ML20107A214
| ML20107A214 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 11/17/1983 |
| From: | Miller W OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Jay Collins NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| LIC-83-286, NUDOCS 8502190329 | |
| Download: ML20107A214 (40) | |
Text
-
..s s-i ic a s, I
NI}tj g0300000 w3tX1v mld
,,l t_1 1 1 C 0 62C06120GB
\\\\
t wits vr.ossin t;53 sisun
(:uE L* 4'n l
- o o J ; S A r' u t L.". I l t, t
} } f, u o t me i u ot s, ;us et6utn (auof>sr ] twaapoj
/uou sb *r 96J;Ed *Jn
- D a
s ;u t*wy k ;;V s of< r ui n t6;ouoc iu6;stsst uutt;n 3*w
,. < r f u g/ n j
) '/ ^
f',
- i toaacuts
-[>t1 *:
aaac;:0 t e;tr so;;ot s,;ap;s 4c ay; 44 uotssp.vo; c
ea Jail [d as43 Jane oy; i stviroad uaoq oA E u s;Jr]
es; o; go;;.sukai r
t
- ru; oitu e s n'o t e
- [
qfr0;u; I s;uo q:>6;;; vi pa;;Acsd ti uo;;tuJojul
'i f u tp;on; o;6p ast:aano cy; c i sc d sitr 02 'es6;Jene
- 1oi%r s a ;
t s
- 4m 'sucti]ry;sL4 iLt
- . o [ qr.s ou; sc ; saatsosso ou; (; ;optd d r. 5 og it;= 4
1 said Cad satLLJiVO3 eq; ek;/Csd ;?}J;s4Q aq) i s ;s of,NJ ' 2 p. 6 {
g u0 } ;6 dj u )
/
'il As h ' ul P L e;EP ' i? P iS IL "0"ce :!LG e Euk-u 01 so;;ol s,ubMs6u'G3 eul W
es;:sa 3 s s #4c;6 doac i:uo6ae 3 (t t I uo { ik ;$ uf'C u t 6 j ;JOj
- suit (c) s n avec c, g g c, c i, gepoo
- soussa,ae c
tieg s n el 'uoifut p y eugt a;pi
'o A laa E n te utir 119 f.1 ue;6ae i c ;6 t r.f,a c aet:rN *s n
v e i s s p;w ;
s seit;;stu p.py 'su6tto) *1 *ran 92-Et-311 g i 71
- g 1. % a u -.,
I h h It' '4 { $ dit'
[t !! p' 4 i' W h E' i. 4 %
i WPilsl) I 'idli'H ((()l
~
t laulsl0 JaMod 3tignd egetu0 l
-e,_
- - - - - - - + -. - - - - + + -
-m
--~%.m
,.-e-ei I
4 a
e e
f A
I e
/
o 1
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION FN 1983 EMERGENCY EXERCISE
\\d EVALUATOR-CuNTROLLER EXERCISE INSTRUCTIONS Table of Contents - General Sequence of Events - Evaluator-Controller General Instructions - Evaluator-Controller Station Record Sheet v)
L'D i
m._
a General Sequence of Events O
V Date Time Even_
12/06/83 8:00 a.m.
NRC interview at the Kmergency Operations Facility 12/06/83 1:00 p.m.
Observer briefing at the Emergency Operations Facility 11:00 p.m.
Notification of Unusual Event emergency 12/07/83 6:00 a.m.
Alert emergency 9:30 a.m.
Site Area emergency 11:30 a.m.
General emergency 4:30 p.m.
Drill termination (may be earlier if all objectives have been demonstrated)
O 12/08/83 10:00 a.m.
OPPD meeting at Emergency Operations Facility 12/08/83 1:00 p.m.
NRC critique / report / exit meeting at the Emergency Operations Facility P' d 11
m f,
Evaluator-Controller General Instructions O'
~
1.
Each evaluator-controller station shall be manned by a person trained in the following basic information:
a.
Objectives of the exercise.
b.
Initiating events and exercise scenario, c.
Expected corrective actions, d.
Assumptions and limitations of the exercise.
e.
Duties of the evaluator-controller.
f.
Compilation of an evaluator-controller critique report.
2.
An evaluator-controller shall be stationed at each of the following locations approximately 15 minutes prior to the start and/or re-sumption of the exercise:
a.
Control room.
b.
Emergency Operations Facility.
c.
Operations Support Center.
d.
Plant exit and assembly areas, f.
Offsite monitoring stations.
g.
Security and plant access areas.
h.
Auxiliary building.
1.
Media Release Center.
~
'~
3.
One evaluator-controller shall be stationed in tiie control room, TSC, or OSC and designated " Exercise Controller." This person shall deter-mine and approve changes authorized in the scenario time, data, and actions in order to reasonably demonstrate all exercise objectives.
4.
Evaluator-controllers shall provide prorrpter or cue cards to particirants at the appropriate time as the means of supplying new and changing exercise events.
5.
Evaluator-controllers shall not offer information, advice, or assistance not contained in cue cards or approved by the Exercise Controller.
However, evaluator-controllers shall not mislead participants or permit major deviation from the approved scenario.
g 6.
Neither the NRC, FEMA, nor any other exercise observer shall be allowed to alter scenario events or introduce additional complications.
2-1
'a e
Evaluator-Controller General Instructions (Continued) 7.
Time deviations shall be allowed in order to demonstrate onsite, recovery, and de-escalation responses during the exercise.
8.
Simulation of actions shall be allowed to fulfill items detailed in or, as necessary, to better demonstrate personnel emergency performance.
9.
Each evaluator-controller.4 hall maintain a written record which shall be the basis of critique comments and/or proposed corrections.
This record shall be submitted during the critique session.
O O
2-2
m Evaluator-Controller Record Station #1 - Control Room (n)
I.
Notification / Activation 1.
Note the time at which the drill began.
2.
Note the time the Unusual Event was de-escalated.
3.
Note the time the drill was resumed.
4.
Note the time at which Operations recognized and declared the emergency classifications:
Notification of Unusual Event a.
b.
Alert c.
Site Area d.
General Emergency 5.
At what time was the nuclear emergency alarm sounded?
6.
Was the announcement made properly?
(Conditions to be announced twice.)
7.
Was a phone talker designated?
(Note time.)
8.
At what time did the control room notify the following groups:
a.
OPPD Management
/
b.
Nebraska State Patrol (15 minute limit)
(Note if notification forms were completed.)
9.
At what time was the control room area monitored for habitability?
Note type of radiological survey Was monitoring (contamination, radiation, etc.) performed.
equipment with visual and audible alarms provided to detect airborne radioactivity?
Note any instrument failures.
At what time was personnel accountability made to the security 10.
force?
At what time was the Shift Supervisor notified that personnel 11.
accountability was complete?
At what time was the injury reported to the control room?
12.
the 13.
Whicn means or communicetioes was used in renortin9 0
injury?
3-1
~ '
J
r e
s Evaluator-Controller Record Station #1 - Control Room (Continued) 14.
At what time was the rescue Squad notified?
15.
At what time was UNMC Radiation Health Center notified?
16.
At what time was OPPD Management notified of the injury?
17.
Were communications with the Operations Support Center effective?
18.
Were communications with the Technical Support Center effective?
19.
Was technical support provided to the control room accurate and timely?
II.
Staffing 1.
Is the shift Operations group staffed according to the Radiological Emergency Response Plan?
a.
Shift Supervisor (SRO) - 1 b.
Reactor Operator (SRO) - I c.
Assistant Reactor Operator (RO) - 1 d.
Equipment Operator - 2 (1 R0 and 1 non-licensed) e.
Auxiliary Operator - 1 2.
Is personnel staffing (control room) adequate?
3.
Were the following items met during the transition from the initial ED0 (Shift Supervisor) to another E00 and/or the Recovery Manager:
a.
Use of EPIP-E0F-13 or EPIP-E0F-14 b.
Efficient transition c.
Pertinent data transmitted to new ED0/ Recovery Manager d.
Notification made to the TSC and E0F 3-2
r Evaluator-Controller Record 5tation #1 - Control Room a
(Continued) 4.
Were the following emergency procedures available?
]
a.
FCS Radiological Emergency Response Plan b.
Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures c.
Emergency Operating Procedures 5.
Were the above procedures used?
List some of the other procedures used.
6.
Does the operational staff appear to be performing duties in accordance with procedures in a timely manner?
7.
Note any problems encountered by the control room staff in trying to correct problems (i.e., no tools, equipment failure, etc.).
8.
Were efforts made by the Operations staff to determine the cause of and/or to resolve the following conditions:
a.
Threat of attack on facility O
b.
Explosion l
OV 3-3
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #1 - Control Room (Continued)
'(
8.
Were efforts made by the Operations staf f to determine the cause of and/or to resolve the following conditions: (Cont'd) c.
j d.
Increasing RCS activity l
i
!O e.
Increasing levels of radiation in containment 4
1 f.
Status of containment purge valves t
.I i
i 3-4 i
k
v Evaluator-Controller Record Station #1 - Control Room (Continued) 8.
Were efforts made by the Operations staff to determine the cause of and/or to resolve the following conditions: (Cont'd) g.
High radiation monitor readings O
i.
Shutting off auxiliary building fans and determining containment leakage j.
PPLS O
3-5
-..~ -.-
l i
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #1 - Control Room i
(Continued)
! ()
j 8.
Were efforts made by the Operations staff to determine the cause of and/or to resolve the following conditions: (Cont'd) i k.
Diesel trouble alann 1
?.
i i
1.
Fire alarm I
I i
l 4
. O i
m.
Loss of all A/C power i
l t
\\~
n.
Restoration of A/C power s
}.
3-6 t
i
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #1 - Control Room (Continued) 8.
Were efforts made by the Operations staff to determine the cause of and/or to resolve the following conditions: (Cont'd) o.
Damaged pressure relief line Were responses by the Operations staff effective in 9.
a.
responding to operational problems? Describe.
b.
Were responses by the Operations staff effective in responding to radiological / emergency problems?
Describe.
p L)
III. Communications 1.
At what times were communications established between:
Control room /0SC and TSC a.
b.
Control room /0SC and EOF 2.
Was flow of information timely, efficient, and effective between the groups?
3.
Was Shift Supervisor informed of occurrences within the plant in a timely manner?
4.
Note any communication problems.
'L 3-7
...y.
- o.
4 r.
Evaluator-Controller Record i
Station #1 - Control Room h.
(Continued) 1 y
IV. Observations, Comments, and Recomrendations
-1.
General Observations:
i, l'
i I
2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
l.-
t-3 1
!..O l
s s'
3.
Recomendations:
LL i-
- r. -
r Observer Date i.
O i.
q.
e J
LO 3-8 l ~
l
..J. u:.-
4..,. '... _
_ c ~ 1,.;,.._.._.._._,._,...,,_.~___,_...___,-..___..;___-.__._..... _ _ _.. _
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #2a - Emergency Operations Facility Administration I.
Notification / Activation 1.
Record time that the EOF was activated.
II.
Staffing EDO:
1.-
Did Recovery Manager request the ED0 to respond to the E0F?
2.
List the name of the reporting EDO.
Recovery Organization:
1.
Did the following members of the Recovery Organization report to the E0F?
a.
Recovery Manager b.
Recovery Manager's Secretary O
c.
Liceasias Administretor d.
Emergency Coordinator i
1 e.
Dose Assessment Coordinator f.
Dose Assessment Operator g.
Environmental Survey and Analysis Coordinator g
l h.
Radiochemical Analysis Coordinator 1.
HP/ Chemistry Technician I.
j.
Administrative Logistics Manager f
k.
E0F Communicator l
1.
Communication Specialist m.
Clerical Assistant n.
Computer Specialist l
L o.
E0F Radio Operator i ~
p.
EOF Information Specialist e
3-9 u - --
..l
.. ~ --
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #2a - Emergency Operations Facility Administration O
(coati #uea)
II.
Staffing (Continued)
Recovery Organization:
1.
Did the following members of the Recovery Organization report to the E0F? (Continued) q.
E0F Technical Liaison r.
Scheduling / Planning Manager Advisory Support Group (including NRC) s.
2.
List the name of the reporting Recovery Manager Was the ED0 to Recovery Manager transition carried out a.
in accordance with Implementing Procedure EPIP-E0F-147 b.
Did this transition progress smoothly?
Was the control room, TSC, and OSC notified of the
' "ll c.
transition?
I d.
Record time of transition.
3.
Are the following emergency procedures available:
I Fort Calhoun Radiological Emergency Response Plan a.
b.
Fort Calhoun Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures c.
Iowa's Emergency Plan l
l d.
e.
Technical Data Book.
f.
Operating Emergency Procedures 4.
Are these procedures being used?
5.
Are logs being maintained properly? (E0F) p f
3-10 l
L:
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #2a - Emergency Operations Facility Administration V]
(Continued) r III. Communications 1.
Specific:
Report the time that the EOF was notified of any injury a.
by the control room.
Report the time that the EOF established contact with:
b.
gM Nebraska State E0C M
Iowa State E0C ffS Local E0C's: Washington County Harrison County Pottawattamie County Report the time that the Blair Rescue Squad was notified c.
and requested to provide transporation.
Report the time that the UNMC Regional Radiation Health d.
Center was notified that a contaminated injured man was O
enroute.
Report the time that the Recovery Manager declared a e.
General emergency.
2.
General:
Were communications adequate to insure that the flow of a.
information was timely, efficient, and effective?
(1) Radio communications with monitor teams (2) Dedicated lines between EOF and MRC (3) Communications between the E0F and TSC (4) Commmunications between the EOF and OSC/CR (5) Communications between E0F and state and local E0C's (6)
Communications within the EOF (7)
Communications with offsite Recovery Organization support personnel
- j 3-11
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #2a - Emergency Operations
]
Facility Administration (Continued)
III. Communications (Continued) 2.
General:
(Continued) b.
Were approved initial and follow-up notification forms used?
Note any communications or equipment problems.
c.
IV. Performance of Duties 1.
Did the Recovery Manager provide information to the E0F Information Specialist for press release?
2.
Were monitoring team survey results being forwarded to the Emergency Coordinator?
3.
Is information being forwarded to the Recovery Manager in a timely manner?
4 Did the Recovery Manager have final approval regarding the declaration of a General emergency?
5.
Was the emergency status fully evaluated prior to the de-escalation of the accident classification?
~6.
Did the Recovery Manager keep members of his staff informed of the status of the emergency?
O 3-12
'p Evaluator-Controller Record Station r/2a - Emergency Operations A
Facility Administration U~_
(Continued)
V.
' Observations, Comments, and Recommendations 1.
General Observations:
2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
10.
3.
Recommendations:
Observer Date O
3-13
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #2b - Emergency Operations Facility Emergency Coordinator Station
,cx
'~)
t I.
Activation / Notification 1.
When and under what Emergency classification the Emergency Coordinator was notified:
-Time Emerg. Class.
2.
Who and under which Emergency Classification the Emergency Coordinator's staff was activated / notified:
Emerg.
Name Class a.
Dose Assessment Coordinator b.
Environmental Survey & Analysis Coordinator c.
Radiochemical Analysis Coordinator d.
Dosimetry Coordinator O
e.
Dose Assessment Operator f.
Site Repre-sentative II. Staffing 1.
Did the Emergency Coordinator have all of his staff at their respective locations to conduct an effective assessment?
Yes No l
If no, then explain the situation or circumstances i
i-l f.
2.
Did the Dosimetry Coordinator call the Emergency Coordinator l
after reporting to his emergency location? Yes No 3.
Did the Site Representative call the Emergency Coordinator after reporting to his emergency location? Yes No _
O,a I
3-14
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #2b - Emergency Operations Facility Emergency Coordinator Station (Continued)
,s III. Radiological Evaluation 1.
Was the dose assessment transition from TSC to E0F carried out effectively?
Yes No If no, describe 2.
Was the meteorological and radiological data transmitted to dose assessment personnel every 15 minutes?
Yes No If no, describe 3.
Were appropriate forms or procedures utilized by dose assess-ment personnel to calculate the Q values?
Yes No If no, describe
/
4.
Was the Emergency Coordinator kept informed every 15 minutes D]
or more frequently about dose rates and doses by the Dose Assessment Coordinator?
Yes No 5.
Was the radiological data posted on the board at least every 15 minutes?
Yes No 6.
Was the interface between the dose assessment group and the State assessment representative effective?
Yes No How was information exchanged?
7.
Was the Recovery Manager kept informed of the dose assessment by the Emergency Coordinator?
Yes No 8.
Was the data regarding plant status and radiological data transmitted to the Site Representative by the Emergency Coordinator as frequently as appropriate?
Yes No 9.
Was the service of the Environmental Survey and Analysis Coordinator utilized for any sample or TLD collections by the Emergency Coordinator?
Yes No Comments O
3-15
~
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #2b - Emergency Operations Facility Emergency Coordinator Station (Continued)
III. Radiological Evaluation (Continued) 10.
Was the service of the Dosimetry Coordinator utilized by the Emergency Coordinator?
Yes No Comments 11.
Was communication establi ed and maintained by the Emergency Coordinator with designated offsite authorities for relating accident information?
Yes No 12.
Were the updates on the radiological data provided to the TSC, OSC?
Yes No 13.
Did the Emergency Coordinator maintain control over personnel assembled at the E0F?
Yes No Comments r
O 14.
Did the Emergency Coordinator inform the Recovery Manager about the PAG's and make recommendations to the State authorities for for appropriate action?
Yes No 15.
At what time (s) were protective actions recommended to the State E0C's?
Were they correct?
16.
When and under what conditions was the General Emergency (if appliable) declared by the Recovery Manager and the Emergency Coordinator?
17.
Who else, other than the Recovery Manager and the Emergency
~
Coordinator, was involved (within and outside OPPD) in the decision making process for declaring a General Emergency (if applicable)?
O
~
3-16
~
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #2b - Emergency Operations Facility Emergency Coordinator Station
['])
(Continued)
IV. Observations, Comments, and Recommendations 1.
General Observations:
2 Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
O 3.
Recommendations:
i Observer Date i
r i
l 3-17
V Evaluator-Controller Record Station #3 - Operations Support Center
- ~,
.U 1.
Was EPIP-E0F-13 used in the transition of responsibility from Shift Supervisor to ED0?
Yes No 2.
Was EPIP-0SC-14 used by the ED0 and Shift Supervisor as a basis for imediate actions?
Yes No 3.
Record the time the following augmentation positions were staffed at the Alert classification:
TSC Time Person a.
Emergency Duty Officer (ED0) b.
TSC Manager c.
Core Physics Coordinator o.
System Analysist/ Proc Coordinator e.
I & C Support Coordinator f.
Security & Tech Support Admin Supv.
O 9
ebone Teiker h.
NRC NRC NRC NRC NRC OSC a.
Reentry Team #2 b.
Reentry Team #3 c.
Dose Assessment Operator
. d.' Offsite Monitor #5
-e.
Offsite Monitor #6 f.
Offsite Monitor #7
, ~.
g.
Offsite Monitor #8 3-18
$l
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #3 - Operations Support Center (Continued)
Time Person y
\\ l-h.
Gate Monitor #9 1.
Gate Monitor #10
- j. Onsite Monitor #11 k.
Onsite Monitor #12
.l.
Onsite Monitor #13 m.
Onsite Monitor #14 n.
Monitor Team Coordinator o.
Radio Operator p.
Message Distrib./ Clerical Support q.
Rescue Squad Monitor #18 r.
Personnel Decontamination
- s.. Sample Count Dosimetry -Issuance T
t.
Outside Coordinator
('/
s_
u.
Shift Operations Supv.
v.
Rad Waste Mgnt Manager w.
-I & C Supervisor Yes No Remarks 4.
Did plant operation move from normal operation, to abnormal operation, to emergency operation, and into the EPIP's in a timely and effective manner?
()
()
List EPIP's used:
nL) 3-19
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #3 - Operations Support Center (Continued)
Yes No Remarks
- 5.
Was adequate respiratory equipment available and used to perform emergency actions?
()
()
()
()
6.
Did the Plant Operations Manager provide important infonnation to the Recovery Manager?
()
()
List time and events:
7.
Was the Plant Operations Manager consulted prior y) to de-escalation of the emergency classification?
()
()
c.,
f List time and events:
J l
I i
8.
Were the requests of.the Plant Operations
' Manager fulfilled in sufficient time?
()
()
List time of request:
List time fulfilled:
9.
Was the need for additional ' operators evaluated?
()
()
(]
Time:
ei 3-20 b
r Evaluator-Controller Record Station #3 - Operations Support Center (Continued)
Yes No Remarks O
. Were emergency inaintenance activities 10 coordinated between the QC Maintenance Supervisor and the craftsmen?
()
()
List activities:
- 11. Were adequate communications available for members of the operation support staff?
()
()
- 12. Were offsite radiological assessments performed by the HP/ Chemistry group until the Recovery Organization was established?
()
()
/ T
~' # 13. Were ALARA and radiation protection recommendations provided to the emergency repair group prior to entry into radiation areas?
()
()
List entries:
- 14. Was authorization provided for exceeding nonnal operation exposure limits?
()
()
- 15. Were adequate training and special procedures provided to personnel entering the auxiliary building during the emergency?
()
()
3-21
s Evaluator-Controller Record Station #3 - Operations Support Center
- ~"
O ves "o
ae= arks 16.
How well did operations support personnel coordinate with their counterparts in the Technical Support Center?
()
()
17.
-Were damage control personnel properly selected, briefed, and directed?
()
()
18.
Was one person designated as the leader for the damage control team?
()
()
19.
Were decontamination, bioassay, and exposure evaluations performed after the work was completed?
()
()
20.
Did the damage control team leader provide a summary report after completion of the work?
()
()
21.
Was the TSC checked for habitability?
()
()
~
Record Time a.
Were radiation surveys performed and documented?
()
()
]
b.
Were contamination surve,,s performed and documented?
()
()
c.
Were airborne surveys performed and documented?
()
()
22.
Report the time that monitoring teams were dispatched.
23.
Is the Emergency Team functioning within the Recovery Organization?
()
()
a.
Are survey instruments properly calibrated?
()
()
r 3-22 i~~.
1 Evaluator-Controller Record Station it3 - Operations Support Center (Continued)
II. Observations, Coments, and Recommendations 1.
General Observations:
2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
- D.
3.
Recommendations:
Observer Date 3-23
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #4 -Technical Support Center O-I.
Notification / Activation 1.
Note the time of TSC activation.
2.
At what time were names of the TSC staff given to the security force for accountability?
3.
Note the time at which communications were established with:
a.
Control room /0SC b.
E0F c.
Offsite Advisory Groups (name the groups) 4.
Note any communication problems.
5.
Was the TSC staffed in accordance with Radiological Emergency Response Plan?
6.
Was the TSC staff kept abreast of emergency conditions?
(]~
7.
a.
Were the following reference materials available for use by the TSC staff?-
- 1) FCS Radiological Emergency Response Plan
- 11) EPIP's 111) Emergency Operating Procedures iv) Technical Specifications v) Operating Manual vi) Station Drawings b.
Were any reference materials required but unavailable? -
O 3-24
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #4 -Technical Support Center (Continued) h I.
Notification / Activation (Continued) 8.
What support did the TSC provide the control room /0SC in the following areas:
a.
Assessment of core damage b.
Source of containment leakage O
c.
Calculation of amount of containment leakage d.
Identify " fixes" for leaking pressure relief line O
3-25
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #4 -Technical Support Center (Continued) l t
O I.
Notification / Activation (Continued) f What support did the TSC provide the control room /0SC in the 8.
following areas: (Continued)
Support of natural circulation cooldown e.
f.
Restoratit.n of A/C power O
g.
Refilling the reactor vessel O
3-26
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #4 -Technical Support Center (Continued) i C:)
I.
Notification / Activation (Continued) i 9.
Was support presented to the OSC in an expeditious manner?
l
.i Was the TSC monitored for radiation annd contamination 10.
quantities?
.II.
Observations, Comments, and Recommendations 1.
General Observations:
1 2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
r3 t _/ ~
s L
3.
Recommendations:
i Date Observer O
3-27
-+
,e,.-,.--.,.,,__:,..,,.,r.--
.v----
r
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #5 - Exits / Assembly Areas O'
I.
Outside of North Exit 1.
At what time did the nuclear emergency alarm sound?
2.
Was the emergency exit controlled?
For what period of time?
(A security guard and a C/RP Technician are assigned access a
control duties at this location.)
3.
At what time did the Rescue Squad arrive at the emergency exit?
4.
Did the members of the re-entry and rescue emergency team enter building properly (i.e., monitor for dose rate at the door, have respirator donned prior to opening door, etc.)?
5.
Was the injured person removed and placed in the Rescue Squad vehicle in an efficient, expeditious manner including contamination control?
6.
Was the injured person monitored prior to entering the vehicle?
7.
Did the re-entry and rescue emergency team exit the building properly (i.e., remove shoe covers and other necessary clothing prior to exiting)?
8.
If other re-entries are made, note time and use same criteria as stated in 5 and 8.
II. Assembly Area 1.
Is the assembly area adequate for the number?
2.
Are personnel orderly?
3.
Are personnel abiding by the instructions provided by the outside coordinator?
4.
If asked for assistance, are the personnel willingly offering their assistance?
bq 3-28
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #5 - Exits / Assembly Areas (Continued)
O V
II. Assembly Area (Continued) 5.
Have surveys been taken of the assembly area?
6.
Report the time the decontamination room was activated.
III. Onsite Monitoring Team 1.
Verify that survey instruments are operable.
(Note problem area (s).)
2.
Was area outside of auxiliary building monitored?
a.
Radiation levels b.
Contaminatin levels c.
Time of survey 3.
Was area outside of auxiliary building posted (contaminated e3 area, radiation /high radiation area, airborne radioactivity,
(../
etc.)? Note time of posting.
4.
Was perimeter of site boundary surveyed?
Note time of the survey.
5.
List other areas surveyed by the onsite monitor team.
O 3-29
]
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #5 - Exits / Assembly Areas (Continued) 4 IV. Observations, Comments, and Recommendations 1.
General Observations:
4 i
i 2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
i 1
i
!O 3.
Recommendations:
I.
Observer Date I O 3-30
]
Eveluator-Controller Record Station #6 - Offsite Monitors
]
I.
Notification / Activation 1.
Report time that offsite monitor teams (Tags 5, 6, 7, and 8) assembled at the TSC.
2.
Were offsite monitoring teams briefed as to what sectors they are required to take samples?
3.
Are the monitoring teams properly equipped with the following:
a.
Monitoring kit b.
Air sampler c.
Water sampling bottles d.
SAM-2 iodine monitor and vehicle 4.
Have communications been tested and verified with the EOF (mobile radio channel #1)?
5.
Has equipment been checked prior to dispatching offsite monitoring teams?
a.
Are instruments calibrated?
b.
Have instrement checks been made prior to use?
c.
Is the converter power supply adequate to run the SAM-2 monitor?
6.
Were the following samples taken:
a.
Airborne samples (1) Particulate (2)
Iodine b.
Contamination smears c.
Water samples d.
Radiation readings 7.
Have samples been documented as to location, date, and time samples were obtained?
O 8-
"as surver =a9 'eea 'abe'ed to rer1ect sa=9'e noiat 'o-cations?
3-31
a Evaluator-Controller Record Station #6 - Offsite Monitors (Continued) 9.
Do the_ survey teams have predetermined sample point locations?
If not, were subsequent samples taken at previously documented locations?
Comment:
- 10. Have survey results been reported to the EOF via radio?
11.
Did survey teams follow procedures and health physics prac-tices?
12.
Did the monitor teams locate the plume?
- 13. Were adequate precautions taken to prevent personal contamin-ation and cross-contamination of samples?
II.
Observations, Comments, and Recommendations 1.
General Observations:
10 2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
i i
3.
Recommendations:
3 h
4 i
Observer Date 3-3?
a
y__
Evaluator-Controller Record Station #7 - Security, Access, and Accountability 1.
Noti fication/ Activation nV 1.
Did the security guard follow the proper procedures in receiving the attack threat?
~.
Did the security force respond properly to the explosion?
4 3.
Was the search of the area properly carried out?
4.
At what time did the nuclear alarm sound?
5.
Were security guards dispatched to the areas listed below following the declaration of an alert?
(Note time that they were dispatched.)
a.
Security work area b.
Northwest corner of protecced area c.
Railroad gate d.
Entrance to site 6.
Were security procedure (s) adhered to?
(Ifnot, elaborate.)
(Note:
Security procedures to be followed are EPIP-E0F-9 and p
EPIP-E0F-12.)
V 7.
At what time following the declaration of an alert were consnunications established with the groups listed below:
t a.
Control room b.
E0F c.
Security guard #2 d.
Security guard #3 e.-
Security guard #4 8.
At what time did the control room (OSC) transmit the personnel roster to security?
9.
At what time did the security force complete their account-ability of personnel? Was this within 30 minutes?
Time No. of Personnel Missing l
,0
+
v 3-33
~
o Evaluator-Controller Record Station #7 - Security, Access, and Accountability (Continued) 1.
Notification / Activation (Continued) 10.
Was microwave zone 1 rearmed immediately after evacuation of personnel from the plant?
(Note the time.)
11.
Were consoles closely monitored?
12.
Were logs properly maintained?
13.
At what time did the security force barricade the entrance to the plant?
14.
Was traffic controlled in an orderly manner?
15.
How was access controlled (i.e., OPPD personnel identify themselves using ID cards; others (except the Rescue Squad members) require approval from ED0/ Recovery Manager)?
16.
Was accountability performed in the owner controlled (exclusion) area?
g 17.
Were offsite monitor team members monitored upon arrival at
.(_)
Gate 3?
18.
During the course of the exercise, were personnel " milling" about (outside of necessary duties)?
19.
Were' personnel returning into the assembly area monitored for contamination?
v 3-34 c.,.
,......-,n.,
- v Evaluator-Controller Record Station #7 - Security, Acccess, and Accountability (Continued)
O IV. Observations, Comments, and Recommendations 1.
General Observations:
2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
O.
3.
Recommendations:
l i
l l
l l
l Observer Date t'
i I
iLO 3-35 1 -
hb
o.
t Evaluator-Controller Record m
~
(d Station #8 - Auxiliary Building I.
Notification / Activation 1.
Note the time of day the nuclear emergency alarm was sounded and the announcement information (i.e., 0800 hours0.00926 days <br />0.222 hours <br />0.00132 weeks <br />3.044e-4 months <br />, control room declared an " Alert" emergency).
2.
Observe auxiliary building evaceation.
Note if evacuation was prompt and orderly; and whether personnel know immediate actions.
- 3..Are any workers remaining in the auxiliary building 30 minutes af ter nuclear emergency alarm sounded? Identify.
4.
How and at what time was the control room notified of the personnel injury?
5.
What first aid methods are being applied while waiting for the Rescue Squad?
.O 6.
Time of Rescue Squad arrival.
7.
What time did rescue personnel arrive to the injured person inside of the auxiliary building?
8.
Did the rescue team monitor for radiation levels?
If so, at what time?
What was the reading?
(Verify instrument operability.)
9.
Did the Rescue Squad team members enter the auxiliary build-ing?
- 10. Was the injured person placed in a nuclear emergency personnel i
carrier or wrapped in plastic?
- 11. Was the injured person and carrier monitored prior to leaving the auxiliary building?
- 12. What actions were taken with the contaminated technician (i.e.,
was he provided with additional clothing prior to exit, etc.)?
13.
Note the time and purpose of the entries into the auxiliary building.
-O V
14.
Does the re-entry team have a RWP?
3-36 Y
e - : o.
Evaluator-Contrclier Record Station 78 - Auxiliary Building (Continued) 15.
Are they dressed in accordance with the RWP?
- 16. Are they using instruments stated on the RWP?
17.
Do they have dosimetry in accordance with the RWP?
- 18. Was the emergency entrance to the auxiliary building ade-quately controlled?
(A C/RP Technician and a security guard are to man tnis area.)
19.
Were radiation and contamination surveys taken and evaluated prior to emercency repairs?
20.
Was communication between the damage control team and an emer-gency response facility maintained?
Identify the applicable ERF.
- 21. Were sufficient tools and equipment identified and available to complete the equipment repairs?
22.
Note the_ sampling, transport, and analysis of the emergency reactor coolant sample. Were proper health physics practices
)
demons trated?
/
- 23. Were decontamination supplies _and procedures adequate?
24.
Is a controlled copy of the 01-PAP's maintained in the chemistry area?
II. Observations, Comments, and Recomrendations 1.
General Observations:
2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
3.
Recommendations:
p.
~U Observer Date 3-37
,9 Evaluator-Controller Record Station #9 - Media Release Center O
I.
Notification / Activa ~ tion 1.
At what time was the Media Release Center activated?
2.
Was staffing in accordance with the applicable EPIP for public information?
3.
Was staffing adequate?
4.
Were communications established between the EOF and MRC?
5.
Was notification made by the MRC to personnel listed in Ap-pendix A of the MRC emergency implementing procedure?
(Note personnel not notified or could not be reached.)
6.
Were communication systems adequate?
7.
What reference materials were used by the MRC staff? (List below.)
f])
8.
What additional reference materials were available? (List below.)
9.
Were news releases made in accordance with procedures?
10.
Which news groups were kept informed by the MRC staff?
(List below.)
11.
Did information from the EOF to the MRC flow in an efficient manner?
12.
How were rumors handled?
13.
How did the MRC staff interface with the groups listed below; a.
State and local civil defenses b.
News groups.
r-
.s
- 14. Were technical liaison personnel knowledceable and effcctive?
U 15.
Did the final news release fully summarize and terminate the emergency?
3-38 u-
,-o
.r.
.n.
Evaltator-Controller Record Station #9 - Media Release Center Q'
(Continued)
II.
0bservations, Comments, and Recommendations
-1.
General Observations:
2.
Items of Particular Interest / Concern:
10.
3.
Recommendations:
Observer Date 3-39