ML20083N310
| ML20083N310 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 04/16/1984 |
| From: | Birch M, Broome L, Carter P, Duckworth S, Finklea S, Glover R, Lunsford P, Mcswain W, Phillips B, Pugh J, Thomas P DUKE POWER CO., GASTON COUNTY, NC, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC, NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF, SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF, YORK COUNTY, SC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083N288 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8404190150 | |
| Download: ML20083N310 (103) | |
Text
._ _ _ _ _ _
RELATED CORRESPONW.NOE l
DOCKETED !
UNITED STATES OF AMERICRStiRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND C G bD -
. - .. e - n e .,
In the Matter of )
)
DUKE POWER COMPANY, e t al .
) Docket !!os. 50-413
) 50-414 (Catawba Nuclear Station, )
Units 1 and 2) )
APPLICANTS' TESTIMONY ON i EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTION 1 AND 7 i
Duke Power Company (R.M. Glover, P .F . Carter, M.L. Birch, S.V. Duckworth)
North Carolina (J.T. Pugh, III)
South Carolina (P.R. Lunsford, W.M. McSwain, S.L. Finklea III)
Gaston County (Bob E. Phillips)
Mecklenburg County (Lewis Wayne Broome)
York County (Phillip Steven Thomas)
~. -
April.16, 1984 8404190150 840416 PDR ADOCK 0 5000413 I -_- _
- . . PDR
, , ,- _ _ . - . - _ = . .. -- - = _ _ - - . . . . - .
j i
I t !
. 1 TESTIMONY OF DUKE POWER COMANY 2 (R M. GLOVER, P.F. CARTER, 3 M.L. BIRCH, AND S.V. DUCKWORTH) ON 4 EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTIONS 1 AND 7 5 Background Information 6 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT AND 7 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS, AND SUMMARIZE YOUR 8 OCCUPATIONAL DUTIES.
1 9 .A. R.M. Glover, Duke Power Company. See my attached 10 resume.
.11 P.F. Carter, Duke Power Company. See my attached 12 resume.
13 M.L. Birch, Duke Power Company. See my attached 14 resume.
15 S.V. Duckworth, Winthrop College. . See my attached
.16 resume.
17- Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY?.
.18: ~A. The purpose of my testimony is to address-CESG and PA 19 Econtentions 1 and 7 as they relate to. Duke's 20 Emergency Plan brochure..(RMG, PFC, MLB, SVD)
- 21: EPC 1 and 7' Testimony 22 .Q. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH' DUKE'S EMERGENCY PLAN BROCHURE 7
. :2 3 !A. Yes. . (RMG,.MLB, PFC, SVD) 24, O.- PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR-ROLE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE 25! BROCHURE.
s L.
e .
2-1 A. 1. I had the overall responsibility for researching 2 information for inclusion in the brochure, 3 drafting copy, developing design and format, 4 gathering approvals, and distributing the 5 brochure. (PFC) 6 2. As Emergency Response Coordinator for Duke, I 7 had the responsibility for providing technical 8 input concerning NRC regulations and what 9 information had to be included in the brochure 10 to meet this criteria. (RMG) 11 3. I provided information with regard to radiation 12 dosage and related health effects. (MLB) 13 4. I was asked by Duke to review the 1984 Edition 14 of the Emergency Plan brochure to assess the 15 applicable reading levels. I also reviewed an 16 earlier. draft and suggested modifications to 17 lower the reading level. (SVD) 18 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE BROCHURE?
19 A. The purpose of the brochure is to provide residents 20 within the EPZ with'information on what to do in
, 21 response to an emergency at the Catwba Nuclear 22 Station. (RMG, PFC)'
23 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT STEPS WERE TAKEN IN PREPARING 24 THE BROCHURE.
25 A. 1. All pertinent government documents were reviewed 26 to determine required information.
1 2. Other emergency brochures from around the 2 country were reviewed.
3 3. Duke Power emergency planning officials were 4 consulted on content.
5 4. An outline of information to be included was 6 prepared.
7 5. The outline was reviewed by Duke Power emergency 8 planning officials.
9 6. A draft copy of the brochure was prepared.
10 7. The draft copy was sent to Duke Power emergency 11 officials for distribution to state and local 12 officials for review.
13 8. A copy was sent to a reading specialist for 14 determination of reading level.
35 9. A revised draft was prepared based on input from 16 emergency planning officials and the reading 17 specialist.
18- 10. A preliminary version of the brochure was 19 produced.
20- 11. Copies were' distributed to federal, state and 21- local emergency planning offices.. 1&ue brochure 22 was also distributed at public meetings. held 23 within the EPZ. Copies were provided.to 24 intervenors and other interested parties. .
e
, ,.- +
-g 1 12. Comments and suggestions to improve the brochure 2 were received from a'll parties, .the general 3 public, intervenors, governmental officials and 4 committees.~
5 13. All comments and suggestions were reviewed and a 6 number of chang 3s in content were made.
7 14. The final brochure was produced and distributed.
8 (PFC) 9 .Q. WAS THERE A PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW OF THE BROCHURE AND 10 ITS CONTENTS? IF SO, PLEASE DESCRIBE IT.
11 A. Yes. The brochure was'rdviewed by the NRC, FEMA, 12 N.C. emergency planning officials, S.C. emergency 13 planning.: officials,' Palmetto Alliance /CESG, the 14 Mecklenburg County Emergency Planning Review 15 Committee, and was issued to approximately 3,000 16 members of the general'public who attended a number .i 17 of emergency planning meetings. Input.from all of 18 these groups was used-in the final version of the 19 brochure.-(PFC) 4 q s.
20 O. WHAT CRITERIA MUST BE MET IN ORDER'FOR THE" EMERGENCY '
', u ? .. % .
21 . PLAN-BROCHURE-TO COMPLY WITH NRCxREGULATIONS?
22 A. The broch'ur,e must contain information: required by 10
~
23 CFR $50.47,(b) (7)Ta'nd .10 CFRiPart ' V 50, - Appendix , E, Part- '
p . .. _
24 D.2 and!NUREG-0654,:Rev{'l'Part G.1. 1 . ( RMG) s a
tP g _ ,,_
i s
{l ?l 1=
z -A. t , ;'
^T <
- .- - - , ;i ?;. _ _.
. 4.
1 O. DOES DUKE'S REVISED BROCHURE TITLED " CATAWBA NUCLEAR 2 STATION EMERGENCY PLAN - 1984 EDITION" MEET THESE 3 CRITERIA?
4 A. Yes. The brochure addresses all of the areas called 5 for in 10 CFR {50.47(b)(7) and 10 CFR Part 50, 6 Appendix E, Part D. 2 and NUREG-0654, Rev. 1 Part G.l.
7 (RMG) 8 O. WHAT DETERMINED THE ORDER IN WHICH THE INFORMATION IN 9 THE BROCHURE APPEARS? FOR EXAMPLE, WHY ARE THE 10 EVACUATION INFORMATION AND SHELTERING LOCATIONS 11 ASSIGNED TO THE BACK OF THE BROCHURE INSTEAD OF THE 12 FRONT?
13 A. Preliminary information on the operation of a nuclear-14 station, facts about radiation, and definitions of 15 nuclear terms were placed in the front cf the 16 brochure to aid the reader in understanding the 17 importance of emergency planning and protective
- 18 actions. In addition, the brochure was intentionally 19 designed to make it easy for the reader-to turn 20 quickly to any area-of the brochure by the use of 21 descriptive tabs with labels such as, " Emergency and 22 You," " Evacuation Procedures," and " Protective Action 23 Zones and Maps." (PFC) 24 O. DOES THE BROCHURE CONTAIN INFORMATION1IN ADDITION TO 25 .THAT REQUIRED BY NRC REGULATIONS?
4
1 A. Yes. It contains information included as a result of -
2 comments by state and county agencies and by <
3 intervenors CESG and Palmetto Alliance to improve the ,
4 brochure as an informational tool. Each year, the 5 brochure will be revised to include new information, 6 to improve it based on comments from various groups 7 involved in emergency planning, and to correct the 8 brochure based on any changes in the concept or 9 extent of planning. An updated version of the
- 10. brochure is planned for September 30, 1984. The new 11 brochure will then be mailed to all EPZ residents.
12 (RMG) 13 O. WHAT ADDITIONS ARE CURRENTLY CONTEMPLATED FOR THE 14 REVISION OF THE BROCHURE?
15 A. Additional information related to shelters e 16 established for York and Gaston County. residents will 17 be included. One shelter, Mount Holly Jr. High, is 18 to be added to the list for Gaston. County residents.
19 In York County, Bethany ARP_ Church, Bethany 20 Elementary School, Sharon Elementary School, and_ i, 21 Hickory Grove School have been evaluated by state
'22 planners and found to be inadequate as long-term, 23 ' shelters, as no showers were available. They are to 124 Lbe replaced,by'other_ facilities outside_ York County 25 as shelters- for Zone 'A-0. " These' changes, along'with
, J .k improvements to the map and tabular listing of-zones,'
~
26~
If e' ,' -
9h'.
e :.
1 evacuation routes and shelters, NRC and state / county 2 comments will be incorporated into an updated version 3 of the brochure and distributed as described 4 previously. (RMG) 5 O. ARE THESE REVISIONS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH NRC 6 REGULATIONS?
7 A. No. They are being added simply to improve the 8 brochure as an informational tool and to revise 9 shelter listings as previously noted. The current 10 brochure complies with the regulations. (RMG)
.11 O. INTERVENORS STATE THAT " A SIGNIFICANT BODY OF 12 SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES HEALTH EFFECTS AT 13 VERY LOW LOW LEVELS OF RADIATION IS NOT CITED." IS 14 THIS STATEMENT ACCURATE?
15 A. No. There is not a significant body of such 16 evidence. (MLB) In addition, even if such 17 information did exist, NRC regulations'do not require.
18 the inclusion of such information in the brochure.
19 (RMG) 20- O. INTERVENORS STATE THAT " PEOPLE WITH COMPELLING 21' REASONS TO STAY.(SUCH AS. FARMERS TENDING TO 22 LIVESTOCK) MAY NOT TAKE THE THREAT SERIOUSLY, 23 ESPECIALLY.AFTER BEING REPEATEDLY TOLD IN THE PAST 24- THAT RADIATION IS NOT PARTICULARLY HARMFUL, AND THAT.
525.. A SERIOUS ACCIDENT IS EXTREMELY.~UNLIKELY." DO YOU 12 6 : AGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT?
1 A. No. The brochure clearly states that radiation is 2 harmful and then gives instruction as to What to do 3 in the event of an emergency. Nor does the brochure 4 hide the possibility of an emergency at Catawba. On 5 page 4 of the brochure it states: "If there were a 6 major emergency at Catawba, people in areas near the 7 plant could be exposed to high levels of radiation.
8 Exposure to high levels of radiation causes health 9 effects." Instructions are then given on page 4 as 10 to What steps to take if radiation were released.
11 Additional information is given on page 9 of the 12 brochure. (PFC)
.13 O. INTERVENORS STATE THAT THE BROCHURE "DOES NOT 14 INDICATE THAT THERE IS A DANGER IN ACCUMULATED 15 RADIATION DOSAGE." IS.THIS ACCURATE?
16 A. No. The brochure addresses this issue by advising 17 the public on pages 4, 9, 10 and 11 to take shelter l
i j 18 or evacuate. When taking shelter, the public.is 19 further advised as to What additional steps to take 1
20 for protection. (PFC, MLB) i 21 O. INTERVENORS STATE THAT THE BROCHURE "DOES NOT _GIVE .
L 22 ADEOUATE INFORMATION ON PROTECTION FROM BETA AND
'23 GAMMA RAYS." IS THIS CORRECT?
24 A. No, the brochure adequately addresses these issues..
i.
25 To~ reduce radiation doses'resulting from external 26 exposures.to noble gases, you can decrease the time
I B 1 spent near (or in) the source, increase your distance 2 from the source,.and increase the attenuation of 3 these rays by passage of the rays through increased 4 thicknesses of material. The brochure adequately 5 addresses these dose reduction methods. The brochure 6 addresses decreasing the time spent near the source 7 (noble gases) by recommending evacuation, and, if 8 evacuation is not feasible, by minimizing the time 9 out of doors. The brochure addresses increasing your 10 distance from the source by recommending either 11 evacuation or, if evacuation is not feasible, you 12 remain indoors, close all windows and doors, and turn 13 off ventilation systems to keep the noble gases 14 outside. It also suggests m,oving to the basement, if 15 possible, to increase your distance from the source.
16 The brochure addresses increasing attenuation by.
17 recommending you remain indoors and move to the 18 basement, if possible. (MLB) 19 O. INTERVENORS STATE THAT THE BROCHURE "DOES NOT SPECIFY 20 HOW YOUNG VERY YOUNG IS." IS THIS CORRECT?-
21 A. No. Page 4 of the brochure has been revised to read
~
22 "(u)nborn babies and children up to six years old are.
23 more likely-to be harmed by radiation." (PFC) 24 Q. INTERVENORS STATE THAT THE BROCHURE DOES NOT CONTAIN
~25 A " CHART TO INDICATE-OVEREXPOSURE DURING NON-ROUTINE 26 RELEASES-OR ACCIDENTS TO PUT INTO PERSPECTIVE THE y . - , - , . .
T
- i 1 POSSIBLE DOSE RECEIVED BEFORE OR DURING AN 2 EVA CU ATION . " WHY DOES THE BROCHURE NOT CONTAIN SUCH 3 A CHART?
4 A. First, the NRC regulations do not require such a 5* chart. (RMG) Second, the composition of such a chart 6 would be voluminous due to the number of scenarios 7 that would need to be covered. (MLB) Finally, the 8 brochure contains adequate information concerning 9 radiation levels on page 2. (PFC) 10 O. INTERVENORS STATE THAT THE BROCHURE "DOES NOT SPECIFY 11 INGESTION DANGERS FROM CONTAMINATED FOOD AND WATER."
12 IS THIS ACCURATE?
13 A. No. Page 9 of the revised brochure states that 14 "(w)ater, milk and food supplies will be monitored 15 for potential contamination. The emergency broadcast 16 stations will notify the public of any actions to be l '7 taken in regard to food and water." (PFC) 18 Q. INTERVENORS STATE THAT THE BROCHURE "DOES NOT SPECIFY 19 THE IMPORTAMCE OF GETTING TO RECEPTION AREAS FOR.
20 REGISTRATION FOR PURPOSES OF NOTIFICATION FOR 21 EVACU E ES' RE-ENTRY TO THEIR HOMES, NOR OF EMERGENCY 22- NOTIFICATION FOR EVACUEES, ACCOUNTING FOR FISCAL 23 ASPECTS OF EVACUATION AND FOR THE BASIS OF 24 ESTABLISHING LEGAL ~ CLAIMS WHICH MIGHT RESULT.FROM THE
- s 1 EVACUATION, AS SPECIFIED IN ' CATAWBA SITE SPECIFIC 2 NUREG CRITERIA' p. B2, #3." IS THIS STATEMENT 3 ACCURATE?
4 A. No. The revised brochure does contain such 5 information. On page 10 of the brochure, the public 6 is advised to "(d) rive to your shelter and register."
7 The public is further advised on page 10 that 8 "(r)egistering at the shelter will enable officials 9 to contact you to tell you when you can go back home" 10 and that they "can also get information there while 11 away from home." With regard to fiscal aspects and 12 legal claims, the public is advised on page 10 that 13 "(r)epresentatives of organizations including Red 14 Cross, Salvation Army and insurance companies" would '
15 be at shelters to provide services needed by the 16 public. (PFC) This information was added from an 17 earlier version to address concerns raised by the 18 intervenors even though NRC regulations do not
'19 require it. NRC and FEMA guidelines focus on the 20 area of safety and not on subsequent legal aspects 21 following a possible event. (RMG) 22 Q. INTERVENORS STATE THAT CITIZENS ARE TOLD IN THE 23 BROCHURE THAT "THEY MA*Z GO DIRECTLY TO ' STAY WITH 24- FRIENDS OR RELATIVES LIVING'AT LEAST 15 MILES FROM 25 THE PLANT.'" IS THIS AN ACCURATE STATEMENT?
I
1 A. No. Page 10 of the brochure states " Drive to your 2 shelter and register. You may stay at the shelter.
3 or after you register at the shelter, you may choose 4 to stay with friends or relatives living'at least 15 5 miles from the plant." This language clearly 6 indicates that affected persons should go to the 7 shelter first. (PFC) 8 Q. INTERVENORS STATE THAT THE BROCHURE DOES NOT SAY THAT 9 "THE RECEPTICH AREAS EXIST TO PROVIDE DECONTAMINATION 10 OF PEOPLE AND VEHICLES." IS THIS CORRECT?
11 A. No. There are no longer any reception areas; rather, 12 evacuees will be instructed to go directly to 13 designated shelters. (RMG). Further, on page 9 of the 14 brochure it states: " Shelters would have facilities 15 for decontamination of evacuees and their vehicles 16 and ~ their personal items." It is there that such 17 decontamination activities take place. This language 18 was added to the current version of the brochure.
19 (PFC) 20 Q. INTERVENORS ASSERT THAT THE BROCHURE STATES THAT "IN AN EMERGENCY AT CATAWBA, CITIZENS 'WOULD BE GIVEN 21 22 PLENTY'OF TIME'TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION.'"
23 INTERVENORS STATE'FURTHER THAT THE BROCHURE " FALSELY
.24 REAS SURES" RESIDENTS BY INCLUDING THIS STATEMENT.
25 DOES THE BROCHURE INCLUDE THIS STATEMENT?
e .
1 A. No. This statement was deleted from an earlier draft 2 and is not contained in the current brochure. Also, 3 no effort is made to " falsely reassure" residents.
4 Information in the brochure is directed at advising 5 the public to take necessary action in an emergency.
6 (PFC) 7 Q. INTERVENORS STATE THAT THE BROCHURE " ASSUMES ALL 8 RECIPIENTS CAN READ, AND AT A CERTAIN LEVEL OF 9 COMPREHENSION." INTERVENORS STATE FURTHER THAT "AS A 10 PRIMARY SOURCE OF INFORMATION IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT 11 ALL HAVE ACCESS TO AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE EMERGENCY 12 PROCEDURES TO BE TAKEN." PLEASE COMMENT ON THESE 13 STATEMENTS.
14 A. First, the. brochure was designed and written so that 15 the general-public could understand the emergency 16 procedures to be taken. Second, every effort was 17 made to ensure that the brochure was written in a 18 form and at a reading level._that could be understood 19 by a broad segment of the public for whom it is 20- intended. (PFC) 21 Q. WHAT STEPS WERE TAKEN TO ENSURE READABILITY OF THE
-22 BROCHURE BY THE PUBLIC?
23 A. The initial draft was submitted to a reading 24 specialist 'at' Winthrop College for an assessment of 25 the reading-level. The initial draf t was determined 26 to be at approximately a college level. . Based on.the
1 directions provided by the reading specialist, the 2 copy was changed in an effort to lower the reading 3 level. (PFC, SVD) 4 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE MORE FULLY WHAT CHANGES WERE 5 INCORPORATED IN THE FINAL VERSION OF THE 1984 EDITION
. 6 OF THE BROCHURE TO ENSURE ITS READABILITY BY THE 7 PUBLIC.
8 A. Duke was advised by the reading specialist that parts 9 of the copy were verbose and too complex.
10 The material was rewritten to be approximately 11 4-6 sentences in length per one hundred words and to 12 have an average of 140-160 syllables per one hundred 13 words.
14 Technical information in areas such as "How a 15 nuclear plant works," and "About Radiation," was 16 rewritten to make the information more 17 understandable. (PFC) 18 Q. FOR WHAT LEVEL OF READER IS THE 1984 EDITION OF THE 19 BROCHURE SUITABLE?
20 A. The 1984 edition of the brochure is suitable for 21 _ readers of many levels. By applying the Fry 22 Readability Formula to assess the brochure, variable 23 reading levels are.obtained. Specifically,, narrative 24 portions'(i.e., those outlining plant operation and
- 2 5. giving information concerning radiation on pages 2 26 and 4) are written on an eleventh grade level.
e .
1 Instructional sequences (i.e., step-by-step 2 evacuation procedures on pages 9, 10 and 11) are 3 written on a seventh grade reading level and are most 4 appropriate for the average reader. (SVD) 5 Q. WHAT OTHER STEPS ARE SUGGESTED FOR COMMUNICATING 6 INFORMATION IN THE BROCHURE TO RESIDENTS IN THE AREA 7 WHO CANNOT READ OR MAY NOT HAVE IMMEDIATE ACCESS TO A 8 BROCHURE?
9 A. Page 1 of the brochure states: "If you know someone 10 who is blind or who does not read well, read this 11 information to them. Talk to them about what to do 12 in an emergency." (FFC) In addition, state and local 13 officials have been asked to include the six steps 14 shown on page 9 in their EBS broadcast. (RMG) 15 Q. INTERVENORS STATE THAT "(T)HERE IS NO INFORMATION 16 CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF A ' PLUME EXPOSURE 17 PATHWAY' WHICH WOULD INFLUENCE A CITIZEN'S CHOICE OF 18 ESCAPE ROUTE" AND THAT "IT IS IMPORTANT FO.. CITIZENS 19 TO BE AWARE OF THIS PHENOMENON BEFOREHAND." WHY IS
, 20 THIS INFORMATION NOT INCLUDED IN THE BROCHURE?
21 A. First, the NRC regulations do not require that such 22 information be included in the brochure. Second, 23 there is concern that public confusion may arise if 24 an attempt is made to provide general information 25 concerning plume pathways, and that the public may u -
1 then not follow the recommended actions in the EBS 2 messages which are based on the specific conditions 3 at the time of the emergency. (RMG) 4 Q. WHAT INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THE BROCHURE WITH 5 REGARD TO SHELTERING 7 6 A. Two types of information are included in the brochure 7 with regard to sheltering. First, on page 9 of the 8 brochure, the readers are directed to take the 9 following six steps if they are told to stay indoors 10 during an emergency:
11 "1. Stay indoors until you are told it is safe to go 12 out.
13 2. Close all windows and doors. Turn off fans, air
, 14 conditioners and forced-air heatino units.
15 3. Move to a basement if possible.
16 4. Place a damp cloth over your nose and mouth.
17 5. Listen to your local radio or television station 18 for more instructions.
19 6. Water, milk and food supplies will be monitored 20 for potential contamination. The emergency 21 broadcast stations will notify the public of any 22 actions to be taken in regard to food and 23 water."
1 Second, if ordered to evacuate, readers are told on 2 page 10 as follows: "Get into your car or other 3 vehicle. Close all windows and vents. Drive to your 4 shelter and register." (PFC) 5 Q. WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR INCLUDING THESE 6 STEPS IN THE 6 BROCHURE 7 7 A. EPA-520/1-75-001, " Manual of Frotective Action Guides 8 and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents,"
9 Environmental Protection Agency, 1975 (and subsequent 10 revisions and editions) recommends actions such as 11 staying in the basement, closing windows and doors, 12 turning off ventilation systems which draw in inside 13 air, and breathing through a damp cloth. The other 14 points are practical comments believed by Duke Power 15 Company to provide more effective sheltering. (RMG) 16 Q. WHAT OTHER GTEPS HAS' DUKE TAKEN TO ENSURE PUBLICATION 17 OF SHELTERING INFORMATION?
18 A. In a letter dated January 23, 1984, to each State 19 Director, Duke has requested that the six items on 20 page 9 of the brochure be made a part of their pre-21 established message format for sheltering. It is my 22 understanding that each state will include this 23 informa tion in pre-established messages. (RMG) l L 24 Q. DOES THE SHELTERING INFORMATION MEET NRC CRITERIA?
25 A. Yes. (RMG)
D I 18 -
1 O. ARE YOU SATISFIED THAT THE REVISED BROCHURE FOR 2 DISTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES THE 3 MATTERS OF PREPARATIONS TO BE TAKEN BY THE PUBLIC "TO 4 ACHIEVE EFFECTIVE SHELTERING" AND "THE ACTIONS THAT 5 PEOPLE SHOULD TAKE WHEN ADVISED TO SEEK SHELTER?"
6 A. Yes, the instructions provided in the brochure are 7 adequate for the public to achieve effective 8 sheltering. (MLB) 9 Q. BRIEFLY EXPLAIN YOUR RESPONSE.
10 A. There are two factors which are important when using 11 sheltering as a protective measure to reduce 12 potential doses. First, the shelter should provide 13 some attenuation of radiation emitted from 14 contamination outside the shelter. This attenuation 15 effect is called shielding. The second factor would 16 be the need to minimize the amount of contamination 17 leaking into the shelter. This is minimization of 18 infiltration. The brochure adequately addresses both 19 factors. With regard to-shielding, the brochure 20 states on page 9: " Stay indoors until you are told it l
21 is safe to go outside." It further states:
" Move to 22 a basement if possible." These instructions describe 23 the methods that should. be used to achieve shielding 24 from the radiation originating from contamination 1
25 outside the shelter.
93
3 3 As a method to reduce infiltration, the brochure :
2 advises on page 9 as follows: "Close all windows and f -3 doors. Turn off fans, air conditioners and forced-4 air heating units." These instructions are measures
- 5 that would effectively reduce infiltration of i 6 contaminated air. !
7 The measures listed on page 9 of the brochure 8 are general practices that would be effective for any
~
9 situation where sheltering is necessary. The 10 brochure also states on page 9: " Listen to your local 11 radio or television station for more instructions."
12 This addresses the need for additional instruction 13 which would not be appropriate in all cases. ,
14 In' addition to.the general practices of ;
15 shielding, reduction of. infiltration and listening 16 for additional information, instructions 4'and 6 on-
'17 page 9 are measures that would be recommended if 18 particulates are released. These instructions would 150 -be'useful in reducing inhalation and ingestion of 20 contaminates if they are present..(MLB) 21 Q. WHAT READING LEVEL IS THE INFORMATION ON SHELTERING 7 22 A. The instructional information on pages 9 and 10 is on i 23 the 7th. grade level. (SVD) .
/ 9
'e .
I 1 TESTIMONY OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 2 (J.T. PUGH, III) ON
- 3 EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTIONS 1 AND 7 4 Background Information l 5 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. ;
i 6 A. J.T. Pugh, North Carolina Division of Emergency J
7 Management, Administration Building, 116 West Jones
! 8 Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611.
9 Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND
!, 10 RELEVANT EMPLOYMENT HISTORY AND EXPERIENCE.
11 A. I have attached a Statement of Qualifications to this
- 12 ,
testimony. It is marked as Attachment A. (JTP) 13 Q. WHAT IS YOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE BACKGROUND?
14 A. I have been in the emergency response business for 15 six years. I was Area Coordinator for one year, 16 Assistant Director in Raleigh for one year, Deputy 17 Director for two years and Director for two years.
18 -(JTP) 19 Q. HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN ANY EMERGENCY RESPONSE 20 ACTIVITIES DURING THOSE YEARS?'
21 A. Yes. I have been involved in numerous response l
22 activities including: flooding in Surry County:
i 23 tornadoes in 14 counties; a chemical fire in 24 Hazelwood, N.C.; a chemical explosion in Rowan 25 countyi and PCB cleanup. My office handles 26 approximately 400 instances a - year. (JTP) 27 Q. HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN EVACUATIONS?
4 L
0 s
! 1 A. Yes. (JTP) 2 Q. SHELTERING?
4 3 A. Yes. (JTP)
! 4 Q. ASSURING PROVISION OF CLOTHING AND BEDDING?
j 5 A. Yes. (JTP)
~
6 Q. DECONTAMINATION?
7 A. We have been trained in this area. (JTP) 8 Q. HAVE YOU REVIEWED NUCLEAR EMERGENCY BROCHURES?
i 9' A. Yes. (JTP) 10 Q. HAVE YOU SEEN BROCHURES ON OTHER TYPES OF 11 .
EMERGENCIES, i.e., TORNADOES?
- 11 2 A. We have seen them and helped to develop them. (JTP) i 13 Q. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH BROCHURES DEALING WITH NUCLEAR 14 ATTACK?
15 ~A. We have seen the brochures prepared by the federal.
16 governmen t. (JTP) l 17 Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR OCCUPATIONAL DUTIES.
i 18 A. I am responsible for emergency response and 19 preparedness for the State of North Carolina. My 20 responsibility is to determine if the counties can 21 handle the amergency, and to get the State to the 3
-22 scene-if necessary. The Division of Emergency 23_ Management has 50'emp1'yees.
o The emergency response 24 team that I handle is . composed of all available 25: resources of the State government. -(JTP)
l 1 Q. BY WAY OF BACKGROUND, PLEASE DESCRIBE THE OVERALL 2 OBLIGATION OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AS IT 3 RELATES TO EMERGENCY PLANNING FOR A POSSIBLE 4 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY AT THE CATAWBA NUCLEAR 5 STATION.
6 A. The three components of the North Carolina obligation 7 to respond to a possible radiological emergency at -
8 Catawba are: (1) planning, (2) preparedness, and (3) 9 recoyery and response. The State obligation to 10 assure the adequacy of these components is for the 11 protection of life and property for the citizens of 12 North Carolina. (JTP) 13 O. HAS THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEVELOPED A PLAN TO 14 COPE WITH A NUCLEAR-RELATED EMERGENCY AT CATAWBA?
15 A. Yes, the North Carolina Emergency Response Plan.
16 (JTP) 17 Q. ARE YOU THE NORTH CAROLINA OFFICIAL RESPONSIBLE FOR I
18 THE PLAN?
19 A. Yes. (JTP) 20 O. WOULD YOU BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PLAN?
21 A. The plan is a three-part document which consists of 22 State procedures, Mecklenburg County procedures, and 23 Gaston County procedures. The plan provides the 24 overall framework for State and local response to a 25 'possible radiological emergency at Catawba. The 26 counties are the initial responders until"such time
4_
- 1 as the governor declares a state of emergency or b 2 disaster. Direction and control of recovery and f
3 response are in the hands of the State once the State i
4 has set up its SERT with support thereaf ter provided j 5 by the counties involved. (JTP) l 6 Q. DESCRIBE BRIEFLY YOUR ROLE IN OVERSEEING THE I
! 7- READINESS OF THE VARIOUS STATE AND COUNTY DEPARTMENTS r t
8 AND" AGENCIES THAT ARE INVOLVED IN RADIOLOGICAL -
9 EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN NORTH CAROLINA. l 10- A. The North Carolina Emergency Management Division is I
! involved in assuring the readiness of State and local 11 I
j 12 response to a radiological emergency in a number.of 13 ways. We have been actively involved in developing 14 the plans for responding.to a possible radiological 15 emergency and have subjected the plans to an actual ,
16 test through an emergency drill. These drills.are
- 17 expected to be repeated on a regular basis. In i
, 18 addition, we-have provided training on request for l 19 State agencies as well as County personnel involved.
20 (JTP)
[. 21 Q. IN YOUR OPINION DOES THE PLAN, PROVIDE REASONABLE l' 22~ ASSURANCE THAT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WILL BE~
23- , ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IN THE EVENT OF A RADIOLOGICAL 24 EMERGENCY AT THE CATAWBA PLANT?
- 25 'A. Yes.-(JTP) 1 1
9- o i
5-1
! l 2 HAVE YOU READ THE CESG/ PALMETTO ALLIANCE EMERGENCY 2 PLANNING CONTENTIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN ADMITTED AS j
l 3 ISSUES BY THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD?
4 4 A. Yes. I am testifying on behalf of the State of North 5 Carolina to address the issues raised by these 6 contentions of which I have knowledge. (JTP) i
, 7 EPC 1 and 7 Testimony 8 Q. DOES THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLAN PROVIDE i
9 INFORMATION RELATED TO CONTENTION 17
! 10 A. Yes. Part 1, Sections IV.D and IV.E of the N.C.
1 11 State Plan and Annex D to that plan.
12 Q. IS IT A GOAL OF STATE AND LOCAL PLANNING FOR 13 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES INVOLVING NUCLEAR POWER
-14 PLANTS THAT ADVANCE INFORMATION BE PROVIDED TO i
15 MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IN THE AREA SURROUNDING THE 16 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT?
l 17 A. Yes. (JTP) i 18 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING SUCH INFORMATION?
19 A. To provide the public with information on the basic 20 dangers of radiation, to provide adequate information 21 on how to implement protective actions for individual :
22' protection in case of a nuclear accident, and/or to ,
23 evacuate safely-the. threatened' area..(JTP) 24 Q. WHAT GROUPS SHOULD RECEIVE SUCH INFORMATIOh?
25 'A. .All individuals living within the Emergency Planning 26 Zene (EPZ) of a nuclear power plant. (JTP)
_ 27. Q. . WHATEINFORMATION HAS THE STATE ITSELF DISTRIBUTED? i m
...,--1 - - - , .--,.--.------_.--------,.--,-----L_a.w--------.-,..-_a.x---_u__--.---_s.----_a-
.. _= __. -
-. ._ --. -. _- . . = .
, e ,
4 1 A. The state plan provides for information of an 2 educational nature; however, this agency has not been 3 able fully to implement this program. We are
- 4 currently in the process of hiring a full-time public
! 5 information officer. Once this individual is on 6 board there should be a greater flow of information.
7 The state presently publishes a Disaster Brochure on 8 common threats, i.e., hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, 9 nuclear power plant accidents, etc. (JTP) 10 Q. IN YOUR JUDGMENT, IS THAT INFORMATION ADEQUATE?
11 A. Yes, considering the limited public demand for this 12 type of information and our limited time available to 13 produce or provide any larger contribution. However, 14 with the addition of the public information officer, s 15 we hope to make more information available to the l 16 public by all means of-communications. (JTP) 17 O. INTERVENORS STATE' THAT "ALTHOUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA '
18 STATE PLAN CALLS FOR EMERGENCY INFORMATION TO BE 19 DISTRIBUTED AS DETAILED IN PART 1, SECTION IV, 2, 3,
{
l 20 and'4, NO'SUCH MATERIAL OTHER THAN APPLICANTS' 21- BROCHURE HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE." DO YOU AGREE WITH 22 THIS STATEMENT?
23 A. Yes,' insofar as'it goes. However, one of the options
(
24 of the North Carolina emergency. plan is that the 25 State may' opt to. rely on Duke's Emergency' Plan I
(-
'I t
F e .
1 brochure rather than to distribute one of its own.
2 The State of North Carolina has elected to adopt that 3 option. (JTP) 4 O. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR ROLE IN THE PREPARATION OF 5 DUKE'S EMERGENCY PLAN BROCHURE.
6 A. I reviewed early drafts of the brochure and suggested 7 changes to be incorporated in the current 1984 8 edition. I then reviewed the current 1984 edition.
9 (JTP) 10 O. DO YOU FIND THE REVISED BROCHURE ACCEPTABLE FOR THE 11 PURPOSE OF ADVISING THE PUBLIC OF AN EMERGENCY AT 12 CATAWBA 7 13 A. Yes. (JTP) 14 O. HAVE YOU ANY ADDITIONAL SUGGESTIONS THAT YOU WOULD 15 INCORPORATE IN THE NEXT VERSION OF THE BROCHURE?
16 A. Yes. The necessity for going directly to shelters is 17 not adequately stressed under paragraph number 5 18 entitled, "If you are ordered to evacuate." Also, 19 the availability of radiological monitoring and 20 decontamination is not covered in this important 21 paragraph. The addition of this information in 22 paragraph 5 would_ strengthen the need for going 23 directly to a shelter. (JTP) 24 It is recognized that the brochure does state 25 that facilities for decontamination of evacuees are 26 available. This information, however, is located
1 later on in the brochure and not at the critical 2 place as mentioned above. The public must be 3 convinced that they should report to the shelters to 1
4 be registered and monitored for radiological 5 contamination and their emergency address recorded 6 for regrouping fctilies. The possibility of a 7 contaminated individual exposing other family members 8 should be stressed. We believe these changes should 9 be included in the next edition of the emergency pl'an 10 brochure. (JTP)
. 11 Q.. DO YOU FEEL THAT THE FAILURE TO INCLUDE THIS 12 INFORMATION IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE BROCHURE 13' AFFECTS THE ADEQUACY OF THE CURRENT BROCHURE?
14 A. No. .The State oof North Carolina is satisfied that 15 the 1984 edition of the brochure in its current form 16 is adequate to advise the public. (JTP) 17 .Q. ARE YOU SATISFIED THAT DUKE'S REVISED BROCHURE FOR 18- DISTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES THE 19 MATTERS'OF PREPARATION'TO BE_TAKEN BY THE PUBLIC "TO 20 ACHIEVE EFFECTIVE SHELTERING" AND'"THE ACTIONS THAT 21 PEOPLE SHOULD TAKE WHEN ADVISED TO SEEK SHELTER"?
22 A. Yes. The six sheltering steps described in the Duke 23 Power Brochure are similar to those advanced by 24 knowledgeable Emergency Management of ficials. State 25 emergency planning officials have been so_ trained.
i
1 Sheltering in this case refers to people staying 2 inside their own homes rather than going to a 3 " shelter" outside the EPZ. (JTP) 4 Q. DUKE HAS STATED IN ITS TESTIMONY THAT IT HAS 5 REQUESTED THAT THE STATE INCLUDE AS PART OF ITS EBS
. 6 PROGRAM THE SIX ITEMS LISTED ON PAGP 9 OF THE 7 BROCHURE. WILL THE STATE INCLUDE SUCH INFORMATION?
8 A. Yes. (JTP)
. I
_-. . . .- = _ _ - .
e ,
1 TESTIMONY OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 2 (P.R. LUNSFORD, W.M. MCSWAIN, AND S.L. FINKLEA, III) 3 ON EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTIONS 1 AND 7 1
4 Background Information on Messrs. Lunsford and McSwain 5 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS.
6 A. Paul Lunsford, 1429 Senate Street, Columbia, S.C.
7 29201.
8 Bill Mc Swain, 1429 Senate Street, Columbia, S.C.
9 29201.
10 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR PRESENT JOB TITLE AND DESCRIBE THE 11 NATURE OF YOUR JOB, MR. LUNSFORD.
12 A. I am a Chief Area Coordinator of the Emergency 13 Preparedness Division for the State of South 14 Carolina. I have jurisdiction over twenty-three of 15 the State's forty-six counties for emergency response 16 planning. These counties include those containing 17 and adjoining the Catawba Nuclear Station. I am 18 responsible for initiation, distribution, and 19 maintenanceoof-state plans that pertain to that area, 20 and for furnishing support and development of county 21 emergency response plans as a liaison for county 22 emergency preparedness directors in those areas. (PL) 23 Q. HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN-IN THAT POSITION, MR.
24 LUNSFORD?
.e t
- i 1 A. There was a title change about one year ago. Prior 2 to that I was Chief of the Plans Section in the 3 Emergency Preparedness Division. Prior to that, 4 three and one-half years ago, I joined the Emergency 5 Preparedness Division and worked with the 6 coordinator. I had that position for a couple of 7 years. Then I moved in as the Chief of Plans 8 Section. My resume is attached to this testimony.
9 (PL) 10 0 DOES THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA HAVE A SPECIFIC 11 EMERGENCY PLAN TO COPE WITH A RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY 12 AT CATAWBA?
13 A. Yes. It is the Catawba Site Specific Plan. (PL) 14 Q. WOULD YOU BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE CONTENT OF THE SITE 11 5 SPECIFIC PLAN AND HOW IT OPERATES?
16 A. The Emergency Plans in South Carolina for Catawba 17 include SCORERP (South Carolina Operational 18 Radiological Emergency Response Plan), STRERP (State 19 of South Carolina Technical Radiological Emergency 20 Respon,se' Plan), Part IV of SCORERP (Catawba Site 21 Specific Plan), and the York County Emergency 22 Operations Plan. SCORERP and STRERP are generic to 23 the State. (WM) 24 SCORERP was developed by the South Carolina 25 Emergency Preparedness Division in cooperation with 26 other State agencies to provide for the guidance,
e 4
- 1 coordination, and utilization of State and other ;
2 2 resources in support of affected local' governments' 3 off-site operations during an emergency resulting 4 from a radiological incident at a fixed nuclear 5 facility in the State of South Carolina or contiguous 6 states. (WM) 7 STRERP was developed by the Bureau of 8 Radiological Health in the South Carolina Department 9 of Health and Environmental Control to provide for 10 the guidance, coordination, and utilization of the 11 technical radiological emergency response and 12 assistance from the State of South Carolina to 13 affected local governments during an emergency 14 resulting from a radiological emergency in South 15 Carolina or contiguous states. This plan is in 16 accordance with SCORERP and is a supporting document.
i 17 (WM) 18 I and others in'this office were involved in 19 developing the Site-Specific Plan and assisted in 20 developing the York County Plan. To develop the 21 Catawba Site-Specific Plan, we used the other site 22 specifics as a guide and took site specific 23 information'for Catawba such as differences in alert 24 -andl notification and sheltering. The'other plans 25 upon which Catawba's were developed were different
\
. , . . ~ _. . . _ , _ _ .
f .1 1 with respect to the aspect of using shelters instead 2 of a reception center concept. We took the site-3 specific information and went from there. (WM) 4 The Site - Soacific Plan is broken down into a 5 general purpose statement, goes.into local situations 6 and assumptions, and then goes into the concept of 7 operations, which is broken down then into emergency 8 response as far as alert and. notification, activation 9 of the SEOC and FEOC, radiological monitoring, 10 evacuation,-transportation, communication, and 11 training. Emergency responso as to direction and 12 control is then described (rela ting to FEOC 13 operations), and last sre the figures, including maps 14 and organizational charts.'(WM) 15 Q. IS THERE A PLANNING BASIS FOR THIS' DOCUMENT 7 16 A. Yes there is. It is NUREG-0654,-Rev.~1. (PL) 17 Q. IN YOUR OPINION DOES THE PLAN' PROVIDE PEASONABLE 18 ASSURANCE THAT MEMBERS OF THE~PUBLIC'WILL BE 19 ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IN^.THEsEVENT OF'A RADIOLOGICAL
! ~,
s 20 EMERGENCY AT CATAWBA?
21 A. Yes it does.s(PL) 3 22 Q. IN GENERAL TERMS, HOW DOES THE PLAN FORKNIN AN y \ \. l \.N '
~
23 EMERGENCY SITUATION? 1 \+
24 A.- Once we receive the notification of the ;5mergency,
- , y -n 25 the South Carolina radiological energency . s-response 26 plan is put into~effect. TheStatN'govehnmentgoes i y '- , ,
, \ '
eQ
, +
LI -
' * - 1 ga v
</ , \
t t 5-
- 1 on alert, the county government goes on alert and of l 2 course, the plan is then implemented. There are t
-3 certain actions that have to be taken by the
. 4 facility, by the State, and by the local government,.
5_ These actions are spelled out in the emergency action 6 levels that are contained in the county plan and the 7 State plan. See York County Plan Annex Q and Table 4
8 IV of SCORERP. The particular emergency action level
!' 9 that we are in determines whether it requires the l ~10 deployment of State and local forces. (PL) 11 The emergency response will be as set forth in 1
12 the South Carolina plan and the county plans. The 13 agencies and individuals that are listed in those 14 plans have been made aware that they are part of the 4
15 plan. Certain state agencies have certain 16 responsibilities in the plan, as do the county 17 organizations and government agencies. The level of 18 emergency dictates the necessary actions to be taken.
19 (PL) 20 -Q. DOES THIS SITE-SPECIFIC PLAN DEAL WITH THE ACTIVITIES 21 OF.THE SOUTH CAROLINA EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION 22 RATHER THAN DEALING WITH THE RESPONSE OF YORK COUNTY?
23 A. Yes. (PL) 24 Q. MR..LUNSFORD, WITH RESPECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 2.5 STATE EMERGENCY. PLAN FOR CATAWBA, WOULD YOU EXPLAIN 26 YOUR ROLE IN THIS EFFORT?--
,A-C m_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
t 1 A. I reviewed all of the concepts and furnished some of 2 them. I reviewed the plans that were being 3 developed, managed.the effort and assigned additional 4 people to the task. I read the plans in their draft 5 stages, and met with planners on almost a daily 6 basis. If I had comments, I would share those with 7 the planners and they would be factored into the 8 plan. Most of my comments were made in writing on 9 the draft plan itself. (PL) 10 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR EMERGENCY PLANNING BACKGROUND, 11 MR. LUNSFORD.
12 A. I have a, former career in the United States Army as 13 an officer in the Infantry, as is described on my 14 attached resume. I have been with the South Carolina 15 Emergency Preparedness Division for three and one-16 half years. During those three and ono-half years-17 here, I have been directly' involved with emergency ,
18 planning. (PL) 19 Q. HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN'ANY EMERGENCIES WHERE 20 NOTIFICATION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE PUBLIC?
- 21. A. Yes, during,the recent tornados. I have also been 22 involved i nuclear power plant ene/ .y exercises.
23 (PL) c I
24 Q. HAVE YOU ~ BEEN INVOLVED' IN ANY EVACUA IONS?
25 A. Yes, at the same time. (Pt;)
l246 Q. HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN ANY SHELTERING ACTIVITY?
I s
r r s 1 A. Yes. (PL) 2 Q. HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN ANY DECONTAMINATION 3 ACTIVITY?
4 A. Not recently. I had biological and radiological 5 decontamination training as part of routine training G in the Army. (PL) 7 Q. HAVE YOU SEEN DOCUMENTS WHICH GIVE INSTRUCTIONS TO 8 THE PUBLIC ON HOW TO REACT IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS?
9 A. Yec. I have seen numerous documents in the routine 10 reading and studies that we do here. I have seen 11 brochures for each one of the nuclear power 12 generation stations here in the State of South 13 Carolina. They all fall in my sphere of supervision.
14 (PL) 15 Q. HAVE YOU RECEIVED TRAINING WITH RESPECT TO-ACTIONS TO 16 BE TAKEN IN THE EVENT OF A NUCLEAR ATTACK 7 17 A. Yes. I was qualified as a Nuclear Weapons Employment 18 Officer-in the Army and I subsequently had three 19 refresher courses, so I am still somewhat familiar 20 with that. (PL)
-r 21 Q. HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH EMERGENCY PLANS FOR OTHER '
22 NUCLEAR PLANTS IN SOUTH CAROLINA?
23 A.- Yes. All of them. There are four nuclear facilities 24 in South Carolina and this is the fourth set of_ plans 25: that we have' developed. (PL) 26~ Q. MR. MCSWAIN, PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR CURRENT POSITION.
\
e .
1 A. I am now the Exercise Training Officer for the State 2 of South Carolina. Prior to that I was the Area Two 3 Coordinator, which included five counties in South 4 Carolina, of which York County was one. I, along 5 with other staff members of the Development Committee 6 for the York County plan, developed the Site Specific 7 Plan for Catawba. I have had approximately seven 8 years of emergency planning experience. My resume is 9 attached. (WM) 10 Q. HOW MUCH TIME WAS DEVOTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 11 CATAWBA PLAN, MR. MCSWAIN?
12 'A. Approximately one and one-half years of ray own time.
13 (WM) 14 Q. TO WHOM DID YOU REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THAT PLAN?
15 A .- Initially to Mr. Tom Beckham, who was Chief of Plans.
16 Aft,r the reorganization, I reported to Mr. Lunsford.
I l 17 (WF 18 Q.- MR. i.CSWAIN, HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN 1
l 19 EMERGENCY PLANNING?-
! 20 A. Approximately seven years. I have been involved in 21 emergencies where public notification was given. I l 22 have also been involved in evacuation exercises. (WM) 23 Q. HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN ANY SHELTERING ACTIVITIES?
'24 A. Yes. Many.-(WM) 25 Q.- HAVE YOU BEEN_ INVOLVED IN ANY DECONTAMINATION 26 ACTIVITIES?
1 A. Yes. I am a Disaster Preparedness Specialist with 2 the South Carolina Air National Guard and we go 3 through training annually at an Air Guard Training 4 Site. On a monthly basis I am involved in training 5 Air Guard Staff in disaster preparedness activities.
6 That training includes decontamination response. I 7 have seen or reviewed documents concerning the 8 response that members of the public should take in an 9 emergency. Additionally, I have received training in 1
10 actions to be taken in response to a nu. clear attack.
11 (WM) 12 Q. WERE YOU RESPONSIBLE _AT THE STATE LEVEL FOR 13 DEVELOPING THE CATAWBA. EMERGENCY PLAN?_
14 A. Yes.
15 Q.- HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH EMERGENCY' PLANS FOR THESE 16 OTHER NUCLEAR PLANTS IN SOUTH CAROLINA?
17 A. Yes. All of them. There are four nuclear facilities 18 in South Carolina and this is'the fourth set of plans-19 that we'have developed. (WM) 20 Q. Q. WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE ROLE OF THE EMERGENCY 21- PREPAREDNESS DIVISION TO BE ONE OF ENSURING THAT THE 22 STATE AGENCIES ARE AWARE OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES IN 23 AN EMERGENCY?
24 A. Yes I'would. We are a coordinating agency for all 25 State ; resources 'in an emergency. (PL, WM) .
.26 Q. DO'YOU PROVIDE TRAINING FOR THOSE AGENCIES?-
a w y
- g -
p -- -'w r y
e .
1 A. Yes we do. (PL, WM) 2 Q. DO YOU MAKE CONTACT WITH THOSE AGENCIES TO ENSURE 3 THAT ADEQUATE RESOURCES ARE PROVIDED FOR THEIR NEEDS?
4 A. Yes we have. (PL, WM) 5 Q. HAVE YOU BEEN CONTACTED BY ANY AGENCIES WITH REGARD 6 TO CATAWBA INDICATING THEY HAVE NEEDS FOR ADDITIONAL 7 RESOURCES TO PERFORM THEIR ROLE?
8 A. Not to my knowledge. (PL, WM) 9 Q. HAVE YOU ASSURED YOURSELF THAT THESE RESPONSE 10 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS ARE AWARE OF THEIR 11 OBLIGATIONS AND REPONSIBILITIES?
12 A. Yes. The agencies that have'a' role to perform in the 13 plan were brought in on the_ process of drafting the 14 plan. They were given a copy in draft form as we 15 were developing it and were asked to comment, or make 16 additions or deletions and change their roles if they 7
17 weren't appropriate. The plan reflects a l 18 responsibility that is satisfactory to each one of 19 the responding agencies or organizations. When we 20 revise the plan periodically we submit copies to-each i
21 state agency that performs a role and they are asked 22 to review it before it's published..(PL, WM) 23 -Q. HAVE THE INDIVIDUALS.IN EACH STATE AGENCY OR 24 ORGANIZATION THAT WOULD BE CALLED UPON; BEEN 25: INSTRUCTED IN THEIR RESPONSE ACTIONS?
l 1 A. To the best of my knowledge, they have. We've 2 performed exercises with members of those agencies 3 and in each case, we have had no major discrepancies 4 found in any exercise that I am aware of. (PL, WM) 5 Q. 'HOW MANY NUCLEAR-RELATED EXERCISES HAS THE STATE OF 6 SOUTH CAROLINA BEEN INVOLVED IN?
7 A. The State has probably been involved in six or eight 8 such exercises. We have gone through each one of the 9 nuclear stations at least once and in the case of the 10 H.B. Robinson plant, twice. These were major 11 exercises, with full participation by all agencies 12 including the counties and the State. These 13 exercises indicate that the response agencies and 14 organizations in South Carolina have indeed performed 15 their function. (PL, WM) 16 Q. .ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN-17 FILED IN THIS PROCEEDING BY PALMETTO ALLIANCE AND THE 18 CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP?
19 A. Yes. (PLi_WM) 20 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY?
1 21 A. -The purpose of our testimony is to address these b 22 contentions that have been put'forth by Palmetto
-23 Alliance and the Carolina Enviro 1 mental ~ Study Group.
24 -(PL, WM) g - o.--~e<es . y y 9- yp-
1 Testimony of Lunsford and McSwain on EPC 1 2 Q. THE INTERVENORS ALLEGE THAT PUBLIC INFORMATION 3 PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANTS AND THE STATE AND LOCAL 4 OFFICIALS IS NOT ADEQUATE TO ASSURE APPROPRIATE 5 RESPONSES TO NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES. DO YOU AGREE 6 WITH THAT STATEMENT?
7 A. No. I believe the brochure generally is a good 8 brochure and has considerable factual information.
9 We have notified Duke Power of a few changes that 10 need to be made. But generally the brochure is an 11 adequate document. (PL, WM) 12 Q. WHERE IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA PLAN IS PUBLIC
- 13 INFORMATION ADDRESSED?
14 A. Annex C of SCORERP and Annex D of the York County 15 Emergency Operations Plan. (WM) 16 Q. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THIS TYPE OF BROCHURE 7 17 A. Yes. (bL, WM) 18 Q. HAVE YOU REVIEWED THE BROCHURE TO ASSURE YOURSELF
.19 THAT IT IS AN ADEQUATE NOTIFICATION TOOL 7 20 A. Yes I have. (PL, WM) 21 Q. HAVE YOU REVIEWED THE REVISED BROCHURE?
22 A. Yes I have. It is my view that the brochure is 23 satisfactory. I agree that changes do have to made 24 and they will have to be made from time to-time in 25 the future because the plan itself changes from_ time 26 to time. (PL, WM)
1 There are some things that we have addressed to 2 Duke Power which we would like to see changed and 3 they have agreed to do so. Based on that agreement, 4 I am satisified that this brochure is an adequate 5 tool. (PL, WM) 6 Q. WHAT CHANGES NEED TO BE MADE TO THE REVISED 1984 7 EDITION OF THE CATAWBA BROCHURE 7 8 A. As far as the map is concerned, on the large scale 9 map where the primary shelters are designated, each 10 host county's boundary should be shown (Chester, 11 Cherokee, Union, Lancaster, and Fairfield). As far 12 as the verbage between the two maps, the communities 13 within each zone should be listed and the " county" 14 designation removed. (WM) 15 Q. WHAT ABOUT THE SHELTERS FOR YORK COUNTY RESIDENTS OF 16 ZONE A-O?
17 A. Those are. going to have to be changed to go into the 18 Blacksburg area of Cherokee _ County. (WM) 19 Q. ARE ANY OTHER CHANGES NECESSARY?
j 20 A. Personally, I would like to see in the next revision 21 to the brochure a card inserted asking certain 22 information about whether'the recipient was blind, 23 hearing impaired, or transportation dependent. That 24 way we _ as planners have some type of grasp on how 25 many people are in each category. That list would be 26 updated annually with the brochure revision. (WM)
e 6 i
1 Q. ARE THERE ANY OTHER AREAS OF THE BROCHURE THAT YOU 2 WOULD LIKE TO SEE CHANGED?
3 A. In the rumor control portion of the brochure the 4 numbers listed there now are for the station itself.
5 Additional numbers could be put in there from the 6 media center to handle a large influx of calls for 7 rumor control. (WM) 8 Q. HAS DUKE MADE IT UNDERSTOOD THAT THEY WOULD 9 INCORPORATE CHANGES OF THAT SORT IN THE NEXT 10 BROCHURE?
11 A. Yes they have. (WM) 12 Q. DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF WHEN THE NEXT BROCHURE MAY BE
-13 COMING OUT?
14' A. In September of this year to the best of my 15 'nowledge. (WM) 16 Q. IS IT A GOAL OF STATE PLANNING FOR RADIOLOGICAL
, s 17- EMERGENCIES INVOLVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS THAT 18 ADVANCE INFORMATION BE PROVIDED TO MEMBERS OF THE 19 PUBLIC IN THAT AREA SURROUNDING THE NUCLEAR POWER 20 PLANT?
'~
21 A. Yes. (PL, WM) 22- Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE IN PROVIDING SUCH INFORMATION?
e s 15 -
1 A. The purpose is to protect the public and the public's 2 property and to provide information as to what the i l
3 public should do to protect itself concerning actions !
4 to be taken in case there is an incident at the 5 nuclear station. (PL, HM) 6 Q. WHO SHOULD RECEIVE SUCH INFORMATION?
7 A. Everyone residing within the ten-mile emergency 8 planning zone plus information should be made 9' available to transients. (PL, WM) 10 Q. WHAT INFORMATION HAS THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 11 ITSELF DISTRIBUTED?
12 A. The State has put out a brochure of its own
- 13. containing information on actions that should be 14 taken in the fifty-mile ingestion pathway. That was 15 developed by the Clemson University Coooperative and 16 Extension Service and the' State Emergency 17 Preparedness Division. (PL, WM)
- 18 Q. HOW IS THAT INFORMATION DISSEMINATED?
l 19 A. HWe did a census on the number of . farmers in the state 20 and issued an appropriate number of brochures to each e
21 -county _ extension agent for further delivery-to 22 farmers in each county.. (PL, WM)
- 23. Q. NOW, WITH RESPECT TO PEOPLE INSIDE THE TEN-MILE =EPZ,
-24 ASIDE-FROM THE BROCHURE, HAVE THOSE INDIVIDUALS BEEN' 25: GIVEN'ANY INFORMATION OR' FURNISHED ANY'INFORMATION BY
.26 ' THE STATE?
gy ---er y- .. .--=
q p - we e
- s 1 A. Yes. Members of the staff of this office plus other 2 state agencies have appeared at public meetings.
3 During the course of exercises that were to be held 4 and were being held, members of this agency and other 5 agencies, such as public information agencies in 6 State government, put out information about the 7 exercise - that it would occur and the purpose of it.
8 (PL, WM) 9 Q. WAS THAT INFORMATION CARRIED BY THE LOCAL MEDIA?
10 A. Yes. Both on television and in the newspapers. (PL, 11 WM) 12 Q. DO YOU PLAN TO CONTINUE YOUR AWARENESS EFFORTS WITH 13 RESPECT TO EDUCATING THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IN THE
- 14 . TEN-MILE EPZ AROUND CATAWBA?
15 A. . Ye s .' (PL, WM) r 16 Q. WOULD THAT BE SIMILAR TO THE ACTIVITIES YOU
- 17 PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED?
18 A. Yes. I would hope there would also be more
-19 continuing education of the public, for in.my. view-20 that is one of the mostlimportant things that:must be
~
'21 done. (PL, WM) 22 10 'ARE YOU AWARE OF- ANY EFFORT TO' ASSURE. THAT THE' BLIND
- :23 L AND ILLITERATE WILL BE MADE ' AWARE OF THE BROCHURE OR 24- OF ANY DOCUMENTS -THAT THE STATE OFI SOUTH CAROLINA 25 MIGHT ISSUE.CONCERNING; EMERGENCY RESPONSE 7 uv - , -c w -- , y
i ,
1 A. The Emergency . Preparedness Director and other staf f 2 members in each county are generally aware of who 3 those people are. In all of our preparations and
- 4. planning and during exercises, one of the facets that 4
5 we cover is notifying people who are not readily 6 accessible to routine notification. That would fall 7 within the county level jurisdiction or even in other 8 entities or echelons in these communities. (PL, WM) j 9 .Q. HOW WILL THE STATE DISSEMINATE INFORMATION IN THE 10 EVENT OF A RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY?
11 A. By the Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) and the South 12 Carolina Educational Television Network. (PL, WM) 13 Q. WHAT TYPE OF INFORMATION WILL BE CONVEYED TO THE.
14 PUBLIC THROUGH THE EBS MESSAGES?
15 A. They.will provide information about the plant, 16 conditions, what is happening, and what the-public 17 should be doing. (PL, WM) 18 Q. HAVE YOU. UTILIZED THE EBS SYSTEMLIN OTHER ,
19 EMERGENCIES?
20 A. Yes.- I have initiated it myself. (PL, WM) l l 21 Q. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT.THERE WILL BE ANY PROBLEM IN 22 COMMUNICATING THE EBS MESSAGES' WITH RESPECT TO THE 23 CATAWBA. EMERGENCY PLAN?.
t
- ~ ,
v w
1 A. Not in a'real emergency. We have evidence that there 2 will not be because we, during the recent exercise, 3 initiated that system twice and it operated 4 pe rfe ctly. (PL, WM) -
5 Q. WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN 6 DISTRIBUTED TO THE PUBLIC, BOTH THE DUKE BROCHURE AND 7 THE ACTIVITIES THAT THE STATE HAS TAKEN AND WILL 8 TAKE, DO YOU FEEL THAT THE COMBINATION OF THOSE 9 ACTIVITIES PROVIDES ADEQUATE INFORMATION TO THE
~
10 PUBLIC ON WHAT TO DO IN AN EMERGENCY?
11 A. I believe it does. But, I also believe it takes 12 constant attention to keep the public educated, to
.13 assure that the public has access to that 14 information. - (PL, WM) 15 Q.. ARE YOU AWARE THAT DUKE POWER IS GOING TO DISTRIBUTE 16 THE BROCHURE ANNUALLY?
17 A. Yes. I feel that.that is-a step in the right
! 18 direction in terms of continuing to1 educate the l
19 public. The state will continue to educate the l 20 public through meetings, broadcasts, newspaper.
'21 coverage, and the like. (PL, WM) i 12 2 .Q. DO YOU FEEL .THAT THOSE : CONTINUING EFFORTS WOULD MEET f
23 THE NEED OF CONTINUING TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC?-
.24 A. I believe so. (PL, WM)
D
,J ~ t m .- - w
1 Q. CESG AND PALMETTO IN CONTENTION 1 MAKE NUMEROUS 2 CRITICISMS OF THE DUKE BROCHURE. PALMETTO AND CESG 3 ALLEGE THAT BECAUSE OF STATEMENTS IN THE BROCHURE 4 PEOPLE WILL NOT TAKE NOTICE OF AN EMERGENCY 5 SERIOUSLY. DO YOU AGREE?
6 A. No. I think they will take notice of an emergency.
7 I think they will respond to not only the sirens, but 8 also to what is given to them over the emergency 9 broadcaut system, such as instructions and additional 10 educational information. I think they will respond 11 because we had evidence of that just recently in 12 connection with the tornado. (WM) 13 In the recent tornado, I was in Marlboro County 14 which was the county that was hardest hit insofar as 15 fatalities. I assure you that people paid very close 16 attention to the local radio station to get their 17 instructions in Marlboro County. They have excellent 18 coverage and an excellent response. (PL) 19 O. IT IS YOUR EXPERIENCE THAT IN AN EMERGENCY PEOPLE
- 20 WILL FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS?
21 A. Yes. In the type of emergencies I have been exposed 22 to lately (the tornado), there was excellent 23 response. (PL, WM) 24 Q. DO YOU FEEL THAT IF ONE WERE TO READ THE BROCHURE AND 25 THEN HEARD A SIREN, HE WOULD ACT RESPONSIBLY AND TAKE 26 THE MATTER SERIOUSLY?'
1 A. Yes. (PL, WM) 2 A. I believe so. It states very clearly what one is 3 supposed to do when the sirens sounds.(PL) 4 Q. DO YOU FEEL THAT THE BROCHURE GIVES ADEQUATE 5 INFORMATION CONCERNING PROTECTIVE ACTIONS THAT SHOULD 6 BE TAKEN?
7 A. I do. (PL. WM) 8 Q. CONTENTION 1 ALLEGES THAT THE BROCHURE DOES NOT 9 STRESS THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING TO A SHELTER. DO 10 YOU AGREE?
11 A. No, I think it stresses it sufficiently. (PL, WM) 12 Background Information on S.L. Finklea 13 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS , MR.
14 FINKLEA.
15 A. My name is Samuel L. Finklea, III. I am employed by 16 the Bureau of Radiological Health, South Carolina 17 Department of Health and Environmental Control, 2600 18 Bull Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. (SF) 19 Q. WHAT IS YOUR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND?
. :20 A. My educational background ~is:
21 B.S. in Physics,- Duke University,1967; M.S. in 22 Physics, University of South Carolina, 1969; Ph.D. in 23 Physics, University of South Carolina,1975; J.D. ,
l 24 University of South Carolina,;1984. (SF) 25 Q. WHAT IS YOUR JOB EXPERIENCE AS IT RELATES TO 26 EMERGENCY RESPONSE?
= ,
1 A. I have been employed by the Bureau of Radiological 2 Health since 1977. During the course of my 3 employment I have:
4 - participated in emergency response 5 exercises in support of the South Carolina 6 Operational Radiological Emergency Response 7 Plan (SCORERP);
8 - reviewed the State Technical Radiological 9 Emergency Response Plan (STRERP), which 10 describes the Bureau's responsibilities in 11 support of SCORERP; 12 - prepared and published revisions of 13 STRERP to. comply with requirements 14 established by State and Federal '
15 regulations; 16 - written computer codes to estimate 17 radiation exposure' doses which would result 18 from airborne releases of radioactive 19 materials; 20 - participated in workshops and training s 21 . courses dealing with emergency response 22 activities. This includes the Radiological 23 Emergency Response Operations training 124 course, Las Vegas / Nevada Test Site, Nevada, 25 1978; workshop on recovery'and reentry 2C planning sponsored by the Federal Emergency
.i .,
1 Management Agency Region IV Regional 2 Assistance Committee, Atlanta, Georgia, 3 1983; and 4 - coordinated Bureau activities during four 5 State emergency response exercises 6 conducted and evaluated according to 7 NUREG-0654 criteria. (SF) 8 Q. HAVE YOU READ CESG/ PALMETTO ALLIANCE EMERGENCY 9 PLANNING CONTENTION 7?
10 A. Yes. (SF) 11 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY?
12 A. The purpose of my testimony is to address 13 Emergency Planning Contention 7 insofar as it 14 contests the adequacy of state plans to provide 15 information on actions which members of the 16 public should take if and when they are advised l 17 to take shelter. (SF) l 18 Testimony on EPC 7 l
19 Q. YOU WERE PREVIOUSLY ASKED SOME QUESTIONS AS TO 20 THE BROCHURE'S TREATMENT OF SHELTERING ,
21 INFORMATION,. MESSRS. LUNSFORD AND MCSWAIN. HAVE 22 YOU HAD-SOME EXPERIENCE IN SHELTERING 7' 23 A. Yes. (WM) 24 Q. WHERE IN THE STATE PLAN IS IN-PLACE SHELTERING i
25 ADDRESSED?
I
1 A. Figure 12 of the Catawba Site Specific Plan is 2 the Catawba emergency information brochure.
3 Part of that brochure discusses actions the 4 public should take if directed to take in-place 5 shelter. In addition, Annex C of SCORERP 6 addresses actions that individuals should take 7 if directed to take in-place shelter. Annexes D 8 and Q of the York County Emergency Operations 9 Plan addreas in-place sheltering. (PL, WM) 10 Q. WERE YOU GIVEN TRAINING IN WHAT PROTECTIVE 11 ACTION ONE SHOULD TAKE IN THE EVENT OF A NUCLEAR 12 ATTACK 7 13 A. Yes. (WM) 14 Q. DO THOSE PROTECTIVE ACTIONS PARALLEL WITH WHAT 15 IS CONTAINED IN THE CATAWBA BROCHURE, TO THE 16 BEST OF 20UR KNOWLEDGE?
17 A. To the'best of my knowledge they do. (WM) 18 Q. IN AN ACCIDENT, WILL INFORMATION CONCERNING 19- SHELTERING BE DISSEMINATED TO THE PUBLIC7
- - 20 A. Yes. That will be through the EBS systim. (PL, 21 WM) 22- Q. WILL THE EBS MESSAGE PARALLEL THE BROCHURE 23 INSTRUCTION CONCERNING. SHELTERING?
24 A .- Yes it will. (WM) 4
-l Q. DOES THE STATE PLAN PROVIDE ADEQUATE INFORMATION ON 2 ACTIONS MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC SHOULD TAKE IF AND WHEN 3 THEY ARE ADVISED TO TAKE SHELTER?
4 A. Yes. (SF) 5 Q. PLEASE EXPLAIN.
6 A. State plans are measured against the requirements of 7 " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of _
8 Radiological Emergency Response Plans and 9 Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants."
10 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Emergency 11 Management Agency- NUREG-0654,.Rev. 1, 1980.-
12 Planning Evaluation Criteria J.9 addresses evacuation 13 and sheltering as protective actions:
14 Each State . . . shall establish a capacity for 15 implementing protective measures based upon l'6 protective action guides and other criteria.
17 This shall be consistent with the
! 18 recommendations of- EPA regarding exposure from 19 passage of radioactive airborne plumes, -(EPA-R20 -520/1-75-001) . . . [' Manual of Protective 21 Action ~ Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear l
22 Incidents,' Environmental Protection Agency, 23 1975.(and subsequent. revisions and additions)]-
24 The South Carolina emergency. response plans were 25 developed according to the-guidance'provided in this
( ;26: latter document. Appendix.B, " Planner's Evaluation 27 Guide-for Evacuation and-Shelter," addresses the -
28 likely hazards which wouldlbe experienced during;an H29 airborne release of radioactive materialLfrom a. fixed-l- 3 0 ' nuclear facility. It' summarizes the.various pathways_
i-l'
1 by which the public could be exposed and evaluates 2 the available. protective actions which could be used 1
3 to mitigate the consequences. .The Appendix 4 recognizes that evacuation before exposure is the 5 recommendation of choice (B-4, B-20) but that this 6 may not always be possible. Furthermore, untimely 7 evacuation'may in some instances result in greater
'8 exposure than one would receive while remaining in 9 available shelter until conditions were more 10 favorable. (B-4) (SF) 11 The appendix summarizes the factors which 12 determine the amount of protection afforded by 13 various types of typical structures. It points out 14 that sheltering effectiveness is usually increased by 15 turning off ventilation systems to reduce 16 infiltration of outside air, by closing cracks and 17 penetrations, and by simple filtration of inhaled l 18 air. B-21. It also points out that, all else being 19 equal, larger buildings, buildings with more massive 20 construction, and buildings with basements provide 21 more protection-than smaller, lighter buildings 22 without basements. B-22. On the.other hand, it i
23 advises against planning to use existing Civil 24 Defense' shelters or_ centrally located structures
26 -
1 where to do so would require members of the public to 2 leave whatever structure they were in at the time to 3 seek different shelter. B-7 (SF) 4 The Appendix provides criteria for determining 5 when sheltering followed by evacuation is the most 6 effective means of reducing exposure. B-16 et sec.
1 7 (SF) 8 The State plans call for evacuation as a 9 precaution to avoid any exposure whenever possible.
10 However, in those situations where evacuation cannot 11 be completed before exposur,e begins, the plans 12 provide for a recommendation of sheltering in place 13 to be made. Sample press releases included in 14 SCORERP include instructions about-remaining indoors,'
.15 closing. doors and windows, and turning off 16- ventilation systems which draw . in outside air. These.
17 are the measures recommended in the EPA Manual.
18 .Likewise,- the public information brochure (1984 19 revision, page 9) contains similar information.-
20 These' recommendations would be1 reiterated.by public 21: announcement whenever sheltering in placeLis 22- recommendedr additional information 'about - the - time 23
- sheltering should begin and end would be provided as 24 necessary. Whenever possible,_ populations at risk-25- would be-evacuated before exposure'begins. (SF)
L
x 9
1 TESTIMONY OF GASTON COUNTY 2 (BOB E. PHILLIPS) ON 3 EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTIONS 1 AND 7 4 Background Information 5 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS.
6 A. My name is Bob E. Phillips. My business address is 7 P.O. Box 1578, Gastonia, North Carolina 28052.
8 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR PRESENT JOB TITLE AND DESCRIBE THE 9 NATURE OF YOUR JOB.
10 A. I am Director of the Gaston County Dnergency 11 Management Agency. My responsibilities include 12 updating all emergency management plans. I am in 13 charge of the county communications center, medical 14 transport service, county fire marshal, and my office 15 responds to all hazardous materials incidents within 16 the county. I prepared the. disaster relief and 17 assistance plans and have prepared the plans in case 18' of-a nuclear war. In addition, I have prepared the 19 county emergency response plans for both the Catawba 20 and McGuire nuclear stations.
21- O. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR RELEVANT EDUCATIONAL AND 22 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE.
23.-A. See my resume, which is included as Attachment A to 24 my testimony.
25 O. HAVE-YOU HAD EXPERIENCE WITH THE EVACUATION OF 26' ' CITIZENS DURING.A DISASTER OR EMERGECY SITUATION?:
4 4
- et.- = y -. y Wym. , ,y- -
4 t 1 A. Yes. There have been several tanker incidents in 2 Gaston County involving gasoline, methanol and 3 kerosene in which we had to evacuate and house 4 citizens. Two years ago, we had to evacuate a two-5 block section of Mount Holly and 250 people were 6 sheltered in churches where they remained for two to 7 three hours. Last week, I traveled to Gates County, 8 North Carolina, to help the county manager there with 9 tornado disaster work. This week, I went to 10 Marshville, North Carolina, to take cots and blankets 11 to be used in sheltering activities because of the 12 train derailment and fire.
13 Q. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE ISSUES IN THIS PROCEEDING 14 RELATING TO EMERGENCY PLANNING EFFORTS FOR THE 15 CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION?
16 A. Yes, I have read the CESG/ Palmetto Alliance emergency 17 planning contentions.
l 18 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY?
19 A. The purpose of my testimony is to address those of
- 20 the emergency planning contentions which involve 21 Gaston County.
22 Q. DOES THE GASTON ' COUNTY PLAN PROVIDE INFORMATION 23 RELATED TO THESE CONTENTIONS?
24 'A. Yes, Part 2, Sections IV.D and IV.E of the N.C. State 25 Plan and Annex D' to that Plan.
26 Q. BY WAY.0F BACKGROUND, PLEASE DESCRIBE THE.OVERALL 27 ORGANIZATION OF THE GASTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT.
a >
1 A. Gaston County operates on the County Commission 2 system. We have seven Commissioners and a County 3 Manager, Which runs the function of the government.
4 We have 31 departments in the County government of 5 Which Emergency Management is one.
6 O. WHAT DOES THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DO?
7 A. We run the county communications center. We dispatch 8 all fire, police and ambulance calls from the central 9 dispatch Which is in the Emergency Operations Center 10 (EOC). The. Fire Marshal's office is here and also 11 the medical transport service.
12 O. ARE ALL THESE UNITS IN THE EMERGENCY PLANNING 13 DEPARTMENT INVOLVED IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN THE 14 EVENT OF A RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY?
15 A. This is correct.
16 O. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH GASTON COUNTY'S EMERGENCY 17 PLANNING EFFORTS FOR CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION?
18 A. Yes.
19 O. HOW DID YOU BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THOSE EFFORTS?
20 A. I'had previously worked on our emergency planning 21 efforts for the McGuire Nuclear Station and I 22 prepared, with assistance from state planners, Part 2
~
23 of'the North Carolina Emergency Response Plan'in
- 24. support of the . Catawba Nuclear Station, Which 25- describes Gaston. County procedures.
i .
1 O. DOES GASTON COUNTY HAVE A SPECIFIC EMERGENCY PLAN TO 2 COPE WITH A CATAWBA-RELATED NUCLEAR EMERGENCY?
3 A. Yes, the Gaston County Radiological Emergency 4 Response Plan.
5 O. DID YOU PREPARE THIS PLAN?
6 A. Yes, I developed the plan for Gaston County.
7 O. ARE YOU THE GASTON COUNTY OFFICIAL RESPONSIBLE FOR 8 THE PLAN?
9 A. Yes.
10 0 WOULD YOU BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PLAN?
11 A. O.K. We've got of course our Emergency Classification System; our Warning Notification 12 13 Methods and Procedures, where we notify the general 14 public; we have the siren system as the primary means 15 of notification and our secondary means is having 16 fire departments to go out on predetermined routes 17 using PA systems and public education information.
18 We try to keep the media informed about our plans and 19 . what to tell the people to do. In addition, we have i
20 decontamination _ points set up which are manned by the l
21 volunteer fire department personnel and highway 22 patrol' officers. These are set up outside the 10-23 mile EPZ. There are-also designated traffic and 24 control points set up on all roads which are manned 25 by the county police, the highway patrol, - sheriff's 26- department and municipalities' personnel. There are
o .
1 two designated shelters at Mount Holly Junior High 2 School and at Ashley Junior High Which are manned by 3 the Red Cross. Personnel monitoring at the two 4 shelters is performed by the volunteer fire 5 department. Communications at the schools is 6 provided by the sheriff's department.
7 Q. IN THAT CONNECTION HAVE YOU BEEN IN CONTACT WITH ANY 8 LOCAL NEWSPAPERS?
9 A. Yes, our Gastonia Gazette. I keep them informed on I- 10 every plan that we put together 'nd a What the people 11 are to do.
12 O. DID THE GASTONIA GAZETTE COVER THE RECENT EMERGENCY 13 PLANNING EXERCISE?
i-14 A. Yes, they did.
15 O. DID THEY CARRY INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT YOU EXPECT i
16 PEOPLE TO DO WHEN THEY HEAR THE SIRENS?
17 A._ Right. We - told th'em to have the = people turn. their i
18 radios and TVs on for public information if the 19 sirens go off.
, 20_.Q. WHAT ELSE DOES THE PLAN COVER?
f
- . 21 A. - Emergency communications. . We have communications 22 with all of our county departments-and also;the city
'23 - departments, and this communications'is manned 24'
'24 hours a day, seven days a week from here in the.EOC, 25 and we also conduct exercises on the the Emergency -
26 Plan =which we just finished'inLFebruary.
1 w a , - - , - - - - , -e , ,~ - - .w=
o ,
\.
s \
l O. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE IN THE COVERAGE 0F THE PLAN 2 THAT YOU-CARE TO MENTION?
3 A. Well we do have the City of Gastonia police, fire, 4 public works and administrative departments, and 31 5 county departments that would run the operation from L
6 the EOC. s
[
7 Q. DESCRIBE BRIEFLY YOUR. ROLE IN OVERSEEING THE 'N
'N 8 READINESS OF.THE VARIdUS COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND
. s _
9 AGENCIES THAT ARE' INVOLVED IN RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY
~
~lO RESPONSE IN GASTON COUNTY.
11 A. I coordinate, brie'f,and train all of the separate 4
( '
e s
12 Gaston County entities that are involved in the s (' 6 13' emergency response. .s ,, ,
14 'O. IN YOUR OPINION, DOES THE PLAN PROVIDE REASONABLE-15 ASSURAN.CE THAT. MEMBERS OF THE , n PUkILIC WILL BE 16 ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IN THE EVENT OF M CATAWBA- , e
,. 3 (y t s.y .? '
17 RELATED, NUCLEAR EMERGENCY?'
~
\ .. -
18 A. Yes.- /s- , , ,
3 L '
c u 19 -O. WHERE IS YOUR-EMERGENCY"UPERATIONS CENTER IN Y '
M' RELATIONSHIP TO THE APPROXIMATELhlO-MILE'EPZ?
C;' (N . .
20 '
< g g, . A i 12 1 A. It is cpproximately 16 - milesJfrp:n;.the plant, which is
_ i _.
l' '[ 's
(
s , .
22- 6 miles outsidi the plume EPZ. 1 -s S* -
\, y ,
EPC51 ~ Testimony # ,' ?
23 .v . vy T . b 24 O.. . TURNING TO'THE.CONTENTIO1(;3.IN THIS-CASE,-INTERVENORS~ s I 116 ' NN 4 s -
i
-25' ASSERT, IN EMERGENCY IPLANNING CONTEN':' ION 1 ~ THAT TUE 26-a p f ;t , ; , '%
. .c -
PUBLIC'INFORMATI.ON
' PROVIDED BY APyLICAUTS'AND BY 'p - l
' E Q'{n!{ .
[}
3 y. :\ , ; ,
7 X .g. I, ,
- 1. . +. 7g
%g / D ' .c y .g .
Y, / .d \ .
, , , .. . m . . .
4,/' 3 5.* ~' "fL ,_ , ., _ , , _
e >
t l' STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS IS NOT ADEQUATE TO ASSURE 2 APPROPRIATE RESPONSES TO EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION
- 3 PROCEDURES. HOW WILL GASTON COUNTY ATTEMPT TO 4 PROVIDE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WITH ADVANCE 5 INFORMATION IN A RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY?
6' A. I have mentioned that all Gaston County activities 7 involving the emergency planning effort for Catawba 8 Nuclear Station have been communicated to the .
9 Gastonia Gazette, which in turn has carried 10 information about What the public should expect and
, 11 What they would be expected to do if they hear the 12 sirens. Our goal is to make the public aware of our 13 planning objectives in the event of an accident at 14 Catawba.
15 O. HAS THERE BEEN ANY OTHER COMMUNICATION AT THE COUNTY
'16 LEVEL TO THE NEWSPAPERS, RADIO, TELEVISION OR TO 17 CITIZENS' ORGANIZATIONS?
18 A. Yes,lfor example, I'have talked to senior citizens' 19 groups about it. I have also talked to the Gaston:
~20 College radio station on our role should an emergency
! 2 'l l ' occur at CataWbc. I also gave a brief synopsis.at-22- Gaston' College'on what'we did during the emergency 23 drill'and Why.
' 24 O. WHAT GROUPS SHOULD RECEIVE SUCH ADVANCE INFORMATION?
.All-residents Uithin the EPZ.
~
!25 'A. .
8-1 Q. IN YO' R JUDGMENT, IS THE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN 2 DISTRIBUTED ADEQUATE?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. AR3 YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE DUKE POWER BROCHURE FOR EPZ 5 RESIDENTS?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. DO YOU HAVE ANY VIEW AS TO WHETHER THE CURRENT B VERSION OF THE DUKE POWER BROCHURE FOR.EPZ RESIDENTS 9 (WHICH HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE INTERVENORS FILED THEIR 10 CONTENTION) IS SATISFACTORY FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE?
r ,
11 A. As far as I know, yes sir. The revised brochure is 12 easier to understand, for one thing, and updates some 13 of the information.
~ 14 ',EPC 7 Testimony 15 O. WITil REGARD TO EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTION 7, ARE 16 YOU SATISFIED THAT GASTON COUNTY' COMMUNICATIONS 17 -o .AND/OR THE APPLICANTS REVISED BROCHURE FOR +
1 ,,
18 DISTRIBUTION TO'THE PUBLIC IN~THE EPZ ADEQUATELY - -
19 DDRESS THE PREPARATIONS TO BE TAKEN BY THE PUBLIC,TO -
20 ACHIEVE " EFFECTIVE SHELTERING" AND THE ACTIONS THAT. -
/ .
PEOPLE SHOULD TAKE<,WHEN ADVISED TQ ) SEEK SHELTER 7-21 - ! . ;n . _
~22 .A.- I am satisifed.
gj[ Y , ,
y l'
23 - Q . 4- PLEASE EXPLAIL YOUR RESPON3E.. >-_y f. , e-U -24 A. .The steps-id"entified are. consistent'with these which e, ,
~
s.
we^have bNen instructed in with respect to' civil 25-L/;c .s l-~
- 26. defense preparddhiss. In addition, Gaston County's-t!,l>'
l ,ff &; ,*:. - - o
.f
,e ^J' ,G-0$
f,-
_ f ,. ,
9- l i
1 educational efforts, previously mentioned, parallel :
2 Applicants' instructions . Also the EBS will provide 3 similar information.
i !
1 2
i i
I-h-
Y N %
b 4
u W I O
- 1 i
1 TESTIMONY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY I 2 (LEWIS WAYNE BROOME) ON 3 EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTIONS 1 AND 7 4 Background Information 5- Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, JOB TITLE, AND BUSINESS 6 ADDRESS.
7 A. My name is Lewis Wayne Broome. I am Administrative 8 Officer for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Emergency 9 Management Office. My business address is 951 South 10 Independence Boulevard, Room 655, Charlotte, North 11 ,
Carolina 28202.
12 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR RELEVANT EDUCATIONAL AND 13 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND WORK EXPERIENCE.
14 A. I have a BA Degree in Sociology from Belmont Abbey
~
15 College and an Associate degree in Business 16 Administration / Management from Central Piedmont 17' Community College.- I have about four years and eight 18 months experience on the job I am in now, . associated 19 with planning and responses-to major emergencies. My 12 0 . resume is attached.
21 O. HAVE YOU READ THE INTERVENORS' EMERGENCY PLANNING l
- 22 CONTENTIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN: ACCEPTED AS ISSUES IN 23 THIS PROCEEDING?,
' 24 A.. Yes.
~
25 . O. .WHAT.IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR' TESTIMONY?
I A 4 - e p y +r , y v -g -
1 A. The purpose of my testimony is to address those 2 contentions or parts of contentions that deal with 3 Charlotte-Mecklenburg's emergency response efforts, 4 and those which I otherwise have some basis to 5 comment on.
6 Q. DO YOU HAVE PRIOR EXPERIENCE WITH EVACUATION, 7 SHELTERING, AND PROVIDING FOOD AND CLOTHING TO 8 EVACU EES?
9 A. During the 1982 chemical fire on North Tryon Street, 10 I participated in the actual evacuation process by 11 providing transportation to evacuees and insuring 12 that the people were fed. I also assisted in 13 providing shelter for the dislocated.
14 Providing clothing was not an issue at that 15 particular situation, but the procedure is in place 16 for doing so and it is being addressed by local and 17 state officials.
18 Q. BY WAY OF BACKGROUND, WOULD YOU DESCRIBE THE COUNTY 19 AND CITY GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION YOU ARE PART OF7 20 A. The City of Charlotte has a council manager form of 21 government. Mecklenburg County consists of a 22 commissioners-manager form of government. The 23 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Emergency Management Office is 24 a joint city-county department.
25 Q. IS COORDINATION OF ALL SORTS OF EMERGENCIES THE 26 RESPONSIBILITY OF YOUR GROUP?
, n l
1 A. All major disaster planning for major situations 2 ranging from flooding, man-made disasters and natural 3 disasters up to and including nuclear war, initiates 4 from this office.
5 Q. DO YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE EMERGENCY RESPONSE 6 IN THE EVENT OF RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY AT CATAWBA?
7 A. Yes. This office is charged with planning support 8 documents for the city and county's response to a 9 radiological emergency involving the Catawba Nuclear
. 10 Station and coordinates the efforts of the various 11 city and county departments that would respond.
12 Q. DOES MECKLENBURG COUNTY HAVE A SPECIFIC EMERGENCY 13 PLAN TO COPE WITH A CATAWBA-RELATED NUCLEAR 14 EMERGENCY?
15 A. Yes. We do have a basic planning document provided 16 by the State,'the North Carolina' Emergency Response 17 Plan. The operational procedures that may. relate to 18 Mecklenburg County-for elements of that basic 19 planning document are being developed at =this time.
20 -Q. DID YOU PREPARE THIS PLAN?
21 A. I assisted in preparation.of-the Mecklenburg County 22 Plan, which is Part III of the N.C. State Plan.
23 Q. ARE YOU THE MECKLENBURG COUNTY OFFICIAL RESPONSIBLE.
24 FOR THE PLAN?
25A.- Lyes.
+ f 'e r 1 Q. IN YOUR OPINION DOES THE PLAN PROVIDE REASONABLE 2 ASSURANCE THAT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WILL BE 3 ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IN THE EVENT OF A CATAWBA-4 RELATED NUCLEAR EMERGENCY?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN 7 FOR MECKLENBURG COUNTY.
8 A. The basic plan identifies several primary departments 9 that will take part in any exercise. It explains 10 their role and responsibility with regard to 11 activation of the plan. Procedures relating to 12 evacuation and shelter and alert notification are 13 addressed.
14 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE BRIEFLY YOUR ROLE IN OVERSEEING 15 THE READINESS OF THE VARIOUS COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND 16 AGENCIES THAT ARE INVOLVED IN RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY l 17 RESPONSE IN MECKLENBURG COUNTY.
18 A. First of all, readiness involves Mecklenburg County 19 and the City of Charlotte. My office utilizes the 20 resources of all the departments of city and county 21 government. It is the responsibility of emergency 22 management to coordinate those activities among all.
23 those departments. My office's role in overseeing 24 ~ readiness involves training, conducting exercises, 25 'and maintaining the emergency' plans.
26 Q.. AND YOU DO THAT?
a e 1 A. Yes. Myself and Luther Fincher, who is now the 2 acting director in the Emergency Management Office, 3 would coordinate those activities to insure that in 4 an EOC environment, everybody works from the same 5 plans; that roles and responsibilities are 6 identified, that resources are identified and that 7 problems are mitigated with the best available 8 resource Whether it be fire, police, medical or some 9 other organization. We coordinate, we get input from 10 these departments to insure that they are capable of 11 doing what it is that they have agreed to do in the 12 planning documents so that there are no surprises at 13 the time that the request is made up.enough to carry 14 on a specific function.
15 O. WOULD YOU ELABORATE ON THE RESOURCES THAT ARE 16 AVAILABLE TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE-17 MECKLENBURG PLAN?
18 A. The planning document - the basic planning document -
19 ' Which is.Part III of_the North Carolina Emergency, 20 Response Plan specifically states in those nine 21 categories that we listed under the table of contents 22 Mecklenburg County. I think it should be brought out 23 that the resources of the City of ' Charlotte which 24 includes emergency response organizations and support
-25 organizations are also available to us, us being
- s 1 Mecklenburg County and the overall operation so that 2 we can respond with total resource commitment from 3 both city and county and not just from one.
4 Q. DOES THAT REPRESENT A SUBSTANTIAL AUGMENTATION OF THE 5 RESOURCES THAT WOULD BE AVAILABLE IF WE WERE SPEAKING 6 STRICTLY OF MECKLENBURG AS A COUNTY?
7 A. Yes. An example would be there are approximately 120 8 law enforcement people in county government, while 9 there are probably about five to six hundred city 10 policemen. The paid fire department of the county 11 represents about five people, while the paid city 12 fire department represents about six hundred. So as 13 you can-see by those numbers we are looking at a 14 substantial amount of resources that'would be 15 available to us.
16 EPC 1 Testimony 17 Q. DOES YOUR EMEREGENCY PLAN PROVIDE INFORMATION WHICH l
l 18 ADDRESSES THIS CONTENTION?
19 A. Yes. - Fart 3, Section IV.D. and IV.E to the N.C. State 20 Plan, and Annex D to that Plan.
21 Q. EMERGENCY' PLANNING' CONTENTION 1 ALLEGES THAT THE 22 PUBLIC INFORMATION THAT.IS AVAILABLE TO-THE PEOPLE IN 23 THE CATAWBA EPZ IS NOT ADEQUATE.- HAS CHARLOTTE- .
24 MECKLENBURG' DISSEMINATED ANY PUBLIC INFORMATION ON 25 RESPONDING TO A RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY?
' e4
.-- e
- e. o 1 A. We have made available the Duke brochure on a request 2 basis. We have not published anything such as a 3 brochure but we have responded when requests for 4 information have been made.
5 O. COULD YOU GIVE US EXAMPLES OF THE KINDS OF REQUESTS 6 YOU HAVE RECEIVED?
-7 A. The 3 inquiries most often received by this office 8 are (1) What zone do I live in? (2) What do the 9 sirens mean? (3) Where would I go?
10 Q. , HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CALLED UPON TO SPEAK BEFORE ANY 11 ORGANIZATIONS OR GROUPS IN THE COUNTY TO EXPLAIN THE 12 CITY / COUNTY EMERGENCY RESPONSE EFFORTS?
13 A. Yes, I have been called upon several times by various 14 organizations, from day-care centers to girl scout' 15 organizations to_ rotary clubs or What have you, to 16 speak about the function of this office, and how we 17 respond and What plans do we have in place to respond 18 not only to a fixed nuclear facility accident, but to 19 other manmade and natural disasters.
1 20 10 WHAT EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES DO YOU CONDUCT TO EDUCATE 21' THE PUBLIC WITH RESPECT TO-ACTIONS TO TAKE IN THE
[
l
- 22. ~ EVENT OF A NUCLER EMERGENCY AT CATAWBA?
Mecklenburg County and local-emergency management
_2 3_ -A.
24 personnel will a'ttend all public meetings following 25 exercises of the plancto provide the public with the l' 26 results of the. exercise critiques. We will
,4 - s- , - - - y g q -m--
s s i
1 respond to information and questions at those 2 particular sessions. In addition, we respond to 3 telephone requests from the public. On several 4 different occasions, we inform the public of exercise 5 dates and we provide the information with regard to 6 that. We speak to groups upon request with regard to 7 the planning acivities and what we are doing to >
8 protect the citizens of the community in the event of 9 an emergency situation at Catawba.
10 O. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH DUKE POWER'S BROCHURE (AND 11 REVISED BROCHURE) FOR EPZ RESIDENTS?
12 A. Yes.
13 -0 . DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE REVISED BROCHURE PREPARED BY 14 DUKE POWER COMPANY ON WHAT TO DO IN A RADIOLOGICAL 15 EMERGENCY IS ADEQUATE FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE?
16 A. Yes. I believe the Duke brochure is adequate for its 17 intended purpose.
18 O.- 'DO.YOU HAVE PRIOR EXPERIENCE WITH READING AND 19 REVIEWING-EMERGENCY PLAN BROCHURES?
20 A.- Yes, I have read and evaluated the brochure forl the
-21 McGuire Nuclear-Station.and have had input intoLthat 22- 'through Duke Power Company. I also had-input.in the 23- oCatawba brochure and in the school brochure which is 24 being distributed for the school children within and 25 near for the Catawba EPZ.
, _ , + g * --* 7 T- W
, s 1 Q. WHEN YOU REVIEWED THE BROCHURES FOR BOTH THE MCGUIRE 2 AND CATAWBA STATIONS, WHAT PRECISELY WERE YOU LOOKING I
3 FOR IN THIS REVIEW OR WHAT STANDARDS DID YOU REVIEW 4 THESE BROCHURES AGAINST?
5 A. The basic standard was to insure that the information 6 contained in the brochure was not in conflict with
- - 7 State and County emergency plans.
, 8 Q. ARE YOU SATISFIED THAT THE CATAWBA EMERGENCY PLAN 9 REVISED BROCHURE FULLY ADDRESSES THE OBJECTIVES WHICH 10 ,
YOU, AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF EMERGENCY 11 PLANNING'FOR MECKLENBURG COUNTY, WANT IT TO ADDRESS?
12 'A. Yes. The information in it is not in conflict with 13 basic planning documents and procedures.
l 14 Q. IN YOUR OPINION, DOES THE PLAN PROVIDE REASONABLE
, 15 ASSURANCE.THAT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WOULD BE 16 ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IN THE EVENT'OF A CATAWBA-17 RELATED NUCLEAR EMERGENCY?
i 18 A. Based on the planning document;and as I see tha-19- planning document being' implemented,'if people will i 20 observe the instructions that local government I
'21 provides to-them via theLemergency broadcasting
.22 system,-I think that the plan ~can be implemented with 23 little or no' confusion and with:little or no panic.-
- 24- -I think that1if they listen to local government, then 25 that function can be carried out.
e
-- - , n,. ,- - ~m.. ,-. -, -
a ,
1 EPC 7 Testimony l 2 Q. EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTION 7 ARGUES THAT THE 3 EXISTING EMERGENCY PLANS OF RELEVANT STATE AND LOCAL 4 AUTHORITIES DO NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE 5 PREPARATIONS THAT SHOULD BE MADE TO ACHIEVE EFFECTIVE 6 SHELTERING OR THE ACTIONS THAT PEOPLE SHOULD TAKE 7 WHEN ADVISED TO SEEK SHELTER. DO' YOU HAVE ANY 8 COMMENT ON THAT ARGUMENT?
9 A. I think there are enough channels of information for 10 the public thtough the Duke Power Company brochure, 11 through the plan, through the activities and 12 procedures that are developed-internally with the EOC 13 and through the Emergency Broadcast System. I don't 14 think our instructions would be a surprise to the
~
15 public and I don't think that panic would result 16 because we are not going to surprise them with 17 souething that they should not be well aware of 18 beforehand. In this regard,.the sheltering steps set 19 forth in Duke Power's brochure appear to be.
20 consistent with measures I am familiar with.
21 Q. WHERE IS SHELTERING ADDRESSED IN THE MECKLENBURG 22' COUNTY EMERGNECY RESPONSE PLAN?
23 A. Section 3 of the plan.
L
i l
s.
1 TESTIMONY OF YORK COUNTY
{ 2 (PHILLIP STEVEN THOMAS) ON !
EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTIONS 1 AND 7 3
4- Background Information
! 5 O. PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS: i 6 A. My name is Phillip Steven Thomas. My business 7 address is P.O. Box 66, York, South Carolina 29745.
8 O. PLEASE STATE-YOUR JOB TITLE.
i 9 A. I am Director of General Services for York County.
10 O. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR RELEVANT EDUCATIONAL AND 11 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE.
12 A. See my resume which is attached.
13 Q. HAVE YOU ANY PRIOR EXPERIENCE IN THE' AREA OF
! 14. ' EMERGENCY PLANNING?
15 JL. Yes. From 1977 until I became Acting Director of 16 Emergency Preparedness-in 1983, I served as Public 17 Information Officer for York County. 1 ]D1_ tha t 18 capacity, I participated in emergency mock exercises
~
19 Jand tab 1e top exercises. _Also, I distributed-20 -brochures from the State and Federal officesLand was i
t 21 the contact person with the media for the status of l
22 emergencies.
'23 0.- 'WHAT IS THE. PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY?
__ 2 4 A'. The purpose of my_ testimony is to address the T
-25 emergency planning. contentions as they relate to York 26 Countyfs emergency planning efforts.'
k.
1 Q. HAVE YOU READ THE CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 2 GROUP / PALMETTO ALLIANCE CONTENTIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN 3 ACCEPTED AS ISSUES IN THIS PROCEEDING?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. EY WAY OF BACKGROUND, WOULD YOU DESCRIBE THE OVERALL 6 T3RM OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF YORK COUNTY?
7 A. York County has a county manager form of government.
8 There are approximately 15 departments in the County 9 government.
10 Q. WHAT DEPARTMENT ARE YOU IN?
11 A. General Services.
12 Q. WHAT DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT OR GROUP HAVE TO DO WITH 13 EMERGENCY PLANNING?
14 A. The Municipal County Emergency Preparedness Agency is 15 a division of the Department of General Services.
16 Q. IS COORDINATION OF. EMERGENCY PLANNING YOUR USUAL JOB 7 17 A. No, it is not. However, the Director of Emergency 18 Preparedness reports to me so I am generally familiar-19 with York County's emergency planning efforts. Late 20 last year the director of the Municipal County 21 Emergency Preparedness Agency became seriously ill.
22 Due to that illness, he became incapacitated and was 23 unable to fulfill his normal responsibilities and 24 duties, which include a detailed knowledge of York W
- p. .
1 County's emergency planning efforts. One of my
'2 responsibilities was to step in and fulfill the 3 director's duties.
4 Q. DOES YORK COUNTY HAVE A SPECIFIC RADIOLOGICAL 5 EMERGENCY PLAN FOR RESPONDING TO AN EMERGENCY AT 6 CATAWBA?
7 A. Yes. Annex Q in the York County Emergency Operations 8 Plan would be used to respond to a radiological 9 emergency at Catawba.
10 Q. DID YOU PREPARE THIS PLAN?
11 A. No, it was developed by the Director of Emergency 12 Preparedness.
13 Q. DID YOU SUPERVISE THIS INDIVIDUAL IN THE PREPARATION 14 OF THE PLAN?
15 A. Yes. I supervise the Department of General Services 16 of which the division of Emergency Preparedness is a 17- part.
.. 18 Q. 'SINCE THE PREPARATION OF THE PLAN HAVE YOU BECOME 19 FAMILIAR WITH IT?
20 A. -Yes, as I.noted, since.the illness of the Director of 21, ~ Emergency Preparedness, I have assumed his duties.
22 This has required'me to obtain a first-hand knowledge 23- of the plan.
24 Q. HOW DID YOU OBTAIN-SUCH KNOWLEDGE OF THE PLAN?
I
e .,
1 A. I read the plan and met with all relevant individuals 2 and service entities to assure that I fully 3 understood their role and how I was to coordinate 4 their efforts.
5 O. ARE YOU THE YORK COUNTY OFFICIAL RCSPONSIBLE FOR THE 6 PLAN?
7 A. At present, yes.
8 O. PLEASE DESCRIBE GENERALLY YOUR ROLE IN OVERSEEING THE 9 READINESS OF THE VARIOUS COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND 10 AGENCIES THAT ARE INVOLVED IN RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY 11 RESPONSE IN YORK COUNTY.
12 A. I see my role as coordinating all of the separate 13 entities that are involved locally through the 14 different service agencies.
15 O. WOULD YOU BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PLAN?
16 A. Annex 0, as our overall plan does, addresses all the.
17 different components that would have to be addressed 18 in any type of emergency - natural or manmade. It 19 addresses all the different components of a nuclear l
20 incident at Catawba and it breaks them down into such 21 areas as communications,' security, transportation, 22 emergency medical services, and emergency welfare 23 services. All of'the different components that you 24 find outside the nuclear situation are all brought 25 together in Annex 0 in a nuclear situation.
I w w '
e .
1 O. IS THERE ANYTHING IN ANNEX Q WHICH IS SPECIFIC TO 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND THEREFORE IS NOT 3 FOUND GENERALLY IN OTHER KINDS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE?
4 A. There are numerous items that are unique to Annex 0, 5 such as monitoring, decontamination and sheltering 6 (identified in specific shelter sites). Evacuation 7 routes, maps, charts, and graphs' that relate to a 8 specific nuclear incident would also be unique to
.9 Annex 0 and not the other parts the of overall EOP.
10 O. IN YOUR OPINION, DOES THE YORK COUNTY PLAN PROVIDE 11 REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WILL s
12 BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED IN THE EVENT OF A CATAWBA -
13 RELATED NUCLEAR EMERGENCY?
14 A. Yes.
15 O. IS THERE A SECTION OF THE YORK COUNTY PLAN THAT' 16- COVERS THE ISSUES RAISED BY EMERGENCY PLANNING 17 CONTENTIONS 1 AND 7,- WHICH DEAL WITH THE ADEQUACY OF 18 THE PUBLIC INFORMATION-ON EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROVIDED' 19 BY APPLICANTS AND BY COUNTY GOVERNMENTS?
f _20 A. Yes. Annex D (York EOP), Annex Q, Appendix 2.
(
- 21. EPC 1 Testimony 22 Q. WITH REGARD TO EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTION 1, WHAT 23 STEPS EULS YORK COUNTY TAKEN TO - EDUCATE .THE PUBLIC SO 24 AS TO ASSURE APPROPRIATE RESPONSES TO NOTIFICATION
'25 PROCEDURES?
I 1
1 A. Beyond normal media coverage of a county official 2 and/or department being involved in anything, which 3 would be in the local newspaper, there was quite a 4 bit of education at the school age level by our 5 former director prior to his becoming ill. Other 6 public education efforts that the county has been 7 involved in would be through the advisory board.
8 This is made up of several different community 9 leaders from around different parts of the county who 10 ,
attempt to educate other groups, spread the word, so 11 to speak, as far as what's taking place with the 12 emergency planning and the Catawba plant itself. I 13 see this as a general kind of educational process.
14 In addition to those items, officials of the York 15 county governmen,t and I have participated in a public 16 hearing following the emergency planning exercise, 17 and an open house at the Catawba plant where the 18 public has been invited in to become aware of what's 19 taking place there. York-County was represented at
- 20 this open house. Prior to the exercise,-there were l ,
~
21 thirteen different meetings held for the public to 22 come and familiarize themselves and ask questions 23 about what was taking place. - The county was 24 represented at those meetings.
-25 -O. WILL THE COUNTY CONTINUE SUCH EDUCATION. EFFORTS?
26 A. Ye s .-
s y _ _ _
t o 1 Q. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH APPLICANTS' BROCHURE 7 2 A. Yes.
3 Q. DO YOU HAVE AN OPINION AS TO ITS ADEQUACY IN ASSURING 4 APPROPRIATE REPONSES?
5 A. In my opinion it seems to be adequate.
6 EPC 7 Testimony 7 Q. EMERGENCY PLANNING CONTENTION 7 ALLEGES THAT EXISTING B EMERGENCY PLANS DO NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE 9 PREPARATIONS THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN "TO ACHIEVE 10 EFFECTIVE SHELTERING," NOR THE SPECIFIC ACTIONS THAT 11 PEOPLE SHOULD TAKE WHEN ADVISED TO SEEK SHELTER. DO 12 YOU AGREE WITH THIS ARGUMENT?
13 A. No. It would appear to me that people have been 14 adequately advised on these matters through the buke 15 Power brochure and through the county's efforts, 16 which include participation in public information 17 meetings and open houses at the Catawba plant. In 18 addition, if a radiological emergency occurred, the 19 EBS system would be used to reemphasize recommended 20 action for the public.
\
EPC 1 and 7 Glover Attachment BACKGROUND INFORMATION R. M. GLOVER Educational Background B. S. Nuclear Engineering - University of Virginia - 1975 r
Company Experience Joined Company June 9, 1975 - Nuclear Fuels Services Jr. Engineer June 1975 - December 1976 Assistant Engineer January 1977 - June 1979 Associate Engineer June 1979 - October 1980 Emergency Response Coordinator October 1980 - Present In Nuclear Fuels Service, Glover was involved in spent fuel transportation and storage, contracting with agencies for fabrication services and enrichment, special nuclear material accountability, in computer analysis of fuel cycle design, and in following heat -load on spent fuel pools versus cooling capabilities. Glover was the lead individual on the Company's long-term spent fuel storage task force.
In Emergency Planning, Glover has coordinated the. development of the Company's Response Program at all three stations and has ensured compliance with developing regulations in this area. He directed the development and performance of four drills and seven l exercises since 1980 and has maintained the corporate plans as i the organization and facilities have evolved. He has coordinated the installation of three siren. systems (with periodic maintenance), upgraded meteorology systems and developed plant specific transport and diffusion computer models , contracted for and provided input into each station's evacuation time study, coordinated the' development of and revisions to each station's annual public information - brochure , and has worked closely with Federal, State and Local' Officials responsible for the off-site-L planning effort.
l t
t i
L C/1360772 j 04/06/84
b -c ~, . EPC 1 and 7 CRr.ter Attachment PHILLIP F. CARTER -
2300 Vineyard Lane Charlotte, NC 28210 Home: (704) 553-1280 Business: (704) 373-2849 i
EXPERIENCE Ten years public relations experience with large and medium size i
corporations. Direct responsibilities included all phases of media and community relations, the supervision of internal and external publications, planning and coordination of special events such as stockholders' meetings, management conferences and press confer-
] ences. Excellent communications skills and experience in writing news, features, speeches and scripts, and working with suppliers and agencies.
PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT Director, Community Relatiens
- 1983-PRESENT Duke Power Company
, Responsible for the planning and managing of communications programs for plant communities, regulatory and financial groups,
. educational audiences and general customer groups; and for moni-i toring and evaluating communications efforts to ensure consistent i
and accurate information exchange with these groups.
1980-1983 Manager, Public Relations Monsanto industrial Chemicals Company Was charged with public relations responsibilities for this $1.6 billion operating unit of Monsanto . Company. Primary duties included handling the unit's responses to major. public issues, coordinating media relations ' and advising management on issues and trends relating to Monsanto and the chemical industry. Additional duties included P. R. response to emergencies in the areas of pollution, plant and worker safety,- hazardous waste and transportation acci-dents, plus development of product publicity for the unit's Elec-tronics Division. Other responsibilities involved the' production of position and background documents on issues which have potential negative impact on the organization, and the implementation of strategy to effectively communicate the company's position on issues to the media and public.
1979-1980' Public Relations Representative Monsanto Corporate Public Relations Department Produced news and feature stories relating to the company's chemi-cal awareness program. Handled press inquiries and planned and coordinated special events including management conferences and seminars. _ Other duties included assisting in production of corporate annual report and the production of major video and slide programs.
+: b e em si ee-se u--* -n P' e C p eP-- WW>- y r- r- r *ra
t ..
," 1974-1979 Public Relations Officer Citizens & Southern National Bank of S.C.
Directed total public relations activities for statewide banking organization. Duties involved the coordination of all media rela-tions, external and internal publications including company employee newspaper and customer newsletter, and audio visual production.
Other duties included planning special events, such as stockholders meeting, financial analyst meetings and opening of new branch offices.
EDUCATION University of South Carolina. i B.A. Journalism (advertising /public relations) - 1974 Midlands College 54 hours6.25e-4 days <br />0.015 hours <br />8.928571e-5 weeks <br />2.0547e-5 months <br /> in Business Administration Numerous management and professional courses by Monsanto and PRSA/NYU.
PERSONAL Born: April 28,1948
- Married, one child, age 4.
- Served in the U.S. Army, 1969-1971, Honorable Discharge. Hobbies and interests include photography and scuba (certified diver).
~
j PFC wk1
, :4/13/84 1
T y w v
- 1 %'yes -
r
- v v y7 --T w w w-
EPC 1 and 7
\- *
~
. - Birch Attachment
-MARY L. BIRCH
, ADDRESS BUSINESS TELEF10NE: (704') 373-4504
- Nuclear Production Department
- . Duke Power Company i Post Office Box 33189
. Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 ;
PRESENT POSITION i
t The SYSTEM ENGINEER plans, schedules, and directs the activities of the Rad-waste Engineering Section in defining, developing, implementing, and evaluating the effectiveness of radioactive waste management programs at all nuclear i stations..
3 . WORK EXPERIENCE 1976-1982 Health Physicist, Radioactive Waste Management Function, Duke Power C apany 1974-1976 Health Physicist, Programs and Procedures Function, -
Duke Power Company 1972-1974 Assistant Health Physicist, Duke Power Company L 1968-1972 Chemist, State of Wisconsin Radiation Protection Section Certified by the American Board of Health Physics Registered Professional Engineer EDUCATION MS 1974 University of Wisconsin (Radiological Sciences)
BS 1968 University of Wisconsin (Chemistry) .
4 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SOCIETY hBBERSHIP -
I Health Physics Society North Carolina Health Physics Society
' Piedmont Carolinas Section of ANS -
Women Executives l Society.of W men Engineers !
- Nuclear Energy W men f Charlotte Business and Professional Women's Club r CURRENT 03NITTEE ACTIVITIES L AIF Subcommittee on Radiation Education
' AIF Subconmittee cn Low Level Waste. Solidification
^
Utility Nuclear Waste Management Group (UNWIG) Low Level Waste Working Group National Low-Level Waste Program Review Committee' TEONICAL PAPERS AND REPORTS .
Post 4MI Environmental Monitoring Requirements, AIF Conference on Environ- '
~ mental Regulation of the Nuclear Industry: A New Decade, May 1980.
Nuclear Station Post-Accident Sampling Systems, NC Health Physics Society, L May 1981.
~
l Emphasis on the Management in Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management, ANS Tenth Biennial Conference on Reactor. Operating Experience, August 1981.
4 NSAC 23, Nuclear Station Post-Accident Liquid Sampling Systems, developed.by Duke' Power C a pany, January ~1981,- Nuclear Safety Analysis Center, Electric Power Research Institute.-
~
,; October.27, 1983,
' ' EPC 1 and 7 PERSONAL DATA SHEET Duckworth Attachment SUSANNA V. DUCKWORTH 131 Withers Winthrop College ~
Rock Hill, S. C. 29733 - Telephone (803) 323-2151, Ext. 31 Birthplace: Waco, Texas Birthdate: July 16, 1944 Degrees B. A. 1966 Baylor University, Waco, Texas M.Ed. 1969 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Major: Special Education Minor: Psychology Ph. D. 1971 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Major: Special Education Minor: Psychology Training Experience Soeech and Hearing Therapy, 1964-66 Clinical practice with speech handicapped youngsters Public school practice teaching with speech handicapped Clinical practice with speech handicapped adults Pre-school articulation testing with Head Start project Mental Retardation, 1968-71 Master's practicum with Intermediate EMH Class Doctoral Internship teaching Education 65 (undergraduate methods class l
' in Special Education) at UNC-CH .
l Remedial clinic for Intermediate EMR Classes at UNC-CH l
Public School Teaching Experience i Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Charlotte, N.C.
Semi-professional Team Aide, High School EMH Class,1966 Professional-Speech and Hearing Therapist, 1967-68 l
Past Administrative, Supervisory, and other Related Experiences at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Lecturer, 1971-72 l
Supervisor, Special Education Clinic, 1971 C., 1969 Cumberland County Schools, Fayetteville, N.
Consultant to Head. Start Project, Deep Creek Center l
e m ,
Workshops: Cumberland County Schools Title III Learning Disabilities Project,
" Focus on Phonetics" - Spring,1972 Liason Coordinator, Bimodal Instructional Program Durham and Orange County Schools Consultant, Guilford County Schools, Title III Project on Values, 1971-72 Coordinator, Master's Practicum and undergraduate student teaching, Special Education Department, 1971-72 Presenter, North Carolina Council for Exceptional Children Bimodal Instructional Project, etc., Spring, 1972 WINTHROP COLLEGE EXPERIENCE Assistant Professor, i
Temporary, 1972-74 Probationary, 1974-78 Tenured 1978 Associate Professor, Promoted, 1981 Professional Activities College Member, School Psychology Committee, 1972-74, 1981-Member, Comittee for Inauguration of President Vail,1974 Member, Knowledge Estimation Panel,1975, National Teacher's Examination S. C. NTE Validation, Columbia, S. C.
Member, Honors Council, appointed 1978-81 Chairperson, Academic Conduct, appointed 1979-Member, Coordinating Committee for the Teacher Education Program (CCTEP),
elected 1980-83 Coordinator, Presentation of Special Education Honors Program co Board of Visitors, Fall,1979 and 1980 Member, Task Force on General Education, 1981-83 School of Education 1980-81 Chairperson, School of Education Graduate Elections Committee, Member, School of Education Student Advisory Committee, 1977-79 Member, Graduate Executive Committee, 1977-78 Member, Undergraduate Executive Committee, 1978-80 Se:retary, School of Education Faculty Assembly and Graduate Comittee 1974-78 Visitation Committee, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Site Visit Student Teaching Panel, Spring, 1976 l
Visitation Comittee, Gaston County Board of Education, Site Visit Student Teaching Panel, Fall,1976 and Spring,1980 Coordinator, Byrnes Auditorium Activities, Inservice,1979 Member Dean's Advisory Comittee on Student Teaching,1982 Chairperson / Vice Chairperson, Task Force II (Professional),1982-Member, Undergraduate Council of Coordinators,1982-Special Education Faculty Advisor, SED Undergraduate and Graduate students,1974-Faculty Advisor, Winthrop College Student Chapter 595 of CEC,1974-78 Student CEC Executive Comittee, 1974-78
~
Member, Special Education Graduate Curriculum Committee, 1976-78 Author, Special Education section of School of Education Publicity Pamphlet, 1974' m
c; <. _3_
Co-Author Special Education Honors Program and Sp@cial Education 450 Honors Seminar Coordinator, MR Student Teaching, 1973-78 Coordinator, Graduate Field-Based Program - Metro Center, Charlotte, N. C., 1975-77 Coordinator, Graduate Practicum,1974-4 i
Coordinator, Graduate MR (EMH, TMH) Program, 1975-l Coordinator, Graduate Curriculum Committee and Program Development, 1978-Coordinator, Search Censnittee, Special Education,1978-l
, (for three faculty positions)
Visitation Committee - Sacred Heart Special Education Program, Spring,1976 Visitation Committee - Charlotte Rehabilitation Hospital, Spring,1975 l
L Visitation - Charlotte Area Consortium,1978-Participant, Workshop on Evaluation, Dr. Joseph Renzulli, Coordinator, Spring, 1976 Participant, Development of written and visual modules on " Critique Writing" t
for SED, May, 1978 Acting Chairperson, Spring Semester, 1981 Coordinator, Undergraduate Special Education Program Committee, Two Year
? Appointment, 1982-84 Organizations Member, Council for Exceptional Children Member, South Carolina Association for College Teacher Educators Past member, American Association of Mental Deficiency Member, Sigma Alph Eta - National Speech and Hearing Honorary Society l
Member, Kappa Kappa Gamma Sorority l
Member, Phi Delta Kappa 1- Member, Kappa Delta Pi Member, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Member, South Carolina Association of Teacher Educators
[ iiember, Omicron Delta Kappa, National Leadership Fraternity
- Member, Delta Kappa Gamma r
Publications Panyan, M., & Smith, R. Implementing.
Calhoun, M. L., Duckworth, S.V. Inservice training manual.
IEPs in regular and resource classrooms:
University Affiliated Facilities Publication, September,1979.
Duckworth, S.V., The effects of selected visual discrimination conditions on young impulsive retardates.- Unpublished doctoral dissertation.-
University of North Carolina,1971.
Duckworth, S.V., Hall, L.E., & Sadler, J.C. Identification of pre- Winthrop_
vocational competencies'of the educable mentally handicapped.
College Competency Testing Project Monograph, 1980.-
Duckworth, S.V. , Ragland, G.G. , . Somerfeld, R.E. & Wyne, M.D.
American_
Modification of conceptual Journal of Mental ~impulsivity(in Deficiency, 1974, retarded children.
79 1), 59-63.'
Mitchell, M.M. , & Duckworth, S.V. , Bimodal instructional program:
educational: evaluation pamphlet, October,1972.
Duckworth S.V.' A process for teacher education ~ program review rationale--
The Journal South Carolina Association Colleges for a call for reform.
Teacher Education, 1982-83, 7, 19-20.
L
4 ia s Presentations Presenter, North Carolina Council for Exceptional Children Convention ~at Chapel Hill, N. C., April, 1972.
Topic: " Bimodal Instruction Program: The Role of the Cocrdinator" Guest Lecturer, EDU 381, M.T. Littlejohn, Professor, Fall,1972 ,
Topic: " Mental Retardation" l Presenter, Carolina Community Services', Headstart Workshop, March,1974 ~
Topic: " Language Arts for the Mentally Handicapped" Presenter, Headstart Workshop, Fall,1976, Columbia , S. C.
Content on Trainable Mentally Handicapped , ,
Presenter, Headstart Workshop, fall,1976, Rock' Hill, S. C.
y Content on Trainable Mentally Handicapped i
' Guest Lecturer, Center for Human Development, Charlot;e, N.C. , Fall,1976 Topic: "P. L.94-142" .
'e Presenter, Winthrop College, Special Education Week-End Workshop, s
~
December, 1976 i Topic: "Needs Assessment for,Sevec.yly Handicapped" ,
Guest Lecturer, SED 556, M. F. Hawisher, Professor, Spring,1977, Fall,1978, Spring,1979 y
- ~ ,
Guest Lecturer, Kappa Delta' Pi, Spring',1979 s '
',s
~
s Topic: " Exceptional Children * ,
Sprin'g , 1979 '
g' GuestLecturer,SEDMethods(videjtape)"
Topic: "IEP Development ,
x
~
's Speaker, South Carolina Council: for Exceptional Children \ Conference,
- c,s Greenville, S. C. , March,1977.;" Graduate Topic: Program for the Teachers of Retarded and Multihandkapped" l' , ' ,i i Presenter and program coordibator, Council for' Excahional ChIidren,' i ' \ s Kansas City, Mo., Spring, 1978 uy 't . ? s Topic: " Instructional Pro 9 ramming for the Severely = Nultihsndicapped','
Presenter, Southeastern' American Association on Mentdl Deficiency (SEAdE),
November, 1978 v ; &
-A Presenter, IEP Figid Testing Workshop,'May,1979; Wint(voo College 54I,(11-2,1979, Presenter, IEP Implementation Workshop \s, September ? , lg ,
Joynes Center, Winthrop College;' .% -
Presenter, Council for Exceptional 1 Children, Philadelphia ;'Pa. , Spring,1980 Topic: " Determining Pre-vocation,.1 Competencies 'of the Educable g, , '
- , s Mentally Handi,capoed" k' <
i Presenter, Individually Guided Ediication Conference,
Columbiak ' '
S. C.
Summer, 1980 1 Education Plansefor Exceptionalm _
Topic: " ' '
". Children Implementing Individus'r Clagsroom" in. the Regpla Presenter, IEP Implementing Workshop, Gaffney, S. C. , January,1980
- i. g 'i f
e . .
4 '. 1 i Guest Lecturer, SED 681, Spring,1980, North, S. C.
Topic: " Mental Retardation" Presenter, Cour.cil for Exceptional Children, Houston, Texas, Spring,1982 i Topic: " Reducing Anxiety in Student Teachers" i.
Consultation i Consultant, Language Arts Teacher Corps., Region V. , Lancaster, S. C. ,
i 1972-73 Consultant, Language At ts Headstart, Rock Hill, S. C. ,1974 Consultant, Program Evaluator EMH Resource and TMH self-contained classes, York School District #1, May, 1975 Consultant, Language Arts, Fairfield County, 1975-76 Consultant, Orthopedically Handicapped, York School District #1,1976
[ Consultant, Program Development, Metro Center, Charlotte, N. C.,1975-
- F Consultant, 1977, Greenwood,Department of Columbia, S. C. and Mental Retardation,(Needs S. C. two) Assessment, Spring, Consultant, Program Development, Union County Developmental Disabilities Center, 1977-78 Consultant, South Carolina UAF IEP project, 1978-
[.
Consultant, Winthrop College Competency Testing Project - Module Development, May, 1979 '
Consultant, The Exceptional Child in the Regular Class, Elloree, S. C.,
i i October, 1981
! Consultant, Duke Power Company, February,1983 b Workshops and Conferences Attended l
Vocational Rehabilitation Workshop - Visually Handicapped, Spring,1973 South Carolina Educational TV Conference Workshop, Fall,1975 j- Renzulli Workshop, Evaluation, Spring, 1976 Queen's College Workshop, Values, Fall, 1975 Central Piedmont Community College, Perceptual Motor Workshop - Fall,1975 l
' South Carolina Council for Exceptional Children, Charlotte, N. C. -
l Spring, 1977
' North Carolina Council for Exceptional Children, Charlotte', N. C. - '
Fall, 1976, 1977, 1980 Winthrop College, Week-End Workshops, Fall, 1975-77 Civic Member / participant of the Myers Park Traditional School Parent / Teacher's Association, 1972-78 l
" Member / participant, Kappa Kappa Gamma Philanthropic Activities,1978 L- Member, United Cerebral Palsy Parents Council, Charlotte, N. ~ C. ,1981-
' Chairperson, Progessional Services Sub-Committee of United Cerebral Palsy Parents. Council, 1981-
-Grants Author U. S. Office of Education proposal, Metro Center, Charlotte, N.C.,
' Fall, 1977-4 Honors The World Who's'Who of Women in Education '
Kappa Delta Pi: Appreciation Certificate for' financial and
~
[ contin'ued support. May, 1983. .
i [ '
- June, 1983 L
- . .= ,- - ~ - -,-. .. - - - .. - - _ .
EPC 1 and 7 p .,
Pugh Attachmsnt A i JESSE THOMAS PUGH, III 713A Grove Avcnun Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 Home (919) 851-3467 office (919) 733-3867 PERSONAL Date of Birth: November 19, 1947 Place of Birth:
Asheboro, North Carolina Age: 36 Height: 5'5" Weight: 150 lbs. Health: Excellent 1;rried: September 1, 1973, to Sandra Strader of Caswell County, North Carolina EDUCATION 1961-1965 ASHEBORO HIGH SCHOOL Asheboro, North Carolina Degree: College Prep.
Clubs and Organizations
-Business Manager for Annual, 1965
-Treasurer for Future Teachers, 1965
-Drama Club, Journalism Club
-Quill and Scroll Club, Wrestling Team 1/81-Present NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Raleigh, North Carolina Enrolled in Masters of Public Administration Program, School of Political-Science and Public Administration .
Spring 1982 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Raleigh, North Carolina Computer Applications Certificate Program MPA, School of Political Science
'7/65-5/69 BS in Textile Technology NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Raleigh, North Carolina Clubs and Organization: Sigma Nu Fraternity
-(House Manager 1966-67)
L Honors: Dean's List Student last three semesters l Fall 1980 GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE INSTITUTE l
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina l August 1967- NORTH CAROLINA OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ~
Morganton, North Carolina MILITARY 6/69-4/72 UNITED STATES' MARINE CORPS
' Honorably. Discharged
~ Highest Rank:' First Lt.
Occupations: Supply Officer --responsible for ordering,.
controlling, . stocking,-and warehousing all supplies for
.a_ Battalion; Fiscal Office - -responsible for budgeting.
t -and accounting for all Battalion funds.
i i.
M
- f e .
EMPLOYMENT 5/82-present Division Director, North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Division of Emergency Management, Raleigh, North Carolina Responsible for the State of North Carolina emergency response and planning. This includes the coordination of all emergency response activities of the 17 State agencies. Serve as State Coordinating Officer and Governor's Authorized Representative in all disaster related matters. In addition to these duties, when I was promoted to Director the Deputy Director position was abolished, and I retained all the duties and responsibilities of that position.
5/79-5/82 Assistant Director, for same division, promoted to Deputy Director May 1980. Responsibile for daily operations of the Division. Supervise 53 emplo:rees, administer budget of approximately $2 million, managed grant program to local governments, represent
- the State in business transactions and in meetings with local and federal government.
7/78-5/79 Area Coordinator for same division, then called Division of Civil Preparedness.
Office located in Asheboro, North Carolina.
- Responsible for a 15-county area, working with local coordinators and governmental officials in preparing plans to prevent and/or respond to disasters, both natural and man-made. Also responsible for arranging specialized training ar local volunteers and governmental en,loyees.
1/73-7/78 Funeral Director / Manager of Pugh Funeral Home, Inc., Asheboro, North Carolina Responsible for counseling with families, arrangement of details of Funeral Services, assisting.in filing of benefits with Social Security, veterans.Adminis-tration, and other agencies. Also responsible for normal office routine, upkeep of' building.and grounds, and normal maintenance.
10/72-12/72 Shift Supervisor,' Textured Fibres, Inc., Liberty, North Carolina Responsible.for scheduling job assignments, maintain-ing production records,. achieving consistent acceptable production levels, and maintaining mo' rale.
m . o
a e CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS Current Member of North Carolina State Alumni Association Member of North Carolina State Wolfpack Club Member of Wake County Democratic Mens Club Former Member of Asheboro Jaycees, Treasurer in 1974 Member of Randolph Asheboro YMCA, serving on program committee, nominating committee, Board of Directors, and Secretary in 1978 Director of Randleman' Heart Fund in 1977 Worker in United Appeal O
e 6
e
. 11
.. r . EPC 1 and 7 Lunnford Attcchmint PAUL R. LUNSFTD, Sr Chief Area Coordinator, Emergency Preparedness Division, Office of the Adjutant General, State of South Carolina Bachelor of Science, Clemson College, 1950 Easter of Science, Shippensburg State College, PA,1972 US Army: Advanced Infantry Officers Course, 1957 Command and General Staff College,1962 War College, 1972 Italian Azty War College,1966 Regular Arv Officer (Infantry) 1950-1980 Lieutenant 1950-5h Captain 195h-61 Majer 1961-65 Lieutenant Colonel 1965-70 Colonel 1970-80 Infantry Platoon Leader, Korea 1950-51 Infantry Conpany Commander, Europe & USA 195h-56 Staff & Faculty,Infcntry School, 1958-60 Staff O'ficer, US Military Mission, Saudi Ara'oia 1962-63 s Executive Officer, Air Assault Battalion, USA 1963-6h Student, Defense Language Institute 1965 Staff Officer, lieadquarters, Allied Land Forces Southern Europe, Italy 1966-68 Parachute Battalion Commander, Viet Nam 1969 Training Brigade Comnander, USA 1970-71 Staff & Faculty, US Arg Nar College 1972-80 (Chief of Staff 1979-80)
Energency Preparedness Coordinator I & II, SCEPD 1980-82 Chief, Plans Section, SCEPD 1982-83 Chief Area Coordinator, SCEPD 1983-Present Employment Address: Emergency Preparedness Division, OTAG 1h29 Senate Street Columbia, S.C. 29201 ne
%s
- __ . _ . _ __-__L:___-- _ _ _ _ - - - - - . - _ _ . - _ . _ _ - _ _ _ .
EPC 1 and 7 McSwain Attachmtnt' RESG E Name William M. ItSwain Address 28 D Tanhrk Drive, Colunbia, S. C. 29210 Phone Office: 803-758-2826 Home: 803-772-3003 Personal Data Age: 32 DOB: tbvember 21, 1951 Marital Status: Married Height: 215 Health: Excellent Education 1967-70 A. C. Flora High School, Colunbia, S. C.
1970 Midlands Technical College, Coluubia, S. C.
1972 University of South Carolina Career Education Courses 1975 Civil Defense USA 1976 Civil Defense Ihnagement 1977 Nuclear Civil Protection Planning 1981 Civil Defense Director / Coordinator 1981 Introduction to Radiological Ibnitoring 1982 Radiological Defense Officer 1982 Radiological Bnergency Planning 1983 Career Development Phase I 1984 Exercise Design Course Military Experience 1970-78 Operations N00 in the US Army Reserve (360th CA Brigade) Colunbia, S. C.
1982-present Disaster Preparedness Specialist - SC Air National Guard Colunbia, S. C.
7.-- -.
y - y
.- i McSwain Resume (continued)
Bmloyment Record ~
1981-present S.C. Emergency Preparedness Division (Exercise / Training Officer since March 1984)
Previously Area Coordinator responsible for development of plans and procedtres for York Cotnty, Catawba Nuclear Station /S.C. Site Specific Plan coordinated with Federal, State, local Government, Utilities and adjoining States in the preparation of the Catawba Plans.
1980-81 Tape & label Engineering - St. Petersburg, Florida Traveled South Carolina and Georgia representing this firm.
1980 Sixteen-Ten Corporation, Cblunbia, S. C.
Managed a restaurant in Colunbia, S. C.
1978-80 MDC, Inc., Columbia, S. C.
Co/0wner and General Manager of three furniture stores.
1974-78 S.C. Disaster Preparedness Agency Develeped plans and procedures for State and local Goverrment for use in emergency situations. Coordinated with Federal, State and Iocal governments in development ,
of preparedness programs.
References Available upon request l
r e EPC 1 and.7 Phillips Attachment RESUME OF BOB E. PHILLIPS I am a lifelong resident of Gaston County. I completed my GED (General Equivalency Degree 7) in 1967. In 1972, I received
- - an _ Associate of Arts Degree from Gaston College. In 1975, I
- received the advanced Law Enforcement Certificate from the Criminal Justice Training and Standards Council. I am also a certified instructor through the criminal Justice Training and
. Standards Council.
Relevant courses taken include:
Credit Hours February 1966 Introduction to Police Science 160 hrs.
February 1968 First Aid. 12 hrs.
March 1969 Riot Control 116 hrs.
February 1970 Supervision of Law Enforcement
! Personnel 12 0 hrs .
- February. 1970 Radiological Monitoring 16 hrs.
April 1970 Ambulance Attendant 28 hrs.
January 1971 Disaster Aid 8 hrs.
, January 1971 Defensive Driving 8 hrs.
June 1972 Police Traffic Supervision 105 hrs.
October 1972 Radar Speed ~ Operation 8 hrs.
l November 1970 Supervision of Police Personnel 80 hrs.
I April 1974 Instructor Training 40 hrs.
l July 1974 Firearms Instructor Training 48 hrs.
l March 1975 Defensive Driving 8 hrs.
I June 1975 First Aid MM 8-hrs.
February. 1976 Public Development Seminar 40 hrs.
, July- 1976 S& W Armorers' School 80 hrs.
l March 1977 -Defensive Driving 8 hrs.
July 1977 Firearms Instructor. Training 48 hrs.
September 1977 Hostage Situations 4 hrs.-
July 1978 Hazardous Devices School 120 hrs.
! October.- 1978 Hazardous Materials Seminar 8 hrs.
l September 1978 Traffic Records _ 6 hrs.
. April 1979 Law Enforcement & The Fuel Shortage _
11 hrs.
- May 1979 Protection'for VIPS .16 hrs.
l September 1979 Police Traffic Records 6-hrs.
- l. March '1980 Plans-& Operations Course 40 hrs.
L May- 1980 Emergency. Vehicle Operations 24 hrs.'
E February _ 1981? Civil Defense: USA-L JApril. 1981: Radiological Emergency Response '
80 hrs.
40_ hrs.
-June: 1981.; Plans &. Operation August- :1981 FEMA Phase-1An 40 hrs..
August ~ '1982 FEMA ~ Phase.lB
! 1983 . Numerous Emergency Management Courses l
lx
- n. , . , -
e , EPC 1 cnd 7 Brooms Attachment A i
RESUME PERSONAL DATA: Lewis Wayne Broome Age: 39 Date of Birth: July 16, 1944 7209 Twillingate Drive Charlotte, North Carolina 28215 Telephone: (704) 568-2171 (Home) 374-2412 (business)
Marital Status: Divorced - Ms. Pamela H. Broome One Child: Pamela Kay.Broome Age: 7 Health: Good EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: Graduated from Central Davidson High School Lexington, North Carolina - 1963
! College: Central Piedmont Community College l Charlotte, North Carolina l Associa'.e Degree Business Management - 1971 Belmont Abbey College
-Belmont, North Carolina B. A. Degree Sociology - 1977 WORK EXPERIENCE: 7/79-Current: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Emergency Management Office 951 South Independence Boulevard, Room 655 Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Title:
Administrative Officer I/ Operations Officer Duties: Inspect shelters that are' part of National- Shelter
[ ESystem; administer surplus property program; I coordinate multi-agency-emergency response; develop plans and procedures to meet federal and state requirements for all hazards; respond'to media
- concerns upon request; speak to various civic,
. church, and business organizations on disaster planning; help with budget preparation decisions.
-l
, , ~ _ - , . -
q ..-
WORK EXPERIENCE: 9/77-7/79: Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services (Continued) 301 Billingsley Road Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
Title:
AFDC Applications Caseworker Duties: Interviewed and investigated clients for public assistance programs. Process involved numerous contacts with elements of the public and private sector.
x 1975-1977:
Full-time student at Belmont Abbey College 8/72-8/75: . Pound and Moore Company 1447 South Tryon Street Charlotte, North Carolina i
Title:
Salesman / Stock Room Supervisor Duties: General sales of office supplies and furniture; supervised stock room staff and procedures for i filling orders 10/67-7/,72: Celanese Corporation Barclay Down Drive Charlotte, North Carolina
Title:
Stationery Clerk Duties: Responsible for filling orders of basic stationery
, items; worked in~ area of forms control;. assisted
-in budget process; responsible for-ordering basic stationery items.
MILITARY STATUS: 1963-1967: Serve'd.in the~U.S. Navy - Honorable discharge in11967.
Currently serving in'U.S. Navy Reserve. Obligation
-consists of two weeks each year of active duty and one weekend each month. Active duty is.normally in the months of either June, July,'or. August.
- SPECIAL.
. TRAINING: LSee attached sheet? titled, " Business,. Trade, or
- Military-Training". .
~ ~
e
&m-
e ~
CAREER GOALS: To develop and maintain the necessary skills and training to ensure that the plans and procedures for proper response to major disasters are in place, and that the various departments, agencies, and per-sonnel are in unison for response to major disasters. To seek fulfillment of my personal goals through a good employment environ-ment that combines good pay and job challenge.
REFERENCES : Kenneth D. Williams (Retired; former Emergency Management Director) 215 Circle Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28207 Telephone: 374-0819 Edwin H. Capin, Director Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services 301 Billingsley Road, Charlotte, NC 28211 Telephone:- 374-3020 Ben Judkins, Chairman Department of Sociology Eelmont Abbey ' College, Belmont, NC 28012 Telephone: 825-3711 Andy Clark, Manager FCX Farm and Garden Supplies
[
6915 Lawyers Road, Charlotte, NC 28212 l
l Walker Busby (Self-employed accountant) 1005 Norwich Road, Charlotte, NC 28212 Telephone: 537-4058-i s
+
.-. . _- - - - -- - . . ~ . . . _ _ _ -
p- ~ ..
BUSINESS, TRADE, OR MILITARY TRAINING No. of Date ' Title of Course / Sponsor Hours 09/79 Radiological Monitoring Instructor's Course - Staff College 24 i
09/79 Civil Defense U.S.A. -
Staff College 10 l
10/79 Introduction to Radiological Monitoring - Staff College 15 03/80. Civil Defense Director / Coordinator - Staff College 15 1
04/80 Municipal Supervisory Certification Program - City of Charlotte- 26.5 3
- 03/80 Plans and Operations Workshop - N.C. State Government 12
- 06/80_ Career ~ Development ~ Course,. Phase I - Federal Government 37.5 06/81-Planst and Operations Workshop - N.C. State Government 12 09/81 Career Development Course, Phase II -Federal ~ Government 66 10/81 Coordinaded Response to-Radiation' Emergencies UNCC -
Member of Presentation Panel - Federal Government 08 01/82 Radiological' Monitoring Instructor.'s Course Update '
~.N.C.iState
, . Government. 16 07/82 Radiological Emergency Training - U.S.fDepartment of Energy, j ? Nevada Proving Grounds 75 i
- 03/83' Career Development Course, Phase III - Fed,eral Government-66 06/83 Safety Systems Hazardous Material-Incident Prevention & Control Seminar / Workshop . - Charlotte' Fire Department . .16
~
09/83 Southern Railway f Hazardous Material Response Seminar - N.C.
Emergency. Management Association- 08-Sub-total 407
.U.'S.' Military Training -EClassroom. _ . _
.40-
-1On thefJob Training-as-Reservist: 500 plus
- TOTAL '947 !
1 J w
$ -y 3 w T
y , EPC 1.and 7 Thomas Attachm:nt RESUME PHILLIP STEVEN THOMAS PERSONAL
. Residence 1623 Farmstead Road, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730 telephone (803) 328-0409 Birthdate August 17, 1948 Marital Deborah Porter, two children Health General health excellent SSN 251-78-5818 EDUCATION 1967-1972 University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina Bachelor of Arts, Political Science 1962-1966 Rock Hill High School, Rock Hill . South Carolina
'High School Diploma 1954-1962 Central Elementary School, Rock Hill, South Carolina
' EMPLOYMENT 1979 to York County Department of General Services,- York, South present . Carolina. Director of General Services: - Manage the organization functions of Emergency Preparedness, Personnel, Building and Codes, Fire Prevention / Inspection, Procurement i and Property' Management, Medical Indigent Services and Social Services Block- Grants.
1977-1979 York County Building and Codes Department, York South Carolina. Building Official: . Responsible for.the.overall conduct of the program of reviewing and approving building plans and specifications and of inspecting buildings and facilities to ensure compliance with various building construction and fire' safety codes'and regulations, managing
. operations of the department.
1974-1977 Lexington County' Planning Department, Lexington, South Carolina, i Building Inspector: Conducted-inspections'of'huilding construction to' assure compliance with all codes as required by building construction codes and regulations.
1973-1974 . Geneva Construction Company, Columbia, South' Carolina.
Proj ect Coordinator for Raintree Project, duties -included
~ labor materials management.
4
.\
- i. ~ . ,
o' * *
- o.
PROFESSIONAL TRAINING ICMA Personnel Administration Course Certificate - Managers and Administrators Institute-Bureau of Governmental Research at USC.
MEMBERSHIPS City / County Managers Association Personnel Association of South Carolina Counties International Personnel Management Association (IPMA)
' Building Officials Association of South Carolina State Association of Plumbing, Cas, Mechanical Inspection f International Association of Electrical Inspectors l
National Academy of Code Administration Energy Futures-Task Force - currently serving as county representative State Budget and Control Board Technical Committee for Loce.1 Government Training - statewide county representative AMI Business Coalition for Health Care Catawba Employers Health Council Catawba Center for Health Promotion - serving as Secretary Planning Committee Member of Three Rivers Health Service Agency PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES J. E. Klugh, County Manager, York County, York, South Carolina telephone (803) 684-9261 Donald W. Myers, D.P.A.
l telephone (804) 257-1600 - business l (803) 747-6285 - home i
- Melvin McKeown, Attorney at Law, York, South Carolina l
telephone (803) 684-4851 i
I l
l I
l I
,e , , --.. -