ML20077J935

Forwards Description of Changes in Amend 82 to FSAR, Transmitted Via

ML20077J935
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	07/31/1991
From:	William Cahill TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
TXX-91250, NUDOCS 9108050269
Download: ML20077J935 (42)

Text

.

~

mamarerarma

~ " * * " " " " *

~ ~

9 Log # TXX-91250 2

Fi1e # 10010 -

_ _.r Z

Ref. # 10CFR50.34(b)

TUELECTRIC wuiim J. cahlit. Jr.

July 31, 1991 Lucunvr ikr Present U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:

Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

C0HANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)

DOCKET N05. 50-445 AND 50-446 FSAR AMENDMENT 82 DESCRIPTION Gentlemen:

Amendment 82 to the CPSES FSAR was transmitted to you under a separate cover letter, logged TXX-91249, dated July 31, 1991. The attachment to this letter provides line-by-line descriptions of the changes in Amendment 82.

FSAR pages which do not have technical changes but are included in the amendment (because they are the opposite side of the sheet from a page that was changed, because the change shifted the existing material to another page or because only editorial changes were made on these pages) are not discussed in the attachment.

As has been the TU Electric practice in the past several FSAR amendments, all changes described in the attachment have been evaluated for relative significance (i.e., the group number 1, 2, 3 or 4 following each change justification as discussed in TV Electric letter TXX-89467 dated June 1,1988).

In addition, all changes applicable to CPSES Unit I have been reviewed under the TV Electric 10CFR50.59 process and found not to include any "unreviewed safety questions."

Sincerely,

/ /

6

./d-William J. Cahill, Jr.

BSD/bsd Attachment c - Mr. R. D. Hartin, Region IV Resident inspectors, CPSES (2)

Mr. T. A. Bergman. NRR

(

g,oS0 W osoog.b.ye l07 C10 r b-

)

p 400 North Olive Street L B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201

m Attachment to TXX-91250 j

July 31, 1991

,Ppge 1 of 41 CPSES FSAR AMENDMENT 82 DETAILED DESCRIPTION FSAR Page

.(as amended)

Dm qrfpilon 1.1-1, 2 See Page No(s):1.4 1

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Miscellaneous editorial corrections and updates to the FSAR to provide consistency within the The FSAR text.

tables and figures and previously docketed correspondence.

Justification:

FSAR Sections 1.1 and 1.4 are updated to reflect the purchase and transfer of ownership interest in CPSES.

The NRC issued Amendments 9 and 8 on 8/25/88 to Unit 1 and Unit 2 CP Nos. CPPR-126 and 127 respectively, for the transfer of ownership interest from TMPA to TU Electric (TUEC).

The transfer to take place in 10 installments.

At the completion of the transfer. TMPA l

would no longer retain ownership interest. A portion of the Units were purchased by TUEC from TMPA in a transaction treated as a completed sale for accounting purposes.

IMPA retains legal title to a decreasing percentage of such portion for legal purposes, full equtable title having rested in TUEC.

Amendments 10 and 9 were issued on 12/8/88 for the complete transfer of ownership interest frem BECP to TUEC.

Amendments 11 and 10 were issued on 8/29/89 for the complete transfer of ownership interest from TEX-LA to TUEC.

FSAR Section 1.1.4 is corrected to indicate an approximate net electrical output designation for each unit of "1150" in lieu of "1159" to provide consistency with FSAR Figure 8.3 -2.

FSAR Section 1.1.5 is updated to reflect the actual date for declaration of commerical operation for Unit I and too revised proposed schedule for Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-057 Related SSER Section: SSER22 1.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 1A(B)-51

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

FSAR revised to allow the use of copper sheathed (CS) cable inside containment for lighting circuits. The CS cable is considered to be equivalent to cable in con-duit for electrical separation purposes.

UL crush test data demonstrates that the mechanical integrity of CS cable is better than that of aluminum sheathed (A1) ca-ble, which has been previously accepted by the NRC at l

CPSES for electrical separation. For inside containment l

applications, the copper does not react with the acri-dent environment, therefore hydrogen generation is not s

Attachsent to TXX-91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 2 of 41 FSAR Page (A) aqqnded)

Dgscriction a concern. In addition, since the copper jacket pro-vides comparable protection from fire as rigid conduit, CS cable is not considered an intervening combustible material and is excluded from the CPSES fire hazards combustible loadings. Wyle test report #53575 demon-strates that 1" separation is adequate to protect Class IE cables due to a fault (325 amps) in 3/C #8 AWG CS cable. CPSES applications of CS cable, at a maximum, is 4/C #10 AWG. The CPSES cable faults are expected to be less severe than of those tested, thus, the test re-sults can be applied to CPSES where 1" minimum separa-tion is m:intained, The Wyle test has been reviewed and approved by the NRC for South Texas Project separation criteria Based on the above conclusions, in contain-ment applications of CS cable in lighting circuits will be implemented at CPSES, Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-001.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 22 section 8.4.4 does not include CS cable as as one of CPSES metal clad cable applications.

k l

1A(B)-51

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

Revised the text to specifically describe the charac-teristics and CPSES applications of aluminum sheathed 1

cable.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-001.3 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No IA(D)-51

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

Expanded the scope of metal clad cable applications to include copper sheathed cable, in additon to aluminum sheathed cable.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-001.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 22 section 8.4.4 does not include copper sheathed cable within the scope of metal clad cable applications for CPSES.

~

,Abtachnent to TXX-91250 July 31, 1991 l

Page 3 of 41 FSAR Page (M amfd1deJ)

DJ g ripfdpf!

1A(B)-51

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of one hour fire rated cable as electrical separation Justification:

Added one hour fire rated materials (e.g. thermolag and one hour fire rated cable) as acceptable for electrical separation. The one hour fire rated cable is Rockbestos cable constructed of a continuously welded stainless steel sheath and 12 mils thick. The cable is constructed cf organic and inorganic materials. The conductors are high temperature, nickel-clad copper sized for up to 1700 degrees F operation. The jacket material is a glass braid with a layered silicone rubber insulation. The cable is qualified per the ASTM E-119-1971 test criteria for a fire resistence rating of one hour. The ability of the cable to propagate a fire induced by an electrical fault is comparable to station cable in conduit due to the amount of combustible material in the cable. The layer of inorganic insulation in conjunction with the glass braid is similar to a wrap of woven silicone dioxide, which is considered equivalent to conduit for CPSES.

Thermolag is also considered acceptable for electrical separation because of similar characteristics to the fire rated cable.

Group: 2 FSAR Chance Request Number: 91-053.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SSER does not include the Rockbestos one hour fire rated cable as acceptable for electrical separation.

1A(B)-51

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of one hour fire r?ted ritJe as electrical separation Justification:

Adds a general description regarding the construction and fire resistivity of the one hour fire rated cable.

The cable will be limited to 1/0 AWG (maximum) power and control circuits where the maximum radiation dose is 50 MRADS or less.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-053.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SSER does not include the Rockbestos one hour fire rated cable as acceptable for electrical separation.

I i

i

. es

A5tachmenttoTXX-91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 4 of 41 FSAR Page (al AmeJ1dg51)

Deg rjption IA(B)-85.86

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete'the accumulated condensate removal requirement at one day after the new fuel oil is added in the fuel oil storage tank'.

Justification:

The accumulated condensate will be removed at quarterly or monthly in lieu of one day after the new fuel oil is added to the fuel oli storale tank. This requirement is consistent with the requiremant of Part C.2.d of NRC Regulatory Guide 1.137. Revision 1.

The CPSES Techni-cal Specifications 4.0 1.1.2.c. d. and e: and 4.8.1.2.

requires the following:

a) Requires sampling and removal of the condensate at every 31 days, which is proven to be a satisfactory sample frequency given the size of the clenrence sump.

b) Requires testing of the accumulated weter(clear and bright test) on each truckload of diesel fuel oil delivered and unloaded into the storage tanks, The water introduced in the receiving activity would take longer than one day to settle out and find it's way to the clearence sump.

The current Technical Spec-ification requirement to sample for and remove accumul-ated water every 31 days is adequate to protect the diesel generator fuel oil system.

The removal of the requirement to sample one day after new fuel delivery would not adversely effect the system or it's component

, would have no effect on any radiological consequence, and will not have any effect on the operability of the diesel generator.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-052.1 Related SER Section: 9,5.4.2:

SSER22 9.5.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes SSER Section 9.5.4.(page 9 13) needs to revise to indicate the deletion of the sample and testing requir-ement for the accumulated condensate at one day after the new fuel oil is added to the fuel oil storage tank.

1A(B)-88.89

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Clarification to the exception listed under NRC R.G.140

. deletion of the periodic in place testing of the HEPA and charcoal adsorber (ASME/ ANSI N510-1980. table

1. notes 2 & 5)

Justification:

The clarification to the exceptions listed under Reg.

Guide 1.140 is required because Table 1 (See Notes 2 &

5) of ASME/ ANSI N510-1980 allows a deletion of periodic in-place testing of filtration systems that are recirculating and located inside containment.

The Containment Preaccess Filtratinn System is a recircul-ating system inside containment building and falls

1 AEtachmenttoTXX91250

~

' July 31, 1991-Page 5 of 41 FSAR Page (n amended)

Dgscriptian under this category.

However, under sections C.S.c and C.S.d of Regulatory fJide 1.140, it states that the in-place leak testing shall be performed as described in ASME/ ANSI N510-1980, Sections 10 and 12.

Neither Sections 10 and 12 of ASME/ ANSI N510-1980, nor Reg.

Guide 1.140 direct the reader to Table 1 of the standard. Therefore, it is necessary to describe the exception taken to the Regulatory Guide under this section of the FSAR.

The preaccess filtration unit is a non-safety, 100%

recirculation unit which is located inside containment.

The unit is utilized to reduce airborne contamination inside containment prior to personnel entry.

Deletion of periodic in-place testing of HEPA and charcoal adsorber may result in bypass of unfiltered air.

Excessive bypass of unfiltered air would only extend the duration of the operation of the Containment Preaccess Filtration System prior to allowing personnel to enter the containment.

In addition, any unfiltered bypass air will remain inside the containment building and therefore, will not cause any uncontrolled release of airborne contamination.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-068.2 Related SER Section: 9.4:

SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes Section 11.2.2.5 shold indicate the clarification provided for in-place testing of Containment Preaccess Filteration Unit as per table 1. notes 2 and 5 of ASME/

ANSI-N510-1980.

2.1-7

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Editorial correction ta the FSAR Section 2.1.2.2 to provide consistency witnin the The FSAR text and tables.

Justification:

FSAR Section 2.1.2.2 is updcted to change the position title from "Hanager, Plant Operations" to " Plant Manager" to provide consistency with the position title changes provided in FSAR Section 13.1 (Amendment 77).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-057 l

Related SSER Section: SSER22 13.1.1 l

SER/SSER Impact: No 2.2-4 5

==

Description:==

(Update)

Updates methodology for evaluating the probability cf an aircraft crash into CPSES.

Justification:

Due to the significant increase in air traffic through the air sector including CPSES and the revised method in which the FAA records aircraft flight statistical l

Attachment to TXX-91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 6 of 41 FSAR Page (A1 Ampn_dd )

D_qig_ipti on n

data for air sectors in lieu of air routes, the methodology f or re-evaluating the probability of an aircraft crash into CPSES was updated to incorporate the new data.

Eventhough the re-evaluated estimation of Pfa (1.91E 07) is higher than the value previously cited in the FSAR (8.9E-08), the updated probability is still considered to be low and that the consequence analysis is still not required.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 031 Related SER Section: 2.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 2.2-1

==

Description:==

(Update)

Updates Figure 2.2-1 to reflect an air route ne,me change from Victor 163W to Victor 568.

Justification:

The FAA renamed the air route Victor 163W to Victor 568.

Figure 2.2-1 was updated to reflect this change.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-031 Related SER Section: 2.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER Section 2.2.2 should be updated to reflect the name change for air route from Victor 163W to Victor 568.

3.8-83

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the welder qualification requirements to clerify the test position which may be used for the partial penetration groove and fillet welds on T. K, and Y connections.

Justification:

The AWS D1.1. 1975 Code (paragraph 5.23.4.5) states that the 6G position qualifies for all position groove and all position fillet welding of pipe, tubing, and plate.

It also states that the 6GR position qualifies for groove T. K, and Y connections and groove and fillet welding in all positions of pipe, tubing and plate.

hheAWSD1.11990 Code (paragraph 5.23.4.5) further clarifies the weld position requirements by differen-tiating between a " partial penetration" (postion 6G) and a " complete joint penetration" (position 6GR) groove and fillet welds in T, K, and Y connections.

The qualification requirement for the 6G position is the same for both the 1975 Code and the 1990 Code.

hheAWSCodehasrecognizedthatuseofthe6Gposition f or the partial penetration groove and fillet welds in T, K. and Y connections demonstrates the welders

Attachment to TXX-91250' Duly 31, 1991 Page 7 of 41 FSAR Page (as Amendid)

DescriDtion ability to produce a quality weld for this application, j

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: SA 91-04.1 Related SER Section: 3.8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.8-13B

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Adds reference for ASW D1.1-90, " Structural Welding j

Code " for Welder qualification of partial _ penetration groove and fillet welds on tubular T. K. and Y j

connections.

Justification:

See justification for LDCR SA-91 04.1 on page 3.8 83 Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-91-04.2 Related SER Section: 3.8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.9N-10 See Sheet No(s):02, 03

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Add system identifier "CS" to valve location numbers 8180, 8350A/B/C/D. 8367A/0/C/D, 836BA/B/C/D. 8377, 8442 8473, 8487 to read "CS-8180", CS-8350A/B/C/D CS-8367A/

B/C/D CS-8368A/8/C/0, CS-8377, C5-8442, CS-8473, CS-8487".

Justification:

This change adds the system identifiers to the subject valves.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90-42.3 SER/SSER Impact: Ho

' Table 3.9N-10 See Sheet No(s):04,05,06

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Add system identifier "SI " to the-valve location numbe rs 8819A/B/C/0, 8900A/B/C/D, 8905A/B/C/D, 8910A/B/C/0, 8900A/B/C/D 8905A/B/C/0, 8919A/B and 8968.

Justification:

This change adds the system identifier to the valve location numbers.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90 42.4 SER/SSER Impact: No JTable 3.9N-10 See Sheet No(s):05

==

Description:==

(Revision)

The position of Containment Isolation valve 1-8880. in the flowpath between the plant nitrogen supply and the Safety Injection accumulator tanks is revised from closed to open during normal plant operations.

Justification:

Leaving valve 1-8880 open during normal plant operation

Attachment to TXX 91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 8 of 41 FSAR Page (11 A*CadCd)

ECittiP_t19D l

provides an acceptable arrangement as specified ty 10 CFR 50, Appendix A GDC 56 and does not increase the likelyhood for failure of this component.

This change provides a constant source of nitrogen to the SI accumulators with minimal operator interface.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90-168 l

Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2:

SSER00 6.3.2 1

SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.98-10 See Sheet No(s):15, 16

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Add valve identification number "-01" to valve LV-4500 on Sheet 15 to read "LV-4500 01".

Add "X " to valve PCV-H116 A/B on Sheet 16 to read "X PCV-H116 A/B",

Justification:

This change adds specific identifiers that were not included in the tables.

Group: 4-l FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90-42.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.9B-10 See Sheet No(s):20, 21

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Provide clarification to the Active Valve List by l

identifying Unit numbers on specific valves for diesel i

generators.

Justification:

The valve numbers in the Table are unique for Unit 1 and Unit 2 and therefore the addition of the unit l

numbers clarifies the identification of those valves.

Group: 4 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 90-104.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.9B-10 See Sheet No(s):22

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Deletes valves XCH-302 and XCH-305.

Justification:

Valves XCH-302 and XCH 305 have had the internals removed and theref ore are no longer active valves.

Also see justification provided for Table 3.9B-10 l

Sheets 22 and 23.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 104.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.9B 10 See Sheet No(s):22 and 23

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete valves 2CH-376.-436.-360 -383.-420,-444,-456,

-466.-343.-346.-403.-406.-452, and -463 from the Active Valve List.

I

(

Attachment to TXX-91250

'uly 31, 1991 J

Page 9 of 41 l

FSAR Page (al. amended)

Description Justification:

These check valves have had their internals removed and the valve bodies abandoned in place, The irternals wert removed as they serve no design purpose other than to runnin open during all modes of operation to provide chilled water cooling during all modes of operation.

The potential for failure. the IST test burden, and the hydraulic resistance also provides the need to remove the valves internals.

The counterpart Unit 1 valves have been already been deleted from the FSAR Table 3.9B-10.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90-214 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3,9B-10 See Sheet No(s):24

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Remove Hydrogen Purge Valves XHV-5526, XIiV-5529, XHV-55 79, and XHV-5580, Justification:

The subject Hydrogen Purge Valves are Non-Nuclear Safet y and are not required to perform a safety function.

Therefore they are not considered " active valves".

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90-42.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.11B-3

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Extension of mild environment classification to equipment when the only environmental criteria to be evaluated is 100% relative humidity and the evaluation demonstrates no adverse effects on the equipment, Justification:

A mild environment classification may be extended to equipment exposed. Os the result of a Design Basis Accident, to environmental conditions which result in a relative humidity of 100% being the only environmental criteria of concern if evaluations are performed to show that no adverse conditions result from the equipment's exposure to 100% relative humidty. When relative humidity is the only concern the localized area / compartment

• s envi ronmental conditions are characterized by a lack of sufficient energy to drive heated air and humidity into typical power plant equipment.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-069,1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 3.11.3,3

Attachmont to TXX 91250 JJuly 31, 1991 Page 10 of 41 FSAR Page (at amended)

Dgscription SER/SSER Impact: Yes l

The SSER includes equipment located in an 100%

relative humidity environment as equipment located in a harsh area, 5,4-15, 16 Description; (Addition)

Add description of explosive expansion transitions in replacement Steam Generator tubes.

Justification:

Explosive expansion transitions in replacement Steam Generator tubes it included in the FSAR.

This method of expansion is superior to mechanically rolled-l transitions, especially combined with shot peening.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-018 Related SER Section: 5.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.4 6

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds control room indication of RHR pump suction pressure including an audible alarm for abnormal condi-tions by installing 1-PT-0601A,0602A & 1-PI-0601,0602

)

in response to Generic Letter 88-17.

i Justification:

This additional instrumentation provides an enhanced monitoring capability for the RHR system as described in TU Electric letter logged TXX-89804.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90-231 i'

Related SER Section: 5.4.3.3:

SSER22 5.4.3.3 L

SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):15

==

Description:==

(Revision)

The normal and shutdown position of Containment isola-tion valves 1-8880 and 151-8968 (item #104) are revised from closed to open to provide a constant source of nitrogen to the SI accumuiators with minimal operator interface.

Justification:

This is an acceptable arrangement as specified by 10 CFR 50. Appendix A. GDC 56 and does not increase the likelyhood for failure of these components, l

See discussion provided for Figure 6.3-1 sheet 2.

l Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90-225 Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2:

SSER00 6.3.2 j

SER/SSER 1mpact: No l

AhtachmenttoTXX91250

~

duly 31. 1991 Page 11 of 41 FSAR page (Al gagnded)

Descript19D Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):05

==

Description:==

(Revision)

The position of Containment isolation valve 1 8880 and valves 151-0132. 151-0154 and 1-8893 in the flowpath between the plant nitrogen supply and the Safety accumulator tanks and the pressurizer PORV's is revised from closed to open during normal plant operations.

Justification:

As described in FSAR section 6.3.2.2.1. the nitrogen gas supply to the accumulators is normally isolated (valves 1-8875A-D) but can be adjusted as required during normal plant operations.

Gas relief valves are provided to protect the accueulators and the PORV's from pressures in excess of design pressure and accumu-lator gas pressure is monitorec by indicators and alarms as shown on this figure.

Also see discussion provided f(r valve 1-8880 on Table 3.9N-10.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-90-168 Related SER Section: 3.9.3.2:

SSER00 6.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 7.7-42

==

Description:==

(Correction) at section 7.7.2.6 change mention of reactor trip on on terbine trip "above 10 percent" power to "above 50 percent" power.

Justification:

This change will make section i 7.2.6 cosistent with previous changes to 7.2.1.1.3 and table 7.2-2.

This change written to correct an oversight when changes to 7.2.1.1.3 were processed.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-183 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 8.3-63

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of one hour fire rated cable as electrical separation Justification:

Adds a description to indicate the methodology for color-coding the Rockbestos cable.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-053.3 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 22 Section 8.4.4 does not include in its description of color-coding methodology for Class 1E and associated cables a description f or the Rockbestos one hour fire rated cable.

At'tachment to TXX-91250

' July 31,1991 Page 12 of 41-FSAR Page (at Amends.d)

Dncrip. tion 8.3-75

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of one hour fire reted cable as electrical separation Justification Added one hour fire rated materials (e.g. thermolag and one hour fire rated cable) as acceptable for electrical separation. The one hour fire rated cable is Rockbestos cable constructed of a continuously welded stainless teel sheath and 12 mils thick. The cable is

)

constructed of organic and inorganic materials. The conductors are high temperature, nickel-clad copper sized for up to 1700 degrees F operation. The jacket material is a glass braid with a layered silicone rubber insulation. The cable is qualified per the ASTM E-119-1971 test criteria for a fire resistence rating of one hour. The ability of the cable to propagate a fire induced by an electrical fault is comparable to station cable in conduit due to the amount of combustible material in the cable. The layer of inorganic insulation in conjunction with the glass braid is similar to a wrap of woven silicone dioxide, which is considered equivalent to conduit for CPSES.

Thermolog is also considered acceptable for electrical separation because of similar characteristics to the fire rated cable.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-053.5 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SSER does not include the Rockbestos one hour fire rated cable as acceptable for electrical separation.

8.3-76

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

Expanded the scope of metal clad cable applications to include copper sheathed cable, in additon to aluminum sheathed cable.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-001.4 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SSER 22 does not include copper sheathed cable within the scope of metal clrd cable applications for CPSES.

8.3-76

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

FSAR revised to allow the use of copper sheathed (CS) cable inside containment for lighting circuits. The CS cable is considered to be equivalent to cable in con-duit for electrical separation purposes.

JL crush test

Attachment to TXX 91250

' July 31, 1991 i'

Page 13 of 41 FSAR Page

( u emended)

Itu ttint. ion data demonstrates that the mechanical integri y of CS cable is better than that of aluminum eheathed (A1) co-ble. which has been previously accepted by the NRC at C btS for electrical separation. For inside containment applications, the copper does not react with the acci-dont ervironment, therefore hydrogen generation is not a ccac9rn, in addition, since the copper jacket pro-tides comparable protection from fire as rigid conduit.

CS cable is not considered an intervening combustible material and is exciuded from the CPSES fire hazards combustible loadir.gs. Wyle test report #53575 demon-strates that 1" separation is adequate to protect Class 1E cables due to a fault (325 amps) in 3/C #8 AWG CS cable. CPSES applications of CS cable, at a masimum, is 4/C #10 AWG. The CPSES cable faults are expected to be less severe than of those tested, thus, the test re-suits con be applied to CPSES where 1" minimum separa-tion is maintained. The Wyle test has been reviewed and approved by the NRC for South Texas Project separation criteria. Based on the above conclusions, in contain-ment applications of CS cable in lighting circuits will be implemented at CPSES.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 001.5 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4,4 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes SSER 22 section 8.4.4 does not include CS cable as as one of CPSES metal clad cable applications.

8.3 76

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justi'ication:

Re %ed the text to specifically describe the charac-teristics and CPSES applications of aluminum sheathed cable.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 001.6 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 8,3-76

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of one hour fire rated cable as electrical separation Justification:

Revised text to include the Rockbestos one hour fire rated cable as an acceptable for electrical separation.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-053.6 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 l

Attachment to TXX 91250 1

' July 31, 1991 Page 14 ef 41 iSAR Page l

(Al Amended)

DetCrhtige i

SER/SSER Impact: tes

$$ER 22 does not include the Rockbestos cable as an acceptable approach for electrical separation.

8.3-78 Descriptions (Update)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

Revised the text to specifically describe the charac-t-

stics and CPSES applications of aluminum sheathed

...~. Also, reduced the maximum number of conductors from 6 to 4 fcr aluminum sheathed cable applications.

Group: 3 75AR Change Request Number: 91 001.8 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER impact: Yes SSER 22 section 8.4.4 indicates that the maximum number of conductors used for metal clad cable is six.

8.3 78. 79

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

FSAR revised to allow the use of copper sheathed (CS) cable inside containment for lighting circuits. The CS cable is considered to be equivalent to cable in con-duit for electrical separation purposes.

UL crush test data demonstrates that the mechanical integrity of CS cable is better than that of aluminum sheathed (A1) ca-ble, which has been previously accepted by the NRC at CPSES for electrical separation. For inside containment applications, the copper does not react with the acci-dent environment, therefore hydrogen generation is not l

a concern. In addition, since the copper jacket pro-vides comparabic protection from fire as rigid conduit.

CS cable is not considered an intervening combustible material and is excluded from the CPSES fire hazards combustible loadings. Wyle test report #53575 demon-strates that 1" separation is adequate to protect Class 1E cables due to a fault (32S amps) in 3/C #8 AWG CS cable. CPSES applications of CS cable, at a maximum, is 4/C #10 AWG. The CPSES cable faults are expected to be less severe than of those tested thus, the test re-i sults can be applied to CPSES where 1" minimum separa-tion is maintained. The Wyle test has been reviewed and approved by the NRC for. South Texas Project separation criteria. Based on the above conclusions, in contain-ment applications of CS cable in lighting circuits will be implemented at CPSES.

Group: 2 L

FSAR Change Request Number: 91-001.9 Related SSER Section: SSER2't 8.4.4 w

-i.,,..,-_*

_..m.,y.

..,w,_m

.>....e e.

--.__-..m__r..,y_.

,_m

-.i-

--?

w

, Attach: ant to TXX 91250 July 31, 1991 P6ge 15 of 41 FSAR Page (as ame!!ded)

EalCtjRllgD SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes SSER 22 section 8.4.4 does not include CS cable as as one of CPSES metal clad cable applications.

8.3 78 Descriptions (Addition)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

Expanded the scope of metal clad cable applications to include copper sheathed cable, in additon to aluminum sheathed cable.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-001.7 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes SSER 22 does not include copper sheathed cable within the scope of metal clad cable applications for CPSES.

8.1-79

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Use of one hour fire rated cable as electrical separation Justification:

Adds a general description regarding the construction and fire resistivity.of the one hour fire rated cable.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 053.7 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.4.4 SER/ESER 1mpact: Yes The SSER does not include the Rockbestos one hour fire rated cable as acceptable for electrical separation, 8.3-100 Descriptions (Addition)

Use of metal clad cable for electrical separation Justification:

l~

Added Wyle test report #53575 as a Chapter a reference l

to support the use of copper sheathed cable for electrical separation.

I Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-001.10 Related SSER Section: STER 22 8.4.4 l

SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3*5

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Non safety Battery Loads Justification:

This change deletes non-safety battery loads detail l

from the FSAR. This table is not explicitly referenced L

in the text of either the FSAR or the associated SERs and appears to have originally included as a "for information only" item. No credit is taken in safety analysis for non-safety battery supplied loads. The deletion of this table will reduce the administrative overhead of having to maintain the information to

~

Attachment te TXX 91250 11aly 31,1991 Page 16 of 41 f!AR Page

( A1 AmtfldC.d) llgKt.lP11.9tl current design calculations.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-181.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 8.3 6

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Non safety Battery Loads Justification:

This change deletes non safety battery loads detail from the fSAR. This table is not explicitly referenced in the text of either the FSAR or the associated SERs and appears to have been originally included as a "for information only" item. No credit is taken in safety analysis for non-s fety battery supplied loads. The deletion of this t ble will reduce the administrative j

overhead of having to maintain the information to current design calculations,

)

Group: 3 TSAR Change Request Number: 90-181.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 0.3.2 9/,>

SER/SSER 1mpact: No fi9ure 0.3-6 See Sheet No(s):01, 02

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise ISAR fig. 8.3-6, 6.9KV Auxiliaries One Line Diagram Saf eguards Buses, to show the "as built" wiring for undervoltage relays 27-2A;D/IEA1;2.

Justification:

This revision is required to bring the FSAR into agreement with the "as built" plant as a result of the implementation of DCA 72425 Rev 0. This modification reterminated the wiring from the potential transformer to the undervoltage relays 27-2A;B/IEA1:2 such that interconnecting cables which are run external to the bus cubical are isolatable in the event of a fault by protective fuses. This modification was required as a result of the Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis and is designed to avoid the generation of a false undervoltage sensing due to faults on externally run cabling with the resultant loss of 6.9KV loads. The modification has no effect on the functional description of these relays and has resulted in a j

clearly conservative revision to the previous wiring configuration.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-201.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l

l

Attachment to TXX 91250 July 31, 1991 Page 17 of 41 FSAR Page

( Al MCHdid)

DutC1111DB figure 8.3 9 See Sheet No(s):03, 04 Descriptions (Correction)

Correction of nameplate Horse power rating of H0Vs 1HV-6084 and 1HV 4700 supplied from HCCs IEB2 1 and IEB4 1 respectively.

Justification:

Field verification identified that the name plate Horse power rating of HOV 1HV 6084 and 1HV 4708 were incorrectly shown on drawings 1E 0007 B and C (FSAR fig. 8.3 9). FSAR Table 8.3 1A shows an estimated safety actuation HOV load of 230 Hp. and states that j

since ine HOVs operate internittently only, this load is not reflected in the running and continuous loading of the Diesel Generator. This correction results in a net change of 4.2 Hp. which is insignificant with respect to the estimated H0V load of 230 Hp. and is j

therefore not material to current electrical load analysis.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-073.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8.3 15B See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Correction) 118VAC and 125VDC one line diagram Justification:

Revised the one line diagram to reflect the new subcomponent tagging scheme for the radiation monitoring system. The new tag number, X RUK 5896B.

represents the RM 80 portion of the control room intake monitor. The tag number for the intake monitor is still X-RE 58968. This change does not affect the the functional capability of the radiation monitor.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 055.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 12.3.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 8 3-15B See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Correction) 118VAC and 125VDC one line diagram Justification:

Revised the one line diagram to reflect the correct tag number for the Train D heated thermocouple cabinet.

The correct tog number is CPI E!PRCV-16.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 055.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 22.2 SER/SSER impact: No

, Attachment to TXX 912$0 July 31, 1991 Page IB of 41 FSAR Page (as Aertided)

DncrDilon Figure 8.3+15B See Sheet No(s):02 Description (Correction) 118VAC and 125VDC one line diagram Justification:

Deleted the load on circuit 12 of the one line diagram.

A control room radiation monitor was incorrectly shown on circuit 12 of the drawing when the monitor is physically connected to another circuit. Circuit 12 does not have a load and appears to have always been a spare, as indicated in the revised drawing.

Group 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 055.3 Related SSER Section: SSER22 12.3.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.2 54 Descriptions (Addition)

Update the existing supply pump capacity from 430 gpm to "240 to 800 gpm" for the Water Treatment System as part of the system replacement.

Justification:

The existing system is under capacity and is being replaced with a new high capacity system to meet the plant demand and to increase the system reliability.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 134.1 i

Related SER Section: 9.2 SSER22 9.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.2 4A See Sheet No(s):03

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add pulsation dampeners and isolation valves to the Water Treatment System, deleted notes 10. 11 and 10

'=

from the figure in FSAR Amendment 81.

Justification:

The chemical feed piping for the acid feed tank and phosphate feed tank of Water Treatment System were corroded and is replaced with Chlorinated Poly Vinyl l

Chloride (CPVC) piping under the modification of the Water Treatment System.

The design modification includes the addition of check and relief valves, pulsation dampeners and isolation valves, which do not affect the design, operation and performance of the Water Treatment System.

CPVC material is not suscept-ible to acid and caustic degradation under the Water Treatment System's environment.

Group 3

(

FSAR Change Request Number: 90-120 Related SER Section: 9.2:

SSER22 9.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

At'tachment to TXX 91250

'Jul:s 31, 1991 page 19 of 41 l'SAR page (Al amended)

Descrjptiq0 figure 9.2 4A See Sheet No(s):04. 05 and 06 Descriptions (Addition)

Update the figures to reflect the replacement of the existing Water Treatment System with a highly efficient

, increased capacity and mo*e reliable system to meet the increased plant load.

Justification:

The existing system is under capacity and is being replaced with a new high capacity systes to meet the plant demand and to increase system reliability and efficiency.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 134.2 Related SER Section: 9.2:

SSER22 9.2 SER/SSER :mpact: No I

figure 9.2 5 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Replaces 3" temporary makeup fill connection with permanent till connection for demineralized water storage tank (DWST).

Justification:

Installation of 3" stainless stac1 permanent makeup fill connection with permanent adequate supports for the demineralized water storage tank will allow filling DWST via mobile water treatment skid.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-234 Related SER Section: 9.2.3:

S$ER22 9.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-5 See Sheet No(s):01, 04 and 05 i

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Cleanup / deletion / addition of minor details on flow diagram.

Justification:

See justification provided for F10.4 8.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-326 SER/SSER 1mpact: No figure 9.2-6 See Sheet Nots):04

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add the Demineralized water connection to various evaporator packages.

Justification:

Installation of cooling / flushing water lines are needed to collect evaporator samples safely and to minimize the contamination of the sample.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-132.1 Related SER Section: 9.2.3:

SSER22 9.2.3

Attachmont to TXX 91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 20 of 41 ISAR Page

( Al A*CDdCJD RCMt_lPilg_0 SER/SSER 1mpdct: No Figure 9.2 5 See Sheet No(s):05 Descriptions (Addition)

Revise figure to show demineralizer water lines, hot wa ter heater, respirator washer and sinks in the fuel building.

Justification:

Demineralizer water lines are added for the various equipner.t in the fuel building for decontaminating the equipment by flushing with the demineralized water.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-012.1 Related SER Sectiont 9.2.3:

SSER22 9.2.3 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 9.2 6

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Updates the figure to add potable water supply connec-tion to warehouse / office building, j

Justification:

A supply of potable water is needed to the warehouse /

office building for the regular usage requirement of i

the facility. This change reflects the as-built j

condition of the plant.

The revised figure was provided in FSAR Amendment 81, but without the change l

description. The description is hereby supplied in this amendment.

No FSAR figure is provided in this Amendment.

Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 095 Related SER Section: 9.2.4:

SSER22 9.2.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.2-6

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Update the figures to reflect the replacement of the existing Water Treatment System with a highly efficient increased capacity and more reliable system to meet the increase plant load. Add the potable water connec-tion to the polyelectrolyte skid in the chemical b1dg.

Justification:

The existing system is under capacity and is being replaced with a new high capacity system to meet the plant demand and to increase system reliability and efficiency.

The revised figure was provided in FSAR Amendment 81, but without the change description.

The description is hereby provided in this amendment.

No FSAR figure is provide in this amendment.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-134.3 Related SER Section: 9.2.4:

SSER22 9.2.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

At'tachment to TXX 31250 iluly 31,1991 page 21 of Al I

ISAR Page (Al Amended)

DVlCtipil0D figure 9.2 7

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Update the figure to add sewage supply connections to warehouse / office building and alternate access point extension to guardhouse.

Justification:

A sewage supply connection is required for the ware-house / office / guardhouse extension. This change in the figure reflects the as built condition of the plant.

The revised figure was provided in FSAR Amendment 81, but without the change description.

The description is hereby supplied in this Amendment.

No FSAR figure is provided in this Amendment.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-098 Related SER Section: 9.2.4; SSER22 9.2.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2 16 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Update the figures to reflect the replacement of the existing Water Treatment System with a highly efficient

, increased capacity and more reliable system to meet the increase plant load. Add the drain water connection from the waste treatment sump to LYW transfer sump.

Justification:

The existing system is under capacity and is being replaced with a new high capacity system to meet the plant demand and to increase system reliability and efficiency.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 134.4 Related SER Section: 9.2; SSER22 9.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s):01 through 16 except 03, 06 & 10

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Correct the references related to instrument air components.

Justification:

Corrects the instrument air system components reference and also makes drawings consistent with the as built configuration. The revised figure was provided in FSAR Amendement 81 but without change description.

The description is hereby provided in this amendment.

No FSAR figure is provided in this amendment.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-034 Related SER Section: 9.3.1; SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSEl: Impact: No

,Attachrent to TXX-91250 July 31, 1991 Page 22 of 41 FSAR Page (M Anttilled)

De5Crint191)

Figure 9.3-1

-See Sheet No(s):13 Descriptions (Addition)

Add 1" instrument air line and valve to the decontamina ation inline respirator $ in the decontamination areas.

Justification:

Instrument air is required for breathing purpose in room X 250 and is connected to the decontamination l

areas inline respirators, Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 014 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.3 1 See Sheet No(s):14 Descriptions (Addition)

Update the figures to reflect the replacement of the existing Water Treatment System with a highly efficient

, increased capacity and more reliable system to meet the increase plant load. Add the inst ument air service

)

to the Water Treatment System.

Justification:

The existing system is under capacity and is being replaced with a new high capecity system to meet the plant demand and to increase system reliability and efficiency.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 134.5 Related SER Section: 9.3.1; SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s): Sheet 03

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Install instrument air piping and valves from the instr ument air system to the UpS HVAC system.

Justification:

Connects the instrument air supply to the UPS HVAC system.

See justification provided for Figure 9.4 15.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 216.2 Related SER Section: 9.4; SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.3-2 See Sheet No(s):02 and 03

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Addition of Service Air piping in the Control Room.

Cable Spreading Rooms 133 and 134 and Corridor 207.

Justification:

Service air is provided to operate Bisco pumping unit which is used for penetration seal work.

The penetrat-ion seal work now can be performed without breaching the Control Room pressure boundary.

The connections added by this change are similar to the existing

Attachmont to TXX 912$0

' July 31, 1991 Page 23 of 41 FSAR Page (as metoded)

Rctcr.ip119n Service Air connections in the Control Room HVAC Room for Train A and Train B equipment.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 233 Related SER Section: 9.3.1; SSER23 9.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No figure 9.3 2 See Sheet No(s) 03

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add 1" service air line and valve for decontamination area.

Justification:

The service air connection is added for operating the power tools for decontamination areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-013 Related SER Section: 9.3.1 j

SER/SSER lopact: No Figure 9.3 7 See Sheet No(s):02 and 03

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add evaporator drain connection to Vent and Drain System Justification:

Installation of drain connection lines are needed i

to collect evaporator samples and to drain and flush l

lines which helps minimize the contamination of the samples.

The revised figure was provided in Amendment 81, but without the change description. The description is hereby supplied in this amendment.

No FSAR figure is provided in this amendment.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 132.2 Related SER Section: 9.3.3:

SSER06 9.3.3 SED /SSER 1mpact: No figure 9.3 9 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Revise figure to show Decontamination drains for sink, respirator washer areas drains in the fuel building.

Justification:

Decontamination drains are provided to collect the decontaminant in the equipment drains, which is collected in fuel building sump number 1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-012.2 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

~

, Attachment to TXX-91250 July 31, 1991 Page 24 of 41 FSAR Page (u pended)

Duttintion Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add the sample cooler to samDie lines on the Doron Cycle evaporators, Justification:

Installation of savple coolers, sample sinks and demin-erlizer water flushing lines will improve safety and decrease contamination while taking samples from Boron Recycle Evaporators.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 158.1 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 9.4 2 See Sheet No(s):03

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add the tool room and alternate RCA access area indoor design conditions.

Also update the design conditions for office & service area A/C and laboratories.

LDCR 90 161.208.

Justification:

The system design indoor conditions for tool room and alternate access RCA areas is added in the table 9.4-2.

Also corrected the design conditions for laboratories and office and service area HVAC system.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 161.2 Related SER Section: 9.4:

SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.4-1 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add temperature switches for the Unit 2 Computer Room Justification:

Temperature switches are required to operate Unit 2 air-conditioning equipments for unit 2 Computer Rooms to maintain the ambient conditions in the Computer Rooms.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-083 Related SER Section: 9.4.1:

SSER22 9.4.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):05

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Revise to depict the air flow path that could be utilized by the drying cabinet when in use. Also change room designation.

Justification:

The installation of drying cabinet requires an exhaust connection to exhaust from the drying cabinet while it is in operation.

Also changes room designation.

. Attachment to TXX-91250 i

July 31, 1991 Page 25 of 41 FSAR Page

(#1 AmtndCd)

DCitt.jpilgu Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 020 Aelated SER Section: 9.4.3:

SSER22 9.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No figure 9.4 4 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add temperature indicator, increase chilled water throu gh the cooling coils and increase air flow to cool the main steam and feedwater penetration areas.

Justification:

Based on the steam leakage in the main steam and feed-water areas, chilled water flow through the cooling coils is increased: also increased is the air flow, insulation is added to the piping and equipment in the HS & FW areas.

These changes reduce the heat load and increase the cooling in the MS & FW areas to meet the Plant Specification limits.

The temperature indicator is added to the MS & FW areas exhaust ductwork which monit.or the average bulk temperature of the HS & FW areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-221 Related SER Section: 9.4; SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No figure 9.4 4 See Sheet No(s):02 and 04

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletion of dampers for Primary Plant Ventilation Systems.

Justification:

Based on engineering analysis, dampers for Unit 2 have been deleted from the Primary Plant Ventilation System on the supply and exhaust side of the system. Deletion of the dampers will reduce the pressure drop through the PPVS. and enhance-the operability of the system to meet the requirement of the design air flows for the I

air borne contamination of the various areas of the plant.

The corresponding dampers in Unit 1 have been deleted, abandoned in place (no instrumentation or actuators remain) or do not serve any safety related function and have not been removed or locked open.

The deletion of the PPVS dampers will not adversely affect the safe operation of the PPVS and the plant.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 045 Related SER Section: 9.4.3:

SSER22 9.4.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l

l

~

Attachmont to TXX 92250

' July 31, 1991 Page 26 of 41 FSAR Page

( Al A*f!140_d)

ERICLIpligD Figure 9.4 11 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Remove heat tracing from the chilled water surge tank equipment and piping as this portion of this system is enclosed in the heated building.

Justification:

Chilled water surge tank equipment and piping is now enclosed in a building with heuters, which maintains the temperatures above freezing.

This building protects all the piping and equipment required for the surge tank to serve its function while the Chilled Water System is in operation.

The heat tracing provided earlier is no longer required to provide freeze protection to the equipment and piping, hence it is deleted from this figure.

Notes lhe revised figure was provided in FSAR Amendment

- 81, but without the change description.

The descrip-tion is hereby supplied in this Amendment.

No FSAR figure is provided in this Amend.nent.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-218 Related SER Section: 9.4; SSER22 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4 11 See Sheet No(s):03

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Add heat tracing designation to the chilled water piping located outside of the Fuel Handling Building Justification:

Heat tracing is required to provide freeze protection for the piping exposed to the harsh environment of winter and ensure that the chillers operate in winter. The figure is revised to show the heat tracing Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-217 Pelated SER Section: 9.4:

SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4 14 See Sheet No(s): Sheets 1.2 and 3

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add the tool room and alternate RCA access area HVAC areas to the system, Add mens and womens changing and shower areas to the system.

LDCR 90 161.208,222 and 91-10 Justification:

i The system design has been modified to include the l-HVAC services provided to the newly added areas of the tool room, alternate RCA access areas mens and womens change and shower areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-161.3 Related SER Section: 9.4:

SSER22 9.4

'Attachnent to TXX 91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 27 of 41 ISAR Page (M Rended)

EcEdpl10B SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.4 15 Descriptions (Addition)

Install instrument air supply to the UPS HVAC system as primary source of air supply to the valves and other components of the system.

Justification:

The instrument Air system is a clean and more reliable source of air supply to operate the condenser throtti-ing control valve on these systems.

The existing air supply source from the air compressor will stay as a backup source which is connected to the class IE power source. The use of the existing air compressor will be significantly reduced, thereby reducing the wear and tear on the air compressor and its components.

The reduction in operating time will reduce the amount of particles and dirt and reduce the maintenance on the system. The installation of the instrument air will enhance the performance of the UPS HVAC systems.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 216.1 Related SER Section: 9.4; SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Inpact: No 9.4A-10, 11 Descriptio1: (Correction)

Clarifi.:ation of the inspection and testing requirement of the Containment Ventilation Systems. Deletion of the in place testing of the HEPA and charcoal adsorber for Containment Preaccess Filtration Unit.

Justification:

A clariVication of the inspection and testing require-ments for the non ESF Containment Ventilation Systems (Section 9.4A), is required because they are different from those specified for the Control Room Ventilation System under section 9.4.1.4 as referred to currently under this section.

The preaccess filtration unit is a non-safety. 100%

recirculation unit which is located inside containment.

The unit is utilized to reduce airborne contamination

-inside containment prior to personnel entry.

Deletion of periodic in place testing of HEPA and charcoal adsorber may result in bypass of unfiltered air.

Excessive bypass of unfiltered air would only extend the duration of the operation of the Containment Preaccess Filteration System prior to allowing personnel to enter the containment, In addition, any unfiltered bypass air will remain inside the contain-ment building and therefore, will not cause an uncontrolled release of airborne contamination.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-068.1 Related SER Section: 9.4; SSER22 9.4.11.2

~

Attachment to TXX 91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 28 of 41 ISAR Page (A1 Amen.ded)

Renr_ildign SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes Section 11.2.2.5 should indicate the clarification provided for in place testing of Containment Preaccess Filtration Unit as per table 1, notes 2 and b of ASME/

ANSI H510 1980.

9.4C-10,11, 12

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Modify the office and service area HVAC system to service alternate RCA area, tool room, mens and women changing and shower areas. Also minor changes to air flow and balancing the system LDCR 90 161,208.

Justification:

The system modification is required to service the alternate access RCA areas, tool room, mens and womens change and shower areas, which provides HVAC and air flow patterr to reduce radiological contamination.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-161.1 Related SER Section: 5.4; SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.4E-3

==

Description:==

(Clarification)

Clarification for the plant Ventilation Chilled Water System Design and Normal operating conditions.

The chillers are operated by the plant operator based on the system actual loads in lieu of all five chillers operating (i.e., maximum) at all times.

Justification:

Five chillers are required to operate to provide the maximum design capacity of the system necessary to maintain area temperatures within Technical Specificat-ion limits.

The plant cooling loads on the system varies with the various indoor and outdoor conditions and the heat load The Plant Ventillation system should be operated efficiently and economically to handle the plant cooling loads.

The plant operators need the flexibility to operate this system as required based oa the plant cooling loads which ensures the component reliability and maintenance of the various plant area temperatures within Technical Specification limits.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-027 Related SER Section: 9.4; SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

.~

- - - ~

Attachnent to TXX 91250

' July 31. 1991 Page 29 of 41 FSAR Page (As amended)

Delttip_tien 9.5 5. 8 See Page No(s):30. 54 Description (Addition)

Use of one hour fire rated cable for electrical separation.

Justification:

Clarification that the one hour fire rated cable can be used in lieu of a one hour fire barrier for redundant fire safe shutdown equipment cabling.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-053.8 Related SSER Section: SSER21 9.5.3.8 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 9.5-54 See Sneet Ho(s):01 and Oi

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Adds temperature indicttors and thermowells in the jacket water and lube oil coolers of the Emergency Diesel Generator Systems.

Justification:

Installation of the temperature indicators and ASME !!!

Class 3 thermowells in ths inlet and outlet of the jacket water and lube oil co)lers are required to monitor the performance of the heat exchangers.

The installation of the thermowells in the existing 3/4" l

threaded coupling will ensure the pressure boundary of the jacket water and lube oil systems.

Installation of the temperature indicators and thermowells does not introduce any new failure modes and-does not impact the

)

operability of the Emergency Diesel Generators.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 199 Related SER Section: 9.5.5.7; SSER22 9.5.5.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5 55 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Replace existing air pressure switch with new type of air pressure switch with auxiliary valve in the Diesel Generator Air Starting System Justification:

The vendor supplied existing air pressure switch for the Diesel Generator Air Starting System Air Compressor is unavilable.

The new replacement air pressure switch needs system modification to add an auxiliary valve with a new type of air pressure switch in the Die'.e' Generator Air Starting System.

The Diesel Generator Air Starting System is non-safety related and redundant for each train of Diesel Generator System. The modific-ation in the air starting system will not impact the safety of the plant or will not make Diesel Generator inoperable.

The Air Starting System also consists of air receiver with a reserve capability of 5 start of

l

,A(tach ent to TXX 91250 July 31. 1991 i

Page 30 of 41 FSAR Page (Al AeCI!dRd)

D.21Cf.iP11911 the Diesel Generator in case of a failure of the Air Starting System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 025 Related SER Section: 9.5.6:

SSER22 9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5 55 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Delete the elbows from figure because they are minor details.

Justification:

Removal of c1 bows from the figure, considered as minor i

details, will not impact the safety of the plant.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 082.1 Related SER Section: 9.5.6:

SSER22 9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5 57

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add the temperature elements in the discharge of the EDG exhaust Justification:

Add TE in the discharge of the EDG exhaust, which is l

consistent with the FSAR Section 9.5,8.1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-082.2 Related SER Section: 9.5.8:

SSER22 9.5.9 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l-l Figure 10.2-1

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises Main Turbine low lube oil trip logic.

Justification:

Revises figure to show the low lube oil pressure trip actuates on 2-out-of-3 coincident logic instead of the previous single signal actuation.

This change reduces l

the potential for unnecessary turbine trips due to l

spurious pressure signals or pressure switch failure.

[

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 215 Related SER Section: 10.2 SER/SSER 1mpact; No 10.4-56. 62

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Installation of flow orifices in the feedwater line to ensure a 90 10 flow split between the main feedwater nozzle and the auxiliary feedwater nozzle at 100%

(

power.

Justification:

l The previous piping configuration did not provide sufficient flow through the steam generator auxiliary feedwater flow nozzle as required to maintain a 90:10

.A(tachmenttoTXX91250

~

July 31, 1991 Page 31 of 41 ISAR Page (As gec!1ded)

Delstipl[.gn flow split.

A maximum of 90% flow is allowed through the main feedwater nozzle to minimize steam generator tube vibrations in the Model D4/05 steam generators.

The installation of the orifices limits the flow thru the main feed nozzle to 90% with 10% bypassing the steam generator preheater section via the auxiliary feedwater flow nozzle.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 009 Related SER Section: 5.4.2:

3SER4 S.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-63

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revise actuation logic for the emergency low pressure heater bypass valve.

Justification:

Logic for actuation of the bypass valve is modified to require 2 out of-3 coincident Feedwater Pump low suction pressure signals instead of the previous single signal, in addition 2 out-of-3 coincident high pressure signals from the Auxiliary gland steam condenser differential pressure switch causes the bypass valve to actuate where previously a single signal was required (the Auxiliary Gland Steam Condenser input to the heater bypass valve actuation was not previously described in the FSAR but is now being added for completeness).

The change from single signal actuation to 2 ot of 3 coincident logic is being performed to reduce the number of unnecessary plant runbacks and potential plant trips.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 152.1 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-97. 99 Description; (Revision)

Deletes the description of turbine heat rate test and heater leakage detection using radi-: active tracer technique.

Justification:

This system is not used at CPSES.

The description was previously supplied for information or,1y concerning a system used for data acquistion for turbine generator /

condenser performance.

Their is no regulatory requirement associated with the system and it has no I

safety function, Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 058 Related SER bection: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

,A(tachmenttoTXX91250 July 31, 1991 Page 32 of 41 FSAR Page (Al Antadt.d)

P_tist.1911g11 10.4 127

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Permits pressure testing of nitrogen supply system pneumatically at 1.2 times design pressure in lieu of hydrostatically at 1.5 times design.

Justification:

This change is consistent ANSI B31.1 1973 Section 137 and is also consistent with the testing requirements for hydrogen supply system previously included (A78) in FSAR Section 10.4.15.2.4 but inadvertently omitted in FSAR 10.4.15.1.4 for the nitrogen supply system testing requirements.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-046 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-7 See Sheet No(s) 01 and 02

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises figure to show the addition of condensate polishing vessel 14" inlet and outlet header manual isolation valves and 1" bypass pressurizing valves.

Justification:

These isolation valves are being installed to provide the flexibility of isolating the individual polishing vessel for maintenance without shutting down the whole condensate polishing system.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 223 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-7 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Cleanup / deletion / addition of minor details on flow diagram.

Justification:

See justification provided for F10.4-8.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 026 SER/SSER impact: No Figure 10.4-7 See Sheet No(s):03

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Deletes valves ICP 0064A thru ICP-0064G.

Justification:

These valves are not included in the as-built installation of the sample cabinet.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-016 l

Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No l

.A(tachaenttoTXX91250 July 31, 1991 Page 33 of 41 FSAR Page (H Aul!Ldid)

DitCIJP11911

. Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the condensate pump trip and condenser hotwell level control system to require 2-out-of-3 trip logic.

Justification:

A plant single point failure analysis identified the condenser level controls as a potential single point failure for plant trip initiation. This modification is expected to reduce unnecessary plant trips.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 224 Related SER Section: 10.4,7 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises normal position of valve 100 0291.

Justification:

This change reflects a minor revision to normal operation of the sampling system.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-043 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 04

==

Description:==

(Editorial)

Cleanup / deletion / addition of minor details on flow diagram.

This figure has also been reformatted (i.e..

redrawn to be more operator friendly and may include changing the number of sheets in the figure).

Justification:

These FSAR figures have been simplified to 1) reduce the number FSAR changes generated for revisions to minor details on flow diagrams 2) allow the use of a single set of flow diagrams for both Units 1 and 2 (except where the units differ) by removing Unit identifiers, and 3) improve readability of drawings by removing non essential detail.

The changes to the figures are primarily deletions of the following types:

(ine numbers (line size remains if greater than 1 inch)

Manual valve numbers Equipment numbers (except where necessary e.g. fans and dampers Air flow rates on HVAC drawings (excent capacity)

Drawing notes not related to system i' unction or which are inconsequential to NRC review i

" Correlation" note above title block l

System boundary indicators Reducer sizes Reducers attached directly to valves or other equipment

,A(tachenttoTXX-91250 July 31, 1991 Page 34 of 41 FSAR Page (A1 Aminded)

DR1CLint12D

" Flow Diagram" in the drawing title Flow diagram numbers in " figure continuation arrows" The following is added to drawings:

Correct FSAR figure number in " figure continuation arrows" The above changes were discussed with the NRC and accepted in NRC letter of 5/15/90, Also added to some of the " cleaned-up" figures were minor details such as small lines, valves, drain and test connections, and instrumentation.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-026 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):03

==

Description:==

(Correction)

Deletes two 3/4" lines and valve 1C0-0419.

Justification:

Correction of drafting errors; not included in the as built design of the condensate system.

Group: 3 FSAR Chenyt Request Number: 91 015 Related Sell Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure l.0ks-8 See Sheet No(s):03 and 04 Description. (Revision) i Revises figures to show 2-out-of-3 coincident logic pressure switches.

Justification:

See justification provided for Page 10.4-63.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 152.2 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-8 See Sheet No(s):04

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the Feedwater Pump low suction pressure trip to require a 2-out of-3 trip logic.

Justification:

A single point failure analysis identified the feedwater pump suction pressure switches as components whose failure can initiate a sequence of events that can lead to a reactor trip.

The modification to require 2-out-of-3 coincident logic will eliminate this single point failure probability and reduce the number of unnecessary plant trips.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-197 Related SER Section: 10.4.7 SER/SSER Impact: No

,AktschmenttoTXX91250 July 31, 1991 Page 35 of 41 i

FSAR page (Al Dm91@ld)

DMGf.ip1LQD Figure 10.4 9 See Sheet No(s):03

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Installation of feedwater flow orifices to assure a 90:10 flow split.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 10.4 56.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 009 Related SER Section: 5.4.2:

SSER4 S.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4 13 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Deletes piping associated with turbine heat rate test and heater leakage detection using radioactive tracer technique.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 10.4-97.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-058 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No figure 10.4-15 See Sheet No(s):01

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Adds LC-2 (locked closed Unit 2) designation to six turbine cooling water valves.

Justification:

These valves serve as Unit 1/ Unit 2 Turbine Plant Cooling Water System cross ties and will be locked closed for personnel and equipment protection during Unit 2 construction.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-067 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-17 See Sheet Ho(s):03

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Revises the Main feedwater Pump low lube oil trip logic to require 2-out of 3 low pressure signals instead of the previous single signal.

Justification:

A plant single point failure analysis identified the Main Feedwater Pump low lube oil pressure switches as possible single point failures.

This change is installed to reduce unnecessary plant trips.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-041 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

1. ttachsent to TXX 91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 36 of 41 FSAP Page

( Al Amtilded)

EtiEC]P11911 Figure 10.4-20 See Sheet No(s):04 Descriptions (Revision)

Revises normal position of valve ISS 0174.

Justification:

This change reflects a minor revision to normal operation of the sampling system.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 043 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 11.4-3 See Sheet No(s):01 l

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add the sample cooler to soniple lines on the Waste Evoporator Package.

Justification:

Installation of sample coolers, sample sinks and demin-erlizer water flushing lines will improve safety and decrease contamination while taking samples from Waste Evaporator Package.

Group: 3 FSAR Chango Request Number: 90-158.2 Related SER Section: 11.2.1:

SSER22 11.2.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 11.2 4 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Addition)

Add the sample cooler to sample lines on the Floor Drain Waste Evaporator Package.

Justification:

Installation of sample coolers, sample sinks and demin-erlizer water flushing lines will improve safety and decrease contamination while taking samples from Floor Drain Waste Evaporator package.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-158.3 Related SER Section: 11.2.1:

SSER22 11.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 13.1-8

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises name of the Technical Support organization to be the Plant Engineering organization.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-20.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1

AitachmenttoTXX91250

~

' July 31, 1991 l

Page 37 of 41 FSAR Page l

DqsqE pting (M #sen_ded)

SER/SSER Inipact: Yes The new organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

13.1-9

==

Description:==

(Update)

Deletes the position of Hanager of Operation Support Engineeering.

Justification:

The reponsibilities for this position have been consolidated within the position of Hanager, Plant Engineering.

Also see justification provided for page 13.1-20.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER %ection: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER impact: Yes The new organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

13.1 20

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises name of the Technical Support organization and reorganizes the responsibilities for the Manager, Plant Engineering, the head of the renamed organization Justification:

The reorganization was designed to enhance the efficiency and productivity of the engineering resources.

This is accomplished by consolidating a number of responsibilities within the Plant Engineering organization previously accomplished in other organizations.

Specifically, the position of the Manager of Operations Support Engineering (which previously was a direct report to the Chief Engineer) is deleted and the responsibilities assumed by the Manager, Plant Engineering.

The Hanager, P1nnt Engineering is a direct report to the Manager of Nuclear Operations Support, but has " dotted line" reportability to the the Chief Engineer. Also, as part of this reorganization, the Performance and Test organization, previously a direct report to the Manager of Nuclear Operations Support, has been incorporated within the Plant Engineering organization.

Group: J FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The new organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

~

Kttachment to TXX 91250

' July 31, 1991 Page 38 of 41 FSAR Page

( Al Mtudtd)

ECKr_JRLI#11 13.1 21

==

Description:==

(Update)

(

Deletes description of Performance and Test Department, l

Justification:

Performance and Test is incorporated within the Plant Engineering Department.

The descriptions of the organizations within the Plant Engineering Department is below the level of detail normally provided.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 i

Related SER Section: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No l

Table 13.1-1 See Sheet No(s):02

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises name of the Manager. Technical Support to be the Manager. Plant Engineering.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-20.

Group: 3 i

FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The new organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

i j

Figure 13.1 2

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises the Operetions organization to reflect the i

Plant logineering organization.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1 20.

l Groups 3 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The new organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

i l

Figure 13.1-3 Descriptions (Update) l Revises the Station organization to reflect the new Plant Engineering organization.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1-20.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 l

SER/SSER Impact: Yes l

The new organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

fttachtnent to TXX 91250 July 31, 1991 Page 39 of 41 FSAR Page (Al omtMed)

Deurintigo 13.1A 1, 2 See Page No(s.1:03, 04

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises the person holding the position of SAFETEAM Hanager and updates the resume.

Justification:

Normal position rotation.

Group: 3

)

FSAR Change Request Number: 91 054 Related SER Section: 13.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 13.1A 1 See Page No(s):52, 53

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises resumes to reflect the new Plant Engineering organization and the accompanying changes.

Justification:

i See justification provided for page 13.1-20.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 13.5 6, 15

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises name of the Technical Support department to be the Plant Engineering department.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1 20.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 019 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 14.2-3 Descriptions (Editorial)

Revises the FSAR figure references for the Startup and Performance and Test organizations.

Justification:

Editorial change.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 019 Related SER Section: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 14.2-11

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises the organizational reportability of the Performance and Test Manager.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1 20.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER impact: No

kitachment to TXX 91250

.. ', July 31, 1991 Page 40 of 41 FSAR Page (Al amended) peggtjpligD 14.2-14

==

Description:==

(bpdate)

Revises membership of the Test Review Group (TRG),

Justification:

The Technical Support membership is replaced by Plant Engineering, (due to the name change) and Performance and Test is deleted since it is already included as a group under Plant Engineering.

Also see justification provided for page 13.1-20, Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1; SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No figure 17.2-2

==

Description:==

(Update)

Revises the Nuclear Operations Organization to reflect the new Plant Engineering department.

Justification:

See justification provided for page 13.1 20.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-019 Related SER Section: 13.1:

SSER22 13.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: Yes The new organization no longer reflects that described in SSER 22.

CAR 040 169

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete'the accumulated condensate removal requirement at one day after the new fuel cil is added in the fuel oil storage tank'.

Justification:

See justification provided for IA(B) 1.137. Part C.2 d.

(SA-90-052.1).

Group: ?

FSAR Chaage Request Number: 91.052.2 Related SER Section: 9.5.4.2:

SSER22 9.5.4 SER/SSER 1mpact. No Q&R 040 169

==

Description:==

(Revision)

Delete'the accumulated condensate temoval requirement at one day after the new fuel oil is added in the fuel oil storage tank' Justification:

See justification for section IA(B) 1.137 for page 1A(B)-85.86.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 052.2 Related SER Section: 9.5.4.2:

SSER22 9.5.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

fttachm:nt to TXX-91250

."

• July 31, 1991 I4 Page 41 of 41 FSAR Page (Al ARCD.dtd)

Df1CLIR11R!)

Q&R 130 1

==

Description:==

(Editoria;)

Revises the response to 0130.1 to refer to previously revised FSAR Section 3.3.2.3.

Justification:

This change is mace to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 90-140 I

Related SER Section: 3.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No