ML20133C380
| ML20133C380 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 10/20/1980 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Kanicki A CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133C364 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-106 NUDOCS 8507200480 | |
| Download: ML20133C380 (3) | |
Text
,
r y tJ~
> pu fd #AS~5 /0
Y
~
(J}G License No. SOP-3160-1 Docket No. 55-4007 (Pile With Bocket No. 50-255)
Mr. Anthony S. Kanicki, Jr.
RR #1 52 M-43 South Haven, MI 49090
Dear Mr. Kanicki:
'Ihank you for your letter dated September 29, 1980, responding to the noncompliance identified in our letter dated September 16, 1980. Please ~
take steps to assure that proper procedures are used and followed. These matters are a part of our continuing inspection effort.
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Sincerely, James G. Kappler Director cc:
Mr. R. B. DeWitt
" 'Cosssicters Toiik[, Vica President
.'?-
.v-Cospa6j' Mr. D. P. Hoffman, Nuclear Licensing Administrator Mr. R. W. Montross, Manager cc w/ltr dtd 9/29/80:
Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b AEOD Resident Inspector, RIII PDR Local PDR NSIC TIC Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission l
Myron M. Qierry, Chicago 8507200480 850509 PDR FOIA JONES85-10A PDR RIII R
_ ___ AIII_ _
__jlIII orric I
r --~ d ------ $/B 22 M N
7 A' /n -------.--
t-------
holUL80.-
kS(5.If---.---.isIn!@
om 1
~.<,_,,..,.m....m~.-..-._
l i
eft)RCDENT ACTIONS AGAINST OPERATOR LICENSEES GETR - TR-1 i
al ure to o serve operating procedures Repeated operation of the reactor in violation of the shutdown margin requirements defined in the Tech Specs.
al ure to o serve operating procedures j
Repeated operation of the reactor in violation of the shutdown j
margin requirements defined in the Tech Specs.
Vemont Yankee - DPR-28 mom operators to follow procedure that was not reviewed by the PORC or reviewed and approved by the Manager of,
1 Operations.
2.
Authori::ed the operation of core verification, including jumpering of refueling interlocks, a surveillance test involving nuclear safety, to be conducted without a detailed written and approved procedure.
Millstone Unit 1 - DPR-21 n that led to unplanned startup of the reacter.
e for permitting and supervising the withdrawal of a control rod that led to an unpla.ned reacter startup.
Monticello - LPR-22 l
i-o -
ulrected and supervised withdrawal of the same control rod that resulted in the short period over the same notch positions. After again receiving an indicated fast period, again directed and supervised withdrawal of a sp.. etric control rod, knowing that the reactor response should be similar. This action resulted in another fast period and subsequent reactor scram.
Dresden Unit 2 - DPR-19 perator, the reactor went critical with the j
inst mmentation showing a period less than 30 seconds. The reactor operator was not instructed to insert control rods but the reactor power level was allowed to increase into the heatup range (range 6 of the intermediate range monitoring system) with Reece and at least two others operating the I!E range switches.
fg, VhM TO
- M TE,
/r*
" ' ' L.: >,,.
i
-m y
h pe, 7
-1
.,b W
,=
n
- w..'..b f-
, y,,,x.,.
..,a
,..,.,_.,.,,i.
se Gh~..y L; W ;. w +.,
z, w....;
.. L..
G :.+ v -
1Tu!
2'v 19 7')
tre + s ec _ 5m b
3,19 79 - L.TR. + n o J + c s e t.- (3 cn <c t.t i ic7
_.-k 5
) ws
- LTC t-Nc e m 3 R O - R l co,.n Nf LG > I 'l 2 0
%k & --
- c. p. d < -,((t' h. C.f Feb.
6,iqr1 LTe + cm.a,< % a u,_0 eD_i:__,.
~6N.
\\ '\\ y l 'I 9 I
- LS R k 5C.C. TaA PT b r'h I?,
l 'l TfI
$o N w fac k"c.g f
~
4.LL.J. 6 Eq
. Am m cm
<m J %+rq T G 5 a h- ~ 'G n
\\%kl c.:_
V
'7'1 -ZD L-\\
D L.gf ~1,1 'I 7 't HCC if =.
b Pc]
- N8Lc..J[
>. au 7
k