ML20083F912

Quality Confirmation Program, Monthly Status Rept for Nov 1983

ML20083F912
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	12/08/1983
From:	CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20083F888	List: ML20083F906 ML20083F912
References
NUDOCS 8401040026
Download: ML20083F912 (30)

Text

- - - - -

THE CIfiCI!!!iATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY WM. H. ZIMMER fiUCLEAR POWER STATION QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM (OCP)

MONTHLY REPORT ,

FOR l10 vel'BER 1983 SUBMITTED:

60ues ltl 0+ izhhs Ugettq.r - QCP 4

og{6g0 0 Se PDR i

l l

QCPIGNTHLY. REPORT

.o l .

l l

SUMMARY

The QCP staff has reviewed each task in light of the current status and the recommendations provided by Bechtel for the transition into PVQC.

A response has been provided in GC-0216 dated November 20, 1983. For those tasks which can be completed in their entirety prior to the postu-lated starting time for the PVQC, in-depth reviews of task progress and ,

any restraints are being performed to ensure timely task completion.  !

Specific restraints to task progress are being investigated and appropriate i action is being taken to either eliminate the restraints or to make adjust-ments to the programs to allow continued progress without affecting the quality of product.

• The activities of Task 1 in the drywell are an example of this effort.

Restraints to our inspections of structural steel welds caused by lack of

. sufficient support in the area of paint removal were reduced through a coordinated effort of the QCP staff working with Bechtel, NCD and HJK.

This resulted in completed inspections of welds on 995 of all structural steel' beams in the drywell over the last two months and inspections have begun in areas outside the.drywell.

The review of small bore pipe welding" data in Task 2 and 4 'is all but complete. The review of welder qualifications has stopped due to the document control indexing program instituted by Bechtel.

~

No progress was achieved in Task 3. The QCPP 9.19 procedure change and related training have been completed, which will provide sufficient QCP controls of our review to eliminate the concerns outlined in CG&E CAP,83-124. The purchase order revisw has stopped due to the document control indexing program.

Progress in Task 7 was imoroved this month with reassignments and relocation of task personnel. Clarification .throu.gh revision of the pro-cedures for voided NR and surveillance report reviews is expected to improve performance next month.

A draft final report for Task 8 was reviewed internally and by S&L and will be revised next month. The report to su=arize Task 6 is now being reviewed and will be revised next month.

~

~

QCP !OfiiHLY hEPORT SUM.ARY Cont ' d.

The results of Task 9's review to date of DDC reference on inspection reports will be issued in an interim report next month. An evaluation of these results should provide a basis for implementing procedural changes to engineering interface, cor.ttruction, and inspection procedures for PVQC and CCP.

I In the areas of bolting (Task 12), masonry walls (Task 13), and seismic columns (Task 14), QCP staff are continuing to work with NED in the development of reinspection criteria.

Lengthy procedure reviews of OPP 3.8 and QCPP 9.52 have impeded the re-start of the seismi( interaction walkdown efforts b'y Task 16. This walkdown  ;

effort resumed in November in special areas only. New criteria is antic-  !

ipated from S&L which will significantly reduce the scope of the walkdown. ,

The QCP staff has increased its attention to task progress and projected interfaces with PVQC. An internal managenent review program has been formally established and will provide a more timely identification and resolution of any potential procedural problems that might arise. A Procedure Coord.inator h: H een a'ssigned to expedite procedure development and reviews. An eval-uation of our commitments to Exhibit 17 was performed to determine QCP's adherence to these commitments. A summary ' status of QCP conformance to Exhibit 17 action items has been prepared and is being reviewed.

. QCp ID' 1" Y iD CT.'

TASK I: STRUCTURI.L STEEL DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK Inspections of welding on structural steel includes all structural ri. embers and their associated welds. This month the primary inspection effort was dedicated to the drywell. Inspections on beams iri other Category I buildings are being performed in the service water structure.  :

Approximately 1,050 beams have previously beer. documented on " generic" nonconformancereports(NR). These beams are being reinspected and

" specific" NRs are being written, where applicable, to provide additional information which is requir'ed for engineering evalua, tion of the welding deficiencies. i This task currently has 26 people assigned, including 16 inspectors.

PROGRESS Welds on a total of 456 beams were inspected this month, of which 270 beems were found to have welding deficiencies. The results of these inspections and a , summary of ' progress achieved to date are shown in the attached Table I-1 for beam inspections and I;RE written. Interim reports will be issued as inspections in each area are completed. -

This task is estimated to be approximately 72S complete. .

Drywell inspections are scheduled to be completed by December 15, 1953 and the balance of inspections by April 30, 1984.

PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION Reduced support work to OCP by Bechtel and H.'J. Kaiser has decreased the production rate of cleaning of welds for inspection in the drywell er:d other Category I buildings resulting in an ex'tensibn in the scheduled ccmpletion. Additional support effort has been requested of Eechtel.

1 ,

QCP M0!1THLY REPORT TABLE I-1 TASK I -

SUMMARY

OF STRUCTURAL STEEL IllSPECTIO"5

. TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCEliT PERCEtlT MAfiH3URS ESTIMATED

1. OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS ITEM ,

ITEMS

• THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS ft0. TO COMPLETE Drywell 1,084 425 1,074 39 99 2,125 1,000 2,497 0 2,137 0 85 0 2,160 Aux.. Bldg.

Serv. Water 324 5 55 155 1,626 Bldg. 595 31 .

Reactor Bldg. 1,661 ,0 338 0 20 0 7,938 Generic NRs 1,716 1,050 0 764 0 73 0 to reinspect -

(Included in above by area)

Totals 5,837 456 3,873 11 72 2,725 14,440

• Structural steel. members .

MONC0tlFORMAflCE

SUMMARY

1,528 tiRs written to date ++

13 CERs written to date

• • These I;Rs primarily document deviations from the erection specification associ-ated with' visually inspected structural members. A deficiency breakdown is pro-vided below, noting that one NR can cover more than one deficiency.

DEFICIENCY BREAKDOW" Deficiency Type Conditions identified Marking 636

' Welding 5,547 Base Metal 160 Installation 1,227 Documentation 11 Reentrant Corners 456 E,037 Total number of Deficicncies

1. . QCP !'::CHLY REi0F.T l l

TASK II: WELD QUALITY  !

1

. l DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK Welder qualification records are being reviewed to ensure that proper documentation exists. NRs are being generated when deficiencies are identi- o fied during this review. To date, the total number of welder stamps (approxi-mate number of welders) subject to review is 2,364 Small bore piping installation packages are being reviewed for veld rod heat number traceability. Discrepancies between documentation and drawings, duplication of weld' numbers, altered information on.the documentation, and ,

missing documentation are being identified on NRs.  !

QCP procedure for weld rod control procedures review is in the final ,

review and approval stage.

There are currently 8 people assigned to this task.

PROGRESS

~~A total of '83 welder qualifications were reviewed this month. Addi-tional defects not identified by HJK's review of these documents r.esulted in the writing of 16 NRs. A total of 70 small bore packages were reviewed resulting in the writing of 23 NRs. .

The results for this month and a summary of task progress to date is

~

given in Table 11-1. Tables II-2 and 11-3 provide a breakdown of NRs written and deficiencies identified.

This task is estimated to be approximately 89% complete.

ihe expected completion date for welder qualification reviews is January 31, 1984 and for filler material traceability (small bore) is December 31, 1983. .

PROELEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTICh The necessary su'pport work to QCP (packages for review) by Eechtel and H. J. Kaiser has decreased to zero. Measures are being taken to provide appropriate direction to Bechtel to provide the requisite support.

QC? C%itb t E: C:-

TABLE 11-1 ,,

TASK II: SU!O1ARY OF WELD QUALITY REVIEWS TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT pERCEtiT MANHOURS ESTIMATED EXPENDED MA!; HOURS

1. OF COMPLETED- C0!iPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED TTEM ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS M0!!TH TO DATE THIS M0. TO COMPE:TE Struct. KE-1 (Appx) .(Appx) II) 11,000 0 11,000 0 100 0 200 Review Lg. Bore (Appx) 9,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,500(2).

Pipe Welding

'Pr;;cedure

-Review 91(3)- 0 ,

91(3) 0 100 0 0(I)

Welder .

Qual. Re- 80' 240 400(1) review 2,364 83 1,887 4

~ Weld rod ^

0 0 0 0 0 0 ,

control 0 Final review -

small bore 2,693* 70 2,681 99 360 920 II) pipe pkgs. 5 25,148 153 15,659 3 90 600 3,020 TOTAL

+ Based on actual count of piping line list

!!otes: s (1) Interim reports on ' hese t subtasks are being prepared.

(2) This subtask will be performed in Task III. '

(3) This is a combination of administrative and technical revieves of weldin@ procedures.

NONCONFORMANCE SUM:1ARY 987 NRs written to date**

172 CERs written to date

• • Table 11-2 provides the breakdown of the 261 NR's for weld'er qualification. p 726 NR's were writtei for small bore filler material traceability and will be summarized next month. .e

o=- .r < -

y C. _. ,- ^3' OCP !40NTFLY P.E'OR7

'f" j' ,, 1 9 .

^

TABLE 11-2 i -

s ,

+

'..  ;.s; J . .

r

.P  :< .T.ASK 11:

1-WELDER CDALJ. !CATIO!4 h04 CONFORMA 4CES .

. r' ',

CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED GENERIC DEFICIENCY "i[ .t ,

A) Unacceptable Final,Signatur( f 1 B) Incorrect Type of Bend Tests , 1 l C) Failure to Implement Corrective Action 1 l D) Unqualified Welder Welded I  ;

E) Dual RT Reports .

1 F) Level I RT_ Acceptance 1 G) Certifying Code Not Designated 2 3

jfl H) Alteced Information Which Now Conflicts ,

1) Discrepant Date of Certification 4

i. ,

5 J) Test Data Conflicts with WPS Certification of, Unapproved WPS 6 K) .

~

8

-}p L) Omitted Information 9

M) Altered Information 10 j~ N) One Position T$st/All Position Qual.

0) Star.p Issuance Date ,

14 P)~~Unverifiabis-QC Inyolvement- ,19 Q) Missing Docukentation 95 R) Conflicting -Information 116 TOTAL 277 .

j,;.

Note: 261 NRs issued to date with the above 277 -total conditions

^

identified.

(4,.

C'

'" A*

E e

9 V

_J

=

, .O !

~

'~

QCP IO:,iEi :.Ei0iG TASK III: HEAT f;UP.5ER TRACEABILITY DESCRIPTI0ft 0F CURREllT TASK This task involves a review of small and large bore piping installa-tion documentation for material traceability by HJK under their procedures and a 100% confirmatory review by QCP.

~

The purchase order review is conducted by HJK to ensure that the package'is complete and to identify the validity of heat. numbers for materials received on site. The QCP confirmatory review of the HJK ef' fort had been suspended pending razlution of QCP generated deficiency documents (CERs and CARS). An interim QCP program has been developed to allow contin-ued review of purchase order packages pending resolu' tion of deficiency

~

documents. .

This task has 4 people assigned who are currently being trained to the interim program and are preparing an interim task report.

PROGRESS

?!o small . bore piping packages.were reyiewed this month because HJK-document review; program is being restructured under Bechtel direction.'

f;o purchase order packages were revie.ed this month although HJK is continuing their as'sembly and review of these packages. Table 111-1 summarizes Task III progress to date.

This . task is estimated to be approximately 40'; complete and is scheduled for completion by April 30, 1984. The remaining effort and completion dates need to be reviewed based on resolution of HJK efforts and schedules.

PROBLEMS At:D CORRECTIVE ACT10'1

-Review of piping installation packages for material traceability has ceased, based on Bechtel's recommendations of documentation priorities. This review will continue under the proposed PVQC. The necessary support work to QCP (packages'for rev,iew) by Bechtel and H. J. Kaiser has decr ased to zero affecting the comoletion date. Measures are being taken tc vide appropriate direction to Bechtel.

.s.

.- ', OCP-!PNTFLY PErnr7 .

TABLE III-I TASK III -

SUMMARY

OF HEAT NUMBER TRACEABILITY TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT KANHOURS ESTIMATED

1. OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS ITEM ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MO. TO COMPLETE' Sm. Bore Doc. 2,725 ISK ~0 640 0 23 0 1,200 Sm. Bore Walkdown' 2,725 ISK 0 2,691 0 100 0 0(2)

Lg.l Bore 380 PSK 0 0 0 0 0 3,300 Doc. (Appx.) -

'Lg. Bore 380 PSK O' 0 0 0 0 1,500

.Walkdown (Appx.)

Purchase 4.196 0 (864)(1) 0 (21)(1) 0 7,000, Order Rev.

Gamma.Plua 403 0 403 0 100 0 0 50.55(e)M-56 TOTAL 10,809 0 3,734 0 40 0 13,000

. (854)

Hotes: .(1) The numbers included in parentnesis inoicate reviewed pacieges .that teill require re-review based on resolution of deficiency dccuments.

(2) Interim reports on'these subtasks are being prepared.

NONCONFORMANCE SUJMRY Small Bore For NRs see Table 111-2 10 CERs written to date Purchase Orders -

No NRs written '

15 CERs written to date Gamma Pluas 10 NRs written .

.g.

t

.  ;CT !O C i:.Y id; d .

5 TABLE III - 2 TASK III - SMALL BORE N0tiCONFORMANCES 4

GENERIC TYPE NUMBER OF NRs Traceability (Ht! in field disagrees 128 with Ht# on inst. records)

Design pressure discrepancy 16 ,

Valves mislabled 1 Code Boundry on weld / valve not I designated -

Paint removal 6 TOTALS 152

L,

, '. QCP MONTHLY RESOTT L q . TASK IV: SOCKET WELD DISENGAGEMENT

^

DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK The small bore documentation packages are reviewed to determine if evidence of socket disengagement was present prior to welding the joint.

.This review is performed by Task II personnel at the time the small bore packages are reviewed for completeness under that task.

There are no personnel assigned to this task. All manhours expended are changed to Task II.

PROGRESS -

Reviews of 30 systems have been completed, with 2,681 small bore packages' examined, covering 28,297 socket welds. 'A total of 2 693 small

- bore _ packages w'ill'be reviewed for 33 systems.

. Of the 28,297 socket welds reviewed, documented evidence of disengagement ,

was not available for 743 welds. To date 405 welds have been accepted per RT, while 130 rejected. 23 were flange welds, which were visually accepted and 31 still require RT. The remaining 154 welds were justified as being hanger attachment or seal welds, or were no longer installed. Any NRs written as a

~

result of this ' askt are' included in theTask 11 summary of URs for.smill bore piping.

This task is approximately 995 complete and is scheduled for completion by December 31, 1983.-

. PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION See Task 11 for concern regarding small bore package review.

O 4

e

OCF t;0iGHLY i.D M,1 TASK V: RADIOGRAPHIC SHIfCil!;G DESCRIPTIONOFCURRENTTt3 No work was performed this month. The final report for this task has been issued to and approved by the National Board and the State of

-Ohio. This' report also has been submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory

,, Commission (NRC) for'their approval.

PROGRESS Reviews.Were conducted on a total of 4,296 radiographs and the task l is 100% complete. , ,

l l PROBLEtiS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 1-Awaiting approval of the Task V Final Report by URC Region III.

No schedule date is available. ,

~,-

. Q3 tz'D._ : r,Ei t ,

TASkVI: CAELE SEPARATION DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK Inspections have been completed on essential, associated, and non-essential cables in selected areas to determine that appropriate electrical

' separation criteria were satisfied. There are currently no people assigned to this task.

PROGRESS Over 3,000 cables, cable trays, sleeves, and floor penetrations were inspected by this task. A total of 1,236 nonconformance reports (NR) were written for separation, identification, and rQuting deficiencies, a more detailed summary of which is provided in Table VI-1. Additionally, 31 CER's were initiated, resulting in the issuance'of 6 CAR's. A final report covering the Task VI inspections and categorizing the tyDe of NRs ,

issued has been prepared.

This task is approximately 995 complete and the final report was reviewed in November 19E3 and will be issued in December 1983.

REfLEf'.S ADD CORRECTIVE ' ACTION S&L has analyzing r.on-IE segregated code cables (connected to'IE

-Bus) which are listed on drawing E-2E0 sheet 2. The analysis resulted s

~

in the issuance of DDC SLE-580 dated November 14, 1983, which reidentified these cables as associated. This reclassification requires a new inspec-tion to ensure that the cables a'dhere to the more restrictive routing criteria. This-inspection may be performed under the scope of the proposed PVQC.

O e

_ _~,,_ -.,-_-__ . .. .

%~ m m m m _

s s

TABLE VI -1

=_.

r a

g E .

E

' h CG&E PROCEDURE NUMBER TOTAL tms

= --r asgr" rr 11;r. ;;traLR OF N0?iCO'4F00WfCE REPORTS (fA) GEttERATED BY BY DEFICIEtlCY 19-0A-31 QCPP 9.45

• Miscellaneous DEFICIENCES g 10-0410 19-QA-38 psceway to raceway - electrical se;3aratinn (i.e. tray to trav) t r.4

• 204 1 12 386 p .

Cable Separatinn - electrical (i.e. cable to cable, cable / panel 73 3 66 19 161

_ ?.

5 m

_, } I= proper litentification (tray, conduit cable, etc.) 4 (, 2 63 39 11 161 3 6 8 3 71 y '. Cables not routed per design drawinqs 51

c. Cables visible above tray siderails 3 1 76 80 an , 95 35 170

_t Seismic (i.e. tray to conduit, tray to pipe, etc.)

k 7. Equipment not installed per desiqn drawings 6 3 14 ' 2 25 a,

" Damaged equirnent 16 19 43 7e i

< ". Drawing detsagreements 7 2 8 4  ?! 3 i 5 .~

i ,

l'. Two redundant divitions or, the sane hinger 5 2 7 ,

r ~

r p 11. !bn-scismic con fuit hanger in Citenory I Structure 1 1

• ]

p 12. lbusekeeping (debris in cable trays, etc.) 5 11 5 21 _

c 9 n h J. Ground or shield wires not temin31ed 1

_ 14. Unsupported cables or cenduits 1 1 13 1 4 23 .. l m

i 15. Windlace nnt in*.tallad on tray (for rable eqress) 1 1 5 9 .

16. Removed / nissing tray sections 5 5

{

517. Minimum cable benei radius violation .

3 3 CCR fittinq not a qualified fire stop 1 y 10. 1 I

{ _19. Inadequate fire hirrier inside of panel .

1

_ ?p, Conduit tn velva - missile arei l 1 1

_ ?1, rionding proble ; in manholes 1-1 & 1-2 1 1 l

,_T ? , Iniecessible co munica*lon system i 1 i _ ?.7. Comunica t hn spaab er mountrd on cable bus 3 y L 4 5

• g TOT 7L fC CER OF flR's FY PROCEDURE 40 18 590 49 149 1.235- i i

r r

.. CK F " W F. V i-Q TASK VII: NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK H. J. Kaiser nonconformance reports (NR) that were voided in the past are reviewed to ensure that nonconforming conditions no longer exist; or.new hrs are written. Surveillance reports (SR) are being reviewed to determine if nonconforming conditions were identified that still exist and, if so, an HR is written for that condition. In a similar fashion, the master punchlist will be reviewed to determine if nonconforming x conditions were identified, and if they still exist, hrs will be written.

Closed NRs will be reviewed to determine if proper disposition has been made. A sample of 300 NRs has been selected at random for this review. The results.of the review will determine if. additional . closed NRs will be reviewed. A QCP procedure'will be prepared for this closed HR review.

Inspectors who previously worked at the Zinmer site viill be contacted by letter to determine if they have any knowledge of specific deficiencies that should be documented as URs.

This task currently has six people assigned.

PR03RESS The procedure for reviewing voided GRs has been revised to ref' lect HRC concerns and training to the revised procedure will be completed in .

December.

An additional 459 SRs were reviewed this nonth resulting in a total of 2,006 SRs reviewed to date. Anothe'r 28 NRs were written this month based on the SR review.

Of the 141 letters sent to indivicutis who did'not receive initial

. letters, 75 have been returned (sddressce unkno.:n) or responded to by the inspector. Additional effort wil'1 De made to locat'e the current addresses of those inspectors not reached as a result of currect efforts.

Ccrrective action to Corrective Action Request 83-66 concerning the review cf all voided MRs for potential reportability of deficiencies under 100FR50.55(e) and 10CFR21 is in progress and now 97L comple'te. This function still requires a CGLE Quality Engineering review and is scheduled fcr completion by December 15, 1903.

~

, 3.

..- 2:P ":qiHL Y F.EF ORT Table VII-1 provides a summary of Task VII progress to date.

This task is approximately 64% complete based on. current estimates.

A revised manhour estimate and schedule to complete will. be made in December based on the scope of the.punchlist review and closed UR review.

It is currently expected that the task will be completed by the end of March 1984.

.-  ?

PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION There are no outstanding-problems in this' task.

E_ _

J b

CC'? M0"THLY REr0RT

'~

TABLE VII-1

^

. TASK VII -

SUMMARY

OF- N0!;CONFORMANCE REPORTS REVIEW TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS ESTIMATED

1. OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS ITEM ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MO. TO COMPLETE Voided NR R;vi::w 1,318 0 1,192(I) 0' 90(2) 90 300 ft Survsillance R: port Review 3,451(3) 459 2,006 13 58 780 2,400 Punchlist 25,000 '

R view (Appx.) 0 ~ 4,618 0 18 0 4,000

. a

' Closed NR .

300 0 50 0 17- 0 1,200 Review tiRs from Inspector's Unknown 0 0 (t;o NRs received this month) 200 TOTAL 30,069 459 7,856 1 64 870 8,100 NONCONFORMANCE

SUMMARY

1. Voided I;q 267 firs written '

2. Surveillance Reports 184 NRs written

3. Miscellaneous 33 NRs written TOTAL 4S9 Notes:

The initial estinate of 1 18 (1) 'This is the total number of voided ND.s.was' based on control nuccers, for whicn NRs cannot ce cases. For this reason, letters are being written to previous inspectors.

(2) The results of review of voided NRs still requires a Voided NR Committee review prior to final ac'ceptance.

(3) An additional 29 SRs were identified for review, 9

17-

_____A__---m___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ - . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

CCD ". NTHLY REP'-~

TASK VIII: DESIGN COMTROL & VERIFICATION DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK Sargent and Lundy (S&L) reviewed and ensured that their procedures required design calculations for those items requiring a final verifi-cation after fabrication and/or installation. S&L also reviewed ade-quacy of their program for controlling deviations from the FSAR and 0f the correctness and consistency of the FSAR with respect to the system designs. The results of these S&L activities were revi.ewed and auditad by QCP and Quaiity Assurance Department personnel.

A Task Coordinator is working part-time on this task.

PROGRESS A draft report summarizing'the investigation and corrective actions by Sargent & Lundy (S&L) and audits of this activity by CG&E was reviewed by QCP.

Revisions to S&L procedures and amendments' to the FSAR have resulted from the reviews under this task concern. One CAR (83-78) on desien dccuments dcviating from the.FSAR has. been issued in the past. An audi.t nee 5$~tobeperformedtoverifyS&L'scorrectiveactiontakeninres;cnte to CAR 63-78.

This task is approximately 99., complete and the final report should be completed and issued by January 15,19E4. ,

PROBLEF.S AND COERECTIVE ACTION There are no problems areas at this time.

-1E-

< QCP F.ZTl;) ri f i TASK IX: DESIGN DOCL1'.ENT CH;'GES DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK This task involves reviewing inspection documents to determine that there is a positive identification of all related design document changes (DDC) for the inspected component or subsystem. Correct inspection docu-l ments should indicate that essential plant systems and their components were i constructed and/or installed in accordance with the latest and correct design documents, including all approved DDCs.

Presently no DDC reviews are being performed. All efforts are being directed towards collecting supporting data and writing the interim report.

Deficiency documents (NRs, DDNs, and CERs) are being analyzed to indicate the type of deficiency found and DDC examples are being collected to illus- ,

trate the problems, significant concerns, and recommendations for the report.

There are currently 6 people assigned to this tast.

PROGRESS

~~ Thirty-th'ree DDCs 'were revie'.;ed this ebnth agains t the r reser.t 6:P 9.15 p ocedsc. Thcse wcre previously reviewed against thc cricinal 15-Qi.-15 pro-cedure. 6,050 DDCs have been reviewed to date. 1,423 DDCs have been reviewed against the preceding procedure (19-0A-15). Of these 4,C27 DDCs, 1,6E5 (36;.) -

have been re-reviewed against the newer QCPP 9.15 procedure. Considering the re-revie'. , the task is apprcxir.:tely 38 percent compicie.

An interim report is being prepared to sur.marize the findings based on the document reviews and to recommend how the concerns idcntified by this task can be adecuately addressed by the document revieces cnd ins:cetiens planned to be cerformed under the proposed PVQC. Inis will elirir. ate pottn-tially redundaht efforts by PVQC and QCP. DDC revie,;s have been discontinued and work is in progress on su marizing the actual BDC/ inspection docu cnt review process. NR and DDN logs have been completed for Electric .1 :nd F"C areas.

The results for this month and a su mary of task prcgress to date is given in Table IX-1 and a ceficiency docu ent sura:ry is civen ir. T3t.e IX-2.

19- l

' -QCP M0I;iHLY RETOP.1

-The expected completion date for this. task is December 31, 1983 based on discontinuing the DDC review and issuing an interim report.

PROBLEMS At4D CORRECTIVE ACTIO!i The Safety Classification (essential or non-essential) contained

.in the S&L Design Document Change Status Report may in some instances

' have discrepancies. A CER will be written to QAD recommending that ,

i S&L verify Safety Classifications for each DDC.

e

'/ .

+ ,g 9'

. -20

~

CO ".. :, ._ r,E i . -

TAELE IX-1 TASK IX: DESIG!i DOCUMEt:T CHA';5ES TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCEf4T PERCENT lW4 HOURS ESTIMATED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MA!; HOURS

'# OF COMPLETED ITEM ITEMS THIS M0!1TH TO DATE THIS Mot;TH TO DATE THIS MO. TO COMPLETE

1. Original DDC review per 19-QA-15 4,627 0 4,627 0 100 0 0 procedure

2. Phase II &

IIA new item reviews 10,786, 0 1,423 0 0 0 0

3. Phase II & ,

IIA re-review ~

of Item 1 DDCs to new procedure 4,627 33 1,685 1 36 20 0 QCPP 9.15

4. Interim - - -

729 1,371 Report - - ,

20,040 33 7,735 2 3S II) 745 1,371 ,

TOTAL flote: (1) Based on counting 4,627're-reviews in cddition to all ne.: reviews.

-2'-

a

- ..: ' 2, :,L Y U i J '.

TABLE IX-2 ,

TASK IX: DEFICIENCY DOCUMENT SUMARY (NRS,DDNS,CERs)

ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL STRUCTURAL WYB TOTAL PROSLEM TYPE

1. DDC Not Verified By Review of.IR 77 36(1) 277 146'1) 536(1)

2. IR Not Available 16 0 386 II) 5 407(1)

3. . Constructed to 4 4 Voided DDC 0 0 0

4. Incomplete 0 20 2 26 Ir. ;pection 4

5. Inspection Pri'or -

To DDC Beina 0 0 1 15 Written (As Euilt) 14

6. Program and Other 0 32 10 176 Misc. Deficiences 134

7. CER (Generic) on:

a) Inspections &

Inspection 3 4 S 2 17 Procedures b) Document Control 0 11-9- 1 2

. heceduras c) Specific Gtneric 2 3 0 0 1 DDCs 245 36(1) 715(I) 168(1) 1,177(II TOTAL (DDN & NR) 12 S 11 4 32(2)

TOT AL (CER) 1,209 51I TOTAL (1) Includes deficiency conditions that are Lcin; processed; these conditions were not counted in last months progress report.

(2) lhis count includes additional generic CERs not included last month.

. u QCP !*.ZC.-:LY F.EPOR' t

TASK IX, SU5 TASK III: CAELE TRAY AND CONDUIT SUPPORT WELDING DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT-TASK Based on a reportable item (E-20) to the NRC under 10CFR50.55(e),

a reinspection program for cable tray and conduit support welding was instituted. To support the S&L evaluation program, a sample of 125 supports were inspected forl weld quality. The results of these inspec- i tions were documented on NRs which S&L will evaluate for selection of.

hangers to be Bestructively tested under their program.

There are no personnel assigned to tnis subtaskt .

PROGRESS-Of the 125 supports selected, a total of 121 supports were inspected.

Of these supports 35 supports (849 welds) were acceptable and 86 supports (1,281. welds) were rejected. The NRs written are being evaluated by S&L, and QCP is providing clarifications on some NRs.

Voon completion of the destructive testing and evaluation of the -

results, revised inspection criteria uili tc issutd bv SEL. Thtse criteria.will be used for reinspection of the cable tray.and conduit supports in the main control room. ,

The remaining scope of this subtask must be defined, and currently there is no schedule for complet~ ion of this task.

PROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIO" Hone 9

m __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ __. _ .I

. (Ci "c',T:..i .O J.i TASK X: SUSCONTRACTOR QA PROGRAMS DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK This task is complete and the final report has been issued as Revision 1. This report will be transmitted to the NRC in December 1983.

There are no personnel assigned to this task. ,

PROGRESS There were a total of 131 QA Program reviews, formal audit reviews, and QA Program Evaluation reviews performed under this task. This review resulted in the issue of 40 CERs. This task'is 100% complete, including QA documentation transfer to permanent storage facilities.

PROELEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION There are no problems with this task.

9 e

f'. -

- - CCP l'.J:;TiiL . . :

_ '.1 TdSKXI: AUDITS DESCRIPTIO!4 0F CURREt!T TASK This task is complete and the final report has been issued as Revision 1. This report will be transmitted to the fRC in December 1983.

t c There are no personnel assigned to this task. j

~ PROGRESS This task-reviewed 324 audits of the QA programs of seven organi-zations and evaluated the closeout of 783 negative audit findings. This review results in the issue of two Potentially Reportable Items (PRI) and 21 CERs. This task is 10'0% co'mplete, inc1'uding QA documentation transfer to permanent storage facilities.

PROBLEMS A!;D CORRECTIVE ACTIO!!

There are no problems with this task.

e O

4 4

0 e

-2E-u, , . .

,,.. QCi M3hiblY REF0Ei TASK XII: SOLTING DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK Develop pr qram(s) for reinspection of structural steel bolted connections, equipment mounting bolting (i.e., nelson studs, expansion anchors ) and equipment bolting (i.e., HVAC duct work, cable tray splice. plates, pipe flange bolting).

f PROGRESS Summary of activities which relate to the progress and development of inspection procedures are listed below:

1. QCPP 9.49, " Structural Steel Bolting Inspection " was sub- ,

mitted.into the procedure review cycle on September 14, 1983.

Review comments were received on November 21, 1983 and will be incorporated by December 11, 1983.

Supporting documentation:

a. Rev. I to IIM-EP1, " Reinspection Program to Verify Structural Steel Framing Connections," was placed in the CGLE Document Control Sypter'on October 18 1983.

b. ZIM-RP11, "Ticins:cction Prcgram for Field Installcd E;1tb -

Supporting Seisr.ic Category 1 Systems and Ecuiprent," was re-ceived fron Sargent and Lundy on October 6, 1982 for QCD comment.

2. TCN to QCPP 9.47, " Quality Verification of seismic Category 1 - Structural Steel," incorporated review comments and was reentered into procedure review cycle. Approval is expected in December.

PROELEF.S AND CORRECTI'.'E ACTION Relic' from the Sho. Cause Order is required to perform structural steel bolting inspection. The ZIM-RP11 procedure from S&L is incomplete with respect to several special bolting conditions, such as structural anchor bolts.

~'

,,,- QCi M. Gr.O !.Eis- ~.

TASK XIII: MASONRY WALLS (TASK XIV: SEISMIC COLUMMS)

DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK ACTIVITIES S&L has issued Notes of Conference on Masonry Walls held in Chicago en 10/31/83. Accordingly, the Inspection Program is defined to include the following:

1. Cracks,spalling,and mortar joint thickness

2. Verification of concrete curb inspections

3. Steel Lintels .

4. Bearing plates for g111ery steel -

5. Statistical sampling of wall anchors .

6. Verification of filled cores

7. Density verification for radiation shielding wa'.ls

8. Fireproofing the walls, both sides and tops

9. Structural angles attached to the cnd of walls FR030ESS. ,

A cr.fere:.c ..:s.hcid at the Chicagc 55' cffice er,11/21/:2 to discuss .the sample size and attributes to be reviewed. The recomdended agreements for this inspection program are scheduled to be issued by .

12/12/83.

A demonstraticn of Ultrasonic Testing (UT) for masonry walls was given by Muneow & Associates. The testing could be used at the Zinmer

-Station. Verification of ther.e tests and claims by the Vendor will be periormed by NED.

-FROBLEMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION The UT. testing method, if used, will have t'o be, built into the Inspection Program which will delay the schedule for implementing the progran. Ute of this method will save a significant arovn: of tire and eliminate the need to destructively test the walls.

w W D

• • QCP lC"THLY REi-02.7 TASK XV: COATIt;35

~

DESCRIPTIO!! 0F TASK A review determined that service level one coatings as applied in the primary containment did not meet the current FSAR commitments.

These coatings will be removed and a qualified coating applied.

This task is closed because no inspection of the present coatings is necessary.

.ew

-EE-l

~

.,.' .C: F.f.i!.LY FETD'S TASK XVI: SEISMIC INTERACTION PROGRAM DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TASK ACTIVITIES

1. Walkdown procedure QCPP 9.52 was issued.

2. Walkdown personnel were trained to OPP 3.8, Rev. 3 and to QCPP 9.52, Rev. O.

3. Indoctrination to the CGSE QA Program was given to walkdown personnel.

4. Work experience and educational background of walkdown personnel were verified and inspectors were certified to appropriate level.

5. The following restraints to resumption of the Seismic Walkdown were cleared. ~

a. MCAR-83-1L response was found satisfactory by QAD.

b. Audit Report 460 was closed.

c. A Conditional Release of SWO-83-04 was obtained on 11/29/83 to perform walkdowns of Prohibited Zones and Main Steam (D+) pioina.

6. The walkdown of these two areas (5.c) Started on 11/33/83 followinc another training session for the walkdown team.

PROGREES n..

MMcd-u? area dra.lirr S r the Dro" bited Zone ra.c been obt'ained.

Resolutions of the NED coruts of r..arked-up area cra..ings are con?lete.

The remaining four inspectors are beinc certified. Fire;rcof storace facilities have been obtair.ed to store the corpleted walkdown records. -

PROBLEUS AND C0F.RECTIVE ACT10N

1. SSL is evaluating alternatives to the current clearance criteria th:t could decrease the magnitude of the required inspections. S&L was directed on N:verber 22, 1923 to submit their reco 7.endations based on their evaluation.

2. The current special walkdowns of non-safet'y rclated zones in Cttsgory I buildings ar.d main steam piping is expected to take 5 weeks.

F.evisions to the Cce.servative Clearance Criteria must be accented before anj fur icr walkdo..ns ccn take place. These further plant-v,ide wallda..ns arc Of saft:y-rclated syric s in Catecery I buildings.

l

-EO-