ML20099E216
| ML20099E216 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 01/30/1985 |
| From: | Parsons R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-319, REF-PT21-85, REF-PT21-85-187-000 178, NRC-319, PT21-85-187, PT21-85-187-000, NUDOCS 8503130609 | |
| Download: ML20099E216 (4) | |
Text
..
CD&L 1
Carolig Poge9& Light Company 35 { {.?.'O. Box 101, New Hill, N C 27562 P
January 30,1985 Mr. James P. O'Reilly NRC-319 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)
Atlanta, Georgia 30323 CAROLINA POWER & 1.IGHT COMPANY SHEARON HARRIS NGCLEAR POWER PLANT 1986 - 900,000 KW - Unit 1 SOCKOLETS AND WELDOLETS -
QUESTIONABLE STARTING MATERIAL, ITEM 178
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Attached is our final report on the subject item which was deemed reportable per the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e) and 10CFR, Part 21, on June 19,1984. With this report, Carolina Power &
Light Company considers this matter closed.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours very truly, k=:W y
R. M. Parsons Project General Manager Completion Assurance Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RMP/sae Attachment cc:
Messrs. G. Maxwell /R. Prevatte (NRC-SHNPP)
Mr. R. C. DeYoung (NRC) l l
8503130609 850130 i
PDR ADOCK 05000400 l
S PDR AcTQlt !
se3/1 7
^*
2'I CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
' SHEARON HARiilS NdCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NO. I FINAL REPORT SOCKOLETS AND WELDOLETS -
QUESTIONABLE STARTING MATERIAL ITEM 178 January 30,1985 REPORTABLE UNDER 10CFR50.55(e) AND 10CFR21 l
se3/3 a
.g
SUBJECT:
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No.1,10CFR50.55(e)
~
and' 10CFR, - Part~ 21: reportable deficiency.
Stainless steel sockolets and weldolets not supplied in accordance with NCA 3800.
-ITEM:
1" and 1/2" ASME 111 Code Class 2 Weldolets and Sockolets.
SUPPLIED BY:'
Guyon Alloys, Ind., 950 S. 4th. St., Harrison, New Jersey 07029.
N ATURE 'OF DEFICIENCY:.
Bonney Forge,1 the fitting manufacturer, performed an internal review and found that the material was not supplied in accordance
.with NCA 3800.J.(The mill test report was not verified by Bonney -
~
Forge testing).
DATE PROBLEM OCCURRED:
CP&L was notified by Guyon Alloys on May 29,1984 that the
' documentation was deficient.
DATE PROBLEM :
REPORTED:
On June 19, 1984, CP&L (Mr. K. V. Hate') notified the NRC (Mr. A.
Hardin) that this item was reportable per the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e) and 10CFR, Part 21.
SCOPE OF PROBLEM:
139 each 1" and 1/2" weldolets and sockolets.
SAFETY IMPLICATION:
Since the documentation did not meet ASME Code require'ments, the potential existed for failure if the fittings were installed in an ASME Class 2 or 3 line.
REASON DEFICIENCY IS l
REPORTABLE:
The materials were incorrectly qualified as ASME Class 2.
CORRECTIVE ACTION: -
Of the 139 fittings received,132 were returned to the vendor. The three (3) heat numbers in question were ~ represented in the 132 fittings returned to the vendor. ' Bonney Forge ~ and Guyon Alloys informed CP&L that the required chemical overchecks were
- ~
performed and deemed: acceptable.
Documentation for the: 7 fittings which remain on site has now been received.
E PREVENTIVE 4
MEASURES:
Bonney Forge has informed CP&L that the cause of the problem
' was due to a ~ misunderstan_ ding 'by previously' employed quality s
personnel as to which parts of their starting material-inventory were purchased as nuclear and which parts were. purchased - to
- commercial : specifications.. Housekeeping and inadequate. review during order processing in the Quality Control Department were also contributing factors.
i s
W se3/4.
..2
. ~.
.~
PREVENTIVE MEASURES: (Cont'd)
Bonney Forge-has stated that their inventory has now been correctly identified as nuclear or commercial grade. Bonney Forge further stated that nuclear orders being processed through their Quality Control Department now receive at least two reviews to verify the correct material assignment.
Bonney Forge informed CP&L that an in-depth review of all materials shipped from their Carlinville Plant was performed, and that they found no similar discrepancies other th' n those identified a
to purchasers by letter dated February 15,1984. As a result of the February 15,1984 notification, CP&L has reported to the NRC on Item 174 dealing with similar deficiencies with materials.
manufactured by Bonney Forge and purchased by CP&L through Hub, Inc., Tucker, Georgia.
i f
I i
i l
[
se3/5