ML20140A766

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Addendum 1 to Final Deficiency Rept,Item 104 Re Defective Welds on 480-volt Switchgear.Insp of Critical Welds Revealed No Significant Deficiencies in Weld Quality.Equipment Shown to Be Seismically Adequate
ML20140A766
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/1986
From: Watson R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
CON-NRC-418 104, HO-860236-(), HO-860236-(O), NUDOCS 8603210219
Download: ML20140A766 (2)


Text

j r-t v-Cp&L Carohna Power & Light Company SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT P. O. Box 165 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 FEB 2 81996 t,

File Number:

SHF/10-13510E NRC-418 -

Letter Number: HO-860236 (0)

Gj Dr. J. Nelson Crace United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission q)

Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)

Atlanta, Georgia 30323 cn to CAROLINA POWER & LICHT COMPANY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 1986 - 900,000 KW - UNIT 1 DEFECTIVE WELDS ON 480V SWITCHCEAR, P.O. NY-435171 ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO FINAL REPORT - ITEM 104

Dear Dr. Grace:

Attached is Addendum No. I to the Final 10CFR50.55(e) Report issued to the NRC on March 28, 1985 for the above subject item.

This addendum addresses the concern identified in Inspection Report RII: CAH 50-400/85-22.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.

Yours very truly, 64__

AT.

atson 1

Vice President Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant MW:cwj Attachment cc:

Mr. C. Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP)

Mr. J. M. Taylor (NRC) 9603210219 860229 PDR ADOCK 05000400 S

PDR NBI-OSI If 3:527 g

c

'M.

SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

-UNIT NO. 1 DEFECTIVE WELDS ON 480V SWITCHCEAR ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO FINAL REPORT - ITEM 104 ISSUED MARCH 28, 1985 FEBRUARY 24, 1986 During an audit by the NRC of our 10CFR50.55(e) files, a question was raised in regard to the above subject. The NRC inspector questioned the justification for accepting several welds which-were not reinspected due to being covered with a coating of-shellac. In response to_the inspector's concern CP&L reviewed the method of evaluation of the shellac covered welds. Based on the

. concern, CP&L removed the coatings on the critical welds on one of-the six safety related switchgears. Results of this inspection revealed no significant deficiencies in weld quality. Subsequent-qualification' testing and analysis was performed utilizing the-weld configuration and quality of the as-built condition. The equipment.was shown to bc seismically adequate based.on the final qualification report.

NBI-OSI.

j