ML20128K321
| ML20128K321 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 06/21/1985 |
| From: | Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Wilgus W FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128K328 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8507100542 | |
| Download: ML20128K321 (1) | |
See also: IR 05000302/1985021
Text
%,
OMciaJ
e-
,,
JUN 21 1985
.
Florida Power Corporation
ATTN: Mr. W. S. Wilgus
Vice President Nuclear Operations
P. O. Box 14042, M.A.C. H-2
St. Petersburg, FL 33733
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT: REPORT N0. 50-302/85-21
On April 26 - May 24,1985, NRC inspected activities authorized by NRC Operating
License No. DPR-72 for your Crystal River facility.
At the conclusion of the
inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff
identified in the enclosed inspection report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within these
areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and
representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of activities
in progress.
The inspection findings indicate that certain activities violated NRC require-
ments and other activities appeared to deviate from a commitment to the NRC. The
deviation, with pertinent references and elements to be included in your
response, is presented in the enclosed Hotice of Deviation.
The violation described in the enclosed Notice of Violation is similar to a
violation contained in a Notice of Violation sent to you with our letter dated
- April 11,1985, and is also similar to a violation described in NRC Inspection
Report No. 50-302/85-11 (but not cited) sent to you with our letter dated
April 23,1985.
We note in your letter dated June 6,1985, that you have
responded to the Notice of Violation sent to you with our letter dated April 11,
1985 (violation 85-08-07) and that this response also addresses the violations
discussed in this report and in NRC Inspection Report No. 50-302/85-11. We are
presently evaluating this response, therefore, no additional response to this
violation is required.
The responses directed by this letter and the enclosures are not subject to the
clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget issued under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.
Sincerely,
/S/~ David M. Verrell;
L
Roger D. Walker, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
(See page 2)
\\\\
f 6 Of
l