ML20133G806
| ML20133G806 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/06/1975 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Gammill W, Grimes B, Heller L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133G739 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-559 NUDOCS 8510160132 | |
| Download: ML20133G806 (2) | |
Text
.
~
. ~,
c:.s1L 3 ..?**.*
NL CM HEi'ULAT.;;;Y Cor.1 MISSION
,g 20555 W ASHINGTON. D. C.
FEB 6 197 5
' ~
W. P. Cammill, Chief, Site Analysis Ernnch, .TR - ,
B.' Crimes, ' Chief, Accident Analysis Branch, TR L. Heller, Section Leader, Foundation' Engineering Section, SAD, TR
' L. Hulman, Section Leader, Hydrculic Engineering Section, SAB, T11 ,
, E.11arhee, Section Leader, IIeteorology Section, SA
- IRITIAL SITE EXA111NATIOU INFORlRTION (ISEI) REVIDI -
The purpose of the ISEI reviewr is to provide cicar recorerendations to the prospective applicant as to ' app _ropriate c*
, For this purpose, to avoid delqy in the. fu.t,umicr,cy of an application.the material provided b is available you should take into account not justapplicant, ll as drawing on but also uha to you, such as caps and historical records, as weWe are not, providing uords for.
personal and organizational experience. Uc are attenpting -
the sake of a regrd or to meet a leSal reguirepent. ih from a minical in an in,fogg. way to provide a maximal atount of insig t rses of acount of inforcation, to identify _i,ssues f and altcynat ve The cou following are agn for the prospective applicant s consideration.some
. A. No probicos identified. .
E .' Issues Identified Additional analysis and/or documentation in the PSAR , . -
,1.
desirable over and above RG 1.70 requirements. e 2..
Develop further analysis and provide to the staff for -
dur review prior to PSAR submittal. . .. .
C. General
-Indicate the availability of the staff for 'further discussion. -
f the I The Accident Analysis Branch's site. analyst and the four sections o Site Analysis Branch will each provide their inputiin draft in final forn form. to the Technical Coordinator for concent, prior to putt ng
- The attachment should be complete in itself for ready inclusion i in a compilation of such results for direct forwarding to the p.ospect ve An example is enclosed.
applicant by the LPM.
golTeof,.
('}% $
. . . . .s.: u ~
'I
.c ,0. c e .i ;
8520160132 851001
[
l g ?' y PDR FOIA y *(:OCgcp V"' ,
5CHLEMM84-559 PDR - -
'/o.
f goo " -
l .
..~, *
. .. /
6 1975
.- 2 FEB I. - .
~
Each reviscr chould spend no more than a few hours (less than a half dsy) without establishing the desirability of fu ,
submittal by the prospective applicant. ,
l f Harold R. Denton, Assistant Director
- for Site Safety Division of Technical Review .
Of fice o,f Nucicar Reactor Regulation .
' ~
Enclosure:
As stated . .
cc: v/ enclosure .
F. Schroeder '-
A. Giambusso .- ,
R. DcYoung .
V. Moore ~
R. Denise D. Muller . .
- 7. Willists
' A. Kenneke . -
cc: u/o enclosure Site Analysts, AAB SAB , Technical Personnel :
. e 68 i . .
i l
. ..m is e
. - - --- - . ,