ML20107G312

Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue on Contention a Re Evacuation Time Estimates

ML20107G312
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	02/23/1985
From:	Lodge T LODGE, T.J., SUNFLOWER ALLIANCE
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20107G302	List: ML20107G299 ML20107G306 ML20107G312 ML20107G322 ML20107G337 ML20107G350 ML20107G353 ML20107G359 ML20107G367 ML20107G373 ML20107G385 ML20107G392 ML20107G424 ML20107G441 ML20107G451 ML20107G463 ML20107G477 ML20107G489 ML20107G502 ML20107G516
References
OL, NUDOCS 8502260378
Download: ML20107G312 (2)

Text

._

00LKETEC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UShRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY C050tISSION Before th'e Atomic Safety and Licensing Board W FS 25 P1:35 In the Matter of FI E OF SELRGk-

)

EPVIC' THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY

)

)

Docket Nos. 50-440 and  %

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2) ) ,,

)

SUNFLOWER'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS (CONTENTION A)

Now comes' Sunflower Alliance, Intervenor, herein, and sets forth the following in support of its position that tt.ere are genuine issues of material fact on Contention A:

1. NUREG -0654 constrains Applicant to give state and local organizations the opportunity to review and coment upon estimated time requirements for confirmation of evacuation. Id_. at 61. Nowhere in the State Plan nor in Revision 4 of Applicant's plan is_there any mention of a coment opportunity for county engineers of Lake, Geauga and Ashtabula -

counties.

2. The Affidavit of Scott T. McCandless accompanying Applicant's-motion is objectionabl'c on'several grounds. First, McCandless expertise is disputed, based upon-his lack of relevant education and professional-experience. The Affidavit refers ~only to coment ~ opportunities by~ '.' officials"

~

"'d DSA Directors" of the affected counties and coment opportunities ~are 'not

- specified by date nor were coments rendered. No mention is made of county engineer coments. At para.'6_of the Affidavit, McCandless stat'es'thati

~'

coments "will be' submitted to the NRC with the next revision of the ETE."2

~

--l -

8502260378 850223 ^

PDR ADOCK 05000440_

P.DR -

__ z _ .Q. _ ___

3. NUREG-0654 imposes the obligation that Where significant costs may be involved, preliminary extimates of the cost of implementing these recomenda-tions will be given.

Id,. at 4-10.

Nowhere in the State Plan, Revision 4 of Applicant's plan, nor by Affidavit

- is. it shown that such estimates have been compiled, rendered, nor subjected to comment.

4. Applicant's' Affidavit reflects no input or agreement by county engineers from the three affected counties as to the sufficiency of the data,~ assumptions.or time / weather condition. scenarios used in the ETE study.

Respectfully submitted, By nj . k t) k -

I- Ter J. Lodge

./- [ . 618 . Michigan Street

/'( Suite"105-Toledo, Ohio : 43624 Phone: (419) 255-7552 Counsel for. Sunflower.

Alliance 6

k

't i

c

• [

4

.'f' i

! w

. ;c_. ,

I* 1 .. _