ML20137X516
| ML20137X516 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 03/27/1980 |
| From: | Jacobi L HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137X502 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-519 PEP-11-01, PEP-11-1, NUDOCS 8603100119 | |
| Download: ML20137X516 (16) | |
Text
.
u r. _..
1
'd SS:11 GB 41<90 97-Se ? ?se u0e{
E To'.'M en.
nountou unamavowas covenev SOUTH TEX A4 PROMCT PEP-11 0
. mgj,,Jacobi l
PROCEDURE R4ANU AL
-eaoc wo aav _wo_
humovre av 7M' 7f
~A PROMCT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE
'* 3
g susacr--- - - REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 07/26/79 DEFl_CIENCIES TO NRC wa enauto
, oyo,y HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PROJECT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE PEP-il REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES TO NRC 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to describe the South Texas Project program for complying with the requirements of both 10 CFR 21 and 10 CFR 50.55(e).
2.0 SCOPE This procedure esteblishes the requirements for review-a h. 4' ing, evaluating and reporting defects, non. compliances i
and deficiencies which could potentially affect the s '. 3 safety functions of the South Texas Project as defined by 10 CFR 21 or 10 CFR 50.5S(e).
,(
I 3.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 10 CFR 21 10 CFR 50.55(e) 4.0 RESPONSIBILITY 4.1 Project Quality Assurance Superviscr l
The Project QA Supervisor is responsible fCr per-feming a preliminary analysis of a reported in-cident to determine if further snelysis of the in-cident is required by the Incident Review Comittee, l
i I
l Ior Infomation On's a
l h
o...c_,,,,,
2
'd 45:11 G6/41/90 SdC'-3dN 53Sd3 N0es W R;.t.& m Housven uo.mMG &'QWER COW ANV_
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT pgp.11 PrWCEDURE MANU At-enae wo
.arv No o
tit [L 2
a, 17 PROJECT tholNEERING PROCEDURE
,,3r REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 07/26/79 onn essuno DEFICIENCIES TO NRC The Project QA Supervisor is responsible for notifying the Manager, South Texas Project and the Nuclear Regulatory Comission of in-cidents determined to be reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 21 or 10 CFR 50.55(e).
The Project QA Supervisor or his designee is responsible for preparing the minutes of all Incident Review Comittee meetings.
4.2 Manager, South Texas Project The Manager, South Texas Project is responsible for notifying the Vice President - Construction and Technical Services, of all incidents deter-mined by the Incident Review Comittee to be reportable under 10 CFR 50.55(e) or 10 CFR 21.
4.3 Team Leader, Nuclear Safety and Licensing The Team leader, NS&L is responsible for chair-ing all incident Review Comittee meetings.
l The Team Leader, NS&t, is responsible for pre-paring and submitting all written correspondence to the Nuclear Regulatory Comission as requimd by 10 CFR 21 or 10 CFR 50.55(e).
The Team Leader, NS&L is responsible for main-taining a file of all incidents considered by the Incident Review Comittee.
l 4.4 Incident Review Comittee l
1 The Incident Review Comittee is responsible for i
determining reportability of deficiencies per 10 CFR 50.55(e) or defects and noncofnpliances Nouston Lighting & Pwer has per 10 CFR 21.
l the citimate responsiblity for deteming(e) port-re l
ability of deficiencies per 10 CFR 50.55 l
[g {p;f3{3idh,ddN M
l k
i....
C
'd 45:11 59,4tf90 Ed'.' *du S35d? Woes s
i
~ $ g* g g woosTQh UGHT*NG & Powan eOW ANY SOUTH TEXAt rROJECT pgp.3) nev.wo 0 _
enoc no.
PROCEDURE MANU AL TATLE cana 3
or 17 PROJECT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE
$U'd" REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTAUCTION lDATR 111Ut 0 _ 07/26 ' 79 DEFICIENCIES TO NRC In order to improve the processing of incident reviews, convening of a joint session of the B&R and the HL&P Incident Review Congnittees is recorrrnended.
5.0 REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Initial Incident Notification Defects, noncogliances or deficiencies which could potentially affect the safety functions of the' nuclear power plant can be identified by numerous individuals and from various pro-cedures or interfaces. Regardless of the in.
dividual, organization or means of identifying such incidents, it is igerative that either the site Quality' Assurance Manager or the Project QA Supervisor be notified imediately so he can review the NCR (Jr ADR, if appropriate) and ini-tinte the evaluation process of the possibly reportable defect, noncomformance or deficiency.
5.2 Safety Evaluation Each incident trientified as being reportable to the NRC per 10 CFR 21 or 10 CFR 50.55(e) will receive both a technical evaluation and a safety i
evaluation to determine whether the incident cculd, if uncorrected, create a substantial safe-ty hazard. Technical evaluations are perfomed by the cognizant engineering organization and safety evaluations are performed by the Incident Review Consnittee.
l F'or the purpose of initial reportability determina.
tion, the safety evaluation may be waived when an extensive safety evaluation is considered necessary and the dispositon of the incident will result in the retention of the original design configuration and safety criteria.
In such cases, the incident shall be considered reportable. The final report A
shall then consist of a technical evaluation.
safety evaluation shall be performed in all cases where the original design configuration or safety b
criteria will not be retained,
M&h d.
L r
"d 05:11 68/4:<E0 SdO tet: 13 s o, uc,.
j
. $ l5' M m MouaTON UQHTING & POWEPLco4#A**v PEP-ll emoe No-nav No _0 SOUTH TEX AS PROJECT PROCEDURE MANU AL TtTLE
,,cr g
e, 17 PA0 JECT INGINEERit1G Proct 0URE REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
_07/26/79 __
8*C' narnianuno dei!CIENCIES T0 hRC For liformatis liilly 5.3 Deficienc.y Determination The following factors shall be considered in evaluating an incident to determine if it is a deficiency reportable to the NRC under the pro-visions of 10 CFR 50.55(e).
1.
The deficiency shall be evaluated as af-fecting or have the potential to affect the safety of the operation of the plant at any time throughout its expected life.
This includes deficiencies which could affect the safety-related function of any structure, system or cowponent for which credit is taken in the FSAR in evaluating their capability to accomodate the effects of and to be concatible with environmental conditions associated with normal operation, maintenance, testing and postulated accidents. Careful considera-be given to the effects of the
-tion shall deficiency to assure that it does not in-directly affect the safety of operation of the plant.
2.
The deficiency shall be related to the design This includes act-or construction phases.
ivities of the Nuclear Steam System Supplier, l
architect engineers, consultants, contractors, or suppliers.
3, The deficiency shall fall within one of the l
following four cate20 ries:
A breakdown in the Quality Assurance Pro-(a) gram related to any criterion in 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, applied to any design or construction activity affecting the safety
[
to plant operation.
(b) A deficiency in final design as approved l
and released for construction such that the design does not comply to the design criteria and bases stated in the FSAR or Construction Permit. Final design denotes those drawings, specifications and other g engineering docements that have been rt-visived, approved and released for l
w-E
'd 65:11 66/41/90 Sdo-Det4 SE5d3 WOdd I
i p D'.f W We HQVSTON LtG64flhed & PoWAA CoMS_4NV SOUTN TEXA$ PROJECT
,P,EP.1.a1 nev.wo o oc.
PR0ct0URE MANUAt
~
TITLE caan 6 or 17 PROJECT'1 ngl 4ttRING PR0ct0URE REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
- d" mata.mauro 07/26/79 DEFICIENCIES TO NRC ksM fabrication, installation or construction.
No deficiency exists if a design stated in t'.e FSAR is changed by approved procedures after receiving prcper evaluation and review.
A deficiency in construction of or damage (c) to a structure, system or component which will require extensive evaluation, extensive repair to establish the adeq,:acy of the structure, system or cogonent.
A deviation from performance sptcifications
( r
defined in tne functional testing require-ments which will require extensive evalue-tion, extensive redesign, or extensive re-pair to establish the adequacy of the struc-ture, system or component.
The significance of the deficiency should be 4
evaluated relative to operational safety. J!Le sienificance of a deficiency it a subjective.
_ evaluation and as such the_stanificance of a civen deficiency may not be close. Therefore, lf the significance of a defic < ency is in doubt, it should be treated as reportable to the NRC.
5.4 Defect Determination be considered in evalua-The following factors shall ting an incident to determine if it is defect report-able to the NRC under the provisions of 10 CFR 21.
The incident identified shall involve either 1.
the software or hardware requirements associated A basic component is with a basic cogonent.
a safety Class 1, 2, or 3 Seismic Category I structure, system, cogenent or part thereof necessary to assure:
(a) The integrity of the reactor coolant pres-sure boundary, The capability to shutdown the reactor and (b) maintain it in a safe shutdown condition, or k+
- -. =
t
' N 9
'd G5:lt SE'4t<90 5dO-Deti 53Sd3 WOdd p *,g m.. g...
HOU5foN L@4 TING & POWER cow 8 ANY SOUTH TEXAS PROECT
. PEP-11 PROCE00RE MANU AL noc =o a nv1 =o 0_
T6TLE
- Ant 6 o* 17 PROMCT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES TO NRC oAn insuro 07/26/79 5
'a (c) The capability to. prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could re-suit in potential offsite exposures compar-able to those referred to in 10 CFR 100.11 2.
The basic cogenent shall contain a defect which is defined by the following categories:
(a) A deviation in a basic component delivered to a purchaser or user where on the basis of an evaluation, the deviation could create a substantial safety hazard; or (b) The installation, use or operation of a basic component containing a defect as de-fined in paragraph 2 (a) above; or (c) A deviation in a portion of the nuclear power plant subject to the construction per-mit requirements of 10 CFR 50 provided the deviation could, on the basis of an evalua.
tion, create a substantial safety hazard and the portion of the factitty containing the deviation has been offered to the pur-chaser for acceptance; or (d) A condition or circumstance involving a basic component that could contribute to the ex-ceeding of a safety limit, as defined in the technical specifications of a license for operation issued pursuant to 10 CFR 50.
The defective basic component should be evaluated 3.
to determine whether the defect could, if uncor-rected, create a substantial safety hazard.
A cottynerical grade item is not part of a basic com-4.
ponent untti after dedication which occurs after receipt when that item is designated for use as a basic coganent.
5.5 Noncompilance Determination The following factors shall be considered in evalua-ting an incident to determine if it is a noncompliance A+
4j.
h_...w.
4
'd 00:21 60/4t.90 sdO-3d4 535d.i wod3 E 5'@W.m t wovsto ucHvisc a roma cow'Auv SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PEP-11 aw No 0 pnoc_ wo PROCEDURE M ANU AL Tn6s -
7 o,
17 PROJECT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE
,,ca REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Md C' DEFICIENCIES TO NRC o,n %g, gy mno reportable to the NRC under the provisions of 10 CFR 21, The incident identified shall involve either 1.
the software or hardware requirements associated with a basic component.
2.
The basic component shall fail to comply with the Atomic Engergy Act of 1954. as amended, or any applicable rule, regulation, order or 11-cense of the NRC relating to substantial safety hazards. This includes failure to comply with design criteria and bases stated in the FSAR or Construction Pamit.
3.
The basic component containing the noncompliance shall be. evaluated to detemine whether the non-compliance could, if uncorrected, create a sub-stantial safety hazard.
5.6 INCIDENT NOTIFICATIONS Five prir.ary notifications occur during the process of reporting defects, noncompliances and deficiencies in accordance with 10 CFR 21 or 10 CFR 50.55(e).
These notification are:
1.
Any individual notifying the Project QA Super-visor of an expected incident requiring con-l sideration pursuant to' 10 CFR 50.55(e) or 10 CFR 21.
The Project QA Supervisor notifying the Team 2.
Leader, Nuclear Safety & Licensing of an in-cident requiring evaluation by the Incident Review Comittee.
The Project QA Supervisor notifying the Nuclear 3.
Regulatory Comission of an incident determined to be potentially reportable or reportable pur.
suant to 10 CFR 21 or 10 CFR 50.55(e).
-...,....m._
8
'd 00:21 SE-41 90 SdO-?dN 535d? woe:
vt 9 8 MOUNTON UQwhNo & DOWeM COUP ANY panc io)
SOUTN TEX AS PROJECT pgp j 0
nev wo PROCEDURE MANU AL TITLE PROMCT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE r.ma
-_B ca 17 REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION a n aissut0 07/_26/79 DEFICIENCIES TO MRC -
,For Informa',aon O ly e
n 4.
The Team Leader Nuclear Safety & Licensing notifying the cognizant engineering discipline and others required to call a meeting of the Incident Review Coernittee.
5.
The Manager, South Texas Project notifying the Vice President. Power Plant Construction and Technical Services of an incident determined to be reportable or potentially reportable.
5.7 WRITTEN INCIDENT REPORT A written report is required to be submitted to the NRC Director of Regional Office and the NRC Director.
Office of Inspection and Enforcement, on each de-fact, noncompliance or deficiency reported to the An outline NRC per 10 CFR.21 or 10 CFR 50.55(e).
for these written reports is provided in Attacrutent PEP-11-01 to this procedure. If information re.
quired for the written report is incomplete when the report is prepared, an interim report shall be prepared describing that information which is avail-able and a schedule for completing the remaining information.
5.8 INClotNT REVIEW COMMITTEE The incident Review Connittec shall consit of the following members, or their designees, as a minimum:
1.
Engineering Team Leader, NS&L - Chairman 2.
Project QA Supervisor 3.
SJpervising Project Engineer, Design 5.9 OEADLINE REQUIREMENTS The following deadlines shall be observed.
A.
The NRC shall be notified by telephone Within 2 days pursuant to 10 CFR 21 1
2 Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e).
following determination by the Incident Review Comittee that incident is reportable, bY 0
h 6..h > a. '
E
'd 10:21 Se'L1 90 SdO-)du 53td:' N0bd E E *. M S W wousTON UQWNG &_PoWE M cow A_NY SOUTH TEX A8 PROJECT pgp.11 O
PROCEDURE BAANUAL pace no arv. ano TITLE PROJECT ENGINEERING FROCEDURE uns 9 op 17 REPORTING DE$1GN AND CONSTRUCTION
- d" natr ennuno 07/26/79 DEFICIENCIES _TO NRC for Informatioil Only B.
The NRC shall be sent a written report:
Within 5 days pursuant to 10 CFR 21 (1)
(2) Within 30 days pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55 (e).
following determination by the Incident Review Comittee that the incident is reportable.
C.
Brown & Root shall submit to HL&P for review a draf t written report:
(1) Within 2 days for Part 21 deficiencies (2) Within 17 days for Part 50.55(e) deficiencies, following determination by the Incident Review Comittee that the incident is reportable.
PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT NOTIFICATION 5.10 _
Attachment PEP-11-02 to this procedure provides a standard statement that must be included in all purchase orders and subcontracts for services and It equipment defined as being a basic component.
is the responsibility of the Purchasing Department to ensure this statement is included in all such purchase orders and subcontracts.
S.11 P0_$ TING REQUIREMENTS Attachment PEP-11-03 to this procedure provides a standard poster which must be displayed in conspic-uous locations at both the Houston home office and it is the responsibility of the construction site, the STP Quality Assurance Supervisor to ensure that adequate posters are displayed in appropriate 10-cations, This poster identifies the individual to whom initial notification of a defect noncompliance should be made.
A+
i
w' h_
01*e 20:21 GE/41,'90 Se0-den 535d3 W0e:
!3.7"Ernmanamm WOusTON LIGH?tNG at eGruim COWAhv SOUTH TEX AS PM0 JECT pgp.11 PROCEDURE MANU At noe so arv No1 n 17 PROJECT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE
,ia, 10 or_
REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 07/26/79 oavsvamoso DEFICIENCIES TO NRC __
For Information 3sy 5.12 Procedure _
For a general flow chart of the incident review pro-cedure, see attachnent PEP-11-04.
Responsibility Action 1.
Reports to the Project Any Individual QA Supervisor any inci-dent which he feels should be evaluated pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e) or 10 CFR 21.
1.
Reviews the incident Project Quality Assurance Supervisor report.
2.
Detemines whether it Project Quali.ty is potentially report.
Assurance Supervisor able.
3.
If not potentially re-Project Quality portable, then handles Assurance Supervisor incident through nor-mal QA channels 4.
If potentistly report.
Project Quality able then the Engi-Assurance Supervisor neering Team Leader, Licensing is notified.
5.
Reviews the incident Engineering Team report and discusses Leader Licensing it with the Project QA Supervisor.
6.
Arranges for review Engineering Team of the incident by Leader, Licensing the appropriate Engi-nearing discipline.
7.
Evaluates the safety Engineering Team significance of the Leader, Licensing incident.
A+
u i' A. g m, _
11*d 20:21 GE 41 90 S dG-Odf 4 S3SdD WOd4 l,
111J 3: ream m.
oustou ua.mma a um crawv gouTM TEXAS PROJECT PEP-11 1
~
PROCEDURE MANUAf.
Panc mo
'" "O= 0 TITLE PROJECT ENGINEERlWG PROCEDURE
,, jg o,
p REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
_DEFICJENCIES TO NRC nata anuan 67/96/79 for Mormation kily Engineering Team 8.
If not potentially re-Leader, Licensing portable, then incident is resolved through nomal QA channels.
Engineering Team 9.
If potentially report-Leader. Licensing able then incident is referred to the Inci-dont Review Comittee.
Incident Review 10 Whenever possible, the Comittee HL&P Incident Review Cournittee shall be con-vened as a joint meet-ing with the 84R Inci-dont Review Comittee.
Incident Revlew
- 11. The Incident Review Consmittee considers Comittee the incidant.
Incident Review
- 12. If deemed not report-able, then the incident Comittee is resolved through nomal QA channels.
Incident Review
- 13. If deemed reportable.
then the incident is Cnmittee reported to the NRC by the Project GA Super visor.
Project QA Super-
- 14. Notifies NRC Region IV within the time visor frame noted in section 5.10.
- 15. Notifies the Manager, Project QA Super-South Texas Project visor and the Manager Qual-ity Assurance.
A&
l s _ = <..... :.
21'd 00:21 60'41'9."
SdO-Deu S 35d:- WOds l,
l-5 4 W M.'5. h m anus Houston UGHTiNG & eDWiM cDWANY SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PEP-11 PROCEDURE MANU AL__
enae wo atv wo 0
mur PROJECT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE _
em 12 or 17 mmer REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES TO NRC mara innuno 07/M /79 y
N N
nob b
Engineering Team Leader.
- 16. Notifies the Super-Licensing vising Engineer. De-sign and the Super-vislieg Enginoer Nuclear Safety & Licensing.
8
- 17. Prepares a written re.
Engineering Team Leader, port to the NRC, Region Licensing IV within the time frame noted by section 5.40. 9.
Engineering Team Leader.
- 18. Prepares a documenta-Licensing tion package to be maintained by the Licensing group and RMS.
6.0 DOCUMENTATION
- Each defect, noncompliance or deficiency evaluated by the Incident Review Corr.ittee shall be recorded in formal meeting minutes by the Project Quality Assurance Supervisor. A copy of these meeting min-utes, copies all telephone correspondence and copies of all NRC correspondence will be maintained by the Engineering Team Leader. Nuclear Safety & Li-censir.g; in addition to the permanent record copy to be maintained by RMS.
It is the responsibility of each individual originating such documentation to en-sure that file copies are properly identified and transmitted to the Engineering Team Leader. NS&L and the Record Management System (RMS) File.
7.0 ATTACHMENTS A.
PEP-11-01 " Incident Report Outline" B.
PEP-11-02 " Procurement Document Statement" C.
PEP-11-03 " Posting Notification" D.
PEP-11-04 " Incident Review Flow Chart" A+
e __ _.
CI'd CO:rt 66,'41 90 EdO-Ddri 5350 W0ed i(Q S.41: e gu
~
woustow voewo a eonest couuwv 800TM TEXA8 PROJECT PROCEDURE MANU AL
_pgPpol mov sp 0 ELT PROJscT INGINEEMING PROCEOURE
,,,, 13 o,_ _ 17 "d"
REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 07/26/79 DEFICIENCIES TO NRC ens iaauen
'9 ATTACHMENT PEP-11-01
'. 3
,b ibh g(dil ll W t.ht.
J INCIDENT REPOAT _QUTLIt(E I.
SUMMARY
This section should provide a synopsis of the incident and its resolution. The following infomation should be contained in this section:
a.
A synopsis of the incident b.
Postulated cause of incident c.
A synopsis of the corrective action taken d.
Synopsis of the results of the safety evaluation.
II. DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT.
t This section should provide a clear and corolete description of the incident and the circumstances surrounding it. The follow-ing information should be contained in the section:
Identification of the facility or activity or basic component a.
(including vendor) supplied to such facility or activity in-volved in the incident b.
Source and extent of incident The date and means by which the incident information was c.
obtained Unusual circumstances pertaining to the incident, such as d.
weather conditions. test procedures undemay and/or abnormal conditions at site Status of construction at time of incident e.
f.
Procedures in effect.to avoid incident (if any)
!!!. CORRECTIVE ACTION This section should provide a clear description of the corrective action taken to rectify the incident and action taken to prevent The following information should be contained in recurrence.
this section as applicable:
A+
t
-. ~......... -
i P1*d PO:2; 59'4I/90 SdO-Det; E3se) woeg
'44 SP
- ne e Houstow va.4vm_c a powsecoueaw SOUTH TEXAt PROJECT hld
,1 PROCEDUMt MANU AL TITJ PROJECT ENGINEERING PROCEOURE
,ia,14 a, 17 w et REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 03/27/80 om mune DEFICIENCIES TO NRC
~
h g
The immediate response by Quality Assurance in response to a.
the incident, b.
A complete description of all imediate actions taken to correct the incident.
A complete description of all long-range actions to be c.
taken to correct the incident and innlementation schedule, d.
A delineation of the testing methods which will be utilized to ensure that repairs have been conducted properly.
Action taken to prevent the recurrence of the incident during e.
the remaining construction phase of the facility.
IV.-
SAFETY ANALYSIS This section should provide sufficient infomation to fully ana-lyze and evaluate all the possible safety implications of the incident. The following information should be contained in this section as applicable: -
Nature of the incident and the safety hazard which is a.
created or could be created, Identification of applicable Quality Assurance documentation.
b.
A record on all incidents noted in the Quality Assurance c.
documentation and their resolution where applicable to the reported incident.
A complete record of the incident and the results of all d.
investigations.
Postulated cause of incident.
e.
l f.
A complete description of all imediate actions taken to mitigate the consequences of the incident.
In the case of a basic comoonent which contains a defect or g.
noncomplaince originated for evaluation by B&R, the number and location of all such components in use at. supplied for, being supplied for other facilities or activities with B&R as the engineer or constructor.
l A4-i
51*d 50:21 Se<4te?O SdO-ObN S3Sd3 woc:
44 ' WP W sus eme j
woustoe. unsma a *owna cowAsty SOUTH TEXA8 PROJ6CT PEP-11 nev.ieo I PROCEDURE MANUAL emoc me.
TITLE
~
or_)]
15 PROJECT' ENGINEERING PROCEDURE paar
- dC' REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 03/27/80 nurianuno D_EFICIENCIES TO NRC r0i' hi.f0fildl[,m 0M,
- ATTACHMENT ' PEP-11-02 14 7
gT 4
PROCUREMENT DOCUMENI STATEM'.NT 10 CFR 21
" Reporting of Defects and Noncompliances" The work to be performed under this purchase order (subcontract) is con-sidered to involve a " basic component" as defined by Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 21 (published 6/6/77 in Federal Register).
Therefore,10 CFR 21 is applicable.
j e
A&
D. 'l *. '. J.,
SI'd 60:21 GS 41/90 EdO-3dti 53Sd3 woe:
l
<g W
- W se r a mus -.
~
e i
I NOWaToft LinMinun a e-a CC=ANY SOUTM YtXASN05C1 gp,j3
)
MOCEDURE MANUAL pe ma nov iso TITH {
PROJECT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE 17 or 17 pins f
~
REPORTING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 03/27/80 DEFICIENCIES T0__NRC nata imaomet--
I 1804808NT ft4Vitet FLWI Cet AAT ATTAcuateesT PGMtes
",8 M ta mest e88 ace' 00We' ev80titas tuvincengefa6
.l M De NL 6 P 04 eteCDe890 east,i,96eest 44 4a8egeaaf34ts etta 898teve48 8
teviseessatak
- a.g
,,gg ggg,, gg 4mo GCe M4170ST*Pess oces was swergsee er salgogeveste gitt ga te geeiettegg i >
pm e *
, r amm
?&
9e es '.aem eue etitesses
- 8 emetage teesct.
c'.ausf 06'iCWeti 98
.g etoersecant
{Q f*
set.ief D.eWALLT e,,...v
_ _ g- - _,. arg rose eleaLW Ahwaaett
[ -_ st0 00ef f0 819 i
assei a_see y-c ;,i.
14 88 8 le 88 48' f
(*? e un et 88 e l_i
(
...m teti tese E.*num
,,,,D,etrCitet,,
4 *,g ee inv0Lves a 00e7esos to gg,L,g,ggy, C teapoetett gg,,
- M C
()
'88
'I vit Y
i.iev e I
eat stocataste sericite 47
- UefeT EI ll*
g ges =>8 staat
$8eelftat tee'lsedet l
4
_am_aintaf
_ vil i
ete0014944' p
seek fl8 I_
T of Cf eAtt lei W Tese flas at*Me kotise e6 MMiiW setwite m seemsteios l
Pesa e eventtisses "8'
- tw a fscu ese,swess os an afs ta maamasa Andenea knu i
Y enoJ esev setieess e
l BWe'fe' est estete tv e9 l
,. e.,
i.e.,s i
.c..., o c.
ec e
Y T _
'tS ittese espest MITI,tse of#9e1 g,,,9 ggggayg es(f a_3, is to a w w ist 8Datt leaal Y
t t,.a e..t,
.. o,eer
.. =
'ia e*
(
PetPaett
.lSaV8 le as tavl l
h_
ggg, y,
.. e e,
e.,,,.
-.a eettt9tpet
-,-w,,--.--,,g,_,.,.,
,m n_ _,,., _ _ _
e
._,,-..,-mnn,-..
,y
,,..,, - - -,, - - - - -, -, _ -