ML20136E994
| ML20136E994 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1985 |
| From: | Withers B PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136E998 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-56176, NUDOCS 8601070177 | |
| Download: ML20136E994 (3) | |
Text
.
Portland General ElectricCompany
~
Rut D W,thers Vce Presod December 31, 1985 Trojan Nuclear Plant Docket 50-344 License NPF-1 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN:
Mr. Steven A. Varga Director, PWR-A
~
Project Directorate No. 3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555
Dear Sir:
Trojan Nuclear Plant Amendment 2 to the Detailed Control Roosa Design Review (DCRDR) Summary Report Amendment 2 of Topical Report PGE-1041, "DCRDR Summary Report" is enclosed.
It provides information to allow review of the incomplete elements of the DCRDR previously identified in your July 24, 1985 Safety Evaluation Report.
Attachment A provides a brief cross-reference between your request for additional information and the applicable pages of PGE-1041.
Attachment B provides the revised pages for PGE-1041.
Sincerely, 8601070177 851231 h r' PDR ADOCK 05000344 Bart. Withers PDR F
Vice President Nuclear 0
Attachment
)
c:
Mr. Lynn Frank, Director
/
State of Oregon a
j Department of Energy p,
I AD - J. KNIGHT (ltr only)
J Mr. John B. Martin ycy,y,j Regional Administrator l
ess (cammrtti ass (sentmsn>
Re0elon V FOB (BENAHOYA)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30th day of December.
bhi hi thf Y
<~
Notar[Ptiblic of Oregon g
BE f Y J. o!I"CII My Commission Expires:
/O '
NOTARY l'UCLIC - OsG0i1 My Ccmmir!cn D9f5
~~
~'
G1 SW Smen Smt Po<tanJ Cmgan 97204
.)
Trojan Nucicer Plant Mr. S. A. Vcrgs Dorket 50-344 Attachment A License NPF-1 December 31, 1986 Page 1 of 2 Sunnary of PGE Response to NRC Exceptions to DCRDR Summary Report NRC Conment PGE Response In the judgment of the staff, the PGE DCRDR for Trojan has satisfied the requirements in Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737 with the following exceptions:
1.
Function and task analysis 1.
Complete. See PCE-1041, Volume 1, Page 3-9.
a.
Compare WOG ERG Revision 1 based EIs with Revision 0 based EIs to identify new or modified tasks.
'b.
Identify information and control capabilities needed for performance of the above tasks.
c.
Identify displays and controls (including appro-priate characteristics) required to satisfy the above information and control capability needs.
2.
Comparison of display and control requirements with a 2.
Complete. See PGE-1041, control room inventory Volume 1, Page 3-9 a.
Determins the availability and suitability of required displays and controls identified by 1 above.
3.
Control room survey 3.
Complete. See PGE-1041, Volume 1 Pages 3-3 thru a.
Complete annunciator and meter studies.
3-5.
4.
Assessment 4.
Complete. See PGE-1041, Volume 2, HEDs 42, 50, 59, s.
Assess any HEDs resulting from 1, 2, and 3 125-129, 132-137, 139, 234-above.
236, 269-271, 273, 276, 277, 283, 286, 345, 357, 364, 448.
5.
Selection of design improvements a.
Select design improvements for HEDs resulting from 5.a Complete. See HEDs iden-1, 2, and 3 above.
tified in (4) above, b.
Select design improvements for HEDs for which no 5.b Complete. See PGE-1041, proposed correction was provided in the Summary Volume 2, applicable HEDs.
Report (see Appendix E of the TER).
/
Trojan Nus10cr Plant Mr. S. A. Vargs Do;ket 50-344 Attachment A License NPF-1 December 31, 1986 Page 2 of 2 NRC Comment PGE Response c.
When proposed corrections do not correct HEDs or 5.c As required after comple-introduce new HEDs, iterate selection and tion of corrective action.
verification of design improvements until See PGE-1041, Volume 1, problems are resolved.
Pages 3-7 and 3.8.
C.
Verification 6.
As required, after comple-tion of HED corrective a.
Verify that design improvements correct HEDs.
action.
See PCE-1041, Volume 1.Pages 3-7 and 3-8.
b.
Verify that design improvements do not intro-duce new HEDs.
7.
Coordination 7.a Complete. See PGE-1041, Volume I, Page 3-6 a.
Compare the operator interface with the SPDS and Volume 2 HEDs 358-363, against accepted human factors standards.
449-451, 453-462, and 464-472.
b.
Verify training solutions to HEDs.
7.b Complete. See PGE-1041, Volume 1 HEDs 401 and 403, c.
Provide all operators with training on changes 7.c As required.
Operators received lectures on the to the control room resulting from the DCRDR objectives and conclusions prior to implementing those changes.
of the DCRDR, control board enhancement scheme and forthcoming design changes in April /May 1985.
8.
Summary Report a.
Report resolution of concerns identified by the staff evaluation.
8.
Complete. Amendment 2 to PGE-1041.
b.
Report final results of activities not yet 8b.
The status of the DCRDR to completed.
date is reflected in Amendment 2 to PGE-1041.
The only acti ties re-maining are implemen-tation of identified cor-rective actions and ver-ification of their adequacy.
DJM/ maw i