ML20107G463

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue for Contention I Re 10-mile Potential Evacuation Radius
ML20107G463
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/23/1985
From: Lodge T
LODGE, T.J., SUNFLOWER ALLIANCE
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20107G302 List:
References
OL, NUDOCS 8502260428
Download: ML20107G463 (2)


Text

.

BDCKETED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA N

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 15 FEB 25 P1:

In the Matter of ff kyY

)

Docket Nos. 50-440 and C

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC

)

ILLUMINATING COMPANY (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)

)

}

.. ~......,

SUNFLOWER'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS (CONTENTION I)

Now comes Sunflower Alliance and sets forth the following materia facts upon which genuine issues of fact and law exists for hearing of I:

At para. 5 and 6 of its " Statement of Material Facts" on this 1.

contention, Applicant states that protective actions under the PNPP Emerg Plan "may" be extended, depending upon conditions, to a 10-mile ra

' f plan, and that protective action recommendations "can" include ev the entire 10 mile EPZ.

10 CFR Section 50.47(c)(2) states as follows:

2.

Generally, the plume exposure pathway EP2 for nuclear power plants shall consist of an-area about 10 miles (16 km) in radius and the b

c) $

ingestion pathway EPZ shall consist of an area

' g a.-

about 50 miles (80 km) in radius.

A^

gf

,mo (emphasis supplied) r t ru _

EPA's recommendations appear in its Manual of Protective Act eg 3.

4 fN Guides, supra _at 2.5:

'28 When ranges are shown (of projected thyroid radia-a.

tion dosage from inhalation.of a passing plume).

me.e the lowest value should be used if there are no major local constraints in providing protection at that' level, especially to sensitive populations.

-1 L

4 4.

Applicant has not established a network of technical devices to measure wind trajectory and dose assessment in response to the criticisms I

of Dr. Isaac Vander Hoven in this 1984 review of the " Description of the j

Perry Nuclear Power Plant Emergency offsite Dose Calculations" (NUS-4336,

. April, 1983).

Respectfully submitted, I

By N /).

  • Terr J. Lodge 618 Michigan Street Suit 105-Toledo, Ohio -43624 Phone: (419) 255-7552 Counsel for Sunflower

' Alliance l -

1; *

~

J

  • 1 i
i l

c

__) [

]

g vg

'O N

> :L,

< j f-c.

.g.

c x

;tc' '.'

s

.}l. k;

~

~

~

,~,-1q, 4

-x.

=

.-4

+

fy t *

~

.N..

. ((

~.

r

<g o

ar

'l _' - *

'.y y

.