ML20137Q486

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests Analysis to Support Finding of NSHC in 851101 Application for Amend to License Condition 2.C.(26).Request for Addl Info Re Turbine Disk Insp at Facility Encl
ML20137Q486
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/22/1985
From: Adensam E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Richard J
MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
TAC-60085, NUDOCS 8512050282
Download: ML20137Q486 (5)


Text

.

November 22, 1985 DISIMtITION:

< Docket No. 50-416 NRC PDR Dotket No. 50-416 Local PDR LB #4 r/f EAdensam Mr. Jackson B. Richard MDuncan Senior Vice President, Nuclear LKintner Mississippi Power & Light Company VPanciera Post Office Box 23054 BDLiaw Jackson, Mississippi 39205 JTsao EJordan Attorney, OELD BGrimes

Dear Mr. Richard:

JPartlow, IE ACRS (16)

Subject:

Grand Gulf Unit 1 - Request for License Amendment to Defer Turbine Disc Inspection By letter dated November 1, 1985, Mississippi Power & Light Company (MP&L) requested an amendment to License Condition 2.C.(26).

The letter attached a discussion, justification, and significant hazards consideration. The proposed license amendment would extend the inspection interval for low pressure main steam turbine discs from one fuel cycle to four fuel cycles (up to 50,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />).

1 The November 1,1985 application for license amendment is deficient in that it does not provide an analysis as required by 10 CFR 50.91(a)(1) using the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92. The no significant hazards consideration provided simply repeats the three standards and states, as a reason for these findings, that the turbine design and turbine disc cracking and failure pro-ducing missiles was considered in the FSAR. The application is also deficient in that an alternate inspection schedule has not been proposed as required in License Condition 2.C.(26). This license condition required inspection of low pressure turbine discs during each refueling outage until the potential for turbine disc cracking has been assessed and an acceptable alternate inspection schedule has been established.

Provide an analysis to support a finding of no significant hazards consideration.

The analysis should consider the increase in probability of an accident caused i

by operation between inspections four times as long (four fuel cycles versus one t

fuel cycle). Similarly, the analysis should consider the effect on the other two standards of 10 CFR 50.92 of operating four fuel cycles without inspection j

of the low pressure turbine discs. Provide a proposed change to Technical Specification Section 6.0 " Administrative Controls" to identify a maintenance and inspection program which is mutually acceptable to MP&L and the turbine vendor.

Provide also additional information as requested in the enclosure.

Supplement the justification by providing a description of the work involved in the inspection if performed during the first refueling outage and the impact on the other work planned for the outage.

8512050282 851122 PDR ADOCK 050 6

P l

i Mr. Jackson 8. Richard The staff has estimated its review of the requested alternate inspection interval will be completed by May 30, 1986, assuming acceptable supplemental information requested herein is provided by December 31, 1985, and any additional information requested during the review is provided on a high priority basis.

If you cannot provide the additional information requested herein by December 31, 1985, please advise the NRC Project Manager for Grand Gulf Nuclear Station within 7 days of receipt of this letter.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely, Original Signed by L. L. Kintner for Elinor G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch #4 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc:

See next page t

I

(

.[

DL:LB4 MTEP DL: 84 LKintner:15/hmc uncan iw 4 -EAdensam 11/2 t/85 11/? O/85 1

/85 11/ft/85

Mr. Jackson B. Richard Mississippi Power & Light Company Grand Gulf Nuclear Staiton CC' Robert B. McGehee, Esquire The Honorable William J. Guste, Jr.

Wise, Carter, Child, Steen and Caraway Attorney General P.O. Box 651 Department of Justice Jackson, Mississippi 39205 State of Louisiana l

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804 Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esquire Bishop, Libennan, Cook, Purcell Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

and Reynolds Vice President, Nuclear Operations 1200 17th Street, N.W.

Mississippi Power & Light Company Washington, D. C.

20036 P.O. Box 23054 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Mr. Ralph T. Lally Manager of Quality Assurance Office of the Governor Middle South Services, Inc.

State of Mississippi P.O. Box 61000 Jackson, Mississippi 39201 New Orleans, Louisiana 70161 Attorney General Mr. Larry F. Dale, Director Gartin Building Nuclear Licensing and Safety Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Mississippi Power & Light Company P.O. Box 23054 Mr. Jack McMillan, Director Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Solid Waste Mississippi State Board of Health Mr. R. W. Jackson, Project Engineer 880 Lakeland Bechtel Power Corporation Jackson, Mississippi 39206 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20760 Alton B. Cobb, M.D.

State Health Officer Mr. Ross C. Butcher State Board of Health Senior Resident Inspector P.O. Box 1700 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Route 2, Box 399 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 President Claiborne County Board of Supervisors Regional Administrator, Region II Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, m.

101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. J. E. Cross, General Manager Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Mississippi Power & Light Company P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150

(

i

\\

ENCLOSURE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TURBINE DISC INSPECTION AT GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 1 i

The Licensee submitted, on November 1,1985, a proposal to amend the existing licensing condition (2.C.26) regarding the turbine disc inspection interval.

The NRC staff has discussed this matter with the Licensee on November 12, 1985.

The following is a followup of that discussion and a request for additional information.

/

1.

It is unclear in the submittal as to. the exact schedule of high pressure (HP) and low pressure (LP) turbine inspection intervals that the Licensee is pro-posing. The staff understands the inspection intervals as follows:

First Outage - inspect HP turbine, Second Outage - inspect LP turbine No. 3, Third Outage - inspect LP turbine No. 2, and Fourth Outage - inspect LP turbine No. 1.

After the fourth outage, the inspection cycle will repeat itself.

Confirm or correct this schedule.

2.

The crack growth in LP turbine discs is a function of the yield strength l

of the disc material and the operating temperature of a disc.

Also, the disc that receives moisture first has higher susceptibility to the stress corrosion cracking.

The staff requests that the Licensee initially inspect the most vulnerable LP turbine which, according to the Licensee, is LP turbine No. 3.

Confirm that LP turbine No. 3 is the most vulnerable.

9 1

i

-g-3.

Confirm that the Licensee will inspect the other two LP turbines if cracks are being detected in the inspected LP turbine.

4.

There seems to be a discrepancy in the tensile strength of the disc materials between the submittal (Attachment I, page 7) and Grand Gulf Unit 1FSAR(Appendix 10A,ES-63,page3). The tensile strength reported in the submittal is from 149 to 156 ksi; whereas, in. Appendix 10A of the FSAR, it is from 113 Jto 135 ksi.

Verify the correct tensile strength.

5.

Attachment IV of the November 1, 1988 submittal, pages IE 85.090 to 85.092.

Explain in detail how the failure probability of a disc, P (t) and 4

probability of the crack initiation, g, are obtained.

j l

.