ML20140G714
| ML20140G714 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 03/27/1986 |
| From: | Tam P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Carey J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-60581, NUDOCS 8604030209 | |
| Download: ML20140G714 (5) | |
Text
_-
=
MAR 27 g Docket No. 50-334 DISTRIRllTION m M"
J. Partlow IMC PDR P. Tam Local PDR D. Miller Mr. J. J. Carey, Vice President PAD #2 Rdg ACRS (10)
Duouesne Light Company T. Novak Tech Branch (PAF0)
Nuclear Group OELD Gray File Post Office Box 4 E. Jordan S. Israel Shippingport, PA 15077 B. Grimes Cear Mr. Carey:
l
Subject:
Request for Additional Information (TAC No. 60581)
Ry letter dated January 15, 1986, you submitted Change Request No. 106. Our review of that request resulted in a number of questions (see Enclosure).
Please provide your response to these within 45 days of receipt of this letter.
If you need clarification or additional time to prepare your response, feel free to contact me.
l This request for information affects fewer than 10 respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, 4/
Peter S. Tan, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #2 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Peactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See next page PM: PAD 9 0: PAD #.
Pian:h MLRubensein 3/l.98 3/23186 ff*SWs N
P
,---.-----.------__---__--,,----------_-_----,----------.------._,w_
Mr. J. J. Carey Reaver Valley 1 Power Station Duquesne Light Company cc:
Mr. W. S. Lacey Mr. Thomas J. Czerpah Station Superintendent Mayor of the Burrough of Duouesne Light Company Shippingport Beaver Valley Power Station Post Office Box 26 Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15007 Pennsylvania Power Company Mr. K. Grada, Superintendent James R. Edgerly of Licensing and Compliance Post Office Box 891 Duquesne Light Company New Castle, Pennsylvania 16103 Post Office Box 4 i
Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 1
Division of Planning Mr. John A. Levin Environmental Assessment Section Public Utility Commission Post Office Box 1049 Post Office Box 3265 Columbus, Ohio 43216 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Office of the Governor Gerald Charnoff, Esquire State of West Virginia Jay E. Silberg, Esquire Charleston, West Virginia 25305 Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N.W.
Charles A. Thomas, Esquire Washington, DC 20036 Thomas and Thomas 212 Locust Street
)
,Karin Carter, Esquire Box 999 Special Assistant Attorney General Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108 Bureau of Administrative Enforcement Sth Floor, Executive House Irwin A. Popwsky, Equire Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Office of Consumer Advocate 14?S Strawberry Square Marvin Fein Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 171?0 Utility Counsel City of Pittsburgh Governor's Office of State Planning 313 City-County Building and Development Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15219 ATTN: Coordinator, Pennsylvania State Clearinghouse Resident Inspector Post Office Box 1323 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17170 Post Office Box 298 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Mr. Jess T. Shumate, Consnissioner State of West Virgini,a Department Department of Environmental Resources of Labor l
ATTN: Director, Office of 1900 Washington Street, East Radiological Health Charleston, West Virginia 25305 i
Post Office Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105
_ ~..
4 4
l i
j Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 1 Power Station I
cc:
David K. Heydinger, M.D.
i State Director of Health State Department of Health 1800 Washington Street, East 4
j Charleston, West Virginia 25305 Regional Administrator, Region I
]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue 3
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection i
i Pennys1vania Department of Environmenthl Resources i
P.O. Box 2063 l
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 i
i 4
)
i l
i I
Request for Additional Information Beaver Valley Unit 1, OL Change Request 106 1.
The corporate organization shown in proposed Fig. 6.2-1 is different from the previous offsite organization.
Provide a description of the responsibilities and authority of each of the entities shown in proposed Fig. 6.2-1 and identify where functions in the existing offsite organiza-tion (Fig. 6.2-1) are performed in the new corporate organization.
2.
The facility organization shown in proposed Fig. 6.2-2 is different from the previous organization.
a)
Describe the responsibilities and authority of each of the entities shown in proposed Fig. 6.2-2.
b)
Identify where all the functions shown in the existing facility organization (Fig. 6.2-2) are performed in the new organization.
3.
The job categories proposed for the onsite safety committee are different from the existing committee.
a)
Describe the responsibilities and qualification requirements for each of the job categories, b)
Identify where the different job categories exist on the organization chart (Fig. 6.2-2).
4.
The proposed limitation on the review of procedure modifications by the OSC in Section 6.5.1.6 should not relieve the plant manager of the responsibility of approving all procedure modifications (Section 6.8.2) whether or not reviewed by the OSC. Modify the proposed text to show that the plant manager or his assigned alternate retains th'e responsibility for approving all procedure modifications.
.. - > 5.
Membership proposed for the offsite review committee is different from that of the existing ORC.
a)
Describe the responsibilities and authority of each of the members, b)
Identify where each of the utility members exist on the organization charts in Figs. 6.2-1 and 6.2-2.
i
.