ML20107G463

Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue for Contention I Re 10-mile Potential Evacuation Radius

ML20107G463
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	02/23/1985
From:	Lodge T LODGE, T.J., SUNFLOWER ALLIANCE
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20107G302	List: ML20107G299 ML20107G306 ML20107G312 ML20107G322 ML20107G337 ML20107G350 ML20107G353 ML20107G359 ML20107G367 ML20107G373 ML20107G385 ML20107G392 ML20107G424 ML20107G441 ML20107G451 ML20107G463 ML20107G477 ML20107G489 ML20107G502 ML20107G516
References
OL, NUDOCS 8502260428
Download: ML20107G463 (2)

Text

. _ .

BDCKETED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA N

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 15 FEB 25 P1:

In the Matter of ff kyY

) Docket Nos. 50-440 and C THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC )

ILLUMINATING COMPANY (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, ,

Units 1 and 2) )

. . ~ . . . . . . , ,

}

SUNFLOWER'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS (CONTENTION I)

Now comes Sunflower Alliance and sets forth the following materia facts upon which genuine issues of fact and law exists for hearing of I:

1. At para. 5 and 6 of its " Statement of Material Facts" on this contention, Applicant states that protective actions under the PNPP Emerg Plan "may" be extended, depending upon conditions, to a 10-mile ra

' f plan, and that protective action recommendations "can" include ev the entire 10 mile EPZ.

2. 10 CFR Section 50.47(c)(2) states as follows:

Generally, the plume exposure pathway EP2 for nuclear power plants shall consist of an-b area about 10 miles (16 km) in radius and the c) $

a.-

ingestion pathway EPZ shall consist of an area

'g about 50 miles (80 km) in radius. A^

gf

,mo -

r (emphasis supplied) eg '

t ru _

< 3.

EPA's recommendations appear in its Manual of Protective Act 4

fN Guides, supra _at 2.5:

a. '28 me.e When ranges are shown (of projected thyroid radia-tion dosage from inhalation.of a passing plume) .

the lowest value should be used if there are no major local constraints in providing protection at that' level, especially to sensitive populations.

-1 L

4

4. Applicant has not established a network of technical devices to measure wind trajectory and dose assessment in response to the criticisms I

of Dr. Isaac Vander Hoven in this 1984 review of the " Description of the j Perry Nuclear Power Plant Emergency offsite Dose Calculations" (NUS-4336,

. . April, 1983).

Respectfully submitted, I

By N /) .

• Terr J. Lodge 618 . Michigan Street Suit 105-Toledo, Ohio -43624 Phone: (419) 255-7552 Counsel for Sunflower

' Alliance ,

l - ~

1;

• J

• 1 i ,

,  : i l c

__) [

] .. .

g vg 'O N

< j f-

> :L , -

x

c. .g . -

c .

-  ; ;tc' '.'

. . s .

~

' ~

.}l . k; ~  :

,~,-1q, 4

-x . #,

=

.-4

fy t *

+

~ '

. ((

" ~ .

r o .N. * . '

, <g

., ar -

'l

'.y _

y _