ML20128B849
| ML20128B849 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/29/1992 |
| From: | Norry P NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Chilk S, Cotter B, Cranford G Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19341G314 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-57FR28642, RULE-PR-50 AD03-1-016, AD3-1-16, NUDOCS 9302030193 | |
| Download: ML20128B849 (7) | |
Text
~
Adc7j-/
. .o lb '
.2 -
7 p %q jo,, UNITED STATES
.[(
5 eg
- ,E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHING T ON, D. C. 20555
%.....& MAY 2 0 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR: Those on Attached List FROM: Patricia G. Norry, Director Office of Administration
SUBJECT:
QUARTERLY UPDATE OF THE HEGULATORY AGENDA The Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services, ADM, requires your input to prepare the quarterly update of the NRC Regulatory Agenda for April through June 1992, the second quarter of this cairndar year. Attached are copies of- agenda entrica for the ru?<> and petitions for rulemaking (PRM) for-which your office iu cesponsible that were included in last quarter's Agenda. Also attached are instructions for updating and adding Agenda entries. Please provide the required material to ADM and to RES by July 3, 1992.
The NRC Regulatory Agenda is used-to indicate those rules that have received the Executive Director for Operations' (EDO) initial approval or annual reapproval for continued development.
In offices subject to the EDO's purview, only those rules'that have received his approval may be developed and may-appear in the agenda.
Additionally, the EDO's procedures on the subject of timely resolution of PRMs require that each office under his purview report quarterly on the status of each PRM to the Rules at.d Directives Review Branch. The EDO requires that the renolution of new PRMs should not be later than 12 months _from the date of publication of the notice of receipt.in the Federal Register.
Any extension of a PRM resolution date aust be approved by the.
EDO in advance. Your response must indicate any proposed extensien of a PRM resolution date, the new proposed date, and the specific reason (s) for the proposed extension. The reason (s) must be provided in sufficient detail to enable the EDO to monitor the action that has been taken to date and to detcimine whether or not to grant the request ~for an extended resolution L date, l
l i
l 9302030193 930129 PDR
$O57FR28642
-2 Your staff may direct any questions concerning this agenda update to_Michnol T. Losar, chief, Rules Review section, Rules and Directivos Roview Dranch, Division of Troodom of Infotmation and Publications Services, ADM (492-7758) .
Ob+T<Y h k1-tA lPatriciaG. Ilorry, Direct 1 office of Administration Attachments:
- 1. Instructions for tho.
/
Rogulatory Agenda Updato
- 3. Regulatory Agonda Entries for the First Quartor
, .- - ,w -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. .s Inatructions for the Agenda Updato pleano ensure the following information is p/ovided for each agonda entry:
- a. the 1boue to be addressedJ 1.e., the problem to be corrected;
- b. the necessity and urgency for addressing :his issue;
- c. any alternativo to rulomaking;
- d. how the issue will be addrossed through rulomaking;
- o. how the public, industry, and NRC will be affected as a result of rulemaking, including benefits and costr, occupational exposure, and resources;
- f. whether the rule will affect small entities, and, if so, whether the small entitics are businesses, governmental jurisdictions, or organizational
- g. whether the rule is subjec- to a legal doodline, either statutory or judicia), and whether this deadlino is for
- a NPRM, a Final Rule, or some other action;
- h. NRC resources and scheduling needed for the rulemaking;
- i. the latest publication ni comment period datos;
- j. the targot for Final Action on the rulo;
- k. key intermediate milostones as approved by-the EDO (boginning of Division Review, completion of Otfico concurrence, submission of rule to EDO) for the present phase (ANFRM, NPRM, Final Rule) of rulemaking.
- 1. reason for ulippage, if applicable; and
- m. the correct namo and telephone number of the AGENCY CONTACT.
For each rulo now under development that has been approved by the EDO but was not included in last quarter's agenda, please provide the required information as a new agenda entry in the NRC agenda format.
InLaccordance with the EDO's procodures on the subjact of control of rulemaking and its timeliness, you are required to send a momorandum to the EDO for each quarterly updato of the NRC Regulatory Agonda, which either--
e cortifies that each rulemaking is on schedulo;
e indicatoo each rule for which, although the original ochedulo han olipped, the targot completion date will probably be met becauco of corrective actiono taken (pleace deceribo); or e indicaten each rulo for which the original schedule will probably not be met and providos the raanon for the clippage and a new target date for final action on the rule.
Pleano cond the original of the memorandum to the EDO. Pleano send the original of the quarterly agenda updato for rulco and petitiona to Michnol T. Locar, chief, Rules Review section, RDRB, ADM, P-223, with a copy to Dill M. Morris, Director, Division of Regulatory Applications, RES, 007-11L, by July 3, 1992.
Pleano direct any quentions concerning this agenda update to Dotty Golden, Regulations specialist, Rules and Directiven Review Dranch, Division of Freedom of Information and Publicationn Servicen (492-4268).
4
OFFICE OF ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA
- 1. Hinor Modificatior '
R oloar Power Roactor Event Reporting ;
(Part 50) .;
f f
i o
I x
A b
T
.+~.de ..
- - _ . - - - e, ,.m_
. . . . 3 e
i a ', ' .
TITLE: !
Minor Modifications'to lluclear Power Reactor Event Reporting Rill: ,
3150-AE12 .
CFR CITATION:
.t 10 CFR 50 ADSTRACT:
The proposed rule would amend the Commicsion's ;
regulations to mako minor modifications to the current ;
nuclear power reactor event reporting requiremento.
The proposed amendmr.nts would apply _-to'all nuclear power reactor licensoon and would doloto reporting requirements for some events that have boon determined to bo of little or no safety significance. This ,
proposed amendments would reduco the industry's reporting burden and the NRC's rosponso burden in event, roview-and assessment.
TIMETABLE:
Proponed Action Published 05/00/92 Final Action Published Undotormined .
LEGAL AUTilORITY:
42 USC 2201; 42 USC So41 EFFECTS ON SMALL BUSINESS AND OTi!ER ENTITIES: -No AGENCY CONTACT:
Raji Tripathi Nuclear-Regulatory Commission Office of Analysis and Evaluation of operational' Data-Washington, DC 20555-
~
301 492-4435 i
,,4, .,.,,G--'#-, ,, -.-4.m..- , , , , , . , _ , . - - - - , _ --.-
ADDRESSES FOR MEliORANDUM D/ATED Samuel J. Chilk Socrotary of the commission B. Paul cotter, Jr., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panol Gerald F. Cranford .
Office of Information Resourcen Management Eric S. Dockjord, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Roncarch :
Robert M. Bernero, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safoty and Safeguards Harold R. Denton, Director Offico of International Programs LEdwaid5L2lJordanjiD1Eedtor, offico of Analysis and' Eval ~uation of Operational Data William B. Korr, Director Office of Small and Disadvantaged Businons Utilization and civil Rights Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation William C. Parler, General Counsel Ronald M. Scroggins, Deputy Chief Financial-Officor/ Controller Janies Li6borman, Director Office of Enforcement k
Lloyd J. Donnolly,. Administrator Office of Licensing Support System Administrator P
L_