IR 05000277/1985022
| ML20134J168 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 08/21/1985 |
| From: | Joshua Berry, Keller R, Lange E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134H770 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-277-85-22, 50-278-85-19, NUDOCS 8508290197 | |
| Download: ML20134J168 (3) | |
Text
.
.-
,
-
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT EXAMINATION REPORT NOS.
50-277/85-22 (OL); 50-278/85-19 (OL)
FACILITY DOCKET NOS.
50-277 and 50-278 FACILITY LICENSE NO.
Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 FACILITY:
Peach Bottom EXAMINATION DATE:
June 25, 1985 to June 27, 1985 F /9!d CHIEF EXAMINER:
mf.
'
D. T.ange, Reaktor' Engindr Examiner
/ Dafe
[//f[
REVIEWED BY:
J/ t Y h/
' J. A. Terry, Lead BW Reactor Engineer
/Dat4
'
Examiner REVIEWED BY:
[If/ /~
. K. Keller, Chief, Projects Section 1C ' Date '
l'/ b APPROVED BY:
,H.
B. Kis'tt, Chief, Projects Branch
' Date No. 1 SUMMARY:
On June 25, 1985, three SR0 and one RO written examinations were administered at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. Oral examinations were administered to two SRO Instructor Certification and one SRO Upgrade candidates on June 26 and 27, 1985.
All candidates passed both the written and oral examinations with no generic weaknesses noted.
BSos2%h p
PDR O
_ D e
-
.
REPORT DETAILS Exam Results:
R0 l
SR0 l Inst. Cert i
I Pass / Fail l Pass / Fail l
Pass / Fail l
I I
I I
I I
I I
I IWritten Exam i 1/0
1/0 l
2/0 l
l I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I Oral Exam I
/
I 1/0
2/0 l
I I
I I
I I
I I
i
1 Overall i
1/0
1/0
2/0 l
l l
l l
l 1.
Chief Examiner at Site: Dave Lange, USNRC,. Region I 2.
Other Examiners:
Tony Mendiola, USNRC, HDQ, OLB
.
m h*
.
.=
..
.
- __ --- __. -..
_
- _ _ - - -
_ _ _ _,.
-
.
.
.
..
1.
Overall, the SR0 and RO candidates appeared to be well prepared for the written and oral examinations.
'
During the oral examinations, only one weakness was noted by the examiner in the area of procedures.
The candidates had difficulty locating and differentiating between some of the plant protection and emergency pro-cedures.
This problem was addressed at the exit meeting.
All candidates were knowledgeable of existing plant conditions and equip-ment location.
.
2.
Personnel Present at Exit Interview:
l NRC Personnel
!
'
l Dave Lange, Chief Examiner, USNRC, Region I Tony Mendiola, Reactor Engineer Examiner, OLB, HDQ
'
Herb Williams, Resident Inspector, USNRC, Peach Bottom l
[
Facility Personnel Steve Roberts, Operations Engineer Bob Bulmer, Superintendent, Nuclear Training Dennis McClellan, Training Instructor, Nuclear Training l
3.
Summary of NRC Comments Made at Exit Interview:
l a.
The Chief Examiner re-emphasized the candidates strengths and weak-nesses notea during the oral examinations.
b.
Cooperation of the control room staff and the training department personnel was appreciated, c.
Plant conditions were clean and security and Health Physics access control was good.
l d.
A problem with the E-4 Diesel Generator security card reader was identified.
In addition, the physical condition of the E-4 D/G door was poor.
Facility personnel agreed to correct this problem.
4.
Summary of Facility Comments and Commitments Made at Exit Interview:
The Superintendent of Nuclear Training commented on the relaxed atmosphere created by the examiners and felt that this increased the quality of the oral examinations.
Attachments:
1.
Written Examination (s) and Answer Key (s) (SRO/RO)
2.
Facility Comments on Written Examinations Made After Exam Review
_
.._. _ _ _ -
..
.
... _. _ _.
_
-
, _ _._ _ _ _ _ _