ML20127H671

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acknowledgment of NRC Acceptance of NAC-MPC CoC Renewal Application for Review
ML20127H671
Person / Time
Site: 07201025
Issue date: 05/05/2020
From: Christopher Markley
Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch
To: Fowler W
NAC International
CTMarkley NMSS/DFM/STL 415.6293
Shared Package
ML20127H670 List:
References
EPID L-2019-RNW-0029
Download: ML20127H671 (3)


Text

From: Markley, Chris To: "Wren Fowler" Cc: "Heath Baldner"; "Debi Chapman"; "Eric Shewbridge"

Subject:

Acknowledgement of NRC acceptance of NAC-MPC CoC renewal application for review Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 5:16:22 AM Attachments: ML20125A133.pdf Hi Wren, Attached please find the transmittal letter documenting acceptance of NAC-MPC CoC renewal application for NRC review. It should be available to access in ADAMS on May 11 using the ADAMS Accession Number ML20125A133. Also attached is a PDF copy.

Please let me know if you have any trouble accessing it or require a pdf file or hard copy instead.

Thank you.

-Chris Christopher T. MARKLEY PhD l Systems Performance Analyst l Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards l Division of Fuel Management l Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Washington, DC 20555-0001 l

christopher.markley@nrc.gov l (: (301) 415-6293 l 7: (301) 415-0020 l From: Markley, Chris Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 8:15 AM To: 'Wren Fowler' <wfowler@nacintl.com>

Cc: Heath Baldner <hbaldner@nacintl.com>; Debi Chapman <dchapman@nacintl.com>; Eric Shewbridge <eshewbridge@nacintl.com>; Torres, Ricardo <Ricardo.Torres@nrc.gov>

Subject:

RE: Access to documents for NAC-MPC If possible, I would also like access for Ricardo Torres. Hes the lead technical reviewer and the one who would be looking at the files.

From: Wren Fowler <wfowler@nacintl.com>

Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 2:08 PM To: Markley, Chris <Christopher.Markley@nrc.gov>

Cc: Heath Baldner <hbaldner@nacintl.com>; Debi Chapman <dchapman@nacintl.com>; Eric Shewbridge <eshewbridge@nacintl.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: RE: Access to documents for NAC-MPC

Ok. We will setup the access point. Should we only allow access to you for the download?

Wren Fowler Director, Licensing NAC International Inc.

Office: 678.328.1236 Email: wfowler@nacintl.com From: Markley, Chris <Christopher.Markley@nrc.gov>

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 9:59 AM To: Wren Fowler <wfowler@nacintl.com>

Cc: Heath Baldner <hbaldner@nacintl.com>; Debi Chapman <dchapman@nacintl.com>; Eric Shewbridge <eshewbridge@nacintl.com>

Subject:

RE: RE: Access to documents for NAC-MPC

[External]

Hi Wren, Yeah, hed like the option to access them in case theyre needed to support the review. Likely, if a document is actually needed Id probably request it for the docket. And note, you dont need to worry about the CoCs in 1.3.1 as those are publicly available and posted on the NRC website. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

-Chris From: Wren Fowler <wfowler@nacintl.com>

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 9:21 AM To: Markley, Chris <Christopher.Markley@nrc.gov>

Cc: Heath Baldner <hbaldner@nacintl.com>; Debi Chapman <dchapman@nacintl.com>; Eric Shewbridge <eshewbridge@nacintl.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Access to documents for NAC-MPC Hey Chris, Yeah we can setup an online access point to download them. Just want to make sure I understand, you want every revision of the FSAR and every revision of all license drawings ever made? Thats want is listed in Section 1.3 and Table 2.2-1.

Wren Fowler Director, Licensing NAC International Inc.

Office: 678.328.1236 Email: wfowler@nacintl.com

From: Markley, Chris <Christopher.Markley@nrc.gov>

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 6:34 AM To: Wren Fowler <wfowler@nacintl.com>

Subject:

Access to documents for NAC-MPC

[External]

Hi Wren, One of my tech reviewers was going through the application and would like access to the references in Section 1.3 and the drawings in Table 2.2-1. Im not sure if you have some portal for access of have some other suggestion. Let me know. Assuming we can get access, it looks like we wont need any RSIs and will start working on the acceptance letter.

Thanks,

-Chris