Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: B10927, Provides Summary of Reevaluations of LOCA Based on Identification of Several Assemblies Containing Leaking Fuel Pins & fuel-related Damage Which Necessitated Rev to Cycle 6 Core Loading Pattern, B11486, Forwards Small Break Loca/Eccs Performance Analysis W/Axial Shape Index of -0.10. Encl Analysis Amends Loca/Eccs Analysis Provided in Per 10CFR50,App K-II.1.b. Previous Reviews Re Effects of Reloads Remain Valid, B11561, Forwards Reload Safety Analysis in Support of Cycle 7 Reload.Core Reload Will Not Adversely Affect Plant Safety, B11568, Forwards Results of Core Barrel Insp Performed During Cycle 7 Refueling outage.Through-wall Cracks at Thermal Shield Support Lugs 4 & 5 Not Propagated, B11570, Highlights Recent Major Milestones in Fuel Performance Program.Three Investigations Conducted During Last Half of Cycle 6 Operation & Weld Defects Probed.No Significant mfg- Related Failure Mechanisms Noted, ML20107A012, ML20115J066, ML20126C726, ML20126J181, ML20128D276
|
MONTHYEARB10927, Provides Summary of Reevaluations of LOCA Based on Identification of Several Assemblies Containing Leaking Fuel Pins & fuel-related Damage Which Necessitated Rev to Cycle 6 Core Loading Pattern1983-11-0202 November 1983 Provides Summary of Reevaluations of LOCA Based on Identification of Several Assemblies Containing Leaking Fuel Pins & fuel-related Damage Which Necessitated Rev to Cycle 6 Core Loading Pattern Project stage: Other B11437, Application for Amend to License DPR-65,consisting of Proposed Revs to Tech Specs for Preliminary Reload Safety Analysis Re Cycle 7 Refueling1985-02-0606 February 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-65,consisting of Proposed Revs to Tech Specs for Preliminary Reload Safety Analysis Re Cycle 7 Refueling Project stage: Request ML20107A0121985-02-0606 February 1985 Proposed Tech Spec Changes for Preliminary Reload Safety Analysis Re Cycle 7 Refueling Project stage: Other B11486, Forwards Small Break Loca/Eccs Performance Analysis W/Axial Shape Index of -0.10. Encl Analysis Amends Loca/Eccs Analysis Provided in Per 10CFR50,App K-II.1.b. Previous Reviews Re Effects of Reloads Remain Valid1985-04-11011 April 1985 Forwards Small Break Loca/Eccs Performance Analysis W/Axial Shape Index of -0.10. Encl Analysis Amends Loca/Eccs Analysis Provided in Per 10CFR50,App K-II.1.b. Previous Reviews Re Effects of Reloads Remain Valid Project stage: Other ML20115J0661985-04-30030 April 1985 Small Break Loca/Eccs Performance Analysis W/Axial Shape Index of -0.10 Project stage: Other B11561, Forwards Reload Safety Analysis in Support of Cycle 7 Reload.Core Reload Will Not Adversely Affect Plant Safety1985-06-0505 June 1985 Forwards Reload Safety Analysis in Support of Cycle 7 Reload.Core Reload Will Not Adversely Affect Plant Safety Project stage: Other ML20126C7261985-06-11011 June 1985 Proposed Revs to Tech Spec Sections 3.2.1,Page 3/4 2-1 & 3.2.2.2,Page 3/4 2-6 Re Cycle 7 Reload Project stage: Other B11570, Highlights Recent Major Milestones in Fuel Performance Program.Three Investigations Conducted During Last Half of Cycle 6 Operation & Weld Defects Probed.No Significant mfg- Related Failure Mechanisms Noted1985-06-11011 June 1985 Highlights Recent Major Milestones in Fuel Performance Program.Three Investigations Conducted During Last Half of Cycle 6 Operation & Weld Defects Probed.No Significant mfg- Related Failure Mechanisms Noted Project stage: Other B11568, Forwards Results of Core Barrel Insp Performed During Cycle 7 Refueling outage.Through-wall Cracks at Thermal Shield Support Lugs 4 & 5 Not Propagated1985-06-11011 June 1985 Forwards Results of Core Barrel Insp Performed During Cycle 7 Refueling outage.Through-wall Cracks at Thermal Shield Support Lugs 4 & 5 Not Propagated Project stage: Other B11569, Application for Amend to License DPR-65,revising Tech Spec Sections 3.2.1,Page 3/4 2-1 & 3.2.2.2,Page 3/4 2-6 Re Cycle 7 Reload,Based on Discussions W/Nrc1985-06-11011 June 1985 Application for Amend to License DPR-65,revising Tech Spec Sections 3.2.1,Page 3/4 2-1 & 3.2.2.2,Page 3/4 2-6 Re Cycle 7 Reload,Based on Discussions W/Nrc Project stage: Request ML20128D2851985-06-19019 June 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 99 to License DPR-65 Project stage: Approval ML20128D2631985-06-19019 June 1985 Forwards Amend 99 to License DPR-65 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises Tech Specs to Modify Allowable Region of Operation When Core Power Distribution Monitored by ex-core Detector Monitoring Sys.Revs Reflect Changes in Cycle 7 Project stage: Approval ML20128D2761985-06-19019 June 1985 Amend 99 to License DPR-65,revising Tech Specs Re Allowable Region of Operation When Core Power Distribution Monitored by ex-core Detector Monitoring Sys Project stage: Other B11590, Forwards Supplemental Info Describing Zone Enriched Assembly Configuration Implemented in Feed Fuel Regions for Cycle 71985-06-25025 June 1985 Forwards Supplemental Info Describing Zone Enriched Assembly Configuration Implemented in Feed Fuel Regions for Cycle 7 Project stage: Supplement ML20126J1811985-06-30030 June 1985 Cycle 7 Final Reload Safety Analysis Project stage: Other 1985-06-11
[Table View] |
Text
k 3/4.2 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS LINEAR HEAT R ATE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.2.1 The linear heat rate shall not exceed the limits shown on Figure 3.2-1.
APPLICABILITY: MODE 1.
ACTION:
During operating with the linear heat rate being monitored by the Incore Detector Monitoring System, comply with the following ACTION:
With the linear heat rate exceeding its limit, as indicated by four or more coincident incore channels, within 15 minutes initiate corrective action to reduce the linear heat rate to within the limits and either:
Restore the linear heat rate to within its limits within one hour, or a.
. b.
Be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
During operation with the linear heat rate being monitored by the Excore Detector Monitoring System, comply with the following ACTIONS:
With the linear heat rate exceeding its limit, as indicated by the AXIAL SHAPE INDEX being outside of the power dependent limits on the Power Ratio Recorder and with the THERMAL POWER:-
Above 100% of the allowable power level determined by l
a.
Specification 4.2.1.2.c, within 15 minutes either restore the AXIAL SH APE INDEX to within the allowable limits as required per l
Technical Specification 3.2.2 or reduce THERM AL POWER to f 100% of the allowable' power level determined by Specification
~4.2.1.2.c.
- b. - f,100% of the allowable power level determined by Specification l
4.2.1.2.c, either restore the AXIAL SHAPE INDEX to within the
{
al'owable limits as required per Technical Specification 3.2.2 within i isour from initially exceeding the linear heat rate limit or be in HOT STANDBY within the next 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.2.1.1 The linear heat rate shall be determined to be within its limits by continuously monitoring the core power distribution with either the excore detector monitoring system or with the incore detector monitoring system.
MILLSTONE - UNIT 2 3/42-1 e506140505 8 11 PDR ADOCK o 6
P PDR
-g POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS TOTAL PLANAR RADIAL PEAKINC FACTOR - Fly LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPER ATION
'e_.
3.2.2 Meet either of 3.2.2.1 or 3.2.2.2.
3.2.2.1 The calculated value of Fl, defined as Fly = Fx[p(oints adjusted 1+Tq), shall be limited to:nl.62 with the AXIAL SNAPE INDEX alarm se consistent with the limits shown on Figure 3.2-2a, or 3.2.2.2 The calculated value of Fl, defined as F1[a=m setpoints adjustedFxy limited tofl.719 with the AXIAL YHAPE INDEX a r
consistent with the limits shown on Figure 3.2-2b.
APPLICABILITY: MODE 1*.
ACTION:
With Fly >l.62 and the AXIAL SHAPE INDEX alarm setpoints adjusted a.
consistent with the limits shown on Figure 3.2-2a, within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> either:
1)
Reduce THERMAL POWER to bring the combination of THERMAL POWER and Fly to within the limits of Figure 3.2-3a and withdraw the fulllength CEAs to or beyond the Long Term Steady State Insertion Limit of Specification 3.1.3.6, or 2)
Apply the limits of Specification 3.2.2.2 and Figure 3.2-3b and within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> adjust the AXIAL SH APE INDEX alarm setpoints consistent with the limits shown on Figure 3.2-2b, or 3)
Be in at least HOT STANDBY.
b.
With Fly >l.719 and the AXIAL SHAPE INDEX alarm setpoints adjusted consistent with the limits shown on Figure 3.2-2b, within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> either:
1)
Reduce THERMAL POWER to bring the combination of THERMAL POWER and Fly to within the limits of Figure 3.2-3b and withdraw the full length CEAs to or beyond the Long Term Steady State Insertion Limit of Specification 3.1.3.6, or 2)
Be in at least HOT STANDBY.
- See Special Test Exception 3.10.2 MILLSTONE - UNIT 2 3/42-6 l
.