ML20085G641
| ML20085G641 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 09/26/1991 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20085G638 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9110250163 | |
| Download: ML20085G641 (2) | |
Text
gy ~.
p2 EIGg O
!\\
UNITED STATES
[-
3.,/,f'%
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
WA$HINGTON. o C. 20t46 S.,
tg/
g SAFETY EVALVATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. bJ TO FACILITY OPERATTRGTTCENSE NON-30 UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY CALLAWAY PLANT. UNIT 1 TEKET NO. STN 50-483
1.0 INTRODUCTION
in its letter dated December 11, 1990, theUnionElectricCompany(thelicensee) proposed that the specific title designations of seven of the eight members of the Ontite Review Comittee (ORC) be removed f rom Technical Specification (TS)6.5.1.2. The position of Chairman u.nains as the Manager, Callaway Plant.
2.0 EVALVATION Yhe licensee states in its request cited above that the basic requi.ements for the seven positions in the ORC remain the san.s with respect to specified areas of expertise. Additionally, the requirement for representation by the management, regonsible for the specified areas of expertise remains the same. All other requirements for the ORC remain the same.
On the basis that the proposed deletion of specific titles introduces greater flexibility in the appointment of ORC menbers, is administrative in nature and does not affect plant operations or inpact safety in any way, the staff finds the pruposed revision to TS 6.5.1.2 to be acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
in act.ordance with,the Commission's regulations, the Missouri State official
'was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
4.0 ENVIRONhfNTAL CONSIDERATION This crendment relates to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or adninistrative i
procedures or requirements. Accordingly, the amendnent meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10). Pursuant T
to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be 9110250163 91100n l
PDR ADOCK 05000403 I
P PDH
2 conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
M. D. Lynch Date:
October 8, 1991 i
.i l
.