - ,, .,....w- - ~ , . , , , - -
Sht:t Ih of M Job No.: 52233 Job: Duauesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: @ Dato: 7/tS/gf ) Calc No.: 019_ Chk: h _ Date://- LHf ' l
Subject:
Anchoraos Evaluation for Various Instruments l 1
-- DETERMINE MINIMUM WELD SIZE REQUIRED. USE TABLE 6 OF REFERENCE 8, FOR A FILLET WELD, ASSUME E60 ELECTRODE:
(~ l SIZEmin :9p SIZEmin = 0.063 j 3 I SAFETY., FACTOR : g g S AFETY_ FACTOR = 3 or SAFETY FACTOR
~ '
l THEREFORE IT CAN BE SEEN THAT THE 3/16" PIPE-TO-BASEPLATE WELD HAS l HIGH CAPACITY FOR THE BOUNDING CONFIGURATION. THE ANALYSIS IS ALSO I CONSIDERED TO BE CONSERVATIVE SINCE THE SEISMIC COMPONENTS WERE ADDED TOGETHER ABSOLUTELY (i.e. NOT SRSS'd); ALSO THE DEAD LOAD ! COMPONENTS WERE SIMILARLY ADDED DIRECTLY TO THE SEISMIC COMPONENTS.
----- EVALUATE THE CONCRETE ANCHOR BOLTS: -- X DIRECTION LOADS: ;
TENx = ' . Ib TENx - 69 lb 24 4 ( , SHRx .= 0 lb SHRx = 0alb ;
- . l
- Y-DIRECTION LOADS:
TENy:= lb TENy = 60 lb l SHRy :=
- lb SHRy = 7 lb
-- Z-DIRECTION LOADS: 4 HNz := f, !b TENz = 90 lb SHR2 := +
4 lb SHRz = 31*1b (Torsional and average shear) 4-[4 ,4 2
-- DEAD LOADS:
TENdi := , lb TEND! = 1I4alb
..- ~ . . - . _ - .. -..- - - - . . . _ . - - .
- Shnet . N of 77
.. . Job No.: 52233 Job: Duouanne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: W Data: 3/zp/K Calc No.: QL9_ . Chk: % Date: /I-Lt.- #
Subject:
Anchorage Evaluation for Various Instruments SHRdt:= lb SHRdl = 13+1b
-- COMBINE ANCHOR BOLT LOADS:
P:whTENx2 +1ENy2+ TENr2+TENdi P = 243*lb , V:=dSHRx 2+ SHRy 2+ SHRz 2+ SHRdl V = 44*lb 4
-- DETERMINE ANCHOR BOLT CAPACITY:
USING REFERENCE 1 APPENDIX C PARAGRAPH C.2 FOR 3/8" EXPANSION ANCHORS, DETERMINE THE ANCHOR BOLT ALLOWABLE VALUES FOR TENSION AND SHEAR: a: ^ Pnom := 1460 Ib Vnom := 1420 Ib i
-- ANCHOR TYPE, EMBEDMENT, BOLT SPACING, EDGE DISTANCE, CONCRETE STRENGTH, CONCRETE CRACKS, ESSENTIAL RELAYS: NO CAPACITY REDUCTION
. FACTORS ARE REQUIRED AS THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE NOT MENTIONED AS A ; CONCERN IN THE SEWS. THEREFORE THE ANCHOR BOLT ALLOWABLES ARE: i- Pallow := Pnom Pallow = 1460 lb Vallow := Vnom Vallow = 1420 lb - ---- USING THE CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SHEAR-TENSION INTERACTION:
]
h+y,[,,=0.2 < 1.0 OK (3/B" DIA ANCHOR BOLTS)
----- PER THE SEWS FOR FT-CH-130, INSTRUMENTS FT-CH-124, -127, & -130 ARE MOUNTED ON A BLOCK WALL. REFERENCE 9 DEMONSTRATES SEISMIC
- ADEQUACY FOR THIS BLOCK WALL.
4 y _ ,,e
Sheet 7O of U
- Job
- Duauenne Beaver Vallev Power Station Job No.: 5223.3 By: n Date: 1/ u r Calc No.: 011. Chk: C4ev Date: // ~10-95
Subject:
Anchornos Evaluation for Various Instruments
-- CHECK THE ADEQUACY OF THE ANCHORAGE IN THE MASONRY BLOCK WALL ITSELF. FIGURE 4 OF REFERENCE 10 PROVIDES ALLOWABLES FOR MASONRY WALLS.
J
.PER TOM WESTBROOK OF DLCo., THE INSTRUMENTS ARE MOUNTED ON C-145 SOLID BLOCK WALLS (REFERENCE 11). ,
L THE C-145 TABLE SPECIFIES A MINIMUM SPACING.0F 4.375", AND FIGURE 3 SHOWS THE ACTUAL BOLT SPACING TO BE 4.0". STRAIGHT-LINE INTERPOLATION WILL BE TAKEN PER NOTE 2 OF FIGURE 4.
- THEREFORE., FROM FIGURE 4 OF REFERENCE 10, FOR THE C-145 SOLID BLOCK, l FOR THE 3/8" DIAMETER ANCHOR, FOR DBE, AND APPLYING THE REDUCTION ,
Pallow a 1170 lb Pallow = 1070 lb 33 Vallow = 1175 lb Vallow = 1074*lb 3
-- BECAUSE THE ANCHOR BOLT SPACING IS 4", IT IS POSSIBLE THAT ALL 4 ANCHOR BOLTS ARE IN ONE BLOCK. PER NOTE 3 OF FIGURE 4, THE LOADS WILL BE COMBINED. USING THE PREVIOUSLY CALCULATED ANCHOR BOLT LOADS:
P:=4 P P = 860 lb V:s4 V V - 149 lb
-- FROM FIGURE 1 A OF REFERENCE 10, FOR SINGLE WYTHE, CHECK THE BLOCK
- USING THE ABOVE ALLOWABLES
] + =0.73 < 1.0 OK (MASONRY BLOCK WALL) THE MASONRY BLOCK WALL HAS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE ADEQUATE ,- CAPACITY TO ANCHOR THE BOUNDING CONFIGURATION INSTRUMENT INSTALLATION. 4
7 .. __ . i Shect 2 _'of _ D ! Job No.: '52233 Job: Duouesna Beaver Vallev Power Station By: /h Date: 9-19 if Calc No.: 0.11. Chk: M Date: is/wnr -
Subject:
Anchornaa Eualuation for Various instruments , 3.1 ANCHORAGE CALCULATION FOR: i FT-CH-122: FT-FW-100A. -100B. -100C: LT-WT-104A1. -104A2 - 1
; - REFER TO FIGURES 9 THROUGH.12 FOR THIS SECTION.
t i
-- THESE INSTRUMENTS ARE GROUPED TOGETHER BASED ON SIMILAR :
4 ~ ANCHORAGE CONFIGURATIONS. THE INSTRUMENT IS MOUNTED ONTO A - i ) ~ VERTICAL CANTILEVER. THE CANTILEVER IS WELDED TO A BASEPLATE. THE ! BASEPLATE IS FASTENED TO THE CONCRETE FLOOR WITH EXPANSION ! 4 ANCHORS. l
.- THE MINIMUM ANCHOR BOLT SIZE IS 3/8" DIA.
-- THE SMALLEST ANCHOR BOLT PATTERN IS 4" SQUARE.
4
-- THE GREATEST INSTRUMENT: WEIGHT IS THE FISHER & PORTER FLOW TRANSMITTER, CONSERVATIVELY ESTIMATED AT 50 LB.
i -- THE SMALLEST PIPE-TO BASEPLATE WELD IS 1/8".
-- THE LONGEST CANTILEVER LENGTH FROM BASEPLATE-TO-INSTRUMENT IS ABOUT 50".
I
-- THE GREATEST HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM PIPE CENTERLINE TO
! . INSTRUMENT IS ESTIMATED TO BE 13".
- 2. ;
-- GROUT PAD MAXIMUM THICKNESS ASSUMED TO BE 2".
, -- THE SMALLEST DIAMETER CANTILEVER IS 2" DIA PIPE. i- -- BASED ON A REVIEW OF FIGURES 9 THROUGH 11, A BOUNDING i CONFIGURATION IS SHOWN IN FIGURE 12. 4 j
N ECE IN'ET<NATCNAL
, , ,,, SHEET NO.
JOB NO. $U N JOB L3 '3 MI-/ E " F , '.6-A' I F'r ' C
.- /2 14. BY /I N DATE ~ '2 4' N CALC. NO. OI! SUBJEC' // / ' Tl CHK'D_ b.. DATE /1/F') ~
(T- CH- l'L'l fileEA $ faRitL /lOOCL I l C 0 1 N $'.o f 0 dll 3'// , g El S/ /'EW l'// " -- a ( - ID l h$)VkE h(10kr fAp~ $'Th'/CC YO 1 +-- ]"$ fifg \ q M m m A r'5" b VW [M Di NT 'l'L*2.' Floor-JJ ) J J / / / J / //)J
%"+ Jnw A. 8.
s ee) e 6 i 4" N.rms O W) 1. hem %Se E
- 2. lNMukCi' k= ^
G_Y.
~50L8$%~r '
WaJ A-A M Tu ve b r ) ftbullL
EGE ece muor SHEET NO
;osNo6ZZT1 aos)uCudt kWdl Attd tWut [mrmd av P JA DATE 44i45 CALC, NO, bl$ SUBJECT IMff8,I1MENfl CHK'D DATE ff[lfj_21 L9 WT - /0 V41 & -/0442 LsEmouc ll53DB5fA 17 4 jf,, gu 3"x3"x 'k"Ts g" (4 ec >
' ~~'
H;/t' E wsr> ,,
$
- o of ___
~~~
J
+ SWxia
/f --.
M , _. i (TYr) mu aav w e , v 4+ 4A b WELO , YIELJ A- A l V) 'x 13C' FunTL _ \
/// / / / /// / // // l Noms
- 1. Jkerca fa Rce b (-loVAL) L Ref 2[-I0Yni).
- 2. u t ~ 20 tf(Efomarm) 1 1
Fiue lo
ECE MERNofCNAL Ct 4 e Sn3.3 sob %aussncbist] ALLEY fDWOL TkT10J By Cf> DA E 'l 24- A5 CALC NO. O l 9 SUBJECT IAlffRliM ENI_f CHK'D DATE M/7 />'~ FT- FW-looA E -toos 2 -looc ITT- 84erca Mcoet 764
~
e--Z"f
-ca i
sz"
'3 "& !
Deru) 9,en), i \ %te
/// / / // J /////J/
s ^ El N VIEk)
~' lo" trvn koMJ ' .1. [Kerm PGLc ENS
- 2. hbv ~21 L8 Palla 4.
#4ra # w/ /atfer Y.
Su //
EGE EGE WiERNATONAL Y
"j SHEET NO.
l OBNO.h1133 IB 9d00CM)Eb/d!4MEfNdl 1TMN BY bb DATET-445 C ALC. NO. OIb SUBJECT 14/JTDAENU CHK'O DATE /dht/ST f8 WELD 13 " 4 : oY 2"4 fac--* , , , ,,
.. 4"Sa 50
. s' t[ -- -5 y .
llELJ R-A
) 'e 2" U/ /// / /// "
n /\ 'l8 Y (4 PL) ELEV VIEW INSr Wt =- 50 LF C . 6.1 = .fo " C. G.i 13" Fivuu 2 Souwt# 0dAMknoa
&z huus 9 ran I)
Sh::t 2 b of 31 Job No.: 52233 Job: Duauesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: @ Date: 9/79/K Calc No.: .Q19_ Chk: (th- Date: //-2.1-4I
Subject:
Anchoraae Evaluation for Various Instruments
~~ FOR BOUNDING PURPOSES DETERMINE THE LARGEST VALUE OF THE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FOR THESE INSTRUMENTS USING THE SPECTRA PROVIDED IN REFERENCE 3. USE THE 3% DAMPING PLOT.
BLDG. FLOOR ELEV PEAK SPECTRAL ACCEL. SFGB 735 0.64g , AXLB 722 0.69g YARD 735_ 0.43g (ratioed from 5% damping plot) USE: ah := 0.69 l VERTICAL: av:=f ah av = 0.46
----- C.G.'s AS SHO'NN IN FIGURE 12:
CGI := 50 CG2 := 13
---- DETERMINE STRESSES ON THE 1/8" WELD FOR X-DIRECTION, Y-DIRECTION, Z-DIRECTION, AND DEAD LOAD. USE REFERENCE 8 SECTION 7.4 AS A GUIDE:
Aw := n-(2) Aw = 6.28 Sw := Sw = 3.14 Jw := Jw = 6.28
-- X-DIRECTION:
" "h SHR_X := SHR_X=5 BEND _X := BEND _X = 549 Xaxial := 0 Xaxial = 0
-- Y-DIRECTION: -
SHR_Y := 0 SHR_Y = 0 BEND _Y := BEND _Y = 95 Yaxial := Yaxial = 4
- ~ , . . . . . . - . - . . . .. --. - -. - . _ - .-- -
8
]
Sheet 77 of 31
^
-' Job No.: 52233 ' Job: Duauenna Beaver Vallev Power Station By: @ Date: S/rs/fr .;
, . ~ Calc No.: 012. .
Chk: CfA Date: //- L7.-4 g i I i t-
Subject:
. Anchoraan Evaluation for Various Instruments , x i
-- Z-DIRECTION:
, ZaximiNO Zaxial = 0 BEND _Z := BEND _Z = 549 (about X axis) l' I (%T CG2 ah)- (2)y ; ITORSION_Z:= j, TORSION _Z = 71 (about YaxN ; SHR_Z := SHR_Z = 5 - 1
- DEAD' LOAD:
BENDdi:= BENDdt = 207
)
AXIALdl:= AXIALdl = 8
)
SHRdl:= 0 SHRdl = 0
--- COMBINE WELD STRESSES:
-- X DIRECTION:
WELDx := SHR_X + TORSION _Z WELDx = 77 ;
-- Y-DIRECTION: l WELDy := Yaxial + BEND _Y + BEND _X + BENDdi- AXIALdl WELDy = 847 I
.(Note that BEND _,Z is not included with WELDy. The bending stresses due to X-dir and Y-dir loads act at.the " top"yf the weld. The bending stress'due to the Z-dir load acts at the " side" of weld, i.e., 90 degrees away. The Z-dir bending stress == 0.0 at the." top" of the weld, which is neutral axis for the Z-dir. bending stress).
- Z DIRECTION:
WELDz := SHR_Z + TORSION _Z . WELDz = 77 l
- COMB:NED STRESS ON THE WELD:
2 2
. f:=[WELDx + WELDy + WELDz) f = 854
Sh: t_ 2. b of 77 Job No.: 52233 Job: Duouesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: @ Dato: 9/2s/97 Calc No.: OlS_ Chk: Cfd Date://-tQf
Subject:
Anchorace Evaluation for Various Instruments
-- DETERMINE MINIMUM WELD SIZE REQUIRED. USE TABLE 6 OF REFERENCE 8, FOR A FILLET WELD, ASSUME E60 ELECTRODE:
S!ZEmin :=g SIZEmin = 0.089 1 SAFETY _ FACTOR := SIZ min
^ -
=1 or SAFETY FACTOR "
i THEREFORE IT CAN BE SEEN THAT THE 1/8" PIPE-TO-BASEPLATE WELD HAS ADEQUATE CAPACITY FOR THE BOUNDING CONFIGURATION. THE ANALYSIS IS - ALSO CONSIDERED TO BE CONSERVATIVE SINCE THE SEISMIC COMPONENTS WERE ADDED TOGETHER ABSOLUTELY (i.e. NOT SRSS'd).. ;
----- EVALUATE THE CONCRETE ANCHOR BOLTS
- l
-- X-DIRECTION LOADS:
TENx :=
'f lb TENx = 216alb SHRx := Ib SHRx = 9 lb
-- Y-DIRECTION LOADS:
TENy := "U 4 lb TENy = 43 lb (2 4) SHRy := 0 lb SHRy = 0 lb
-- Z-DIRECTION LOADS:
TENz := [f lb TENz = 216 Ib SHRz := + 4 lb SHRz = 28 lb (Torsional and average shear) 4-{4,4 2
-- DEAD LOADS:
TENdi:= [, -- l Ib TENdi = 69 lb SHRdi:= 0 lb SHRdl = 0 lb
Shrst 71 of 3 ~7 J:b N3.: 52233 Jub: Duauesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: @ Data: 9/zp/97 Calc No.: 01H_ Chk: A Date: // @
Subject:
Anchorage Evaluation for Various Instruments
-- COMBINE ANCHOR BOLT LOADS: -
P := dTENx2 + TENy2 + TENz2+ TENdi P = 377+1b v :=JSHRx 2+ SHRy 2+ SHRz 2+ SHRdl V = 30 lb ]
-- DETERMINE ANCHOR BOLT CAPACITY:
USING REFERENCE 1 APPENDIX C PARAGRAPH C.2 FOR 3/8" EXPANSION ANCHORS, DETERMINE THE ANCHOR BOLT ALLOWABLE VALUES FOR TENSION . AND SHEAR:
- l
\
Pnom := 1460 Ib Vnom := 1420 Ib 1
-- EMBEDMENT, BOLT SPACING, EDGE DISTANCE, CONCRETE STRENGTH, I CONCRETE CRACKS, ESSENTIAL RELAYS: NO CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTORS l ARE REQUIRED AS THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE NOT MENTIONED AS A CONCERN IN I THE SEWS. l
-- SINCE THE ANCHOR BOLT TYPE IS UNKNOWN, USE THE 0.6 REDUCTION i FACTOR:
-- THEREFORE THE ANCHOR BOLT ALLOWABLES ARE:
Pallow := Pnom 0.6 Pallow = 876*lb Vallow := Vnom 0.6 Vallow = 852*1b l
---- USING THE CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SHEAR-TENSION INTERACTION: l p,,$,, + y,[,, = 0.46 < 1.0 OK (3/8" DIA ANCHOR BOLTS)
r N - ECE MEwatOW v? SHEET NO. 30 8N .kN 33 ,OB UOMI @fbO Vau.er JoaatJ noa e, ,,< D 1, ,, . , , . ,,. CALC. NO. O 9 SUBJECT bbkI(' CHK'D DATE /I'~D-4i
, vG is .,
P CO
<a s um .
e 4:-___ J i: .-
> n -
A-h d- fh(lk[, a
'; M-RACK-4 j- 4 g L&Youf 29
'> ~ Q a fu s s
@ >- 3 4- *
- h ~
0
)
i uJ J
$ W t
0 0
= N1 a _ ;...,
bU a- 3 y i:I - r---+'q g i:-- J e .a N
//
^ ll _
'r 5, a.
y x ,, - -
..w +
EG
. - ECf WiE3x7CNAL b
;e .62173-.cs )k&uFJNd [gwaL Auff kovadrmb^/ BY AC DA 1- 4 vr CALC, NO. b!b SUBJECT bN' bCNf CMD Cd9b DATE Il 35 g" g7pg.'
; Sj . 4 L b -
Ca a g.t.s Tw I A, (i Y
/ d ^"'" ' h M il d
~3/g* q y , 3 =5
'/[BrauT A V
s
.s 2 e i C 2 q -
9 [ l v ICs%E E > QS-Rall-1 D G T A LL Y Yb 3 t DE T AIL _ T Y "9. . 3 /g" y 3 p 1 U S nut W'/ n
-~ i
?b A 14 14
/,
4c W A S H E I. 7 y p, (TTP & TO
'TYP[
v s -. a. O, c 6, .y a> 0, , O r b d P s d E
'I Ad E *
~
po e9 g,,
* !- Co4CR.ETii -
- E
%\Y E D (n 3 *p i" y ,:s amcc jy' vmeo"
1 Shnt N of 37 l Job No.: 52233 Job: Duauenne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: oc Date: si.w. tr Cale No.: O1S_ Chk:b _Date:Il-Ja-95 l
Subject:
Anchorace Evaluation for Various Instruments j I 3.2 ANCHORAGE CALCULATION FOR QS. RACK-4
-- GENERAL CONFIGURATION AND DIMENSIONS FOR THIS INSTRUMENT RACK ARE FOUND ON FIGURES 13 and 14.
--- A REVIEW OF THE SEWS INDICATES THAT THE RACK IS VERY STIFF AND WELL-ANCHORED. SINCE THE RACK IS ANCHORED AT THE TOP ALSO, IT IS JUDGED THAT THE WEAK LINK IN THE ANCHORAGE ARE THE TWO 3/8" CONCRETE WALL ANCHORS AT THE TOP. THE 8-3/8" CO,NCRETE ANCHORS FOR THE TWO FLOOR BASEPLATES ARE JUDGED ADEQUATE BASED ON PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. !
l l
-- EACH BOX WEIGHS 10 LB PER THE SEWS. THEREFORE EACH ROW OF BOXES i
WEIGHS: UPPERROW := 610 lb UPPERROW -60 lb LOWERROW := 610 lb LOWERROW = 60 lb i
-- THE C.G. HEIGHTS ARE: UPeg := 57 LOWeg := 40 THIS RACK IS LOCATED IN THE YARD. USE GROUND SPECTRUM PEAK SPECTRAL ACCELERATION,5% DAMPlNG (REFERENCE 3):
HORIZONTAL: ah := 033 ;
~
DETERMINE LOADS ON THE WALL ANCHOR BOLTS: X-DIR: ; (UPPERROW ah UPeg) + (LOWERROW ah LOWeg) ,
. (2-(40 + 17 + 3.5))
SHRx := 0 lb SHRx = 0*lb
-- Y-DIR:
SINCE THE RACK IS BOLTED TO THE FLOOR, IT IS JUDGED THAT ALL VERTICAL LOADS ARE REACTED BY THE FLOOR ANCHORS, AND NO VEHTICAL LOADS ARE REACTED BY THE WALL ANCHORS. TENy := 0 lb SIIRy := 0 lb c
Sh::t 33 of _ 3 ) Job Na.: 52233 Job: Duouesne Beaver Vallev Power Station. By: A (. Date: // Is fr Calc No.: D19. Chk: CW Date: II-h- A S
Subject:
Anchoraan Evaluation for Various Instruments i
-- Z-DIR:
SINCE THE RACK IS STIFF, IT IS JUDGED THAT ONLY SHEAR LOADS WILL BE EXPERIENCED BY THE WALL ANCHORS. TENSION LOADINGS CAUSED BY ROTATION ABOUT THE VERTICAL AXIS ARE JUDGED TO BE INSIGNIFICANT. TENz := 0 Ib 3 UPPERROW ah + LOWERROW ah 3 , 2
-- DEAD LOAD:
DEAD LOADS ON THE WALL ANCHORS ARE CONSIDERED TO BE = 0.
~
TENdi := 0 lb SHRdt := 0 Ib
-- COMBINE ANCHOR BOLT LOADS:
P :=MTENx2 + TENy2 + TENz2+ TENdi P = 16 Ib v:=JSHRx 2+ SHRy 2t SHRz 2+ SHRdl V = 20 Ib
-- DETERMINE ANCHOR BOLT CAPACITY:
- USING REFERENCE 1 APPENDIX C PARAGRAPH C.2 FOR 3/8" EXPANSION ANChiORS, DETERMINE THE ANCHOR BOLT ALLOWABLE VALUES FOR TENSION AND SHEAR:
Pnom := 1460 lb Vnom := 1420 Ib
-- ANCHOR TYPE, EMBEDMENT, BOLT SPACING, EDGE DISTANCE, CONCRETE l STRENGTH, CONCRETE CRACKS, ESSENTIAL RELAYS: NO CAPACITY REDUCTION l
FACTORS ARE REQUIRED AS THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE NOT MENTIONED AS A CONCERN IN THE SEWS. Pallow := Pnom - Pallow = 1460 lb Vallow := Vnom Vallow = 1420 lb
---- USING THE CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SHEAR-TENSION INTERACTION:
h + y,h = 0.02 < 1.0. OK (3/8" DIA WALL ANCHOR BOLTS) THE ANCHORAGE FOR QS-RACK-4 HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE SE!SMICALLY : ADEQUATE.
Shret_ M of 3? Job No.: 52233 Job: Duauesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: a c. Date: if- u . ,r Calc No.: 019_ Chk: Cr> Date: 11-78 i
Subject:
Anchornos Evaluation for Various Instruments ANCHORAbf b 3.3 li;TERACT 0!? EVALUATION FOR QS-RACK-3 A REVIEW OF THE SEWS FOR THIS ITEM SHOWS THAT THE ANCHORAGE WAS , CONSIDERED TO BE ADEQUATE BY THE SEISMIC REVIEW TEAM. CM// M THE NOTED CONCERN WAS ERACTION WITH AN ENCLOSUR E WOODEN ROOF OF T RUCTURE WAS NOTED AS BEIN LLING HAZARD, AND COULD T SENSING LINES ON THE EQUIP RACK. 1 CTION, AND IS A WOODEN ) E STRUCTURE PROVIDES WEApTP FRAMEWORK COVERED WITNVtSQUEEN. AS SUCH, IT IS NOT CONSIDER O BE A RUGGED (UCTtfRE NOR SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE. TyuTrsiS CONSIDERED TO BE AN OUTLIER. n~~ ~ ; i I
. \
l l
Shmt 75 of M l Job No.: 52233 Job: Duouesna Beaver Vallev Power Station By: n Date: n. 3, .,r Calc No.: 019_ Chk: W Date: //-7>-15
Subject:
Anchorace Evaluation for Various Instruments 3.4 DISCUSSION OF ITEMS NOTED ON THE SEWS AS BEING SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE NOTED ON THE SEWS AS BEING SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE: TAG No. BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION FIS-FW-151 A SFGB 722 FIS-FW-151 B SFGB 722 , PS-MS-101 A SFGB 768 PS-MS-101 B SFGB 768 PS-MS-101 C SFGB 768 PS-VS-106A AXLB 768 j PS-VS-106B AXLB 768 ! TS-HV-55 A SRVB 713 TS-HV-55B SRVB 713 PNL-MS-101 A SFGB 751 PNL-MS-101 B SFGB 751 PNL-MS-101 C SFGB 751 l THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THIS CALCULATION FOR COMPLETENESS. l l 4 I
Sheet 3k of 77- i Job No.: 52233 Job: Duouesna Beaver Vallav Power Station By: ac Date: u sa vr Calc No.': Q.1.E. Chk: h Date: /l-D- E ;
Subject:
Ancharmaa Evaluation for Various Instruments j 3
~
4.0
SUMMARY
- a. .THE ANCHORAGE FOR THE FOLLOWING INSTRUMENTS AT THE DUQUESNE ;
LIGHT COMPANY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE ; ADEQUATE TO WITHSTAND THE SEISMIC LOADINGS FROM AN SSE EVENT: i TAG No. BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION l ] FT-CH-122 AXLB 722 , i FT-CH-124 SFGB 722 l FT-CH-127 SFGB- 722 i FT-CH-130 SFGB 722
- FT-CH-150 AXLB 722 FT-FW-100A SFGB 735 l FT-FW-1008 SFGB 735 l
, FT-FW-100C SFGB 735 1 !_ LT-FW-474 RCBX 718 i LT-FW-475 RCBX 718 LT-FW-476 RCBX 718 : p
- LT-FW-477 RCBX 718 l LT-FW-484 RCBX 738 i LT-FW-485 ' RCBX 738 l LT-FW-486 RCBX 718 LT-FW-495 RCBX 718 LT-FW-496 RCBX 718 i LT-WT-104A1 YARD 735 )
LT-WT 104A2 YARD 735 PT-RC-403 RCSX 701 1 QS-RACK 4 YARD /RWST 735 i FOR INSTRUMENTS LT-OS-100A, -100B, -100C, and -100D THE SEWS INDICATES , THAT THEY ARE LINE MOUNTED AND AS SUCH THE ANCHORAGE IS MARKED AS "N/A". THEREFORE THESE FOUR INSTRUMENTS ARE NOTED HERE FOR I COMPLETENESS ONLY. Mm I b. INSTRUMENT -RACK-3 WAS SHOW OUTLIER BAS EI ON CONCERN. d i
Shit 3 7 of 77 Job No.: 52233 Job: Duauesne Beaver Vallev Power Station By: ac Date: n. j s . ,r j Calc No.: 019_ Chk: W Date: 11- 30-i f l
Subject:
Anchornos Evaluation for Various Instruments l 1 8 d THE FOLLOWING INSTRUMENTS WERE NOTED ON THE SEWS AS BEING ; SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE: l TAG No. BUILDING FLOOR ElFVATION J FIS-FW-151 A SFGB 722 FIS-FW-1518 SFGB 722 ' PS-MS-101 A SFGB 768 l PS MS-101B SFGB 768 - PS-MS-101 C SFGB 768 . PS-VS-106A AXLB 768 PS-VS-106B AXLB 768 ! TS-HV-55 A SRVB 713 l TS-HV-55B SRVB 713 PNL-MS-101 A SFGB 751 PNL-MS-101 B SFGB 751 i PNL-MS-101 C SFGB 751 j
\
I
- j l
1 I l
- e. -
Sheet A-1 of l $7_. Job No.: 52233 . Job: Duauesne Beaver Vallev P,wer Station By: r&- Date: 9 'l l'Y Calc No.: 019_ Chk: Te Date: JW ' r
Subject:
' Anchorace Evaluation for Various Instruments Attschment A SEWS SHEETS FOR INSTRUMENTS
( $2.pages in Attachment A) ( _3 e 9
m g g,- c. - 3 e / 2. Status Y N 11 SCREENING EkALVATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 Equip FT-CH-122 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks fo. ' , i h t Description CH/ CHARGING HEADER FLOW TRANSMITTER i V Mara L tion: Bldg - AXLB Floor El. 722 Room, Row / Col COL 10-1/4 & J Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) F/ 5c.#te /herE/2 docEc /o B 2 V N,A B a /s
- SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input _ 72 ? '- o
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade WN U 3.
4. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N U@ DOC Bounding Spectrum BS GERS GER '
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum l.5 x Bounding Spectrum Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. Does capacity exceed demand? hNU CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and ; explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) l
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class @N U N/A 2.
3. No computers or programmable controllers Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate fN U@ u) N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U UA
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U /s
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility ON U N
- 7. Anchcrage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N@NA
- 8. Relays moun+ed on equipment evaluated Y N U UA l
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U NA i Is the intent of all the f caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N @N/A I
CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule , and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) !
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A i
i
- c. -~ .. - - .. . . . . . . -. ..
' m n- c -e .c. L- A3 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Shoet 2 of 3 -
i Equip. ID No. FT-CH-122 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks e Equipment Description CH/ CHARGING HEADER FLOW TRANSMITTER j CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models ,
tested,is listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A ;
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to ;
seismically induced system perturbations (e.g., sloshing) Y N U N/A '
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 5. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS i
~ level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A , ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined !
(23sg , CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) Y N @ N/A M
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP @N U N/A ;
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined (_Y) N U N/A :
4 Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated 1 (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion ! anchor tightness, etc.) Y N @ N/A M 1
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of l 1
safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@ action on anchors considered hN U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate hN U N/A )
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete l pad adequacy svaluated bN U N/A Are anchorage requirements met? Y N$
4 INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A 4
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y N U@
- 3. @NU N/A i
1
- sun- c . om pa el ;
SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 '- > Equip. ID No. FT-CH '22 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks t Equipment Description CH/ CHARGING HEADER FLOW TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likily to collapse
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
$N U N/A L Is equipment free of interaction effects? (11 N U N/A GNU ,
15 E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? Y NJT) i COMMENTS ,
-W # Li6HY fa ruff eMudap' (os, dV fd6/ $!% fM) g4- acto wr of w ns.
A44 - v s m.s e ss C u t, t?tQ . e i Evaluated by: // Date: S//o/93
&G A, Le, c s/teth r
a
; , e e
m_..a
.4 a .L- - - - a - -- A-Y ,
.3 3 !
g
=
~ b";
n 7 . n.
-pc.
I F - ~ h /t g y " i
" A "
V l l l
\
M" 9 ( /4
,. tp 60 Y
- .,-(
8 e , ) - k C f[
-> 7 f' x '/
a r- - - . , u I 1 V l I
- l. . .
2 -- =
%- !ffrv>AT.
T_ f lo u' d s . . .. s d hJ T V ~-[ [ l" d p ( e
> \ fuw i
. = . - . .. .. .. . .. - . - - - - . - - - . . . . . _ _ - - . - - -
s u u -e-eim P* A U ! Status Y N$ l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1'of 3- ; 1 Equip._IMA . FT-CH-124 Equip. Class 18'- Instruments on Racks Equi s Jescription CH/RCP-IC SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER ' Loc ti n: Bldg ~ SFGB Floor El. 722 Room, Row / Col PENT A Manufactura , Model, Etc; (optional) ROSEMOUNT MODEL 1154HP4RB SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
!. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input _ 72-7
'2. . Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade (Y_.) W U .
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC :
Bounding Spectrum BS : GERS GERS !
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS !
l'.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS i Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic H-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does c.apacity exceed demand? YNU CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) ;
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience l equipment class N U N/A l
- 2. No computers or programable controllers N-U N/A :
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A i
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to irapact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together I J
5.- if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered N UO N U N/A J
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) N @U l )
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated KNU l 4
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? (v.) N U N/A l Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
Y N U N/A j i
- CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are '
met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
-2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow !
transmitter' Y N U N/A l I
.s - --,.---nn- ,. ,,,w a ~e
av - c -e m =- J ~1 , SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 - Equip. ID No. FT-CH-124 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description _CH/RCP-lC SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'dl
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, a~s listed in Appendix B Y N U $/A !
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to ,
seismically induced system perturbations (e.g., sloshing) Y N U N/A )
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
. 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped l floor response spectrum if estimated natural '
frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack cr,,4ble of structurally transferring GERS level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
!s the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) k)N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP .Y N N/A 3.
4. Sizes and locations of anchors determined Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated O ) N @U N/A (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion ,_ anchor tightness, etc.) (Y) N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than (T} N U N/A 1/4-inch (DN U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @) N U N/A
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete @N U N/A Y N U 6/
pad adequacy e' valuated Are anchorage requirements met? Y N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A )
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
- 3. Attached. lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A l
l i i
SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Seet3ofb J l Equip. 10 No. FT-CH-124 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description CH/RCP-lC SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd) l
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are ,
not likely to collapse N U N/A !
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects?
@NU IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU ,
GMMENTS I l l i l 1 S 4 ,s _ !V , . Gu ,WWEbwh_ , . - 5h7./c,5
. )
02 Ws -c -oio F- P Status Y N 0 -- SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 S Equi ) N O No. FT-CH-127 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Eq en Description CH/RCP-1B SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER cation: Bldg: SFGB Floor El. 722 Room, Row / Col PENT A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) ROSEMOUNT MODEL ll54HP4RB SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 727
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade (D N U 3.
4. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N U6 DOC , Bounding Spectrum BS .- /
- 5. Demand based on:
GERS GER F r' , Ground Response Spectrum GRS l 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS ; Does capacity exceed demand? @NU j CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class @N U N/A ,
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers CY) N U N/A l
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate (D N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U@
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered () N U N/A 4
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Ci> N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) .Y N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U d!Z D
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding' Spectrum? Y N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are i met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule 1 and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) ;
1 Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing ! equipment class Y N U N/A !
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A !
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A l
i l s tw.-c- o< a ,, ye l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of~3 - Equip. ID No. FT-CH-127 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks i Equipment Description CH/RCP-1B SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is ne'of the specific makes and models tested, as lia ed in Appendix B [
Y N U N/A
. 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
, sloshing) Y N U N/A , 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A :
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A ;
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural i frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N~U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS 1 level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A !
.Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by G1P N U N/A
'3. . Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A 1
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated .I (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.) @N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of '
safety considered: embedmont length, anchor spacing, ; free-edge distance, concrete. strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch ON U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying '
action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate n ,
(.YJ N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requirements met?
Y N U@ Y N U 1 INTERACTION EFFECTS 1, Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
@N U N/A L2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment 4 free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility (f)N U N/A
)
l l 1 i I
9z: n- - e * *A SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 - Equip. ID No. FT-CH-127 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description CH/RCP-1B SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse @N U N/A
- 5. Have youIlooked for and found no other adverse concerns?
Is equipment free of interaction effects? @N U N/A
$NU IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMMENTS ,
I l I l 1 Evaluated by: G62 _ Date: 6/f7/9.3 ara UTX$lnilbd
<v s w E/27/93 f
.. _ .-~ . -
g wn, - e - m o 's a , Status Y N Us SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 Equip. ID'No. FT-CH-130 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks EquipmDt" Description CH/RCP-1A SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER beat : Bldg'.~ SFGB Floor El. 722 Room, Row / Col PENT A cturer, Model, Etc. (optional) ROSEMOUNT MODEL 1154HP4RB SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input _727
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade WN U 3.
4. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N U@ DOC Sounding Spectrum BS ,&/' GERS GER G - , O
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. R Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? @NU CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class @N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers 6N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate @N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays . Y N U@
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered @N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility CD N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U@
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? &N U N/A Is the intent of allfthe caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N U N/A CAVEATS - GERI (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- l. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment clast Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N O N/A
- 3. Ccmponent is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A
Gzn '-c m , , A : 3 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 cf 3 . Equip. ID No. FT-CH-130 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks __ Equipment Description CH/RCP-1A SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested,-as Itsted in Appendix 8 Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
slashing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) @N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A 3.
O Sizes and locations of anchors determined Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated
@N OP U N/A (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion ;
anchor tightness, etc.) @N U N/A l S. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of l safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than hN U N/A 1
1/4-inch
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap @N U N/A under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path @N U N/A to CG adequate
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete @N U N/A ,
j pad adequacy evaluated Y N Are anchorage requirements met? U @Y N U 3 INTERACTION EFFECTS .
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby I equipment or structures $N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment i free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures 02 N U N/A !
- 3. Attached if nes have adequate flexibility Q) N U N/A i L
I l
EL2 32-ocs 9 ~
.(
SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 .,'. Equip. ID No. FT-CH-130 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description CH/RCP-1A SEAL INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? N U N/
Is equipment free of interaction effects? NU IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00 ATE? YNU COMMENTS I l I l l L l
/ -
Evaluated by: GM < - Date: 5/27/97 GTJ n9M E/27/?3 , i
\
6
- dB - a w A & .a2,smn-,k 4-. --.na m aJ--5 4-Jeh,--24 s.4 M A +J--d , M . elB- *- Fi 4 *s----
sn u-c.c.a - 6/2 7 /f y ; J' u v vs ;
~
f* - 4',3&,l% n
~
l c ; I fO . . . . .. . . . 4:-+. C* : , r ,
' 'S ,3 ;"1 C
'g
. 1
.m . gu, ;
)
-.% t-1 .I i
( > lQ ', A i.. -. 1 ' i
. . ni Gtar ts f i
_a ;: : fz,,. . -
.. .. a r .
-' l bY C\ l$h< k(~ x fl -Q(,'-\-
7'i;, ,
. . vs !
* .I a /< ef , << :
y-1 3 .-4eo
~ _ _
Y~ {k ~ l Af ' ' ' -- > z_ ~ ($ hc(& ,
/27 p
- j. ;
/96
- . ~ ,
ff *s w/ s:'. s
)
" . (
u ' ' NU gh 5, , i (y l*) kln. 12 7 2. J,. , s , f{h ~ )r 2
'i !
- I l ( .
~ V ~ & <'!I >
t2.9 ( 'i c) . . tz7 l .. _. _ . - ~
~~
LAi1 - l
' ca.vt 5 - - . . ....4 _ ._
~
1
! l %
~V9 f/
4 I 61 i 4 .:,. It b(i
/ ; f
/}O t
- b
_ _ _ . _ _=. 3 tC9h setsi- c~m u kv SSEL Line No. 3208A Status Y N LT A 3 SCREENING EVALVATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 s. IhNo. t FT-CH-150 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks EhipmentDescription CH/ LETDOWN FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AXLB Floor El. 722 Room, Row / Col COL 11-1/2 & G Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) F120 FISHER & PORTER C0 fno ast
- loS2f9C P/3 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 1 2 7 - 5 <r
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade
(,1) N 3. 4. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation YN DOC U@ U Bounding Spectrum BS , 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS @RSGE
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. @
. Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @U ,
COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) ' CAVEATS - B0UNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate 4.
N U N/A Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or 1 sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U N/A l
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered ~N U l
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y N U
- 7. Anchorage adeduate (See checklist below for details) N U NA B. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated N U A
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y N U N
!s the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are '
met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class N U J55
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats _NU e
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level o flo transmitter hN U N/A ,
v -- . - --- .-. i SSEL Line No. 3208A G22 C$-t - C4 P A ' ~l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. FT-CH-150 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description CH/ LETDOWN FLOW TRANSMITTER i CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd) '
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to YhU N/A seismically induced system perturbations, e.g., ;
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N CUN/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter--to-rack 9.
interface (document basis) Rack capable of structurally transferring Y N U@ seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A l
- 10. All adjacent c:binets or sections of multi-bay j assemblies bolted together Y N U Is the intsnt of all the caveats met for GERS?
[F.'oU h1 ANCHORAGE '
- l. Appropriate equipoent characteristics determined (mass, CG, natur41 freq., damping' center of rotation) Y N @ N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP /Pso 444 N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined 4.
Y N U N/A Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion l anchor tightness
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of
@N U N/A j safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, !
free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking //e centn.rt. c. raw. 3 Y
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than N@N/A 7.
1/4-inch Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap hN U N/A 8. under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adeq,uate stiffness and effect of prying Y N Uh 9. action on anchors considered Strength of equipment base and load path hN U N/A 10. to CG adequate Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated hU N/A Are anchorage requirements met? Y N U N/A NU INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures _
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment hN U N/A (
free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U@
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y N U tF/ A
--- - . , . _ , d -
SSEL Line No. 3208A- !
% ; n e c.e s.<j , A- s"6 l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 l l
~
Equip. ID No. FT-CH-150 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks l
~
Equipment Desctlption CH/ LETDOWN FLOW TRANSMITTER i INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd) :
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse N'U N/A !
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? YNU !
l IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADEOUATE? YNU j COHMENTS t [ g"fpe. Q O. ;
-/+ -
s a :- __ l A A ;k r
+ t -
\\
v'
',.- ww em -
f i x ,/t ,ThX Ya 1
.\
S, Iw 7p i w 4 ' z. i 1 11 ; I 0 M d w = W c a .5 - p, ;sa as. .,,, e p va.i. j
. . l 1
I i Evaluated by: A - Date: 3~M"/ F h 2 N&.:._:s _ m, E .) .i ' f e i
. ,.~ _
l
cz;n- c-c a g. s SSEL Line No. 4103A Status Y N U A SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 ! N.- I Eq{p. Nq. FT-FW-100A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Eq Jip) nl Descrlption FW/ AUX FEED TO SGA TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 735 Room, Row / Col AUX FEED PUMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1204 ITT-BARTON SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input '73 f
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade NU
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum @ '
GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. @ ;
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic i demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) j CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or i sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together 5.
if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@ N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage ade~quate (See checklist below for details) N U Nf_A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated N U Cl@L i
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? N U N/A l Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? (3 N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, . temperature, level or flow ,
transmitter Y N U N/A _ . _ . _ _ _ =
SSEL Line No. 4103A SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. 10 No. FT-FW-100A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Descr.iption FW/ AUX FEED TO SGA TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models 4
tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic ampilfication of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A
] Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS7 Y N U@ i ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness l S. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of @N U N/A safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, , free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than @N U N/A 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Y N U6
- 8. Base has adequate stiffnoss and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate 10.
N U N/A ! Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U A . Are anchorage requirements met? ~Y NU l i INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
- 2. @N U W/A If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A l
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A ]
SSEL Line No. 4103A s z z's3- c - ce r9" Av SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. FT-FW-100A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/ AUX FEED TO SGA TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are ...
not likely to collapse N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y N U Is equipment free of interaction effects? N/@A. ,N U IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? @NU COMMENTS 1
)
, a 0: 2 / e8 sJ14);a a uw
- cz 29. - C ' > p An i
'. \/
q <A -
){ __ TL f' y
, - e,
-- - - - - - - 4
, i t k
- 3
.ac..e d . 7<g + i,
$* O 3 f C. p f e A .es -
ef cmaer -
/ de" cg , r b e b .'s le s.s. 6'i A
TYf ~/k i, t 4 RKB x
+ YT- h)- loo A j fb /c 9 $ % q
g n .;; - c . r , F g 2;, SSEL Line No 4104A Status YNU_ A SCREENINGEVALUATIONWORKSHEET(SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 N No. FT-FW-1008 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks L
' pment Descr.iption FW/ AUX FEED TO SGB TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 735 Room, Row / Col AUX FEED PUMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1204 ITT-BARTON SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND _.
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 2.
3. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz h.730 ,N U U/ N U N/A 1 Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS ' GERS
- 5. Demre. ' sed on:
. Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. (Eb Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS.
Does capn.ity oceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMME Q it a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand r.cc. um is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)' l CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which l are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and i explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A ;
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A '
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks wh!ch are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together 5.
if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y NNU N/A Ud i
)
l
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A l
- 7. Anchorage ade'quate (See checklist below for details) N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y N U @f_A)
Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? @N U N N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) !
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing l equipment class Y N U N/A i
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A l
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow l transmitter Y N U N/A I
I
SSEL Line No. 4104A G.' 2 4 3 ~ ^ - t g, SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. FT-FW-1008 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks , Equipment Description FW/ AUX FEED TO SGB TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A -
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y.N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U@
ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A !
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A I
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., i weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness @N U N/A l
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A ;
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than i 1/4-inch hN U N/A
- 7. Factors effecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@ 9. action on anchors considered Strength of equipment base and load path hN U N/A to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated YN Are anchorage requirements met? U h@,N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, eqelpment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @)
LY NN U N/A l
SSEL Line No. 4104A '3-'~' r 'e A 2 #> , SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. FT-FW-1008 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Desc,ription FW/ AUX FEED TO SGB TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are .
not likely to collapse /Y N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y NU N/A_
Is equipment free of interaction effects? (J N U IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE7 @NU LOMMENTS l 1 i Evaluated by: j ' M Date: 2/h/[6 4U %w ? ,;e , .:fr P l I
em 3- c.cn 7, %. ;
' l t
i 1 i I l
- w. - .. .
__ st.
.,t"1
/,,-
c,
- ..T
+ .___. _ . . . yy d , ,, \
s
.h. *L -
)
5 1 I 1 7 3 w.b p .;edic , l .
. u, . a ,1 . 75* l t,
~~~
11,- $c -- .-\ 3,s,. (y
. 4 41 T . i j
' C' ** .,.
C Ch i t b \t* * *
, .-.w.. .. ,, , , , , ~ ~h ( g py
~ . -
He k
> le .s. g*r g U t
TV , 1 r1 - r v.) - I oc A , TS c \ l I i i e
. - - - - . - .. -- - .- -. . . _ - . . . . . . - ~ .--.
SEz 33 - C-ot9 _ g k? 7 ! SSEL Line No. 4105A Status Y N U ! A f f SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 : i
,Equ' s D No. FT-FW-100C Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks i
E ipment Description FW/ AUX FEED TO SGC TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 735 Room, Row / Col AUX FEED PUMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1204 ITT-BARTON i 4 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND :
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input ,7 W !
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade @N U
, 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Cu N U N/A '!
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation .
DOC l Bounding Spectrum BS ' l.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS
@ i LERS :
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS i 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des..In-Str. Resp. Spec.
Does capacity exceed demand? Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. (Indicate at right (*) and in
@S RR j COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic Q)4 V l
demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRIM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks wMch are close enough to impact or
- sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain es
- ential relays "
N
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered N U @N/A
- 6. Attached lines-have adequate flexibility N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) N U NA
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
- . Is the intent of'all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? @N U N/AT L) N U N/A 3
CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are l met by intent without meeting the-specific wording of the caveat rule i and explain the reason for~this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing !
equipment class Y N U N/A ;
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A l
- 3. . Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter hN U N/A
SSEL Line No. 4105A p ,. . , n ., /. , ,, SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. FT-FW-100C Equip. Class 18 - Instrumu Ls on Racks Equipment Description FW/ AUX FEED TO SGC TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic ampilfication of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic cemand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
Y N U@ Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) @N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP d) N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined @N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness @N U N/A
- 5. -Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N Ud action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete i pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requirements met? Y N U$ gN U
)
INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures hN U N/A l
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures C, J( N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility (y/ N U N/A
SSEL Line No. 4105A ' ggzv3- C-oi9
- 3. tv 2-1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. FT-FW-100C Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/ AUX FEED TO SGC TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are .,
not likely to collapse W, N U N/A !
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? (y N U is equipment free of interaction effects?
N/@A. NU IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? QNU COMMENTS I l i 1 mna fe 0${Q f asa
-+6 -,
--m &
1
$ *{*O ** *, e "
i e' e
% e* ,
i ' 4 ' _f 9 , i , f, r -1 C - .
. *t_
l ( ,, 4 4.- t i t
~ ~ ~
- . . . _.h,R -
i t i i 0
..3" >
b n:r.
- e-
- .J
.p *f e v Ti c i !
b.'
- 2-k.fY
., y e
g, w ge - ,z g A
**) ,J 1 a 41 7 { / e c ". ..
- (_
^
C 41i. TC* ,-%.,. . (p b: h :s j e s.,, 1
^ ~ " - -
4 ,, 4 f l TW
. 4 m === f r < - r vJ - I c c. A ,, 3 / c 1
6
* +
e,-
- . . . . - - -- -.- . . - . - . - . . . .-- - . - . ~ . - . - - - ...
i nz s ?-c-ce * "* I l Status YN U. ) SCREENING-EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet l of 3 E ui { N. LT-FW-474 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments-on Rscks - 1 d Equ - it Description FW/RC-E-1A NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER l l L ation: Bldg ~ RCBX' _ Floor El. 718 Room, Row / Col ANNULUS COL 16
. Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) IT 3cA Ecl El +t 3/&! ': s >
l J SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND ! 1. 2. Elevation where eaufpment receives seismic input Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade 722 - qd N U !
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation CU N U N/A
' DOC
+ Bounding-Spectrum BS i GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS i 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS j a-Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS -
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS e Does capacity exceed demand? YNU CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and
- explain the reason for this conclusion-in the COMMENTS section below)
L 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A 3.
N U N/A Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A.
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together Go adj. Rods if they contain essential relays Y N U
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered @N U @N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adeguate flexibility CD N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See enecklist below for detalls)
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N @ N/A
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
Y N U@ Is the intent of allfthe caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? (D N U N/A i Y N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the. specific wording cf the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class
- 2. Meets-all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A I
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow Y N U N/A transmitter ~ Y N U N/A
._,m----,
6 m n - c-o's ,, ;,9 ' 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 s l Equip. 10 No. LT-FW-474 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks i
. Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1A NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER 4
(AVEATS - GERS (Cont'd) , j 4 .- Component is one of the specific makes and models . tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to !
seismically induced system perturbations (e.g., ; sloshing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A ,
; 7. All_ external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural ,
frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A -
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS ;
level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A ; Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE !
-1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of' rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A l
- 3. Sizes and locations of' anchors determined N U N/A :'
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expateion *
. anchor tightness, etc.) @N U N/A !
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of l safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, l
. free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and l concrete cracking @N U N/A !
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than !
_ 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A -
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying '
action on anchors considered @N U N/A =
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path l to CG adequate . N U N/A y '
- 10. Embedded stee), grout pad or large concrete 4
pad adequacy. evaluated Are anchorage requirements met? YN U @YLJlde N U
.Isji INTERACTION EFFECTS ;
4 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby -
. equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment :
free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A i
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y N U N/A i
__ . _ _ _ . ~- 60:st- c-e a P4 J
%'4 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-FW-474 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1A NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not like~ly to collapse @N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? WN U N/A is equipment free of interaction effects? (DN U IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMMENTS-r.m { .
hk
~
. ~i &5 ? 2.
ic.]l-. . ., ., f" N ad'~ c ..,q L eA e Ak Q~ ~@ 4 . ys" skett uek m
% M kpl
. c b u
\ \
lc - q j N. l si ac- \ J N r 4 i
- i
~L l Evaluated by:
fd L/- 11 / i/ Date: $/6/93 3A Ad 6-^s~98
-1 i
. : i ozz n e.. p h3q Status Y N O f SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 b Eq ip. IDN. LT-FW 476 Equip. Class j 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipp eQ Description FW/RC-E-1A NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER I U ~~ LgaIlon: Bldg. RCBX Floor El. 718 Room, Row / Col ANNULUS COL 15 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) ITT BARTON MODEL 764 5 /10 1968 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 72 2_
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade @N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz WN U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum GERS GERS l
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS l Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS l
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS l Does capacity exceed demand? YNU CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and j explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience I equipment class N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers @W NU N/A 3.
4. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate ON U N/A Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or g edaI5 / M o e @, . h ;V S sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together 5. if they contain essential relays-Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@ N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A i
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment : valuated N@NA i Y N U
- 9. Have you looked for and f'.,und u other adverse concerns? (D N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an rsterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent withcut meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule :
and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is ecluded in the generic seismic testing '
equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow Y N U N/A transmitter Y N U N/A
GzM 2-c-era P*" %s : SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 , 1 j Equip. ID No. -LT-FW-476 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks l Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1A NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd) l
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models )
tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A )'
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g., l sloshing) Y N U N/A )
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A l
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A i
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS7 Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A ,L. 4 , l
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A ,g g g
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated '
(weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion ' " " anchor tightness, etc.) @N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap,under base less than 1/4-inch rm.. @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essentlajs relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U @ m ill,*.c M e Are anchorage requirements met? Y N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility GP N U N/A
g c2 tn- c-o M :,e AW Status Y N U'> SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 T Equiptil0 No. LT-FW-475 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equi nynt, Description FW/RC-E-1A NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Lbc[cn: Bldg. RCBX Floor El. 718 Room, Row / Col ANNULUS COL 16 ufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) ~_~~_Td en .IIe 76Y Y\l '/7C SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade (]2 N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz UY N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In.Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? YNU CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A
- 2. No computers or prugrammable controllers N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together rJe re k/ 5/hh c' l fC c CS if they contain essential relays Y N U@
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered @N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility CY)N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N U NA
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated 1N U
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? (D N U Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N U N/A CAVEATS - G GS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A
'fk t. S
%c w ((,]77 p_ l
,%% . m hk i l
Et% - c -oiq SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheot 2 of 3 2,p % /
~
7 Equip. 10 No. LT-FW-475 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1A NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Componertt is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
sloshing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A Is the, intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A 3 Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion n anchor tightness, etc.) (y N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than @N U N/A 7.
1/4-inch Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap hN U N/A under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A S. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate
- 10. Enibedded steel, grout pad or large concrete hN U N/A Wdl i pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requirements met?
Y N U @ . b r,eed Y N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment @N U N/A free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A
, 6 c n -c-en ge 4%% SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-FW-475 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1A NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse @N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? yN U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? fjN U IS E0VIpMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00 ATE? YNU COMMENTS a
xsr { 3 sn, M
. . . btf h St tus bi SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 D i ip Nd. LT-FW-477 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks ; Equi enpDescription FW/RC-E-1A WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER l ocation: Bldg. Room, Row / Col ANNULUS RCBX _ floor El. 718 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) L 11 h don Mcckel '76M S/td 3423 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input _722
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Q) N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz- '3D N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum B GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum RS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS Conserv. Des. .In-Str. Resp. Spec. ks 37.
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? @NU CAVEATS - BOUNDING SF:.CTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent wit out meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason fc- this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is i cluded in earthquake experience equipment clas N U N/A
, 2. No computers u programmable controllers N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together enJJ.NAs if they contain essential relays Y N U d@D
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N @ fLA
- 8. Pelays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U G/.A>
- M' P
- 9. Have you looke'd for and found no other adverse concerns? 6N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y f@f/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) '. hose caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A ;
l
02t u -c-en Sheet 2 of 3 g3 pgo SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEW' LT-FW-477 Equip. Class 18 .struments on Racks Equip. ID No. Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1A WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component ~is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
sloshing) Y N U N/A Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS Y N U N/A level seismic loads to anchorage Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
Y N UQ ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined N U N/A (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.) @N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A l
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch GN U N/A l
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete a pad adequacy evaluated Y N U Q4A wN U WMed Are anchorage requirements met?
INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A l
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @/
(Y NU N/A I l
sz.z.s 3- c-aq bl i
) Sheet 3 of 3 T'$
_ SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS Equip. Class _18 - Instruments on Racks tquip. 10 No. LT-FW-477 Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1A WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER -4 INTERACTIONEFFECTU(Cont'd)-Overhead 4. equipment NU orN/A distribution sy
@W NU N/A@NU 5.
not likely to collapseHave you looked for and found no other adverse con Is equipment free of interaction effects? YN@ IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00ATEI COMMENTS : i e/ w G " p
,g
~ - .
W
.6 ;t T-i l "
\
- 'L '/z k.
%!/Y Hn kel i, ,
.d - -
/'6 3 clf ,/Sl u ll c m & c c i NlHfir m.... ..f * '
t I
$+ 2Y2 * + i l
v e,. a, / '
----.--_.f_.___._,._
C-< G 7@S 1 l s/ J 1 L.,,
*W & -
~
4
-, ~
k! \ p/ Evaluated by:
<y/. j/)lf// Date: 8//5/93 6~-/5-92 ,
y
~
52.2.33 -GCM q 44 , Status Y N U s SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 Equip.IDNof.LT-FW-484 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks ! t % 4 Equi %eng [ehcription FW/RC-E-1B NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Locati Eldg7 RCBX Floor El. 738 Room, Row / Col ANNULUS COL 9 a 1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) _ITT BARTON MODEL 764 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 74 0 4 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade 10p U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz CY)N U N/A
. 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS GERS GERS
, 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS _ Does capacity exceed demand? YNu gy CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which
- are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and ,
explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience i equipment class CD N U N/A 1
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers @N U N/A I
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate CO N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or g ,,4 / ,/ 6 ejj, M sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together e
5. if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@ ($ N U N/A i
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility W N y N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N GS N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U <3ZD
- 9. Have you looked for ar.d found no other adverse concerns? @N U Is the intent of allfthe caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? N/@A N U N/A
/ CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are ;
met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule ' and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) .
- l. . Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing '
equipment class Y N U N/A >
- 2. Meets all. Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A ,
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow
. transmitter. -Y N U N/A-4: :
922.u- Coiq SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 @^ Equip. ID No. LT-FW-484 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description _FW/RC-E-18 NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER l CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
sloshing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A J
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A !
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural '
frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable cf structurally transferring GERS l level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS7 YN @
. ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined I (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated ,
1 - (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
.gNL'
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of NgN/A ,
43 m (c9., safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, g . ,. free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and " }>: ' . "~ [' - concrete cracking hN U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch hN U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
' t
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete udi \1kA pad adequacy evaluated Y N Are anchorage requirements met? U @T N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment
@N U N/A free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures $N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Q) N U N/A
s 2 2. n - d -o m g tr'l W SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-FW-484 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1B NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER INTEPACTION EFFECTS (Cont'dl
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are
, not likely to collapse If N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? (j) N U Is equipment free of interaction effects? N/A@NU I IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU ,
COMMENTS E dal(d;oa fue 6700 - RK.
'1.7 hj{; l(v.,kt.- h. N , b e L C ~
Evaluated by: , ,/, 'l 7/ z Date: [!/:I/9 3
. MN d(19~~ s-ar-su -
N
.- -. - -_ -. ,~~ . - - . - - . - - - . _ . - -.. . - . - _
~
52.2 33 049 U ?$ Aus s Status YN j. SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 : Equip. ID io. LT-FW-485 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks ,
- i. A wt
~ Description FW/RC-E-1B NARROW RANGE TRANSMITTER Efi ! L$ e : Bldg. RCBX Floor El. 738 -Room, Row / Col ANNULUS COL 9 i Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) I n On- h e. n Mov e 7bi C f%d I /6C) i SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic. input 2.
73 8 Md m M . Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade 1@ U-
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz !
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Q) N U N/A l DOC Bounding Spectrum BS i GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: !
Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? ,, Y N U) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and . explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class '
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or N U N/A -
sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together @ Oy>[L,'M) A. if they contain essential relays
- 5. _ Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility QN U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
(3) N 1 N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N @ N/A
- 9. .Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y N U dOD Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? @N U N/A
$ NUN /A CAVEATS - GEM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. . Equipment is-included in the generic seismic testing equipment class
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats YNU N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow Y NU N/A transmitter Y N U ~N/A
gzza - c -on MIV Sheet 2 of 3 7*J SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) ! Equip. ID No. LT-FW-485 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks l l Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1B NARROW RANGE TRANSMITTER ' CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models )
i tested, as listed in Appendix'B Y N U N/A !
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
sloshing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A ,
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped i floor response spectrum if estimated natural i frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A :
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS
. level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A ,
Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U g,; ' ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined ;
(mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) @N U N/A ;
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP @N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined Cf/i N U N/A
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated .- n'g (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.) h@N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, !
free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and , concrete cracking )N U N/A (
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than m :
1/4-lach O') N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap e 'mW under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Y N
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying U @ gg 3g
- action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path ,
to CG adequate @N U N/A i
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete A ll -
pad adequacy evaluated YN M d ck'! ' Are anchorage requirements met? U @J) N U INTERACTION EFFECTS- 1
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby !
equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A
~
83 n n- c-on
. SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 r} A 61 1 Equip. 10 No. J T-FW-485 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description _FW/RC-E-1B NARROW RANGE TRANSMITTER , !
INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd) ;Seecker, ube 0;g
., te o c t e d,c,3 se eos, wull / T w. .He - 4.eldal ~
b/
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution' systems ard =
not likely to collapse @N U N/A
%y
- 5. Have yoif looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
Is equipment free of interaction effects? (_Y) N U N/ N U' IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMMENTS ay ds.y d *( t
-59 ~,v e r %ggg-
. . w_ u u,ldeel amus wJ-
-y j g ;t a;& t, we +0 ?:,'e
I \
-) !< 9 Is4'4"f 7V+" N - \
w .n ~ l I a Nf i O , ra, p 1 _.F~ y,ua -
. f 10YL
,F- r J <
t m,
-w -
f , 4' D .s h . ? y h i . .
" ~
%cack i, I b Ti.oe
,hs A
~
Wilt l 1,,a_ w ^ el 3 6 . m # n e d ers #
/g y . s J , ,v, ~ Vee n \ \ Al\ k9ht ,s L. ., . : A 4. . i c c I .1 3ce7hd e.
Evaluated by: ll Date: 5//6/f3 w a ar N I t
6ZZ %-( -o19 pcg . 441 I Status Y.N (f . I SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 Eqpp.h . LT-FW-486 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks l Equ d De'scription FW/RC-E-1B NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Lo ion: Bldf RCBX Floor El. 718 Room, Row / Col ANNULUS COL 9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) ~M hoa Mceb 76d : l l SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input __ 722 ;
- 2. . Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade WN U. '
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz $N U N/A <
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation 00C i Bounding Spectrum BS GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS !
1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS ! Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp._ Spec. CRS . Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS t Does capacity exceed demand? Y N IT, CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which ! are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and i explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) j
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience .:
equipment class N U N/A I
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A i
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A i
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together & rd 7s/'& 4 . r d s a if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@ {
5._ QN U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility WN Q N/A ;
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N@NA '
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U ;
- 9. Have you look.ed for and found no other adverse concerns? ON U N/A c :
Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? fLNUN/A l CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are - met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule i and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) l
- 1. Equipment is included =in the generic seismic testing i equipment class. .
Y N U N/A j
- 2. . Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A j
- 3. Component is. a pressure, temperature, level or flow !
transmitter Y N U .N/A 4 i i
)
Szzs v c-oli g +tI i SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-FW-486 Equip. Class __18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1B NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Componen.t is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
sloshing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
, 7. All external mounting bolts in place YN U N/A
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? YNUN/)
ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP 3.
N U N/A Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.) l
@N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, l free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors
-A f3 YN U @ncgg
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate
- 10. Embedded steel grout pad or large concrete. G) N U N/A pad adequacy e, valuated gi YN Are anchorage requirements met? U @1,ydel NU ,
INTERACTION EFFECTS l
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment
@N U N/A free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility (Y.) N U N/A 3
l
62.n3 - c.-ci9 ,tc3o SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-FW-486 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1B NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse 6) N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? $N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? CON U IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMMENTS
, .' I4 i $oe;dch 3cied ,
Y[f4 K wlk. A s /,tl 1,..,ld
/
s *x s* i
& .e,d..A:. J kk U e w.s -
c 9 bdcs;l b j RK-IF Evaluated by: j, pf/// DIE-- / t G/ Date: 6/I6[93
~WW bW g_g. gig R .
n 527. n- c - o t1 P') 81 Status Y N U SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3
)
r E ti . 1E (o. LT-FW-495 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks E, qui i nt Jescription FW/RC-E-lC NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER L tion: Bldg. RCBX Finor El. 718 Room, Row / Col ANNULUS COL 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) ITT BARTON MODEL 764 W/J 7F6(o SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 722_
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade CR N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz G) N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC i Bounding Spectrum BS GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? Y N ;U CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A
! 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A 1 Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate NUN ,
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or % g4 g /,w/A I
.$.ed sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together 6(w 5.
if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@
@N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U N/A l 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N@NA
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U ,.
Is the intent of all'the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Q N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A 1
l
C2n- C -O(1 HL SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-FW-495 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-lC NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested,-as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to caismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
sloshing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A r
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A _.
Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? YNUN/3 ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freg., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A .
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion 5.
anchor tightness, etc.) Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of
@N U N/A l safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, ;
free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and I concrete cracking @N U N/A i For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 6. 1/4-inch hN U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors ON U N/A
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A l
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A ,Jl .
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete w. 1 pad adequacy evaluated Y N U W ded ,
Are anchorage requirements met? NU INTERACTION EFFECTS 1
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment l free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A '
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility C.Y> N U N/A l
I
SE2. O 'C - Oli q kb6 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 L Equip. ID No. LT-FW-495 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks
- Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1C NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'dl
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse @N U N/A' '
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?. WN U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? , (O N U IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMMENTS llifh.' be!f bc. w 'I m e ,
ekekalf ,Sll cs uh, c ~, hi , f I I
~
dl # Evaluated by: #J. '/2/2 Date: 5//6/93 5-/5-9.T H
N w 4M Status Y N U
, SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 u No. LT-FW-496 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks E ent Description FW/RC-E-lC NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER ocation: Bldg.' RCBX Floor El. 718 Room, Row / Col ANNULUS COL 4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) ITT BARTON MODEL 764 3/C 385 7 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
_ /22
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade 09 N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz dN U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Fealistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? YN0 CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together
&4 I3 g ,j/
if they contain essential relays M Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U QX)
- 5. @N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility LY) N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N $NA
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U 4
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A, Is the intent of all.the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? J N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting tha specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A
Sg2n-C-c6 q Ass SCREENfNG EVALUATICN WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-FW-496 Equip Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-lC NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd) 4.. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
sinshing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A >
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural
; frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring GERS i level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? YNUN[p -
ANCHORAGE Appropriate equipment characteristics determined 1. (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A 4.- Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated
. (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion : anchortightness,etc.) N/A !
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of '
safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, ' free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and ' concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors ;
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying @N g
U N/A i action on anchors considered UV N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete hN U N/A ,,
W:d ' pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requirements met? Y N U @ NcMed Q, N U - INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A 8
3
52353 - C-ei9 (* ^% ! SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. 10 No. LT-FW-496 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description FW/RC-E-1C NARROW RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead- equipment or distribution systems are not Ilkely to collapse 6) N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A is equipment free of interaction effects? @NU IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMENTS
$(c( %,N. % .'x d ihd Ag 2. cd -
v g' . v;* 3,,, ,-hh m. 4 4 - V / %ll k-> Mbd [ Evaluated by: M/. /d f Date: 5//5/93 N A n/ N K-s-er H
92zE-C-em P{ Ml SSEL Line No. 4101A Status Y N U ' A 7 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 !
< l
[Ecu{pNo.
; 10 LT-WT-104A1 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks uipnent Descr.iption WT/WT-TK-10 LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 735 Room, Row / Col YARD >
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) R369 ROSEMOUNT SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND /
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input '76,6
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation C Bounding Spectrum
@S 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum AB GERS GS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS (f a special exception to enveloping of seismic ,
demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) l CAVEATS - B0UNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and ; explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) i
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience I equipment class N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers )
N U N/A 1
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A i
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or i sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together i 5.
if they contain essentisl relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y NNU N/A Uh , l
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N W U N/A 7.
8. Anchorage ade'quate (See checklist below for details) Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N@NA Y N U l
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Yf@N/A !
CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are ! met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule ' and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A i
1
SSEL Line No. 4101A 6tz33-c-ca 7 3gp SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-WT-104A1 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description WT/WT-TK-10 LEVEL TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'dl
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A
!s the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
YNUh ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined W k h esp, N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., dwb 3 h w oc'5 weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness hN U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking Y N @ N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages 1/4-inch GroMed gap under base less than hN U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, ca'pacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N Uh action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y NhN/A Are anchorage requirements met? Y Nh INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures &N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility &N U N/A i
l l 1 SSEL Line No. 4101A gg7 n ,c.ciq j SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3
<l Equip. 10 No. LT.-WT-104A1 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks ;
1 Equipment DescrJption WT/WT-TK-10 LEVEL TRANSMITTER l l INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd) l
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are '
not likely to collapse .'N U N/A '
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? .Y N U l
!s equipment free of interaction effects? N/@A NU IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE?
YN@ COMMENTS leve. 9uo c wo cge. CON wY %fcoi he 7 nc4 creEle. ide-N co,1cir.w, i i I V Evaluated by: GTO -l / '[ /IK% " d Date: 12[fd/E1 C-5 2 M A d 5 T Sk./4. 4/ t l
kVD ser33- c-ot9 P3 CSEL Line No. 4102A Status Y N U A /
/ SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 Equ(hID No.
LT-WT-104A2 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks pment Description WT/WT-TK-10 LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 735 Room, Row / Col YARD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) R369 ROSEMOUNT SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND e
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7 36,6
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade N U ;
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS G RS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum RS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) i
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience '
equipn. ant class N U N/A
- 2. N,o,, computers or programmable controllers N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate @N U N/A )
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or l sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together 5.
if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@ N U N/A
- 6. Attached liner have adequate flexibility N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N@NA
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? YNhN/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A I
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow i transmitter Y N U N/A j i
i
SSEL Line No. 4102A ggy n- C-olq pc) A tr l SCREENING EVALUATION WORX SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-WT-104A2 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description WT/WT-TK-10 LEVEL TRANSMITTER CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic ampitfication of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? YNh ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) Y N @ N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP QN U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined CD N U N/A 4 Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness @N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking Y N @ N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap I 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@ action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete
@N U N/A l pad adequacy evaluated Y N @ N/A Are anchorage requirements met? Y N@
INTERACTION EFFECTS i
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A l
l
SSEL Line flo. 4102A g g 53 . c.oig , kv ;- SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. LT-WT-104A2 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description WT/WT-TK-10 LEVEL TRANSMITTER INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd) l
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? NU !
Is equipment free of interaction' effects? N/(Ai,N U -15 EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00 ATE? YN@ COMMENTS t n A EA.D
'"EOCA C.f" r- PA 4 CO C CCA L4 s Sud[0r" a A ce CA are not ece Ale AmAe c..coms. '
9,L,,, o ~p sed s -E uec. c.y..J smo4 ls jclpe) 4o laa acle-gabe-A % . L ,, wJ;df M asm :
~4 '
i
. s zrn - c -c m pa + v %.
Status Y N 7 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 ! Equip. ID PT-RC-403 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipe es ription _RCS/ WIDE RANGE RCS PRESSURE TRANS Loca(ipn': O l dg'.~ RC8X Floor El. 701 Room, Row / Col A CUBICLE ) l Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional) VTI 7.31-0053 ROSEMOUNT l 1 SEISMIC _ CAPACITY VS DEMAND ,
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7do '- l' " !
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade CO N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz 4 Capacity basecl on: Existing Documentation Y N U@
DOC Bounding Spectrum BS GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum ;
4 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. %iCl Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. S I Does capacity exceed demand? YN9 CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class (1) N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers 3.
CD N U N/A , Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate Y N @ N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or l sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered N U
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N ll t
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) 8.
Y N (U) N/A Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U d@D !
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A !
Is the intent of allfthe caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? YN@N/A
- [AVEATS - Gifs (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow Y N U N/A transmitter Y N U N/A
6 Z2.33- C - o9 go A-te 4 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 J Equip. ID No. PT-RC-403 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description RCS/ WIDE RANGE RCS PRESSURE TRANS
- CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd1
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested,-as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A 4
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations (e.g.,
sloshing) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on amplified portion of 3% damped floor response spectrum if estimated natural frequency of rack less than 33 Hz Y N U N/A
- 9. -
54N' Seek capable of structurally transferring GERS level seismic loads to anchorage Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) Y N @ N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP @N U N/A
- 3. . Sizes and locations of anchors determined Q') N U N/A
- 4. Adequacy of anchorage installation evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.) Y N @ N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. ' Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@ action on anchors considered ON U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy Are anchorage requirevaluated ements met?
Y N U@Y N (jp , INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby i equipment or structures @N U N/A 4 l
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y N U@ !
- 3. @N U N/A l
6 2 Z M- c-em en M SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. PT-RC-403 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description RCS/ WIDE RANGE RCS PRESSURE TRANS INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not lik61y to collapse @N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? WN U N/A_
Is equipment free of interaction effects? (f/ N U IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNh COMMENTS colli t h *MfE' 4 - ua er sarua s,eovt p glba. no-RK-IB4l/ . g,, e jtj'
- e i .l : w 3
- / d o-i.
" / A. %*-
,i p.; : vi j,1 g
T 1 n] ', ..' pi :q
;- . o. !
Q - fl', d,j.*
~>
%s ?
N; . I n (El,.. dfl-Il[1&G ")EL)
/)
ll 4L4W ! ~ ' 3r F
> b%
% h. ,
! n u /}$ ?tivtl f
% V
% hloL1";
$eep.4t-1 S Evaluated by: "Cu .
L' Date: #/'/3/91 it.'NWRL a s/iOf3 7
57.7 m c-oi9 P.A/4 SSEL Line N . 4107D Status Y N U
\ Sheet 1 of 3 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)
/ I t
- p. D No. FIS-FW-151A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description AUX FW PUMP FW-P-3A SUCTION LINE FROM WT-TK-10 FIS Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 722 Room, Row / Col AFW ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 1204/BARTON INSTRUMENT /7.23-20 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMA D e 9
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7 Z4 - 7
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade CD N U 3.
4. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N UO DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum d@D GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CDIh Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in CDNU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class dD N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers CD N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate <D N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U@
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered QN U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility (U N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage ade.quate (See checklist below for details) @N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U 4[3>
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? (D. N U N/A is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? $ NUN /A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats . Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A l
. _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ ,._m_ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _
i SSEL.Line No. 41070 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) , Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. FIS-FW-151A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks i Equipment Description- AUX FW PUMP FW-P-3A SUCTION LINE FROM WT-TK-10 FIS
. CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd) ;
- 4. Component is one of_the specific makes and models '
tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to ,
seismically induced system perturbations, e.g., sloshing-(cover this as part of Section 6-evaluation) Y N U N/A ;
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A '
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A Demand based on realistic amplification of floor 8.
i response through rack to transmitter-to-rack ~ interface (document basis) Y N U .N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A l i '10. All' adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay ;
i assemblies colted together Y N U N/A i is the intent of all the caveats met"for GERS?
. YNU@
ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) <D N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP
-3.
G>N U N/A Sizes and locations of anchors determined 9pN U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., .
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness G)N U N/A 5.. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking (D N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch QL N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@ action on anchors considered dD N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete <
pad adequacy evaluated Y N U E3) ; Are anchorage requirements met? (D N U l INTERACTION EFF{fli j
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby i equipment or structures (D N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment ]
free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Y N U@
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility <C* U N/A
_g_,-,-_,,_-- -_ _
, __ _7_ ._ ,
SSEL.Line No 41070 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) , Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. FIS-FW-151A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description AUX FW PUMP FW-P-3A SUCTION LINE FROM WT-TK-10 FIS INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse ON U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? OE U IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE?
@NU COMMENTS N eT 4'. O fL A F ii .4 4 R enw ss T S w 15 m s T TE D wed. G t %f TD
- c. . a.n. es.T n A w w t, e a. oa 57eo - G. 28- 3833 SH.1 O s TA N or ym s h P P o s.T.
L G ) i l
-- lst -
- A- ~(" 3 m ' ,
s As i 1 El ~q l i n 3,,
-- p
-s g F
3 -
% l 7/ . [ __-f o CL
_ g, sw es \. ~
,. c, l
1 Evaluated by: / _. L. E Date: Nav.dS,t9CSi t Wl{hikk . n/G M r
.. - _- _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ __ ___m__.-__m____ _ _ _ - _ __. _ __ __
* " '" " Csrp rcto Nuclear 5:rvicas um r, rt u /m l DESIGN ANALYSIS COVER SHEET Unit / PAGE 1 CF /Y-fL /J > ,i~'
Design Analysis d Altcenato Calculctica C OA CATEGORY
'LATION TITLE (Indicative of the Objective):
CA
~
t- fS fy - l$1 - E VA WA M N d'~
~'
hI~ YII RELATED
'~
$dtfM!* f.fu ^t Ifit3 Y10 N ! b it * ='*! M N 0III I 0g ita n ws i$o n f*,> ~ F1C 4U * / f / A.,4 ; 'l i"~-~ i DCP/TER-No. Seismic l Systen No. Building Calculation No.
res El "o 24t Mscv 8700-2?QC-DOA0 1747 uco. u. vr CONTIRMATION Prcpared by/Dete Checked by/Date Verified by/Date REV. NO. SUPERSEDES REQUIRED (h (N,( ~ M- CALC NO. ADDilNBUM-Ne. OR REV. NO. TES NO
)/l ' ie [p,J., j g' rnkw o (%~ !
'l?/91 W7/91 , p gjg. .
/ j Apprcved By/ Dates Ah IM t
1
. . s A cved By/ Dates -
mm M WlthHU'dH
@WLuww .. . ..
Approved By/Datet h .. Q._,. ,; a L _. ,
! \
r.a. .
- ' ' ' '~~~'
Apprcved By/ Dates mm n web se m. 1 1-Approved By/ Dates
.. Ttt.
7,
. .! l .
~ ~~
Apptcved By/ Dates Purpose / Scope /
Conclusion:
Sv.s...*r .G en,f,_..,,,, . . . /va u- / i.'m /:b -r .
- ~ ~ -* r: u ~ ~ < - .
- (=,;,5 . , .
i s i A / a; a ~ a s ~ c.,~ i ..:. sorse .s.- r a i. c. * - . . 4 , g,. WL" ~:.$a~ o.
- s$ : . + s~ s . .
,, ,; ; ,, , h . s a d s r . i t . I t' . ' . , ' . . . "
ya f< r.= a . . * .* 1"d t e d as .C., ~ .o - s ~,
.--a 4
. - - - - , . , - - , - , , _ , - , , , w- a, , - ,--,,,n_ _y , ,,amam.a,sm _r; _a m, y ,ma - _ - _ _ - , - - - - _ _
w 1 I 4 -9 l '
- i
'g v .
4n 1 ' d h Fts -FW- (5) A F(5 -FW -- (513
)
i i p l l l l
~
l l - ! l 1 l l I i s
- me l
I
6 caQ ju u k i T.: 3 ,i l SSELLineNf.4108D Status Y N U
\
SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3
)LDNo. FIS-FW-1518 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description AUX FW PUMP FW-P-3B SUCTION LINE FROM WT-TK-10 FIS Location: Bldg. _SFGB Floor El. 722 Room, Row / Col AFW ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) I204/BARTON INSTRUMENT /7.23-20 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND i
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input M G-7
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade @N O 3.
4. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N U@ DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum A Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in d2N U COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class @N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers ON U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate @N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U@
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered <D N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility 6) N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) <p N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated YN U
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? QN U @N/A G N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats 3.
Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow Y N U N/A transmitter Y N U N/A
= ^ , - - g . c- 3 4 g - - - - - - - - - - - 1 SSEL Line No. 41080 l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. FIS-FW-151B Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description AUX FW PUMP FW-P-3B SUCTION LINE FROM WT-TK-10 FIS CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring :
seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U@
ANCHORAGE i
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) (D N U N/A l
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP (D N U N/A l
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined d) N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness ON U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch QN U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect-of prying YN Uh action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment case and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated YN Are anchorage requirements met? U @D
( NU INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby l equipment or structures , @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Y N U dOh
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility d2. N U N/A
. t
moas
~'
. v ,0 l el p ; WO L SSEL Line No. 41080 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) '
Sheet 3 of 3 l Equip. ID No. FIS-FW-151B Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description AUX FW PUMP FW-P-38 SUCTION LINE FROM WT-TK-10 FIS INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse @N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? GN U N/A !
Is equipment free of intaraction effects? (ON U IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? GNU COMMENTS l jl b I y ~~ \ \ 9wn f i ,, ~~~Tri ! U (3_7 7
+ O,r 3 .,
I o j -o _,, vi u .. i ',. ' S< ;=
~
\om t
b 1 L M o it.TP-Evaluated by: Y Date: Ow. rh o t 9 95 WIh5Avn[ l nh/w
_ _. __~-
. . . - ~ _
ggg _g_ giorp.,...e.a. aoroto Nuc1cor Sorvices Unit
-.e Y. f-( ' l5._ _ __ _ '
DESIGN ANALYSIS COVER SEEET Unit / PAGE 1 0F / Y '*/ L < 'J ., , . ' ~ D: sign Analysis b Alternate Calc'ilotien C CA CATEGORY , C#
'LATION TITLE (Indicative of the Objective): j
~ f Q I - KUCLEAR D II FIS FW - ISI '. E VA L:./S m d d SATETY
]
$d/ fM * : ifu A L.iMbs Tis d ,/ / Luc.1 !> J H RELATED
- I
/*.Z'C f u / f/ A ,/l i t ;~; QIII QF Q
,?& " wa i$a ~ f*>
DCP/?tR-No. Seismic Systcm No. Building calculation No. py Mcv 8700-pec-oop.o l747 Tea E) No mec. u. n CONTIRMATION Pr:partd by/Date Checked by/Date Verified by/Date REV. No. SUPERSEDES REQUIRED }/ J. Ch (q,g - R- CALC NO. YES NO ADDEN9UH-Ne. OR REY. NO. jtj'ff /WAW* lTi)(Ww'O
'I?l9' 6/7l9/ . . gjg /
Approved By/ Dates a MN 1, l A eyed By/Date: _. -
\
mmmWJilllltIUUU , www - _ , I 9 Appr:;ved By/ Dates Apprcved By/ Dates :
)
i Approved By/ Dates I 1 Approved By/Date Purpose / Scope /
Conclusion:
4L.- : fe,r,,,c a...,,, ,
, ..,e'vo ,v- r... i.e. +- e , j.. .
*n'=
, .a f g,, i dL =I ' ' * " - -* W 'A M ~ ' ' =
r /*,' ,, s#Ao & o. i ' . L M .p o 9
/ f / .1 / of 4 .** .'?
W /$2 ~ . /. _.: .
.t a . . :,o .- et M .
~~ -
7*aa ~ - .l.~O. ...
. 'J : . .. .
re .ir a, w. 2 .- ft c -s .. C,, n .. ..
=
. m.__,.s.mm. --~m--+4.4e**~*-- -=-= " ^ ^ ~ * ' * * * * ' * ^ ' " " " " " * * " " * " " ' " * - ' ' - - - - ' - " ' " ' ' ' ' - " " ~
S
- r I
l l 1 i; ( , i * ' e. < i . I 4a i 4 9 4 i Ft6 -N- l51 A , FIS-Tu)-15t3 m i i !. l I i' r
. ~ .
l ( l I j .. l i I l , l 1 ll e * { A en
$b gMM MM SSEL Line po. -4205E Status Y N U A
f SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 T ID No. PS-MS-101A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks quipment Description ATHOSPHERE STEAM DUMP S.G. lA location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 768 Room, Row / Col MSVH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) B70/BARKSDALE CONTROL DIV/82T-M12SS/ SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND , ,
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input t 7 71 * (*
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Y@ U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz GN U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation 00C Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum @
GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. @
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does ' capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) (_AVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class CD N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers CD N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate QN U N/A 4 Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@
- 5. N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated ~c.e ,*T u. r a n.s. (D N U N/A
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? w @ N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? @ NUN /A ,
CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow '
transmitter Y N U N/A
~
San s.-OW p.LTi
. SSEL Line No. 4205E SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. PS-MS-101A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description ATMOSPHERE STEAM DUMP S.G. lA CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A ;
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring '
seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. A].1 adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met.for GERS? Y N U@
ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A ,
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N A wGLo r o
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined NU g,
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., -
n/rF weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion 5. ancnor tightness @N U N/A Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than Y N U@
1/4-inch Y N U@
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Y N U@
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U Are anchorage requirements met? N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment
@N U N/A free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A 4
' ~~ ~ ~ ' ~
gg g -C- Q l q p, p lf SSEL Line No. 4205E , l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 i l Equip. 10 No. PS-MS-101A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description = ATMOSPHERE STEAM DUMP 5.G. lA INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse ON U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @.N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? @NU IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? @NU COMMENTS fl J
Evaluated by: od , Date: e Aloo.7$ile5 h,.hl$.hhvh
- it,l7l~t~~ -
~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i
~
6 - s o o -i- O H ~~~~~Pi-, W ~ ~ ~~~ - ~~~ - e' l N 1 l l '95 - m s - t o t A l l _ i i i l i ! I j 1 l I ! i ,%-
-- . .. . . . __ J, i i em_
l 95- MS- tot 6 pS _ mg _ ,g t g i i ., .
.-...q.. -
1 ) l . i l d' i e 1
u mo
- ~
Sa o. o r_. -o o m w e;M 1 Ps -ms- IDl & m vaaa~ c& '1 av ' i s '/g * .W 6
- 35 ;
{
,L ,t 7
__.y_.
e- hlam. Ooxo .'
8", 8. v 4 , W stM %.d ( 'i P4 < u% nJ- h [ /c{: o ., wa a ae. <c p\de..'ig ez u . - i
- \j -Q ; -
u (M iI 7 ^ 1 1 T- ';
$ SV4 x 7' V4 - 2~ 5 Y
es . ,n s - mi.s - , ,
< 4 k ; e g
i
' / je h M jr D% L
/;
=
l t
- N r f' :
y Lghsa,.w v21> g
" 3e
^) J/4 Sidg b#-
e x %..- .
. ,LJ Viem !
)
f
)
r I l 5NC EA} bee k 3w3h760- E6-196 )
--- ~ ~ . g -- h_ ta8*s;att CONTROLS Orv'Sch.3211 % mane 4 , e o som saa4xos angre, ca soess..r'3 ses-s et Hrused Saurden Tube Medels water.rgnt Houes (NtuA 4) a e roIf Nrnet Adjustment OPERATINGCHARACTERISTICS
- ORDE PRESSURE SWITCHES - All values given in P.S.I. (Gauge) j,,og l Adjustable Range Approx.
'"(Test) r Decreasing i increasing ACIua ' "
yu BIT Catalog B2T
~
Wetted Catalog Pressure l Min l Max. l Min.l . Man. (Differentist)IMatenal. umber Number 1800 50 ' !!80 70 1200: toto 20 Bronze 1800 50 1173 77 1200 BIT H12 IB2T H12
~ 11 to 27 316 4800 160 3170 B27 A1233 190;3200
- 4800 1 60 3161 199i3200 15 to 30 16 to 39 Bronte 31 6 BIT Blf H32 Al2S$
{82T H3
- 7200 240 4715 325 4800 Blf.H3253'82TH3253 40to 85 31 6
" **9750 325 6385 440 6500 BIT A4853 82T A48$3 54 to !!5 31 6
"!$000 600 !!450 1150 12000 Bli A65$5 827-A65SS 275 to 550 31 6
" 24000 600 17450 !!50 f!8000; Blf Al20$5 B27 A120$$
275 to $50 , 31 6 Apprerimate shippmg weight ltis. Bli A18033l Bis A180S$ Sif $lNGLI $(TTINC 82T DUAL CONTROL i 2.5 25
*"Bronte" represents Phosphor Bronze Tube with SAE 88 Brass Socket "316" represents 316 Stainless Steel Tube & Socket
""SUPERPRESSURE"(formerly AMINCO) female opening for M* 00 tu addition required. Change A655$ and A120$$ switches to M* npt, add F4 DffAll DATA ELICTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS: All models incorporate Underwriters' Laboratones, Inc.
ured single pole double throw snap action switching elements. Electrical rating (con.
- t. Nous inductivel 10 amps 125 of 250 volts AC,3 amps 480 volts AC Automatically reset tv snap action of :=rtch. For rnere details and other switch classes see pages 37 38 CLECTRICAL conduit coneector. CONNECTION: To screw terminals on covered terminal strip through %*nps. .
PRESSUtt CONNECT 10ll: Pressures above 8.000 P.S.I. have "SUPERPRES$URE" femaleCircuit
- onnection. .
opening for W" O D tub WlRE CODING - PRESSURf
#1: Common - Pc: .
Nortnally Closed - 6 .. ADIUSTMENT IN$TRUCTIONS Normally Open - 8et Ten adjustment screw clockwise to lower actuation point (switch setting). Circuit #2: Common - Brc.- Normally Closed - Orsate Normally Open- Yeoca yi '
._ j Bli B2T
~
ms- -- g l'yA P, C0h0Ulf C044(CTich m nn. J _ f4 ppg- .
.- 250 TlaWimal stetP AA- - -- ..
'lifll?, ,,s
, i J r m f
.t. m s;s.. , 1 % l 3 w i:~
.r., s ,as e 5 250 .
, } \-}
- ,. 5;nga j gggpg emsr < s:et.s l 5875 l -
statw (RtW0vt :0vte 406 , 4 36 CC"'
, @ , l' jl , ' * *
- C0vit g6 ~'"" l 31I '
&<etW0vt 166
/
f i
- 2500 etssi,et p;er l in e t Note: All other dimensions for
/ B2T are the same as BIT s#tWissu t'er! watt OPINiNC ist! N0ft;" (le ft).
h k a le LMin U0. 8 70 42c - A 13 es
d cA d
.~
3 Viq h, f""") b ~5 N D**32" #** '"'
'" 38"3*'" ***" :a secas 212i m.a: i Conventenal eiectromecharucal pressure switches use vanous tecnnologies cepending upon the apphcation. These include a diaphragm and piston. Th3 fonowing chart compares the diapnragm, bourdon tube, seased piston and a combination of adv*ntaps and disadvantages of each technology so you Comparisort Table chooss : ? pressure switch most ideal for your application.
swinnias reem 'm Caernewest Wgist Dieshragm Bowdse Tote Pisten ue (Trpest) 10 000.000 cycas Obtest Plsess 1000 000 cycles 5 1.000.000 cycles 2.500.000 cyces 00e'ating Range 1.000.000 cycles 15 to 10.000 os vacuum to 150 psi 50 to 18 000 pt 15 to 20.000 psi Actufaty vacuum to 1.000 ps: 205% mustaew range 20 5% seustaow range 20 5% acutaow rany 22 0% adsustaow range Aes1tance to facement a2 0% adpustare rany ve anon Good Good l Good Good
$*4cti Ome'ent,as 2 to 100% adiustaow raagt Ramp 2 to 7% amustaow range 2 to 7% Mustable range 2 to 7% amustace rav 2 to 7% Mustaow range t Dwareg Ameent 04 to 160*F 7evature Range -654 to +1654 -664 to +1664 *~
-204 to +1654 -204 to +1654 PW Presswre 15.000 ps 300 cs 24 000 os 20 000 psi Owaneg ino<stors 2.000 ps 2 LfD's andcate overt 4A under set poent status NA WA gg Solid State Pressure Switch Component Description Mounting External Mounting. Mounts in any position. ~
Enclosure Sensor
- Meets requirements of NEMA 4,12 and 13. Four captive screws each hold chained tamper-resistant adjustment cover Transducer type: Semiconductor strain gauges bonded to enda terminal block cover in place. Covers include captivateo 17 4PH stainless steel diaphragm. Electrical output of theextrusion-proof gaskets. h sensor is proportional to the pressure applied.
Set Point Adjustment 'l lwhching I Scho 1, tate tn.acs. Large dial calibrated in bar and psi provides setting accur to 3% adjustable range. Leakage current 1.7 Ma max. Vonage drop 2V max ! Switening voltage from 30 to 130 VAC, Status indicators Two LED's switch simultaneously with control circutts. Red LED . diuminates when pressure is greater than increasing set point Green s;t point. LED illuminates wnen pressure is lower than decreasing.
^
~
t W L e ( 3
= +-
- ! E g gg -:;g 3ck)b6-UOTW P.Mb l l
d. F-ss ts ls \s s :ss a e
- k a
s sans I :S : : .
-- 1 y
ij j: !* s asE is is !s s z l22 si s) i a ' an R q 8 :s: s: : = = sa 2 i ~...
-sce
(, dj A2 ss 22 $$ C SSS a assa
* , as ss as sa i 5,5 5
l ~::: i
- ng ct ss 5 ccc
.z ~~~ s s 8
5j R: a
- a :: (e as a
1m j . ~j8) 1 5 ss s s s a , ~: : e- c e a c !! *3 a w ; 5)3 ::
- : : "" I i- ! : Y :
J 8 m
" " ' " i* -
- a:s:ii !
}
E g < RI - 3 c i 55
$ - :: , s -
j I s
= 3ma 4 a
a 23 m : j E gg { .... i l o 13 l- j '*
~- - -
* * **^ ig
=
} y
~
3 u*
- i '
3 'E *
- a -
l s:s1:3 2 i
- c 15 - = 0 :
- Ei j5 , :: 5 i -s 3 I[ E8 35 53 SE 3 222 : E j ~... i 8 i
e ;el n 1e 3 s, s, sa s, , 11; :g . . ;;;; ij j 1 8 se W sij SS EE EE II 2 !![ g!
. I ~: : y 2!!aj e c == ss ec ss e sS2 s --
- 1 1 ,
6 5:% 5 y a ss ss ss as 1 555 g ; 932' f.^ g
- **:2 88
- EEE 8 i e jglE,i sj l 52 !J ,
ga gggg gg ggg lg jg_ a jg] j 3 g] jg,, i G }, 5 9,gg
}]3
. - s, s, s, ,, , ,s, 4 e :-
a 3g a
- h;:
3 j 3, [ isj 22 :0 33 55 2 aa1 : u :
=e s: aa ss s 553 .e 9 --
a 4.
.t.j:Ii 1 , as as as ss a ssa " 3# 32 3 h. x o j -- == =s == = ggg 2' g[ af 363
.a
$
- A: ii kk ss d
~* ~*
a c*=*
=* =* s
~
,. l s. l :i l :* ) l l E. ] .
Ih 1 n-a ys g 3
; 1{ g 3 4 j
- *' ~
E 55 EE E s{] ] I9 g g gj, a ; EE ff i3
} I y
o E 3 y
. as as as as s ass 8E EE EE EE E iji
.s a s l 3 ,' i i ;e l l l 3 s%
3 j'.,8 jsi gg j M G N i IR E3 a ss as sa ss i 255 R5 E2 3 339 ]s
--...... [
I
- las' 18$jli$ g5 n gg.A 15.,
ag ' _. i gg a~ ece s --- se::ss -a 8Em >
$M{ 53g sS := 23 emg
]
- 3 i m .
z: J
--...... . a 3 a wa=s
~ - --~~--
n- j ((
- E, = * .s s j s u-
$$ ! $ $ $ $$ 3 ! y II I 15, .p! 34
=
- l E8 EE 2E Ei ! EEE as ss as as s s55 l !"~~~~'.*:!!!
iii 3 s wi a 5E
. J o
- s EE =B E2 E sis A
=
i f s a s s a s ;s ;a !,n ,s
- a{-jjjj95"@:ac 3 ...
a 2 b s 1
- 85 EE 55 d5 E 555 lg I cc...... g
=2 l
g}3
~~~~
= . >> >> ss as a lii - - a -
.l me s ss as e aan 85 } -
= s ss cr im i nan 3! ,i , s __~~. - "* assassii g-1 3,, 4 sa ss 22 ss s sss h - AC::: tn 1 .
== ** == 8* s ESS u
o'
=
5 a llw l -
........st
- ==cces 2,s g
i c = W 3
] ,h II II I.l RE ](( E.3 3 _'88!.'!.*.!.*.*
-- .. . ~~
E
,!c
,s E
5 - g ]ah RR l ] $. )l *N:,. 1- 55555,$,13,11 8 sass s ss h f .s i l j b,
- - , , , ----
- :=
=
. . i Ij j . dI} '$ i .d !
E,.E T 3 l}N'E*E'=53k ! fre .) O 37
Saa3b-C Ol 4 p.My SSEL Line No. 4206E Status Y N U A f SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 Y E p . ID do. PS-MS-101B Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks l Equipment Description _ ATMOSPHERE STEAM DUMP S.G. IB Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 768 Room, Row / Col MSVH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 870/BARKSDALE CONTROL DIV/82T-M12SS, SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND , my v.
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 5 7d- G dr.rr, Ape,
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from gradey n. Y U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation 00 Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS
@G;RS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
Realistic H-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. @S RR Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS ff a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those cavects which ! are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and I explain the reason fcr this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class ct N U N/A ;
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers <D N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate @N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@
- 5. N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage ade.quate (See checklist below for details) N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated' 4a vT4e ostf (D N U N/A
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?gg7E2.N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? @ NUN /A j i
CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing .
equipment class Y N U N/A l
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A l
l v S l
7-- ggggc_ ogq p, p q;5
~
SSEL Line No. 4206E f SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 l Equip. ID No. PS-MS-101B- Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks ! Equipment Description ATH0 SPHERE STEAM DUMP S.G. IB > 4 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'dl l
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models !
tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A l S. Necessary function of component not sensitive to , seismically induced system perturbations, e.g., sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. 81], adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U@
ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP NU watpg 1 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined NU rso gg
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
~ weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion 1
anchor tigntness " @N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of
, safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, r i free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and
- 6.
concrete cracking For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than Y N U@ , 7. 1/4-inch Factors affecting essential relays considered: . gap Y N U@ 8. under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Baso has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@
~
action on anchors considered
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path @N U K fvv- W'*
to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U Are anchorage requirements met? Y N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures <D N U N/A
. 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures C.N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility CD-N U N/A i
4
- - - . _ . - - . , , - - - _ , - . - , - . _ , . , m , y .. - - , - , , - , , - - - - . - - -
Saas=5 -c-atq'
~
p A% SSEL Line Noc 4206E SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. 10 No. _PS-MS-101B Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description ATMOSPHERE STEAM OUMP S.G. IB INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse (D N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?j @N U N/A Is equipment free of inte,raction effects? H&m op GEN U IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? @NU COMMENTS 4
I I
.)
i' i, et
\
u in - 1
,1- i 6
.}1 t..I
- N=1 ed 1
o 9 1
- > 0 \
g ..
*( A' C & hw Evaluated by: it Date: Nu [,/c11]I osv W ey %.- IE, ~ K - -
u/r/9s
. b R
g d =5 ! i I , 1 l - i
' 1 i
i 1
- r. >
i i T5- ms- tot A t
-r t
~
! } . -
! se -- i i m i * ! l ) ~~ l . r l .s - .. l l Sbn o{ (or 95- ms- to t 6 pS _ yts - i o t e,
.. ' ~
I 3.- , e, . l ! / j s-3 s 1
~
5 6 6 b D ~G~ U N ' V H' % 95_- m s - t o t 6
%e i oc z 7% cona.tl l
/ At l
- Alum.% i i
. 9"a e~ ,, g
..- .. ,a NI I 4 i j .p. .
7f '/ 8V I \ d. s ct c ", s ", n *%
) ,, % V Y: i~
y+ c0 e i i f $w 2a Y4
+}\ W1.
N il I V v . a N b h,V N 2" Ptge, ~
-nWy N N
. N
fLge. 2.5 2
$ +
m N Y
%V
, - k. (o"N (o "r Vg "
r Tre NO C $ t.kd p m ,e,d eg 4C v i bo% stdc., oQ 4,4 ,, i
' wed AJ.Eddd :
wcld only pet,e4 n C. I2 " 20.7 okde (1k Gh, e
~ -~
S aab3-C- O jc; - p, pg
^ '-
PS - MS - t O f G Page, Z of 2 b toeg_\abe-
/ %c, V ,
n - . M ' ~
< Gl2 x 20.7 A
( 1 eia. 1 1 -'%Jk N 3g d 'h at
- e f g, ,
- d. -T
$ 3 i e-M"M 4 1 4 + 6 a
--- - - - - r , _ _
5 :_ m_ -c-o R %, - -@ _ e m. sea. e.w.cas--, - a, Hened sovedon Tebe Medeh Cater-fight Housing (NEMA 4)
$pe'r"p'r"ItNrnal Adjustment OPERATINGCHARACTERISTICS
- ORDERIN PRESSURE SW57CHES - Afl values given in P.S t. (Gtugt) a Proof Adjustable Range Approa, '
(Test) Decreasing i lacreasing Adu on BIT 82T Pressure y, Weted Catalog Catalog
. Min. ) Max. l Min.l Mas.!(DiMerential) Material. Nurnber Number 1800 50 l !!80 70'1200 10to 20 Bronze 1800 50 1173 81T H12 ' 62T.H12 77 1200 11 to 27 316 81T A1233 82T A1253 4800 160 3170 190 3200 15 to 30 Bronze 81T H32 B2T-H32
" 4800 160 3161 199 3200 1 16 to 39 31 6 81T H3253 82T H3255 ;
7200 240 4715 325 4800 40 to 85 31 6 81T-A4835 82T A4853
" 9750 325 6385 440 6500 !
54 to 115 31 6 81T A65$$ 82T A6553
" 18000 600 11450 )
!!50l12000 275 to S50 316 81T A120$$ 82T A120$$
" 24000 600 j 174501150 {l8000275 to 550 316 817 A180$$ 82T A18035 <
Acoroximate shipping weight its. 2.5 sti slNGLI SETTIME 827 DUAL CONTROL T Bronts" represents Phosphor Bronze Tube witn SAE 88 Brass Socket25 I ! i "316" represents 316 Stainless Steel Tube & Socket
'"SUPERPRESSURE"(formerly AMINC0) female opening for W" 0D tube conne changerequired.
addition A65SS and A120$5 switches to h* not, add Pd sutfin to model number Pri OCTAll DATA (LICTRICAL CHARACTEMSTICS: All models incorporate Underwnters' laboratories. lac tsted u siegte pole double throw anao-action swatening elements. Electrical rating (con.. tia cus inductive) 10 amps 125 or 250 volts AC. 3 amps 480 volts AC. Automatically reset by snap action of switch. For more dotatis and other switch classes, see pages 37 38 (LICTRICAL CONNECTION: To screw terminals on covered terminal stnp through 1/s'nps conovit connector. hessures above 8,000 P.S.I. have "SUPERPRESSURE" temale connectiori. Circuitopening
#1: Common- Purc'efor W* 0.0.
Normally Closed - 8%e ADJUSTMENT INSTRUCTIONS Normally Open - 8eo Circuit #2: Common- Broma t Turn edivstment sues clockwise to lower actuation point (swed setting). Normally Closed - Orange Normally Open- Yenoa yI ' Bli .ky _am
.@N )
~ Iff& pp, 4 I l't n es con 0uff CCnnicison 38 3 mt ) .,-- - i , 2<A
,Tleuinal ec. tam sTm9
;-- - r i
- A& ,- '
i
,6 32 sceurs i D b.E ' ,
r , f m
- I
,.-.m.e e ]
! twa:ts
.f :.; 5:s[n$ @
s .;j; .
#* l i
~ Aalust:#C sc80s s sa m :$;agn 18?l; l a010$71NG ON 00#I" Scan' I M62 (etuod corta 406I 406 c:ecult at to acusT) i c:#:uit at
. r- '
Il2 J 625 :h w9 _ ,pr wax; ,w, e.ene ,or
-eemit er t a.,r 82T ere ths (www asse -81T
. ras s.*(#Petssent Iguatt oerminc cstg =c.gia_ ~
T b c h s W e. k ch fUo. 87042 0 - A 13 i
- omM-C-01" Conventional electromechenecal pressure swviches use various
- p. A \
A eo Cs sasaxas Aneses ca soons.mm ses4 technologies depending upon the applicata. These include a diaphragm cad piston. Th3 fIllowing chart c mpares the diaphragm, tsourdon tube, sealed piston and a combination of advantages and disadyrntages of each technology so Compartoon Table choose the pressure switch most ideal for your application. gl 7 cheresserisse sammes resnemen seedsase C, newees )ees Lde (Typcan Pwee piHeel name 10.000.000 cymes 1.000.000 cyces ; 1,000.000 cydes Ope <stmg Range 2.500.000 cyces 15 e-10.000 se 1.000.000 cyces vacuum to 150 psi 50 to 16.000 pm Accracy 15 to 20.000 psi 20 5% amus:ste range vacuum to 1.000 ps 10 5% mustame range 20 5% a4ustaode range 22 0% actustage range Aes> stance to Ezeenent 22 0% adrustame range v@ratuon Good Good Good . Good Seten Defterental 2 to 100% adustaode range Range 2 to M aeustaede range 2 to 7% a4ustaNe range 2 to 7% amustame rage 2 to 7% adsstatus range
$0*F to 160*F
. 65'F to + 165'F )
(- -20*F to + 165'F
-20*F to + 165'F Pfoof P' essure 15.000 pp 300 psi 24.000 ps Doe <atmg snaicators 20.000 ps 2.000 ps 2 LED's irocate over/ N/A under set powtt status N/A N/A N/A Solid State Proesure Switch Component Description Mounting i t
External Mounting. Mounts in any position. Enclosure Sensor Meets requirements of NEMA 4,12 and 13. Four captive j screws each hold chained tamper. resistant adjustment cover Transducer type: Semiconductor strain gauges bondedand to terminal a block cover in place. Covers include captivatec , 17 4PH stainless steel diaphragm. Electrical output of the extrusion-proof gaskets. ' sensor is proportional to the pressure applied. A Set Point Adjustment Q' twHehing Solid. state triacs. Large dial calibrated in bar and psi provides setting acc to 3% adjustable range. Lcakage current 1.7 Ma max. Voltage drcp 2V max Switening voltage from 30 to 130 VAC. St:tus indicetore Two LED's switch simultaneously with control circuits. Red LED inuminates when pressure is greater than increasing set point. sGreen t point. LED inuminates when pressure is lower than decreasing
~
l l l 1 3
=. _
we
- e
VJ r--iWC ~~~
^'
O o aOO L -UN SSEL Line No. 4207E Status Y N. U A SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3
'qq
$I No. PS-MS-101C Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks b
ui pment Description ATMOSPHERE STEAM DUMP S.G. IC Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 768 Room, Row / Col );5VH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) B70/BARKSDALE CONTROL DIV/B2T-M12SS/j SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND ,
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input C 71 - 6
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Y
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz @db N UUN/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum dED l GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Dis. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CIHb t Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS
- Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic l demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) )
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience ,
equipment class @N U N/A i
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers @N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate @N U N/A
! 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together . if they contain essential relays Y N U IOD
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered GN U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility CN U N/A Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) ON U N/A 7.
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated ~coarm ron.4 QN U N/A
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? WON U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? () NUN /A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing i equipment class Y N U N/A i
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or, flow j transmitter Y N U N/A !
- J l
_ _ _ ._ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . . _ _ I _ _' . _ . . '. ..
" ' ~
Q W O .D - L.- L)l 4 P. P 1 _,2 l SSEL Line No. 4207E j SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. PS-MS-101C Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description ATMOSPHERE STEAM DUMP S.G. IC l 5 CAVEATS-GERSlCont'd) ,
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix 8 . Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
i sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A e 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting belts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack i interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring ,
Y N U N/A seismic demand loads to anchorage , .10. Alj. adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay 4 assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A , Is the intent of all the caveats met f.or GERS? YNUh ANCH0kAGE _ .
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined j (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) @N U N/A ;
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP @N U N/A whoso '
'3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined ON U N/A )
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., )
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion ancnor tightness @N U N/A , 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of l safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, ! free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and Y N U@ concrete cracking
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch Y N U @b
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@
~
action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate $N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated YN Are anchorage requirements met? U @$ N U !
' INTERACTION EFFECTS I
- 1. -Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures ON U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U N/A ,
l
y saas=5 o oW p A94 SSEL Line No. 4207E SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. PS-MS-101C Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description ATMOSPHERE STEAM DUMP S.G. IC INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse @N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? ON U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? @NU IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE7 @NU COMMENTS E
o b Gd.
, &snnk -
,,/,irr
l L \ll -
/ J,
.z
\ / / / 7s 4 s.io c,a < e Ps yl- tog A t l ., ,
, 7:
l s.. \ l G.\ y :. .
\... .
i'y .R ... . 7
?$-mS-101C-
.=
l * ' l l e-l N- ' l - ---..-... -..-. - ---..
o g - v t>c -t r . n -l u> I PS - ms - to t C vte< cock:L l added an m/ ., :a. .f \ 3 ( n y .n uv % V N e amo, .. . L i , , fg(b.Gex ,g,e s - -
*)
-k. a.
a 6 lo N eck b ef ' W " locif wit L w t en 6 c.k..:cte of cicle. 9 2e\ws- f-
\ M l I 4
i n 14-.
- 2,,>
+
4
- t. eV "x 7 *4 a YYt h vs - m s - sote. +
l k - a T n .-
*Q /
'O -
i%:n3 V 1 1 W B x 31 '
'U lcleJ on one g 3
s:cte oC 0 e o^f % yZb
- i. A b ages.,
h4 (oY4 b t Weu side \!ies Looklng We.st Todidk3 9eed h 8700 - 7.5 - t96
. .. m.
gyy y ., (,,,)rw =~T"T~#F i
- I SAms0 ALE contacts omsors2tt Nese a .
n . e o sa sanota ane.wi ca e:ase.esi ses.44e, { Hnsed seerden Tew ::*dels svarer TigMt H;using (N(MA 4) ! and ferminal Stric Terroer proof External Adjustment OPERATINGCHARACTERISTICS
- ORD PRES $llRE SWITCHES - All values given in P.S.I. (Gauge) p,,,, Adjustable Range l Appros.
(Test) Decreasing g37 i 82T increasing i Pressure Min.1 Mar. [
" ,08 Min.) Masl h?,erential)' Material *t Wetted Catalog umber Catalog
( Nurnber 1800 50 1180 70'1200 10to 20 Bronze B17 H12 1800 50 !!73 827 H12 4800 77 1200 lito 27 316 81T-Al2SS B2T Al253 160 3170 190 3200 15 to 30 Bronze BIT.H32 4800 160 3161 199 82T H32
" 3200 16to 39 7200 240 4715 325 31 6 81T-H32SS !B2T H3253
- 48u0 40 to 85 316
**9750 325 BIT A4833 82T A4855 6385 440 6500 54 to l15 31 6 Blf A65SS
" 18000 600 !!450 1150!!2000 275 to 550 827 A65SS 316 Blf-A120!S 82T A120S$
" 24000 600
_ 174501150 l18000 275 to 550, 31 6 ,81T A180$$ B2T- A180SS Acoroximate shipping weight lbs. 81T SINGLE SETT)ME I 2.5 82T DUAL CONTROL l 25
."Bronre" represents Phosphor Bronze Tube with SAE 88 Brass Socket "316" represents 316 Stainless Steel Tube & Socket
""SUP(RPRESSURE".(formerly AMINCO) female opsning for 4* 00 tub addition required. change .A65SS and A120S$ switches to s' not, add P4 DETAll DATA ILECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS: All models encorporate Underwnters' Laboratones. Inc.
I,s'ed a s#rt'e pole double throw snao action switching elements Electrical rating (con. f.a ous inductive) 10 amps 125 or 250 vetts AC. 3 amps 480 volts AC. Automatically reset by srap action of switch. For more details and other switch classes, see pages 37 38 ELECTRICAL CONN!CTION: To screw terminals on covered terminal strip through %'aps. conduit connector. P*essures above 8.0~00 P.S t. have "SUPERPRESSURE" cormtctuon .. WIREternale CODING - PRES Circuit #1: Common - Pur: e opening
$URI fo learmally Closed - BN:
ADIUSTUENT INSTRUCTIONS Nomially Open ~ Res . 1 Turn adjustment screw clockwise to lower actuation point (switch setting). Circurt #2: Common - Brown i Normally Closed - Ornete Normally Open- Yelica yl 81T .. y I
~~
- a 375 i #""9 g pp 3 l'2h P3 CONDVII C0h*ICTION -- 2%
- 34 3 M P i - -= - l 7tewit4L siflP g___ -j -- - y [ 5 CCNtacts
,g 3; ggwg O p r
~ j.g
;".".'5* %w% .
es '
- ! - \.
i
.t n s: stas 6 ) -
d II# b' j 10NstkG Stat *5 sa 2.. : s:w
. pm! -
agggyggg (etWOvt CCvie xnw 'o '=5" l sc. ! a,, (etM0ft Covie ODI #l to ADNsT) T-
._ m e.,
cot *2 312 3 625 [
. *w '
MI I
'.- ! $co'
- et$sbel NeflsNPt Note: All other dimensions for L
B2T are the same as BIT s.Pf e,e(sscat r[ust! oPit'wG ts(( NCr0**- (left).
% \u,Lde.
GJh m. 870420 ~ ^ 13
..E h
QJQ~ J W_f ' 'I U e r m.es3 an . # o an unma % :4 goosa.gia ses# , Convent @4l eiectromechanical pressure switche8 use vary */ technologies depending upon the application. These inc',de a di phragm and ptst n. The following chart compar;s th3 d.contagm. bourdon tube, sealed piston and a combing',on of advantages and disadv'ntages of each technology so yo choose the pressure switch most ideal for your application. Comperfeon Table senswee fwnestesir Chererwelate Send-Isme D6eenroom Wedusfuge. Menee L4 iTrocal) 10.000.000 cycles ' Die 8eef Muse 1000.000 cycles 1000 000 cycles 2,500.000 cyces O w anag Range t 5 to 10.000 ps 1.000.000 cyces vacuum to 150 psi 50 to 18.000 ps Ar. tacy 15 to 20.000 ps 20 5% adiustam range vacuum to 1.000 ps 20 5% Mustanie range 20 5% Mustable range 22 0% adiustanie raAge Aes stance to Dcetient 22 0% actustanse range V>c anon Good Good Good Good Seiten Ome'entw 2 to 100% eustable range 8taagt 2to N Austaev range ' 2 to N mustaos range 2 to M asustable range 2 to N qustasie range 0 to 160*F I 'F
-65'F to +165'F
$ 4 220*F to +165'F -20*F to +165'F PW P'essee 15 000 ps 300ps 24 000 ps 20.000 psi Ope'af#9 indcators 2.000 pas 2 Lf 0's inocJte over/ k!A under set po:nt status h/A N/A h!A Solid State Pressuto Switch Component Description Mounting Futernal Mounting. Mounts in any position.
Enclosure Senso' Meets requirements of NEMA 4,12 and 13. Four captive screws each hold chained tamper-resistant adjustment cover Transducer type: Semiconductor strain gauges bondedand to terminal a block cover in place. Covers include captivated 17-4PH stainless steel diaphragm. Electrical output of theextrusion-proof gaskets. srnsor is proportional to the pressure applied. ,
, Set Point Adjustment -
switching Sohe state triacs. large dial calibtated in bar and psi provides setting accur to 3% adjustable range. Lcamage current 1.7 Ma max. Voltage drop 2V max Switemng voltage from 30 to 130 VAC. Status Indlestors Two LED s switch simultaneously with control circuits. Red LED illummates when pressure is greater than increasing set point. Green set point. LED diuminates when pressure is lower than decreasing e ~ O 4 3 1 . 4 # N -* ..
r . n -19 ~ q d oic3 O i t U N l l SSEL Li e No. 5222C Status Y N U f Sheet 1 of 3 [ SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) 1lf} > A qu p. ID No. PS-VS-106A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description SLCRS EXH FAN VS-F-4A TRIP UPON VAC COND IN CNMT PURGE Location: Bldg. AXLB Floor El. 768 Room, Row / Col Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 8070/BARKSDALE CONTROL DIV/0!T-M3 j SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 17 3 -Pr
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Y db U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz @N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DDC Bounding Spectrum l
BS i 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS dD ; GERS 1
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS ,
Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. @ l Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? .(Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class ON U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers CD N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or d2N U N/A sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays .Y N U d@b
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered CN U N/A
- 6. Attached line.s have adequate flexibility N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) N U N/A 8.
9. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated c.o ea m cTon. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? N U Mbr cp N U N/A t) Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? ONUN/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow transmitter Y N U N/A
Q c> o Q ._) L t > $ 7 H tT IL)L) SSEL Line No. 5222C SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. 10 No. PS-VS-106A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description SLCRS EXH FAN VS-F-4A TRIP UPON VAC COND IN CNMT PURGE CAVEATS-GERS) Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met-for GERS? YNU O ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined hD WG/4 C (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) O N @I N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP CD N tl N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined CD N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness T% wsr, Figet. rua7 FAwr ov.n.- C.D N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin ,of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 7.
1/4-inch Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap
- 6) N U N/A under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors - CD N U N/A c o *TMw
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered (p N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate dQ N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U Are anchorage requirements met? N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @-N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipm'ent G free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A e m m 7o
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility (D N U N/A g
I.3 d-d b b 1 -(_.)k Y N lU \ SSEL Line No. 5222C SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. PS-VS-106A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description SLCRS EXH FAN VS-F-4A TRIP UPON VAC COND IN CNMT PURGE l l INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are !
not likely to collapse d) N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? )
Is equipment free of intgraction effects?
@N U N/A '
(I)N U IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? @NU COMMENTS l) ov m A 9F# w 4, Tuw dt, t} Dw ct w.w. s a#ativv No n -s t15m c., go wm i g An m, $ , ,. o r , o w , r s u. . ~ & . + s~e- . ~~ g 4 #* W b% tm s g* wts t c4 a s s- No W A w g p ty p p, g g 3 , E
# 8VF N A ow. A' f o, R.W h o" i il -
@ (p
<n m ,y H
7 w -1,. .a ~ n .s {/ge1'( P M S# 3, 4 R. 9 3 , < ',y h hA "q q' ;g_-i"
- ,E.
'u . --.l 4,, %% rp' . 4 Lembw s 4 j,1; ,,
\s t-f
*) h J Evaluated by: / Id Date: l#G/Si W'$MIE
//
- 1\/C,/95
. =
r g o, w m ,, ,
, ' $~ . ... .
A Ps -Vs - t oG A t B TS - v s-t o GA ( e
~~
j r: .
- e. f., ,.
i r
., W , ;-
/ .
q N . . N q n
. s h
95 - m 5 - L o I C. k, '*
- 7 r~ ,. . .
. .. -- _s, 7 g -
d
*6 e
/
r
- e e
R.
-------------------_-----___A
saa scatt contacts civisica.nu swa a4
- a so saso.t ugus :a ass.22 sataa, OPERATINGCHARACTERl5flCS e ORDER PRESSURE SWITCHES - All values given in P S l. (Gauge)
Housed Diaphrsgm Models Proof j Adsustabla Range l Water Ti DD',88f :
' (Test) ) Decreasing i increasing l Dlf N','s,',ght oo Housset (NEMA ' " " 4)',istes'/Adivittnent
'
- a- ' "'t : *"- " ' ' - ! valu
*""'"e')
l( *etted i l ' "" I Cat:1og i D2T Catalog 3 018 i ! 6 54 Adi 1.7 i 018 to .046 8 25 3 018 1 65 068 1.7 l 02 to .05 } 17 7PH g, Dif H2 1 02T H2
, D17H255 D2TH235 10 C3 2 89 14 3. 05 to 11 8 25 j D1T A3 D2T A3 10 03 1 2.85 i
18 3. 07 to 15;j 17 7PH , Oli A3SS D2T A33$ 60 , 4 17 80 g ,e 60 18. 1 to .20 8 25 D1T-H18 D2TM18 60 l .4 160 l .5 17.74 77 2 66 18. 22 to 26 17 7PH {01TH1853 4 D2T H1833 33 l 80. 1.4 to 2 8 8 25 OIT A80 C2T A30 160 ! 5 - 76 6 39 '
- 80. 16 to 3 4 17-7PH D1T.A80$$
300 l 15 144 8 I 6.7 150. 2.2 to 5 2 8 25 D2T.A80$$ D17 A150
, 300 i 1.5 !144. l 7.5 l150.l 2.3 to 6 0 l 17 7P5f Oli A150$$
D2T Also D2T A150$$ Approximate shipping weight lbs. l 2.0 a 2.0 4 i VACUUM SWITCHES - All values given in inches of rnercury (Gauge) Proot j Proof Adsustable Range Dif $!NGLE SETTING (Test) (7est) Dec. Vacuum { inct. Vacuum u n Oli DZT Vacuum Pressure value Wet *ed Catalog Wa.1 Mas. , En. ) Mas. (Differentral) Catacg D2T DUAL CONTROL Matenal* Number NuMe< 6 4 6 10 PSI i 06 l 58 ! 26 l
- 6. .09 to .20 8 25 Olf A3 ; D2T a3 10 PSI l 06 l 5 72 34 6. 14 to .28 17 7PH Dlf A313 i D2T al" 30 1 60 PSI . 8 l 29 34 1 46 30. 4 to .66 8 25 01T.H18 ' D2T *1 t r
30 l 60 PSI l8 l 29.2 16 30. 4 to 8 17 7PH D17H1853 I D2Tw H A _ oprearmate shipping weight Ibs. _ _ __ _ [ . 2.0 l 20 OtTAIL DATA '8 25 Buythum Copper,17 7PH Stainless . - ELEC1RICAL CHARACTERtSTICS: AH models incorporate Undensraters' Lab-g oratories. inc. hsted singte pole double throw snap action switching ele-monts. Electrical rating (continuous inductive) 10 amos 125 or 250 volts AC,3 amps 480 votts AC. Automaticatty reset try snap action of switch. For WIRE C00fMC- P:tESSURE more details and other switen c! asses. see pages 36 38' WIRE C00lMC - VAcup Circuit 41.Commin-Purple Normally st"D Cir sed - Blue Circuit #1: Common 8. .
- E'.[CTRICAL throtgh %~ nps conduit CONNECTION:
connecto'- To screw terminafs on covered terminal Normally 0 pen - Red NormallyClosta - Normally 0cen - 5
- Circuit #2: Common - Brown Circuit #2: Common - B -
PRES $URE (VACUUM) CONNECTION: %* not intomat thread. %* npt avail Normally
- Closed - Orange Normally closed <e .
able stainless steel only add -P2 to catalog number when ordenng. Normally Open - Yellow Normstly Open - C a a ADIUSTMENT INSTRUCTIONS Positae (seitch Pressure: settang). Turn adsustment screw ciockwise to lower actuation point Vacuum Switches Undetwriters Laboratones and factory Mutual listed 'o, r Turn ediustment screw counterctockwise to approach atmospheric _ Protection service request Dulletin 690627. DressWre. Djy 3*_ M Dia (2 houffin8 wolf in att
- 17)e %- 312 02T aos scars r -
~"" _
Nr$3"m l1 I ) '~~T am m r 3 I i -- ~" wt2 stortte> A 4 E, geft, , i E -.I i ,, v y sne un i _.4 }.-_ .J.j' P l ,,i : W ) D7t by t-
-l .
,~ Note: All other dimensions for - ...
l
- 17:s -
02T are the same as Dif (letti' (
. 3 o, -l C :ss ~l.ieu. .- m ~
~
~ s an -
p 4 s43 - Sofs =0Ver14C e4acalf hat E
. , . , gGa0Vuo SCREW t
[ ffM,
- t EcYacri.:
.a ua e )
s C@ O C - (* b_ - ee a_, _ . _ V cenatencecoaoury / ,, n ., I RheAA 4 87c42c A a e 8
SSEL Line No. 5223C Status Y N U l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 Equip. NofAP-VS-1068 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks ] Equip nt r tion SLCRS EXH FAN VS-F-4B TRIP VPON VAC COND IN CNMT PURGE ! 3 Loca .BYdg. AXLB Floor El. 768 Room, Row / Col i Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) B070/BARKSDALE CONTROL DIV/0IT-M3-l i SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMA@
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 777dT l
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade YQ U v
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y l) U N/A :
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC '
Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum @ GERS 7 GERS i
'5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS (
l.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. @ ; Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS i Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are mat by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class @N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers &N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate @N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U@
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered @N U FfA
- 6. Attached lines.have adequate flexibility N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) N U N/A 8.- Relays mounted on equipment evaluated c o NTA c ro A. N U N/A
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? g,N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? $ N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or' flow transmitter Y N U N/A
- - . - - . . - - . - - , , -l
.. - - .-._ ~ ..
J SSEL Line No. 5223C' SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 i l Equip. ID No. PS-VS-1068 Equip Class 18 - Instruments on Racks ' Equipment Description SLCRS EXH FAN VS-F-48 TRIP UPON VAC COND IN CNMT PURGE CAVEATS-GERS) Cont'd) -
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to <
seismically inducpd system perturbations, e.g., sloshing (cover.this as part of Section 6 evaluation)
~
1 Y N~ U N/A ,
- 6. No vacuum tubes . .
Y N U N/A '
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack '
interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable.of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of. multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A YNUh; l Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?
ANCHORAGE
- l. Appropriate equi"pment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A i
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A l
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A I
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion 4 anchor tightness T u mgyr p Factors affecting anchorage dap,4
% 94 W AM$N U N/A
- 5. -
aci $ or mar' r gin, I 4 safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking $N U.N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch &N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap
, under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A c ero A
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of_ equipment base and load path to CG adequate &N U N/A j 10.- Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad. adequacy evaluated Y N U@
Are anchorage requirements met? @N U i INTERACTION EFFECTS- ,
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment-or structures @N U N/A 0
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipmer.t free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A m T* m a ,
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility ON U N/A y
)
4 e., ,m. .,y y-. , ,- -- -,,, , . _ .- ,~.
b Oo O "JO l'i W. h I U(.D SSEL Line No. 5223C SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. PS-VS-106B Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description SLCRS EXH FAN VS-F-4B TRIP UPON VAC COND IN CNMT PURGE INTERACTIONEFfECTS(Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse @N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A 3)
Is equipment free of interaction effects? @NU IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00 ATE? $NU COMMENTS PS -us- L CGh , l)d t) Ner- ho no eS r
- 3) t\ nd '
ie wecIgeck b w ee.n b s d c.h ^ o u SEA-p mp[ 4k t p{me , Te M 5 k o u [cdlo e_ ecmo v ed , y M], ) MWA 0 4 7 ( , B ro Wo rr raru sI 09 - V5 lC63' D ./X l To 9GwovE W G o kE. o to u, r A
/X lY W
- _ $] . wm ,
Ce %gerh emc cuc.acecge. c eAE 9 eo io f 5 - w - (CG A. ,
. ~.
1
/ s/ .// j' 94- Date: 11/f /95 Evaluated t,y: _ auh$ O Meyf,f I6 9(
~^
Ps -us - t c6 A t B Vs - vs.iosa 4 e
~
f Y ~ I lj *
=
k " ~. 0 ,3 m. <.
) '
'f t
. ;f'km l-~
S I
?S - m s - t o l C.
7- _ . _ ,_ .7. , f
i
a"*"--
No.23180 l WORK - REQUEST ! SUBMITTEi MARK NO. ~% - 4 D C.B -
' PROBLEM Mut w&Daan tiLaTJ elL a sa ~~ '
'?
.Sw s rc a Ma u s .u c Aun
- m. ..o& pm ru ,
I _ w__._ _ _ ____ ~ - - -
, 23180 l:no..R.sususTTED -
No. 23180 j o*T um 23180 $ \ L h o. (., ,lq q g- 'E BV1 av2 .
- man na -
Pb-Mb-tos,% I rensaan smuca r.& ss.c c s.
.(
f. i 5%W. Faa %-F-4E Ts.te . ' =-
- 1 y
auxs ma ..< . _.,,_ i g ed W4L.L. G 't'134v t., s,.m dssa r l 1
, , . t, m ,. . . . .
- ceaanan. Maiht. Garmomaur kc ne ; 1 l . .. u g- ,,...
G..
'~ ~ ~ ~ '
MuT W WP&n D %S T*vJ uT t eJ , sw t re a a.usi% we i b Ft.A rs TD N f,',$ .
'n.ene
.m . uv 4e7o.seJ g I
i
$ F-I'**
.)
g1. . O c.ou r O oosr O un.4t...T. 1
. '..'-~
t e.u . i .i. w ,. . . ,.4 .n.,r .in .i! 'r _.._ ..
-) '
o . Pt.Acan sy: E MP. NO. MWRMO. - l L.V.Omis 7s o*rcss . APPROYED eYi E MP. NO. DATE: .. s % l
CDOOD "*L ~ v 4~d W l@ 3 CVPOWR19 BEAVER VALI.EY POWER STATION WORR REQUEST LVPNW19 SECTION 1: CRICINAT03 CRANGJ 005 CAUTION
]
NUMBER PRIORITY: 4 REPAIR MODS: 7 EQ ITEM. N IST PUMP / TAG NO IAG NO TAG NO l 7686 QA CAT. 1 TEST NODES 7 TYPE Cs N VALVE: N 023180 N/A N/A ) (IT SYSTEM NO EQUIPMENT MARR NO NPRD CODE TASR NO l 01 16 PS-VS-1065 INSTRU N/A l ELDG AUIILIARY ELEY 768 BLDG AREA SOUTE-WEST NALL l PRA: N R.G.1.97: N G.L. 89-10s N SEISMIC CLASS: 550 N l EQUIPMENT PUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION: SLCRS EXE PAN VS-P-45 TRIP UPON VAC COND IN OINT PURGE BEE DUCT MANUPACTURER B070 RARRSDALE CONTROL DIV / DELAVAL l MODEL NO DIT-N3 SERIAL NO N/A l REoVEST *******TECE SPECa***** OPEN ITEM an* ORIoINATING SUPERVISOR "* l DATE DATE TIME NUMBER
- NO. Y/N N EMP.# NAME l 951106 N/A 'N/A N/A N/A - N/A 0078 P V DAVIS '
INITIAL PRORLEN/PAILURE DESCRIPTION: A NUT IS WEDGED BETWEEN TER SWITCE BOUSING AND TEE MOUNTING PLATE. IT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. RECORD WAS WRITTEN YOU ARE IN CEANGE MODE "PPl* - EELP "PP5" - CONTINUE PROCESSING "PP3" - RETURN SysAv1 Appl .~ 0 l l , 1
% 0
yQ'* L) i I t~'* O \\ U 1 sausase n soivso srnsvr.ee a<e \ n a 8= Sasous aves ta ma-rta sawai OPERATINGCHARACTERISTICS
- ORDE PRESSURE SWITCHES - All values given in P $ IlGaugd Houwd Diaphragm Medets
/ Proof l Adiustable Range WaterTesh: Housset (NEMA 4) uat o'n Covered Terminal Strip (Test) ) Oecreasing I lacress'nt D1f 02T Pressure i M in, i Vaz. value Wetted } Catalog Tamper proof Esternal Adjustment ; Vin. Cataleg M as. ! (Diffeeenttal) Vatenal* 1 Number '
. Numt>er 3 018 1 65 068 1.7 02 to C5 177PH ' 01T.H2$3
- 10 C3 , DZT H213 i
2 89 14 3. ; C5 to 11 8 25 01T A3 02T A3 10 C3 l 2.85 18 3. ' 07 to 15 17 7PH OIT A3$5 027-A355 60 4 ' 17 80 60 18. 1 to 20 8 25 01T H18 60 4 D2T M18 17.74 66 18. 12 to .26
- 17 7PH DIT.H1833 160 D27.H18$3 5 77 2 33 1 80. 1.4 to 2 8 j 8 25 01T A40 160 300 1 1.5 l5 76 6 39 80. !6 t? 14
}
17 7PH Oli A80$3 C2T A80 02T ABCSS
! 144 8 300 l 1.5 l 6.7 150.
2.2 to 5 2 i B 25 Dlf A150 D2T A150
!144. I 75 150. , 2.3 to 6 0 l 17 7PH 01T.A150$$
= 02T A150$5 Approssmate shipping weight lbs.
l 2.0 1 2.0 ( VACUUM SWITCHES - All values given in inches of mercury (Gauge) Proof Ad,ustable Range Ao8 8 DITIIN6LI SETTIM (Test) l (Proof Test) g g Vacuum ;, Pressure Dec. Vacuum I inct. Vacuum value Wetted Catalog Cata'c D2T DUAL CONTROL Min. I Man. 6 Min. l Man. (Defferential) Matenal' Number
- 6 l 10 PSI 06 58 26 N u m e t'_
1 6. 09 to .20 8 25 6 ' 10 PSI I' 06 Olf A3 02i AJ 5.72 34 6. 14 to .28 17 7PH 01T.A333 30 60 PSI .8 29 34 1 46 D2T Am 30 60 PSI
- 30. 4 to 66 8 25 Olf-HIS 02T >'l l 8 l 29 2 16 30. 4 to .8 17 7PH DlT.H1835 D2T pl b Approsimate shspping weight Ibs.
2.0 l 20 DETAIL DATA
'8 25 Berythum Copper,17 7PH $tainlesa : -
titCTRtCAL CHARACTERt$ TIC 3: AH fnodels incorporate Underwnters' Lab-oratones lac. hsted single pois double throw snap action switching efe-ments. Electncal rating (continuous inductive) 10 amps 125 or 250 votts s
- AC. 3 emps 480 volts AC. Automatically resat by saan. action of switch. For WIRE CODINE - PRESSURE more deta,is and other sweten efasus, we pages 36 38. WIRE COOING - V4CUW Ci#cuit #1; Common - Purple Normally sin Cloud Circud #1: Common - P. : +
[LECTRICAL
'hrough %" npa conduit CONNECTION:
connector- To screw terminals on covered terminal # - Blue NorenaHy0 pen ped Norma 4y Closed ' ' Normatty 0 pen - 3 .* Circuit #2: Common - Brown Cirevet #2: Common - 9 : - PRt3 SURF (VACUUM) CONNECTION: %* not internal thread. %* not Normaity ami. Closed - Orante Normatty CHrud 'e w I able sta>ntess steet only add -P2 to catalog number unen ordonng. Normany Open - yellow Normatty Open - 0 a a ADJUSTMENT INSTRUCTIONS j Positive Pressure: Turn adlustment screw clockwise to lower actuation point (seitch setting). I Vacuum: Seitetes Underwnters Laboratones and Factory Mutual listed r, for j pfessure. Turn adlustment screw countertfockwise to approach atmosphenc Protection service recuest buiteten 690627 t D1f 28 -
- nu d ' . ns
- utYi
,o,
; DN
,,n, w , , 4 fm ,
K 7 eau m ,
,. ^ ast2 4 p .. t 5"m*t 7 .
y:w M' _e.
.Iv.3.,,
I L v un i
-i .h - M"
.> t i
,I_
ii il . J +- p
@W <-- '
t l 1 i N.,em othe, d. mens.ene ,o, _ D2T a,e the ume oir l .
,~ nns ~
\ cem.
L_.- t m _, )
- ILit
,,,.,p.
- m. rm _
'0 4 " * .m
"'8,e.
.no. w te* r I
, 64 .
n ('5*~ f, _, -
,= N4 %We a _
1,,
" 7 '.E.
t/g a Ps CDetmat./ 6. cewarenos Ly .. l, i t a't GAAA toa. 87c42.c - A I
.' ." ~
~ ^ ' '
C LXc7 v ) - VM p g gi t SSELLine(o. 5201C Status Y N U SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 r- qui ID No. TS-HV-55A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Desc_ription TEMP SWITCH FOR VS-F-55A Location: Bldg. SRV8 Floor El. 713 Room, Row / Col SW EMERG SWGR } l Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) l jflSMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input _72 5, 6 ,
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade
- 3. Q) N U ;
4. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N U@ DOC Bounding Spectrum BS x Bounding Spectrum
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS l
1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS ! Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CIEEt ! Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in CNU l COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic I demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A 3.
N U N/A Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U@
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered ON U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility 7.
N U N/A Anchorage adequate (See checklist befow for details) N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N U N/ Y N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow Y N U N/A transmitter Y N U N/A
5 a a 63-c-OH P . R \ \ cA SSEL Line No. 5201C SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. TS-HV-55A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Deseription TEMP SWITCH FOR VS-F-55A CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'dl
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix 8 Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A -
Is the intent of all the caveats met'for GERS? Y N UdQ'A) ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A S. CM 3.
4. Sizes and locations of anchors determined Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., N U N/A h - h weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness @N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance concretg gstr ngth/congi ,and -
concrete cracking ^ For bolted anchorage PhThunIerIne ig* k'e3s an *
'S Y N U
- 6. 1 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U$ action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U Are anchorage requirements met? N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility N U N/A
% d3~3-L.-O\d \" h l i ~u SSEL Line No. 52010 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. TS-HV-55A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description TEMP SWITCH FOR VS-F-55A INTERACTIONE[FECTS(Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment ~ distribution systems are not likely to collapt,a N U N/A
- 5. Have you lookeri for and found no other adverse concerns?
Is equipment free of ',taraction effects? N U N/A s YNU IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADEOUATE? hNU COMMENTS
~~
0 l Evaluated by: V. /# ewe m6/ R _w Date: 11 / 2 / 9 5
$.b & Nss 1 %E. ic14(
3 d d .c O u _.A 1 P.n \ rt T S - H V - 55A hp t42 <
,q P 100(
6 4 o k
.2 o
'~. , SCCO e
3elh I 6pEJ khh f 2. q tues s M ~' a u (t 5", 9 ', V4 ' m
! [. )
0%
,, < s'
,t
\ ~
, ,e
> h 6e w:$ Tibe ple c Ocn.cluN r -,
o 2
, y N
6
, PtCol
a e ~ w vm e . e-cu=- -
' T*$
~
, :H V - 5 5 R Pac, 1 2 c5 E l wag *26
.g ,
g y Ftool ; P icci
-_ ~
f j
- i y
g Picoo PicCO- , l W !
- i. #1 u is , 26 4
sg r 6 i a , F\ e n Vie v l,
, [
**=
4
,. ~ PICC Wlb- % Pl00 l .
/ ) - 'l t I
\
(gggg r7p) l @ :ce i PTerfed Gem - ~ V a { N O -
? r, 1
- ,. \
om . m es ,- , < a n-S
. i e b p, ,
l b!.I *.NW
" ! _.. I i
l I
//
f'
- an omd - y n" ,
Imil 6-G ___
~
~
i
- s -
2 di ' i I i
~
P. j . QI , s i . j 6 l ' l T5 - H V-55A Ts- so- SSA l . I l l l
- I l
I mammew .....e4 3 I
, .s
- y Ts _ gv - 55e, i s - s v - 55a l ;- ?
- ~ . - .
3 i . .
'J D w - JM SSEL Line No. 5202C Status YNU l A
p SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet I of 3 f l k utp 10 No. TS-HV-55B Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description TEMP SWITCH FOR VS-F-55B Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Room, Row / Col SW EMERG SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEM ND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 726
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade CD N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N U [A)
DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum CAYD GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS l Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
Realistic H-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
@RRS !
l Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in CCN U l COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers N U N/A 3.
N U N/A Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted t3 ether if they contain essential relays 6%te. wA on M N U@
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility 7.
N U N/A Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? N U N/ Y N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or, flow Y N U N/A transmitter Y N U N/A
- u n
~~ ~
;_, m -
9 3.; ; , - 9 55 - SSEL 1.ine No. 5202C SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) . Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. TS-HV-5SB Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description TEMP SWITCH FOR VS-F-558 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external-mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met'for GERS? Y N U @,
ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness @N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, and free-edgecracking distance, "T5concrete i<,. c A kstrength / condition,is akMY 6.
concrete d. 4e s4c dAd For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than bp W M N U@ 7. 1/4-inch Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap hN U N/A 8. under base, c,apacity reduction for expansio.n anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect'of prying Y N UO action on anchors considered GN U N/A
- 9. ' Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U Are anchorage requirements met? yN U INTERACTION EFFECT.S
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures CY N U N/A
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Q) N U N/A
D MOC~VM 9,N\l9 SSEL Line No. 5202C SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. TS-HV-55B Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description TEMP SWITCH FOR VS-F-558 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse hN U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concernsi Lp N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? $NU IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE?
@NU COMMENTS t
899, 0 h zwe j e #
- u. a m r .
F6 - HV - 556 2 w ic <2c
~
( v:.ege..C. A N e.~)
\ t J( l [
L- # 17 4f6 BOO SA i _y & c icco
.b. i
* $ 4 n _[.
i
-2 *s -e i N
. 4 0 l
,2 v .
A iz w wm / .1 n - _ _ / _ . _
~
, .l .- .
(
< ,( ,< h p 9 l CO I 3 4
4 Y x 4f i amuse If 3/4 g o x to
- bwNing b e..% N
- Tg 3 e w.e4 i , Y+e Cliacy kees ( rg 2 place )
lc U i 1 d v y T
- .h
<r i ib 4 . / g M g ] > % +
O h ,. S 3 l t ei ei ! t q
$, \ .u ,.
4 .,, '
. 3
_N -
- I - ;
LJ; o,s. .- .,
- 53 0 ce& tAe.
7j y ,,
&A bAL u f Lceb ss esi. :
. . i r
N
,g s-I i j ja Me
- n l
l FE ...
-h w
T5 - H V-55A I s - y v .- 55,4
'l I r i >
i
*I L . '4 b,'l y J
l W ~i~5 - tR/ - 55G t 6 - H V - 55G 3 e t
/
~ Saa3 M -OR p. ra i d i SSEL Line No. 4205E Status Y N U SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 ng - Eq i> /ID.No. PNL-MS-101A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks uipnknt Descriotion INSTRUMENT RACK FOR S0V-MS-101A AND S0V-MS-101A4 Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 751 Room, Row / Col MSVH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) DCP 721 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input '7 N
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade 121 ON U 3.
4. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation ON U N/A DOC h Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum (SD GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. GD Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @N.
COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class @N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers @N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate ON U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together 5.
if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@
@N U N/A 4)
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility CD N U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for detalis) QN U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? $N U @N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? (j N '. A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing 2.
equipment class Meets til Bounding Spectrum caveats IN U N/A Y N U N/A
- 3. Compor,ent is a pressure, temperature, level or flow %
tr;.1smitter
#@N U N/A
Q M b-C.-O M p. R \ ci D SSEL Line No. 4205E SCREENING EVALUATION WORX SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No, pNL-MS-101A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK FOR SOV-MS-101A AND 50V-MS-101A4 CAVEATS-GERSbCont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A S. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? YN.9, ANCHORAGE l
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined l (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) @N U N/A '
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP QN U N/A ,
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined <!) N U N/A l
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness S. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of
@N U N/A safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, cc,u rete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch ON U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@ action on anchors considered ON U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate ON U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requirements met?
Y N U@ ON J JNTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment P free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures ,@ %.wr N U M23)
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U N/A
g d-33 L.-Ut i pglM SSEL Line No. 4205E SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. PNL-MS-101A Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK FOR 50V-MS-101A AND SOV-MS-101A4 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse @N U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? GNU ISEOUIPMENTSEISMICALLYADE0VATE? @NU COMMENTS RACV- \5 ta s o ? r t A d A ' N 5 t.5 0 00 - Om c - 2. 2. (. S 4 9 700 - Oqc-ooo4.
~
Evaluated by: M Date: Oes it> 1945' Vd v%7 m-,s-a-W l
. - - ~ . - _ _ _ _ - _ , , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.o -
l ' gy63 # a
.. oi
,- "y = = 3 ,
j 'Il i l _ _t-j -- l
- S RL- /ff-/0/.B *^ Rk -k/f-/O/4 i
a I
' y l .,
L l 4 17 i 0 . a. l l2, : c. ,
~
tu s i . l - l _. _ p l l i- + p
.- n 45
+ tt l
! PX/L-gr-vo/c ! 3 t d e 1 e 4
..----,--.,...yw-.,v--w.-,r-..-,- ,,- . - . . . . - , - . - - . - - . - - - . . . . . - - - - . - - , . . . . _ _ _ _ - -
seaoc-1_.-os o r s - 7 2.ph I ~
- 4) .M idd
I / P c o oT Roi ._i
'4l [ L ' }$
\ ' p 's
. ? 1
!C y A r,(b.u
,Yg 35"
]gs
~5 M
Q ,x&, QNg ,y v t
,j
,y;
*[% us
\ 4'Q Y ql/ % !
qiq
\\k # O',' /Y 7
z '4 ' 2'i- 7 /(, z. l/ 7 (
'y 1
J'@,,)'l IN 3, , p g , - J 4
^
f f'T* 7 .,y
}\
44qe , 2't 4 +1 A s't M a~ 1 3 't '1 3 b y l I
$ {46 $ -C.- O \% - Y N\d l PtE0 _ l ot &O DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY -
Nuclear Engineering and Records Unit DESIGN ANALYSIS COVER SHEET Design Analysis E Alternate Calculation O Unit No. / DCP No. Safety Related Verification Required Seismic Analysis No. 72/ Yes @ No O resE No0 res g No O # '
$$O$
Titie 8700. Al .3.3 Arnen\mwaxic hesg wpfoisseacy V41.;/ss-faisax k . Purpose and Scope: ro zamrxHm A/Ma7Nsg JWA AMJ/Untf 884/-2 A n a so u xA:14 sty Gt/Al/F/av Fez der G st/-/. 7WE w-2 CW.4 . der Maocs *2K -38/-4xp N A$dC. Design Base Document (s) Affected: System No. g dAld. 87ec-Df&2248 zv-z' so. & #EQDP-AGF 2/A/6C,)ht&df .
Conclusion:
we tr9 l l N /3 GUAL/f*/ED FDM /AJ73Cd;Dco 4/Cf GQ/, l t Rev. Prepared By/Date Checked By/Date ApprgvedBy/Date Y - _t? W.A. W N $ 1 y - 2 i i
bh d6 h " b[ 6h [O~
/g j7
? alt of f DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY Nuclear Engineering and Records Unit DESIGN ANALYSIS COVER SHEET Design Analysis @ Alternate Calculation C Unit No. [
DCP No. Safety Related Verification Required
. Seismic Analysis No. f 72l Yes Tit 1e:
No@ YesO Nog Yes Q No *[ f '~ nwasmmswn one un Conrosa ms .~ c e. .a ! Purpose and Scopes f b8
~ fin ogsic+ Au ,% % + +.f' t a ux A
- m e s.,fo Q 14e A ror* e W enoc $7enM DvM P VALyr1 co Air 4*'S.
T4is 9Aer is i+1ovute L :.y r46 /WAik $7iKM I \ vpue yon 4 is seemorau , ce,, w o. i Te A m yger A >> oehf*J 7 s/ 4e %pssesrs gevl 1 Design Base Document (s) Affected: System No. 2.l l ; , S 7oo- OM K '2/St A I 7e o
, o - o oM n k - 2.2 / V A 1700- DA4X - 2. 2 5.)y
-s. e s a 9s. g A
-2z&A qn carz
- ttg*A i N AM#t Conclusion 3 Sse % < ti m A < ce ncas,..s.
l tot
;) I c *s si- o .r e s M avn UmT 1 i Rev. Prepared By/Date CheckedBy]afe AppfovedBy/Date o
( J' L . + t n 4 G IL E M M;%L%5M Qw.J4l=inuaLtaMwi-n @WL&eMM 1 14
- ie
- 1 } "
l i i
Wv -
% M gog
,y..............
Omu a. uei cear An.e r w. swi race
- z. o, a coumso av C,riemarE 7/c dficuecxso my [~ oArE 3 ANAL YSIS NO. h7CC-hM (- 2, M 8*" 3//</37 /P3 v 7/ 7/s 7
( , /.o S <*er /eace - o ' 4 g O * ') of QQ / 91 % fre*& f *'1 ? /* A t C ** FSs 0 **'f ' *S)
. r4 ~ Ar .. - . , c- s rs - r u v ,a n i , c o. ,1- a vn s
, rz< x' w . it 4e s, o-- r #d a 14e p ,4, ,,,e s,n, y gi_ , e x a s-8 m/ ! so sm ic
/ (v m do s .9-r .
1a 2. O fr c .w > 14 gg E.f klGC $4Ar-se of $14 r 4 ( OA-sif**l% , U Eas la s - ss 2 E- " De asw o + Mema S V uc, o 13. a.:, a o r r, i9gZ i, 2T " l'as s> A. S wa u ud S w:n " i t o, s.. , f.se y y... y , 1, 2. 4 $ D- srat 4 , t'sA v 5, i s 7 7 S f t- De><ca 4 .> a . a -
- n. 2 . 9~ En,t c, s 2. cer 1977
,, 2. 4 Lwi s r + r e.g r a oh- ,
/?,. . t oi?
3* 2 ~7 W, tl %s uJ D.~rany (~ns as os.c h3 l 26 L~M O - 71 Z b 10 ts 3.0 Ot'Siss *IuprS - - 23 b. D/h > ' ' '* M V A L '** lN M" be5m f/fsedld~ .) i 22 (0 %.'do. cl 2,y 'h Md ts I2 U.<a o sat o' Zov pue = 's 'f o M m c*.,1n s 's G l. S ze p Le F Gnso s A se
- 3. '22 87 @ ~ Q M -2.8% YAA 2, 3. .t 6 ,' 4*/0
.o 3.
.yoo. og k' -2 2 / $4 - 2 25 e /9 ,/h l y,. , e r oa- orc - '*
5, (, '
.. ,. , m u .<,
24 bh $f SON S8 39 60 et A
m.c o % u * . P RIM f % f/ter>\ ; SEco -c-a c,-
- U TU 3,,
'- /f o . c .
~
;'C E E A't ~
7Al- l 5- 7 g - $ -- 0 4 3 8 l ;. /l MEMbi~ ~~;,A%. ~ 5 wM. l y l A'WY i
/ .
Ped! ##Y
/ r. [
f 4] i' al A ([- Mi % */ :
$ l n
- 5 016 ~5 A P x i 3:
al ,' s
\
l r'T '. - l k
- I
'""l J ' ~ 50 t h5P :!O^t M
SECO D 721 I P I 7, 1 j p- L:- - , h_ .
;-l e ; , .a =; g eg ,
- 1
"~i
- 0.'
% 1' .- . -
~
' ., sl - _ _
N.' {# ~
'c15 3 SP OO')
~ . -- 2 oa+6 i
[ I q $ , SECO D 721.L . 2EE Or..ait . 5.. C: 4 b ._ MS Il D.S
' l i i ..
l
' Ifor Syd P l i SCs 1 AP MIL (Ps.J. =
[ .. T. .
' l. / ' ,
/A C O -f )
' C 4.
(pL - h '
,g I i
z SC14 l-4 P 'MNLL A = w
\ *i ;
SC 4 $ 42 M4NE'. 6J d' 30154 SP(to SC 144 AP (94NEL C) ; I*i'.
- Y * .. ' , f ,, l, *ECO S O '1 !. s Nf% ' "[
y .. - i::
~%
/ XY.k .
g e-j L 4
-M".4 <
_d' ,-
.. r 22 (1 eCici a vann e) s
\
501% M'n : l iC , e l SC!'6 # (PANE. b) *
\ L_.
3 s SEco D M 43 *
/ -
$gc e $
E BoaP (/4 net C) I j
) ' ms s-s .
), Ty I '"'
'~
sott7.s m . so, c, 0 '
<s sco.o M 69 ; J, . <
p 3. J' 4 w . v -m . .- ' ~ < l
,, .o $
Y. Et.15 D O'
' (
T 'r.': a b'>P
,u r E E d
- v. : : - _
*; e $ ;
G : -*. Vi
- a IN fi 'Buti CrP)_) e ,'
d 5!$ o n '*:-
>T St.E N OTE 2 , ~ ~,'
-(a ) 50t S S AD-p Jh- N:
2"> 5l. T,..
. r.A ST 1
+ct Typ 4225 - / cN g
'* " ' , ' * ' wi eace. cr cc., 2cc :
a SM Sf3to ?; W K 7 % 6 4 er 5 33 ;.,,: .L.f aunee .
~- - _
5-SSEL Lir:- Wo. 4206E Status Y N U l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 p Py
,1 Equ JDl lo. PNL-MS-101B Equip, Class 18 - Instruments on Racks uipm4 nt Description INSTRUMENT RACK FOR SOV-MS-101B AND SOV-MS-10184 Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 751 Room, Row / Col MSVH Manufacturer, Model Etc. (optional but recommended) DCP 721 SEISMICCAPACITYVSDEMA$D
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7 fi 1
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade 72 2.@ N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation @N U N/A t)
DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum 43) GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. 41Db Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. MS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in Q)NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
fAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which I are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers
@N U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate WN U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or
@N U N/A sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essentt31 relays Y N U d@b
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility CD N U N/A (D N U N/A i) 7 Anchorage ade.quate (See checklist below for details) @N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated
- 9. Have'you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y N U (Eb Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
ON U N/A GD N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level .or ' flow Y N U N/A transmitter Y N U N/A
~
Qg 3 t y9 Kh l B c4 SSEL Line No. 4206E SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) , Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. PNL-MS-1018 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK FOR SOV-MS-1018 AND SOV-MS-10184 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix 8 Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N UO l ANCHORAGE l 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined l (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) @N U N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP (D N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined CD N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness @N U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, i free-edge distance, concrete strengts/ condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under btse less than 1/4-inch @,N U N/A
- 7. Factors affeci,ing essential relays considered: gap 8.
under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect-of prying Y N U@ l action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equip'.1ent base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated YN Are anchorage requirements met? U @D
( NU INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. . Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structurrs (D N U N/A l 2. If equipment contains sensitive rclays, equipme~nt free from all i,?onct by nearby equipment or structures Y N U
- 3. Attached lines ha e adequate flexibility ON U @N/A
. t 4
CdcA3h-C-bH P . H l C __ SSEL Line No. 4206E SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. PNL-MS-1018 __ Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK FOR 50V-MS-1018 AND SOV-MS-10184 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse ON U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? (ZL N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? @NU IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADEOUATE? @NU COMMENTS n ) R. Prc K. \5 Luo ?ec_A4Atwses 9 7 0 0 - o m, c. 2.u g (,
B7 00 - D e c. - o o o 4 M oTG '. h.r SGWs 69 s v -m s sos a 4 sov-ms.-sosear e p acLM - nna 9
a . A
- p. '
6" M/_- //f-/6/E
- A* 42. -F/f-/O/4
, N l . . !.
. ,s i r A' ,
).
^
g
, 3 i
. 2 * . e.
l ! j j ~
,uu - -
es. W 1
~. .. ~ . . . .
0 e d a e W .
3-vs A r ,N t Z l YLI l L Y 71 g !(.! y N 7 , ( b . u ' ' f _@ q$et .,,,, -- f t y
?{
4 l , ,&
;# ;t. 3
*ff DA (2 +t 4, '-
u g
/
~g// e - h e &,1. - /c i
%'l Z '4' hY y'(, t 1
'j / -
r g
$. k sqrMM Ti ,/ f 7q ,- T
, .3 ,
S ' k k
+ * ~
T_ i 7 1 gy .---. z%, 4 t z' # 2 't A { (q i t; 3( 2 kt 4 i(
,%; 3
. -~~~~~
'J 1
3y q < , s n3 . v
3gga v - vm P .r 'c cw SSEL Line N3. 4207E Status Y N U f SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 f N/ E .10No. PNL-MS-101C Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks IquinentDescription INSTRUMENT RACK FOR SOV-MS-101C AND SOV-MS-101C4 f Location: Bldg. SFG8 Floor El. 751 Room, Row / Col MSVH Manufacturer, Model, Etc.-(optional but recommended) DCP 721 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAhD
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input ~7 51
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade 712. O N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz ID N U N/A y
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS
&GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec.
@RR5 Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in @NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
CAVEATS - 80 s ING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class QN U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers ON U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate (D N U N/A
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together if they contain essential relays Y N U (3D
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered ON U N/A d
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility GN U N/A
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist bel.ow for details) CD N U N/A
- 8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N U@
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? ON U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? (DN U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or~ flow transmitter Y N U N/A
- r
3OD'G- VM V . t- \ \ L \ SSEL Line No. 4207E SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet,2 of 3 Equip. ID No. PNL-MS-101C Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Descriptiort INSTRUMENT RACK FOR SOV-MS-101C AND SOV-MS-101C4 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'dl
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models :
tested,-as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to 4 seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring
-seismic demand loads to anchorage _
Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay ,
assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A l YNUh 19 the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? ANCHORAGE
. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A 2.- Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness QN U N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete crackir.g @N U N/A :
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@ ,
8. action on anchors considered G.N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete QN U N/A
- 10. ,
pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requiremea45 met? Y N U& wN U fNTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures .
- d. N U N/A
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures $ 2leN qU4 v @
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U N/A l'
Og o 33% %d11 \-), W\ Sf SSEL Line No. 4207E SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. PNL-MS-101C Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK FOR SOV-MS-101C AND SOV-MS-101C4 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse GN U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Q. N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? @NU IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? GNU COMMENTS d R hcic t5 Rac io P s rt. NAcsn B7 oD - D m c.- 7 2 6 3 4 87 oo - D Q c - o o o4.
6 *13~ SNS 49 SoV -/WS-tosc f Sov-ms - to s c4 t
/941[
Evaluated by: _ Date: Ck.Tlo MM s.e-es
-1 i
. L e
r----- ,- g w ..
~~
' ' 0 *
; s q 07 a i 3 g zf: ,
.__. o t1 : _ .__
_7 l ;_, -
^
I 4 _ e l l O $/- MC-/0/E *^* M -k/2-/O//{ e L
~
s. A 37 l s . 8 11, . g, : I
~
~
l . l .;
, e. - 4 e
?
g Q . .
y _ _ _ _ -. -._m . . - . . w- g y g v fML~ M S7 l01 (l' _3 fg .. 23/4, R1 q l fQ
'I ,
I k - _: _ T 3 , 1 .- m
; )
f f . ._, h ;) [ ,
+ ' g,
~
sh[ \y L,
, fr t s d+ + +
~ \ '
'\
3 // ) - n\4
, ) ___
. k,I . L e
+
b a o e
5 6at t G-DM p H IHI SSEL Line No. 8121 Status Y N U SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 W EM aD No. QS-RACK-13 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks _ s sua gQ) quipment Description QS/ RACK FOR RWST HEAT TRACE (-W SIDE OF RWST) Location: Bldg. YARD RN g floor El . 735 Room, Row / Col YARD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAN'D
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input % '73 9
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade G.) N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz GN U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum (Ei) ,
1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS GERS GERS l
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Responso Spectrum 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum
@ AGS l
i Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in GN ; QMMENTS f f a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) 1 CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which I are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and l explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience i equipment class ON U N/A l
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers ON U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate (D N U N/A *[ l
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together ,
if they contain esser.tial relays Y N U E3
- 5. Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered (p N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility (D N U N/A e l. ,
- 7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) <D N U N/A
- 3 31 l
- 8. Relays mounte'd on equipment evaluated CD N U N/A ,4 '*W
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? (D N U N/A is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? ON 1/A l CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or flow ,
transmitter Y N U N/A 6 -
3 3c3 O O -t L X i FMG SSEL Line No. 9121 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) , Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. QS-RACK-/3 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks
& ttrd Equipment Description QS/ RACK FOR RWST HEAT TRACE (M- SIDE OF RW CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd) ..
- 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A
- 5. Necessary function of component not sensitive to seismically induced system perturbations, e.g.,
sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum tubes Y N U N/A
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor response through rack to transmitter-to-rack interface (document basis) Y N U N/A
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring seismic demand loads to anchorage Y N U N/A
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay assemblies bolted together Y N U N/A is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U@
ANCHORAGE
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined MillflW '
(mass, CG, natural frea., damping, center of rotation) O N QI N/A
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP @N U N/A
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined @N U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation D ate, e.g.,
weld quality and lengtW, nuts and washers, expansion po nhM anchor tightness @ N J2( N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and Malu t I concrete cracking @ N J@I N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 7.
1/4-inch Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap hN U N/A 8. under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Y N U@ action on anchors considered @N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated @N U N/A M 7/4 Are anchorage requirements met? @N INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Y@U N/A *5 l
- 2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment l 3.
free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y N U@ 1 CD N U N/A j
g q' gig 3 g g. 3 g _. { g g - SSEL Line No. 8121 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. 10 No. QS-RACK-/3 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description QS/ RACK FOR RWST HEAT TRACE (SE SIDE OF RWST) INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse Y U N/A #5
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
Is equipment free of interaction effects?
@ @NU N/A Y@U IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YN@
g COMMENTS 0 EwsTscs on Ps ATC5, ST R.u7 4 As ca ca. s, ho ewT , etw averit. co APP A st. net s v n.w c.T a a. A t c.hp % 4. m f a og c.n i o n . N u s R.EL AW E mo Ts ou Po5gsgua, As.s, s.g a ss o g. .
- 3) MA 55 Lo w , S w P 9 e n.T Re o wu on aT , v e n.3 ST s p p.
d) No P ELM S, TH E R.m c.o w 9 t,.O Re.Nttwt.9/Rw M EO
- 5) WooO E A RouG Cow 60 F A s t. A F FET.T s 4 % SecSs44 t s w e s, , n. ertwen. sosv rArt.Asts.
hg g J M L :./ -k T H 9G
b ua ff @q Nuc at Engineenng Mon crancum . Duquesn3 Ught C:mpany 5 s 1, i o F :> 7.$ jEM NO. cate Prepared
/ 0 '1 SO /
I /21 / 9 4 j WWR h l** i I""" ' e (*'""*'"'*- lCommftm nt j ITargetove oste i /2.s/u.lEMomunmoen 3 lComo.Coce g4 % lMam%
;s E.M.
ra -
~
4 " 2 I m . a.a . I a..oen . a.w. EZY ]N,
te: MOM kT" V W 'k \ D M.
3 Subject % o moca- 6 ow ca w.w.re ecwoJ a.ae a u N t % w s sp e .14 d Jtw mi.Jett:.1 l Ff'
'P= Y 6AX. oc h c. ( Q d-l 1 2.16 Ph , e W.c O s%
a h ed.t%cer -$ s o C IT 1 t= MEC n:%ac.u b Ct fct- s4 N c.A e- _d "Th ( - e e s-+-
"ChC*>te c b tot E E4fAch>e4 (. Des.).D b & Mtm.x e Ed.o m Ne,z 2..Ti- o e. W
-S I e %:m- . % x -o, a smu % a - u -
F A( Fi 4.t c> C ec c.w e d t:AJbMstr %E Sc t.c :4* CMo E U>C*lO h a 0i ' W .c.3 RIgo (,gaggg .3,w w g p ea % . _% g 3, jgg o e,,, o g mA w 4le_ceis.micau,, u c w % c. %s ht:> cAi e i :, o. s c A w .s a a.:> u , e p eeremma Ong. Dept , - By: Emo/53 No. L-- O Cos Career,,Yo M h "5 M S &
% ;e:o R M 6 w + - G.
M 6 Aeproves By: . No. Oma: A dE'777 .. : / Cro 5~" //:77/ % f ' C M UTER ON Ute : ' G . sue,sa meen. one fg Aesenes sanon: Aesqpies re: A g.fr g f f mesoones to ,cect :x .o O
* [~l819 4 h Ernst No. Y.V . O W \ O 7$ E)
N Lg. C:aeemesson Reepeneet t.
*\. T"u J E A i <, tN O A "PE *^ fa 2 *-4.'T We,.> Ft_ A e \li S c # wrw
}
' C e ., r c._m 4 ? It a c, y a /t G t4 h c e 9 P A n u cr vJ i m N Fm Monsf1 e A n o a c. M L A a . ., a
. o4 SAeert o sr. 7% , 5 g fm ,
M o - ,:- WAy Dir-r., ft a o e o ia a e 3 ( S t4. c. tJ A-4, \ <, 9mAc.73 w a c:t e e A w., i a r. Cc sa v4cT vJ 41- H W 2'T C e w c ft tr*f" 5 Ace s., o GE j i (t. tNL Dr C.\a' D l WWR No. mensweenimes: Yinemmet O anesvue uennai ,e e try nee.orce, g Mosereneau 'Eng.C L ,.Neese Stepan Med. Res 'Teenreen Emet. Reper "1 - . Es. E c.55 No. Remaue? CY @ SW 7 OY $ tut? Cy g b SA Ote G TGei eaxh m,_ ..g,,g ' sn
@{
i 3WA 7 i h Syenern Engmeerms y de 6mm vo ses.3 E r. Nuesser sanay Numeer Corurimmen I Operesars Ptooseures M Planririg & Sensaame a c. . cm w .. i coerumore angreer g,)g m , ac ,,, . x,g . ,,, Ii Teemme serween ugr. wa t,, . e y__ ._. .ao ..
*: r. ?. ;." ' ' ?n I A Y. '9'i . & NU. MC. $cy.5, - Q Y A. C 46 u.c c T'T M cp-t O. @w se:,s-q
g "' '
- - ~
, .f- g {_ ~j ' F, j g" s'-j -
hc. L 3 o .' 3 l2 " @ H e s T s Du e -A ~ W M-- NORTt\ w/ CNT G e T- p]
's
's ~
f CoVN t$ ~ TD kNQ hCIIE M
\. ! eF F A ~ E L. END h'c 5 7 D b O ?O C "'
F A a .: - te.N o F .sT (9 ) O t /N. e 5 . [_.--- - s NN A p g(E M - D W . C. C l l l A g 1 N i s s % s N s M Ais CLEA7 5 Tb " D(t h w THCu 5 s L 's T; b% L p. RAF.T.Ts.ANC h tN'eTAtw '8
- Hiu r C 4. . T R% ET~ t M , a 5- S , o g \\ .~ h w :. m o :: s n~ c s r- ?
-r A ~ .r (7) S i m i No Gc-T 56us M C
A N J., 6 C C. . I'^ ~
\
g A f f f. c s i en A T w7 'L .~ 4 i ' O j l ' l SMnM. l
! \
/ i I 1 -
Acc cr.s l l O00G- l
/ j ,c l%
'l (Q {.
#9 C ADvE (w i r E 9- c r d A *~ '-
. , s w., u Fecs- a T r: N *~
E
/ L c. e p, v c , tA 5 E A Tu /LN f B a c.s u g T s TtM. 14 o v TH E
' CAULE, j
ouTw 4C c f- E % \ $ T s t4 % \.90 0 j e h' - # 5 sus oa c o u c tt.s T e c c. 3 k -, -3ro cs c $ow or c,c.. - ~ o La m .
, s.n s.,e n a '
Ext sTs aa 9 b hl Aa Y sqw S a tCc t-T "
\1
.5 c4. A$~f.-C- O R {g g g-3 P' M H d w
8
- Bout w/ ' "
t No Bout PLAta W A S H. j (TYP. T rd - -' i
~
4 t d & T Rt4 M G 9'i 5
, , ?' A e
. LA N t ilbT Lu T F te o )
- g
/ '
~Y 4 i457Ru. I '
~
, u c4
&h M /0 CA. "
Y vee Eoie!
/S RED ME ADS Coac.ss7s Ascaen.s E.ts v. L.o o zi o c. Noa.Ti4 try ,3 1/
, 3t e i : 8 ll i
\4/" )Y$ h y
- o g ..
/
.+
'/4' B G 4 T D A R (T iid
( , -
~
j , W P
\ TM P.
3/g i / h G t t ? D E T A \ \,. S Y g f >- l
/ /-
% V \rT P.
s o c r, ; r
J a FI
,..n h/ '
'Y i' .
k
+,t I
QS-24cx- 3 0- C, d[-84dM-8 f M 14 Tmt. 4 c ri e v l w_,i Ii l / , JI E . h C f) 'I,
. 4. _s . o., f,. : re, , r-: )'l
...dj . .
Q (1 '
~
' ~
ll,,)} 3~y ...
,.. ~ . , ..
i e GM" ,
- D e
\ QW h ' -L. Q\M 'Q h 6 SSEL Line No. 8124 Status Y N U l SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) . Sheet 1 of 3 f
. ID No. QS-RACK-4 Equip. Class 18 - Instruments on Racks JW Equipment Description QS/ RACK FOR RWST HEAT TRACE (+esT- SE SIDE OF RWST) location: Bldg. YARDkwST* Floor El.
735 Room, Row / Col YARD
'afanuf acturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 2M
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade CD N U
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz @N U N/A
- 4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum @
1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS GERS GERS
- 5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum G) 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in GNU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class (D N U N/A
- 2. No computers or programmable controllers ON U N/A
- 3. Steel frame and sheet metal structurally adequate ON U N/A a. 1
- 4. Adjacent racks which are close enough to impact or sections of multi-bay racks are bolted together 5.
if they contain essential relays Natural frequency relative to 8 Hz limit considered Y N U@ CD N U N/A
- 6. Attached lines have adequate flexibility ON U N/A
- 1 7.
8. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Relays mounted on equipment evaluated GN U N/A h lusPm *3 1
- 9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?
ON U N/A 4 di N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Q N U N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
- 1. Equipment is included in the generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
- 2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U f(/A
- 3. Component is a pressure, temperature, level or' flow transmitter Y N U N/A
SSEL Line No. 8124 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) , Sheet 2 of 3 l Equip. ID No. 05-RACK-4 Equip. Class 18 - In W uments on Racks , Equipment Description QS/ RACK FOR RWST HEAT TRACE ( SE SIDE OF RWST) CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd) . 4. Component is one of the specific makes and models ! tested, as listed in Appendix B Y N U N/A-
- 5. Necessary function 'of component not sensitive to' 4 seismically induced. system perturbations, e.g.,
. sloshing (cover this as part of Section 6 evaluation) Y N U N/A
- 6. No vacuum. tubes Y N U N/A ;
- 7. All external mounting bolts in place- Y N U N/A
- 8. Demand based on realistic amplification of floor ;
response-through rack to transmitter-to-rack ' interface (document basis) Y N U. N/A ;
- 9. Rack capable of structurally transferring :
seismic demand loads to anchorage Y NU N/A l
- 10. All adjacent cabinets or sections of multi-bay '
assemblies bolted together . Y N U N/A 1
!s the intent of all the caveats met'for GERS? Y N 0@ ;
4 ANCHORAGE i
- 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined i (mass, CG, natural frea., damping, center of rotation) Y N Q N/A 1
- 2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP q;) N U N/A '
- 3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined C N .U N/A
- 4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,
weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion Pnnblsg anchor tightness B. N g N/A
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety censidered: embedment length, anchor spacing,
. free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking Y N @. N/A
- 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @. N U N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Y N U@
- 8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered G,N U N/A
- 9. Strength of equipment base and load path i to CG adequate @N U N/A
- 10. . Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated @N U N/A
.Are anchorage requirements met?
Y N ([) j INTERACTION EFFECTS'
- 1. Soft targets-free from impact by nearby ;
. equipment or structures @N U N/A .;
- 2. .'If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment '
free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures _ Y N U ./ 3.- Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U /A I
- , . . r. n , --. - - , ,. ,, .m~-r e
~
<~ -
g 'i J
- J - Q M pp -
SSEL Line No. 8124 SCREENING EVAL.UATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. 05-RACK-4 Equip. Class _18 - Instruments on Racks Equipment Description QS/ RACK FOR RWST HEAT TRACE (MOST SE SIDE OF RWST) INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse GN U N/A
- 5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? GN U N/A F 3td6f is equipment free of interaction effects? @U IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNh
( COMMENTS O EwsTiwk o r Fu Al ss, sva.wT/ Au c.a o n.s. Tr v svuoi , }+owcessen. no AM A S.t 4T 1'. T n.a c.Tu n. A b c A P A<. cr4 9 EDACTe n4 . N ND R.E wn.T W E. r*o rso w 90s,t.igs.g , Aus Lig n o t..
- 3) M a s s L*w , Surpen.T Re in s o% T , V. a Y 6-riff a) n o R a i e < s , Ta . w o w w m s a w s . m .- , f a m e,cs e o
*5L
,/t. O 1. c,n, wT i
~3r r \
o, a
\ a 9
s k 3'( a A. si os d((, '
.hi( h~3,s _
s m, sr crum c4 Evaluated by: Date: Vev 'Lk/44 I
.4.6L Az& -
y n'-2-9c
. m .
5* E b3 <-DF1 [g_ Qcg._.s.y' VH \5T 1 1 l o 5 )
. b ~
w= , p - WO q: . l I 4; -----
; 1, o
I-ed i l go
.2 9 su i{\9
~ s s e
ds d i 2 ' f 4N e g e
*k 0 1 i O
.)
)
i tu J e s LD au Y p * * ' OO
** O i 2-54 c J- ,
.t~,, .
4 ~. m .e----- b ., ,,'4% o **
*O N 1 , I ~~
f M j i- = ===
~ '
d d s
.x $< +1E. 44 /-
A' ,,7 g 4
,, 5 W s5 *
,, %,5.- t Y
en g7 /g. j'M o E E Ta- I' : I
;,1 ".
A ta c a o tt. e-1
.I 'd- 75 ll' 'F-1F i I
'L 5 ..
T D obi M c. y f '/ A B E u T 1 2 e sc m q=. =r .
= m
?
4 f r E D 3 % 7 D E T A st., " E" d t ., De T ail " A : 6' T Y P, _3 / t" r39 1 F MS nut w/
? t. A 1 4 Nnt1 JY w A S H E R. y y p'
'TYP' (TTP 8 TO a.
7
- O ,.
<6 m
A d P
>=
O, + O h p ! >' y - i o A q f. . a
'M E M I s M r G v
?
qs e q ,, t y
,s A -
,4Y EOG a *
, p 15%
( ,',. D E T A i1," C " DETA\L"D" l
Sheet B-1 of lo Job No.: 52233 ' Job: Duaussne Beaver Vallev Power Station - By: a c. Date: n- so.f r Calc No.: Q11 Chk: C#v Date: // '3MS
Subject:
Anchorage Evaluation for Various Instruments l j Attachment B l FAX'ed INFORMATION FOR DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY MASONRY BLOCK ' WALLS ( b pages in Attachment B) ; l i 1 i
J . G . i.D . ' R C. J bLD~& iLL;*L.~&22~ < G im u J 2J 0 00 iso.vv r.v1 { I gyg Duquesne Light Company Nuclear Engineering & Safety Unit l hg SEB-3 S M'C- OH
- P. 8 2_
Telecopy Transmittal _ DATE: II 96 TO: low Oydia3 TELECOPIER PHONE NO.: 714-833 -3392 LOCATION: EQE; Le se , ca FROM: 'T~m de.se coeSc TELECOPIER PHONE NO.: 412-393-5536 LOCATION: ~3V P S , SL; opia) o o r 4 , PA TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including transmittal): ll AT TO ! PLEASE CALL i VERIFY RECEIPT OF THIS TELECOPY. l DATE AND TIME SENT: COMMENTS: - _. 4 I n Ay m t A -
= v#
SENDING TELECOPIER IS A KONICA 810L
=-. .
m . L . r. u . usu ,sen w.n xm m -
-u g ougueene ugnt company annym. un PAGE.. Op !
JO. TITLE ANALYSit NO. O. F.E. ]
$USJECT COMPILED BY DATE CHECKED 8V DATE DEPT /DIV. . APPROVED BY DATE r
I) h 327_7.7-C.-OM 2 g 3 i C
<? . B3 FE
-i$
9: N l
-i __l r n, th 4 Io Rt H
in "h t 2>
./ f\ gp 00h,
~d a rG ;r- 5~ >Dr o n o e . .,-
o o r- nW o w r:- W ." '.k e < l F...Z Ul l g
.sa -
r
\ *+"
.. :. a b D 'S 3 -
{q2 !C 2 -q m 2> -57 rio.h! LM, s a !._ k-p T T L E~ '23 7 E st s 2gg 5= 1 P s- aS= (Le o 1 m p ' .:) E g p n r p s, a >a Ep , -.:. 3o:c i- 1 c., e( P U ,.h. h .?e Ed _. U$k Uh ; L @ m 1 ~(A
.Li-l rzn @.
=:
JI' I g- s d, r r-at - 8 0 r-
. aCo )V3 - a +. e > -d l n > p o p p ve x)
.-l o g.
, v ;. -
v& > v4 a-3 l
., > pl - .
1 T . H u
, $ e
....*de,' T. ) ,-
i ,,
- s. .,
, .ig l5 (?" vr '
or #3 E a i w "3 , E
-r#
.,. 3 0_ "3n n + a - n n s- +
m 8-p L9 >7 65 m ,-l a> i'
,p.~F >
.m .-H> s9 acs vm
>_ e w Yrn , 4 .
- Y a.
k a m
- f -
a 1 SRIP P0nel 8.1f.1 a L e
~' ' ~
Fucuas 16 g, Neu ow 2: c K R o c e D u i>E go-
~
g ' Ckcck , Allow <.bic %.s. ., Ri.y',3 e.) roie. m e t c,,, A) .
$3r r e. 3 2
R Anchors s_ 5 5 i .,,g N,' S /32 . ('a[T 3 C-90 e : v t .-r- '
)[; [0 "
esblz Skear(d."$be) b All-aM e s E,e 3
- Sk.IlCame i
. !f 0wc '
(EAs*o n Pwllowl 1n erc.ckion e - . Chec k. w a<
/ %ure4 G-oc Taue v \ rs_ % ,
.s.
.z. '4 ,,,o
!!$ ! E y E Allomble SL=r hl:the ) % '- M ~ Ues
- 8E w i s !: 9 %,c- 4 .
- g. 5 E 8 5 QY '
t E
- QQ e m% .
'!k N AllowoWe Est.e (siTfoc.e) Tnwach o, E9 N check / Fl y ee 3 IN (s)2 z
; ,,o a .a. ,, , (z
[c=l LO nu., ue sue . s u~ u.s (ch) r#..m , w& a
', ,- F we 3 y. .
~
_C- 129 . Allowdle. T sio. (III*)b ill Tolerc.d:on E.g
- u. Fi3uee 4 or Tale V M/s 3, 7- W ,,,o _
L' C(eck j7 @S IJ h- L Block Allo-cme SLeo< (v?A*f. : [U res,e 4 ;- o ,,, s Blotlc ?uDoui (Recluc col)
>jQ E .
g T ble 3L illowol.1e, fo. 7 ca ) I i
v . L . Lu . rir.u o r.D"O Ir.L N o' W9V To'95 o;57~N0'.004 P;09
.... . c , ............ d,9m==== uma c m A we w
, COMPlLE9 BY DATE CHECKE7 SY DATE ANALYST $ NO.
{ l
. E~2.233 -C - om P.B5 Ficus.a 2
,' h ocK 'i~ye c= s '
*Nd 0 b O ('S b OkiC) bko C.k ~ /. OCSCI b m eia 5 l C-90 (socio p.C % llow tolock - Loc,J benetn3 a
c - I29 ' CL:3hLe;3(700(,;)) kilaw lolaeh:- h)on lacA loea<in3
,, k+ bla c.k 13 14 ll .
Loco L of Ty p ,.s
,, 'Blel 3 Wall Do. T~ype of LJoll l
, fb. 3ld3. All wa115 %\iCl talock (c - 145) 28
,, Cable EH GV'-t h 7 soled block (c_ ys)
,, CV I
,, c.o 2
. CMf 1, 2, 3 bliow fillecl (c cio) 27
.. Ser sice. 31cl3 53 I +L~ is Hollow filleel (c-so)
,. . SB- 3 8, 9 f 12 Hollew Bloc.k ( c- 90)
- 3. All obe. Hollow Tbk ( c r29)
L I '8143. All walls M allo a "t S c.lc (c.9o) 13 34
. At 4
7 4 39 40 (1
- . . - t . .
~
u . t. . t.u . ne u d t e- o it.L:412-696-s60 Nov 20 N 9:09 No.0US P.01 ! l
,on ........ . m (hDuquesne Ught Company AneWs Sheet ,, , o, _
3 COMPILED eY DATE CHECKED BY DATE ANALYSIS NO. ( n uza 4 . 52233-C-on P.86 i
, U nil ,_ $ ci o o n c y kilovecble [ o c. cls 6
7 6oc.:o hoc.w (.C - I 4 5 ) i b
,, fine.b o r Site / % . 0.h fo ~~I e n c i e n L oucis S h a.c L.o c. d
,, ' Dianter Gr SpacA3 Cona PWlod I'S$) based on bl.J<
6 43 (m) osa tas Qlm,e (cas) n V4 3 '/4 385 G50 006 bad Too It75 15
, '/S 4% 700 Il70 v
,, I/t S Vz 1l00 IS5 0 y V o ,
0 Houov %. c c. i<. (c-9o)
,, /inc.L oc 5;me Min . lenoton L oc.cl b e. . . J Sker. r Lo cl 3 ;.m ler-
,. Spac.'n3 on Shellbe %llai (tm) bm.ed on blee.lc
( end o r3 e p3a 6 ilu 'e I'05) _
, V4 9/A 260 435 osa DsG
- s. 70 0 II75 a '/8 ~
N/A 2 76~ 4GO so
,, YZ b/A 416 G90 y y 3,
,, o-E5 M
Js . Ca u C $ or o !f 0 W bkoc. C. G r cr or C- 90 block , Er C. - # 2 9 b) c e Ir., , = mlHe y l by o. G . . \ '
- 2. ~3 ce^cko c is le.ss ikon m'm . teoluce ike.
= gllow bles b y spac.ine) sica;3 ki lin e inte e p oled to n.
- c. 3. IC mo re ihe,n o n e. o,w e.k o c pec b \ o e.k + b e. l o c.c). s ka ll be.
. .. e.ombinact b=Rnce coeno seine, lo otllowable s/ i . . .> , til l l
, a ,
4 2 l 4 ENCLOSURE 2 1 i e 0
? - ,-
I
! M j ~,-
SUPPLEMENTAL DATAB ASE INFORMATION:
, , BATTERY CHARGER CABINETS 1
- One of the major benefits of the SQUG program for the resolution of USI A-46, was the recognition that i seismic analyses of standard electrical cabinets for earthquake loads were not justified based on actual earthquake experience. The performance record of electrical equipment in actual earthquakes demonstrates that cabinets conforming to standard industrial construction do not suffer structural damage unless subjected to overturning or severe impact (precluded by the requirements of GIP).
l l The specific equipment category of battery chargers (AC/DC rectifiers) provides an illustration. The l SQUG/EPRI database currently includes some 120 examples of battery chargers and inverters (the two i types of cabinets are very similar in structure and mass). These 120 examples are spread among some 40 l
- different industrial and pow er plant sites, affected by a total of 18 different earthquakes. These sites were l i subjected to earthquakes ran 3i ng in magnitude from 5.4 to 8.0, with resulting ground shaking intensities from MMI VII to MMI IX (M Mified Mercalli Intensity), and peak ground accelerations from 0.20 to 0.60g. ,
j Throughout this inventory e< examples, there are no instances of damage to the cabinets enclosing the ! charger / inverter internals. ) i .. m ., e g' ~
.J
% q;i%
l
} .f ;
l 1 .
. py. at. k, ?
$%q.;
s f IhMi, h # lgper ; Aa ;rM 1
& '3 s .3
- 1
{ 6. > , 39 l s i m 1
*~
i Cl, ~) . l M, W S i N;*r . \ The battery chargers illustrated above are typical examples of rectifiers supplied by major U.S. ) manufacturers in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The same model La Marche charger is found at the Beaver Valley Unit 1 Nuclear Station (left), and at the Glendale Power Plant (right). The Glendale Plant withstood peak ground accelerations of about 0.30g in the San Fernando earthquake of 1971, and again in the Northridge earthquake of 1994. i 250282.04\ Beaver (4/97)
_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ .~. _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ N
$8 ~ . . _
l , SUPPLIC.. NTAL DATABASE INFORMATION:
, COMPONENTS ATTACllED TO AIR OPERATED VALVES l
- Pneumatic actuators for control valves normally carry components bolted to the valve yoke or the
' diaphragm casing. Such components typically include pneumatic positioners, electro-pneumatic transmitters, pressure regulators, and solenoid valves. The normal mounting details are sufficiently rigid that there is ao potential for significant out-of-phase motion between the valve yoke and its attachments. The SQUG/EPRI database currently includes over 600 examples of pneumatic-actuated valves subjected
- to strong motion earthquakes. This category of equipment is by far one of the most common items l encountered in the power plants and heavy industrial facilities that are the focus of post-earthquake investigations. The inventory of database examples of pneumatic valves are drawn from some 25 sites,
, affected by 13 different earthquakes. These sites that contain significant numbers of pneumatic valves experienced peak ground accelerations ranging from 0.20 to over 0.60g. Instances of damage are limited to a few cases of impact, where valves supported on flexible piping j swayed into adjacent steelwork. There is also one instance where excessive sway of a pneumatic actuator disconnected a tubing attachment. There are no instances of damage due to interaction effects between , the valve body and its attached components, nor are there instances of components detaching from the ! valve. l 0 i
?4 ,, [
?:
t - '
, e
- f. - .
W
- y. 'D a
- J Typical attachments to pneumatic valves are illustrated by the r.olenoid mounted on the diaphragm i casing for a control valve at El Centro Steam Plant (arrow,left). The site experienced peak ground accelerations of 0.42g in the earthquake of 1979, and 0.26g in the earthquake of 1987. More recent-vintage valve attachments include pressure regulators and electro-pneumatic transmitters attached to a control valve at the Gilroy Cogen Plant (right), which withstood 0.32g in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.
4 d 250282.04\ Beaver (4/97) i j
.. .~. _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ , , . _ . _ . _ . . .
t g- d
- 1 1
4 i SUPPLEMENTAL DATABASE INFORMATION: I CAST IRON YOKES FOR AIR-OPERATED VALVES j I Cast iron as a load-bearing material in mechanical equipment is an issue of particular focus in the SQUG ! A-46 re riew, Caveats within the GIP prohibit cast iron for certain load-bearing applications, such as for j the supports oi motor-operated valves. Standard pneumatic diaphragm-actuated valves, however, use a cast iron as a standard material for valve yokes. The large representation of cast iron yokes for
- diaphragm valves in the database eliminates any reasonable concem about the material's ability to j withstand the relatively modest reaction forces from the mass of the pneumatic actuator. The 1 SQUG/EPRI database currently includes over 600 examples of pneumatic-actuated valves subjected to l l strong motion earthquakes. This category of equipment is by far one of the most common items j encountered in the power plants and heavy industrial facilities that are the focus of post-earthquake i investigations. The inventory of database examples of pneumatic valves are drawn from some 25 sites,
! affected by 13 different earthquakes. These sites that contain significant numbers of pneumatic valves ; 4 experienced peak ground accelerations ranging from 0.20 to over 0.60g. j l Instances of damage are limited to a few cases of impact, where valves supported on flexible piping i l swayed into adjacent steelwork. There is also one instance wheie excessive sway of a pneumatic actuator i ! disconnected a tubing attachment. There are no instances of damage to cast iron yokes where inertial j
, loads alone were the cause. Checking valve mounting configurations for the impact potential as part of the GIP review is therefore sufficient to preclude diaphragm valve yoke damage regardless of the J
material. . [ [
' I 4' . * !
^ l l - - .gl e - - -
x . _ k ' p {
' .7.
- t. -
l 4
'I 14a . -
. 4 i
g 2 i
- The Fisher Type 657 is one of the more common diaphragm actuators found at database sites. This actuator features cast iron as the standard material for construction for the valve yoke. Examples of these j valves are found at the Union Oil Butane Plant (left), which withstood a peak gromJ oeceleration of about 0.60g in the 1983 Coalinga sequence of enthquakes. On the right is an example of a Fisher Type 657 at the Cool Water Power Plant, which withstood 035g in the 1992 Landers earthquake.
23028204Wver (4/97)
__ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ i i 1 4 4 SUPPLEMENTAL DATABASE INFORMATION:
... WEIGHT OF BATTERIES j $ Based on the range of sizes of stationary batteries subjected to strong motion within the SQUG/EPRI database, the GIP places an upper limit on the weight of individual batteries at 450 pounds. This upper
- limit is reasonably close to the maximum size of individual batteries supplied by the more common !
j manufacturers used in power plants and industrial facilities. Data added from investigations of recent earthquakes tends to expand the range of battery mass represented by the database. Batteries up to atout 500 pounds in mass are found on racks at database j facilities subjected to particularly strong motior, (approaching or exceeding ground motion as j characterized by the SQUG Reference Response Spectrum). Floor-mounted batteries of even greater mass !' j are found at telephone switching stations included in the database. These floor-mounted submarine" l batteries used for DC power supply in phone systems weigh about 800 pounds per battery, almost twice j the mass limit currently listed in the GIP. Based on actual earthquake experience, the mass o! individual i batteries does not appear to be a factor except for the inertial load that must be supported by the steel battery rack and its floor anchorage. As long as calculations indica'e that the rack and anchorage can support the batteries for the required design-basis earthquaka loe ds, the current database indicates that ! large mass in individual batteries does not present a sourcc of ea.thquake damage. i l The SQUG/EPRI database currently includes some 140 examples of battery racks, representing some 45 j sites and 20 different earthquakes. Within this inventory there are several instances of damage to i batteries, most often due to toppling from racks that lacked any form of restraint or confinement. Other l causes of damage are anchorage failure leading to overturning of the rack, and inter-battery impact ) j leading to internal damage within the cells. There are no instances of damage to battery racks that l 1 conformed to the requirements c:_cked in the GIP, and no correlation between battery damage and the ! mass of individual batteries. Y j , sai W ' (/ l ,.- .
.1 I ih *'
~ '
- y
_ y str4 T he Manzanillo Power Plant in Mexico uses Exide Type FHC Size 29 batteries for its DC power supply
- (left). These are among the largest batteries provided by Exide, with a weight of about 500 pounds each.
The several racks at the plant withstood long-duration broad-band motion during the 1995 earthquake,
- for which the response spectra from the site's free-field instrument approximate that SQUG Reference Spectrum. More massive batteries within the database are found at certain telephone switching stations (right), such as the floor-mounted " submarine" batteries at the Pacific Bell Rosemead Station, which withstooJ .s estimated peak ground acceleration of 0.40g in the 1987 Whittier earthquake.
250282.04\bw.nr (4/97) l
- -- - - P . v- - ., , -w, ,, , , _ , , , , _ _ _ , , _ _ _ _
W I l I i l 1 1 l l l 1 l 1 l ENCLOSURE 3 , i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1}}