ML20077L020
| ML20077L020 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 12/17/1982 |
| From: | Roberts T NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Ahearne J, Gilinsky V, Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20077K587 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8308080111 | |
| Download: ML20077L020 (2) | |
Text
~y 73
- .s zwt.,L.cew m
.S WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
{4
.y,h.fg,.,
R y= *. +.-%._..-.~,..~.=.......,.,s..~,...,.a.
.o*
- ,'.~~.-.~...
.a :....
-.=
=.
~p*
1.r:?:. =^ 'a. x 2.-;.#%:.,:;.
- w.
c:..w.5:2.w.a
.=v.v.'e- -- - December 17;'1982
..o64 J*
FFI EOFTHE d'
~'..~'~~.^...J.
' ~ ~
c."._ _ MM.. ISS10 N ER.~l.~7". ' i '..a I
?
, e, w w::.=.
~:T:.=:.',.x
=:
,*. ' ' = -
- ~.:. : :. :
n
.'a.-.:-
..u. n.:._.
2-w + =..- ~): w i :n
.-m,.: m L. :,.-. -
.w
...z:::
- y..
v
=.a.
...-:=4..-....
.- 2.. MEMOPANDUM FOR:
Chairman Palladino Commissioner Gilinsky F.:5l dix
- c. :....
r-r,:: =:r.e j
~-;i.Fn Commissioner Ahearne 2 B. P.. ? - i ~.7.
. Comissioner Asselstine
.7
.e......
FROM:....
Thomas M. Roberts.I.S. y
+.
v
=
a :.,-
mi..m...y.... :.:. '.=.~;=.2.._.
~
,,.'... JJ
~*
.~
.. F.W... - SUBJECT. i F. _...
.GPU v. B & W
- e
. =v
..a sn
.z.
21.7.:..
Yesterday,"I was advised by the: General Counsel that OGC could not.
T~iJ respond to the ' Commission.'s request that it be apprised of new informa-
?
~
tion developed in the case of GPU v. B & W prior to a Comission Ed decision'on restart.
Apparently, OGC coes not have somecne sufficiently esc'5 char. familiar with the Till-1 Restart record to distinguish between informa.
'~
tion devel.oped in the Restart proceeding and information developed in the trial.
Additionally, the record of the' trial is already more than 71 c E2 t : 0,000 pages long and promises to become much longer.
In light of these
~
two factors, I propose that the Comission not req 0' ire OGC t~o prepare some quick sumary of the record prior to our restart decision.
- Rather, I would prefer that the Comission make its decision based on informa-tion presently before it.
The Comission should be provided withia' report of any new information developed in the trial at the conclusion of the trial.
If the report brings to the Comission's attention any issue which would require revisiting, the Comission will do so at that time.
I would like the. Secretary to monitor. responses to this. memorandum.
..,3 v
. we is
~
cc:
S. Chilk s
i OGC
/k /7 r
i l,
m.:
Q.
4
.20..
I t
A*-$:
l
~
... 3 _
~~
8308080111 830715 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR Y
c.s: -
ir ne
~. # ?c4 REQUES.TREPLY TO SECYBY M/e s
,d..g,.f'. ' :3.. y '--- ;,~.y T NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3'~ 7, y K7 4h.
..,. UNITED STATES.
m.-
,. /. 3....
-1
' WY
-h. 5.
h 5.:I-~
WASHIN GT ON. 04. 20555 f
^ '
~ C OMIR-8 2 --2.
~.
- g. ~ 9 iW f
7-;,,= ~
~
pct _.. %,*,e.
.~
December 17, 1982 y $FFICE OF THE '
'~
~
COMMISSIONER
~
W.'. * %.=..;&.....
.;1.:~ ~~EC....WE,... '=y" n
=i :r,.. v.- e..:
J r
l'
-> c - ".v..z..- 2 y.
A
- gy- _
- -:%
/ \\
M f"'
HEMOP.ANDUM FOR:
Chairman Palladino
-q..S Commissioner Gilinsky
' 7..-#9-G..1:.
Commissioner Ahearne
(,,
Commissioner.Asselstine v.
."*dt.,._.
"Th'~.E EW=i%.=_.
,Q j P i 'C FROM:i Thomas M. Roberts p/ W
[
$3f'~:-?; C;:
@p V,
..Q_ _
SUBJECT:
GPU v. B & W w ::
._m.g T " "' Yesterday, I was advised by the. General Counsel that OGC could not h
U isiEr e.1. respond to the Commission's request that it be apprised of new infoma-3 M9 T tion developed in the case of GPU v. B & W prior to a Commission
\\0 f
decision on restart.
Apparently, OGC ooes not have someone sufficiently f amiliar with the' TMI-1 Restart record to distinguish between informa-
~
tion developed in the Restart proceeding and information developed in the trial.
Additionally, the record 'of the trial is already more than 4,000 pages long and promises to become much longer.
In light of these S~
two factors, I propose that the Commission not require OGC to prepare some quick sumary of the record prior.to our restart decision.
- Rather, I would prefer that the Commission make its decision based on informa-tion presently before it.
The Commission should be provided with a report of any new information developed in the trial at the conclusion of the trial.
If the report brings'to the Commission's attention any issue which would require revisiting, the Commission will do so at that time.
_~..
2 I..would like the Secretary to monitor responses to this memorandum.
4.
-.-=:Jn
~
4 r
4
.h s
cc:
S. Chilk
{q L.
0GC f
J
.M.. 2.
-.ShN.
[
.$ m.
5;. --f y.
p A-
..,p
~~
~P
^~@. -
_ f.,,3.'.
WR 1.
urm hn E b 23u u 2
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 8
wAssmcTcw. o. c.2osss w.;py J -g 3...g, 7,
(,:,,~ '.
f
,g,s % =.g._.e.c..
--m, December 29,~1982
& CMAIRMAN Gll";r
~
MEMORANDUM FOR:
William J. Dircks, Executive Director
.m.
- for Operations S~ '
=.? -
~~-
FROM:
Nunzio J. Palladino REVIEW OF B&W-GPU TRIAL COURT RECORD
SUBJECT:
involving the question of liability for
~
The B&W-GPU lawsuit the Three Mile Island accident is currently being tried in
" y..' - - -
the' federal District Court for the Southern District of
~
F Much of the trial testimony in that lawsuit is New York.
?>
concerned with the sequence of events of the Three Mile
. 5r Island accident.
.t...
.7
-F The Three Mile Island accident has._heen closely. studied by the Commission on sev'eral occasions.
This.is to request
~
you to have knowledgeable staff examine ~the record being e
developed in the. lawsuit and to advise the Commission includ.ing but whether our understanding of the accident, not limited to the sequence of events., is significantly affected.
Based upon your advice, the Commission might find it necessary to take action.
Thus your review should
_=T.1 be. thorough and you should prepare a summary of any
~
significant changes._t.o-ou.r previous understanding that are identified.
Commiss'ioner Gilinsky cc:
Commissioner Ahearne Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine
. ~
O G C'
~ ~ * -
OPE 01A 01 m"
a b
~
h 4
M e
s E'
gg
..