ML20141F302

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Battery Chargers & Inverters Anchorage Evaluation
ML20141F302
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 12/13/1995
From:
EQE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS (FORMERLY EQE ENGINEERING
To:
Shared Package
ML20141F268 List:
References
52233-C-017, 52233-C-017-R02, 52233-C-17, 52233-C-17-R2, NUDOCS 9705210269
Download: ML20141F302 (60)


Text

-

(OlO CALCULATION COVER SHEET ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Calculation No: s -

[

Project: T)UGuCNE $A /J /4LLEY kom/t u 7 0 - - */

Calculation

Title:

NffEIU CHAlI!'EW NlldllTL U N 4C H3 t? W f'M L U Afl0 A

References:

Y b C ~'i 3 d -

Attachments: A N#

, s .A Total Number of Pages (including Cover Sheet):

/ '

l Revision Approval Number Date Description of Revision Originator Checker Approver Y ' *l30 0RiuinAL rd'JW A% & flc 1 "'"in  % Paw Hn 2 n A a c. CLt ce 2L / ]fow'srnt % [tw // /

2- "'" h s kdd fut n B at CM~' ac sL / OpoadT6au ksr IgovE ///

a

~

12312-CVCove<sm (7@)

9705210269 970516 4 PDR ADOCK 0500

She*t cf f Job No.: 52233 Job: Duauanna Liaht Comnanv. Beaver Vallav Power Station By: f>m DIt::9-ti-'I C :Ic N 2.: 01Z. .

Chk: W Dt::9/30/9f

Subject:

Battery Charaars BAT-CHG 1. BAT-CHG-2. BAT-CHG-3. RAT-CHG-4 and invertars INV-VITBUS-1.INV-VITBUS 2. INV-VITBUS-1 INV-VITBUS-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH DESCRIPTION PAGE NUMBER 1.0 - PURPOSE

2.0 REFERENCES

3' 3.0 BATTERY CHARGER ANCHORAGE CALCULATION 4.0 INVERTER ANCHORAGE CALCULATION )

4.1- INVERTERS -1 & 2 ANCHORA.5 CALCULATION b..

4.2 INVERTERS 3 & -4 ANCHORAGE CALCULATION fb ,

5.0

SUMMARY

ff ATTACHMENTS A SEWS SHEETS FOR BATTERY CHARGERS A-1 and INVERTERS

( PAGES IN ATTACHMENT A)

B SEISMIC QUALIFICATION UTILITY GROUP B-1 -

NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 3, ISSUE 2, SEPTEMBER 1995 (SELECTED PAGES).

I PAGES IN ATTACHMENT B) l I

i

~ ~ . _ . . - ~ . _ . . - _ __ _ . . _ . _ _ ,. . - __ .. - - . _ _ _ _ . . . .

4 d 4

Shtst 3 of O jab No.: 52222 Job:' D"a"= na' t_iaht Comnanv. n.. var vallev power Station By: /D~ Date:9 L4 4 i Ccic No.: ~ Q12.;- . Chk: Elf Date: 9/Ja/pf

- *:ubject: ' Batterv Charners BAT-CHG 1. BAT CHG-2. BAT-CHG-3 BAT-CHG-4 and invertars INV-VITBUS 1.INV-VITRUS-2. INV-VITRUS-3. INV-VITRUS-4 i 9

i 1.0 PURPOSE ~.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS CALCULATION IS TO DEMONSTRATE SEISMIC ANCHORAGE ADEQUACY FOR .l BATTERY CHARGERS BAT-CHG 1, BAT-CHG 2, BAT-CHG-3, and BAT-CHG-4 AND INVERTERS - i

. INV VITBUS 1, INV VITBUS-2, INV VITBUS-3, and INV VITBUS-4 AT THE DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY . {

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION.

l l . THE BATTERY CHARGERS AND THE INVERTERS ARE FLOOR-MOUNTED IN THE SRVB BUILDING'AT  !

FLOOR ELEVATION 713'.  ;

, t A REVIEW OF THE SEWS SHEETS FOR THE BATTERY RACKS INDICATES THAT THE CONCERN IS THE - R

) . ANCHORAGE OF THE BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS TO THE CONCRETE FLOOR. l l

-i

2.0 REFERENCES

1. SEISMIC QUALIFICATION UTILITY GROUP (SQUG), " GENERIC IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE (GlP)",

4EVISION 2, JUNE 28,1991.  !

2. SEWS SHEETS FOR BATTERY CHARGERS BAT-CHG 1, BAT CHG-2, BAT-CHG-3, and BAT-CHG-4. ,

D 1

" - 3. SEWS SHEETS FOR INVERTERS INV-VITBUS-1, INV-VITBUS 2, INV-VITBUS-3, and INV VITBUS-4. -)

?

, 4. NOT USED. l 1 5. ' DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 87001.24-65A, " INSTRUCTION MANUAL 4 ' MODEL A 11, A128 FILTERED FLOAT BATTERY CHARGER".  !

6. SEISMIC QUALIFICATION UTluTY GROUP NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 3, ISSUE 2, SEPTEMBER 1995.

'7. TELECOPY FROM G.S. RITZ TO R.W. CUSHING dated JULY 13,1995, EQE INCOMING LOG NUMBER 522331-003.'

8. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 08700-01.024.0207, "UPS EQUIPMENT

' OUTLINE DRAWING", REV. A.

9.' DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-1.24-77A, " SEISMIC TEST PLAN,  !

NEW UPS UNITS",  !

10. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-1.24-74C, " OUTLINE AND .

l MOUNTING". l L11.- DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-RE 388, " SILL DETAILS, SH. 2" l 1

'12. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-RE 25Z, " OUTLINE - VITAL BUS 3 & .

4 UPS AND 25KVA STATIC UNE VOLT REGULATOR". ll

- 13'[DUQUESNE LIGHT. COMPANY NUCLEAR DIVISION DRAWING 8700-RE-380, " SILL DETAILS, SH. 4'".

l Sheet .

.of j

N

. . Sho::t M of // I

. J:b N3.: 52222 Job: Duacenne Uoht Comnanv. Beaver Vallev Power station By: fA Dits: b'L4 45 Ccic No.: 012.- Chk: @ Dats: 9 fy/pf

Subject:

Batterv Charaers BAT-CHG-1. BAT-CHG 2. BAT-CHG-3 BAT-CHG-4 and j fnverters INV-VITBUS-1.INV-VITBUS-2. INV-VITBUS-3. INV-VITBUS-4 j 2.0 BATTERY CHARGER ANCHORAGE CALCULATION j l

--- THE FOLLOWING SKETCH SHOWS THE BATTERY CHARGER DIMENSIONS AND GENERAL ANCHOR I BOLT DETAILS: -  ;

1/2" HILTl (TYP) a y . (BAT-CHG- 1 ONLY) 374u _

(2 PL) i x7 27" o n

N . . . p '

56" 24.75"

-27" g 7o jg 7,

2.5" SKETCH PE'R SEWS SHEET FOR BAT-CHG- 1

2. " ph PLAN VIEW ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS NOTES: l
1. CRACK ON CONCRETE SURFACE AT POINT "A" l FOR BAT-CHG- 1. l
2. BAT-CHG-4 IS MISSING BOLT "B".

- SIMILARITIES AND Dl FERENCES BETWEEN THE 4 BATTERY CHARGER INSTALLATIONS: 1

1. BAT-CHG 1 IS THE ONLY CHARGER USING 1/2" DIA HILTI BOLTS. THE OTHER 3 CHARGERS USE 5/8" DIA SHELL ANCHORS. THE CAPACITY OF A 5/8" ANCHOR (OF UNKNOWN TYPE) EQUALS 3170 LB *.75 = ,

2378 LB (TENSION). BAT CHG 1 IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE BOUNDING CASE. l l

(- THE .75 REDUCTION FACTOR FOR AN UNKNOWN EXPANSION ANCHOR IS FROM REFERENCE 6, AND l A COPY IS LOCATED IN ATTACHMENT B OF THIS CALCULATION). )

2. BAT-CHG-4 IS THE ONLY C,HARGER MISSING AN ANCHOR BOLT (SEE SKETCH ABOVE).

A REDUCED NUMBER OF BOLTS WILL BE USED FOR THE ANCHOR BOLT TENSION AND SHEAR CALCULATIONS. THIS WILL ADD A MEASURE OF CONSERVATISM TO THE ANALYSIS.

1


THE DENSITY OF A TYPICAL BATTERY CHARGER PER REFERENCE 1 TABLE C.1-1 IS GIVEN AS 45 l LB/CU. FT THE BATTERY CHARGER WElGHT IS CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS:

%T : '- (27 24.75 56) lb %T = 975?lb e -

Shtct M of h Job No.: 52233 Job: Duouesne Licht Comoanv. Beaver Vallev Power Station By: EL Dat2: 189 9 9r l I

Calc No.: Qll, Chk: C4%. Date:// M 95

Subject:

Batterv Charaers BAT CHG-1. BAT-CHG 2. BAT CHG 3. BAT-CHG 4 and Inverters INV VITBUS-1.lNV VITBUS 2. INV-VITBUS-3 INV-VITBUS-4 Revision 1 3.0 BATTERY CHARGER ANCHORAGE CALCULATION

- THE FOLLOWING SKETCH SHOWS THE BATTERY CHARGER DIMENSIONS AND GENERAL ANCHOR BOLT DETAILS:

1/2" H!LTl (TYP)  ;

(BAT-CHG- 1 ONLY) 3gu _.

1 a

y (2 PL) x/ - 27"

, t 56" 24.75"

,,.. / l l 7" l 8" l 7" l l 1 2.5" 2.5" SKETCH PER SEWS SHEET FOR BAT-CHG- 1 PLAN VIEW ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS NOTES:

1. CRACK ON CONCRETE SURFACE AT POINT "A" FOR 8AT-CHC- 1. )
2. BAT-CHG-4 IS MISSING BOLT "B".
3. BAT-CHG- 1 IS MISSING BOLT "C". i 1

-- SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE 4 BATTERY CHARGER INSTALLATIONS:

1. BAT-CHG-1 IS THE ONLY CHARGER USING 1/2" DIA HILTl BOLTS. THE OTHER 3 CHARGERS USE 5/8" DIA SHELL ANCHORS. THE CAPACITY OF A 5/B" ANCHOR (OF UNKNOWN TYPE) EQUALS 3170 LB '.75 =

2378 LB (TENSION). BAT-CHG 1 IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE BOUNDING CASE. j

( THE .75 REDUCTION FACTOR FOR AN UNKNOWN EXPANSION ANCHOR IS FROM REFERENCE 6, AND A COPY IS LOCATEDJN ATTACHMENT B OF THIS CALCULATION).

I 2. BAT-CHG-1 & -4 ARE THE ONLY CHARGERS MISSING AN ANCHOR B,OLT (SEE SKETCH ABOVE).

3. BAT-CHG 4 ANCHORAGE BOUNDS BAT CHG 1.

A REDUCED NUMBER OF BOLTS WILL BE USED FOR THE ANCHOR BOLT TENSION AND SHEAR CALCULATIONS. THIS WILL ADD A MEASURE OF CONSERVATISM TO THE ANALYSIS.

-- THE DENSITY OF A TYPICAL BATTERY CHARGER PER REFERENCE 1 TABLE C.11 IS GIVEN AS 45 LB/CU. FT. THE BATTERY CHARGER WElGHT IS CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS:

WT = (27 24.75 56)lb WT = 975+1b l

l

She:t of Jo'; No.: 52233 Job: Duauesne Licht Comeanv. Beaver Vallev Power Station By: (/p Det:: 4-bi df Ccic N3.: Q12. Chk: W D'.t2: 3/3a/9r

Subject:

Batterv Charaars BAT-CHG-1. BAT-CHG-2. BAT-CHG-3. BAT-CHG-4 and invertern INV VITBUS-1.lNV-VITBUS 2. INV-VITBUS-3. INV-VITBUS-4

-- DETERMINE SEISMIC ACCELERATIONS:

-- THE BATTERY CHARGERS ARE LOCATED IN THE SVRB BLDG. AT ELEVATION 713'. FROM REFERENCE 7 THE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION IS:

ah := 0.36 VERTICAL ACCELERATION IS:

M~

av := l la h av = 0.24

--- C.G. HEIGHT FOR THE BATTERY CHARGER IS AT THE GEOMETRIC CENTER OF TH:. oNIT.

C.G. HEIGHTCO := 28 in

--- DETERMINE LOADS ON THE ANCHOR BOLTS FOR X-DIRECTION, Y-DIRECTION, Z DIRECTION, AND DEAD LOAD:

- X DIRECTION (CONSIDER ONLY 3 BOLTS FOR TENSION,7 FOR SHEAR):

TENx := TENx = 141 lb

[n SHRx := SHRx = 50'Ib Y DIRECTION (CONSIDER ONLY 7 BOLTS FOR TENSION):

TENy := TENy = 33*lb SHRy := 0 Ib SHRy =0 lb

- Z DIRECTION (CONSIDER ONLY THE 2 BOLTS WITH DISTANCE = 15" BETWEEN):

TENz := TENz = 327 lb 5

SHRz:= SHRz = 50*lb

- DEAD LOAD:

TENdi := TENdi = 139 lb SHRdi := 0 lb SHRy = 0 lb

--- COMBINE ANCHOR BOLT LOADS:

P:=dTENx2+ TENy2+ TENz2 - TENdi P = 219 lb V:sMSHRx2+ SHRy2 + SHRz2 - SHRdl V = 7l lb 1

. . . - . .. ~ .. .. . -. -_. . . - . . . - - - .. .

~

Shast of

- Job NL: 52233 Job: Duauenna Ucht Comnanv. Beaver Vallav Power Station By: (#v _ D:ta: Tal,f-ff

- Ccle No.: Q1l. .

Chk: W Date: Is/s/ff

Subject:

Batterv Charoars BAT-CHG 1. BAT-CHG-2. BAT-CHG-3. BAT-CHG-4 and inverters INV-VITBUS 1.INV-VITBUS-2. INV-VITBUS 3. INV-VITBUS-4

i. --- DETERMINE ANCHOR BOLT CAPACITY:

FOR 1/2" DIA HILTI KWIK BOLT, USING APPENDIX C OF REFERENCE 1:

' Pnom : 2290-lb Vnom2380Ib f

-- ANCHOR TYPE, EMBEDMENT, SPACING, CONCRETE STRENGTH, ESSENTIAL RELAYS: NO CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTORS ARE REQUIRED AS THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE NOT MENTIONED AS A CONCERN

, IN THE SEWS.

- THE SEWS FOR BAT CHG 1 INDICATES A CONCRETE CRACK NEAR ONLY ONE OF THE ANCHOR I BOLTS, FOR CONSERVATISM APPLY THE CONCRETE CRACK REDUCTION FACTOR (TENSION ONLY):

RCp 2 0.75

- THE SEWS FOR BAT-CHG 2 SHOWS A CONSTRUCTION JOINT (ASSUMEb TO BE A FREE EDGE) AT 4.5" .

(' FROM THE CABINET EDGE. THE SEWS FOR BAT-CHG 1 SHOWS IT'S ANCHOR BOLTS TO BE 0.75" FROM THE CABINET EDGE. ASSUMING SIMILARITY OF THE INSTALLATIONS, THE ANCHOR BOLT EDGE DISTANCE IS THEREFORE 4.5" 0.75" = 3.75" (Emin = 5.0 inches PER REFERENCE 1 TABLE C.2-1).

DETERMINE THE EDGE DISTANCE REDUCTION FACTORS AS FOLLOWS:

E ; 3.75 D = 0.5 CHECK: 4D = 2.0, THEREFORE E > 4D, NOT AN OUTLIER rep = rep = 0.75 10 D) i-

- g - 1.5 REs :l REs = 0.65

- THE ANCHOR BOLT ALLOWABLES ARE:

Pallow : Pnom RCp rep Pallow = 1288 lb Vallow 2 Vnom REs Vallow = 1546 lb 1 - USING THE CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SHEAR TENSION INTERACTION:

P V g + g = 0.22 < 1.0 OK (1/2" DIA HILTl KWIK BOLTS)

THE ANCHORAGE FOR THE BATTERY CHARGERS IS SHOWN TO HAVE LARGE SEISMIC CAPACITY.

1 4

i

Sh:r.t of _

Job No.: 52233 J:b: Duouesne Licht Comoanv. Beaver Vallev Power Station By: b _D:t::5 19 -q r '

Ccic No.: Q12. Chk: 64P Date: 9/3s/pf l

Subject:

Batterv Charoern BAT-CHG 1. BAT-CHG-2. BAT-CHG-3. BAT-CHG-4 and I Invertarn INV-VITBUS 1.INV-VITBUS-2. INV-VITBUS-3. INV-VITBUS-4  !

4.0 INVERTER ANCHORAGE CALCULATION

--- INVERTERS 1 & 2.HAVE A DIFFERENT DIMENSIONAL CONFIGURATION THAN INVERTERS -3 & -4.

' THE FOLLOWING SKETCHES SHOW THE TWO CONFIGURATIONS.

Yn Z

N 55 - 1/2" 36" '

(North) 68" INVERTERS - 1 & -2 GURr~ 1 NOTES: )

1. DIMENSIONS PER SEWS SHEETS FOR I INVERTER - 1.

5/(8" TYP)HILTI

_ _n _-

3"

, FLOOR

\g.s")

FRONT ELEVATION VIEW DIMENSION / DETAIL PER REFERENCE 8 INVERTERS - 1 and -2 ( OON SOM FIGURE 2 FLOOR 30" -

SIDE- ELEVATION VIEW DIMENSION PER REFERENCE 8 (LOOKING EAST)

c Sheet of _ f

' Job N3.: 52233 J:b: Quouanna Licht Comeanv. Beaver Vallev Power Station By:fA Dat:: 944-4 Cale No.: Q12 Chk:_ W Date: 9/3a/sf

Subject:

Batterv Charaarn BAT-CHG-1. BAT-CHG 2. BAT-CHG-3. BAT-CHG-4 and' inverters INV-VITBUS 1.INV-VITBUS 2. INV-VITBUS-3. INV-VITBUS-4

~ 1 - 1/2" (TYP)

- 3 0"H 3 6., 3/4" HILTI (TYP)

PLAN VIEW INVERTER RECTIFIER 36" INVERTER -3 (REFERENCE SEWS) oX 36" 5" (TYP) + Z 9

PLAN ylEW 6 INVERTER -4 INVERTER RECTIFIER (REFERENCE SEWS)

. . . (REFERENCE 12)

INVERTERS -3 & -4 FIGURE 3 11 INVERTERS -1 & -2 ANCHORAGE CALCULATION

-- INVERTER WEIGHT FROM REFERENCE 8:

WT := 3000 lb


C.G. LOCATED AT THE GEOMETRIC CENTER OF THE ENCLOSURE:

C.G. HEIGHT: CG := 34 in


DETERMINE LOA.DS ON THE ANCHOR BOLTS FOR X-DIRECTION, Y-DIRECTION, Z-DIRECTION, AND DEAD LOAD:

-- X DIRECTION:

TENx := TENx = 4081b 3

SHRx := SHRx = 180 lb

- Y-DIRECTION:

TENy := TENy = 120+1b SHRy := 0 lb SHRy = 0 lb

- Z DIRECTION ICONSIDER ONLY THE BOLTS ON THE OUTER CORNERS):

TENz:= TENz = 343*lb 3

.SHRz:= SHRz = 180 Ib

. . . . - . . .. ~ , . ..- . ..~-~ . ~. . - . ~ ., . . - - - . . . ,

7 .

Sheet cf  !

"J:b N2.:: 52222 Jobi Duauanne Unht Comnans. Beaver Vallav Power Statinn By: Cp p _ Dit3:9-7 4-46 ~

Calc Noa D.12. Chk:' W ' Date: 9/3 d f j .

Subject:

Batterv Charners BAT-CHG-1. BAT-CHG-2. BAT-CHG 3. BAT-CHG4' and '

Inverta a INV VITRUS-1.INV-VITBUS 2. INV-VITBUS-3. INV-VITRUS4 '

- - DEAD LOAD:

- WT "ENdi = 500 Ib

, TENdi:= 7 SHRdi;= 0 lb SHRy = 0*Ib

, -- COMBINE ANCHOR BOLT LOADS:

P:=MTENx2 + TENy2 + TENz2- TENdi : P = 46 lb V :=hSHRx2+ SHRy2+ SHRz2 - SHRdl - V = 255*1b

--- DETERMINE ANCHOR BOLT CAPACITY:

'FOR 5/8" DIA HILTl KWIK BOLT, USING APPENDIX C OF REFERENCE 1:

Pnom := 3170 lb Vnom := 3790 lb

- ANCHOR TYPE, EMBEDMENT, SPACING, EDGE DISTANCE, CONCRETE STRENGTH, CONCRETE CRACKING, ESSENTIAL RELAYS: NO CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTORS ARE REQUIRED AS THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE NOT MENTIONED AS A CONCERN IN THE SEWS.

- USING THE CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SHEAR TENSION INTERACTION

l + ,, = 0.08 < 1.0 OK (5/8" DIA HILTI BOLTS) 3 THE ANCHORAGE FOR INVERTERS 1 & 2 IS SHOWN TO HAVE LARGE SEISMIC CAPACITY.

4

~~ REFERENCE 13 " STRUCTURAL NOTES E) and F)" ALLOW CERTAIN MINIMUM EMBEDMENTS FOR THE 5/8" HILTI BOLTS, THE SMALLEST EMBEDMENT DEPTH NOTED IS 2 7/8". REFERENCE 1 TABLE C.2 6 SHOWS THAT FOR A 5/8" HILTl KWIK BOLT THE MINIMUM EMBEDMENT TO ACHIEVE FULL STRENGTH

= 2.75". THIS IS LESS THAN.2 7/8" THEREFORE THE STRUCTURAL NOTES FOR ANCHOR BOLT

EMBEDMENT WILL NOT COMPROMISE THE DEVELOPMENT OF FULL STRENGTH IN THE EXPANSION ANCHORS.

She:t /0 of //

Job No.: 52233 J:b: Dunemana Ucht Comoanv. Baavar Vallev Power Station By: W D;ty 4 't,4-if Calc No.: Q1Z. Chk: W Date:_ 9fM/.9f

Subject:

Battarv Charnars BAT-CHG-1. BAT-CHG 2. BAT-CHG-3. BAT-CHG-4 and invertars INV-VITBUS-1.INV-VITBUS-2. fNV-VITBUS-3. INV-VITRUS-4 4.2 fNVERTERS -3 & -4 ANCHORAGE CALCULATION '

--- INVERTER WElGHT FROM REFERENCE 9:

. THE INVERTER WElGHS 1500 LB, THE RECTIFIER WEIGHS 1000 LB, USE 1500 LB.

WT = 21500 Ib


C.G. LOCATED AT THE GEOMETRIC CENTER OF THE ENCLOSURE:

C.G. HEIGHT: CO = 42 in

--- USE THE ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS FOR INVERTER -4 SINCE THERE ARE ONLY 6 BOLTS TOTAL.

~~ DETERMINE LOADS ON THE ANCHOR BOLTS FOR X-DIRECTION, Y-DIRECTION, Z-DIRECTION, AND DEAD LOAD:

- X DIRECTION:

TENx =

f TENx = 582 lb I SHRx = SHRx = 180 lb

-- Y-DIRECTION:

TENy := TENy = 120 lb SHRy := 0 lb SHRy = 0 lb

- Z DIRECTION (CONSIDER ONLY THE BOLTS ON THE OUTER CORNERS). RECTIFIER AND INVERTER -3 ARE NOT BOLTED RIGIDLY TOGETHER, USE 1/2 WElGHT AND 30" ANCHOR BOLT DISTANCE:

CO ah TENz := (2 30) in

}

SHRz:= SHRz = 180 lb DEAD LOAD:

TENdl:= TENdt = 500 lb SHRdi:= 0 lb SHRy =0 lb

--- COMBINE ANCHOR BOLT LOADS:

P :=MTENx + TENy2 + TENz2 - TENdi P = 204 Ib V :sMSHRx2 + SHRy2 + SHRz2 - SHRdl V = 255 lb

-_ - . , _ ~ _ - - _ . - . . . . - . _ . _ . _ . . _ . - _ _ _-

Sheet _- // of; //

^ Jib' NL: 52233 ~J:b: Qugueana iiaht Carnaanv. n.. var Vallav Pawar Statinn Byi h 0;.t::: 9*1(+4[

C:lc No.: - Q.1.Z.- .

Chk: W Date: 9/w/pf . .

Subject:

Rattarv Charanta RAT-CHG-1. BAT-CHG-2. BAT-CHG-3 BAT-CHG-4 and I invartars (NV-VITRUS-1.lNV-VITRUS-2. INV-VITRUS-3;INV-VITRUS-4 l'

~

l- --- DETERMINE ANCHOR BOLT CAPACITY:

-- FOR 3/4" DIA HILTI KWIK BOLT, USING APPENDIX C OF REFERENCE 1:

Pnom . 4690 lb Vnom 5480 lb

- ANCHOR TYPE, EMBEDMENT, EDGE DISTANCEi CONCRETE STRENGTH, CONCRETE CRACKING,  !

' ESSENTIAL RELAYS: NO CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTORS ARE REQUIRED AS THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE ]

NOT MENTIONED AS A CONCERN IN THE SEWR-  ;

!- - SPACING REDUCTION FACTORS: .

i ANCHOR BOLT SPACING FOR -3 = 3", WHICH IS = 40. THEREFORE THE REDUCTION FACTORS ARE:

' RSp = 0.5 . RSs : 1.0 1 Pallow :Pnom RSp Pallow = 2345+lb 1 J

Vallow :Vnom RSs Vallow = 5480 lb j

-: USING THE CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SHEAR TENSION INTERACTION:

P V g- + g = 0.13 < 1.0 OK (3/4" DIA HILTI BOLTS)

J i

THE ANCHORAGE FOR INVERTERS -3 & 4 IS SHOWN TO HAVE LARGE SEISMIC CAPACITY.

i e

j, 4

4 4

- )

I 5.0

SUMMARY

.THE ANCHORAGE FOR BATTERY CHARGERS BAT-CHG 1, BAT-CHG-2, BAT-CHG-3, and BAT-CHG-4 AND INVERTERS INV VITBUS-1, INV VITBUS-2, INV VITBUS-3, and INV VITSUS-4 AT THE DUQUESNE UGHT COMPANY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE ADEQUATE TO WITHSTAND  :

THE SEISMIC LOADINGS FROM AN SSE EVENT.

. . g r

Ssxt M or // '

' u '- .

'J:b N2.: 52222 Jr.b: Duanaana 1inht cornnanv. R== var Vallav Power Statian By: Ac Data: fl-WM

. . , .Csic No.: Q,1Z. Chk: fh Date:/j-LS-46

' ' 'T i

Subject:

Rattery charnarn BAT-CHG 1. RAT-CHG 2. BAT-CHG-3 RAT-CHG-4 and Invertara INV VITRUS-1.lNV VITBUS-2. INV-VITRUS 3. INV-VITRUS-4

..< Revision 1

.,J I - DETERMINE ANCHOR BOLT CAPACITY:

3

, FOR 3/4" DIA HILTI KWIK BOLT, USING APPENDIX C OF REFERENCE 1:

  • ~A

. 'i Pnom ,= 4690 lb Vnom := 5480 lb

' 'i:

c; -- ANCHOR TYPE, EMBEDMENT, EDGE DISTANCE, CONCRETE STRENGTH, CONCRETE CRACKING, 1

' ' 'T

?

ESSENTIAL RELAYS: NO CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTORS ARE REQUIRED AS THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE NOT MENTIONED AS A CONCERN IN THE SEWS.

i

' /J: ..

  • I

- SPACING REDUCTION FACTORS-FIGURE 3 SHOWS THAT FOR INVERTER 3 THE ANCHOR BOLTS ARE 1.5" FROM THE EDGE OF THE

. . ,.y CABINET, THEREFORE CONSERVATIVELY ASSUME ANCHOR BOLT SPACING FOR 3 = 3", WHICH IS '= 40.

. 'j THEREFORE THE REDUCTION FACTORS ARE: .

r.n '# RSp : = 0.5 RSs = 1.0 q

... Pallow :Pnom RSp . Pallow = 2345 ib f.c Vallow . : Vnom RSs Vallow = 5480 lb

~

. --- USING THE CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SHEAR TENSION INTERACTION:

+

w p V

, , ]; ".. g + g = 0.13 < 1.0 OK (3/4" DIA HILTI BOLTS)

,i-

, ecg. THE ANCHORAGE FOR INVERTERS -3 & -4 IS SHOWN TO HAVE LARGE SEISMIC CAPACITY.

+

. .v, ..

l

  • ?b l

/.

.4 s

1,

? . :. l v., 1

~ 'i 0 5.0

SUMMARY

'L'1 - THE ANCHORAGE FOR BATTERY CHARGERS BAT CHG 1, BAT-CHG 2, BAT CHG 3, and BAT CHG 4 AND

, ..),Ii; ~ INVERTERS INV-VITBUS 1, INV VITBUS 2, INV VITBUS-3, and INV VITBUS-4 AT THE DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE ADEQUATE TO WITHSTAND i T4 7,",3"- THE SEISMIC LOADINGS FROM AN SSE EVENT,

. ~

/ Ti,' ef n , .., y )

i

.,,, , **  ; . O.

g 6 , "*

, , - , , - - - . - , , , - , ,,c_

_ - ,. ..... .., .. . . . - . . ._ . - , . . - ~. - _ -. - .. _.

- Shsst Nb of' // .}

Job No : 12223 -Job: Dunuanna Unht Comnanv. Raaver Vallev Power Station By: tic Date: Ja 12 9f'  !

Calc No.: 012. .. _

Chk: (W Date:It-l'L-Rf .i

Subject:

' Batterv Charners BAT CHG 1. BAT-CHG 2. BAT CHG 3. BAT-CHG-4 and {

fnvertars INV VITRUS-1.INV-VITRUS 2. INV VITRUS-3. INV VITRUS-4

-- Revision 2 l t

a DETERMINE, ANCHOR BOLT CAPACITY:

- FOR' 3/4" DIA HILTI KWIK BOLT, USING APPENDIX C OF REFERENCE 1: 'I l

4 Pnom :4690-lb Vnom :5480 lb  :

I - ANCHOR TYPE, EMBEDMENT, EDGE DISTANCE CONCRETE STRENGTH, CONCRETE CRACKING,- l ESSENTIAL RELAYS: NO CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTORS ARE REQUIRED AS THESE ATTRIBUTES ARE l NOT MENTIONED AS A CONCERN IN THE SEWS, l

- SPACING REDUCTION FACTORS:

- FIGURE 3 SHOWS THAT FOR INVERTER -3 THE ANCHOR BOLTS ARE 1.5" FROM THE EDGE OF THE j CABINET. THEREFORE CONSERVATIVELY ASSUME ANCHOR BOLT SPACING FOR 3 = 3", WHICH IS = 40.

.THEREFORE THE REDUCTION FACTORS ARE: i RSp = 0,5 RSs . : 1.0 ' i

Pallo v.
Pnom RSp Pallow = 2345 Ib  ;

Vallow :Vnom.Rss Vallow = 3480 lb t

-- USING THE CONSERVATIVE LINEAR SHEAR-TENSION INTERACTION:

].

i V P .

g + g = 0.13 < 1.0 OK (3/4" DIA HILTl BOLTS)  ;

(INVERTER 3)

THE ANCHORAGE FOR INVERTER 3 IS SHOWN TO HAVE LARGE SEISMIC CAPACITY.

l i 1

~. A REVIEW OF TPE SEWS SKETCH FOR INVERTER -4 (SEE PAGE A33 OF THIS CALCULATION) SHOWS l THAT THE WEST SIDE ANCHOR BOLTS ARE ABOUT 1" FROM A FLOCH CONSTRUC1lON JOINT. l

- THEREFORE THESE TWO ANCHOR BOLTS HAVE ZERO CAPACITY AND INVERTER -4 IS AN OUTLIER. l i

1 4

l

. 5.0 SUMM THE AM.:HORAGE FOR BATTERY CHARGERS BAT CHG 1, BAT-CHG 2, BAT-CHG-3, and BAT-CHG-4 AND i INVEPTERS INV VITBUS 1, INV VITBUS 2, INV-VITBUS 3, and AT THE DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE ADEQUATE TO WITHSTAND THE SEf3MIC LOADINGS FROM AN SSE EVENT.' j (iHE WEST SID8E ANCHOR BOLTS FOR INV VITBUS-4 ARE ABOUT 1" FROM A FLOOR CONSTRU l

. JOINT, AND THIS ITEM IS THEREFORE AN OUTLIER.

, 1 l

)

't Sh;st A1' of ,

5

.. Job No.: 52233 J:b: Duaumana Unht Comnanv. Beaver Vallev Power Station By: @se Date: -7 14-%. <

Calc N2.: 01 Chk: @ Date: She/ST ' i Subject; Battarv Charners BAT-CHG-1. BAT-CHG-2 BAT-CHG-3 BAT-CHG-4 and  !

Invertars INV VITBUS-1.INV VITBUS-2. INV-VITRUS-3. INV-VITRUS A i i

i

. ' Attachment A SEWS SHEETS l

for ,

BATTERY CHARGERS

.and INVERTERS pages in Attachment A)  !

(

I l

e i

it ,

1 1

l 9

l

SSEL Line No. 5343 Status Y N U A I 3 f SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 N.

kfj ( O EEU t, J1/ := q AL Equ IfNo. BAT-CHG-1 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #1 .

~

l Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Room, Row / Col AE SWGR I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) LOIS LA MARCHE MFG CO VTI 1.24-65 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7/35 '

> 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Cp N .

3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y N C @/
4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC ,,y Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum @

GERS GERS

5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec.

Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec.

@ RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in CNU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)

CAVEATS - B0UNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N U N/A
2. Solid state type N U N/A
3. For floor-mounted, transformer positively anchored and mounted near base, or load path is evaluated @N U N/A
4. Base assembly of floor-mounted unit properly braced or stiffened for lateral forces @N U N/A
5. For wall-mounted units, transformer supports and bracing provide adequate load path to the rear 6.

cabinet wall-All latches and fasteners in doors secured 1N Uh Q) N g N/A

7. Anchorage adequate (3ee checklist below for details) Y N (y)
8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N J N/A
9. Have you looked for ind found no other adverse concerns?

Is the intent of all the cweats met for Bounding Spectrum? @N U N/A ,

Y N V, N d CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A

c SSEL Lin'e No. 5343 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 52233 C 017 - A s '

Equip. 10 No. BAT-CHG-1 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #1 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)

3. Silicon-Controlled Rectifier (SCR) power controls; wall- or floor-mounted NEMA-type enclosure Y N U N/A
4. Within range of battery charger ratings:

24-250 VDC Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 25-600 amps Y N U N/A 150-2850 pounds (floor-mounted) Y N U N/A 150-600 pounds (wall-mounted) Y N U N/A

5. Within range of inverter ratings:

120 VDC only Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 0.5-15 KVA Y N U N/A 300-2000 pounds Y N U N/A

6. Heavy components are located in lower half of cabinet and are supported from base or rear panel with no panel

, cutouts adjacent to attachment Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U$

ANCHORAGE

1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,

weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness @N U N/A

5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A
6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch -

U N/A

7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap QY-
s. 9-8.

under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered h h idy:

9. Strength of equipment base and load path

@N U N/A 10.

to CG adequate Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete hN U N/A pad adequacy evaluated

~Are anchorage requirements met?

Y N UhyN U INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures N U N/A
2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment ,

free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Y N U N/A';

SSEL Line No. 5343 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 52233 C J17 =g 4+

Equip. ID No. BAT-CHG-1 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters  :

Equipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #1 i INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)

3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility hN.U N/A
4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are ,

not likely to collapse '

N U' N/A

5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? 'Y N U N/A, Is equipment free of interaction effects? ,YJ N U IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YN[

COMMENTS ,

m ~i- :

s e 6 ks De.?- 83i Gc a.cke . .y cleta.'Is.(bow - i TC.?-Leh 6 ',

1/g "p6 14tth / ~,k E lfs

/

t's0 Evaluated by: / &/)/ . ,/ </ // Date: 3[I ,

[ b,YbNrYF 2/=/ii

l

,...........i,4.i h Duqxesne Light c:mpany Analysis sheet

- nn w,. ' j 17 Counetrosv cATE DATE ANALYSl5 NO OI i C9ECKEDBY .p,, /G

% . Ers e ',

.q's ~) g ,  ;

u  ; R, .

s

(,, @): .//g-(!!G. - I

' ~ ~ ~

u D.As /Jo.:

!!Ar3 /.&'E.'. : $.bf'.!, L _l

( )a -Q ,

.,s, y .i l ..

%=seMt:

, DC' % N,:, W J T. c, _.->

- -._ ~ __ . l 10 G' f 4th 14 W Y%[(f . ~~

~

1 ~~ l

.i 52

! l

' I I5 i I

l50 I

t j 1

6 '

l l

17 f b

i 10  ! e  !

s j -

x '

2' ,

I I I 21 1 22 13 i .

,, I I

fEenT 2s 27
g l

/ /

,/ hY[.

29 .

31 /

32 33 Ii 3e , l 'I

  • 3.

e

, --p 4 ,

37 W 7' 38 3,

l i.

43 I i i

i.

n I , .

as 43 '*pi

p. 1-f f-

.. - y Qw,4t 9 + .

.s / i,:$?O ,

$~S M >

~

., m- _ . . .

-~ / ,, '

4e aw,,, , _ q ', ; iz u. *_

u ,

I 49 '

5 L:3 " 317 po J Av THE FOLLOWING ARE NEAR BLOCK WALLS:

EIN DISTANCE FROM-WALL SSW-VITBUS-1 BEYOND PROJECTION OF THE WALL INV-VITBUS-1 84" DC-SWBD-1 BEYOND PROJECTION OF THE WALL BAT-BKR-1. 60" BAT-CHG-1 BEYOND PROJECTION OF THE WALL PROJECTION OF.THE WALL IS EQUAL TO ITS HEIGHT. (90")

THE BLOCK WALLS ARE IDENTIFIED AS SB-1-11, SB-1-12, SB-1-13.

THE WALLS HAVE BEEN EVALUATED AND FOUND SATISFACTORY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IEB 80-11 REVIEW.

l

' (17 q A ~7 l SSEL Line No. 5344 Status Y N U  ;

A l

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3

\ yf , '

Eqt if 'D No. BAT-CHG-2 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #2 Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Room, Row / Col DF SWGR ,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) LO15 LA MARCHE MFG CO 1

SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7l~5 2.

3.

Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz hN U '

4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N U@

DOC l

Bounding Spectrum isS l

" 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum @ l GERS GERS  :

5. Demand based on
Ground Response Spectrum GRS j 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS 1 Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CIEP Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. l RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in )

COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic GNV '

demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)

CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which 1 are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class
2. Solid state type N U N/A
3. N U N/A

' For floor-mounted, transformer positively l anchored and mounted near base, or load path is evaluated

4. Base assembly of floor-mounted unit properly hN U N/A braced or stiffened for lateral forces bN U N/A
5. For wall-mounted units, transformer supports and bracing provide adequate load path to the rear cabinet wall 1N U 6.

All latches and fasteners in doors secured C(/ N U @N/A l

7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N N/A
8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N 9, N/A Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?

!s the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? @N U N/A ,

YNO[,N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by. intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class
2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A Y N U N/A

c 5 2 2 E ? ' il l .-e AT SSEL Line No. 5344 -

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. BAT-CHG-2 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipment Descr-iption 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #2 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)

3. Silicon-Controlled Rectifier (SCR) power controls; wall- or floor-mounted NEMA-type enclosure Y N U N/A
4. Within range of battery charger ratings:

24-250 VDC @N U N/A 120-480 VAC N U N/A 25-600 amps N U N/A 150-2850 pounds (floor-mounted) 3N U N/A 150-600 pounds (wall-mounted) Y N UR

5. Within range of inverter ratings:

120 VDC only Y N U / ..

120-480 VAC Y N U A' O.5-15 KVA Y N U .NF

) 300-2000 pounds Heavy components are located in lower half of cabinet Y N U@

6.

and are supported from base or rqar panel wi$h no panel cutouts adjacent to attachment Ade bs \rm Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?

hN U N/A Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE

, 1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A

2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,

weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness Y N U N/A

5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of # .ce c ,. .s.# v.(. .-

safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking % w kom new c. 7 - we +1de h @N U N/A

6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch
  • hN U N/A
7. Factors affect ing essential relays considered: gap 8.

under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying @N U N/A action on anchors considered @N U N/A

9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate hN U N/A
10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N O '

2

, Are anchorage requirements met? N U INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby 2.

equipment or structures If equipment contains .sensitiye e rel_a/.be equipment hN U N/A free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Y U N/A

's

.~ 1QR s  !

s .- - s : ' C

  • u* . / r

-SSEL Line No. 5344  !

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)- Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. BAT-CHG-2 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers ; inverters ,

1 Equipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #2 l l

INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd) l

3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U N/A l
4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are i not likely to collapse N U N/A ,
5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? N V N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? GNV IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY A0E0VATE? YNU i

COMMENTS Ma ggheD q itc M h u 6 - nc o -130 V s et e - 435z e h.d Volb 4GO L$.d iby '37 15 e 3 Ndekc. [6-00 M A,x gs -10 0 7G. delis i30 No. Cells GO Tj,e Ce.IlL,'\, l Mb ; La A-de M?3 Co. J' 6 u6..R %4 cna 3 s, t 3 3 ' Ac.h e d c-n

,- l a s 3 e- ac ro ss A*- Scod mul mes w d-s b @ ~ 4Lc l* 5e "L****

ad J A Sre,d 4 Ad- 1 I

)

1

,, s ti .lf ,

r Evaluated by: GTw / '_I/ h [ h , C Date: ) /il /97

Peck &L ,1, pr l

i l

i

'"' '~**

THE T  ? " ': "I' '" t ' 1 -

4e< -~ ,

117- Aid 7...

-. .. . .~'

T~

'IL

  • '~ -

d p ... .

~ .

7; 97 7~n ... L ,

4 p ~ . ,

. 1 O F ~ " " ' ' ', L p - - , ,

r. . . r, r n r ,r; p t

!J OF T" c' t ' ' '. L PROJr' ' 'r ""~

.t.

~ ' '

'TS HEI-"T. ("0")

' ' '~' *^

THE ' ' ': - " * ' ' ~ * ""-1-6, S ' - 1 , SB-1-8.

TH E '. , ""D SAT *r:.~0RY IN

'~" ' ~

ACCO' '

~

m

. . . . . . @)ci uom c... , u ,,. a

.w. o, _

, , . . e -.< . : . . o. . e..c... e... ...t....

". (. . ..-

C 01 /' - Au ,

I

.re, -

.c jj 6.: e sc-2.

( tf e

. /.,+G //o.:

9' f  %

' 'S ekbe $. h lA M KdL ' ' ' '

, ~ Fac M4.t._ . . _

~

.. .9 64 I

h

  • Sy W I

.s _I (,,3a~

ae es.o t<ram

\ m~l

.e I l ,Ao ma.n.. o, .A0b

,, s .

, l  ; c. . .. . .

.e , a wT,gePg....w ou .

,, ej >, > n , ,

n s'.$. {y ,

,, I i y, ,/ .

l g n I ar

g l l A $?*.
o l SL it h t,d aiI j ) N L. M e se T.M

--- . N '

a r- ga ng.h

'N ^NA,,' su' "*g, n -e .-

n' Q $ Lac ..  ? # '

wp

- i m

u

.' T.-:.<j 1-at/> lab k.  !

i 2r,. 'j

    • e u us cerc ele -

.". :> , . t. . . -W.1 :

.d; 0 c.al N. s L il .. g "

, 2. .,,, ,( ls g ,, p, , f-

" i.,, , - -

--- 5'es ses-6 4P5" Z Z C *' Q / .s se 4 * ,

4 ~ v ,

4a i d er a=,.

r ' '

a ** ,

i b. N % - - '

4

i. _g'rggjg A',--
  • I m.., t

' kjWN eM ew ~,bd,i y.. o, !

$d .

l

. r--- em.1 4% . - -

-)

us e a a 2P ut g,,es .~!,,

gp e us~-

(.a#f Gutt #

t$ est.,a C+******

. .J h t -

w,e i

. j e

  • 4

I SSEL Line No. 5345 Status Y N U l A l

% SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 )

52233cq17 Q

gip.IDNo. BAT-CHG-3 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters g 2.

Equipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #3 Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Room, Row / Col AE SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) LO15 LA MARCHE MFG CO VTI 1.24-65 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND I  !

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7_I U
2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Q)N f
3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 HZ Y N '

/A

4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC , ,, /

Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS GERS

5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AG1 Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. d3F Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in $NU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)

CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which I are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipmer.t class N U N/A
2. Solid state type Y N U N/A
3. For floor-mounted, transformer positively anchored and mounted near base, or load path is evaluated @N U N/A
4. Base assembly of floor-mounted unit properly "

I 5.

braced or stiffened for lateral forces For wall-mounted units, transformer supports and @N U N/A l bracing provide adequate load path to the rear cabinet wall NU

6. All latches and fasteners in doors secured Y N U N
7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)
8. N Ou mza Relays mounted on equipment evaluated N U CNZO
9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y N U N/A q Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N V,N/A l i

CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which  !

are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat  !

rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) '

l. Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A

r . ... -

l

~

SSEL Line No. 5345 I'1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. BAT-CHG-3 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipment Descr.iption 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #3 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd1

3. Silicon-Controlled Rectifier (SCR) power controls;  ;

wall- or floor-mounted NEMA-type enclosure Y N U N/A

4. Within range of battery charger ratings: i 24-250 VDC Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 25-600 amps Y N U N/A 150-2850 pounds (floor-mounted) Y N U N/A 150-600 pounds (wall-mounted) Y N U N/A
5. Within range of inverter ratings:

120 VOC only Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 0.5-15 KVA Y N U N/A 300-2000 pounds Y N U N/A

6. Heavy components are located in lower half of cabinet and are supported from base or rear panel with no panel cutouts adjacent to attachment Y N U N/A is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,

weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness

5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of hN U N/A safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and 6.

concrete cracking Mo (cA.C h %.

For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than hN U N/A 7.

1/4-inch .

Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap @ a U N/A S OM 8.

under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying Q r u Aq $ l 9.

action on anchors considered Strength of equipment base and load path hN U N/A I to CG adequate

10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete hN U N/A pad adequacy evaluated Y N U N/

Are anchorage requirements met?

,1 Y N U l INTERACTION EFFECTS 3

1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
2. If equipment contains sensitive relays. equipment @N U N/A free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures Y N U @

SSEL Line No. 5345 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 i 52C n s 17 i=3

  • H Equip. ID No. BAT-CHG-3 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters i i

Equipment Description _39/ BATTERY CHARGER #3 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Ont'd)

3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U N/A
4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse hN U N/A
5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? (f) N U N/A- .,

is equipment free of interaction effects? f1N U IS EOUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMMENTS gu S ., L,"s4x Q "s

= , , < -

3 I

i} I lI )

%Wm- ,va w z.

$%?)D

,,( y ~5

"m,iiIgpx-'

7 23 t " '

Nc. 3 3hrf4149-3 \A t u t'. .

l l C :. o.%' 7 '

f ,  !

W- \l Evaluated by: ,/ Date:

3 g

, .-f i N'll 5 2f)/W 4

a st e cio ssies so ,ep Duquesne Light C!mpany Analysl8 Sheet PACE a e .. cc COM.htEDSY OATE CHECKED BY CATE AN ALY$15 NO 5 E L E O ' ., ' v d / i .j 4 ) -

stae 2

- d V, h ')

4 ;,): oI.wg ~[- c l-[G - ) \

3 l i

'~ ~ ~ ~

(. O/s /Jo.:

' e~aw-(' d) / WARE l.'"4~L : 4 4 *l4 v . t. ~4_.

  • %q .

l--

^l l

8 D J'~G"K/J4 .'..* \

'; G' M e4L- N [ d-f7.0 i~__ j

~

o 0A- 'bl 4 /-f,$ r /E N 7 i e II i _..

i '

' d[

-w 22 .

i H .-

- 5 I '

l

,, ti,

%d %"

ts l'

!' ;Q l

e %+- 4 ;)-

24 G 1.

n, l

% pu 4 \

\  !

3,

,i i

I t.p g g' I9 .>

i

. .. ( . . .,% a 'y> c 3'

l 5 l

[ ,

s -

5

~..: . ,

]

1

! l TI n  ! l ( op M SN' see EGT 3 i

! MS-Te rut *

/

n s

de o*T .

i W Pt- -

ar l u l

/

/ RP Dm-' 1 n I

. /

31 32 l

n ,

3

'L d a u I r r-t /

u -

f%: ,,

_ a - 1 ht '

30 9~ } 7h .' I

' i  !

)![t.-g 37 -

I n

s .

n  ; .

Qim, ,

,! )//

t a1 - -

')b. .. Wt

?

h e

l I as e rc %

l g

]f k Mlcu.ke., Lyd -
-)4 -p#

N .t 3

$ A S'G" M . lK fp- g as 2- i t

49 10

/ '". - - - Wl. 0 -

^

g

,,,, c o m i Duquesne Ught Cornpeny SHEET OF -

ger. .

Joe ff7LE FifNg w4400%"v12 p,q & l I/

v LOCATCN 50SJECT j?"'D eArE 2 //3 /99

. CHECxEO DEpantutNT By DATE EviSED g OATE-

, 5a-sa-3 ,,,, . ,

F A

.\ #

D0- $!

SwGV 8 37% ,

{N'r GAT- y >

C.HG ~ b ,

33V2 N'

Ul ,'

bt/nRT6.k

}2 ._

e N' p ;- e f"\ V 4 &

I 2E CTIFIER -

n I . i dl r

.. : - @' ' *' J

. TW 28 %,

A N

0+ ssW - y Y,Taas - 2  ; 28N r

3 l

SSEL Line No. 5346 52233 C C17 Pi m Status Y N U A

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 f

Eq No. BAT-CHG-4 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters -

Eq ipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #4 Location: Bldg. SRVB_ Floor El. 713 Room, Row / Col 0F SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) L015 LA MARCHE MFG C0 SEISMIC CAPACIT'Y VS DEMAND

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input ~71 3
2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade CN U
3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz
4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y N U@

DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum GERS GERS  :

5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. @

Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS l

Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic

@NU demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)

CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class
2. Solid state type (9 N U N/A
3. For floor-mounted, transformer positively @N U N/A anchored and mounted near base, or load path is evaluated
4. Base assembly of floor-mounted unit properly @N U N/A braced or stiffened for lateral forces @N U N/A
5. For wall-mounted units, transformer supports and bracing provide adequate load path to the rear cabinet wall .Y N U@
6. All latches and fasteners in doors secured
7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details)

QN U N/A

8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N @ N/A
  • Ce Nt. Y N UE
9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?

Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?

Y N U N/A YN($N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class
2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A Y N U N/A

SSEL Line No. 5346 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 5 22^2 C-017 PW!

  • Equip. 10 No. BAT-CHG-4 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #4 CAVEATS'- GERS (Cont'd)
3. Silicon-Controlled Rectifier (SCR) power controls; wall . or floor-mounted NEMA-type enclosure YN U N/A
4. Within range of battery charger ratings:

24-250 VDC Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A-25-600 amps Y N U N/A 150-2850 pounds- (floor-mounted) Y N U N/A l150-600 pounds (wall-mounted) Y N U N/A

5. Within range of inverter ratings:

120 VDC only Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 0.5-15 KVA Y N U N/A 300.2000 pounds Y N U N/A

6. Heavy. components are located in lower half of cabinet and are supported from base or rear panel with no panel cutouts adjacent to attachment Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N Uh ANCHORAGE
1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) N U N/A
2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP N U N/A
3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A
4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,

weld qualit'y and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness

5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of h@Nc aUlo...It N/A bL safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking hN U N/A
6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch .

6N U N/A

7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors hN U N/A
8. Base M : adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered ON U N/A

.9. Strength of equipment base and load path

-to CG adequate @N U N/A

10. Embedded steel, grout pad 'or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Y N U @f_3.>

Are anchorage requirements met? Y N U INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft-targets free from~ impact by nearby

- equipment or structures g% @N U N/A

2. If equipment containscssnsitive_ relay.sz equipment free from all' impact by nearby equipment or_ structures @N U N/A

SSEL Line No. 5346 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No.

512: ... ap., w BAT-CHG-4 Equip. Clast 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters J Equipment Description 39/ BATTERY CHARGER #4 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd) 3.

4.

Attached lines have adequate flexibility Overhead equipment or distribution systems are

$N U N/A AA not likely to collapse N U N/A

5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? YNU IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMMENTS 4 g e. e s m L. 6ik ekubd - cJl L'3b, . ,

g,d [& I, cit ,e ss. 3 6 SL2Il M" Gk*N "

, mjt N~ cle M I:ne +

y g,,,,. ,ri,e yaaor ie veoaeo 70 M /unmedr 7a Dmce duwe Evaluated by: C42 _1 , Date: I/I4 bi (WNM_

. GT~ l Ii4 / b~

. , . . ., . . - . .- . - - - ~ - - - ~ -- --8

--~...~.......--.n

.. ew. y Ovevesne Lasnt Compsay Aaasys.a Sneet- - - ~ -

  • scs  :* ,:,

ve tst ev -A-t 0-se,ta tv ~34*f ***i91sa W dM

'.,~,; ,

) ,, Ekt \. ) ,. ..

s. .. - .

n /s . . - _.- s= -=,-

f, O 4, O, .O e *

  • O 1,,, 7 -'
w. ,

5 1( y ' 4's)f ),Q, * =i

, 4 . WA!$ /!~~4*;, f _

D I '

d e3 hek.no .e _y,,_

e . 2 e i . . .

I

.3 I n  !

, g ,

a  :. t y ,, ',

. 4 , i

9 9
  • j9- , ,#  !

,6 p i hs * *#

sr ' g *

. ee; e ,; e 4, o

'e ' .. ' " 1 , ,a Ja '4 ,

.9 e

't/*/  !

se ,

n l

o' n_'l

?

is a 4 4

- ts

, l i i I ' i'  ? f l' .' .

~

,'. {

l .

. g l / NP .*.< s".*

',' . , / .

3; la

  • 43  ?

s 34 =I

  • II 3,.=4e7 ps=7 .77s '-. .* * 's /  ?

a.

. . < '"""* MI 5 ' #7'

< as

y. 3 g,a(

..n v

~a  ; -

    • J B '. 4 35
  • h g! . 9 39 , / *

' * [ Pe s# 4,0 l

,, [ a.4. *g 64;- p.sl sl.' es a

.. a.. . .

48 es vi a 4'

3 5 *  !

se n *W

+

gg "I'm he% $

4 *

  • A' s N (s % $  % f af *i # -

SS ((.

bov 4 aA 1'.e 9  ;

e '

., . e  !

ff l Y! ~ is n I 't t

~

  • ?

%gslh :.hW (a,n 6.;3es i 5 I ' ( ~~ {

s e w ::\r

-4 L ~ - s. . C. . ./ 4

, -L..i }l[. ~

'+ nhL,J 4 L, '

y I ^*

J nI s. i  !

t

.2 --

a Qar.CnG.4 i

R f

8 ,

1 i

5

y. h g

O

  • 5 e

$ h i- l

[

f

,4-

+ . - - , . . - -

4 SSEL Line No.. 5335 Status Y N U >

A SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 16 - Battery tharo'ers R *# '& Yn]verterse e ? .c . r

, Equ .I io INV-VITBUS-1 Equip. Class _

Eqt ipmehr escription _38/UPS 1

[

Lo n: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Room, Row / Col AE SWGR l

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended). S250 SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC VT!!!

-i SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND  :

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input _ 'I3  !

l 2. Elevation of seismic input below about_40' from grade WN U  !

3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Y NU N/A  !
4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC  :

L Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS GERS GERS

5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS
1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS  !

! Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS i 9 , Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does' capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in l YNU

COMMENTS _if a special exception to enveloping of seismic
demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.) ,

3 t

CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which i 2

are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and l explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience . , , s equipment class 7'
2. Solid state type @N U N/A  :
3. For floor-mounted, transformer positively wN U N/A {

o anchored and mounted near base, or load path is evaluated $N U N/A  !

! 4. Base assembly of floor-mounted unit properly i braced or stiffened for lateral forces bH U N/A i

['

5. For wall-mounted units, transformer supports and j bracing provide adequate load path to the rear . i cabinet wall N U N/Ai  !
6. All latches and fasteners in doors secured NU  !
7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y  ;

N/A 8.

9.

Relays mounted on equipment' evaluated Have_you looked for and found no other adverse concerns?

Ys NTl(H)G/_A3 N

CD N U N/A

1s the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N U N/A ,

j CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk-(*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)  ;

1. Equipment is' included in generic seismic testing i equipment class Y N U N/A
2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A  ;

1 e

, , , ~ , , y,, . -

SSEL Line No. 5335 SEL Mi g m SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. 10 No. INV-VITBUS-1 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters

. Equipment Description 38/UpS 1 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd)

3. Silicon-Controlled Rectifier (SCR) power controls; ,

wall- or floor-mounted NEMA-type enclosure Y N U N/A

4. Within range of battery charger ratings:

24-250 VDC Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 25-600 amps Y N U N/A 150-2850 pounds (floor-mounted) Y N U N//

150-600 pounds (wall-mounted) Y N U N/A

5. Within range of Inverter ratings:

120 VDC only Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 0.5-15 KVA Y N U N/A 300-2000 pounds Y N U N/A

6. Heavy components are located in lower half of cabinet and are supported from base or rear panel with no panel cutouts adjacent to attachment Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., dlmping, center of rotation) @N U N/A
2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP (y N U N/A
3. Sizes and locations af anchors determined OY N 'U N/A
4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., .

weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion -

5.

anchor tightness Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of hN U N/A  :

safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking @N U N/A

6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 7.

1/4-inch -

Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap hN U N/A under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @. N U N/A

8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying

' action on anchors considered hN U N/A

9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete -

pad adequacy evaluated Y N U A.

'Are anchorage requirements met? N U INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment --

free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures h. N U N/A

l 1

SSEL Line No. 5335 c -

" k' c - . ~w .

  • Ll pe, ,A g

~

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3

-Equip. ID No. INV-VITBUS-1 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Charcers & Inverters '

Equipment Description 38/UpS 1 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)

3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U N/A
4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are s not likely to collapse Y N U N/A
5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? .F N U s

15 E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00 ATE? yNy COMMENTS 9(- Q',_%.3._lc.3c3 5 6 k"$f 4 's ExcA>ds - h I h \ > "' '

3c' Ts.eP

1. :  % it O ye ,' 4. e k ,5 *

. a r. v 4.,ih c,A: as t e i S m .' C c v.d,l, ed /j . A:.i .' %= h 2C P - ! 53 ( -

e 1

/ o s o/ ..

i.:

Evaluated by: , m.

d.sQaMy@ Date: I /h' .~

h[ d[$m  ::w O'

f., hic. % M 7 C SSEL Line No. 5337 Status Y N U A

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 Equip. ID No. INV-VITBUS-3 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipme(Description 38/UpS 3 LQa

$1dg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Room, Row / Col AE SWGR Manu actlurer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) C782 CYBEREX INC, VTI 1.24-74 J

SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input , 7 D,
2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade Qg N U
3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz QP N U N/A
4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum ABS GERS GERS
5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in YNU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)

CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class N @N U N/A
2. Solid state type (J) N U N/A
3. For floor-mounted, transformer positively anchored and mounted near base, or load path is evaluated bN U N/A
4. Base assembly of floor-mounted unit properly '

braced or stiffened for lateral forces (2) N U N/A

5. For wall-mounted units, transformer supports and bracing provide adequate load path to the rear cabinet wall Y N >
6. All latches and fasteners in doors secured . ?') N U N/A
7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) T N @ N/A
8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated ,Y: N @ N/A
9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? /Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N U WA CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)
1. Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A

- - - - == .-- -- - . _

SSEL Line No. 5337

$ 223 3.g ,j y p.

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. ID No. INV-VITBUS-3 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Charcers & Inverters Equipment Description _38/UpS 3 CAVEATS - GERS (Cont'd) .

3. Silicon-Controlled Rectifier (SCR) power controls; wall- or floor-mounted NEMA-type enclosure Y N U N/A
4. Within range of battery charger ratings:

24-250 VOC Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 25-600 amps Y N U N/A 150-2850 pounds (floor-mounted) Y N U N/A 150-600 pounds (wall-mounted) Y N U N/A

5. Within range of inverter ratings:

120 VDC only Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 0.5-15 KVA Y N U N/A 300-2000 pounds Y N U N/A

6. Heavy components are located in lower half of cabinet and are supported from base or rear panel with no panel cutouts adjacent to attachment Y N U N/A Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U N/A ANCHORAGE
1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) @N U N/A
2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP 3.

N U N/A Sizes and locations of anchors determined N U N/A

4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,

weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion -

anchor tightness Q) N U N/A

5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking hN U N/A
6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4-inch @N U N/A
7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors
8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying @N U N/A action on anchors considered @N U N/A
9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate @N U N/A
10. Embedded steel, rout pad or large concrete pad adequacy eva uated Are anchorage requirements met? Y N UhY N U INTERACTION EFFECTS
1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A
2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures d) N U N/A Ah rel7

-. . . - . . . . = ~ _ . . . - -

SSEL Line No. 5337 5 22 2 2.._ .g1 j , gw SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. INV-VITBUS-3 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters  ;

Equipment Description 38/UPS 3 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)

3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility hN U N/A
4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse $N U N/A
5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y N U N/A Is equipment free of interaction effects? YNU IS E0VIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE0VATE? YNU COMMENTS
  • Tr.' , ec d '.n +e k e Ib ' ' n '- M E L : ':bn e t- S i

= ^ d- '

u s .i , N e - 1.n$ cm u. Ik tl' : ' ec N.C r:c r. k e. w0:^b> G ~*

4e .,w w e. c ' z e. us1 nwe c w. kcAi cs ,

N t

/ ,f ll Evaluated by: ,

/ , 'j ;c 3 . Date: I / 31 /'j i

-v /-5/-9f ,

M ,

. . - - . _ . - . . . . . -~ _ _ . .,

      • o's 22"8 _ DuqueCoe Light Company SMEET OF FILE NO JOS TITLE O F E NO ea ea- - ._ m A 2')

LOCATCN C O /J O / J COMPILED SUSJECT SY- CATE-CHECKED Ot mattMENT Br DATE-oivisou eP oATE I / 3I /43 Idd-V1TGu.s'-3 Glac k .W,'4ll 5 G , I - 16 y // / / / - -

, S e ct 4 %, . -

.L. . Tg .

4  ?,je e.4 c ,

pd -l4;h.' '/ '

f[wik belt Tvo,N"O O --

s O 'a

/8 -

t I1ll NN 3

. I d'\)VZitTd Ps , , CC.T l F142.R

  • D 4

Gt-T- l C'u

,-, 046 o g o o ', ,e

, 5h*, 36" . 36" .

, 7 t -

l ,i er h 7

'u

/

kPon

, l V */6, o

f scr l"

j 11 as'

)/

~

3 /'2 O O m I Ocuptm3

/

\,

!!//// V

\ /

N /

'o - o's 3:ur Duquesne Light Company

, SHEET OF A01 title NO '

' ~b

' P 3 4-1 Y LOCAtsON C O /J O COMPILED SUSJECT ev- DATE-CHECKED DEsumTMENT SY DATE mEvaSED /-

DivtSCN - SY DATE- I [II / '.'7 l

~

I ~

- ck., ,

g]

gb u j *f' " l1 l .N;

gY,. \

. r.,O t-p

-- p. . .

t r- ( n h

-. Nt' 3 o al

o ' ~

7;'

~

-h

! kll f(3'h

{.n'4)

- 3

< Ts .~s.. s

[Re c.  !

\

1

. pl',

! i

'l l

=. .

2 v .A A. ..

'I f

o sV' { ,1 Dx l ft' j ' 't

> 17w'4 i

j7'; i :

Y e,

~

gA) i l'

,,, , ,, 33, ,,

Duque:ne Ught Company S'e.EET - 05

,0. w a O O * '0 D k,h, ,

LOCATION - C 013 0

,uPtLED

$UBJECT MECKED CATE 2 !/ 3 !

DEpamTMENT .

DATE o#vlS80N lEviSED DATE 3AT- 13K2 - 3

,g~

l' a

b ,$

t C. -

is i Sw'SO-3 -

N

37%" c

\ v GAT- y c.HG-j 33E2 z ,

I ui /

A UERTO$

']2 4 N< *]j .

Q ar c

g * [<h kE CTIFIER 2i l6 _ y_ '

s M'

  • Tw . sah .

A N

er+ ssa - n

\/iTGuS-4 1 287+ v r-O.onC,rc.kc. YcS

SEL Line No. 5338 $ 2 2 7 - )l 7 A9 Status YN U- '

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3 f

Equip.f14No. INV-VITBUS-4 Equip. N s J6 - Battery Chargers & Inverters ,

u tIDescription 38/UPS 4 catihn
Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 ,, Room, Row / Col DF SWGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) C782 CYBEREX INC, VTI 1.24-74 '

J

. SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 7I3 "
2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade W./N U i 3.

4.

Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz Capacity based on: Existing Documentation Y

DOC N UO '

Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum @

GERS GERS

5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS i 1.5 x Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp. Spec. GD E-Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS .

Does capacity exceed demand? '(Indicate at right (*) and in CDNU COMMENTS if a special exception to enveloping of seismic i demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)

CAVEATS - B0UNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience equipment class 1 l N U N/A 2.

3.

Solid state type For floor-mounted, transformer positively

@N CU U N/A  :

anchored and mounted near base, or load p.ath is  ;

evaluated @N U N/A

4. Base assembly of floor-mounted unit properly braced or stiffened for lateral forces hN U N/A
5. For wall-mounted units, transformer supports and '

bracing provide adequate load path to the rear 6..

cabinet wall Y N UJ@  ;

All latches and fasteners in doors secured @N U N/A i

7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y N N/A
8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y N 'U N/A
9. . Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? @N U N/A ,

Is the intent of all the. caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y N(J,N/A CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the cave't i'

rule and explain the reason for.this conclusion in the COMMENTS se; ion below)

1. Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class Y N U N/A
2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats Y N U N/A

_ - _~ - . .- - -- _ _ . . .

l I

SSEL Line No. 5338 5H 7.^.;17 g , g; SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 j l

i Equip. ID No. INV-VITBUS-4 Equip. Class _16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters EquipmentDeschiption 38/UPS 4 CAVEATS --GERS (Cont'd)

3. Silicon-Controlled Rectifier (SCR) power controls; wall- or floor-mounted NEMA-type enclosure Y N U N/A

. 4. Within range of battery charger ratings:

24-250 VDC Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 25-600 amps Y N U N/A 1 150-2P50 pounds (flNr-mounted) Y N U N/A 150-f;0 pounds (wtil. mounted) Y N U N/A

5. Within reage of inverter ratings: '

120 VDC only Y N U N/A 120-480 VAC Y N U N/A 0.5-15 KVA Y N U N/A 300-2000 pounds Y N U N/A

~6. Heavy components are located in lower half of cabinet and are supported from base or rear panel with no panel cutouts adjacent to attachment Y N U N/A l Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS? Y N U@

4 ANCHORAGE

1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) Y N (f) N/A 1
2. Type of anchorage covered by GIP 2.

@N U N/A Sizes and locations of anchors determined (_Y) N U N/A I

4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g.,

' weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness @N U N/A i

5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: embadment length, anchor' spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength / condition, and concrete cracking

. 6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than @N U N/A 1/4-inch ON U N/A

7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors @N U N/A
8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors considered @N U N/A
9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate
10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete

@N U N/A pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requirements met? Y N U@

Y N (DN INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures
2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment

@N U N/A free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures @N U N/A

. _ ~ . - -

SSEL Line No. 5338 c, , , , ,

7 SCREENING EVALVATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. INV-VITBUS-4 Equip. Class 16 - Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipment Description 38/UPS 4 INTERACTION EFFECTS (Cont'd)

3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility @N U N/A '
4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse @N U N/A l S. Have you. looked for and found no other adverse concerns? LY/ N U N/

Is equipment free of interaction effects? U IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE00 ATE?

YQ l COMMENTS Co,b'nd Le* h of $4

,s c)-s o b r "" S bcI3 0 s m<..g u u < _ u

& _g-._ m_ . m, c a d k u d ~ded c( Lu-r 3-ye -mic+l med meds L c6 c.et he:o. , L :scLes ;3 c. m e s o c. cALme axd  :

no Am s of s... .cG eul ~3 5 ne e. moasted ln the. m pge .-- l W 4 6. e net.

l

Cuf O M At c, g CC WG *

& a m .ti ne w e _.e J ud aml 7 ,J y I6 Bo-U . WC 1

- j l

A /

/i Evaluated by: GL) / Date: 1/12 /i5~

wi e ,W 0:1 ,Iu2.l.w I

l

t_T

'*******.. 'yw, ,

~ :_

- o- . . . . ,,,,  :....... ,.., .,_,,.,.,3

, ,, .e w

  1. ) C"A va'~4 0 ,0

~

i 5 2233 C 017 A ( wuu

- x:: ez a- : ~.. :

t a e

a/

?$&alkm*, f-0 -

f * .. _

O =

50 et s

    • g f e4 ,
  • a , go /~/ kM ,

j

' 8 e' /

?(sc-1 ..

s 8

7' 4 i 't- 'l

.e , , .l 1rv" % ei % ,

I

& #* /

l N' .'

)f~lf i

as t i / i a i 4

'~

/. i f, . '

I / ,

+

1 22 . . e I

33 t f f i 1

.>l,

': I '

,i. .

A '!  ;

n-so

-/ -nn - ": .- . ^7-n v f

  • a:

i 8

)

u f/ ,_

3 (.* to.

4 t . , <c ,., nl +,' . l, :!

[4 i i 0. 4 y ~.- l o '

Gd W --n . .

s %.- - - -_ , 5 ~r,*

ll , f , , ,

" ') /,' ~_ f (6 ..g*

',' Lb ,

3 D'

[

9 Y( s'$ ' f

/a.,.l4 2. i

  • ..p .

n r / a a eu 4;. . l';b:..:' * '

~ y}

t O4 *%

! i

~

i .

i 9

1 4

. e e e

  • O
k g a m * . ,- _ ,1- . . *

.. . . . -. .. . _ . . - . _ ~

g Shut B-1 of Job No.: 52233 Job: Duauanne Licht Comnanv. Beaver Valtav Power Station By: @ Date: 4. MAf

- Cric No.: Q11, . _

Chk: @ Date: 9ho/97

Subject:

Batterv Charaars BAT CHG-1. BAT-CHG-2. BAT-CHG-3. GAT-CHG-4 and -

Inverters INV-VITBUS-1.INV-VITBUS-2. INV-VITBUS-3. INV-VITRUS-4 Attachment B SEISMIC QUALIFICATION UTILITY GROUP NEWSLETTER VOLUME 3, ISSUE 2, SEPTEMBER 1995 (SELECTED PAGES).

( PAGES IN ATTACHMENT B) t i

t a

9 i.

C h1 l

SQUG . . = ,

1 I

Volume 3, lasue 2 ~

Seismic Qualification Utikty Group Newsletter September 1995 GIP REVISION 3 SUBMITTED TO NRC Step 4 of Section 7.4.2 of the GIP. This change brings the J by Richard Starck, MPR GIP into agreement with EPRI Report NP 5228, Revision 1,  !

Volume 4, the reference report used to establish the GIP l On July 31,1995, SOUG submitted Revision 3 of the guidelines for evaluating the seismic capacity of tanks and l Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP 3) to the Nuclear heat exchangers. l Regulatory Commission (NRC) for review and approval. The SQUG members hav. been informed of these three l The changes proposed in this revision reflect new additional restrictions during the course of evaluating these information obtained by SOUG and incorp3 rate lessons changes to the GlP through various SOUG meeting loomed by member utilities during the past tt.ee yeais while presentations, meeting reports, and newsletter articles, l usirg the GlP to resoNo USI A-46. Even though most of the SQUG members are nearty finished or have completed their Table 1 USl A-46 programs, SOUG considers it important to formally Changes in CIP-3 Pullout and Sheer vrvidste the updated crrteria and guidelines in GIP 3 since Capacity Reduction Factore (RT) by rna = :,f the SOUG utikties plan to continue using the GIP as Types of Expanolon Anchore

' an altemative for verifying the seismic adequacy of new and replacement equipment and parts for the remaining life cf their plants.

SOUG is anticipating a speedy review and approval of Manurecturer enemaRama .Leall the changes contained in GIP-3 by the NRC so that the

' Star Steel Punout 75 benefits of using the updated criteria and guidelines may be realized in the remaining seismic reviews still being Stud Puno64 0.6 0.73 conducted and for future use of the G!P for new and 8* " 0 73 replacement equipment.

The purpose of this article is to describe the changes WEJ.rT Stud Punout 0.s 0.75 included in GIP-3. These changes are grouped into three sheer oe 1.o categories: changes which impose additional restrictions on Wode. Punout ' O.75 0.5 the user, editorial changes, and typographical changes. Sheer 0 75 0 75 l Hdti Sleeve Pusout 0.6 0.5 Additional Restrict %ne ps.mch) sheer o.s 1.0 s 75 New information has become available which shows p neh) o '

that existing GlP 2 criteria and guidelines are not sufficiently ,

conservative ,ni three areas.

sheer o.e o 75 (1) The capacity of certain types of expansion anchors shown in GIP Table C.2 2 shbuld be lowered while others O s4nch Pusout 08 0.75 should be raised. The makes and models of the expansion

      • "' " 0 78 anchors which have revised capacity reduction factors (RT) are show in Table 1. These changes are based on additional teet data including a wider variety of bolt types.

The results of this work are documented in EPRI Report NP. Editorial Changes 5228, Revision 1, Volume 1.

(2) The minimum natural fraquency of substructures in Extensive use of the GIP during the past three years has control panels and benchboar 1s should be raised from shown that certain portions of it may cause confusion or 11 Hz to 13 Hz when an in<abinet emplification factor of 4.5 may be misinterpreted. Therefore SOUG decided these is used from GIP Table 6 2 or w 5en using the GENRS areas should be clarified to assure that the original intent of computer code from Screening Level ' of GIP Section 6.4.2 the GIP is clearly understood. Several of these areas were for establishing the seismic demand on relays mounted on identified by SQUG member utilities during the these substructures. This change to a triore conservative implementation workshops conducted by SOUG. SOUG cutoff frequency is a result of further evaluatior.. conducted considers it desirable to revise the GIP in these areas so that by SQUG. users and NRC reviewers will not misapply the GIP during (3) The allowable capacity of the base plate welds on the seismic reviews of equipment. None of the changes of this chalta of horizontal tanks and heat exchangers should be type in GIP 3 moddy the originalintent of GIP 2 as approved lowered by a factor of two as determined in the equation in

l l

i l

1 l

1 l

l l

.-e l

1 1

1 1

1 1

(

ENCLOSURE 5 l

l l

l l

l

l M 95 A1.003 AA/ NEAP 2.13 j 3 c;P P.V Am.,N ONLY Sheet / of 7 ms occuwNT suu not se usto To l M '1 FORM PHYSICAL WGF.K OR COtJOUCT ACTIVmES WH4CH DIRECTLY AFFECT DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY PLAffT QuAUTY.

I_ECHNICAL EVALUATION RE31T

SUMMARY

SHEET (SHEET 1 OF 4)

TER No. MZ9M Rev.No. O BVP5 Urit No. L System No.(s) 8 EM No.(s): MWR No.: 650087 EVALUATION TYPE (s):

Vendor Technical Information (VTI) Setpoint Change Design Document Discrepancy / Design Equivalent Change Removal / Retirement in Place Vendor Approved / Recommended Part Change Cornmunications System Change Other Purpose of Evaluation:

&~tA4L /JAMOA) n= J/)8d'*7/7t/7G AAkde24t:G mJ-denrG GMPA/lstDA) 7VFlGb A~CL $7'-CNC-2 . KW/57~///C A/M N &=~ d) /3Al F20A17" 5Ad2 (A/ err /./) DAZ) A/W Mff M A-$

t 90/)C /Ak'PEC7*/OA]- l l

Conclusion of Evaluation-

$/.JAs'7/77)75 AA/dMcEAcad 44 JJaadM/Em h//rA//s]

AC' AdBG*WABl.G FDR A/CA'A/AL AA)D tie?/SP//c. 4AD9. j j

Prepared By: -

1 l /- /2- 96~

Date qgineer Reviewed By: s

[ Date SGpervisoNgineering Assurance OSC Review:

(When Re ired) Data (d _

l

,[v Date h

Section Supervisor Approved By:

Onit Operations Manager Date (Setpoint Change and Removal / Retirement in Place Only)

- - - - . -. - -~ .. .. . . _ . - . - _

A1.003AA/ NEAP 2.13 ,

i TER No.

Revision C 929f

' No. 2, Sheet of 7 DUQUE5NE LIGHT COMPANY TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT

SUMMARY

SHEET (SHEET 2 OF 4) ,

! 1. Does this TER affect any component listed on the MEL7 / Yes No Have the Supervisor, Configuration Management sign to indicate that he has received MEL markup / update sheets (NEAP / /

6.8) or concurs that t e MEL is unaffected.

lupfrvisor', Conhguration Management

2. Is a UFSAR change required? Yes / No if"Yes", assure the TER is presented to the OSC per NPDAP S.10 and initiate a UFSAR Review per NEAP 2.12.
3. Are Spare Part requirements or information (including part numbers, documentation, storage, receipt /

inspection, etc.) for a component changed? Yes V No notify the Nuclear Procurement Department ifof"Yes",hange the c via an EM.(EM No. )

If "Yes", can any stock bought to the existing stock No description be used until depletion? Yes 1

1 Are any of the Questions on the OSC presentation j l

4. Yes v No y form marked "YE5"?

l if "Yes", perform a 10CFR50.59 evaluation and 4 make it an Attachment to this TER. 1

5. Is there any impact to the Design Basis Document? Yes / No if "Yes", initiate a DBD update using a DBD -

Revision Request (See E5 A 004). l 6, Does this TER affect any component listed as Yes / No Environmentally Qualified on the MEL? V If "Yes", have the Supervisor, EQ review this TER.

Supervisor, Environmental Qualification Does this TER affect any microprocessor based or Yes / No 7.

digital equipment? / )

If "Yes", have the Supervisor, Digital Systems Engineering review this TER.

Supervisor, Digital Systems Engineering

A1.003AA/ NEAP 2.13 TER No. 989[

Revision O No. $

Sheet of 7 DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY

-TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT

SUMMARY

SHEET (SHEET 3 OF 4) ,

8. Does the result of this TER approve any of the following:

a) a modification to a concrete block wall (e.g. core drilling, load additions)?

Yes No b) the addition or removal of Zinc or Aluminum inside Centainment?

Yes No c) a change involving equipment that is seismically quallfled or mounted 7 j

/ Yes No If of the above are "Yes", have the Su rvisor ' d Cik& Structural Engineering review th TER.

I l-l %E *

~ Supervisor, Civi Tw St7urtural Engineering

9. Does the result of this TER affect any of the following:

a) Equipment listed as Station Blackout Equipment on the MEL7 I Yes No b) A substitute mechanical component or component modification which changes the BHP required of the associated motor?

Yes No c) Any substitute electrical component?

Yes / No If any of the above are "Yes", have the Supervisor, Power Systems review this TER.

Supervisor, Power Systems Enginbering

10. Does this TER affect a Component /Part which contains Cobalt (Stellite)(see E5 M 018)7 Yes No if"Yes" have the Supervisor, Materials, Codes,,and Standards review this TER.

Supervisor, Materials, C6 des and Standards

11. Does the result of this TER affect any fire protection equipment reguardless of QA Category?

Yes No have the Unit Fire Protection Engineer If "Yes",t his TER.

review Unit Fire Protection Engineer

A1.003AA/ NEAP 2.13 I TER Revision No. (D29[ i 2]/

No.

Sheet of 7 DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY

-TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT

SUMMARY

SHEET (SHEET 4 OF 41 ,

12. Does this TER affect a QA Category I motor operated valve component (i.e. valvex, valvop mecfun or motorx) through a change in available voltage, Yes V-/ No internal pressures or flows, or physical loadirig 7 If "Yes", have the Supervisor, Component Engineering review this TER.
  • Supervisor, Component Engineering List Documents requiring revision or new documents to be added. Prepare an NED Drafting / Graphics

" Work Request Form per NEAP 2.21 and/or process a VTl change per NEAP 211, and/or prepare a Vond. Deficiency Report per OM 1/2.48.2 and/or process a cafculation change per NEAP 2.5.

OLCo Document ID. oresent Rev. level and RTL# if VTl(Tech Man A3.0018. Vend Drw A3.001C) 27/y2- 6/. 624-00044 References used in orecarina this TER i

2700* O/. 02Y-06$k 8740-D9&d54$~ .

Reason forTER revision Revision Instructions i

l 1

, . l TER 9294 CATTERY CHARUER ANCHORACE SUDSTITUTION l Pg 5 of j[,

I Three (3) of the four (4) existing concrete anchors on the north face of the No. 2 battery charger failed the USI A-46 SQUG tightness check. A substitute, external anchorage member and concrete expansion anchor set is needed, since the existing anchors are inaccessible for re-setting.

The ex' ting anchors will be abandoned in-place. The substitute arrangbasat is entirely, functionally equivalent as a design feature of the charger enclosure. Calculation 8700-DSC-6545 provides the analysis of adequacy for the substitute connection approved by this TER. >

l h

4 ,,

b l

J l

l l

l I

i 1

l

OSC CHANGE PRESENTATION FORM C/ 7 (EXAMPLE) 76 4'- 92 # l' DATE: /- /8- 96~ Attachment /

Subject or Procec'ure No.: /TE-9f9 , CIRCLE uni @2,1/2 TITLE: NM7~- N ~S M/N O 8 Reason and/or Description of Change (include references, if applicable):

2 OJ;;~ Y/Ek'/S7~/A hl 01JOEG72;r E%2"MAJS7& kAA:".AC2(' I od 271l

&n mm zer-am-e min =v wrM& romae rer.

JA'w H27'dG" AA/C/.lCA34UlG* /6' LIE /EVG't27 Of W/$ 'TE~2-Precarer/ Reviewer Determination of 10 CFR 50.59 Acolicability Circle One

1. Site Facilities are changed such as:
a. Desion. Function or method of performing the DESIGN - YES function of a structure, system or component (SSC) FUNCTION - YES described by text, or drawing in UFSAR or other METHOD - YES information relied upon by the NRC for BVPS License.

YES

b. Radwaste System is involved.

YES

c. Plant or equipment environmental cualifications are affected.

YES

d. Performance of an SSC is affected due to a subcomponent of an SSC or non-safety related component.
2. A procedure described in the UFSAR is changed, such as:
a. Plant in a condition where it functions differently than YES @

described in UFSAR. (Includes Admin. Controls of UFSAR).

b. Removes from service equipment outside of justified UFSAR YES h  ;

outage times (both Tech. Spec. and non-Tech. Spec, items). l

3. Test or experiment not in the UFSAR is involved, such as:
a. Operable UFSAR SSC or subcomponents will have reduced adequacy YES h l to perform its functions as described in UFSAR for prevention l or mitigation of accident conditions.
4. A facility change, procedure, test.or experiment requires a YES h change to the Technical Specifications and Licensing notified. '

-IF ANY ANSWER TO ITEMS IN 1,2, OR 3 IS ANSWERED "YES", A 10 CFR 50.59 EVALUATION IS REQUIRED. REFER TO NPDAP 8.18 .

)

The above change (s) are answered "NO* because it meets or exceeds the original intent or design

)

equirement. Consequences, malfunctions, and probabilities of 10 CFR 50.59 are not changed:

BASES: L$b'M 77)7'G' AA/d/,fCA%A" PMEM'S' 77/G* dMME" /2htmeA)

N dW/<;;1/AJAl dDMP6A/sA* f7$', 7%lGMMA"6; G&2PPfEA17~/5

~

/ )

//A/Al2E* 2@ /~/JA}87/DAA4U.VM/ t]$2977?2A'~DA).

List applicable documents / sections used to answer checklist.

TECH. SPEC. SECTION(S):8 8 f.S UFSAR SECTION(S): M.KS. N/P/E z 2-#

OTHER DESIGN BASI CUMENTO ~ ULATORY COMMITMENT MM d M886dEAll-reegN aar.4rmd wwwxe PREPARED BY: -

REVIEWED BY,: --M #2A

__ - f

  • P, 2,4d, C,

( ) APPROVED, NO UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION ( ) DISAPPROVED BV-OSC-(NPDAP 8.10 Revision 2) covicie

i

. .w . .. .. . . . i i n h Duquesn3 Light Crmp ny An: lysis Sheet p 7 g, 7 COMPILED BY DATF/-/2-N6~ CHECKED BYCV A DATEhM ANALYSIS NO. 8 76 d - N d-- d 6 I -

l rae 92%

  • Cor sexced i49 q

^/esta pex AccGee-

  • l & meg wrA combasi

~

,y ,, , , ( , ,o y ) , g , ,._ g g ,__ g

,desce M4ren/at.;odex-

% s' }Q

= size frereW 70 K Q

,, MACE Trdeewlex1.s

,, e e s s e. }x k l 4

>, j'x I Rs M$

l .,  ;

66sc Exisr/am kh 1.

EOt-T Note (7YM) !

bk .

l ir . I j 1s 1.

li y l'

sollef"goi7gL usara ~ Ql,  ;- - -

-lgl, "exax44;

': B'/ F/RD

. s cite wram ,, l j,f  ;

l\ l

\ erisat Ex/enda da' mJs

  • As geo'o. A i F ,

"l bj ~h ', h/0TE E  !$'rNeo-Ba7s ($ "ca g"$)

='

s*

$ 4s' *Rttr/

\

214 c od <)'dsas l7K'R GA. END 30 31 at l

" A)orce : .

i:1"xx grsexeo -ro /.saarn er .4 ra suois fox M<ri R d e e H e n r / f p s e e m s x y'.

37 jf

2 N/Lrt MH se Moveo /d'fxoM 7x47 c/ois! 70 M,cf f?.wK Ess4,e. Maiardt4 /41 "g of Nosc 7b ,4date E, cts. rusrAa.

    • P e K ~P/ f g 3 0/.3 ,

$. 2x2Xy L 70 86 &?428o4 og &"rgidiess,195LD 7b /Ebrs/d

    • Mare"is4 22ecwHamr/oA.*PsiNT C4KBod Pge J?/9'. 3
  • Poi 7.9 K0 RG A$774 A307 c4 A/93 GA8, Ali7A A/VW

- iam . rocee re a '-%ia.,ruraesex woaa wxaen i l **' NEAD/Nur> Lock lJ,45#en IMDER c,opostic 220 ///'N EM-7~

d'eacr4 A/4's ons(/) 7N, esso CMsWidg Afree Texaus; recsgo /.edcrt!.

4 6 P//476R/445 7~6 Bf GA GAT ~.2. -

s0 6. SLA~/* IL/AS/JCKC Ms4Y M Uf@ '78 3///M CN GddLdCUAY

1 1-ss FOn !NFORMATION ON!!( A1.003AA/ NEAP 2.13 TH;S DOCUMENT $H 4tL Nor sE OcED TO  ;/

PERFORM PHYSICAt.Waf'K OR CONDUCT TER No. '/o2 7 ACTMTIES WHICH DMEGTLY AttEcT Revision No.

PLANT QUAUTY.

Addendum No.I Sheet j of [ .

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT ADDENDUM SHEET System No.

19 EM No.

MWR No.

6ms3 Unit No.

.i Purpose of Addendum (description of change):

A o:o 75 m xie s 7 o- t oc4,rox1

//

4=' A/6h? /N77AM/JHEAW ED475 As JP/on/A) 6Alk/. 2.

Reason for Addendum:

52/$7/*A}dllE $AA/dE~ llN6 lAdA77DA$$' hl/l.4.

Alo7~ AN-DL<1/AldYM(A77eAl t3C Af)E$ GAl AlEh] h 77k%l~

l A/GA}7-Ears' - /x17nrx>:ms W ></>73\t</ Jp>w- FA/Aff MMBg.

\

l j

List n,ew/ additional documents affected: (* or no longer affected)

DLCo Document ID O MAa_W l

l

  • Denotes document to be deleted form previous evaluation.

Prepared By: =__ . /-2/- N Enginees/ / Date

//d'4 F I*/ sb/ 6eviewed By:

Supervisor, En ineenng Assurance / Date OSC Review: !8 (WheIl Required) / Date l

Approved By* N~ SectionTupervisor / Date V'

.is t i.es Duquesn3 Light Ctmpany Analysis Sh:ct p 7

,. n.no av omn/-a-95cwecxso evct/M oirs &n ANALYSIS NO 8M--Nd" d6 I

([-et '/CAvo L) rse 9299 Ray:0 APD..L1

-

  • Ct.r;sexe.e4 As
  • ^/earav sex Acces; , .

- ""*'"^'"#'"""" AJces see 6 coar) FAr-aga-2

, Ge.cca P/4reeix-L; en.'*2- = $

. size gaans ra f K

,, FACE "/ddeender1L.[

yl l %Q f~

n seeaz '-

yg n  ! j Q"

" we sxisrm kh n rvM , Ao d-p &E

" des //,7s n

w ;a  : ;n, -

a Avv.g s  ;

~

yo. 1 Giuh ,l~ -

i, t- i o C&d v

  • a z'Lj'kozr6 uitara b .
a,

~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~

g

~j '

"Ex3x4A

\

2~/ FiaD 4 rech K }\

FEP44ce fysgyida d'ceep.jg

", cuousum$,,):Q[f',6/s2)

(xxe 2 -

. or 9/rijzo.ga n (; ';,a y 4) n u

,, G' Va *Nari 04 <f asce z.ia s

" ,ryn es. ear 30 ,

31 32

" /Ao7~es *

  • 33

/. "MAY 25 ADD &D 7o LedG71) er g rb ,4Li.oh) FC~K //il77 EI K4cei-ten 7- /F /JEdGs5%g/.

//

  • ibrl b $$ YhYe0 fe0 $ $ {/fC k Y,

" resa. ssiarsi,o m"d of nae ro saat.e .coss. roersa.

Peg P/ff 3C/.3.

  • 1 $ . BX2X.y L. 7'c BG QAgso4 og fygigtrgg,,c,gzg 7o Egygig
    • Mare"Mi. DecoHe,orarroa.7Aiur c4xacd P4e!/S./ 3

? N"x'j.";d20t7.5 7*o 25 A977-f A307 cx i4/93 &x8, Alnd AM/

- .aem . renoue re a '-*uio.,rurue,w esnaa wx,aev

//EAD///ur,40cx hMs#ex advee oppostra 22c, 4/a. &7~

/24C7// //49 cas(/) 7Nxr4.0 9/od/Al9 AfrER 7e200E; Kent 2p l.sdCrs.

2 5 C/ A G.4 X "W 6 //ArERMz5 l 76c,. Aeat Me"Foirs swy seAkv .L"r.2ok1aosjggf>

- - - , - - -- ..,a.a , u a m._., m - _a a s a - --

a w - - -

a 1

1 i

k J

4 4

1 ENCLOSURE 6 1

1 4

I i

e J