Letter Sequence RAI |
|---|
|
Results
Other: AECM-85-0289, Forwards Revised Proposed Tech Spec Change Concerning Spent Fuel Pool & Upper Containment Pool Storage Capacity After Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks,Per 850506 Submittal, AECM-85-0297, Forwards Correction to Table 1 of 850815 Final Response to NRC Question Re Dynamic Analysis of High Density Spent Fuel Racks Proposed for Installation at Facility, AECM-85-0352, Forwards Clarification of Use of Stress Criteria for High Density Spent Fuel Racks,In Response to NRC Request.Stress Criteria Differences Between OT Position Paper & NUREG-0800 Amount to Same Limits for Rack Modules, AECM-86-0077, Forwards Revised Spent Fuel Loading Pattern Developed to Maintain Dose Rate Contribution from Spent Fuel in Auxiliary Bldg Spent Fuel Pool Area Below 2.5 Mrems/H for Routinely Accessible Areas, AECM-86-0179, Forwards Revised Tech Spec Page 5-6 Inadvertently Omitted from 860605 Submittal Re High Density Spent Fuel Racks, AECM-86-0229, Forwards Responses to NRC Concerns Re Spent Fuel Decay Heat Capability & Associated Operating Procedures,Per 860716 Telcon.Requests That OL Amend for High Density Racks Be Granted on 860818, ML20117C275, ML20117C283, ML20203G517, ML20205D440, ML20205E845, ML20205E852, ML20205T067, ML20209G129, ML20212N039
|
MONTHYEARML20117C2831985-05-0606 May 1985 Licensing Rept,High-Density Spent Fuel Racks Project stage: Other ML20117C2611985-05-0606 May 1985 Application for Amend to License NPF-29,changing Tech Specs to Allow Replacement of Current low-density Aluminum Spent Fuel Racks w/high-density Spent Fuel Racks to Provide Increased Storage Capacity Project stage: Request ML20117C2751985-05-0606 May 1985 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Replacement of Current low-density Aluminum Spent Fuel Racks w/high-density Spent Fuel Racks to Provide Increased Storage Capacity Project stage: Other AECM-85-0143, Forwards Application for Amend to License NPF-29,changing Tech Specs to Allow Replacement of low-density Aluminum Spent Fuel Racks w/high-density Spent Fuel Racks. Licensing Rept,High-Density Spent Fuel Racks, Encl.Fee Paid1985-05-0606 May 1985 Forwards Application for Amend to License NPF-29,changing Tech Specs to Allow Replacement of low-density Aluminum Spent Fuel Racks w/high-density Spent Fuel Racks. Licensing Rept,High-Density Spent Fuel Racks, Encl.Fee Paid Project stage: Request ML20129F9581985-07-0505 July 1985 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re High Density Spent Fuel Racks in Upper Containment Pool & in Spent Fuel Storage Pool.Response Due by 850715 Project stage: RAI ML20133A1781985-07-26026 July 1985 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Application to Amend License NPF-29,allowing Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks in Upper Containment Pool & Spent Fuel Storage Pool.Info Requested by 850815 Project stage: RAI AECM-85-0229, Responds to 850705 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Analyses Presented in 850506 Application for Amend to License NPF-29,allowing Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Direct Stress Below Liner Matl Ultimate Stress1985-07-29029 July 1985 Responds to 850705 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Analyses Presented in 850506 Application for Amend to License NPF-29,allowing Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Direct Stress Below Liner Matl Ultimate Stress Project stage: Request ML20136H1801985-08-0909 August 1985 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re 850506 Request for Amend to License NPF-29,allowing Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks in Upper Containment Pool & in Spent Storage Pool.Info Requested by 850826 Project stage: RAI AECM-85-0252, Responds to NRC 850705 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Analyses Presented in Application for Amend to License NPF-29,authorizing Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Info Re Numerical Solution of Dynamic Analyses Encl1985-08-15015 August 1985 Responds to NRC 850705 Request for Addl Info Re Structural Analyses Presented in Application for Amend to License NPF-29,authorizing Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Info Re Numerical Solution of Dynamic Analyses Encl Project stage: Request AECM-85-0272, Forwards Response to NRC 850726 Request for Addl Info Re Amend to License NPF-29,allowing Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Tech Spec Section 4.5 Changed to Conform to Ref Design Used in Analysis1985-08-30030 August 1985 Forwards Response to NRC 850726 Request for Addl Info Re Amend to License NPF-29,allowing Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Tech Spec Section 4.5 Changed to Conform to Ref Design Used in Analysis Project stage: Request ML20209G1291985-09-0606 September 1985 Evaluation of Spent Fuel Racks Structural Analysis,Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Unit 1, Technical Evaluation Rept Project stage: Other AECM-85-0297, Forwards Correction to Table 1 of 850815 Final Response to NRC Question Re Dynamic Analysis of High Density Spent Fuel Racks Proposed for Installation at Facility1985-09-11011 September 1985 Forwards Correction to Table 1 of 850815 Final Response to NRC Question Re Dynamic Analysis of High Density Spent Fuel Racks Proposed for Installation at Facility Project stage: Other AECM-85-0289, Forwards Revised Proposed Tech Spec Change Concerning Spent Fuel Pool & Upper Containment Pool Storage Capacity After Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks,Per 850506 Submittal1985-09-12012 September 1985 Forwards Revised Proposed Tech Spec Change Concerning Spent Fuel Pool & Upper Containment Pool Storage Capacity After Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks,Per 850506 Submittal Project stage: Other AECM-85-0352, Forwards Clarification of Use of Stress Criteria for High Density Spent Fuel Racks,In Response to NRC Request.Stress Criteria Differences Between OT Position Paper & NUREG-0800 Amount to Same Limits for Rack Modules1985-11-0101 November 1985 Forwards Clarification of Use of Stress Criteria for High Density Spent Fuel Racks,In Response to NRC Request.Stress Criteria Differences Between OT Position Paper & NUREG-0800 Amount to Same Limits for Rack Modules Project stage: Other AECM-85-0410, Forwards Response to NRC Request to Determine & Submit Occupational Exposures Associated W/Operation W/High Density Spent Fuel Racks,Per 850506 Application for Amend to License NPF-29,allowing Installation of Racks1985-12-18018 December 1985 Forwards Response to NRC Request to Determine & Submit Occupational Exposures Associated W/Operation W/High Density Spent Fuel Racks,Per 850506 Application for Amend to License NPF-29,allowing Installation of Racks Project stage: Request AECM-86-0077, Forwards Revised Spent Fuel Loading Pattern Developed to Maintain Dose Rate Contribution from Spent Fuel in Auxiliary Bldg Spent Fuel Pool Area Below 2.5 Mrems/H for Routinely Accessible Areas1986-03-14014 March 1986 Forwards Revised Spent Fuel Loading Pattern Developed to Maintain Dose Rate Contribution from Spent Fuel in Auxiliary Bldg Spent Fuel Pool Area Below 2.5 Mrems/H for Routinely Accessible Areas Project stage: Other AECM-86-0011, Responds to 850809 Request for Addl Info Re 850506 Application for Amend to License NPF-29,allowing for Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks1986-03-15015 March 1986 Responds to 850809 Request for Addl Info Re 850506 Application for Amend to License NPF-29,allowing for Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks Project stage: Request AECM-86-0176, Application for Amend to License NPF-29,changing Tech Specs 3/4.7.9.1 & 5.6.3 Re Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks,In Response to NRC Concerns from Review of Util .Affirmation & Justification for Change Encl1986-06-0505 June 1986 Application for Amend to License NPF-29,changing Tech Specs 3/4.7.9.1 & 5.6.3 Re Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks,In Response to NRC Concerns from Review of Util .Affirmation & Justification for Change Encl Project stage: Request ML20205T3631986-06-0505 June 1986 Proposed Changes to Tech Specs 3/4.7.9.1 & 5.6.3 Re Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks Project stage: Request ML20205T0671986-06-0909 June 1986 Revised Tech Spec Page 5-6 Re High Density Spent Fuel Racks Project stage: Other AECM-86-0179, Forwards Revised Tech Spec Page 5-6 Inadvertently Omitted from 860605 Submittal Re High Density Spent Fuel Racks1986-06-0909 June 1986 Forwards Revised Tech Spec Page 5-6 Inadvertently Omitted from 860605 Submittal Re High Density Spent Fuel Racks Project stage: Other ML20203G5171986-07-14014 July 1986 Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amend to License NPR-29 & Proposed NSHC Determination & Opportunity for Hearing to Revise Tech Spec Section 5.6, Fuel Storage, Allowing Increased Upper Containment Pool Capacity Project stage: Other AECM-86-0229, Forwards Responses to NRC Concerns Re Spent Fuel Decay Heat Capability & Associated Operating Procedures,Per 860716 Telcon.Requests That OL Amend for High Density Racks Be Granted on 8608181986-07-25025 July 1986 Forwards Responses to NRC Concerns Re Spent Fuel Decay Heat Capability & Associated Operating Procedures,Per 860716 Telcon.Requests That OL Amend for High Density Racks Be Granted on 860818 Project stage: Other ML20205D4401986-07-28028 July 1986 Notice of Violation from Insp on 860613-0714 Project stage: Other ML20205E8521986-08-12012 August 1986 Notice of Availability of Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Application for Amend to License NPF-29,revising Tech Specs to Authorize Spent Fuel Pool Expansion Project stage: Other ML20205E8451986-08-12012 August 1986 Environ Assessment Re Mod of Spent Fuel Storage Racks at Plant Project stage: Other ML20212N0561986-08-18018 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Issuance of Amend 17 to License NPF-29 Project stage: Approval ML20212N0391986-08-18018 August 1986 Amend 17 to License NPF-29,revising Tech Spec Section 5.6, Fuel Storage to Allow Increased Upper Containment Pool Capacity & Increased Spent Fuel Storage Pool Capacity Project stage: Other ML17219A2551986-12-0505 December 1986 Safety Evaluation Re Util Fire Protection Deviation Requests from App a to Branch Technical Position Asb 9.5-1 & App R to 10CFR50.Listed Deviations Granted.Deviation Re Lack of Fire Rated Barrier Denied Project stage: Approval 1985-09-12
[Table View] |
Text
JGL 5 1985 Docket No.' 50-416 DISTRIBUTION:
Docket.Eile 50-416, NRC PDR Local PDR Mr. Jackson B. Richard PRC System Senior Vice President, Nuclear NSIC Mississippi Power and Light Company LB #4 r/f ACRS (16)
Post Office Box 23054 MDuncan JPartlow Jackson, Mississippi 39205 DHood BGrimes OELD, Attorney EJordan
SUBJECT:
GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 1-HIGH DENSITY SPENT FUEL RACKS
Dear Mr. Richard:
The NRC staff is reviewing the Mississippi Power and Light Company submittal dated May 6, 1985 which requests an amendment to Grand Gulf Unit i license to allow installation of high density spent fuel racks in the upper containment pool and in the spent fuel storage pool. The staff finds that the additional information described in the enclosure is needed to complete the review.
In order to meet the schedule for completion of this review, you are requested to provide the information described in the enclosure by July 15, 1985.
Provide one copy directly to our consultant:
R. C. Herrick Franklin Research Center 20th and Pace Street Philadelphia, Pa 19103 The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, f p J c~
cu r
/ E inor densam, Chief f
i
. sing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing Enclosure Kalf /
K^lif DL:LB#4 LA:DL:L #4 C:DL:LB#4/
LKintner:cl MDuncan EAdejn am 7 / 3 /85 7/$/85 7 / 5 /85 su Pn40a m., w a n u.-
8507170498 850705 PDR ADOCK 05000416 p
PDR
GRAND GULF Mr. Jackson B. Richard Senior Vice President, Nuclear Mississippi Power & Light Company P.O. Box 23054 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 cc: Robert B. McGehee, Esquire The Honorable William J. Guste, Jr.
Wise, Carter, Child, Steen and Caraway Attorney General P.O. Box 651 Department of Justice
.lackson, Mississippi 39205 State of Louisiana Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804 Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esquire Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.
and Reynolds Vice President, Nuclear Operations I?00 17th Street, N.W.
Mississippi Power & Light Company Washington, D. C.
20036 P.O. Box 23054 Jackson, Mississippi 39705 Mr. Ralph T. Lally Manager of Quality Assurance Middle South Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 61000 New Orleans, Louisiana 70161 Mr. Larry F. Dale, Director Nuclear Licensing and Safety Mississippi Power & Light Company P.O. Box 23054 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Mr. R. W. Jackson, Proiect Engineer Bechtel Power Corporation 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20760 Mr. Ross C. Butcher Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 2, Box 399 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 303?3 Mr. J. E. Cross, General Manager Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Mississippi Power & Light Company P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150
ENCLOSURE 1 MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 Request for Additional Information Regarding the Proposed High Density Spent Fuel Rack Installation [1]
A.
SPENT FUEL RACK SEISMIC ANALYSIS 1.
With respect to the numerical solution of the dynamic analysis, please provide the following:
a.
Proof of satisfactory convergence and stability of the numerical solution of the equations.
b.
The integration time step used, and its relationship to that integration time step forming the boundary of stable solutions.
2.
Contrary to the discussion of computed results in Section 6.6 [1], the dimensions shown in Figures 2.1 and 2.2 indicate that no gap exists between the walls and the proposed fuel racks that are placed adjacent to the walls. Please provide a full description of the space between adjacent racks and between the racks and the walls.
3.
Figures 2.1 and 2.2 of the Grand Gulf Licensing Report [1] indicate that fuel racks of various dimensions and geometric orientations are placed adjacent to each other. Also, racks of the same dimensions and geometric proportions may be loaded with a differer.t number of spent fuel assemblies to cause a variation in the mass from rack to rack.
Therefore, high probability exists for adjacent racks to have dynamic out-of-phase motion with each other, effectively reducing the gap per rack module to half the value shown and discussed in the licensing report. This consideration would affect the fluid coupling parameters used in the dynamic analysis as well as the gap width to which displacements are compared. Please provide response data indicating that the rack modules do not impact under this out-of-phase motion condition.
4.
While the licensing report [1] provides technical descriptions of the non-linear dynamic displacement analysis and the basis of the stress analysis methods, the rationale for transfer of the non-linear dynamics results for use by the subsequent linear stress analysis was not described. Please provide the technical basis for this operation as well as any checks employed to assure its validity in this application.
B.
DROPPED FUEL ACCIDENT I 1.
Please be more precise as to the total drop height associated with the statement " dropped from 36 inches above a storage location" as stated in Section 7.1 of the Licensing Report [1].
, C.
LINER INTEGRITY ANALYSIS 1.
For liner stress under the worst rack foot loading, it is not clear from the discussion on pages 7-3 and 7-6 of the Licensing Report [1]
that the " max liner direct stress" is a tensile stress and how it was calculated. Please supply more detail.
D.
SPENT FUEL POOL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS 1.
Please identify all masses considered to be acting with the spent fuel pool floor in the modal analysis and the dynamic analysis. Please explain why these masses are included and why other masses associated with the spent fuel pool should be excluded.
Reference 1.
Mississippi Power and Light Company, Licensing Report on High Density Spent Fuel Racks, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1, report submitted as to letter from Mississippi Power and Light Company (0. D.
Kingsley) to the NRC (H. R. Denton), dated May 6,1985.
s
~
Docket No. 50-416 DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File 50-416 NRC PDR Local PDR Mr. Jackson B. Richard PRC System Senior Vice President, Nuclear NSIC Mississippi Power and Light Compary LB #4 r/f ACRS (16)
Post Office Box 23054 MDuncan JPartlow Jackson, Mississippi 39205 DHood BGrimes OELD, Attorney EJordan
SUBJECT:
GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 1-HIGH DENSITY SPENT FUEL RACKS
Dear Mr. Richard:
The NRC staff is reviewing the Mississippi Power and Light Company submittal dated May 6,1985 which requests an amendment to Grand Gulf Unit I license to allow installation of high density spent fuel racks in the upper containment pool and in the spent fuel storage pool. The staff finds that the additional information described in the enclosure is needed to complete the review.
In order to meet the schedule for completion of this review, you are requested to provide the information described in the enclosure by July 10, 1985.
Provide one copy directly to our consultant:
R. C. Herrfck Franklin Research Center 20th and Pace Street Philadelphia, Pa 19103 The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, Elinor G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing Enclosure DL:LB#4 LA:DL:LB #4 C:DL:LB#4 LKintner:cl MDuncan EAdensam 7 / J/85
/ /85
/ /85 l