Similar Documents at Maine Yankee |
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20196K4821999-07-0606 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Because of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Status of Myaps Facility,Confirmatory Orders No Longer Necessary for Safe Operation or Maint of Plant ML20206H1611999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 164 to License DPR-36 ML20206G5731999-05-0303 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 163 to License DPR-36 ML20205D5261999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Util Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program for Maine Yankee.Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program Consistent with Current Licensing Practice for Facilities Undergoing Decommissioning ML20204C4631999-03-16016 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 162 to License DPR-36 ML20197C8231998-09-0303 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),10CFR50.47(b) & (C) & App E to 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning ML20236U8451998-07-24024 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co Operational QA Program ML20217H5241998-03-30030 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 161 to License DPR-36 ML20202D3181997-11-26026 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License DPR-36 ML20216F1511997-08-0808 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 159 to License DPR-36 ML20141G6511997-05-19019 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 158 to License DPR-36 ML20138G3541997-05-0202 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-36 ML20058E2641993-11-0505 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 143 to License DPR-36 ML20056F7831993-08-23023 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 142 to License DPR-36 ML20127D5061993-01-11011 January 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 136 to License DPR-36 ML20126H6211992-12-29029 December 1992 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 135 to License DPR-36 ML20059K9991990-09-20020 September 1990 SER Accepting Methodology Re Statistical Combination of Uncertainties for RPS Setpoints ML20059H5901990-09-12012 September 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Facility Response to Station Blackout Rule.Issue of Conformance to Station Blackout Rule Will Remain Open at Facility Until Identified Nonconformances Resolved ML20059D0501990-08-30030 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 117 to License DPR-36 ML20055C2911990-02-20020 February 1990 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Assessment of Asymmetric LOCA Loads Problem ML20246F6281989-07-10010 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 113 to License DPR-36 ML20245J0571989-04-25025 April 1989 SER Re Accepting Facility Emergency Response Capability in Conformance to Reg Guide 1.97,Rev 3,w/exception of Instrumentation Re Variables Accumulator Tank Level & Pressure & Containment Sump Water Temp ML20245D4481989-04-24024 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 111 to License DPR-36 ML20245D4351989-04-24024 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 112 to License DPR-36 ML20155B4631988-09-27027 September 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 107 to License DPR-36 ML20154A1411988-09-0707 September 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 106 to License DPR-36 ML20150D7681988-07-0707 July 1988 Safety Evaluation Approving Util Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation Sys Contingent on Completion of Emergency Procedures & Operator Training & Submittal of Applicable Tech Specs ML20153A9641988-06-28028 June 1988 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Proposed Reflood Steam Cooling Model ML20196G6871988-06-23023 June 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 105 to License DPR-36 ML20151W5861988-04-26026 April 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 104 to License DPR-36 ML20153B3381988-03-16016 March 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831110,840216,0412,1214, 850618 & 0820 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2.2, Based on Stated Util Commitments,Insp Rept 50-309/86-07 & Actions Described in Procedure for Vendor Interface ML20149H2831988-02-17017 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 103 to License DPR-36 ML20196C4301988-02-0909 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 102 to License DPR-36 ML20235M4661987-09-29029 September 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 101 to License DPR-36 ML20236F6441987-07-29029 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Response to Item 2.1 of Generic Ltr 83-28 ML20234B1781987-06-25025 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 100 to License DPR-36 ML20216J0371987-06-25025 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 99 to License DPR-36 ML20215E9301987-06-15015 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 98 to License DPR-36 ML20214W3841987-06-0404 June 1987 SER Supporting Util 831110 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28, Item 2.2 (Part 1) Re Requirement for Program Description to Ensure All Components of safety-related Sys Identified as safety-related on Informational Matls ML20214M1491987-05-21021 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 2) Re Established Interface W/Nsss or Vendors of Each Component of Reactor Trip Sys ML20214J6001987-05-20020 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 97 to License DPR-36 ML20210C6631987-04-23023 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Adequacy of Offsite Power Sys.Further Evaluation Cannot Continue Until All Requested Info Received.Surowiec Line Not Acceptable Substitute for Mason Line During Startup or Normal Operations ML20206U9231987-04-0909 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 96 to License DPR-36 ML20197D4421987-04-0707 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting 850807 Request for Relief from ASME Code,Section XI Inservice Testing Requirements for Pump & Valves ML20205M6391987-03-26026 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Accepting Upgraded Seismic Design Program Contingent on Licensee Commitment to Upgrade Items in Table 3 ML20197D4241987-03-26026 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 94 to License DPR-36 ML20212N7091987-03-0404 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 93 to License DPR-36 ML20211G4361987-02-14014 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831110 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2 Re on-line Testing for Reactor Trip Sys Reliability ML20210V1831987-02-0909 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 92 to License DPR-36 ML20207N2181987-01-12012 January 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Response to NRC 860721 Request for Addl Info Re Reactor Coolant Pump Shaft Integrity,Per IE Info Notice 86-019 1999-07-06
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20211M4841999-08-31031 August 1999 Replacement Pages 2-48,2-49 & 2-50 to Rev 14 of Defueled Sar ML20211D7111999-08-0909 August 1999 Rev 17 to Maine Yankee Defueled Safety Analysis Rept (Dsar) ML20196K4821999-07-0606 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Because of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Status of Myaps Facility,Confirmatory Orders No Longer Necessary for Safe Operation or Maint of Plant ML20206H1611999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 164 to License DPR-36 ML20206G5731999-05-0303 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 163 to License DPR-36 ML20205D5261999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Util Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program for Maine Yankee.Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program Consistent with Current Licensing Practice for Facilities Undergoing Decommissioning ML20204C4631999-03-16016 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 162 to License DPR-36 ML20206D7491998-12-31031 December 1998 Co Annual Financial Rept for 1998. with ML20155G9591998-11-0303 November 1998 Rev 1 to Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20155D8651998-10-28028 October 1998 Public Version of, Maine Yankee Emergency Preparedness Exercise ML20197C8231998-09-0303 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),10CFR50.47(b) & (C) & App E to 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning ML18066A2771998-08-13013 August 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Deficiency in CE Current Screening Methodology for Determining Limiting Fuel Assembly for Detailed PWR thermal-hydraulic Sa.Evaluations Were Performed for Affected Plants to Determine Effect of Deficiency ML20236X1751998-08-0303 August 1998 Rev 16 to Defueled Sar ML20236U8451998-07-24024 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co Operational QA Program ML20248D3011998-05-26026 May 1998 Rev 14,page 16 of 17,Section II of QA Program ML20247J0211998-05-11011 May 1998 Revised Page 16 of 17 of Section II of QA Program,Rev 14 ML20247D3451998-05-0606 May 1998 Rev 15 to Defueled SAR, Replacing List of Effective Pages ML20217J9811998-04-28028 April 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Incorrect Description of Drift Specification for Model 1154,gauge Pressure Transmitters,Range Code 0 in Manual Man 4514,Dec 1992.Cause Indeterminate.Will Issue & Include Errata Sheets in All Future Shipments to Users ML20217H5241998-03-30030 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 161 to License DPR-36 ML20217D9691998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Maine Yankee.W/ ML20216D7681998-02-25025 February 1998 Rept to Duke Engineering & Services,Inc,On Allegations of Willfulness Related to Us NRC 971219 Demand for Info ML20203A3011998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Maine Yankee ML20202F3771998-01-31031 January 1998 Annual Rept of Facility Changes & Relief & Safety Valve Failures & Challenges ML20202E0541998-01-30030 January 1998 Rev 14 to Myaps Defueled Safety Analysis Rept ML20199K3211998-01-27027 January 1998 Rev 13 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co,Qa Program ML20199K3471998-01-22022 January 1998 Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co QA Program ML20199C2281997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217R2301997-12-31031 December 1997 Myap Annual Financial Rept for 1997 ML20203F8551997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20202D3181997-11-26026 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License DPR-36 ML20198R6371997-11-0606 November 1997 Yankee Mutual Assistance Agreement ML20155G9511997-10-31031 October 1997 Rev 1 to M01-1258-002, Decommissioning Cost Analysis for Myaps ML20198P9431997-10-31031 October 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217K5191997-10-24024 October 1997 Part 21 Rept Re Five Valves That May Have Defect Related to Possible Crack within Forging Wall at Die Flash Line.Caused by Less than Optimal Forging Temperatures.Newer Temperature Monitoring Devices at Forging Area Heating Ovens Procured ML20211N0571997-10-0707 October 1997 Revised Pages to Jul/Aug 1994 SG Insp Summary Rept ML20198K0201997-09-30030 September 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20199H1861997-09-25025 September 1997 Rev 12 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co,Qa Program ML20217A9251997-08-31031 August 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217R1051997-08-27027 August 1997 Myaps Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20216F1511997-08-0808 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 159 to License DPR-36 ML20210M4451997-07-31031 July 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1997 for Myaps ML20151M1351997-07-21021 July 1997 Rev 0 to Technical Evaluation 172-97, Cable Separation Safety Assessment Rept ML20141H2691997-06-30030 June 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20141B9951997-05-31031 May 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1997 for Maine Yankee.W/ ML20141G6511997-05-19019 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 158 to License DPR-36 ML20138G3541997-05-0202 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-36 ML20141G2871997-04-30030 April 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20137Z1971997-04-14014 April 1997 Forwards to Commission Results of Staff Evaluation of Performance of Licensees W/Ownership Structure Similar to Plant ML20137N7541997-03-31031 March 1997 Rev 11 to Operational Quality Assurance Program ML20138B1491997-03-31031 March 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1997 for Maine Yankee 1999-08-09
[Table view] |
Text
. . .
ENCLOSURE 1 SAFETY EVALUATION MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER STATION-DOCKET NO. 50-309- .
ADEQUACY OF STATION ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM VOLTAGES INTRODUCTION AND
SUMMARY
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (MYAPCo) was requested by NRC letter dated August 8,1979 to review the electric power system at Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station. The review was to consist of:
(a) Determining analytically the capacity and capability of the offsite power system and the ensite distribution system to automatically start as well as operate all required loads within their required voltage ratings in the event of (1) an anticipated transient, or (2) an accident (such as LOCA) without manual shedding of any electric loads.
(b) Detemining if there are any events or conditions which coula result in the simultaneous or consequential loss of both required circuits from the offsite network to the onsite electric distribution system and thus violating the requirements of GDC 17.
The August 8,1979 letter included staff guidelines for performing the required voltage analysis and the licensee was further recuired to perform a test in order to verify the validity of the analytical results. MYAPCo responded by letters dated February 29, 1980 and June 30, 1980. The Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and a telephone call on October '1,1980 were used to clarify provided infomation. A detailed review and technical evaluation of the submittal was performed by EG&G under contract to NRC, with general
'81040301%
1
^
supervision by NRC staff. This work was reported in EG&G's Technical Evaluation Report (TER), " Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station" dated January 1981. We have reviewed this report and concur in the conclusions that the offsite power system and onsite distribution system are capable of providing acceptable voltages at the teminals of the Class IE equipment fo' worst case station electric load and grid voltages.
EVALUATICN CRITERIA The criteria used by EG&G in this technical evaluation of the analysis includes GDC 5 (" Sharing of Structures, Systems and Components"), GDC 13 (" Instrumentation anc Contr:1"), and GDC 17 (" Electric Power Systems") of Appencix A to 10 CFR 50; IEEE Stancard 308-1974 (" Class 1E Power Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"); ANSI C84.1-1977 (" Voltage Ratings for Electric Power Systems and Equipment - 60 Hz"); and the staff positions and guidelines in NRC letter to MYAPCo dated August 8, 1979.
ANALYSIS AND TEST FEATURES The analyses were performed using the reserve station service transformer and .
unit station service transformer with maximum and minimum switchyard (grid) voltages (120 kv and 116.5 kv for reserve station service transformer and 362 kv and 345 kv for unit station service transformer). MAYPCo did not analyze bus 5 receiving power from the tertiary windings of transformer X16.
Use of this ::cwer source requires manual operator action and is controlled by Plant Procedure No.1-22-3. This is a third source of offsite power that is not required by GDC-17 and the FSAR takes no credit for this as a source of offsite power. 'It has been establisned that the emergency 4 kv loads would
t operate within allowable. limits for the worst cases noted above. Given the minimum voltage case, a brief condition exists while. starting a large~ ,
.J non- Class 1E cotor with the unit buses fully loaded that would momentarily _ prevent'._ .,
i contactor pickup for 480. volt MCC loads until the voltage recovers. No contactor drcp out or spurious shedding of load will occur. .This momentary, inability to start 480 voit loads is not significant.due to the very short~-
time of concern and the fact that it only becomes a concern if concurrently the grio is at its lowest allowable level and there becomes a need 'to auto-matically sttrt an emergency load during the initial phase lof the starting-transient of a large non-Class 1E load.
The voltage analysis was verified by measuring the grid, generator and selected bus voltages with the transformers leaded at greater than 58% load.
The comparison showed that calculated voltages for "the Class 1E buses are within
+1.30 and -2.;2% of the measured voltages. This close correlation verifies the accuracy of the analysis submitted.
l l
CONCLUSICNS We have reviewed the EG&G Technical Evaluation Report and concur in the findings ,
t' hat:
(1) MYAPCo has provided verified voltage analyses to demonstrate that the Class 1E ecuipment voltages remain within acceptable operating limits for the postulated worst case conditions.
l l
{
l i
l
!_.--.....,__._.~__-,..__,.-..-.,,.,_._
- . - ~ . . .. - . . . . . . .
]
(2) The tests used to verify the. analysis were valid and showed the ,
e analysis to be accurate. j (3)' MYAPCos reaffirmation of compliance with GDC 17 requirements is acceptable, s
r (4) Upon the review and approval of the degraded grid voltage protection modifications proposed by MYAPCo and currently being reviewed by EG&G, there will be acceptable assurance that spurious tripping of i cffsite power to Class IE equipment will not take place upon starting a large non-Class 1E load.
t '
h
'I e
. - - . - . - . . _ . . , _ . - , - . . . . . _ . . _ _ . _ . _ , _ . . , . . . _ - - , _ _ . ...-.-..u- - . - ._ _ _____ . . . . - . - . . _ . - - . . . . _ . . _ . . _ _ -
l l
1 ENCLOSURE 2 !
l l
EGG-EA-5324 January 1981 i
1 4 ' I
, ADEQUACY OF STATION ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM VOLTAGES, MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER STATION, DOCKET NO. 50-309, TAC No. 12774 A. C. Udy U.S. Department of Energy Icano 0;,erations Office
- Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
~ *"
. 't. l. W 79 '
? t-Qgg}.' 3%[:= e% -
- p. 7[vg ~~
.-A, *.
.afle6 re- s
, s.j F .r/
Q .g3 .4 w-- * -
9 wx ss g ey m i , ; ^
e i, j --. . t -
. . . . _ , .. <. . g 4A 1 -
w ,- .
-) f.[.ay f '.
~
j' - - ;m amma sn-m6,m n, ,,,, {,;, [,
.i W f.Efg~'(h-
% h- ]- .-c M g h ,c r y
.c p-.-i&B-w,m,"""*-===:r sm'mut- amsame -Jy.summ, {p Fg, "x.-
Z. - - @e":",
e ;6 p n
.- _ , ,'. % q,:u-e
-.._r w.
,,_=:
. :- a
. .m
_m
-- ; . m. - _e. .- _. . . ,2
=._
,W_.
. . . #, . j, r- ,
& & P .::" "_,-
.e f I@r D.,s- - :Nb '
, _ '* ~- ~~ " C ._ ^._t ..C' .. .
5.rl .E':t $&he' k ' ^ _MY. -
- - ., Y -"~^^^^^ Z Q =~~,} _-~ W Q-l7,/
.y - 3g, g. _ _
__. _m . % .. . %_, n gmc .- y ,, -_r~%
- -. p.
ma--
NA4
-~
.%ne-
. . L,.;.. 5:., ~- = --
1-_ -% .
~
This is an informal report intended for use as a preliminary or working document y ,
- y
~
l
,,< 1
\
Prepared for the ,
( U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co=ission g /
l .Ur. der DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-76ID01570 g $ $ g G ,,,n, 7IN No. A6256 per "" .
.- ..w.r.,-,---..-- ,--_-,,...,,--..m..-,-,..,...e-,.% ....,r,--.,..m--w,.,,y-~, m- .-.-c- ...,,y,.--.- ,m---.-. --c--- --, -- - , - - - , - - .g-