ML20137Q804

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Proposed Rev to 10CFR35 & Reg Guide 10.8,per 840213 Request.Guidance Will Be Necessary on What Actions License Reviewer Must Take If Procedures Do Not Meet Regulatory Requirements
ML20137Q804
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/06/1984
From: Stohr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Cunningham R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20136D915 List: ... further results
References
FRN-50FR30616, RTR-REGGD-10.008, RULE-PR-35 AA73-1, NUDOCS 8509230272
Download: ML20137Q804 (3)


Text

r-

. e MErog UNITED STATES

,{ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGloN il

[g7 /F#[/@

p g r E 101 M ARIETTA STREET. N.W. /

  1. ;# ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303

\*****/ p'm]f APR 0 61984 o P

MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard E. Cunningham, Director, FCMS Division, NMSS FROM: J. Philip Stohr, Director, EPMS Program Division

SUBJECT:

COMMENTARY ON PROPOSED 10 CFR 35 AND REGULATORY GUIDE 10.8 In response to your request for review of the subject revision dated February 13, 1984, we offer comments as follows:

10 CFR 35 A. General Comments

/ -1. We believe it is important to clarify whether it will continue to be necessary for the Regional Licensing Staff to review the applicants' operating procedures. Normally, we do not review applicant documents that will not become enforceable. If reviews are to be made, then some guidance will be necessary on what actions a license reviewer is to take if he finds the procedures inadequate to meet regulatory requirements.

B. Specific Comments

/ 1. P.105, S35.70(d) and (g) - Will the applicant specify the dose rate and contamination action levels in the application or can these be specified later in operating procedures?

y 2. P. 107, 635.90 - Will the licensee be required to initially open volatiles and gases in a fume hood?

/ 3. P. 109, S35.120 - Suggest rewording to require possession of an

" operable" portable survey meter.

/4. P. 113, S35.220 - Suggest rewording as in S35.120 above.

/5. P. 115, 535.320 - Suggest rewording as in S35.120 above.

/6. P. 118, S35.420 - Suggest rewording as in S35.120 above.

CONTACT:

JPotter 242-5571 8509230272 850906 PDR PR 35 50FR30616 PDR w

r-Richard E. Cunningham 2

,/7. P. 122, S35.620 - The teletherapy licensee should have access to both a high and low level survey meter. The high range meter is needed for approaching a malfunctioning teletherapy unit or as substitution for a malfunctioning installed monitor. The low range meter is needed for occasional S20.105 measurements.

/8. P. 95, S35.39(a)(4) Requiring the authorized user to be physically present on one hour notice should be clarified. It appears the purpose of this requirement is to provide for management of toxic shock and loss of material or contamination. We suggest rewording to extend this interval to eight hours if the institution has a full time emergency room physician and the supervised nuclear medicine technologist is on duty. If the authorized user is available by telephone he can arrange with the hospital administrator for any required support. The Nuclear Medicine technologist on duty should be able to deal with any cleanup, or isolation, or search for missing isotopes under the telephone guidance of the authorized user. The one hour rule seems unduly restrictive for most hospitals.

h. P. 9, Notes, last paragraph - most human use licensing is now handled by individuals who are in close proximity to those who inspect; however, we do not believe that most NRC license reviewers also inspect.
10. P. 84, S35.16(d)(2) - reword to include the U.S. Atlantic Ocean Commonwealth & Territory of Puerto Rico & Virgin Islands within the non-federal licensing jurisdiction of Region II, in the same manner as the U.S. island territories of the Pacific Ocean are within Region V.

The Region II address is Suite 2900 rather than 3100. /

/11. P. 99, 935.51(b)(3) - suggest defining the term " dedicated" check source. Just a " check source" should be adequate.

Regulatory Guide 10.8 A. Specific Comments P. 8, Item 5, line 7, reword as "if you plan to have an eye applicator, fl.

express its total activity (in mci), as a separate line item."

/2. P. 9, Item 7.d. requires " properly" trained paramedicals. Are licensing reviewers supposed to veri fy credentials of supervised individuals in the same manner as for an " authorized user?" If so, then 10 CFR 35.38 should require supervised individuals to possess such credentials.

Richard E. Cunningham 3

3. P.10, Item 7.a.(4) Can physicians not previously authorized as users, be independently approved, based on training and experience which meets

,/ the criteria in-10 CFR 35 or Regulatory Guide 8.10, without consulting the NRC ACMUI? If not, then this is a significant reversal in our licensing policy.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

J." h'ili Stohr l

l

.-