ML20100F722

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances for JULY-DECEMBER 1984

ML20100F722
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/31/1985
From:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I02, NUREG-0750-V20-I02, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I2, NUREG-750-V20-I2, NUDOCS 8504040416
Download: ML20100F722 (105)

Text

. _ _.._______.

i 1

a L

i NUREG-0750 s

t Vol. 20 j.

Index 2

/.

- N.. t~.

. '. y<. g

'Tf

's.

sl w

1s

' E T

m ~ L ; ;., N w'-*-i 5* g% ~gy' m g t.

m-4 - g g g g/7 4 -'rr r - Tc g, & %..

-g

~.h h n.

i 2 -

nwe=;w:WMs =: a.~

R ClD:..

\\

"~

_a _ g.P

.x a. -

m:x-~~my&.? 'gw w_,ayu,.r u1 ;

. @w?$e.

r

• v: *^,

q.

-. ~.

" m u m,,, g.,

y

.l;.

O we

1... ic.,t f

9

.. 'ja7:.,. (.;u y

%3';N i-

w..

t.-k

& "_ Web ;g ;,::

+

n

..s,

<e r-VL, a

~.,

f ts SR, '

.2 '_. g Y __ _,

x.

. =#

_ g

.-n

. s.

--. n,,o.

4

., F./.

fs

,,. /. }jq sj 4

i y.

.. %. s.j (.

.q

- W -. -

I 3.,

_( -

4.g J

.-. m. n e.-

x. a.... L M>.-.

J 4.. -

g..

.o.4 - t g.p... : a 4_

.I pm

~

, = --

6

,', f[

1

~..

2 7.'-

%{ '

..v'

,.- s w i. m.,

L

.-M.

'M^

- - -- t.'

l, g

pt.

.. Jer.y WM,g,;(.

-.~.~#4.._.3--.~.

a eg. f.s,.9.v'q;. * *- '

f y

J,-

e g h + a a ~?, i.

lN+

2

~

[. ;.,,

/

C

,a.. n 4

._.i'-,'.*O

, i. eM'3

,9

._g..,J.

w

.g_

~ -'

}...L... _,:_- _.

%L

~

,'l g_g f-

, %}g) 1}

f

.,,,2,.

,_. "m:&ig.; :- j : _

u-2 q--

-- y; ' -

.~

i.-

1 ;.. - j.

~

g. -v a.

nna y*

s

,w.

pnc. _ r

.7. A

'jL.-

_,., f. -

s.. '.'x.: :..a tv 2 -

.. n.. -

" ' - ~ '

T' '

effe,3

,!,k

-.. &[,;, g,.,

,, _., j g.

.c

,1

- t

.. r,. M, C'.....

' a v

. ~;.

1 t,

+,e-4 r

-.3 mg.

y,.

..c.

-_.-.m..

.l

'g y

1. y l

, y m,,,,,,, _,.

f.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

I I

I h-

.==

., =

.e.e w e e.-...

s 1,,o s 6

9

%,- ~.~

w wv..,..,

'. ~

8504040416 850331 PDR NUREG 0750 R PDR N

e

. 7.y,e n.

.-~-r-ow.

v--

-w.

• y. y ears - -

..p.

9 J

'r e

..a 4

n s

t..

p l:

L -

4

+

.- q

_.mN

=,

. - + -.-,c.c--_

.. p e

U Available from y,;

~

a.,. 4

- > -~ -. - -

. 'W

~'N 1NRC/GPO Sales Programn -

Jp r

+

=~=5gy y. -

.=. y=-

33 =

an.a :=.e a. =r x,..e c.,.: Superintendent of Documents =~=-. %*

"l

=

.- a w

1 w.....

.. Govemment Pn. tin ce n,,..~_...^ ~.~_~.-.a2==. g m

n.

s

. ~,. :. ~

a,

~ _. ~ ~r_m. _

4

.m_.._.~ _ _ _..

.a _:~.,_.,:... w.w..." Washington, D.C. 20402r u~

- ~

. - "n-"., ;

, m m, nn.m g

s

'.i

_. - -m-.7

=

=

T

- % _,nc /.u_.w + -

4.

m

.. ~ _.:.

.~,

- ~ x::::=.acm ;_ A year's. suu,sW, w, n consiste of 12 softbound issues,r ~ m;.:==

%QW-.t

. =4 Indexes, and 2 hardbound editions for this publicationc

^-i=

-?

,y s

n.: =. m =-w. ' =..

4

; w.:s ;. m ::-. = w p -

- a.

. :. a : a.

,7,,,.

.. wwm,,

?~. T~1 =. +.c U n.m._A_ _. - Single copies of this publicationn

-. W. " _ _....

2

~

a -

are available from National Technical 7 7_ %.. _.C.

'r.;

i a n. a, A _. - nformat'on Service, Springfield, VA 22161 -

~

. Microfiche of singlo copies are available from NRC/GPO Sales Program

~

i Washington, D.C. 20556 j

1,

._..:.:; a. -

z.

p.-...,a.,-=

... ~,

g

.. wg w;

g.

m.

7 t_.

m_..-

f.,, * ^ 7..{,,T2 p,.L T'f 4

_.. -,,.. '* ' * ~ ~ ' ~_,,

7"

~

+

A

~..

, e m

I f._. ir. }%.^' G4-] A M h. - -.

,.y

... - ~..

,l, b.f -

~~

-.s m

bA -

-"+,

YW, Errors in this publication may be reported to Vicki E. Yaner, Divleion' of ' 7 "

l

. Q ]TechrucalInformation and Document Control, Office of Administration,J~

^

~. Si.. M U.S Nucioer Regulatory Commiselon, Washington, D.C. 20555-

_ y

., w...mn,., = - *. e.

s-=..c y ; g ggggy

. ; vs.

3

'.,.= - '

e fee A

.. 4 4. d.. Mk AMS.- e w A' e-gt. e.

.: Q e.

g.

.~-t, my

~

3 e %. Eo a A-a.Mrum.detoaarept9

[ e. am.4.Caqu o

..*.y.,s.m..r..

49 i

• w.-

W' S] M $DtbCLi.g% mkG$a$S%"T W ElNiI.-.~ ra u..a-w a +.--*ww.-.---.-9 102

~. -

~-em o u m. %.w,qq.

i A.,.m,. ~_.-

4 4

.. ~,. ~

y=4 m h e._<. 6 * *-o.ep* me Ju+ =~m

... =

9-e.

seg Anip w w.&we +g,#

wm =. ; :. -

~ -.'~ D.k $ 3.*N A W N Y 3 % 5,-l$i~S l n n - m -u.yyt-'1m r w,. m.x

--,i =

.. -... ~. -

t y r s.n w

_17Qs, ye ?

+.;

~,,*%

- e <,

.wa s a e

~

m a'+-+-'t~

< - * - ~ -

e.s'

'~,l' e~.#.*~*

- w -+ < r n * - v.~ =q 5

t a.

A

+e W.-** v.g h--

~ ~ ' * * ', ~.

r-g.. - N b

1 l

• y i

}

p- -... V ?,~;

~ ~ ;..

_;~.

, _ _...---._ _3 : 7_-.m.

g 7_., -...

p

-7..r.,

,,.,,,..w.

.-~

--. -.. m

-. - -. ~..

~. -.. ~,-

• * ^

- ' ' Mentiesm%e.d.4 -r a.g.,r s. % e mg.g.gg.J, n e.M*gggggg,g y * * ' -

E,,,j" '! = ]j a

9 1

k e

e y--

,-----q..

9 NUREG-0750 Vol. 20 I

Index 2 l

lNDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES l

July - December 1984 l

O. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

I i

i i

i 1 -

• w,

. -em

t 4

)

)

)

Foreword i

Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing t

Board Panet (LBP), the Administrative I.aw Judge (AIJ), the Directors' Decisions f

(DD), and the Denials of Petitions of Rulemaking are presented in this document.

Dese digests and indexes are intended to serve as a gu;de to the issuances.

information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

l.

i Case name (owner (s)of facility)

Full text reference (volume and pagination)

Issuance number Issues raised by appellants legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes) r Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter ofissues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction permit, operatinglicense,etc.)

Type ofissuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged as follows:

1. Case Nameindex ne case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type of issuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.

2. Digests and Henders The headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows:

the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB),

the Atomic Safety and Liceasing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative I.aw Judge (AIJ), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking.

He header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type o f hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance.

De digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal referem.es used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphabetically.

l ill b2 e

=

1 1

3. legal Citations Index Ris index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alphanumerical arrangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. These citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and Statutes may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

The references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally i

followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. These phrases are follo red by the issuance number and the full text reference.

4. Subject Index Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues and subjects covered in the issuances. The subject headings are followed by phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

5. Facility Index Ris index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of issuance, issuance number, and full text reference.

i iv 1

.,w..

W

~

I I

5 i-f,

il l

l il 4 I

CASE NAME INDEX

'J t

BOSTON EDISON COMPANY

{

REQUEST FOR ACTION; FIN AL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. l 2.206; Docket I

No, 50-293; DD-8415. 20 NRC 157 (1984)

CAROLINA POWER A LIGHT COMPANY and NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN M11NICIPAL l

I POWER AGENCY i

OPERATING LICENSE; FINAL SET OF RULINGS ON ADMIS$1BILITY OF OFFSITE j

EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTIONS. RULING ON PETITION FOR WAIVER OF NEED FOR-POWER RULE AND NOTICE OF UPCOMING TELEPHONE CONFERENCE j

CALL; Docket Not 504, 50-401 ( ASLBP No. 82-472-03 OL); LBP 84-298,20 NRC 389 (1984)

CINCINN ATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY. et as.

WITHDRAWAL OF OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-3584L (ASLBP No. 76 317-01-OL), LBP-84 33,20 NRC 765 (1984)

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIN ATING COMPANY, et al OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Docket Nos. 50-440 OL. 50-441-OL; LBP 84 28,20 NRC 129 (1954); LBP 84 40. 20 NRC 1881 (1984)

REQUEST FOR ACTION. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. ) 2 206, Docket No.

50-441; DD-84-23,20 NRC 1549 (1984) l COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY l

OPERATING LICENSE; DECISION; Docket Nos. STN 50-454 STN $0-455; ALAB 793,20 NRC I

1591 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE, SUPPLEMENTAL INITIAL DECISION; Docket Nos. STN 50-454-OL, STN 50-455-OL ( ASLBP No. 79-4tt 04 OL); LBP-84 41,20 NRC 1203 (1984)

CONSUMERS POW ER COMPANY OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; INITIAL DECISION; Docket No. 50-155 OLA ( ASLBP i

No.79-432 Il LA); LBP 84-32,20 NRC 601 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; SUPPLEMENTAL INITIAL DECISION; Docket No.

50155-OLA ( ASLBP No. 79-432-11-LA). LBP 84-38,20 NRC 1019 (1984) l REOLEST FOR ACTION, DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. ) 2.206; Docket Nos.

50 3,9,50-330; DD 8417,20 NRC 226 (19848 l

REQUEST FOR SHOW-CAUSE ORDER; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. ) 2.206.

Docket No. 50-155. DD-84-25. 20 NRC 1703 (19A4) j CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT, et al.

REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT OF REGULATIONS, DENIAL OF PETITION FOR RULEM AKING. Docket No PRM 71-6, DPRM-84-2,20 NRC 1563 (1984)

DUKE POWER COMPANY, et al OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Docket Nos. 50-413-OL,50-414-OL; l

ALAB 794,20 NRC 1630 (19841 OPER ATING LICENSE, PARTIAL INITIAL DECISION; Docket Nos. 50-413. 50-414 (ASLBP j

No 81463 06-OL), LBP 84-52,20 NRC 1484 (1984)

OPER ATING LICENSE; SUPPLEMENTAL PARTIAL INITl4L DECISION ON EMERGENCY PLANNING, Docket Pos. 50-413-OL,50-414-OL ( ASLBP No.81-463 06-OL); LBP 84 37,20 NRC 933 (19841 l

REQUEST FOR ACTION, DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. l 2.206; Docket Nos-50-413,50-414. DD 84-16,20 NRC 161 (1984)

N 5

8 i

I l

l i

L l

f L

[

o CASE NAME INDEX GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY OPE R ATING LICENSE RENEW AL. MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER, Docket No. 50-70-OLR

( ASLBP No $3 48101-OLR); LBP 84-54,20 NRC 1637 (1984)

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY. et al.

OPER ATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Docket Noi 50-424-OL,50-425-OL

( ASLBP No. 84-499-01-OL); LBP-84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984); LBP 84-49,20 NRC 1457 (1984)

GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION REQUEST FOR ACTION, DIRECTOR'S DECI5 ION UNDER to C F R. l 2.206; Docket No.

50-289, DD-84-22,20 NRC 1033 (1984)

GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY, et at OPERATING LICENSE; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50458-OL,50-459-OL

( ASLBP No 82-468-Ol-OL); LBP-84 51,20 NRC 1478 (1984)

KANSAS G AS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.

OPER ATING LICENSE; DECISION; Docket No. 50 482 OL; ALAB-784,20 NRC 845 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE; INITIAL DECISION; Docket No. 50-452-OL ( ASLBP No-

$1453 03 OL); LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No 50-482-OL (ASLBP No.

81-45343-OLl; LBP 84-27,20 NRC 125 (1984)

KERR MCGEE CilEMICAL CORPORATION M ATERIALS LICENSE AMENDMENT; MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No.

i 40 2061 ML ( 45LbP No 83-495-01 ML); LBP-84.42,20 NRC 1296 (1984)

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY DI5 QUALIFICATION-MEMORANDUM, Docket No. 50-322 OL; ALAB 779,20 NRC 375 e 1984); CLI-94-20*,20 NRC 106l (1984)

OPER ATING LICENSE; DECISION; Docket No. 50-322 0L; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984)

OPER ATING LICENSE, INITIAL DECISION; Docket No. 50-322-OL-4 ( ASLBP No.

?? 347-0ICOLI (Low Pomer); LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1984)

OPER kilNG LICENSE, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No 50-322-OL; LBP 84-30,20 NRC 426 (19848 OPER ATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 (Emergency Planning); ALAB 780,20 NRC 378 (1984)

OPER ATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-322-OL-4 (Low Power), ALAB 777,20 NRC 21 (1984); ALAB-787,20 NRC 1097 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-322 OL,50-322-OL-4; CLI-84-21,20 SRC 1437 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDEP, RULING ON REMAND ISSUES, Docket No. 50-322 OL; LBP-84-53,20 NRC 1531 (1984)

OPER ATING LICENSE; ORDER, Docket No. 50 322 OL-4 (Low Powers; CLI 8416,20 NRC 799 -

fl994h LBP 84-35 A,20 SRC 920 (1984)

LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY OPERATING LICEN5E; MEMOR ANDUM; Docket No. 50-382-OL; ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 (1984)

OPER ATING LICEN5E; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-3824)L; ALAB 786, 20 NRC 1087 (1984)

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, et at OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; INITIAL DECISION; Docket No 50-289-OLA (A5LBP No. 83-49144-OLA) (Steam Generator Repair >; LBP-84-47,20 NRC I405 (1984)

REQUEST FOR LICENSE SUSPENSION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. l 2 206; Docket No. 50 289; DD 84-18,20 NRC 243 (1984)

SPECIAL PROCEEDING, DECISION, Docket No. 50-289-SP; CLI 84-il,20 NRC 1 (1984)

SPECI AL PROCEEDING. M EMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 50-289 SP (Restart Procee&ng Management Remand); ALAB 791,20 NRC 1579 (1984)

$PECIAL PROCEEDING; ORDER; Docket No. 50-289 SP (Restart); CLI-84 l?. 20 NRC 801 (1984), CLI 84-18,20 SRC 808 (1984); CLI-84-22,20 NRC 1573 (1984)

MISSISSIPPI POW ER & LIGHT COMPANY, et at OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No.

50-416-OLA f ASLBP No. 84 497-04-OL); LSP-84-39,20 NRC 103I (1984) s i

t 3

2 W

Tf M 6 1"***

e' CASE NAME INDEX MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, MIDDLE SOUTH ENEROY,INC., and SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER A$50CIATION OPER ATING LICENSE; ORDER; Docket No. 50-416; CLI-8419,20 NRC 10$$ (1984)

REQUEST FOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F.R.{ 2.206; Docket No.

50-416; DD-84 21. 20 NRC 788 (1984)

PACIFIC G AS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY l

OPERATING LICENSE, DEC15 TON, Docket Nos. 50-275-OL,50-3234L; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984); CLI 84-12,20 N RC 249 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-275-OL,50 323 OL; ALAB-782. 20 NRC 838 (1984); CLI 8413,20 NRC 267 (1984)

OPERATING LICEN5E; ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-275 OL,50 323-OL; CLI-84-13 A,20 NRC 283 (1984); CLI-8414,20 NRC 285 (1984)

REQUEST FOR ACTION. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. ) 2.206; Docket No.

50-275 DD-84-20,20 NRC 776 (1984)

REQUEST FOR ACTION, INTERIM DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. l 2.206; Docket Nos. 50 275,50-323. DD 84-19,20 NRC 773 (1984)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; INITIAL DECISION; Docket Nos 50-463-CP,50-464-CP (ASLBP No.76-300 01 CP); LBP-84-43,20 NRC 1333 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE; DECISION; Docket Nos. 50-352. 50 353; ALAB-785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50 352, 50-353, ALAB 789,20 NRC 1443 (19841 OPERATING LICENSE; SECOND PARTIAL INITIAL DECISION; Docket Nos. 50 352-OL, 50 3534L ( ASLBP No. 81465-07 OL); LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (19846 PART 70 LICENSE. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Not 50-352,50-353; ALAB 778, 20 NRC 42 (1984)

PORTLAND GENER AL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT, INITIAL DECISION; Docket No. 50-344 OLA (ASLBP No. 84-49845-OLA) (SFP Amendment); LBP 54-52A,20 NRC 129 (1984)

ROCHESTER OAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT (MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No-50-244 OLA ( ASLBP No. 79-427-07-OLA); LBP 84 34,20 NRC 769 (1984)

RULEM AKING ON THE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF NUCLEAR WASTE RULEM AKING. DECISION; Docket Nos PR 50, PR 51 (44 Fed. Re8. 61,372); CLI-84-IS,20 NRC 258 (1984)

SHIPMENTS OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL REQUEST FOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R.{ 2.206; DD-84 24,20 NRC 1557 (1984)

SUFFOLK COUNTY AND STATE OF NEW YORK MOT:ON FOR DISQUALIF! CATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE COTTER DISQUALIFICATION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No 50-322-OL-4 (ASLBP No.84-503 01 Mnct LBP 84-29A,20 NRC 385 (1984)

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Decket Nos STN 50-518, STN 50-520 ALAB 783,20 NRC $43 (1984)

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. STN 50 566 STN 50 567, ALAB-783,20 NRC 843 (1984)

TEX AS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMP ANY, et al.

OPERATING LICENSE, MEMORANDUM; Docket Not 50445,50-446; LBP 84 30A,20 NRC 443 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50 445,50-446; LBP-84 44,20 SRC 1340 (1984); LBP 84 46,20 NstC 1403 (1984); IMP-84-55,20 NRC 1646 (1984); LBP-84-56,20 SRC 1696 (1984)

OPER ATING LICENSE, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 50-445-OL 2, 50 4464L 2 (ASLBP No.79-430 06A-OL); LBP 84-36,20 NRC 928 (1984); LBP-84 48,20 j

NRC 1455 (1984); LBP-84 50,20 NRC 1464 (1984)

~

s 3

~

f 9

o-w

~,

l CASE NAME INDEX Tile REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAllFORNIA FACILITY LICENSE RENEW AL; MEMOR ANDUM; Docket No. 50-142-OL; LBP-84-29,20 NRC 133 (1984p VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Docket Nos.

50-3384LA 1,50-339-OLA 1 ( ASLBP No. 83 48101 LA) Docket Nos. 50-338 OLA 2, 50-3394LA-2 ( ASLBP No. 83-48242 LA); LBP-84-40A. 20 NRC i195 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos.

50-3384LA.2. 50-339 OLA 2. ALAB-790,20 NRC 1450 (1984) f 4

g-e

.I

,I 4

b 4

0 V

?

i DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF file NLCLEAR RIGULATORY CO%1 MISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, et al (Three Mde island Nuclear Station.

26,1984 DECISION CLI-84-il Unit 11, Docket No. 50-289-SP; SPECIAL PROCEEDING; JulyThe Commission renew on plant design and procedures in this restart proceedmg. The Commission A

NRC 814 (1983) decides four cf the issues on the basis of the record in the proceeding, finding with respect to each that the esisting endence provides reasonable assurance of safe for specified action, subject to possibte further decision by the Commission.The C not preclude chat!c1ges to the continued operation of plants where it is alleged those plants B

cannot be safely operated becausd of spectfic enwronmental quahficauon deficiencies.

The boards must closely examme any accident sequence which in their judgment poses an unacceptable nsk to the pubbc health and safety. Probabihsue or numencal calculanons or C

any other mit gause act ons deemed necessary by the boards may be i

when reasonable questions are raised regardmg the rehab:hty of a plant system, a board 838, 843-44 (1981).

has discrenon to examine that system, even if st is safety-grade, to determine whether it poses D

an unacceptable nsk to pubhc health and safety. In makmg such an exammation, a board may use the test asadable data even if not plant-spect6c. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMP

{

CLI 84-12 10, 1934, Umts I and 21 Docket Nos. 50-275-OL,50-323-OL; OPERATING LICENSE, August The Commimon determmes that the circumstances m this case do not proude a basis DECISION l

for departure from its decision in Southern Cahforma Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generat.

A mg Stauon, Units 2 and 3), CLI 81-)),14 NRC 1091 (1981), that (1) NRC regulations do not require considerauon of the impacts of earthquakes on emergency planm I

be addressed as a genene matter. The Commission decides to imtiate such a rulemaking and, i'

further, determines that the issuance of a full-power operatmg hcense in this proceedmg need not be delayed unut its conclusion.

The Commission will not bcense a nuclear power plant unless it can make the statutonly required finding that operation of the plant mil not result in undue nsk to pubhc health and B

f safety. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Dublo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, 10, 1984 l

CLI-84-1)

Umts I and 2), Docket Nos. 50-275-OL, 50 323-OL; OPERATING LICENSE; August j

i MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Commission determir.es to make effecove, without prejudice to the pendmg appeats and pettuons for reuew of the sartous hcensing and appeal board decisions in this proceeding, A

f f ll the Licenang Board's fourth and final Parual Insual Decision autho ums the issuance o a u -

l 6

power heense for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Unit I, LBP 82-70,16 NRC 75

)

(1982), and, funher, concludes that the hcense conditions imposed by the Board have been ful-I I

filled anJ all other rnauers resobed =o that the hcenw may be issaed.

CL18413A PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon N l

j i

l l

1984. ORDE R 1

s l-f l

l l

l

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CLI 84-14 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), Dodet Nos. 50-275 OL, 50-323-OL; OPER ATING LICENSE; August 20,1984, ORDER A

The Commission decides not to review the Appeal Board's conclusions contained in ALAB-763,19 NRC 578 (1984), concermng the adequacy of the operating license applicant's quality assurance program, except for a matter relating to the propnety of the Appeal Board's ex-clusion of tertain contenuons from the reopened heanns that was the subject of ALAB-763. The Commission indicates its agreement with the Appeal Board's exclusion of those contentions, but modines the Board's reasoning for that action.

CLI-8415 RULEMAKING ON TIIE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF NUCLEAR WASTE (w te ConGdence Rulemaking). Docket Nos. PR-50, PR 51 (44 Fed. Reg. 61,372); RULE.

as MAKING; August 22,1984 DECISION A

The Commission sets out its findings in this waste con 6dence rulemaking proceeding called for by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Minnesota v. NRC, 602 F.2d 412 (1979). In general, the Commission finds that it can, with reasonable assurance, reach favorable conclusions with respect to the safe storage and disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent fuel. Specifically the Commission finds reasonable assurance that. (1) safe dis-posal of high-level radioactive waste and spent fuel in a mined geologic repository is technically feasible; (2) one or more mined geologic repositones for commercial high-level radioactive waste and spent fuel edi be available by the years 2007-09, and that sulTicient repository capacity will be avadable within 30 years beyond expiration of any reactor operating license to dispose of esisting commercial high lesel radioactive waste and spent fuel ongsnating in such reactor and generated up to that time; (3) high-level radioachve waste and spent fuel will be managed in a safe mantier untd sufUcient repository capacity is avadable to assure the safe disposal of all high-level radioacuse waste and spent fuel; (4) if necessary, spent fuel generated in any reactor can be stored safely and without sigmficant environmental impacts for at least 30 years beyond the empiration of that reactor's operating htense at that reactor's spent fuel storage basin, or at either onsite or olTsite mdegndent spent fuel storage installauons; and (5) safe independent onsite or olisite spent fuel storage wdl be made avadable if such storage capacity is needed.

CLI-84-16 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1).

Docket No. 50-322-OL-4 (Low Powerl; OPERATING LICENSE; September 7,1984; ORDER A

The Commisuon calls for the views of the parties concermns a September 5,1984 Licensing Board 0-der (LBP-84 35A,20 NRC 920) in this operating license proceeding.

CLI 84-17 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, et al. (Three Mde Island Nuclear Station, Uma 11 Docket No. 50-289-SP (Restart); SPECIAL PROCEEDING; September II,1984; ORDER A

The Commission demes a request by the Licensee to stay the reopened managernent heanngs in the Three Mde Island, Uma I, restart proceeding based upon its determinahon that the stay critena are not sausfied and it grants an intervenor's motion to lift the stay of the re-opened heanngs on certain other allegauont B

The four factors to be considered in deciding whether to grant a stay request, as set forth in 10 C F.R. j 2.788(e), are: (1) Whether the moving party has made a strong showing that it is likely to presad on the ments; (2) Whether the party edt be irreparably injured unless a stay is granted; (3) Whether the granung of a stay would harm other parties; and (4) Where the pubhc interest hes.

C The most <ignacant factor in deciding whether to grant a stay request is "whether the party requesung a stay has shown that it will be irreparably injured unless a stay is granted."

Westmshou.se Electnc Corp. IEuport to the Phihppines), CLI-80-14,11 NRC 631,662 (1980).

D Mere husahon expense, even substantial and unrecoupable cost, does not constitute ir-reparable injury. Consumers Power Co. (Midland Plant Umts I and 2), ALAB-395,5 NRC 772, 779 (1977),quoung RenegotLat.on Board v. Bannercraft Co.,415 U.S. I,24 (1974).

CLI-84-18 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, et al. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Uma l), Docket No. 50-289-SP (Restart); SPECIAL PROCEEDING; September 11, 1984; ORDER A

In ordet to determine whether furt'er hearings are required in this special restart pro-ceeding for Uma I of the Three Mde Island (TMD nuclear power plant and the scope of any 6

W

a 1

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE NLCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

h such heannss. the Commission (1) decides to reuew certain portions of the Appeal Board deci-sions in ALAB-772,19 NRC ll93 (1984), and ALAB 738,18 NRC 177 (14836, and (2) requests the views of the parties regarding additional heannas. The Commisuon als announces its inten.

tion to determine whether the plant must remain shut down pending more hearings, should it f'

Gnd such heanngs are required.

MISSISSIPPl POWER & LIGitT COMPANY, MIDDLE SOUTil ENERGY, INC-, and CLI 84-19 SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Umt 1). Docket No. 50-416; OPERATING LICENSE; October 25,1984 ORDER To avoid giving the erroneous impression that by designating its full power authonzauon A

j for the Grand Gulf facihty a "hcense amendment" (to a previously issued facihty license author-inns low-power operation) tt intended to create new heanns rights under i 189a of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Commission orders the StafT to replace the -license amend-ment" with a separate full-power hcense, CLI 84-20 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Ishoreham Nuc! ear Power Stanon, Umt 11, Docket No. 50-322-OL 4; DISQUALIFICATION; September 21,1984. M EMOR ANDUM l

The Chairman of the NRC, Gnding that the standards for disquahncanon have not been l

A met, demes on the ments and as untimely a motion Gled by intervenors to the Shoreham licens.

l ing proceeding that sought his recusal i'

I CLI-84 21 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon. Umt II, Docket Nos. 50-322-OL,50-322 OL-4, OPERATING LICENSE; Nosember 21,1984; MEMO-1 RANDUM AND ORDER Upon rewcw of the Licensing Board's September 5,1984 Order authonzing fuelloadmg j

A and precntical and cold cntical tesung at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauen. Umt I, the Com-l mission Jetermines that the order may become effecuse only afler another Licensing Board in this proceedmg resolves certain issues remanded to it in ALAB-7BS. 20 NRC 1102 (19344 in favor of the applicant (or determines that they are not matenal to low power tesung). and the Staff resolves any remaimos uncontested issues. The effectiveness of any Licensms Board order regardmg the remanded ( ALAB 788) issues is delayed by the Commission unal 7 days after issu-ance.

l B

Every health and safety regulation is not riecessanly apphcable to fuct loading and to every phase of low-power operation. Rather, simple logic and common sense indicate that some regulations should have no appbcation to fuel loading or some phases oflow-power operauon-C in determimns whether to grant a stay, the Commission or the adjudicatory boards con-l sider (1) whether the moving party has made a strong showing that it is hkely to presail on the merits; (2) whether the party will be irreparably mjured unless a stay is granted; (3) harm to other parues diould a stay be granted; and (4) where the pubhc interest hes.10 C f R.

$ 2.788(el.

D The Commission is obligated under the Admimstrative Procedure Aci and under princi-pies of fair and efUcient admimstration to act with reasonable dispatch on requests for hcenses.

CL184 22 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, et al. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stauon, Unit II, Docket No. 50-289-SP (Restar0; SPECIAl. PROCEEDING; Dwember 13, 1984, ORDER The Commisuon demes the Intervenors' monon to defer a decision on renart of Three A

Mile Island Unit I pending msestigauon of alleged radianon etTects of the March 1979 Umt 2 accident on the health of the local population, Gndmg the monon and its supporung data insu Ti-cient to call into question results of previous scientific studies that indicated such radtation releases will pose mimmat risks to the populanon-r 7

h

l DIGESTS ISSLANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS ALAB-777 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon, Umt 1),

Dosket No. 50-3224L-4 (Low Power); OPERATING LICENSE; July 20, 1984; M EMOR A N-DUM AND ORDER A

Acting on a referral by the Licenung Board of its ruhng denyms intervertors' motion for disquahncation of all three members of one of three Licensing Boards considenng issues in this operaung heense proceedmg, the Appeal Board Gnds the disquah0 canon monon both legally and factually msub9anual and amrms the Licensing Board's demal of the motion.

B A supportms amdaut is required to accompany a monon for disquahncation of an adju-dicatory board member even where the factual underpinmngs of the monon are matters of pubhc record.10 C F R. 2.704(c); Duquesne Light Co. (Beaver Valley Power Station, Units I and 27. AL AB 472, 7 AEC 42,43 n.2 (1974); Detroit Edison Co. (Greenwood Energy Center, Unts 2 and 31. ALAB-225, 8 AEC 379, 380 (1974). See also Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Stanon Umts I and 2), AL AB-749,18 NRC 1195,1l97 n.1 (1983).

I C

Wuons for disquahGcanon or recusal must be submitted as soon as practicable after a party has reason 4ble cause to beheve that grounds for disquahncanon exist. Seabrook, supra,18 NRC at 1198, quonns from Marcus v. Director Omce of Workers' Compensabon Programs, 548 F 2J 1044,105) t D C. Car 1976).

D An admmntraine tner of fact (hke a federal judgel is subject to dnquahfkauon if he or she has a direct, personal, substanual pecuniary interest in a result; if he or she has a personal bias aganst a participant, if he or the has served in a prosecutive or msesugative role with regard to the same facts as are m nsue; if he or she has prejudged factual - as disunguished from legal or pohcy - awues, or if he or she has engaged in conduct whKh gnes the appearance of personal bias or prendgment of factual nsues Pubhc Service Electnc and Gas Co. (Hope Creen Generaung Stanon Urut 11. ALAB 759.19 NRC 13, 20 (1984); Consumers Power Co.

(%d:and Plant, Umts ! and 21. ALAB 101, 6 AEC 60, 65 (1973). See also flouston Lighung and Power Co (South Texas Project, Umts I and 2), CLI-82 9,15 NRC 1363,1365-67 (1982);

Cmdere!!a Career and Fimshms Schoofs, Inc. v. FTC,425 F.2d 58),591 (D C. Cir.1970).

E in order to proude a baws for dnquahGeat on on prejudgment grounds, the asserted pre-Judgme9t tot appearance of prejudgment) must relate to factual, as distmguished from legal or i

pohey, nsues. Southern Pactnc Commumcations Co. v. AT&T,740 F 2d 980,990-91 (D C. Cir.

l 19846.

l F

The fact that a member of an adjudicatory tnbunal may have a cryualhted pomt of view on quesuons oflaw or pokcy is not a baus for his or her disquahneauon. Midland, supra,6 AEC at 66, Northern Indiana Pubhc Service Co (Bailly Generatmg Stauen No.1), ALAB 76, 5 AEC 312,313 (1972). See also Southern Pacific Communicanons Co. v. AT&T, supra.

ALAB 778 PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY (Limenck Generating Station, Umis I and 21 Docket Nos. 50-352, 50-353. PART 70 LICENSE; July 23, 1984, MEMORANDUM AND l

ORDER A

The Apreal Board amtms the Licensing Board's oral ruhng denymg the intersenor's motica for a hearms m connection with the appheant's revised request for authority under 10 C F R. Part 70 to ship, recene and store new fuel at the Limenck site pnor to receip' of an

[

operatens hcerne for the plant. The Appeal Board also denies the miervenor's tequest for a stay of any movement of new fuel from the outdoor storage area to mside the plant B

A hcensing board ruhng that removes any possible adfud catory impediments to the is-suance of a 10 C F R. Part 70 bccrne by the Director of the Omce of Nuclear Matenal Safety r

h i

9 I

I r

a 1

i:

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS and Safeguards INMSS) is immediately appeatable. Philadelphia Electne Co (Limenck Generat-ing Station Umts I and 23, ALAB-765,19 NRC 645,648 n.1 (1984).

j C

A Part 70 matenals hcense does not permit operation of a reactor at any power level, or

~

even loadit;g of the fuel into the reactor vessel.

D Proof of sersice should accompany all filings with the Commission. A certiccate of serv.

ice should shoa the names and addresses of the persons served, the manner of service (e-3.,

j deposit in the U.S. mail), the date of service, and averment of the person making service. See 10 C.F.R. 66 2.712fe),2.701(b). All fihnss must also be subrmtted to the Commission's Public I

Document Room or Secretary.10 C.F R. ( 2.70!(a).

E Even thoi.sh represented in proceedings by a non-lawyer, a party is expected to comply with the rules of practice. See Pennsylvania Power and Light Co. (Susquehanna Steam Electnc Station. Units I and 2). ALAB 563,10 NRC 449,450 n.1 (1979L F

An adjudicatory decision is usually the product of the arguments raised by the htigants.

A party cannot be heard to complain later about a decision that fails to address an issue no one sought to raise.

G Notwithstanding the absence of a heanns on an apphcation for a materials hcense under 10 C.F.R. Part 70. the Commission's regulations require the statito make a number of findings concerning the sophcant and its abihty to protect the pubhc health and safety before issuance of the beense. See 10 C.F.R. Il 70.23, 70.31. Cf. South Ca@a Electnc and Gas Co. (Virgil C, Summer Nuclear Station, Umt II, ALAB442,13 NRC 881,89,-96 (1981), aff*d sub nom. Fair-field Umred Action v. NRC. 679 F.2d 261 (D C. Cir.1982).

H An amendment to a Part 70 application sites nse to the same rights and duties as the original applicattert I

A person

• hose interest may be affected by Part 70 heensing action is entatted to some form of adjudicat2on of that interest, though i,t need not be a formal hearing before a heensing boarJ. See secuon 189a(1) of the Atomic Energy Act 42 U.S.C.12239all). The consistent agency practice, however, is for 1. censing boards, already presiding at operating license hearings, to act on requests to raise Part 70 issues involving the same facility. Limenck, supra.

ALAB-765,19 NRC at 65152.

J To be admissible for htigation in a licensing proceeding, the contention and its bases must be set forth mith reasonable specificity.10 C.F R. l 2.714th).

K The followmg technical issues are discussed: Handhng and Storage of New Fuel at the Reactor Site, Fire Protection of New Fuel at the Reactor Site.

A L A B-779 LONG ISL AND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. Umt 1).

Docket No. 50-322-OL; DISQUALIFICATION; August 3,1984; MEMORANDUM A

The Appeal Board esplains, for the benefit of the parties sad the Commission, its agrec.

ment with the determination of the Chief Admimstratise Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licens-ing Board Panel. mot to refer to the Appeal Board his denial of intervenor's moteon calling for his disquahfication froat participation in any matters concermns the Shoreham facihty.

8 The Comrnission's reguiation at 10 C F R. ( 2.704(c) provides for referral to the Com-mission or Appeal Board of only those disquahfication motions addressed to the presiding officer or a deugnated trember of a heensing board.

ALAB-780 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Choreham Nuclear Power Station. Umt I).

Dodet No. 50 322-OL-3 (Emergency Planmns); OPERATING LICENSE; August 15, 1984; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

The Apswal Board denies as interlocutory a party's appeal of a Licensang Board order l

denying that party's request for discovery. Treating the appeal as a motion for directed cernfica-tion of the order. the Appeal Board demes the mohon.

8 Sechon 2.*30t0 of 10 C F R. generally prohibits interlocutory appeals. The single excep-hon to that prohsdinon is found in 10 C F R. 2.7144, which allons an appeal from certain orders entered on pennons for leave to intervene in an adjudicatory proceeding.

C An order granung discovery against a non party to a proceeding has all of the attnbutes of finahty insofar as that non-party is concerned and, thus, is appealable as a matter of right Comrnonwealth Ednon Co (Zion Stauon, Umts I and 2), ALAB Il6. 6 AEC 258,258 (1973).

j See also Long Island Lighting Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit I), ALAB-773,19 1

NRC 1333 (1984L le '

i i

mm

r, ~

DIG ESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATO\\ llc SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS D

An order tr:21 demes dim:osery by quashing a subpoena addressed to a non-party is wholly in erlocutory in character and, accordingly, is not immediately appealable Zion, supra. 6 AEC at 258.10 C F R. 2.730(fl.

E A Lwensng Board ruhng normally will quahty for discretionary interlocutory reues only ifit either fli threatens the party adsersely atTected by it with immediate and senous irreparable impact wrush, as a practKal matter, could not be allesiated by a later appeal, or (2) alTects the basic structure of the proceeding in a pervasne or unusual manner. Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana (Marble Hill Nuclear Generaung Station, Umis I and 2), ALAB-405, 5 NRC 1190,1192 (1977). Discosery ruhngs rarely meet those tests. Consumers Power Co. (Midland Plant Umts I and 21, ALAB-634.13 NRC 96,99 (1981). See also Houston Lighung and Power Co. (South Texas Project, Umts I and 2), ALAB-608,12 NRC I68,170 (1980).

ALAB 781 P 4CIFIC G AS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 21 Docket Nos. 50-275-OL, 50-323 0L, OPERATING LICENSE: September 6, 1984; DECISION A

Upon the appeals of intersenors and the Gosernor of Cahfornia, the Appeal Board af-firms (with respect to Unit Il the initial decision of the Licensing Board authonzing the issuance of a full power license for the Diablo Canyon nuclear facihty. Consideration of Umt 2 by the Appeal Board is postponed, pending the Board's completion of findings of fact for that umt.

B Escepuons to an imual decision that are not bnefed on appeal are deemed waived. See Pubhc Scruce Electnc and Gas Co. (Salem Nuclear Generaung Stanon, Umt 1), ALAR-650,14 NRC 43. 49 (!98D afTd sub nom., Township of Lower Alloways Creek v. Public Service Elec-inc & Gas Co., 647 F 2d 732 (1982); Pubhc Sersice Co. of Indiana (Marble Hill Nuclear Generaues Stanon. Umts I and 23, ALAB.461,7 NRC 313,315 (1978).

C NRC regulauons do not require specine consideranon of the impacts of earthquakes on emergency planmng. Southern Cahforma Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generaung Stanon, Units 2 4,d 38, CLI.8133,14 NRC 1091 (1981). See also Pacinc Gas and Electnc Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-723,17 NRC 777,793 (1983); CLI 84-12, 20 NRC 249,240119141 D

The Commisuon's June !),1980 pohcy statement eatitled " Nuclear Power Plant Acci-dent Consderanons Under the Nauonal Environmental Pohcy Act of 1969," 45 Fed. Res.

40,101, does not rnandate that the agency consider Class 9 accident sequences for plants, hke Diablo Canyon, where the final Enuronmental Impact Statement has already been issued, unless there is a showing of special circumstances. In this instance, location of a nuclear power plant in a region :>f known msmgity as not a "special circumstance" under the pohcy statement.

E The Commission's emergency response regulations,10 C.F R. 50.47(aH21. do not re-quare " final" Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEM A) findings on the adequacy of off.

ste emergency resporae plans before a I. cense may be authorized. Pacific Gas and Electnc Co.

(Diablo Canyon Nucicar Power Plant, Units I and 21. ALAB-776,19 NRC 1373 (19841 F

Central to the deselopment of ofTsite emergency response plans under the Commiss.on's regulations is the con 6ept of emergency planmns zones (EPZs), i.e., those areas around a plant for whKh planmns is needed so that umely and elTectise acuans can be taken to protect the pubhc m the egent of a radiological emergency. See 10 C F R. 50.47(cH26; 10 C F.R. Part 50, Appendis E; "Cntena for Preparanon and Evaluauon of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," NUREG-0654/ FEM A REP-I, Rev. I INosember 1990s at 10. The Commission's regulatory scheme contemplates J.e establish-ment of two such zones: the plume exposure pathway that "shall consist of an area about 10 miles (16 km) in radius and the ingesuon pathway that "shall consist of an area about 50 miles (80 km) in radiut* 10 C.F R. 50 47(c)(2).

O The Commission's regulauons regt. ire that emergency response planmns with n the emergency planmng zones meet the requirements set forth in 10 C.F R. 50.471bp. Section 50.47(c)f 21 further proudes that it]he exact size and con 63urauon of the EPZs surrounding a particular nuclear power reactor shall be determined in relation to local emergency response needs and capabahues as they are affected by such condinons as demography, topography, land i

charactenstus, access routes, and Junsdmuonal boundanes."

H Although the regulations proude that the exact saze and configuration of a particular EPZ is to de determmed with reference to site specific factors, the wholesale enlargement of the II

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS Commission-prescnbed EPZs by a state cannot preclude a hcensms decision based upon the re-quirements of the NRC regulations. See Southern Cahforma Edison Co. (San Ono(re Nuclear Genersung Stauon. Units 2 and 31. LBP.82 39.15 NRC !!63. IISI (1982P. a:Td. ALA8-717 17 NRC 34 (198Je (The Commission's regulations clearty allow Iceway for a mile or two in either direcuon. cased on local factors. But it.. clearly precludes a plume EPZ radius of, say.

J 20 or more miles.").

A party seekmg to impose a radical departure from the Commission's prescnbed EPZs 1

should seek an exception to the rule pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2.758.

The staridard appbcable to appeal board review of a heensmg board's factual findings as J

whether an appeal board's exammauon of the eudence convinces et that the record compels a different result. See Northern States Power Co. (Monticello Nuclear Generaung Plant. Unit I).

I ALAB-611.12 NRC 301. 304 (19806; Niagara Mohawk Pbeer Corp. (Nine Mile Point Nuclear Stanon. Umt 28. ALAB-264. I NRC 347,357 (1975).

The Commission's emergency response regulations contemplate, in appropnate circum-4 K

stances, predicthe findmss on emergency response plannmg so that operation of a facihty need not be delayed unnecessanly by the heanns process. See San Onofre, supra,17 NRC at 380 n.57. See generally Detroit Edison Co. (Ennco Fermi Atomic Power Plant. Unit 21. ALAB-730.

17 NRC 1057,1%7 (1913p.

A Licensms Board must adequately confront the conflictmg vie pomts of espert wit-L newes and resche each issue before it. See generally Pubhc Seruce Co. of New Hampshire (Sea-brook Station. Umts I and 21. ALAB-442,6 NRC 33,41 (1977).

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Po er Plant.

ALAB-782 Umts I and 2t. Docket Nos. 50-275 OL 50-323-OL; OPERATING LICENSE; September 6.

1984; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Appeal Board dismisses the joint intersenors' monon to reopen the Diablo Canyon A

proceedmg on seismic issues fmdmg that it tacts junsdicuon to consider the matter.

Under the terms of 10 C.F R. 2.206. a party may request the Director of Nuclear Reactor 8

Regulahon to msutute a show-cause proceedmg seeking to amend or resoke a nuclear power plant operating hcense.

C

% hen a dricrete issue has been decided by an appeal board ard the Commission dechnes to resiew that decision. agency action is final with respect to the issue and appeal board jurisdic-tion is termmated. Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuc! car Stauon. Unit No. D.

ALAB 766.19 NRC 981. 983 (1984); Virgima Electnc and Power Co. (North Anna Nactear Pu er Stanon. Umts I and 2). ALAB-551,9 NRC 704. 70849 t1979 ; Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshee (Seabrre Station. Units I and 23. ALAls-513. 8 NRC 694. 695 (19737.

D w here fmality has attached to some but not all issues, appeal board juttsdiction to enter-tain new matters is dependent upon the esistence of a " reasonable nesus" between those matters and the issues remaimes before the board. See %rgima Electne and Power Co. (North Anna Nuclear Po.er Sianon. Umts 1 and 23. AL AB-551.9 NRC 704,707 (19791.

ALAB 783 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTilORITY Diartsulle Nuclear Plant. Umts I A and 2A).

Docket Nos. STN 50-518. STN 50-520. and (Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant, Umts 1 and 21 Docket Nos. STN 50-566. STN 50 567; CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; September 11.198a; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Bawd upon the cancellanon of Umts I A and 2A of the proposed Hartsulle Nuclear A

Plant and the proposed two-umt Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant, the Appeal Board terminates the hmiteJ Junsdicuan it previously.*etained oser the construcuon permit proceedings involwns these faaliurs.

ALAB 784 KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. et at twolf Creek Generating Stauon.

Umt D. Do6ket No. 50-482 OL; OPERATING LICENSE; September 13.1934. DECISION The Appeal Board atTirms an earher order of the Licenung Board that dismissed an inter-A venor as a party to this operatmg hcense proceedmg based upon the Licensing Board's determma-hon that the mtervenor's single contention concerned the financial quahfications of an apphcant and, under the Commission's rules, such issues are not htigable in such proceed 4ngs. The Appeal Board's acuon as predicated upon the Commission's promulgauon of a new rule that, hke its predecewor. removed considerauon of an apphcant's financial quahficauons from operstmg hcense proceedings.

It i

i

<w e

-e 4

w

.o 4

6 l

DIG ESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS B

Neither apsval boards nor heensing boards are empowered to entertain challenges to the legality of a Commimon regulation. See 10 C F.R 2.758f a4 see also Potomac Electric Power Co. (Douglas Pomt Nuclear Generating Station, Units I and 28. ALAB 218, 8 AEC 79,89 90 t

(1974L ALAB-785 PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Limenck Generaung Station Umts I and 2),

Docket Nes. 50-352,50 353. OPERATING LICENSE; September 26,1984, DECISION A

The Appeal Board affirms, in part, the Licensing Board's decisions in this operating license proceeding concerning the environmental impacts of the Lirnerick supplementary cooling water system, and remands two issues to the Licensing Board to afford the intervenor the oppor-tumty to resubmit its contentions on those issues. Addit:onally, the Appeal Board demes the in-tertenor's motsons to set aside the Licensing Board's decisions on the basis of new evidence.

B Federal agencies are precluded from taking action that "substantially conflict!s!" with a comprehensive plan for the development and use of the water resources of the Delaware River Basin (DRB) when it has been adopted by the Delaware Rher Basm Commission IDRBC) with the concurrence of the Commission's federal representatise. See DRB Compact, Pub. L No.

87 328, i 15.I(sil,1901 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News (75 Stat. 688) 775,80t08.

C In the usual case, environmental heanngs awast the preparation and circulation of the stafTs final environmental statement. See, e s., Potomac Elecinc Power Co. (Douglas Pomt Nuclear Generaung Station Umts I se12). ALAB-277, I SRC 539,546 (1975).

D Although an agency must ordinanly adhere to its own rules and estabhshed practices, it i

is always within the discretion of an admimstratsse agency to retas or modify its procedural rules adopted for the orderly transaction of business before it when in a given case the ends of Justice require it. See Amencan Farm Lmes v. Black Ball Freight Service,397 U.S. 532,539 (1970),

quoting NLRB v. Monsanto Chemical Co,205 F 2d 763,764 tith Cir.1953).

E A hcensms board may direct the staff to pubbsh its enuronmental documents by specific dates if, after affording the parties - mcluding the staff - opportumty to be heard on the mat-ter, it Gnds no funhet delay is sustified. Otishore Power Sprems (Floatmg Nuclear Power Plants). ALAB-489. 8 NRC 194. 208 (1978). See also 49 Fed. Reg. 9352,9361 & n.14,9383-84 (1984) tthe latter to be cndied at 10 C.F.R. ) 51.15).

F NEPA does not address the timing of an enuronmental statement, as long as it is availa-ble by the time of the agency's recommendahon or report on the proposed federal action. New England Coahtion on Nuclear Pollution v. NRC,582 F.2d 87,93-94 (1st Cir.1978).

G The NRC coukt neither authonie a utihty to withdraw water from the Delaware Rner in amounts that esceed that allocated by the DRBC, not require the DRBC to make any particular allocahon decision among the compeung interests for the Delaware River. But the NRC is not precluded from esamtmng the effects of the amount whhdrawn for a nuclear power plant and actirig to lessen the impact of a plant on the Delaware River.

H TN Commimon has an independent responsibihty to fulfill the purposes of NEPA to the fullest extent gesable. 42 U.S C. { 4332. See Tennessee Valley Authonty (Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant, Umts 1 and 2), ALAB-506, 8 NRC 533, 544-49 (1978). But see Bucks County Board of Commissioners v. Interstate Energy Co., 403 F. Supp. 805. 808 (E.D. Pa.1975)

(DRBC is "the federal agency designated to implement NEPA for all projects affecung the Dela-ware Riser Basm~l In carryms out its NEPA dunes, the NRC need not perform a wholly inde-pendent analysis from scratch, but may rely, if it wishes, on scienufic data and inferences drawn by ot!'er agencies.

I To the estent that an apphcanon for an operatma bcense renects some actual changes m connection with the facihty as it was contemplated at the time of issuance of the construcuon permit, such chartges are within the scope of the operstmg hcense proceeding. On the other hand. if activity already authonzed by the construction permit results in impacts not previously espected. that is a matter for resolution by the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulauon pursuant to 10 C F.R. 66 2.202. 2.206. See Consumers Power Co. tMidland Plant, Umts I & 2),

ALAB474.15 NRC 1801 (1982).

3 NEPA does not require the NRC to conuder those enuronmental impacts of a water di-sersion project solely attnbutable to a separate entity otherwise unassociated with the nudear plant, when the total impacts have already been evaluated by another agency with oversight of 13 N,

e9

i i

1 I

DIGESTS l

IS50ANCE5 OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICE,NSING APPEAL BOARDS k

the enure proicct See llenr> v. I PC, $13 F 2d 395 (D C. Cir.1975) See also Kleppe v Sierra j

Club,427 U.S 3% 410 t19'et K

Se.nen 100 of the Nanonal flistoric Prescrunon Act (NHPA) rcquires the head of any federal agero haurg authent) to bcense any undertakng, pnor to the nsuance of any hcense, to take into account the etTest of the undertaking on any'dntrict, site. building, structure, or object that is mcluded in or ebsible for mclusion in the Nanonal Register The head of any such federal agency aho must a!Tord the Adusory Couned on llistoric Preservation a reasonable op-portunity to comment with regard to such undertabng 16 U.S C. ( 470f L

Sectw.n 110(0 of NifPA requires agencies to undertake in advanse all powable planning and actions recessary to mm:mtre any direct and adserse harm to a Natuenal if atonc Landmark as a consegune of any federal approul.16 C S C. ( 470h.2ff),

N1 The requirement of the Fish and Wildiere Coordmauon Act,16 U.S C. ) 662f a) - that i

an agency ~llist shall consu;t~ with the U S. Enh and Wddl.fe Seruce whenever any waters are proposed or authonted to 9e dnerted pursuant to a federal license - does not prewribe exactly when and ho* thn consultation is to occur. so long as it precedes any defimtive agency acuon.

N Secuon 102 of NEPA, 42 U S C. ) 433212)(C). requires consideranon of alternatives on!y for major federal actions signiCeantly affecung the quality of the human enuronment."

O Secucn ? of the Endangered Species Act ( ES A), as amended in 1979,16 U S C, t 153 Mal (2p. proudes that each fedcral agency must, in consultation with and with the assist-arNe of the Secretary of the intenor or Cornmerce, msure that any agency acuon is not likely to jeopardue the continucJ esistence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in l

the Jestructson or adserse raodi6 cation of the habitat nf such species. In fulfilhng this require.

ment. cash agency must use the best scient:6c ami commercial data available.

l 1

P Section

• of ES A does not require acquiescence to Nanonal Nf anne Fishenes Seruce j

ue.s just consultation. 5,erra Club o Frochtke, 534 F 2d 1289,1303-04 (8th Cir 1976). Cf.

Lake Ene U!unce for the Protesuon of the Coastal Corndor v Army Corps of Engmeers,526 l

10t 3. IMI 8% D Pa 1981), arrd, '07 F 2d 1392 (3d Car 1. cert demed.

U.S. -

F %pp 104 S Ct. 2" t1983).

f Q

Congrew did not Jewsn ESA to protest mdntJual members of an endangered species.

l only the speues as a whole The smallest units afforded protecuon are " subspecies" and "any dnunct populanon serrnent. which interbreeds when mature." 16 U.S C. i 1532(16L R

The Commisuon's es parte rules prohibit commumcations between the parties to contest-ed prweedmn nn the one hand, and, on the other, those with decisionmaking responubihues

- i e Crir-mnuoners, their statTs and advisers, members of adjudicatory boards, and their stath and adusert 10 C F R. ( 2 780 See Admimstratne Procedure Act, 5 U S C. 6 557(d).

The "NRC cafT' does rot aduse the Commnuon or the boards. Rather, at is a dnunct an separate entQ that is a party to a proceedmg and may confer with other parues. See 10 C F i.

42102:48 S

AdiuJ:eatory boards c4n act only on apphcanons before them and cannot dictate e' anses m $ush appbcauons that are a rnatter of management prerogative.

T An achcant n o%ged to notify the board and the parues promptly of a-significant sharges in its ipphsanon Tennessee Valley Authority (Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Umts I,2 and 31 ALAB 677,15 SRC 1387,1391-94 (1982).

i U

Parnes to an adjud:catory proceedmg must be afforded an opportunity to challenge any newly amended, ugnificant pornon of an apphcation under consideranon. See Philadelphia Elec.

nc Co (Limenck Generates Sianon, Units I and 2), ALAB 778,20 NRC 42,48 (1984).

l V

in makmg its determinahons, an adjudicatory board must decide only the federal ques-tior's before it, without bemg unduly mfluenced by the deciuons of others with diffenng concerns and responumhues See KerralcGee Corp t%est Chicago Rare Earths Facihty), CLI-82-2,15 NRC 232. 269119427. a:TJ sub nom Cay of West Chicago v. NRC, 701 F.2d 632 (7th Cir.

I 19'138, and cases died See also Cross Sound Ferry Seruces, Inc. v. Umted States,573 FJd 725 l

732 33 (2d Cer 1978:

14 1

h i

Y m.smus

i i

DIG ESTS ISSL' ANCES OF THE ATOst!C SAFETY AND LICENSING APPE AL BOARDS i

I AL AB '86 LOUISigN A POW ER & LIGH T COMPANY (Waterford Steam Electnc Station. Umt

31. Dcoet No 50 332-OL OPER \\ TING LICENSE. October 2.1984; MEMOR ANDUM \\ND ORDER A

The Appeal Board defers ruhns on mienenors' monon to reopen the record on the nsue of the aderaacy of ufety related concrete construction at Waterford, pendmg recetpt of certam information that it requests from the NRC staff.

B A successful motion to reopen the record of an adjudicatory proceeding must be timel).

j address a ugmfkant ufety or enuronmental usue and show that a different result rmght have j

been reached had the riewly prolTered matenal been considered imtially. It must also present I

more t! an bare al:eganons. Louisiana Power & Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electnc Station.

Umi 3. ALAB 753.18 SRC 1321.1324-25 (1983L j

C g newspagr article alone does not provide a basis for reopening a closed adjudicatory l

record.11 at 1324 25 i

D At a mmimum. new matenal in support of a monon to reopen a closed record must be l

set forth with a degree of partic Janty m excess of the basis and specifkity requirements con-tained in 10 C.F R. 2.714Ibn for admisuble contentions. Such supporting information must be more than mere aneganons; it must be tantamount to evidence. And. af such endence is to alTect matenally the previous dectuon. it must possess the attnbutes set forth m 10 C F R.

2.743W de0ning admissible eudence for adiudicatory proceedings (i.e, it must be relevant.

rnatenal. and rehablet Pacinc Gas and Electnc Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. Units I and 2e. AL AB.'75,19 NRC 1361.1366-67 f 1984i See also id. at 1367 n.18 E

The burden of satisfyms the requirements for reopemns a closed record is on the propo-nent of the motion and is a heasy" one. Kanus Gas and Electric Co. (Wolf Creet Generaung Stanon. Umt No. IL AL AB-4e2.

• NRC 320. 338 (1978).

F si a mmirmm. the sta:! has a daty to submit to an adjudicatory board by way of a Board j

Notifkanon any informanon that is clearly relevant to a matter pending before the board. Such nouncanc.n should be umely and mclude a discusuon ofits relevance.

G

%s a general matter, the NRC's Executne Derector for Operanons determines which stal!Mrscnnel test:fy at heant ts. See 10 C F R. ) 2 720th)(2)h).

ALAB 78' LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Sunon. Umt 1).

Docket No. 50-322-OL-4 tLow Powern OPERATING LICENSE; October 5.1984. MEMORAN-DUM \\ND ORDER A

The Appeal Board determines that the Commission has not depnved it of junsdicuon to reuew tre Licenseg Board's disposinon of the entervenors' physecal secunty contenuons m this opera trg hcense prcveeding, and dnmisses. as mterlocutory mtervenors' appeal of the Licenung Board decsion den)eg certam of those contentions.

B Normally :he Commasion does not undertake an immediate effecuveness review of a hcenseg board mma? Jecision :n an operat2ng bcense proceeding unlew the dectuon authon/es facihty operanon at greater than fhe percent of rated power. See 10 C.F R. 2.764f D(IL C

Commnuon imrnediate etTectneness reuews hase no beanns upon the esercne by an appeal *xard of the general appe!! ate reues authonty in 10 C.F R. Part 50 proceedings that n corderred ty 10 C F R. 2.7858ae 10 C F R. 2 764rgt if the Commisuon deures to preclude or to lirm: t*!e eserche of ut aat! ontv en a particular Part 50 proceeding, it must - and does -

say w oprewi> See. e s. Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon. Umt No.14 CLI 79 8.10 NRC 141.147 (1979414.. CLI 81 l9.14 NRC 304, 305 (1981); id.,

CLI.4134.14 NRC 1097.1098 81981L D

The Commiwon's rules of pracuce bar appeal of an mteriosutory order that does not dis-pose of a major wgment of a proceeding, or termmate the participational nghts of a party.10 C1 R 2 ?30fD See Pubhc Senice Co of New Hampshire ISeabrook Stanon. Units I and 2).

ALAB *31.17 NRC 1073.10?4 75 (198D. quotmg Toledo Edison Co. tDavis-Besse Nuclear Power Smons. AL AB 300, 2 NRC *$2. 758 (1975). and ciung Houston Lighting & Power Co.

(Allens Creek Ncear Genermung Stanon. Unit No.11. ALAB-635,13 NRC 309, 310-18 81981: By was cf contrast, see Kansas Gas and Electnc Co. (Wolf Creek Generaurig Stanon.

Umt le. AL AB '94. 20 NRC 145 (1984L i

15 I

1 I

~.

.m

DIG ESTS 1530ANCIS OF Tile ATO\\ llc SAFETY AND LICEN5tNG APPEAL BOARDS ALAB 788 LONG isL OD LIGilflNG COMP ANY 15horeham Nuclear Power Station. Omt 17.

Dnsket No 50 322 0L. OPER ATING LICF NSE. October 31.1%4. DECISION The Arpeal BoarJ af6rms the iminal decnion rendered by the LKenung Board in this A

prerating bcense proceedes. LBP.83-57,18 NRC 445 (1983), with the esception of three mat-ters that are remanded to the Licenung Board: til the question whether the plant may be operated pendmg resolution of a speci6ed unresobed safety issue; (2) resolution of certa n issues associated with housekeepmg; and Of the issue of enuronmental quah6 cat 4on of electncal equipment. Additionally. the Appeal Board s acales as unnecessary a condition imposed by the Licensmg Board requiring the apphcant to adopt a particular definition of the regulatory term "important to safety "

The quaht) assurance requirements contamed in 10 C F R. Part 30. Appendis B or their B

equnalent do not automatNall) apply to "important to safety" strustures. systems and compo.

nents of a nudear power plant.

C The Atomic Energy Act of 1954. as amerided, makes clear the Commnsion's aumonty to regulate all items contained in a riudear power plant m order to protect the pubhc hea.th and ufety. See 42 U.S C 220lbs The NRC espects twenwes to adhere to their obbgations and commitments and stil not D

hesitate to issue apprornate orJers to make sure that such commitments are met 10 C.F R Part

2. Appendis C l IV E.

E There is no eipress regulatory prerrme for requinns a engle study directed esclusnely to sptems interactions at nudear power plants See generally Pacific Gas and Elecine Co Deablo Can>on Nudear Po*er Plant. Umts I and 21. AL AB 725.17 NRC 777 $10-11 (1983). Bat. an appbcant must demonstraic that safety sptems are not compromned because of their interrefa-tionship with nonufety or other safety systems.

F where there a a genenc uriresuhed safety mue (USI) involung a diwerned wrety problem, the statiis ebhged to esplam why the USI does not stand m the path of construction permit or operstmg 1: cense hsuance. See Virgima Electne and Power Co (North Anna Nuclear Power Si4 tion. Units I and 28. ALAB-491. & NRC 245. 24b48119787 and Gulf States Utahties Co. t Rner Berid Stanon. Umts I and 2). ALAB-444. 6 NRC 760,775 (1977).

G Cntenon Mill of Appendit B to 10 C.F R Part 50 requires that a compretensive -

setem of planned and periedic asdits be carned out to serify cnmpliance with and determme ef-fectn enen of the Append:s B quabiy auurance program. Random-sa nphng s:at;sucal methodology, homeser, n not raandated by t%s requirement.

Il Quality auutarse reue4 irnolves two separate. Det mterrelated, inquines, t e-, ahether denuencies have Nen uncosered and corrected, and whether a genenc problem custs that could 4trect the con 61ence m the safety of the facihty See Omon Electne Co. (Calia*4y PIant.

Umt 18. ALAB 740.18 NRC 343. M6 (1983r.

I Error free construction of a nuclea power plant is not mandated for Ocensing Rather, the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. as amended and the Commnwon's implementes regJations require a findirig of reasonable anurance that. as built the facihty can and will be operated with-out endangentig the pubhc hea:th and safeu. Ibid.

J In cuammms daims of quehty anurance dc6cencies, an adjudicatory board must consid-er the implKation of those dc6aencies in terms of safe plant operatiort Ibid K

in reuc*ms quahty amrance. an ad.udicatory board must be satnlled not only that con.

struction defects have been corrected but that there has been no overall breakdown of quahty suurance. See abid Numerr.,us imperfections, esen if mmor, may be mdicative of a more wide-spread or genenc quahty anurance problem.

L Not escr> uotation of a %uahty assurance implementing manual or procedures const2tutes a uotation of in C F R. Part 50. Appendis B. See 10 C F.R. Part 2, Appendix C. { WA.

M Cntenon Ult! of 10 C F R. Part 50. Appendis B does not establish requirements for the maumum amount of time allowed in tracmg the data used in design calculation, but requires umply that records be identifiable and retnesabte.

N Cnierion I cf 10 C F R. Part 50. Appenda B requires that the persoris and orgamrations pertorr.ung qu4hty aswrance functions hase sufliaent authonty and organsrational freedom to identify quahiy problems; imtiate, recommc.d. at proude solutions. and verify implementation of solutions-4 16

I DIG ESTS ISSUANLES OF Tile ATON!!C SAFETY AND LICEN5ING APPEAL BOARDS i

O

\\lere demonsratwn that a heenung boarJ crred is not sufficient to marrant appellate t

f rehef C escLnd E!cc:rg 1:lummaang Co (Perry Nucle.tr Power Plant. U nits I and 21.

ALAB44). 6 NRC '41. '56 (19"e, The complumns party must demonstrate actual prejudwe

- i e. ; hat the ruMg had a substantial etTect on the outcome of the proceeding. Loumana Power a-J L ght Co. i%aierford Steam Electne Staaon. Uma 31. ALAB 732.17 NRC 1076.

r i

1090143i P

L ader the Cernmimon's rules of pracixe, an adjudicatory board must use its powers to assure that the heaneg is focused topon the matters m controsersy and that the heanng process is conducted as espectiously as possib!e. consntent with the desclopment of an adequate decmonal record.10 C.F R. Part 2. Appenda A. 4 V Ad;udicatory beards may impose time limits on cross-cum nation. regaire parties to pursue certun matters first. or limit endenbary matenal to that mferma' ion that ;$ genumely the subject of controsersy.

t Q

Certain matters may be left to the s:2ff for post-heanng resolution where heanngs would i

not be he ;ful and the adjudicatory board can raake the findings requnite to issuance of a f

heense. Conschdated EJnon Co cf Nc= York ilndian Pomt Stanon. Uma No. 2). CLI 74-23. 7 f

AEC 94'. 951119'48 R

Regulatory guides do not set out mandatory regulatory requirements. Slethods and solu-uons dit?crent from these set out m the guedes can be acceptable if they provide a basis for the 4

fmdmis re@n.te to tr.e ruuance of a licethe. \\letropohtan Edisen Co. (Three Side Island Nucle-g at Stat:en. Umt No li. ALAB-648.16 NRC 1290.1299 (1982p. rev'd m part on other grounds, j

CLI 8J 22.19 NRC 244 41983).

1 5

5eamie design responw spettra set forth m Regulator) Guide (Reg. Guide) 1.60 are de-ugned f>r applaabC) at ewentially any lesanon m the countr> and ma> be unnecessanly con-scrutne W some p! arts 'Devgn Response Spectra for Senmic Devgn of Nuclear Power Plants? Reg Guide I es iRev. la iDec.1973p.

T TMe mere pendenq of confirmator) staff analyses regardmg htigated mues does not auto-matican) frestose NarJ resolution (f those issues.

U 5 econ 199 cf.he Ainmie Eners> Act. 42 U S C. 4 2239. which proudes parues.ith an 4

eanng. does not pic61ude the adoption of procedures for untten opporte a for cross.eumnanon V

ine Admirag atne Proced.re \\ct i AP u. 5 U S C. 6 556fd). exprewly authorizes agen-

'l cies m certain heers. g cases to advrt procedures for the submimon of all or part of the esiJence in untisa form as rg as the part:es are not prejudiced.

l T?e APA dce Sct gne praes 41 unbrmted right to s bmit rebuttal endence and con-duct c ess-esamma:.e Rather, these r ghts are bounded by a need for a full and true disclosure of the facts INd X

Tse followeg :echmcal niaes are dncuncJ Safe Shutdo.n Earthquake; Quahiy Assur-ance Re.; :rements. Important to Safet) and Safety-Related. Turbine Bypass 5> stem; Reactor Core leat:on Cocl:rg #RCICs Sptem. Standb> Liquid Control (SLC System, liigh %ater Level Tnr. Rod B.co Momtor IRBM r. Reactor Water Cleanup (R% CU) System; 5>sems Interuttn. Unrewned Safety lwwe (USI A-l? 15ptems Interactioni. USI A-47 (Control -

Setem Fadurew Prr&behsuc Ra Assessrrents (PRA>; Esent Tree / Fault Tree Methodology of a PR 4. Housekeerms. Control of Caku:anons. Separation of Elecincal Cables. Quahty Assur-

{

ance O gamiation. W ater ihmrrer. Enuronmental Quahrecation. Post-Accident Momtonng. Pas-sne Muhamcal \\ ae Fadure, snucipated Transient Without Scram (ATW5s; ASME Code; j

Smgle Falare Cnte en. Scram; Senmic Design. Eanhquake Motion idisplacement, selocity, i

l accclerat.ont. Senme Response Spectrum; Mark Il Contamment; Vacuum Breakers; Des gn Baus Loah Cnnta.nment Leikage Tests; Safe y Rehef Vahes d5RVs) (Two-Stage and Three-Stage SR\\ p.

AL A B-719 PHILADELPtils ELECTRIC CO\\lPANY 'Limenck Generatmg Stanon. Units I and 2). Duet Nos. 50 352 (0-353. OPER ATING LICEN5E; Nmember 5.1944. MEMORAN.

DUM OD ORDER A

The Appeal BeirJ demes mtersenors' monces that sea a way of the nsuance of a low-power t.ense for tre Limench facihty. Treaurig the monons as requests to suspend the low-lHeer Dcense autheneauen (because the hCense h3J alread) f%ued by the time the Appeal i

17 i

e N

"' -WWe wusae -

m m

_m a

T c

I DIG ESTS ~

ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOstIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS 4

Board recened the motionst, the Appeal Board finds that the stay criteria have not been satisfied and that one of the motions is untimel)

B in ruhng on a su) request. appeal boards are required by the Commission's Rules of Practwe to conader the same four (actors traditionally apphed by courts in deciding similar t18 mhetner the moung party has made a strong showmg that it is hkely to prevail on motions.

L-the merits; (21 whether the party will be streparably injured unless a stay is granted; Of whether

+

the granting of a stay would harm other parties; and (4) where the public interest hes.10 C.F.R.

{ 2.788(et C

The second factor contained in 10 C F R. l 2.788(cf. trreparable harm. is often the most important in determining the need for a stay. United States Department of Energy (Chnch River Breeder Reactor Plant). ALAB-72I.17 NRC 539. 54144 (1983), Pubhc Sernce Co. of Indiana

- (51arble lii!! Nuclear Generating Station. Units I and 2), ALAB437. 6 NRC 630,632 (1977).

D The issuance of a lo power beense does not begin an inesorable" process that threat-ens the public safety. A.*u!! pomer hcense mill not and cannot be issued to any utihty untilit has demonstrated that the plant in question can be operated safely and in accordance with myriad -

regulatory requirements.

E If a safety problem is rescaled at any time during low pomer operation or as a result of the merits reuew of a party's appeal of authorization of that operation. the lo* power license 1

1 can be suspended.. See, e s.. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Uma 11. CLI.81-30,14 NatC 950 (1981L 4

F The Commission's long-held ues on economic concerns is that they are not within the proper scope of swues Imgated in NRC bcenung proceedmss. A nuclear plant's possible etTect I

on rates the utthty's sahency and the hke are best raised before state economic regulatory l

- agencies. Pubhc Serswe Co of Nem flampshire (Seabrook Station. Umt 27, CLI 84-6,19 NRC 1

975 (19841 l

G Under 10 C F R 4 2388tal and 2.710, a party is obhged to seek a stay within 15 days I

of the scrswe date of a hcensing board decivon.

I 11

- A party's motion for stay mill be demed where the mosant wholly fails to address the j

stay critena of 10 C.F R 6 2388det See Pubhc Seruce Co. of Indiana Blarble mit Nuclear r

i Generatmg Station. Umts I and 2), ALAB493. 8 NRC 253. 270-71 Il978L a

ALABJ90 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY (North Anna Power Station. Umts I l

and 23. Docket Nos. 50-338-OLA.2. 50-339 OLA 2; OPERATING LICENSE ANIENDNIENT;

}

Nosember 20.1984 NIESIORANDC51 AND ORDER A

Determining that in the particular circumstances of the case, the appellant had sustained l

no present or potentrai mjury by the Licensing Board's demal of its intervention petition, the Appeal Board dnmisses its appeal from that demal.

B Secticn 102(218Ci of the National Ennronmental Pohey Act of 1969, 42 U.S C.

l l

4332(2HCI. requires a federal agero io prepare an enuronmental impact statement (EIS) in

(

l csery recommendation or report on proposals for legniation or other major federal actions sigmfi.

cantly affecteg the quahty of the human enuronment. If, howeser after an imtial enwronmental j

aucument, the agency Jetermmes that no ugmficant impact will result from a proposed action, without add.t!onal analy us it may pubbsh a statement 'necating that such is the case g

?

C' It is sell-settled that in Commisuon practace as in judicial proceedmgs, only a party ag-d i

grieved may appeal. Panfic Gas and E!ccaric Co (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Po cr Plant, Umts I I

& 2h ALAB444,13 NRC 903,91418981), and cases there cited.

l ALAB 791 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY. et at (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, l

Umt th Docket No 50 289 SP IRestart Proceedms-Management Re<nand); SPECIAL i

PROCEEDING; Decernber 3,1984. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER l

A' The Appeal Board, conclu&ng that H.terlocutory appellate review is not warranted.

demes mtersenorN motion seeking directed certification and rescrsal of a Licenung Board ruling i

4 that presented intersenor irom mtroducing mio evidence the testimony of two former NRC C

Commissioners.

B The Ethics in Gosernment Act prohibits former federal ofrwials from attempting to in-fluence their former agencies eith respect to particular matters in which they were personally 3

and substantia!!y insolved shale gosernment employees.18 U S C. ( 207 fat f

IS

+

4 6

f L

7 4

w m se

_ _,, m.. - - -

I DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS C

FaiLre of a party to address the standards for directed ceruncanon in responding to a mot on seeking such reuem may be construed as a master of any argument regarding the propne-ty of directeJ certi6cauon Cf. Pubhc Seruce Co. of New Hampshire (Seabrook Station, Umts I and 27 AL AB 734,18 NRC 11,14 n.4 (1983).

D la deciJeng whether to esercise its directed certi6 canon authority, an appeal board consid-I ers whether a hcensing board ruhng either (1) threatens the party adversely affected by it with immediate and senous irreparable impact which, as a pracucal matter, could not be alleviated by 1

a later appeal, or 12) affects the bawc structure of the proceeding in a pervasive or unusual I

manner. Pubbe Seruce Co_ of New Hampshire (Scabrook Stauon, Urhts I and 2) ALAB-737, 18 NRC 168.178 (19831 quonns Pubhc Service Co. ofIndiana (Marble Hill Nuclear Generating

}

Stauon, Units I and 27, ALAB 405. 5 NRC 1890, i192 (1977).

j E

Determmanons reprding what esidence should be admitted rarely,if ever, have a perva-sise or unmal effect cn the structure of a proceedmg so as to "varrant interlocutory intercession

]

by an appeal beard. See Long Island Lighting Co. Gamesport Nuclear Power Stanon, Umts I

(

and 21, ALAB-353,4 NRC 381 (1976); Toledo Edison Co. (Das-Besse Nuclear Power Stanon, j

Umt 1), AL AB414, 3 NRC 98 (1976). See also Clevelano E:ectric tilummaung Co. (Perry

'f Nuclear Po=er Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-675,15 NRC !!O), Ill) (1982) (error must funda-mentally alter the very shape of the proceeding to warrant mterlocutory review).

F j

The fact that an esidentiary ruims involves a matter that may be novel or important does not alter the stnct standards for directed certification. See Virgrua Electric and Power Co.

(North Anna Po er Station. Units I and 2), ALAB 741,18 NRC 371 (1983).

,l G

The Commission's Statement of Pohcy on Conduct of Licer: sing Proceedmas, CLI 818, 13 NRC 452. 456 (1981t, neither eupheitly nor imphcitly relanes the standards for directed certincahon. Ra;her, is simply enhorts the hcensing boards to put before appeal boards legal or pohey quesuoas that. m their judgment, are sigmficant and require prompt appellate resoluuon.

North Anna. supra,18 NRC at 375 See also Long Island Lighting Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Po*er Stanon Umt is. ALAB 780,20 NRC 378,382 (1984), Anzona Public Service Co. (Palo Verde Nuc: car Generaurg Stanon Umts 2 and 31, ALAB 742,18 NRC 380,384 n 10 (1983).

If The :arguage reprdmg directed ceruGcauon m i VWI48 of Appendix A to the Rules of Pracuce. hke the Comnmsuon's Pohcy Statement CLI-81-8, supra,13 NRC at 456, does not relas the staMards for directed cerancauon.

ALABJ92 LOLISI ANA POWER & LIGliT COMPANY (Waterford Steam Electric Stauon, Umt

31. Docket No 50482 0L; OPER ATING LICENSE: December 12,1984; M EMOR A N DUM A

The Appeal Board determmes that it has Junsdiction to rule on intervenors' motion to reopen the record where the motion raises issues that have a reasonable nexus to other issues mil pendmg ttfore et B

lhes that c2nnot properly be raised m adjudicauon may be presented in a petition filed under 10 C F R i 2 206 *ith the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulauon (NRR).

C if an appeal board has preuously cons +dered aa issue and (by either the scuon or inaction of the Comm:suon> the determinauon amounts to Onal agency acuan on that issue, the appeal board has no junwhetion oser a subsequent attempt to raise that matter once again. Such requests are, in general, more properly directed to NRR, even though other issues m the same proceedmg rnay still be peMing before the board. When an issue sought to be considered anew, or to be re.

considered, has a reasonab:e nesus to a discrete matter sull pending before an appeal board. the board has sur:sdicuon over it. See Pacific Gas ard Electnc Co. fDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB 782,20 NRC 538,840-42 (1984), Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Eclear 5: anon, Unit No.17, ALAB-73,19 NRC 981, 983 (1984); Louisiana Power & Light Cu Iw terford Steam Electne Stanon, Uma 3), ALAB-753,18 NRC 1321,1329 a

30 (1984), F!onda Po er and Light Co. (St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Urut No. 2). ALAB-579, il NRC 223,224-26 (1980); Virgmaa Electnc and Power Co. (North Anna NuclearPower Stanon. Umts I and 21. ALAB-551, 9 NRC 704, 705-09 (1979); Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana f Marble Hill Genernur g Stauon, Umts ! and 2), ALAB 530, 9 NRC 261, 262 (1979); Pubhc Service Co of Ne* Har pshire (Seabrook Station, Umts ! and 27 ALAB 513,8 NRC 694,695-96 (1978)

D The fact that an appeal board's pending inquiry m.a an issue anses from a motion to reopen, ratter than from an appeal frorn a Licensing Board decision, is of no moment to a 19

,~

DIGESTS 1st, ANCES OF THE ATO\\ llc SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BO4RDS L

determinatmn of its Junsdiction oser a related matter Rather. 4s was stated in North Anna.

supra 9 NRC 4 709. the decisne factor is whether. except for thow hmited issues as to which Junw!Ktion has been esprewly retained, the case has been decided The focus in determimns junsJNticn a ott whether anJ what mues remain before the board. not how they got there.

ALAB 793 COM410Nw E \\LTH Edison CostP \\NY iB>ron Nuclear Power Sianon. Umts I anJ 2). Dodet Not STN $0-454. STN 50-455. OPER ATING LICENSE December 20. 1934 f

DECISION 5

A The Appeal Board afGrms the Licenung Board's authorizauon of the issuance of operat-i ing hccrbes for the two-umt B)ron facihty. It does so by affirmirs the Licensmg Board's imtial deciuon tLBP 84 2.19 NRC 36 (19840 m part and the supplemental irutial decision (LBP to the Appeal Board's deciuon l

41, 20 SRC 1203 (1984i) issued by that Board pursuant' n

(ALAB 770.19 NRC !!63 (198416 on the applwant's appeal oi the imtial decision B

A party as always free to urge the alTirmance of a tnal (nbunal's result on grounds other than those assigned by that inbunal. See, e g. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp INine Mile Pomt i

Nuclear Station. Umt 2L ALAB.264,1 NRC 347. 357 tl975L j

C Ltihties engaged m the construction of nuclear power plants are required by the Commis-sion's regulations to hase a quahty assurance program that, among other things. Sen6es that ac-j tivities atTectmg the safety-related functions of structures, systems, and components have been i

performeJ correctly.10 C F R. Part 50. Appendin B, Critenon 1.

I D

W hile it must retam ulumate responsibility for full comphance with all quality assurance requirements. an appheant may delegate to its construction corttractors the estabhshment and ed j

ecuuon of andnidual quahty assurance programt Ibid.

E An integral part of all asceptable construstion quality assurance programs is cortfidence that the mdniduals carrymg out the inspesnons have the quahCcanons to ful618 their respontbih-ties properly.

F it is of crucial importance in the assenment of the adequacy of a quality assurance pro-i gram that there be satisfactory praof of the mspestors' quahneauons. Normally, that proof will take the form of Quahty assurance documemanon estabhshmg that the indnidual sti queshon has the traimng and esper ence appropnate to has or her awgned furiction anJ has p4ued any requi-ute quahf> tag exammanons.

G Erfectne Arn! 26. 1982. the Comn inion amended its regulauons to prohibit the linga-non of need for power and abernatne ene g> source issues m operatmg hcense proceedings. 47 Fed. Reg 12.940 il952s. The prombiuon currently is found m 10 C F.R. f t.53 sci. See also 10 C.F R. 5123 es H

With n this agene, only the Commnuon itself has the authonty to insahdate one of its own rules or regulauens See 10 C F R.2.*58 tat Kansas Gas and Eleetnc Co twolf Creek Generating Stanon. lmt is. AL AB-784. 20 NRC 845, 846 (19148 Potomac Elecr:c Power Co.

(Douglas Pomt Nuetear Generaung Station. Umts I and 27. AL \\B-218,8 AEC 79. 69 (1974L I

Undergiriir's t h 1982 araendment prohibiting htrgauon of need for power and a!ternatise energy scarces swues et the operat:rg hcense stage oas the Commission's Ochef IM41. as a general matter, no useful pur;me is sersed by sonudennt sash matters at that time. See 47 Fed Reg.

12,940 3

Ul nuclear po*er plants must be Jewgned and built to protect the pudhe from the hazards c,( T4dicatne releases should the plant be subjected to mosements m the earth's crust.

Pacinc Gas and Electne Co (Di4Mo Caaten Nuclear Power Plant. Umts I & 2!. ALAB 644.13 NRC 903. 409 (1981s. quotmg Pxif.c Gas and Eicctric Co tDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power i

Plant. Umts I A 21. ALAB-519. 9 NRC 42,45 (1979L K

Under the Cornmission's regulatory wheme, protection from mosements in the earth's crust is achieved in part through the requirement that the plant be designed to withstand the i

manimum ubratory ground motion bn terms of acceleranon) that rmght resul. upon the occur-rence of one of t*o d.fferent pombie senmic events the Safe Shutdown Earthquase (SSEs and the Operatmg Basis Earthquake IOBEL 10 C F R.100. Appendis A. tv Illic). (dt L

The 55E is the most fewerfut earthquake ever expected to oscur at a plant site. The i

plant must be ab}c to withstand the forces of the SSE without re!caung dangerous quantities of radioactmty Diablo Canyon. AL AB-644. supra,13 NRC at 911.

e i

I Io 1

l

-w.m.-

~

a 0

4 f

DIG ESTS

{

ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC 5AFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS i

M The OBE is the s:rongest earth,;uake considered hkely to occur dunns a plant's operating i

I:fenme. The faedity must be desisned and 1vilt to funct on through the OBE without creating I

undue rnk to the public health and safety. Ibid N

The ubratory ground acceleranon assigned to the OBE must be at least one-half that as-signed to the SSE unless a lesser salue is junified.10 C F.R.100. Appendit A, (( II. V(a)(2);

4

.I Diablo Canycn. ALAB444, supra.13 NRC at 989 92.

l.

O Before selecting the SSE and OBE that are to serse as the design bases for its proposed facihty, a utility is required to insestigate in sufGcient scope and detad, inter aba, the structural d

geologic condiuons of the site and surrounding region including its geologic history.10 C.F.R.

i

]

100. Appendis A. 9 IV.

a P

If there is a fault within 200 miles of a site that might be of significance in estabhshing j

the SSE. the appheant rm.st further determine whether that fault is capable?* lbed.

l Q

A fault is a large-scale dislocanon or distortion etthin the earth's crust along which dif-1-

ferenual sbppage of the adjacent earth matenals has occi.tred parallel to the fracture plane. Id.

-t l

% !!!(et 1

j R

A capable fault is Jefined in 10 C.F.R. Part 100. Appendix A. { I!!(s) as a fault which s

1 has exhibited or e of mere of the following characteristics:

j

!. Mosement at or near the ground surface at least once within the past 35.000 years or I

rnosement of a recurrms nature within the past 500.000 years. -

2. Macro-,eismicity ingrumentally determined with records of sufficent precision to 1

demongrate a deect relanceship with the fault

3. A str ctatal relatonship to a capabte fault according to charactenstics (I) or (2) of this paragraph such the mosement on one could be reasonably espected to be accompanied by mesement on :he other.

S If t'ere is a capa?.e fault wanm 200 miles of a plant. it must then be evaluated for its pmenual for caaung u* nory grounJ monon and surface dnplacement, and taken into account I

in estabhsvg :ne SSE. ld 4 IWu* and His. IVf bt T

If 49 sesi:gaue-both demonstrates that a rarucutar fault is structurally associated with 4

2 g:ologicalls Od structaM features tsush as many of those found an the eastern region of the

~

Lnited Steesi and uneSers no affirmaine estdence of capabihty. that fault shall be presumed to be not ceaele IJ. i Ill'gt C

Fac.re of a par:y to brief issaes adequately deprises the adjudicatory boards precisely of l

that assnian.c whwh the Rules of Prxuce are deugned to hase an appellant provide. i e. to t.csh nut t e hats bones ewcphons with the preene porton of the record rehed on in support of h

the assernon of errer.10 C F R. 6 2162(ai and to present the boards with sufficent iriformation i

i er argumeri:o dios an.n:clkgent dispomucn of the swes. See Consumers Pomer Co. (Midland P: ant. Uncs : and 2r. ALAB-270. I %C 473,475 819*3t V

Un::et ta long standing practue the Appeal Board reucus. Sua sponte. any final disposi.

Lon of a l'cer.smg proceejmg that ec*:er mai or had to be founded upon substanuse determina-l-

t ons of s 6mf e4nt saft:y or ensironmenta! nsues. OtTshore Power Systems (Manufactunns tacense for F:cems Nicar Power Plants), 4 LAB-684. Its NRC 1187. 890 (1982); Sacramento i

Muracipal L:: Sty Dntret 8 Rancho Seso Nustear Generatmg Stations. AL AB463.14 NRC 799..

iO3 #1981>. mung w stungton Pue! c Pomer Surpiy Setem 8% PPSS Nuclear Project No. 27 a

4 ALAB.371. In NRC 65' 692 fl979s; Philadelphia Electric Co. (Pexh Bottom Atomic Power i

Stauon Crms 2 and 36 4 LAB 504. 4 NRC 46'9,683 n s 41971L y^

The fo: lowing techmcat issues are dacussed-Quhty Assurance Program f and Reinspec.

tien Programu Quhty imurance Inspector Ceruficahon and Quahficahon. Seismic Design

+

iOperaung Baus Eartmake (OBEs and %fe Shutdo*n Earthquke (SSED: Capable Faults;-

4 Earthquke Gmund Acce:eranon. Core Dnmng; Refracten Senmography: Relatise Age Dating of Fault. wctute ye Datms of Fault. Scarp for escarpmente. Modified Mercalh Intensity Scale; Richter Scale; Caie Tray Hargers. % hole Body Countmg and Stronnum 90.

1 ALA8/94 - DLKE POW ER COMPANL ei al 8Catamba Nuclear Stanon. Units I and 28. Docket i

h 50-413-OL 50-4;4-OL: OPERATING LICE.NSE. December 24. 1984 MEMORANDUM OD ORDER

-A The Appeat Board dentes mtersenors' apphcat on for a stay of the authoritauen of the -

low power Scense issi.e4 in this operaung hcense proceeding for Unit I of the Catawba facihty.

1 l

t-21 4

4 i

i

?

a o

b* m,

.-.0,

a DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BO ARDS The Board determines that the stay criteria set forth at 10 C F.R. 2.788(e) have not been satisfied.

8 The estabhshed criteria to be applied in passing upon stay requests in NRC adjudicatory proceedings are set forth in 10 C F.R. 2.788(e):

(1) Whether the moung party has made a strong showing that it is likely to prevail on the merits, j

(2) Whether the party will be irreparably injured unless a stay is granted; (3) Whether the granting of a stay would harm other parties; and j

(4) % here the pubhc interest hes.

C The NRC's stay critena are the same as those appbed by the courts. See, e.g., Virginia Petroleum Jobtiers Ass'n v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921 (D C. Cir.1958); Washington Metropohtan l

Area Transit Comm*n v. liohday Tours, Inc.,559 F.2d 841 (D C. Cir.1977).

D Under NRC Rules of Practice, stay apphcations may not exceed ten pages'in length. See l

10 C.F.R. 2.788(bs.

f E

The second factor contained in section 2 788(e) of 10 C F.R.. arreparable harm, is often the most important in determining the need for a stay Philadelphia Electric Co. (Limenck Generating Station, Units I and 2), ALAB.789,20 NRC 143,1446 (19841,and cases cited.

I I

?

I f

f i

s 22

1 I

l i

i I

l 1

i i

i DIG ESTS 155 LANCES OF THE ATO\\ llc SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS i

[

LBP-84 26 KANS 45 G AS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, et at (Wolf Creek Generating Stauon, Umt 2

1p, Docket No 50-482-OL i ASLBP No. 81453-03 OLs; OPERATING LICENSE; July 2,1984; I

INITIAL DECISION A

The Licensirig Board issues an initial Decison authorizmg the issuance of an operatog j

license for the Wolf Creek Generating Station. Unit No.1, provided two conditions have been met pnor to the issuance of the operating twense.

B Hasms accepted the benents of a stipulation, one is estopped from challenging it. Toledo Ednon Co Daus Besw Nuclear Power Stanon), ALAB-300. 2 NRC 752,767-68 (1975L j

C At the operating license stage, a Licenung Board passes cnly upon contested matters.

W hile a Licens.ng Board has the residual power to deh e into any senot.s matter, even if no party has put it into issue. here the Board determines that there were no senous matters which it should raise sua sponte ard thus. the deciuon as to ail other matters which need be considered I

I pner to the iswance of this operating twense is the responubility of the NRC StatT and it alone.

10 C F R h 2104s ). 27 tea; 10 C F R. Part 2. Appendis A, Villtbi; Consolidated Edison Co.

c of New York fir:dian Point. Units 1. 2 & 31. ALAB 319. 3 NRC 188 (1976L D

If the Lwenung Board. purwant to 10 C F R. 4 2.754, directs that all parties should nie proposed f ndets of fact, wndusions of 124 and bnefs, any party fashrig to Gle these submissions shall be deemed in default Flonda Power & Light Co (St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Uma 2).

AL \\B-280. 2 NRC 3. 4 n 2 i1975)

E Errergency plannmg is a conunuous process and a Licenung Board's 6ndmgs are predic-l Ine j

F Mmor details. *hicn are not set forth m the emergency plans, are a proper subject for l

j post heanns resolunon by :he Nr..~ StatT Lousuana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam I

Elecinc Stancn. L'mt 31 \\ LAB 732.17 NRC 1076,1106 (1983L j

G The fo!!o*ms techn:calissue is disuwed: Emergency Plans.

LBP 84 2' KANS AS G AS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al (Wolf Creek Generatmg Station Umt 11 Ocsk et No 50-482-OL ( ASLBP No 81-453 03-OLn OPERATING LICENSE, July 26, 1094. MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER

)

A Pursuant in Arpheants' Monon for Ctanncanon. concurred in by all parties, the Licens-mg Board clanties its Imtral Deciuon *LBP 84 26,20 NRC 53) issued on July 2,1984.

l LBP-84 28 CLE\\ ELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIN ATING COMPANY. et al (Perry Nuclear Power i

Plant, Un is 1 and 2s, DNket Nos 50 440-OL, 50 441-OL; OPERATING LICENSE; July 26, i

19it4. MEMORANDUM OD ORDER A

The Lsenung Board. haung admitted a broad emergency planning content on pnor to i

the compiction of State and local plans, grants Applicants' mouon to require intervenors to " par-j tic ianse" its contention by proudmg speci6 city and bases.

B

% hen a broad con *ention has been admitted at an earty stage in the proceedmg mterse.

]

nors shoufJ be required to proude greater specincity and to particulanze bases for the contention I

when the infr$rmation required to do so has been deseloped.

I LBP 84 29 THE REGENTS OF THE LNit ERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (UCLA Research Reactorp.

l Docket No Sn 142-OL; FACILITY LICENSE RENEWAL; July 17, 1984; MEMORANDUM i

A Lgensmg Board reuews allegations of misconduct made agamst technical members of l

the NRC Stati and conctuces that although the mformation availab8e to the Board does not j

conclausely show rmwonduct. that mformanon does raise conecrns for the integnty of the adju-I.

dnatory proun Thew concerns are brought to the Commission's attenuon for whatever action 1

1 1

1 23 I

I l

l l

-~

(

DIGESTS ISSL ANCE5 OF THE ATO\\ llc S AFETY AND LICENSING BO A RDS et deems neccoar) \\dJ:ncV!>. the Board recommends that the Commiss;on take up a Staff proposal for rutemaking *hsh it had earher declined to entertain LBP-84-20 % SUFFOLK COUNT) AND STATE OF NEW YORK NtOTION FOR Dl5QU ALIFICA-TlON OF CHIEF \\D\\tlNISTRATI\\ E JUDGE COTTER (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station.

Umt th Decket No 50 322-OL-4 4\\$LBP No. 84-503-01 We i. Dl5QU ALIFICATION.

August 1.1994, \\f E\\ TOR ANDUNI AND ORDER A

The C*uef Admimstrat:se Judge of the Atomic safety and Licenung Board Panel demes intersenor 5ctfolk Ceunty, rmation for recusal on the grounds that he has no adjudwatory re-sponubehbes in Connection a.th the Shercham proceeding and consequently no adjudicatory re-sponsibility from whsh to recuse himself B

The rules gosermng notions for recusa! and their resolution are generally the same for the admimstratne judictars as for the mdn.ial branch itseif, and the Commisuon has followed that practice.

C The Chief Admirustra*ne Judge of the Atomic Safety and Lsensing Board Panel has no authonty to deside any usue pending in tne Shoreham proceeding, and consequently no adjudica-tory responubiht) from whsh to recuse himself D

The Chief Adminwratae Judge of the Atomw Secty and twenung Board Panel has no authonty to refaw to perter-the adminstratne responsibihties of bs roution LBP 84 298 CAROLIN A POW ER & LIGHT CO\\lP\\N) and NORTH CAROLIN A EASTERN

\\tl NICIPAL POW ER AGENCY (Shear.,n Harns Nucle 2r Power Pant. Units I arid 2L Docket Nos 50 4u0. 50 4al I \\$LBP No. 82 4'2 03-Olt. OPER Al'ING LICENSE. August 3.1984 FIN 4L SET OF RL LINGS ON AD\\ll551BILIT) OF OFFSITE E\\tERGENC) PLANNING CONTEN TIONS Rl LING ON PETITION F OR W \\l% E R OF NEED-FOR POW E R RULE.

AND NOTICE OF L PCO\\tlNG TELEPHONE CONFERENCE C \\LL A

In this \\lemor4rde and OrJer. the Lwenung Board corapletes its ruhngs on the ad-mauhibly of the oser ids e e gency pt emns wntentions submit cJ by sanous intersenors B

Emergena pLm re not called upon hs rest.lanon or gudance to gne an account of matenals audaNe ter eu..ee deconum. nation NUREG Oe54 iosuses on prosiding for decon-taminapon of emergene wc %ers. who would be hkely to face greater contaminauen dangers

- esaluaten,ri eria under 4 II K in NL REG-ot 54 Ho*eser, the than esacuees *ouil $ee t

plans must show that the re enubility fer es acuee decontammation has been esigned to organi.

sations *hhh *di be 4de ns a traincJ :o 6arry Nt tr:e taA C

Any urge Jetnn:. - aanon et cusuces or sehees 4: ihe border of the pLme EPZ

• ould sery h6ce imrede mmpt eu. anon of tne mmt threatened part of the population arosnd the punt Tne Jewra o noid p.rported safety menures (P.it 40uld in pede esseuation is ret'ected in cubanon cr:t mn 11 J 10 9 of NL REGM4 li calls fnt uting the host areas, and thus the pnncipal Jc.ontavation ceders. "at ient 5 mdet and preferably 10 rmles. be>ond the tmundanes of the pee 1 P/l "

D The emph4us in eu aaen sn:eria 11 \\1 I and !! \\t 3 4 in NLREG-0654 is on planmng for the dectuon to reemer. "t en meawres to be esecuted dunns reentry and recosery Presum-ably. the thought bmnd 'P s emphau a that the deciuon to reenter is equitaient to a decision to rein protestne meawres 'eutuation entenon 41 I m NUREG454. g ID and is therefore to be made with 4 degree of care ahwh reqaires u>me aJunte thought Howeser, since reentry and retoscry *.suld not *ase plJcc under thC urae time pre %ureg protectise Activns gou!j. plan.

rnng for ment.res to oc ese' Med during reentr> and recnser> necon't be more than general.

E A tinding that twe i reason 45!e 4mrance that ebe plans un be implernented tw under 10 C F R. 4 $4 4*84i8 2L Se based brgely on the pLrts not the mynad detads of the imple-menung proteJurcs It"riememabehty n a charactenstic of good PLs for esen the best imple-meeting proccJares cantwt escue an v coneened run Thus it is to the adequa y of planning that all of the Comrwoni punning standards and cu%4non enterta are directed. not the me-chamtal details of implemeerg procedares \\n intersenor looking to introduce wch procedures 24 l

-m

DIG ESTS 1550ANCE5 OF THE 4 Toil!C SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS into htigation *Nd hase to comt to wme plan proumon drafted i t such a way that a board mou!J hase to '&s at the ivementing procedures under it to deterrmne whether there was rea.

wnable assurarse it cou!J x rmplemented Accord Lousuana Po*er and Light Co (Waterford Steam E;cctnc Statmn. Leit.4. tl \\BJ32,17 NRC 104.1106-07 c 19331.

F Sub-areas of the p%. c EPl need not be rerfectly regular concentric nngs, or parts thereof, any r'*e e than the EPIs themselses should be esxtly 10 or 50 miles in radius. -The i

boundanes of the sub areas small be based upon the same factors as the 7PZ. namely demogra-phy, topograph), land charxteristws 46 cess routes, and local jurisdwtions? NUREG 0654. Ap-penda 3. at 4-4 G

State and ! col plantng efficials are not obhged to supply a *ritten justi6 cation of their bo.ndary-maorg.intil they are faced with an admitted centention o9 the subject. In parucular.

l m the absence cf such an ad*'tted contennon, of6cials rieeo not fusufy m entmg the excluuon i

from the plume 1 PZ of areas fusi mude she 10-mile limit Semon 50 47(cH2) of 10 C F.R. says that the plume EPZ shall te adout" 10 miles in diameter. not "at least ~

Esuuat:on routes are not umpty routes out of the plume EPZ they are routes to public II shelters Thus in crder to rexa the nearest shelter, some routes may have to carry traf6c toward i

the plant before the) carrv it **ay.

LBP 84 30 LONG 15 LAND LIGHTING CONIPANY 15horeham Nudear Power Station. Urut 17.

j Dodet No.%322-OL. OPERATING LICENSE. August 13. 1932-. \\tENIOR ANDUN1 AND i

ORDER A

The Lxensms Board *enies a petition pursuant to 10 C F R. i 2.758(bl. for exception to the regulat:or.s ehminatzg the Gnancial quah6 cations reuew er electric utihties in operatmg i

liceche proceed.rgs in the aaernatne, the Board demes admnuon of an unumely financial qual-i6 cations contert:en The ScarJ also dernes ceru6 canon of tne issue to the Commission.

B A pet; ton for wan er or ewepuon to the Commnuon's regalations. pursuant to 10 C F R. 4 2 755m. should cM be grantcJ m " unusual and compelhng circumstances? Northern States Po*er Co 8 %tonn.e c Nudear Generating Plant. Unit is. CL172 81. 5 AEC 25, 26 stC2L the rute prectud.ng coriuderatinn of a.nhty's 6tiancial ;uah6ca-C in order u. hem tra:

pons in an operanng hcense proceedmg should be maned in a parucutar proceedirig, the party petitionmg for aaner must show that the electric unhty cannot recoser its costs through the ratemaking preses5 Propm.s to daallow a portion of a utihtv's costs are not a sufficient baus for the waner cf regulations Neauve the outcori'e of such proposals is speculatne.

D Athent eudence that a State rate ccmmisuon is systematic 4D3 denyms a unhty recovery of its costs. dwaiaance c' ccnstruenon-related costs is not an appropriate baus for maiving the financial qua'Icanons reg. 2ans in an operatmg lesense proceedmg E

A party sceung *a.er of the Gnancial quahficanons regulat.ons must make a prima facie sho*trtg that t*e utiht) has Men denied recosery of costs for safe plant operation F

Good ca.se for t*e :a:e Gims of a contention shich is based on a recently iswed document. dces not ennt * *en the mformanon corta ned m that document was pubhcly availa-ble at an earl er date.

G With reg.ards to tre,tandards for the admiwnn of a late-Oled contenuon. a party cannot asust in the cese:cprnent M a wund record unless the contenuon presents a ugnificant, triable asue.

LBP-84 30 4 TEX AS CTILITIE5 ELECTRIC CostP ANY. et al. itomanche Peait Steam Elecinc Station. Units I and 21 Dxhet Not 50-445. 50 446. OPERATING LICENSE August 24, 1984. St EstOR ANDL NI A

in this \\lemorand -. the Licenung Board concludes that a request for a license for fuel loading and r ecritical testrg may be conudered pursuant to 10 C F 2 6 50 57fc) because the actnities for ~*%n a beerse is zught fall within the utnities for 4hKh a low-power license may be granted B

A ficenurs board t 43 authonze the usuance of a license for fuelload and precriticat test.

ing prouded ta.at it makes *e findings required by ) 50 57(a) with respect to the contested ac.

tait) wught to be author cei Homeser, the pendency of a broad gaahty assurance contention re.

quires that the -)otion be aaompamed by eudence concermng the status of those systems re-quired to asu.re that cr aca..:) will not occur dunns the proposed setmues.

b 15 i

-..y.

9 i

I DIGESTS I

ISSL ANCES OF THE ATO%IIC SAFETY AND LICE.NSING BOARDS i

'I C

The following technical issues are discussei Fuel loaJ. Preentical tesung. Baron g

equipment. Neutron momtormg equipment. Fuel-handims equvment. Reactor protection 535-tems. Quahty control. K,g i

LBP-34 31 PillLADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY (Limersk Generaung Sianon. Umis I and

21. Dodet Nos 50 352-OL 50 353-OL (ASLBP No. 81465-07-OL); OPER ATING LICENSE.

August 29.144. SECOND PARTIAL INITIAL DECISION A

The Licensmg Board issues a Second Parnal Imual Decisior Gnding m favor of the Appli-i cant on all controserted issues prerequisite to authonzmg a low power operating license. Offsne 9

emergency planmng issues are still pendmg for htigauon.

i B

The whole body of implementing procedures need not be ready for challenge in a hear.

mg. Loumana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electnc Stauon. Umt Ji. ALAB 732.17 NRC 1076 (1983L Ifomeser, this does not mean that a Board cannot esamine implemenung procedures which are asailable and arguably necessary to determine whether certdm prousions m the emergency plan meet NRC plannmg standards. Exammauon of such implemenues procc-dures is with the adequacy of the plans foremost in mind, smce the proper object of litigation is

(

the adequacy of the plan.

C Smee lindmss of the heensmg tnbunal are deemed to amend the FES amendment and recirculanon of the FES are not normally required. unless the differences between the decision j

and the FES are truly substanhal. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp tNine Mile Point Nuclear Sta-tion. If nit 2!. AL AB-264. I NRC 347. 37172 (1975); Aihed-General Nuclear Services IBarn-

• cli Nuclear Fuel Plant Separauons Faciht)). ALAB-296. 2 NRC 671. 680 (1975L See also Public Sersice Co of Ne Itampshire (Seabrook Station. Units I and 27. CLI 78 l. 7 NRC 1.

i 29 n.43 a 1978)

D The followmg techmcal issues are discussed: Onute emergency planmng. Enuronmental j

anal) sis of sescre accider:ts. Quahty control of welding. Environmental quahficanon of electncal i

equirment. Effect on plant structures of postulated petroleum and natural gas pipelme accidents.

j Cooling tower plumes, aircraft carburetor icitig.

L BP.8 4-32 CONSUMERS POW ER COMPANY (Big Rock Pomt P! anti. Oncket No 50-155-OL A

( ASLBP No.79-432 II LAh OPER ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT. August 29.1984. INI-TI AL DECISION A

in this imual Decision, the Licenung Board authontes the Licensee to add three more spent fuel racks to its spent fuel pool. espandmg its capacity from 193 spent fuel assemblies to 441 awembhes upon the condshon that the plant wil' not be operated should the heat inad from the fuel and the temperature of the nearby lake present the Licensee from assurms that the maiicup Ime to its pool mill be able to keep the bulk pool temperature belo* 150'F The Board also res:res that there be a human factors analyus of the meter for the noble gas stack momtor and that Licensee aduse emergeng plannmg authonues to conuder practKable means of improurg emergeno esacuauon at time of a maior esent at the Castle Farms site.

8 The folio *ing techmcal inues are discussed. Spent Fuel Pool inside Contamment (Makeup Water Linet. Temperature Anal > sis of Srent Fuel Pool Zircaloy/ Steam Reacuon m s em Fuel PmL Concrete integnty m Spent Fuel Pool. Radiation Esposure from Spent Fuel; e

Orcrash Rnks. senmec Stabihty of Gan'ry Crane-Emergency Plar!ning. Sac of EP2. Radianon Mon.torms. Emergeno Planmng. Summer /Wimer Condiuons. Emergency Planmrg Children and Pregnant Women LBP-44 33 CINCINNATI G AS & ELECTRIC COMPANY. et al. iWilham 11 Zimmer Nuclear Power Stahon. On i 18. Docket No. 50-358-OL ( ASLBP No.76-317 01-OLh %ITHDRAWAL OF OPER ATING LICENSE APPLICATION. A ugust 29 1944 M EMOR A N DL'M AND 1

ORDER I

A Licenung Board grants Applicants' unopposed mot on to withdraw their apphcation for an operstmg lwense tot the Ismmer Stauon and to termmate this proceedmg. subtect to Ll'c con-dihon that Apphcants implement. wah Staff senfianon, their ute restoranon plan The Boaid refuws to irrpose a condiuon. consented to by Apphcants, that the grant of the mobon be with prejudge to any future apphcanon by these Applicants for a nuclear reactor at this site on the ground inat such a condshon is unnecewary.

26 e a

\\

\\

o DIG ESTS 1550ANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICE. SING BOARDS N

B Damiw.el of an operaung ! sense apph.:4 tion with prejudice is a sesere sancuon whicn is resersed for unuwal wiuations where it is necesury to present substantial prejudice tn a party who opposed the aprixation.

LBP-8 4-14 ROCilESTER G As & ELECTRIC CORPORATION (R.E. Ginna Nuclear Plant. Umc

!),

Docket No 50-244-OL A (ASLBP No. 79.427 07-OL A p; OPE R ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; Augnt 30.1994 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER in this Memorandum anJ Order the Licensmg Board dismisscs the proceeding n view of A

the withdrawal of the sole Intersenor and the consequent removal of allissues requinns hearing.

LBP-84 35 GEORGI A POW ER COMPANY, et al fNostle Electnc Generaung Plant. Units I and 2), Docket Nos 50 424-OL, 50-425 OL (ASLBP No. 84 499-01-OL); OPERATING LICENSE; i

September 5,1914. MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER

}

In this Memorandam and Order, the Licensmg Board rules on the admisubibty ofInter-A senors' contenttons.

l Because Intersenors failed to make a pnma facie shommg of special circumstanses justify-B i

mg s maiser of 10 C F R. ) 5153fes to permit reconuderation of the need-for-power issue at the l

operating licenw stage.10 C F R. l 2.758(cf bars further consideration of the matter, and inter-senors' contenoon is dninned C

The Commisuon's determmation that its rule barnes hugation of Anancial quahncanons issues n operstmg bcense proceedmst remains in elTect. despite the deciuon of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Datnct of Columbia Circuit m New Ergland Coahuon on Nuclear Polluuon NRC. 727 F 2J II2' *D C. Car 19846. bars conuderauon of Intertenors' nnancial quatt6ca-s tions contenuon LBP-84-35A LONG iSL AND LIGilTING COMPANY f 5horcham Nutlear Power Stanon. Cmt 11 Dooet No 50 322-OL 4 e 55LBP No. 77 347-01C-OLD tLo* Power); OPERATING LICENSE:

Septent er 5.19s4. OR DER Upon reconudcrauen the Licenung Board grants summary dnpounon as to all nsues A

reles.nl to prop +ed fuel Matrg. precnticahty testing, and cold enticahty tesung. Although the use ucks a fully qah6cd onote source of emeraency AC power, no such power is needed to pro-test pwt'hc heahh and uit > Jarms the requested actnines. thus. they may be authorized without cnntrasention of appbcaNe reguiatory critena.

B Fuel loading, preentgaht> tesung and cold criocahty phases of proposed low-power pro-gram require no onute emergenc, AC power C

Although GDC !* is apphcable to low power operations, it may be appSeJ m siew of a "ru'e of reason" where rebested actnaties require no emergency AC power to protect pubhc h ild and safety LBP-84 M TEX AS UTILITIE5 ELECTRIC COMPANY, et at (Comanche Peak Steam Electnc stanon. Umis ! and 2t Docket Nos. 50-443-OL-2, 50-446-OL 2 ( ASLBP No 79-430 06 &OlJ; OPER kTING LICEN5E; September 17.1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

The Lseming Boa d orders the OITice of Inseuigauons (Oli to proside to the Board and parues. subject to protectne order, a copy of each of the msesugation reports that Ol had olTered to prosida to the Board es parte B

in a case m wh.ch senous alleganons of mumidauon hase been the subject of mtenuse hearirgs it as act proper ftr the bcenung Board to recene reports of twenty two related mvesu-gations es parte, without presiding the parties the opportunity to comment on the relesance of the reports. The proper way to handle the matter 5 to provide the matenals under protectne order to the partes. ruami whaisser prosiuons are necessary in the circumstances to avoid re case of the names d scalidentral informants. In the past, senuine secunty matters hase been hand:t1 n inn wa) so tw shoutJ con 6dentiaht) matters LBP-84 3' DU) E POW ER COMPANY, et al iCatamba Nuccar Stanon. Unas I and 2). Docket Nos 50-413-OL. 50 414 0L iASLBP No. Bl 463 06-OL) tEmergency Planmng); OPERATING

• ! CENSE; September H.

1994: SCFPLEMENTAL PARTIAL INIT!AL DECISION ON EMERGFNC5 PLANNING in thn Parti.1 Imaal Deciuon. the Licenung Board completes consideration of all A

emergenty plaMmg iNes and authorizes the issuance of an operstmg hcense to Apphcants sub-jett to certam u r'ditmns 17

DIGESTS ISSL WCES OF Tite ATOstlC S AFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS B

A revonubilitt of the twensmg Board in deciding emergency planmng issues is to deter-mine if the planmng es m conformity with regulatory Mandards. Althwgh the Interrenors may

-desire that the leset of the emergency preparednew be cnhanced to the maumum entent posible." the Luenury Board's role is not to require that measures be taken which esceed the f

requirements of the regulations and regulatory gwdes.

C The Commisuon's emergency planmns regulations and regulatory guide require that in.

formational brochures must adsne the pubhc bv unabiusise language t*:at high lesels of radiation are harmful to bealth and may be life-threatemng. See 10 C F R. 6 50 4NbHh and Part $d Ap-pendis E. ) 1% D 2. NUREG 0654/FENt 4 R EP 1. Rev.1. 6 il G I.

D The Commmmn's emergency planning regulations and regutatory guide reqwre that warmns segris and decals must not be io general m their messige that they do not state that the f'

warning relates to a nucte.tr emergency. There should be made asailable to transients a source of

}

local emergency Information so that they too hase the opportunity to become aware of how to cope in a nuclear emergency prior to the time an event may occur. See 10 CF R. f 50 4NbiU) and Part 50. Arrendis E. 6 IV D 2; NUREG-Oe!4/FENI A REP l. Res.1. ! 11 G.2 E

The Commisuoni emergeno plannmg regulations and regulatory guide do not require the incluuon within the plume emergency planmng zone any portion of the City of Charlotte, North Carolme. whose city hmits come withm 9 ? miles of the plant. See 10 C F R.

6 50 4McH2) and NUREG-OoS4/FE\\t A REP 1. Rev. l. 41 D.2 F

Although the Commston does not require that ait aspects of emergency plans be com-plete before a nnat licenvng deciuon is readed. where the plannmg for the esacuation of a theme amuwment park. that can hase in ciceu of 25.01:0 attending at a time, is bems read-drewed and the prrwen is not near completica. it is appropnate for the Licenung Board to re-quere as a condition of heen,mg the piant that plans be compicted withm a specified time to the satnfaction of the NRC Staff LBP-8444 CONSUNIF RS PO% ER CO\\tP AM e B g Rock Point Planti. Docket No 50-155-OLA (ASLBP No ?9 432 II LAi. OPER ATING LICENSE ANIEND\\1ENT September 25. 1984 SL PPLLNIEN TAL INITI AL DECISION -

A In this Supplemental Imtial Deciuon. the Licenung Board dnmmes four remaming nsues and an.thonies the swuance of a heense amendment.

8 The follo*ing ecshmca: inues are dntus>ed. Spent Fuel Pool Water Level Ntomtors; Comamment Pressuritation t rnm vent fuel pool). Ntotor-Operated Valses hrrelevant to spent i

fuel pool). Eraergency Planmg PampNet (contenth Datnbution of Emergency Planning Pam-phlet. Cau Drop taJMuan of reJunda9t support spiemt LBP41449 Nils 51551PPI POW ER 1 LIGHT CO\\1PoY. et / (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. Umt it. Docket No 50 416 OL \\ s 45LBP No 844AI)4 0LI. OPERATING LICENSE ANIEND-NIENT. Septemm r 28.1954 \\tE\\ TOR ODU\\t OD ORDER e

A in this stemoranJam and Order. the Lkenung Boird dammes the proceedirts upon con-Grmation of the anhlrawal of it'e only Intersennt L BP-84-40 Cl L\\ EL AND LLECTRIC ILLL\\llN ATING CO\\lPANY. et al iPerry Nuclear Po er Plant. Umts I and 26 Duet Nos 50-440-OL. 50 441-OL f ASLBP No. 81 45744-OLE OPERATING LICEME.OcRaer 4.1944. NIE NIORANDUNt OD ORDER A

in ihn stemnrandum and Order the Licensma Board demes intervencr's motion for sum-marv tudgment and dnmisws its content on finding that Appl, cants are not required to install an automated standby hqwd control ssstem under Commisuon regulations dealmg with anticipated tranuems without scram B

Summars dnernation may be granted agamst the party requesting summary dispostion when vil the relesant facts are agreed and the law dictates a result opposite the moving party's pimtion.

C The Comr.euon's regulatmns de not teamre an automated standby ligwd control system to be installed m boiling

• ster reactors that were not designed and constructed to mcorporate.

wh a sptem 10 C F.R. t 50 626;H48 LBP-84 40A VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER CONtPoY (North Anna Power Station. Umts I and 2# Do6ket Nos 504ROL A 1. 50 339-OL A l I A5LBP No 43 441-01.LA). Docket Nos.

18

1:

55 2 r

DIGESTS is5COCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING 8OARDS i

'i 50-338-OLA 2. 50-3)*-OL A-2 t 45LBP No. gJ-4824.LA). OPER ATING LICENSE AMEND-i i

MENT. October iL I44. \\f EstoR ODUNt AND ORDER

]

I A

in Case OLA l. msolung an appbcation for an amendment to tae Nonh Anaa operating I

licenses to permit the receipt and sterage of Stie spent f act auembtitt from the Surr) fachty, f

the Liceriseg Board r* ales that certain contentions, as resant by the Board into a consobdated con-tenuon. are admitteJ as issues in comrosersy. and admits t'is 'iterseior as a sarty. In Case l

OLA4 mso6 sing an apphcanon for an amendrpent to the operatm, hcenses to per. nit the espan-a 1

soon of the fuel pool storage capaaty at the North Anrta facht), the Licensutg Board rejects the l

contentions, demes the peution for lease to intervene. rtismisses the.ase, and authorites the Director of Nuc! car Reactor Regulanon to isme an amendment ta me Nor.h Anna operatmg.

licenses ehgh renses the techmcal specifwatsons to permit the u panuon of the spent fuel stor-age capaaty.

B 5ection 2.714 of 10 C.F.R does not require une petzt:on to detail the eudence whuh =dt be offered in supMrt of each contenuon. and. tn passeg upoq whether an intervention petition should be granted. 6t is not the furghon of a Iwensing Mard to review the ments of a comen-non. Mississippi Power and Light Co. (Grand Gutt Nuclear Sianon. Units I and 2N AL AB-130 6 AEC 423,426 (19736.

LBP-84-41 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY (Byron Nuclear Poser Station. Umts I and j

2). Docket Nos. STN $0 454-OL STN 50-455-OL (A51.BP No. 79-48104 OLN OPERATING LICEN5E. October 16.1984. SUPPLEMENTAL INITIAL DECISION j

l A,

In this Supplemental Initial Decisaon, the Licenung Board conctudes that the Applicant has demonstrated its abihty or willmsness to comply with appheable NRC regulations to maintain i

J& quahty assurance and quahty control program. and to otserse on a contmums and adequate basis the apphcable quahty comrol and quality assurance cntena plans The Board authonaes the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon. upon makmg all requisate Gndmss, to issue full-power

licenses for Byron Nuclear Power Stat.on. Umti i and 2.

B As a general rule, the auhonty of hcensms boards is hmited to deadmg matters in con-trosersy among the parues. An eperating hcense for a nuclear power plant may be issued at such '

ume as the NRC renders the Cndegs required by 10 C F R. i 50.57(ai. and the Commission.

' subject to the immediate effecuseness provisions of 10 C F R. ) 2.764. has sened the Director -

of Nudear Reacor Regulation *ito the authoniy to make such 6ndings-

-C A bcensing board may driegate a matter or issue to the NRC Staff when it is clear that the NRC Staff un adequately rewbe it.

LBP-84 42 AERR-MCGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION'i%est Chrcago Rare Earths Facihty).

Docket No. 40-2061.ML (ASLBP No. 8)-495 01 MLt M ATERIALS LICENSE AMEND-j MENT, October 19.1984. MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER A

In a proceedir.g commenced to consider Staffs proposal to license onsite storage of thori-um mitt tanhngs, the Lgensms Board. m considenas objections to contennons, rules that Stati must consider permanent disposal of the mdi taihr:ss now and that the Apphant may Gle conten-tions an the proceedmg esen tho.g't it Jid not request a heanrg.

. An appigant for a igense amendment ma) Gle contentions challengir a Staffs proposed B

i action m a proceedmg commer!ced at the request of another party despite the fact that apphcant did not request a heatmg.

i 4

g C

Commnsion's delegauon to Licensing Board of authonty to act on peuuons to mtersenc and conduct any necessary proceedess pursuant to 10 C.F R. Part 2. Subpart G mcludes author.

I sty to accept contentions Died by apphcant even though apphtant did not request a hearing.-

7

' l D-Facts surroundmg Staff s pro,wal to Igense onsite storage of mdl taihngs where apphcant -

had appbed for a Igenw permitt:ng on9te permanent disposal are stror' gly mdicauve of the con.

i I

clusion that Staffs proposal amounts to segmentauon prohibited by NEPA'o' an oserall plan.

l

' Provisions of the CEQ's regu Sons 4dopted by NRC) mandate that permanent disposal be con.

t sidered now.

2 E

Where no concrete proposal enists to add matenal to the mdl tashnga which are the sub-I ject of the proceedmg. there rs no requirement that Staff consider the addinon of such material t

{

in its enstronmentalimpact statement. -

i t

s t

'I 29 I,

i 1

7 9

DIG ESTS IN5 LANCES OF THE ATO%Ilc SAFETY AND LICEN51NG BO tRDS i

F Conuderauon of ahernatne ures under NI P A is meamngful onh when all abernauses conudcred n cer the requirements of the Comm sen's regulanons promu!pted under the

{

Atomic Fnergy ui G

Noihing in 9 203 of UMTRCA susseus that 4 Iwensee must peu a bond to coser the cost of aJserw health and soooeconornic effects resu!Ong from Jnpoul of rM! taibr gs H

EPNs regulanons promulpted under CMTRCA proude a mmimum lesel nf protection whgh may riot m all cases be decined sufficient by NRC after the latter coriuders the level of risk posed by a specific taihngs pde, economic costs, and other appropriate factors (% 84(al, Atomic Enern Acts.

I I

Section 83(bHIH AHul of the Atomic Energy Act proudes that, if the State in whwh a l

permanent taihngs dispowl ute is located elects not to hecome the owner of that ute on hcense termination, the federal goscrnment must.

J Cntena 9 and to of Appendis A to 10 C F R Part 40 reqwre that the fihancial cost of l

long terrn mamtenance and momtonng of dnposal soll be conudered smual!y rather than I

deferred until short:y before license termmanon.

K Part 51 cf the Commnsion's regulanons reywres a cost-benefit balance whKh mcludes a I

considerauon and balancing of quahtause as well as quant.tatne enuronmental impacts.

LBP 84-43 PHILADELPHl4 ELECTRIC COMPANY (Fulton Generaung Stanon. Umts I and 21 I

Dodet Nos 50-463.CP 50-464-CP ( ASLBP No.76-300 Os-CPt. CONSTRL CTION PERMIT.

j October 23.1984 INITI AL DECISION A

In ihn Initial Deciuon. the Licenung Board damnses the proseedmg without prejudice l

45 moot, subyect to the conditioft that the Apphcant is barred from fihng a future apphcation identical to the one damnsed B

An unparuculanted, unsupported general attegsuon of harm to periperty salues caused i

by Apphcant's delay m dnmasmg its applNation is not of wf f'uent weight or moment to cai.ne I

the Board to mqwre further C

General attegauons of p9 chol <igul ureu, esen if factuam supported. prnude no Nus for a legally agmnnt staim for rehef D

Cous incurred by the NRC StalT m reucumg an appikanon s bsequedy wit'. hawn m.n u

not be billed :o the apphcant as a condiuon of dnmnwl. where those costs were mcvred pnor to the Nosember 6.1991 adoption of reused regulations LBP la-44 TEX A5 LTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANL et al (Camanche P'.k Steam Electnc Stauon, Uruts I and 23. Docket Not 50-445.50-44n. OPER ATING LiLENst Ostober 25 1934. MLMOR ANOCM AND ORDER A

in this Memorandum, tbc Licenung Board requests mformauon conserrung artam

echmcal nsuet B

The following teshnut inues are antussed 5.fet> factors derned from matenals tests.

Tests of materials frepresentainenen of sample teveJ1. A36 and A307 steels as structural mate-nals LBP 84-45 LONG ISL AND LIGHTING C04tPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power itauon. Urut 11 Docket No 30-322-OL 4 i ASLBP No. '7-347 01C-OL) (Low Powers. OPER ATING LICENSE.

October 29 1954 INiil AL DECI5 ION A

Licenung Heard grants 10 C.F R. 4 50 57(c) esempuon to regurements of general design criten4 to suihonte lwense for low pn=ct operahon m rebance upon an " enhanced" off-ute AC crnersency power wuem m the absence of a fully quahfied onute 9 stem B

Pursu.nt to Commnvon direcuen. appheant for 10 C F.R. 6 50 57tes esempoon to por-tions of deugn criteria met show that ;b operauon of the plant will be "as safe as" it would be were it in full comphance, and that equities of esigent urcumstances fasor l'.e grant of the cu-emption C

An cuarmnanon of "mconuuencies" in NRC regulauons must mclude not only inconus-rencies in their hteral wording but ahn mconsistencies in their apphcation in practice.

D If no core coohng n neceswry to protect pubhc health and safety dunng certain phases of Apphcant's lo*-power testmg program no emergency AC power can be needed for that pur-pose, compuance with requirement for suffcient asadable emergency power is 4thiese<!. esen in the absence of any emergency AC power sources whatweser.

30

= *w n

-m..

1 l

DIGESTS i

1%LANC8.5 OF TIIE ATO% llc MFETir AND LlLEN5tNG BO4RD5 E

The ufety times of to C F R. t 50 46ibe are et mmersameh to pruside a sarety

{

margin A plant is deemed ufe if it can show that it meets thew hmits; it necd etceed them t'y i

no particu!ar n argin of ufety F

NRC reactor sa:ety standards a siemed in the funcuena! sense. W hat must safet) sy s-tems be 451e to do an crJer to protect pubhe health and safet) and are they able to do it' A j

point-bppomt companwn of each component of alternate $) stems is not appropnate.

j G

An esemption to the req irernent for a fath quahPd onute emergenc) AC poner source is granted for purposes of low power operation where ernergency po cr is asadabic from

• enhanced ofhate s) stems ll Ahhough. trt heu of a fully quahfied source of onute emergency \\C power. normal otT-ute power wurces mi;l be rehed upon, in part, for emergency power during low-power operations. there is no requirement or justificauon for ampoung the scismic quahficanort of these normal otTute power sources.

I

% here emergency AC power es to be supplied unbring a system compnsed of maluple separaie power sources. the ungle fadure cnterion is apphed to determine the imput of a single g

failure on the ability to prosede power to the system as a whole, not on the ability of exh component thereof l

3 An esempuon to GDC 17 may be authonced for low. poser operation where applicant

{

has shown that operanon would be as safe as it would be rf st were in full compliance, and that enigent circumstances fasor the grant of the esemption.

K Where an eserrpuon is sobsht from regulation requinns a qualMed source of onsite emergency AC power, ttte offsite power " enhancements" prouded as sources of addinonal I

emergency power reeJ not be treated as vital

)

L Cost to apphcant of protracted htiganon may be considered as an

• eco.iomic and financial I

hardship

• expenenced by at relevant to an equitable "enigent circumstances" determinauon.

l M

The forto*ms techmcal ruues are discussed. Emergency AC Power; General Design Cntenon 17. LOCA at Low Power. Low Power Operanon. OtT$ne Electrical Poner Gnd. Safety Standards. Segle Failure Critenon. Standby Gas Treatment System-LBP 84-46 TEN AS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COtlPANY. et al. IComanche Peak 5 team Electnc Stauon. Units I and 2#. Docket Nos. 50 445. 50 446. OPER ATING LICENSE; October 29 1984. MEMORANDLM AND ORDER A

In this Memorandum, toe Licensing BoarJ requests mformauon on certain melding issues LBP-84 47 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY et al tThree Mde Island Nuclear Station.

Umi IL Docket No f0-289-OLA t ASLBP No 83-49104 OLA t (Steam Generator Repairn OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; October 31.1984. INITIAL DECISION A

in this (mual Deauon. the Licenung Board authonies the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulauon to issue to the Licensee. upon makms requiute findmgs. art operstmg hcense amend-ment that reuses techmcal specifkations to recogniee steam generator tube repair techmques other than plugging, specifically the itmenc espanuon tube repair technique. The authoruation is subject to sausfaction of conditions ident4cd in the Ininal Deciuon B

if a licensms bord directs all parties t3 file proposed findings of fact and conclusons of law and rules that the) *%Id be deemed m default for failure to file, an intersenor is deemed to -

be in default with respect to a contenuon (it fails to file propmed findmss upon that issue. Flon-p da Power & Light Co 8 51. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant. Unit No. 21. ALAB-280. 2 NRC 3. 4 n.2 (1975J.

C The followirs techtual issue ts discussed. - Steam Generator Tube Repair.

i LBP A4 48 TEXA5 UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY. et al aComanche Peak Steam Electnc Station. Umts 1 and 21. Docket Nos. 50-445-OL 2. 50 446 OL.2 ( ASLBP No. 79-430-06A-OLh OPERATING LICENSE. November 2.1994. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

The Licenung Bc,ard sacates its order of September 17.1934 (LBP.84-36,20 NRC 928).

i 31 t

.-w 4emi

• DIG ESTS j

155L ANCE5 OF THE ATOMIC 5%FETY AND LICENSING BOARDS LBP 84 49 GEORGI A POW ER COMPANY, et al (Vogtle Elettr c Generaung Plant Umts I and 28 Dosket Nos. %424-OL, 50-425-OL ( ASLBP No.54-499 01-OLL OPERATING LICENSE; f

November 5,1964. MEMOR ANDL M AND ORDER A

in thes MemoranAm and Order, the Licenerg Board rules on Intersenors' ob;ections to sis Memorandum and Order decidmg the admissibility of intersenors' contentions. LBP 84-35, 20 NRC 88' t19348 i

8 The Licensms Board further rules that Intersenors' request for an msesngation into Ap-j phcants' practices proudes no basis for broademns an custmg contention relatmg to Apphcants' quality assurance program LBP-84 50 TEX AS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al IComanche Peak Steam Electric j-Stanon. Umts I and 28. Docket Nos 50-445 OL 2, 50-446-OL-2 ( ASLBP No 79-430-06A OL):

OPER ATING LICENSE. Nosember 16.1994 MEMOR ANDLM AND ORDER I

A The Licenung Board refuses to honor a grant of prmlege for some documents created by f

Joseph J. Lipinsky and said to be cosered by attorney client priulege. The Board finds that Ap-j plicants' lawyer could not properly represent Mr. L pinsky,.no had pressously taken a position l

adverse to Apphcants' ard who therefore had an irreconcitable conAiet of mterest. In addition, the Board honors a hmited claim of prmlege for documents for which attorney work product l.

prmlege was claimed but dentes the prmlege for other dccuments for which the Board found an -

t overridmg interest in obtaining the documents because of their importance in the proceedmg.

I B

Documents are not prmleged pursuant to an attorney-chent prmlege if they were generated m the course of an attorney-chent relationship that appeared to cust but could not cust becaud of an irreconcilable confhet-of. interest. An attorney chent relauonship cannot be used to dra down a man of secrecy oser an attorney's relationship with an ind4vidual ehose po-utson was adscrse to the ;whon of another chent whom the attorney conunues to represent.

I C

A daim of worn product priulege may be overridden with respect to documents for which there is an impor'. ant eudennary need.

LBP 84-!! - GLLF STATE 5 LTILITIES COMPANY, et al. (Rever Bend Stanon Unsts I and 2),

Docket Nos 50-458-OL, 50 459-OL ( ASLBP No. 82 468 01-OLt OPERATING LICENSE; Nos ember 20.1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A

in this Memorandum and Order, the Licensing Board grants Intemenor's monon to *ith-draw its remmmng contentions. grants Appbcants' motion to eithdraw their apphcanort as to t rut 2, and d:smisses the proceeding L BP-84-52 DUKE pow ER COMPAN). et al. iCatawba Nuclear Stanon. Urnis I and 2), Docket Nos 50-413. 50-414 8 45LBP No. SI 463 06-OLh OPERATING LICENSE; November 27, 1984. PARTI AL INITI AL DECISION A

The Licensing Beard issues a Parnal Ininal Decision resoisms " foreman override" con-cerns m the Apphcants' fasor. The phrase -foreman oserride" denotes a usuauon where, for esample, a foreman d rects a welder to meld m uolation of procedurcs in order to speed con-struction. See LBP 84-24.19 NRC 1418,156246 (19341. Followmg an eudentiary hearms, the Licensmg Board found that instances of foreman osernde at Cata*ba had been isolated, and that in any egent they did nct represent a significant breakdoor; m quahty assurance. In Ught of these findings and earher findirgs favorable to the Applicants on various safety and emergency plan-n;ng contentions. the Board authorites the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regu!atron to issue full-po*er operatmg heenses for the Cataaba Nudear Stauon.

LBP-84 52A PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al. (Troun Nudear Plant).

Docket No 50-344 OLA (ASLBP No. 84-498-05-OL A) isFP Amendment); OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT, Nosember 28.1984. INITIAL DECISION A

in this iniual Decision the Licensmg Board finds that the Licerisee has adequately demonstrated that the espanded capacity of its spent fuel storage f,t.sh:y is designed to maintain discharges of radiauon with specified hmits and that such capactr, is designed so that in case of accidents olfute radianon levels mill not esceed 10 C F.R. Part 100 guidehne reference radiation 1

dose salues The Board concludes that there is reasonable assurarice that the Trogn Nuclear Plant can t e operated without endangering the health and safety of the pubhc under the espand-ed spent fuel pool capacity authorized by Armendment No. 88 to License No. NPF 1 issued by the NRC OtTce of Nuc car Reactor Regulanon on June 8,1984, affirms the issuance of the 32

l DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE 4Totfl0 SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS

}

]

amendment. and addit.ona!a concludeJ ihJt no mo&6catsom thereof or 4JJanonal constions are required.

LBP-84 3) LONG 15L AND LIGHTING COtf P ANY (St oreham Nue: car Power Stanon. Unit i t.

DodetNo 50 3224)L. OPER ATING LICENSE; Nose nber 30. 1914 NIENIORANDUNI AND ORDER RULING ON RENI %%D ISSL E5 I

A Of three issues remanded to et by the Appeal Board - (I* housekeepmg; (D enuron-f mental quah6 capon of nonsafety-related electrical equipment; and (b control systems mteraction

=

- the Licenseg Board 6mds that numbe's II) and 8D are adegaarely resolved h affidauts f

from the NRC Staff. Althoug't the Acrest Baard haJ en anded Ime No. f 3) whJe under a sig.

J m6 cant factual misempresuon 'that two stud;es had not been done while, in fact, they had). it f

apparently *nried to alTorJ Imergenors some recem opportunity to come forward with hugable issues pertam rig to the two studies. Thus. the Licensms Board grants the Intervenors additional j

hme to frame such issues. a'inough they could fairly be charged witn delay Howeser. based on a balancit:g of the equtnes, the pouible per.denc) of mh suues does not proude a basis to stay I

the issuance of a low power r*peratmg hcense.

B The test for determmes whether a stay of actnines shoulJ be emposed pending dispose-tion of a remand is less strmgent for the proponent than is the test arphcable for stay pending appeal. The test balances s ie senousness of the remanded inue; (2) traditional balancmg of I

equities, and (3r any hkely pre;udice to further decisions that mrght be called for on the remand.

l C

Where facts mater a! :o a remandeJ inue had changed ugn 6cantly dunng the penderacy of appeal, parties were under some obl.ganon to take steps to protect their mterests in the i

intenm l

D Where Intersenors *.ad been m pcs3euson of documents settmg forth the Applicant's and Staff's nahws (or oser a year, were on specinc nonce triat the subject matter msolved had i

been remanded *3 the Lxenseg BoarJ for possihic future adjudicanon for three weeks, were remmded the days prior to a scbeduled conference of counsel that they would he espected to come to the conference prepared with spec:fe substantae inues challeagmg the arialty 5. the in-tenenors' failure to come so prepared cannot ce uewed as reasonable E

The tonomma techn: cal awes are Jncussed Comrol ustems mieracuons. Enuronmen-tal quahfication of nonsafe:)-related eqwpmer i LBP 84 54 GENER\\L ELECTRIC CO%fPtNY (GETR Valiecitost. Docket No 30-70-OLR

( ASLBP No $3-48101-OLR*. OPERATING LICENSE RENE% AL; December 17 1984; NIE\\f0RANDLNf AND ORDER A

Licenutig Board demes request for readmnuon to a proceedmg fled by pets'ioner to m-tenene which fasied to resnj to the Boa J s orders reactnatmg the proceedmg after several pears of mactnm and corsese ttly was Jar +ued

=

B Parues t-a3 not step r.ato and out of NRC proceedmss at wilt United States Depanment of Energy (Chnsh Ract Bree:er Reactor Pleo. ALAB?68.19 NRC 487. 40 (1984s. Consum-ers Power Co 8 Midland P:am. Units i ed D. ALAB 8dl.16 NRC $97. 907 $ 198D. w here a party does not crTer a su:Le : eseuse for its failure to respond to Board orders reactaating a proceedmg (whKh failure teJ :o its dismmal'. *t must sausfy the cntena related to u umely pets-tions to mtervene in order to be readmi;ted C

A party appearms pro se must nonf the secretary of any change ofits address.

3 D

Service of dor.uments pon a party is complete upon depout in the Un:ted States Mail, promrty stamped and addressed LBP 84 53 TEX AS L TILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY. et al (Comanche Peak Steam Elecinc Stanon. Units I and 21 Doc ket Nos 50-445-OL. 50-446-OL i ASLBP No. 79 430-06-OL).

OPER ATING LICENSE. December 18.1994 MEMOR ANDUNt AND ORDER A

In this Niemorandurn, tne Licensmg BoarJ decides certam weldmg issues.

B

' Signi6 cant meonustecc:es in tesbraony and con 6dennal background mformatmn are grounds for discounting the creibibly of witnenes.

C Systematic viotauons *f construction procedures may hase independent s,gm6cance regardless of their safety emphcat ons When uolanons of procedures are tolerated, this afversely alTects workers' percepnons of me senousness of complymg with other procedures 33 S

r o.w

DIG ESTS 1550ASCES OF THE 470\\l8C SAFETY LND LICENstNG BOARDS D

Permitting elders to determine whether there is adequate preheat by employing a

" hand warm" test may not be an adequate procedure to aswre compliance with the preheat re-quirements.

L The following technmal imes are diwwwed' wease.ending. Downhill welding w ld

. e rod control. %elding of misditiled holes. Repair melding Imadnlled holesh Preheat meldsng.

l Welding preheat LBP 84-56 TEX A5 UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO\\tPANY. et at (Comanche Peak Steam Electric -

Station, Units I and 25 Docket Non 50-445-OL. 50-446-CL ( ASLBP No 79-43046-OLh OPER ATING LICENSE. Decemoer 18.1984. \\lEMORANDU\\1 AND ORDER i

A Because a fahe statement maJe by Applicants' witnesses and other anconsistencies en Ap-plwants' filings, the Licensing Board perm.ts Intersenors and Staff to file additional discosery re-

?

queus relating to the credibihty of ApplNants' witnesses B

Diwosery may be reopened against Applicants as a remedy for a misrepresentation and j

for inconsistencies in testimony.

k 4

I I

I i

4 1

t i

l I

l I

l l

l

[

DIGESTS l

ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS I

i i

j DD-34-15 BOSTON EDISON COMPANY (Pi!gnm Nuclear Power Station), Docket No. 50-293.

REQUEST FOR ACTION July 3,1984. FINAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R.

l 6 2.206 i

I i

A The Director of the Omce of Inspecuon and Enforcerrent dentes the remaining portion i

of a petinon under 10 C F R. l 2.206 which requested that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission take action to remedy alleged senous denciencies in the offsite emergency response plans for the i

i Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. On February 27.1984, the Director issued an Intenm Decision, DD-84 5.19 NRC 542, which denied rehef on all issues except potential trame bottlenecks to t

evacuanon of the area surrounding the P0gnm facihty. The remainmg issue was referred to the a

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEM A> for evaluanon. Based on FEMA's evaluation f

that trams management nsues have been adequately addresed by the Commonwealth of g

Massachusetts, the Director dentes the remainder of the petition.

[

B Trame management issues related to poiential bottlenecks to evacuation have been ade-quately addreswd by the Common *ealth of Massachusetts.

O DD 84-16 DUKE POWER COMPANY. et al ICatawba Nuclear Stanon. Units I and 2), Docket Nos. 50 413. 50 4 14 REQUEST FOR ACTION. July 6. 1984 DIRECTOR'S DECISION m o UNDER 10 C F R.12 206

>= P A

The Director of the OMce of Inspecuon and Enforcement denies a pennon Gled by the j I Government Accountabihty Project on behalf of the Palmetto Alhance which requested mitianon Q 5 of mdspendent des!gn, construction.nd management audits of Duke Power Company's construc.

3 Q tion of the Catawba Nuclear Stanon. In denying the requested rehef. the Director determmed

.y that the quahiy a.ssurance prostam for Catawba had not suffered a senous breakdown.

w B

Although hcensees are not required to respond to pentions under 10 C F R.12.206 in

,d the abwnce of a formal request by the staff under 10 C F.R. 6 50.54(D of 6182 of the Atomic z

Energy Act, hsersees may respond to such petinons at their own soliuon j

C A request for an invesuganon, particularly for an mvesuganon ofinternal NRC personnel w

matters, does riot fail squarely within the class of requests contemplated by 10 C F.R.12 206.

d D

Seither the Atomic Energy Act nor the Commission's regulanons trandate error-free construcSon W hat is required is a findmg of reasonable assurance that the facihty, as built, can be operated without undue nsa to pubhc hea'th and safety E

Acceptabehty of hcensee's quahty anurance program under 10 C.F R. Part 50, Appendia B, is discussed.

F A Nonce of Violanon under 10 C F.R.12 201 is the pnmary enforcement tool used by

'he NRC to document noncomphance and to ensure corrective action and compliance with regulatory requirementt Under the enforcement pohcy, the Comrmssion generally does not assue Nonces of %olahon in cases involvmg uolauons of lesser sagraficance which the hcensee has identified and has corrected or will correct.

DD-8417 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY (Midland Plant. Units I and 21. Docket Nos.

50-329. 50-330. REQUEST FOR ACTION: July 24,1984 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. l 2 206 A

The Director of the Omce of Inspection and Enforcement denies a request by Bilhe Pirner Garde of the Government Accountabehty Project on behalf of the Lone Tree Council and others requesurrg that the Commnsion take acuon with respect to the Midland Plant.

B The Comrnssion requires all hcensees to develop and implement a quahty assurance pro-gram to be apphed to the design, fabncanon, construcuon and testmg of the structures, systems and components of its facihty.

35

..--n

--m

.w,----w--,.e

-og-g-

---r--v--

w.--ww e

w

---

g

-, - *+- - - -.

--r,.--w-

+--- - - - - - - - - - - - --

---

e

--ww-e----

---

=-----w--w-s---e-----se-e-am

a w

DIGESTS ISWANCES OF DIRECTORS" DECislONS C

The requaements imposed on heensees by Arpendi. B. tcgether ith the hcensee's o.n quahiy assurarwe program, are usually suffwient to ee.. that a power reactor is constructed in accordance with NRC requirements However. m certaan cases constrwuon quahty weaknesses have been of suth magmlude that the NRC has found that it needs to impose adJiuonal controls to ensure that the facehty is beeg constructed m a quahty manner. Under such circumstances, the NRC has required hcensees to undertake a remedial program to ensure that the construct:on of the facihty is in accordance with NRC requirements DD 8418 METROPOLIT AN EDISON COMPANY. et al. (Three Male Island Nuclear Stanon, Umt 11. Docket No 50 289. REQUEST FOR LICENSE SU5 PENSION. July 2*,1984. DIREC.

TOA'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R. ) 2.206 4

The Director of the Ofnce of Inspecuon and Enforcement demes a peuuon Gled by the City of Harnsburg, Pennsylsama requesting the msutution of proceedings pursuant to 10 C.F R.

12.202 to suspend ind Gnstely the hcense of GPU Nuctear to operate the Three Mile Island Nuclear Stauon, Umt No 1.

B Pet:tioner's request pursuant to 10 C F.R.12.206 is demed in the absence of any sub-stanuse nformanon calhng mto quesuon the adequacy of the pl.mc esposure pathway Emergen-cy Planmns Zone (EPZ8 as currently configured or the emergency esacuauon planmns etTorts within the EPL C

To the entent that vanous municipahues located m counues insolsed with emergency planmns base not adopted and approsed emergency plans. sush acuon on their part is not neces-sary for and does not constitute an impediment to adequate emergency planmns.

DD-84-19 PACIFIC. GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon %ctear Power Plant, Units I and 21. Docket Nos. 50-275. 50-323. REQUEST FOR ACTION. August 20.1984.IN-TERIM DIRECTDR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 6 2 206 A

The Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon denies a request by the Gosernment Ac-countabihty Project on behalf of two former employees at the Diablo Canyon facihty that twens-ing be deferred until alleged mtimidation and harassment on site is neutralized. The Director concluded that, even if the two peutoners were improperly terminated harassment and intimida*

uon and possible coserup of deficiencies were not such substanual problems at the site as to re-quire deferral of a hcensing decision Howeser. the Director aho determmed that a Gnal determe nauon on the peupons mill be made upon completion of ingest:gations mto the harassment and mtimidauen of the petitioners.

DD 84 20 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.

Unit II, Docket No 50 2't REQUEST FOR ACTION, August 20,1984 DIRECTOR'S DECI.

SiON UNDER 10 C F R. 6 2.206 4

The D.tector of Nuclear Reactor Regulation demes a senes of petinons filed by the Government Accountabihty Project on behalf of the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace which requested deferral of decisions to issue low power and full-power hcenses for the Diablo Canyon Umt i facihty unul a senes of speciGed acuens mere taken.

DD 84-21 MISSISSIPPI POWER A LIGHT COMPANY, MIDDLE SOUTH ENERGY, INC.,

SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION (Grand Gu:f Nuclear Station. Umt II, Docket No. 50 416. REQUEST FOR ACTION, August 31. 1984-. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER to C.F.R.12 206 A

The Director of the OfTwe of Nuclear Reactor Regulauon demes a request by Cynthia Stewart on behalf of Jacksonians Umted for Lisable Energy Pohcies that the Commission take acuan with respect to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. Umt 1.

B The Commission has accepted industry criteria for esaluaung the adequacy of on shift operating esperience for near-term operaung license apphcants-DD 84-22 GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stauon, Umt l), Docket No. 239, REQUEST FOR ACTION; September 25. 1994 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R.6 2 206 A

The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation demes a request Gled by Ellyn R. Weiss and Robert D Pollard on behalf of the Umon of Concerned Scienusts requesting that the Commission imtiate show-cause or further enforcement proceedings with respect to the Three Mde Island Nuclear Station Umt i Emergency Feed ater $> stem.

36

4 DIGESTS ISst'ANCES OF DIRECTORS

• DECislON5 DD 34-23 CLE% EL oD ELECTRIC ILLDilN 4 TING CostP4NY et al. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Unit b. Docket No. 50 441 REQUEST FOR ACTIO% Nosember 15.1984. DIREC-TOR'S DECISION LNDER 10 C F R. 6 2.206 l

The Deputy Director cf the Office of Inspection and Enforcement dimes a peuuon sub-A rnitted by Susan L Hiatt on behalf of Ohio Citerens for Responsiete Energy (OCRE) requestmg i

l issuance of a show-cause order to resoke or suspend Ciesciand Electnc illuminatmg Company's j

construcuon permet for Perry Un i 2.

4 NRC resuisuons do not require that a construchon permit be revoked or suspended for B

slo.irig or stopping construchon. hen there is no current threat to the public health and safety I

by the hcensee's actions 1

C A slowdo n m construenon does not itseif sne nw to a reportms obriganon.

j j

DD-84-24 SHIP 5 TENTS OF SPENT SUCLE AR FUEL; REQUEST FOR ACTION, November 30, l

1984. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. 6 2.206 j

The Director of the OtT..e of Nuclear statenal Safety and Safeguards denies a peution A

filed by %f r. Lmdwy h&n requesung that Certificates of Compliance for certain spent fuel ship.

l ping casks be mo& fed to address oudation phenomena and that addauonal analyses of transpor-4 tation accident and wbotage scenanos be conducted.

B The Direc:or.itt not insutute proceedmss or undertake other actions in response to a pe-j tiuon under 10 C F R 9 2 206 to consider an issue the Commission is treatmg genencally tnrough ruterr.akeg

?

DD-84 25 CONSU%tERS POW ER COstPWY 4 Big Rock Point Plants. Docket No 50-1$$. RE-QUEST FOR SHOw C ALSE ORDER. December 3.1934 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R t 2 2th The Dire. 07. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. deme; a Petiuon filed by %fr John A

O'Ne:ll.11, req.esang trat me Commiwon suue a show cause order requirms Consumers Power Company :c demonstra:e that it is nnanaally quatined to operate an expanded spent fuel WI I

4 i

i i

37 i

s I

4

,i I

4 i

I l

i DIG ESTS ISSO 4NCE OF DE. I AL OF PETITION FOR ROLEM AKl. G N

N lI 1

t 1

DPRM-84 2 CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT, et al. Dodet No. PRM 716, REQUEST FOR f

AMENDMENT OF REGULATIONS, November 2,1984, DENIAL OF PETITION FOR RULEM A KING A

The Commisseon Jerues a peution for rulemaking which requested that the Commission amend its regulations peruining to emergency response and planning for transportation accidents e

l involving radioactive matenals. The petition is denied because the issues raised in the peution j

have been substantially resobed by subsequent Federal action.

l I

h j

I fi i

I t

i n

J t

i I

i t

l 4

j l

i i

i I

1 i

4 i

1 e

l, i

i i

4 l

t l

l l

l l

c_

l --.,.. _ _. -,.__._

4

)

i I

4 l

l 1

i l

4 LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES i

i j

i I

Allied-General Nuclear Seruces (Barnwell Nuc! car Fuel Plant Separations Facility) AL AB 296. 2

]

NRC 671,680 (1975 8

,I f

need for recirculanon of FES because of modiGcasions. LBP 84-31. 20 NRC 553 (1984l j

Amencan Farm Lmes v Black Ball Freignt Seruce,397 U.S. 532,539 419'0)

Board authonty to modify procedural rules ALAB-785,20 NRC 864 n 44 (19846 j

I Arirona Public Seruce Co (Palo Verde Nuclear Generaung Station. Units 2 and 31, AL AB 742.18 i

j NRC 380,384 n.10 (1933) 1 et7ect of policy statement on standards for directed cert:6 canon; ALAB-791,20 NRC 1583 n 14 l

(1984p i

l l

Anocianon of National Advertisers, Inc. v. FTC,627 F 2d !!51,1174,11'7 (D C. Cir ' 798. cert.

denied. 447 U S 92111980) i i

basis for dnqualifkation of a ludge on prejudgment ground ALAB ??7,20 NRC H f19148 Balumore Gas and Elettnc Co s Natural Rewurces Defense Council. 76 L Ed 2J 43', 446-47. 452 1

(19838 wore of FES. LhP 84 31,20 NRC 572 73 (1984p Bonng5 Keller,97 F R D. 404 Ii4831 i

1 dneosery of opinion work product, LBP 84-50,20 NRC 14'4 (1984s I

Boston EJnon Co. (Pilgnm Nuclear Genersong Sianon. Un t 28, LBP '7-66. 6 NRC 8H t197?t alTd. AL AB 479, 7 NRC 774 (1978) cauw for rextuon of StatT alternaine site analyus. LBP 84-42,20 NRC 1319 (19948 l

Boston Ednon Co. (Pilgnm Nutlear Power Station, Unit 2). LBP-813,13 NRC 103 (19 tis idenu6 canon of alternaine uses for disposal of mill tail:ngs. LBP 84 42,20 NRC 1320 (19848 Boyle v United States. 515 F 2J 1397,1402 (Ct. Cl 19?58 i

responubilities of Chief AJmmatranve Judge of Atomic Safety and Licens ng BoarJ Panel.

LBP 84-29 A. 20 NRC 347 819846 Branch 5 Phill?ps Petroleum Co,638 F 2d 873 (5th Cir.1981) disunctmn. for appeal purposes, between order granung dncovery against nonparty and order dennns dncovery by quashirg subpoena addressed to nonparty; ALAB ?80. 20 NRC 351 n 9 (1984)

I Bucks County Board of Commnuoners v Interuate Energy Co,403 F Supp 805. 808 # E D Pa.

1975) means for Commission to fulfHI purposes of NEPA, ALAB 785,20 NRC 868 n 65 419941 Bumpus v Uneroyal Tire Co 385 F. Supp. 711,713 (1974)

[

reawn for umelinen requirement for disqualiGcanon monons, CLt-84-20. 20 NRC 1082 41995)

I Carohna Power and Light Co. (Shearon llarns Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2), LBP.82119 A,16 NRC 2069,2073 (19827 support and parutulanty required of petitions for waiver of regulau we-LBP-84 30. 20 NRC 431 119541 Carolina Power and Light Co (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Units I,2,3 and 47. CLI *4 9, 7 AI C 197,198 (1974) circumuances appropriate for grant of cae-aon from regulations, LBP-84-45,20.NRC 13*6 n.!!6 (1984)

Carolina Power and Light Co (Shearen f(arns Nuclear Power Plant. Units I,2,3 and 4), CLI 74-22, 7 AEC 938 (1974) circumstances apprornate for grant of ciemption from regulanons LBP-84-45,20 NRC 13*6 n.116 (1984) 41

-.-,----e,.

--_g,,

i-

,,,ey w-,,,,%.,_w

.w..w--3-,--.,w, m,,w..__

_,-,y.,.

,,---r--.

.,. - -.,,,, m m.---

l LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASE 5 Carnhna Po.et eJ L:6'it Co 55hearon if arns Nuclear Poact Plant. L mis 1. 2. 3. and 41. CLI-7818.

s NRC 293

• 14'8

• rehabihty of 5:atT 4.tavis. LBP44 29,20 NRC 148 419148 Cmunnan Gas and Ewr e Co t%ilham if Zsmmer Nustear Power Stauoni. CLt-82 33.16 NRC 1439 41982#

NRC means fer usaring quahip construchon of nuclear power plants. DD-84-17. 20 NRC 233 11984:

Cinannau Gn and Electne Co aWeiham 114mmer Nuclear Po*er Stauon Umi li. ALAB 727.17 NRC 760. *e4 (1483a resulator) sheme for emergency planmns issues; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 938 (1984)

Cencinnau Gas and Licctne Co (Wilham 18 limmer Nuclear Power Stauon. Umt 1), ALAB 727.17 NRC 7tH). *e=441983 purro e of emergenc> p:ar:mns cones. ALAB-781. 20 NRC 829 (1984)

Cmemnau Gas eJ Electrx Ce

• witham 11. bmmer Nuctear Power Stauon. Uma 11. LBP t2-68.16 NRC 741. '44 41932)

1. I prerequawte to assuan.cc of a decision in a case where Staff review is mcomplete; LBP-84-31. 20 NRC 506 (1984 Cmcmnati Gas and Elecme Co aWilliam II Zimmer Nucicar Power Stanon. Umt 11. LBP 9' 58.18 NRC 640, ee2 63 (1983s showing recircJ on other factors w hen good cause is nat shown for readmission; '.' A84-54,20 NRC lo45 (1984:

Cinderella Career and F m h ng Schools s. FTC. 425 F.2J 583 (D C. Cir.1970s uandard fer daquant'ca' on of a judge CLI 84-20. 20 NRC 10'l n 46 (1985)

Cmderella Carect and Fimams 5shools. Inc. v FTC,425 F 2d 583. fil (D C. Cir.1970) allegation of pre;udgn ent against Chief Adrmmstratne Judge of Licensms Board Panet; LBP-84 29 s. 20 NIC 336 41994 Jmuahticanon of fudge: on prejudgment ground. AL 48 777. 20 NRC 24 (1984)

Ci:uens for Safe Pa er. lee s NRC. 324 F 2d 1291.1294 n 5 (D C Cir 1975s modiGeatmn of FES t* trough NRC admimstranve adjudicanons. LBP 84 31,20 NRC 553 (1984)

Cit.zens for %:e Ppmer. Inc s. NRC. 524 F 2J 1291,1297 (D C. Cir 1975) tinding regsred for heensirg of nuclear power plants. DD 8416 20 NRC 166,181 (1984)

City of Rochecer s Posta; seruce. 541 F 2d 967 (2d Cir.19766 agenty juriwtiction to conuder enuronmental impacts over segments of a protect otL r than its own. LL ABJ85. N NRC 874 n 46 (1984)

Cloeland Elec e laumea:ms Co aPerry Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2!. ALAB-298,2 NRC 730. 736 37 e 19756 Board rehance on preisuse findings and post-heanns serificahon ey 5talT. LBP 84 31. 20 SRC 5071644s Cles etand Elecne 1:lummat;rg Co (Perrs Nuclear Pomer Plant. Umts I and 27. ALAB 298. 2 NRC

'30. 737 e19'5 s awanment of Board responsibihties to Staff. LBP 84-31,20 SRC 506 n 8 (1984)

Clociand Elettne lituranat,eg Co. (Perr> Nuclear Power Plant. Uruts I and 27, ALAB-443,6 NRC

• 41, 756 i l9"i Board error as ground for appettate rehef. ALAB 788,20 NRC ll!! n.282 (1984)

Cicseland Elestr<c litummstmg Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and '. ALAB 675.15 NRC 1105. 1813 819928 effect of adserse euf t itary ruhngs on structure of a proceeding. ALAB-791. 20 NRC 1583 n.ll i1984i Contal states Gas Corp s Department of Energy. 617 F 2d 854,864 #D C. Cir.1980) purpovt of attornet.ork product prndege. LBP 84-50. 20 NRC 1473 (1984)

Committcc for Lto Reschihty s. Solomon. 603 F.2d 992.1002 n 44 (D C. Ctr 1979), cert.

Jerned. 445 LLS 915 ilH0s agency puri,J>cuon to consider enuronmemal impacts over se5ments of a project other than its own: ALAB 785. 20 SRC 874 n 96 (1984) 42 l

4 s

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASES j

i i

(

Common.e4!th EJ w Co (len 5:4tta Umts I and 27 LL AB 116

• AEC 258. 258 & n 3 (1973) l J!stm6 tion. for apx4 purpmes. bet *een order grantarg d%osery agmnst nonparty and order j

denpng dison ers 4 4eashirig sutapoena add'essed to nonpart); ALAB-780,20 NRC 381 nn 6-8 (lif ts l

Comrronwealth EJen Co. 4Zier Sunon. Onas I and 28, LBP 80 7. Il NRC 245 (1980) alcQuacy of strL. tar 41 m4!cnah and components of spent fuel storage bauns to function for longer than Jes:gn baws. CLI-84-15. 20 NRC 357 f1984 ConsohdateJ Ednon Co of New iork (InJun Point. Uma 2p. CLI.74-23. 7 ALC 947. 951 (1974) matters Icft fer 3.st-heanns rewlution by Start. ALABJ88. 20 NRC 1159 n.329 (1984)

ConeliJ4ted Ednon Co. of New Tork (Indian Point. Umt 2>. CLIJ4 23, 7 AEC 947. 951. 952 & n 8 119'4' unousness of emrenme't!JI QualifICallon deficienCles for purrows of allommg post-heann$

resolution M 5taff. LBP.44-31. 20NRC SM i1984f ConwhJared Edien Co of Ne* York IIndian Pomt. Umt 2). CLI 8215.16 NRC 27,36-37 (1982) coment of testimony on acaJent probabihty. LBP-84 38,20 NRC 586 (19848 Conw>hJ4ted Ednon Co of New iork (Indan Pomt. Umt 21. LBP-83 68.18 NRC 811,888 (1983) reasonableness of 2. hour delay time before esacuation following radiological emergency; LBP-84 31. 20 NRC $*0. $*8 (19846 Consohdated Ednon Co of New Tork ilndian Point. Unit 2). LBP-83-68.18 NRC 311,891. 892 (1983l factors cons Jerco in assesung societal risk of nuclear power plants. LBP 84-31,20 NRC 586 (1984)

Ccnichdated EJacn Co of Ne* iork (Indan Pomt. Umts 1. 2 and 36. ALAB 319. 3 NRC 188 Il9*6i responsibeht) (sr resolution of ncontestcJ swucs pnor to issuance of operating hcenw; LBP-84-26. M NRC 5181464 Conwadated Ednon Co on New icra iIndun Point. Umts 1. 2 and 3). CLI 75 8,2 NRC 17),176 al4*5 j

sho*mg necemt for imtauer. of enfortement prosceJings. DD 84-16, 20 NRC 181 (19846 Conwmers Power Co 'S 3 Rock Point Plants. LBP-92-60.16 NRC 540,544 (1982) l purpow of the emergency plannmg broshure. LBP-84 37,20 NRC 945 (1984)

Consumers Power Co t \\ldland Plant. Umts I and 21. ALAB-101,6 AEC 60. 65,66 (1973) standards for J y.4hfication of NRC udges. AL AB 771. 20 NRC 34 nn 54. 55 ll984s J

Consumers Po*er Ce '\\ltdiard Plant. Umts I and 21. ALAB 122,6 AEC 322 (1973) appealabihty <f crfer grantirg Jacosery against nonparty to a proceeding. ALAB 780. 20 NRC 391 n 7 f14?46 Conwr-ers Power Co '\\ldland Plant. Umts I and 2' ALAB 270,1 NRC 473. 47518975) penalty for fa.:.re 'o brief iswes on appeal. AL AB 793. 20 NRC 1619 (1984l Conumers Po.er Co istdiand Ptant. Unas 1 and 2p. ALTB-283,2 NRC 11 (1975). reconuderation demed. AL AB-3;5. 3 NRC 101119'6e butJen of ptc6f in an enfor6ement proceeding. LBP 84.42,20 NRC 1304 (1984)

Consumers Power Co a Ate!and Plans, Unas ! and 28. ALAB 395,5 NRC 772,779 (1977) hugation eww as irreparable injury for purpow of supporting stay request; CLI-8417,20 NRC 404 (1984 Consumers Power Co i\\ lid!4nd Plant. Umts I and 2t. ALAB 458,7 NRC l$5,159 60,169J0 (1978) f' test for deterrvias whether to impose stay of actmues pending disposition of remand.

i LBP-84 53. 20 NRC 1543 n 36 (1984)

Consumers Power Co 8%Iidland Piant. Umts I and 21. ALAB 458,7 NRC 155,16163 (1978) meen4hty of eccecmic costs of a propnsed ast:on under NEPA. LBP 14-31,20 NRC 577 n 23 i

il994:

Cc.ns mers Power Co t \\l.J:4nd Plant. Units I and 28. AL AB-634,13 NRC %,99 (1981)

Jmosery ruhnp c.f Licenweg Boards as candidates for discretionar) mterlocutory resiew; ALAB.780. 20 NRC 381 n.13 (1984)

Consumers Pomer Co ' Ald!4nd P' ant. Omts I and 2p. AL AB 674.15 NRC 1101 (19821 I

resolunon. at operatmg hsenw stage, of unespected impacts from actmties authorued under constructe permit. ALAB 785. 20 NRC %*l (19848 9

43 N

I 1

LEG A L CITATIONS INDEX Casts Con >umera Power Ca * \\fidLN PLnt t nits I and 2#, AL AB474,15 NRC 1101,1102-03 (1992)

Leunwrg tioard Mtwn to modd.s construet on permits. DD 8416. 20 NRC 164; 2 (1984)

Corsamers Power G < \\1d:aN Punt, Cnns I and 21, AL AS498,16 NRC SE 907 t19821 poho regardmg readmasan to NRC proceedess LBP 84-54,20 SRC 164311984)

Cron-Sound Ferry Scrwes.14 s. United States, 573 F.2J 725,732-33 (2J Car 1978) apphcabahty of rengs of uher federal agencies to NRC proceeding. ALAB 785,20 NRC 885 n.164 f1984r Darr> land Power Cooperatae ela Crowe Boihng Water Reactor), LBP-83 23,17 NRC 655,658 59, 4

all'd, AL AB 733, il NRC 9 819831 4

apphcab+hty of sentnic deugn uandards to plants already built and operaung, LBP-84 32,20 l

NRC 65) (19841 Delaware Rner Bawn Commimon 5. Buas Couniy water & Se.cr Authority 545 F. Supp.138, j

140-42 (E D Pa 1932) prmcipal concerns of Delaware Iber Basin Commisuon ALAB 785,20 NRC 868 n 65 (1984) l Dela*are Water Emergenc> Group v. Itansler, $36 F. Supp. 26, 33-34 (E D. Pa.1981), aft'd,681 F 2J 805 (3d Cir.1982; need for segmented enuronmer talimpact ustements for connicung Delaware Rner water uses-,

AL AB-785,20 NRC 55' n.!! (19341 Delaware Water Emergency Grei.p v. liansler,536 F. Supp. 26,42 n 25 (E D. Pa.1981), aff'd,681 F 2d 805 Od Car 1992; need for NRC to defer to Delaw.re Rner Baun Commisuon findings, ALAB-785,20 NRC 868 n 65 (19846 Department of Water and Po er of the Ccy of Los Angeles (Nf ahbu Nuclear Plant, Unit I),3 AEC i

179, 183 (196 )

7 apphcabiht) of wnmN des an Mandards t0 pLnts already built and operatar'g; LBP-84 32,20 l

NRC tis 3 (1934e Detrois Edimn Cn (Enrico Fer-u Atoms Power P: ant Unit 2), AL AB 730,17 NRC 1057,1066 (1943p degree of sompletion reg, red of emergeno plans prior to finallicensing LBP-84-37,20 NRC 919 (19847 Detroit Ednon Co f Enrwn Fermi Atomic Power Plant, l' nit 21 AL AB 730,17 NRC 1057,1067 t1943:

preibctae findmss as hus for LNenung Board deciuon, ALAB-781,20 NRC 834 n 54 (1984)

Detroit Ediwn Co (Green *oc,3 Energy Center, Units 2 and 31 ALAB-225,8 AEC 379,380 (1974) denul ni dmioahtkatwn : ouon for Lck of proper support. ALAB 777,20 NRC 24 n.1 (1984)

Diamond

• Stration. 95 F R D 503 (1992s showing necewar) to ceta.n Jocuments claimed as prnileged under attorney work product dostrine. LBP 94 50. 20 NRC 1475 (1984) in re Doe,662 F 2d 1073 shoeing neteuar) to cota.n Jotuments chimed as prnileged under attorney work product dottnne. LBP-44 50. 29 NRC 1475 (19948 DuffielJ s Charleston Area Nfeccal Center,503 F 2d 512,51516 (4th Cir.1974) ome for fihrg disquahficanen monons CLl44-20,20 NRC 1041 (1985)

Duke Po*er Co ( Amendment to Nfrerub License 5%f 1773 - Transportation of Spent Fuel from Oconee Nudear Stanon for Storage at Nf 6Guire Nuclear Stanon), ALAB-651,14 NRC 307 (1981) test to determine if a progst has been segmented for purpme of conudering environmental impacts AL AB ?45,20 NRC 872 n 84 (19846 Duke Power Co (Amendment to \\tateruh License SMI 1773 - Transportanon of Spent Fuel from Oconee Nuclear Stanon for S:o age at.\\fcGuire Nudcar Stauoni. AL AB-651,14 NRC 307,313 (1941) wparate esaluanon of ens.ronmentalimpasts nf proposed amendments for moddication of spent fuel pool and spent fuel $Npments. LBP-84-40 A,20 NRC 1200 n 5 (1984)

Duke Pneer Co (Transrmrtate of Spent Fuel from Oconee Nuclear Station for Storage at NicGuire Nudear Stanon), AL AB-651.14 NRC 307,313-15 (1981) need to sum the enuronmental elTetts of two proposed acuons AL AB 790,20 NRC 1454 n.10 (19448 44

~

t 9

i 4

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX

]

CASES

.i I

Duke Power Co (Caumba Nutiear Sur on, Units I and 2). ALAS-687,16 NRC 460 (1982P, vacated 1

m part on other grounds, CLI 8319,17 NRC 1041 (1983) i sundards for directed certificanon of meertocutory ruims; ALA8-791. 20 NRC 1584 n.15 (1984) s Duke Po*er Co. (Cau*ba Nuclear Stauon, Unsts I and 23. CLI-83-19.17 NRC 1041 (1983) resincuens on new enformanon as basis for tats fihng of contentions. L8P 84 30,20 NRC 437 (1984) f standards for admission of reformulated contenuon, ALA8 785,20 NRC 869 n.70 (1984) j Duke Po*er Co. (Witham 8. WGuire Nuclear Sianon. Umts I and 2), ALA8 669,15 NRC 453, 459 71 (1982)

}

hydrogen mitiganon ssystem m ice condenser containments; ALA8 794,20 NRC 1634 n.14 (19g4)

Duke Power Co. (Wilham 8. McGuire Nuclear Stanon Units I and 2), ALAS 669.15 NRC 453,477 (1982)

'4 l

sponsorship of esidence. ALAB-781,20 N RC 831 n.43 (1984) '

d Duplan Corp. v. Deenrg Milhken, Inc., 400 F Supp 497,510 (1975) a cumutanve development of basis for recusa! motion as cause for its unumchness: CLI-84-20,20 NRC 1082 n 52 i1985)

Duquesne Light Co. (Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 2), L8P 84-6.19 NRC 393,40103 (1984) g burden on party seekms waiser of 10 C.F.R. 51.5)(c); LSP 84-35,20 NRC 893 (1984)

Duquesne Light Co. (8ener Valley Power Stanon. Units I and 2), ALA8172,7 AEC 42,43 n.2 i

(1974) denial of disquahficanon rnonon for lack of proper support ALAB 777,20 NRC 23 n.! (1984) j Eastern Oil Transport Inc. v. Umtea suies,413 F. Supp.121 (E.D.N C 1976)

+

waiver of nsht to a beanng; L8P 84 42,20 NRC 1305 n.13 (1984)

]

Easton Uuhues Commasson v. AEC,424 F.2J 847 (D C. Car.1970)

I j

waiver of right to hearms by NRC licensee on its request for hcense amendment; L8P.84-42,20 t

NRC 1305 n.14 419847 a

Ecology Acuon v. AEC. 492 F.2d 998,100102 (2d Cir 1974) modificanon of FES through NRC admemstrative adp.dscanons; L8P.84-31,20 NRC 553 (1984)

EEOC v. Bay 5hipbuild2t's,668 F.2J 304 (7th Cir.1981) j wa: Set of right to a meanng; L8P.84 42,20 NRC 1305 n I) (1984)

EEOC v. Neches Buune Products Co.,704 F.2d 144.148 (5th Cir.1983) disunct on, for appeal purposes. between order granung discovery against nonparty and order j

Jeriymg discosery by quashing subpoena addressed to nonparty; ALAB 780,20 NRC 381 n.9 (1984) i Environmental Coahtion on Nuclear Power v. NRC. 524 F.2d 1403 (3d Cir.1975) adequacy of nser foHower method for prosid ng supplementary coolms water; ALA8 785,20 NRC 857 n.9 41994) '

Environmental Defense Fund v. Gorsuch,713 F 2d 802,815 (D C Cir.1983) means for repeahrs Commnsion pohcy expreued in its regulanons; L8P-84 29,20 NRC 14!

(1984) l Eterson v. Office of Personnel Management,684 F 2d 918,926 27 (D.C. Cir.1982) naht of apphcants to challenge Staff actions by fihng contenuons; L8P 84-42,20 NRC 1306 n.I5 i

(1984)

Federal Broadcasung $> stem v. FCC,225 F 2d 560, 566 (D C. Cir) (dictum), cert. denied sub nom-WHEC v. Federal Broadcasting System 359 U.S. 923 (19551 decision of Board to espedite proceeding as basis for its disquahlication; ALA8-777,20 NRC 40 n.1(1984)

Flonda Power and Light Co (St Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Uma 2), ALA8-280,2 NRC 3,4 n 2 (1975) penalty for failure to file proposed findmgs of fact on issues m controversy; LDP-84 26,20 NRC 61 n 3 !!9841; L8P 84 47,20 NRC 1414 (1984)

Florida Power and Light Co. (St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Umt 2), ALA8 579. Il NRC 223 224 26 (1980)

Appeal Board junsdicuon to hear issue that has been subject of final agency action but that has nesus to matter sull penditis. ALA8 792,20 NRC 1588-89 (19848 45 T

(

1 6

'e H e 6

+n.-n.---

,,-.,w-

.m,.

a._,-.--

.e

,,n,w.

v

__.m 4

5 4

7 2

- i' LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASES

{

F i

' florida Power and Light Co ist Lucie ?iuclear Power Plant. Co.121. AL AB-t03.12 NRC 3011980),

^

l atTd.CLI gi il.13 NRC 838,843 44 fl98tt -

4 j

su!Gciency of methodology for evalualmg reliabibty of emergency (cfJaa:er system. CLI-84-il, 4

20 NRC 8. 9 t19441 Flornia Power and L<ght Co i furkey Poma Nuclear Generaurts uuon. Umts 3 and 4t. 3 AEC 173 s

f1967) need for nonpower reactor lesensees to protect asamst sabouge, LBP 84-29,20 N RC 145 t1984) j Florida Power and Light Co (Turkey Pomt Nuclear Generstms unon. Umts 3 and 4s. 4 AEC 9.12 s

l i1967)

- LBP 84 45,20 NRC I400 (19847 mterpretanon of the terms " common defense and security iPC v. Ilope Natural Gas Co. 320 U.S. 591419448 basis for grantmg exemption to rule barrms financial quah6 cations reuce in operating twense proceedings; LBP-84 30,20 NRC 432 (1984)

Gilligan. % dl & Co. v. SEC 267 F.2d 461 (2d Cir.19591.

allegation of prejudgment asamst Chief Admimstratne Judge of Lacertseg Board Panet LBP-84 29A.20 NRC 386 41984)

Gilhgan. Will & Co. v. SEC 267 F 2d 461. 469 (2d CirJ. cert. demed. 361 U.S. 8% (1959) disquah6cauon of Judges on prejudgment ground. ALA8 777,20 NRC 24 (1984#

Green t NtcElroy. 360 U.S. 474. 495-% (19597 1

need for prousson to all parties of reports made available so Licensics Board. L8P-84 36. 20 NRC 930 t1984i Gulf Od Corp v. FPC. 563 F 24 588. 610 f 3J Cir.1977) decmon of Board to espedite proceedmg as basis for its discafi6 canon. ALAS 777,20 NRC 40 I

l j

n.l(1984)

~

l Gulf States Utilitus Co iRiser Bend Station. Umts I and 2#. ALAB 444. 6 NRC '60,77$ (1977) i g'

effect of pendercy of generse systems analysis study on safety finding for nudear power ;! ant '

i twenses. ALAB 788 20 NRC 1135 n.187 (1984); LBP 84-53,20 NRC 1539 n 22 (1994) f ifall s. Small Busmess Admmistranon. 695 F.2J 175 41983) 1 g

standarJ for dmiuah6 canon of a judge. CLI-84-20. 20 NRC 1078 n.40 a198!#

llenty s. FPC,513 F 2J 395,407 n 33 (D C. Cir.1975:

j scope of enuronmentalimpacts to be considered by NRC on segmented project. ALAB *85,20 6

NRC 8') 81984)-

l flickman v. Ta> tor. 329 U.S. 495. 511 12. 675 5 Ct. 385,393 94. 91 la Ed. 251 (1947) matenals shielded by attorney work product prisilege in NRC proceed. css. LBP 84-50,20 NRC-1473 74 #1984p flame Bos OtTse, Irw. t FCC,567 F 2J 9. 54-56 (D C.Cir 19777 1

proprwt> of contacts between interested parues and ageno decisionmaners. LBP 84-36. 20 NRC 7

i 929 (1984) flouston Lighting and Pomer Co 8 Allens Creek Nuclear Genermung Stauon. Unis Ir. ALAB-e3!.13 l

j!

NRC 309. 31011 i1981)

{

i prohibiuon agamst interlocutory appeals; ALAB-787,20 NRC 1101 n.ll (19948 llouston Lighi:rg and Power Co 85outh Tesas Project, Units I and 23. ALAB-608.12 NRC 168.170 i

?

(1980s l

discosety rulings of Licensing Boards as candidates for discretionary interlocutory review; ALAB 780. 20 NRC 381 n 13 (1984l l

flouston Lighting and Power Co (South Tesas Project. Umts I and 27. CLI-82 9,15 NRC 1363.

I 1365-67 (1982) standard for disquahncahon of a judge; ALAB-777,20 NRC 34 n.54 (1984); CLI 84-20. 20 NRC t

1078 n.46 (1985#

1 j

llouston Lighung and Po er Co 8 South Tesas Project. Unsts I and 2).CLI-82 9.15 NRC I:63,1366 -

i j

tl9829 persons agamst whom monons for disquahncation are directed. LBP 14 29 A, 20 NRC 316 (1984) i ilouston Lighung and Power Co. (South Tesas Project. Umts I and 2), LBP 83-J?.18 NRC 32,59 4'

[

189841 denial of rate rehef as a basis for htigauon of financial quahncations in operstmg twerse proceedmgs. LBP 84 30. 20 NRC 434 (1984)-

s

!I-f 44 I

i k

I i

k i-t i

4 k muse,. -

• =w e,

t

---

t=-rm f---

=

y

,-t'v*-

T-.-w-M'-+OT- -w

.i-r --

-w ee----

-V

-ep-

--v v

s.-vii y-

-g' I

'--9*-+-v-e

w we--=-

i LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX cases j

Houston L:ghung and Power Co (South Texas Pro)ect Umts I and 21, LBP-84-13,19 NRC 659 f1984) i nenus between management character and conthet ofinterest in Apphcants' representauon of party

• hose positaon of adverse to Apphcant's, LBP-84-50. 20 NRC 1467 (19848 Illinois v NRC,548 F 2J 12 4 7th Car 1979) need for heant g in response to 2.206 request DD-84-20,20 NRC 785,798 n.4 (1984) 3 P. Lenahan. lac.,138 F !J 650,651 (2d Cir.19431 basis for #.ahficanon of a Judge on prejudgment ground-ALAB 777,20 NRC 35 (19848 Kansas Gas and E!e ic Co. tWolf Creek Generaung stauon, Unit 18. ALAB462, 7 NRC 320,338 t1978) burden for sausfying requirements for reopening a record. AL AB 786,20 NRC 1090 41984)

Kansas Gas and Electric Co t%olf Creek Generauns stauon, Unit II. ALAB-784,20 NRC 845 (1984) effect ofimtal decision on participational rights of parues AL AB 787,20 NRC 1100 n.9 (19841 l

Kansas Gas and E:ectne Co 4 Wolf Creek Generating Stauen Unit II. ALAB-784,20 SRC $45,846 l

(1984) authonty to insahdate Commission rules or regulauens, ALAB 793,20 NRC 1614 (1984; KerratcGee Corp.1%est CNcago Rare Earths Facihty), CLI-82-2,15 NRC 232,247 56 f1982), affd City of West Chrcago v. NRC,701 F 2d 632 (7th Cir.19833 Licensing Board discreuon to control proceedings ALAB 788,20 NRC 1178 n.463 (1984)

Kerr4fcGee Corp twest Cbcago Rare Earths facilitp, CLI 82-2,15 NRC 232,269 (1982), affd

+

sub nom Cat of West Chacaso *. NRC, 701 F.2d 632 (7th Car.1981s i

l apphcabihty of ruhrgs of other federal agencies to NRC proceeding, AL AB 785,20 NRC 885 n 164 t19848 Kleppe v. Sierra Ch.b. 427 L 5. 390, #aM)l,410,44 L. Ed. 2J 576, SAS,590 f1976) need for separate enuronmental empact statements for two-step approach to dnposal of mdl fashngs, LBP 84-42,20 NRC 13l2 nn 31,32 (1984)

Kleppe v sierra Club, 42' L 5 390. 410 t 19761 I

proper wope of an agenc>'s enuronmental renew under NEPA, ALAB 785,20 NRC 874 f1984) l K eppe v. Sierra Club,42' C 5 390,410, n 21 (1976) wope of enuronrnentalimpact stuoies, LBP-84 31,20 NRC 575 (19848 Kleppe v Sierra Club,427 L 5. 390,49 L. Ed. 2d $76 (1976) i need for consideranon of.lternarnes to ons!te storage of mill tathnss, LBP-84 42,20 NRC 1311, 13l2 n 3111984#

Lake Ene Atlance for the Protecuan of the Coastal Corndor v. Army Corps of Engineers,526 F-Supp.1063.10318W D. Pa 1981), affd, 707 F 2d 1392 f 3d Cir #, cert. demeJ.104 5. Ct. 277 f1983) need to obtain ue.s cf Nanonal Af anne Fisheries Seruce on endangered species in water doers.on prc.ect, ALAB 785,20 SRC 881 o 145 (1984)

Long Island L:shurg Co 134n esport Nuclear Pomer Stauon, Umts I and 21, ALAB-353,4 NRC 381 (1976) j effect of adserie eudentary rulings on structure of a proceeding ALAB 791,20 NRC 1583 n 11 (19848 Long Island L sht:ng Co 85horeham Nuclear Power Stauon, Umt II. ALAB 780,20 NRC 378,382 e

i1984) effect of po! rey statement on standards for directed cernficano,; ALAB 791,20 NRC 1583 n 14 (19841

,i Long Island Lighune Co (5hercham Nuclear Power Stauon, Unit 1). ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102,1l42 (1984)

Board treatment of alleg4tions of welding uotauons on consafety systems. LBP 84 52,20 NRC 1488 fl944s Long liland Lishung Co. (Shereham Nuclear Power Siauon, Uma 1), CLI-83-17,17 NRC 1032 (1983)

Commewon pohc) Jafatonng speculanon on outcome of ongoing proceedings to deterrmne 5

apphcaucet of speci6c regulauons, LBP-84 30,20 NRC 433 fl984) 1 I

(

l 41 4

l

4 1

i LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX f

CASES 1

- i f

Long Island Lighting Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power %unon. Unit I), CLi-84-21,20 NRC 1437,144l (1984) j effect of grant ofluw-power license on subsequent grant of full-po cr hcense; LBP 84 53,20

+

NRC 1547 n.5011984)

Long Island Lighung Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon. Umt I). CLI-84-8.19 NRC 1854 (1984) basis for determming equipment design standards. CLI-84 il,20 NRC 15 n.15 (1984)

Long Island Lighung Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon Uma 1), CLI-84-8,19 NRC 1854 (1984) sundards for granung exempoons to requaements for full-power operanon and circumstances where exemphons are required, CL1-84-19,20 NRC 1059 n.7 Long Island Lighung Co (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon. Umt I), CLI-84-9,19 NRC l.' i (1984)

Commiss on pohey disfavoring speculation on outcome of ongoms proceedings to determme applicahon of specific regulations;. L8P 84-30,20 NRC 433 (1984)

Long Island Lightmg Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power 5tauon, Umt I),CLI-84-9,19 NRC 1323 (1984)

I specincity required of quality assurance contentions; CLI 84 I4,20 NRC 284 n.1 (1984)

Long Island Lighung Co (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon, Umt I), LBP 82-41,15 NRC 1295,1305 (1982) htigabihty of financial quahficauons issues related to construction in an operating license proceedmg; LBP 84 30,20 NRC 434 (1984)

Long Island Lighting Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Umt D, LBP 82-82,16 NRC 1144, l162 (1982) test for determinmg apphcabihty of work product privilege; LBP 84 50,20 NRC 1474 (1984)

. Long Island Lighung Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Umt II, LBP 83-30,17 NRC 1832,1843 (1983) standards for determmms admissibility oflate fited contenuons based on new issues; LBP 84-30,

' 20 NRC 440 (1984)

Long Island Lightmg Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon, Umt 1), LBP 83-57,18 NRC 445,544 -

H983) post hearing resolunon of environmental quahlication deficiencies by StatY, L8P 84 31,20 NRC 507 (1984)

Lonon v. NRC,712 F 2d 1472,1474 (D C. Cir.1983), cert. granted on other grounds sub nom.

Flonda Power and Light Co v. Lonon,52 U S.L.W. J701 (U.S.1984:

type of requests referred to NRC Staff for consideration; DD-84-16,20 NRC 0163(1984)

Louisiana Po cr and Light Co. tw terford 5 team Elecinc Stauon, Umt 3), ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076, a

1093 94 (1983) i i

entent of emergency planmns necessary for plant operation; LBP-84-26,20 NRC 60 (1984)

Louisiana Power and Light Co. iWaterford Steam Electnc Station, Unit 3), ALAB-732,17 NRC 1076, 1096 (1983)

I burden on party claimms preludice from procedural rulmgs; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1851 n.283 (1984)

Louisiana Power and Light Co (Waterford Steam Electnc Stanon Umt 3), ALAB 732.17 NRC 1076, 1103 (1983)

Board rehance on predicine findings and post heanns serification by Staff; LBP 84 31,20 NRC 507 (1984 Louisiana Power aid L.ght Co. (Waterford Steam Efectnc Station Uma 3). ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076, 1103-04, 1106 6 (198')

ii htigabihty of u, olem6nung procedures for emergency plans LBP 84-37,20 NRC 939-40 (1984)

Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electnc Station. Unit 3), ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076, 1106 (1983) emergency planning details appropnate for post-hearing resolution by N RC Staff, L8P 84-26,20 NRC 68 (1984)

Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electnc Stauon, Umt 3), ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076, j

1107 (1983)

}

htigabihty of emergency plan emplemenung procedures; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 516,524 n.14 (1984)

Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electnc Station Umt 3), ALAB 753,18 NRC 1321, t

1329-10 f1983) i finahey of an issue that has not received court review; ALAB-782,20 NRC 848 (1984) 48 i

1

(

t f mempe,-

~--.~

- - ~,

.-a-4

.I

.y i

i

[

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX

[

cases 4

t j

Louinaru Po er and Light Co. t%2terford 5 ream Electne Stanon. Uma 3#, ALAB-753.18 NRC 1321, 1331 (19838 afrg the Jetarted finamss of LBP-83 27.17 NRC 949 (19838 j

litigabddy of *Jequaa of eraergency preparedness brochures. LBP 84-298. 20 NRC 406 (1984)

Louisiana Power ed L;gn Co (%aterford steam Electne *m on, Umt 31. CL173 25. 6 AEC 619, i

t 622 n 3 419?)#

1 j

circurnstances appropna:e for grant of esempr ' ~ f** regulanons. L8P 84 45,20 NRC 1376 n.Il$(19446-Lousuana Power and Light Co (Waterford 5:earo L3'ttr'( Stanon, Umt 3), LBP 82100,16 NRC 1550.1563.

5' afrd. AL AB-732.17 NRC 1076 II*8 bde8ree of completion required of emergency nonficanon and commumcation systems, for full-Po*er operahon. LBP-84 26. 20 NRC 62 (1984)

Louisiana Power and Lrght Co (%sterford 5tearn Electnc Stanon, Umt 3), LBP 82 Il2.16 NRC j

1901 (19827 j

sausfacuon of condamns pnor to issuance of operaung heense: LBP-84 27,20 NRC 126 (1984) 1' Louisiana Power and Light Co. tw terford Steam Elecinc Stauon. Uma 31, LBP 83-27,17 NRC 949 a

i (19831.

trnportance of clarn) in emer8ency planmns brochure. LBP 84-37,20 NRC 945 46 (1984)

Mame Yankee Atorms Power Co. tMene Yankee Atomic Power Stanon). CLI-83 21, la NRC 157.

f19836 l

support of peutions for maner of resuranons. LBP-84-30,20 NRC 435 n 9 (1984) i Mame Yankee Atomac Power Co. Rimne Yankee Atemic Power Stanon) DD 83-3,17 NRC 327

}

(1983#.

1 t

, need for action on safeguards concerns bemg considered serierically in rulemaitmg. DD 84-24,20 j

)

NRC !!61419848 Marcus i Directcr. Otree of w rkers' Compensanon Programs, 548 F.2d 1044.1031 fD C. Cir.19766 -

o I,

need for umchness of Jew;uardicanon mobons. AL AB-777,20 NRC 32 n 43 (1984)

\\

Metropohtan Ednan Co. iThree Mde Island Nuclear Sta 3n, Umt 11. ALAB-698,16 NRC 1290, j^

j 1299 fl982#, revJ m part on other grounds. CLI 83-22,18 NRC 299 (19838 f

acceptaNht) of metPods and solanons different from those set out en regulatory guides; I

AL AB ?88. 20 NRC llel n 341 il984r-i Metropohtan Ednnn Co eThree M.fe liland Nuclear Stanon. Umt is. ALAB 705,16 NRC 1733, 1

1742 n 24 fl992:

{

]

peed for conuJeranon of class 9 accidems for plants in a region of natural hazards; ALAB-781, 20 NRC $27 a 24 819844 i

Metropohtan EJiwn Co j

r Three Mde filand Nuclear Stauen, Umt I). ALAB 729.17 NRC 814 (1983) j dopoution of caso peMeg Commimon Jefimuon of the term *important to safety *1 ALAB ?94. 20 SRC 1812 f1994s

}

I Metropnhtan Ednnn Co i Three Mile Island Nuetear Station. Umt 11. ALAB-729.17 NRC 814,874 n 280 419838 aff*J :n rn$cipal part. CLI-84-II. 20 NRC I (19848 use of the terms Nfd ) grade' and safeterelated". ALAB 788,20 NRC till n.15 (19846 Metropohtan Ediwn (o i Three Mile Island %ctear Stauen, Unet 11. ALAB 729,17 NRC 814, 885 85(19838 Lkenung Board autho= ty to reue* 5tatt analysis before making finallicensmg decision; AL AB.?lt. 20 NRC l171 n 409 (19846 '

Metropnhtan Ediwn Co. 'Three Mile Island Mclear Station, Umt II ALAB 766,19 NRC 981,983

=

(1984s Appeal Boa'dlunsdiction to hear issue that has been subject of final agency acuon but that has -

nesus to matter $t 'l pendin8. ALAB 792. 20 NRC I$88 89 (1984) termmation of Appeal Boardlurndicuen; ALAB 782,20 NRC 841 n.811984#

Metropolitan Ednon Co iThree Mae I, land Nuclear Station, Umt 11. CLI-79 8,10 NRC 141,147 (1979s

- Commisuon authern) to dnpose of appeals from Licensing Board decisions. ALAB-787,20 NRC

!!00 n.7 f1944s Metropoutan Ednun Co e Three Mae Island Nuclear Station, Umt 18. CLI-84 il,20 NRC 1,16 i

(1984) precluvon of plant operation pending rewtuhon of generic systems interaction program.

ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1133 n 18? #1984 1

49 E

4 k

I I

1 I

1

, we

... -., =

I i

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX Casts

,a 2

1 Metropolitan E4 pn Co iThree \\l.le Island Nuclear Stasson. Unit it, LBP 815% 14 NRC 12tl,1588 j

(19818

)

preciesbois of ewuanon routes based on potennal wmJ arecsion. LBP 84 298. 20 NRC 415 (1984s l

Metropohtan E& son Co f Three Mile Island Nuc' ear Statsofi. Umt II, LBP-8160.14 NRC 1724 09817 4

authority of Licensing Board so admit an apphcant's contenucns; LBP-84-42,20 SRC 1301 n 8 l

-(1984)

{

i Metropohtan E& son Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy.103 $. Ct.1556. 75 L. Ed. 2d 134 (19831 psychological stress as ground for dismissal of apphcation with prejudice; LBP-84 43,20 NRC 1337d19841 Metropohtan E& son Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy,460 tLS,766.103 S. Ct.1556 0983}

l i

htigabihty of psychoingical heahh contentions; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 915 8.1984s Mannesota v. SRC,602 F 2J 482 09797 imuanon of wasie con 6dence rulemaking proceedms; CLI 8415,20 NRC 289,31L (19841 7

Mississippi Power and Light Co. (Grand Gulf Nuclear Stanon. Cruts I and 21. ALAB lJ0,6 AEC 42), 426 0 9?3#

t need for ments redew of coratenuon for its admission. LBP 84.40A. 20 SRC 1198 n 4 (1984) -

Mississippt Power and Light Co. (Grand Gulf Nuclear 5 anon Units I and 2s. ALAB 704,16 NRC 1725, 1730 (1992) 4 a

shommg required on other factors when good cause is not shawn for readmission of party; j

LBP.84-54,20 NRC 1645 (19847 l

In re Murphy. 560 F.2J 326. 336 81977) 1

{

t showing necewary to obtain documents claimed as prmleged under attorney work product t

doctrine; LBP.84 50,20 NRC 1475 (1984p j

Nagel v. Department of Health anJ liuman $ersices.' 707 F.2d 1384.1387 iFed. Cir 1983) re ponsibthues of Chief AJmmistranse Judge of Atom e Safety and Licensmg Board Panel.

3 LBP-84 29A. 20 SRC 387 (19848 4

Nash S Cahfano. 613 F 2J 10 (2d Cir.1980s -

decision of Buard to espedite proceedmg as basis for its disquahfication; ALAB 777,20 NRC 40 -

n.149448 '

i f

Nanonal Broadcastmg Co_ s. Uruted States. 319 U.S.190 0943) pubhc snterest in granting escanptions from regulanons; LBP-84 45,20 NRC 1381 n.143 H984) i

}

Sational small Shipments Tramc Conference, Inc. v. ICC,590 F.2d 345,350 #D C. Cir.19788 propnety of contacts between interested parues and agency decssionmakers where a formal hearms is under way: LBP 84 36. 20 NRC 929-30 (1984#

Natural Resources Defense Council. Inc. v. NRC,147 F.2d 633. 653 a $7 (D C. Cir 19766, vgv'd on 4

other grounds, sub nom. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRC,435 U 5. 519 H9785 3

need for ensironmentalimpact statement for estended spent fuel storage. CLI 8415,20 NRC 312 n 8 81984#

New England Coahuon on Nuclear Pollution v. SRC, $82 F 2d 87,93-94 (Ist Cir.1978)

}

i umms of iwuance of Staff environmentalimpact statement; ALA B-785. 20 NRC 866 a $6 0984)

New England Coahtion on Nuclear Pollution s NRC,582 F.2d 87,98 Ost Cec.19781 i

l 4

prestusion of NRC roiew of LPA nndings. ALAB-785,20 SRC 869 n 67 09841 New Engbnd Coahuon on Nuclear Potiution v. SRC,727 F.2d 1827 (D C. Cit.19841 t

' cause for remand of amended financial quahficatsons tute; ALAB 784,20 NRC 847 0984) i j

d6 position of 6nancial quah0 cations rule; LBP-84-35, 20 NRC 895 H9841 hogabshty of Gnancial quahrecanoes contennons in operatmg license proceedings. LBP 84 26,20 t

NRC 57 n 109848. LBP-84-30. 20 SRC 432 09847 need for financial review of hcersee to determme its quahfications to operate espanded spent i

fuel pool DD 84 25. 20 NRC 1704 0984) 1 a

New England Power Co. s. SRC,683 F.2d 12 (1st Cir.1982) 4 recovery of costs incurred by NRC Staff m processing apphcation that is subsequently withdrawn; LBP-84 43. 20 SRC 1338 0984)

New York Shipbuildmg Corp,1 AEC 707 0960

{.

7 ulumste burden of proofin an enforcement proceeding; LBP-84 42,20 NRC 130$ n.12 0984) -

i

+

4 i

i i

f

-eegse..y

^.

r.

,..m._

m__-

_.m.,

,- _ _ ~,. _., _. _., _

4

~ -,

+

A 1

I i

l 4,

i j

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX j

CASES 1

j.

Niagara Mohawk Po.er Cc,p iNine Mile Poens Nuclear Stapon. Umt 21. ALAB 264. I NRC 347, Ji7 (1975 j

nsha of party to appean grounds of a Inal tribunal's result, ALAB 793. 20 NRC 1597 n 3

+

standard arphcable to appellate reuew of Lkeassag Board's factual Gndmss; ALA B 781,20 NRC

- i 834 n.53 41984) -

Niagara Moha k Po.er Corp. #Nine Mite Pom Nuclear Stapon. Unit 27. ALAB-264. I NRC 347, l

371 72 (19'5s need for recirculation of FES because of modincations. LBP44-31,20 NRC 553 (19845 Niton v. Sinca. 487 F 2d 700, 714-17 (1973) osernding attorney worli product privilege. L8P-84-50,20 NRC 1473 (19848 NLR8 v. Monsanto Chemical Co.,205 F 2d 763. 764 (sih Cir.19531 Board authonty to modify procedural rules; AL AB 785,20 NRC 864 n 44 (19844 Northern Indiana Pubhc Service Co. IBadly Generating station No Ip. ALAB-76. 5 AEC'312,3!3 (1972) basis for disquahficauon of a judge on prejudgment ground; AL AB 777. 20 NRC 34 n.55 81984)

Northern States Po*er Co. (Monticello Nuclear Generauris Plant, Unit 1). ALAB-6ll,12 NRC 301, 304 (1980s standard apphcable to appellate review of Licensing Board's factual findings, ALAB-781. 20 NRC 834 n 53 (19846 Northern States Power Co. Nonucello Nuclear Generaung Plant Unit is. CLI 72 81. 5 AEC 25,26 (1972)

]

circumstances apprornate for waiver of or esception to regulanons; L8P-84 30,20 NRC 431. 434 (1984 Nonhern States Power Co. ITyrone Energy Park. Uma 1), CL180 36.12 NRC 523 (19801 i

resosanon of constrwuon permit because of halt in construction. DD 84 23,20 NRC 1553 (19848 OfTshore Po.er Sy stems < Flodung Nuclear Power Pfantsi, ALA8.489. 8 NRC 194 (1978) 4 3

propnety of heartog on enuronmentalissues preof to iswance of final enuronmental statement.

i i

AL ABM85,20 NRC $65 n 52 (19848 -

Othhore Power $>nems tFloanns Nuclear Power Plants), ALAB 489. 8 NRC 194,221-22 81978e :

{

right of apphcants to challenge Statiutions by Ghng contennons; LBP 84 42,20 NRC 1300 n.15 j

(1984s j

Offshore Power $ntems

• Floating Nuclear Power Plants), LBP 7915,9 NRC 653 (19799 j

]

need for cons >Jeration of alternatnes to onsste storage of mill taihngs; LBP 84-42,20 NRC 1311 f1984

'Othhore Power Soterrs eManufutunns License for Floatmg Nuclear Power Plants) ALAB 689,16 1

NRC 887,890 f1982e I

l wore of wa sponte appellate reuew; ALAB 793. 20 NRC 1624 n.169 di984r l-Osterneth v. E.T. Barwed Indusines. 82 F R D. 81. 87 (N D. Ga.1979) j wore of attorne) *ork product pnsdese. L8P44 $0,20 NRC 1473 (1984 l

j Pacific Gas and E!ectric Co. (Diablo Canyun Nuclear Power Plant. Una I), CLI-8130,14 NRC 950 i

(1981) -

t came for suspenwon oflow power operaung license ALAB-749,20 NRC 1447 (1984#

}

PactGc Gas and Electne Co (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. Unit I), CLI-84-5,19 NRC 953, j

960-61 (19847 J

adequacy of operdict emperience at nuclear facihty; DD 84 21. 20 NRC 793 n 3 f1984) 4 PaciGc Gas and Elecinc Co. IDiablo Canyon Nuclear Po*er Plant, Uma 2), ALAB-254. 8 AEC 1184 1

(1975) 4 dispouuon reiprotesed findings of fact based on entra-record eudence. L8P 84-32,20 NRC 744 '

n 20 (1984t Pacific Gas and Electnc Co. (Diablo Canton Nuclear Power P: ant. Umts I and 21. ALA8 il9. 9 NR 42,45 (1979t nope of wstmc devan for nuclear power plants; ALAB-793. 20 NRC 1616 (1984#

Ia' i

1 51' x

i t

e 5

9 1

vy,

,,. -.., -.,.. ', -m'*' -

• v'--C-

'+'r'*'w er-'

'-r -

p-r-~

w e7

v e

• -. - -~

e+~

-F

• s+-re-

' = -

'w-'-~**-

'----'r-*"-7

. ~--- -..-. -.

i.

1 8

1 LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX j

CASE 5 i

I i

Pacinc Gas and Electnc Co (Diablo Canyon Nucleat Po*er Plant, Umts I and 21, ALAB-598,18 NRC 876 (19:07

.f standards to de addressed by parties commentmg on need for reoremns the record. CLI 8418, g

20 NRC 809 (1914)

Pacific Gas and Electne Co. IDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2p, ALAB444,13 NRC 903,909 (1981) -

l scope of seistmc design for nuclear power plants; ALAB-793,20 NRC 1616 (1984)

Pacinc Gas and Elecinc Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-644,13 NRC 903,914 (1981) standmg to appeal; ALAB-790,20 NRC 1453 n.9 81984)

I Pacinc Gas and Electnc Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units I and 2), ALAB-644,13 NRC 903,924 n.40 (1981), review dechned, CLI 8212A,16 NRC 7 (19821 deGmtion of" design response spectra *; ALA8-788. 20 NRC I!69 n 395 (1984)

Pacific Gas and Electnc Co, (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB 644,13 NRC 903,937 (1981) measures appropnate for achieving regulatory standards for emergency plans; LBP 84-37,20 NRC 939 (1984) -

Pacinc Gas and Elecinc Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant L* nits I and 2), ALAB 728,17 i

NRC 777,8101I (1983) regulatory requirements for systems interaction studier, ALAB-789,20 NRC 1l28 n.131 (1984)

PaciGC Gas and Elecine Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 27, ALAB-775,19 NRC 1361,1366-67 & n.18 (1984) 2 particulanty required of matenal supportirig motion to reopen a record, AL AB 786,20 NRC.

1090 n.4 (19848 PaciGe Gas and Electne Co (Dia., Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 21, ALAB.782, 20 NRC 838,840-42 il984p Appeal Board junsdiction to hear issue that has been subject of final agency action but that has nesus to matter still pending. ALAB 792,20 NRC 1588-89 (1984)

Pacific Gas and Electric Co (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. Units I ant; 2), CLI 80-24,11 i

NRC 775 (1980)

I

(

use of protectne order to avoid the need for en parte esam. nation of reports, LBP-84 36,20 l

l N RC 930-31 (19843 1

Pacinc Gas and Electnc Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units I a id 21, CLI 816,13 NRC 443, 446 (1981)

I appropriate forum for addressing adequacy of diesel generator bus: ding, DD 8411,20 N RC 230 j

f19847 Pacific Gas and Elecinc Co IDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), CL1-83 27,18 NRC 1846 (1983) g matenality of onsite diesel generators to low power operaten LBP 84 45,20 NRC 1353 n.19 i

l (1984)

Pacinc Gas and Electnc Ca (Diablo Caelon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), LBP.8121,14 -

NRC 107,120-23 (1981) j

~ degree of protection to be afforded to the public during low power operatinn; L8P 84 45,20 NRC 1350 n.14 (1984)

PATCO v. Federal Labor Relanons Authonty,685 F 2d $47,569 n 46 (D C, Cir 1982) decision of Board to expedite proceedirig as basis for its disqualification; ALAB-777,20 NRC 40 j

n.1ft984)-

Pecliham v. Ronnco Corp. 288 F.2d 841,843 fist Cir.1961) standard for Gnding disqualeGcation motion untimely; CLt 84 20,20 NRC 1082 (1985)

Pennsylvama Hydroelectnc Development Corp.,15 FERC 166,152 #1981) preclusion of agency considerauon of an issue by Delaware Rner Basin Compact; ALAB 785,20 j

NRC 869 n.67 fl984p Pennsylvama Power and Light Co. (Susquehanna $ team Electric Station, Umts I and 2h ALAB-56),

10 NRC 449,450 n.1 i1979) i standards appbcable to lay representatsves in NRC proceedirigs. ALA8-778,20 NRC 47 n.4 (1984) 4

.52 i

1 I

i j

i i

4

..w yi-4 re-m9-..i

+e-w ow,.

g a.m n.

-- ew, -,.--.

ow,,

m.-

9-

,y.,,._p-eg.--,,,-.

.,a r-- g

-v-e--.arN-,

7.<7-re

4 a

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX Cuts i

Peuhon for Emergency and Remedial Acuen, CLI 78-6, 7 NRC 400. 406 0978:

resporiubebty fer choosirs remedy for a violanon, DD 4417,20 NRC 23l 0984)

Peution for Emergency and Remedial Acteon. CLI-80 21.11 NRC 707 0980s operanon of pianis with enuronr ental quahdicanon deficiencies. CLI-84 II,20 NRC 3 0984)

Peuuon for Emergency and Remedial Acuon CLI-80 21, il NRC 707,714-15 0980) deadlme for wahficanon of motor operated salses. LBP-84-38,20 NRC 1022 0984)

Pennon for Snutdown of Cenam Reactors. CLI.73 31,6 AEC 1069.1070 0973), af1*d sub nom.

Nader v NRC. 513 F 2d 1045 ID C. Cir.1975) findmg required for bcensms o(nuclear power plants; DD-84-16,20 NRC 166-67 0984)

Philadelphia Destnc Co. (Fulton Generatmg Stanon. Unas I and 23. ALAB-657,14 NRC 967 098D 4

t authontauon of wnhdra*al of applicauon *nh pretudice; LBP-84 33,20 NRC 767 0984)

Philadelphia Electnc Co. (Limernk Generaung Stanon. Unas I and 2). AL AB 262. I NRC I63,197 I

n.54 09751 basis for Nanonal Enuronmental Polky Act JuJaments for any facihty; L8P-84-31,20 NRC 552 53 (1984#

Philadelphia Elenne Co. (Limench Generating Station. Umts I and 2), ALAB-778. 20 NRC 42,48 U984) hogabihty of amendment of operatmg bcense apphcanon; ALAB-785. 20 NRC 884 09841 s

Philadelphia Electnc Co. 8Limench Generaung 5: anon. Umts I and 2). ALAB-789,20 NRC 1443.

1446 0 984#

most important factorin determmms need for a stay; ALAti 794. 20 NRC 1633 n ll 0944)

Philadelphia Electne Co (Penh Bonom Atomic Po er station. Umts 2 and 3), ALAB 216,8 AEC

13. 20-21 119748 detail regwred of evidence supporting contennon for its admission, LBP-84 40A. 20 NRC II98 n.)(1994:

Philadelphia Elec:nc Co 'Penh Bonom Atomic Po er Stanon. Unas 2 ar.d 3) AL AB-509. 8 NRC 679. 683 n 8 firts wore of sua vonte appetta:e reuem. ALAB 793. 20 NRC I624 n 169 09841 Porter County Chapter of the lia.k %aiton League v NRC,606 F.2d 1363 <D C. Cir.1979) need for heanns m responw to 2 2n6 request. DD-84-20,20 NRC 785,198 n 4 0984)

Poner County Chapter of the liian Walton League. Inc. v. NRC,606 F 2J 1363.1370 (D C Cir.

1979; risk to bcenwe constructing a nutlear po*er plant. 00-84-23. 20 NRC 1554 n 2 81984)

Potashneck v. Port City Construcuon Co. 609 F 2J 1801 (5th Car D. cert demed,449 U.S. 820 0980) standard for daquabfkanon of a judge. CLb84 20. 20 NRC 1078 n 46 0985)

Potomac Electric Power Co. IDouglas Point Nuclear Generatmg Stanon. Umts I and 21, ALAB-218, 4 AEC 79. 89 M (1974>

authonty to insahdate Comm's54on rules or regulanons. ALAB 784. 20 NRC 846 n 2 0984),

ALAB 79). 20 NRC 1914 (1944)

Potomac Electne Power to (Dm.glas Pomi Nuclear Generating Stanon. Unas I and 21. ALAB 277, i NRC 539,546 'l975*

reason for detay of enuronmentat heannes um.I Fmal Enuronmentat Statement is circulated:

AL AB 785. 20 NRC 464 n 43 (19848 Power Rextor Desetopment Co t Internavonal Union of Electn.a!, Radio & Muhme Workers 367 U S 396 49617 NRC dntmshon between construenon and operanonalimpacts of an activity; ALA8-785,20 NRC 871 n 90 (19448 Pnwer Reactor Deselopment Co s U 5.396.4t$f19618 internanona! Urpon of Electncal, Radio & Machme Workers 367 rnk to hcenwe tomtrucims a nuclear po*er plant. DD-84 23,20 NRC 1554 n.2 0984)

Pubhc Seruce to of Indiana iMarele Hill %vdear Generaung Station. Umts I and 2# ALAB 316. 3 NRC 167 f19N authority of Lxewng soard to adrmt an applicant's contentions; LBP-84 42,20 NRC 1301 n 8 (1944#

53 l

l

f LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX Cms i

?

Pubis Scrwe Crt of Inaana ( AlcNe Hdt Nuclear Gens raung Stanon. Umts I and 26. AL AB-405. 5 i

a I

NRC 1190.1892 (19">

factors considered et Arpe 61 Scard in deudsrig w hetner to esercne directed ceru6 canon 4

' authoni); AL \\B 794. 20 NRC 1582 n 8 (19842 standard for dncrenonary in ertotutory reuce of Licenung Board order; ALAB-780. 20 NRC j

381 n.12 (19145 l

Pubhc Seruce Co. of in hana l\\tarble Hdi Nuclear Generating Stauon, Umts I and 21, ALAB-437,6 i

NRC ed0,632 (19779 meight given to potential for irreparable harm, in ruhng on sta) requests; ALAB 789,20 NRC f

Pubhc Scrwe Co. of indiana t Ntarble Hal Nutlear Generaung Stanon. Umis I and 2), ALAB 461. 7 1446 (1984#

j

]

NRC 313. 315 (19'Si effect of fadure to br ef cuernons on appeal AL AB 781. 20 NRC 824 n.4 (19341 i

Pubhc Seruce Co of Indiana t Ntarble Hdi Nutcar Generaung Stanon. Umts I and 21. ALAB-493,8 f

NRC 253. 270 7118978:

demal of stay motion becau e of failure of mosant to address factors of 10 C F R. 2.788(el; g

ALAB 789,20 NRC 1444119846 i

i Pubhc Seruce Co. of Indiana INiarNe Hill Nuclear Gener4ung Station Umts I and 28. ALAB 530,9 NRC 261. 262 419*97 i

Appeal Board prnacuan to hear inue that has been sub;ect of final agency action but that has nesus to rnatter stdl penirg; ALAB 792,20 NRC 1588 89 t19448 Pubhc Seewe Cn of inlana tstarNe tidl N uclear Generaung Station. Umts 1 and 27, CLI-8010,11 4

NRC 438. 442 4311930)

NRC means for anunns,pahtv consirwuon of nuctear power planis. DD-8417. 20 NRC 233 41934)

Punhc Serwe Co of Ne* Hamphire (Seabronk Stahon. Uma 2), CLt.84 6.19 NRC 975 (1494) htig bihty of ecowrme iuses in NRC proceedings. ALAB 789 20 NRC 1447 (19841 Pubhc Serue Co of Ne* Harenhire (Scabrook Stanon, Umt 27, CLI.84-6.19 NRC 975,979 81994i specincity requireJ of 2 2% peuuons: DD 8418. 20 NRC 244 (19443 Pubhc Seruce Co. of New Hampmre f 5eabrook Stanon. Umis I and 21. AL AB 271,1 NRC 478.

482 83 11975) treatment of argal as monon for d:rected cert 0 canon of oral order; AL AB ?50,20 NRC 380 n38191148 Pubhc smice Co. of New Hamnhire 15eabrook Stahon. Units I and 2p. ALAB 442.6 NRC 33,41 (19776 Lic;nues Board ireatment of conflating ue. points of espert witneues; AL ABJ81,20 NRC 834 n64(1984:

Pubhc Seruce Co. of New llaenhire (Scabrook Stanon. Units I and 28. AL AB 471,7 NRC 471 (19781 factors influenang sele 6 tic r t.f wies for disposal of mill taihngs LBP 44 42,20 NRC 1320 t 1954)

Pubhc Scruce Co of New Hamnhire (Seabrook Stahon, Umts I and 21. ALAB 513,8 NRC 694. 695 (1978) terminanon of Apreat Boa *J Jurmliction; ALAB 782,20 NRC 841 (1984)

Pubhc scrwe Co of Ne* Ila nhire (Seabrook Station. Umts I and 27. ALAB 513,8 NRC 694 695 4 6 41978)

\\ppeal BoarJ Jurmlichon to hear suue that has been subsect of Gnal agency achon but that 'tas nesus in matter suit pending. ALAB-792,20 NRC 1588 89 (19841 Pubhe serwe Co of New Ha*pshire (Scabrook Stauon. Units I and 2p. ALAB 731,17 NRC 1073.

1974 75 (1983 descnction ofinterlocutory order; ALAB 787,20 NRC 1100 n 8 (19446 Pubhc serwe Co of New Harnpsnire (Seabrook Siahon. Umts I and 27. ALAB 734,18 NRC 18,14 n 4 (194D etTect of failure of party to address standards for directed certincanon; ALAB 79f 20 NRC 1582 n 7 (1984 54

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASES f

Pubke Seruce Co of New Hampshire (Seabrook Stanon. Umas I and 2p. ALAB 737,18 NRC 168.

i 171 (1983) j factors considered 5 4rMal Bc,arJ in deciding whether to esercise Jirected certMcation authonty: 4L 4B *41. 20 NRC 1582 n 811984)

~

Pubhc Senwe Co cf New Hampsh.re 65cabrook Station. Umts I anJ 27. AL AB.749.18 NRC 1195.

119? n I (19836 denial of disquahficatsen motion for lack of proper surenrt; ALAB 777,20 NRC 24 n 1 (l984p i

Pubhc Senke Co. of Ne* Hampsnne (Seabrook Stauon Umts I and 27, ALAB 749.18 NRC 1195.

I19B (1983) need for timelencss of Jaqual4 canon monens. AL AB 777. 20 NRC 32 n 43 t1954) 1 Pubbe Scruce Co of Ne= Hampshire 45eabrook Stanon. Umts I and 2#.CLI-77-8. 5 NRC 503. !!6 l

(19?7)

Commisuon authonty to determine need for and scom of further heannss; CLI-84-It 2C NRC i

810 (1984#

i Pubhc Sense Co. of New Hampshre t5eabrook Stanon. Umts I and 2s. CLi 7*-8. 5 NRC 503,521 (19776 1

test for determimeg

• Nther to impose stay of actnines pendirig dispositio.. of remand; l

LBP-84 53. 20 SRC !!43 n.36 (19e4r j

Pubhc Senne Co. of New Hampshire escabrook Stauon. Units I and 2s. CLt 77 8. 5 NRC 503.

$24-23 (1977) t I

use of tainteJ informa:cm m selection of shernatnes for mill taihngs disposal. LBP 84-42,20 NRC 1322 n 75 (1944s Pubhc Scruce Co. of New Hampshire t5eabrook Stanon. Umts I and 2t. LBP-83 32A,17 NRC 1170, 1177 n 5 (19838 ac sht snen to emergena planneg standards of NUREG 0654. LBP44 3?. 20 NRC 939 n.)

l 419948 Pubue Seruse Co of New Hamp@ ire s NRC. 582 F 2d 77 (1st Car 9, cert. demed. 439 U 5 1046 (19 Se agenc) Junsdstion to awJer enuronmental impacts oser segments of a profect other than its own. AL AB.*85. 20 N RC 8'4 n 96 819848 Pubhc Seruce Co of Oktatera e Brack Fos Station. Umts I and 21. CL1-80-8. Il NRC 433. 434 (1980s circumstances marran:: g conuderanon of class 9 accidents; AL AB ?81. 20 NRC 827 (1984e Pubt:c Senice Co of Oklahc-a 4 B!ack Fos Stanon. Umts I and 27. LBP-8310.17 NRC 410 41983) wit!'drs*al of operates trense appfwation without prejudice. LBP 84-51,20 NRC 1482 t1984)

Pubbe senwe Elecinc at:d Gas Co f Hope Creek Generaung Stanon. Umt 18. ALAB-739.19 NRC

13. 20 e 1904 standards for disquahfca: en cf SRC Judges. AL AB-777,20 NRC 34 n $4 41984)

Pubhc 5enice Electne and Gaa Co iHope Creek Generaung station. Umts I and 21. ALAB 518. 9 NRC 14,39 s l9'9s bass for Sauonal Enve:' mental Pohey Act Judgments for an> facihty; LBP-84-31,20 SRC 552 53 81984 Pubire 5ense Elecinc and Gas Co 854 tem Nuclear Generaung 5tauon. Umt !). ALAB-650.14 NRC

43. 49 (19811. a!TJ sub t'cm. Townsfup of Lome-Alloways Creek s.Pubhc Seruce Electric and Gas Co. 687 F 2d 732 8142, etfect of failure to bnef eweptions on appeal. ALAB 781,20 NRC 824 n 4 (19841 Puerto Rico Electric Po.er A.thonty INorin Coat Nuclear Plant. Umt It, ALAB-662.14 NRC !!25

. (1961) aathoniaunn of eithdra.el of applKauon with prejudice; LBP 84-33. 20 NRC 767 (19841 Puerto Rico Electnc Pnwer hihonty iNorth Coast Nuslear Plant. Umt 14. ALAB-662,14 NRC 1125.1133 34 t19416 showing neceuary for wessf.I peuuon for dnmissal of apphcanon with prejudice. LBP 84 43, 20 SRC 1337 (19%4:

Reese Sales Co s. Hardit af 6 F 2J 183 (9th Cir.1972)

• aner of right to a heares. LBP-84-42,20 SRC 1305 n 13 (1984#

55 5

t emom a>

9

n LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASES i

Renegottauon Board v Banrercraf t Co,415 U 5 1,24 (1974 htigation cupense as irreparable mjury for purpow of supportmg my reques.CLi-8417,20 NRC j

804(19841 Rockford League of women Voters v NRC,679 F 2d 1288,1222 (7th Cir 1952) appropriate foriam for addressing adequacy of diesel generator building. DD-8417,20 NRC 230 (1984)

Roosevelt Campobello Internanonal Park Commnsion v. EPA. 684 F 2d 1041 (1st Cir.1982) l studies of endangered speces required for comphance with Endangered Species Act ALAB-785, 20 NRC 831 a 145 (1984)

Roosevelt Campobeflo international Park Commnsion v. EPA. 684 F 2d 1041,1048-49 (1st Cir 1982) dc6nihon of jeopardy to the eugence of a speues, ALAB 785,20 NRC 881 n.147 (19841 l

Sacramerito Mungipal Utihty Dntrgt iRancho Seco Nuclear Generaurg Sunon), AL AB-665,14 i

NRC 799. 803 (1981)

~

scope of sua sponte appellate reuce; ALAB 793,20 NRC 1624 n.169 (1984 Sangamon Valley Teleuuon Corp v Umted States. 269 F 2d 221 (D C. Cir.1959) propriety of contacts between interested parties and agency densionmakers; LBP-84 36,20 NRC

^

929 (1984)

Siegel v. AEC,400 F 2d 778,784 (D C.Cir.1968) interpretauon of the terms common defense and security"; L8P-84-45,20 NRC 140! (19841 Sierra Club v. Freeh!ke,345 F. Supp 440,444 (W D. Wis 19727, aft'd,486 F 2d 946 (7th Car 1973)

I uses of envirocmentalimpact studies. LBP-84 31,20 NRC $75 (19841 Sier a Club = Froehlke,534 F 2d 1289 (8th Cir 197(o need for conuderanon of alternatnes to onste storage of mdi taihngs. LBP 84-42,20 NRC 1311 (1984)

Sierra Club v Frochtke,534 F 2d 1289,1303 04 88th Cir 19?61 need to obtain siens of Nanonal Manne Faheries Seruce on endangered species m water j

dnersion project' ALAB 785,20 NRC 881 n.145 (19846 Sierra Club v Morton, S'4 F 2d 856 ID C. Cir.19756 need for wparate enuronmentalimpact statements for two-step approach to dnposal of mill taihnss. LBP 84-42. 20 NRC 1318 n 30 t19846 Smith v. Danto,585 F.2d 83. 46 (1978 standard for nndmg dnquahncauon monon unumely; CLI 84-20,20 NRC 1082 (l985)

South Carohna Electric and Gas Co (%rgit C, Summer Nuclear Stauon, Urut 18, ALAB.642.13 NRC 881, 895 96 (1981), alt'd sub nom Fair 6 eld Umted Achon v NRC. 679 F 2d 261 (D C. Cir 1982)

Gndings necessary prior is issuance o Part 70 laense; ALAB-778,20 NRC 48 (1984) r Southern California Edison Co. (San Onofre Natear Generaung Sutton, Umts 2 and 3). ALAB-680, 16 NRC 127,137 (1982) l estimation of number of contammated injured m a nuclear accident; LBP 84 31,20 NRC 535, 5 % (19843 Southern Cahforma Edison Co (San Onofre Nuclear Generating Siation, Umts 2 and 31 AL AB 717, 17 NRC 346,366 68 (1983)

{

sponsorship of cudence; ALAB 781,20 NRC 831 n 43 (1984)

Southern Cahfornia Ednon Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generaung Station, Umts 2 and 3), ALAB 717, 17 NRC 346. 380 n.57 (1983) predictne 6ndmss as baus for twenung Board decnion; ALAB 781,20 NRC 834 n.54 (1984) 1 Southern Cahfornia Edison Co. (San Onofre Nutear Genermung Stanon, Uruts 2 and 31, CLI-8133, 14 NRC 1091 (1981) need to conuder impacts of earthquakes on emergency planmng, ALAB 781,20 NRC 824 (1984)

Southern Cahforma Edison Co (San Onofre Nuclear Generaung Stauon, Umts 2 and 31, CLi-8813, l

14 NRC 1091.109192 (198t p i

need for cons 4deranon ofimpacts on emergency planning of earthquakes occurnns during accidental radiologgal release; CLi-8412,20 NRC 250,256,259 (1984)

Southern Cahforma Ednon Co (San Onofre Nuclear Generaung 5tauon, Umts 2 and 3), CLI 8133, 14 NRC 1091,1092 (19818 need to conuder umultaneous occurrence of a LOCA concurrent with an earthquake for plant hcensing. LBP 84-45. 20 NRC 1374 n.101 (1984) 56 i

i

}

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX i

CASES i

i i

6 Southern Cahforma Eown Co t5an Onofre Nuclear Genera ing Stanon. Unas 2 and 3), CLI-8310.

?

17 NRC 528 (198D entent of emerges, plarWng rrcasures that must be taken. LBP-84 37,20 NRC 940 (1984)

Southern Cabforma Eason Co (San Onofre Nuclear Generaurg Stanon, Umts 2 and 3). CLI 8310

(

17 NRC 528. 532. 533. 535-36 t1983) j need for proviseon of measures to care for contaminated injured indmduais. LBP-84 31,20 NRC j

531. 535. 536 (1984 Southern Cahforma Edison Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generating Stanon. Unas 2 and 31, CLI 8310 g

{

17 NRC 528. 335 36 (1983) j htigabihty of contennon questiomns adequacy of medical services for contaminated injured; i

LBP-84-298. 20 NRC 402,403 (19848 l

Southern Cahforma Eduon Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generating Stanon. Units 2 and 3), LBP-82 3 l

!$ NRC 61.185-97 (1982) i degree of prctection to be afforded to the public dunng lav power operation: LBP 84-45,20 NRC 1350 n.14 (19848 Southern Cahforma Edison Co (San Onofre Nuclear Generancs Stauon. Unas 2 and 3), LBP 82 J9 l$ NRC 1163 till (1982), a!Td. ALAB 717.17 NRC 346 (1983) expansion of ernergency planmns tones beyond Commisseon requirements. ALAB 781,20 NRC 831 (19848 Southern Pacifk Cornmun canons Co. v. ATA T 740 F 2d 980. 990 91 ID C. Cir 1984) basis for disquahDcanon of a Judge on prejudgment ground. AL AB-777. 20 NRC 35 n 56 (1984)

Statement of Pohey on Conduct of Licenens Proceedings CLI 818.13 NRC 452 (1981) espedinon oflicenung proceedings. ALAB-777. 20 NRC 37 n 66 (1984)

Licenung Board responu% ) to avoid or reduce delays en bce%ng proceedings; LBP 84 52,20 3

NRC 14A6 (1984)

Statement of Pohey un Conduct of Licenung Proceedings CLI-818.13 NRC 452. 456 (1981) effect of pobey statement on standards for directed certication. ALAB 791,20 NRC 1583 n 13 (1984 need for relasarion of interlocutory reue* standard. AL AB 780. 20 NRC 382 (1984) 5.ain v. Brinegar. 542 F 2d 364 4 ? h Car 19'61 (en banc) t test to determine if a proAct has been segmented for purpose of considenrig environmental impacts. ALAB-785. 20 NRC 872 a 88 (1984)

Tennessee Valley Authonty eBe !efonte Nuclear Plant. Cmts I and 21. LBP 74-66. 4 AEC 472. 475, 476 (19748 challenges to Staff determmanons m an adjudicat:on; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1301 n.7 (1984)

Tennessee Valle) Authont, ' Bro.ns Ferry Nuclear Plant. Umts I,2 anJ 31. ALAB-677,15 NRC 1387.1391-94 f1982:

respontbihty of parties to nohfy Board of sigmfkant new desetopments; ALAB 785,20 NRC 884 n 163 f1984:

Tentessee Valle, Authonty (Hartsulle Nuclear Plant. Umts l A. 2A,18. and 28). ALAB 398. 5 NRC 1152 (1977) ground for treatment of petnion for reaJmiscon as tardy petnion for intervention; LBP 84 54,20 NRC 1642 n 9 (1984p Tennessee Valley Auihonty ()(irtsulle Nuclear Plant. Umts I A. 2A.18. ar.128), ALAB 463,7 NRC 341,348 f1978) forum for pursuing ne* atreet of contended assue at operaung hcenung stage; ALAB-785,20 NRC 878 (1984)

Tennev.ee Valley Authoniy 8Phgps Bend Nuclear Plant. Umts I and 21. AL AB 506. 8 NRC 533, 544-49 (1978#

means for Commnven to (WUlf purposes of NEP4. AL AB 785. 20 NRC 868 n.65 (1984)

Toledo Eden Co. f Daus-Bene Nuclear Power Stanonp. ALAB 300,2 NRC 752 (19751 wasser of right to heanns by NRC bcensee on its request for heense amendment; LBP-84-42. 20 NRC 1305 n.14 (1944p Toledo Ednon Co (Daus Bewe Nuttear Power Stauont. ALAB 300. 2 NRC 752,758 (1975) desenprion ofinterlocutory order; ALAB 787. 20 NRC II00 n 8 (1984) 57

~

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CA5ES Toledo Ediwn Co iDaus-Bes.c %Icar Poect Sra"oni. AL AB Juo,2 NRC 752,76743 (1773) litigabelity of withdra*n contention that is the su',.-st of a sapulauon betwe'n parties.

L8P44 26. 20 NRC !8 n 2 41984:

Toledo Ednon Co iDaus-Besse hiear Po.er Station. Omt 16. ALAS-3:4. 3 NRC 98 0976) 4 elTect of miserse eudenuary ruhess on structure of a proceedies, ALA8-791,20 NRC 15J3 n il i1984)

Trustees of Columbia Unnersity,4 AEC 349 (1970) need for nonpower reactor hcensees to protect agains: sabotage. LBP 84-29,20 NRC 145 (1984) i Union Electnc Co iCallaway Plant. Umt l), ALAS-740.18 NRC 34),346 0983) means for assunng quahty of nuclear poner plants, DD 8417,20 NRC 2410984)

{

}

quahty espected of nuslear power plant construchon, DD-84-16,20 NRC 166 !!984) 4 wopc of qualay assurance reuce; ALA8 788. 20 NRC 1842 a 230 U9847 ultimate factualissue related to quahty assurance to be made; L8P 84 52,20 SRC I488 0984)

Union Liectnc Co. (Callaway Plant. Umt I), AL A8,750A,18 NRC 1218,1220 0983) damissal cf construction permit apphcanon eith a condiuon,18P-84 43,20 NRC 1338 #1984) ismon Elestnc Co (Callamay Plant Umts I and 21. AL A8 527,9 NRC 126.136 37 0979) regulatory bass for NRC actions to presert harassment and discommatic 1 against workers at nuslear reastor construcuon sites. DD-8416,20 SRC 182 n.14 (1984) i Umon of Concerned 5cenusts v. NRC, til F.2d 370 (D C. Car 1983) means for repealing Commimon pobcy empressed in its regulauons, L8P-84 29,20 NRC 145 (19846 Union of Concerned keenusts t NRC. 711 F 2d 370,377, H3 ID C. Cir 1983) sacanon of intenm enuronmental quabficatmc. rt:le for N'ure to proude opportumty to comme.it. CLI-84 il. 20 NkC 4 41984:

Umon of Conce.ned Soentist, t N RC. 735 F 2d l#37 (D C, Cir.1984) litigabihty of financial quahfkanons contenuons m op' rating imense proceedings. L8P.84 26,20 NRC 57 n i U984) hugabihty of nsue of need for planmns for earthquakes whw*t hase emergency preparedness imphcations, CLI 8412. 20 NRC 265119847 need for emergency preparedness cuerenes pnor to imtial hcensms demon; ALA8 781. 20 NRC 835 0 984:

need for intersenors to update emergency planmn3 contentions to reflect current state of the record. L8P 8418. 20 NRC 132 n 5 41984) sahdity of 10 C F St. 50 41'ao2) concermes hti8abihty of results of emergency response exercnes. LBP 84 298,20 SRC 405 (1984)

Umon of Cornerned Saentats t NRC, ?)3 F 2d 1437,1444 n 12 (D C. Cir.1984)

Lisenung Board dnereuon to control proceedings ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1878 n 463 !!984) tmted States Department of Energy IChnch Rner Breeder Reactor P' ant), ALAB 721,17 NRC !)9, 543 44 (1983 meight snen to potential for irreparable harm,in ruhr.g on stay requests ALAB 789,20 NRC 1446 61984)

Umted States Department of Energy (Cimch Rner Breeder Reactor Plant) Al A8 761,19 NRC 487, 493 f1944) polwy regardmg readmissiert to NRC proceedings, LBP 84-54,20 NkC 1642 43 0984)

Omted States Department of Energy (Chnch Raer Breeder Reactor Plant),CLi 82 4, t5 NRC 362, 373 U9821 hntory of apphca' ion of 10 C F R 501284), L8P.84 45,20 NRC 1375 n.llo 0984)

Umted States Department of Energy (Chnch Rner Breeder Reactor Pla.sti. CLI-82 23,16 NRC 412 (f982) need for consederauon of alternatnes to onsite storage of mill taihnss, L8P 84 42,20 NRC 13tl (1984)

Umted States Department of Energy IChnch Roer Breeder Reactor Plant),CLi-831, !? NRC 1,4-6 41983) urcumstarwes appropnate for grant of esemption from regulations, L8P 84.4J,20 NRC 1376 n.ll)81984)

}

$8 l

l M,'

n.

4' e

t l

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX cases

+

1 Umted States Energy Research and Development A dmimstranon (Chnch Riser Breeder Reactor i

Planti. CLI 76-13. 4 NRC 6?. 75 76 (19761 1

Commisuon authonts to determme need for s.,d scope of further hearings; CL18418. 20 NRC 810 (19846 Umsed States v. Aneghent Ludlum Steel Corp.,406 U.S. 742. 755 (1972) pubhc interest in granung esepiptions from regulations. LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1381 n.143 (19841 Umted States v. 8&O Southeastern Railroad Co 226 U.S.14,20 (1912) reports from agency Stati as ei parte commumcanons. LBP-84-36. 20 NRC 930 (1984) i i

Umted St.tes v. Haldeman. 559 F.2d 31.13e n.332 (D C. Cir.1976) (en bancs (per curiams, cert.

4 demed,431 U.S. 933 (1977p j

basis for disquahfcahon of a judge on prejudgment ground; ALAB-777. 20 NRC 35 81984)

United States v. Lipshy,492 F. Supp. 35. 44-46 41979) osernding attorney norm product pnulege. LBP 84 50,7 4 73-74 (1984)

Umted States v. Patnck. 542 F 2d JII. 390 (7th Cir.1976)..

• ewd. 430 U.S. 931 119778 time for filirts disqualMcanon monons; CL1-84 20,20 %. : 1081 (1985)

Umted States v. Storer Broa&astmg Co. 351 U.S.192 (195b public mterest in granur:3 esempoons from regulations; LBP 84-45,20 SRC 1381 n.143 (19841 Vermont Yanace Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station). ALAB 124,6 AEC 358, 360. 361621 n.4 (19*3 assignrnent of Brurd responubihties to Staff. LBP-84 31,20 NRC 506 n 8 f19841 l

Virgima Electne and Power Co iNorth Anna Power Stauon. Umts I and 2). ALAB-491. 8 NRC 245 (19787

{

j plant operanon pending <ntut on of genens unresolged safety issues; LBP-84-26. 20 NRC 59 i

I1984) t regulatory requirements for antems interactions studies. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1128 n 130 (1984)

.}

t Virgmia Electnc and Po er Co Worth Anna Power Stauon. Umts I and 21. 4 LAB-491. $ NRC 245.

247-48 fl978p crest of pe'idency of gerene spiems analyus study on safety findmg for nuclear poser plant _

5 hcensms. L3P.44-53. M NRC 1539 n.22 #19841 preclusion of plant operanon pending resciution of generic systems interaction program; ALAB 788. M NRC !!3! n 187 (19348 Virsima Electnc and Power Co 8 North Anna Pomer Station. Umts I and 2N AL AB 551. 9 NRC 704 1

=

705-09119th appellate JunsJ.ction oser decided issue because of its nexus to pending issue; ALAB.742. 20 NRC 841 n 911954*. AL AB 792. 20 NRC 1588-89 f19847 Virgima Electric and Power Ce iNorth Anna Power Sianon. Umts I and 21. ALAB-551,9 NRC 704, 708-09 f1979i 1

termmation of Appeal Scard junsdiction. ALAB-782. 20 NRC 84111984s Virgima Electnc and Pomer Co (North Anna Power Stat on. Umts I and 2s. ALAB 741. Il NRC 371. 374 75 (1983e standards for d2rected cer:.f. canon of nosel or important issues. ALAB 791. 20 NRC 1583 n.12 41984:

Virgima Electnc and Power Co 8 North Anna Power Stanon. Umts I and 27. ALAB-741.18 NRC 371. 375 (198b

. appbcanon ofimerlocutcry resiew standard. ALAB 780,20 NRC 342 n 16 (1984r

- Virgima Electric ar.d Power Co iNorth Anna Power Stanon. Umts I and 2). CLI-76-22,4 NRC 480, j

488 91 (1976). afrd sub norn. VEPCO v. NRC. 571 F.2d 1289 (4ih Cir.1978; -

i right of hcensee to deterrame its own rate of progress in constructing a nuclear power plant; DD.84 23. 20 NRC If 55 f1984) 4

. Virgima Petroleum 3c bbers Ass'n s. FPC. 259 F.2d 928 iD C. Cir.1958p i

' cntena apphed in passmg on stay requests. ALAB 794. 20 NRC 1632 n.7 f1984)

Virgima Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. FPC,295 F.2d 921. 925 f D C. Cir.1954) test for determtmns whe:her to impose stay of activities pending disposition of remand; LBP 84-53,20 NRC If43 n 35 (1984p Washmston Metropohtan Area Transit Comm'n v. Ilohday Tours. Inc. 559 F 2d 848 (D C. Cir.1977) cntena appbed in passir g r,n stay requests. ALAB-794120 NRC 1632 n3 f1984)

/~

59 l

e 6

3 e mee, J,

+*

9

--.n..

y- - - -,

w

s

}

l LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASES

{

I Washington Pubhc Power Supply System (Hanford No. 2 Nuclear Power Plant) ALAB ll3,6 AEC

.251, 252 11973) j Board rehance on predicine Gndings and post-hearing ven6 cation by Staf7; LBP.84-31,20 NRC

{

507 (1984) 1 l

Washington Pubhc Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Prosct No. 2), ALAB-571,10 NRC 687, j

692 (19791 scope of sua sponte appellate review; ALAB 793,20 NRC 1624 n.169 (1984)

Washington Pubhc Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Propct No. 3), ALAB 747,18 NRC !!67,

'1877 (1983) particulanty required of late intervention petitioner in desenbing its contribution to development of a sound record; LBP 84-54,20 NRC 1644 (1984)

Washington Pubhc Power Supply System (WNP Nos. 4 & 5), DD 824,15 NRC 1768,1767 (1982) halt or slowdown in construction as ground for revocation of construction permit; DD-84-23,20 NRC 1553-54 (1934)

Wemberger v Catholic Action of Hawaii,454 U.S.139,143 (1981) sw,= of NRC decisionmakms process; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 575 (1984)

Westmshouse Electne Corp. (Esport to the Phihppinert, CLI 8014,11 NRC 631,662 (1980) g most sismncant factor in decidmg whether to grant stay request; CLI-84-17,20 NRC 804 (1984) g Wisconsin Eteetnc Power Co. (Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-739,.18 NRC 335, 338 39 (1983:

htigabihty of functions of previously bcennd systems in operatmg bcense amendment f

proceeding; LBP-84-32 20 NRC 616 (1984)

W throw v. Larkm. 421 U.S. 35 (19758 i

persons asamst whom motions for disquahncation are directed, LBP 84 29A,20 NRC 386 (1984)

C i

5 i

i I

i 1

i 64 a

i 4

n g

I i

8 i

i I

r a

t l

4 a

i

+

1 3

1 i

j LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX

{

R EG L'LATIDSS l

10 C.F R. 2 l

cost bene 6t aspects of mill taihngs disposal that must be dealt with under; LBP 84 42,20 NRC 1310 (19946 j

10 C.F R. 2.101 proper submission of revisions to Part 70 hcense apphcation; ALAB-778,20 NRC 49 (1984) i 10 C.F R. 2.102f al f

description of NRC Staff as a party to SRC proceedings; ALAB 785,20 NRC 884 n.161 (1984) i 10 C.F R 2104 3

need for a hearing on an operatmg hcense apphcation in the absence of matters in controversy; LBP-84-34,20 NRC 770 f1494#

l i

I need for hearing on operating license amendment in absence of controsersy, LBP-84 39,20 NRC g

1032 (19841 a

j 10 C.F R. 2.104fcs O

hmitations on Licensing Boar: aathority to decide issues; LBP-14-41,20 NRC 1217 (1984)

{

i responsibility for resolution of uncontested issues prior to issuance of operatarig hcense, LBP-84-26.

f f

20 SRC 58 (19646

/ :

10 C F R 2.104fcii41 2 2 htigabihty of financial quahf' cations of electric utihties in operating license proceedings; LBP 84 30, 20 SRC 428 n 3 (1984p IC

}

10 C.F R. 2.105

- a need for a heares on an operating hcense application in the absence of matters in controsersy; i

LBP.14-34,20 SRC 770 f 19941 j

rieed for hearing on operating bcense amendment m absence of controsersy; LBP 84 39,20 NRC 1032 81984) a" 10 C F.R 2.201 deGeienc:es requir ng correcuse action D0-84-16,20 NRC 166 (19848 10 C.F.R. 2 202 I

resolution, at openting hcense stage, of uriespected impacts from actnities authorized under l

construction permit. AL AB '45. 20 SRC 871 (1984) i 10 C F R 2 206

)

j appbca5hty of reguiaaon to SRC personnel matters DD 84-22,20 NRC 1046 n.33 (1984)

I appropriate forum for addressmg adequacy of diesel generator building; DD 4417,20 SRC 230 l

1 I

(1984) i denial of petsuon requesting independent deugn, construction, and rnanagement audits of Cata*ba l

facihty. DD-9416,20 SRC 162 (1984) j j

denial of peution requestirs modincation of Cert Scates of Comphance for spent fuel shipping casks;

)

i DD 84-24. 20 NRC 1557 (1984)

)

denial of petition requestirs resacatmn of construction permit because of doadown in construction; DD 44-23,20 NRC 1550 8'9846 i

denial ef request for action on acequacy of operator quahneation issue DD 84-21,20 NRC 789 l

i1994) i I

denial of request for action to remedy deficiencies in traffic managemeit during evacuation; DD-84-15,20 NRC 158 fl9h4#

denial cf request fo' action with respect in Midland Plant; DD-84-17,20 N RC 227 (1984) j denial of request for deferral of hcenung pending neutralitation of alleged haras= ment and i

l intimidauon on site; DD %419. 20 NRC 77311984) 61 i

i l

l l

i

m LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REGLLATIONS dental of request for enforcement proceed'ngs with respect to TMt emergency feedwater system.

DD 84-22. 20 NRC 1033 (1924) demal of request for show cauw order requiring twensee to demonstrate its Gnancial quahficanons to operate an enpanded spent fuel pool. DD 84 25,20 NRC 1703 (1984) demal of request for suspension of hcense because of alleged inadequacies in emergency evacuation plan; DD-84-18,20 NRC 244 (19848 denial of requests for deferral of operating bcenses for Diablo Canyon; DD-84-20,20 NRC 776 (1984) forum for prewnt.ng issues that cannot properly be raised in adjud6 cation; ALAB 792. 20 NRC 1588 (1984) forum for pursuites concerns on seismic design issues. ALAB-782. 20 NRC 840 (19841 htigabihty of NRC personnel matters under. DD-84 21. 20 NRC 789 n.1 f1984) means for empressing dissatisfaction with a party's fut011 ment of its commitments; ALAB '81. 20 NRC 835 n.58 (1984 means for providing information on environmental quah6 cation deficiencies at nuclear power plants; CLI-84-il 20 NRC 5. 6 (1984) resolution, at operating hcense stage. of unexpected impacts from activities authorized under consiruction permit; ALAB 785. 20 NRC 871 (1984) 10 C F.R. 2.206(al scope of requests under; DD-84-17,20 NRC 227 n.2 (1984) specificity required of 2 206 petitions. DD-84 IS. 20 NRC 244 (1984) 10 C.F R. 2.701f al need for proof of service in fihng appeal. ALAB 778. 20 NRC 47 n 411984) 10 C.F R. 2.704 41984 persons against whom motions for disquihf' cation are directed. LRP-84 29 4. 20 NRC 386119846 responubihties of Chief Admimstratne Jadge of Atomic Safety and Licenung Board Panel.

LBP 84-29 A. 20 NRC 34' '19846 10 C.F R 2.7041cv apphcab!!ity of. to Chief Admimstratne Judge of Licenung Board Panel. AL AB-779. 20 NRC 376 (1984l failure of petitioner to inmke prescribed procedure for fihng disquahfica'io.1 motion; CLI-84 20. 20 NRC 108111984) grounds for denial of dicah6 cation; AL AB '". 20 NRC 23 n.l. 24 (1984) need for referral of denial of rnotion for disquah6 cation. LBP-84-29A. 20 NRC 387 (1984p 10 C F R. 2.707 demat of intersention because of a party's fadure to appear; LBP-84 35,20 NRC 917 (19841 10 C F R. 2.708fe) need for parties to inform Ccmmission secretarv of change of address. LBP 84-54. 20 NRC 1642 (1984) 10 C.F R. 2.710 importance of timehness of request for stay of agency action. ALAB.'89. 20 NRC 1448 I1984) 10 C F R. 2.712(b) need for parties to inform Commission secretary of change of address; LBP 84 54,20 NRC 1642 11984) 10 C F R. 2.712(d)(3) completion of service of dncuments' LBP-84 54. 20 NRC 1642 (19841 10 C F R. 2.712f es. 2.70lf bt need for proof of servse in 6hr's appeal. ALAB 778. 20 NRC 46 n.4 (1984) 10 C F tl 2 713 Licensirg Board authority oser NRC Start; LBP-84-29,20 NRC 147 n.46 (1984) 10 C F.R. 2.7134 t9 need for parties to inform Commissaon secretary of change of address; LBP-84-54,20 NRC 1642 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 2.714 htigabihty of financial quahticauons contentions in operating license proceeding; LBP-84-30,20 NRC 428 (1984) 62

d a

1 4

l

~j LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX R EGl'LA TIONS i

j need for a hear ng on ar' operating licenw apphcauon in the abwnee of matters m controsersy; LBP 84-34. 20 NRC P011934:

l' need for hearms on cNratirg lu:ense amendment in abwnee of comroserss; LbP 84-39. 20 NRC

}

1032 (1984s g

10 C.F R. 2.7!4tal Board jurietion to hear comennons submitted by an apphcant; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1303 (1984) right of an apphcant to fi!c contentions; LBP 14-42,20 NRC 1306 (19848 speci6 city required of quahry assurance comemnons; CLI-8414,20 NRC 284 (19841 10 CF.R. 2.7141att D admission requirements for refded comennons based on presiously unasailable emergency plans; LBP 84-35,20 NRC 910 (19848 cnteria for admisuon of comestions outside the scope of resisions to Part 70 application; ALAB-7'8. 20 NRC 5141984)

I factors to be addressed by request for reidmission to proceedms; LBP-84 54,20 NRC 1640,1643 l

(1984p showies neceuary m Dhng an amph6 cation of the bases of contenuons; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 914 n 3 (19844 standards for admission of reforn'ulated contemion: ALAB 785. 20 NRC 869 n.70 (19848 standards for determimes admisubihty oflate-filed contemions; LBP 84-30. 20 NRC 436 (19848 10 C F R. 2.714(aills. Ibe requirements to be sausfed m amending and espandmg contenuons: ALAB-785,20 NRC 878 n.l!9 (1984) 10 C F R. 2 714'bi.

cause for Lu:ensing Board dismissal of comennons; ALAB 778,20 NRC 45,50 (1984) contemion requirement for mtervenuon; LBP-84-35. 20 NRC 888. 916 (19848 l

dismissal of comennon for lack of specificity; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 912 (19841 -

i particulanty required of ma enal supporting motion to reopen a record. ALAB 786 20 SRC 1090 n 4 (1984s i

i particularization required of contenuons; LBP 84-28. 20 NRC 131 (1984!

purposes of the basis-for contention requirement; LBP 84-40A,20 NRC 1897 (19848 remedy for paring down a broad contenison; LBP-84-28,20 NRC 129 (1984) 10 C F.R. 2.714a f

. appeal of demal ofin:ersennon; ALAB 790. 20 NRC 1451 (1984!

j escepuon to prohibinon aga:nst interlocutory appeals: ALAB-780,20 NRC 380 n.I (19848 10 C.F R. 2.715 t198D t

participauon by a State as bmh a party and'as an imerested State; LBP 84-51,20 NRC 1479 (1984s 10 C F R. 2.715tc7 3,

rights of parties participating under; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 515 (1984#

designauon of State party as intervenor". LBP-84-30,20 NRC 428 n.2 (1984) 10 C F R. 2.71!a i

comolidauon of mtersenors' efforts; LBP 84-35,20 NRC 916 (19848 10 C F.R. 2.718 i

r authonty of presiding officer to dismiss operatitig hcense amendment proceeding in absence of l

mues ia controsersy; LBP 84-39,20 NRC 1032 (1984) authority to distmss a proceed:ng m the absence ofissues in controversy; LBP 84 34. 20 NRC 770 (19847

demal of petiuon for certification of financial quakfications contenuons to Commission; LBP-84-30, 20 NRC 429. 442 (1994s Licenung Board dncrenon to control proceedmgs; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1178 n 463 (19841 10 C F R. 2.718'o applicabihty of. to interlocutcry ruhngs, ALAB 791,20 NRC I582 n 5 (1984 s

6 Commission authonty to direct certi6 canon on its own motion; ALAB 751,20 NRC 825 n.10 (1984) i treatment of appeal as monon for airected certificauon of oral order; ALAB 780,20 NRC 380 n.3 fl984)'

63 e

m e =ge p-n,

J

\\

}

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX 3

R EGULATIONS t

l 10 C F.R. 2.720(h)(216) responsibihty foe determming which Staff personnel resufy at hearitigs; ALAB-786,20 NRC 1095 3

i n.13 (1984) 10 C F.R. 2.721 (1984) persons agamst whom motions for disquahficanon are directed; LBP-84-29A,20 NRC 386 (1984) responsibihues of Chief Administrative Judge of Atomic Safety and Licensms Board Panel; LBP 84-29A,20 NRC 387 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 2.722 (1984) persons asamst wnom motions for disquahGcation are directed; LBP-84 29A,20 NRC 386 (1984) 10 C F R. 2.730 denial of peuuon for cerufication of Gnancial quahfications contentions to Commission; LBP 84-30, 20 NRC 429. 442 (1984) 10 C.F R. 2.730(f) appealabihty of order denying discovery; ALAB 780,20 NRC 382 (1984) '

prohibition shamst mterlocutory appeals; ALAB-780,20 NRC 380 (1984); ALAB 787,20 NRC 1100 n.10 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 2.740fb)(2) matenals shielded by attorney work product privilege in NRC proceedings; LBP 84 50,20 NRC 1473-75 (1984) 10 C F.R. 2.743fe) particularity required of material supportirig motion to reopen a record, ALAB486,20 NRC 1090 n.4 (1984) 10 C F.R. 2.75ta purpose of special prehearms conference; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 888 (1984) _

10 C.F.R. 2.754 i

penalty for fa !ure by intervenors to Gle proposed findings of fact on issues in controversy; l

LBP 84-26,20 NRC 61 n.3 (1984) i 10 C.F.R. 2.758 j

denial of pettuon for waiver of need-for power rule; LBP 84-298,20 NRC 424 (1984) t espansion of emergency planning zones beyond Commission requirements; ALAB-781,20 NRC 831 (1984) jurisdicuon over petition for waiver of Snancial qualifications rule; LBP-84 30,20 NRC 430 (1984) need for consideration of impacts on emergency plannmg r.f earthquakes occurring during accidental radiological release; CLt.84-12,20 NRC 253 (1984) pention for waiver of( 51.5)(c); LBP-84-35,20 NRC 890-92 (1984)

Staff position on protection of nonpower reactors against sabotage as an attack on regulations; i

LBP-84-29. 20 NRC 149 (1984) j 10 C F.R. 2.758(a)

^

authonty of Boards to entertain challenges to regulations; ALAB 784,20 NRC 846 n.2 (1984) authority to mvahdate Commission rules or regulations; ALAB-793,20 NRC 1614 (1984) -

10 C.F.R. 2.758f b) circumstar es appropriate for waiver of prohibition against litigation of need for power and alternative energy source issues; ALAB-793,20 NRC 1614 (1984) demal of petinon for exception to regulation barrms litigation of financial quah6 cations contention in operating hcense proceeding; LBP 84-30,20 NRC 429,430,442 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 2.758(b) and (c) l htigabihty of financial quah6 cations in operating license proceedings; ALAB 793,20 NRC 1628 n.4 81984) 10 Cf R. 2.758(c) responsibility of presidar.g ofncer where intervenor fails to show cause for waiver of regulation;.

LBP-84-35,20 NRC 892,894 (1984) 10 C F.R. 2.758(d) failure ofintervenor to'make prima facie showing that regulation should be waived; LBP-84 35,20 i

NRC 892 (1984) t i

64 1-S 5 -ukgyen w

t a.

... +..

,.n.

5 j

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX i

REGULATIONS t

i hugabihty of financial quahfk:anons in operaung hcense proceedmas; ALAB 793,20 NRC 1629 n.5 (1984) treatment of successful pention for waner of regulanon; LBP.84-30,20 NRC 431,442 (1984) 4 10 CF R. 2.7604 j

authonty for makirig findirigs necessary for issuance of operaung hcense; LBP-84-41,20 NRC 1217 (19841 responsibihty for resolution of uncontested issues pnor to issuance of operating license; LBP 84 26, 20 NRC 58 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 2.76Ia authonrauon for site preparation activities prior to completion of environmental review; LBP 84 42, 20 NRC 1313 (1984) i 10 CF R. 2.762(a) timehness of appeal from oral order: ALAB-780,20 NRC 381 n.Il (1984) 10 CF R. 2.764 limitations on authonty for making findings necessary for issuance of operating license; LBP 84-41, 20 NRC 1217 (1984) relationship of effecuveness decision to pending appeals and peutions; CLI-84-13,20 NRC 268 (1984) 10 CF.R. 2.764(D authonty to approve operanon of nuclear power plants above low power; ALAB-794,20 NRC 1632 (1984) effecuteness ofio. power decisions without Commission review; CLI-84-21,20 NRC 1440 (1984) 10 CF.R. 2.764(f)(1) circumstances appropnate for Commission immediate effecuveness review of Licensing Board in:tial decision; ALAB 787,20 NRC 1099 n.3 (1984) 10 C F R. 2.764(O(2)

I finality of supplemental initial decision; LBP 84-41,20 NRC 1295 (1984) i 10 CF.R. 2 764(gs effect of Commisuon immediate effectneness review of Licensing Board initial decision on appellate sunsdiction; ALAB-787,20 NRC 1100 (1984) 10 CF.R. 2.771 apphcability of, to interlocutory rulings; ALAB 791,20 NRC 1582 n.5 (1984) 10 CF R. 2.780 definsuon of jeopardy to the caistence of a species; ALAB-785,20 NRC 881 n.147 (1984) desenpuon of es parte contacts; ALAB 785,20 NRC 883 (1984)

I reports from agency Staff as er parte communications; LBP-84-36,20 NRC 930 (1984)

)

10 CF.R. 2.785f a) effect of Commiwcn immediate effecuteness review of Licensing Board initial decision on appellate jurisdiction; ALAB-787,20 NRC i100 (1984) 10 CF R. 2.745(b)(1) apphcability of, to interlocutory rulings; ALAB 791,20 NRC 1582 n.5 (1984) 10 CF R. 2.786 triggers for Commission review of a decision; CLI-84-18,20 NRC 815 (1984) 10 CF.R. 2,737(b) authority of Appeal Panel Chairman to terminate appellate junsdiction; ALAB-783,20 NRC 844 4

(1984) 10 C.F.R. 2.788 application for stay of hcense"a athorization; ALAB-794,20 NRC 1632 (1984).

10 C F.R. 2.788(a) importance of umchness of request for stay of agency action; ALAB-789,20 NRC 1448 (1934) -

10 CF.R. 2.788(b) restriction on fength of stay application; ALAB 794,20 NRC 1633 (1984) 10 CF.R. 2.788(el content of wntien views on whether Licensing Board order may serve as basis for license issuance; CLt.84-16,20 NRC 100 (1984) critena apphed in determining whether to grant a stay; CLI-84-21,20 NRC 1440 (1984) 65

+ 1mape --

. m.er

--3

- ~

4 i

}.

e i

x

?

}-

' LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS l,

cntena apphed in passerg on stay requests; ALAB-794. 20 NRC 1632 n.7 (1984) jl -

factors considered in de:erminmg w hether to grant stay request; CLI 84-17,20 NRC 803 n.) (1984) factors conudered in rubng on stay requests: ALAB 789,20 NRC 1446 (1914) need for pany requesung stay to address fauors of; ALAB-789. 20 NRC 1448 (1984) -

1 test for deterrmning mPe;her to impose stay of actiuties pending disposition of remand; LBP 84 53, 20 NRC 1543 n.35 414541 s

l 10 C.F.R. 2388t h) t etTect of a remand on issuance of an operaung heense; LBP-84-53. 20 NRC 1548 (1984) 10 C.F R. 2. Appendes A. V use of Board powers to control hearmss; ALAB-788. 20 NRC 1852 n.291 (1984) 10 C.F R. 2. Appendis A. VdO(4) issues apprornate for directed certfication; ALAB-79ta 20 NRC 1583 (1984)

- j 10 C.F R. 2. Appendis A. Vill litigability of Snancial quahfications of electric utihues in operating license proceedmss; LBP-84-30, 20 NRC 429 n.3 (1994p 10 C F R. 2. Append s A \\III(b>

responsibehty for resciunon of uncontested issues pnor to issuance of operaung hcense; LBP-84-26, 20 NRC 5811984s 10 C F R. 2. Appenda C i

descnption of NRC enforcement program; 00 8416,20 NRC 184 (1984) i 10 C F.R. 2. Appenda C. as reused 44 Fed. Reg. 858) (Niarch 8.1984) j resocanon of construction permit for matenal false statement; DD-84-23,20 NRC 1554 (1984) 10 C F R. 2. Appendis C. I E84s

?

descnpuon of Con 6rma:ory Acuen Letters; ALAB-788. 20 NRC 1144 n.244 (1984) 10 C F.R. 2. Appendn C.111 Stati method for de6ning QA noiauons. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1143 n 238 (1984) j 10 C F R. 2. Appenda C. IV t1983), as reused,49 Fed. Reg. 8583 (1984) j purpow of Notice of %c'atron. DO-8416. 20 NRC 180 (1984) -

i 10 C F R. 2. Appendis C, IV A Commswon enforcemert practice for uolauon of QA implementing manuals or procedures; 4 LAB 768,20 NRC 1143 n 237 819848 j

10 C F R. 2, Arpenda C. IV A. IV.B I and 2 l

{

NRC enforcement pohcy :owards hcensee idenuncahon and correcuon of problems; DD-84-16. 20 NRC 207 819848 l

10 C F R. 2. Appenda C. IV E i

means for enforemg hoewe adherence to its obhgations and commitments; ALAB-788. 20 NRC j

i126 849848 4

10 C F R.19 j

regulatory basis for NRC acuons to present harassment and diwnmmation agamst workers at t

nuclear ructor constr:sction utes; DD 8416. 20 NRC 181 n 14 (1984p

}

f 10 C F R. 20 t

calcut.ition of shicidmg capabihty of spent fuel pool wall; LBP 84 32,20 NRC 667 f1984) j degree of hazard from destrucuon of ceramic uranium dioside fuel pellets; ALAB-778. 20 NRC 50 t

fl9948 operatmg timets on Trogn Plant radiological releases; LBP-84-52A,20 NRC 1513 (1984) 10 C F R. 2018cp stand.srd for protectmg =orkers modif)ing spent fuel pool; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 666 (1984) f

< 10 C F.R. 20106f as -

basis for protetuse action guides for dnnking water; LBP-84-31,20 NRC $95 (1984) l

' 10 C F.R. 20. Appenda B. Table !!

l calculation of potential sensequences of radiological release to Philadelphia water supply; j

_l LBP 84-31. 20 NRC fil, 59511984) l 10 C F.R. 21 4

adequacy of means for controltmg field sanations between specific design and as-built construction j

of Catawba facihty: DD 8416,20 NRC 168,190.1% (1984) -

i description of spectabied :nspecuens performed at Catawhe; DD 84-16,20 NRC 187,204 (1984)

I i

j i-t 1

N a

i

.j s

I j

i a

e

]

>?-e

-m

~

a LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX 1

R EGL LATIOM 10 C F R. 40. \\ppenda A idenulication of alterr aine sites fer dispoul of mill imhngs. LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1320 (1984) 10 C F R. 40. Appenda A. Cn:enon I osernding constJerauen in d 5pcsal of mi!! taihngs. LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1323 n 81 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 40. Appendit A. Cntenon 1 I

consideration of Title I CMTRCA site for disposal of mill taihnss. LBP 84-42,20 NRC 1323 n.79 1

(1984) 10 C F.R. 50 j

adequacy of structural rna:enals and components of spent fuel storage basins to function for longer j

than design t6aus; CLI-84-15. 20 NRC 357, 364 (1984) j amendments to. CLl-84-15,20 NRC 292-93. 353 t1984) application for Part 70 license enor to receipt oflicense to operate facility; ALAB 778. 20 NRC 45 (19841 I

assurance of continuity of safe management of spent fuel. CLI-84-15. 20 NRC 35111984) consideration of nonrad:olog; cal ensironmental impacts of construction of spent fuel storage facilities; CLI 84-15,20 NRC 367 (19846 l

nienm means of waste storage pending compteuon of DOE waste repositones. CLi-84-15. 20 NRC 350-51. 353 (1994i i

licensing of facihues for reprocesung of h th-!csel nuclear maste. CLI-8415. 20 NRC 353 (1984) need for pressure-operated re!:cf salses to be des:gnated safety grade; CLI-84 II. 20 NRC 11 (1984) operating hmits on Trous Plant radiological releases; LBP-84-52 A. 20 SRC 1513 (1984) 10 C F.R. 50 2f ii interpretation of the terms Nommon defense and secunty ; LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1400 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50 7 regulatory basis for NRC acuens to present harassment and discnmmanon against workers at nuclear reactor construct.cn sites. DD44-16. 20 NRC 182 n 14 (19841 10 C F R. 5010sc) authonzation for site preparauon actnaties prior to completion of environmental reuew; LBP-84 42.

20 SRC 1313 (1934p 10 C F R. 5012 standards for grantmg esempuens to reqmrements for full-power operauon. CLI-84-19. 20 NRC 1059 n.7 standards for granting esernpuons under. LBP 114-35 A. 20 NRC 923 (19841 10 C.F R. 50.12(a) history of application of. LBP 94-45. 20 NRC 13'5 '6 (1984) enemption from GDC l' reprements durms low power operation. ALAB 777. 20 NRC 27 n.16 (1944); AL AB 78'. 20 NRC 1099 81HD. LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1352 (1934) interpretatiori of the terms "cor w a me.n3 secunty"; LBP-84-45. 20 NRC 1400 (1994) means for seeking low-pewer Lee 9se -

se of onsite source of emergency power; LBP 84-35A.

20 NRC 922 (1984 showing neceuary for grant of esempuon from regulations. LBP-84 45. 20 NRC 1361 (1984) 10 C.F R. 50.3)(D litigabihty of financial qualifl canons issue. DD 84-25,20 NRC 1704.1705 (1984) 10 C F.R 50 3380fli limitauon on issues lit. gable in operating license proceedmas; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 895 (1984) 10 C F.R. 50 348as(7) adequacy of Statisenfication of Shorehart QA program implementation; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1137 (1924) 10 C F.R. 50 34(b)(6)f i) i compliance of desenption of Shoreham's operauonal quality assurance program with; ALAB-788. 20 NRC 1837 (1984) 10 C F.R. 50 40fb8 hmitauon on iswes htigabte in operaung license proceedings; LBP-84-35. 20 NRC 895 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50.46 rnk of excessive fuel c'addeg temperatures during low power operation. LBP 84-45,20 NRC 1355 (1984) f 67 i

m

• e e.

r LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX R EG L'LATIONS 10 C F.R. 50 4M bt funcuonal requiremems fer wfety equipment. L.BP-84 45. 70 NRC 1360-el (1934) hmits that must be satisfied to mitigare loss-of<oolant accidents; LBP-84 45,20 NRC 1365-66,1387 11984l 10 C.F.R 50 47

+

degree of completion required of emergerwy notification and commumcation systems for full-power operation; LBP-84-26,20 NRC 62 (1984) i i

reasonableness of 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> delay time before evacuation following radiological emergency; LBP-84-31, 20 NRC 570 t1984#

10 C F R. 50.47(4) degree of completion required of emergency notiGeauon and commumcation systems for reasonable assurance Onding; LBP-84-26. 2P NRC 61. 62 n 4. 63,67,86 (1984) extent of availabihty of radiation monitonng equipment necessary for reasonable assurarme finding, LBP-84-26. 20 SRC 78 (1984) extent of completion of emergency worker training program necessary for reasonable assurance finding. LBP-84-26,20 NRC 84 A6 f1984) estent of esacuation planning for persons without private transportauon necessary for reasonable assurance Ondmg. LBP 84-26. 20 NRC 73 (1984) esient of planmng for emergency worker protective clothmg necessary for reasonable assurance Ondmg. LBP 84-26. 20 NRC 87 Il984) 10 C F.R. 50.47(as and f be need for accommodation c.f scaenal conditions in emergency planmng; LBP-84 32. 20 NRC 690 696 (1984) 10 C F R. 50.47(aHII adequacy of Catawba means for presenung contaminated persons from entering nuncontaminated znnes. LBP-84-3'. 20 NRC 959 (1984)

Gnding necesury pnor to iswance of operatmg beense. LBP-84 26,20 NRC 60 (1984p need for assessment of pubhc response to a radiological emergency; ALAB-781,20 NRC 835 (19848 need for completion of emergercy planmng at ume of heanns. ALAB 781,20 NRC 834 rn.55-57 (19841 NRC emergency plannmg findir'ss necewary for operating hcense issuance. LBP-84 37. 20 NRC 938 (19841 10 C F.R. 50 4'f adis il9828 contrast between post-heanes resoluuon of enseronmental qualification deficiencies and emergency plann.ng de6cierictes. LBP $4-31,20 NRC 508 (1984) 10 C F R. 50 47(aH2) hasis for NRC Ondings on adequacy of emergency planmng. LBP-84-37,20 SRC 938 (1984) f:ugability of adequae) ofir 0.emeriting procedures for emergency response plans. LBP 84 298,20 NRC 404 (1984p hugabihty of results of emergency response exercises; LBP-84-298,20 NRC 405 (1984) need for issuance of Anal FE\\l A findings on emergency planmns pnor to author ration for full power operation. AL AB-11. 20 NRC 828 (1984) need to test emergency comrrumsations equipment during emergency preparedness exercises; LBP-84 26. 20 NRC 63 819444 10 C F.R. 50.47f be adequacs ornfrute planmes withm Diablo Canyon emergency planmns zones; ALAB-781,20 NRC 830 t1984) area encompassed by emergery planmng; ALAJ 728 20 NRC 829 (1984) estent of emergency plannmg necewary for plant operanon; LBP-84-26. 20 NRC 60 fl984F result of failure to meet offute emergency plann ng standards; LBP 84-37,20 NRC 940 (1984) j standards applicable to offsite emergency response plans. LBP 84 37,20 SRC 939 (1984p 10 C F.R. 50 47f bHI stafGng reqwrerr.ents for offme emergency response orgamrauons; LBP 84 26,20 NRC 89.111 (1944p standard apphcable to otTsite emergency planmng; LBP %4-37,20 NRC 962 (1984) 68 I

9 w-m-.

i-i LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REGCLATIONS i

10 C.F R. 50 47(b)(48 Enahty of emergency pians; LBP 84-28. 20 NRC 131 n.4 (19848 I.

10 C.F R. 50 47(bs(Sa adequacy of Cata*ba means for notification of public of a radiological emergency; LBP-84 37,20 NRC 970 (19841 10 C.F.R. 50.47(bid 66 adequacy of Diablo Canyon emergency communications systems; ALAB 781,20 NRC 833 n.50 (1984) adequacy of offute Diablo Canyon emergency commumcations systems; ALAB 781,20 NRC 833 (1984) effect of power ouuge on Catamba's abihty to notify public of a radiological emergency; LBP-84 37, 20 NRC 971 (1964) requirements for otTuie emergency commumcations; LBP.84-26,20 NRC 83 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50.47(b)(7s adequacy of Catawba pubhc education and mformation efforts on emergency planning; LBP 84 37, i

20 NRC 942 (19841 adequacy of emergency response mformation programs for Diablo Canyon; ALAB-781,20 NRC 832 n.47 41984)

I adequate means for dasemination of emergency planning information to transients, LBP-84-26,20 NRC 68,96 (19848 1

' need for serification of pubhc understandmg of emergency preparedness information; LBP 84-29B, I

20 NRC 406 (1964#

10 C F.R. 50.474blI8 adequacy of Catawba emergency facihties and equip nent; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 954,955 n.3 (19848 10 C.F.R. 50.47(bs49#

adequacy of Big Rock momtonns systems, LBP-84 32,20 NRC 763 (1944D scope of monitorms required for assesung offsite consequences of radiolrigical emergency; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 678 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50.47(bit 101 adequacy of evacuation time estimates for Big Rock Point esacuation plans; LBP-84-32,20 NRC j

764 (19841 cnteria for special esacuation measures for children and pregnant women; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 697 8

(19845 I

- need for facilities for special populations to have their own evacuation transportation resources; LBP 44-29B. 20 NRC 396 f1984) 10 C F.R. 50 47(b)(12) need for provision of measures to care for contammated injured mdividuals. LBP 84 31,20 NRC 4

531,535,536 f19%4#

i 10 C.F.R. 50 47(btil3; '

I scope of reentry and recovery requirements of, LBP 84 298. 20 NRC 399 (1984).

I

- 10 CF.R. 50 47(b)(15e l

adequacy of traimns of Limerick offute emergency support personnel; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 550 j

(1984) deadhne for completion of traimns of emergency responw personnel, LBP-84 29B,20 NRC 404 i

4 l

(1984p 10 C F R. 50 474bs(16e

. conformance of ernergency response plans with requirements for updating plans; LBP-84-298,20 NRC 410 (1994p l

10 C.F R. 50.47(cilli.

i result of failure to meet offsete errergency planning standards, LBP-84 37,20 NRC 940 (1984) l 10 C.F.R. 50.47(ci 2) 8

-description of emergency planmns znnes: ALAB 781,20 NRC 429 n.33 (L984) estabhshment of larger-than-required emergency plannmg zones; ALAB-781,20 NRC 829-30 (1984) -

factors determmmg size of piume esposure pathway emergency planmns zone; LBP-84-32,20 NRC l

674. 675 (1984:

4 j

.9 j

1 i

/

-WW%

-O

. ~.

~,

i LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REGllLATIONS i

1, htigabihty of adequacy of plume esposure pathway emergency planning tone; DD 8418,20 NRC 245 (1984) fitigability of contenteons calkng for esacuation of populations outside plume EPZ: LBP 84-29B. 20 NRC 394,419 (1984) lingabihty of need for espansion of plume EPZ; LBP-84-26,20 NRC 75 (1984)

{

need for espansion of Catawba plume EPZ; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 979,984,987,989 (1984) purpose of emergency planning zones. ALAB-7al,20 NRC 829 n.32 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50.47(d) occurrence of offsite consequences from radiological emergency dunns operation at low power; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 538 (1984) satisfaction of conditions pnor to issuance of operating license; LBP-84-27,20 NRC 126 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50.48 adequacy of Gre protection at Vogtle Plant; LBP-84 35,20 NRC 906 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50.49 e

i adequacy of enuronmental quahficauon of electric equipment at Limerick facihty; LBP-84-31,20

{

NRC 493,498, 505, 506, 507, 508-09 (1984) compliance of Limenck component classification program with requirements of; L8P-84-31,20 NRC 501 (1984) deadline for environmental quahtication of electric equipment at timenck; LBP-84 31,20 NRC 499 (1984) deadhne for quahGcation of motor-operated sabes; LBP-84-38,20 NRC 1022 (1984>

need for environmental quahGcation of emergency feedwater system; DD-84 22,20 NRC 1039, 1041. 1044 (19847 scope of; LBP 84-38,20 NRC 502,504 (19841 systems escluded from environmental quahGcation program at Limerick; LBP-84 31,20 NRC 501 -

(1984) 10 C.F R. 50.49(as environmental quahGcation program required for nuclear power plant licensing; LBP-84-31, 20 N RC 498 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50.498 bi type of nuclear power plant equipment that must be environmentally quahfied; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 498 (1984) 10 C F R. 50.496)(1) definition of safety-related structures. systems and components; ALAB-788. 20 NRC 1113 n.19 (1984) documentation of equipment requiring ensaronmental quahfication; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 499 (1984) 10 C.F R. 50.49(b)(llfil ims i

I need for environmental quahncation of emergency hghting system; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 501 (1984) need for environmental qualiGcation of.n-plant commumcations systems, process computer system, feedwater control system. LBP 84 31,20 NRC 502 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50 49(bt(2) environmental quahGcanon of nonsafety-related electncal equipment; LBP-84 53,20 NRC 1533, 1535-38 (1984) equipment which must be environmentally quahned under; ALAB 788,20 NRC i157-60 (1984p need for environmental quahGcation of equipment other than safety-related; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 499, 500, 503, 505 (19847 10 C.F.R. 50 49(b)(3)

ALAB-788,20 NRC 1100 (1984) catesones of equipment regwnns environmental quahficanon; LBP 84 31,20 NRC 500 (1984)

. need for environmental quahfication of post accident momtonns equipment; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 503 (19848 post-accident momtonns equipment requiring environmental quahGcation; ALAB 788,20 NRC '

1860 (1984) 10 C.F R. 50 49(is need for analysis of program for enuronmental quai:Gcation of electne equipmer.t at Limenck; i

LBP 84-31,20 NRC 493,505,508 09 (1984) a 70 n

I i

. ~,

1

a o

J LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REGl'LATIONS 1

10 C F R. 50.544fp i

need for licenwe or appheant response to 2.206 pennons; DD 84-1e. 20 NRC 103 n.l 419846; 00-84 21,20 NRC 's9 f19848. DD 84-22. 20 NRC 1034 tlM4+ -

10 C.F.R. 50.54(t) applicabihty of. LBP 84-298. 20 NRC 410 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50.544aat scope of plans necessary for estended storage of spent fuel. CLI 84-15. 20 NRC 308 n.7 (19846 10 C.F.R. 50 55(b) oblisauon oflicensee to report slowdown in construction; DD-84-23. 20 NRC 1553,1555 419848 3

10 C.F.R. 50.55(e) adequacy of means for controllitig t'teld vanations between specific design and as-built construchon l

of Cata*ba facility; DD 84-16,20 NRC 168,190.19e t1984

}

adequacy of tramms of Catawba start to meet reporung requirernents of; DD-84-16. 20 NRC 205 g

(1984) descnpuon of speciahzed inspections performed at Catawba. DD 84-16,20 NRC 187119848 means for determming reportability ofitems under; DD-8416. 20 NRC 204 (19848 purpose of construcuon completion program at Midland; DD-84-17. 20 NRC 233 t19843 responsibihty for idenufyirs and esaluaung nuclear power plant problems; DD 84-16,20 NRC 207 (1984)

{

result ofinadequate procedures for idenufying and esaluaung deficiencies. DD 84-17. 20 N RC 239

}

(1984)

)

sestmg required for pasaise mechanical valses; ALAB-788. 20 NRC 1862 (1984) 10 C.F R. 50.554 t

i 10 CF.R. 50 554ta)(2)

I acceptability of devianons from Code requirements for salve testes; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1862 i

n.348 (19841 -

10 C F R. 50.57(as -

tindings neceswr) for authonzation of heense to load fuel and conduct preerttical testms-.

LBP-84-30( 20 NRC 444 (19841 findmgs necessary for issuance of operatmg licenses; LBP 84 41. 20 NRC 121' 419848 10 C.F.R. 50.57(aH3i safety of oserhead crane at Big Rock Point Plant; LBP 84-32. 20 NRC 743 41984) 10 C.F.R. 50.57(a)(3)(i) evaluation of seismic structural adequacy of oserhead cranc au facihty licens $ tefore promulgation of seismic design standarJs; LBP 84 32,20 NRC 654. 665 '! M4t means for assessmg rehabhty of makeup kne; LBP-84-32. 20 NRL 614 (1984s =

10 C.F.R. 50.57(a)(4) htigability of financial quahfications issue; DD-84-25,20 NRC 1*04 i19848.

10 C.F.R. 50.57(c) actissues hcensed under. LBP 84-30A. 20 NRC 444 (1984l apphcabihty of GDC 17 to low power operatior.; ALAB 777,20 NRC 27 (19846; LBP-84 45,20 NRC 1351.1353,1356 f1984p enutlement of apphcant to low power l>cenw prior to reschn.an of emergency power source issue.

ALAB-777. 20 NRC 25. 26. 2911984) exemption to allow low power operation pendirig resolunon of d:ewt generator issue. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1110 (19848 l

level of operanon authonzed by; LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1349 n.7 81984) means for obtainmg authonzation for low-power hcense; LBP-84-27,20 NRC 126 (1984) methods for meeting standards of; CLI-84 20. 20 NRC 1067 t1984#

10 CF.R. 50.58f b) need for a heanns on an operaung hcense apphcanon in the absence of matters in controsersy; LBP 84-34,20 NRC 770 (1984) need for heanns on operatmg license amendment in absence of controsersy; LBP 84-39,20 NRC

{-

1032 (1984) r 3

- 78 i

4

-.wm.wr. -

-e,+

-.-,r--

v y

,+_,

n.

yei

,..y-3+---

,. m

a a

4 i

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX g

REGULATIONS I

i 10 C.F.R. 50 80. 50.82 j

assurance that safe storage conditions will be maintained until nuclear waste disposal facilities are i

available; CL! 84-15,20 NRC 352 (1984) 8 10 C.F.R. 50.90-50.92 htigabihty of financial qualifica$ons issue in operstmg hcense amendment proceedings; DD 84-25, 20 NRC 1705 (1984) j 10 C.F.R. 50.91 3,

need for a hearing on an operating hcense application in the absence of matters in controversy; LBP 84 34,20 NRC 770 (1984) need for hearing on operating license amendment in absence of controversy; LBP 84-39,20 NRC 1032 (1984) 10 C.F.R 50.100 l

construction slowdown as cause for revocation of construction permit: DD-84-23,20 NRC 1551, 1553 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix A apphcabihty of, to Big Rock Point spent fuel pool; LBP 84 32,20 NRC 742 (1984) definition of smgle failure. LBP-84-32,20 NRC 613 (1984) j function of onsite emergency diesel generators at a nuclear power plant; LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1350 a.

n.12 (1984) l guide for assessing rehabihty of makeup line; LBP-84 32,20 NRC 613,625,741 (1984) regulatory requirements for systems interactions studies; ALAB-788,20 NRC !!28 (1984) j structures, systems, and components for which quahty assurance program is applicable; CLI-84-14 20 NRC 284 (1984) 10 C.F R. 50, Appendis A, n.2 scope of design of passive components in fluid systems; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 613 (1984) i 10 C.F R. 50, Appendix A, Introduction interpretation of the term "important to safety"; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1813 n 20 (1984)

- 10. F.R. 50, Appendis A. Definitions and Explanations b

eppbcation of single failure criterion to passive mechanical valves; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1863 n.352, 1l64 (1984) 10 C F.R. 50. Appendis A. GDC 1

{

mterpretation of the terms important to safety" and " safety related"; ALAB-788,20 NRC lill, 1115 (1984) quahty assurance program apphcable to "important to safety" stems; ALAB-788,20 NRC til718 (19841 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix A, GDC 1,2 and 4 i

scope of; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 627 (1984) 10 C F R 50 Appendit A, GDC 2 adequacy of design of oserhead crane at Big Rock Pomt Plant; LBP 84 32,20 NRC 743 (1984) natural hazards which nuclear power plants must be designed to withstand; ALAB-781,20 NRC 827 n.25 (1984) proumity to region of known seismicity as cause for consideration of class 9 accidents; ALAB-781, 20 NRC 827 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50 Appendia A, GDC 4 i

need for environmental quahfication of emergency feedwater system; DD 84-22,20 M 21039 n.10 (1984 operation of nuclear power plants with environmental quahfication deficienus; CLI-84-il,20 NRC

! n.4 (1984) rehabihty of emergency feedwater system at TMI-!; CLt-4411,20 NRC 9,10 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendia A. GDC 17 apphcabihty of, to low power operation; ALAB-777,20 NRC 26 n.Il (1984); ALAB-787,20 NRC 1099 (1984); CLI-84-21,20 NRC 1439 40 (1984); LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1348,1352,1356,1359, 1367, 1370, 1382 (1984) necessity for onsate diesel generators at nuclear power plant; LBP-84 45,20 NRC 1350,1361 (1984) need for onsite source of emergency power for toe power operation; LBP-84-35 A,20 NRC 921 n 3 (1984) 72 W9

J 6

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX

]

I REGULATIONS s,

10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix A, GDC 20 j

need for compensation for lack of standby liquid control system; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1165 (1984)

.j-10 C F.R. 50, Appendix A, GDC 44 abihty of TSil 1 emergency feedwater system to meet smste failure enterion; DD-84-22,20 NRC 1051 n 40 (19845 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendas A, GDC 61 l

evaluation of consequences of spent fuel pool accidents; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 637,741 (1984) need for licensee to demonstrate integnty of reinforced concrete spent fuel pool; LBP 84-J2,20 I

NRC 627 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix A. GDC 61 and 62 purpose of remotely actuated makeup line; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 613 (1984) 10 C.F.R 50, Appendix B adequacy of Staff venfication of Shoreham QA program implementation; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1137 j'

appropriateness of using quahty assut ance standards retroactively; LBP-84-32, 20 NRC 662 (1984)

(1984) denvation of the term " safety related"; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1812,1115 (1984) description of NRC review of Catawba deficiency control systems; DD 84-16,20 NRC 202 (1984) j distinction between deficiencies and significant deficiencies; DD-84-16,20 NRC 200 (1984) 1 1

improper documentation of repair welds at Comanche Peak as a violation of; LBP-84-55,20 NRC 1689 (1984) interpretation of the terms "important to safety" and " safety related"; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1113 (1984).

lack of onsite AC power system as violation of, CLI-84-21,20 NRC 1439 n.3 (1984) need for turbine buildtr:g piping to comply with requirements of; DD 84-16,20 NRC 219 (1984) l quahty of welding at timenck; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 512 (1984) scope of applicabihty of ALAB 788,20 NRC tit 3,1887,1818 (1984)

{

scope of nuclear power plant quality assurance program; DD-8417,20 NRC 2J3 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix B. Introduction l

applicability of quality assurance requirements; ALAB-788,20 NRC til2 n.16,1818 n.51 (1984) definition of quahty assurance; DD-84-17,20 NRC 233 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendix B. I default by Apphcant in osersight of contractor quality assurance program; LBP-84-41,20 NRC 1275 (1984) regulatory basis for NRC actions to prevent harassment and discrimination against workers at nuclear reactor construction sites; DD 84-16,20 NRC 182 n.14 f1984) scope of actnities senfied by a quality assurance program; ALAB-79),20 NRC 1598 n.5 (1984) separation and freedom of persons and organizations performms quality assurance functions; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1150 (1984) 10 C.F R. 50, Appendit B, I and it independence and organizational freedom of Catawba quality assurance program; DD 84-16,20 NRC 170,197 (1984) 10 C F.R. 50, Appendia B,11 housekeeping requirements dunns nuclear power plant construction; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1844 n.240 (1984) housekeeping requirements for nuclear power plants; LBP-84-53,20 NRC 1534 n.3 (1984) i timely implementation of QA program; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1849 n.267 (1984) i 10 C.F.R. 50. Appendix B.111

' use of Vanation Notice procedures for controlling field variations between specific design and as-built construction of nuclear pn er plants; DD 8416,20 NRC 167,169,188,194 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50. Appendix B, V adequacy of Shoreham program fot data traceability; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1147 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50, Appendis B. VIII and IX j

adequacy of Catawba measures to provide material traceability; DD 8416,20 NRC 178,216,217 r

(1984)

.}

73 h

e

' W.+

.s,,

F LEG AI. CITATIONS INDEX REGLLATIONS 10 C F R, 50. Appenda B. X adequae of Catawba's procedures for respondmg to nonconformmg conditions; DD 8416,20 NRC

!?3. l*4 (19846 10 C F R. 50. Apxnda B. X and XVI allegatmns of mereaw m uolations of, at Catawba; DD-8416,20 NRC 174 (1984) l 10 C F R. 50, Appenda B. XVI description of requirements of; DD 8416, 20 NRC 200. 201,204 (1984 means for assuring quahty of nuclear power plants; DD-8417,20 NRC 241 (1984, means for correct.ng de6ciencies that do not rise to the level of nonconforming items; DD-84-16.

I 20 NRC 176,177 (1984) l treatment of signdicant deficiencies in Q A program; AL AB-788. 20 NRC 1142,1143 (1984) 10 C F R. 50. Appendn B. XVill methodolegy for selecims QA items to be audited; AL AB 788,20 NRC 1138,1140 (1984) i reaud; tion of QA deficency areas; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1143 (1984) 10 C F.R. 50. Appenda E I

content of emergency plarts; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 929 (1984) cutent of eme:gency planmns necessary for plant operation; LBP-84-26. 20 NRC 60,87 (1984) litigability of adequaq of plume esposure pathway emergency planning zone; DD 8418,20 NRC 245 (19848 need for ernergency preparedness esercises prior to mitial hcensms decision; ALAB-781,20 NRC 835 s19846 purpose of emergeno plannmg zones, ALAB 781,20 NRC 829 n 32 (1984) reawnabieness of 2-hwr delay time bcfore esacuation followmg radiological emergency; LBP-84 31, 20 NRC 570 (1984:

time limit for ronf>ing State and local gosernments of declaration of an emergency; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 525 819848 10 C F R. 50. A prenda E. n 2 htigabiht) of need for espanuun of plume EPZ; LBP 84 26,20 NRC 75 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 50. Appendn E. IV purpo<.es of esacuation ame estimates. LBP-84 37, 20 NRC 992 (1984) 10 C F R. 50. Appenda E. IV, n 4 weight gnen to emergency plannmg standards of NUREG-0654; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 939 n.3 (1984) 10 C F R. 50. 4 pend.t E. IV D 2 adequac of Catawba pubhc education and information efforts on emergency planning; LBP 84-37, 20 NRC 942 (1984' responsib hty for emergency plans. LBP-84-37,20 NRC 953 (1984) 10 C F R 50. Appenda E. IV E 4 htigabihty of adequ40 of training of physicians who will perform medical services durmg radiokgnal emerpres. LBP-84 298,20 NRC 411 (1984) 10 C F R. 50. Arpenda E. IV.E 6 catent of p!anneg r ectuary for medical scruces arrangements for contammated mjured individuals; LBP-94-298. 20 NRC 402 (1984) 10 C F R 50. Appenda E. IV.F.1.b degree of completion required of emergency notification and communication systems for full-power operanon. LBP-84-26. 20 NRC 61-62 (19848 extent of testmg neceswry for emergency response plans; LBP 84-29B,20 N'tC 405 (1984) 10 C.F R. 50. Appenda E. IV G applicability of. LBP 84-298. 20 NRC 410 f 19848 finahty of emergeno plans, LBP-84 28,20 NRC 131 n.4 (1984) 10 C.F R 50. Appenda E. V wparation of implementmg procedures from emergency response plans; LBP-84-298. 20 NRC 408 (19849 10 C F R. 50. Appenda K length of time core could be without coohng before p(ak claddmg temperature was exceeded; LBP-84 45. 20 NRC 1388 (1984) 74

4

?

f i

i 3

j.

{

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX j

R EGl'LOIONS

-i

.I 10 C E R 50. AppenJis R nonsafety ssstems requirms upgraded quaht) assurance, ALAB ?$8,20 NRC 1116 n.37 (1984)

I i

10 CF.R. 51 5

i amendment of. ALAB 785. 20 NRC h4 n 43 I19841; LBP-g4-31,20 NRC 553 (1984)

I 1

Commission response to pubbe comments on proposed amendments to; CLI-8415,20 NRC 292-93, 7

I 306 (1984) l responsibility for making a plant's enstronmental assessments arti cost-benefit balancing, j

LBP 84-35,20 NRC 91211984) i 10 CF R. St.l(a) and (bi

. j responsibiht) for consideration o(enstronmental aspects of a planned action. LBP 84-35,20 NRC 1

913 i19846 j

10 CF.R. 51.St aH21 (19826 8-need for ensironmemal impact statement for o;erating license inuance; AL AB-785,20 NRC 866 l

n.57 f19845 l

10 CF.R. 51.14(b) j definition of time when a proposal eusts and of the scope of an enstronmental impact statement; j

LEP-84-42,20 NRC 1316 nn. 42,43 (19846 j

{

10 C F.R. 5120 t

I environmental report required of appheant for a construction permit or operating bcense; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 913 81984) 10 C.F.R. 51.40 l

need to consider alternatise disposal sites for mdl tadings; LBP-84-42. 20 NRC 1321 (1984) j 10 CF R. $1.45(c) responsibitity for adentification of alternause sites for disposal of mill tadings; LBP 84-42,20 NRC.

e a

1 1321(1984s I

10 C F R. 5152(a) 41982 time allowed for pubhc inspection of dra't ensironmentalimpact statement before litigation; 4

i ALAB.785. 20 NRC 863 n.42 (19f at I

j 10 C.F.R. 51.!2f bs i

6 litigabihty of contentions submitted ey an apphcant; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1303 (1984) 10 CF.R. 51.53tci i

burden on party seekmg maner of, LBP 84-35. 20 NRC 893 (1984#

3

- consideration of need for po*er and alternarne energy sources at operating licensing stage; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 575 81984) i, htigabihty of need for power and alternatne er:ergy source issues in operatmg heense proceedings.

ALAB-793. 20 NRC 161415 (1984s htigabdity of need for power and alternatne energy source issues in operating license proceedings; i

3 LBP-84-35. 20 NRC 890,894 (1984e 10 CF R. 51.60 responsibility for identification of alter?.atise sites for disposal of mdl taihnss; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1321 (19P48 10 CF.R. fl.102(c) material constituting record of decision; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 553 (1984) 10 CF R. 51.104 j

- litigabihty of contentions submitted by an apphcant; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1303 n.10 (1984) '

~

4 10 CF.R. 51.104(a)(ll i

I.

restrictions on placing FES in evidence; ALAB-785,20 NRC 864 n 43 (1984) e 10 CF.R. 55

' mitigation of spent fuel storage accidents caused by human error; CLI 84-15,20 NRC 365 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 60

}

areas of amerguity with respect to availab2hty and timing of a nuclear waste repository; CLI 84-15,

- 20 NRC 297 (1984) 10 CF R. 60. Subpart E timely deselopment of nuclear waste packages. CLI-84-15,20 NRC 337 (1984) 1 10 C F.R. 61 t -

identification of alternatae sites for disposal of mill taihnss; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1320 (19841 I

75 l

1 e

i I

[

-c.,

,-,-.--,-v,--.._-

f LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REGULA flONS 10 C.F.R. 70 i

application for hcense under, pnor to receiving Part 50 hcense to operate facihty; ALAB 778,20 NRC 45 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 70 5,70.21

,j-proper submission of resisaons to Part 70 hcense applicanon; ALAB-778,20 NRC 49 (1984) j 10 C.F.R. 70 21(d) 9 need to provide nouce of matenals hcense applications; ALAB 778. 20 NRC 49 n.9 (1984) i 10 C,F.R. 70.23, 70.31 j

findings necessary pnor to issuance of Part 70 license; ALAB-778,20 NRC 48 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 7i NRC responsibihues for transportation of hazardous materials; DPRM-84-2,10 NRC 1567 (19841 scope of accident scenanos considered for spent fuel casks; DD 84-24,20 NRC 1560 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 71.31 catent of NRC oversight of packaging for transport of spent fuel; DD-84-24,20 NRC 1558 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 78.51(a) and 71.71 standards for packages used to transport spent fuel; DD-84-24,20 NRC 1558 t1984) 10 C.F.R 71.73 I.

I standards for packages used to transport spent fuel; DD-84-24,20 NRC 1558 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 71.101 quahty assurance standards apphcable to packaging for spent fuel shipments; DD-84-24,20 NRC 1558 (19848 10 C.F.R. 72 i

I adequacy of uructural matenals and components of spent fuel storage basins to funcuon for longer than design basis; CLf 8415,20 NRC 357,364 (1984) consideranon of nonradiological ensironmental impacts of construction of spent fuel storage 3

facihues; CLt-84-15,20 NRC 36' (1984) mienm means of maste storage pending completion of DOE waste repositones. CLI-8415. 20 NRC i

350 11984#

licensens of fuel storage pools after espiration of reactor operating hcense; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 356 419846 10 C.F.R. 72. Subpart I mingation of spent fuel storage accidents caused by human error; CLI 84-85. 20 NRC 365 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 72.28c) safety of extended dry storage of spent fuel; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 359 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 73 level of protection reqwred for nonpower reactor. LBP-84-29,20 NRC 135,143 (1984#

wope of protection afforded to transportation of radioactise matenals, DD-84-24,20 N RC 1559 (19847 10 C.F.R. 73.2 treatment of power enhancement equipment as sital for purpose of assessing security nsk dunns i

Iow-po*er operation. LBP.84-45,20 NRC 1357 (19848 j

~

10 CER. 73 40 chronology of Staticonsideration of sabotage at nonpower reactors; LBP-84-29,20 NRC ISI (1984)

+

10 C.F R. 73 40(a) chronology of Staff considerauon of sabotage at nonpower reactors; LBP-84 29,20 NRC 155 (1984) level of prote: tion reqmted for CCLA research reactor; LBP-84 29,20 NRC 135,143,144 (1984) need for ru!cmaking to address inconsistent treatment of regulanon by Staff, LBP-84 29,20 NRC 149, 150 819841 10 C F.R. 73.40(b), fcf. and (d) catesones of protection reqwred of nonpower reactors; LBP-84-29,20 NRC 135 n.4 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 73.47 chronology of Staff consideration of sabotage at nonpower reactors; LBP-84 29,20 NRC 152 53 (1984) 10 C.F.R. 73 50 chronology of Staff considerauon of sabotage at nonpower reactors; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 151 (19841 1

I 76 i

e' W et -

>es

. I

a

\\

I 4

?

I LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX R EGULATIONS l

10 C F.R. 73.60 catesones of protecuon required of nonpower reactors; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 135 n 4 (1984 i.

t chronology of Staticonsaderation of sabotage at nonpower reactors; LBP 84 29,20 NRC 151 (1984

}

esempuon from requirements for protecuon of nonpower reactors; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 137 (1984) misrepresentation of amount of special nuclear matenal on hand at research reactor: LBP 84-29,20 1

8 NRC 136,137 (1984) l nonpower reactor hcensees exempt from requiremems for protection against sabo age; LBP 84-29, J

20 NRC l35 819848

- 10 C.F.R. 73.67 I

catesones of protection required of nonpower reactors; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 135 n.4 (19846 i

chronology of Staticonsiderat on of sabotage at nonpower reactors; LBP-84 29,20 NRC 152 53

}

(1984) misrepresentauon of amount of special nuclear material on hand at research reactor; LBP-84-29,20 NRC 136 (19848 need for nonpower reactor licensee to protect against sabotage; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 144,147 (19848 10 C.F.R. 73.67(b)(1)(i) i nonpower reactor heensees esempt from requirements for protecuon against sabotage; LBP 84-29, 20 NRC 135 (19848 10 C.F R. 73 67(di r

categories of protection required of nonpower reactors; LBP-84-29,20 NRC 135 n.5 (1984) 10 C F.R. 73 671f) 4 l

catesones of protecuon required of nonpower reactors; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 135 n 6 (1984) 10 C F R. 73.7t(b3 chronology of StatT consideranon of sabotage at nonpower reactors; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 155 (19848 10 C.F.R.100 2

accidents mhich need not be considered in reactor design; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 641 (1984) 1 adequacy of Trolan expanded spent fuel storage facility to prevent eacesme offsite radiatien releases in case of accidents, LBP 84-52A,20 NRC 1520,1523,1528 (1984) '

. basis for accurag of probabihsuc analyses; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 645 (19847 calculauon of dose frorn postulated cask drop accident in spent fuel pool; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 638 (1984) evaluauon of conwquences of spent fuel pool accidents; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 637 (1984) 4 olisate radiauon dose consequences of core melt accident at Big Rock Point Plant; LBP-84-32,"20 NRC 720 (19848 radiolog: cal hazard from top nozzle failure of spent fuel assembly; CLI 84-15,20 NRC 307 (1984) type of nuclear power plant equipment that must be environmentally pah6ed; LBP 84-31,20 NRC i

499 (1984) 10 CIR,10011 j

accidents encompassed by; LBP-84 32,20 NRC 641 (1984)

I cntena for determirur:g acceptabdity of engineered safety features for spent fuel poot, LBP 84-32,20 -

NRC 638,640 t1984) i 10 C F R.100, Appendit A alternative methodology to determming design basis earthquake; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 653,728 f1984) appropnateness of compantig site speciGc SSE spectra with Regulatory Guide spectra; ALAB 788, 1

20 NRC 1870 819646 l

calculation of safe shutdown earthquake for Shoreham under esisting standard precedures; LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1397 (1984) denvauon and scope of the term " safety-related'*; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1112, Ill) (19848 evaluation of seismic structural adequacy of overhead crane in facihty bcensed before promulgation -

of seismic design standards: LBP-84-32,20 NRC 656 (1984) j requirements for quahtication of systems not performing safeti-related funcuons; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1122 (19846 77 5

G f

f I

d.

O j acang,y..

3,

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS j

4 i

10 C F R 100, Appenda A, Illics (d) i esents against whsh a nuclear power plant must be designed to withstand. ALAB 793,20 NRC 1016 (1984) j 10 C F R.100. Appenda A, !!!ter, Vl(aHil, VI(b)(3) definition of safety related structures, systems and components. ALAB-788. 20 NRC 1113 nn.18,19

}

t1984) 10 C F R.100. Arpenda A. I!!f g8 definition of 'o!d E. \\L AB N3. 20 NRC 1617 (1984) j dewnption of a arable fault. ALAB.793. 20 NRC 1617 n.Il9 (1984) 10 C F R.100. Appenda A.11111) recans for determines etTects of earthquake motions on a nuclear power plant; ALAB-788,20 NRC

!!69 n.394 ql484 10 C F R.100. Appenda A. IV scope of geologic insestigation for nuclear power plant site; ALAB-793,20 NRC 1616-17 (1984) 10 C F R.100. Appenda A. (ViaM7) and (8) 1 accounting for upable faults in establishing safe shutdown earthquake; ALAB-793. 20 NRC 1617 A

81984)

I 10 C F R.100. Append:s A. IViau!) n 3

)

rneans for Jeterrmn.ng age of a fault; ALAB-793,20 NRC 1619 n.134 (1984)

I 10 C F R.100. Appenda A. Vtan(2) u!cu!ation of ub aan ground acceleratron for operating basa earthquake; ALAB.793,20 NRC

(

1616 n.ll4 (1994:

{

10 C F R,100. Appenda A. Vit4HI) scamic considera: ons in deogn of nuclear power plants; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1169 n.393 (1984) i 40 C F R.192.32 tin req irements to N addre.seJ in determining means of dealing with mill tailings. LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1325 tlH4s 40 C F R.1500.1e m uses of environr emalimpact studies. LBP-84 31. 20 NRC 575 (1984) 40 C F R. !!O2 and 1503 cure of defects in F.nal Enuronmental Statement; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 552 (19848 40 C F R.1502 980 fa:Rre to consider cotwauences of class 9 accidents for Diablo as a siolation of. ALAB-781,20 NRC 828 n 28 i1%4s 40 C F R 1502 22+

were of Board ocntdera' ion of accident scenanos. LBP 84-31,20 NRC 575 fl9R4s 40 C F R.1508 23. !M 25 definition of the upe of an ensironmentalimpact statement; LBP-84 42,20 NRC 1316 (1984) 44 C.F R. 350 need for comple esn cf formal FEM A reuew of adequacy of State emergency plan in order for Board to author:ze operating license. CLI-8313,20 NRC 269 n.1 (1984) responsibility for reuen anJ approval of nuclear power plant emergency plans; DD-8418,20 bRC 246 (1984 49 C F R.172.203 utformation requ;ted to accornpany radioactive matenals shipments; DPRM.84-2,20 NRC 1571 81984) l 49 C F R.172.204

~

responsibilities of steppers of radioactise matenals; DPRM-84-2,20 NRC 1569 (1984) 49 C F R.177 861 respnnsibilities of h*gh*ay carrier in case of transportation accidents involvirig radioactise materials; DPRM 84-2. 20 NRC 1f 69 (1984) t 78

- -,. -, ~

i r

i i

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES 4

I i

1 i

I Admmistratise Procedure Act,5 U S C. 551 et wq.

l procedural ground rules for licensms heanngs; AL AB '88. 20 NRC 1178 (1984)

I j

Admmistratne Procedure Act,5 U.S C. 551559 means for repealms Commission pohey espressed in its regulations. LBP 84-29. 20 NRC 145 (1984)

}

Administratise Procedure Act,5 U.S C. 556(di Licensing Board authonty to require subminion of eudence in entten form; ALAB 788,20 NRC l

I 4

1 ii78 n.465ei984) l Admmistratne Progedure Act. 5 U S C. 557(dt f

j l

description of es parte contacts; ALAB 785. 20 NRC $83 (1984 l

Atorme Energy Act, llg. 42 U.S C. 2014(g) mierpretation of the terms common deferse and secunty"; LBP 84-45. 20 NRC 1400 (1984)

/

)

i Atomic Energy Act. II(cca definition of utilization facihty; LP.P.84-33,20 NRC '66 (19848 d

l Atomic Energy Act. 83(bulH A)(n>

J j

factors relesant to safe management of mill taihngs; LBP-84-42. 20 NRC 1328 n 96 (1984) l Atomic Energy Act. 84(a. 42 U.S C. 2114(a) fe lesel of protecuon prouJed by EPA standards governmg mill tailings; LBP.84-42, 20 NRC 1327 O

i n.95 (1984:

3 -

Atomic Energy Act IO212nCt. 42 U.S C. 4332i2HC) need for separate enstronmental impact statement on proposed shipment of spent fuel assemblies; C

l ALAB.790,20 NRC 1452 n.5 t19847 a

j Atomic Energy Act, 103.104b,42 U.S C. 2133. 2134(bn l

scope of Comrmssion 6ndmgs in maste con 6dence rulernsking proceedirs; CLI-8415. 20 N RC 293 I

r l

n.2 (19841

]

a Atomic Energy Act.104f er 42 U.S C. 213alc) amount of regalation impowd on nonpo*er reactor licensees; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 142 (1984) i Atomic Energy Act.1614i. 42 U.S C. 22011 8 Commwion authonty to regulate items contained m a nuclear power plant; ALAB 788,20 NRC l126 (1984)

Atomic Energy Act,170 habihty for damages from shippmg accident involvmg radioactne matenals dnpersal. DPRM-84-2, 20 NRC 1570 (1984s Atomic Energy Act,181. 42 U.S C. 2231 procedural ground rules for licensms heannss. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1178 (1984)

Atomic Energy Act,182 need for hcensees to respond to 2.206 petitions: DD-84-16. 20 NRC 163 n.1 (19841 need for operatirig hcense apphcant to respcnd to 2.206 pention; DD-84-21,20 NRC 789 (1984)

I Atomic Energy Act,186c.188. 42 U.S C. 2236, 2238 assurance that safe storage Conditions will be maintained until nuclear waste disposai facibiies are j

available; CLI 84-15. 20 NRC 352 (1984r Atomic Energy Act,189. 42 U.S C. 2239 need for oral presentation at heannss; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1878 (19846 Atomic Energy Act,1898aH tl. 42 U.S C. 2239(a)(D need for emergency preparedness esercises pr:or to insisal hcensms decision; ALAB 781,20 NRC 835 (1984e i

n I

79 t

i b

i a

e i

i.- -

4 i

A LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES 7

Atomic Energy Act,189a designauon cf authoriaanon for full-power operation as license amendment; CLI 84-19,20 NRC 1059 (1984)

Atomic Energy Act,189a(1),42 U.S C. 2239a(1) i nght of interested parties to a heanns on revisions to Part 70 license applicanon; AL AB-778. 20 NRC 48 n.7 (19848 Atomic Energy Act,274,42 U.S C. 2021 ciustence of Board error in failure to give effect to larger-than-required emergency planning zones; ALAB-781,20 NRC 830,831 (1984:

Atomic Energy Act. 42 U.S C. 20ll (1982), as amended respons4bilities of Chief Adminsstrative judge of Atomic Safety and Licensms Board Panel; LBP.84 29A 20 NRC 387 (1984)

Celaware River Basin Compact, 1.3, 1961 U.S. Code Cong.1 Ad. News at 776 funcuon of Delaware River Basm Commission; ALAB 785,20 NRC 868 n.64 (1984)

Delamare River Basm Compact,15.lfs)t,1961 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News at 807-08 preclusion of NRC reevaluauon of DRBC water a!!ocation decision; ALAB 785,20 NRC 858 (1984) restnctions on federal agencies concerning uses of Delaware River Basin; ALAB-785,20 NRC 856 n.6. 867 n.62 (1984)

Delaware River Basin Compact Pub. L No.87-328,1%i U.S. Code Coes. & Ad. News (75 Stat.

688) 775 description of Delaware Roer Basin Commission; ALAB-785,20 NRC 865 n.5 (1984)

Endangered Species Act,16 U.S C.1532(16) smallest units of species afforded protecuon; ALAB-785,20 NRC 881 n.146 (1984)

Endar:scred Species Act,7 as amended in 1979,16 U.S C.1536(a)(2) comphance of NRC with respect to shortnose sturgeon; ALAB-785,20 NRC 880 (1984)

Energy Reorganiaauon Act of 1974,202 DOE exemption from NRC bcensms requirements; DD 84 24,20 NRC 1561 (1984)

Energy Reorganiaauon Act,210 regulatory basis for NRC actions to present harassment and discrimination agamst workers at nuclear reactor construction sites; DD-84-16,20 NRC 182 n.14 (1984)

Ethics in Government Act,18 U.S.C 207fa) restnction on tesumony by former NRC Commissioners in NRC proceedings; ALAB-791,20 NRC 1582 (1984 Federal water Pollunon Control Act,' 401 prectuwon of NRC reuew of EPA findings; ALAB-785,20 NRC 869 n.67 (1984)

Fish and Wildhfe Coordinanon Act,16 U.S C,662(a) need for NRC to obtain Fish & Wildhfe Service comments on proposed diversion of waterway; ALAB 785,20 NRC 878 n.125 (1984)

Motor Carner Act of 1980,30. Pub. L 96-296, as amended by 406 of Pub. L 97 424 i

responsibility for estabhshmg regulations on levels of habihty for damages from shipping accident mvolving radioactive matenals dispersal. DPRM-84 2,20 NRC 1570 (1984)

Nanonal Environmental Pohey Act 42 U.S C. 4321 et seq.

failure to consider conwquences of class 9 accidents for Diablo Canyon as a violanon of; ALAB-781,20 NRC 828 n 28 (1984) legahty of prohibition against heiganon of need for power and alternative energy source issues; ALAB-793,20 NRC 1616 (1984) f psychological stress as ground for dismissal of application with prejudice; LBP-84-43,20 NRC 1337 (1984),

Kope of environmental review required at operating license stage; ALAB-785,20 NRC 858 (1984)

Nanonal Environmental Pohey Act,42 U.S C. 4332 means for Commission to fulfill purposes of; ALAB 785,20 NRC 868 n 65 (1984)

Nanonal Environmental Pohey Act,102,42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C) major federal actions requirms consideration of alternatives; ALAB 785,20 NRC 879 n.131 (1984)

National Environmental Pohey Act,42 U.S C. 4332f 2)(E) need to consider dry cask storage as alternauve to spent fuel shipments; LBP-84.40A,20 NRC 1898, 1899 (1984)

SS i

1 1

4 W

e

a LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES National Historic Preservauon Act,16 U.S.C. 470a(s) distinction between National Histonc Landmarks and areas listed in the National Register; ALAB-785,20 NRC 877 n.17 (1984)

N.tional Histone Presersation Act,106,16 U.S C. 470f need for consideration of effect of nuclear power plant operation on Ifistoric Distnet; ALAB-785,20 NRC 875-76 (1984)

National Histone Preservation Act, 110(0,16 U.S.C. 470h-2(0 Licenang Board respons*hty to protect Delaware Canal by complying with; ALAB 785,20 NRC 877 (1984)

NRC Reorganization P*an No. I of 1980,2(b) responsbilities of NRC Chairman; CLI 84-20,20 NRC 1071 (1985)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982, Title !!

authonty granted by, relevant to nuclear waste repositories; CLt-84-15,20 NRC 298,338 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,8(c) scope of Commission findings in waste confidence rulemaking proceeding; CLt 84-15,20 NRC 293 n.2 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982, Illf a)(2) effect of waste form on DOE waste repository program schedule; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 325 (1984)

+

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982 Ill(b)(1) pnmary purpose of NWPA; CL1-84-15. 20 NRC 302,346 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,111 125 schedule for availability of nuclear waste repository; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 301 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982, ll2(b)(B) and (C), ll4(a)(2)(A) deadhne for recommendations for nuclear waste repository sites; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 341 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982, ll2(b), ll2(b)(1)(B), II4(a)(2)( A), ll4(b), ll5(b), Il5(c),

(ll6Hb)(2), ll8(a) steps cecemry pnor to NRC authonzation for construction of nuclear waste repository; CLI-8415, 20 NRC 347 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982, i12(D areas of ambiguity with respect to availabihty and timing of a nuclear waste repository; CLI-84-15, 20 NRC 297 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982,112,114 schedule for sinking emptoratory shaft and completion of site characterization for nuclear waste repository; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 335 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982, ll3(c), (d); il4(a), (D; 119(a); 121(c) conformance of DOE waste repository program with National Environmental Policy Act; CLi 84-15, 20 NRC 348 (1984#

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,114 deadhne for NRC authorization for construction of nuclear waste repository; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 347 (1984)

Nuclear waste Pohey Act of 1982, ll4(a) areas of ambiguity with respect to availabihty and timing of a nuclear waste repository; CLI-84-15, 20 NRC 297 (1984)

Nuclear waste Policy Act of 1982, Il4(d) rate of waste emplacement in nuclear repository; CLI-8415,20 NRC 350 51 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982, ll4(e)(2) mitigation of delay in complyi.is with waste repository deadlines; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 148 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982,115 authonty to veto nuclear waste repository siting; CLI-8415,20 NRC 299 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982, ll5(c) means for overnding veto of nuclear waste repository site; CLI 8415,20 NRC 341 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,115,116,117,118, !!9 resolution ofinstitutional problems related to nuclear waste repository site selection; CLf-84 I5,20 NRC 336,340 (1984) 81 I

MS - *-

e-

r r

r L

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES l

b Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,116, ll6(a),117.117(a)(1) and (2), II7(b), ll 7(c)

[

resolution ofinstitutional uncertainties regarding nuclear waste repository siting; CLI-8415,20 NRC 299 (1984)

[

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, ll6(b)(2) deadhne for veto of nuclear maste repository site; CLI 84-15,20 NRC 341 (1934)

[

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982,116,117,118 r

financial assistance to enable State or Indian tribal participation in nuclear waste repository site I

review and approval actnities; CLI 8415,20 NRC 341-42 (1984)

(

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,123 intenm means of maste storage pending completion of DOE waste repositories: CLI-84-15,20 NRC 351 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982,131(a),135(a)(!),135(b),135(e),136(a)(1) IJ6(d) responsibility for safe interim stora e of spent fuel pending availability of waste repository; n

(

CL!-84-15,20 NRC 368-69 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982,131 137 assurance that safe storage conditions will be maintained until nuclest waste disposal facihties are available; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 352,368-69 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982,135(a)(1)-

NRC finding necessary for interim stonge of nuclear waste at a federally owned facthty; CLI-84-15, 20 NRC 352 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982,135(a)(4) assurance of safe management of nuclear waste during interim storage at a licensee's site; CLI 8415,20 NRC 352 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982,'135(b) time allowed for mierim storage of nuclear waste; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 351 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,211(2)(B) authority of Secretary of Energy concerning dry storage of spent nuclear fuel; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 363 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,215 availabihty of nuclear waste disposal facihties; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 298 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,217 schedule for m situ testing of waste disposal program; CLI-8415,20 NRC 298 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982, 218(a), (b), and (c) responsibehty for safe interim storage of spent fuel pending availability of waste repository; CLI-8415,20 NRC 369 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982,301(a) and (b) requirements for approval of report on waste repository program; CLI-84 l5,20 NRC 344 (1984)

Nuclear w te Pohey Act of 1982,30lfa)(8) as provisions for timely development of nuclear waste packaging; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 338 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982,302(a)(2),302(b)(2),302(b)(I)(8),302(e)(5) provisions for continued funding of nuclear waste management program; CLI-84-15,20 NRC 345 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,302(a)(5)(B) deadi'ne for DOE to begin dnposal of higit fevel nuclear waste and spent fuel; CLI-84-15,20 NRC A8 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,302,303 funding of nuclear waste repository site selection; CLI-84-15, 20 NRC 336 (1984)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act of 1982,304 continuity of management of nuclear waste program; CLI 84-15,20 NRC 343 (1984)

Uranium Mill Tashngs Radiation Control Act,203 failure of site-selection process to comply with; LBP-84-$2,20 NRC 1324 (1984)

SZ 9

+w.c

~

c

+

I LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX OTHERS

+

35 Ad. L. Rep. 3d 412. 526 l

burdens on parties where attorney work product pnvilege is contested, LBP-84-50,20 NRC 1474 i

(1984)

Confhet of Interest and Impermissible Representation, Rule 1.7(b)(l) j representation by Applicants' attorneys of party whose position is adverse to Applicant's; I

LBP 84-50,20 NRC 1468 (1984)

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3) e l

materials shielded by attorney work product pnvilege in NRC proceedings; LBP-84-50,20 NRC 1473 75 (1984)

II.R. Rep. No. 1457,96th Cong.,2d Sess. 38, repnnted in 198tT(J.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 6378, 6401 i

j standard of government action to mirumize adserse impacts to National Histonc Landmarks-,

i ALAB-785,20 NRC 877 n.16 (1954) x J

i Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7 g-l representation by Apphcants' attorneys of party whose position is adserse to Apphcant's; l

}

LBP 84 50,20 NRC I468 (1984)

S i

Weinstein's Evidence,1503(b>[03) ut i

l apphcability of attorney-chent prmlege to notes prepared by an indmdual for his pnvate use; hy LBP-84-50,20 NRC 14'2 (1984) i 8 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure i 2024 (1970)

$3 scope of attorney work product privilege; LBP-84 50,20 NRC 1473 (1084) s c J

s m

l i

l l

83

~%

i i

I l

i SUBJECT INDEX i

ACCIDENT (S) l adequacy of spectrum of, envisioned in emergency plans for Limenck; L8P 84-31,20.NRC 446

~

(1984) assessment capabilaues, continuing adequacy of, during radiological emergency; LBP-84-31, 20 N RC 4

446 (1984) at spent fuel storage facilines, nsk of; CLI-8415,20 NRC 288 (1984) i class 9, need for consideration of, where FES has already been issued; ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 (1984) class 9, need to consider for Diaolo Canyon; CLI-84-13,20 NRC 267 (1984) control rod drcp, mit:gauon of effects of; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) involving dispersal of radioactive matenals, liabihty for. OPRM-84-2,20 NRC 1563 (1984) loss-of<oolant, miugat:on of, m case ofloss of offsite power; LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1984) natural gas and petroleum pipeline, potential for damage to Limerick facihty from; LEP-84 31,20 NRC 446 (1984) presenting entry to containment for entended penod, reliability of makeup water system in the

)

event of, LBP-84-32,20 NRC 601 (1984) scenario for drop of spent fuel assembly into spent fuel pool; LBP 84-52A,20 NRC 1509 t1984) scenanos duries transportauon of smnt fuel, need to consider; DD-84 24,20 NRC 1557 (1984)

)

TMI 2, adequacy of studies of health effects from radioactive releases from; CL1-84-22,20 NRC l

157) (1984) l sinnsportauon. involving radioactive matenals, adequacy of emergency planning regulations for; I

DPRM 84-2,20 NRC 1563 (19846 ADJL'DICATORY BOARDS authority of, over NRC Staff action; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984) authonty of, to entertain challenges to legality of a Commission regulation; ALAB-784,20 NRC i

f 845 (1984)

{

authonty of, to invalidate its own rules or regulacons, ALAB 792,20 NRC 1585 (1984) delegated authonty of. to assess health and safety nsks; CLI-84-II,20 NRC I (1984) l discretion of, to modify procedural ruler, ALAB-785,20 SRC 848 (1984) effect of othe* proceedings on determinations of; ALAB-785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

(

resolution of issues by, pending conformatory Staff analyses; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) responsibiht:es of,in esamining c: aims of quality assurance deficiencies ALAB 788,20 SRC 1102 l

(1984) scope of authonty of, ALAB-785,20 NRC 848 (1984) i AFFIDAVITS executed by SRC Staff, Licensing Board concerns w.th; LBP 84 29,20 NRC 133 (1984)

AIRCRAFT carburetor icing caused by emissions from coohng towers; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) crash into containment housing espanded fuel pool, nsks to public from: LBP 84-32,20 NRC 601 (1984)

ALARA concerns dunes Big Rock Point spent fuel pool modification; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 60l (1984)

ALERTING pubhc, dunng radiolegical emergency at Wolf Creek, adequacy of siren system for; LBP 84-26,20 NRC SJ t1984)

See also Notificauon 85

,_7

,y--

r

+

SUBJ ECT INDEX ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES consideration of, at operstmg hcense stage; LBP 84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984) htigabihty of,in operatie's license proceedings; ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 (1984)

ALTER N ATIVE(S)

NRC actions requiring consideration of, ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984) to onsite rmil tastings storage, meamngfut consideration of; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1296 (1984) to spent fuel shipments, consideration of dry cask storage facility as; LBP-84-40A,20 NRC 1895 (1954)

AMENDMENT of 10 C F.R. i 73 40(a), need for: LBP 84 29,20 NRC 133 (1984) of bases for contention predicated on newspaper articles; LBP-84-49,20 NRC 1457 (1984) l of Part 70 license apphcation, nghts and duties of parties regarding; ALAB 778,20 NRC 42 (1984) of regulations concernirig emergency response to transportation accidents involving radioactive matenais, demat of petition for; DPRM 84-2. 20 NRC 1563 (1984) to operstmg license, treatment of full-power license as; CLI.8419,20 NRC 1055 (1984)

See also Operatmg License Amendment AMERICAN SH AD impacts of Limenck facility on; ALAB-785,20 NRC $48 (1984)

ANTICIPATED TRANSIENTS WITHOUT SCR AM d

adequacy of Shoreham measures for meugating; ALAB 788,20 NRC !!02 (1984) plants required to have automated standby hquid control systems for mitiganon of; LBP-84 40,20 N RC 1181 (1984p APPEAL disposition ofissues raised on; ALAB 778,20 NRC 42 (1984) finaht) of discovery orders for purpose of; AL AB 780,20 NRC 378 (1984) inter!ocutcry; exception to prohibition of, ALAB 780,20 f4RC 378 (1984) interlocutory, of eudentiary ruhngs; ALAB 791,20 NRC 1579 (1984) mterlocutory, prohibition of, AL AB-787,20 NRC 1097 (1984) of grounds for tnal tribunal's result; ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 (1984) standing to. ALAB-790. 20 NRC 1450 (1984)

APPEAL BOARD (St authonty to remove hcensee employee from supervisory duties; CLI 8418,20 NRC 808 (1984) factors considered by, in decidmg whether to exercise directed certification authority; ALAB 791, 20 SRC 1579 (19341 Junsdiction, effect of Commission immediate effectiveness review of Licensms Board initial decision on ALAB-787,20 NRC 1097 (1984) junsdiction over construction permit proceedings, termination of; ALAB-783,20 NRC 843 (1984)

Junsdiction over motion to reopen on issue where its pnor determination amounted to final agency action, ALAB 792,20 NRC 1585 (1984) jurisdiction to entertain new matters, when allissues are not finas; AL AB 782,20 NRC 838 (1984) junsdict:on when agency action is final with respect to an issue; ALAB-782,20 NRC 838 (1984)

APPLICANTS for hcanse amendment, admissibihty of contentions filed by; LBP-84 42,20 NRC 1296 (19841 near-term operating hcense. cnteria for evaluating operating empenence for; DD-84-21,20 NRC 788 (19946 responubihty of, to inform Boards of sigmf cant new developments; ALAB-785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

ATOMIC ENERGY ACT ohhgation under, to report slowdown in construction; DD 84-23,20 NRC 1549 (1984)

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL authority of Chief Administrauve Judge of; LBP-84 29A 20 NRC 385 (1984 AUDIT 85) of Byron remspaction program, specifics of; LDP-84-41,20 NRC 1203 (1984) requirements for venfyms regulatory comphance of quahty assi.rance pregram; ALAB-788,20 NRC i102 (1984)

BARRIERS engmeered, for isolatmg wastes from biosphere, development of; CLI.84-15,20 NRC 288 (1984) i N

e i

(+-m

=m..

~

a I

t SUBJECT INDEX BOARD NOTIFICATION responsibihties of NRC Staffin submission of; ALAB 786,20 NRC 1087 (1984)

BOARDS See Adjudicatory Boards, Appeal Board, Atomic Safety and Licensmg Board Panel, Licensing Boardt s)

BORON I

equipment adequacy of, for low power operation of Comanche Peak; LBP-84-30A,20 NRC 443 (1954:

CABLE in multiconductor configuranons performance of; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984) 3

. CABLE TRAY HANGERS

' I apphcant's program for serifying the adequacy of; ALAB 792,20 NRC 1585 (1984)

CASK DROP '

i safety of Big Rock Pomt spent fuel pool from; LBP-84-38,20 NRC 1019 f1984) f CASK LOADING PIT f

adequacy of cleanup system for espanded spent fuel pool to decontammate; LBP 84-52A,20 NRC

- l 1509 (1984).

CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE for spent fuel shipper:s casks, request for modification of; DD-84-24,20 NRC 1557 (1984)

]

i CHAIR IAN NRC, responsibihties of, CLI-84-20,20 NRC 1061 (1984)

CHARACTER management, nexus between confhet ofinterest in Apphcants' representation of party whose posinon of adserse to Appbcant's and; LBP 84 50,20 NRC 1464 (1984)

+

CHLORINE GAS releases from Vestle conhng towers. enuronmental and agricultural efYects of; LBP 84 35,20 NRC 887 (19848.-

i CLAMS, ASl% TIC description of threat to nuclear power plants from; LBP-84 51,20 NRC 1478 (1984)

CLASSIFICATION of equipmem for purpose of comphance with quality assurance requirements; CLI-84-14,20 NRC 285 819846 i

of quahty assurance de'iciencies. AL AB-788,20 NRC !!O2 (1984)

CLASSIFICATION, SAFETY of reactor core isolation coohns system; ALAB 788. 20 NRC i102 (1984#

of reactor sessel high a:er level trip sniem; ALAB-734,20 NRC 1102 (1984) of reac:or water cleanup sprem; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1802 (1984) of rod block monitor; ALAB 788,20 SRC 1802 (1984) of standby liquid control sptem. ALAB-788. 20 NRC !!02 (1984) of turbine bypass sys:4m; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1802 (1984)

COMMISSIONERS NRC, responsibehues ci; CLI 84-20, 20 NRC 1061 (1984).

COMMUNICATIONS durms Wolf Creek radiological emergency, adequacy of staffing for; LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) equipment for Wolf Creek emergency. post-hearing confirmation by Staff of availabshty of; LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) with trarsportanon dependent persons; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) -

See alw Es Parte Communicanons CONCRETE structure of spent fuel pool, possibihty of failure of, due to boilms of pool water; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 601 (1984)

CONFLICT OF INTERf_ST in attorney chent relanoeshp, apphcabihty of prmfese in hght of; LBP-84-50,20 NRC 1464 (1984#

CONSTRUCTION Completion Program at Midland, need to include all ongoing actnity under, DD-8417,20 NRC.

226 (19841 error-free. of nuclear power plants. need for; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984)'

87 -

4 i

1.

f

.4

~, *

%.m.

e,-

c.

t

,.(--

e-

4

%)

3 ps SUBJECT INDEX -

f-t*

impacts, distmction between operational impacts of construction changes and. ALAB-785,20 NRC i,

848 (1984) procedure violations. independent significance of; LBP-84-55. 20 NRC 1646 (1984) quahty mandated by Atomic Energy Act, degree of; DD 84-16,20 NRC 161 (19846 revocation of construction permet for slowmg or stopping; DD-84-23, 20 NRC 1549 (1984) -

CONSTRL'CTION PERMIT (S) application. dismissal of, with or without prejudice; LBP-84-43,20 NRC 1333 (1984) revocation of, for slowing or stopping construction; DD-84-23,20 NRC !$49 (1984) j.

CONTAINMENT j

j Mark !!, at Shoreham, adequacy of; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1102 (1984) t pressuntation, reliability of motor-operated valves to control; LBP-84-38. 20 NRC 1019 (19841 q

radiation monitors, at Big Rock Pomt, adequacy of. LBP 84-32,20 NRC 601 (1984) -

nsks to pubhc from crash of B-52 bomber into; LBP 84 32,20 NRC 601 (1984)

CONTAMINAT!ON of groundwater below Vogtle site, potential for; LBP 84-35,20 NRC 887 I1984)

~

of Philadelphia water supphes from postulated severe accident at Limenck; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446

~

(1984)

~

sulfate, at pressunzed water reactors; CLI 8415. 20 NRC 288 (1984)

CONTENT!ONS amendment of bases for, predicated on newspaper articles; LBP-84-49,20 NRC 1457 (1984) 2

{

broad,later particulanzation of; LBP-84-28,20 NRC 129 (1984) detaa! required for supportmg evidence, for admission of; LBP 84-40A. 20 NRC 1195 (1984) l filed by apphcant for a license amendment, admissibihty of; LBP-84 42,20 NRC 1296 (1984) j good cause for late fihng of. LBP 84 30,20 NRC 426 (1984) late #iled. stand.rd for determmms ability of to assist in deseloping a soiand record. LBP 84 30. 20 NRC 426 (1984 htigable, request for insestigation as basis for broadenmg; L*?-84.49. 20 NRC I457 (1984)

.:andards for admissibehty of, m matenals beense amendment proceeding; ALAB 778. 20 NRC 42 (1994) j CONTROL SYSTEMS interactions at Shoreham, irr. pact of; LBP 84-53,20 NRC 1531 (1984)

COOLING SYSTEM drywell at Grand Gu f, adequacy of design and construction of; DD-84-21,20 NRC 788 (19346 See also Reactor Coolant System. Reactor Core

~

COOLING TOWERIS i

aircraft carburetor iems causeo oy emissions from; Lt?-84 31, 20 Nic 446 (1984).

I collapse at Limenck. postulated. discussion of effects of; LBP $ s-31,20 NRC 446 (1984)

I enuronmental and agncultural elTects of releases of salt and cVorme gas from; LBP-84-35,20 NRC ;

88'i1984) y plumes. behavior of. LBP-84 31. 20 NRC 446 (1984)

COOLING WATER supplementary, rner follower method as alternatine for prosidms; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

CORE COOLING :

I dunes low power cperation. requirement for; LBP-84-35A,2') MRC 920 (1984) l See also Reactor Core CORE DRILLING i

as means for determrmns capabihty of a fault. adequacy of; ALAB M2. 20 NRC 1585 (1984)

CORROSION of steam generator tubes at TMI-1, tesis for; LBP-84-47. 20 NRC 1405 (1984)

COST BENEFIT AN ALYSIS r

t scope of, for long term mamtenance and monitonns of mill tailmss. LBP 84-42. 20 NRC 1296 t1984)

~ COSTS-incurred by NRC Staff. in resiewing an application subsequently withdrawn, recovery of; LBP-84-43,20 NRC 1333 81984) to ipphcant of protracted litigation consideration of, in operatmg heense proceedings; LBP 84-45, I

'O NRC 1343 #1984) t 1

1 1

.3 4

l--

n

, ^.,

4 em,

-e-

a f

d 1

SUBJECT INDEX l~

CROSS EX AMIN ATION limitanons on nghts of parties to conduct; ALAB 788, 20 NRC 1102 (1984) entten, adopuon of procedures for. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984 DECISION j

See also Iniual Decision 1

DECONTAMINATION

+

centers, sating of, LBP-84-29B. 20 NRC 389 (1984) f dunns radiofcgical emergency, adequacy of staffing for; LBP 84 26,20 NRC 53 (1984) esacuee need for accounurg of materials available for in emergency plans; LBP-84-298. 20 hRC 389 (19846 of site evacuees. extent of provisions necessary for: LBP 84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984)

DEFICIENCIES 4

I quality assurance. classificauon of; ALAB 788,20 NRC I102 (1984)

I quahty assurance, responsibehties of Boards in examining claims of; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984)

DEFINITION of harsh environment; DD-84-22,20 NRC 1033 (1984)

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMIS$10N desenption of; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMPACT J

effect of, on Federal actions; ALAB-785,20 NRC 848 (1984) j DELAYS in heensing proceedmss. Licensms Board responsibihty to avoid or reduce; LBP 84-52,20 NRC j

1484 (1984#

bcensing, congressional dmpproval of; CLI-84-20, 20 NRC 1061 (1984)

DEPRESSURIZATION under madequate core coohng conditions, use of PORV for; CLI-84 il,20 NRC 1 (1984)

DESIGN cntena, showing necessary for esemption from; LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1343 (19848 marsm, desenpuon of, L BP 84-41,20 NRC 1203 (1984) scismic. scope of and means for achieving, for nuclear power plants; ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 (1984) f DIESEL GENERATOR (S# -

building at Mid!and. hogabihty ofintegnty of, under 2.206 petition; DD 8417,20 NRC 226 (1984) g mandactured by TDI for Vogtle, reliabihty of; LBP 84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984) i DIRECTED CERTIFICATION j

failure of a party to address standards for. ALAB 791,20 NRC 1579 (1984)

DISCOVERY f

orders, finahty of. for purpose of appeal; ALAB 780,20 NRC 378 (1984)

{

reopenmg of, as remedy for misrepresentauon by Apphcant; LBP 84 56,20 NRC 1696 (1984)

DISMISSAL of construction permit apphcation with or without prejudice; LBP-84 43,20 NRC 1333 (1984) of operating heense apphcanon with prejudice; LBP 84-33,20 NRC 765 (1984) of operaung license proceedmg in absence of matters in controversy; LBP-84-34,20 NRC 770 (1984) of party for failure to respond to Board order reactivatmg a proceeding; LBP-84-$4,20 NRC 1637 '

(1984)

DISPOS AL SITES for mill taihnss cost oflong term maintenance and monitonns ofi LBP 84-42,20 NRC 12% (1984)

{

ownership of; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 12% (1984)

D!SQUALIFICATION t

motion not addressed to presiding officer or member oflicensing board, need for referral of ruling i

on; ALAB 779. 20 NRC 375 (1984).

I monons, timehness requirements for CLl 84-20,20 NRC 1061 (1984) of adjudicatory board member, support required for motion for; ALAB-7'7,20 NRC 21 (1984) l of NRC Chairman, denial of request for; CLI-84 20,20 NRC 1061 (1984) standards for. ALAB 777. 20 NRC 21 (1984) e' i

e 1

89 9.1m.ph a,.

~

t.

4.

,i SUBJECT INDEX 4

l h.

4 1

j timchness requirement for motion for; AL AB-777,20 NRC 21 (19848

{

. See also Recusal DOCUM ENT SERVICE g-completion of. LBP-84-54,20 NRC 1637 (1984)

DOCUMENTATION.

i of QA inspection procedures and results at Byron facility; LBP-84-41,20 NRC 1203 (19848

. DOSE (St 4

control for emergency workers; LBP 84 26,20 NRC 53 (19847 methodology for projecting.

• hen instrumentation is inoperable; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 446 81984) olisite, adequacy of apphcant's means for calculation and monitoring of; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) radiological, from dispossi or storage of m.31 taihnss, estimation of; LBP-84 42,20 N RC 1206 (1984)

See also Radiation Dose i

DOSIMETERS dis'ribution of. to emergency workers; LBP-84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) 2 DRY CASK STORAGE FACILITY as alternative to spent fuel shipments, need for consideration of; LBP 84-40A,20 NRC 1195 (1984)

EARTilQUAKEt5) l Morgan Ell, effect of, on seismic design of Diablo Canyon; CLI 84-13,20 NRC 267 (19848 need for consideration ofimpacts of, on emergency planning; ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 (1984);

CLI-84-12,20 NRC 249 (1984)

]-

See also Safe Shutdown Earthqu.ke, Seismicity potential for mosement of Trojan spent fuel pool racks during; LBP-84-52A,20 NRC 1509 41984)

ECONOMIC ISSUES htigability of, en operating hcense proceedingr. ALAB 789,20 NRC 1443 (1984p EDDY CURRENT tesis at TMI-1, requirements for; LBP-84-47,20 NRC 1405 (1984)

EFFECTIVENESS of Licensing Beard order, delay of; CLI 84 21,20 SRC 1437 (1984)

ELECTRIC pow ER offsite, result ofloss of, during low-power operation; LBP 84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1984) j onsite emergency AC, exert ption from requirement for, during low-power operatiot LBP 84-45,20

.-NRC 1343 81984).

4' ELECTRICAL CABLES '

] '

. overtenssoning of, at Byron facility; LBP 84 41,20 NRC 1203 (1984) sufTaciency of separation of, at Shoreham; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) -

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT -

' at Shoreham, adequacy of enuronmental quabficauon ofi ALAB 788, 20 NRC 1102 (1984:

at TMI, environmental quahfication of DD-84-22,20 NRC 1033 (19846 comphance of, eith January 1983 environmental qualinear on rule; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) s enuror, mental quahfication of, CLI-84 il,20 NRC I (1984) -

nonsafety-related, need for environmental quahfication of; LBP 84 53,20 NRC 1531 (1984s i

required to operate in harsh enuronment; DD-84-22,20 NRC 1032 (19848 l

ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

(

at Byron, evaluation of discrepaticies in: LBP 84-41,20 NRC 1203 (19846 i

EMERGENCY BROADCASTING SYSTEM

. effectiveness of, during a power outage; LBP-84 37,20 NRC 933 (1984) -

t EMERGENCY FEEDWATER j

effect ofinadscrtent initiation of, at TMI 1; LBP-84-47,20 NRC 1405 (1984 7

EMERGENCY FEEDWATER SYSTEM at TMl 1, telia5hty of; CLI-84-il,20 NRC I (1984) l at TMI l, upgrad:ng of environmental and seismic quahfication of; DD-84-22,20 NRC 1033 (1984)

. l response durics high-energy line breaks and seismic events at TMI-l adequacy of; DD 84-22,20 NRC 1033 (1984) -

f' EMERGENCY OPER ATIONS CENTER need to provide for relocation of; LSP 84 26,20 NRC 53 (1984) ^

a, y

f

N-ep

,. +

---,en c-

v 4

j, 9

d I

i i

i 4

SUBJECT INDEX f

f EMERGENCY PLANNING s

g

' adequacy of B.g Rod Pomt radiation monitonng in the contest of. LBP 84-32,20 N RC 6016 IM48 admnuon of broad contention on, subject to later particularization; LBP 84-28,20 NRC 129 81646

} -

conduct of crow etammarion, redirect eummation and recross-cummation on, through tj depoutions. ALAB 788. 20 NRC !!02 (1984#

i

j defects. operatmg license authontation in light of; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984) etTect of failure of local municipahties to adopt emergency plans on adequacy of; DD 8418,20 NRC 243 f198a7 -

for transportation accidents msolving radioactive materials, adequacy of regulations for; i

f DPRM-84 2,20 NRC 1563 (19846 -

guidance for sansf)mg regulatory standards for; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) information. prousson of, to transients; LBP-84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) i.

j issues, Licensing Board responsibility in decidms; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) j nature of find.ngs on adequacy of; LBP 84-26. 20 NRC $3 (1984) need for consideration ofimpacts of eartriquakes on; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984) need for final FEM 4 Andings on, prior to license authorization; ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 (19N t

need to consider coinplicating effects of earthquakes on; CLI-8412,20 NRC 249 (19848 pamphlet for Big Rock Point, distnbution of, to residents and transients: LBP-84-38,20 NRC 1019 119848 predictise nature of findings on adequacy of; ALAB-781. 20 NRC 819 (1984) prosisions for food. slothing. bedding, and shelters, adequacy of; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 933 (19845 regulations gosermng; ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 (1984) regulations, enceptions to; AL AB 781,20 NRC 819 (19848 regulations, reconsideration of. folinwing TMI accident; LBP-84-26,20 NRC $3 i1954)

{

requirements for reentry and recovery, scope of. LBP-84-298. 20 NRC 389 (1984)

EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONEtS) adequacy of staffer's to ensure security of, durms radiological emergerwy; LBP 84 26,20 NRC 53 11984) i configuration of sub-areas of. LBP-84-29B. 20 NRC 389 (1984)

{

discusuon of concept of; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984) expansion of. because of mereased insentory of the spent fuel pool; LBP-84-32. 20 NRC 601 (19841 j

factors determmms siae and con 6 uranon of, ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 (1984); DD-8418. 20 NRC 243 (19848 j

' need for entten Justification of boundar> making for. LBP 84-29B. 20 NRC' 389 (19844 plume esposure pathway, hmits of; LBP 84 37,20 NRC 933 (19848 precluuon oflicenung deciuon on basis of State enlargement of; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984,.

radioingical, meteore!ogical. and demographic reasons for etransion of. LBP-84-37,20 NRC 933

. I1984)

EMERGENCY PLANf 57 accounting of matenals asanlable for evacuee decontamination in; LBP-84-29B,20 NRC 389 (1984# -

deficiencies m. requirms license condition: LBP-84 37,20 NRC 933 f1984# -

for Limenck, adequacy of spectrum of accidents encompassed by; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 446 (1914s for transportation accidents msolvmg radioactive materials, need for; DPRM-84-2,20 NRC 1563 (19847' smplementing proteJures, lit:gabihty of adequacy of. LBP-84-298. 20 NRC 389 (1984)~

incluuon of supporting reference documents in: LBP-84-298,20 NRC 389 (1984) mair tenance and updating of; LBP-84-29B,20 SRC 389 (1984) post-heanns reelation of mmor details of; LBP 84-26,20 NRC $3 (1984) requirements for information brochures. marning signs, and decals to advise the pubhc; LBP 84-37,

+

-20 NRC 933 819441 separate, for summer and wmter. need for: LBPd4-32,20 NRC 601 (1984)

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

' brechures, need for verificanon of pubbh understanding of LBP 84-298,20 NRC 389 (19847 exercises, dead!mes for, and conditions to be conducted under: LBP 84-298,20 NRC 389 (1984)

EMERGENCY RESPONSE actorties. Catawba plans for coordination of; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) 98

)

1 i

l N'

ewg,

o

- i SUBJECT INDEX i

i T

j EMERGENCY %ORKERS j

- basis for respome rate en emergency plans; LBP-84 298,20 NRC 389 (19848 t

dose control for: LBP 84-26. 20 NRC $3 (19848 sufficency of informauon on radiauon risks to; LBP-84 31. 20 NRC 446 (19841 EMISSIONS from cooling towers, aircraft carburetor icmg caused by; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984)

ENDANGERED SPECIES smallest umts of. aTorded protection; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

See also American Shad Shortnose Siurgeon ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT effect of. on NRC licensing activraies; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

ENFORCEMENT actions, issue beirs addressed in ongoing operating license proceeding as the subject of, DD 84-17, 20 NRC 226 (1984#

oflicensee obligations and commitments; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) tool used by NRC to document noncompliances and ensure corrective action; DD-84-16,20 NRC 161 (19846 ENFORCEMENT POLICY I

NRC, description of. DD-8417,20 NRC 226 (1984)

ENVIRONMENT harsh, defimtion of. DD-84 22. 20 NRC 1033 (1984)

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS due to proumity of Vogtle Plant to DOE L-reactor, need for aswssment of LBP 84-35,20 NRC 887 f1984s ENVIRONMENT tL IMPACT

- of a project attr+utable to entity unassociated with nuclear plant, NRC responsibility to consider; ALAB-785. 20 NRC 848 (19848 -

i of class 9 acciden:s. need for consideration of, where FES has already been issued. ALAB.'81,20 l

NRC 819 e19941 j

of euended storage of spent fael; CLI-8415. 20 NRC 288 (1984) 1 ENVIRON \\t ENT 4L 1%f PACT STATEMENT l

availability of. prior to hearin8-ALAB-785. 20 NRC 848 (19841 j

for transport of spent fuel assemblies, need for separate; ALAB-790,20 NRC 1450 (19848 j

need for preparation of, for operating license amendment; LBP 84-40A,20 NRC !!95 (1984) need for. to consider addition of material to mill tailings which are the subject of the proceedmg;

(

LBP 84-42. 20 NRC 1296 81994#

t timing required by NEPA by. ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (19841 4_

j to consider impacts of spent fuel storage at reactor sites beyond clipiration dates of reactor licenses, l

-need for CLI 84-15,20 NRC 288 41984#

-j See als Final Ensironmental Statement ENVIRON \\f ENTAL QU ALIFICATION I

contention, lack of support for pension for reconsideration of; LBP-84-49, 20 NRC 1457 (1984) i

}

of efectric equipment at Limergk, compliance of, with January 1983 rule; LBP-84 31,20 NRC 446

'(1994)

I of electncal equipment at TMI-1; DD-84 22,20 NRC 1033 (1984)

{

of electrical eq4ipment, compliance of Shoreham with regulatory requirements for*. ALAB-788,20 NRC 1802 #19847 f

.of electrical equ:pment, efTect of, on adjudicanon; CLf-84-il. 20 NRC I (1984)

. of nonsafety-related electncal equipment, need for; LBP-84-$3,20 NRC 1531 (19848 of safety-related egaipment and components at Vogile, adequacy of; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 897 (19847 i

EQUIPMENT, SAFETY RELATED.

j at bost:e Plant, adegaacy of ensironmental qualificanon of. LBP 84 35,20 NRC 887 (1984i ETi(ICS IN GOVERN % TENT ACT

}

restrmtions agamst former federal officials trying to influence their former agencies; ALAB 791,20 NRC 1579 (1984#

i.

t i

92 t

f

+

4

.m e s

-r rne-e

+

r.-

y

.e e

SUBJECT INDEX EVACUATION adequacy of provisions for trame control and access control dunng; LBP 84 26,20 NPC 53 (1984) j because of Wolf Creek emergenc), demal of contention citmg inadequate staffing far; LBP 84 26 20 NRC 53 (1984)

I delay time of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, assumption m emergency response model of; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984)

I dunns radiological emergency, nsk of people declimng; LBP 84 31. 20 NRC 446 (1984) measures for children and pregnant women, adequacy of Beg Rock Pomt plans for LBP 84-32,20

[

NRC 601 (1984) l of Catawba EPZ, mmimum time for; LBP 84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) of health care facsLies and residents needing special transportauon assistance; LBP 84-26,20 NRC l

53 (19847 1

of persons without pnsate transportation; LBP ' 4-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) of populauons from Carowinds and Hentage U.S.A., adequacy of plans for; LBP-84-37. 20 NRC 933 (1984 of pregnant women and small children; LBP 84 26,20 NRC 53 (1984) of recreauonal, mobahty impaired, and school populations during Shearon Harris radiological emergency; LBP-84-298, 20 NRC 389 (1984) -

of schools. Mequacy of trainmg of appropriate individuals for: LBP-84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) l resolution of trame management issues related to potential bottlenecks to; DD 8415,20 NRC 157 i

(19846

)

1 routes, oseresumation of flow of trame on; LBP 84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) routes. preselecuon of. on basis of potennal wind direcuon; LBP-84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984);

l LBP 84-29B. 20 NRC 389 (1984) g-speed, backups and bad weather, adequacy of calculauons for, in Limerick emergency plan; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984)

{

ume esumates for indniduals who do not have their own automobiles; LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53

{

f1984) j use of whool buses for; LBP 84 37,20 NRC 933 (1984) i EVIDENCE I

{

cause for discounung cred:bihty of. LBP 84 55,20 NRC 1646 (1984) effect on a proceedirts of determmations regardmg evidenhary admissions; ALAB-791. 20 NRC l

1579 (1984s f

rebuttal, hmitations on rghts of parues to submit; ALAB-788,20 NRC !!02 (1984) i I

submission of. m untten form; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984)

EX PARTE CONfNtl2NICAT10N5 i

prohibinon asamst; AL 4B '85,20 NRC 848 (1984)

}

EX PARTE CONTACTS j

use of protectne order to asoid, LBP 84-36. 20 NRC 928 (1984) l EXCEPTIONeSi j

to iniual decision shat are not briefed on appeal waner of, ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (19841 j

to prohibition cf mterlocutory appeals. ALAB-780,20 NRC 378 (1984) j EXEslPTIONS

}

from design enteria. showmg necessary for; LBP 84 45,20 NRC 1343 (1984) i FA ULT (5s definition of. and means for determmmg capabihty of; ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 (1984) means of determmms age of. ALAB 792,20 NRC 1585 (1984)

FAULT, HO5G RI l

effect of, on design of Diablo Canyon; CLI 84-13,20 NRC 267 (1984) l' proumity to, as unique circumstance warranung considerauon of class 9 accidents; ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 (19547

}

FEDERAL ENIERGENCY NIANAGENfENT AGENCY final findmgs on emergency planning, need for, pnor to hcense authontation; ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 f1954s

{

reuew by, of trame management issues related to potential bottlenecks to evacuauon; DD-84-15, 20 NRC 157 819848 reuew of ernergency plans. need for completion of, for issuance of operatmg license; CLI-8413,20 NRC 267 61984)

I l

ii 93 1

a w-w

.P..

n J.

1 i

SUBJECT INDEX 1

- FIN AL ENVIRON \\lENTAL STATEMENT content of, concerning accident risks; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) need for environmental hearing to await preparation and circulation of; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984) i FINALITY of discovery orders for purpose of appeal. ALAB-780,20 NRC 378 (1984)

FIN ANCI AL QUALIFICATIONS of Licensee to operate spent fuel pool, need to consider; DD 84-25,20 NRC 1703 (1984) of utihties, basis for waiver of regulation precluding; LBP-84 30,20 NRC 426 (1984) of utilities, consideration of, at operating license stage; ALAB-784,20 NRC 845 (1984); L8P-84-35, 20 NRC 887 (1984) '

FINDINGS OF FACT penalty for failure to file; LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) proposed, penalty for failure to file; LBP 84-47,20 NRC I405 (1984)

FIRE-FIGHTING capabihties on site, need to provide for offsite augmentation of; LBP-84-31, 20 NRC 446 (1984)

FIRE PROTECTION of new fuel at the reactor site; ALAB 778,20 NRC 42 (1984) regulatory requirements for testmg program for; LBP-84 35,20 NRC 887 (1984)

FUEL handhng equipment, adequacy of. for low-power operation of Comanche Peak; LBP 84-30A,20 NRC 443 (1984) loading and precritical testing, findings necessary for license authorizing. LBP-84-30A,20 NRC 443 (1984) new, handling and storage of, at reactor site; ALAB 778,20 NRC 42 (19847 See also Spent Fuel t

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA.

appbcation of, according to rule of reason; LBP 84-35A,20 NRC 920 (19841 GENERAf0RS -

}

diesel, enhancement of otTsete power system at $boreham with; LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1984)

See Diesel Generators Steam Generator Tube GEOLOGY of Vogtle site, adequacy of apphcant's assessment of; LBP 84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984) site, scope of assessment of, for nuclear power plant construction, ALAB-792,20 NRC 1385 (1984)

GROUNDWATER contamination below Vogtle site, potennal for; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984)

II A R ASSM ENT alle8ed, at Diablo Canyon, denial of request for deferral of hcensing pending neutralization of; -

DD-84-19,20 NRC 773 (1984) at Diablo Canton, status of mvestiganons of; CLi-84-13,20 NRC 26711984)

IIEALTil AND SAFETY regulations, apphcabihty of, to low-power operating licenses; CLI-84-21,20 NRC 1437 (1984) risks, authority of adjudicatory boards to assess. CLI-8411,20 NRC i (1984)

- standard for issuance of operating licenses; CLi-8412,20 NRC 249 (1984)

See also Psychoicgical llealth

. IIEAlfil EFFECTS '

due to prosimity of Vogtle Plant to DOE L-reactor c:ed for asseument of; LBP 84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984) from radiological emergency, assessment of cost of medical treatment for; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) latent, from Limenck radiological emergency, adequacy of FES consideration of; LBP-84-31, 20 NRC 446 41984) of TMI 2 accident, adequacy of studies of; CLl 84-22,20 NRC 1573 (1984)

IlEARING(St adjudicatory, right of parties to challenge newly amended pornons of applications in; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 41934p enuronmental, need for preparation and issuance of FES, prior to. ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984) 94 3

1 e

1 "w-1 g

r--

- -+ r vy-t

m -.

f i

SUBJECT INDEX i

- {

l m response to 2.206 peupon, need to hold; DD-84-20,20 NRC 776 (1984); DD 84-21. 20 NRC 788 (1984) means for expediung; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1802 (1984) j on matenals hcenses under Part 70, nght to; AL AB 778,20 NRC 42 (1984) j on operating hcense amendment m absence of controversy, need for; LBP 84-39,20 SRC 1031 i

(1984)

}

on operatmg heense apphcanon, need for,in absence ofissues in controsersy; LBP 84 34,20 NRC 770 (1984) operating hcense, issues for consideration in; LBP-84-26, 20 NRC 53 (1984) j waner of naht to; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1296 (1984) wntten cross-cuamination in; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984)

IfOUSEKEEPING at Shoreham, adequacy of; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) problems at Shoreham, resolution of; LBP-84-53,20 NRC 1531 (1984) 11)DROGEN recombmers for Vogtle, adequacy of quahfication of; LBP-84 25,20 NRC 887 (1984i IMPORTANT TO SAFETY disunction between safety-related" and; CLI-84-14,20 NRC 285 (1984) interpretation of; ALAB-788,20 NRC !!02 (1984)

INITIAL DECISION l

failure to bnef exceptions to, on appeal; ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 (1984) immediate efTectneness review of; ALAB-787,20 NRC 1097 (1984) f INSPECTION program, NRC, scope of, for Catawba; DD-84-16,20 NRC 161 (1984)

INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT NRC program, for plants under construcuan; DD-84-16, 20 NRC 161 (19841 INTERDICTION crop, milk, and populanon, adequacy of FES considerauon of; LBP-84-38,20 NRC 446 (19841 INTERPRETATION

}

ofinconsistencies m regulanons; LBP-84-45, 20 NRC 1343 (1984)

INTi\\flDATION alleged, at Diablo Canyon, denial of request for deferral of heensing pending neutrahzation of; i

DD-84-19,20 NRC 773 (1984) at Diablo Canyon. status of mvesusauons of; CLI-84-13,20 NRC 267 (1984)

INVESTIGATION of foreman overnde at Catawba, Apphcants' methodology for; LBP-84-52,20 NRC 1484 (1984) request for, as basis for broadenmg a htigable contention; LBP 84-49,20 NRC 1457 (1984)

IODi> E monitors, m. plant, at Big Rock Point, adequacy of; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 601 (1984) 3CRISDICTION Appeal Board, oser monen to reopen on inue where its pr:or determinauon amounted to final agency action; ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 (1984) appellate, effect of Commission immediate etiechweness review of Licensing Board initial decision on; ALAB 787,20 NRC 1097 (1984) appellate, termmateon of; ALAB-783,20 NRC 843 (1984) appellate, to entertain new matters, when all issues are not final; ALAB-782,20 NRC 838 (1984) appellate, when agency action is final with respect to an issue; ALAB 782,20 NRC 838 (1984) oser issues that cannot properly be raised in adjudication; ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 (1984)

KRYPTON gaseous releases of, from failed spent fuel in spent fuel pool LBP 84-52A,20 NRC 1509 (1984)

LEAK RATE MEASUREMENTS at TMI 1, rehabihty of; LBP-84 47,20 NRC 1405 (1984)

LETTERS OF AGREEMENT for emergency seruces, need for dehneauon of authority in; LBP 84 31,20 NRC 446 (1984) with host health care facihues to accept panents during emergency evacuation, scope of; LBP-84-27, 20 NRC 125 (1984) 95 d

I"Y y

y

J t

I i

i SUBJECT INDEX i

i I

LIABILITY for damages from shippmg accidents involving dispersal of radioactive matenals; DPRM 74-2,20 NRC 1563 (19841 -

LICENSEE obhgations and commitments. Board enforcement of; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1802 (1984) response to 2206 petitions, need for; DD.8416,20 NRC 161 (1984)

LICENSING denial of request for deferr-1 of pending neutrahzation of alleged harassment and intimidation at

+

Diatio Canyon DD-8419. 20 NRC 773 (1984) of nuclear power plants, safety Andmss required by Atomic Energy Act for; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 #1984)

LICENSING BOARD'St authonty of, to accept contentions filed by an apphcant; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 12% (1984) authonty over NRC Staff. LBP 84-29,20 NRC 133 (1984) delegation of matters to Staff for resolution; LBP-84-41,20 NRC 1203 (1984) error as cause for appellate rehef. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) limitations on authonty of. LBP-34-41,20 NRC I203 (1984) operating license authonration in hght of emergency planning defects as abuse of discretion by; ALAB-781,20 NRC 819 (1484:

' order, delay of effectneness of; CLI 84-21,20 NRC I437 (1984) quesuon refusalof Licensee to respond to; LBP-84-46,20 NRC 1403 (1984) resolution ofissues by: ALAB 'il. 20 N RC 819 (1984) responsitnhties for espedition and thoroughness of proceedings; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) '

responsibihties for resolution of asues. ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) responsibility in deciding emergency planning issues; LBP-84 37,20 NRC 933 (1984) l responsibehty to asoid or reduce delays in hcensms proceedings; LBP-84 52,20 NRC 1484 (1984) i review of mvemsatne reports. propnely of, LBP 84 36,20 NRC 928 (1984) i LICENSING PROCEEDINGS responsibihty to avoid or reduce delays in. LBP-84-52,20 NRC 1484 (1984)

LITIGATION EXPENSE y

i as irreparable injury for purpose of grant of stay request; CLt-8417,20 NRC 801 (1984)

LOW POPI'L ATION ZONE evacuation. resolution of traffic management issues related to. DD-84-15,20 NRC 157 (1984 j

M AIN STEAM LINE RUlrTi!RE DETECTION SYSTEM delegation of respnnsibihty to NRC Staf'for approval of solution to problem of, CLI-84 il 20 NRC f

I(19848 i

M AINTEN A NCE of mill taihngs dispoul sites, cost of. LBP 84-42,20 NRC 12% (1984) i MAKELP %ATER & ITEM f

rehabahty of, in esedt of accider. presenting entry to containment for extended period; LBP-84-32.

20 NRC 60! 11984:

M A PS i

4 operations and mgestion pathway need for mclusion of,in offsite Shearon Harns emergency plans; LBP-84 29B,20 NRC 389 81984) l M ATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT I

failure to mform NRC of cessation of work and investment m nuclear power plant unit as.

I D0-84 23. 20 NRC 1549 f1984) l M ATERI ALS LICENSE Part 70, amendment of apphcation for; ALAB 778. 20 NRC 42 (1984) f' under Part 70, NRC Staff respor'sibihties regardmg; ALAB 778,20 NRC 42 (1984) under Part 70, scope of. ALAB ??8. 20 NRC 42 81984)

}

?

M ATERI ALS TRACEABILITY

{

at Cataaba, adequacy of measures for; DD-8416,20 NRC 161 (!984)

MECH ANICAL SYSTEMS

}

at Byron, evaluation of diwrepancies in; LBP-84-41,20 NRC 1203 (1984) f t

96 l

1

+ -agr -e-em-

,, c -

,s--,

,c~

. ~

.._~

i '

i SUBJECT INDEX f

NIEDICAL SERVICES for contammated in;ured indnidua;s hugabihty of contentions on. LBP-84-298. 20 N RC 389 (1984) for contaminated iruured, need for emergem planning for; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 44611984) for treaung radiation uctims from Shearon Harns ra6clogical emergency, adequacy of;

- LBP 84-298. 20 NRC 389 (1984s I

N!!LL TAILINGS l

disposal sites, cost of forg term maintenance and monstorms of. LBP-84-42. 20 NRC 12% (1984) proposal for onsite storage of, as segmentation prohituted by NEPA: LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1296 (1984) '

storage on site alternatnes to; LBP-84-42,20 NRC 1296 (1984)

NilSREPRESENTATION by Apphcant, recpenmg of discosery as remedy for; LBP 84 56,20 NRC 1696 (1984) i I

by.NRC SufT of regulatory requaements concermos protection of nonpower reactor against sabotage. LBP-84-29. 20 NRC 133 (1984) l SilSS:SSIPPI RIVER j

Old Rner Control Structure, etTect of fadute of, on Riser Bend Station; LBP-84-51,20 NRC 1478 e

(1984) l i

Sf0NITORING.

l equipment, neutron, adequacy of for low-power operation of Comanche Peak. LBP 84 30A,20 NRC 443 (1984) of mill tailt: gs disposal sites, cost of. LbP 84-42. 20 NRC 1296 (1984)

I of Shearon Harris esacuees for radioactive contamination, adequacy of plans for; LBP 84-298,20 NRC 389 19841 l

post accident adequacy of enuronmental quah0 cation of Shoreham equipment for; ALAB-788. 20 NRC 1102 (19846 radiauon at Big Rock Pomt Plant. adequacy of. in contest of emergency planning; LBP-84 32,20 1

NRC 601 (19848 i

rad'ution, of Trojan spent fuel pool means for and adequacy of; LBP-84-52A,20 NRC 1509 (1984p systems on wte at Limenck used to ininate emergency action levels, adequacy of; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984r NIONITORS rod block, function and safety classification of; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) water lesel at Big Rock Point quahfication of. for high temperature and humidity; LBP 84 38,20 NRC 1019 (19846 SiOTION to reopen on issue where Appeal Board's pnor determination amounted to final agency action, junsdiction oser-ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 81984)

NATIONAL lilSTORIC PRESERVATION ACT effect of, on NRC hcenssng actmues; ALABM85,20.NRC 848 (1984)

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FISHERIES SERVICE requirements for NRC consultauon eith; ALAB 785. 20 NRC 848 09841 NATURAL G AS

+

pipehne accidents near Limerick, potential for damage to facahty from; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 l

(19846.

NATURAL HAZARDS j

proximity to as grou os for considerauon of class 9 accidents; ALAB-781. 20 NRC 819 (1984) 1 SEED FOR POWER consideranon of, at operatmg hcense stage; LBP 84 35,20 NRC 887 (1984) litigabihty of in operaung hcense proceedings: ALAB 792. 20 NRC 1585 81984)

NOBLE G AS effluent monitors at Big Rock Point descnption and adequacy of; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 601 (1984) -

i

}

NONCONFORNfANCES

{

at Catawbe, adequacy of controls to process and respond to; DD-8416,20 NRC 161 (1984)

NONSAFETY SYSTENIS -

treatment of *eldmg uotauons on. LBP-84.52. 20 NRC 1484 (1984) i NOTICE OF VIOLATION purposes of, and circumstances appropnate for tssuance of. DD 8416,. 20 NRC 161 (1984)

+

97 I

1

-e-m - - W9

,4

..m y

y

t 1

l i

SUBJECT INDEX NOTIFICATION '

of emergency response personnel, adequacy of telephone system for; LBP 84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) of governmental agencies of Wolf Creek evacuation decision, adequacy of means for; LBP-84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) of Limencit emergency response organizations, emistence of mutually agreeable bases for; j

LBP 84 31,20 NRC 446 (1984) of offsite authonties of Limenck emergency, deadhne for; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) of public of radiological emergency, adequacy of Catawba plans for; LBP 84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) of transients in reservior area, of radiological emergency, means for; LBP 84-27,20 NRC 125 (1984)

See also Alertmg, Board Nohncation NRC PROCEEDINGS apphcabihty to, of allegations made in other htigation asamst hcensees, DD-8417,20 NRC 226 I

(1984)

{

responsibilities oflay representatnes in; ALAB 778,20 NRC 42 (19848 NRC STAFF as witnesses, responsibihty for assignment of; ALAB 786,20 NRC 1087 (1984)

~

authonty of adjudicatory boards over; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984); LBP-84-29,20 NRC 133 (1984) costs incurred in reviewmg an apphcanon subsequently withdrawn, recovery of; LBP 84-43,20 NRC 1333 (19841 inspection personnel, htigabihty of 2.206 request to augment; DD-84-17,20 N RC 226 (1984)

Licensmg Board delegation of matters for resolution bv; LBP-84-41. 20 NRC 1203 (1984)

Licensing Board delegation of responsibihty to, for approving solution to Main Steam Lme Rupture -

Detection System problem. CLI 84-il,20 NRC I (1984) heigabihty of adequacy of performance of, under 2.206 petition; DD 84-16,20 NRC 161 (1984) misrepresentations by, of regulatory requirements concernmg protection of nonpower reactor agamst sabotage; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 133 (1984) obhganon of, to bring relevant and material information to the attention of Boards LBP 84 29,20 NRC 133 (1984) obhgation regardmg unresolved safety issues; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) oversight of implementauen of Byron reinspection program, LBP-84-41,20 NRC 1203 (1984) poupon of,in NRC proceedings ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984) post-heanns resolution of emergency planning details by; LBP 84-26. 20 NRC $3 (1984) post-hearms resolution ofissues by; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (19848 responubihties for nndings on Part 70 matenals license; ALAB-778,20 NRC 42 (1984) responubihhes in submittmg Board Notification; ALAB 786,20 NRC 1087 (1984) review of allegations of mnconduct against; LBP 84 29,20 NRC 133 41984)

NUCLEAR POW ER PLANTS authonty to regulate items contained in: ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) required to have automated standby hquid control systems to mitigate anticipated transients without I

scram; LBP 84-40,20 NRC l181 (1984r -

I safety Gndings required for hcensing of; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (19841 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

authonty to choose a remedy for a violanon; DD-8417,20 NRC 226 (1984) authonty 10 regulate items contamed m a nuclear power plant; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1802 (1984) l Chairman, denial of request for disquahficanon of CLl-84-20,20 NRC 1061 (1984) immediate errectneness review of Licenung Board initial deciuon by ALAB-787,20 NRC 1097 -

)

(1984) mspecuon and enforcement program for plants under construction, DD 84-16,20 NRC 161 (1984) personnel matters, conuderauen of, under 2.206 petitions; DD-84-16. 20 NRC 161 (1984) responubehties under NEPA; ALAB 785. 20 NRC 848 (1984) responsibehty of, for timely processing of heense requests; CLI-84 21,20 NRC 1437 (1984) responsibihty to conuder environmentalimpactr of a project attnbutable to entity unassociated with nuclear plant; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY ACT effect of, on Commnsions waste con 6dence decision; CLl 84-15,20 NRC 288 (1984) 93.

t 4

+

• e.m ^.

sa v

~-

t

--r w

e

~-

._- ~ -_~

P 4

I.

SUBJEC f INDEX

{

NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY geologic, for high-lesel radioactne waste, safety of, CLI 8415,20 NRC 288 (1984) i OLD RIVER CONTROL STRUCTURE on Missisuppi Rner, effect of failure of, on Rner Bend Station; LBP-84 51,20 NRC 1478 (1984) 4 OPER ATING BASIS EARTHOUAKE i

t description of, and means for calculaung vibratory ground accelerauon assigned to; ALAB-792,20 j

NRC 1585 (1984e OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT need for hearing on, in absence of controversy; LBP-84-39, 20 NRC 1031 (1984) need to prepare enuronmentalimpact statement for; LBP 84-40A,20 NRC 1895 (1984) reviung technical specifications to recognize steam generator tube repair technique other than plugging; LBP-84-47,20 NRC 1405 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE PROCEEDINGS conuderanon of cosa to applicant of protracted heiganon; LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1984)

}

consderation of need for power, afternatne energy sources, and financial quahfications of utahties in; LBP-84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984) hergabehty of economic tssues m; ALAB-789,20 NRC 144) (1984) scope ofimpacts considered in; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSEtS) apphcants, near term. criteria for evaluating operating experience for; DD-84-21,20 NRC 788 (1984) apphcanon dismissal with preludice; LBP 84-33,20 NRC 765 (1984) apphcanon, need for hearms on, in absence ofissues in controversy; LBP-84-34,20 NRC 770 (1984) appImation, withdrawal of, without prejudwe; LBP 84-51,20 NRC 1478 (1984) i k

authoruation m hght of emergency planning defects as abuse of drscretion by Licensing Board; l

ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984) 3

'l condition requiring adopteon of Board definition of %mportant to safety'* classification; ALAB 788, i

20 NRC 1102 (10846 full power and low-power, treatment to be given relauonship between; CLI-8419,20 NRC 1055 i

I1984) full-power, treatmem of, as amendment to; CLI 8419,20 NRC 1055 (1954) health and safety stardard for issuance of; CLI 8412,20 NRC 249 (1984) hearir gs, issues for consideranon in; LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984) low power, appbcabihty of health and safety re8ulation to; CLI 84-21,20 NRC 1437 (1984) a low power, cause for suspension of; ALAB-789,20 NRC 144) (1984) low power, elTect ofissuance of, on full-power hcense; ALAB-789,20 NRC 144) (1984) low-power, effect of remand on issuance of; LBP-84 53,20 NRC 1531 (1984) low power, finderigs necessary for issuance of; LBP-84 30A,20 NRC 443 (1984)

NRC responsibiht) for timely procesung of; CLI 84-21,20 NRC 1437 (1984) -

4 remedy to emergency plannmg deficiency as condiuon to; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984) satnfacuon of conditions prior to issuance of; LBP-84 27,20 NRC 125 (1984)

OPER ATION, ll)W POW ER authorgauon of esemphon to GDC 17 for; LBP 84 45,20 NRC 1343 (1984) need for onste emergency AC power for; LBP 84-35A,20 NRC 920 (1984)

ORDER 1

Licensing Board, delay of elTectneness of; CLI-84 21,20 NRC 1437 (1984)

OVERHEAD CR ANE at Big Rock Pomt, senmic stabihty of; LBP 84 32,20 NRC 601 (1984)

PENALTY for fas.ure to file proposed findings of fact; LBP 84 26,20 NRC $3 (1984); LBP-84 47,20 NRC 1445 (1984)

PERSONNEL on ute at ume of emergency, abihty of apphcant to account for; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) 4 PETROLEUM a-pipehne accidents near Limerick, potential for damage to facihty from; LBP-84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) 4 1

I9 1

4 e-

,y

---

m-.,,p__-v n.-ww y-y.,gemy,m.

3---

. - ~

O j

SUBJECT INDEX i

PHYSICAL SECURITY j

levels required for nonpower reactors; LBP 84-29,20 NRC 133 (1984)

- PIPELINE j

natural gas and svtroleum. potential for damage to Limerick facility from accidents involvmg; 4

LBP 84 31,23 NRC 446 (1984) 4 PIPES I

and piping supports, adequacy of Diablo Canyon design of; CLI-8413,20 NRC 267 (1984)

I POINT PLEASANT HISTORIC DISTRICT I

impacts of Limerick facility on; ALAB-785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

POLICY See Enforcement Pohcy POLYMERS adequacy of testmg of, for low-level radiation damage; LBP-84 35,20 NRC 887 (1984)

POW ER onsite emer$ency AC. need for, for low power operation; LBP 84-35A,20 NRC 920 (19841 outage, effecuseness of emergency broadcasung system dunng; LBP-84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984)

See also Need for Power PREJUDGMENT basis for disquah0 cation on grounds of; ALAB 777,20 NRC 21 (1984) i PREJUDICE dismissal of operating license apphcatinn with; LBP 84-33,20 NRC 765 (1984) to parties by Licensing Board review of mvesugative reports, avoidance of' LBP-84-36. 20 SRC 928 (19848 i

PR E55URE OPER ATED RELIEF VALVES uw of, durms lom-temperature operation and inadequate core cochng conditions; CLI 84-ll. M NRC 1 f1984)

PRIVILEGE attorney chent. apphcabihty of, where confhct esists in attorney chent relationship; LBP44 50,20 1'

g NRC I464 419848 work product circumstances for oserndms; LBP 84-50,20 NRC 1464 (1984)

PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS l

need to identify or assess adverw systems interactions as part of; ALAB-788,20 N RC ll02 (1984) j PROTECTIVE ORDER use of, to asoid emparte contacts. LBP 84 36,20 NRC 928 (1984)

PsiCilOLOGICAL HEALTH

}-

hogabihty of issue of. LBP 84 35. 20 NRC 887 (1984)

' PS)Cl(OLOGICAL STRESS as baus for peution for dismissal of construcunn permit application with prejudice; LBP 84-43. 20 NRC 1333 tVo84s P) ROPHORICITY of nrcatoy claddmg after ettended storage; CLI-8415,20 NRC 288 (1984)

QUALIFICATIOv5) enuronmental and seismic, of emergency feedwater system at TMI-l. upgradmg of. DD-84-22. 20 NRC 1033 819848 I

of Diablo Canyon operators and shift supervisors, adequacy of. CLI-8413,20 NRC 267 (1984) of hydrogen recombmers for Vogtle, adegaacy of; LBP 84 35,20 NRC 887 (1984p of QC inspectors at Byron.venGcanon of; LBP-84 41,20 NRC 1203 (19848 t

)

of quahty assurance inspect 7rs, proof of. AL, 1792,20 NRC 1585 (19841 seismic, of equ.pment at Vogtle, need for reassessment of, LBP 84-35,20 NRC 887 (19841 seismic, of otTute emergency power sources, need for; LBP 84-45,20 NRC 134) (19848 -

{

5ee also Enuronmental QuahGeauon Financial Qualifications i

QUALITY ASSUR ANCE apphcabihty of 10 C F R Part 50. Appenden B requirements; ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) r at Shoreham, adequacy of; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1102 (1984) deficiencies, clasu0 cation of; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) denciencies. responsibihues of Boards in enammms claims of ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1802 819846 i

delegauon of responsibihty for; ALAB-792,20 NRC 1585 (19848 e

i 100 e

t

>w.+

~

-y y

'w-p

.-+4-.-e a

g ww e4-4xg e' e

~

t e

/

j SL'BJ ECT INDEX 1

I functions, requiremen:5 of Mrsons anJ arpmzanons performing; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1102 (1984)

~

{

inspector quahfkanons, reprements fer; ALAB 792,20 NRC 1585 (1984)

\\

need for remossi of %diarJ 1 censee from managenal responsitnhty for: DD 84 l'. 20 NRC 226 t1984) 4 4'

of construct on of \\gt!e p ant. adequaa of program for; LBP-84 35,20 NRC 88' (1984) of construction. remedial prcgrams to ensure comphance with regulatory requirements for.

DD 84 l'. 20 NRC 226 #1984) of welding at Lamenck. 2Jequacy of LBP.84 31. 20 NRC 446 (1984) program at Byron. effectiseness of; LBP-84-41,20 NRC 1203 i1984s i

program at Catawba. accer:45hty of; DD 84-16. 20 NRC I68 (1984) program. audit requireme :s for senfprg corpphance with. AL AB 788. 20 NRC 1102 (1984) reinspecuon recgram at B>ren Stanon scops o(; ALAB 792. 20 NRC 1585 (19841 reue*, scope of; ALAB *si. 20 NRC 1102 it9341 4

scope of program required (cr nuclear power plants; AL A8 792,20 NRC 1583 #1984) standards for radioutese rverials pakaging. DD-84-24,20 NRC 1537 (1984) stolations of implementing procedures or manuals as slotations of Part 50, appendia B QUALITY ASSLRANCE INSPECTORS I

at Byron facihtv. senficanon of etiecuseness of LBP.84-41,20 NRC 1203 (1954 QL'ALITY CONTROL 4

of systems re:esant to low rower oteranon, need for assurance of adequacy of, pnor to hcense e

authontation. LBP 44.20A. 20 NRC 443 f1984 RADIATION l

)

electromagnetic. from Vg:'e transmiwen hnes. health effects of; LBP-84 33. 20 NRC 887 (1984) 3 ionizing adewey of Ves::e menment of effects of. LBP.84-35,20 NRC 887 41944s j

momtones at B g Rock Poet Pl ant. adequacy of, in contest of emergency planmes; LSP 84 32. 20 i

NRC 601 ilites 2

I momtonns danns raJ:cteg.cai emerges adequacy of stailing for; LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984 a

I

{

nsks. sufficiency of mformaton for eraergency workers on; LBP 84 31,20 NRC 446 (1984) l j

nsks to general pubhc nad =crkers froi-i radiation shine through thinnest wall of expanded spent fuel pool. LBP 84-32. 20 NRC 601 <!M46 l

RADI ATION DOSE.

calculanons fer thinnest =a3 of espanded spent fuel pnot; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 6nt (1984) from postula:ed drop of sme; fuel assernbly mto sperit fuel pool; LBP 84 32. 20 NRC 601 (19848 to Philadelphta frem gwssi.'ated severe accidents at Limenck; LBP-84 31,20 NRC 446 (19848 See also ALAR 4 RADIOACTIVE %I ATERIALS shipments. afeguacy of regu:anons for drner informanon on; DPRNf-84 2,20 NRC 3 563 (1984)

RA DIOACTi\\ E R ELE ASES 2

Junes mosement of m;!! *args to rer-1anent dnposal sites, estimanon of. LBP 84 42,20 NRC 1

12 % (19848 l

etTect of espa'isici of sMM ( ef pnot o9 abihty of cleanup system to maintain lesels of. within heensed tiraits. LBP 84 !2 L 20 NRC 1509 r1984) from TMI 2 accident. adenacy of studies of healih effects of; CLI 84-22. 20 NRC 1573 (1984) i I

R ADIOACTIVE % ASTE high-level, feaschty of safe storage of, in mmed geologic repositones. CLI-84-15. 20 NRC 288 i

j 81984) -

{

RADIOACTIVITY in spent fuel pool water, source of. LBP 84 523,20 NRC 4509 (1984)

RADIONUCLIDES adequacy of Wgtle anewae-t e f poten:tal for relea e of. LBP-84 3$. 20 NRC 887 f1984) a A

RADWASTE DEMINER All2ER entent of use of, to attenga:e radiauon from espanded spent fuel pool; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 601 4

81984)

REACTOR COOLANT 5) STE\\t use ofinnosa:ne design c. LBP.84 3f. 20 NRC 84711984) -

T I

b l

j l

lel 1

'i s

,h W

ww 4

.. _, _, -. ~

~ _..

... ~. ~,

., ~

SUBJECT IN DEX f

RE ACTOR CORE damage dunng acodent, abihty of Big Rosk Point to auew degree of, LBP 84 32. 20 NRC 601 (19947 notauon coohng sptem. funcuon and ufety claw 6,a: ion et. \\L AB 781,20 NRC 110211984) i See also Core Cooling RE ACTOR OPER ATOR quah6 cations at Grand Gulf, falu6 cation of. DD 84 21. 20 NRC 759 i19841 REACTOR VE5SEL funcunn of safety rehef sabes m. ALAB 788. 20 NRC ll0211434 high water leselino funcuan and ufety clawficatien of. \\ LAB 738,20 NRC 1102 (19841 REACTOR (S) nonpower. chronology of NRC Sta:T conuderatton of ubotage at. LBP-44-29,20 NRC 13) (1984) nonpower. levels of protection reauired for; LBP 84-29. 20 NRC 133 !!9946 l

protecuon splems. adequacy of, for low power operanon of Comanche Peak. LBP 84-30A. 20 NRC 443 (1984) i water cleanup sniem. function and safety clasuficatien of. AL AB-788,20 NRC !!02 (1984) l RECONSIDER ATION of enuronmental quah6 canon contenuon. lack of support for peution for; LBP 84 49. 20 NRC 1457 410446 RECORDISI t'urden of utnfymg requerements for reopenmg. AL ABM46. 20 NRC 1047 (19841 newspaper article as baus for reopening; AL AB 7 fin 20 NRC 1017 (19546 paruculanty regt. ired of matenal supporung a motion :o renpen; AL AB.786. 20 NRC 1087 (19847 quahty anurance requirements for traceabihty of. \\L \\B '81. 20 NRC 1102 I1984) requirements for succewful motion to reoren. ALAB 730. 20 NRC 1037 f19841 standards for recremng. CLI-94 IS. 20 NRC 80411414e e

RECUSAL of adjudicatory board member. surport required for motinn for; AL AB 777. 20 NRC 21 (1934) of Chief Admmniraine 3sose of \\tomic Safety and Lwenung Board Panel. LBP-84-29A. 20 NRC 3A5 (1944 requests, t mehnew requirements for. CLi-94-20. 29 NRC tu6141984 t mehnew requirement fnr monon lor. AL \\B 77*. 20 NRC 21619446 REENTRY \\ND REC 04 ER) scope of emergency plantnes reuuirements for. LBP-?4 298. 20 NRC 389 (1984#

RESERR AL OF RULING on dnquah6 canon monon not adJrewed to preudag ot6cer nr raember of licertung board, need for; ALAB 779. 20 NRC 375 t19841 RLGULATIONISI appbcabihty of General Deugn Cntena to low-power operiuor s. LBPJ4 35A. 20 NRC 920 (1984)

Board authoniy to msahdate. ALAB 792. 20 NRC l<45 fl944t Cnmmisunn. authonty of adjudicatory boards to entertain shallenges to; ALAB-784,20 NRs 845 (19847 consernmg emergency responw to transportanon 4,;cideets msolurg radioactive matenats, need for i

amendment of. DPR\\l 84 2. 20 NRC 1563 (19*4 dewsn. showmg r:ecewary for esempunn from. LBP 44-45. 20 NRC (343 i19447 l

emergency planmrg, escerunns to. ALAB 781. 20 NRC 819 81994 esammation of irwonustencies in; LBP-84-45. 20 N RC 1343 e 1954:

heshh and ufety, appheabihty of, to lowtower orerstmg hserhes CLI.84 28. 20 NRC I437 (1984) prestuding sonuderanon of need for pnwer at ope 4:mg twerhe stage. *aner of-LBPJI4 35,20 NRC 887 819846 promulgated under Uramum Niill Taihngs Radiatmn Protetuun Act. level of protection afTorded by.

i LBP.84-42,20 NRC 1296 419441 standard for grant of peuuon for waner of. LBP-44 30. 20 NRC 426 819841 REGUL ATORY GLIDES use of methods and solunons d:fferent from. AL AB 794. 20 NRC 1102 f1984)

R elNSPF CTION program for Byron facihty. descnption of; LBP 84 41. 20 NRC 1203 (1944f f

i 102 Y

• W

\\

1 l

1 I

i J-

+

SUBJECT IN DEX T'

]

RELATIVE AGE DATING ' ~

}

of faults to determine their capability, techriscal description of; AL AB 792,20 NRC 1585 (19841 J

RELOCATION

{

of people beyond 10 miles from Limerwk Juring radiological emergency, plausibihty of, LBP-84-31, i

4 1

20 NRC 446 t1984) l REMAND I

effect of, on inaance oflow-power hcense. LBP 84-53,20 NRC 1531 (1984) test for determrnirig whether to impose star pending dnposition of; LBP 84-53,20 NRC 1531 (1984)

~

REPRESENTATION by Apphcints' attorneys, of party whose positron is adverse to Apphcants'; LBP 84-50,20 NRC I464 (19841 j

lay, in NRC proceedings, standards for; ALAB 778,20 NRC 42 (1984)

REPROCESSING effect of, on radioactive waste form and waste package; CLI 84-15,20 NRC 288 (1984)

[

RESTART of TMI Unit I, demal of motion to defer decision on; CLI 84-22,20 NRC l$73 (1984) i REVIEW

{

appellate, Licensirig Board error as cause for; ALA8 788,20 NRC 1802 (1984) appellate, of grounds for trial tribunal's result; ALA8-792,20 NRC 1585 (1984) i appellaie, of Licensing Board's factual findirras, standard apphcable toc ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 i

-l (1984 t

{

appellate, sua sponte, wope of. ALAB 792,20 NRC 1585 f1984)

I j

dncretionary interlocutory, Licenung Board ruhns quahrying for; ALA8 780,20 NRC 378 (1984) en parte, by Licensing Board ofinvestigative reports, propriety of; LBP-84-36,20 NRC 928 (1984)

}

{

immediate effectneneu, of Licenwns Board imtial decision by Commission; ALAB-787,20 NRC l

1097 (19447--

f independent, of construchon, design and rnanagement of Catawba, demal of petition for; DD-84-16, f.

I 20 NRC 161 (1984) quahty assurance, scope of; ALAB 788,20 NRC I102 (1984)

RISKS accident, content of FES concermng LBP 84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) -

from radiation esposure to emergency workers; LBP 84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) health and safety, authority of adjudicatory Soards to assess. CLI 84-II,20 NRC i (1984) 1 1

of accidents and acts of sabotage at spent fuel storage facilities; CLI-8415,20 NRC 288 (1984) to pubhc from crash of B 52 bomber into contatnment housing spent fuel pool; LBP 84-32,20 NRC '

.601 (1984)

I See Probabihstic Risit Analysis RULEMAKING l

effect of, on adjudgation; CL1-84-il,20 NRC I (1984) i on need to consider complicating effects of earthquakes on emergency planning, focus of; CLi 84-12,20 NRC 249 (1984)

~

j to amend regulations concermns emergency responw to transportation accidents involving radioactive materials, denial of petition for; DPRM 84-2,20 NRC 1563 (1984) '

j waste confidence, imtiation of CLi-8415,20 NRC 288 (1984) t RULES l

en parte meeting to dncuss licensms status of plants as violation of; CLI-84 20,20 NRC 1061

..(1984).

. procedural, dncretion of adjudicatory boards to modify; ALAB-785,20 NRC 848 (19841 i

j RULES OF PRACTICE 4

admissibihty of contentions filed by applicant for a license amendment, L8P 84-42,20 NRC 12%

(1984 admnsabihty of contentions in materiats 1: cense amendment proceeding; ALA8-778,20 NRC 42 5

(1984.

I Appeal Board jurndiction over motion to reopen on nsue where its prior determination amounted to final agency action: AL AB 792. 20 NRC 1585 (1984) l

- appeal of 8 rounds for trial tribunal's result; ALA8 792,20 NRC 1585 (1984) i 4

i 103 4

l 4

. 4s> W.

.m em T-m w-4-c-y w

,-y-Twm..

.,,g.

+we, r,

,w

-e m-v,

,-w

- -, --- --- - - - - --mv,-~v

- -, -, -r-,--r w

,-4 e

-.~

. - -~..

_~.=.

~!

t i

I i

i I

SUBJ ECT IN DEX l

apphcability of 4:torney chent privilege where conflwt exists in attorney-chent relationship; LBP-84 50.- 20 NRC 1464 819846 burden of sausfying regwrernents for reopening a closed record. ALAB 786,20 NRC 1087 (19846 I

challenges to stipulauons. LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53 41984) completion of seruce of documents; LBP-84 54,20 NRC (637 f19841 i

_ consideration of NRC personnel matters under 2.206 petitions; DD-84-16. 20 NRC 161 (1984) 4

}

entena apphed in passing on stay requests; ALAB 794,20 NRC 1630 (19848 cntena used in determming whether to grant stay of agency action; CLI-84 21,20 NRC 1437 (19846 l

j,

denial of motion for stay of agency acuon; ALAB 789,20 NRC 1443 ((9848 j

demal of monon for summar) disposinon. LBP 84-40,20 NRC 1181 (19848 detail required of cudence supporting contenuons, for admissibility purposes; LBP-84-40A,20 NRC g

5 l

- 1195 (1984) dismissal of construction permit apphcanon with or without prejudice. LBP-84 43. 20 NRC !)33 (19848 -

effect of a party's failure to briefissues adequately; ALAB-792. 20 NRC 1585 (19846 8

exception to prohibinon ofintertocutory appeals; ALAB 780,20 NRC 378 (19847 I

factors considered by Appeal Board in deciding whether to exerci e directed cerufication authonty; i

ALAB-791. 20 SRC 1579 t1984) factors considered in ruhng on stay request; ALAB-789. 20 NRC I443 (1984) factors to be considered m decidmg whether to grant stay request; CLI 84-17,20 NRC 801 (1984) i

}-

~ j failure of a party to address standards for directed certification; ALAB-791,20 NRC 1579 (1984)

I finahiy of discostry orders for purpose of appeat ALAB-780,20 NRC' 378 (1984) imroediately appealable achons. ALAB 778. 20 NRC 42 (1984) importance of timehness of request for stay of agency action; ALAB-789. 20 NRC 1443 (1984) j msutuuon of show cauw proceedings; ALAE 782. 20 NRC 538 (19A41 l

l institution of shou sause proceedmss on issues being treated generically through rufemaking; DD-84-24. 20 NRC 15!* I1984) i j

mterlocutory arMais of eudenuary ruhnss; ALAB 791,20 NRC 1579 (19848 l

1

-issues on appe4L ALAB ?*8. 20 NRC 42 (1984) i junsdiction oser issues that cannot properly be raised in adjudicanon; ALAB 792. 20 NRC 1585 4

I ten 8th of request for stay of agency action, restnctions on; ALAB-794,20 NRC 1630 ([9847 81984:

7 licenwe response to 2 206 ntitions, need for; DD 8416,20 NRC 161 (1984)

Licensing Board error.s cause for appellate rehef. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (19845 f

litiganon expenw as irreparable mjury for purpose of grant of stay request; CLi 84-87. 20 NRC 801

?

i i1984) rnost important factor appked in deterrmning the need for a stay; ALAB-794,20 NRC 1630 (19846 need for referral of ruhng on Jisquahficanon monon not addressed to presiding officer or member

{

of hcenung board. AL 48 779. 20 NRC 375 (1984) newspaper articie as a basis for reopening a record; ALAB 786. 20 NRC 1087 (1984)

I, particularity rewired of matenal supporting a monon to reopen a record; ALAB 786. 20 NRC 1087 (1984) e particularizauen c4 broad contennons; LBP-84 28. 20 NRC 129 (1984) l penalty for failure to file propowd findings of fast; LBP-84-47,20 NRC 1405 (19846 penalty for failure to Gle required findirigs of fact; LBP-84 26,20 NRC 53 (1984) t i

penalty for party's failure to respond to Board order reactivatmg a prnceeding; LBP 84-54,20 NRC

)

1637 (1984e l

prohibiuon against en parte commumcations; ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

I prohibiunn of interlocutory appeal. ALAB 747. 20 NRC 1097 (19847 proof of wruce eith all fil.ngs with the Commission, need for; ALAB 778,20 NRC 42 (1984) recusal of Chief Admmistr1tist Judge of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panet L8P.84 29A. 20

}

NRC 385 81984:

reopenmg of dncovery as remedy for misrepresentauon by Appheant; LBP 84 56,20 NPC 1696 i

f19846 requirements for succeuf al motion to reopen a record. ALAB 786,20 NRC 1087 (1984) 1I responubihties of lay reprewmatives in NRC proceedmss; ALAB 778. 20 NRC 42 (1984) i i

i 104 i

a

• h$

n,m.-

y e g g-.

,e

,, -y rrdr-.-

-vv v

rv-*-am r'-w-

+w-r--

9-M'r'--.---'r

.- =

y

=--

i a

5 3

f 4

SUBJ ECT INDEX 1

4 i

respons4:dny for determines which NRC Stiff personnel tesufy at hearings; ALAB 786. 20 NRC l

l 1087 41484e responsi :hty of applicant to inform Boards of significant new deselopments; AL AB-785. 20 NRC

~

1-j respons&ty of party appearms pro se to noury secretary of change of address. LBP-84 54,20 NRC 848 f.4541 4

f-1637 il464e l

revocataca of construction permits: DD 84 23,20 NRC 1549 (1984)

. scope of 5 a sponte appei! ate reuew; ALAB 792,20 NRC 1585 t1984) significan:e of irreparable mjury in deciding stay requests. CL1-g417,20 NRC 801 (1984) specifics:y reamred of 2 200 requests; DD 84-18. 20 NRC 243 (1984) standard for grant of pennon for waner of regulation LBP-84-30,20 NRC 426 (1984) j standards for grant of dsretionary mterlocutory remw riheensms board relmg; ALAB 780,20 j

1 NRC 3*l 41984B l

a standmg to appeak ALAB 790. 20 NRC 1450 (1984) f.

support reqared for monons for disquahficanon of ady.adicatory board member; ALAB-777,20 NRC 2111934) l test for determitung whether to impose a stay pending disposiuon of a remand. LBP-84 53,20 NRC 1531 *19846 timeliness reqwrement for motions for disquahfication. ALAB 777. 20 NRC 2 (1984) l unumelic.ess of mtersenors in challenging apphcant's studies; LBP-84 53. 20 NRC 1531 (1984) l use of pro:ectne order to asoid ex parte contacts; LBP 84-36,20 NRC 928 (1984) i waiser cf escepuons to mmal decision that are not briefed on appeal; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984.

maiver cf regalanon to permit considerauon of need for power issue at operating license stage; LBP44 M 20 NRC Si? f19846 eeight ga en to " irreparable harm factor in ruims on stay requests. ALAB-789. 20 NRC 1443 (1984#

i j

oork precci prmlege, circumstances for overriding; LBP-84 50. 20 NRC 1464 (1984) l RCLING5 eudent a.7. interlocutory appeal of; ALAB-791,20 NRC 1579 (1984)

Licenseg Board. quahiyms for discrenonary interlocutory review; ALAB 780. 20 NRC 378 (1984) j

]

procedral shommg of prejudice necessary to demonstrate error m; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1802 l

(1984*

See also Refer al of Ruhrg 1

l S A BOTAG E -

1

}

at nonx *er reactors. chronology of NRC Staff consideration of; LBP-84-29. 20 NRC 133 (1984) of spent fuel sto age facihues. rnk of; CLi 84 8 5. 20 NRC 288 (1984)

]

i scenattos 1.rms transportanon of spent fuel. need to consider; DD-84 24,20 NRC 1557 (1984) j

$AFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE j

at TMI ! emer8ency feed *ater system response follooms; DD-84 22,20 NRC 1033 (1984) a.

t descntt;cn of. and rnear.s for calculating; ALAB 792. 20 NRC 1585 (19848 SAFETY

')

findmis reqwred by 4:omic Energy Act for heensing of nuclear power plant; ALAB 788,20 NRC -

I i

1102 *1984#

l findmss regwred by comic Energy Act for nuclear facihty operation; DO-84-16. 20 NRC 161 J

(1984 I

of dry s:crase of nuciear wastes; CLl-84-15. 20 NRC 288 (1984) of weld r.s at Byron facthry; LBP-84 41.20 NRC 1203 (1984)

See also Health and Safety,important to Safety

]

$AFETY-GR A DE classiccanon of presswre operated rehef vahes as. CLI 84 il,20 NRC 1 (1984)

P

$ 4FETbR EL ATED J_

g distinct.on detween important to safety'* and; CLI-84-14,20 NRC 285 (1984) l i

$AFETYl$5LEfSt

]-

A.17 a.M A 47. need to preclude plant operauon pendmg completion of study of; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1102 f19848 1

unresobed. NRC Staff coligation regarding; ALAB 788. 20 NRC 1102 (1984)

)l i

les

.i 1

I

'~

m.

1 o

4 I

s i

i SUBJECT INDEX f

k SAFETY STANDARDS I

for low-power tesung, esmphance with, LBP 84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1984)

SAFETY SYSTESIS requirement for studying interacuons between; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) t

. SALT I

l releases from Vestle coohng to*ers, ensironmental and agricultural effects of LBP 84-35,20 NRC l

887 (1984) 4 SECURITY

{

I of emergency planmns zone dunns radiological emergency, adequacy of stalTing to ensure; LBP 84-26,20 NRC 53 t1984)

See also Physical Security SECURITY ISSUES j

guidance on htigatnhty of, LBP-84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1984)

SECURITY PLAN emergency power sources treated as vital m; LBP-84 45,20 NRC I343 (1984)

SEGMENTATION StarY proposal to license ons6te storage of mill taihnss as; LBP 84-42,20 NRC 12% (1984) l SE!SMIC DESIGN response spectra site-specific tailonns of; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) l i

SEISMIC REFRACTION 4

j as means for determimns capability of a fault, adequacy of; ALAB 792,20 NRC 1585 (1984)

SEISMICITY I

j prosimity to region of, as a natural hazard; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984)

$ERVICE

'I need for proof of, with all filings with the Comrmssion; ALAB-778,20 NRC 42 (1984) i SilELTERING dunns radiological emergency at Wolf Creek, adegaacy of facilines and services for; LBP-84-26,20 i

NRC 53 (19846 i

f of milk ammals dunns a site emergency, need for plans for; LBP-84-298,20 NRC 389 (1984)

$lilELDING of expanded spent fuel pool. adequacy of; LBP 84 32,20 NRC 601 (1984) g 2

SHORTNOSE STURGEON -

1 impacts of Limerick facihty on, ALAB 785,20 NRC 848 (19846 Sitow-CAUSE PROCEEDINGS institunon of, to amend or resoke a nuclear power plant operating hcense; ALAB 782,20 NRC $38 189846 1

on issues being treated genencally through rulemaking; DD-84 24,20 NRC 1557 (1984) g SINGLE FAILURE CRITER!1N apphcation of, at Shoreharn AL AB-788,20 NRC ll02 (1984) apphcation of. to multiple wparate power sources, LBP-84-45,20 NRC 134) (1984)

SIREN SYSTEMS for alerting pubhe of radiciogical emergency at Catawba, adequacy of, LBP 84-37,20 NRC 933 (1984:

1 SITES for mined geologu: repositories for radioachve waste storage, identificauon of; CLi-8415,20 NRC l

i 288 (1984)

SPECIAL NUCLEAR M ATERI AL that is enempt from physical wcunty requirements: LBP 84 29,20 N RC 133 (1984)

SPENT FUEL awmbhes, need for separate environmentalimpact statement for transport of, ALAB 790,20 NRC 1450 (1984

{

assembly, impact of postulated drop of, LBP-84 52A,20 NRC 1509 (19846 enuronmental aspects of entended storage of, CLI-84-15,20 NRC 288 (1984)

I feasibihty of safe storage of, in mined geologic repossiones, CLi-84-15,20 NRC 288 (19841 safety of dry storage of; C1l-8415,20 NRC 288 (1984) shipments, construchon of Jry cask storage facihty as alternause to; LBP 84 40A,20 NRC 1195 -

(1984)'

136 i

+

T J

3

N

.,,, -.. + -,,..,

n-,

.o-n-.,

.,. ~~

i l

[

StJBJ ECT IN DEX l

l Storage, nonradiologsal consequences 06 CLt-8415,20 NRC 238 t1984r j

stored, with failed claddir g. effects of. on capacuy of Trojan spent faci pool cleanup system.

LBP 84-52A,20 NRC 1509 (1984s I

underwater storage condaions long-term integrat) of; CLI-84-15, 20 N RC 288 (1984)

SPENT FUEL ASSENIBLY l

drop into fuel pool raduten dose from LBP 84-32,20 NRC 601 (19848 l

SPENT FUEL POOL cffect of expansson of.on abihty of cleanup system to rnaintain radiauon levels within heensed limits, LBP 84 52A,20 NRC 1509 (1984) etTect of masimum locaheed temperatures in: LBP 84 32,20 NRC 601 (1984)

' espanded, adequacy of shieldmg of; LBP-84-32. 20 NRC 601 (1984) espansion of emergency planning zone because of increased enventory of; LBP 84 32,20 NRC 601

- (19848, espansion of, with high-density fuel racks; ALAB 790,20 NRC 1450 t1984) failure of concrete structure of. due to pool boiling during postulated accident; LBP-84-32,20 NRC 601 (19848 modincation. ALARA concerns during; LBP 84-32,20 NRC 601 (1984) need to consider Licensee's firuncial quahricauons to operate; DD-84 25,20 NRC 1703 (1984) possibehty of zircaloy/ steam reacuon in: LBP 84 32,20 NRC 60111984) -

radiauon risks to general pubhc and workers from radianon shine through thinnest wall of.

LBP-84 32,20 NRC 60141984) safety of structure and components of, for estended facihty operauons for storage of spent fuel in:

[

CLt 8415 20 NRC 288 419846 j

water level monitors at Big Rock Point, qualincanon of, for high temperature and humidity; LBP-84-38. 20 NRC 1019 419846 7

I SPRAY POND f

. putennat for destruction o(, from messdes from an esplosion or coohng tower collapse; LBP 84-31.

[

- 20 NRC 446 f1984)

STANDBY GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM

+

need for, dunns low power tesung; LBP 84-43,20 NRC 1343 (19848 STANDBY LIQUID CONTROL SYSTEM automated, plants required to hue. LBP-84 40. 20 NRC ll81 (19846 funcuan and safety clasufbtion of; ALAB ?88. 20 NRC 110211984:

STANDING to appeal. ALAB 790. 2i) NRC 1450 (19841 STAY denial of monon for. becau e of failure to addrese cruena of 10 C.F R. 2.788(el; ALAB 789,20 NRC 144) f19841 factors considered in decidi.as whether to grant request for; CLI 84-17. 20 NRC 801 (1984) factors to be addrewed by movants for;CLt-8413,20 NRC 267 (19848 most important factor appl ed in determinirig need for; ALAB-794. 20 NRC 1630 (19846 of agency action, entena 3; plied in pasung on reqsest for; ALABJ94,20 NRC 1630 (1984>

of agency acnon, critena used in determining whether to grant; CLI 84 21,20 NRC I437 (19846 of agency acuon, factors considered in ruhng on request for; ALAB 789,20 NRC 1443 (1984) pending remand, test for determamns uhether to impose. LBP-84 53,20 NRC 1531 (1984) restnctions on length of request for; ALAB-794,20 NRC 1630 (1984)

STEAM GENERATOR TUBEtSi adequacy of Vogtie meawres for protecung against degradation of; LBP 84-49,20 NRC 1457 (1984) fadures at Vogt!c, potennat for radiation releases from; LBP 84 35, 20 NRC 887 (1984) repair by kineuc expansion technique; LBP 84 47. 20 NRC 1405 (1984p repaired, at TMI l. hardness tests on, LBP 84 47. 20 NRC I405 (1984) l STEEL A36 and A307, composeuen of; LBP-84 56. 20 NRC 1696 (1984)

STIPULATIONS challenges to, LBP 84 26. 20 NRC 53 (19847 1

l l

l 107 E'6

f

.... ~..,

m O

SUBJECT INDEX STOR AGE dry, of nuclear wastes. safety of. CLI-8415. 20 NRC 288 (1984) estended, of spent (cel. enuronn ental aspects of. CL I 84-15. 20 NRC 288 (1984)

SUNINIARY DISPOSITION demal of motion fur LBP 84-40. 20 NRC 1181 (1984) i SUSPENSION oflow power operaung hcense, cause for; ALAB 789 20 NRC 1443 (19848

j SY NERGISM l

between radiauon, heat, and on> gen. need for consideranon of, at Vogtle Plant; LBP 84 35,20 i

NRC 887 (1984 l

SYSTEMS INTEk ACTIONS I

adequacy of Shoreham methodolcgy for analyzmg impacts of; LBP-84-53,20 NRC 1531 (1984#

}

between safety and nonsafety s)5: ems, requirements for studyms. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) study for TNil 1, need for; CLI 84-ll,20 NRC I (19R4)

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS comphance of Grand Gulf survei!!ance procedures with; DD 84-21,20 SRC 788 (1984) e reusion of, to reecgnize steam ger:erator tube repair technique other than plugging; LBP-84 47,20 NRC 1405 (19841 TERNilN ATION i

of htmted appellate junsdiction oser construcuon permit proceedmss; ALAB 783,20 NRC 843 11984s TESTING e

low-power, comphance with safety standards for; LBP-84 45,20 NRC 134311984)

I methods for components at Vogde contaming polymers, adequacy of; LBP 84-35,20 NRC 887 4

(1944) of gas turbines at Shoreham, adesacy of LBP 84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1944}

I of pasuse mechamat salves, regarements for; ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) precritisal, finding necessary for h eme authoritmg; LBP 44-30 A. 20 NRC 443 (19841 TEST 5 eddy current, at TMI 1, requirem:nts for; LBP 84 47,20 SRC 1405 (19I47 for steam generamr tube corroucn at TMI 1; LBP-84-47,20 NRC 1405 (1984#

THERM AL SilOCK elTects on Vrgile rextor sencL Jemal of contenuon on, for lack of specificity, LBP-84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984)

TRAINING and empenence of emergency p!a mers. litigab.hty of, LBP-84-298,20 NRC 389 (19848 of Dublo Canyon operators and in ft superusors. adequay ot; CLI-8413 20 NRC 267 (1984) of mdiuduals for esacu4uon of shools; LDP 84 26,20 NRC 53 f1944) of phyucians handhng radiauon emergencies. need for; LBP.84-29B,20 NRC 189 (1984) of temporary wnrkers for work on spent fuel pool espansion; LBP-84 32,20 SRC 601 (1984) programs for personnel with emergency responubihties, need for finahrauon of, for operaung hcense inuance. LBP 84 26,29 NRC 53 (19841 TRANullSSION LINES health clTects of electromagnetic radeauon from; LBP-84 35,20 NRC 887 41984)

TR ANSPORTATION accident and sabotage wenarios for spent fuel shipments, need to address, DD-84-24,20 NRC 1557 (1984) accidents insolung rad:oacuse materials, adequacy of emergency planning regulations for; DPRM-84-2,20 NRC 1563 e' *94>

for contammated inared during radiological emergency, adequacy of Limenck pronuon for; LBP-84 31,20 NRC 446 (1934 of radioactise materials. need for aw of speaal routes for; DPRM 84 2,20 NRC 1563 (1994#

TURBINE BYPAS5 SYSTEM funcuan and safety slasuficanon cf. ALAB 788,20 NRC 1l02 (19A4)

TU R BIN E5 gas, at Shorenam. adequacy of testmg of. LBP 44-45,20 NRC 1343 (1964) 108

.--w

~.

SUBJECT INDEX U 5 FISH AND %ILDLIFE SERVICE requirements for NRC consultanon with; ALAB-785,20 NRC 848 (1984)

URANilM MILL TAILINGS RADIATION PROTECTION ACT lesel of prosecucn atTorded by regulations promulgated uncer; L8P.84-42,20 NRC 12% (19841 VACLIM BREAKER $

description of, and problems associated with, ALAB 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984)

VALVES

- l motor operated, rehabehty of. to control containment pressurization; LBP-84-38,20 NRC 1019 (19841 passise mechanical possibikty of failure of, at ShorePam; ALAS-788,20 NRC 1802 (1984) 4, 3

safety rehef, tests and challenges, ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) solenoid, quahlkanon of, at Vogtle; L8P 84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984) l See also Pressure 4perated Rehef Valves VENDORS

?

adequacy of Cauw os quahty assurance program for; DD 84-16,20 NRC 161 (1984) i VIOLAT!ON45)

I at Diablo Canyon, NRC StatT program for evaluanon of allegations of, DD-84 20,20 NRC 776 l

(19841 NRC authonty to choose a remedy for; DD-84-17. 20 NRC 226 (1984) of construct:on prxedures, independent signincance of, L8P 84-55,20 NRC 1646 (1984) of en parte rules r ceting to JAuss hcensing status of plants as; CLI-84-20,20 NRC 106l (1984)

}

ofinterpass tem;erature hmit for welding on stainless steel; L8P-84-52,20 NRC 1484 (1984) of quahty assurance implementes procedures or nianuals as violations of Part 50, Appendit 8 i) f of welding procedures under foreman direction. L8P 84-52,20 NRC I484 (1984) quality assurance. denning; ALA8 788,20 NRC 1102 (1984) l welding, on consafety systems. treatment of LBP-84-52,20 NRC 1484 (1984) l WAIVER of exceptions to inzual decision that are not briefed on appeal; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984) 1 of regulation to permit considerauon of need for power issue at operating license stage; LBP 84-35, 20 NRC 887 *1994#

l of regulation, sta:idard for grant of pennon for; L8P 84-30,20 NRC 426 (1984)

WA5TE PACKAGES for long term storage of radioacuse wastes, development of CLI-84-15,20 NRC 288 (1984)

WATER level monitors, at 8.s Rock Point, quahncanon of. for high temperature and humidity; LBP 8418, 20 NRC 1019 41984) spent fuel pool. iource of radioactivity in; LSP-84 52A,20 N RC 1509 (1984) supphes for Philade!phia, contamination of, from postulated severs accident at Limenck facility; L8P 84 31,20 %RC 446 (19546 See also Coohng w ter, Groundwater, Sf akeup water System a

WATER HAMMER mitigation of, at Shoreham, ALA8 788,20 NRC II02 (1984)

WEATHER bad, time estimates of evacuauen during; L8P 84-31,20 NRC 446 (1984) worst case, need to consider in evacuauon time esumates; L8P 44-37,20 NRC 933 (1984)

WELDING adequacy of Lirnenck quality assurance for, L8P 84 31,20 NRC 446 (1984)

I downhill and wease, at Comanche Peak, tect.nical discussions of allegations ofi L8P 84-55,20 NRC 1646 (1984) nare bevel groose. procedures for production of L8P 84 41,20 NRC 1203 (1984) in violation of procedures, under direction of foreman, LSP-84-52,20 SRC 1484 (1984) of mihinited holes without appropriate authontauon or inspection, alleganons of, at Comanche Peak; LBP-84-55,20 NRC 1646 (1984) on stainless steel. uolauons ofinterpass temperature limit for; LBP 84-52,20 NRC 1484 (1984) quahty of, at Byron, L8P 84 41. 20 NRC 1203 (1984) use of" hand warm

• test to determine adequacy of preheat; L8P-84 55,20 NRC 1646 (1984) violations on nonsafety systems, treatment of; L8P 84-52,20 NRC 1484 (1984) 109 w e, g

y c-

,w c

,-,r-w

u,

=...

s J

}

SUBJECT INDEX.

i 4

i WEI D45) m rextor coolant and contaenment systems of Vogtle, safety of. L8P-84-35,20 NRC 887 (1984)

-? ~

repair hold point, inadequate resoonse to Board question on; L8P 84-46, 20 NRC 1403 (1984) rod control uolations at Comanche Peak, allegations of; LBP 84-55,20 NRC 1646 (1984)

%ITif DR AwAL of operating license application without prejudice; LBP 84-58,20 NRC I478 (1984)

}

cause for discount rg credibility of L8P.84 55,20 NRC 1646 (1984)

%ITNESSES responsibility for assignment r,f NRC Staff as; ALAB 786,20 NRC 1087 (1984) l e

YELLOWCAKE

- ~

(

I j

- analpes of emergency response to transportation accidents involving spills of; DPRM 84-2. 20 NRC

-v 1563 (1984)

{

ZlRCALO)

[

pyrophoricity of, after estended storage; CLI.8415,20 NRC 288 (1984) l reaction with ueam i. spent fuel pool, possitnlity of; LBP-84-32. 20 NRC 601 (1984)

ZONES l

I noncontaminated. Caiaobe plans for presenting contaminated persons from entering; L8P 84 37,20 t

[

. NRC 93311984) l Sandakh Fault and Plum Riser Fault capability of, relative to Byron Station; ALAB 792,20 NRC i

1585 81984) i

}

l See also Emergency Planning Zone (s) Low Population Zone f'

j

)

i f

i e

Ie-i 4

lie i

I.

)

r g

i e-w I

y-s

=

y s

-y.y,,

,3 y----

-,-ew-,

,y,-

y e

yr-o-w-

,-o,-,

9

-r-&c

-3,e evq

,9-9w<-+.

ge,---w

i i

F s

FACILITY INDEX 1

BIG ROCK POINT PLANT; Docket No 50-155 I

OPERATISG LICENSE AMENDMENT, September 25,1984, SUPPLEMENTAL INITIAL I

DECislON: LBP 84-38,20 NRC 1019 (1984) i OPERATING LICENSE AVENDMENT; August 29,1984; INITIAL DECISION; LBP 84-32, l

1 20 SRC 601 (19841 REQUE.ST FOR SHOW CAUSE ORDER; December 3.1984, DIRECTOR'S DECISION

}

UNDER 10 C F R. ( 2.206, DD-84-25,20 NRC 1703 (1934)

I 1'

BYRON NUCLEAR POW ER STATIO N, Umts I and 2; Docket Now STN 50-454, STN 50-455 i

OPERATISG LICENSE. October 16,1984; SUPPLEMENTAL INITIAL DECISION; l

LBP 84-41,20 NRC 1203 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE, December 20,1984, DECISION; ALAB 793,20 NRC 159l (1984)

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION, Umts I and 2. Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414 OPERATING LICENSE; September 18,1984. SUPPLEMENTAL PARTIAL INITI AL DECislON ON EMERGESCY PLANNISG; LBP-84 37,20 NRC 933 (1984) l OPERATING LICENSE; November 27,1984 PARTIAL INITIAL DECISION, LBP 84-52,20 NRC 1484 (1984)

X j

.I OPERATING LICENSE, December 24,1984, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-794,20 W

l NRC 1630 (1984p 7

1 REQUEST FOR ACTION. July 6.1984. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R.

I

) 2 206. DD 84-16,20 NRC 101 (1984)

[

COM ANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION. Umts I and 2; Docket Nos. 50-445, 50-446 OPERATING LICENSE, August 24,1984, MEMOR ANDbM; LBP-84-30A,20 NRC 443 (1984)

I

].

OPERATING LICENSE; September 17, 1984; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 84 36,20 NRC 925 (19847 OPERATING LICENSE; October 25,1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 84 44,20 NRC 1340 (1984)

J OPERATING LICENSE; October 29,1984, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-84-46,20 i

NRC 1403 (19841 OPERATING LICENSE, Nosember 2,1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 84-48,20 NRC 1455 (19941 OPERAT1NG LICENSE; November 16,1984, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP.84-50,20 NRC 1464 (1994)

OPERATING LICENSE; December 18, 1984; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 84-55,20 NRC 1644 (1944#, LBP 84 56. 20 NRC 1696 (1984)

DIABLO CANYON SUCLEAR POW ER PLANT, Umt 1; Docket No. 50-275 i

REQUEST FOR ACTION, August 20,1984 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206. DD 84 20,20 NRC 776 (19848 j

DIABLO CAN)ON NUCLEAR POW ER PLANT, Units I and 2; Docket Nos. 50-275, 50-323 j

OPERATING LICENSE; August 10.1984, DECISION; CLI-8412,20 NRC 249 (1984)

OPERATISG LICESSE, August 10,1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; CLI-84-13,20 NRC 267 (19948 OPERATISG LICENSE; August 20, l984. ORDER, CLI-84-14,20 NRC 285 (1984) i OPER ATING LICENSE, September 6,1984. DECISION; ALAB 781,20 NRC 819 (1984)

OPERATISO LICENSE: September 6,1984. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB 782,20 NRC 838 (1994p OPERATING LICENSE; September 12,1984; ORDER; CLI 84-13A,20 NRC 283 (1984) j til

--v-----

-,,,-ew mmw wm w.,v, pg.y-m m-ewww-

f.

FACILIT) INDEX REQCEST F OR ACTION. August 20.1984; IN TERIM DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C I R t 2 206. DD-84-19. 20 N RC **3 (19846 t CLTON GENE R \\ TING STATION. Units ! and 2. Docket Nos. 50 463-CP. 50 464-CP ( ASLBP No 'e 30ibol-cpi CONSTRLC TION PERMIT. October 23.1984 INITIAL DECl5 TON; LBP,4-43,20 NRC 1333 (1984 GETR \\ ALLECITOS. Docket No. 50-70-OLR ( A5LBP No. 83-48101-OLR)

OPERATING LICENSE RENEWAL; December 17.1984. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 84-54. 20 NRC 1637 (19847 GR AND GULF NUCLE AR STATION. Unit 1; Docket No. 50 416 OPER ATING LICENSE. October 25.1984. ORDER; CLI-84-19,20 NRC 1055 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; 5eptember 28.1984; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. LBP 84 39. 20 NRC 103181984)

REQUEST FOR ACTION August 31. 1984; DIRECTOR'S DECislON UNDER 10 C.F R.

4 2 206. DD 84-21. 20 NRC 788 (1984)

H ARTSVILLE NLCLEAR PLANT. Urats I A and 2A; Docket Nos. STN 50-518. STN 50-520 CONSTRLCTION PERMIT. September !!,1984; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB 783. 20 NRC 843 (1984)

LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, Unris 1 and 2. Docket Nos. 50-352, 50-153 OPERATING LICENSE. August 29.1984; SECOND PARTIAL INITIAL DECISIM.

LBP.84 31. 20 NRC 446 41984)

OPERATING LICENSE. September 20.1984 DECISION. ALAB 785. 20 NRC 848 (1984)

OPER \\ TING LICENSE; Nosember 5.1984. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-789. 20 NRC 1441 f 19843 P tRT *O LK ENSE; Juh 23.1984, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB-778. 20 NRC 42 e1984)

MIDL \\ND PLANT. Units I and 2. Docket Nos 50 429. 50-330 RE QUEST FOR ACTION. Juh 24.1944 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. l 2.206.

DD-84 l' 20 NRC 22611984)

NOR Til ANN A POWER STATION. Units I and 2; Docket Nos 50 338-OLA l. 50-339-OLA l 8 ASLBP No. 83 44101 LA). Dosket Nos 50-338-OLA-2. 50-339-OLA 2 ( ASLBP No.

83 442 02-LAi OPER ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; October 15.1984, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-84-40 A. 20 NRC 1l95 (1984 NORTli ANN A POW ER STATION Unas 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 50-338-OLA 2,50 339-OLA 2 OPERATING LICLNSE AMENDMENT. Nosember 20.1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. \\ LAB 790. 20 NRC 1450 819841 PERR) NLCLE 4R POW ER PL AN T. Unit 2. Docket No. 50 441 RLQUEST FOR ACTION. November 15.1984 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R.

4 2 206. DD 34 23. 20 NRC 1949 ' 89841 PERRY NLCL E AR POW ER PLANT Unas I and 2; Docket Nos. 50-440-OL. 50 441 OL OPFR ATING LICENSE. July 26.1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-84 28. 20 NRC 129 (1944#

OPLR ATING LICENSE; October 4.1984. MEMtlRANDUM AND ORDER: LBP 84 40,20 NRC 1l81 il9844 PILGRIM NLCLE AR POWER STATION: Docket No. 50-293 REQUEST FOR ACTION. July 3.1994. FIN AL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F R-6 2.206. DD 8415. 20 NRC 157119846 R E OlNNA % CLEAR PLANT, Unit 1. Docket No 50-244 OLA ( ASLBP No 79-427-07 OLA)

OPE R ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT. Auguu 30.1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LHP 84-34. 20 NRC 769 (1984s RIVER BLND ST ATION. Units I and 2. Docket Nos. 50-458-OL. 50-459 OL ( ASLBP No.

82 468 010Lt OPER ATING LICENSE; No$ ember 20.1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 84 $l. 20 NRC 14*8 419848 111

• 1 L

FACILITY INDEX SHEARON ll ARRis NLCLEAR POWER PLANT. Umts I and 2. Docket Nos. $0-400. 50-401

' (ASLBP No. 82-4'243-OL D OPERATING LICEN5E. hust 3.1984. FINAL SET OF RULINGS ON ADMI55IBILITY OF OFFSITE EMERGENC) PLANNING CONTENTION 5. RULING ON PETITION FOR

%AlVER OF NEED-FOR POW ER RLLE. AND NOTICE OF UPCOMING TELEPif0NE CONFERENCE CALL; LBP 84 299. 20 NRC 389 t19841 SHOREHAM NLCLEAR POW ER STATION. L'mt I; Docket No. 50-322-OL DISQUALIFIC ATION: Augut I.1984. MENIORANDUNI AND ORDER; LBP 84-29A. 20 NRC J81 f l 414t Dl5 QUALIFICATION. Augun 3.1984. MEMORANDUM; ALAB.779. 20 SRC 375 (1984)

DISQUAllFIC 4T!ON. September 21.1984 MEMOR ANDUM; CLI 84-20,20 NRC 1061 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE;3uly 20.1984. StEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAB477. 20 NRC 21 (19841 OPERATING LICENSE; haun 13.1984. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP-84 30,20 NRC 426 c1994 OPERATING LICENSE; Auguu I$.1984. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ALAB-780. 20 -

NRC 378 fI4546 j

OPERATING LICENSE. September 5.1994. ORDER LBP-84 35 A. 20 SRC 920 f19841 OPER AfiNG LICENSE. Se; tember 7.1984; ORDER; CLI 84-16,20 NRC 799 (1984)

OPERATING LICEN5E: Oceber 5.1984. MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER. ALAB-787. 20 NRC 109' *!4948 OPERATING LICENSE.Ocober 29.19!4. INITIAL DECISION; LBP 84-45,20 NRC 1343 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE.Ocwber 31.1984 DECISION. ALAB.778. 20 NRC 1102 f19446 OPERATING LICENSE. Nmember 21.1984. MESf0R ANDUM AND ORDER. CLi 84 21. 20 NRC l437 8 3848 OPFiATING LICENSE; Nosember 30.1994. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RULING ON

' REM AND 155tES. LBP.it-53,20 NRC 1331 (1984)

THREE MILE ISLAND NLCLEAR STATION. Omt 1; Docket No. $0 289 OPERATING LICEN5E elENDMENT.Oaoher 31. 1944, INITIAL DECISION; LBP-44-47 20 NRC 144! (1984:

REQUEST FOR ACTION. Sertember 25.1984 DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R.

2 2%. DD.44-22. 20 NRC 1033 41984 REQUEST FOR LICENSE SUSPENSION. July 27.1984'. DIRECTOR'S DECislON UNDER 10 C F.R. )

• 206. DD 94-It. 20 NRC 243119848 SPECIAL PROCEEDING. J2y 26.1994 DECISION; CLI-84-il 20 NRC i 119446

$PECIAL PRCCEEDING. September II.1984. ORDER; CLI 84.It 20 NRC 80111984);

CLI 84-18. 20 NRC 908 +10941 SPECIAL PROCEEDING. December 3.1914. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALABJ91,20 NRC 1579 'litan SPECIAL PROCEEDING. December 13.1984 ORDER; CLt 84 22,20 NRC 1$73 81984:

TROJ AN NUCLE AR PLANT. Duket No. 50 344-OLA f ASLBP No. 84-498-05-OL U 85FP Amendmeno '

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT: Nmember 28.1984 INiilAL DECISION; LBP 84 $2A. 20 NRC 1!09 (19848 UCLA RESEARCH REACTOR. Docket.No !0-142-OL F ACILITY LICENSE RENEW AL; July l',1984; MEMOR ANDUM; LBP 84 29,20 NRC 133 (1984)'

VOOTLE ELECTRIC GENER ATING PLANT. Umts I and 2. Docket Nos. 50-424.0L. 50-425-OL (A5LBP No 84-4v9 01 OL#

OPERATING LICEN5E: Se;tember $.1994. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. LBP 84 35,20 NRC 487 49%48 OPER ATING LIC ENSE. Nosember $.1954. MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER. LBP44.49,20 NRC 1457 s1994#

J 813 d

9 w ayne v+.'t g

L

FACILITY INDEX

% ATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION Umt 3. Docket No. 50-382 OL OPER ATING LICENSE. October 2.1984-MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; AL AB 786. 20 NRC 1087 (19848 OPERATING LICEN5E. December 12,1984; MEMOR ANDUM, ALAB-792,2u FRC 1585 (19848

% EST CHICAGO R ARE EARTHS FACILITY, Docket No. 40-2061.ML I ASLBP No. 83-495-01-M L)

M ATERI ALS LICENSE AMENDMENT; October 19.1984. MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 84-42. 20 NRC 1296 (1984)

%1LLIAM H. ZIMMER NLCLEAR POW ER STATION, Umt I; Docket No 50-3584)L ( ASLBP No.76-317 01 OL)

WITHDRAWAL OF OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION; August 29, 1984;

?

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LBP.84-33. 20 NRC 765 (1984)

WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, Umt I; Docket No. 50-482-OL OPER ATING LICENSE. July 2,1984, INITIAL DECISION; LBP-84-26,20 NRC 53 (1984)

OPERATING LICENSE; July 26,1984 MEMORANDUM AND ORDFR; LBP-84-27,20 NRC y

125 11984)

OPERATING LICENSE; September I),1984; DECISION; ALAb-784,20 NRC 845 (1984) l 1 ELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT. Umts I and 4; Docket Nos. STN 50-566, STN 50-567 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT; September 11, 1984, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; f

ALAB *83,20 NRC $43 (1984) l 1

- 4

-