ML20129F709

Notice of Violation from Insp on 960821-0926.Violation Noted:On 960914,procedure 2BVS 1.2.3.1-1, ASME Surveillance Requirements for Centrifugal Charging Pump 2A, Failed to Provide Adequate Steps to Ensure Essential Svc Water Sys

ML20129F709
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	10/18/1996
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20129F685	List: ML20129F681 ML20129F709 ML20129F721
References
50-454-96-07, 50-454-96-7, 50-455-96-07, 50-455-96-7, NUDOCS 9610290196
Download: ML20129F709 (1)

Text

. _ - - - - . ~ . -- - - .- . . - - - _ - . - - . - -

i V -

E TICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455 Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 License Nos. NPF-37; NPF-66 During an NRC inspection conducted from August 21 through September 26, 1996, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the

" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:

l 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, requires in part, that activities affecting quality shall be j prescribed by documented procedures of a type appropriate to the

circumstances.

4 Contrary to the above, on September 14, 1996, procedure 2BVS 1.2.3.1-1,

! "ASME Surveillance Requirements for Centrifugal Charging Pump 2A and l Chemical and Volume Control System Valve Stroke Test," Revision 12, was inappropriate to the circumstance, in that, it failed to provide

adequate steps to ensure that the essential service water system

provided cooling to the 2A chemical and volume control pump lube oil l cooler (50-455/96007-02(DRP)).

4 This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

. Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and a copy to the NRC

Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within i i 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting the Notice of Violation  ;

(Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of  !

! Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the l violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the i

. corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the l corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not d

received within the time specified in the Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or

, why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

1 Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, 1~

or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without

redaction. However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.

. l 1 I

Dated at Lisle, Illinois this la_ day of October 1996 i

~

9610290196 961018

. PDR ADOCK 05000454 0 PDR l