ML20112C584

Intervenor Exhibit I-JOINT-17,consisting of Undated Attachment I-39(r), NRC Violations, Listing Dates of Response to Notices of Violation for Shearon Harris, Hb Robinson & Brunswick Plants

ML20112C584
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	09/07/1984
From:	AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OL-I-JOINT-017, OL-I-JOINT-17, NUDOCS 8501110266
Download: ML20112C584 (12)

Text

.

$~b - 400 0 L" z 3 y _

p ;Q w- -

• Attachment 1-39(r)

NRC VIOLATIONS

&f . f f N.k Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant

'DaTe of ~

DMS Response to Notice Summary of Incident Action Taken of Violation Tests were improperly performed Concrete Compressive 11/17/81 Testing certification on concrete cylinders due to excessive loading. for the technician involved was rescinded until the technician passed both oral and written exams.

Weld inspector failed to identify Employee responsib!c 3/25/82 was removed from pipe report deficiencies because he did them. weld inspection, pending not see reinstruction.

Weld inspector either overlooked or Employee responsible 4/23/82 was removed from pipe arbitrarily failed to reject defects in welds weld inspection and is no longer employed by CP&L.

Date of incident performed and inspected own work counseled 4/83 inspection of welds employee resigned before prior to 7/29/82 improper action could be taken suspected of improper initiating of employee resigned while 4/82 investigation being conducted seismic 1 inspection reports

' unsatisfactory performance of weld certification invalidated, 4/21/83 retraining, retesting and inspections recertification required unsatisfactory performance of weld certification rescinded; 12/82 reeertification required.

inspections Warning giv,en.

~

evidence of use of cocaine terminated prior to 2/3/82 Fallure to comply with work suspension (probation) 2/84 procedure

• Ab ONh PDR L

4 s

H.B. Robinson Unit 2 Date of Response to Notice -

of Violation 7/26/78, A chain holding up a radiation area Employee involved was sign had broken loose from the wall reprimande+arte counseled.

and a Radiation ControlTechnician N was instructed to submit a trouble ticket for the repair of the chain.

The technician failed to perform this task.

Individuals entered the reactor Employees were counseled.

8/22/79 containment, which was a locked, high radiation area, without entering their names on a valid radiation work permit.

Fire protection program states that All parties involved were 2/5/80 every connection from a yard main made aware of the incident to a building be equipped with a and cautioned to prevent post Indicator valve, and large further occurrence.

yard main systems must be provided with sectional controlling valves at appropriate points. However, the yard' main connection to the Auxiliary Building interior fire hose system was not provided with a post indleator valve and a post indicator sectional control valve was not provided for the northeast portion of the water main loop. This was a result of an FCR (fleid change request) made by Construction that was disapproved by Engineering but the change was actually made.

' Field documents used to verify the Employees involved were 11/12/80 as-bullt for safety-related system cautioned and counseled.

150 RC-4 did not have any records of inspection of clearances for the wall penetrations.

An Auxillary Operator was climbing Employee involved was 740/81 reprimanded.

in the overhead piping in the Boric Aeld Evaporator Room wearing only

" shoe covers and gloves instead of anti-contamination clothing whleh were required.

2-

1/29/82 An individual was observed in the Employee involved was Boric Acid Evaporator Room without reprimanded.

a dose rate survey instrument.

6/17/81 Radiation surveys of the hot leg Employees involved were compartment inside Steam Generators cautioned as to the A, B, C performed 9/17/80 were not importance qDetaining maintained or preserved. all survey documentation.

9/1'0/81 Changes were made in the Gas Employees involved were Calibration step of procedure RCP-1, cautioned.

without prior review by Plant Nuclear Safety Committee or approval by the General Manager.

12/22/81 An operator failed to fouow valve Employee involved was lineup procedure OP-38A for counseled regarding the positioning of valve RHR-764 from seriousness of improper locked open to locked shut position performance of valve lineups.

4/15/82 Equipment contro1 polley was not Employees directly involved implemented in that Local Clearance were admoaished, and Test Request 113 listed incorrect aux 111ery feedwater system valves for the maintenance performed, and clearance was canceled without opening the isolation valve for a local suction pressure gauge.

12/2/82 QA audits were not performed within Employees (CQA) responsible the 24 month frequency were counseled by the Corporate QA, not by the HBR management.

Various Fuel Shuffle procedures were Employee involved had 3/4/83 not implemented during the 12/26- diselplinary action taken 12/28 fuel movement against him involving loss of pay. The employee's Shift s

Foreman was counseled.

6/22/A3 Disposal of 1 gallon of liquid Employees responsible were waste containing 11eensed material admonished and counseled.

by way of Chem-Nuclear Systems,Inc.,

SC, who was not authorized to receive liquid waste '

Date of incident 2/83 failure to follow plant periodic increase in' pay procedures deferred for 6 months improper performance of valve employee sent home; resigned 5/83 before further disciplinary lineups action coul'd be taken noncompliance with administrative counseled 3/83 procedures

- w failure to sign out on R.W.P. counseled 2/83 conviction of possession of terminated 2'/83 controlled substance off the job (on his own time) failure to follow procedure. counseled 2/83 Sodium hydroxiden 2 supply valve left out of position.

failure to follow plant procedures periodic pay 2/10/83 increase deferred for 6 months failure to implement all aspects of counseled; required 1/11/83 to review special special procedure for moving spent fuelin spent fuel pit procedure and administrative requirements for procedures compliance; 2 days suspension without pay.

Violation of H.P. procedures I week without pay 2/19/84 Violation of H.P. procedures I week without pay 2/19/84 9

T

~ Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Dste of Response -

to Notice of-Violation

+ at - ,, w

$/20/78 Individual was observed not wearing Employee involved the required protective clothing as was counseled on specified. importance of radiation control techniques.

3/12/79 After an individual had received an Employees involved exposure in excess of 5 rem (whole were counseled on body), Licensee failed to submit value of prcmpt a written report within 30 days. submittsis.

4/2/79 Reviewers failed to notice out of Employee involved specification stroke time for valve was counseled.

F046 during RCIC Pump and Valve Operational Test.

7/24/79 Two Auxiliary operators without lab Employees involved coats entered a contamination ares were counselad by the in the Reactor Building which required Shift Foremsn.

lab costs for entry.

10/25/79 QA Test results had discrepancies Employees involved that had not been identified by. were cautioned about Licensee's review process. seriousness of not recogni:ing and evalusting deficiencios.

12/20/79 A fire protection sprinkler and stand- Employees involved-pipe system for the No. 3 Diesel Generator were counseled regardit wap; isolated and the continuous fire watch the proper actions to was not stationed. take.

1/13/81 Valve lineup verification decumenestion Approprista corrective showed that locked valve PT46.1, RCIC, or disciplinary actions and NFCI turbine exhaust manus 1 stop for employees were check valves were verified open, when taken - two shift r' in fset both were closed. Foreme'n received no nuclear license

,, , supplement pay for one weekt two Auxiliary Operstors given one day off with no pay.

~$-

1

.12/30/80 Sampling and analysis of airborne Involved RC&T tech-particulate radiosctivity was nicians were counseled.

inadequate: 40" of totsi particulate activity in Reactor Building roof vents ,

were not identified. '

2/3/81 Training requirements for BSEP QA Appropriate employees Survei11snee Personnel, which had were counseled.

, . not been revised since 9/75, referenced -w procedures that no longer existed and

' did not cover more than 25 standards and procedures that were then a part of QA Control.

12/18/81 Various vent monitors were found to be Technicians responsi-inoperable due to lack of maintenance. ble were counseled.

7/1/81 Approval requirements for temporary Employees involved changes made to procedures RC-ER-12 were counseled.

and RC-ER-18 were not met.

8/26/81 As a result of operstor error, the Disciplinary action reactor mode switch was taken out of was taken with the the refueling mode, placed in startup, employees involved.

and controlled withdrawal commenced with Letter of repr1=snd the A-loop RHR torus suction valve shut. placed in file for one year period.

10/30/81 Radiation Hs=ards Survey concerning All three employees

, repair of a valve was inadequate, involved were counseled causing a worker to exceed dose and disciplinary action limit. was taken - one employee was given two weeks off without pay; two er.ployees were assigned to Caswell Beach Pump-ing Station.

10/6/81 Two employees were observed in posted Employees involved radiation arcas without proper dress. were counscled.

I

. 10/12/81 An inadvertent release of approximst'aly Employee involved 300 gallons of liquid waste from the was counseled.

"B" floor drain sample tank without prior sampling for gross activity.

Temporary changes to PT-A3 Rev. O and Operations ecployees 7 OP-50.1 Rev. 13 were. approved by Plant were cautioned.

Nuclear Safety Committee in 16 and 17

.. days instead of the required 14 days

• from implementation dato.

11/2/81 Inoperable instrumentstion channel All Senior P.esctor has not pis,ced in the tripped mode Operstors were within one hour of determination counseled as well as that this instrumentatien could not ILC periodic testing be calibrated. personnel.

m .A.

~

~

11/30/81 Temporary change to Liquid Radioactive Operations employees Waste Processing System Procedure was were cautioned. .

not reviewed although it remained in ,

effect through August 1981.

3/11/82 A primary coolant sample taken at Employees involved 2100 hours0.0243 days <br />0.583 hours <br />0.00347 weeks <br />7.9905e-4 months <br /> exceeded .2 UCi/ gram dose were counseled.

, -- - equivalent I-131, and the subsequent -*

samples required once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> were

. not taken.

8/16/82 Reactor vessel water level low Employces involved instrumentation (transmitter), required were counseled.

by Technical Specifications, was inoperable. However, trouble ticket was prepared, statin; that the trans-mitter was not required by Technical Specifications.

4/30/82 Shift Foremen failed to complete an Employees involved Event Ev11uation Check Sheet or make were counseled.

entry in the Shift Foremen's log when informed that the Standby Liquid Control heat tracing circuits were inoperable.

7/2/82 1A-1 battery charger was momentarily Two operators not positioned as per clearance responsible were procedure, and service water vital counseled.

header crosstie vcive was not positioned as per operating procedure.

8/5/82 Contrary to Technical Specification Technician involved 6.S.l(s), Regulatory Guide 1.33 was counseled.

Appendix A was not implemented in that safety-related equipment mainte-nance instruction was not correctly performed.

I 6/24/83 Reactor Water Cleanup System was not Senior Reactor Operator isolated, as required by Table 3.3.2-1 was reroved from Item 3.a. within one hour. licensed duties for two weeks and during that time was counseled.

8/11/83 Unit 2 augmented off-gas system was On-shift personnel out of service and the air ejector (excluding Tadioactive off-gas monitors were inoperable, yet waste and fire protec-a reactor shutdown was not initiated. tion) were immediately counseled. One. Control Operator was removed from licensed' duties with loss of license

- supplement pay for 14 days. Approximately 10 Shife Operating Supervisors. Shift Foremen, and Control Oncrators involved were given verbal repri-mands evidenced by memo to their files.

8/4/83 A representative air sample was not The Health Physics collected in an individual's breathing Technician involved zone while he was splitting radioactive was been counseled.

waste bags containing material with unknown contamination levels and radiation levels of 30 mrem /hr. ,

Date of Incident or Action 2/12/83 use of unapproved procedure in 5 days suspension loading cask without pay and written reprimand 12/81 failure to adhere to established 3 days suspension o healtn physics procedures without pay b

9/81 failure to adhere to established 3 days suspension health physics procedures without pay 3/83 two radiation safety violations letter placed in file L-within 60 days with performance -

evaluntion review to be made in 6 months

4/83 allowed on employee to sign letter placed in file verification sheet for a periodic test performed by another 4/83' Improper c!carance - failed to one any suspension

..i b .

exercise supervisory overview without pay, letter of reprimand included in file 3/17/83 improper review of periodic test letter of caution w w 3/rf/83 - failure to sign off a step of a written reprimand

.. periodic test 7/81 allowed worker to exceed calculated 2 weeks suspension stay time resulting in over- without pay

, exposure 10/15/81 Radiation safety violation. counseling False information about age.

12/20/82 , failed to have QC verify letter of cleanliness of hold point reprimand 2/5/83 improper attention to procedures letter placed related to waste casks , in personnel file for 1 year 8/81 , Level 2 radiation safety violation 1 day suspension without pay and I day training with health -

physics.

12/82 failure to do required testing in letter of reprimand time specified on diesel generator

( 1/83 failure to enter into action suspension of license pay statement as required - Technical for 2 weeks Specifications violation 2/83 failure to perform safety related 5 day suspension without activity in accordance with pay procedure r .

5/83 failure to maintain awareness of-power plant status removed from contol floor an e*

O

-.9'

January 10, 1984 Failed to exercise management Letter of reprimand, control and demonstrate job responsiveness; three incidences. ,

January 10, 1984 Falsified time associated Two (2) days s'uspension with procedure completion. without pay.

JanuaTy 25; 1984 Failure to accurately complete Memo to personnelwfile.

calculation associated with PT.

January 26, 1984 Procedural noncompliance; Memo' to personnel file.

improper work authorizations.

January 27, 1984 Deviation from procedure. One (1) day suspension without pay.

January 31, 1984 Procedure violation. One (1) day suspension

. without pay.

February 2, 1984 '

Failure to accurately Memo to personnel file.

research information and misrepresented conditions through negligence.

e hk' March 5,1984 Nonconservative interpre- llemo to personnel file, tation of Tech Specs resulting in failure to initiate a LCO.

March 8, 1984 Lost 0.27 uCi source thru Memo to personnel file.

negligence and failed to 7

follow sign out procedure.

!! arch 22,1984 1 Poor judgement and  !!cco to perscnnel file.

faflure to notify super-

. vision of occurrence resulting in airlock seal

, damage. ,

March 23, 1984 Failure to maintain Memo to personnel file.

attention to detail .

r resulting in improper LCO handling / clearance.

-A P ril 11,1984 Valving error resulting in 'One (1) day suspension reactor scram; demo'nstrated paor jud;:cment in sur -

veillance and communication.

hrch 8,1984 Failure I to follow control Two days off without pay and a

-procedure on Q-list veld rods letter of reprimand. '

,resulting in a nuclear plant procedures report.

Mrch 19,1984 Violated two health physics First violation - written reprimand.

- , - . rules related to moving tools Second violation - two Jays off to an uncontaminated tool without pay.

room.

February 15, 1984 Worked on equipment prior 2 days without pay; written to preparation reprimand l

s l

OO

- _ __ _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ . . . _ . .__ _ _ . . _ . . _ . _ . _ . - . _ _ _ . -