ML20070T340
| ML20070T340 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 09/06/1983 |
| From: | Bean F YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20070P788 | List: |
| References | |
| 4, NUDOCS 9104040115 | |
| Download: ML20070T340 (10) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT 2 YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY
,YAmxsia s
.~
'14, tTTT.f.- -
M 6
SEABROOK STATION FIELD QUALITY ASSVPANCE PROCEDURE TITLE. Field Quality Assurance Check Lists NUMBER: 4 REVisiCN: 5
(
DATE:
PREPARED BY: I. W. Bean DATE: January 27, 1977 APPROVED FOR USE: Walter J. Miller 2/23/77 YAEC Q A MAN AGE R REVISIONS NO. DATE PREP. BY APPROV. BY NO. DATE PREP,BY ~ APPROV, BY J' "* N' J' 1
2/2/78 s SinRieten Miller J. W. W. J.
2/25/79 Sincleton '
__ Miller 3
5/11/81 Sin ietof "
, 8/05/82 J.W. V 12 Sincleton -
Sin ketor [/ 13 6 "
14 7
15 B
16
~
9104040115 910322
! PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR
FIELD QUALITY ASSURMICE MANUAL AND PROCEDURE PROCEDURE NUMBER 4 Record of Revision Revision 1, chanSe: Complete Re-write Revision 1 has been reviewed and approved:
Byt.
- Date:l' 2 '7'?
Quality Assurance Manager J
Revision 2, Changer Para. 2.1 changed "all" to "the" & other minor changes (, )
Annual review completed July 25, 1979, Revision 2 has been reviewed and approved:
By:_
Date: 2'* J ' 'df Quality @suranceManager e
8Ss i
uge.
FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL AND PROCEDURE 4 RECORD OF REVISION Revision #3, May 27, 1981
- 1. General A. Change Procedure Form B. Renumbered Pages 1 thru 22
> II. Specific Change:
A.
Rewrite the following paragraphs:
Para. 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 5.1.2, 5.3.5, 5.4.1, and 5.4.3 B.
Rewrite sample attachment numbers attachment # 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Annual Review has oeen completec ano changed as required.
Revision 4 has been reviewed and approved:
By: &c/Mk M Date: Jr/2 7/s/
QualitypsuranceManager "B"
- .. . . . . . -. . . . - . _. . .~ - . . . _ . . - . . . . .
FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL AND PROCEDURE 4 RECORD OF REVISION l Revision #4, August 5,1982 l
l 1. Specific Change:
A.
Para. 5.3.3 added "Where a Master Check List is used in its entirety, only the Surveillance cover sheet is added to the Master Check List" .
Annual Review Completed, Change 4 Reviewed and Approved B y :, [ Date: 8/u /C2_
/ Constructi'on QA Manager *% / /~
J
(
t e
"C"
l CFQA MANL'AL & PROCEDURL PROCEDURE NUMBER 4 RECORD OF REVISION I Revision Number 5, 9/6/83
- 1. General Change - Revised title and references -
A. Change Field Quality Assurance: Group to Construction Field Quality Assurance Group.
II. Specific Change A. Revrite para. 3.2.2, 3.2.3 B. Revised para. 4.4 C. Rewrite para's. 5.2.2, 5.2.7 D. Delete At tachment 7.2 E. Revise para. 5.3.3, 5.4.3, 7.0 F. Revise Attachments 7.1, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7 Revision 5 has been reviewed and approved:
By:
Date- 9/6/83 i
w "D"
CFQA Manual l Procedure No. 4 Pavision: 5 Datet 9/6/83 Page 1 of 5 CONSTRUCTION FIELD QUALITY ASST lP.ANCE CHECK LISTS 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To establish the requirements and procedural methods for preparing,-
and controlling check lists to be developed and utilized by the CFQAG.
. 2.0 SCOPE 2.1 To provide a set of master check lists that include the requirements for construction activities affecting the quality of safety related-structures , systems and components.
2.2 To provide a source for selecting characteristics in developing surveillance check lists which vill be used in performing surveillance activities.
2.3 To provide current indices of Construction Field Quality Assurance Master Check Lists develcped and referenced documents used.
i 2.4 To provide check lists that have _ unique numbering systems _ or codes cociatible with the YAEC/QAD computerized' " Summary and Status of Corrective Action" for deficiencies.
3.0 GENERAL 3.1 Definitions 3.1.1 Characteristic _-_Any property or attribute of an item, process or service that is distinct, describable and measurable,-as conforming or nonconforming to specified_ quality requirements. -
Quality characteristics are generally identified in specification l and drawings which describe the item, process or _ service.
3.1.2 Quality Assurance - All those planned and systematic actions' necessary to provide adequate confidence that an item or a facility will perform satisfactorily in service.
l 3.1.3 Surveillance - A review, observation _or inspection for. the j purpose of-verifying that_an action is. accomplished as specified.-
3.1.4 - Master Check-List: _A comprehensiva list of attributes developed to-i
' cover each specific area of construction activity and to be-used I
in se.lecting characteristics for developing shrveillance check lists.
3.1.5 i
Surveillance Check List - A= list of attributes taken from the -
l ' Mas t e r Che c k Li ts. The Surveillancu Cheek List is developed to coyer.the specific area of construction activities being i
performed during a phase of construction.
i
.~,m. ..-.~m,-_.. .._..--.m _ -, - -~.,,-_-m..,_,,--..-_...-_--. _
- - , - ~ _ . - , - - , - - . . . , , , . - . . . -
. - . - . . . - - . - . . . . . . _..-. .- . . - . - - - . . . . ~ . - . - - . - . - - - . ..
l
. . CFQA Manual l Procedure No. 4 Re vision: 5 Dat e t . 9/6/83 Page 2 of 5 3.2 Responsibilities 3.2.1 The Construction Field Quality Assurance Group personnel shall be responsible for the development of check lists.
3.2.2 The Construction Field Quality Assurance Discipline Supervisor or his designee shall be responsible for the review and approval of developed master check lists.
3.2.3 The Construction Field Quality Assurance- Surveillance Supervisor or his designee shall be respon.ible for assuring that all master check list and referenced document indices are current and up-to-date.
400 REFERENCES 4.1 Appendix B to 10CFR50 4.2 ANSI N45.2 Se rie s 4.3 Seabrook Station Quality Assurance Manut,1 (YAEC) 4.4 Seabrook Station FSAR 4.5 Applicable Code Standards 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 General 5.1.1 A Master Check List is a predeveloped Check- List covering the applicable attributes for a specific construction or Quality Assurance function. le may combine one or_more requirements, such as an applicable criteria of 10CFR50, l Appendix "B", an ANSI N45.2 section, the applicable
- Regulatory Guide, etc. Personnel developing Master Check i
List may elect at his discretion, single or multiple 1 l inclusions.
5.1.2 The Master Check Lists shall provide a list of characteristics l-available for selection in developing the surveillance check.
lists.
5.1. 3 The Surveillance l Check Lists 'shall be the working check lists that will provide documented evidence of all surveillance activities performed.
y 5.2 Preparation of Master Check Lists 5.2.1 Master Check Lists shall be developed to provide a complete listing of the requirements for specific safety related construction activities prior to the performance of those activities.
4
--. . m.;.w. y, , - c + .--vww,,m%,w-,--,-,wn,-w..-.~,,m.w,e.,,e. . . , , . , y-r.=r,+- + ,. , - * , , . - - ,
-l CFQA Manual.
Procedure No. 4 Revision: 5 Dat e: 9/6/83 Fage 3 of 5 5.2.2 The Master Check Lists shall be developed by Construction Field Quality Assuranc *ersonnel and approved by the Construction Field Quality Assuranci iiscipline dupervisor.
5.2.3 Each Master Check List shall be comprised of characteristics selected by thorough review of the latest applicable documents (i.e. procedures, standards, specifications, drawings, referenced codes, etc.) for the specific activity.
5.2.4 The attributes that makeup a Master Check List may be organized and arranged in a oequential progression that coincides with the sequence of construction activities.
This arrangement aids in the development of surveillanco check lists.
5.2.5 Each characteristic shall have provisions in the right hand column of each page for reflecting the results of examinations by provding "Yes", "No" and "N/A" columns.
5.2.6 Normally the attributes of a Master Check List will be -
selected from more than one source.. Each source and it's revision shall be listed on the Title Sheet. (See Attachment 7)
It shall be the responsibility of the individual developing a check list to utilize one of the following methods of traceability from the check list characteristic to che reference document:
[
5.2.6.1 Identify the source and. paragraphs form which the attributes were extracted.
5.2.6.2 Identify the source and paragraph'from which_a section of a check list was developed.
5.2.6.3 Add a " Table of Contents" relating the sourves with the specific--pages in the more' complex-check lists.
l 5.2.7 The attributes that makeup-a Master Check List shall be- '
uniquely numbered and' utilize the YAEC NSD Quality Assurance Department' Procedure Q-ll3; Deficiency Coding System, in-order to issue computerized " Summary and Status of Corrective Action".
-(See Attachmentd 7.3) Utilizing the deficiency code-should facilitate _nonconformances by a given contractor or for any given.
construction activity.-
5.2.8. Each Master Check List shall include a Title 1 Sheet.. It shall have provisions -for the title, check listinumber, signature of' preparer, approval signature and date, revision blocks, and list of referenced documents, their revision and/or data and_the specific section or paragraph used.
(See Attachment 7.1) 4 1
_ - ~, . . . __ ... , , _ . . . - . - - - ~ , - - _ _ - , . - - ~ - _ _ - - - , - - . . - - , ~ . . , _ ~ , ~ . - , --,-.,_.s.- a
CFQA Manual l Procedure No. 4 Pavision: 5 Date: 9/6/83 Page 4 of 5 5.2.9 The Master Check Lists shall be an internally controlled document. They shall be numbered and reflect the current-revision and date. Each page shall be numbered for-accountability and shall also include the check list number and revision in the uppe* right hand corner. When a revision occurs, the actual revised portion will be noted by an asterisk (*) placed in the right hand margin adjacent to the revision. In addition to the change being noted in the test, a " List of Changes" will be made a part of each revised Fkster Check List. (See Attachment 7.4) _ lt shall be the responsibility of the Construction Field- Quality Assurance l Engineer to review revised reference documents and determine whether a Master Check List needs to be revised to incorporate these changes or not.
5.3 Preparation of Surveillance Check Lists 5.3.1 Surveillance Check Lists shall be developed to coincide with the progress of construction activities.
5.3.2 The Surveillance Check Lists shall be prepared by the
' individuals within the Construction Field Quality Assurance Group l whc will be performing the surveillance function.
5.3.3 Each Surveillance Check List shall be developed by -
selecting characteristics from a Master Check List.
Where the Master Check List is used in'its entirety, l only the Surveillance cover sheet is added to the Master Master Check List. In order to maintain traceability, each characteristic on the Surveillance Check List :shall carry the same number as on the Master Check List. Each characteristic shall have provisions in the right hand column for reflecting the actual results of examinations by- providing "Yes", "No" and "N/A" columns.
5.3.4 lt shall be the preparers' responsibility to-assure that the characteristics are selected-from the latest revision of the Master Check List in accordance with the index '
(See Attachment 7.5) l 5.3.5 Surveillance Check Lists _ shall be developed and used 'to_ ensure depth and continuity of surveillance activities. 'These check.
lists should not restrict surveillance activities to only the-characteristics as listed on the Surveillance check List.
0.3.6 Surveillance Check Lists shall not be controlled documents requiring a check list number and revision. They may be changed each time they are used or the same check list may be used on several occasions depending on construction activities being covered and results on past surveillance activities.
_ _ _ - - - _ . - . . _ . - - . ~ __ . - , - _ . . ._.. . _ _ . - . . . . _ _ _._ _ .
CFQA Manual l Procedure No. 4 Re vision: 5 Date: 9/6/83 Page 5-of 5 E
5.4 Use of Surveillance and Master Check Lists Master check Lists are to be utilized as a source of
~
5.4.1 attributes for the development of Surveillance Check Lists.
5.4.2 Surveillance Check Lists shall be utilize 6 as working check lists.
5.4.3 Should "No" be checked'for a certain chgracteristic on the check list, the deficiency code for the deficiency shall be entered in the "N/A" column.
6.0 CRECK LIST CONTROLS 6.1 An Index-or Master Check Lists shall be developed. This index shall reflect the latest revision and date for each check list. The users of Master Check Lists shall ensure that the current issue is-utilized.
(See Attachment 7.5) 6.2 An Index of Referenced Documents shall be developed listing all references used in the development' of Master Check Lists. The index shall reflect the latest revisions and/or dates of the documents. It~
shall also indicate the ' Master Check Lists for: which they were utilized.
(See Attachment 7.7) 6.3 A historical file shall be maintained for all obsolete Master Check Lists.
This will provide an available source of the requirements that a -
contractor may have been committed to prior to any subsequent revisions <co the referenced documents.
7.0 ATTACEKENTS 7.1 Title Sheet - Master Check List (sample 7.1) l 7.2 Summary and Status of Corrective Actien-(sample 7.3) _l 7.3 List of Changes - Master Check List (sample 7%4) -
l 7.4 Index of Master Check Lists (sample.7.5) l-7.5 Surveillance Check List (sample 7.6) - l 7.6 Index of Referenced Documents (sample 7.7) _l f
9 we==mvwr--.- tre-^r --w-