ML20077L039

Informs of EDO Analysis of Gpu Vs B&W Transcripts.Commission Should Be Advised of Any Info in Record Which Might Affect Restart Decision.Partial Decision Should Be Deferred Until Analysis Received

ML20077L039
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	02/25/1983
From:	Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:	Ahearne J, Gilinsky V, Roberts T NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20077K587	List: ML20077K992 ML20077K996 ML20077K999 ML20077L001 ML20077L004 ML20077L020 ML20077L024 ML20077L030 ML20077L036 ML20077L039 ML20077L042 ML20077L056 ML20077L059 ML20077L064 ML20077L070
References
COMNP-83-3, NUDOCS 8308080150
Download: ML20077L039 (2)

Text

-

v,q.,.,......w..

.3[

brh:b -

UNITED d

o@i"

" _;'.:-- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

~

j o

"'*p

.)/

vl n

WASHINGTON. D. C. 20S55

/

r.~

af E 4 /; h h* ',.:.. E.~

~

.. February 25, 1983 N

.C

~

h b..

COMNP-83-3 v.

- ;g

~-

5 %* M. W :..-2

~-

'@?.Sf*Jfl[..j:I.".U ".2. ~ ~'". *= ~

-9.T.E p, MEMORANDUM FOR: LCg3.sissioner Gilinsky 7

6 ;-

Commissioner Ahearne

== W.it.:. ;1 2

2..... :..

Commissioner Roberts

)

- 3 3 F ' r ".

';_ ~

' Commissioner Asse1stine

- S c : r-~Y y.7 :< " -: C *

.=..=:._ :-7..

+

fW,rx -

S M - E. [.f R 0 S d Nunzio J. Palladino

/

l

(

~

v

-f i & 5: 5.;'.1 --- T.: : n..

_._ TMI-1 RESTART U

e+ wet-urSUB J EC r."L.3sMEmi~ct. =~ -

- - - - ^ -

.d 5 1. M K 1.'i-:.:.a'.~L'T P -

2335; The'.%D'0'.ZEs'tTT5 i s conducting an ana3ys.is: of GPUrriEd:

B&W

~

A majority'of the Commission has voted that K W.~~ ct rrnsrx# pts. O to consider, in the work already underway,

. 5 E.l_. we..Iafskl.-the EDthe -questions raised.in Commis.sio.ne.r Gilinsky's memor 20=524 ~

I understand this task is currently

"%"%cre. o.f.;._F_e b r u'a ry 2, 19 8 3.

I a1so p1 a n n e d it'0%Wompteted b'f:Tbo 0 tr-th e~-Ftidr f' Ma rc h r-o

73. 3 7

~

we have received a memorandum from the' EDO on note that

.;;;C...- February 17 to the eff ect that potentially significant M.'.

information has been identified.

The-ED0 should continue Wif,

d contains any

• 7

- ~to advise the Commission on whether the recor Commission's decision

'information which might affect the rega.r. ding the restart of Unit 1.

-=.. -

N2.

4Eb$hiTv~~eUFe~shiful'd Ed 5.f eH'o~u r( p a r.t.i.a1 d e c'i ~s'i o n. o n TMI alf

~

=ie--+ - ~

dieXI:acrgnit.i by en h a y e _ t h e.:;s.t a f f '. s :. a n a 1 y s is-i n h a n d a n d F t h e a pM3;ra b.1 ell e g a l-'p ro c e d u r e s" h a v e-b e e n - f o i l ow e d.

7"-

Therefore, I propose that first get the staff's

=

analysis.

Following that, e wou14 request the parties' i 5?i.

comments on.the staff's analysis. BOGC and OPE would review th'e7 staff's analysis and the parties' comments, and make W.

.recgmmendations on possible changes to our draft TMI-1 l 3ri:c;-

$~- ~

• decision based on that review.

~

'.y..

.J:r.-

T~

Co'midssioner Gilinsky f eels that, at a minimum, the the parties now that they will be Commission should.tellon the staff analysis so that they will asked to comment have-time to familiarize themselves with the record in w

.h.

,.GPU:._vf.B&W.

I have no objection to this.

M.J 7

. 0 051- ~~

whatever V

Z.s i J~.

'F6rtI[e'rmore, Commissioner Gilinsky states that, F C.f thhtCommission does, he still wants the General Counsel's

" T :-T h. ~

independent advice on the relevance of the GPU v.

B&W

-= :..

=-plE

' transcripts.

Instead, I believe that the plan proposed T.d above_.will provide the General Counsel's input without

__ Q..

l

_ [

s y.*.[ *- -

B308080150 030715 PDR COMMS NRCC j

CORRESPONDENCE PDR

-=- 3

=

7 t..

....sts -

a.

. n,.

,e,.*. 5 *.*.' y... s,..a.,...

6...

w 2:

... ~

. ;,.g..

~ :

. w.-7..

m.-=.:

reauirina. OGC.to duplicate the transcriot review alreadv er r

i beino. undertaken by the EDO.

y

..,. a,...

a.

.v....,e....

~~'.

" Vith regard to Commissioner Gi3insky's request that 0GC, as

.m :.. ;-. :

~ a separate and less urgent matter, prepare a written

Se

.....

analysis of the ef fect which the 'GPU and B&W settlement may

lifr'-x - /. C

~ Fr*" 4.F have on GPU's pending $4 billion claim against NRC, I 7:

- ?.k be1Teve it is~ appropriate for 0GC to provide such an

~~ analysis.

u...... n..

..... T. I. would like SECY t.o track responses-to the plan outlined W4e y..e.

\\

:.2aboye.

..."* : ~- : k:"

e sh.

. e.== :. - 4.ss

-r.

e..'... =.... =. -. - -..

cc: :SECY

';=T.i%"

i " l"4: 0GC

%. :...." z.-; ch.~0PE r%^ '* :. 4.:;.0IA

.I.

'.*' ' PU/..

MT

.1 U1 ww "P***OCA C?7 :':*....

w:

."J. ~;; O P A

• • ?T.~~ * '

... _... 0 0 c

g

• Y N

w

. 7.

e e

e

• o J.e..

.e

.~.*4.

J 4

.. a.

• • ~

?

t.,.*

e..-.

u...,

'.***.*.?

.g....-

'M7

~C..,

.~

. ~ ~,,,

M p=M

.e M

D lN'.

r

- ~

,m,