ML20070T361
| ML20070T361 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1991 |
| From: | Feigenbaum T PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | Norton L NRC OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20070P788 | List: |
| References | |
| NYN-91023, NUDOCS 9104040125 | |
| Download: ML20070T361 (14) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
..nACHMENT S eW Omp5 hire Yg( ,, u ,e u .
pmident on# CNel tiewwe offm NYN. 91023 February 8,1991 Mr. Lec J. Norton Assistant inspector General For Investigations Office of Inspector General Unlied States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washing.on, DC 20$55
References:
(a) Facility Operating License No. NPF.86, Docket No. 50 443 (b) NHY Letter NYN.91002 Dated Janut. y 11, 1991; Ted C. Felgenbaum to Leo J. Norton ' i
Subject:
Additional NHY Response To 010 Request For Information
Dear Mr. Norton:
The construction practice at Seabrook was to have designated Yankee Atomic Quality Assurance personnel perform, as a minimum, a 100% review of the Pullman.Higgins safety, related pipe weld final acceptance documem, tion, whenever on. site radiographic examination was the NDE process required to meet ASME piping code requirements. Notwithstanding this practice, in the process of assembling documents in response to additional congressional staff requests, we have discovered that this review did not occur with respect to one specific weld; Field Weld CS.328 02 F0204. Also, the radiographs for this weld have not been located and are presumed to be lost or discarded. Enclosed, for your information, are the Radiographic lospection Report (RIR) and the Field Wct i Process Sheet for this weld. Attached to the RIR is Corrective Action Request (CAR) No.91001 (Rev.1), which documents the current status of our determinations associated with this weld. To briefly summarize, we believe that the final, hard. copy RIR and subject radiographs were never transmitted by the piping contractor, Pullman.Higgins, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) CA/NDE personnel for review and final vault storage. A microfilmed copy (versus hard. copy) of the RIR lodicates that the final acceptance radiographs were shot and accepted by a Pullman.Higgins Level !!! review on August 17, 1982 and were further reviewed 6.nd accepted by the Authorized Nuc! car Inspector (ANI) on August 23, 1982. Further evidence of w:ld cornpliance to the pertaining ASME !!! Code, Class 2 criteria is provided by the field weld process sheet records, which were initialed and dated by the Pullman.lliggins Level !!! reviewer and the ANI on the same dates as above, and by Revision 2 of Non.Conformance Report (NCR) 2128, which documented a Pullman. Higgins' dispositica verifiestion, on October 7,1982, that the weld has been accepably 9104040l25 91037.2 PDR CDP.MS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR Nw Hompshire Yonlee Division of Public Service Company of Nw Homoshire , P.O. Box 300
- Seobrook, NH 03874
- Telephone (603) 474 9521
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 8,1991 Attention: Mr. l.co J. Norton Page two repaired and radiographed. Additionally, other quality records indicate that Field Weld CS. 328 02 F0204 was objected to a volumetric ultrasonic testing (UT) lospection on January 31, 1986 and a liquid penetrant testing (1.PT) examination on February 12, 1986. Both of these tests were conducted in accordance with ASME XI basellne inservice inspection provisions, in excess of the ASME Ill construction requirements, and provide further evidence of acceptable weld quality. From this and the enclosed documentation, you will see that the quality, functionality and operability of the weld are not in question. However, the history of this weld has two implications. First, the requirement for weld lifetime retention of she final acceptance radiography has not been met. In order to correct this, the weld will be re tadiographed before the end of the 1991 Seabrook refueling outage, the film will be reviewed in accordance with our present program requirements and the film will be placed in the records vault w complete the required quellty document set. The second implication is that the YAEC practice of conducting an additional OA examination of all safety.related radiographs was, on this single occasion, not followed. As indicated in the CAR, investigation of the causes of this omission have led to the conclusion that it..'; was an isolated occurrence with no discernable generic implications. Nonetheless, because it appears to be an exception to our previously unquallfled proposition to you regarding the 100% YAEC review practice, we wanted to bring this specific occurrence to your attention. The NRC Senior Resident lospector has been apprised of the missing ra& graphs and our subsequent actions / determinations. Section 8.2 of NRC Inspection Report 50 443/90-24, issued January 17, 1991, pertains to this matter. If you have any questions on the enclosed documents of this matter in general, please do not besitate to call Neal A. Pillsbury at (603) 474 9521, Ext. 3341. Very truly yours, l [ ! Ted C. Feigenbaum TCF: NAP /bes/ tad Enclosure (s) l ' -. ,e ,- , ---.
. -, , - . - - - .__,-c , . . _ . . , , . ,,_. -- --- - - , _ . . . _ _ , , , ~ . . -
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Mr. Leo J. Norton February 8,1991 Page three cc: Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 475 Allendale Roed King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Noel Dudley NRC Senior Resident inspector P. O. Box 1149 Seabrook, NH 03874 Mr. Gordon Project Edison, Directorate I 3 Sr. Project Managerj United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Peactor Projects Washington, DC 20555 Mr. Frank Forglone Special Agent Office of the inspector General United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission MNBB 6715 Washington, DC 20555 Document Control Desk United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 i
~
. - , . - --- .,r, , .
RADIOGRAPHIC Pullman Power Products
. SEABROC4 STi'lON l
. INSPECTION REPORT. Joe as
- e,~ c ,,o. . o ~o.- - ,,u o ., n o m
. ... ,,s,,o 1 CS J 2.8 62 Fo 2. 0 Y
, . n.. . .m.....~,. . . - . . n, c. ~ --- eh o em ..:~. g-3f .o o . .. . . . o o
, , ,L , ,,. f3f,
,, g/,. a,, . . < . , - . .f, g .
. . , .s.u.
u=> .- nn.,g n o e . . .. .- . ... , 0.~. - . _ P, R B~. . . . .. - -/o --_..
-.~o-
,., , _. . - ,> .. e //vbtJing) (LlG!1- 9 o .~,,,. . < . . .--. - - .
. . .. s . . . , o
. 8-0-l2- ..e a ' ~~i.ucr o
. a ..a o m. ..a o ..
. / hA 0
- n a ft
'r 84 e /Ag
.-{** V/ /qQ l i !
f#\\ I }RG rr i,^ 644 es.c a..o ga or,on nvica
. a aet w a n .c a4.ci.e to *t.n ma.n , . .
FILM OATA LNT cNstryING 6CREENS R Ael ATiON SOURC E
.... CV ao ..O "li'ito , a ~. o . f. o ' o'" & c" 'N-w.o g1 - .. . . , a . . . . . o<,, , , , a o~ . -_ 'a ** a P =
u% - pg /th .. p GT cc . n o r ~ f@ ,a
. , mt , /o7 3 . /g -. o -- .o s 9- ecJ"'a~nca o*1^
n ,.,, . .
/g, , . .o --, o _ , GF we m f / uh.,p,...c /y,/6-n /.$/.T ' IN 6 - u . m '.~ct
,,. . . ,,. /.. , L f er cessi~Q oarA
. m .,- . . . f . . . . . f .,c . . g%, a . , e4, f. __ -
,,; o .., F
/~/
~~~'
/,/
,6 us,, lj ! /
/n,/ $ f'/it.//
... - . ,y - ~
ise " <
, ._o} /
}
/ _
/
/ V
/ /
d / \ t> 5 WBGE
--g. pi
.9 N k 6CC te .A .
~~ Y:poO o '
M SJNIm A ~' 7 - 0 '.TA. f l iib
~ i [ d & w C, 6 d % .
U ,, ' . I- f , e , * .-
s 1 . . Now Hampshire Yankee - Subject ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION INF0PJtATION (CAR 91001) From D. L. Covill Dom. February 8, 1991 j To File Reference i As part of the verification process for CAR 91 001 a review was performed I utilizing Pullman-Higgins Veld Repair Order (VR0) Log. This log is not a QA record. It contains information thSt was used i.o double check the results of the investigative action described an page 3. paragraph 8. of CAR 91 001 (Rev. 1). An additional ' film on hand' verification was conducted oy using P.H's VR0 Log as follows: P.H's WR0 Log was reviewed for piping field welds (FVs) with three or more entries, along with piping PVs with the repair cycle noted as , three or more. ' This review denoted 137 field welds which required radiographic examination (RT). All 137 welds were verified to have YAEC-reviewed radiographic film on hand. This conservatively expands the corrective action detailed on page 4 of CAR 91 001. Rev. 1. beyond the CDT data base search. bal Q Dennis L. Cov111 1 New Hompshire Yonkee Division of Public Service Company of Nw Hampshire P.O. Box 300
- Seobrook, NH 03874
- Telephone (603) 474 9521 ,.
j COPJ.ECTIVE ACT:0N REQtJEST Page 1 of 2 ICTS fQA11131 CAR No. 91001 Rev. 1 i
- 1. Initiator Depart =ent Date 2. 04AP Dennis L. Cov111 NQG 1/09/91 @Yes O No
- 3. Description of Condition Adverse to Quality A review of documentation for field weld 1-C5-328-02, F0204, revealed the radiographic fil: vas missing. The field weld package contains all SME Code required inspections and NDE and were found acceptable pursuant to the Code ,cunqtruction. j/
(Continued on Page 2) 4. Approved By // IM /Am - #7N M,, Ing.kir'sSupervisor ' Daf.e
- 5. Respensible Manager R.E. White /J.J. Warnock 6[DateResponseisDue 2/15/91
- 7. Disposition (to correst the conditica)
See Page 3
- 8. Investigative Action (the cause of the c:ndition)
See Page 3
- 9. Corrective Acticn (to prevent recurrence)
I See Page 3 10 CTR 21 Review Required 0Yes Gwo If Yes, Manager of Engineering Notified Date
- 10. Date-Cerrective Action Vill Be Cc=pleted EwAd\"hebb.ON. " o Corrective Action Concurrence b A.N3d..b b 7 3 NWMtk /
'/M/91 Nam & Title (Af fected Department)NQh Da e
- 11. Corrective Action Approved By e *d '
/ I.
j Na e ( 7,iTie / / ate
- 12. Cerrective Action Evaluation Cc:pleted By b Ln d d ; 4M _
M/ I Nuclea- QualityI Ihmec( Date
- 13. Corrective Action Verification .,
Nuclear Quality Manager Dat' cc: L.A. Gauthier (File 17.2.16.2) y,ey
- 4 R.E. White Nyy perm 12720 A J.J. Warnock D.L. Covill .
..~-..,_w.---- ,.,J-,J-,--L-,1,..- .,.,,,#,..,4,-_-,_.m ,,,,,,,,,.,_,_m.,, .,..,_,,,.,_m,..,,,_,,,,.m,,m._.7,,_y,,_ , , , ,
CAR No. 91-001 Rev. 1 Page 2 of 2 Corrective Action Recuest (Continued)
- 3. Description of Condition Adverse to Quality (Continued):
The radiographic film is required by ASMI Code and ANSI N45.2.9 for lifetime retention. Additionally, there was no 3rd level overview done by YAIC QA of the radiographic film for this particular field weld. The YAIC TQA Manual Procedure #5 required YAIC QA perform a review of all safety related site generated radiog:aphs during the construction phase. NOTE: The CAR was revised to correct section 9 of the CAR vhich was i= properly filled out by the initiator. i
CAR 91001 rev.1 PaBe 3 of
- 7. Disresition (to correct the condition)
Re. radiograph field weld 328.T0204 during the first refueling and perform third level review. Retain examination report and film in accordance with station approved procedures.
- 8. Investirative Action (Ref.: CEH.90 1001)
A design implacentation document and quality record review of field weld 328.T0204 has been performed. Adequate documentation was found to establish that this veld received all code required inspections and NDE with acceptable results. The subject film may have been inadvertently discarded prior to YAEC third level review. This most likely took place during a period when T0204 was incorrectly identified as T0209 on the construction isometric
- drawing. As noted in the referenced memo, T0204 was incorrectly deleted from the isometric subsequent to its acceptance (as T0204). Since the third repair NCR disposition required removal of the heat affected zone adjacent to the veld, the designer may have assumed that T0204 no longer exists. The cortect veld number was later re established on this drawing.
To determine if other radiographic film may have been discarded, the veld record of field welds having three or more repairs were reviewed (attached). Of those identified in the search, all had film and YAEC review completed. It is, therefore, concluded that there are no generic ' implications.
- 9. Corrective Action (to prevent recurrence)
The programs and procedures applicable during the period of time when ' I construction documents were turned over to NHY, and reviewed by YAEC QA, are no longer in effect. Additionally, since generic implications are not apparent, steps to prevent recurrence are not necessary. A 10 CTR 21 review is not required for this condition. Field weld 328 F0204 is an integral part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCP seal injection) and, therefore, constitutes a basic component. _Since adequate docu=entation exists to establish that this veld received all code required inspections and NDE with acceptable results, a substantial safety hazard does not exist, e
- 6
. . CAR 91-001 rev. &
E* CORRECTIVE ACTION REQtTEST CAR 91-001 2, . A pca tout was obtained from a CDT data base search on the vord
'rspair' from the first 120 characters in the description field. This search denoted 203 NCR's from the population of 14,922 in the system.
- 2. NOR's with 3 or more repairs noted in the description field were reviewed for film on hand. As a result 23 velds were reviewed. 2 velds of the 23 had been deleted. Of the 21 re=aining velds, all had YAEC reviewed film on hand.
NOTE: NCR's where the description was not revealing as to an obvious third repair vare randemly reviewed and processed as above, s l l l _, . _ , _ _ _ _ . ._.7 . , _ ,, _.,, __ .,% . . , _ , .
New Hampshire ' ciR ,1 0e1 ,e , 1 Yankee "
' CEM-90-1001 IMSi A16.06.33 SUBJECT RECORDS RIVIEW - FIELD WELD rJ/328.F0204 FROM R. E. Whi t e DATE December 27, 1990 TO W. cagnon 8?EFERENCE .
Engineering van requested to independently evaluate the design implementatien documents and quality records for field weld 328.F0204 in light of missing radiographic film. Based on this review, it was determined that all code required inspections and NDE vere performed, and found acceptable. The Radiographic Inspection Report provides objective evidence that this
- examination was performed, and results found acceptable by a qualified 1.evel 3 Inspector. Additionally, the Authorised Nuclear Inspector (ANI) has provided concurrence with these results.
Discussion - Field veld 325-F020s. is and ASME I !, cl. 2 joint, located in the 3 inch cc:=en RCP seal wat er return, outside containment. This veld is identified on
- nstruction isemetric CS.328 02 and c:nnects spool E2936 969 and E2936 970 on line 1 05 325 2 2501 3*.
After a third attempt at achieving a radiographic quality joint. NCR no. 2 28 was initiated, per program requirements, for disposition by the Engineers. The rework, as stated in the NR3RT dated 7/19/82, was completed, i l and the 1002 radiographic examination made on 8/17/82 accepted. Process sheets t6nd Radiographic Inspection Reports are. filed with the NCR in support of Disposition Verification which was completed on 10/7/82. Some confusion may exist in review of the Construction-Isometric history. Subsequent to completion of the final veld, and NCR close out verification. FJ 328 F0204 was changed to F0209 on the isometric. It appears that, irrespective of the NCR close out status, the designer may have assigned the new veld number in preparing rev. 7 of the iso. because the PCR 2128 disposition required a complete veld cut-out (EAZ). The veld had, however, been previously accepted as F0204 and the effective iso revision (rev. 6) - l- reflected this designation. The iso was corrected on rev.13 to properly l identify this joint as F0204 PE0279-New Hompsn' ire Yonkee DMilon of Public Service Company of Nr "% white . P.O. Box 300
- 3eobrook, NH 03874
- Telephone (603) t 4 952
- . - . - , . - - , - , , , . -...-.r,.-. ,, -,-,,,---,-.,,,-n.-~,~,,..,.n-,- -,,,n.,... ~ + - - , ,,--,-nn,v,-, . - - ~ , - - . - - . - -
' CAR 91-001 rev. 1 4
pg.6 Fage 2 RECORDS REVIEW - FIELD WILD FW/328-F0204 All documentation for field weld 328 F0204 indicate that code required inspections and NDE, including radiography was performed and found acceptable by qualified personnel. Authorized Nuclear Inspector concurrence of the radiographic examination interpretations is indicated on the Radiographic Report. Therefote, there is no reasen to believe that the quality of 328-F0204 is ccepre=ised by lack of the radiographic film. The requirements of ANSI N45.2.9 and the ASKE code are not, however, satisfied with respect to documentation required for lifetime retention. Both require radiographic records, as well as film, be retained for the life of the plant, and on that basis, radiographic inspection should be repeated at the earliest convenience. Cenclusion: Adequate documentation exists to establish that 328-F0204 received all code required inspections and NDE with acceptable results. The requirements of ANS: N45.2.9 and the ASMI code include the retention of radi: graphic film as well as radiographic results for the lifetime of the plant. Radicgraphic inspection should, therefore, be repeated at the earliest c:nvenience if the subject film cannot be found.
/ '.
/
L'b /z4L R. \E . Whit e Plant Engineering Manager REV/ RRO ::.c s cc: R. J. DeLoach 01/40 J. M. Vargea 01/62 R. Bergeron C1/62 C. V. Robert: 01/62 L. V. Rau 01/62 G. Tsouderes Bolton R. R. Cliche 01/62 DOC 02/06 4 e PIO270 l . . _ . .._. . - _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . . .- - - , _ ~ ..-._.. -- - . - -- ----- --
ar ---m uum umm mam - usa musumu K
- Ji
'*" e 4 t s >
$w
- 7 3 w
R,r t a a r aw Q '!ba 4 is't t w{ 7d. 6 6 '8* M 4>$ $ 3- S$ A k t u k > + u a . - h V u u u 3-k_k k - 90 _ h g g = y --- g-
* *7 C + $ Tb ? " 6 t si
~ Bh t* j d =3e d@39>fw3 2 4 bonNF! WS ek
@a h 3of*a S # t,su sise A s gd 9 k s_L4 2 e s. 4
__b q < c q'- c
- g 12 k 32 e E<
.)%
, 'Cs -
% g s.
b .s c d
- o .
].
EL . n .,, Ir Uh( 8 o N 5 Q
=
E
-g 'U 'U
- 8 g-
- e. .
n t - c a s ,%o w0 s" S b $ N t b 33 a - W 24 s to o u o e e m m,
" dg< 3 o o
*o . "= g a n m
~
=
.g -
N1g4 M
.g m um . m
- p Q h Q N um O *E g v 30~ d
. b d 4 8 o
,n,, $ a
*5 W t uw
" d d B.-8 m
t: tg g g Q m j t p .g"8~ e, g=
"A~ W -
x._E_.i" Basil m _itte 9
~
gn
- n e n = m o -~n n
. s .
9 y - f.= Ag- - ya..-- 5
.2 q 1k5 % a o g s- g t br -
., s% cm w
4 6 h Ta k7r 'A N go. .
< b -
7
=
0
. u. o ~< :
e
~ =< w<a; t:;
,'l. '- $w: -
a w tj ' g .
,c rN
%1 n - -
g t t t k e nrr. n> r'o t n w n - ) >
- u. n. u. o t
> < n> m.
i Di ut g u 4 ' c o t u. c
) wE e
- N e g . c i
Q t w g v o u
- +,J u
< M utau::b. a i
k a o u
= 2 g
e n% m
'e a <B- 4 R4 45 t d y "8 9 -
6 ? s s h n s =: A
- a i _p2 a ; y 4 u = g
- e. pv2 , .
r y > - S - - ib i
, 6, J J
, B q -
9 . e t . . -. t to [t $ '~ h e i No =h b " hh s
.. ff "3 5 3 .,
h . o. = p ys t , de s ? " t 8 0 , n *c . .. . . . - . " m c - . .V. . u r . =
- e.n .e u J
= 3 wg it4%t ].4 "r t 8 ; ; ) s '
m .- . 3 e
'D 6 h : .ou i s. .
N .* 7 *,' g
. .e t- ,*
** ry ,, a o q . r, f ygg ,
o u a E, g ,, p 8 m, pi IM6il$II bdfb
}
- C%M1::ATION
N j // J / = A:tept.ible N/Ae*b: /;plic.61e t.' *O
- i .-
_ps. :t TO VTt3 f?:0 P "Ir
. ./+ ,
ff@v (6 fsta c Q X = Ik: Accept $le lI,%lbC kh.e.sset Physics 1 Intc Arity of Ccmnenen . 0 9 E ,'.C ) # pt T W .f v ac. 84-~_'
- 1 E** C 5 Vo1Jer Qualif tud for Joint .
Ve rify Fst e r(21 M rking ' , . M lter.s to be '.*cided * , Megustely Supported . Joint Design c.iesnliness
- 1. Veld Frep V J/N,p*b~ 2 ,
- 2. Internal Surface V ...
. -P rA.7'"" '
Miststch ) .[ /M F - / 2 -/t ?. cancant ric tccentric V ggg' . g Cold Spring ~ H I ' \" b C O V H G' K G &. GMG c o , Tack Velds *. * #
- t/
ur s Satis factory V Fre-test / - M MC (*3/ Os c t t. c . P t
' Socket Lid Ca p -;- f [0 ' # .
- Scribe brk Verified N I' .
4 . 020 4g w > m o: - 0* t D R.C C W LS D C ~~ Pra. 6.5 E tat':.s O - T.f.e=.11 Sciace ., p.::ce) Inte.r .a1 Surface (If A :essible)
- O,8 NV( ? -) T Q V MrMR N I.. er-Pa.ss Ter.p. '\
%R [N08h,
.. L;, - ,
g E).T.NATIC:1 Arrti vrtsti::: . Pea 6.5
,N '
l9 Internal Surface StaUS .
'If Accessible ' .
C*xida tion Cencavity
- Wn) 6 Car.vexity .
h dereut . . .
-( .
W eensused Icsert *'
--- [ ..i*' .-
. ,. [ '
' Cs$&A Tr - / 3 -f C.*
bi,dt: TOR
- Exte:.r.1 Surfaces .DATI JVeld & Hest Affected 1:ne)
- Rein!:r:seent Corrett
(!!eight & Vidth) V Tre frs= Ar: Strikes , And Vald Splatter Transition Between ,/ DLiterent DL.-etcrs V <
- 1:ndertut- #
Sult !,ility for il0T. V --
- Jotat & Velder ident.
V , Ketoval of To p. Attach. ant: M' f. \ Furg; Das RC 0v: 1 ' y g [a / ] -h ( '
/- c .5 - 3 23 M v F C. M ' !! :. '!:T0!'.
DATC i
- ATTACHMENT 6
/ a [\ isso stAns Hvct. tam msoVLATOM COMMM10N nasoni ,\*ov** (Ps AL. LEND Al,4 Ro AD xmo op pave stA. pasusnv/ NiA i++es Docket No. 50443 m 12 E Public Service Company of New Hampshlis - ATTN: Mr. Ted C. Feigenbaum President and Chief Executive Ofnost New Hampshire Yankee (NHY) Divialon Post Of6ce Box 300 Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874 Gentlement
Subject:
Request for Information on Radiograph Records Th6 porpose of this letter 18 to wnfum out tuyunt that New Hampshlie Yankee provide the following information to the NRC in writing, e The number of Pullman Higgins weld radiographs retrieved from the Ales incident to post construction follow up on weld adequacy questions, and the number of Pullman-Higgins v. eld radiographs which were not retrievable during this effort, e The number of Pullman Higgins weld rad!ographs which should be on nie. e The technical baals for your conclusion that the missing radiograph for Field Weld CS. 328 F0204 is an isolated occurrence with no discemable genene impheahons (reference your letter h"I'N 91023 to NRC (010) dated February 8,1991). ThuW you for your prompt utteutivu tu this otatter. Sincetely, t.t W. ,Dirtstui
' Division of Reactor Projects l
l n ,. . , i I A O fl [
Public Service Company of 2 FEB $I III New Hampshire m L. E. Maglathlin, Jr., President and Chlef Eucutive Officer PSNH J. M. PexheJ, Regulatory Compilance Manager, NHY D. E. Moody, Stadon Managet, NHY T. Hupster, Directot of UNMing Servitsa, NMY - R. M. Kaclch, Manager of Generadon Facultles doensing, NUSCO J. F. Opeka, Execudve Vice President, NU O. Garfield, Esquire R. Hallluy, Director, Dept. of PubUc Health, Commonwealth of Masuchuutts S. Wo. ihouse, Legisladve Aufstant K. Abruam, PAO, R1 (2 copies) T ubuc Decument Room (PDR)
!.o:al Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) NRC Realdent inspector State of New Hampshire, SLO Commonwealth of Munchuutts, SLO Designee Seabrook Hearing Service Ust e e
. -- ,, - , ..,w.-- - -
,-----y w - y .
5(alt 00K 6E AR14*, 5Etv1Cf L151 Jack Dolan
.Rotert A. Backws, [so. Feceral (*ergency Faneserent Agency tackws Feyee a*c Solomon 442 J. W. McCorrack (P0;H) 09 116 t.owsil' Street loston, Massachusetts 0a1 Panche ner, New Hampshire 03106 Gerald Garfield. Est.
Phillip Ahren. (50 Day, geray and Howard Assistant Attorney General City Plat.e Of fice of the Attoresy General Hartford, Connecticut - 06103 3499 State House Statfor. #6 Avgwsta. Maine 04333 Snnster Gordon J. Humphrey Ps. Swtanne Beefseth AffN: Tom Burack Board of Selecuen U.S. Senate Town of He Mon Fa115 531 Hart Senate Office Building Orietwater Read Vashington, D.C. 10510 Hampton Falls, he,. wampshire 03344 Administrative Judge Fr. R. $weeney Howard A. Vilber New Hucsttre taekee Division Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Beard twblic 5ervice Comsany of New Hampshire U.S. Nwelear Regulatory Commission
$wite 610. These Fesrc Center Washington, D.C. 20555 20814 Bethesca. Fa'/ 1ard Administrative Judge Acministrative Judge Thomas 5. Moore, Est.
A*an 5. Rosenthal Cnairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Atomic Safety anc t,4 censing Appeal Board U.S. Nweisar Regwistory Commission 4.5. Worlear Retw14 tory Ccmmission vaihtagten. 0.C. 20555 Washington. 0.C. 20hb Admininrative.1udge Aemittistrative dvdge Jerry f(arbour (neth A. Lwebte Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety anc Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Reguistory Comission U.S. Nwelear Regulatory Commission Washington. 0.C. 20555 Vashington. 0.C. 20555 Ese. H. Jeseph Flynn l Counsel l Paul McCachern. Esc. Assistant Genera I Shatnes anc McEachern Feder 1 (mergency Management Agency 1 25 Kaplewood Avenue Washington 0.C. 20472 Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801 Blane Curran, Est. R. Scot,t Hill Whtiton, Esq. Andrea Fenner, Est. Sw 4 Me P. Evan, toe. Hirmen, Cuiran, & Tevs1*y Lagouti5, Will WhiIton 2001 5 Street, W.W.
& Rotondt Suite 430 70 State Street -
Washington. 0.C. 20009 ' Newburyport, Massachusetta 01950
. _. _ _ . _ _ . . _ ,_ _ ._ ~ _ - _ _
$[A900( HtAt!NG SERVICE L157 Edwin J.' Reis. (ie. Ashod N. Amirlan, Esq.
Office of the Geeeral Counse) 145 Main $treet U.S. Nuclear Regw14 tory Comission P. O, tox 34 Washington. 0.C. 2C555 Bradford, Massachusetts 08130 Chairran. Icard cf $electmen $sacoast AntiaPollut' ion League P. O. Son 710 5 Market Street heath Hatster. hew Hampshire 03862 Portsmouth, New Hanpshire 03801 Ja's $pecter Administrative Judge Feceral (merga Regulatory Co mission Ivan V. $mith, Chairman (2) 825 Ncrth Capitol $treet, N.t. Atomic $afety and Licensing Board Re:m 81C5 U.S. Nuclear Regw14 tory Comission Washingten,D.C. 20426 Washington, D.C. 20$$$ kr. Georst L. 1strien. Cicetter John Traficente. Esq. he, harpshire Office of Energency Chief Nuclear $4fety Ur tt k a n a j e * * *.t Office of the Attorney (,)neral
$ tate office tact lowth Ore Ashbweten Place 100 F' essa *t Street Igth Floor Ctecott, hem Martsn've 03301 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Pr. Ga*y n'. Heints. [st. Administrative Judge Heines anc (114s Kenreth A. McCollom 47 Wienacwaret Read 1107 Vest Knapp Street Hay ttn. New Heepshire 03g42 $tt11 water, Oklahema 74057 Actinistrative Jsele Adjudicatory File (2)
G. Paul Bollwert. !!. Chairean Atomic $afety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety anc Ucensing Appeal Board Panel Docket U.$. Nsclear Regwlatory Comission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Washtrston 0.C. 20555 Washington 0.C. 20555 Adelnistrative Judge Mitti A. Young Richard F. Cole Attorney Atomic $afety and Licensing Board Office of the General Counsel U.$. Nuclear Regwistory Commission U.S. Nvetear Reguistory Connission Washington,D.C. 20555 Washington. 0.C. 20555 i Robert R. Pierce. Est. Congressaan Nicholas Mavrovlos Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.5. Hovie of Representatives U.S. Nwclear Reggiatory Ctamissten 70 Washington Street Vashington, D. C. 20555 Sales, Massachusetts 01970 l l Barbara J. Saint Andre, Est. Judith H. Mitner, Est. l Kooleman and Paigt P.C. Counsel for West Newbury l 20) Arch $treet 79 State $treet Boston, Massachusetts 021% Newburyport, Massachusetts 01:50 1 i
. - . - ~ . . , $EAlt00K WEAR!RG $ERV!CE Ll$T Mr. R. M. Katich Mr. J. F. Opeka hut'llivant Utilities Lervice Company Northeast Vtilitten lervise Compsey P. O. Bei 270 P. O. Box 270 M4ttfuid, Connecticut 06141-0270 Hartford, Connestiswt , 06141-0270 John P. Arnoid. Attorney Geners) Atomic $afety and Licen61ng Appea)
George Cana 8(stee Algeciate Board Attorney General li t Woeisar Regulatney rammittinn Attvinns General's Of fice Washington, D.C. 20lli 25 Capitol Street Corcord. New Hampshire 03301 l l
, - - . - , .-.. . .. . - . , ., , , _ ,_ ,__,__, .,_ _ , _ _ .}}