ML20140F810
| ML20140F810 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 04/28/1997 |
| From: | Neri A SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20140F736 | List: |
| References | |
| PI-MP3-09, PI-MP3-9, NUDOCS 9705050355 | |
| Download: ML20140F810 (5) | |
Text
_
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-MP3-09
/'T INSTRUCTION REV.1 V
i
?
Client: Northeast Utilities
{
Station: Millstone Unit 3
Title:
PREPARATION AND APPROVAL OF CHECKLISTS 1
3 Safety-Related Non Safety-Related i
i 1
Reviewed By:
Approved By:
1 4
System Lead Programmatic C&M Lead Accident QA Engineer Internal Review Venfica'Jon Team Lead Mitigation Committee Manager Lead Chairman
/
Date: Y'Ai'$)
NL W
/ d!& $ h4 WSUk AW N'LN
^
DescWlon f[
(//
8 1 l
Rev.1 Added requirement to obtain NRC approval of any ew or nvised checklic 1
1 i
i
- O Page 1 of 5 l 9705050355 970428 PDR ADOCK 05000423 p
+
I E
i PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-MP3-09 INSTRUCTION REV.1 l
f f
1.0 PURPOSE 4
This project instruction (PI) establishes the Sargent & Lundy procedure for preparing checklists to be used in the Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) reviews. These checklists shall be used by the lCAVP reviewers to document and verify key attributes and areas covered in the lCAVP. These checidists will provide the team with the basis for determining if discrepancies exist in the design, configuration, and operation, maintenance
{
and testing of the Millstone Unit 3 plant (MP3).
All areas of the ICAVP shall utilize checklists to control the review activities.
These areas include:
i System Reviews Operation, Maintenance and Testing Reviews i
PhysicalConfiguration Reviews Programmatic Reviews l
Accident Mitigation Systems Review i
As many checklists as is required to adequately cover the particular review area shall be utilized.
)
i
2.0 REFERENCES
1 2.1 MP3 Final Safety Analysis Report j
2.2 MP3 Safety Evaluation Report l
2.3 MP3 Technical Specifications 2.4 MP3 Design Criteria 2.5 10CFR50 Appendix A General Design Criteria 2.6 NRC Inspection Manual, Chapter 2535, Appendix A 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 System Review-In depth review of the design of the systems in the scope of the ICAVP O
I c ge 2 of 5 l a
i
~
PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-MP3-09 INSTRUCTION REV.1 i
l 1
4 1
3.2 Operation, Maintenance and Testing Review-Review of the operating, maintenance and testing procedures, and training manuals for j
the systems within the scope of the ICAVP l
3.3 Physical Configuration Review - Walkdowns to verify that the current
{
as-built conditions are in conformance with the design and licensing i
basis for the systems within the scope of the ICAVP l
i 3.4 Programmatic Review - Review of programs and processes addressing j
" generic" (non-system specific) issues 3.5 Accident Mitigation System Review-Review of the entical design characteristics for the accident mitigating systems to ensure that they can perform their required safaly functions.
i 4.0 RESPONSIBluTIES 4.1 A Verification Team (VT) Member shall be responsible for preparation of a checklist and for performing a review associated with a checklist.
O 4.2 The VT Lead or his designee shall be responsible for approving the I
(/
checklists in his area and for providing concurrence for the reviews conducted within his area.
4.3 The VT Manager shall be responsible for resolving comments which cannot be resolved between a team member (reviewer) and the Team Lead. The Verification Team Manager may also approve checklists.
5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 General The checklists are intended to assure that key issues associated with a particular area or element are adequately and consistently evaluated during the review process. Some checklists may be system specife, but many of the checklists will apply to elements that are common to many or all systems.
5.2 Checklist Preparation 5.2.1 Checklists shall be prepared prior to performing the affected review activities.
O I
Page 3 of 5 l
r
'*h PROJECT h
INSTRUCT!ON PI-MP3-09 INSTRUCTION REV.1 i
5.2.2 The checklist shall be prepared by an individual knowledgeable in the area or element under review. The preparer may be the individual who
]
will perform the review.
5.2.3 The first page of the checklist shall use a form similar to that shown in
,.2. The checklist shall contain questions related to key issues applicable to the area or element under review. Applicable checklists developed for previous project reviews may be utilized as a j
source for checklist preparation. Input for checklist preparation may be obtained from the following:
J MP3 Final Safety Analysis Report 4
MP3 Safety Evaluation Report MP3 Techr,! cal Speccations MP3 Design Cnteria i
l 10CFR50 Appendix A General Design Criteria USNRC Regulatory Guides applicable to MP3 1
Industry Codes and Standards applicable to MP3 1
In addition to the above MP3 source documents, S&L design experience and prachces, as well as industry experience,'shall provide a basis for i
t checklist preparaton. Chapter 2535, " Design Verification Programs",
Appendix A, of the NRC Inspection Manual also provides guidance for checklist preparation, (Ref. 2.6).
Checklists shall address system design adequacy, component design I
adequacy, design process adequacy, and plant procodure adequacy.
Specific accept / reject criteria shall be provided for configuration reviews.
5.2.4 Checklists shall be numbered by each ICAVP group according to the following scheme:
CK MP3-hK 295 ProjectInstruction _
SequentialNumber Applicable to the l
Checklist 5.2.5 The Team Member designated as preparer of the checklist shall sign and date the checklist. The checklist shall be approved by the respective VT Lead or by the VT Manager.
5.2.6 The VT Lead shall file checklists in the project file in accordance with PI-MP3-12.
O i
Page 4 of 5 l
i a
e I
~ " y""'
i PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-MP3-09 q
INSTRUCTION REV.1 l-3 5.3 Checklist Completion i
l The ICAVP Verifier assigned to perform the evaluation of a particular area / element shall complete the appropriate checklist according to the i-requirements of the applicable project instruction and sign and date the checklist. It is recommended that the checklist be used to document the j
j basis for accepting questionable items which might otherwise be i
considered discrepant by another reviewer. As a minimum, the 4
appropriate VT Lead or his designee will indicate his concurrence with the review work performed by the ICAVP Venfier by also signing and dating the checklist. This concurrence will confimi that the checklist is complete and that there is adequate explanation describing the results.
Concurrence shall not be given unless there is documentation of those records and/or documents used in filling out the checklist.
Any unresolved comments between the ICAVP reviewer and the VT Lead will be resolved by the VT Manager. Any differing professional l
opinions shall be handled in accordance with PI-MP3-10.
J i
i Discrepancies identified as a result of the checklist review shall be processed in accordance with PI-MP3-11.
1 6.0 REVISIONS Any revisions to a checklist shall be prepared and approved in the same manner as the original issue. The revision level of the checklist shall be indicated on the checklist. Any new or revised checklist shall be.qaroved by the NRC prior to use. If a checklist revision is made subsequent to the completion of any i
reviews, the affected review shall also be updated, as applicable, to account for the revisions to the checklist.
l 7.0 ATTACHMENTS i
7.1 ICAVP Process Flowchart, " Checklist Preparation, Approval and Use"
- (1 page) 7.2 Sample Checklist Form (1 page) i
,!O 1
j l
Page 5 of 5 l
PI-MP3-09
,.1 l
~((
Gather MP3 Data &
i Questions Related t
/
\\
to Checklist 4
(v/
i p
,u Team Member assEssahuann m;rald i
ir i
G Prepare Checklist h i
U I
s l
Team Member j IFsn4Msni#!s@$Ani i
I 1r E
i Approve Checklist 5
I l
2 Review Team Lead
!3 i
i y #
,:#.- 4 seme 1r h)
Perform Review per e
V l!
applicable Checklist Requirements
(
Verifier
'9 l
pasawaissisagen 1r i
j Review Concurrence Review Team Lead
)
asu wwwace 1F File Checklist per PI-j MP3-12
~
! OV ICAVP PROCESS FLOWCHART i
Checklist Preparation, Approval and Use l
l
t PI-MP3-09 M=? = t 7.2 Samole Checklist Cover Pare Nonheast Utilities Millstone-Unit 3 i
l Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP)
System Review Checklist CK-MP3-02 -4.3, Rev. 0 Electrical Schematie Review Checklist (3
V Prepared by:
Name Signature Date Approved by:
Name Signature Date IMPLEMENTATION System Document No./Rev.
Verified by-Date:
Concurrence by:
Date-l
. _. _