ML20127D708

Const Assessment Program (Bcap) Independent Expert Overview Group (Ieog) Second Interim Rept,Oct-Dec 1984

ML20127D708
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	02/15/1985
From:	Hansel J EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20127D681	List: ML20127D677 ML20127D708 ML20127D741
References
NUDOCS 8506240308
Download: ML20127D708 (105)

Text

.

t 1

EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION (ERC)

BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAP)

INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP (IE0G) 4 Second Interim Report (October - December 1984) t Y'

't RE80% w sbs/ss John L. Hansel Date Project Manager s%6240308 8%

g PDR ADOCK PDR R

]

STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE This Second Interim Report delineates the progress and activities of the Independent Expert Overview Group (IEOG) during the period of October through December 1984 in overviewing the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP) being condu::ted by Commonwealth Edison Company at the Braidwood Station.

As the ERC Project Manager for this overview activity,-I certify that the IE0G has continued to maintain independence from other organizations at the Braidwood Station and that the IE0G has not been coerced by any of the parties involved but rather has received complete cooperation from each project participant contacted.

Cr' John L. Hansel Project Manager i

J

1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

1-2.0 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS....................

4 i

3.0 ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS 5

3.1 Staff..........................

5 5

3.1.1 Staff Changes 3.1.2 Trai ni ng and Certi ficati on...........

7 3.2 Overvi ew Ac ti vi tie s..................

7 3.2.1. General 7

3.2.2 Element Overviews 8

3.3 Document Reviews 9

3.4 Audits 9

3.4.1 Audi ts Pe r formed................

9 3.4.2 Overview of BCAP QA Audi ts...........

14 3.5. 0 veri n spec ti on s....................

14 3.6 Observations and _ Requests for-Corrective Action....

14 3.6.1. 0bservations Issued

~14 3.6.2 Observation BCAP-08S-003............

16 3.6.3 Observati on BCAP-0BS-004.............

16 3.6.4 Status of Observati ons.............

16 3.7 Issues 17 3.7.1 Status of Issues from First Interim Report...

17' 3.7.2. Issues Raised This Reporting Period...... -

18 3.7.3 Open Issues at the End of the Period......

21 4.0 PROJECTED NEAR-TERM ACTIVITIES...............

23 5.0 - IEOG ASSESSMENT OF BCAP TO DATE 25 6.0 APP E ND I C ES.................. -........

26 4

6.1 Resumes of Added Personnel 27 6.2 - Trai ni ng Records of Personnel..............

42.

i 6.3 Certification Records of. Added Personnel 90 6.4 : Quality Assurance Plan 101 ~

i 6.5 ~Audi t l Re por ts......'................

130 i

'6.6 Ob serv ati on s i.....................

143-1 i

. 11.

LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 3.1 IEOG Organi zati on.......... _...........

6 LIST OF TABLES 3.1 BCAP Doc uents Reviewed..................

10 3.2 Checklists and Instructions Reviewed 11 3.3 BCAP Quality Assurance Documents Reviewed.........

12 3.4 Verification Packages Surveilled or Overviewed by the IEOG.

15 111

1.0 E)iECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The activities of the Independent Expert Overview Group (IE0G) are presented herein for the period of October 1984 through December 1984.

During this period, the IE0G continued the overview begun previously.

However, the character of the IE0G overview changed this period in response to the change in BCAP activity from programmatic emphasis to implementation of the program previously established.

Therefore, the effort of the IEOG also has changed to include overview of the BCAP inspections as well as the BCAP checklists and documentation reviews.

In consonance with the changing needs of the program, the IE0G has added three qualified nuclear inspectors.

Each is certified Level III in accordance with ANSI /ASME N45.2.6.

These certifications are in mechanical, electrical, and structural disciplines.

Although the IE0G continued to review BCAP docume'ntation, only one new program procedure was reviewed -- BCAP-25, " Evaluation of Results".

The rest of the documents reviewed consisted of revisions of various program documents, several checklists from CSR, and a number of Quality Assurance Special Instructions.

Based on IEOG audits and surveillance of BCAP QA, the IEOG considers the BCAP QA program adequate, effective and meaningful. Therefore, the IE0G has reduced its auditing of BCAP and has instead continued its auditing to BCAP QA and to surveillance of BCAP QA audits. However, before this decision was reached, three audits had been performed. One of these resulted in issuance of three concerns; the rest resulted in no action i tems.

The IEOG inspectors performed eighteen surveillances of BCAP in-spectors as they performed their inspections.

In addition, the IEOG in-spectors performed thirty-three overinspections using BCAP inspection packages. These surveillances and inspections will continue thr6ughout the program.

1

r i

As a result of this surveillance and overinspection, two IE0G obser-vations were issued dealing with problems developing in BCAP inspection.

Both observations have been resolved and closed. One of these.

BCAP-0BS-003, dealt with an embedded plate not shown on the design drawing

' n the package. The inspector failed to issue an observation recording i

this anomoly. The other dealt with similar errors in inspection that indicated inadequate inspector preparation.

d At the close of this period, there were three concerns which the IE0G retained open. However, one of these was satisfied and closed two days l ater. The two remaining concerns are:

1.

Resolution of the inspector reinspection portion of RSCAP.

This can be a time consuning process. HoweveE, it has not started nor is a decision to start apparent.

In the mean-time, the BCAP clock is running.

If BCAP is to overview this process, it must be started soon.

2.

The resolution of the problem of missing and inappropriate signatures for the verification drawings for small bore pi pi ng.

L In the document review of small bore piping, BCAP observed many missing and inappropriate QC signatures on drawings used-for configuration verification. Since there is no sample expansion for document review discrepancies, the IE0G concern is how the rest of the documents will be reviewed.

With the implementation phase of BCAP now underway in all elements of i

the program,-the.IE0G emphasis has changed to provide the proper overview

- functi on'.

This change includes continued surveillance of BCAP CSR in-spectors, overinspection of a sampling of BCAP inspections, overview of-RPSR procedure-review, and overview of RSCAP documentation of results.

- Additionally, the IE0G will be involved in the review of BCAP observations 2

0 w

,--..---e 3

w. <,

,m

--t-

=

=

vw,m, -.

determined to be invalid and those determined by Sargent and Lundy (S&L) not to be design significant. This is an important function since the consideration of. sample expansion is based on the S&L response. designating a design significant observation.

t a

I s

i 4

e h

J

=

I 3

?

s 2.0 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS The Evaluation Research Corporation (ERC) released the First Interim Report of the Independent Expert Overview Group (IEOG) on October 12, 1984.

The First Interim Report documented the IE0G activities in overviewing the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP) from March through September,1984.

This is the Second Interim Report, which documents IEOG activities for October through December,1984. This report addresses progress in BCAP during that time frame and is not intended to reiterate the intent or scope of BCAP, except as related to IEOG activities during the specified three month period.

l n

i 4

t.

3.0 ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS 3.1 Staff 3.1.1 Staff Changes The IEOG has been careful to staff its organization with personnel corresponding to the overview responsibilities for BCAP.

With the initiation of CSR inspections during the time frame covered by this report, the IEOG has added three qualified inspectors to the staff.

The inspection personnel added are collectively qualified in Mechanical, HVAC, Welding, Civil / Structural, and Electrical. Each is certified Level III in accordance with the requirements set forth in ANSI /ASME N45.2.6.

Additional ERC personnel were brought in on an as-needed basis to cover specific needs and then returned to their base organization. These needs included:

1)

Independent internal IE0G audit

2) Peak loads in surveillances All such personnel were specifically selected for their particular exper-tise in the areas where additional resources were deemed necessary.

At the present time, the IEOG is staffed with ten (10) full-time and three (3) scheduled, part-time personnel. However, the IEOG p1ans to remain alert to changes within BCAP or the BCAP organization such that proper staffing is maintained.

The present IE0G organizational alignment is depicted in Figure 3.1.

5

)

PROJECT MANAG(R J. L. Hansel Quality Assurance Manager A.

[. Cocoros A55T PROJECT MANAG(R R. E. Ham Adm 6e es tra t ion C.

M.

Thompson Steretary D. L. Togliatti m

I I

I i

1 Mec ha n ic a'1/

Electrical HVAC Civil /5tructural Audits / Inspect.

Piping N. A. PetelCk R.

V. teney C.

H. Brown. Jr.

A.

C. COCoros

v. t. Chase D

I l Records Management

~~~J,E' C. M.

Thompson I

__.C. J. Siemens

-- P. L. Clark g

G. A. Maeorth CSR N

R. t. wa=

,E s

((es,,,

~

Mtinocotocr v

y R5 CAP

~** E C*'

~

Figure 3.1 IEOG Organization I

i 3.1.2 Training and Certification Due to the visibility and creditability requirements associated with IE0G responsibilities, the IEOG has been careful to ensure that all person-nel engaged in supporting IEOG activities have undergone appropriate train-ing and orientation in accordance with ERC QA procedures, even for short-term assignments.

All such training and orientation has been appropriately doctmented in IE0G files.

In addition, verification of the background for all personnel is documented in ERC files.

Included in the on-going training requirements for IEOG personnel, especially for the full-time on-site personnel, is a review of all re-visions to BCAP plans, procedures and checklists.

3.2 Overview Activities 3.2.1 General During this period, the overview activities of the IEOG have increased dramatically and have changed in character. Previous overview activities were directed toward assuring the programmatic implementation. The over-view activities this period have been directed heavily toward the BCAP implementation of the program delineated by the plans and procedures previously established.

Many new doctanents have been issued by BCAP including checklists and instructions for performing reinspection of completed QC accepted work.

With one exception, the programmatic BCAP documentation was in place at the beginning of the period. This additional document, BCAP-25, was issued during the period. Fro.u the viewpoint of the IEOG, BCAP-25 is important since this document provides the procedures for analyzing the res'ults of CSR inspections. The procedures provide for sample expansion, if needed, and evaluation of the results for programatic discrepancies.

Also, many revisions to BCAP documents have been issued. The IE0G has reviewed each of these and provided coments where appropriate. Details are included in Section 3.3.

7

Each element of BCAP, BCAP administration, and BCAP QA have been audited by the IEOG. The results of the last three of these audits are included in Section 3.4; the reports are discussed in Appendix 6.5.

Some of the overview activities have resulted in discrepancies being discovered. These are recorded as observations which are discussed in Section 3.6.

Also, a few of the overview activities have resulted in issues of concern to the IE0G. These are retained in open status until resolved.

A discussion of all issues opened during the period together with currently open issues is included in Section 3.7.

3.2.2 Element Overviews Each element of BCAP has been overviewed by the IE0G discipline i

engineers and IEOG engineers assigned to overview each element (see Figure 3.1).

Additionally, the IE0G has overviewed the BCAP administration and BCAP QA. These overviews have consisted of both formal and informal meetings with individuals within each organization. This overview has provided the IE0G with good background and information on the status and progress within each of these organizations.

CSR is moving ahead with the reinspections and has implemented dociment reviews. The IEOG~ inspectors and engineers have been following this work by reviews, surveill ances, and overinspections. Generally, thi s work is going well. Also, the CSR observations and S&L responses as to design significance have been reviewed by IE0G personnel.

RPSR has continued to develop the checklists necessary to review the procedures extant June 30, 1984. Early next period, the actual reviews should begin. The IE0G overview of this work shows it to be complete and comprehensive.

Although RSCAP is moving ahead with both the documentation reviews and the implementation reviews, the implementation of all eleven corrective 8

n action programs are not progressing rapidly. One of the IE0G concerns involves the fact that the Inspector Reinspection Program has not started.

The current IE0G assessment is that BCAP remains technically sound and should provide reasonable assurance of the quality of construction at the Braidwood Station. The IEOG will continue to overview and assess the effi-cacy of each BCAP element and will provide reports of these assessments in the future.

3.3 Document Reviews During this period, the IE0G has continued to review the documentation issued by the BCAP organizations. These documents are comprised of initial issues of checklists and BCAP-25, and revisions'of existing documents. The documents reviewed during this period are listed by revision in Tables 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3.

In addition, the IEOG has reviewed the observations issued by BCAP and the replies from S&L as to the design significance of each observation.

The few coments provided to BCAP by the IEOG were for clarification and programmatic improvement. Although each comment was considered to be important, none was cl assi fied as mandatory.

3.4 Audi ts 3.4.1 Audits Performed Implementation of the ERC Program of auditing BCAP continued during this period. Three audits were performed which completed the first round of auditing of the use of BCAP Project Procedures and the use of BCAP Quality Assurance Procedures. The audits were conducted to assess ad-herence to the program element procedures and to evaluate the involvement D

9 l

L

i-l t

' Table 3.1.

BCAP Documents Reviewed 1

F Document No.

Ti tle Revision No.

Overview Plan 1 and 2 CSR Plan 1 and 2 RSCAP Plan 1 and 2

.BCAP-01 Program Indoctrination for Employees 2 and 3 l

BCAP-02' Organization and Responsibility 1 and 2 l

BCAP-03 Records Management 1 and 2 BCAP BCAP Interface with Contractors and Architect / Engineer 2

pg BCAP-06 Observation and Discrepancy / Concern Processing.

3, 4, 5, and 6-BCAP-07 BCAP Reports 1 and 2 BCAP-20 CSR -. Establish Popul ation 2

l BCAP-21 CSR - Sample Selection 2, 3, and 4 BCAP-23 CSR - Preparation of Reinspection and Document Review 1

Packages BCAP-24 CSR - Performance of Reinspection and Document Review 1 and 2 l

BCAP-25 CSR - Evaluation of Results 0

BCAP-41 RPSR - Identification of Specifications and Contractor 1

l Procedures BCAP-42 RPSR - Preparation.of Checklists 1, 2, and 3 l-BCAP-43 RPSR - Review of Contractor Proceduures 1

l BCAP-60 RSCAP - Review Methods 1

D O

e e

>v, e

s w

Table'3.2. Checklists and Instructions Reviewed

~

+

/. '..s susV Check 11st No.

Inspections Check 11st Tit 1e Revisions No.

Reinspection CSR-1-M-01 Small Bore Piping Configuration 1

I CSR-I-H-01 HVAC Duct 3

.~

CSR-1-H-03 HVAC Hangers and. Auxiliary., Steel 0 anc 2 ~

CSR-I-E-CND Con,4uit 1 and 2 O

'CSR-1-E-CBt.

Cables 0

-CSR-1-E-C0H Coriduit Hangers 0 '

w CSR-I-E-CBP Cable Pans O

~_

CSR-I-H-02

's NYAC Equipment Installation 0

CSR-I-M-04 Large Bore Pipihg Configuration 0

l

)

<3 c.

s

~+.

e x

~

sg 5

I s,

3r A

i Tabl e. 3.3.

BCAP Quality Assurance Docisnents Reviewed i,

F Dociment Revi sion Nisaber Titie Reviewed QA Overview Group Plan 1

QASI-02 Control of Quality Assurance Special Instructions 3

QASI-04 Training, Qu.tlification and Certification of QA Personnel 3&4

+

QASI-06 Doctament-Reviews 3

x QASI-07 Surveillances 3

QASI-08_ Audits 3

QASI-16 Performance of Reinspection and Document Review Overview 2&3 QASI-17 Action Item Requests 0

i I

e t

"h 1

1 12 j

of the BCAP Quality Assurance Department. The following tabulation sum-marizes the audits conducted:

Audit No.

Date Performed Procedures Audited Letter No. & Date ERC-84-103 10/24/84 BCAP 40-43 BCAP-023,9/14/84 ERC-84-104

-10/5/84 QASI 01-16; BCAP-032, 9/26/84 SQI 18, 25, 27, 28 ERC'84-105 10/19/84 BCAP 20-25 BCAP-039, 10/18/84 The audits were performed in accordance with ERC Procedure BCAP-18.1,

" Quality Assurance Audit Program," with personnel meeting the qualifica-tions of ERC Procedure BCAP-18.2, " Qualification of Audit Personnel."

Each of the Lead Auditors met the qualification requirements of ANSI /ASME N45.2.23, " Qualification of Quality Assuranace Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants," and were certified accordingly.

An audit plan and checklists were developed for each audit by the Lead Auditor, approved by the Quality Assurance Manager and implemented during the course of the audit. The checklists were used to document the detailed results of the audit.

A written report (tabulated below) was transmitted to the responsible manager whose organization was audited. These reports documented the

,g course of each audit and the results of each. Where findings of deviations or concerns were noted,' the report required the audited organizations to reply within a specified time agreeable to both parties. The response was to identify the corrective action to be taken and the date for implementa-tion of the action. All corrective actions have been implemented and all audits are considered closed.

Appendix 6.5 contains copies of the indi-vidual audit reports..

Audit No.

Report No. and Date ERC-84-103 ERC BCAP-064, 11/2/84 ERC-84-104 ERC BCAP-043, 10/10/84 ERC-84-105 ERC BCAP-058, 10/30/84 13

3.4.2 Overview of BCAP QA Audits In addition to the audits conducted, ERC personnel participated as observers during three audits conducted by the BCAP Quality Assurance organization ( Audits No. BQAA-IV-05, BQAA-IV-16 and BQAA-IV-07). During these audits, ERC personnel observed the methods used and the effectiveness of the audits. Subsequent to these, a meeting was held between ERC and BCAP Quality Assurance management personnel to discuss the evaluation and critique of these audits by ERC.

Presently, ERC plans to continue to act as observers during the con-duct of BCAP Quality Assurance audits of BCAP operations.

It is intended to operate in this mode as observers rather than conduct the audits as long as ERC considers the BCAP Quality Assurance audits effective and meaning-ful. At least one audit is being planned by the IEOG during the next quarter. This will audit BCAP Quality Assurance in its implementation of the 3 CAP Quality Assurance Program.

3.5 Overinspections As comitted by letter from Mr. J.J. O'Connor, Comonwealth Edison Company, to Mr. James G. Keppler, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, concerning the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program, NRC Docket Nos.

50-456 and 50-457, dated August 30,1984, IE0G field inspections and surveillances of BCAP reinspection activities have been performed. 1.i sted in Table 3.4 are verification packages that have been overinspected or surveilled.

Two observations were written as a result of overinspection and

• surveillance efforts of the IE0G. Both observations have been resolved (see Section 3.6).

3.6 Observations and Requests for Corrective Action 3.6.1 Observations Issued During this report period, there were two observations issued. Ob-servation BCAP-0BS-003 and Observation BCAP-0BS-004 were issued. Both 14

4 i

Table 3.4.

Verification Packages Surveilled or Overviewed by the IEOG

~

Surveill ance Overinspection CSR-I-H-01-015 CSR-I-H-03-016 CSR-I-H-03-016 CSR-I-H-03-018 CSR-I-H-03-018 CSR-I-H-01-008 CSR-I-H-03-008 CSR-I-M-01-002

'CSR-I-H-01-923 CSR-I-H-03-008'

-CSR-I-H-03-005 CSR-I-H-03-005 CSR-I-M-01-015 CSR-I-H-03-006

-CSR-I-H-01-020 CSR-I-H-01-040 CSR-I-M-01-011 CSR-I-M-01-011 CSR-I-M-01-006 CSR-I-M-01-006 CSR-I-M-01-018 CSR-I-M-01-018 CSR-I-M-01-019 CSR-I-M-01-019 CSR-I-M-01-020 CSR-I-M-01-039 CSR-I-S-01 CSR-I-M-01-054 CSR-1-S-01-011 CSR-I-H-01-024 w o, CSR-I-S-01-21 CSR-I-H-01-033-CSR-I-S-01-15 CSR-I-M-01-048 CSR-I-5-01-59 CSR-I-M-01-056 CSR-I-M-01-055 CSR-1-E-CNO-018 CSR-I-E-CNO-027 CSR-I-E-CND-028 CSR-1-E-CND-039 CSR-I-E-CNO-046 CSR-I-S-01-21 CSR-I-S-01-18' CSR-I-S-01-08 CSR-I-S-01-49 CSR-I-S-01-32' CSR-I-S-01-26 CSR-I-S-01-58 CSR-I-S-01-42 CSR-I-S-01-56 Legend I = Reinspection H = HVAC M = Mechanical

' S L= Structural -

E = Electrical:

CND = Conduit-i 15-

observations dealt with BCAP inspections and are explained in detail in Paragraphs 3.6.2, 3.6.3, 3.6.4, and 3.6.5.

Copies of both observations are contained in Appendix 6.6.

3.6.2 Observation BCAP-0BS-003 BCAP-0BS-003 was developed from an IE0G surveillance during the re-ir.spection of Veri fication Package CSR-I-S-01-09.

An embedded plate had been installed which was not identified on Sargent and Lundy (S&L) draw-ings. Rather than preparing an observation, as required by procedures, the inspector consulted with CSR engineers and was advised to note it in the

" Remarks" col umn.

BCAP-0BS-003 addressed a non-compliance with BCAP procedures when the BCAP inspector did not prepare an observation for the discovery of the em-bedded pl ate. A copy of Observation BCAP-0BS-003 is included in Appendix 6.6.

3.6.3 Observation BCAP-0BS-004 BCAP-0BS-004 was developed as a result on on-going monitoring of the reinspection process. The observation dealt with four (4) different anoma-lies which caused concern that inadequate training and/or adherence to pro-cedures was occurring.

BCAP-0BS-004 addressed an overall IEOG concern with the reinspections, that inadequate training and/or adherence to procedures was suspect because of continuing anomalies during BCAP reinspections. The observation identi-fied four (4) occurrences which are noted on the observation. A copy has been included in Appendix 6.6.

3.6.4 Status of Observations Both observations were resolved to the satisfaction of the IEOG and appropriate corrective actions have been implemented.

16

3.7 Issues As with results discussed in the First Interim Report, many issues have been opened during this period of performance.

BCAP personnel have remained very objective and responsive in understanding the basis for IE0G comments and in preparing acceptable resolutions.

3.7.1 Status of Issues from First Interim Report The First Interim Report discussed three open issues. These were:

1.

Revisions of selected docunents to incorporate revisions previously committed to the IE0G.

ie i'

2.

Response to Observation BCAP-0BS-002 (CSR Small Bore Piping Configuration Population).

3.

Inspector certifications and the certification process.

The documents of concern in the first issue above have been revised to incorporate. the IEOG comments. The revised documents are the BCAP Program Document, the BCAP Overview Pl an, the RSCAP Plan. the CSR Plan, BCAP QA Plan and BCAP Procedures BCAP-07 and BCAP-60.

BCAP-0BS-002 (Issue 2 above) was cleared by an adequate response.from the BCAP Task Force. Additionally, the checklist and instruction for small bore piping configuration has been satisfactorily revised and accepted.

The BCAP Task Force has incorporated the requirements of ANSI /ASME N45.2.6 into its inspector certifications (Issue 3 above) and the certifi-cation process. The IEOG overview of this process and the associated record keeping has shown no further anomalies in this area.

~

As a result of the above actions, all open issues stated in the First Interim Report have been resolved and closed.

I 17 p

N-y' ym-y

e 3.7.2 Issues Raised This Reporting Period Several issues have been opened during this reporting period. Al-though only three of these remained open at the end of the period, all will be discussed in subsequent paragraphs.

3.7.2.1 Delineation of Issues During this reporting period, the following issues were rai sed:

1.

Response to Observations BCAP-0BS-003 and BCAP-0BS-004.

These both dealt with concrete placement.

2.

Inspector Certification - Level III Electrical Inspector not certified.

3.

Differences in inspection results between BCAP Inspectors and BCAP QA Inspectors.

4.

Control points for reinspections. This primarily applied to the structural popul ation.

5.

Resolution on " Hold Tags" for areas to be reinspected by BCAP inspectors.

6.

Resolution of inspector reinspection. This is an area to be overviewed by RSCAP.

7.

Evaluation of CSR discrepancies to the most adverse lo-cation within the population.

8.

Resolution of documentation problems found during review of documentation for the small bore piping configuration.

9 3.7.2.2 Significance and Status of Each Issue 4

The significance and status of each issue listed above is discussed in this section in the numeric order given above.

t 1.

The texts of Observations BCAP-0BS-003 and BCAP-0BS-004

.are given in Appendix 6.6.

Both dealt with reinspection errors and omissions developing early in the reinspection 18 4

of the structural popul ation.

It was important to cor-rect reporting errors made during reinspections before they became serious habits. Therefore, the observations were written to provide a vehicle for developing correc-tive measures.

These observations were closed on November 29, 1984. The corrective actions involved both documentation changes and training of BCAP personnel.

2.

At the time the concern on inspector certification was written, the BCAP Level III Electrical Inspector had not been certi fied. This resulted in a delay in the initia-tion of electrical reinspections since the Level III Inspector was needed to certify the Level II Inspectors.

Essentially, all reinspections are carried out by the Level II Inspectors.

This issue was closed on November 9,1984, when BCAP certified a Level III Electrical Inspector.

3.

Although there may be minor differences between in-spectors inspecting the same work, major differences are undesi rable. For this reason, the IE0G was concerned when the results of reinspections by the BCAP inspectors and the BCAP QA inspectors were quite different.

The differences in inspection results were identified as part of the problem of program startup. This problem was settled by a series of meetings, reviews, and corrective actions within BCAP and BCAP QA over the period.. There-fore, this issue is considered closed.

4.

During the visual reinspections of concrete walls, cer-tain discrete measurements were required. With many i

marks on the walls, the inspectors could not be.sure 19 s

i

-i P

which marks to use as the official survey marks to con-trol thier measurements. This was a concern to the IE0G because erroneous results could ensue from the use of the l

wrs,g control points.

l This issue was still open at the close of this reporting I

period. -

L 5.

To preclude additional work on, in, or around samples selected for reinspection by BCAP, the BCAP Task Force

~

' decided to use " Hold Tags"' installed in the sample area.

~ ~'

Although the decision to install the " Hold Tags" had been made, the procedural mechanism for installing the tags was not in place. The IEOG issue was that without the

" Hold Tags" in place, additional work or repair could proceed on the selected sample.

The issue was resolved by issuance of Project Procedure PCP-15 on December 11, 1984. This procedure specifies fully the requirements for and the limitations inherent l

in placement'of the hold tags.

6.

One of the elements of RSCAP. is the overview of the ~

]

inspector reinspection in the plant. - The IE0G issue i s 4

- that the inspector reinspection has not been initiated nor is the decision made as to how to. proceed. The BCAP clock continues to run, so if RSCAP is to overview this

~

element, an early decision and-implementation must be l

made.

~

The inspector reinspection issue is'still open.

l 7.

There was a concern that CSR samples may-not cover the most severely loaded items in the population. For thi s -

. reason, the IEOG was concerned that observations should

~

be evaluated against some of the more critically loaded 20

~

,-y

--~

e.

. - +,.,,,.

,,e

--v

i tems in the popul ation.

However, since BCAP is based on a statistical sampling, statistically, some of the more heavily loaded items should be in the initial sanple of the popul ation. Also, the BCAP Task Force intends to select a sizable portion of the engineering judgment samples from those items that have been identified by S&L to be highly stressed or critically loaded. For these reasons, this item was closed.

8.

During the review of documentation supporting the popu-l ation, Small Bore Piping Configuration, several red-lined drawings were found which had not been signed or initialed by a certified QC inspector. Others were found which were signed by a QC inspector whose certification post-dated the drawing issue date. This violates the procedures which require the signature / initials of cur-rently quali fied, certi fied, QC inspectors.

This item is still open.

Also, there is no indication what steps are to be taken to assure the integrity of the remaining small bore piping drawings since BCAP does not expand the sample for document review.

3.7.3 Open Issues at the End of the Period Based on the discussions in the sections above, there were three issues open at the end of this reporting period. These

~

are:

1.

Control points for reinspection.

Although this was open at the end of this reporting period, it was closed January 2,1985, with the establishment of specific control (or survey) points within the plant suitable as benchmarks for the use of inspectors making measurements. Additionally, the inspectors were trained to recognize these marks.

21

2.

Resolution of the inspector-reinspection element of RSOAP.

To settle this issue requires the making of a project de-cision as to how the inspector reinspection problem is to be handled and the specifying.of a starting date for initiating the designated program.

3.

The problem of missing and inappropriate signatures on the verification drawings for small bore piping and how the integrity of the remaining small bore piping verification drawings are to be assured.

To settle this requires a project decision as to how the integrity of the small bore piping verification drawings is to be assured since BCAP does not expand the sample for document review discrepancies.

i 4*

t 22

4.0 PROJECTED NEAR-TERM ACTIVITIES

.During this period of performance, the IE0G has shifted overview activities to be responsive to progress in BCAP.

In consonance with this shift, the following highlights are noteworthy:

1.

A transition from the IE0G performing regularly scheduled audits of BCAP to on-going surveillances of BCAP QA. This transition was accompanied by the IEOG passing results of its surveillances on to BCAP QA, so their audits would cover the areas of concern by the IE0G. This change appears to have been satisfactory.

2.

Ir.itiation of surveillances for BCAP reinspections and review of completed reinspection packages. This activity has resulted in two observations as discussed earlier.

r 3.

Reviews of the BCAP observations determined to be non-design significant by Sargent and Lundy (S&L).

This review has resulted in considerable discussion with BCAP and S&L personnel regarding the structure and content of review conclusions.

The next period of BCAP performance and, hence, IEOG activities are expected to undergo additional changes. As a result, IE0G activities are expected to be highlighted by the following:

1.

With planned increases in the BCAP inspection resodrces, the IEOG will be alert for the need to increase inspection overview re-sources.

2.

Even though the IE0G has performed a few overinspections, an increase in the number of IE0G overinspections is expected.

23

3.

With front-end activities nearing completion for RPSR and RSCAP elements, increased surveillance on reviews and evaluations in those elements is expected.

4.

A significant increase in the review of observation evaluations determined to be non-design signi ficant 'by Sargent and Lundy.

5.

Review of observations determined to be non-valid by CSR re-sources.

6.

Continued overviews by IEOG technical experts in all elements to ensure the technical accuracy of BCAP performance.

7.

Continued overviews to observe interactions among BCAP elements to ensure that problems surfaced in one element, which may affect another element, are evaluated / incorporated as appropriate.

8.

Performance of regularly scheduled audits of BCAP QA.

9.

Performing surveillances of BCAP QA audits.

10. Review of the recertifications of the BCAP Quality Assurance i nspectors.

1 24 m

m

1 5.0 IEOG ASSESSMENT OF BCAP TO DATE As stated in the First Interim Report, the IE0G remains positive as to the design of BCAP and performance of BCAP personnel.

The Program appears to have settled down to a production mode for the CSR element and should achieve the review / conclusions mode for RPSR and RSCAP elements during the next reporting period.

The IE0G continues to view the BCAP and the BCAP team members as a positive approach for assessing the quality of construction of the Braidwood Pl ant.

Issues brought up by the IEOG have received positive attention by-BCAP personnel and it is expected that these will continue to be dealt with positively by BCAP personnel.

i t

3

.t h

25

4 e

6.0 APPENDICES 26

T 6.1 Resumes of Added Personnel 5

1 27

CHRIS J. SIMMONS Mr. Simons has 14 years experience in construction with the last seven being in the Nuclear Power Plant Field.

Experience includes: Level 111 Group Supervisor, developing / implementing training, certification and maintenance of certifications for inspection personnel.

Technical and Quality Assurance activities associated with Mechanical, Civil and HVAC disciplines, incluping overseeing contractor QA/QC activities.

EXPERIENCE:

1984 - Present Evaluation Research Corporation, Oak Ridge, TN.

Quali ty Assurance Engineer.

Evaluation of quality assurance and quality control procedures for compliance with ap-plicable codes, standards, specifications, and program requi rements.

Develop surveillance checklists and per-form surveillances of quality assurance activities.

Evaluate inspection doctsnentation for adherence to ap-proved inspection procedures. Certified level 111 Inspector in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6 and Qualified Auditor in accordance with ANSI N45.2.12.

1982Property "ANSI code" (as page type) with input value "ANSI N45.2.12.</br></br>1982" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process. - 1984 Consumers Power Company, Mid1and Energy Center Project, Midl and, M1.

HVAC Training Support Group Supervisor, Midland Power QA Division, level 111 per ANSI N45.2.6.

Responsibilities were to provide supervision and tech-nical direction to HVAC Training Support Groim.

De-veloped and implemented the HVAC training pr gram for the certification of inspection personnel in accordance wi th ANSI N45.2.6.

Supervised the HVAC training program which includes the orientation process, programmatic, initial and continuing training and the certification of inspection personnel in accordance with departmental procedures.

Prepared and implemented a tracking system for the maintenance of certi fications. Approved lesson plans and examinations developed for the certification of inspection personnel.

Selected and approved in-structors to perform HVAC training.

Reviewed Project inspection Plans for conformance to the quality assur-ance program prior to issuance.

1980 - 1982 Public Service of Indiana, New Washington, IN.

QA Surveillance Specialist Hech/ Civil level 111 per ANSI N45.2.6, Marble Hill Nuclear Division.

Performed surveillance of site contractor activities to assure compliance with approved procedures, drawings, speci-fications, and applicable codes for Category I and !!

nuclear construction.

Performed surveillance on the on-site testing organization for site construction activities to verify compliance with procedures, specifications, and applicable codes, and ascertained and/or identifled and obtained corrective action for 28

CHRIS J. SIMMONS - 2 nonconforming hardware.

Identi fied and reported con-ditions, materials, equipment, and activities that were in noncompliance with codes, standards, specifications, or procedures.

Had "Stop Further Processing" authority when nonconforming conditions were identifi '. Reviewed quality verification documentation to assure compliance wi th approved procedures.

1977 - 1979 Louisiana Power and Light, Hahnville, LA.

Quali ty Control Welding Inspector Mech, certified Level 11 per ANSI N45.2.6, Waterford !!! Nuclear Division, Tompkins-Beckwi th, Inc.

Monitored and approved all aspects of welding procedures and welders qualifications.

In-spected fabrication and welding of safety and non-safety related piping systems.

Hydrostatic testing of safety and non-safety piping. Verified weld identification and associated piping subassemblies and/or components as per erection drawings.

Surveillance of welding parameters, i.e., amperage vol tage, gasflow, etc.

Inspected welds on pipe supporting assemblies.

Reviewed documentation when work was complete and assured inspection points were satisfied.

Inspection to: ASME !!I Subsection, NA, NB, NC, ND, and NE, AWS 01.1, ANSI B31.1, ASME Section IX.

1973 - 1977 Metallurgical Engineers of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.

Supervisor Quality control Level II ASNT.

Nondestructive Evaluation - Certified ASNT Level 11 to SNT-TC-1A in all phases of PT, MT, RT, UT (thickness and flaw detection).

Welding - Development of welding procedures, certifica-tion of welders and procedures, shop and field in-spection of weldsents.

Inspected and worked to: 'ASME Section II - A, B, C, !!! Class 1, 2, 3, and MC Com-ponents, Sections V and IX, AWS 01.1 ASTM, ANSI.

Mechanical Testing - Stress - strain analysis, yield-point, ultimate strength, elongation, Brinell and Rockwell hardness, Charpy impact.

Metallurgical Analysis - Failure analysis, photmicro-graphs and photmacrographs, grain size, orientation, fusion, defects, thermal effects.

1969 - 1972 U.S. Army - Special Forces.

Attached to N/75th Airborne Rangers.

Related job experience is as follows: Inter-mediate and Permanent Construction and/or Demolition of bridges, dams, buildings, runways, and roads.

Honorable Discharge: Awarded Bronze Star and other various medal s.

29

CHRIS J. SIMMONS - 3 1969 Southwest Rolling Mills, Los Angeles, CA. Quali ty Control Welding and Material Inspector Certified ASNT Level I SNT-TC-1A Dye Penetrant and Magnetic Particle Inspection. Verified welding and fabrication of vessels and assemblies as per erection drawings. Hydrostatic testing of vessels.

Identification of welds and ma-terial as per specifications.

Dye Penetrant and Mag-netic Particle inspection steel erection as per erection drawings.

I

^

EDUCATION:

1967 - 1968 Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey -

Mechanical Engineering i

1971 Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN -

Engineering SPECIAL TRAINING: Lockheed, Marietta, GA - Blue Print Interpretation Master Tooling Armed Forces - Fort Bragg, NC, Intermediate Construction and Demolition of Bridges, Dams, Runways and Buildings Convair School of X-Ray, Gamma Ray, Industrial Interpretation, Chamblee, GA Kraut Kramer - Branson, Stanford, CT, Advance Weld Inspection Special courses in all phases of NDE, Radiography, Ultrasonics, Magnetic Partical, Dye Penetrant CERTIFICATIONS AND AFFILIATIONS:

Certified Level III per ANSI N45.2.6 American Welding Society - Certifled Weld Inspector 80116991 American Welding Society - Member Aircraft Owner's & Pilot Association e

~

30

PAUL LEONARD CLARK 10516 Halter 'Ihompson Drive Vienna, Virginia 22180 703-938-0997 Education 1958 - B.S.M.E. - tbrth Carolina State thiversity Raleigh, tbrth Carolina Average: 2.88/4.00 Registration E.I.T., Virginia P.E.,

Virginia Professior.31 Membership ASME, NSPE Specific Areas of Experience Stress and Vibration Analysis Machine Designe Heat Transfer Analysis Mass Properties and Weights Analysis Air Compressor System Environmental Control System Mechanical Design Associated with Optical Systems Pressure ard Vacuum Vessel Design Material Flow Studies Environmental Test Coardinator Design Associated with Infrared ' Airborne 'Iblescope Reliability and Failure Mades aM Effect Analysis (FMEA)

Ship Ibard Material Handling FqJipment Systems m vironmentt1 Analyzers for Air contamination.

Compater Programs for Stress and Mass Properties Analysis Liaison Engineering - Shop, Field and Vendor Management of Engineering Technical Personnel Quality Control and Maintainability Mechanical Design Associated with Re-6try Vehicles Missile Ground SJpport Equipment Structure Analysis Specification and Proposal Writing Electrical Cbnnectors and Cable Electronic Packaging Conveyor Systems Design of Air and Fluids System Nuclear Power Plants-System Engineering (piping) and writing Pre-Operational and krveillance 'Ibst Procedures

-Instrumentation and control Systems

-NUREG 0578 ('INI Short-Term Lessons Learned) 0660 & 0737

-D:ruipnent 02alification to the requirements of IEEE-323-1974, NUREG-0588, and I&E Niletin 79-01B Property Management 31

f Resume Update of Paul Leonard Clark 7

April 1984 to present Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Vernon, Vermont Assigned to Cbnstruction Department Responsible for the electrical installation and test procedures for engineering design changes, and the implementation and testing of these design 5

changes during the 1984 refueling outage.

August 1983 to August 1984 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Wading River, New York Assigned to Technical Support Dept.

Responsible for the review of surveillance test results and procedures j

to ensure compliance with station technical specifications and procedures, ANSI /IEEE Std-338-1977, Reg. Gaide 1.33 and ANSI /ANS-3.2-1982. Resolved problems with procedures and/or test results by means of meetirgs with plant staff and/or recommended revisions of procedures. Certified to perform OA level 3 function per ANSI N45.26-78.

November 1982 to August 1983 Contract Ehgineer Assic;n<d to New York Power Authority Assigned to TMI project at the James Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Station.

Responsible for the design review and implementation of plant modifications required to satisfy NUREG 0578, 0600, and 0737 Tasks:, Preparation of work tracking forms, field revision notices, production orders, pre-operational test procedures, specifications for class lE equipment, field verification of plant modification, conduct pre-operational tests and supervision of crafts.

I f

l i

32

m Paul Leonard Clark February 1980 to present Senior Dygineer assigned to k ston D$ison Company Boston, MA Assigned to the T.M.I. Task Fbrce Team: responsible for the modification and design of safet related control systems for Pilgrim POclear Station No.1, BWR, to satisfy NUREG 0578 (T.M.I. Short-Term Lessons IAtarned), 0660 and 0737. Tasks: Preparation of schematics and wiring diagrams, plant design charge requests, field revision notices, production orders, specification for Class IE equipment, and pre-operational test reports, control panel design (layout), verdor and field liaison. Assigned to Pilgrim Station for the irplementation of T.M.I.

modifications, aguiprent qualification to the requirements of IEEE-323-1974, NUREG-0588 and I&E Bulletin 79-01B.

January 1976 to February 1980 Senior Dgineer assigned to Bechtel Power Corporation San Francisco, California Assigned to Grand G21f thit 1 and 2,1100 MW BWR's.

Responsible for specifications for control valves, containment leak rate test, electrical ard sneumatic control actuators, seismic instruments and con-tainment past loca gas monitoring equipment; and all documentation, manuals, ard drawing requirements for the above specifications; vendor and field liaison.

Previously assigned to Millstone thit 2, 830 MW PWR. Respansible for specifications for control valves, balance of plant pneumatic and electronic instruments, HVAC logic diagrams, all documentation, manual and drawing requirements for the above specifications, vendor and field liaison.

April 1973 to January 1976 Senior Mechanical Digineer/ Supervisor assicyted to Balti.more Gas and Electric Company Baltimore, Maryland Assignei to Calvert Cliffs ibclear Power Site. Responsible for writing and conducting pre-operational and surveillance test procedures for electronic systems-reactor regulating system, reactor protective system, nuclear instrumentation, diesel generators, pressurizer level and pressure control systs, and pressure, level and tenperature instru-ment loops; review of test procedures to ensure that plant technical specifications are not violated; presentation of test procedures to POSRC for approval; supervision of engineers ard technicians; and system engineering-ensuring that start-up systems are installed accordingly to P&ID, piping drawings and specifications.

October 1972 to April 1973 etichanical Design Digineer assigned to Fairchild Industries Germantown, M1ryland Design of a parcel sorting system (Matrix Sorter) for the USPS.

Tasks:

Design of the induction station, buffer and feed cnnveyor system. 3 Testing of methods used in the induction of parcels.

33

Paul Leonard Qark June 1972 to October 1972 Senior Mechanical mgineer, assigned to Aerojet-General, Frederick, Maryland Design associated with an automatic sorting system for roll carpet; design and testing of the induction station and the supporting structure for the induction area and the conveyor system.

April 1972 to June 1972 Mechanical Design Engineer, assigned to 0:ean system, Reston, Virginia Design associated with an oil recovery system.

January 1972 to A;ril 1972 Senior &chanical mgineer, assigned to EMR, College Park, Maryland Design of a spacecraf t system for the U.S. Air Ebrce. Packaging con-figuration, structure analysis and mass properties report.

June 1971 to January 1972 Mechanical Design mgineer, assigned to ARC, Alexandria, Virginia c

Design of small missile components, test fixtures, and selection of materials.

~

January 1971 to June 1971 Senior &chanical Dgineer, assigned to Bunn Research, Inc.

Silver S; rings, Maryland Design of a small sorting machine for the U.S.P.S.

Design of the in-duction station, structures and conveyors; stress calculations and human engineering.

tbverter 1970 to January 1971 Senior Mechanical mgineer, assigned to Litton College Park, Kuyland Electronic packaging of airborne equipment for E2c Navy aircraf t.

Productivity study of electronic packages and design and analytical calculations associated with packaging.

0:tober 1969 to January 1971 Senior &chanical bgineer, assigned to Owens-Illinois, recker Systems Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Design associated with a 36" Airborne Infrared 'Iblescope to be in-stalled in a Q41 Aircraft for NASA, Ames, California. Tasks: Stress, vibration, masc properties and heat transfer analysis. Design of a vacuum and pressure vessel, super flexible wire huness, environmental control system for the telescope cavity, air supply to support telescope air bearing and related pneumatic systems, automatic telescope balancing system, telescope caging and centerisq systems.

34

.e

O Paul Leonard Clark May 1969 to October 1969 Reliability Dgineer, assigned to Ling, Temco-Vought, Inc.

Dallas, Texas Performing Reliability and Failure Mxles and Effect Analysis (FMEA) on NASA Lunar Landing Simulator at Langley Research Center. Stress' analysis of the supporting structure and drive systems for the Sisnulator.

March 1968 to May 1969 SeniorMechanibalEhgineer, assigned to General Electric Company, Inc.,

Utica, New York Assigned to the Missile Glidance Digineering Section. Responsible for Failure Analysis associated with the Seeker Assembly of the Chaparrel Missile System. Conducted studies and tests in order to recorrvnend changes in Assembly and Test Procedures so as to increase productivity. Writing test specifications, placed on task forces in order to isolate and solve the rash of prominent failures. Maintained records of failures which included types, numbers, and the corrective action taken. Stress and vibration analysis, mass properties calculations.

January 1968 to March 1968 Senior &chanical Digineer, assigned to Scope, Inc., Falls 01urch, VA Electrcnic packaging of a Shipborne Radar Receiver. Tasks: Design reviews, stress and vibration analysis.

Ax;ust 1967 to January 1968 Senior Mechanical Dyineer, assigned to latex Cbrporation Dover, Delaware Research and developTent of automation equipnent (Dpipment Process Producted Fabric used in women's wear) and in automation of manual sewing operations.

Tasks : Design concepts, design of machine elements, stress and vibration analysis, supervision of engineers, assembly and testing of the ateve equipnent.

June 1967 to August 1967 Senior Mechanical.D)gineer, assigned to Control Data (brporation Rockville, Maryland Design tasks associated with the developnent of an automatic letter sorting ard storage system for the thited States Post Office Departenent.

Tasks: Design of Machine Elements, Stress and Structure Analysis.

.s.

35

V Paal Leonard Clark December 1966 to June 1967 Senior Mech'anical Digineer, assigned to International Msiness Machine Corporation, F.lectronics Systems Centers, Oswego, New York Department: Divironmeht Design Resp)nsible for mass properties reports on the following systems:

EA6B, Mark II and MOL. Supervisor of Cbntract Personnel, cost and weight reduction studies, material research, coordination of area of redesign, mass properties and stress calculations using computer programs, vibration analysis of electronic systems for aircraft.

Q:tober 1966 to December 1966 Senior techanical Digineer, assigned to AVCO, Incorporated, Wilmington, Massachusetts Program manager for the Ground Supp3rt Equipnent for Re-Ditry Vehicles and the associated support equipnent. Tasks: Packaging configuration, stress analysis, mass properties, vibrations, fluid and gas test sets, and test procedures.

MAY 1966 'Io 0::tober 1966 Senior Mechanical Digineer, assigned to the Lkiited States Post Office Drpartment, Washington, D. C.

Design of automation equipment for handling bulk mail. Tasks: Cbn-veyor systems, pieumatic systems, design of machine elements, material flow study, structures, stress and vibration analysis.

February 1966 to May 1966 Senior Mechanical Digineer, assigned to Aerojet-General Frederick, Maryland Digineering evaluation and redesign of an autom' atic warehouse system for the storage and shipment of bulk oil barrels. Tasks: Material flow study, structures, design of machine elements, conveyor systems, and stress analysis, tbvember 1965 to February 1966 Senior techanical Digineer, assigned to NASA, GSFC Code 623 Greenbelt, Maryland a

Hechanical packagiry of scientific experiments which go ainard satellites and sounding rockets. Tasks: Packaging, analytical studies, stress and vibration analysis, environmental test.

e 36

l Paul Leonard Clark September 1964 to tbvember 1965 Assigned to contract work the Navy Department and NASA, CSFE, Washington, D. C.

Program manager on the struc'tural system used in the Polaris Missile training schools which supports the simulated interior of the subnarine. Tasks: Manufacture of structural systems, customer, and subcontract vendor liaison. Design of pneumatic power overhead hoist system for shipborne. Missile gmund support equipment, aerospace payloads. Tasks: Electronic packaging, proposal and specifications, packaging of optical systems, weight reduction studies, stress and

.e vibration analysis.

February 1962 to September 1964 Assigned to Helpar, Inc.

Falls Gurch, Virginia Mechanical design of an environmental gas analyzer. Chs sampling system, electron capture detector, scan cell, hydrogen gas storage system arti regulator system, optical test system.

April 1960 to February 1962 Assigned to Western Electric krlington, tbrth Carolina Manufacturing responsible for Nike Zeus Missile Subcystem. Target,,

missile and discrimination radar units. Tasks: Liaison between Western Electric and Bell Laboratories, special tools and fixtures.

.~

January 1960 to April 1960 Assigned to Pratt & hhitney Aircraft West Palm Beach, Florida Design of com;enents for jet engines, fuel systems and bearing test structures.

June 1958 to January 1960 Mechanical Engineer Helpar, Inc.

Falls Gurch, Virginia Mechanical design associated with an electronic aircraft monitoring subassembly. Tasks: Electronic packaging, design of a condensor microphone, collapsible windscreen, comutator and start-stop mechanism for:4n electronic timer, investigation of epoxy adhesives, environmental testing, vibrations and stress analysis, heat transfer, analysis, and e

pressure vessel design.

v f

4 f

e 37 4

GERALD A. HAWORTH Twenty five years military and civilian experience in nuclear power re-search and development, operations, maintenance, and construction. Project Quality Assurance Engineer for radioactive waste reduction and disposal, and alternate energy research programs.

Developed and supervised Construc-tion Quality Assurance Program at the Idaho National Engineering Labora-tory.

EMPLOYMENT:

1984 - Present Evaluation Research Corporation, Arlington, VA.

Senior Quality Assurance Engineer.

Provide technical assistance for development and implementation of Quality Assurance Programs in industrial and construction en-virons.

1981 - 1984 EG&G Intertech.

Engineer IV. Saudi Naval Expansion Program. Provided technical support to U.S. Navy Program Manager and Senior Royal Saudi Naval Forces Representative, Washington, D.C. for:

o Audit and evaluation of SNEP contractors.

o Technical reports and presentations.

o Automated model for anlaysis of preventive mainte-nance manpower requirements.

o Computer software program tests.

Maintenance Management and QA Programs.

o

,o Configuration Management.

o Ship Weight and Moment Control.

1973 - 1981 Idaho National Engineer Laboratory (AeroJet Nuclear Co./

EG&G Idaho Inc.).

Project 0A Engineer.

o Examination and test of the THI-11 Nuclear Plant f ai l ure, o Nuclear waste reduction and storage research projects.

o Small scale alcohol plant construction.

o Solar research projects.

o Geothermal / Isobutane Power Plant Prototype.

Participated in a special project with the U.S. 00E to evaluate the capability and productivity of a proposed National Fuel Alcohol Program.

38

1 G.A. Haworth - 2 1

J Scientific and Engineering Supervisor:

Supervised the development, implementation, and operation of the Quality Assurance Program for Construction at the Idaho y

National Engineering Laboratory.

o Civil works.

o Modification of test reactors and chemical processing pl ants.

o Two QA engineers and 18 highly specialized technici ans.

o On-site Nondestructive Testing.

o Soils and Materials Testing Laboratory.

Reduced inspection costs through modernization of materials testing lab, improved audit procedures, and intensive specification / design review.

Senior Quality Engineer.

Quality Engineering in support of experimental nuclear reactor operation, modi fication, and repair.

o Design review.

o Procurement support.

o Inspection planning.

Developed Quality Assurance and Inspection Plan for major modification of a nuclear test reactor and two chemical processing, plant modifications.

Implementation of these plans Jm; roved the design analysis' process resulting in signt ficant cost reduction and construction time. Developed a techniciar.Ir,salification program which reduced process failures in one area from approxi-mately 95% to virtually zero.'s Qualty Engineer.-

i f,

o Plans and procedures for inspection of procured nuclear reactor components and materials.

o Supplier survey.

o Supplier performance data collection and failure trend analysis.

i '

o Source inspection of critical, reactor components.

o Chairman Material Review Board for procured materi al s.

o Developed catalog of critical materials and specifi-c ations.

• Senior Inspector.

.o Source and receiving inspection of major nuclear reactor components.

o Nondestructive testing of widments and composi,te materi al s.

o Dimensional in:ipection.

[

o Materi als' testing.

+

\\ '*39 U

~

4 3

i y

G.A. Haworth - 3 1

1951 - 1973 U.S. Navy.

o Repair Officer o Damage Control Officer o Safety Officer o Ship Superintendent o Instructor, U.S. Navy Nuclear Power School o Nuclear Power Plant Operator o Welder o Machini st o Salvage Diver EDUCATION:

1976 - 1981 University of Idaho, Quality Assurance Subjects 1978 American Management Association, Project Management 1972 Laverne College, Management Organization and Theory 1958 U.S. Navy, Nuclear Power 1951 Kempsville High School, Kempsv111e, VA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:

American Society for Quality Control o Chainnan Eastern Idaho Section - 1980/81 o 1980 Regional Conference Chairman o Membership Chairman Northern Virginia Section 1983/84 CERTIFICATIONS:

(all certifications wre by examination) o Certified Quality Technician (Mechanical) - 1976 o Certified Quality Engineer - 1978/81/84 Coordinating Agency for, Supplier Evaluation o Lead Auditor - 1978 Idaho National Engineering Laboratory o Penetrant Inspector Level II - 1974 o Ultrasonic Examiner Level II - 1974 o Radiographer Level II - 1975 PUBLICATIONS / PAPERS:

"The Feasability of Water Storage, Natural Head Irrigation, and Power Pro-duction in the Big Lost River Basin," G.A. Haworth,1978.

'40

G. A. Haworth - 4 This paper was prepared to assist the Custer County Development Corporation in what was ultimately a successful attempt to obtain federal economic assistance funds. The scheme for water storage involving recharge of dry aluvial fans is in operation; the natural head irrigation involved civil work which was at the time uneconomical; the power production involving a series of low head bulb turbines is presently under development by the local REA Cooperative.

O O

l e

i 41 l

9 I

6.2 Training Records of Personnel 42

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING 1

ASSIGNED T0:

C.

H.

3rdun, Jr.

S.S. N0:

019-03-5869 (QA & Audits)

EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 1

BCAP Overview Plan lo/t o /B4-C,g4,[3%\\

Qualification of ANSI inspection, Examination & jo, f C-ld- @ m W N45.2.6 1978 Testino Personnel Qualification of QA 2.23 1978 Prograa Audit f c/i c, /g4 C, (4%%\\

persnnnal 1

CECO Letter to

---

Aug 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP

/s2/84

{Mw QAP-2.1 1

Daily Log to[a/g4 C,,h(Romh, QAP-18.1 1

0A Audit Program s o/e/84-C,t.f, $ m C, y. &dh.

DP & P-101 0

QA Policy gg g DP & P-102 0

QA Programs o/gq/ g4

(, W,hm 4

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

(

/

R e v i ew e d ByT-Q 2 b_,.,,,.,...

/ d'

'".,,. y Cate:

/0

/C/JI i

[

/QA Manager 43

.. _ _.~

u tu.un t l uft REST. ARCH CORPUK A l 10ii QUALITY ASSURANCE

{

RECORD OF ASSIGNED __ READING ASSIGNED TO:

C.

H.

Brosn, Jr.

S. S. (10 : 01r,-03-6859 (Sr. Civil Leaa J EMP. ?!0 :

Doc.

vote No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature O

CSR Plan 1

RPSR Plan icyid/of C 14Grom 1

RSCAP Plan BCAP-20 1

CSR Establish Populations lofjg,fg+

C (4h.

SCAP-21 1

CSR Sar,iple Selections lo/ (./8 e C14, M \\

r CSR. Preparation of g

BCAP-22 1

Instructions & Checklists p/lc [d+ C. N.%romy CSR Preparation of Re pec Document t

g jggfg, g g BCAP-23 0

a os C5R Performance of

(

5(cti n & Occument q/2 5 /6+ C H G c SCAP-24 0

CSR Evaluation of C %i

• • 3 CAP-25 Resuits

~

RPSR Icentification of N h capgns aJd 9 /45/6 & C R%d 3 CAP-41 0

i RPSR Preoaration of lo/lo/64 C.Li b e i-arao 42 1

Checklists RPSR Review of g

9/M /6+ CM ma p BCAP-43 0

Contract Procedures 8 CAP-60 0

RSCAP Review Methods 10/86 /64-D MO%

\\

Procurement Document QAP 4.1 0

Control ICA6/d4---

C. H.bw

• Signature acknowledges that I have read'the documents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered-to assure my.

understanding.

• • When Issued

_Da'te:

//

C [. '-[

1 Reviewed By.

'.c 4..

c,

,/,0 j

- w

~

/

[QA-Manager

_- 4 4 -

y

=_

...i..w.,

n c.,

,m ust w w n e v s. 's *

• w.

• QUALITY ASSURANr.E RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED TO:

W.

L.

Chas'e S.S. H0: Fed.

I.D. #25-1416577 (Sr. ilechanical Lead)

EMP, N O Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• S i g n a t u r'e 0

BCAP CSR Plan fp g

f 1

BCAP RPSR Plan

/

p g

BCAP-20 1

CSR Establish Populations C

g 3 CAP-21 1

CSR Sample Selections

/

</

6

.s CSR Preparation of

/

Instructions & Checklisty(/g./ff ff>/gg, / [g'#,#

BCAP-22 1

~

CSR Preparation of Reinspection & Document f

I BCAP-23 0

ggygew p3cq3g,3 CSR Performance of dspection& Document

/[] j y

SCAP-24 0

• • BCAP-25 CSR Evaluation of Results BCAP-60 0

RSCAP Review Methods

/8 / //

/[/h[/

[A

/ /

y

~

• signature acknowledges.that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

• • When Issued Re v i ewe d By :c 2 Re-,__e.

-;k -/ /C. c... e 2 x Date: / o/2.//r /

I QA Manager 45

l QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED RE'ADING ASSIGHED TO:

W.

L. Cha'se 5.5. NO: Fed.

1.D. #25-1416577 (QA & Audits)

EMP. NO-Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 1,

BCAP Overview Plan

/f/ / ft/

/g/

/4?f 2.6 1978

//8

[d n

4 2.23 1978 jg fy 7pf 7

r u

(

[ 8 / /f..[

//

M-

---

Aug 30, 1984 the N AP QAP-2.1 1

Daily Log

/b[/f[,ff fpf g

QAP-1 QA Audit Program

/g /[r h -

gy g&/L.

DP & P-101 0

QA Policy

/

g[

jg, es! 4--

/4)[/6gg, DP & P-102 0

QA Programs

/

/

y

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity.to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

t

(

Reviewed Byt 2p.44,..,_e,

, / r C. c.,

Date: m/.w/W

.. e QdManager 46

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD CF ASSIGNED READiriG ASSIGNED TO:

U.

L.

C h a s'a

5. 5. fl0 : Fad.

I.O. #25-1416577 (Sr. RPSR Lead) g,g, Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 1

3 CAP RPSR' Plan

/[l f, f[

p/

Program Indoctrination J

BCAP-01 0

for Emoloyees

// / g

/0 // f/[

f BCAP-02 1

p ty SCAP-03 0

Records Management

/[) [ [k

////j)p>

gd6 BCAP-04 1

o r

nd

/ M

//////[

k

• • BCAP-05 Observation and BCAP-06 2

Discrepancy / Concern f[

pencecsing BCAP-07 1

BCAP Reports Qualification and BCAP-08 0

Certification of

/g)

[

ooinenac+ inn oorsnnnel

~

~'

RPSR Identification of

/p /[, /

p/

ggg BCAP-41 0

Required Documents B C AP'-4 2 1

o h

ts

/f) /,

ggjg, g

RPSR Review cf y) /

BCAP-43 0

Contract Procedures l/(

,fff(,)

/g//L-

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided,an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

• • tihen issued R e v i ewe d By :o 7'2.,..._,,

.,n.# # C c c

.c Date: /oA.,//r /

f I

QA Manager 47

_1

QUAL.!TY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED T0:

W.

L.

Cha'se 5.5. H0: Fed.

1.D. #25-1416577 (Sr. RPSR Lead) ggp, gg Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Si,gnature 7

Procurement

/O / h

//g(/, [h[8

/

QAP-4.1 0

Document Control

.1 r

N

)

• Signature acknowledges:that I have read-the-documents.'and have been provided,an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

(r/

Reviewed By:d 3,, w i/ g d. c. e.-

Date: -/c/., s/r/

)

~ <.

.(QA Manager 48

/

~

QUALITY ASSURAliCE JEC'ORD OF ASSIGfir0 RE ADitiG

.A551GI(ED TO:Hv_L L

C L.T c k S.S. H0:

239 - #4- ('<?po (QA & Audits)

,EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• signature 1

BCAP Overview Plan U A4-Q[M/m/(

Qualifications of N4 2,6 1976 f,"N$

n, a

nation &

ii,zg,pj

,,,g,f, f

n AMSI Qualification of QA M45.2,23 1978 Program Audit Personnel u-2.9.p 4O,dN8/fr ed

/

DP & P-101 0

QA Policy

_ g.1c).pA.

., h,?j, [

f i

/

DP S P-102 0

~QA Programs

n. 29 f,[

im/(

CECO Letter to

/

Aug'. 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP a

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

s Rev iewed. By:-

N3

[ b '

Date:

/

.w w QA Manager 49

~

QUALITY ASSURAMCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READit:G ASSIGNED TO:~R,oL L. C L utx 5.5. HO:_239-44-0220 E!1P. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Ti tie Comge,tyd

• Signature

/

ERC QA Plan,for BCAP

]jpgg, g,y M k, BCAP Policy Doctment W

gg g

4

-- ~ Y 7/lo/94 BCAP Site QA Over-c.f,y

/p3e//Aview Group P1an

,g_ ]gg,Q gg

/ QAP-1.1 h/g Personnel Qualifications

,g g, gg

< QAP-1.2 0

Indoctrination and Train-ing of Personnel g,

,g.-gj

<QAP-2.1 [16 Daily Log g

ggg,

- QAP-10.1 Quality Review and Sur-g)g i veillance

((y,g

,,g v'QAP-10.2 bf-Y 7

Qualificaticn of In-g.0/B j spection Personnel h.&$4

-Ad

/ QAP-15.1 0

Doct=entation and Di s-o position of Observations and Discrepancies I t. 26 N-

't QAP-16.1 0

Corrective Action 28 M bd QAP-18.1 [ y %

Quality Assurance Audit r

c Progras 112.864-(

0<

QAP-18.2 % / K Qualification of Audit Personnel gg g

/,

ANSI /ASME-1977 Requirements for Auditing

/

N45.2.12 of QA Progra.s for Nu-clear Power Plants fpf gg,y jg j

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided' an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my underst.irtding.

Reviewed By. _

, [. @(oM 5 RTC :

/

k 0A Manager 50

, hg E

M'-

e Mt. ek>

4 -_ _

QUAllTV ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING

(

ASSIGl4E0 TO:

4.

E. Coc/ os 5.5. NO:

212-18-2609 (Sr. QA & Aud'.ts i.ead)

EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature

-1 BCAP Overview Plan J/

jy Qualification of f"$n 2.6 1978 ersonn Qualification of QA Ai4SI N45.2.23 1978 Program Audit

//[ gfc Parsonnal CECO Letter to

---

Aug 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP ff QAP-2.1 1

Daily Log I'f7 fff 4/ QAP-1 QA Audit Program IIhffy DP & P-101 0

.QA Policy I'h[f/

,/

l'!7[E/

DP & P-102 0

QA Programs

^

I I

(

• Signature acknowledges that 1-have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

l

!(

~

//!7![(/

Reviewed By:

I Date:

.QA Manager 51

}

\\

QUALITY ASSURAl4CE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READit;G

.('ASSIGl4EDTO:

A.

E. Coc~oros S. S. Il0 :

212-18-2600 (QA Manacer)

(Sr. kSCAP Lead)

EM"-

N0; Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 0

BCAP CSR Plan

/ / '/

~

h

--~~

l dCo.P RP5R Plan g'I II8 1*

aco RscAP alan Program Indoctrination

//

U 1 ff meAo-n1 0

for Employees

//

Orcanization and

//

3 CAP-02 1

Reiponsibility

',/7/EI

'l!7f/

8CA?-03 0

Records flanaaecent BCAP Interface with

//

BCAP-04 1

Contractors and A/E

"/7/[/

• • 6 CAP-05 t

Cbservation and eN n

7M

/

3 CAP-05 2

7!M BCAP-07 1

BCAP Reoorts Qualification and it / /,c 7 Certification of BCAP-08 o

co3nenoc,3nn porconnel f 7f BCAP-20 1

CSR Establish Populations If7[f)/

BCAP-21 1

CSR Sa.r.ple Selections 7 f</

CSR Preparation of I'!7/['/

/

BCAP-22 1

Instructions & Checklists

• Signature acknowledges that I.have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

• • lihan issued L

Reviewed By:

Date:

t < /7 V

QA Manager 52

a QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING

(

ASSIGt4ED TO:4. E. Cocor'os

5. 5. !!0 :

212-18-2609 (QA itanager)

(Sr. RSCAP Lead)

EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature CSR Preparation of Reinspection & Document st[7[fg 8 CAP-23 0-Review Packaces t 'I /

CSR Performance of

'#[/[f[

Inspection & Document 7

8 CAP-24 0

oovipve

• • SCAP-25 CSR Evaluation of Results RPSR Identification of

//

BCAP-41 0

Required Documents

1. '/ 7//y' RPSR Preparation BCAP-42.

I of Checklists I

y RPSR Review of

/

l'/ ~/h 8 CAP-43 0

Contract Procedures s

I#

BCAP-50 0

RSCAP Review Methods 7 ff QASI-01 2

Control of QASI's l'

Corrective Action

//

l'/7/f[

QASI-02 2

Raouests Training, Qualification &

l'[7gy Certification of QA 0ASI-04 3

perennnel

1. !7E[

QASI-05 2

Correspondence Control

'#!?[k QASI-06 2

Document Reviews

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

Reviewed By:

Date:

It

/ dy QA Manager 53 J

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READitlG ASSIGNED TO:

A.

E.

Coc'oros S.S. NO:

21?-18-2509 (QA ilanager)

(Sr. RSCAP Lead; EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed,

• Signature I'

-07 2-Surveillances

[

h

-08 2

Audits I'

l'[?

09 2

Documentation / Records

/ y'

-10 2

ce

.11 2

Monthly Status Reoort

/[

12 2

Final Overview Report

7 f-/'

g

-13 1

Stop Work Order d/

"!7/f/

14 1

Trend An lysis I'

-15 1

Sample Selection f/

Performance ci

-16 i

Reinspection anc l'

pf n-,-ne-o n.? 4 n.,

n. - c.? s.,,,

ANSI Requirements for a llection, N45.2.9 1974 MCQ 9h and (1aiat2aance of

/

Ar!S I QA Ter.as and jf N45.2.10 1973 Definitions

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

(

//r! (If/

Reviewed By:

M 7

Date:

h QA Manager 54

QUAllTY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED REA61NG ASSIGNED TO:

R. E. hia S.S. NO:

2d7-62-0967 EMP. NO:

d

_Q1q7 Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature t o /t2 /(-e/ J2'9M 1,

BCAP Overview Plan g jujg Qg Qua1ification of f

ANSI Inspection, Examination &

gu/jgj(.y(2f,ff i

d N45.2.6 1978 Testino Personnel S,w nii-kA51M Qualification of QA i oj//2/yv /ff.f/ {

ANSI Pr udit

/

N45.2.23 1978

[am t;

CECO Letter to l'/12/ D/ ^'21/

q

---

Aug 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP S [%/3t(

$hy QAP-2.1 1

Daily Log g/tf/#il kfM e Osts iI l 1

QA Audit Program t o/g 5/gt(

Q{d cAfgjQAP.Lk r

(,lg /gy Qgg IL l2/kt{ diff-DP & P-101 0

QA Policy 8/ f/2/s yJh'jf IC DP & P-102 0

QA Programs 3.oM Rf W-1

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

L Reviewed B C p c) w O // 4. d e-,e,,3 Date:

/ CM/

[AManager 55

\\

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING k,

ASSIGIIED TO:

R. E. Him S. S. t10 :

247-62-0967 (Assistant Project Manaaer)

~

(Sr. CSR Lead)

EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 0

BCAP CSR Plan 1

BCAP RPSR Plan

\\

LNSV k b4h 1'

BCAP RsrAP plan Program Indoctrination BCAP-01 0

for Employees to [g7 /gy (R qd%.

Organization and BCAP-02 1

Responsibility

!O/(1[gy

(( E BCAP-03 0

Re:ords ilanagement gg/g/gy Qg BCAP Interface with BCAP-04 i

Contractors and A/E 10 /t 2/8Q RQ $lh i

• • BCAP-05 Observation and sc cy/ Concern Ip!(1! u R.

BCAP-06 2

c 9

~

BCAP-07 1

BCAP Reports 1.0/f1/gy k{h x

~

Qualification and Certification of 7

10 /t d AV kbh BCAP-08 0

opincnoctinn poc<nnnol BCAP-20' 1

CSR Establish Populations (0/(2/gy Q {,dg,

)

BCAP-21 1

CSR Sample Selections to/;q/pjj Q g,j/

CSR Preparation ~of BCAP-22 1

Instructions & Checklists g/g 7/g pg

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.'an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

i

• • When Issued

-Reviewed By Q Sr.~ m rf.e // f 0 c..e a Date:

sc/ J/W dA~ Manager

~56

3 3

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READlf;G k

ASSIGHED TO:

~

R.

E. Ham S.5. N0:

247-62-0967 i '

(Assistant Project iianager)

(Sr. CSR Lead)

EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature CSR Preparation of hp)$P,'h[he,& Document g

g Qg BCAP-23 0-CSR Performance of Inspection & Document IO!ll!AV kk BCAP-24 0

Reviews

• • RCAP-?5 CSR Evaluation of Results RPSR Identification of BCAP-41 0

Recuired Docuraent s 10 2/A y k

RPSR Preparation il BCAP-42 1

of Checklists ID l 8N RPSR Review of BCAP-43 0

Contract Procedures 1011/94 Q

a4-%.

Procurement Document

( /tg/gy QQ QAP-4.1 0

Control Preo., Review &

Approvai QAP-5.1 0

of.Q. A. Procedures tgggfgy f

Distribution and Control QAP-6.1 0

of Q. A. Documents

. geht/'gy g

QAP-17.1 0

Q. A. Records Progrart

((gg y

• Signature acknowledges'that I have. read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

L

/od /!J/

Rev iewed By.<23.% - i<. / 4 C c..o;s Date:

/QA Manager 57

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED 10:

R.

E. Ham' S.5. NO:247-62-0967 1

EMP. NO:__ __9_ 0 3_t l Doc.

Date o

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature BCAP-01 3-fo Em 1 y e d/IT /8 V b b Nm I?-/l9/84 k

BCAP-02 2

ep sb t

p < w-8 CAP-03

/2.

Records Management i L/19 /8 V k(N w BCAP Interface BCAP-04 2

with Contractors & A/E 11/19/gt/

M[ k Rf#

Observation & oiscrepancy/

BCAP-06 g&

Concern Processing

/2.[/ef/gy ggh BCAP-07 2

BCAP Reports 1%//f/Jtf

[

BCAP-20 2

CSR Establish Populations gg//9/pf g

BCAP-21 4

CSR Sample Selection

/2//9/gy hg CSR Prep. of Reinspection 8 CAP-23 1

& Doc. Review Packages

/.7/jg/g gg CSR Performance of BCAP-24 2

Inspection & Doc. Reviews

/A//47/g/' [

CSR Evaluation

/2.[/<f[py

[

BCAP-25 0

of Results g

'~

RPSR Ident. of Specs.

& Contractor Procedures j y/jgg g

g p

)

)

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

,/

/

Reviewed By:

Date:

7 QA Manager 58

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED 10:

R. E. Ham' S.S. NO: 247-67-n467 EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature

/2!/f[ff

[

BCAP-42 3-k s

/

/1/87

[

BCAP-43 1

on r t

o edures

/ 2[/f[f9' BCAP-60 1

RSCAP Review Methods s

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

Reviewed By:

[

Date:

/

W QA Manager 59

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF A551Gi4ED READING ASSIGNED 10:

R. E. Hat 5.S. NO:

247-62-0967 EMP. NO:, _ _ _ _ _, _ _,

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature If / HAY Rh#M QAP-1.1 l'

ations

' f[/I'!(Y f

QAP-10.1 1

y nce Qualification of QAP-10.2 I

Inspection Personnel 11!'6/64 hb QAP-17.1 1

QA Records Program Il[/f((y hA QAP-18.1 2

QA Audit Program fg/7 g

Qualification of QAP-18.2 1

Audit Personne1

/ Z//P/[rT/

A oSignature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

Date:

/ L M Reviewed By:

60 QA Manager

RECORD OF AS$1GNED RE ADING ASSIGHED 10:

R. E. Him S.5. NO: 247-62-0967 EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

T it le Completed

• Signature 2

Overview Plan 17,//g/gq Q

Rf. S

/ z.,

BCAP CSR Plan g t/sg/gy Q f_ b BCAP Site QA Over-1 view Group Plan

/ E[/((((//

A 001 2

ERC QA Plan for 8 CAP

/ L[/p/gy k

A RSCA Nw 11/1918y 9E h t

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

Reviewed By:

M Date:

3 QA Manager 61

.........v..

n e. x n n u n, v u n r u n n.. v i.

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING

-(

ASSIGNED T0:

J.

L.

Hansel S.S. fl0: 310-26-0735 (Project.'4anager)

EMP. NO:_do J_W.

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 0

BCAP CSR Plan

~~~~~

Z Ap n

V Program Indoctrination 26)ff ghg BCAP-01 0

for Employees to Orgonization and M

BCAP-02 1

Responsibility fg/g /fy Q[,Q l

(/

8 CAP-03 0

Re ords.4anagement g/gg[gy Q{g SCAP Interface with N

ph/gy M

8 CAP-04 1

Contracters and A/E

/

I y

{

• • BCAP-05 Observation and BCAP-06 2

/0 L t. dY

-f D.

-g V

/o!t4!P/ h h-d BCAP-07 1

8 CAP Reports Qualification and f

.k

)

$"p

/d !26 /fY 17)

-f._

BCAP-08 0

nnng1 i

y

[f'/

(7[.gf BCAP-20 1

CSR Establish Populations

/s jg/ghy {Qhg 8 CAP-21 1

CSR Sample Selections CSR Preparation of O

BCAP-22 1

Instructions & Checklists jo y py Mg,, A (J

~

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided,an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

• • When Issued Reviewed By:

Date:

'[0 7

/

f i

QA Manager 62

r

-..--....v.o noennun c un e vs.n. 4 v..

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READlt'G ASSIGNED T0:

J. L. Hans'el S.S. NO:

310-26-0735 (Project f4anager)

EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

' Signature CSR Preparation of

'a24.[8/ h'

.,,[

h3,kP,eg})ppnge00cument BCAP-23 0-CSR Performance of 2A AY N Y/hJf f

/#

BCAP-24 0

pe 0

• • RCAP ?S CSR Evaluation of Results RPSR Identification of

/

/

//

BCAP-41 0

Reauirad Cocunents

/0 /24/ 7

/4

'd 8

s

!O/2'

-' d RPSR Preparation BCAP-42 1

of Checklists 1

y e

RPSR Revteu of f

/#/26!ff I

--8 BCAP-43 0

Contract Procedures

/

Procurerent document

/o[26 8/ J/ M.... O QAP-4.1 0

Control Prep., Reviaw 6 Acorcval k

f

,p,j,lp,t y QAP-5 1 0

ci Q.

A. Procscures I

i Distribution and Centrol

//

k

/o[zfjff/ g g

QAP-6.1 0

cf Q.A. Documents QAP-17.1 0

Q.A. Records Program

/d Py M

v

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

Reviewed By:

Date:

/0 f

l QA Manager 63 i

QUAllTY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED RE'ADING

(

ASSIGl4ED TO:

J.

L.

nansin S.S. NO:

310-26-0/35 IO^ 3 ^" die EMP. NO:,__bO~7'35 Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature g[p eg j

1, BCAP Overview Plan fg ANSI Inspection, Examination &

/

/

[/(

Qualification of N4S.2.6 1978 Testino Personne1

/# //I/8Y e

Qualification of QA

(/

fo[f gy Pr a

Audit 2.23 1978 CECO Letter to

/

/

[

---

Aug 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP

/d/24 /[Y 2

/d/26/Jy' QAP-2.1 1

Daily Lo9

'O 1

OA Audit Program

/

g S/'

[

c v QAP-y DP & P-101 0

QA Policy fg/g [gf 1%

M'

/

y fg[fffgt/ g gg DP & P-102 0

QA Programs

/

y

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

Reviewed By:

Date:

/

M

/QA Manager 64

- =

QUAllTY ASSURANCE RECORD OF A551GkED READING ASSIGNED 10:

-J.

L. Hansel 5.5. NO: '310-26-0735 EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• S i g ~n a t u r e BCAP-Ol' 3-1

/2 /3 SY b

BCAP-02 2

e po s i

ty

/

/7 Ef BCAP-03 1

Records Management

/g/ / 3 l t['

f BCAP Interface BCAP-04 2

with Contractors & A/E

/2, / /Y O[ [

/-_

7 Observation & Discrepancy /

BCAP-06 5

Concern Processing

/L/jc//g<[

(

BCAP-07 2

BCAP Reports

.j jc/

[

/ '(

BCAP-20 2

CSR Establish Populations 77 j7 BCAP-21 4

CSR Sample Selection j

,4

[ g' CSR Prep. of Reinspection BCAP-23 1

& Doc.-Review Packages j,

g CSR Pbrformanc'e of BCAP-24 2

Inspection & Doc. Reviews j

f7

/ g i

+

//

CSR Evaluation

- f f (/

BCAP-25 0

of Results

~

jy/

ffc/ [

RPSR Ident. of Specs.

/

/

[

,& Contrattor Procedur's e

ggp,4)

)

g ii i

ff

- y

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents'and have been provided,an opportunity to have questions answered to assure ~my under, standing.

t t

1F

[

7 V

Reviewed By:

//f-- -

Date:

. /], /~,,(d 5 QA Manager 65 r

t

1. s-nf c'

. P

QUAL 11Y ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED 10:

J. L. Hansel 5.5. NO: '310-26-0735 EMP. NO: _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _,

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature RPSR Prep. of

/

/

BCAP-42 3-Checklists

/?j/g/7Y hI

-'k BCAP-43 1

on r c o

dures

/

ff

[

/~ I y

8 CAP-60 1

RSCAP Review Methods -

(([

1 g

ll

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

i M

Date:

Reviewed By:

ff 5

// E t'.vi'd /5 Q A Ma n a g e r 66 l

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD Of A551GN00 3 ADING J. L. Hansel 5.5. NO: ' 310-26-0735 ASSIGHED T0:_

EMP. NO:__ ; _ _ _ _',

Doc.

Date e

No.

• Rev.

Title Completed

• Sigtsture

/2 !/7 8'[

X QAP-1.1 1-a e tions ufve I net

[2- /7 [Y

[

QAP-10.1 1

nd N-I

//

Qualification of

/

QAP-10.2 1

Inspection Personnel

/M//7

[V h T.'

'QAP-17.1 1

QA Records Program

/

7I

[/

QAP-18.1 2

QA Audit P r c-am j

f g

g

/p 7

[

QAP

,8.2 l-di e

/

L

(

~

+

y J'

e

.f.

i t

• Signature acknowledges that I have remd, the' documents'and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.'.

Reviewed'By:

b Date:

I e

// 6 COI.v&S - Q A Ma na g e r 67 I

L.

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF A551Gt4ED READING ASSIGNED TO:

J. L. Hinsel 5.5. NO:

310-26-0735 EMP. NO: _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _,

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 2

Overview Plan

/p p gy g

Os 1

BCAP CSR Plan jy f

/ff

_ _d BCAP Site QA Over-J2 fl.i JY hb,g4 /

'1 yiew Group P1an 001 2

ERC QA Plan for BCAP

/

j 87

{

j i

C

~

oSignature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been e

provided.an e,portunity to have questions answered to. assure my understanding.

Reviewed By:

Date:

/b d f

// /~ l'nGriX OA Hananer 68 a

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGHED TO:

J.

E Moff 5.5. NO: 397-54-3137 A

Aud u s )

EMP. NO:

j d/J]_, _

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 1

BCAP Overview Plan

, j,.4 g gj i

Qualification of N

[# 18 ANSI Inspection, Examination &

F N45.2.6 1978 Testino Personne1

/>[6/e V h E 21 I

' /

/

h QualHicadon of @

AHS1 ar udit P [r g'

N45.2.23 1978 r

Ceco Letter to

{

---

Aug 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP

,, f g /,.y 1y Mg

/

/

NJ (i' ()U QAP-2.1 1

Daily Log

,,,fg/gg J% y M/

ii.i V

/ '60

'!4'9;p Q A p,3 r T 1

QA Audit Program g4 h 7 g/

//

Q f'f6 DP & P-101 0

QA Policy fg,,. /h g y /g

/ /

ll'[

DP & P-102 0

QA Programs f,/ fg y

( ggf/

[/'

N ffW

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered-to assure my understanding.

Rev1ewed By:QBN'm &*

f C'. G c. L Date; fol/S l

' [

1. QA Manager 69-

/

QUAL.11Y ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED T0:

J. E. Hdff S.S. NO:

497-54-3137 EMP. NO:__ _ Jj g, Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 4

SCAP Site QA 1

Overview Group Plan ggjgy M 1, Q

/

[

N

((

ERC QA Plan for 001 2

BCAP fgfggy g 7 jg i

/

N j '/U

. ica ft /fg/gy ky M

2 3 CAP Overvit.

/ /

N

/ '{JU i

i i

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been

- provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

1 Reviewed By:

/

// M -

Date:

/ 2,/2./ W

~

v QA Manager 70

' ~ '

QUAlllY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGriED READING ASSIGNED TO:

J. E. Hof'f 5.5. N0: 497-54-3137 EMP. NO:__/]-U3_-]_,

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature Personnel QAP-1.I 1

Qualifications jtf,, /gy A_ _

E //g Quality Review QAP-10.1 1

and Surveillance

,7/[/s V MT M

/ Y

\\1

' ' {} {/

Qualification of

/z /n /8'/

M7N QAP-10.2 1

Inspection Personnel

/ /

(f)

QAP-18.1 2

QA Audit'Procram ft/f 7 !a / 3% { N

/

/

\\

Qualification of QAP-18.2 1

Audit Personne1

/z./n /gy j f

/,M m

/

/

Q l 'gV 4

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been

~

-provided.an opportunity'to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

e 7

Reviewed By:

[

M

.Date:

/

2/

/

QdManager 71

QUALITY ASSURAtlCE RECORD OF ASSIGHED READillG p

0 ASSIGNED TO:

Robert V. Laney S.S. NO:

176-32-1255 E!*,P. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Ti tl e Comge,tyd

• Signature ERC QA P1 an. for BCAP 8'-t

{

M'S BCAP Policy Document

((g[a,q es 7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over-view Group P1an 88 -f qq, -

.QAP-1.1 0

Personnel Quali fications

[

i, _ g QAP-1.2 0

Indoctrination and Train-i

/9

[ /, r / )

/

ing of Personnel

"-1 e

QAP-2.1

[Ii Daily Log

[

[ W,,,__

,,_g QAP-10.1 0

Quality Review and Sur-j

/,4/g/

/

i

/

veillance H -l

,g

(

QAP-10.2 0

Quali fication of In-

[/

/

/.,(g/

spection Personnel li- )

g f- -

QAP-15.1 0

Doctmentation and Di s-position of Observatior.s

/

and Discrepancies le-1

[

A j

7

((

QAP-16.1 0

Corrective Action QAP-18.1 [ l/

Quality Assurance Audit

/

Program lt -l Lvv,. -

QAP-18.2 0

Qualification of Audit

/

Personnel l'-I

, / /,

ANSI /ASME-1977 Requirements for Auditing

/ [

i N45.2.12 of QA Programs for flu-

//A4t.g e,- ;

l clear Power Plants

• Signatt.re acknowledges that I have read the doctruents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understdttding.

_('

Reviewed Dy.

[

nmvi 00Tc

a

.5 JV 0[ Manager 72

1 QUAllTY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGHED 10:

R.

V. La'nev 5.5. NO: 176-32-1255 EMP. NO: _ _ _ _ _, _ _,

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature CSR Estr3Iich 8 CAP-20 2

Populati'v.s

/2 (([Y

'[% "

CSR Sample BCAP-21 4

Selection e'

CSR Prep. of

• $"y "fckaaes d ^ d*V -

BCAP-23 1

P o

CSR Performance of M

Inspection of Doc.

/,

fgf*

d%~

BCAP-24 2

noviews CSR Evaluation of Resu hs

/>

g 4_

BCAP-25 0

RPSR Ident of Specs.

[/

,/ g [g BCAP-41 1

& Contractor Procedures /,

/

RPSR Prep. of

/J BCAP-42 3

Checklists

, g/g 1

g ^/

RPSR Review of BCAP-43 1

Contract Procedures Awy f/

BCAP-60 1

RSCAP Review Methods

/

"'/^ % '

• Sigt.ature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

L!f/

Reviewed By:

Date:

/

QA Manager 73

QUAll1Y ASSURANCE j

RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGHED 10:

R. V. Laney S.5. NO:

176-32-1255 EMP. NO:

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature Persor.nel QAP-1.1 1

Qualifications g./ff/f4/ [

/

'/

I Quality Review QAP-10.1 1

and Surveillance

/

Qualification of f,

f QAP-10.2 1

Inspection Personnel

/ 4 h, QAP-18.1 2

QA Audit Prooram Qualification of

//

QAP-18.2 1

Audit Personnel oSignature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

Date:

t /J '

Reviewed By:

QA Manager 74

~

QUAL.11Y ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED TO: R. V. Laney S.S. NO:

176-19 194g EMP. NO: _ _ _ _ _, _ _,

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature gy[g/f4/

/

2 Overview Plan

/'/

/

1 BCAP CSR Plan 4

km c

g --

' M[dwy BCAP Site QA Over-4 I

view Group Plan 001 2

ERC QA Plan for BCAP 1

4 i

I

?

s 4

4 4

4

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

A Date:

'[r Pa '

Reviewed By:

(

s QA Manager 75

. _.. =_.

i.

c. int.un i l uN RESL ARCH ' LORF ukn i t uN l

QUALITY ASSURANCE

!s RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED T0:

M.

A.

?ot/ics 5.5. NO:

201-H-/529 (Sr. 'Electrica l Lead!

g.. p, gg.

4

Doc, e

Date l

.No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature O

CSR Plan th g 1

RPSR Plan 1

RSCAP Plan BCAP-20 1

CSR Establish Populations 10 m.

o BCAP-21 1

CSR Sample Selections

\\chu,\\%

hkMyt.

)

r 5

CSR Preparation of h\\bk M /@\\\\h' BCAP-22 1

Instructions & Checklists 6

l CSR Preparation of

~~_

i Reinspection &

Document BCAP-23 0

Pac' aces

\\b\\ b f4\\,

L

NR Review x

C5R Performance of

~ ~ '

e i n & Document SCAP-24 0

g g

(

i CSR Evaluation of I

l

• • 8 CAP-25 Results RPSR Identification of Specifications and

\\\\\\(\\( q

\\6 BCAP-41 0

gK rnntrartne pen earturat I

RPSR Preparation of o\\d Q gh grAp 42 1

Check lis t s

'..@\\ \\ g gA RPSR Review of i

BCAP-43 0

Contract Procedures

\\

e%rt, BCAP-60 0

RSCAP Review Methods

- \\

5 k

bQ Procurement Document

\\

QAP~4.1 0

Control A M Ik M v t..

\\

• Signature acknowledges that~l have read the documents and have been j

provided-an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

• • When Issued j (-

Reviewed By:

[

hh Date:-

V 1

m QA Manager 76

i..

- - -~ <- - -. - -,

i QUAllTY ASSURANCE RECORD OF A551GNfD READING

(

ASSIGHED TO:

N. A. Pet' rick 5.5. NO:

204-14-7529 (QA & Audits)

EMP. NO: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, _,,,,

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Iitle Completed

• Signature

'7\\tk64 1

BCAP Overview Plan p

.g i

Qualification of J1 i

ANSI Inspection, Examination &

4

\\A 4(. D N45.2.6 1978 Testino Personnel

. Qualification of QA

(- -

~~

rat udit

~~

i 2.23 1978 nn I

J CECO Letter to 9\\M khMqg

---

Aug 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP 3

QAP-2.1 1

Daily Log 67\\t\\.\\6@

PW(c s

n.,

a,6TdQAP.1R T 1

QA Audit Program gd gA

'h

.Wr i t

, (

DP & P-101 0-QA Policy

\\ckuok G q pgt DP & P-102 0

QA Programs

,hudEk fMhL l

1 I

t i

e J

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have. questions answered to assure my l

understanding.

i 1

I-

.'7 Reviewed By:

Date:

7 1

l QA Manager 77 f

QUALITY AS".,URAMCE RECORD CF ASSIG!!ED READING ASSIGNED TO: b hm'. b,%ged, S.S. t10: 2T4'l8-R57 l

EMP. NO:

$ 19$ ~l Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Ti tl e Compl e ted

• Signature 95/

4

,, 91 ERC QA P1an for BCAP

/

jg 3 c ' : <M,, a n.i BCAP Policy Document M

/ Vfimumtnto i t, - >

7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over-6 7(.}

((/

view Group P1 an j,,,, g g(

QAP-1.1 0

Personnel Qualificatiens 2L.lL_

/va, QAP-1.2 0

Indoctrination and Train-ing of Personnel g,,,

(

QAP-2.1 3p Daily Log

~. ~. ~ - ~

(

,,,, z QAP-10.1 0

Quality Review and Sur-vei ll ance

\\

iv %

i. xdy v_,

(

QAP-iD.2 0

Quali fi:.ati en o f In-specu an Perscr.nel 1 0,.

(\\

v.

<m

,w QAP-15.1 0

rocumentatica and Di s-position of Observaticas and Discrepar,cies l,j, 3

QAP-16.1 0

Corrective Action I' <,\\

,,,. - 3

. ), w w w w a.

QAP-18.1 1y Quality Assurance Audit t,a,o <<< Program

,3 QAP-18.2 0

Qualification of Audit Personnel 3

ANSI /ASME-1977 P.cqui rements for Audi ting N45.2.12 of QA Programs for flu-clear Power P1 ants g..,/

//

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the doct:::ents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure ray understanding.

Revicued By.

ll;'hH2,,a At) f 0,.g(a6:

) OQ O OAriadger 78 b

.....v..

neatnnen cuntuna*av" QUAL 1TY ASSURANCE REC'ORD OF ASSIGNED READING

(

ASSIGNED TO:

C.

J.

S i,mo n s 5.5. NO: 259-78-1957 s

(QA & Audits)

{ gg'"~}_

gyp, gg, Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature j'

id - 2 '/- B1 1

8 CAP overvieu Pian

(' Ju jec) s i ii,py,;;[(( c.~

Qualifications of

~

m.,p.e v ANSI aQ N45.2,6

197o, insepction, Examination &

(

% 3,, 7 p _ n n.,,

_ u._ % _

j

'# ~" #I ANSI Qualification of GA N45.2,23 1978 Program Audit Personnel

(_ g,.i, ;%_

s f

,e -iN v DP & P 101 0

QA Policy kg

,,s.

...... a c

DP & P-102 0

QA Progrars

(

. \\w A CECO Letter to hw)s~ x+. _'

l g,, g-b 'i Aug. 30, 1984 the NRC-3 CAP

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided_an opportunity to have ouestions answered to assure my understanding, k

, # /4,-. a,

- a,, / /

t. '..

Reviewec By: '

,.. Date:

a/2,e/f/

QA(Manager a

/

79

QUAll1Y ASSURAriCE a

RECORD OF ASSIGt4ED READING ASSIGNED TO:

C. J. S i m.ao n s 5.5. NO:

259-78-1957 EMP. NO:

$ 19T 7 Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature

' P e r s o r.n c i QAP-1.1 1

Qualifications s 2-i 3 (Q-(

Quality Review

, 7,, g

(*

-R QAP-i0.1 1

and Surveillance Qualification of QAP-10.2 1

Inspection Personne1 l 'i - 8 h HTR m m -c r,g 0AP-ld.1 J

OA Audit Procram e7., y CC Qualification of QAP-18.2 1

Audit Personnel ll-'}

(

• b ne

.y%m oSignature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my

. understanding.

Reviewed By:

-[. h@f#.I

[8"

/2!/7

/

Date:

QA Manager 80

QUAlllY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED 10:

C. J. Sim. tons S.S. NO: 259-78-1957 EMP. NO:__ _ _ ( lClI l

~ Doc.

Date i

No.

Rev.

Iitle Completed

• Signature BCAP Site QA 1

Overview Group Plan f 4./g ERC QA Plan for 001 2

BCAP

/ 2 -. [

@_. (

2 3 CAP Overview Plan

/ 2.

14/ NC iw 1

1 4

i l

F 1

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

/ 2[7[g'/

Reviewed By: k-[ d()Cd/8.5

/

[W- -

Date:

w QA Manager 81

-QUALITY ASSURANCE

' RECORD'CF ASSIGNED RE'ADING ASSIGHED TO: 'C.

M.

Th orioson S.S. NO:

302-38-6814 (04 & Audits)

ENp. No:

4-Qf_/f Doc.

Date No.

• Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature 1

BCAP Overview Plan ggg Qualification of

/

ANSI Inspection, Examination &

N45.2'.6 1978 Testino Personnel

//)jfg//Y Qualification of QA

/

ANSI udit N45.2.23 1978

{r

/

CECO Letter to jgjjg [g

---

Aug 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP

/

QAP-2.1 1

Daily Log f

pt/ h%QgAQ

/

9/,

QAP-1 QA Audit Program j,gj,//g/

j g

?

f DP & P-101 0

QA Policy

/p / /f u'

((ggA,g

/ph,[g h [l

.j DP & P-102 0

QA Programs

• Signature. acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity.to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

k.

Rev iewed By>;n Els...... >

J f C. e.

Date: A l:2/

'f

/

'QA Manager 82

.i

. ~..

l QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED T0:

C. it. Thompson 5.5. NO: 302-38-6814 (Admin. 2. Racords Mgr)

DP

'O L k

Doc.

Date No.

Rev.

Title Completed

• Signature BCAP-01 0'

o 1y

/0

//

f 8 CAP;O2 1

po b

t

/O/)f/fL/ fff) h Q a

a, SCAP-03 0

Records Manar 0.atot

/o/jy//L/

Og[g' e

BCAP Interface with f e,/f 7//(/

A,7,gM i

(.

SCAP-04 1

Contractors and A/E'

• • dCAP-06 Observation and ff

/0/[f//Y

, t/'

8 CAP-05 2

ine

/

SCAP-01 1

BCAP RcportS

} O/,/}<l 0'_ h u d Qua lification anc / h e'$,, fNo[p sonne l /0//7//F MorM'> BCAP-08 0 s Procurement Qap-4.1 0 Document Contro1 / O/j'f}{L) h//h wm) ProceCures/O})7lL) h)7)^ Ghp.5,1 O p ova r. /g, Distributien and Control fo/7[y' &f h g,j QAP-5.1 0 of Q.A. Dccoments / f r QAP-17.1 0 0.A. 4?corss Program /0/j-p/jg/ h, f

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been i

provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

• • When issucc Reviewed ByrJ 7 2$...e

/.f (.2c. e 1 Date: / c O.//J V ,.e [ 04 Manager 83 ..m- -- ~m+

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECDRD C'F ASSIGNED READING ASSIGHED T0: C. i4. Tho.moson 5,5, no: 302-38-6814 (Admin. & Records tigr.) E t4 P. NO: Doc. Date No. Rev. Title Completed

• Signature Requiremants for I8 2.9 19M l]jRecoros/adf//h AppM

,4 i - i j i ANSI QA Terms a /g/p/jp g N45.2.10 1973 Definitions L

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

R e v i e w e d B yc E 4....-c 4h ./ / O c...c,.s Date: ec/7//r/ [AManager 84

. =. QUAlllY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED 10: C. 11. Thor:ip son 5.5. NO: 302-38-6814 EMP. NO: _ _ _ _ _, _ _, Doc. Date No. Rev. Title Completed

• Signature SCAP Site QA 1

Overview Group Plan jg/g } r f / ERC QA Plan for j /g } 001 2 BCAP f-r ,/f t/ .. M,og 2 BCAP Overview Plan / / P i I i 1 i i

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.

U Y Reviewed By: [M Date: N A Manager 85 4

~_

t. i n t u tt i : U N K L blMKlit L u n r" U rt st e l u n QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING

~ ASSIGHED TO: C. M. T hoino son S.S. NO: 302-38-6814 e EMP. NO:,, _ _ _ _ _, _ _, Doc. Date No. Rev. Title Completed

• Signature Procram Indoc.

for' Employees /w///j/ [g/, .l 3 CAP-01 3. j f i f r Organization & y-l 8 CAP-02 2 Responsibility- /M, ///9 .. M,m / ) m 8 CAP-]3 1 Records Management [,J//j// [M, og ) y a ii BCAP Interface with I BCAP-04 2 Contractors & A/E /Mjjp'y hgg) Observation & Discrepancy / I j dCAP-05 5 Concern Processing gg [g A) ,,. y- ] BCAP-07 2 BCAP Reports / f/t/ ,) jf l 4 f f i i { l,

• Signature acknowledges'that I have read the documents and have been 1

provided,an opportunity to have questions answered to, assure my understanding.* 4 Reviewed By: h-Date: /2 2/ f* QA Manager 86 - m - m. m. m. m. ..mm. .m.

m. --

.2. m.

l QUALITY ASSURANCE l RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED TO: C. M. Thonip s on S.S. NO: 302-38-6814 EMP. NO: _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _, Doc. Date No. Rev. Title Completed

• Signature

. r,.N._) Ncations /MdC//Y QAP-1.1 l' a N M/ d/[Y Rdw)_ QAP-10.I 1 v neo y 10/./// QAP-10.2 1 spe o er onnel g ,y - QAP-17.1 1 QA Records Program /.7/JO//Y M, m mq) QAP-18.1 2 QA Audit Program jggjy p p Qualification of _) /.)/2o//k % j, QAP-18.2 1 Audit Personnel / / ~ 'IW I e l

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided.an opportunity to have questions answered to, assure my understanding.

? 2/ [ Reviewed By: / Date: QA Manager 87

- _ ~..... = . =. .) - 4 l QUAL 1TY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING 4 ASSIGNED-TO: J. E. Younb 5.5. NO: 358-34-6428 1 (QA & Audits) _g6/Jg r EMP. NO: ~ i Doc. Date No. Rev. Title Completed

• Signature foggp[9h,q 1

BCAP Overview Plan Qualification of i ANSI Inspection. Examination & j N45.2.6 1978 Testino Personnel / 9 7[' Qualification of QA a Audit $ro g g'g [ 4 2.23 1978 Y p n,, t t i t I CECO Letter to

---

Aug 30, 1984 the NRC-BCAP

,,/u/t./ 7 E-f/M i QAP-2.I 1 Daily Log / v[3v[' f[ ) [ t/ QAP 1 QA Audit Program / o/2./[P[ ." ~ j j

• 5 J

~ t DP & P-101 0 QA Policy / b/2 V/8/ h

• i fo/2/[T[

h .- f DP & P-102 0 QA Programs l l l I j I i i 3 }

• Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and.have been l

provided,an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my l understanding, j i

1. fgW 5 7 S '/

l ' Reviewed By: ,/s Date: i QA Manager 88 i I

ERC TRAlfilf4G ATTEl: DANCE SHEET TRAINING SESSION DATE: 'O 8// (f M 9 6 <.J C o D LOCATION: //77 O///C# DURATION: ,, 'hh-8, /. b g-/. Abk/ YtrQ4j h ' TOPIC: i My signature acknowledges that I have received instruction on this topic. It also indicates that I have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to ensure my understanding of the aaterial presented. PR i flT il AME SIGriATURE ORG/ DEPT. SS# ( n ff' _4$.:oM.Ma< mem"h*suo hAneuace f .fi)N d p n f(= hk T L-hY L:KC /N1s 5 %-N'2n ] %-- ;x. %.,sc hAb siec ms s 3 s r. w - L </ w, a se ul, fz,k +L ea< %, -a- & ~ c eis \\ hi m bws b #_ M - -- F O C,/ M % 2 M. ~1R-/957 C htst er H. ho n C. uCbth Erack b om-os-sa, 3ous L $atMC C N W.T S EdN d D U-d11d ( ./ ~x L. ArrfL & 'T4AINidG.(llSTRUCTOR

6.3 Certification Records of Added Personnel 90

i i MEMO i l i 1 Septemoer 24, 1984 i T0: ERC Files 2

SUBJECT:

Qualification of ERC Personnel / Employees performing work i i for the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP) l l l I have reviewed the education records, prof essiona l work exoeriences and personal cualifications which I feel are required for C. H. Brown, Jr. to perform as a member of the ERC/BCAP Independent Expert Overview Group and find h im/ tarr fully qualified to so perform. ,~ i' b. j _ ? (y,y c.- y J. L. nansel l l l ERC Project Manager ) i l 1 i ) JLH/dit l l l i i 'l I t I k 91

l e memo l December 6, 198' l TO: ERC Files SU6 JECT: Qualifications of E.RC Personnei/ Employees performing i work for the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (8 CAP). i i, I have reviewea the education records, prof ess iona l and, work experiences and perscoa l cualifications unich ! believe are recuired for P. L. Clark to perform as a member of the ERC/dCAP l Independent Expert Overyiew Group, and find him f u lly qua lified I to so perforn. I \\ t i I r l C CtM h \\ l J. L. Hanse1 { Projtct Manager j JLH:CMT/dit 1 i i l I i 1 I 92 .---,n__,..---,,-,_,,a...-- _ - - - - _., _

r l MEMO + l t i October 9, 1994 J T0: ERC Files \\ \\ SU3 J's c i : Qualification of ERC Personnel / Employees performing work 4 for the ?raidwood Construction Assessment Program (3 CAP) l I ! hade reviewed the education records, professional and work experiences j i l and :ersonal qualifications which ! feel dre recuired for G. J. Simmons i i to ptriora as a., ember of the ERC/BCAP Independent Excert Overview i i i Grcup and find him fully qualified to so perform, [ l l' t J. L. M a rt $ e l i F b $s i K 4h f( ERC Project Manager t dL cvA%k l I JLH/dit j j I l l i f l J e l l 93 i l

l MEMO -( l l November 8, 15G4 i T0: ERC Files SU3 JECT: Qualification of ERC Personnel / Employees performing work for the Braiduoud Construction Assessment Procram (BCAP). I have reviewed the education records, professional and work l experiences and personal qualifications wnich ! believe are I required for G. A. Haworth to perf orm as a metaber of the ERC/aCAP Indepencent Expert Overview Group, and find him j fully qualified to so perform. CW%. J. L. nansel { I Project Manager s JLH:REH/dit j i I 1 ~ l 1 I f 4 i I i 1 94 i d ._w, .-a, n--~

u,..,f' ~ m:. n.. a v..a:% v74.m:u udt:k.~ vr , % van % v n u % u?Ga % Jnt w D w s m: 71!!/* ME4V* C'%%5%V* 6%%W/* *%URU.V* 6%%R3h G%%91Vb G%%5%V* *NMW//D *M%W//) taffc - %tGt p k h ENERGY and ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC h DIVISION Ss o y0-kh ll ..h~, This is to certify fhat 4 ll 8 G* CHRIS J. SIMMONS %~ ~ '@p.. has successfully met the requirements of ANSI 45.2.6 ,h, " Qualifications of Inspection, Examination and Testing h, .)' ' Personnel for-Nuclear Power Plants" }.'e aC and is hereby certified as a 'n-h~ Quality Assurance Inspector LEVEL 111 -- CIVIL (Structural) .f1 x ~; t R sw g,M at /danager, Quality Assurance Date vfGa% v7G:~ uTRa% v7Ga% v7(h:% UMa% J75a% U7G:i% u?Ga% Ulk% UIGr :% AG: zulA c%tGPJJ/b ;&l/n cgg:lz! ys cyg:pJzra aggnsyn enu:g!//2 cgg: 5_yt/a cgg::gya cgg::yj/> cgtg tgjn %:: gin Q F-10.2.2 t

^ y- /s -

r 4.,.

MV* nWDWu ^% 5v1/* *N@SWs ^%WJn WWWy* hw,9Ws %Wnys nM5m sww$ h,, g A >> J 8.% & e/7EttW'85 % OJ,s,6 % 'c47tte & *O7(V45 % e/] lit 11,$h.bf ger&Az y>minnucw ^. )., r;-- *.. s i ., ". af. ,i, ,p .gsEA9tfy ]h / %q t 4)2 f ENERGY and ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES '4 DIVISION / Sh V t This is to certify that jh CHRIS J. SIMMONS ik ?P af 8:)h has successfully met the requirements of ANSI 45.2.6 ], " Qualifications of Inspection, Examination and Testing hh 'Q Personnel for NucIcar Power Plants" }}( 'iG and is hereby certified as a !b Quality Assurance Inspector !f f LEVEL 111 - MECHANICAL sk kk \\E kb n n,, 10 Sh Manager, Quality Assurance vate -~_.~---~~ n ------np W W WF>.%bVOcyggmj/ncg$ggjptsymgp nymj/0symf/scysgmjn swmj/> m y my w gr.io.2.2

.r O r Mi% J G/IB?'5% qATOI% o/Ebfi% e/Al?t% q/h,,% q/I(Dt.*.% s/Illit% q/Illfb a/Illt Aaa M A2 V/* *%LC2PJ/* 6%LGLUV* *%UMMf/* "%%lMV* *%%931/2 cy;gy7/s cgg:3yy2 cgg3tysn agg:.t27pv tggn cgyr.:yym t h ENERGY and ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC h p y DIVISION \\ <gCg / This is to certify that s CHRIS J. SIMMONS y M has successfully met the requirements of ANSI 45.2.6 " Qualifications of Inspection, Examination and Testing ,h Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants" y, and is hereby certified as a Quality Assurance Inspector h:. )f LEVEL 111 - WELDING M"anager, Quality Assurance Date to f ________m.m.--,%-%. ?bnM%Y3 tu1/2 cqq:Mgn cgy:wf/2 cgg:.:gn cgg: tyf/2 cgy:;yfp cga:w/a cqq:tyf/m %:typ myw/ QF-10.2.2

EVALUATION TESEATCH PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION COWAQUATION NAME: EMPLOYEE I.D. NO: Paul L. Clark Contract LEVEL EFFECTIVE OF DISCIPLINE DATE OF RECERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION CERTIFICTION DUE III Electrical 12/6/84 12/6/85 BASIS FOR CERTIFICATION: EDUCATION 1 GENERAL EXPERIENCE X VISUAL ACUITY EXAM X,, TRAINING X ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION "~~ OTHER FACTORS Prior certificates by Lono Island Lichtina Co. 9/19/83 LIMITATIONS OF CERTIFICATION: None b THE ABOVE NAMED INDIVIDUAL IS CERTIFIED TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF QAP PROCEDURE 10.2. Rev.1 /2 6b A. E. Cocoros 4 SIGNATURE - QA MANAGER ~ ' DATE QF-10.2.3 11/84 98

ememe%e%wr@wwwo%euw%e

• • • " CN c, o

11 f ENERGY and ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC h gp g g oivisio N This is to certify that th Paul L. Clark ik 1 0 1hh has successfully met the requirements of ANSI 45.2.6 " Qualifications of Inspection, Examination and Testing }Q Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants" }.}C BC and is hereby certified as a $b $h Quality Assurance Inspector df Level til - Electrical $b kb /2,ls,l,9f Date A.E. Cocoros, QA Manager C % @ @ % @ % e % @ % @ % @Alh01 Pm # % # % # QF-10.2.2 11/84

P e

• • • "% c,

o f eseacy ana esviaosseNTAL SCleNCe gA h g' y DIVISION This is to certify that hh h* e j), C.M. THOMPSO N ij E has successfully met the requirements of ANSI 45.2.23 fh " Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit h 3n Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants" 35 and is hereby certified as a b.2 $k Quality Assurance Lead Auditor f!E kh, 93 ~ A. E. C0COROS 4 uamesc,, omamos o,aece. E ref( 4! g g om,e emeenemenemememenemere

6.4 Quality Assurance Plan 3 101 .}}