ML20137R349

Concurs W/Proposed Rev to 10CFR35 W/Condition That Current General Licensees Not Be Affected or Be Notified of Rulemaking & Requested to Indicate Continued Interest in Maintaining General Licensee Status

ML20137R349
Person / Time
Issue date:	08/30/1982
From:	Minogue R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
To:	Cunningham R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20136D915	List: ML20136D909 ML20136E266 ML20136E272 ML20136E278 ML20136E295 ML20136E318 ML20136E323 ML20136E492 ML20136E705 ML20136E879 ML20136F099 ML20136F109 ML20136F154 ML20137Q526 ML20137Q531 ML20137Q538 ML20137Q545 ML20137Q557 ML20137Q566 ML20137Q572 ML20137Q579 ML20137Q585 ML20137Q596 ML20137Q605 ML20137Q612 ML20137Q619 ML20137Q628 ML20137Q633 ML20137Q639 ML20137Q644 ML20137Q650 ML20137Q655 ML20137Q660 ML20137Q668 ML20137Q671 ML20137Q676 ML20137Q682 ML20137Q686 ML20137Q688 ML20137Q690 ML20137Q692 ML20137Q695 ML20137Q697 ML20137Q705 ML20137Q710 ML20137Q715 ML20137Q719 ML20137Q721 ML20137Q724 ML20137Q726 ... further results
References
FRN-50FR30616, RULE-PR-35 AA73-1, NUDOCS 8509230479
Download: ML20137R349 (1)

Text

_

s pn af ooq UNITED STATES og NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON Tg(

g WASHINGTON, D. C 20555 h

30 1982

+....

MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard E. Cunningham, Director Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety, NMSS FROM:

Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED REVISION OF 10 CFR PART 35 I have reviewed the proposed revision of 10 CFR Part 35 that accompanied your August 17 memo.

I concur in this proposed rulemaking with the following condition.

While I realize that there are not many persons who are currently general licensees because most require the higher possession limits provided in Groups I through III, I do believe that these licensees are the only group which may be significantly affected by this rulemaking which proposes to combine the general license with the lowest risk use group of the proposed specific license.

Therefore I suggest the following:

(1) Either ' grandfather' the current general licensees so they are not affected by the proposed rulemaking; or (2) Since the general licensees currently submit a registration ie l form, notify them of this proposed rulemaking and requeste Z(t that they reply if they are interested in maintaining the d"~$

7 level of use afforded by the general license. They would

[t [,, '.

-f /.! J)

/"g then be put into the proposed General / Group I Class.

f Failure to reply would indicate no interest in maintaining general licensee status.

4M'".

f I believe that either of these alternatives would be acceptable to accomodate any impact felt by the current general licensees. With such a clarification.

I concur in this proposed revision to 10 CFR Part 35.

lh{6f(h)]twf.-(

Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research gg92g479850906 3D SOFR30616 PDR

- __