ML20107G306

Answer to Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention A. No Evidence of County Engineer Input Available.Util Failed to Allow Adequate Opportunity for Public Comment

ML20107G306
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	02/23/1985
From:	Lodge T LODGE, T.J., SUNFLOWER ALLIANCE
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20107G302	List: ML20107G299 ML20107G306 ML20107G312 ML20107G322 ML20107G337 ML20107G350 ML20107G353 ML20107G359 ML20107G367 ML20107G373 ML20107G385 ML20107G392 ML20107G424 ML20107G441 ML20107G451 ML20107G463 ML20107G477 ML20107G489 ML20107G502 ML20107G516
References
OL, NUDOCS 8502260375
Download: ML20107G306 (2)

Text

_-_ -. - - ..

00CKETE8 UShRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA .

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 6 @ 25 P1:34 In the Matter of ['Sfghth

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ) Docket Nos. 50-440 and $$ N ILLUMINATING COMPAdY )

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2) ) .. n >

SUNFLOWER'S ANSWER TO MOTION FOR SUFDfARY DISPOSITION OF CONTENTION A By 10 CFR Section 2.749(d), Applicant must show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that it is entitled to a decision as a matter of law. The record is to be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 368 U.S. 464, 473 (1962); Pennsylvania Power & Light'Co., and Allegheny Electric Cooperative Inc. (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units l' and:

2), LBP-81-8, 13 NRC 335, 337'(1981).

Here, it is clear that Applicant has used an affidavit painting with quite a broad brush. " Meetings" with " officials" of the three'affected counties have been held, with vague comment. opportunities given. No evidence of county engineer' input-certainly indispensible-in reviewing evacuation routesLand' time requirements-appears. ~And there is'a clear failure by~ Applicant to evidence the making,. much less publicization, of cost estimates per NUREG--

0654. Finally, the bland assurances that public comments will be submitted" in the future is certainly not. proof that compliance with planning guidance exists today.

_y_. et y

8502260375 850223 PDR ADOCK 05000440 6 s G _ PDR;j;

. . ~ . .-. . - .. .=. - . _ - . _ - . - - - - - - . _ - -

f:_

3:

1 1- .

i F

f- For all of the foregoing reasons, Sunflower prays the Board 4

s dismiss Applicant's summary disposition request as to Contention A.

i Respectfully submitted, i

I w

' g By A I. f b

/ Ter'ry} J. Laige 6 11 ) . MicNigan Sui (N105 Toledo, Ohio 43624 Phone: (419) 255-7552 Counsel for Sunflower Alliance I Il

. s a;. s f

f~ V w g  ?,'

,- A

/ A

{

a

,'f r .

< s .- .

7 4.-. r _.;y ' - t

-. , < r

,. 9

• ~y ~

^

+ -

O 's ** s g~ 1,i

.s _

^l '

, , s -

' 't g, I

.1 3_

,* . :p -

~ , '

4

.: +: - ,

,g' '

3; -

;f

E -~$  ; *

.- ' clI

^

I. d .

't .m- .5.. IS. Ah .

~ b. '- 4 A b- e. -- - . - - - '--