|
---|
Category:ARCHIVE RECORDS
MONTHYEARML20206F7771999-05-0404 May 1999 Commission Voting Record on SECY-99-101 Re Proposed Rule - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F7891999-04-21021 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F7991999-04-17017 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8391999-04-12012 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving with Comments SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8021999-04-0808 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving with Comments SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8211999-04-0505 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20153G6451998-09-23023 September 1998 Nonproprietary Package Consisting of Presentation Matl from 970212-14 ACRS T/H Phenomena Subcommittee Meeting ML20153G3461998-09-22022 September 1998 Nonproprietary Package Consisting of Revs Re AP600 PCS Pirt/ Scaling Closure 970916 Meeting ML20153F8601998-09-22022 September 1998 Nonproprietary Package Consisting of Proposed Rev to Ssar Subsection 7.7.1.11,w/respect to Manual Actuation Function List & Indication List ML20133H5711997-01-15015 January 1997 Commission Voting Record on Secy 96-128 Re Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standarized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H7301996-12-12012 December 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6661996-12-0202 December 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy Issues & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6541996-11-25025 November 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part,W/Comments SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6341996-11-15015 November 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving W/Comments, SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6731996-10-0909 October 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20134A5551996-07-0101 July 1996 Rev 6 to Design Configuration Change Control for AP600 Program ML20082Q6491995-04-12012 April 1995 Nonproprietary Presentation Matls Re Distributed Parameter Comparison to LST-internal Rake ML20153G5441994-11-15015 November 1994 Nonproprietary Presentation to NRC, AP600 Passive Containment Cooling Sys Analysis Program ML20153F9981994-05-0101 May 1994 Package Consisting of Nonproprietary MAAP4 Info ML20153G4121993-07-14014 July 1993 Nonproprietary Presentation Matls Used During 930714 Meeting on AP600 CR Habitability ML20153G3961993-04-20020 April 1993 Nonproprietary Presentation Matl from Westinghouse/Nrc 930420 Meeting on AP600 Design ML20153F5381993-02-24024 February 1993 Nonproprietary Slides Used During 930224 Presentation to NRC Re AP600 Testing Program ET-NRC-92-3783, Nonproprietary Slides Used During 921214 Presentation to NRC Staff on AP600 Test & Analysis Programs Schedule Update1992-12-14014 December 1992 Nonproprietary Slides Used During 921214 Presentation to NRC Staff on AP600 Test & Analysis Programs Schedule Update 1999-05-04
[Table view] Category:LETTER BALLOT
MONTHYEARML20206F7771999-05-0404 May 1999 Commission Voting Record on SECY-99-101 Re Proposed Rule - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F7891999-04-21021 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F7991999-04-17017 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8391999-04-12012 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving with Comments SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8021999-04-0808 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving with Comments SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8211999-04-0505 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20133H5711997-01-15015 January 1997 Commission Voting Record on Secy 96-128 Re Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standarized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H7301996-12-12012 December 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6661996-12-0202 December 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy Issues & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6541996-11-25025 November 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part,W/Comments SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6341996-11-15015 November 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving W/Comments, SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6731996-10-0909 October 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design 1999-05-04
[Table view] Category:NOMINATION VOTE
MONTHYEARML20206F7771999-05-0404 May 1999 Commission Voting Record on SECY-99-101 Re Proposed Rule - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F7891999-04-21021 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F7991999-04-17017 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8391999-04-12012 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving with Comments SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8021999-04-0808 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving with Comments SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8211999-04-0505 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20133H5711997-01-15015 January 1997 Commission Voting Record on Secy 96-128 Re Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standarized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H7301996-12-12012 December 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6661996-12-0202 December 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy Issues & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6541996-11-25025 November 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part,W/Comments SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6341996-11-15015 November 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving W/Comments, SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6731996-10-0909 October 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design 1999-05-04
[Table view] Category:COMMISSION VOTING
MONTHYEARML20206F7771999-05-0404 May 1999 Commission Voting Record on SECY-99-101 Re Proposed Rule - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F7891999-04-21021 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F7991999-04-17017 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8391999-04-12012 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving with Comments SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8021999-04-0808 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving with Comments SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20206F8211999-04-0505 April 1999 Notation Vote Approving SECY-99-101 Re Pr - AP600 Design Certification ML20133H5711997-01-15015 January 1997 Commission Voting Record on Secy 96-128 Re Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standarized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H7301996-12-12012 December 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6661996-12-0202 December 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy Issues & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6541996-11-25025 November 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part,W/Comments SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6341996-11-15015 November 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving W/Comments, SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design ML20133H6731996-10-0909 October 1996 Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving in Part & Disapproving in Part w/comments,SECY-96-128, Policy & Key Tech Issues Pertaining to W AP600 Standardized Passive Reactor Design 1999-05-04
[Table view] |
Text
.,
NOTATION VOTE RESPONSE SHEET TO: John C. Hoyle, Secretary FROM: COMMISSIONER MCGAFFIGAN
SUBJECT:
SECY-96-128 -
POLICY AND KEY TECHNICAL ISSUES PERTAINING TO THE WESTINGHOUSE AP600 STANDARDIZED PASSIVE REACTOR DESIGN Approved Disapproved Abstain Not Participating Request Discussion COMMENTS:
- u 4 fv-SIGNATUREO I)
- 1.1 / 99G Release Vote / v/ i DATE Withhold Vote / /
Entered on "AS" Yes .x No ,
i I
9701170272 970115 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR
, . -- . _ . ~ - . -. .- -- - _ - - . . .
2 a
a w
COMMISSIONER MCGAFFIGAN'S COMMENTS ON SECY-96-128 i
Severe Accident Manaaement and Mitication I support the staff's position, as stated in the November 12, 1996 revised clarification paper, on the importance of assuring that the AP-600 design includes adequate means for long-term management and mitigation following a severe accident. I am prepared to support the inclusion of an additional non-safety l
- system or systems for this purpose if the staff can be more specific with respect to the design and performance requirements 4 for the system (s) and if these additional requirements are
! consistent with the general concept of a passive design.
j Use of Realistic Fission Product Removal Coefficients I do not approve the staff's proposal to use realistic fission product removal coefficients in desion basis calculations for the j
AP-600 because of the inclusion of an additional non-safety system (s) for severe accident management and mitigation. I agree with Commissioner Rogers that the staff's choice of values in their analyses and reviews of design basis accidents should be arrived at through a process involving expert technical judgments i
and should not be settled by bargaining.
i Post-72 Hour Actions i
j . I approve the staff's position that the site be capable of sustaining all design basis events with onsite equipment and supplies for the long term, with replenishment of consumables (such as diesel fuel oil) from offsite suppliers allowed after seven days.
External Reactor Vessel Coolinq approach, involving reliance on in-vessel retention of the core complemented with limited analytical evaluation of ex-vessel phenomena, to address the adequacy of the AP-600 design for ex-vessel events.
i UNITED STATES
/
y ,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j WASHINGTON, D C. 20555-0001 e
,[ January 15, 1997
..... I OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY l
l MEMORANDUM TO: Hugh L. Thompson, Jr Acting Executive Director for Operations Karen D. Cyr Gene oun e FROM: Joh . Hoyl , Secretary
SUBJECT:
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-96-128 - POLICY AND KEY TECHNICAL ISSUES PERTAINING TO THE WESTINGHOUSE AP600 STANDARDIZED PASSIVE REACTOR DESIGN The Commission agrees it is inportant that the AP600 design include adequate means for accident management and long term mitigation. However, the Commission does not support the staff's j request for the inclusion of additional system (s) for accident management and long term mitigation following a severe' accident as presented, not because it may be inappropriate, but because the basic design and performance requirements have not been bounded or specified, and the' requested additional system (s) do not appear to be consistent with the concept of a passive design.
The Commission is open to reconsideration of this issue if the staff can be more specific in terms of what additional system (s) are contemplated, including the design and performance requirements.
The Commission believes fission product removal coefficients for analyzing the consequences of design basis accidents should be based on technical merits, and should not be linked to the availability of one or more non-safety systems.
The Commission approved the staff's position that the site be capable of sustaining design basis events with onsite equipment and supplies for the long term, with replenishment of consumables (such as diesel fuel oil) from offsite suppliers after seven days.
SECY NOTE: THIS SRM, SECY-96-128, AND THE COMMISSION VOTING RECORD CONTAINING THE VOTE SHEETS OF ALL COMMISSIONERS WILL BE MADE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE 5 WO ING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS SRM.
3 '
'4 92 n) s
\\
of
l l
The Commission approved the staff's position that Westinghouse use a balanced approach, involving reliance on in-vessel retention of the core complemented with limited analytical :
evaluation of ex-vessel phenomena, to address the adequacy of the AP600 design for ex-vessel events.
l cc: Chairman Jackson Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Dia:
Commissioner McGaffiran OCA OIG Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail) l 4
4 J
9