ML20063H176
| ML20063H176 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1982 |
| From: | PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20063H132 | List: |
| References | |
| ENVR-820731, NUDOCS 8207290352 | |
| Download: ML20063H176 (142) | |
Text
[gj ) LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OPERATING LICENSE STAGE R" VISION 4 PAGE CHANGES The attached Revision 4 pages, tables, and figures are considered part of a controlled copy of the Limerick Generating Station EROL.
This material should be incorporated into the EROL by following the instructions below.
REMOVE INSERT VOLUME 1 Page 2-v Page 2-v Pages 2.1-1 thru -8 Pages 2.1-1 thru -8 Table 2.1-17 (pgs 1-5) Table 2.1-17 (pgs 1-8)
Table 2.1-19 Table 2.1-19 (pgs 162)
Table 2.1-20 Table 2.1-20 Table 2.1-22 Table 2.1-22 Table 2.1-24 Table 2.1-24 Tables 2.1-25A thru 2.1-37 Tables 2.1-25A thru 2.1-37 Tables 2.1-39 thru 2.1-43 Tables 2.1-39 thru 2.1-43
()
( )
Figure 2.1-2 Figure 2.1-7 Figure 2.1-2 Figure 2.1-7
'^',
Figure 2.1-9 Figure 2.1-9 l VOLUME 2 i
! Page 2-v Page 2-v Table 2.4-11 Table 2,4-11 Figure 2.4-2 Figure 2.4-2 Figure 2.4-11 Figure 2.4-11 Page 3.1-1 Pages 3.1-1 & -2 i Figure 3.1-2 Figure 3.1-2 Figare 3.1-3 Figure 3.1-3 VOLUME 3 l
Pages 5.2-17 & -18 Pages 5.2-17 6 -18 Table 5.2-14 Table 5.2-14 Table 6.1-46 Table 6.1-46 VOLUME 4 Pages 8.1-3 6 -4 Pages 8.1-3 & -4 Pages 11.1-1 & -2 Pages 11.1-1 6 -2 Table 11.3-1 (pg 1) Table 11.3-1 (pg 1) 7ss Pages 12.1-3 & -4 Pages 12.1-3 6 -4
( ) ---- Pages E310.1-1 thru E310.12-1
' ---- Pages E320.1-1 thru E320.2-1
Pages E470.1-1 thru E470.14-1 Pages E471.1-1 thru E471.5-1 ----
8207290352 820727 PDR ADOCK 050003gg T m
l LGS EROL
() CHAPTER 2 TABLES Table No. Title 2.1-1 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 1970 2.1-2 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 1980 2.1-3 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 1983 2.1-4 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 1990 2.1-5 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 2000 2.1-6 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 2010 2.1-7 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 2020 2.1-8 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 1970 2.1-9 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 1980 2.1-10 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 1983 2.1-11 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 1990 2.1-12 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 2000 2.1-13 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 2010 2.1-14 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 2020 2.1-15 Sources of Projected Populations 2.1-16 Bureau of Census Populations of Counties Within 50 Miles of the Site 2.1-17 Industries Within 5 Miles of Site 2.1-18 Present Land Usage Within 5 Miles of LGS 2.1-19 Projected Land Usage Within 5 Miles of LGS 2.1-20 Hooker Chemical Company l 2.1-21 Pipelines Within 5 Miles of LGS
(~% 2.1-22 Airports Within 10 Miles of the Site
\ L.]
2-v Rev. 4, 07/82
l LGS EROL
[T CHAPTER 2 THE SITE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACES 2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location 1 Limerick Generating Station is located in southeastern Pennsylvania on the Schuylkill River, about 1.7 miles southeast of the limits of the Borough of Pottstown, and about 20.7 miles i northwest of the Philadelphia city limits. The Schuylkill River passes through the site, separating the western portion, located in East Coventry Township, Chester County, from the eastern portion, located in Limerick Township and Pottsgrove Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Figure 2.1-1 identifies the general location of the Limerick site, and Figure 2.1-2 shows the immediate environs, within 5 miles of the site.
The Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates of the Limerick
('/
x-
) Unit I reactor are 4,452,582.462 meters north and 449,984.170 meters east, Zone 18T. The corresponding Greenwich coordinates for Unit 1 are 40013'26.67" north latitude and 75035'16.27" west longitude. The Unit 2 reactor is located at 4,452,582.462 meters north and 450,033.548 meters east, Zone 18T of the Transverse Mercator Coordinate System, with corresponding 40013'26.64" north latitude and 75035'14.15" west longitude coordinates.
l 2.1.1.2 Site Area The land portion of the site consists of 595 acres, as shown in Figure 2.1-3. The property within the site boundary is owned by Philadelphia Electric Company except~as noted below. The site boundary is shown in Figure 2.1-3. As shown in Figure 2.1-3, the site is traversed by several public roads, a Conrail right-of-way, and the Schuylkill River. These areas, including the island in the river, are considered public passageways and not part of the site property.
The site is located in gently rolling countryside, traversed by numerous valleys containing small streams that empty into the Schuylkill River. On the eastern bank of the Schuylkill River, the terrain rises from just under el 110 MSL, at the river, to approximately el 300 MSL toward the east, which is the highest ground on the site boundary. Two parallel streams, Possum Hollow f)
\_/
Run and Brooke Evans Creek, cut through the site in wooded valleys, running southwest into the Schuylkill River. Grade in the area of the reactor and turbine enclosures is about el 217 2.1-1 Rev. 1, 09/81 I
I LGS EROL MSL. On the western bank of the river the terrain is relatively flat, rising only about 50 feet from the shore to the western i edge of the site. One small stream flows southeastward through the site to the Schuylkill River.
The exclusion area for Limerick Generating Station, shown in Figure 2.1-3, is defined as the area encompassed by a radius of l 2500 feet from the center of each reactor unit. The property within the exclusion area is owned by Philadelphia Electric Company, except as noted below. As shown in Figure 2.1-3, the '
exclusion area is traversed by several public roads, a Conrail right-of-way, and the Schuylkill River. These areas, including the island in the river, are considered public passageways and not part of the site property. Arrangements for control of public access to these areas in the event of an emergency have been made with the Pennsylvania State Police and with Conrail, as described in the Emergency Plan.
There are no outstanding mineral rights within the exclusion area.
The locations of principal station structures are shown in Figure 2.1-4. In addition, the Limerick Atomic Information Center is located on the site property. The information center, owned and operated by Philadelphia Electric Company, is open to the public during specified hours. Admission to the information center is controlled by Philadelphia Electric Company.
A power plant simulator, used for training operating personnel, is adjacent to the site. This facility is operated by General Physics Corporation. Use of the facility is controlled by Philadelphia Electric Company.
2.1.1.3 Boundaries for Establishing Effluent Release Limits The boundary line of the restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR Part 20, is identical to the site boundary line shown in Figure 2.1-3. The land area within the boundary lines is owned by Philadelphia Electric Company. Control of public passageways is discussed in Section 2.1.1.2.
There are no permanent residences within the restricted area.
Station effluent release points are shown in Figure 3.1-2.
Rev. 4, 07/82 2.1-2
LGS EROL 2.1.2 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION 2.1.2.1 Population Within 10 Miles The population distribution within 10 miles, as a function of distance and direction, for the decades 1970 through 2020, is listed in Tables 2.1-1 through 2.1-7. The 1983 projections are considered to be representative of population-in the year of initial station operation, and the 2020 projections represent population at the anticipated end of station operation. A map, keyed to Tables 2.1-1 through 2.1-7, is provided in Figure 2.1-5.
The population distribution within 10 miles is based upon the number of households, obtained from a 1976 meter count of Philadelphia Electric Company's residential customer billing file, and a 1976 meter count of Metropolitan Edison Company's billing file. A factor of 3.58 persons per residential meter in Philadelphia Electric Company territory, and a factor of 2.85 persons per residential meter for the Metropolitan Edison Company j territory were used to convert the meter count into population.
! Projected populations were determined by using county projection
- factors obtained from state agencies. Where information was not available to the year 2020, Philadelphia Electric Company y,j extended the available information through that year.
Table 2.1-15 lists the sources of population information.
Population distribution is based upon the assumption that the l population of each civil division is spread evenly over its area.
l Population per sector may then be determined by multiplying the l
fraction of each civil division's area within a given sector by its respective total population.
O Population for the year 1983 was estimated by Philadelphia Electric Company by extrapolation of data between 1980 and 1990.
Projections for the years 2010 and 2020 were made by increasing projections for the year 2000 at a rate of 20% per 10-year period.
2.1.2.2 Population Between 10 and 50 Miles Population distribution between 10 and 50 miles for 1970 through 2020 is listed in Tables 2.1-8 through 2.1-14. This information was determined by the same techniques as in Section 2.1.2.1. A l
map, keyed to Tables 2.1-8 through 2.1-14, is provided in Figure 2.1-6.
Population changes for 1950 through 1970 in the counties within 50 miles of the station are indicated in Table 2.1-16.
O 2.1-3 Rev. 4, 07/82
1 l
LGS EROL 2.1.2.3 Transient Population The transient population in the site area is classified as daily i or seasonal. The daily transients result from an influx of 1 employees to local business and industrial facilities. Local )
industries, and their location and employment, are listed in Table 2.1-17. The only industries with a significant daily transient population are Mrs. Smith's Pie Company, Sircom Knitting Company, and Crouse Company.
Seasonal transients result from use of recreational areas, of which there is only the Countryside Swim Club, Inc., within 1.3 miles of the station. The maximum daily attendance at the swim club is estimated to be 800, with a daily average of 400 during the summer season.
A 1976 creel survey of people fishing the Schuylkill River within 5 km of the station showed that 96 percent lived within 10 km of the river and thus do not comprise a transient population. These data also projected 1980 fishing pressure within 5 km of the station at 8800 angler hours for the principal fishing months of May through September. The average time spent fishing was 3.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> from shore and 4.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> by boat. Less than 20 percent of the fishing pressure came from boats. Table 2.1-42 describes boating hours per year as cited by the Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Based on these data and data collected in a 1980 creel survey conducted as part of the Limerick preoperational program, an average of 1100 boaters per year could be expected to useithe Schuylkill River within 10 miles of the station, most of which would occur below Vincent Dam (3.3 miles below the station).
2.1.2.4 Age Distribution The age distribution in Montgomery County compared with the U.S.
population in 1970 is shown below:
Age Percent in Ace Group Montgomery County United States 0-11 21.4 22.4 12-17 12.2 11.9 18 and over 66.4 65.7 Total 100.0 100.0 There is no reason to believe that there will be a significant difference in age distribution in the year 2000 between the United States and Montgomery County. The United States age distribution in 2000 is shown below:
Rev. 4, 07/82 2.1-4
f LGS EROL g-G Age Percent in Ace Group 0-11 17.3 12-17 9.2 18 and over 73.5 2.1.3 USE OF ADJACENT LANDS AND WATERS The general land use character of the area within 5 miles of the Limerick site is rural and open, and contains one major forest, located in northern Limerick and Lower Pottsgrove Townships. A discussion of local land use was provided in Section 2.1.4 of the Limerick Generating Station Environmental Report - Construction Permit Stage (Revised). There have been no major changes in actual or projected land use patterns.
Present and projected land use within a 5-mile radial area of Limerick is presented in Tables 2.1-18 and 2.1-19. The urban development and population concentration near Limerick lies outside a 2-mile ring and, historically, has been oriented along the Schuylkill River, with recent suburban growth spilling out over municipal boundaries. About half of the 1970 population was
, located in the Boroughs of Pottstown, Royersford, Spring City, and unincorporated areas of So~uth~Pottstown and Kenilworth.
O- Pottstown Borough, with a 1970 population of just over 25,000 i people, is the largest local municipality. The borough's l population declined from 1960 to 1970.
2.1.3.1 Industries Industries with 10 or more employees within 5 miles of Limerick Generating Station are listed in Table 2.1-17. The number of employees, products, and locations is listed for each establishment.
The nearest industry to the site is the Pottstown Trap Rock Quarry, Inc. Operations of the quarry include the detonation of explosives in the process of quarrying stone. However, the use of explosives is infrequent and only enough explosives for one particular application are brought to the quarry. There are no explosives stored on the quarry site. Other industries located within 1.3 miles of the station include Hooker Chemical Company, Mahr Printing, Inc., Eastern Warehouses, Inc., Amerind-MacKissic, Inc.,
and Structural Foam, Inc. The location of these industries is shown in Figure 2.1-7. Hooker Chemical Company is the only establishment near the Limerick Generating Station that has significant quantities of hazardous materials stored onsite. These materials are listed in Table 2.1-20.
As shown in Figure 2.1-8, there is a natural gas pipeline adjacent to the site, consisting of two separate pipes, operated by the 2.1-5 Rev. 4, 07/82 l
i LGS EROL Columbia Gas Transmission Company, and an oil pipeline operated by Atlantic Richfield Company within the site area. Other pipelines within 5 miles of the station are operated by Philadelphia Electric Co, Mobil Oil, Texas Eastern Transmission Corp, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, and UGI Corp. Pipe sizes, age, operating pressure, etc., are listed in Table 2.1-21. At the present time, there are no plans to utilize these pipelines to transport products other than those currently transported.
2.1.3.2 Transportation Routes The major transportation routes located within 5 miles of the site include the following:
- a. U.S. Route 422, an east-west highway passing approximately 1-1/2 miles to the north of the site.
- b. Pennsylvania (PA) Route 100, a north-south highway passing approximately 4 miles west of the site.
- c. Pennsylvania (PA) Route 724, a southeast-northwest highway passing approximately 1 mile southwest of the site.
- d. The Consolidated Rail Corporation line (formerly Reading &
Company), passing through the site along the north bank of W the Schuylkill River. The line is comprised of three tracks and has a rail spur serving the station.
- e. The Consolidated Rail Corporation line (formerly Pennsylvania Central Railroad), running in north-south direction, passing along the western boundary of the site.
These transportation routes are shown in Figure 2.1-8. Planned changes to local transportation routes include the extension of the Schuylkill Expressway, and Interstate Route No. 76 from Valley Forge to the terminus of the Pottstown bypass, U. S. Route 422.
The proposed alignment follows the Schuylkill River, generally about a mile away, and passes near the northern boundary of Royersford Borough. About midway through Limerick Township, the expressway veers northward to join with U.S. Route 422. In the vicinity of the Limerick site, the expressway is located farther away from the Schuylkill River than in any other location.
Expressway interchanges now exist along the Pottstown Bypass at PA Route 100, Hanover Street, Keim Street, PA Route 724, Firestone Blvd., Township Line Road (presently labeled Evergreen Road on all street signs), and existing U.S. Route 422. The PA Route 100 interchanges are modified types, which necessitate turning movements across traffic flow to get onto and off the ramps. This turning movement tends to lower traffic capacity of the feeder streets, as well as the ramps.
Rev. 4, 07/82 2.1-6
LGS EROL O The Township Line Road intersection, now a rural ramp interchange, would be rebuilt to provide for high speed continuity between the existing Pottstown Bypass and the Expressway extension. Township Line Road is a rather short road, about a mile in length, extending between existing U.S. Route 422 and Possum Hollow Road.
Philadelphia Ilectric Company has extended and improved this road to a modern two-lane road with paved shoulders as the main access to the Limerick Site. Another important interchange of the Expressway extension is with Linfield Road, near Barlow Heights.
Linfield Road is planned as an important regional traffic route, since it is now one of the only roads with an adequate bridge crossing the Schuylkill River between Pottstown and Royersford.
The only remaining new interchange with the Expressway within a.5-mile radius is with the road leading to the Royersford Borough.
The lower Perkiomen Valley Plan proposes several highway improvements for Limerick Townsh.ip. Linfield Road is another important regional route to be improved to a semicontrolled access highway that would selectively restrict access of adjacent property owners, although still having grade level intersections.
According to Department of Transportation design criteria, a semicontrolled access highway is designed to handle 5,000 to 13,000 vehicles per day. Also included in this recommendation is the proposed relocation of existing U.S. Route 422 and Township O Line Road that are recommended to be upgraded to collector roads.
It was recommended that Township Line Road be extended and partially relocated to connect with Long View Road.
The widening and improvement of PA Route 724 to a four-lane arterial highway, the programmed Phoenixville spur, and the long-range proposal for the Piedmont Expressway, are the highway factors critical to the future development south of the Schuylkill River in Chester County. The PA Route 724 improvement will include a new interchange with PA Route 100. This southern area is planned for less intensive development than the northern area. New industrial areas, however, are planned in Spring City, near improved PA Route 724 in East Coventry Township, and west of Pottstown Landing. This area is served by a lower level highway network, and the 1968 long-range sewer plans for Chester County anticipate extensions in only the Pottstown Landing, South Pottstown, Kenilworth, and Spring City areas.
The Schuylkill River, in the vicinity of the Limerick site, is used only for recreational boating. Due to the presence of downstream dams, there is no commercial traffic on the river near the Limerick site.
Pottstown Municipal Airport lies about 5 miles northwest of the site and is the only municipal airport within 5 miles. The 1978 O National Airport Plan classed it as a general utility airport, one that can handle general aviation craft, except transports and jets. Pottstown Municipal Airport has no scheduled airline 2.1-7 Rev. 4, 07/82
)
i l
LGS EROL l service, but serves a charter service, flying school, and privately owned aircraft. The airport runway is hard-surfaced, 1 2700 feet long, and has a heading of 2500 A line extending from l
the runway to the northeast, along the runway's axis, would pass about 3.3 miles from the site boundary at its point of closest approach. Approximately 53 aircraft are based at the airport, l and estimated operations are 16,000 annually.
Two additional airports exist at New Hanover, 5 miles north of the l site, and at Limerick Center (Pottstown-Limerick airport). The latter facility lies about 2 miles northeast of the site, and is owned by Philadelphia Electric Company and leased to the airport operators. A few small private aircraft use this field. The New Hanover Airport has a sod runway, 3450 feet long, at a heading of 270 degrees. The airport has no scheduled service, but serves skydiving operations and privately owned aircraft. Skydiving is the primary activity, with peak movements taking place on weekends, weather permitting. Approximately 70 percent of the aircraft using the airport are single-engine and 30 percent are twin-engine. The total number of movements is about 2500 annually.
All landing fields within 10 miles of the site are listed in Table 2.1-22. These include 11 landing strips that are for private / restricted use only, and the Perkiomen Valley Airport.
The Perkiomen Valley Airport has a hard-surfaced landing strip with no scheduled airline service, but it supports a charter service, flying school, and privately owned aircraft. The runway is 3000 feet long and has a heading of 2700 About 80 aircraft are based at this airport. Operations are estimated to be 7000 for all aircraft annually.
l The Pottstown VOR (Very High Frequency Omni-Direction Range) is located 1.3 miles east of the Limerick Site. This radio range serves as a hub for several VOR airways used for commercial aircraft flights. These airways extend for 4 miles on each side of their centerlines. The Pottstown VOR is the main departure route from Philadelphia International Airport for flights going north and northwest but, due to traffic patterns, it is not used for arrivals. By the time departures reach Pottstown VOR, the flights have reached an altitude of 7000 feet. The federal airways passing within 10 miles of the site are listed in Table 2.1-23.
2.1.3.3 Recreational Areas There are no major parks or recreational areas within 5 miles of the Limerick site. However, the Schuylkill River downstream of the site is utilized for recreational boating and fishing as discussed in Section 2.1.3.6.
Rev. 4, 07/82 2.1-8
.. s Cg3gany Pr 390L2959EY_C220tY Mrs. Snith's Pie C3 Pr Princess Bakery Pr Lincola Underwear Co K1 Spring City Pnitting Co Ci Pottstown Textile Co, Inc DE Sunset Manufacturing Inc D2 IFA-Lin Dreer Co DE Frederick Bros, In: Mi nela Foil, Inc. AB Pixie Paper Products, Inc PC Peerless Publica+ ions, Inc NG Mahr Printing Co Smales Printery Co Piss 7n Press, In: Co
" wea
LG9 EP3L TABLP 2.1-17 (Page 1 of 8) l JNDUSTPIES FITHIH 5 MILES OF SITE Number of
@ hcl Lgga; iga Empigygg3 Dren Specialties Charlotte and Water Sts 1,700 Pottstost
)cd and Bakery Products 113 S. Fashinaton St 14 Pott stosa lt Underwear Mills 175 S. Fvans St 240 Pottstoat IculcrKnitVabricMills i
475 N. Lewis Poye rsford Ed 129 l
Dcces 4?O Apple St 36 Dottstow1 bcsss 24 Moser Rd 300 Pottstow1 esces 119 N. Y3rk 9r 40 Pottstown Llwork Hanover and Bas
- Sts in Pottstown uminum Products Shoemaker ani Robinson Pas 10 Pottstown perboard Products Quinter and 3 Sts 40 Pottstown wspape rs Fanover and King Sts 99 pottstown mmarcial Printing R. D. 3 13 Pottsto41 mmercial Printing 785 N. Charlotte St 20 Pottstosa P.mercial Printing 244 King St 12 Pottstoat i
Rev. 4, 07782
es
-s
_________________________________________c E9E930Y fE S.T.V., Inc. En.
Doly.neric Systems, Inc Ad[-
Pott stown Roller Mills, Inc. Pal Stanley Tools, Inc mig Diamond 31 ass Co Gl(
Universal Concrete Products Coro cog Kevetone Gray Iron Foundry Co Gr6 Albright Paper & Box Co. Ca0 Peading Crane S Engineering Co. Co3 l
Morris Wheeler & Co, Inc FaQ Fabricating Works
- Pottstown Metal Welding Co, Inc F99 Sanatosa Metal Co, Inc ShG Superior Metal Prod Co, Inc SbG Cann and Saul Steel Co Ir@
Mrs. Smith's Poil Co meg
~~- n-
L3S ER3L T ABLE 2.1-17 (Con t' d) (Page 2 of 8)
(-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of uct Location Emoloyees hin cerin a Robinson Rd 225 Pottstow1
@sives and Sealants 860 Cross S6 34 Pottstown 1 a nd Poller Bearings 625 Ind 3sy 10 Pottstowa Bellanoons Plastics Products Upper Lewis Rd 136 Limerick Twp 20 Containers First Ave 780 Royers for d Ereto Products 10 S. Crosstown Rd 50 Pottstowa P Iron Foundries Keim and Cross Sts 60 Pottstowl 2 board Conversion Pobinson Rd 8 Pottstown Feying Equipment 1200 High S& 30 Pottstown gicated Structural St eel First Ave 80 Royers ford Ticcted Plate Work 350 W. High it 45 Pott st own Lt Metal Work Sanatoaa 15 Lower Pottsgrove Twp st Metal Work Perks St 45 Pott stowa e and Steel Forgings N. 4th Ave 190 Poversfor d 31 Stcmpings, N.E.C. 255 South Sr 75 Pottstowa Rev. 4, 07/82
i
-~ ,
[93 gang Pp American Metal Finisbers, Inc Eli Norco Finishing, In Eli Platers, Inc Eli Pottstown Pla ting Works Eli Fivlin aros. Sc:
Pottstown Pioe Products, Inc Va:
Royersford Soring Co Wi:
B and S Specialties, Inc Pal N.'
Telefler, In: Ind Mechanical Division N..
Neapco Drodu:Fs, In: Col Egi United St at es Axle Co Co1 Eg1 Dottstown Machine Co Mai Brusch Machine and Tool Co Spt Chop Rita Mfg Co Fa American Machine and Tool Co, In: Wo
~,
humi
LOS FF3L T ABL F ?.1-17 (Cont ' d) (Page 3 af 8)
Number of 3 duct Location Fmplovees actroplating 1346 Farnington Ave 30 Pottstown 2ctroplating 238 Root hve 14 Pottsto#1 Pctroplating Keim and Cross Sts 12 Pottstown actroplating Washington and Laural Fts 52 Pottstost 74 4 ) Processin g Old Reading Pike 10 Pottstown Eve and Pipe Fittings 412-42 Laurel St 44 Pottstosi re Springs Main Street and First Ave 29 Roye rs ford
>ricated Metal Products, Route 20 and Levengood Rd 23 P . C. Pottstown ernal Combustion Engines, North Wales 200
?. C . Limerick Twp istruction Machinery and Queen and Bailer Ste 400 tipm3nt Pottstown 1struction Machinery and 275 Shoensker 40 tipment Pottstown thine Tools Roland aid Peadiaq ER 80 Pottstown tcial Dyes and Tools 342 W. Ridge Pike 15 Lime rick Twp id Products Machinery 859 Crass St 22 Pot t stodi
>dworking Machinery Spring and 4 t h Sts 100 Poye rs for d Rev._ 4,__07/82
_ _____ ___ _ u
-, .-~
E90030Z EE9 Clover Lamo Co, Inc Lig Dana Coro - Spicar Division Mot ACC Tri-P x Laboratories Opt Powe r Wash, In: Man 39ats93ery_Cguary AS L Handles, Inc. Pla Amcord, Inc. Ped Sudebroi, Inc. Thr Cor Hollingsworth Solderless S.
Terminal Co. Cri Fooker Chemical Co./PVC Div. PVC Pro Pollock R esea r:b S Designs, Inc. Spe Hat Pottstown Mfg. Co. Spe Pottstown Plating Parks, Inc. Elg Met l
Peniss-Jason Corp. CoK Cre now Chenical Co. P1
- s,s L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ .
L3S ER3L TABLE 2.1-17 (Cont ' d) (Page 4 of 8)
__.____== =____________________________________________________ - ___
Number of iugt Lggatigg Eggle, egg bting Equipment, N. E. C. First Ave 100 Payers ford pr Vehicle Parts and 125 S. Keim Sr 625 e
'ssories nottstoaa ical Instrumen's and len- 701 High St 45 Pottstown afacturing Industries, N.E.C. High and Berks St 20 Pottstown stic Products 244 Shoenaker Pd. 30 Pottstowa wood Furniture Adam S 03een Sts. 106 Pottstown ead, Sawing Kits 6 Shoemaker Pond 250 d Pottstown Torminals S Connectors 85 Ben Franklin 3wy. 600 mping Tools Pottstown Rasins and Fabricated Firestone Boalevard 750 ducts Pott stosa cial Design Machinery E 1200 High St. 90 erial Handling Equipnent Pottstova cici Ind. Machinery Ed. 2 121 Pottstowa ctroplating & Finishing - Washington S Laarel 52 als Pottstown rugated Paper Dicplays, Pailroad Aveaue 20 pe Pa pe rs , School Supplies Roy ' rs for d stic Lined pipe 1st Avenae 7 toyers ford Pev. 4, 02/82.
-- ,~
E9393DZ ff9$
French Creek Products Plas E. F. Qaay Walling Weld I
Snov King Frozen Foods, Inc. Proc Pottstown Cerient Block Co. Cone Crouse Co., Inc. Fabr Cont 3retz '4achine Productr Mach Videotek, In:. Fadi Dete 0- B Constraction Co. Wood "The Guardian" News Sermetal, Inc. Inor Nelson's Tea Cream Inc. Ice Bechtel Dairies Dair Hammond Lead Droducts, Inc. Smel Columbia Poiler Co. of Pottetosn Hea' l P oll Fo r m , Jac. Poll l
[
%c w/
I
L3S FPDL TABLE 2.1-17 (Cont' d) (Page 5 of 8) tiumber of uct Location Employees tic Products 1st Aven1e 1A Poyers ford ing Specialties Robinson Rd. 3 Pot t st own essing of Frozen Foods 980 Glascow St. 120 Pott stova rete Block & Brick W. High Street 7 Pottstown icated Pipe and Industrial Upper Lewis 93. 1300 rols Royers ford in erv 40 Sacco Rd. 13 Linfield, Lineri k Twp.
3 - TV Tra nsmit ting, S 125 N. York St. 85 cr ional Equipment Pottstown Kit chen Cabinets 1949 North Charlotte St. 41 Pottstown pape r 40 High S t. 9 Pottstown ganic Chemical Coatings International Edqtes. 83 155 S. Linerich Pd.
Limerick Cream 651 Walnat St. 35 Poyersford l l
v 617 S. Lesis Pd. 52 l Poyers ford ting & nefining 10 South Crosstaen FF. 30 Pottstow1 ang Equipmeri Old Reading oike 89 W. Pottsgrova T4p.
Forming 6 Metal Fab. Pt. 422 10 ,
Limerick l l
Re v. Er n7/P2
, m.
ss
______________________ ______________c gg3gagy gr Inperial Specialty, Inc. sea Baker equipment Engr. Co. of Da. Coc Par 5 MfT. Div. Mill er S eal Prg (S.
Reechwood Co. Pl.
A. P. Valker ElQ Fegelv S Son .Ind 1
Jacob Castinas Pattern Work, Inc. In Mayer - Pollack Steel Corp. FaC.
Meadowbrook Dairy Da[
"The Mercury' Net Pickar Aros. dig Interstat e Energy EnG Pottsgrove Metal Pinisbers ElG Ch28t9E__299DLY I
Meadowbrook Farm 9, Inc F14
1
_- l LGS FROI TABL5 2.1-17 (Cont'il (Page 6 of 8)
Number of duct Location Fmployees ew Machine Products 1153 Sembling Ave. 20 Pottstown
- m. - Ind. Ma chinery Airport P3. 41 Ben Franklin Rwy, Limeri ck cision Parts Ellis400d Rd. 25 rew Machine Parts) Pott st own stic 1356 Farmington Ave. 12 Pottstown Strical Construction 826 North Levis 30 Poyersford Estrial Supplies W. High Street 50 Pottstowa Estrial Patterns - Alum. Old Reading Pike 70 anc Molded Castings Pottstowa Ticn&cd Struc+ ural St eel S. Keim St. 200 Pottstowa L
py S. Keim St . 50 1
Pottstown l
hpaper Hanover S Kiag St?. 99 Pottstown
, Cast 3 Plastic Molds 876 E. Schuylkill Pd. 14 i Pottstown hgyFesearch Robinson Road 12 Pottstown
$tro Plater 533 W. ' High S t. 45 l Pottstowa l
l I
ld Milk 895 S. Keim St 53 ;
Pottstoda j Pev. 4,
<W 07/82 i
=
j
- ~ em l
l
___________________________ _____________e C23230'l 2E6 Sunny Slope Dairies, In c FlE Sircom Knitting Co, Inc Ma B Valley Farge ' lag Co, Inc Pa3 Weekly Advisar, Inc Nec c/o The Reporter Tursack Printing, Inc CoE Taylor Indastries Cut Little Lake Industrie? Was (U.S. Leisure, Inc)
Mingo Nanferroas Metals, Inc Moa l
Allied Steel Products Corp of PA Fa3 Spring City Electric Mfg Co. Cas Prinser Mfg Co. Scg Norco Foundry and Specialty 00, Inc VaD Amerind-Mackessic, Inc Gag Progressive Machine Co, Inc SpG Spring City Foundry N3G w
LOS EP3L T ABL F ?.1-17 (Cont'dl (Page 7 of 8)
Number of
} ggt L2S2119G [ggloveng id Milk Bridge St Fxt 88 Spring City 2 Und erwe ar 475 N. Lewis S+ 1,000 Spring City ricated Textile Prod, N. E. C. Main St 175 Spring City soapers, Publishing and printing 225 Schuylkill P3 11 Spring City nercial Printers, Lithographic R.D. 1 32 Spring City Stone and Stone Products Anderson Rd 26 Parkerford i Househald Furniture Sanatoga Rd 10 5 East Coventry Two ferrous Foundries N. Church Sr 34 Spring City cicated Dlate Work Ponte 72'4 and Wells Pd 28 Parkerford b Met al Housings Hall and Main Sts 90 Spring City bw Machine ?roducts 312 Church St 10 Spring City vas and Pipe Fittings 216 River Pd 25 Pottstown Scn Tra ctors and Equipment Old Sebaylkill Fi 59 Parkerford cial Indtistrial Machinery,t?.E.C. Paght own Rd, R . D. 1 20 Spring City current-Carryino Piring Devices Hall and Main Sts 100 Spring City Pav. 4, 07482.
s
'w b,
C_o_mo_anY Prs Pecticon Coro Se9 I.aSallo. Steel Co Col Micra-S' rain, In: ElG Spring City Rosiery Mill, Inc k'o ru
_________--________________A_____________c W
4 4
s s
L.
m w.
N g '
\.
\
I o %
a W
w.
h
- LGS 2FDL TABir 2.1-17 (Cont'd) (Pago 8 of 8)
~'"
t'umFer of SI . 19E11190 EED19%Ee2
~
onkuc0 3rs and P olat ed,Devicer ~
Poute 724 ani Wells Pd 75 L- '
Parkerford Finished Steel Parr Main S Pridge St = 81
- , Spring City brotilc 4easuring Devices Stoney Pan Rd 9 s ,
Spring City N
3's Hosiery Pikeland Ave 12
[J' Spring City 1
T.
f-Pev. f4,1 T/lf2 w . _ . .
l l
LGS EROL TABLE 2.1-19 (Page 1 of 2) l PROJECTED LAND USAGE WITHIN 5 MILES OF LGS BY YEAR 2000 Usage Area (m2) % of Total
, Agricultural 3.23 x 107 15.9 l
Cropland 2.66 x 107 82.5 Pasture 3.26 x 10* 10.1 Timber and Brush 1.13 x 10* 3.5 Other 1.26 x IOS 3.9 Residential 1.23 x 10s 60.4 Industrial (1) 2.48 x 107 12.2 Transportation 1.18 x 107 5.8 Recreational 1.09 x 107 5.4 Wildlife Preserve 5.18 x 105 0.3
(}
Total 2.03 x 108 100.0%
(2) Included within industrial land usage are commerical land use, institutional land use, and land use attributable to utilities.
Source: Comprehensive plans of boroughs and townships within
( the study area (Comprehensive plans used are listed below.
- 1) Borough of Pottstown Comprehensive Plan - 1968, Montgomery County Planning Commission, Norristown, Pa.
- 2) Royersford Borough Comprehensive Plan - 1964, Montgomery County Planning Commission, Norristown, Pa.
- 3) Spring City Borough Comprehensive Plan - 1965, Chester County Planning Commission, West Chester, Pa.
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-19 (Cont'd) (Page 2 of 2) ll
- 4) Upper Pottsgrove Township Comprehensive Plan -
1972, Montgomery County Planning Commission, Norristown, Pa.
- 5) Lower Pottsgrove Township Comprehensive Plan -
1964, Montgomery County Planning Commission, Norristown, Pa.
- 6) New Hanover Township Comprehensive Plan - 1969, i Montgomery County Planning Commission, Norristown, Pa.
- 7) Upper Providence Township Comprehensive Plan -
1972, Montgomery County Planning Commission, Norristown, Pa.
- 8) East Coventry Township Comprehensive Plan - 1966, Chester County Planning Commission, West Chester, Pa.
- 9) East Pikeland Township Comprehensive Plan - 1965, Chester County Planning Commission, West Chester, O. Pa.
- 10) North Coventry Township Comprehensive Plan - 1977, Chester County Planning Commission, West Chester, Pa.
l O
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGF EP3L T ABI E 2.1-2 0 HOOKER CHEM! RAT. COMP ANY l relief Storage a Marinam Elevation Valve Temp 0F and ,
lE3!201 pgagtitg g _#_13333 [agagity Eggggggg_pgig
.nv1 051orida 3,000,000 lb 12 feet 100 osia 30 ocig-ambient tadiela f.00,000 lb 12 feet 100 neig 20 psig-ambient i
>L-finro- Porta bl e iloroethylene 2,000 lb cylinder 375 psig 68 psig-ambient
'i- fluro-113roethylene 1,000 lb In process --
Ambi ent
)r nal d e bvie 50 Drums Warehouse --
Ambient
)thanol 10 Drums Wareho1re --
Ambient
.trogen 130,000 SCF 3 feet 3F0 nsig -3250r
>1nene 13,000 gal. 12 feet 100 prig Ambient-vent moline 52,000 gal. Underground --
Ambient-vent
- vrene 60,000 gal. 12 feet 100 onig Ambient-vent
.nv1 T:9t at e 25,000 gal. 12 fee
- 100 osig Ambierit-ve nt Fichloro-
'hylene 15,0 ?0 gal . 12 feet 100 psig Ambient-vent
.nf l Pyridine 10,000 gal. 8 feet --
l 1
1 Rev. 4, 07/32
/
a y 4%
Approximate Distance SirEort Fron Site hi_L P otts town-i.imerick 2 Pottstown dunicipal 5 New Hanover 5 Perkiomen ;' alley 8.5 Sunset 9 trio 5 3aisha11 8 Kings 8 Yarrow o Funda 8.5 Walickson 7 Kolb 5 3inrich 4.5
'mery 2 Dinascio 5.5 Ransen 7.5 (2) VFR "?rminal Area Chart for PhiladelphiE
__________________________________ _ _ - - - =
= __
L3S EPDL TABLE 2.1-22 L,TS !?ITHIM 10 MILES OF THE SITE ( t) - - _ -
Ivge Punway_ Surf ace / Service Iongest Punway (ftL oublic use Hard sarface/ lights 3412 l Public use Pard surface / lights 2700 Public use Soft surface 3450 eu blic use Pard surface / lights 2900 orivate use Soft surface 1550 Private use Soft surface 2000 Private use Soft surface 1700 Private use Soft surface 1800 orivate use Soft surface 1300 Drivate use Soft surface 1800 Private use Soft surface 1500 Private use Soft surface 1600 Private use Soft surface 1300 orivate use Soft surface 1300 Private use Soft Surface 1800 P4, January 1, 1980 l 1
Fev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL b
TABLE 2.1-24 LOCATION OF NEARESTC2) MILK COW, MILK GOAT, RESIDENCE, SITE BOUNDARY, AND VEGETABLE GARDEN (3) l (DISTANCE IN METERS)
Milk Milk Site VegetableCz)
Sector Cow Goat Residence Boundary Garden N 8534 -
914 884 914 '
NNE -
6980 792 792 792 NE 4267 -
1052 792 1052 ENE 6706 -
823 792 823 E 6980 -
1021 762 1021 ESE 4511 4755 945 762 945 SE 3597 -
1554 762 1554 SSE 7376 -
1770 1006 1770 S 3627 5654 1341 762 1341 SSW 3048 -
1524 762 1524 SW 2835 -
1006 884 1006 WSW 2134 -
1173 853 1173 W 4755 -
975 853 975 WNW - -
1128 792 1128 NW - -
1128 762 1128 Os NNW - -
1204 884 1204 (1) Nearest within 5 miles.
(2) It is assumed that the nearest vegetable garden is located at the nearest residence in each sector.
(3) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Limerick Generating Station,"
RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1976.
O Rev. 4, 07/82 1
LGS EROL
/ '
D) TABLE 2.1-25A LOCATION OF DAIRY PASTURES WITHIN 5 MILES OF LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 AND GRAZING FACTORS AT EACH LOCATION (1) l Fraction of Food Fraction of Required During Distance From Vents Year Cows Are Grazing Season Sector (Feet) (Meters) On Pasture Obtained From Pasture N 28,000 8,534 0.750 0.884 NE 14,000 4,267 0.583 0.749 ENE 22,000 6,706 0.583 0.246 E 22,900 6,980 0.667 0.576 ESE 14,800 4,511 0.583 0.244 ESE 19,200 5,852 0.583 0.235 ESE 25,600 7,803 0.583 0.204 SE 11,800 3,597 0.750 0.884 SE 23,900 7,285 0.833 0.546 SE 24,100 7,346 0.667 0.337 SE 24,750 7,544 0.667 0.337 SE 25,500 7,772 0.667 0.337 SSE 24,200 7,376 0.750 0.640 S 11,900 3,627 0.583 0.238 T S 13,400 4,084 0.750 0.599
%) S 13,600 4,145 0.667 0.762 S 17,250 5,258 0.333 0.167 S 17,650 5,380 0.750 0.246 S 18,300 5,578 0.667 0.344 S 22,400 6,828 0.166 0.330 SSW 10,000 3,048 0.583 0.222 SSW 14,600 4,450 0.583 0.459 SSW 17,750 5,410 0.667 0.394 SSW 21,450 6,538 0.583 0.298 l SSW 22,100 6,736 0.583 0.444 l
SSW 24,550 7,483 0.667 0.865 l
SSW 24,600 7,498 0.583 0.884 SW 9,300 2,835 0.583 0.293 SW 12,300 3,719 0.583 0.264 SW 15,200 4,633 0.583 0.272 SW 21,000 6,401 0.750 0.884 WSW 7,000 2,134 0.583 0.253 WSW 14,000 4,267 0.583 0.253 WSW 14,100 4,298 0.583 0.253 WSW 15,200 4,633 0.583 0.276 WSW 23,000 7,010 0.667 0.215 W 15,600 4,755 0.667 0.450 (2) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey
(}
(_j in the Vicinity of Limerick Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1976.
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL
() TABLE 2.1-25B (Page 1 of 2)
LOCATION OF BEEF PASTURES WITHIN 5 MILES OF LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2(1) l Distance From Vents Sector (Feet) (Meters)
N 11,200 3,414 N 15,600 4,755 N 20,100 6,126 N 22,350 6,812 N 26,100 7,955 NNE 5,200 1,585 NNE 18,100 5,517 NNE 21,500 6,553 NNE 21,650 6,599 NNE 22,050 6,721 NNE 22,750 6,934 NNE 24,800 7,559 NE 14,000 4,267 NE 17,800 5,425 NE 20,750 6,325 NE 24,800 7,559 NE 26,150 7,971 NE 27,600 8,412 O- ENE 12,700 3,871 ENE 13,600 4,145 ENE 17,450 5,319 ENE 19,750 6,020 ENE 21,250 6,477 ENE 22,000 6,706 ENE 22,050 6,721 ENE 24,750 7,544 E 6,200 1,890 E 9,300 2,835 E 22,900 6,980 E 23,250 7,087 E 24,650 7,513 E 25,150 7,666 ESE 14,800 4,511 ESE 19,200 5,852 ESE 25,600 7,803 ESE 25,900 7,894 ESE 26,900 8,199 ,
SE 23,900 7,285 '
SSE 23,700 7,224 SSE 24,200 7,376 S 11,900 3,627 S 13,400 4,084 (h
\ ,/
S S
16,050 16,300 4,892 4,968 s
S 17,250 5,258 S 17,650 5,380 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL
() TABLE 2.1-25B (Cont'd) (Page 2 of 2)
Distance From Vents Sector (Feet) (Meters)
S 17,900 5,456 S 18,550 5,654 S 20,400 6,218 S 22,400 6,828 S 23,000 7,010 S 23,850 7,269 S 24,000 7,315 S 25,900 7,894 SSW 4,700 1,433 SSW 10,000 3,048 SSW 14,600 4,450 SSW 17,750 5,410 SSW 19,400 5,913 SSW 20,700 6,309 SSW 21,450 6,538 SSW 22,100 6,736 SSW 22,900 6,980 SSW 24,550 7,483 SSW 24,600 7,498 SSW 25,600 7,803 O SW SW SW 9,300 12,200 14,800 2,835 3,719 4,511 SW 15,200 4,633 SW 20,150 6,142 SW 21,000 6,401 SW 24,150 7,361 SW 24,450 7,452 WSW 7,000 2,134 WSW 14,000 4,207 WSW 14,100 4,298 WSW 15,200 4,633 WSW 23,000 7,010 WSW 24,600 7,498 W 15,600 4,755 W 16,850 5,136 NW 21,850 6,660 NNW 20,750 6,325 NNW 23,500- 7,163 NNW 24,000 7,315 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Limerick Generating Station,"
RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1976.
O Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-25C LOCATION OF SHEEP PASTURES WITHIN 5 MILES OF LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2(1) l Distance From Vents Sector (Feet) (Meters)
N 15,600 4,755 NNE 18,100 5,517 NNE 18,400 5,608 NE 17,800 5,425 NE 20,000 6,096 NE 21,600 6,584 NE 26,000 7,925 E 3,000 914 )
SE 23,000 7,010 i
~
S 9,900 3,018 S 10,000 3,048 SW 14,000 4,267 W 13,400 4,084 W 16,000 4,877 W 16,850 5,136 NNW 24,000 7,315 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Limerick Generating Station,"
RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1976.
T l
l l
O Rev. 4, 07/82 1
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-25D LOCATION OF SWINE PASTURES WITHIN 5 MI-LES OF LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2(1) l Distance From Vents Sector (Feet) (Meters)
NNE 5,200 1,585 NNE 25,000 7,620 NE 3,600 1,097 NE 24,800 7,559 ENE 13,600 4,145 ENE 19,750 6,020 ENE 24,750 7,544 E 6,200 1,890 E 9,300 2,835 E 24,650 7,513 S 17,900 5,456 SSW 20,700 6,309 SW 9,300 2,835 W 13,400 4,084 W 16,850 5,136 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Limerick Generating Station,"
RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1976.
O .
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL TABLE 2.1-25E LOCATION OF GOAT PASTURES WITHIN 5 MILES OF LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2(1) l Distance From Vents 4
Sector (Feet) (Meters)
NNE 22,900 6,980 ESE 15,600 4,755 S 18,550 5,654 (2) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Limerick Generating Station,"
RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in ;
1975-1976. '
O i
1 O
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-26 MILK DESTINATION AND PRODUCTION 0-5 MILES FROM LGSC1)
No. of Farms Processor Contributing Liters /Yr % of Total l Raw Jug Milk 2 1.19 x 10s 1,1 Hershey Chocolate 2 2.97 x 105 2.6 Lehigh Valley Dairy 6 2.07 x 10* 18.0 Interstate Co-Op 17 4.61 x 105 41.0 Bechtel Dairy 4 1.41 x 10* 12.0 Sunny Slope Dairy 1 2.05 x 105 1.8 Tri-County Dairy 1 2.07 x 105 1.8 Brenningers Dairy 1 5.06 x 105 4.5 High Dairy Store 1 5.94 x 10s 5.2 Meadow Brook Farms 3 1.31 x 108 12.0 Totals 38 1.12 x 107 100.0 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use O' Survey in Station,"
the Vicinity of Limerick Generating RMC-TR-12, June 1977. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1976.
O Rev. 4, 07/82 j
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-27 DISTRIBUTION OF MILK FOR PENNSYLVANIA <2)(2) l 1975 1979
% of Total % of Total ll Marketed Whole Milk 60.26 53.60 (Through Distributors)
Frozen Products 14.47 13.38 l Cheese 8.42 8.82 l Butter 6.06 12.97 l To Consumers (Raw Jug Milk) 4.05 4.63 l Home Use 1.40 .37 l As Animal Feed 0.57 .74 l Other 4.77 5.37 l (2) Pennsylvania Corp Reporting Service, "1975 Crop and Livestock Annual Summary," CRS-66, July 1976.
(2) pennsylvania Crop Reporting Service, "1980 Crop and Livestock Annual Summary," CRS-78, 1981.
O Rev. 4, 07/82
r
,4 4 ANNUAL-MILK PRODUCTION (L.
DISTANC(-
Directi on 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 N -
NNE - -
NE - -
5.63 x 10+4 - -
ENE - - 6.29 x 10+5 8.05 x 10+5 3.46 x 10+5 E - -
2.57 x 10+5 -
2.69 x 10+5 ESE - -
9.42 x 10+4 6.86 x 10+5 1.91 x 10+5 SE - - - -
7.04 x 10+5 SSE - -
7.92 x 10+4 7.88 x 10+5 2.01 x 10+5' S - -
7.13 x 10+4 1.30 x 10+6 2.55 x 10+5 SSW -
3.15 x 10+5 1.25 x 10+5 1.25 x 10+5 4.58 x 10+5 SW -
5.06 x 10+5 1.56 x 10+6 1.71 x 10+5 .
WSW -
3.33 x 10+5 5.50 x 10+5 -
6.07 x 10+5 W - -
2.25 x 10+5 _ _
WNW - - - - -
NW - - - - -
NNW - - - - -
Total -
1.15 x 10+6 3.64 x 10+6 4.21 x 10+6 2.85 x 10+6
, -(l) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of L
' -- Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-T1001550-01V
BS EROL LE 2.1-28 ters/ Year) WITHIN 50 MILES OF LGS RANGE IN MILES (l) 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Total 1.68 x 10+6 4.60 x 10+6 4.64 x 10+6 1.29 x 10+7 2.83 x 10+6 2.67 x 10+7 1.44 x 10+6 4.21 x 10+6 6.93 x 10+6 1.66 x 10+7 2.38 x 10+7 5.30 x 10+7 1.37 x 10+6 3.35 x 10+6 6.55 x 10+6 1.60 x 10+7 2.13 x 10+7 4.86 x 10+7 1.34 x 10+6 5.13 x 10+6 8.16 x 10+6 1.09.x 10+7 1.32 x 10+7 3.99 x 10+7 1.44 x 10+6 5.09 x 10+6 7.02 x 10+6 7.95 x 10+6 5.66 x 10+6 2.77 x 10+7 1.44 x 10+6 4.08 x 10+6 2.23 x 10+6 4.72 x 10+6 1.61 x 10+7 2.95 x 10+7 1.63 x 10+6 3.69 x 10+6 3.09 x 10+5 1.27 x 10+6 1.09 x 10+6 8.69 x 10+6 3.10 x 10+6 9.09 x 10+6 1.19 x 10+6 7.62 x 10+6 1.35 x 10+7 3.56 x 10+7 2.48 x 10+6 1.02'x 10+7 1.05 x 10+7 8.53 x 10+6 1.43 x 10+7 4.76 x 10+7 2.75 x 10+5 3.45 x 10+6 1.26 x 10+7 2.37 x 10+7 1.85 x 10+7 8.04 x 10+7 3.45 x 10+6 1.06 x 10+7 2.02 x 10+7 4.71 x 10+7 5.23 x 10+7 1.36 x.10+8 9.66 x 10+5 8.77 x 10+6 3.66 x 10+7 5.64 x 10+7 5.25 x 10+7 1.57 x 10+8 1.71 x 10+6 2.19 x 10+6 3.23 x 10+7 5.16 x 10+7 6.00 x 10+7 1.48 x 10+8 3.13 x 10+6 1.07 x 10+7 1.88 x 10+7 3.41 x 10+7 3.92 x 10+7 1.06 x 10+8 2.61 x 10+6 1.26 x 10+7 2.22 x 10+7 1.17 x 10+7 5.45 x 10+6 5.46 x 10+7 1.52 x 10+6 3.65 x 10+6 1.95 x 10+7 9.07 x 10+6 1.25 x 10+6 3.50 x 10+7 1.10 x 10+8 2.18 x 10+8 3.20 x 10+8 3.41 x 10+8 1.03 x 10+9 3.27 x 10+7 merick 976.
Rev. 4, 07/82
r~
r TA1 ANNUAL MEAT PRODUCTION (KIl DISTANCE Directi on 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 N - -
2.24 x 10+3 3.18 x 10+3 _
NNE 7.02 x 10+3 - -
1.00 x 10+3 6.61 x 10+4 NE 1.54 x 10+4 -
3.32 x 10+3 1.64 x 10+3 2.47 x 10+4 ENE 6.15 x 10+2 -
3.70 x 10+4 3.69 x 10+4 2.69 x 10+4 E -
2.64 x 10+3 1.15 x 10+4 -
1.23 x 10+4 ESE 4.27 x 10+2 1.78 x 10+2 3.03 x 10+3 3.91 x 10+4 5.63 x 10+3 SE - - - -
3.84 x 10+4 SSE -
6.40 x 10+2 7.51 x 10+3 3.09 x 10+4 1.47 x 10+4 S -
5.33 x 10+2 2.45 x 10+3 8.14 x 10+4 1.54 x 10+4 SSW 1.15 x 10+3 1.20 x 10+4 4.19 x 10+3 2.94 x 10+4 1.66 x 10+4 SW -
1.71 x 10+4 7.09 x 10+4 8.95 x 10+3 1.44 x 10+3 WSW -
1.83 x 10+4 2.38 x 10+4 -
3.10 x 10+4 W
6.06 x 10+3 5.69 x 10+4 4.27 x 10+3 .
WNW -
NW - - - -
5.77 x 10+2 NNW - - - -
6.18 x 10+3 Total 2.45 x 10+4 5.75 x 10+4 2.22 x 10+5 2.36 x 10+5 2.60 x 10+5 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Li Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1 s..,
- me T1001550-01V
N, iS ER0L E 2.1-29 JGRAMS/ YEAR) WITHIN 50 MILES OF LGS RANGE IN MILES (l) j 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Total 3.59 x 10+5 7.90 x 10+5 1.53 x 10+6 1.80 x 10+6 9.16 x 10+5 5.40 x 10+6 3.38 x 10+5 1.00 x 10+6 1.15 x 10+6 1.34 x 10+6 1.90 x 10+6 5.80 x 10+6 3.23 c 10+5 6.00 x 10+5 9.69 x 10+5 1.36 x 10+6 1.59 x 10+6 4.89 x 10+6 c.16 x 10+5 9.98 x 10+5 1.23 x 10+6 1.23 x 10+6 1.53 x 10+6 5.41 x 10+6 e.38 x 10+5 1.19 x 10+6 1.24 x 10+6 1.23 x 10+6 1.43 x 10+6 5.45 x 10+6 8.33 x 10+5 9.63 x 10+5 5.26 x 10+5 1.13 x 10+6 4.16 x 10+6 7.17 x 10+6 8;.35 x 10+5 8.06 x 10+5 1.06 x 10+5 3.40 x 10+6 2.64 x 10+6 7.33 x 10+6 s.76 x 10+5 1.21 x 10+6 5.47 x 10+5 7.66 x 10+6 3.70 x 10+6 1.35 x 10+7 t.95 x 10+5 1.21 x 10+6 1.54 x 10+6 8.82 x 10+5 1.50 x 10+6 5.53 x 10+6
.10 x 10+5 1.49 x 10+6 2.49 x 10+6 2.68 x 10+6 1.69 x 10+6 8.82 x 10+6
- .10 x 10+5 1.26 x 10+6 3.23 x 10+6 9.58 x 10+6 1.09 x 10+7 2.55 x 10+7 N.15x10+5 1.23 x 12+6 8.17 x 10+6 1.27 x 10+7 1.18 x 10+7 3.41 x 10+7 f.35 x 10+5 3.27 x 10+5 6.99 x 10+6 1.10 x 10+7 1.22 x 10+7 3.08 x 10+7 S.73 x 10+5 1.59 x 10+6 2.81 x 10+6 5.07 x 10+6 6.81 x 10+6 1.68 x 10+7 S.01 x 10+5 1.87 x 10+6 3.31 x 10+6 2.78 x 10+6 2.42 x 10+6 1.08 x 10+7 f.57 x 10+5 5.45 x 10+5 3.15 x 10+6 2.86 x 10+6 5.65 x 10+5 7.38 x 10+6
@.32 x 10+6 1.71 x 10+7 3.90 10+7 6.67 x 10+7 6.58 x 10+7 1.95 x 10+8 Herick
@76.
Rev. ,1r47/82
^ %
L TAB ANNUAL CHICKEN PRODUCTION (KI DISTANCE Directi on 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 N - - -
NNE - - - -
7.64 x 10+1 NE - - - - -
ENE - - - - -
E ESE - - - - -
SE - - - - -
SSE - - - - -
S - - -
SSW 3.79 x 10+2 _ _ _ _
SW - - - - -
WSW - - - - -
W - - - - -
WNW - - - - -
NW - - - - -
NNW - - - - -
Total 3.79 x 10+2 - - -
7.64 x 10+1 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Li Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-]
Tf001550-OlV
w-GS ER0L LE 2.1-30 LOGRAMS/ YEAR) WITHIN 50 MILES OF LGS RANGE IN MILES (l) 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Total 1.19 x 10+5 6.20 x 10+5 4.42 x 10+4 1.61 x 10+5 2.53 x 10+4 9.70 x 10+5 5.76 x 10+4 9.18 x 10+4 7.90 x 10+4 2.42 x 10+5 2.98 x 10+5 7.68 x 10+5 5.50 x 10+4 7.44 x 10+4 8.72 x 10+4 5.56 x 10+5 7.86 x 10+5 1.56 x 10+6 5.38 x 10+4 1.39 x 10+5 1.08 x 10+5 8.86 x 10+5 1.35 x 10+6 2.54 x 10+6 5.76 x +0+4 2.02 x 10+5 1.51 x 10+5 1.27 x 10+5 2.83 10+5 8.21 x 10+5 B.76 x 10+4 1.64 x 10+5 9.16 x 10+4 5.94 x 10+4 1.59 x 10+5 5.32 x 10+5 7.89 x 10+4 1.74 x 10+5 1.28 x 10+4 1.81 x 10+5 1.59 x 10+5 6.06 x 10+5 1.25 x 10+5 6.38 x 10+5 6.03 x 10+3 6.71 x 10+5 9.47 x 10+5 2.49 x 10+6 R.82 x 10+5 7.47 x 10+5 8.34 x 10+5 6.50 x 10+5 1.58 x 10+6 3.99 x 10+6 f.52 x 10+5 9.19 x 10+5 1.54 x 10+6 1.72 x 10+6 8.52 x 10+5 5.28 x 10+6 2.52 x 10+5 7.78 x 10+5 4.71 x 10+6 1.90 x 10+7 2.11 x 10+7 4.58 x 10+7 7.07 x 10+4 1.35 x 10+6 1.75 x 10+7 2.75 x 10+7 2.56 x 10+7 7.20 x 10+7 f.12 x 10+5 3.47 x 10+5 1.45 x 10+7 2.30 x 10+7 2.43 x 10+7 6.24 x 10+7 1.69 x 10+6 2.98 x 10+6 5.86 x 10+6 9.03 x 10+6 2.00 x 10+7 f.88x10+5 1.98 x 10+5 1.99 x 10+6 3.51 x 10+6 3.38 x 10+6 3.23 x 10+6 1.25 x 10+7 3.99 x 10+5 5.77 x 10+5 2.89 x 10+6 2.77 x 10+6 5.96 x 10 7.03 x 10+6 2.76 x 10+6 1.05 x 10+7 4.91 x 10+7 8.68 x 10+7 9.03 x 10+7 2.39 x 10+8 herick
@76.
t Rev ,4,.07/82
m .. ,
i TAl ANNUAL VEGETABLE PRODUCTION DISTANCI Directi on 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 N - -
1.08 x 10+4 - -
1 l
NNE 2.71 x 10+3 - - -
1.36 x 10+5 )
l NE - - - -
3.25 x 10+3 j l
ENE 1.63 x 10+3 -
2.71 x 10+4 -
5.42 x 10+2 )
I E -
1.08 x 10+4 - - -
]
I ESE - -
3.25 x 10+3 _ y l
SE - - - -
8.13 x 10+4 2 SSE - - - -
2.17 x 10+3 5 -
5.42 x 10+2 3.25 x 10+3 5.42 x 10+3 5.96 x 10+3 3 I
SSW 21.7 x 10+3 - -
1.08 x 10+4 -
4 SW - -
21.7 x 10+3 2.71 x 10+3 _
a WNW - - - - -
1 W - -
1.63 x 10+4 1.08 x 10+4 -
1 WNW - - - - -
1 NW - - - - -
1 NNW - - - - -
1 Total 8.68 x 10+3 1.14 x 10+4 6.02 x 10+4 3.30 x 10+4 2.29 x 10+5 3 (1)P,adiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Li Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1 s
III)01550-01V
GS ER0L ILE 2.1-31 (KILOGRAMS / YEAR) WITHIN 50 MILES OF LGS RANGE IN MILES (l) 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Total
.95 x 10+5 1.50 x 10+6 1.55 x 10+7 1.38 x 10+7 6.82 x 10+6 3.78 x 10+7
.96 x 10+5 4.99 x 10+6 9.19 x 10+6 6.39 x 10+6 9.00 x 10+6 2.99 x 10+7
.87 x 10+5 1.20 x 10+6 3.04 x 10+6 3.09 x 10+6 2.63 x 10+6 1.02 x 10+7
.83 x 10+5 1.53 x 1 0+6 3.82 x 10+6 2.69 x 10+6 3.47 x 10+6 1.17 x 10+7
.96 x 10+5 7.22 x 10+5 2.58 x 10+6 4.05 x 10+6 8.76 10+6 1.63 x 10+7
.96 x 10+5 5.57 x 10+5 3.51 x 10+5 7.40 x 10+6 2.58 x 10+7 3.43 x 10+7
.24 x 10+5 6.50 x 10+5 2.47 x 10+5 2.98 x 10+7 2.70 x 10+7 5.80 x 10+7
.38 x 10+5 1.47 x 10+6 7.41 x 10+5 7.98 x 10+7 7.65 x 10+7 1.59 x 10+8
.51 x 10+5 1,44 x 10+6 3.43 x 10+7 5.54 x 10+7 1.85 x 10+8 2.77 x 10+8 o87 x 10+5 1.77 x 10+6 2.96 x 10+6 7.33 x 10+7 1.75 x 10+8 2.54 x 10+8 o87 x 10+5 1.50 x 10+6 2.68 x 10+6 5.82 x 10+6 4.79 x 10+7 5.84 x 10+7 236 x 10+5 6.22 x 10+6 1.10 x 10+6 6.70 x 10+6 6.24 x 10+6 1.86 x 10+7 oS7 x 10+5 1.28 x 10+5 3.60 x 10+6 5.77 x 10+6 6.31 x 10+6 1.60 x 10+7 o88 x 10+5 1.28 x 10+5 1.10 x 10+6 2.14 x 10+6 1.04 x 10+7 1.45 x 10+7
- 62 x 10+5 7.33 x 10+5 1.30 x 10+6 8.45 x 10+5 1.23 x 10+7 2.29 x 10+7 316 x 10+5 2.13 x 10+5 5.48 x 10+6 1.52 x 10+7 2.82 x 10+6 2.38 x 10+7 3 90 x 10+6 2.02 x 10+7 9.13 x 10+7 3.20 x 10+8 6.06 x 10+8 1.04 x 10+9 i
fick i
- ) 76.
l R d 07/82 l
a as LI TABI ANNUAL FRUIT PRODUCTION (APPLE AND PI DISTANCE Direction 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 N - - - -
NNE - - - - -
NE 1.80 x 10+2 - - -
9.00 x 10+1 ENE - - - -
1.77 x 10+2 E 9.00 x 10+2 _ _ _ _
ESE - - - - -
SE - - - - -
SSE - - - -
1.36 x 10+3 S -
1.80 x 10+2 2.34 x 10+3 -
6.50 x 10+2 SSW - - - 1.77 x 10+2 , _
SW - -
2.50 x 10+1 - -
WNW - - - - -
W - - - - -
WNW - - - - -
i NW - - - - -
i NNW - - - - -
Total 1.08 x 10+3 1.80 x 10+2 2.37 x 10+3 1.77 x 10+2 2.28 x 10+3 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Lir Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1!
w flD01550-01V
iS ER0L
.E 2.1-32 ACH, KILIOGRAMS/ YEAR) WITHIN 50 MILES OF LGS -
RANGE IN MILES (l)
J 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Total 3.07 x 10+4 6.16 x 10+4 6.40 x 10+5 6.72 x 10+5 4.82 x 10+4 1.45 x 10+6 3.53 x 10+4 2.84 x 10+5 4.52 x 10+5 4.51 x 10+5 5.85 x 10+5 1.81 x 10+6 3.38 x 10+4 1.49 x 10+5 3.50 x 10+5 5.18 x 10+5 6.51 x 10+5 1.70 x 10+6 3.30 x 10+4 2.00 x 10+5 4.43 x 10+5 4.11 x 10+5 4.94 x 10+5 1.58 x '0+6 3.53 x 10+4 1.28 x 10+5 3.18 x 10+5 4.56 x 10+5 1.67 x 10+6 2.61 x 10+6 3.53 x 10+4 1.00 x 10+5 5.55 x 10+4 2.63 x 10+6 8.00 x 10+6 1.08 x 10+7 3.67 x 10+4 1.78 x 10+5 5.85 x 10+4 1.17 x 10+7 1.28 x 10+7 2.48 x 10+7 5.17 x 10+4 2.83 x 10+5 4.21 x 10+5 1.99 x 10+7 6.75 x 10+6 2.74 x 10+7 4.10 x 10+4 1.69 x 10+5 4.65 x 10+5 5.24 x 10+4 7.91 x 10+4 8.10 x 10+5 5.70 x 10+4 2.07 x 10+5 3.47 x 10+5 5.20 x 10+5 8.87 x 10+5 2.02 x 10+6 5.70 x 10+4 1.76 x 10+5 2.66 x 10+5 4.55 x 10+5 1.01 x 10+6 1.96 x 10+6 1.60 x 10+4 1.19 x 10+5 2.94 x 10+5 4.42 x 10+5 4.12 x 10+5 1.28 x 10+6 1.15 x 10+4 2.31 x 10+2 2.23 x 10+5 4.94 x 10+5 6.78 x 10+5 1,41 x 10+6 1.89 x 10+3 1.12 x 10+3 1.99 x 10+3 2.10 x 10+5 9.22 x 10+5 1.14 x 10+6 3.40 x 10+3 1.32 x 10+3 2.34 x 10+3 3.41 x 10+5 5.26 x 10+5 8.74 x 10+5 8.76 x 10+3 3.85 x 10+2 1.84 x 10+5 6.17 x 10+5 1.05 x 10+6 9.15 x 10+5 4.88 x 10+5 2.06 x 10+6 4.52 x 10+6 3.99 x 10+7 3.57 x 10+7 8.27 x 10+7 erick l76.
Rew-4h 07/82
esW s L
- TAE ANNUAL GRAIN PRODUCTION (KIL l
, DISTANCE Directi on 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4' 4-5 N - -
4.41 x 10+4 9.64 x 10+4 -
8.36 x 10+4 72.35 x 10+5 NNE - - -
NE 1.84 x 10+5 -
1.15 x 10+4 -
2.10 x 10+5 ENE - -
5.94 x 10+5 3.98 x 10+5 1.55 x 10+5 E - -
3.23 x 10+5 -
1.49 x 10+5 ESE 1.25 x 10+4 - -
7.14 x 10+5 1.79 x 10+5 SE - - - -
7.78 x 10+5 SSE - -
3.65 x 10+4 7.83 x 10+5 9.98 x 10+5 S - -
3.86 x 10+4 1.28 x 10+6 . 4.13 x 10+5 SSW 3.75 x 10+4 2.18 x 10+5 6.19 x 10+4 5.00 x 10+5 3.83 x 10+5 SW -
1.91 x 10+5 6.99 x 10+5 1.29 x 10+5 ~ 6.80 x 10+4 WNW -
2.19 x 10+5 4.03 x 10+5 _ 4,45 x 10+5 W - -
1.68 x 10+5 5.55 x 10+4 -
WNW - - - - -
NW - - - -
9.05 x 10+3
~
NNW - - - -
8.01 x 10+4 Total 3.18 x 10+5 6.28 x 10+5 2.38 x 10+6 3.95 x 10+6 4.10 x 10+6 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Li Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1 n001550-01V s
~-
GS ER0L l
LE 2.1-33 l
OGRAMS/ YEAR) WITHIN 50 MILES OF LGS RANGE IN MILES (l) l 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Total 2.46 x 10+6 9.52 x 10+6 4,43 x 10+7 5.75 x 10+7 8.43 x 10+6 1.22 x 10+8 2.12 x 10+6 1.71 x 10+7 3.43 x 10+7 4.93 x 10+7 5.93 x 10+7 1.62 x 10+8 2.02 x 10+6 6.38 x 10+6 1,40 x 10+7 2.30 x 10+7 2.19 x 10+7 6.77 x 10+7 1.97 x 10+6 9.16 x 10+6 1.73 x 10+7 1.71 x 10+7 2.07 x 10+7 6.74 x 10+7 2.12 x 10+6 7.55 x 10+6 1.35 x 10+7 1.73 x 10+7 1.54 10+7 5.63 x 10+7 2.12 x 10+6 6.02 x 10+6 3.40 x 10+6 8.18 x 10+6 2.45 x 10+7 4.51 x 10+7 2.26 x 10+6 5.34 x 10+6 9.10 x 10+5 2.37 x 10+6 2.58 x 10+6 1.42 x 10+7 3.55 x 10+6 1.08 x 10+7 2.87 x 10+6 8.20 x 10+6 1.25 x 10+7 3.97 x 10+7 2.83 x 10+6 1.16 x 10+7 1.87 x 10+7 1.14 x 10+7 4.05 x 10+7 8.68 x 10+7 3.92 x 10+6 1.43 x 10+7 2.39 x 10+7 3.74 x 10+7 4.38 x 10+7 1.25 x 10+8 3.92 x 10+6 1.21 x 10+7 1.52 x 10+7 1.63 x 10+7 2.69 x 10+7 7.55 x 10+7 1.10 x 10+6 8.63 x 10+6 5.87 x 10+6 7.77 x 10+6 7.24 x 10+6 3.17 x 10+7 2.24 x 10+6 3.12 x 10+6 9.53 x 10+6 1.20 x 10+7 1.95 x 10+7 4.66 x 10+7 4.46 x 10+6 1.52 x 10+7 2.68 x 10+7 4.17 x 10+7 4.08 x 10+7 1.29 x 10+8 3.72 x 10+6 1.79 x 10+7 3.16 x 10+7 2.10 x 10+7 1.45 x 10+7 8.87 x 10+7 2.18 x 10+6 5.20 x 10+6 3.85 x 10+7 3.28 x 10+7 3.77 x 10+6 8.25 x 10+7 4.30 x 10+7 1.60 x 10+8 3.01 x 10+8 3.63 x 10+8 3.62 x 10+8 1.24 x 10+9 merick 076.
ReL4r 07/82
s
, , . _. t 1 l TAI ANNUAL SILAGE CORN PRODUCTION DISTANCI 1 i Directi on 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 N - - - - -
NNE - - - s - -
NE - - - - -
ENE - -
9.98 x 10+4 1.60 x 10+6 4.99 x'10+5 E - -
3.81x1d+51 -
2.00 x 10+5 ESE - - -
1.22 x 10+6 2.32 x 10+5 s
SE - - - -
. 1.57 x 10+6 SSE - -
6.53 x 10+4 7.26 x 10+5 1.27 x 10+6 S - -
7.26 x 10+4' 1.03 x 10+6 3.17 x 10+5 SSW -
4.76 x 10+5 4.35 x 10+4 6.53 x 10+5 1.81 x 10+5 SW -
1.27 x 10+6 3.25 x 10+6 2.00 x 10+5 _
WSW -
5.71 x 10+5 9.25 x IL+5 -
1.22 x 10+6 W - -
3.15 x l'0+5 _ _
WNW - - - -' -
NW - - - - -
1.12 x 10*5 NNW - - -
- 1 -
Total -
2.32 x 10+6 5.15 x 10&6 5.43 x 10+6 5.61 x 10+6 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of L' Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-:
~> .
- Ww T1001550-01V .
m _.
i
.GS ER0L LLE 2.1-34 (KILOGRAMS / YEAR) WITHIN 50 MILES OF LGS RANGE IN MILES (l) 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Total 2.85 x 10+6 9.21 x 10+6 1.44 x 10+6 1.03 x 10+7 8.08 x 10+6 3.18 x 10+7 2.16 x 10+6 5.29 x 10+6 5.67 x 10+6 1.52 x 10+7 2.55 x 10+7 5.38 x 10+7 2.07 x 10+6 5.85 x 10+6 1.20 x 10+7 2.69 x 10+7 3.76 x 10+7 8.44 x 10+7 2.02 x 10+6 8.62 x 10+6 1.52 x 10+7 2.44 x 10+7 3.35 x 10+7 8.59 x 10+7 2.16 x 10+6 7.71 x 10+6 1.23 x 10+7 1.56 x 10+7 1.91 x 10+7 5.75 x 10+7 2.16 x 10+6 6.16 x 10+6 3.49 x 10+6 1.05 x 10+7 3.60 x 10+7 5.98 x 10+7 2.53 x 10+6 6.95 x 10+6 1.42 x 10+6 1.02 x 10+7 7.68 x 10+6 3.04 x 10+7 5.24 x 10+6 1.69 x 10+7 6.60 x 10+6 3.50 x 10+7 4.18 x 10+7 1.08 x 10+8 4.21 x 10+6 1.73 x 10+7 2.22 x 10+7 2.30 x 10+7 3.64 x 10+7 1.05 x 10+8 5.85 x 10+6 2.13 x 10+7 3.56 x 10+7 3.44 x 10+7 4.54 x 10+6 1.03 x 10+8 5.85 x 10+6 1.80 x 10+7 4.10 x 10+7 1.12 x 10*8 1.62 x 10+8 3.44 x 10+8 1.64 x 10+6 1.66 x 10+7 9.32 x 10+7 1.45 x 10+8 1.35 x 10+8 3.94 x 10+8 3.44 x 10+6 4.87 x 10+6 8.16 x 10+7 1.26 x 10+8 1.39 x 10+8 3.55 x 10+8 6.92 x 10*6 2.37 x 10*7 4.19 x 107 7.06 x 10+7 6.46 x 10+7 2.08 x 10+8 5.72 x 106 2.80 x 10*7 4.94 x 107 1.84 x 10+7 2.88 x 10+5 1.02 x 10+8 3.36 x 10+6 8.12 x 10+6 4.09 x 10+7 9.00 x 10+6 1.03 x 10+6 6.22 x 10+7 5.78 x 10+7 2.05 x 10+8 4.64 x 10+8 6.86 x 10+9 7.52 x 10+8 2.18 x 10+9 ia9 rick 976.
Rev. 4, 07/82
( TAB ANNUAL PRODUCTION OF ALL HAY (I DISTANCE Directi on 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 N - -
3.85 x 10+4 4.54 x 10+4 -
NNE - - - -
9.07 x 10+4 NE - -
6.44 x 10+4 -
1.89 x 10+5 ENE - -
3.04 x 10+5 1.50 x 10+5 2.14 x 10+5 E - -
4.07 x 10+5 -
1.66 x 10+5 ESE - - -
5.71 x 10+5 1.18 x 10+5 SE 4.76 x 10+5
{ - - - -
SSE - -
6.53 x 10+4 6.58 x 10+5 9.89 x 10+5 S - -
2.72 x 10+4 1.12 x 10+6 4.13 x 10+5 SSW 2.27 x 10+4 3.58 x 10+5 7.07 x 10+4 4.61 x 10+5 1.94 x 10+5
$W -
2.04 x 10+5 1.41 x 10+6 4.63 x 10+4 6.80 x 10+4 WSW -
2.27 x 10+5 4.48 x 10+5 -
6.12 x 10+5 W - -
2.72 x 10+5 7.53 x 10+4 -
WNW - - - - -
NW - - - -
6.80 x 10+4 NNW - - - -
9.80 x 10+4 Total 2.27 x 10+4 7.89 x 10+5 3.11 x 10+6 3.13 x 10+6 3.69 x 10+6 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Lid Generating Station," RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-19 w
.S ER0L E 2.1-35 ILOGRAMS/ YEAR) WITHIN 50 MILES OF LGS RANGE IN MILES (l) 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 Total 1.46 x 10+6 5.84 x 10+6 1,46 x 10+7 1.95 x 10+7 9.54 x 10+6 5.10 x 10+7 1.11 x 10+6 6.47 x 10+6 1.16 x 10+7 1.70 x 10+7 2.55 x 10+7 6.18 x 10+7 1.06 x 10+6 3.10 x 10+6 6.56 x 10+6 1.75 x 10+7 2.35 x 10+7 5.20 x 10+7 1.03 x 10+6 4.53 x 10+6 8.18 x 10+6 1.55 x 10+7 2.11 x 10+7 5.10 x 10+7 1.11 x 10+6 3.95 x 10+6 6.55 x 10+6 8.06 x 10+6 6.53 x 10+6 2.68 x 10+7 1.11 x 10+6 3.15 x 10+6 1.78 x 10+6 4.96 x 10+6 1.61 x 10+7 2.78 x 10+7 1.21 x 10+6 2.73 x 10+6 4.06 x 10+5 2.05 x 10+6 2.11 x 10+6 8.98 x 10+6 2.10 x 10+6 6.18 x 10+6 8.83 x 10+5 7.37 x 10+6 1.10 x 10+7 2.92 x 10+7
.68 x 10+6 6.91 x 10+6 7.31 x 10+6 6.63 x 10+6 1.12 x 10+7 3.53 x 10+7 l
2.33 x 10+6 8.50 x 10+6 1,42 x 10+7 1.71 x 10+7 1.63 x 10+7 5.95 x 10+7 l
2.33 x 10+6 7.19 x 10+6 1.26 x 10+7 2.68 x 10+7 3.19 x 10+7 8.25 x 10+7
.54 x 10+5 6.07 x 10+6 1.99 x 10+7 3.04 x 10+7 2.83 x 10+7 8.66 x 10+7
.64 x ,'0+6 2.52 x 10+6 1.99 x 10+7 2.92 x 10+7 3.57 x 10+7 8.93 x 10+7 I
3.58 x 10+6 1.23 x 10+7 2.17 x 10+7 3.47 x 10+7 3.49 x 10+7 1.07 x 10+8 2.95 x 10+6 1.44 x 10+7 2.55 x 10+7 1.60 x 10+7 1.02 x 10+7 5.91 x 10+7 L.61 x 10+6 4.20 x 10+6 2.51 x 10+7 1.71 x 10+7 2.61 x 10+6 5.07 x 10+7 2.70 x 10+7 9.81 x 10+7 1,97 x 10+8 2.70 x 10+8 2.86 x 10+8 8.89 x 10+8 erick 76 .
R~~v e d 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-36 CROP PRODUCTION AND YIELD
SUMMARY
(1) l Production Yield Crop (ka/yr) % Total (ka/m2)
Vegetables 1.04 x 10' 19.2 3.36 l Apples and Peaches 8.27 x 107 1.5 -
l Grain (2) 1.24 x 10' 22.8 1.37 l Silage Corn 2.18 x 10' 40.2 3.12 l Hay 8.89 x 10s 16.4 1.14 l Total 5.43 x 10' 100.0 l l
(1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Limerick Generating Station,"
O RMC-TR-12, August 1979.
(2) Grain comprised of wheat, 12%; oats, 4%; barley, 6% and grain corn, 78%.
O Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-37 (Page 1 of 3)
LOCATION OF RESIDENCES WITHIN 1 MILE OF LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 VENTS (1) l Distance From Vents l
Sector (Feet) (Meters)
N 3000 914 N 3100 945 N 3100 945 N 3100 945 N 3150 960 l N 3200 975 N 3200 975 N 3200 975 N 3300 1006 N 3300 1006 N 3400 1036 I
N 3400 1036 N 3450 1052 N 3500 1067 N 3500 1067 N 3550 1082 O- N 3600 1097 N 4550 1387 N 4550 1387 N 4900 1494 N 5000 1524 N 5150 1570 N 5280 1609 N 5280 1609 ,
NNE 2600 792 l NNE 2800 853 l NNE 3600 1097 NNE 3700 1128 NNE 3850 1173 NNE 3950 1204 NNE 4000 1219 NNE 4050 1234 NNE 4200 1280 NNE 4200 1280 NNE 4300 1311 NNE 4450 1356 NNE 4450 1356 NNE 4850 1478 1 NNE 5050 1539 {
NNE 5150 1570 O NE NE NE 3450 4100 4200 1052 1250 1280 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-37 (Page 1 of 3)
LOCATION OF RESIDENCES WITHIN 1 MILE OF LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 VENTS (1) l Distance From Vents Sector (Feet) (Meters)
N 3000 914 N 3100 945 N 3100 945 N 3100 945 N 3150 960 N 3200 975 N 3200 975 N 3200 975 N 3300 1006 N 3300 1006 N 3400 1036 N 3400 1036 N 3450 1052 N 3500 1067 N 3500 1067 N 3550 1082
\' N 3600 1097 N 4550 1387 N 4550 1387 N 4900 1494 N 5000 1524 N 5150 1570 N 5280 1609 N 5280 1609 NNE 2600 792 NNE 2800 853 NNE 3600 1097 NNE 3700 1128 NNE 3850 1173 NNE 3950 1204 NNE 4000 1219 NNE 4050 1234 NNE 4200 1280 NNE 4200 1280 NNE 4300 1311 NNE 4450 1356 NNE 4450 1356 NNE 4850 1478 NNE 5050 1539 NNE 5150 1570 1
O NE NE NE 3450 4100 4200 1052 1250 1280 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL
'~'
TABLE 2.1-37 (Cont'd) (Page 2 of 3)
Distance From Vents Sector (Feet) (Meters)
NE 4400 1341 ENE 2700 823 ENE 2950 899 ENE 3650 1113 ENE 4100 1250 ENE 4500 1372 E 3350 1021 E 3900 1189 E 4750 1448 E 4900 1494 ESE 3100 945 ESE 4200 1280 ESE 4200 1280 ESE 4250 1295 ESE 4250 1295 ESE 4400 1341 ESE 4400 1341 ESE 4900 1494 O ESE SE 5000 5100 1524 1554 SE 5300 1615 S 4400 1341 SSW 5000 1524 SSW 5050 1539 SSW 5100 1554 SSW 5200 1585 SSW 5250 1600 SW 3300 1006 SW 3450 1052 SW 3900 1189 SW 4000 1219 SW 4100 1250 SW 4150 1265 SW 4400 1341 SW 4500 1372 SW 4600 1402 SW 4650 1417 SW 4700 1453 SW 4750 1448 SW 4800 1463 SW 4900 1494 SW 5050 1539 SW 5150 1570 i /~'\ SW 5150 1570
\~ l SW 5200 1585 WSW 3850 1173 Rev. 4, 07/82
l LGS EROL O
l TABLE 2.1-37 (Cont'd) (Page 3 of 3)
Distance From Vents Sector (Feet) (Meters)
WSW 3900 1189 WSW 4000 1219 WSW 4150 1265 WSW 4300 1311 WSW 4300 1311 WSW 4500 1372 WSW 4650 1417 WSW 4750 1448 W 3200 975 W 3600 1097 W 3650 1113 W 3700 1128 W 3800 1158 W 3800 1158 W 3850 1173 W 4600 1402 W 5250 1600 WNW 3700 1128 WNW 3800 1158 s- WNW 3800 1158 WNW 3900 1189 WNW 3900 1189 WMW 3950 1204 WNW 4000 1219 WNW 4150 1265 WNW 4150 1265 WNW 4150 1265 WNW 4300 1311 WNW 4400 1341 WNW 4600 1402 WNW 4700 1433 WNW 4900 1494 NW 3700 1128 NNW 3950 1204 NNW 4300 1311 NNW 4500 1372 NNW 4900 1494 NNW 4900 1494 NNW 5100 1554 (1) Radiation Management Corporation, " Agricultural Land Use Survey in the Vicinity of Limerick Generating Station,"
RMC-TR-12, June 1979. Survey based on data collected in 1975-1976.
Rev. 4, 07/82
^
. s 5
Location No. (t) User 7 Connelly Container, Inc, Philadelphi3 Plant 8 Container Corp of America Philadelphia Plant, Mill Div.
9 Nicolet Industries, Inc, Norristown Plant 10 Philadelohia Electric Co W. Conshohocken 3as Plant 11 National Gypsun Co W. Conshohocken Plant
- 12 Lukens Steel CoC3) 13 Philadelphia Electric Co Barbadoes 3enerating Station 14 Synthane-Taylor Corp 15 Phoenix Steel Corp (Phoenixville Plant) 16 Philadephia Electric Co Cromby Generating Station
- 17 Keystone Coke Co(3)
(1) Ref er t o Figare 2.1-9 for locat
( a) Withdrawals authorized by Delaw!
(3) No entitlement, rather a fee is k g,P
I LGS EPOL TABLE 2.1- 39 CHUYLKILL RIVER - INDUSTRI AL RAT ER USEPS DOWNSTREAM OF LIMERICK SITF Entitlement (gpm) ( 2 )
1971 Use Non- River Distance
__jgE3L_ Total Consumptive Cgnsgmptive From Station 13i t 26.5 40.0 35.0 4.0 34.4 5,650 7,500 7,350 150 33.0 39 300 286 14 30.0 600 1,273.5 1,260.8 12.7 27.2 1,523 1,523 1,507.7 15.3 27.35 4
1,247.3 1,190.3 57.3 25.7 I 67,368 100,600 99,425 1,175 23.7 557.8 900 891 9 17.4 i
571.1 11,639 9,311 2,238 12.4 230,470 255,000 252,980 2,020 8.9 i
l 1,493.1 1,130.9 362.2 25.1 I ons of water users.
re River Basi,n Commission, paid for water withdrawn from the river. I p_________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 4, 07/B I
c.
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-40 (Page 1 of 2) l ACCESSIBLE RECREATION AREAS ON THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER DOWNSTREAM OF THE LGS SITE (1)(2) l River Mile Location Name From Site
- 1. Vincent Dam 3.3
- 2. East Main Street Area, Spring City 6.6-6.9
- 3. Vicinity of Phoenixville Water Company 8.7-8.9
- 4. Montgomery County Geriatric and 9.7-10.2 Rehabilitation Center Area
- 5. Route 113 Bridge Boat Ramp 10.2
- 6. Black Rock Dam Area 11.0-11.6
- 7. Route 29 Bridge, Phoenixville 12.3 l
() 8.
9.
Port Providence Area Oaks Area 13.3-13.6 14.3-14.7 l
l
- 10. Pawling Road Bridge, Perkiomen Junction 16.0 l
- 11. Valley Forge State Park 16.1-19.4 l
- 12. Betzwood Bridge Boat Ramp 19.4 l
- 13. Boat Ramp North of Barbadoes Island 23.1 l
- 14. Spring Mill Road Area 29.1 l l
- 15. Miquon Area 30.0 l
- 16. Shawmont Area 31.0-32.2 l
- 17. Lower Gladwyn 32.3 l
- 18. Flat Rock Tunnel 32.4-32.5 l
- 19. Green Lane Bridge 33.5-33.6 l
- 20. Main Street Area, Manayunk 33.8 l
- 21. Fairmont Park 34.7-39.6 l Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL l O TABLE 2.1-40 (Cont'd) (Page 2 of 2) lI (1) Pennsylvania Environmental Council, " Recreational Uses of I the Schuylkill River," Draft Report, November 1977.
(2) Personal communication, 1982, Pennsylvania Fish Commission.
[l O
i O
Rev. 4, 07/82 l
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-41 ACCESSIBLE RECREATION AREAS ON THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER DOWNSTREAM OF THE LGS SITE (PROJECTED)(*)(2) l River Miles Location Name From Site
- 1. Impounding Basin Near Abrams 21.9 l
- 2. Pennsylvania Turnpike Bridge 24.9 l
- 3. Blue Route Bridge Near Plymouth Dam 26.7 l
- 4. Fayette Street Bridge, Conshohocken 27.4 l
- 5. Area Near Barren Hill Road 28.9 l
- 6. Strawberry Mansion Bridge Boat Ramp 36.9 l (2) Pennsylvania Environmental Council, " Recreational Uses of the Schuylkill River," Draft Report, November 1977.
(2) Personal communication, 1982, Pennsylvania Fish Commission. l O
Rev. 4, 07/82
l LGS EROL i
TABLE 2.1-42 BOATING HOURS ON THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER DOWNSTREAM OF THE LIMERICK GENERATING STATION ( >ca) l River Miles Downstream of LGS Site Boatina Hours / Year 0-10 5,000 10-20 59,000 l 20-30 88,000 l 30-40 23,000 l 40-50 82,000 l (2) Pennsylvania Fish Commission, "1975 Fishing and Boating Inventory."
(2) Personal communication, 1982, Pennsylvania Fish Communication. l
- O j
i O
Rev. 4, 07/82 i
l
LGS EROL ,
TABLE 2.1-42 BOATING HOURS ON THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER DOWNSTREAM OF THE LIMERICK GENERATING STATIONC1)(2) l River Miles Downstream ,
of LGS Site Boatino Hours / Year 0-10 5,000 10-20 59,000 l 20-30 88,000 l 30-40 23,000 l 40-50 82,000 l (1) Pennsylvania Fish Commission, "1975 Fishing and Boating Inventory."
(z) Personal communication, 1982, Pennsylvania Fish Communication. l O
O Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE 2.1-43 PRESENT AND PROJECTED FISHING HOURS AND EDIBLE FISH CATCH IN THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER DOWNSTREAM OF THE LIMERICK GENERATING STATIONca)(a) l River Miles Downstream of Fishing-Hours / Year Edible Fish Catch (kg/yr) the LGS Site Present Proiected Present Proiected 0-10 175,000 255,000 3,200 4,700 l 10-20 228,000 320,000 4,200 6,000 l 20-30 256,000 356,000 4,700 6,700 l 30-40 472,000 822,000 8,700 15,700 l 40-50 364,000 634,000 6,700 12,000 l (2) Pennsylvania Fish Commission, "1975 Fishing and Boating Inventory."
O (2) personal communication, 1982, Pennsylvania Fish Commission. l i
1 I
O t
Rev. 4, 07/82
f a.-g
^
- . . .; ) ' - e. / ,
'g\ f i*'
,:. . X Cg ~ '
ll Y* % 'N
.st
, 'Q
.. ."&.m. ?'g*'?_ ~: " h .$b f',
? :.
g,. : e , c::..-? ,n
~ ;- :-
.- ' :' N -
,~; - .,
.m ~.
s p(: . &; ~g- ' :; %s 'd W p R (. ' 'y'% " . ., -* / sp!*e / .,' 'c; A*l a <.+: . 5*
3.:.,
e .
- s. ,.,
.:{;:y ll1.'i
'.f _
, E
- V, pytTtPLM a.a. . "ly., .
- Yl
~
V- - s, .y:
i w .,** W *l.:' ~.f,E
- *5 N
- [ ,
, :*,r.
( '5
./" lfrLe (1 '
lJ .e,:, *s/
s' x" ^~ n,23/% w ' *ff(f Y"h.%.
T Rtyf.~;'*U,- ~'
'5
.)
\_ - -%N Wf 4 l.f'?. / ~;. )
. ,l d'El%
.,y* Qn'"*( L
'^sg s ,/7.,ff
/y.
i!
j ~
_' ' f..- ^
j'.~ .c y ??[ *
.l ? S W] fiEW.y ?&! ')p.!,& . / 7h, <
>'y if}[ [W~ p d < d h @r G $j.h 7.M . *N**
br h?$$,& f 2^%'
Q~ 7.$p,&sV_f h,hN l\Y.yg\._<tf.%?", ,a , , G 7 'N
/~' #' T 5 hA Y. 5 90 3 utesg SHE',, cj '
/ s
% B,.d % A t (3/k s %m ,<.g i g y w' , ' A
/[/N[sk.g %. O.g fy' J) s W iv.&.f g,
's . w
_ *< %. , e w1 J s-' c a_,,x
~< .
p 'N; . 'N .
-A
- 4;;g $ [ h/
j m .@yjk)Y.~ rl? E %D?
- r x jo
\
N 1.pF'
' ,s ,ri D
@% Y;=< <M; w . EkW[h.-Q, hQ h j~#g_ # h(# c y, 4/m.
.r 7 is_
r
~~
/ 4 /
- 1{jE'" ^.. s. N qe &
% f "+ mA - 'aw a ~ .pn w p~;< i '
'(4 h e& s
$ ,,ff, " p y> 'c,('Vl
%\ , h > ?,
5 z '- m, ,;~a, If .i y
i .3 .g [f(x 9 Qy'i.\.. g, ,y
,,s r,f y ni;Lh ) q l. 's. . )
M@, , k,;bwo.p. , %p J i cU M
$h Ndd7 =~3 5_ + w.r .
M f
~
., ~ r'a! c T R M. s*wu.4- N+b hf k... Tf. D-s.t2 3 ,
th Ln:
f m 1 r Q % ,L W U f+: ,;'v , .?:? .s<e .f r
e s s
<n*
a .. .
f M,. .q;p+'~~My d) ?; m.rVr a " ,
t- ~~ ,
~. '-
,! @b< .r x..cyw[xgs badM%
V
. K. ,?.}.},..3 j. .
v
%g %,7) x/
E '.$s * 'd f.f 1na.t.
tm . -
W__-_--._ .- -
y'~ , N g* '- -O, , * '"*
-e
,ll,,'
M ,/ ,,.' y ., o.
p' 'N v.- .4'
~ , ~.er
, yc
>g /
.' ' . . p. ' '))f. (+,Gc. , , . ab.~ ~ r=/r*t.\g
j,/
'/ ~
i
%. ~*;, i s m/. ' gns A a p .
>\
. itf ' f 1. E 'M 'V R k h x) % .f
>ayf ~
7
'+'= ' -r 77
'.rn ..iw L/ < j./'~ j. '.,_; . . . .l <. .f wp . ,.
,y& py t , . . . . '. g ~.,- s ,.
_ ~ ,, .', '. '
n jp~%, ,.g t, f + 1 g **" $v*rE.
. ., '_ rz- s --
y,,
^
% /L 1j / ~ f . ;. ,' 5' h $m - .d ... 1 Q &. ? :
+w'Q.'. , ,,
s f s/ .c
,;. ?; "
) '~ - , -.
. M .. Q : /
' ~~ 2 ' . Y f~---s*
.,w
. Q /}a - ?,
o :" -
/{ ' '
. c,
. .Q).
e,,.
/ 3. E u,, y
~
/-
), .
p, s S -
/- / 4 y1 /
er y s y *
/ -
" (
s s ;'
',$ '^ !g g s+ (,' ...-
j.
- h. ,
. , '.x. -
Z f4*W- 5 '** fs h . 4 Q
f?? Y f /* _
,. . Le.g..-*1mr -%
J (7 u e( W Q '
.l,,
~R - , < <
/,.h4. . ~ ,^ g c j Q j ,/? . ,. .- .."
po'- W' J bl} ar >;l p, W'yN * '*
,-~. ~-
! } !{f Qh -h!Q - A //]g s
- 2 Y W 4 -
)
$Wh%
'MWf L)&s
,_a,s %\ a'% ,
f kh[t Wi ,4\
/*
,8. n,aen%%
m 'g ) ) ~
.4...'
) i:
' ^* k f, *. 4' ja .
( .;,
g.- gO hN/' J LIMERICK GENERATING STATION
'.j d 7 * "
lJ, y '+h_My .$'
UNITS 1 AND 2 WF W . q / -'
e ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
? N, gY . ...- ^, ;- V;,
r . ,{ W.
, .a . ~.y ' :
' _ s'O 8
/n
.- : N -- 3 ",Q.
~z. n ,V)3 .
gf f,eo.-k f (s 9(cls"r f oQ% p' '& j'j&Q,Q-Qf
GENERAL SITE AREA MAP
- e( N! h m _ y i%
. i . # *"
riGuRe 2.i.2 nev.47o7,w2
m . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,m .1 m p
8 , / , .
L .;d4978 '
a
~
n' he
{
\
f ~'
s < l} ,/ ,' / ..
- {
gq t
k b.
,/ '
' MAHR -
-~
.s PRINTING
' ^'
+. f 4 s 'p g
/' trnpoundioS POTTSTO'WN t TRAP ROCK '
i Basin .
CHE ICAL \ QUARRIES INC.
Q m.
(
COMPANY .
D' sgn,i l \[' /,
e/iha p
w.s '
I
'pd/4 i.
4,
~
. s
}
~
c e N, +
2f y.*; .'.
} , .;r c_
' EASTERN
[0 Q'N(~
I [ g "NI j' ~
,c ,
5
~ ;
...,+
'7 c0uNmsix i+ \.. 's-s 5 y .,. c<u.. ,Nc.
, s*
Ax g' s y' y , .,
'sN pA(njpf f g ps d )\ym -
"' k .' y -
s x
~N
~d
'~
' 3-
. o ,, .~
Qr, a?ad /q+((s: x e c
- 34. .% 4 d,g%o sTRucTuRAt
'" *" B v (
.AcR:::ncy <
5 '!'" '" ,"a '*
L' u' ! .. . 2.0# ' = ~
N .N:
L <
s
.g- NV
"~~
e 6 M' '
T.(f -
[# /
/
, - .f50 !
[
fO 'y ,
-)
~
- s. J
)*w , / ,,
,/ , ai .
J jiIg 2 3 :; y
- , 5.G - / ,j
,, 8 #
l
[ . 5 c' * . -' s ;
jh '
,'C
$ f', %
/f 'S' ,
00 22
( .,
,y,. 4 7ge ,
i
} ' gt. 4 ,-
N ([: ]
% j @ ' f+ $
QD -
- p?p,. '
?' y A* s"~
- i
\
7(yy%g#$ggg}y,l,Q753
\
.. j N.vf[\( s QI
- s 5 N
3 q
%] \ s
. s- M,v'As ( ..' ';
) -
,' t\ s LIMERICK GENERATING STATION
- ,y
\t g"(\
g- ,\ ,
3 UNITS 1 AND 2
- % ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT g4 ,
", \j O + g I INDUSTRIES WITHIN THE LPZ D . /
m 1 6' 4
>,~
- A,g / FIGURE 2.1-7 REW4 Y d2
~t
-s %
UZERNE COUNTY COLUMBIA ,
COUNTY
' y f / 4 ,~7
/ ( y' f / CARBON COUI
/
NORTHUMBERLAND , t' ' ' j\
,F i COUNTY f' (
<' f ,
h
/ c:\ s ,<9ft ; z;ob I
[ %
s 3
p\r 9 Ng T,.[ " '
\ hPRO
' / [ , /CRE
- , s ,
' N DAUPHIN -
COUNTY ,
, f BERKS COUNTY ONTELAUNEE -
- /'
gi RESERV0lR g (EXISTING) >
! (
I LEBANON COUNTY , ,
- s. I READING $
I LP BLUE MARSH T
\ RESERVOIR Qm
\
% s'D s e %
- ' PO1
/ \ Scsuy,k/LL s
s7 LANCASTER COUNTY , \. gg ,
(#r' ~\ % -
NOTES: .
/
- 1. COMPILED FROM INFORMATION FROM (,
l l DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
- 2. INDICATES WATER SUPPLY WITHDR AWAL POINT:SEE TABLES 2.1-38 AND 2.1-39 FOR IDENTIFICATION CHES OF USERS SCALE IN MILES 5 0 5 1,0
w I
rY l 5 '
/- -N-
' SCHUYLKIL ,
RIVER BASIN )
_ _ _, i EHIGH COUNTY PLANT SITE
> SED MAIDEN K RESERVOIR
, ms -
~
p a l
nA CR '/
% g
) t i
/
j *
(
g '
,J
=
\
~l STOWN t k
\* '
-* ') BUCKS COUNTY YVER MONTGOMERY\
l 5
COUNTY s\
l 4 i 16 3 o
l 15 14 I3
^
\--s ^ # N to 9 HILADELPHY 2
}R COUNTY g
, 1 LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 7
DELAWARE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT NU l j k LOCATION OF DOWNSTREAM SURFACE WATER USERS SCHUYLKILL RIVER FIGURE 2.1-9 REV,4,0?M2 l
LGS EROL CHAPTER 2
[}
TABLES Table No. Title 2.1-1 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 1970 2.1-2 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 1980 2.1-3 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 1983 2.1-4 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 1990 2.1-5 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 2000 2.1-6 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 2010 2.1-7 Population Distribution, 0-10 Miles, 2020 2.1-8 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 1970 2.1-9 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 1980 2.1-10 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 1983 2.1-11 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 1990 2.1-12 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 2000 2.1-13 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 2010 2.1-14 Population Distribution, 10-50 Miles, 2020 2.1-15 Sources of Projected Populations 2.1-16 Bureau of Census Populations of Counties Within 50 Miles of the Site 2.1-17 Industries Within 5 Miles of Site 2.1-18 Present Land Usage Within 5 Miles of LGS 2.1-19 Projected Land Usage Within 5 Miles of LGS l
2.1-20 Hooker Chemical Company l 2.1-21 Pipelines Within 5 Miles of LGS 2.1-22 Airports Within 10 Miles of the Site 2-v Rev. 4, 07/82
es -w INDUSTPT 00 1971(3E N3.(t) Wat er User ( 2) Use
- 7. Ooanelly Containers Inc, 1.16 Philadalobia Plant
- 8. Container Corp of America, 247.33%
?hiladelohia Plant, Mill Div
- 9. Nicolet Industries Inc, 1.70G Norristocn Plant 10.- PE00, W Consbobocken 3as Plant 26.2Ve
- 11. National Gypsum Co 66.66,
( Allentown Portland Cement Co)
W Conshohocken Plant
- 12. Latens Steel Co(s)
- 13. PE00, Barbadoes Generating 2,949.085 Station
- 14. S7nthane-Taylor Corp 24.41
- 15. Phoenix Steel Corp 250.00e (nhoenixville Plant)
- 16. P?Co, Oromby Generating 10,089.250 Station
- 17. reystone Coke CoC5)
(1) These serial numbers are a continuation o (2) See Figure 2.u-2 for locations of water n (3) Water ase is given in 106 gallons per man
(*) Sour:a: Delaware Fiver Basin Commission (
Protection Agency, Region III, Philadelph (s) No entitlenent, rather a fee is paid for
%s
L3S EPOL TABLE 2.4-11 WATER US'FS ON SCHUYLKILL P!VEB ST9E44 OF LIMERICK SITEC 4) i ENTITLE 4ENTC3)
Consumptive
'Is e as ? Piver Distance i Non- Percentage From Station i
_I2 tai __ gggsgegtige ;gggagg; igg gg_Igtal___ ____j3 1 t____ i 1.751 1.575 0.175 10 3 4. u 329.320 321.744 6.566 2 33.0 1 13.133 12.520 0.613 4.67 30.0 1 55.750 55.192 0.559 1 27.2 1 66.666 65.999 0.667 1 27.05 54.602 52.107 2.495 n.6 25.70 l 4,403.866 4,352.429 51.437 1.1f9 23.7 l 39.398 39.004 0.394 1 17.4 l 509.493 407.592 101.999 20 12.4 l t 11,162.880 11,074.470 88.410 0.792 8.9 I 65.362 49.506 15.956 24.3 26.10 l tho lers.se in Table 2.4-4.
h (1 mont h = 3 0. 4 aars).
P PC) , Trenton N.J., and U.S. Environmental I a, Pa.
ter withdrawn from the river l Pev. 3, 07/2,,2 /
^
> c, ,, , ,, ,
H"."""' c ""'.Y COUNTY
' { &) -7 s
./
/ (W
' / CARBON COU NORTHUMBERLAND l' COUNTY f ) ,
'g
,f y (
/
Q~ )
M BEEE f '
b '< lf jQ
- ') "'
\ hPRO
\
/ ,
qRa DAUPHIN " ~
\
s N
COUNTY ,
o i /
~
- ( (
/ (
)
BERKS COUNTY g j/ #
ONTELAUNEE l-gf ( RESERVOIR g p.
( (EXISTING) >,
A '
LEBANON COUNTY l
N A READING $
CfEN Ch hX I BLUE MARSH h
\ RESERVOIR Q
Y _ , A , ,, +
. ~/ POT
\
s scayy,k/LL ._ '
LANCASTER COUNTY
'7 s
b gg ,
[
(Jr ~\ ~wm
/
/
(.-
NOTES:
- 1. COMPILED FROM INFORMATION FROM DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION.
2.
CHEST INDICATES WATER SUPPLY WITHDRAWAL POINT; SEE TABLES 2.410 AND 2.411 FOR IDENTIFICATION OF USERS.
SCALE IN MILES 5 0 5 10
w NTY I 1
- PENNSYLVANIA r /, -N-
, SCHUYLKIL ,
RIVER BASIN 1EHIGH COUNTY '
PLANT SITE SED MAIDEN pK RESERVOIR
, e ns -
~
ev ,
l
,, / 9
/
(
2 1 $\ t fSTOWN
/ 3 w ') s BUCKS COUNTY
&lVER l
Q \ s f
MONTGOMERY 5
COUNTY s\ g 7
4 '
16 3 4
15 13 17 14 b 12 6
-v ~ 10 M
9 ' PHILADELPHY F 3R COUNTY LIMERICK GENERATING STATION
/ 8 1 UNITS 1 AND 2 7 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT DEM M M l j LOCATION OF DOWNSTREAM
\- SURFACE WATER USERS SCHUYLKILL RIVER v* _-
FIGURE 2.4-2 REV. 4,07/82
_ (
Y5 ^ g ,s,/ [a g .
w/o'$l y* y Ji_.z w
+ '
,, o
$ #a c , q, w~
l4 \ k@ u cP ooo
\\
I ) lf
-*E!?
- [ 'j % q e#
['l
[##,# f[(
, ,h ~ - -
7/
\..i
~
T.p;_2,,,55';,424'l';1$
.. .. 7 P;g6 5
'7 YEP th Q
^
, W \ ~,
' ' oo
\ Q{Ql y* y " W' r~; T ~ "f
.M
-'- a'y N ,./ ' p
[
\ g'J i . ,N
"" } ~
\ ~ \ W,9 Mp+}d2)20l'
~
0 N600
\
i o '/
,i ' '
\_
. y ,,
l ,,,
h 'h
.s
+a
~~
l .n /78/ '
// ' )
% gy '*'Pt20[EN s- /
.g PI,
,I /,f'/J s 1ss e ;
. 3<;y
) /
N'k Pf( ,gg.
) N
/
\
N'%
"BGW.lyR...;cm.;z*:y>7
\ )
'l "', ' g.' l [' Y /
fiEo'> .,
\ ; (7L / -
'N
'l .). )\ ( '\ '- ,
s \ s
\
\
-(
J )(\ ~
EXPLANATION h" E/4 SCALE IN FEET S ps Observation well with elevation of water level in feet.
O indicates po ary we Is) WERu "^" ^'"
UNITS 1 AN 2
/ ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT g otentiometric P contours in feet.
O' Note: OBSERVATION WELLS AND Wells SP 21, SP 20, P1, P2, and P4 POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOURS OF destroyed during construction. WATER TABLE, MAY 25,1979 FIGURE 2.4-11 REV. 4,07/82
LGS EROL s 3 THE STATION 3.1 EXTERNAL APPEARANCE The external appearance of the station was described in the Environmental Report-Construction Permit Stage, Section 3.1 and in the Final Environmental Statement, Section 3.1.. The construction of the station has been consistent with the plans described in these reports.
The preserved woodland, with the rolling topography of the adjacent area, partially screens the station when viewed from a distance. The tan color of the exterior precast walls was selected to harmonize with the surrounding rural environment. An architect's concept of the station as seen from offsite is shown in Figure 3.1-1. A final photograph is not available at this time because the cooling towers are not fully erected.
~
Thc turbine, reactor, radwaste, auxiliary boiler, control and diesel-generator enclosures comprise the power block, which is T located at el 217 feet above mean sea level about 800 feet east of the Schuylkill River bank. The layout of the power block groups the various sized structures in a manner which creates a visually integrated mass. The resultant configuration, in addition to the articulation of the exterior walls with vertical fins, achieves an interesting play of planes and shadows which minimizes the bulk of the structures. A combination of aggregate and smooth finish wall panels were selected to create texture and contrast for the facade.
The administration building with the attached shop and warehouse is at the southeast corner of the power block. The five-story s
s' tower portion has a precast concrete and glass facade. The curtain walls are of dark bronze aluminum and double-glazed dark bronze glass. This gives the building a distinctive character, semphasizing its. intended function of housing the administrative offices.
The Technical Support Center building is a two-story steel frame structure with precast concrete exterior wall panels. It contains approximately 24,000 sq ft of floor area which includes, in addition to the Technical Support Center, a computer area, s security area, and office area. The building is located south of
/) the cooling tower for Unit 2 and east of the water treatment (s,/ enclosure.
3.1-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL The remaining structures include the Schuylkill pump structure, circulating water pump structure, sewage treatment enclosure, Perkiomen pump structure, fuel oil transfer enclosure, and spray pond pump structure. These structures are low-profiled with precast concrete exterior sides. The consistent use of one material for the exterior sides creates a sense of continuity and harmony for the plant complex. A 500-kV substation is located about 1200 feet southeast of the power block, and a 230-kV l substation is located about 300 feet northwest of the power i block. Figures 3.1-2 through 3.1-4 show the spatial relationship of the above-mentioned features and the location of liquid and j gaseous effluent release points, which are described further in l Sections 3.3 through 3.7.
O l
l l
l l
l 1
O Rev. 4, 07/82 3.1-2
l i
\] /
R d
O C Y T A R C V AI T A H L S N E L
O T E R P I X
E S
N V O W I
R H U E T S, A I
E O E ).
)
L E
R 5 O 5 S 5 D 5 T
- 5. 5 G P S F 6 E R 52 R 6 F
RR 1 6 48 TT U C%
I E AE M S 2 8 S 2 8 O 25 O 00 8 RSC4,1,5 75 EA1 2 T N 60 9, 6 DR9 V H1 0, S
A NET I FE O)3 LK 9,0 7, 6 3 1 N 8 7, 6 7, 30 14 A N 18,M1 F
S 6
83 93 F 7, 33 S S1 7,0 5
/
E7,3 4 4 IC R 3,0340 0 2 R O W2 006 E D CC1 3 6, 4 E K LIS03 6,1 1
S1 4 K C R3 6. 2 L RO(fNE NA 32N V E 3 6, N E3A C 3 6, 4 3 6,6,7 F
T32N 32N P O 322N LD32N
( ET CR 32 A O AT OT 32N E O N O AT O R OES CNN NH E S I T
I A T I
VG I T
KI R LES O
I T
L OO A E R T R RN A
E T2T I
I T
B R A
V HO L A V
M V E E A V H E A
V EL I A Y V U U A V
R OC T RIL N TO F M AHA U O E L WN E
L O E
L HO E
L GI E E
L AO E
L HF E L
R TTV SUE T (N NEE TENEE HNEE TBNEE EGNEE WCNEEE SDNEE CI O AOL N PSE R _
E W T O 2 N T T E G@N N
I U I
M T
A L EE O RR O TUS C
} 1
/.
{ 1 _
hJ _
D _
N -
O -
P -
} Y A
R E
R T
S W
O -
T 1
J G@T N
I I
N U
L
} 1
- O O
C
} 1
/
h s
iI! ,!
iIl ,l l llI g .
(* t -
G o o
NI s K
R A 0 P ,0 T 3 N _
A N L - -
P DO N 0 RIT 0 R - 2 E
T N
k 0
- l s
,0 1
T i "
, g
- ,50 _
s _
a - _
/ \l /r,E .O _
S _
/
G S _
D& U O
- LBP
- SH _
e E E
N. HO R A
R MI S W U D <
S A O 1 _
L 2 _
' C T N I 3 4 N G N
E N I 0
I E
MU U RR PR E PIE O N OU 2 l H
' I TS T 0 RIV P
M R U
B C
AtO. NI E C U
- T ER TL U ,
T RN -
N AL P Wlx R
E , E R
hERR E E M
T NL WY T
A U OU 1 A Ou S TS T < E DH CO W
J R I
O AL N WC C L E C U T O S R C E LO 1
RN c
I C N T E
E G BT l I A ,
E N W N U NE E i I
B R
U
- ,b ER GU S S
j l N N
N s
T #.h L O E
S L C ,s s
I E C I N DE
\
\ G N
",ll - . .:e1 l88 l181e . \ I I e l8 li!
'r
- l8 1 '
N ER E E
E T R GU SU j O O R L OC YN HE S
D R
A Y [Emm5X gmz$>dzO N> doz H
C CzQe n" go u T
I W mz5mOzE z p mm OmH S
UrOH mr>z >zo zONEbr 7mpmmmo z m e m mrCmz4-I F_
" g3m W:.4 .
2pc183N i 5
- ill l' (
n AUXILIARY BOILER EXHAUt HOT SHOP HVAc EXHAuf REACTOR ENCLOS URE V ENTI LATioN EX HAU ST^k ~
k NORTH VEklT O
DIESEL C7E.MERATOR EXHAUST ,
t_
bhE_
- w,)
4 L'; m -~
D u iV E L 2.1 7 ' d EAST E L E VATIO NJ l i
o
l n COOLINic, TOWER WATER VAPOR AND DRIFT EL 7G4.5' 1
I IT T
=__ . - _ _ _
WRAY DMD
~ -
__7 _
,r E L 2 50'
\ EL 2.57 ' g t, g4.g >
0 Go100 200 300 F:E ET E.LE.VATIONS ARE GilVEN IN FEET ABoVE MEAN SEA LEVEL, LIMERICK GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT EAST ELEVATION OF STATION FIGURE 3.13 REV.TU7/82
LGS EROL
<x Direct shine doses for various pointe are presented in Table 5.2-14, Direct Radiation Dose.
5.2.4.4 Annual population Doses The annual total body man-rem dose and the annual man-thyroid-rem dose to the population expected to reside within the 50-mile region at the midpoint of station operation has been calculated.
Results are presented in Section 5.2.5. Also, the total body man-rem and man-thyroid-rem doses received by the population of the continuous U.S. from all liquid and gaseous exposure pathways are presented in Table 5.2-15. Appendix 5.2C describes the models and assumptions used in these calculations.
5.2.5 ANNUAL RADIATION DOSES The calculated annual radiation dose to the regional population from all station-related sources, using values calculated in previous sections, are summarized in this section.
The total of the whole-body dose to the population from all LGS water related pathways are listed in Table 5.2-16. The total of the whole-body dose to the population attributable to gaseous effluent pathways within 50 miles of LGS is listed in Table
(~N 5.2-17 along with the total of the thyroid doses to the
\s population (thyroid-rem / year) from radioiodines and particulates.
Table 5.2-18 is a comparison of the calculated individual doses with the applicable design objectives of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50, indicating that maximum doses resulting from operation of LGS will be small fractions of these design objectives.
ALARA compliance is demonstrated by comparison to RM-50-2 Site
! Design Objectives. As shown in Table 5.2-18, calculated maximum I individual doses are small fractions of these design objectives.
l l
b l V 5.2-17 Rev. 4, 07/82 l
LGS EROL 5.
2.6 REFERENCES
O 5.2-1 USNRC, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Releases of Reactor Effluents for the the Purpose of Evaluatino Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix, I, NRC, Washington, D.C. (October 1977) 5.2-2 USNRC, Regulatory Guide 1.23, Onsite Meteorological Programs, NRC, Washington, D.C. (1972).
5.2-3 USNRC, Regulatory Guide 1.111, Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Liaht-Water-Cooled Reactors, Revision 1, NRC, Washington, D.C. (July 1977).
5.2-4 Briggs, G. A., Plume Rise, AEC Critical Review Series, TID-25075, AEC, Washington, D.C. (1969).
5.2-5 Sagendorf, J., and Goll, J., "XOODOQ - Program for the Meteorological Evaluation of Routine Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations," NUREG 0324 (September 1977).
5.2-6 Singer, I.A., and Smith, M. E., " Relation of Gustiness to Other Meteorological Parameters," Journal of Meterology 10 (1953) pp 121-126.
5.2-7 Singer, I.A., and Smith, M. E., " Atmospheric Dispersion at Brookhaven National Laboratory," International Journal of Air and Water Pollution, Vol. 10, (1966) pp 125-135.
5.2-8 Hanna, S. R., et al, " Meeting Review - AMS Workshop on Stability Classification Schemes and Sigma Curves -
Summary of Recommendations," Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 58 (1977) pp 1305-1309.
5.2-9 Smith, M. E., et al, "The Effect of Atmospheric Recir-culation on Calculated X/O Values at Peach Bottom,"
submitted in letter from E. J. Bradley to B. C. Rushe, Docket No 50-277, 50-278 (November 30, 1976).
5.2-10 Smith, M. E., et al, "Further Review of Wind Recircula-tion Effects at Peach Bottom," submitted in letter from E. J. Bradley to B. C. Rushe, Docket No. 50-277, 50-278 (February 3, 1977).
5.2-11 Chamberlain, A. C., " Aspects of Travel and Deposition of Aerosol and Vapor Clouds," A.E.R.E., HP 1R 1261 H.M.S.O. (1953).
5.2-12 Pasquill, F., Atmosoheric Diffustus, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. (1974) pp 267-269. lh 5.2-13 Pelletier, C. A., and Zimbrick, J. D., " Kinematics of 5.2-18
m SITE BO'JNDARY Distance g Sect 2E IftL(2) m N 2835 NNE 2550 NE 2560 ENr 2579 E 2591 ES? 2579 SF ?570 SSF 3247 S 2504 SSR 2549 2942
(.
- SW WSW 2797
'~
W 2825 WNW 2535 NW 2571 NNW 2818 Visitars Center 1724 (1) Bath uaits operating at full (2) 31 stance is based upan an aq Distances.given are the clas
! (3) Exclustoa Area eaundaries a
(*) Visitar's Center dase for y power, at a capacity of 100 Vistars Center f ar 2000 hou full oawer at a capacity of (5) Distances to the closest re clasest residence within 1 (6) No residen:es within 1 mile
____-=
l V
LG9 EROT.
'ABLE 5.2-14 DIRECT R ADIATION DOSE R ATES( * )
EXCLUSION AREA CLOSEST RESIDENCE BOUNDARY OR PUBLIC FACILITY se Distance Dose Distance Dose gn /vr) jft)(2) imreg/grL (f tL(1)- Imrem/yrt(s)
.3 2500 7.7 3000 3. 9
.0 2546 6.2 2600 5. 5
.1 2567 4.9 3450 1. 5
.6 2579 3.6 2700 3.1 4 2581 3.4 3350 1. 2
.8 2579 1.8 3100 0. 9 4 2570 1.4 5103 0.1
.6 2550 2.6 (6) (6)
.5 2504 3.5 4400 0.3 7 2549 2.7 5503 0.1 7 2571 1. 5 3303 0.6
.2 2583 1.7 3850 0.3 7 2584 2.8 3203 1. 2
.6 2583 3.3 3700 0.7
.1 2571 3.1 3700 0.7
.0 2533 6.0 3950 0.9
.1 x 10-2(*)
power at a capacity of 805 with continuaus occupancy.
gin at the reactor oressure vessel and at column line 23.
st location to the origin witnin each of the 16 sectors.
used to establish the clasest residence ar public f acility dose data.
itors from the general public is based on bath units operating at full with occupancy of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per year. For an emplayee accupying the per year, the dose rate is 2. 3 mrem /yr f ar bath units operating at 0 percent.
dences are taken from the Linerick Appendix I report and are the le of L3S.
,f L3S.
Dev. 4, 07/82
, m. ,s I
DETECTION MA AIR BO WATER PAPTIC ANAEXEEE le cid1L __leci grass beta 1. 6 .0 39 1600 Su in 12 59 re 23 5R,60 Oo 10 65 Zn 23 95 7r-Nb 12 131 7 .0 134,137 Os 12,14 .0 143 BA-LA 12 (1) Aaalvses shall be performed in s conditions. 00:ssionally, backg interfering nucli3es or other un 430 is the mininum Setectable level (
net counting rate.
NE
LG9 EROL
- ABLE 6.1- 46 CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSI9 "IMUM VALUES FOR MI'lIMUM DETECTABLE LEVELS OF ACTIVITY (MDL) ( 1 )
RNE FOODS JiATE FISH MILF SEDIME9T PRODUCTF
/M3L_ foci /kg,wett 1001/11 (pci/kqt3ryl_ JgCi/kg, wet) 08 109 200 100 200 1
6 .8 08 100 12 123 60 12 uch a manner that the stated MDLs will be achieved under routine round fluctuations, unavoidably small sample sizes, the presence of controllable circumstances make these MOLs unachievable.
ss pCi per unit mass or volume) based on two standard deviations of the
_ _ _ --=
~
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O
occur. Changes in tax laws, for example, could produce results that differ substantially from today's estimated values.
8.1.2.1.1 State Taxes
- a. Capital Stock Tax This is a 1% annual tax on the value of capital stock of corporations which are incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The tax is levied against all outstanding stock of all classes, common and preferred.
The average annual capital stock tax is estimated to be approximately $16 million.
- b. Corporate Net Income Tax Pennsylvania levies an annual corporate net income tax which is an excise or privilege tax levied against all corporations "doing business" in Pennsylvania or "having capital or property employed" in the state. The tax rate is 10.5% of net income allocated to Pennsylvania, which in the Applicant's case is all its net taxable income.
\ The average annual corporate net income tax is projected
[/
N- to be approximately $11 million.
- c. Gross Receipts Tax Public utility corporations doing business in Pennsylvania are subject to a 4.5% tax on the gross receipts from utility services rendered. In the Applicant's case the tax is levied on gross receipts from energy sales.
The average annual gross receipts tax is estimated to be about $45 million.
- d. Public Utility Realty Tax Public utilities do not pay local property taxes in Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania levies a public utility realty tax in lieu of local property taxes, and redistributes this tax according to a specified formula. The public utility realty tax is 3%
l of the state's taxable value of public utility realty.
The public utilities realty tax average annual liability for Limerici: Station is estimated to be approximately
$13 million.
(
8.1-3 L
LGS EROL
- e. Total State Tax The average annual state tax liability attributable to Limerick Station is estimated to be approximately 585 million.
8.1.2.1.2 Federal Income Tax The Applicant will incur a federal income tax liability for income increases resulting from the Limerick Station contribution to energy sales. The federal income tax, as well as the previously discussed state income tax, was developed based on the Applicant's projected rate of return, after taxes, on invested capital necessary to cover costs of equity capital (recognizing effects of investment tax credit and tax basis depreciation deductions). The analysis assumes that energy sales will cover debt service, operating costs and the projected rate of return on invested capital.
The average annual federal income tax is estimated to be
$42 million.
8.1.2.1.3 Miscellaneous Taxes Local governments and school districts levy various personal and wage taxes on residents and persons who work within their jurisdictions. Most of the operating staff of Limerick Station will reside near the station and thus contribute to these tax revenues. Because of the fluid nature of these taxes their value to the local governments have not been estimated. However, many taxing bodies levy a 1% earned income (wage) tax. Based on Subsection 8.1.2.2 this.could produce approximately $116,000 l annually.
1 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania levies a 2.2% earned income tax on residents and employees in Pennsylvania. This tax (based on projected 1987 operating salaries) would be approximately
$352,000 annually.
8.1.2.2 Payrolls and Employment Expenditures for the operation of the station represent an addition to the national as well as regional income.
Approximately 724 people are expected to staff the Limerick Station. The annual payroll in 1987 dollars, for the operating l staff, is expected to be about 536 million.
Because the bulk of the operating labor force for the station is drawn from the local area, the impact is and continues to be on regional employment. l Rev. 4, 07/82 8.1-4
LGS EROL O) i
~
CHAPTER 11
SUMMARY
BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS The importance of the Limerick Generating Station (LGS) in providing an economic and reliable power supply for the Applicant l
and the PJM Interconnection was demonstrated in Chapter 1. The economic and social effects of station construction and operation were discussed in Chapter 8. Other benefit-cost information has been provided throughout this report. It is the purpose of.this chapter to summarize and weigh the overall benefits and costs of operating the completed station. This final balancing must, of necessity, be qualitative, since it is not possible to quantify all of the station's benefits and costs in comparable units of measure. All monetary values are expressed in 1987 dollar values unless otherwise noted.
11.1 BENEFITS 11.1.1 DIRECT BENEFITS The primary benefits resulting from operation of LGS are those gx inherent in the value of the generated electricity which will be g) delivered to meet customer needs. The station will provide an average annual generation of 12.9 billion kWh based on a 70%
capacity factor for the 2110 MWe station. Distribution of the energy based on projected 1985 demand is: 3.45 billion kWh -
Residential, 8.0 billion kWh - Commercial and Industrial, 0.55 billion kWh - Other and 0.9 billion kWh - System Use and Losses. As noted previously, the actual value of this energy cannot be readily monetized, since its true worth relates to customer. needs, safety, convenience, etc., that it provides.
Based on an average $0.083 per kWh for all users, the value of station output in its first full year of operation is approximately $996 million.
As discussed in Chapter 1, delays from current in-service schedules for the station are likely to add substantially to the Applicant's overall cost of service. For example, if both the units were delayed one year, the Applicant's cost of energy is estimated to increase by about $900 million, and plant cost is estimated to increase by about $310 million. Furthermore, it has also been noted that station operation will conserve oil.
11.1.2 INDIRECT BENEFITS The indirect benefits to be realized from the construction of LGS include an estimated $127 million annually in taxes (essentially
(~) transfer payments) to the state and federal governments.
11.1-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL Operating staff for LGS is projected to about 724 persons with an 9l' expected average annual payroll of $36 million. The bulk of ,
these employees will be drawn from the local area thus enhancing the local economy.
O O
Rev. 4, 07/82 11.1-2
LGS EROL O TABLE 11.3-1 Page 1 of 4
SUMMARY
BENEFITS-COSTS; LIMERICK GENERATING STATION Item Benefits (1) Reference
- 1. Expected Average Annual 12.9 billion kWh Section 8.1 Generation and Approximate $996 million(2)
Value
- 2. Proportional Distribution 66% Industrial Section 8.1 of Electric Energy (1985) and Commercial 29% Residential 5% Other 100% Total
- 3. Average Annual Federal $127 million Section 8.1 and State Taxes
- 4. Direct Station Employment 724 Section 8.1 l
- 5. Public Facilities An Energy Informa- Sections 2.1, tion Center 8.1 is provided
- 6. Annual Savings of Oil for 20 million barrels Section 8.1 Power Generation Item Costs Reference
- 1. Capital Cost $3,780 million Section 8.2 (Land and Station)
- 2. Capital Cost (Associated $110 million Section 8.2 Transmission System)
- 3. Decommissioning Cost (3) $100 million Section 8.2 :
- 4. 10-Year Levelized Annual $120 million Section 8.2 Fuel Cost (1985 Dollars)
- 5. Annual Operation and $80 million Section 8.2 Maintenance Cost
- 6. Annual Low Flow $9 million Section 8.2 Augmentation Cost Average Annual Federal $127 million Section 8.1 O'-
7.
and State Taxes Rev. 4, 07/82
-,,-.n - , , - .- - - - - , - - - ~ - - - , - - - - - - - - - - -- ,-
l LGS EROL O' Permit Agency Status
- 13. Intake Structure for DER Received Perkiomen Creek Facilities
- 14. Dredging and Encroachments DER Received '
Permit - Possum Hollow Creek
- 15. Water Obstruction-Electrical DER Received l Conduit - Possum Hollow Creek l
- 16. Water Obstruction - Culvert - DER Received Possum Hollow Creek
- 17. Water Obstruction - Culvert - DER Received Brook Evans Creek
- 18. Plan Approval - Temporary Department of Received Construction Buildings Labor & Industry (DL&I)
- 19. Plan Approval - Turbine, Reactor, DL&I Received Control and Radwaste Buildings f'D 20. Plan Approval - Sewage DL&I Received A s/ Treatment Building
- 21. Plan Approval - Circulating DL&I Received Water Pump and Water Treatment Buildings
- 22. Plan Approval - Auxiliary DL&I Received Boiler and Lube Oil Storage Building
- 23. Plan Approval - Schuylkill DL&I Received River Pumphouse
- 24. Plan Approval - Diesel DL&I Not Received Generator Building
- 25. Plan Approval - Spray DL&I Not Received Pond Pumphouse
- 26. Plan Approval - Administration DL&I Received Building
- 27. Plan Approval - Perkiomen Creek DL&I Received l Pumphouse 12.1-3 Rev. 4, 07/82 l
LGS EROL Permit Aaency Status
- 28. Flammable Liquids Storage and State Police Received Handling for Eight Underground Fuel Oil Tanks
- 29. Flammable Liquids Storage and State Police Received Handling for Two Above Ground Fuel Oil Tanks
- 30. Flammable Liquids Storage and State Police Received Handling for Temporary Above Ground Fuel Oil Tank
- 31. Highway Crossing Permit - Pennsylvania Not Received Perkiomen Creek Pipeline Department of Transportation (PennDOT)
- 32. Railroad Crossing Agreement - Conrail Received Schuylkill River Cased Pipes (Reading Div.)
- 33. Railroad Crossing Agreement - Conrail Received Schuylkill Road at Grade
- 34. Deleted
- 35. Certificate of Necessity Public Utility Received Commission (PUC)
- 36. Notification of Airway Bureau of Received Obstruction Aviation
- 37. 52 PA Code CH57 Public Utility Not Received Transmission Siting Permit Commission (PUC) for Limerick to Cromby, 220-60 (230 kV) line
- 38. 52 PA Code CH57 Public Utility Not Received Transmission Siting Permit Commission (PUC) l l for Limerick to Cromby, 220-61 (230kV) line
- 39. 52 PA Code CH57 Public Utility Not Received Transmission Siting Permit Commission (PUC) for Cromby to Plymouth Meeting, j
220-63 (230 kV) line 1
0 Rev. 4, 07/82 12.1-4
LGS EROL O OUESTION E310.1 (Section 3.1)
Are"there any substantial changes in the station external appearance or layout which have been made subsequent to the description in the EROL (Section 3.1)? If so, please describe.
RESPONSE
The only change to the station external appearance or layout since docketing of the EROL has been the addition of the Technical Support Center. Section 3.1 has been changed accordingly.
O l
O E310.1-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O QUESTION E310.2 Are there any new roads, transmission corridors or rail lines or relocations of roads, transmission corridors or rail lines near the plant which.have been proposed subsequent to the description in the EROL (Section 2.1.1.3.1 and 3.9)? If so, please describe.
RESPONSE
The are no new or relocated roads, transmission corridors, or rail lines near the plant that have been proposed subsequent to the present description in the EROL.
O l
l l
O l
E310.2-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
l i l
~
LGS EROL I OUESTION E310.3 (Section 2.1) i Please revise the demographic data and projections using data j from the 1980 Census. (EROL Section 2.1.)
RESPONSE
1 l
The response will be provided by September 30, 1982. .
I i
i j
1 !
i ,
i i
i i
i l h
4 l
l l
I ,
I l
l i
f i
l t
l i
i i
i t
I l
! E310.3-1 Rev. 4, 07/82 i
t
)
f.
i LGS EROL
- OUESTION E310.4 (Section 2.1)
Table 2.1-19, of the EROL describes projected land usage within 5 miles of the station. By what year is this usage expected to j occur?
l
RESPONSE
The projected land usage is expected to occur by year 2000.
l Table 2.1-19 has been relabeled to reflect this projected date.
i Sources of data have been added as references to the table.
i t
lO ,
I i
I i
I l
[
l O
l l
E310.4-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O OUESTION E310.5 (Section 2.1)
Table 2.1-17, EROL contains information on industries within 5 miles of the site. Please identify the industries distances and direction from the site. Also note any significant changes which have occurred in the industries or number of employees since this table was constructed. Please make necessary revisions in both the EROL and the FSAR.
RESPONSE
Section 2.1 of the EROL has been changed to reflect current information on industries within 5 miles of the site. The FSAR has been changed accordingly. The significant changes that have occurred are (2) the sale of the Firestone Tire and Rubber Company facility to Hooker Chemical Company and subsequent decrease in employees, and (2) the closing of Continental Distilling Corporation.
O o
V E310.5-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL QUESTION E310.6 (Section 2.1)
Tables 2.1'-31 through 2.1-35, EROL describe individual crop production within 50 miles of the site. Table 2.1-36 is the summary table. The tables do not seem to be consistent however.
For example, Table 2.1-32 has a production figure of fruit (apple and peach, kilograms / year) of 8.27 x 107 Table 2.1-36 reports production of 9.12 x 107 (kg/yr) for peaches alone and'6.55 x 107 (kg/yr) for apples alone. Please reconcile the differences in production reported in this set of tables.
RESPONSE
Table 2.1-36 has been changed to reflect data correctly presented in Tables 2.1-31 through 2.1-35.
O O
E310.6-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
_ _ - . - ~ - - . _ - .
LGS EROL O OUESTION E310.7 (Section 8.1.2.2)
Section 8.1.2.2 of the EROL contains an estimate of 324 operating personnel required for the station. This number is on the low side of the estimates of operating personnel required for most stations. Please provide a revised estimate, if necessary and state whether the workers are employees or contractors. Also provide, if revision is necessary, an estimate of the average annual operating workers' payroll for the units.
RESPONSE
The estimate of 324 operating personnel stated in the report remains unchanged. However, it should be explained that this number does not include contractors, instrument technicians, maintenance, and construction personnel. The number of contractors (primarily security, construction, and' maintenance personnel) is estimated at 125 during power operations, rising briefly to 575 during a major outage. Philadelphia Electric' employees not included in the operating personnel number of 324 are estimated at 275 during power operations, rising to 440 O during a major outage.
Chapters 8 and 11 have been changed accordingly.
r O
E310.7-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O OUESTION E310.8 (Section 8.1.2.2)
Where will the operating workers reside, and will they or their families cause any significant impact on public or private facilities (e.g., housing, schools, traffic use, etc.)? (EROL Section 8.1.2.2.)
RESPONSE
Most of the plant operating workers will reside within 1 to 1-1/2 hours commuting distance (approximately 35 mile radius) of the facility. The residences of the operating workers are dispersed over a wide suburban area that includes portions of eight ,
counties and numerous townships and school districts.
The dispersion of plant workers over this area is expected to have a negligible impact on public or private facilities. The impact, if measurable, would have a positive effect on the tax base needed to support public and private facilities, given that the per capita income for the families of Limerick workers is
() nearly twice that of the general population of the area.
O l
E310.8-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
sq '
s LGS EROL -
O V OUESTION E310.9 (Section 8.1.2)
Local purchases of goods and services for a nuclear power plant operation may frequently have a significant impact on the local economy. (For these purposes local may be defined as either the host county or the host county and one or more contiguous counties.)
- N Please provide information on local purchases of goods and '
services expected to be made by Ahe station during a typical year of operation. To the extent possible, identify specific types of dollar amounts of these purchases. If it appears that there will be no significant local purchases, explain "
why. (EROL Section 8.1.2.)
RESPONSE
Limerick, while under construction, h'as impacted the local economy through purchases of goods and services. Local purchase of goods and services will continue when Limerick becomes operational. It is expected that local contract work for
(
additional construction, thermal insulation, piping, painting, and services will continue. Waste removal, scrap disposition, and some food purchases will continue.
It is also expected that labor for ma!jor outage work, while less than that now needed for construction,.will be recruited locally.
Miscellaneous electric supplies and mechanical supplies, such as pipes, valves, and fittings will be purchased locally. Welding supplies are now and will continue to be bought locally.
m Limerick is approximately three yeirs away from being - ,
operational. In that perP26 ef time, the local availability of goods and services may chtng", dnd more opportunities for local purchases will be revus'eA Jntil then, it is difficult to.be more specific on the tes(t ..,4 dollar amounts of purchasesl\-
. . x O -
E310.9-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
l i
LGS.EROL i
j (Section 2.6)
QUESTION E310.10 j Identify any impacts to cultural resources in the vicinity of the plant property and transmission line corridors which could potentially result from the operation and maintenance of the j
plant. Provide copies of any correspondence with the State j Historic Preservation Officer on this subject. (EROL Section 2.6) ;
1
! RESPONSE l l
1 l
l_ The requested information will be provided by September 30, 1982.
l
'A O,
\-
s O
E310.10-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
l 1
1 l
LGS EROL OUESTION E310.11 (Section 2.1.2.3)
Section 2.1.2.3 of the EROL describes transient population, but no estimates are included for those partaking in recreational fishing and boating as described in Section 2.1.3.6. Please provide these estimates.
RESPONSE
4 Section 2.1.2.3 of the EROL has been changed to provide the requested information.
J
- O 1
j i
i O
1 E310.11-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL s
'/
OUESTION E310.12 (Section 2.1.2.1)
Techniques used for estimating population within 10 miles of the station are described in Section 2.1.2.1 of the EROL. Meter counts form the basis of the estimates with factors of persons per residence used to determine total population. "A factor of 3.58 persons per residential meter in Philadelphia Electric Company territory, and a factor of 2.85 persons per residential meter for the Metropolitan Edison Company territory were used..."
How were these factors obtained and why do you feel that a difference of 0.73 persons per meter exists within 10 miles of the site given electric company territory?
RESPONSE
A factor of 3.58 persons per residential meter was obtained for use in Philadelphia Electric Company territory by taking the number of residential meters in the Philadelphia Electric service area division, which includes the Limerick vicinity (Schuylkill Division), and dividing that total into the population figures for the townships and boroughs served by the the Schuylkill Division. Similarly, Metropolitan Edison calculated the factor l
(~)N
\m of 2.85 persons per residential meter for use in Metropolitan Edison Company territory by dividing the population figures for the townships and boroughs served by the Metropolitan Edison Central Division, which encompasses Berks County, by the number of residential meters in their Central Division. Population distributions are based on the assumption that the population of each electric company division is spread evenly over its entire area. The difference of 0.73 persons per meter exists within 10 miles of Limerick because the population distribution is comprised of a largely rural area of Berks County served by Metropolitan Edison and a more populous, urbanized area of Montgomery and Chester Counties served by Philadelphia Electric.
EROL Table 2.1-16 provides the population figures for these counties.
O V
E310.12-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL
() OUESTION E320.1 Provide the following:
A production cost analysis which shows the difference in system production costs associated with the availability vs unavailability of the proposed nuclear addition. Note, t} e resulting cost differential should be limited solely to the variable or incremental costs associated with generating electricity from the proposed nuclear addition and the sources of replacement energy. If, in your analysis, other factors influence the cost differential, explain in detail,
- a. The analysis should provide results on an annual basis covering the period from initial operation of the first unit through five full years of operation of the last unit.
- b. Where more than one utility shares ownership in the proposed nuclear addition or where the proposed facility is centrally dispatched as part of an interconnected pool, the results of the analysis may be aggregated for all participating systems.
- c. The analysis should assume electrical energy requirements grow at (1) the system's latest official s forecasted growth rate, and (2) zero growth from the latest actual annual energy requirement.
- d. All underlying assumptions should be explicitly identified and explained.
- e. For each year (and for each growth rate scenario) the l following results should be clearly stated: (1) system I
production costs with the proposed nuclear addition available as scheduled; (2) system production costs without the proposed nuclear addition available; (3) the capacity factor assumed for the nuclear addition; (4) the average fuel cost and variable O & M for the nuclear 7
addition and the sources of replacement energy (by fuel i type) - both expressed in mills per kWh; and (5) the proportion of replacement energy assumed to be provided by coal, oil, gas, etc. (The base year for all costs should be identified).
RESPONSE
The requested information will be provided in September 1982.
O E320.1-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O QUESTION E320.2 Provide 30 yr levelized fuel and O & M costs (fixed and variable). Provide escalation, discount rates and all other variables assumed in calculating these costs.
RESPONSE
1 The requested information will be provided in September 1982.
O t
i
'O E320.2-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O QUESTION E470.1 (Sections 2.1.3.6 & 5.2.4.1)
The agricultural survey should be extended from 5 miles to 50 miles (not river miles). Same comment both page 2.1-11 and page 5.2-14.
RESPONSE
Sections 2.1.3.6 and 5.2.4.1 have been modified to clarify that no downstream users of water for irrigational purpose have been found to a distance of 50 miles.
l l
O E470.1-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O QUESTION E470.2 (Section 5.2)
Although PECo claims to be using 1.109 equations and assumptions, it appears they have modified critical parameters such as dose conversion factors. While they are free to do so, NRC will perform an independent assessment of population dose to determine compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I.
RESPONSE
The NRC computer programs LADTAP and GASPAR, which incorporate the computational models and conversion factors described in Reg. 1 Guide.1.109 Rev. 1 (October 1977), were used to assess maximum individual and population doses. Decay during transport for all !
noble gases was included and site specific usage factors were utilized when sufficient data were available. When site specific data were not available, Reg. Guide 1.109 Rev. 1 usage factors were used.
O 1
l l
O E470.2-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O QUESTION E470.3 (Section 5.2.2.1)
Table I.2-51(sic) "X/O depleted" should include both radioactive decay and deposition occuring during atmospheric transport.
RESPONSE
Although Table 5.2-5 "X/O depleted" includes deposition, decay is not included because, as stated in Appendix 5.2B.1, the atmospheric transport times to all receptor locations evaluated were too short to permit any appreciable decay of radiciodines and air particulates during transport to the receptor locations.
Individual and population dose assessments utilizing these values are conservative.
O l
l t
O
(
E470.3-1 Rev. 4, 07/82 l -_. _ _. _ . _ - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
LGS EROL O, QUESTION E470.4 (Section 6.1.5.2)-
Table 6.1-45: 1 year and 6 months prior to fuel load: While six radioiodine air samples per week is more than adequate, the samples should include 3 offsite areas expected to exhibit the highest annual average D/O during operation.
Direct Radiation Measurements: There should be 2 rings of 16 each (32) plus 8 areas of special interest such as schools, nearby residences, and population centers, for a total of 40.
Thirty-five stations may be enough, but the smaller number will require a justification.
Surface Water Samples and Drinking Water Samples should be collected by continuous sampling, not composited from grab samples. It is not clear from this table (or Table 6.1-47) whether PEC proposes to do that.
Ground Water Samples: should be collected quarterly if the wells are likely to be affected.
RESPONSE
(~]
(ms e As indicated in Section 6.1.5.2.1 and Table 5.2-6 the E, ESE and SE sectors are the sectors with the highest offsite annual average D/0 The radiciodine air samples located in these sectors are located as near as practicable to the location within the sector with the highest annual average D/Q. A total of 17 radioiodine air sampling stations have been established around the plant. Six of these will be analyzed weekly and the remaining 11 will be analyzed if conditions warrant.
A total of 48 direct radiation measurement stations have been established around the plant according to the two ring methodology. Schools and population centers are adequately covered.
All surface water and drinking water samples which fulfill the requirements of the Branch Technical Position, Rev. 1 on Reg.
Guide 4.8 will be collected by automatic composite samplers which collect an aliquot at time intervals which are very short (e.g.
hourly) relative to the compositing period (e.g. monthly). One water sampling station established to provide additional assurance will consist of grab samples collected at less frequent intervals and be composited monthly. Footnote 3 to Table 6.1-45 clarifies this protocol.
Hydrological evaluations have demonstrated that ground water will not likely be affected (Section 2.4). However, in the interest p)s q_ of providing additional public assurance, two nearby wells will be sampled semi-annually.
E470.4-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O QUESTION E470.5 (Section 6.1.5.2)
Table 6.1-46: MDL I-131 in water is missing. Is there a reason for this?
RESPONSE
Table 1 of the Branch Technical Position on Reg. Guide 4.8, Revision 1, states that 1131 analysis in drinking water need routinely be performed if "the dose calculated for the consumption of water is greater than 1 mrem per year" using Reg.
Guide 1.109 methodologies and site specific usage factors.
Table 5.2-11 of the EROL shows the dose rate to the maximum organ (thyroid) and age group (infant) to be well below this value.
Hence, we do not intend to routinely analyze composite water samples for I-131 and have not provided an MDL for I-131 in water.
O l
O E470.5-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O QUESTION E470.6 Specify in either Section 2 or 5 which option PECo has chosen for ALARA compliance (i.e., RM-50-2 (Annex to Appendix I) or cost-benefit).
RESPONSE
RM-50-2 Site Design Objectives have been used to demonstrate )
ALARA compliance, as described in Table 5.2-18, Section 10.7, and Section 10.8. Section 5.2.5 has been changed to provide clarification.
)
l l
O l
O E470.6-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
i
! LGS EROL
'O QUESTION E470.7 (Section 2.1)
Page 2.1-9: (a) Update data in Tables 2.1-24 through 2.1-43 giving date of data and specific references for source of data.
(b) If the milk production in Table 2.1-26 is on an annual basis revise table to indicate so.
RESPONSE
Tables 2.1-24 to 2.1-37 and Table 2.1-39 have been changed to indicate references and dates for sources of data. Table 2.1-26 has been revised to indicate that the units for milk production are liters / year. To determine the applicability of the data presented in Tables 2.1-27 through 2.1-36, a comparison of dairy and agricultural production between 1976 and 1980 was performed for the 10 counties whose borders lie fully within 50 miles of the station. The data are presented and summarized in Tables E470.7-1 through E470.7-9 and indicate that there have been no major changes in agricultural production from 1976 to 1980.
() It should be noted that these individual statistics reflect the low rainfall experienced in 1980. Because weather and economic factors will affect year to year agricultural and dairy statistics, the data presented in the current EROL tables are considered to be applicable and provide a valid data base for assessing plant effects on individuals and populations.
Similarly, with regard to Tables 2.1-24, 2.1-25, and 2.1-37, some minor variations in nearby agriculture are expected to occur from year to year. However, as indicated above, significant regional l changes have not occurred since the field survey in 1976.
Table 2.1-39 describing industrial water usage has been changed to reflect currently available data. Municipal water users have not changed; therefore, Table 2.1-38 has not been changed.
Tables 2.1-40 through 2.1-43 have been changed based on current data from the Pennsylvania Fish Commission.
O V
E470.7-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
'% p%
Pro Mil Meat Proi Appll oraf Sil.s Hay
___c (1) i
(
- s
L LGS EPDL T ABL E v47 0. ?-1 S!1MMAPY OF YFP_ PLY PROD UCTICN DAT A F0F VHPIOUS FAPM PPDDUCTS PRODUCE 9 IN THE TEN PFNNSYLVANIA CO"NTIES MEAFEST T3 L35, 1976 TO 1980.
uct 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Units 402.5 (1) 39 7.5 376.2 420.3 1x 106 93.3 (1) 97.3 121.9 119.8 kg x 106 lers 12.6 (1) 16.3 18.3 18.3 kg x 106 es S Peaches 30.5 32.6 ? R. S 34. 2 41.1 kg x 106 nn 661.5 658.0 663.6 69a.4 428.7 Pg x 106 ge Corn 738.4 754.3 744.7 685.5 887.5 kg v 106 450.0 453.8 497.7 514.6 428.0 kg x 106 c____________ ________
- ta' a not my al,l a bl e.
1 Rev. 4, 07/8 F
LGS EROL O TABLE E470.7-2 COMPARISON OF YEARLY MILK PRODUCTION FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Production (liters x IO*)
1976 1977(1) 1978 1979 1980 Berks 147.6 126.2 119.1 155.3 Bucks 41.6 39.9 39.7 41.8 Carbon 2.4 2.0 1.9 1.8 Chester 134.7 151.5 154.4 155.4 Delaware 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.3 Lehigh 15.0 10.6 10.4 11.3 Monroe 4.8 3.7 3.5 3.6 Montgomery 33.1 30.9 30.1 32.2 Philadelphia - - - -
Schuylkill 20.3 14.5 14.1 15.6 Total 402.5 382.5 376.2 420.3 O (1) Data not available for 1977.
O Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE E470.7-3 l
COMPARISON OF YEARLY MEAT PRODUCTION (PIGS, BEEF AND LkMB) FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
l t
Production (kg x 106) 1976 1977(2) 1978 1979 1980 Berks 32.0 34.8 44.1 44.8 Bucks 9.3 9.4 11.7 11.0 Carbon .8 .6 .8 1.4 Chester 28.1 28.4 33.5 30.7 Delaware 1.1 1.1 1.7 1.7 Lehigh 4.9 5.1 6.5 6.4 Monroe 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 Montgomery 8.0 8.6 11.9 10.4 Philadelphia - - - -
) Schuylkill 7.6 7.8 10.3 11.9 l
Total 93.3 97.2 122.0 119.9 O
, (1) Data not available for 1977.
i l
- O i Rev. 4, 07/82
,i
l LGS EROL
!O TABLE E470.7-4 COMPARISON OF YEARLY BROILER PRODUCTION FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Production (kg x 103) ,
1976 1977C1) 1978 1979 1980 Berks 6401 8257 9308 9277 Bucks 154 200 255 223 Carbon 7 9 11 11 Chester 2825 3643 4106 4093 Delaware 4 5 5 5 !
! Lehigh 19 24 28 27 Monroe 4 5 5 5 Montgomery 357 461 521 519 Philadelphia 4 5 5 5 Schuylkill 2840 3661 4129 4115 Total 12615 16270 18343 18280
.O (2) Data not available for 1977.
l i
O Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE E470.7-5 COMPARISON OF YEARLY FRUIT PRODUCTION (APPLES AND PEACHES) FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 to 1980.
Production (kg x 105) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 13.8 10.2 9.0 11.3 12.9 Bucks 1.9 2.4 2.1 0.9 3.0 Carbon 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 Chester 2.1 3.4 3.0 3.8 4.2 Delaware 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.8 Lehigh 9.6 12.2 10.7 13.5 15.5 Monroe <0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Montgomery 0.7 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.5 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 1.4 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.7 Total 30.5 32.6 28.5 34.2 41.1 O
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE E470.7-6 (Page 1 of 5)
COMPARISON OF TOTAL AREA HARVESTED AND YEARLY PRODUCTION OF GRAIN (CORN, WHEAT, BARLEY AND OATS) FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Area Harvested (m2 x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 465.4 445.2 441.1 461.4 412.8 Bucks 162.7 155.8 144.9 150.1 127.1 Carbon 25.5 25.9 28.7 29.9 29.1 Chester 283.8 262.3 261.8 276.8 250.5 Delaware 9.3 8.1 6.9 6.9 6.1 Lehigh 675.9 254.2 232.7 236.8 229.5 Monroe 26.7 26.7 26.7 28.3 27.1 Montgomery 108.5 114.5 97.9 98.7 90.7 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 119.8 132.3 175.6 149.7 140.8
() Total 1877.5 1425.0 1416.3 1438.6 1313.7 Production (kg x 108) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 201.5 199.0 207.9 218.8 123.4 Bucks 75.4 74.1 70.9 72.6 43.0 Carbon 9.9 9.8 11.1 12.7 7.4 Chester 146.0 139.5 144.5 154.8 113.5 Delaware 4.9 4.4 3.9 3.8 2.8 Lehigh 124.3 119.6 110.1 109.3 62.9 Monroe 10.0 10.8 10.5 11.5 8.1 Montgomery 46.9 49.4 45.2 47.4 26.2 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 42.6 51.4 59.5 63.5 41.4 Total 661.5 658.0 663.6 694.4 428.7 l
O Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE E470.7-6 (Cont'd) (Page 2 of 5)
COMPARISON OF AREA HARVESTED AND YEAPLY PRODUCTION OF CORN FOR GRAIN FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Area Harvested (ma x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 287.3 280.9 290.6 311.6 261.0 Bucks 116.6 113.7 105.2 110.1 84.2 Carbon 11.7 13.0 15.8 17.0 15.8 Chester 216.5 200.3 204.4 219.4 193.0 Delaware 7.3 6.5 5.7 5.7 4.9 Lehigh 182.5 170.0 153.8 155.4 146.9 Monroe 15.4 15.8 17.0 18.2 17.4 Montgomery 76.1 83.0 68.8 69.2 59.1 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 57.9 74.9 121.0 95.1 89.0
() Total 971.3 958.1 982.3 Production 1001.7 871.3 (kg x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 164.6 162.6 174.5 185.8 85.2 Bucks 65.3 64.4 62.5 64.2 32.7 Carbon 6.7 7.4 9.0 10.5 4.7 Chester 130.9 123.7 130.6 141.8 98.1 Delaware 4.4 4.0 3.6 3.5 2.5 Lehigh 105.8 100.6 92.4 91.7 43.3 Monroe 8.1 8.9 8.9 9.7 6.2 Montgomery 40.3 42.8 39.2 41.3 19.3 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 31.3 40.0 49.4 53.1 30.1 Total 557.6 554.6 570.0 601.6 322.2 x yield 0.57 0.58 0.58 0.66 0.37 Kg/m2 l
O Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O- TABLE E470.7-6 (Cont'd) (Page 3 of 5)
COMPARISON OF AREA HARVESTED AND YEARLY PRODUCTION OF WHEAT FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Area Harvested (m2 x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 82.5 74.8 65.5 72.0 74.4 Bucks 24.2 21.0 18.6 20.2 22.6 Carbon 5.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.6 Chester 35.6 32.3 28.3 30.4 32.3 Delaware 1.2 1.2 .8 .8 .8 Lehigh 48.1 43.3 38.0 41.6 43.7 Monroe 3.6 3.2 2.8 3.2 3.6 Montgomery 17.8 16.1 14.1 15.3 15.3 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 20.6 18.6 16.1 17.4 18.2 Total 238.8 215.3 189.0 205.7 216.5 O Production (kg x 105) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 18.3 17.6 15.4 16.0 20.5 Bucks 5.2 4.7 4.0 4.2 6.1 Carbon 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.3 Chester 7.7 7.8 6.9 6.7 8.9 Delaware 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 Lehigh 10.7 10.2 9.0 9.0 11.2 Monroe 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 Montgomery 3.7 3.5 2.9 3.0 3.5 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 3.7 3.4 2.9 3.1 3.9 Total 51.3 49.1 42.7 43.8 56.5 x yield .21 .23 .23 .21 .26 Kg/ma O
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE E470.7-6 (Cont'd) (Page 4 of 5)
COMPARISON OF AREA HARVESTED AND YEARLY PRODUCTION OF BARLEY FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Area Harvested (m2 x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 34.0 32.4 30.8 27.5 27.9 Bucks 9.3 8.5 8.1 7.3 6.1 Carbon 0.4 - - - -
Chester 19.4 17.4 16.6 15.0 14.2 Delaware 0.4 - - - -
Lehigh 9.7 9.7 9.7 8.9 7.3 Monroe - - - - -
Montgomery 5.7 5.7 5.3 4.5 4.9 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 9.3 6.9 6.1 5.7 4.1 Total 88.2 90.6 76.6 68.9 64.5 Production (kg x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 7.5 8.2 8.4 7.3 7.8 Bucks 2.6 2.8 2.0 1.8 1.6 Carbon 0.1 - - - -
Chester 5.2 5.6 4.6 3.9 4.3 Delaware 0.1 - - - -
Lehigh 2.0 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.6 Monroe - - - - -
Montgomery 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.3 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 1.8 2.0 1.3 1.2 0.8 Total 20.7 22.4 19.9 17.4 17.5 x yield 0.23 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.27 Kg/m2 O
Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O
TABLE E470.7-6 (Cont'd) (Page 5 of 5)
COMPARISON OF AREA HARVESTED AND YEARLY PRODUCTION OF OATS FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Area Harvested (ma x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 60.7 57.9 52.2 51.0 49.4 Bucks 12.5 12.5 13.0 12.5 14.2 Carbon 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.7 Chester 12.1 12.1 12.5 12.1 10.9 Delaware .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 Lehigh 30.4 31.2 31.2 30.8 31.6 Monroe 7.7 7.7 6.9 6.9 6.1 Montgomery 8.9 9.7 9.7 9.7 11.3 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 32.0 32.0 32.4 31.6 29.5 Total 172.8 171.6 166.4 163.1 161.1 Production (kg x 10*)
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 11.1 10.6 9.6 9.7 9.9 Bucks 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.6 Carbon 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.4 Chester 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.2 Delaware .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Lehigh 5.8 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.8 Monroe 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 Montgomery 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 5.7 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.4 Total 31.5 32.1 32.1 31.6 32.6 x yield 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.20 Kg/m2 Rev. 4, 07/82 1
LGS EROL O- TABLE E470.7-7 COMPARISON OF AREA HARVESTED AND YEARLY PRODUCTION OF CORN FOR SILAGE FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Area Harvested (ma x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 75.2 74.8 72.8 74.8 111.7 Bucks 25.1 21.4 18.2 18.6 38.0
.8 Carbon 1.2 1.2 1.2 22.2 Chester 61.5 58.6 57.0 58.6 79.5 Delaware 3.2 2.4 1.2 1.2 2.0 Lehigh 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 8.9 Monroe 1.6 2.0 1.6 1.6 2.2 Montgomery 14.5 15.3 16.1 16.5 34.2 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 6.1 8.1 10.1 10.1 15.3 b
NJ Total 193 188.5 182.9 187.3 294.2 Production i (kg x IO*)
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 299.6 306.4 310.9 259.4 297.0 Bucks 72.8 72.1 66.8 64.9 106.0 Carbon 2.6 4.0 4.3 4.1 4.2 Chester 258.7 247.5 247.8 235.7 291.5 Delaware 14.0 10.3 5.4 5, 0 7.7 Lehigh 17.9 17.7 13.5 18.1 16.6 Monroe 4.9 7.5 4.9 4.5 5.3 Montgomery 46.4 57.5 56.9 56.7 120.2 Philadelphia - - - - -
Schuylkill 21.5 31.3 34.2 37.1 39.0 Total 738.4 754.3 744.7 685.5 887.5 x yield 3.8 4.0 4.1 3.7 3.0 O kg/m2 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O TABLE E470.7-8 COMPARISON OF AREA HARVESTED AND YEARLY HAY PRODUCTION FOR THE TEN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES NEAREST TO LGS, 1976 TO 1980.
Area Harvested (m2 x 106) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 258.2 249.7 236.3 242.0 221.8 Bucks 68.8 84.6 102.0 102.0 87.8 Carbon 14.2 14.2 16.6 18.2 19.8 Chester 171.6 191.4 211.7 222.6 214.5 Delaware 4.0 6.1 7.7 6.1 6.1 Lehigh 74.9 80.9 78.5 80.1 80.1 Monroe 26.7 27.5 22.7 22.7 20.2 Montgomery 51.8 59.1 66.0 68.4 68.4 Philadelphia 0.8 - - - -
Schuylkill 69.6 74.9 84.2 88.6 91.9
() Total 740.6 788.4 825.7 850.7 810.6 Production (kg x 10*)
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Berks 173.9 164.7 165.6 158.2 125.0 Bucks 34.2 45.2 53.5 55.7 48.0 Carbon 7.3 6.6 7.5 9.7 8.2 Chester 108.6 113.0 139.6 140.3 122.6 Delaware 2.1 2.6 3.7 3.9 2.6 Lehigh 48.1 47.4 43.3 46.1 37.7 Monroe 14.1 11.2 8.9 9.6 8.4 Montgomery 26.0 31.2 34.8 39.6 30.6 Philadelphia .5 - - - -
Schuylkill 35.2 31.9 40.8 51.5 44.9 Total 450.0 453.8 497.7 514.6 428.0 x yield 0.60 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.52
() kg/m2 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL TABLE E470.7-9 DISTRIBUTION OF MILK FOR PENNSYLVANIA (2)(a)
Use
. 1975 1979
% of Total % of Total
/
Marketed Whole Milk (Through Distributors) 60.26 ,
53.60 Frozen Products 14.47 '13.38 Cheese 8.42 8.82 Butter 6.06 12.97 To Consumers (Raw Jug Milk) 4.05 4.63 Home Use 1.40 .37 As Animal Feed 0.57 .74 i
() Other 4.77 5.37 (1) Pennsylvania Corp Reporting Service, "1975 Crop and I Livestock Annual Summary," CRS-66, July 1976.
(2) Pennsylvania Crop Reporting Service, "1980 Crop and l
l Livestock Annual Summary," CRS-78, 1981.
l O
i Rev. 4, 07/82
i v
F LGS EROL QUESTION E470.8~ (Section 2.1)
. Update Figure 2.1-9 to correspond to updated data for Tables l 2.1-38 and 2.1-39."
! RESPONSE l Figure 2.1-9 has been changedito reflect the information in i Tables 2.1-38 and 2.1-39.
l 1
1 4
1
- i i :
1 I
l, t
i i
{
l i
i 1
i i
i l
I l
E470.8-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
s LGS EROL s OUESTION E470.9 (Section 2.1) v.
\
Page 2.1-11: Second Paragraph, "A door to door ..." When was .
i the agricultural survey done? Update and verify results of s survey and specify date(s) of survey and source of information.
RESPONSE
s The agricultural survey was completed in the spring of 1976 e'nd performed for Philadelphia Electric by Radiation Managements s \
Corporation (RMC). RMC contacted the agencies listed in EROL Section 2.1.3.6 in 1981 to obtain information on irrigational users of Schuylkill River water. The review by RMC of 1981 information, as well as a review of dairy and agricultural data between 1976 and 1980 (as discussed in the response to Question E470.7), indicate minor land use changes.
- \
m
\
, 4
\1 i
k
\
s O
E470.9-1,- x Rev. 4, 07/82 ,
LGS EROL O QUESTION E470.10 (Section 2.1)
Table 2.1-17 listed the following food processing operations within 5 miles radial distance of the plant:
(a) page 1 of 5:
Continental Distilling Corp.,
Mrs. Smith's Pie Co., and Princ_ess Bakery (b) page 4 of 5 l Meadowbrook Farms, Inc., and l Sunny Slope Dairies, Inc. j l
The EROL should indicate whether the above industries have the potential of contributing 10% or more to either individual or population doses. If the dose contribution is 10% or more, the calculational details should be provided.
RESPONSE
O Individual and population doses have been determined for the exposure pathways associated with the above industries, as described in EROL Section 5.2, including ingestion pathway doses for milk, vegetation, and fruit grown and consumed within 50 miles of-the plant. Channeling food products through the above food processing operations does not create additional exposure pathways specific to the region around the site that could contribute 10% or more to either individual or population doses.
l l O l G E470.10-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O OUESTION E470.11 (Section 2.2)
Verify that the data in the tables indicated below are consistent with currently available information:
Tables 2.2-88 through 2.2-94 2.4-10 2.4-11 For tables 2.2-88 through 2.2-92, provide annual production rate in units of kg/yr.
RESPONSE
The data presented in Tables 2.2-88 through 2.2-94 are a valid representation of dairy and agricultural activities in the vicinity of Limerick and are consistent with currently available information.
O As discussed in the responses to Question E470.7 and E470.9, a comparison of dairy and agricultural data between 1976 and 1980 verifies that the agricultural survey data provided in these tables are consistent with currently available information.
Slight variations from year to year are to be expected as crops are rotated, herds are sold and purchased, weather variations occur, and economic conditions change.
There have been no changes in municipal water users; therefore, Table 2.4-10 has not been modified. Table 2.4-11 has been modified to indicate the change in industrial water users.
Tables 2.1-29 through 2.1-35 provide annual meat, grain, hay, corn for silage, fruit, and vegetable production in units of kilograms per year within 50 miles of Limerick.
O E470.11-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
LGS EROL O
OUESTION E470.12 Table 5.2-14:
Clarify as to whether the direct radiation dose rate calculated at the Visitors Center is for visitors from the general public or for employees.
1
RESPONSE
)
The direct radiation dose rate calculated at the Visitors Center is for visitors from the general public.
Table 5.2-14 has been changed to provide the clarification requested.
O O l l
E470.12-1 Rev. 4, 07/82'
LGS EROL 7-OUESTION E470.13 (Section 6.1.5.2.2)
Page 6.1 Section 6.1.5.2.2 states that a total of 48 locations will be used for direct radiation monitoring. However, Table 6.1-45 (Rev. 1, 9/81) indicates only 35 locations. Explain the discrepancy.
RESPONSE
To implement the guidance in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Regulatory Guide 4.8, Revision 1, November 1979, the number of TLD monitoring locations has been expanded to
- 48. These locations will be configured according to the "two ring" methodology as proposed in the Branch Technical Position and will encompass special interest areas such as population centers, residences, and schools and will include at least three control locations. Forty-five locations have been finalized and monitoring at these locations has taken place since June 1981. A complete description of the preoperational and operational Limerick Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, as well
,-s as a revised Table 6.1-45, will be provided by October 1982.
]
ia f }
'\v' E470.13-1 Rev. 4, 07/82
.________---_______A
LGS EROL OUESTION E470.14 (Section 6.1)
Revise Table 6.1-46 so that under " ANALYSIS" column the seventh item reads "95 2r-Nb."
RESPONSE
Table 6.1-46 has been changed to correct the typographical error.
O l
l l
l
- O E470.14-1 Rev. 4, 07/82 l