ML20132B030
| ML20132B030 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 12/12/1996 |
| From: | Pugh N NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Oneill J SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132B034 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-351 NUDOCS 9612160433 | |
| Download: ML20132B030 (9) | |
Text
_ _ __ _ _ _ . _
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NRC FOLA REQUEST NUMBERtSl e
FOIA 351 ;
RESPONSE TYPE
[S * @D RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST I FINAL DATE l y l PARTIAL, y
% / W C 1 2 1996 i DOCKET NUM8ER(Si(//spphedble/
REQUESTER Mr. J. H. O'Neill, Jr. ATTN: W. R. HOllaway PART l.- AGENCY RECORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOCATED (See checkedboxes/
No agency records subject to the request have been located.
No additional agency records subject to the request have been located.
RIquested records are available through another public distribution program. See Comments section.
Agency records subject to the request that are identified in Appendix (es) are already available for public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W , Washington, DC.
X Agency records subject to the request that are identified in Appendix (es) O are being made available for public inspection and copying at ths NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC,in a folder under this FOI A number.
The nonproprietary version of the proposal (s) that you agreed to accept in a telephone conversation with a member of my staff is now being made available l for public inspection and copying at the N RC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, OC, in a folder under this FOI A number.
Agency records subject to the request that are identified in Appendix (es) may be inspected and copied at the N RC Local Public Document l Room identified in the Comments section. l Enclosed is information on how you may obtain access to and the charges for copying records located at the NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC.
X Agency records subject to the request are enclosed. Appendices D&E l
Records subject to the request have been referred to another Federal agencybes) for review and direct response to you.
Fees You will be billed by the NRC for fees totaling $ .
l You will receive a refund from the N RC in the amount of $
In view of NRC's response to this request, no further action is being taken on appeal letter dated , N o.
PART 11. A-lNFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Csrtain information in the requested records is being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to the exemptions described in and for the reasons stated y in Part 11, B, C, and D. Any released portions of the documents for which only part of the record is being withheld are being made available for public inspection and copying in the NRC Pubhc Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC in a folder under this FOI A number, COMMENTS The review of additional records subject to your request is continuing.
Some of the documents on Appendix F contain drafts which are considered predecisional information. The final versions of the drafts have already been made publicly available.
p@
o\
d SIG TURE. HECTOR,Di 151 OF F M OF INFOR TlON AND PUBLICATIONS SERVICES
/ $l JnA's/ b l ,[f, , l 5 . . ,
w
- ~ .
3_ ,,
(.
.g...
, 'f
\ )
Y& ~96i2160'433 961212 ^ N' '
'=.
O'NEILL96-351 PDR
.( ,
- u- ,- e z_._.........,n.,
_ _ - . . . _ ~ . ._. ___ _ _ _ _._ _ _ . . _ . _
l FOIA NUMeERis) DATE
~
RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST FOlA 351 i
4 (CONTINUATION) i
'l PART 11.8- APPLICA8tE EXEMPTIONS I l
Records subject to the request that are described in the enclosed Appendix (es) D&E I
are being withheld in their entirety or in part under the i Exernption No.(s) and for the rosson(s) given below pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 10 CF R 9.17(a) of NRC regulations.
l 4
j l . The withheid informat'on property clas:sfied pursuant to Executive Order. (Exemption 1) l
- 2. The withheld reor: nation relatas solely to the mternal personnel rules end procedures of NRC. (Exemption 2) l l 3. The withheid mformation is specifically e..ampted from public disclosure by statute indicated. (Exemption 3)
$ Sections 141 145 of the Atomic Energy Act, which prohibits the disclosure of Restricted Data or Formerly Restricted Data (42 U.S.C. 21612165).
1 4
Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act, which prohibits the disclosure of Unclassified Safeguards Information (42 U.S.C. 2167),
, 4. The withheld information is a trade secret or commercial or financial mformation that is being withheld for the reason (s) iridicated. (Exemption 4)
- The enform,stion is co.'sidered to be confidential busmess (propnetary) mformation.
] ._
$ The mformation is considered to be propnetary mformation pursuant to 10 CFR 2 790ldHit i The mformation was submated and received m confidence pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790ldil2L i
i 5. The withheld mformatson consssts of mieragency or mtraagency records that are not available through discovery durmg litigation (Exernption 5). Applicable Privilege: ,
Dehberative Process. Disclosure of predecisional information would tend to mhsbet the open and frank exchange of ideas essential to the deliberative process. l
)( Where records are withheld m their entirety, the f acts are inextricably intertwined with the predecisionalinformation There also are no reasonably segregable f actual portions because the release of the f acts would permet an mdirect inquary mto the predectsional process of the agency Attorney work product pnvilege (Documents prepared by an attorney in contemplation of litigation 8 Attorney. client privilege. (Confidential commurucations between an attorney and his/her client.)
- 6. The withheld information is esempted from pubhc disclosure because its disclosure would result m a clearly unwarranted evasion of personal pnvacy (Exemption 6)
- 7. The wethheld mformation consests of records compiled for law enforcement purposes and is being withheld for the reasonis) mdicated (Exernprion 7)
Disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with an enforcement proceed ng because it could reveaf the scope, direction, and focus of enforcement efforts, and thus could possibly allow recipients to take action to shield potential wrongioing or a violation of NRC requirements from investigators. (Exemption 7 (All Disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasson of personal privacy. (Exemption 7(C))
The mformation consists of names of individuals and other information the disclosure of which could reasonably be enoected to reveal identities of confidential sources. (Exemption 7 (D))
OTHER l PART 11. C-DENYING OFFICIALS Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.25(b) and or 9 25lc) of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm ss.on regulations, it has been determined that the mformation withheld is exempt from pro.
duction or disclosure. and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public mterest. The persons responsibie for the denial are those officia!s identified below as denyme officials and the Director, Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services. Off.ca of Administration, for any denials that may be appealed to the Executive Director for Operations (EDO)
DENYING OFFICIAL TITLE / OFFICE RECORDS DENIED APPELLATE OFFICIAL l
5"* $
F/1-4, 7-9, 14- So lJ. Lieberman Director. OE 22 Y S. Joosten Executive Assistant. SECY F/93-2R v E. Jordan Director. AEOD E/1. F/5-6. '
10- y 13 I
l l PART 11. D- APPEAL R:GHTS The denial by each denymg official identified in Part ll.C may be appealed to the Appellate Official identified there. Any such appeal must be made in writing withm 30 days of receipt of this response. Appeals must be addressad, as appropnate, to the Executive Director for Operations, to the Secretary of the Commission, or to the inspector General, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and m the letter that it is an " Appeal from an initial FOI A Decision."
NRC FORM 464 (Part 2) (1-91) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
i j Re: FOI A-96-351 i
APPENDIX D l l RECORDS BEING RELEASED IN THElR ENTIRETY I i
i NLQ, DATE DESCRIPTION /(PAGE COUNT) t
- j. 1. 01/04/94 EA Request Form (EA 94-003) (1 page) t j' 2. 01/04/94 Letter from S. Miltenberger to T. Martin with redacted version i of Respondent's Motion for Summary Decision (29 pages) i
! 3. 04/14/94 U.S. Cash Link, Wire transfer of payment of civil penalty (EA 94-003) (1 page) l 4. 06/21/94 EA inquest Form (EA 94-112) (1 page)
I
- 5. 08/02/94 Transcript of Enforcement Conferenu with the Salem Senior j Nuclear Shift Supervisor (EA 94-112) (102 pages) i
- 6. 11/08/94 U.S. Cash Link, Record of wire transfer of payment of penalty (EA 94-112) (1 page)
- 8. 11/21/94 Memo to Addressees from J. Gray, OE,
Subject:
01 Report 1-93-021R (EA 94-239) (2 pages)
- 9. 02/01/95 Letter to M. Wetterhahn from J. Gray,
Subject:
Request for Transcript and Release of 01 Report 1-93-021R, w/o enclosure (2 pages) 10, 05/11/95 Deposit Ticket re Wire transfer from PSEG (EA 94-239) Partial copy of printout (1 page)
- 13. 11/15/95 Listing for FDS Deposits, Record of wire transfer of payment of penalty (EA 95-117, EA 96-062, EA 95-065) (1 page)
- 14. 12/10/95 T. Martin's notes as a result of a meeting with the licensee (2 pages)
.. . - . . . - ~ . - _ ~ - - . - . . - . - _ . - . . . . . . . - . . . . - . _ . - - . . . -. . . - . -.
l I
Re: FOI A-96-351 t
- APPENDIX D (continued) l RECORDS BEING RELEASED IN THEIR ENTIRETY I ?
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION /(PAGE COUNTJ
- 15. 12/18/95 Memo to T. Martin from W. Russell,
Subject:
Extension of l Salem SALP with attached 11/17/95 Memo to W. Russell from l T. Martin,
Subject:
Suspension of Salem SALP (2 pages)
- 17. Undated Salem Equipment Deficiency List since 1/94 labeled as Attachment 1 (4 pages)
- 18. Undated Notes of T. Martin (1 page)
- 19. Undated T. Martin's notes from a meeting (1 page) l 1
i 1
I i
i l
l I
l -
, . . . _ - . _ . - . _ . _ . - _ _ _ _ . .- _ _ . . . . . . _ . _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ . . ~ , . _ _ _ . _ _ - . . . _ . . _ . . . . _ _ . . _ . . _ _ . _ -
I l 1
- 1 l l 1
Re: FOIA-96-351 !
APPENDIX E i RECORDS BEING WITHHELD IN PART
)
O. DATE DESCRIPTION /(PAGE COUNT)/ EXEMPTIONS
- 1. Undated Memorandum of Understanding between PSE&G and !
Township of Lower Alloways Creek (7 pages) EX. 6 l l
I
__ . ._ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . __ _ . . _ ___ . . _ . . _ . _ . _ _ . ~
! Re: FOIA-96-351 i
i APPENDIX F j RECORDS BEING WITHHELD IN THElR ENTIRETY NO. DATE DESCRIPTION /(PAGE COUNT)/ EXEMPTIONS
- 1. Undated Memo to J. Lieberman from T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed Enforcement Action - PSEG with enclosed draft of letter to PSEG, draft NOV, draft letter to individuals (EA 94-239)(33 pages) EX. 5
! 2. Undated Memo to J. Lieberman from T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed i
} Enforcement Action - PSEG with enclosed draf t letter to PSEG, i
draf t NOV, draft memo T. Martin to J. Liberman, draf t Secy j paper (EA 95-062,95-065,95-117)(18 pages) EX. 5 l l
i 3. Undated Memorandum from Thomas Martin to James Lieberman on Proposed Enforcement Action - Public Service Electric and Gas Company (Salem) (18 pages) EX. 5
- 4. Undated Memorandum from Thomas Martin to James Lieberman on Proposed Actions to Public Service Electric and Gas Company (Salem) and Three Individuals (15 pages) EX. 5
- 5. Undated Draf t AIT inspection report, rev. 0 (53 pages) EX. 5
- 6. Undated Declaring Terminated Emergency Conditions (3 pages) EX. 5 1
- 7. Various Handwritten notes regarding various Salem enforcement topics l
(17 pages) EX. 5 )
- 8. 02/12/92 Memo to J. Lieberman from T. T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed Enforcement Action with enclosed draft of letter to PSEG (EA 92-007)(12 pages) EX. 5
- 9. 05/13/92 Memo to J. Lieberman from T. T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed Enforcement Action with enclosed draft of letter to PSEG (EA 92-084)(7 pages) EX. 5
- 10. 12/19/92 Draft AIT inspection report (32 pages) EX. 5
- 11. 12/20/92- R. Spence's electronic files draft input 01/12/93 to AIT inspection report sections 2,3, 5,6, sequence of events, & simulator demonstration (48 pages) EX. 5
- 12. 01/13/93 Draf t AIT inspection report, R. Spence comments (35 pages)
EX.5 1
l 4
i i
i
l Re: FOI A-96-351 !
APPENDIX F (continued)
RECORDS BEING WITHHELD IN THEIR ENTIRETY NO. DATE DESCRIPTION /(PAGE COUNT]/ EXEMPTIONS.
- 13. 01/27/93 Draft AIT inspection report (55 pages) EX. 5
- 14. 02/03/93 Memo to J. Lieberman from T. T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed '
l Enforcement Action with enclosed draft of let.ter to PSEG (EA l 93-014)(7 pages) EX. 5 l j 1 i
1
- 15. 03/09/93 Memo to J. Lieberman from T. T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed l l
Enforcement Action with enclosed draft of letter to PSEG and ;
draft NOV (EA 93-014)(11 pages) EX. 5 i
!- 16. 02/14/94 Memo to J. Lieberman from T. T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed Enforcement Action with enclosed draft of letter to PSEG and draft NOV (EA 94-003)(13 pages) EX. 5 l 17. 02/14/94 Memo to J.. Lieberman from T. T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed l Enforcement Action with OE cover sheet and enclosed draft of l
letter to PSEG and draft NOV (EA 94-003)(15 pages) EX 5
- 18. 03/01/94 Fax copy of draf t memo to file from D. Vito,
Subject:
Closeout of Allegation Rl-93-0011 for Salem Steam Generating Station:
i with cover notes (7 pages) EX. 5
, 19. 03/18/94 Fax copy of draft letter to S. Miltenberger, from T. Martin, l
Subject:
NRC Augmented Inspection Team Findings involving
!- Loss of Overhead Annunciators with attached cover sheet, notes, typed insert, telephone message, and draft letter to individuals (8 pages) EX. 5
- 20. 08/12/94 Memo to J. Lieberman from T. Martin,
Subject:
Proposed l, Enforcement Action - Public Service Electric and Gas Company l with enclosed draf t Secy paper, draft letter to PSEG, draf t NOV, draf t letter to individual (EA 94-112)(30 pages) EX. 5
- 21. 10/20/94 Memo to R W. Cooper from R. M. Gallo,
Subject:
Potential enforcement actions from the Salem comprehensive 3 assessment of performance with attached draft NOV (3 pages)
EX. 5 l
f
_ _ .. _ . _ ._.__._. _ . _ ._ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . ___.. _ . ._ .. - _ .___.m____ _ _ _ _ _
~
l -
1 e i
- Re
- FOl A-96-351 l APPENDIX F l (continued)
RECORDS BEING WITHHELD IN THEIR ENTIRETY NO. DATE DESCRIPTION /(PAGE COUNT)/ EXEMPTIONS
- 22. 06/13/95 Handwritten notes re Salem Enforcement Panel, with i Enforcement Panel Briefing Form and draft violations attached (13 pages) EX. 5 1
23, 10/05/95 Commissioner K. Rogers' Notation Vote Sheet on SECY 246 (1 page) EX. 5 j
- 24. 10/12/95 Chairman S. Jackson's Notation Vote Sheet on SECY-95-246 l l
(1 page) EX. 5 ;
I
- 25. 10/16/95 Memo from J. Hoyle to J. Taylor,
Subject:
SECY-95-246 Proposed Cumulative Civil Penalties in the Amount of
$600,000 to Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G) Company concerning Violations at Salem Units 1 & 2 (1 page) EX. 5 1
i t
I I
l .
I l l
i
(
l l
1
. = _ . - _ . . . . . -. - _ - . - _. . _ . . _ ~ . _ _ . - . . _ _ . . _ - - . . . . . .
EA NLMBER REQUEST FORM i TO: OEMAIL OR FAX TO OE FROM: [ q REGIONAL CONTACT DATE OF REQUEST /[h[fh REGION /
1 LICEMSE!! Ida,g_._es % d FACILITY /LOCAllON b Sd UNTI3 l LICENSE / DOCKET NO(S). b ' O _ ,[ 7 2 76_ h/[
IAST DAY OF INSPECllON /l [L ) )h3 O! REPORT NO. ! ! DATT. OF 01 REPORT j
SUMMARY
OF FACI 3 OF CASE (ANNUAL REPORT FORMAT FOR EA13 ENFRY) (MAXIMUM OF 300 CllARACERS)
$ WW), _ ) c3 -
g h &g,&f QQvu__
i 'lt W M I W h 0 M ad M BRIEF
SUMMARY
OF INSPEC110N kNDINGI(IP NOT SUFFICIENIT.Y DESCRIBED!ABOVE) !
Y /
N ?. / . 4 >
1 J
2 g REASON FOR POTENilAL ESCA!ATED ACHON i
a l l \
! l
- DELEGATED CASE YES NO j MED INST PHYSICIAN NUC Pl{ ARM RADIOG IRRA 4 D WEli LOGGERS ACADEMIC GAUGE MOIFIURE DENSTIY j OT1IER TYPE
j CITE SIMILAR CASE: FA NO SilOULD OE ATITiND ENF CONF YES NO I NONDEll!GATIID CASE YES NO NONDELEGABW TYPE 01 REPORT /WilliULL COMPLEX / NOVEL l DISCRE?I1ON COMM APPROVAL 01INEREST SL 1 OR 2 OTilER REASON:
i IS TilERE A BASIS TO CLOSE ENFORCEMENT CONTERENCE? Y/N IF YES, EXPIAIN; f
1 i
I EA # ASSIGNED BY OE Y 003 DATE:
/ (/ c/ t/
ES ASSIGNED g
l
/ / l
/
4
o SHAW, PirrMAN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE 2300 N STREET. N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20037 1128 (202)663-8000 f (202 0007
- ~ n m m u. .o. F0lA/PA REQUEST
(*********
l Case & %-35I August 30,1996 Date Rec'd: 4-1 N
! Action Off:
! Director, Division of Freedom of Related Case:
Information & Publications Services l Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Two White Flint North Building 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 l Re: Freedom ofInformation Act Request Regarding the Salem Generating Station, Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 Dear Sir or Madam-This is a Freedom ofInformation Act request pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Q 552(a)(3) and 10 l
l C.F.R. 9.23. We request that you make available to Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge the documents responsive to the attached Request for Production of Documents. These documents need to be made available as soon as possible to support depositions in an
~
accelerated legal action. In onier to expedite production of the documents, we have deliberately' tailored this request to be narrow in scope and straightforward in the type of documents requested. We have already obtained copies of relevant documents presently available at the N.R.C. Public Documents Room and they need not be produced again in response to this request. Of course, we agree to bear the cost of this request as per 10 C.F.R.
f 9.23(b)(4),9.33,9.39, and 9.40, and we authorize you to respond to this request piecemeal as documents become available. Please contact me at (202)663-8148, or William Hollaway at (202)663-8294, at your convenience if you have any questions regarding this request.
Please direct your response, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 9.27, to:
William R. Hollaway, Ph.D. y Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.
l, Wcshington, D.C. 20037-1128
- (202)663-8294 l Fax
- (202)663-8007 I V
. . . - - - - . _ _ _ . -. -. . . _ _ ~ . . . - . _ _ . . . . - - _ _ - . - _ - . . . . -. . _ , -
l-5 HAW, PITTMAN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE A PAntnE ntMir tNCLUDING PROFE S$l0NAL ComPORAtl0N$
l f
Director, Division of Freedom ofInformation and Publications Services August 30,1996 Page 2 l Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sin ely, ,
l l John . O'Neill, Jr. I i
l Attachment i
i 34410748 / DOCSDCI e
?
O I
l
- l. :
I v1A Request, Aug. 30,1996 REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
)
i l
l l
l L DIRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. The term "NRC" means the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, all offices and/or branches thereof specifically including, but tot limited to, headquarters in Rockville, Maryland and the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, and also in-cludes all employees, consultants, agents, and representatives to the maximum extent per-mitted by 10 C.F.R. Q 9.3, unless otherwise indicated by the request.
- 2. The term " Salem" means one or both units of the Salem Generating Station located in Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey and operated by the Public Service Electric and Gas Company. (
1
- 3. The term " SAP" means the Salem Assessment Panel that was developed in 1995 specifi-L cally to review Salem Generating Station on an ongoing basis, including all members and supervisors thereof.
l
- 4. The term "PSE&G" refers the operator of Salem, Public Service Electric and Gas Company.
- phia Electric Company. .
- 6. The term "Delmarva" refers to Delmarva Power & Light Company.
- 7. The term " Atlantic Electric" refers to Atlantic City Electric Company. ,
- 8. The term "SALP" means the Strategic Assessment of Licensee Performance, a compre-hensive review of plant performance, performed for each plant on an 18-month cycle. The most recent SALP review for Salem was issued on January 3,1995.
- 9. The term " Enforcement Action" means a civil penalty levied by the NRC against the licen-sees of Salem pursuant to single or multiple violations at Salem. The most recent En-forcement Action regarding Salem was issued on October 16,1995.
l
- 10. The term "AIT" means the Augmented Inspection Teams that performed invsstigations of Salem in 1992,1993, and 1994, including all members and supervisors there'of.
l
! 11. The term " SIT" means the Special Inspection Team that performed an investigation of Sa-lem in 1995, including all members and supervisors thereof.
i
- l l
l
FOIA Request, Aug. 30,1996
- 12. The term "PA" means the comprehensive Performance Assessment evaluation of Salem performed in July-August,1995 to aid in focusing future NRC inspection resources at Salem.
- 13. The term " Confirmatory Action Letter" means the letter from the NRC to PSE&G on June 9,1995 confirming PSE&G commitments to take specific actions prior to the restart of Salem and confirming that failure to take these actions may result in enforcement action.
IL DOCUMENTS REQUESTED
- 1. All documents concerning the NRC's Salem Assessment Panel (" SAP") established on August 2,1995, especially including but not limited to:
- a. All internal NRC discussions concerning the formation and purpose of the SAP;
- b. Transcripts, meeting minutes, summaries, and handouts of all meetings of the SAP;
- c. Lists of attendees at all meetings of the SAP;
- d. All materials presented to the SAP;
- e. All notes taken during presentations and meetings of the SAP;
- f. All repons or memoranda of the SAP;
- g. All reports or memoranda written by any members of the SAP concerning Salem. ,
- 2. All documents concerning the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance
("S ALP") reviews of Salem from 1990 through the present, especially including but not limited to:
- a. Transcripts, meeting minutes, summaries, and handouts of all NRC meetings on the Salem SALP reports;
- b. Lists of attendees at all meetings on the Salem SALP reports;
- c. Variances, differences or changes between consecutive Salem SALP feports;
- d. Internal NRC discussions about interim drafts of the Salem SALP reports;
- e. Internal NRC discussions about final drafts of the Salem SALP reports;
- FOIA Request, Aug. 30,1996
- f. Internal NRC discussions about variances, differences or changes between interim reports and the final Salem SALP reports; 5
- g. The basis for each of the findings in the Salem SALP reports; l
h Region I's knowledge ofissues raised in the Salem SALP reports; l
l i. Region I's knowledge of PSE&G's plans to address issues raised in the various Sa-l lem SALP reports;
- j. Internal Region I discussions concerning the findings and conclusions expressed in the Salem SALP reports;
- k. Whether NRC or Region I ever expressed any concerns about poor or declining performance or the like to PSE&G related to the Salem SALP reports;
- 1. Communications between NRC and Region I personnel concerning consistencies or inconsistencies between the various Salem SALP reports;
- m. All documents setting forth or discussing the deliberations and considerations of the SALP boards reviewing Salem performance from 1990 to the present;
- n. To the extent not covered by previous requests, all other documents regarding the Salem SALP reports.
l 3. All documents concerning potential and actual NRC enforcement actions regarding Salem from 1990 to the present, including but not limited to:
- a. Transcripts, meeting minutes, summaries, and handouts from all Enforcement Con- ,
l ferences concerning Salem between NRC and PSE&G, including but not limited to meetings on February 2,1992; April 9,1992; April 6,1993; February 1,1994; July 28,1994; February 10,1995; Jilne 1,1995; June 23,1995; July 13,1995; and July 28, 1995;
! b. Lists of attendees at all Enforcement Conferences concerning Salem between NRC and PSE&G;
- c. Transcripts, meeting minutes, summaries, and handouts from allintes; pal NRC i
meetings concerning enforcement actions regarding Salem; i d. Lists of attendees at all internal NRC meetings concerning enforcement actions re-l garding Salem; l
- e. Communications with PSE&G concerning potential and actual NRC enforcement l
l actions regarding Salem; I
I
FuA Request, Aug. 30,1996
- f. Communications with others concerning potential and actual NRC enforcement actions regarding Salem, especially including but not limited to PECO Energy, Delmarva, and Atlantic Electric; .
- g. Internal NRC discussions concerning potential NRC enforcement actions regarding
- Salem; l
- h. Internal NRC discussions concerning actual NRC enforcement actions regarding Salem, including but not limited to the $50,000 civil penalty issued March 9,1994;
! the $500,000 civil penalty issued October 5,1994; $80,000 civil penalty issued April 11,1995; and the $600,000 civil penalty issued October 16,1995;-
i
- i. The basis and rationale for taking each of the enforcement actions regarding Salem;
- j. Internal NRC discussions about drafts of the enforcement actions regarding Salem;
- k. Internal NRC discussions concerning the findings and conclusions expressed in the enforcement actions regarding Salem; i
Internal NRC discussions concerning PSE&G's responses to each of the enforce- !
1.
ment actions regarding Salem; 4
l 1
I
- 4. All documents concerning meetings between the NRC and PSE&G management or Board of Directors concerning the performance of Salem from 1990 to the present, including but -l not limited to:
- a. Transcripts, meeting minutes, summaries, and handouts from all meetings, includ-ing but not limited to meetings on June 25,1992; July 1,1992; October 10,1992; July 16,1993; July 18,1993; August 6,1993; May 7,1994; March 20,1995; March 21,1995; April 3,1995; June 5,1995; and May 24,1996;
- b. Lists of attendees at all such meetings;
- c. Communications with PSE&G concerning such meetings;
- d. Communications with others concerning such meetings, especially including but not limited to PECO Energy, Delmarva, and Atlantic Electric; I
- e. Internal NRC discussions concerning such meetings.
- 5. All documents concerning the NRC Augmented Inspection Team ("AIT") investigations ofincidents at Salem from November 11-December 3,1991; December 14-23,1992; June 5-28,1993; and around April 1994, including but not limited to:
FOIA Request, Aug. 30,1996
! a. Transcripts, meeting minutes, summaries, and handouts from all AIT meetings re-garding Salem;
- b. Lists of attendees at all AIT meetings regarding Salem; l c. Communications with PSE&G concerning the AIT investigations at Salem and )
AIT meetings regarding Salem-l
- d. Communications with others concerning the AIT investigations at Salem and AIT meetings regarding Salem, especially including but not limited to PECO Energy, Delmarva, and Atlantic Electric;
- c. Internal NRC discussions concerning the AIT meetings regarding Salem; 1
- f. The reasons why the NRC decided to do the AIT investigations at Salem.
- g. The basis for each of the findings in the AIT reports ofinvestigations at Salem;
- h. Notes taken by inspectors during and after the AIT investigations at Salem;
- i. Internal NRC discussions about interim drafts of the AIT reports ofinvestigations at Salem;
- j. Internal NRC discussions about final drafts of the AIT reports ofinvestigations at Salem;
- k. Internal NRC discussions concerning the findings and conclusions expressed in the AIT reports ofinvestigations at Salem.
- 6. All documents concerning the NRC Speqial Inspection Team (" SIT") review of Salem per-formance from March 26-May 12,1995, including but not limited to:
- a. Transcripts, meeting minutes, summaries, and handouts from all SIT meetings re-garding Salem; l b. Lists of attendees at all SIT meetings regarding Salem;
- c. Communications with PSE&G concerning the SIT investigation at S$em and SIT meetings regarding Salem; l d. Communications with others concerning the SIT investigation at Salem and SIT meetings regarding Salem, especially including but not limited to PECO Energy, Delmarva, and Atlantic Electric;
- f. The reasons why the NRC decided to perform the SIT investigation at Salem;
- g. The basis for each of the findings in the SIT report regarding Salem;
- h. Notes taken by inspectors during the SIT investigation at Salem;
- i. Internal NRC discussions about interim drans of the SIT report regarding Salem;
- j. Internal NRC discussions about final drans of the SIT report regarding Salem;
- k. Internal NRC discussions concerning the findings and conclusions expressed in the SIT report regarding Salem.
- 7. All documents concerning the NRC's Performance Assessment ("PA") review of Salem from July Il-August 25,1994, including but not limited to:
- a. Transcripts, meeting minutes, summaries, and handouts from all meetings concern-ing the PA review regarding Salem;
- b. Lists of attendees at all meetings concerning the PA review regarding Salem;
- d. Communications with others concerning the PA review and PA review meetings regarding Salem, especially including but not limited to PECO Energy, Delmarva, and Atlantic Electric;
- e. Internal NRC discussions concerning the PA review meeting regarding Salem; ,
- f. The reasons why the NRC decided to do a PA review regarding Salem;
- g. The basis for each of the findings in the report regarding the PA review regarding Salem;
- h. Notes taken during the PA review regarding Salem;
- i. Internal NRC discussions about interim drans of the PA review report regarding Salem; ,
- j. Internal NRC discussions about final drans of the PA review report regarding Salem;
- k. Internal NRC discussions concerning the findings and conclusions expressed in the PA review repon regarding Salem.
- FOIA Request, Aug. 30,1996
- 8. All documents concerning the Confirmatory Action Letter of June 9,1995 (CAL No. I l-95-009), including but not limited to:
- a. Communications with PSE&G concerning the Confirmatory Action Letter;
- b. Communications with others concerning the Confirmatory Action Letter, espe-4 cially including but not limited to PECO Energy, Delmarva, and Atlantic Electric; 1
- c. Internal NRC discussions concerning the Con 5rmatory Action Letter;
. d. Discussions with Region I concerning non-final drafts of the Confirmatory Action
. Letter;
- e. Discussions with Region I concerning final drafts of the Confirmatory Action j Letter; i
I
- f. Region I's knowledge of the issues raised in the Confirmatory Action Letter, l
i 3 g. Region I's knowledge of PSE&G's plans to address issues raised in the Confirma-i tory Action Letter. ,
i 3451401IDocsDcl m