ML20133G846

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Comments on Site Investigation Rept Submitted by Natl Power Corp for Proposed Philippine Nuclear Power Plant
ML20133G846
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/08/1977
From: Vollmer R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Miraglia F
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20133G739 List:
References
FOIA-84-559 NUDOCS 8510160152
Download: ML20133G846 (9)
v • d • e


Text

a e

a f[;L

<> - k n.. '".

$5 1

.a. -,... :-

s c.ve...

x p.... {.hg....,., g, (

g. '. -- 33.,

.w _v.,. 7.J.

,,. 9)

g,

. c,

. g..; ;... _ +,. p.

. ~.

.in.. ?..;N.tw....r.

. ;. v

XT A..

O EW

~.

-,'u % -$f}.:,

. 3.[..Q :

d.

. l

-:),?S:f.d..,

F. J. Miraglia, Technical. Assistant to the Direc'6ir,g

-],.

"l. -

Q,5 6.;

1. f i

. iiEMBEM FOR:

Division of Si..te Safe.ty and Enviro.n, ment.al _Analysi.r.!,II.RR.?.t

./

..,. ~

. m...

...,..m.a., a

.e..-

Richard H'. Yollmer, Assistant Director for Site Anal [s'{if

~ FR

' Division of Site Safety 'and Environhental Analysis, 'FIRO.M 7.,.7#

s,y 3

  • N fJB C0;MENTS 011 PRELIMliiARY SITE IllVESTIGATict! REVIEW OF.

TriE PHILIPPI?:E t!UCLEAR PCL'ER PLAllT UillT 110. l

. (?;t.2 Str e

  • QNw 2.1, 2.1-1, 2.2, 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of 'the prellisinary Ve hue reviewed Sections site W.stication report sub"itted by the !'ational Pwer Corporation for the propec Philippine fiuclear Po'.ser Plant Unit l'o.1 site at Pfapot Point',* Bataen,

[

L'e are returning, as requested in thefe.'bruary 16, and hse enclosed our coments.

1977:ss fron H. Denton to R.11. Yollper et al., the sections of the report e.ich

-i :

werez;t to us for review.

3. ;.

This shation was coordinated by r.. Ferrell, Site Analyst, Section R, f.ccit.t Anal;ris 3 ranch.

d

.i. '.

.s,.

Richard H. Vollner,. assistant Director

.i70.

  • E for Site Analysis Division of Site Safety and Envirormental Analysis p6 cl e
  • Distribution 1.

Iritial Site Examination Infor.ation U"U N

'l' "4 tariev - Philippine I:uclear Pouer NRR Reading i

Mm:t Unit fio.1 AAB Reading

2. hilippine l'relinir.ary Site Investigation AAB File (Early Site Review)

,mt DSE Reading cc:

R. Centon

,.,. /

D. ruller R. Ycliner

~ s.
c. Bunch J -- i L. Sof fer

. ~

. ' [{.d 5 C. Ferrell

~ 'D.:.:.'}

f'f,..

.u h ol g 2 851001 SCHLEMM 84-559 PDR 2,.. -

AAB_ _: D._S E _ __ _.. __AA_B_: DS E__

AAB:DSE AD/S DSE 1

r..

o mcc >

j bg_.

.S.o.f.f e_r__.. _ __.Dhu _ci _;_. _g,o her l

sUPN AMc w

._2/_2 / n__ _.__.._.30. /11_ _ _ m._3/.'1 GL _ __ _ _ 3L1B 7 oarr >

t"PC Form 318 (2-76; t;RCM 02040 c u.s. co v r awr.wt pamt us or rec t: teve-sta_7es

6,

~

INITIAL SITE EXAMINATION INFORMATION REVIEW P.9ILIPPINE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NO.1 II.

PoWon Density Thet fonal Power Corporation has supplied demographic data for the time perimil975-2020 out to a 50 Km radius. The population density at 50 Km (31sces) for 1975 and 2020 is 87/Km2 and 477/Km2 respectively. Figure i shas:he current and projected population at 50 Km radius to be 685,827 and2;40,045 respectively. This figure indicates that the current and pro-jec'af populations fall within the current NRC. guideline talues of 500 and 2 respectively.

We see nothing unusual in the present and 100E ;sple/ mile the;rdected population at this site which would require the review of alteste sites.

III.

Nearx Facilities The liitt road traffic in the vicinity of the reactor site consists of mini-bus, fspneys and tricycles on Route 312 which passes within 1.5 Km north of the site. The only marine traffic listed by the applicant on the South China Sea, ediacent to the site, is by 20 motorized boats which carry six to ten persons.

The airstrip at Morong which was used by the Long Beach Mining Corporation is currently unused and is not being maintained.

No mention is made of flight patterns in the vicinity of the site'. We have noted no nearby transportation i

or industrial facilities which could affect the safe operation of this pro-posed nuclear power plant.

l Section 2.2.3, Evaluation of Potential Accidents, has not Seen provided.

that we are unable to coment further in this area. We do note from figure 2.2-15 that a Naval Reservation is located about 15 Km (5.8 miles) fro proposed site.

5

~

.]

-e.-...._.._....~...

?

2-Addltiout Comment

~

f It appers from Figure 1.1-1 that the turbine is in a non-peninsular NRC would request additional analysis to show that a turbine orienta2m.

ft missileuauld not damage structures or systems critical for nuclear sa e y

?

  • e F

{

6, 4

(.

l

~

Philippine Nuclear l'ower Plant Unit No. 1

~

7 10

.1 IsalIiii s

~

2 2, 590/ KM

[1000/Mi. 2 )

Y EAR 2020 2

Eo 1,295 / KM

[ 500 / Mi. 2) s 3mo 105 us

?

F

_a Y EAR 1975

~

j 3o l

10

/

/

4 9

l 8 -,

7 6 -

5 -

4 '

3 -

2 -

o 103 ii11litti 10 20 30 40 50 Km.

OlSTANCE FROM PLANT, KILOMETERS a-l l

FIGU RE 1 Cumulative Population Distribution l

l

[ Y "%

l

.k

?.

U.hhich-

  • S(4 #

?

9..i

-/

$rM f.C

.r, IN*-

1,-

.).

.k f dcY.*I-s..--

,',..p.#-).

. p. ;.x

.h

',- (.Sb b:y 'A N--l.u.a.<t'

f. %p,&.. (

5-

.k,:

q

-4 k)4sp.

MR 3 SII c..

p.

. Lfi:.M.? % J K s..N.o P.. S.r w c.4:. p{ e W,,

DC

  • ~

w 5h,-~;,

ev N.-

'r :

-0; N.

~:

y g:.;. g.

. 7 '&'..:r.-F J,.Miraglia, Techrifqa1 Assistant to the b,ir

+:

L '

q

. Olvisfoe qf $1te Safeg"and Environmq%.L;w:-? ? ?M ',.

FOR

.p o+

.Q.J.:'. v.; fstant Direciar for Site Anahsttj -

'%d v

' ':':..f.C.:

Ass..

L

. Richard II, Yollmer,fety and Env1rospental Analysth mRg ' q FR I

Divlsfon of Site Sa

g..

.j, g

4 AAB COINENTS ON PRELIMINARY $1TE INVESTIGAT i

THE PHILIPP]t:E NUCLEAR POVER PLANT tmIT N t';

,c.

l 2.1, 2.1-1, 2.2, 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of the prel atnary h

sitaterstigation report subritted by the Mational Pover Corpor viewed Sections Ve

Cataan, propuntPhilippine Nuclear PoWr Plant Unit Po.1 site at Napo We are returning, as requested in the I h

and tue enclosed our connents.1977ams from H. Denton to weresma to us for review.

Thisamh;ation was coordinated by t. Ferrell, Site Analyst, Sect Ana M B anch.

Richard R. Vollner Assistant Director for Site Analysis Division of Site Safety and Environnental Analysis Distribution Enc 1sesre:

1sitial Site Exa-inetton Infomation

@ l ple 1.

RR Reading tester - Pn111ppine f:uclear Pouer AAB Reading

2. FW1fppine Pre 11ninary Site Investigation AAB File (EaGy Site Review)

Flart Unit No.1 i

DSE Reading pg cc: E.Denton R. P'. lier R. Tc11ner

e. Bunch L. Soffer k

VII C. Ferrell I/ AI.1',Y L

,p' J

i/

n--

'(

)

i or r.cd AAB:DSE AAB:DSE AAB:DSE AD/S OSE c

.9 A_ _

e jb

_ t.

.f.e......

,_3/_l/77____,_ N._7.U _7_ _ _ _ _ s.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,. _.

- wc >

. 3/M_ _.. _ _ o. _3 G. /R. _,

ala t 'a c o' r c a esse.n.

,e, D"TE M t u.v.. c.e v t a wt u t NRC Form 318 0 76; t;R06A 02340 l

w

~

j s

(

\\

\\

INITIAL SITE EIAMINATION INFORMATION REVIEW PHILIPPINE N0 CLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NO. 1 II. Pesesion Density Theational Power Corporation has supplied demographic data for the time pertus1975-2020 out to a 50 Km radius. The population density at 50 Km 2 and 477/Km2 respectively. Figure I (3 Ides) for 1975 and 2020 is 87/Km 685,827 shaste current and projected population at 50 Km radius to be This figure indicates that the current and pro-andgp0,045 respectively.

jecastpopulations fall within the current NRC guideline values of 500 and 10E psple/ mile 2 respectively. We see nothing unusual in the present and thepudected population at this site which would require the review of altmete sites.

III. Neashy Facilities The Mght road traffic in the vicinity of the reactor site consists of mini-bus, jeepneys and tricycles on Route 312 which passes within 1.5 Km north The only marine traffic listed by the applicant on the South China the site.

Sea, adacent to the site, is by 20 motorized boats which carry six to ten perseus.

The airstrip at Morong which was used by the Long Beach Mining Corporation is No mention is made of flight currently unused and is not being maintained.

We have noted no nearby transportation patterus in the vicinity of the site.

or in&strial facilities which could affect the safe operation of this pro-posed nuclear power plant.

Section 2.2.3, Evaluation of Potential Accidents, has not been provided so We do note from Figure that we arc unable to coment further in this area.

2.2-15 that a Naval Reservation is located about 15 Km (5.8 mile proposed site.

=

i 2

h Additient Coment_

It appens from Figure 1.1-1 that the turbine is in a non-peninsular l

NRC would request additional analysis to show that a turbine orientaen.

miss11eamld not damage structures or systems critical for nuclear safety.

l e

i i

l l

l 1

1 l

l l

M -

4.. '.

j PM11ppine Nuclear Fower Plant Unit No.1 i

7 10

.i i s i g n i a i 2

y 2,590/KM

[1000/Mi.I 3

/

Y EAR 2020 10s r

2 2

1,295/ KM 0

E

[ 500 /Mi. 2) a 3

5 10 m

2r 4

a Y EAR 1975

~

31 i

3 o

I i

4 I

10

! i-l-

1 i

6 -

5 -

4 U 3-2-

i 103 8888Ii888 10 20 30 40 50 Km.

DISTANCE FROM PLANT. KILOMETERS 4

FIGU RE 1 Cumulative Populatix Distribution

(

7-- - _--- - - ____ _

(

i NCV 4 1977 The Honorable Librado D. Ibe Comissioner Philippine Atomic Energy Comission P. O. Box 932 Manila, The Philippines s

Dear Comissioner Ibe:

As you know, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission and the Philippine Atomic Energy Comission have cooperated on projects and exchanged Our technical infonnation on several occasions in the recent past.

Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis (DSE), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, has now asked us to request copies of those sections of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report for the Napot Point nuclear power plant which describe its geotechnical (geology, seismology, DSE believes this material will be a and engineering) characteristics.

valuable supplement to NRC's present data on siting power reactors in l

volcanic terrains, an area which concerns us because the tectonic setting of the U.S. Nor'.hwest is similar, in some respects, to that of We know that an analysis of the volcanic and seismological Napot Point.

hazards of the Napot Point vicinity constituted a portion of the Preliminary Site Investigation Report and understand that the subsequently-completed PSAR considerably expanded the original evaluation.

I would appreciate your assistance in securing the identified PSAR i

If this request presents the PAEC sections for NRC on a timely basis.

with any problems, please let me know and I will be glad to work with If not I look you to reach some mutually acceptable ' resolution.

forward to receiving the geotechnical sections of the Napot Point PSAR soon.

Sincerely,

o. ;.,; u
g l

.bfi D. L2.. r, J r.

Joseph D. Lafleur, Jr.

Deputy Director Office of International Programs bcc: JR5hea JDLafleur f^b DMChenier

'j\\

HElefevre, DSE R feann l

(

ilippine IP IICia'enier : kf

_,_q

'a fl eu r 11/4/77 11/tl/77

    • -T-~

=-e.w..-,y_,,,__

(

(

GO?/ERNMENT ACCOUNTADIUTY PROJECT

. Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street. N.W., \\Voshington. D.C. 20009 (202)234-9382 July 5,1984 Nuclear Regul'atory Commission REEDOM OF INFORMATION Directory. Division of Rules and Records CT. REQUEST Office of Administration Washington, D.C. 20555 S M -gy-$gf phone:(202) 492-8133 M 'd 7-6 -8 9 To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 1 552, the Government Accountability Project (GAP) requests copies of any and all agency records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 5 9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, Appendix 0211 parts 1.A.2. and A.3 (approved October 8, 1980) and information including but not limited to notes, letters, files, memoranda, drafts, minutes, diaries, logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering analyses, drawings, graphs, charts, maps, photographs, books telephone messages, computatons, voice recordings, any other data compilations, interim, status and/or final reports rela-ted to.and/or generated in connection with:

(1) all legally binding agreements and/or informal committeents made by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regarding Philippine Nuclear Power Plant-1, as well as the texts of any such agreements or commit-ments.

(2) all communications by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission re-garding the Philipp ine Atomic Energy Commission including but not limited to those specifically in connection with the recent/ current visit to the United States of America in connection with the Final Safety Analysis Report on the Philipphine Nuclear Power Plant-1.

(3) all communication received and/or sent between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with Mr. Bartholome Ziola current head of the Philippine Atomic Energy Commisssion and (4) All communications received and/or sent between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with Mr. Ibe, former head of the Philippine Atomic Energy Commission.

N Y9

  • }

G=

u e

-py y i

o...

'f

(-

C

. July 5.1984 if any records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 5 9.3a(b) and covered by this request have been destroyed and/or removed, and/or are destroyed and removed after receipt of this request, please provide all surrounding records, including but not limited to a list of all records which have been or are destroyed and/or removed, a description of the action (s) taken, relevant date(s), individual, office and/or agency-wide policies and/or justification (s) for the action (s), identification of all personnel involved with the action (s), and any and al.1 records relevant to, generated in connection with, and/or issued in order to implement the action (s).

GAP requests that fees be waived, because " finding the information can be considered as primarily benefitting the general public."

5 U.S.C. 5 552(a)(4)(A). The Government Accountability Project is a non-profit, non partisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open government. Through legal representat ion, advice, national conferences, films, publications and public out reach, the Project promotes whistle blowers as agents of government accountability.

GAP re-quests the above information as part of an on going monitoring project on the ade-quacy of the governments efforts to protect the public safety and health at nuclear plants.

For any documents or portions that you deny due to a specific F0IA exemption, please provide an index itemizing and describing the documents or portions of documents withheld. The index should provide a detailed justification of your grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is relevant to the document or portion of the document withheld.

This index is required under Vaughn v. Rosen (I) 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).

We look forward to your response to this request within ten days.

Sincerely, f)sufd L. S-wman Donald L. Schlemmer i

f l

l

.. - -.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20133G846&oldid=4239515"