ML20133G806
| ML20133G806 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/06/1975 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Gammill W, Grimes B, Heller L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133G739 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-559 NUDOCS 8510160132 | |
| Download: ML20133G806 (2) | |
Text
.
~
c:.s1L 3
..?**.*
~,
CM HEi'ULAT.;;;Y Cor.1 MISSION NL W ASHINGTON. D.
C.
20555
,g FEB 6 197 5
~
W. P. Cammill, Chief, Site Analysis Ernnch,.TR B.' Crimes, ' Chief, Accident Analysis Branch, TR L. Heller, Section Leader, Foundation' Engineering Section, SAD, TR L. Hulman, Section Leader, Hydrculic Engineering Section, SAB, T11 E.11arhee, Section Leader, IIeteorology Section, SA IRITIAL SITE EXA111NATIOU INFORlRTION (ISEI) REVIDI The purpose of the ISEI review is to provide cicar recorerendations to the prospective applicant as to ' app _ropriate c r
For this purpose, to avoid delqy in the. fu.t,umicr,cy of an application.the material provided b you should take into account not justapplicant, but also uha is available ll as drawing on to you, such as caps and historical records, as weWe are not, providing uords for.
personal and organizational experience.
Uc are attenpting the sake of a regrd or to meet a leSal reguirepent. ih from a minical in an in,fogg. way to provide a maximal atount of ins g t i
rses of acount of inforcation, to identify _i,ssues and altcynat ve cou f
The following are agn for the prospective applicant s consideration.some No probicos identified.
A.
Issues Identified E.'
Additional analysis and/or documentation in the PSAR,.
,1.
desirable over and above RG 1.70 requirements.
e 2.. Develop further analysis and provide to the staff for dur review prior to PSAR submittal.
-Indicate the availability of the staff for 'further discussion.
General C.
f the The Accident Analysis Branch's site. analyst and the four sections o I
Site Analysis Branch will each provide their input in draft forn to i
in final form.
the Technical Coordinator for concent, prior to putt ng The attachment should be complete in itself for ready inclusion in a i
compilation of such results for direct forwarding to the p.ospect ve An example is enclosed.
applicant by the LPM.
golTeof,.
('}% $
'I
....s.: u
~
,0. c e.i ;
[
.c 8520160132 851001 y *(:OCgcp ?' y PDR FOIA l
g 5CHLEMM84-559 PDR V"'
'/o. goo f
l
.. ~,
/
6 1975 I.
.- 2 FEB Each reviscr chould spend no more than a few hours (less than a
~
half dsy) without establishing the desirability of fu submittal by the prospective applicant.
l f
Harold R. Denton, Assistant Director for Site Safety Division of Technical Review Of fice o,f Nucicar Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
' ~
As stated cc: v/ enclosure F. Schroeder A. Giambusso.-
R. DcYoung V. Moore
~
R. Denise D. Muller
- 7. Willists
' A. Kenneke cc: u/o enclosure Site Analysts, AAB SAB, Technical Personnel e
68 i
i l
..m is e
,