ML20062G523

Performance Indicators, for Oct 1990

ML20062G523
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	10/31/1990
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20062G520	List: LIC-90-0934, Forwards Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators, for Oct 1990 Monthly Rept ML20062G523
References
NUDOCS 9011290289
Download: ML20062G523 (136)

Text

h 4

,_.__.......__...._...-._.._._...A__

, , _' T ' ]--T ; -

2_ x FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OCTOBER 1990

=3 J -""*4g p g Illl W [.p N gMgabra ~

l--- .

)

lY,t-

,/

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division l System Engineering Test and Performance Group

. . j l

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS f

PREPARED BY:

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SYSTEM ENGINEERING l

OCTOBER 1990 l

I 1

l 1

I . . _ _ , _ ._. , _ . , . -

4 -4+- 1 .s -

4 2 y n,-

& I e f

4 a

e s t t

,f i .

I

.I I

s.

's e 4 4 a n w m a m a .. -

~

il Onusloer wisdom evnd & judgmemi... -

4

-t I

ib ' k CD , CaMwN{q COAYvrrtilMuunb. . ., . . .,

il k cv 9 , y Q.;.S 6 lOta,f s, e ,b Ort /Yt % ~ C O DClD b , 4 W b $ts M 6S?b a

r g MM . M o

- N D- ..

J , bO l SlN- $, '

\~' .

,1: .[

,1 N b $

s

a -

3 hIb .

e_

ipnp. o:c- i ,

3

.4 1 t-- 1 u,< ,

J . '

TABLE OF CONTENTS t

t Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv ,

Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  !

Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Adverse Trend Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Indicators Needing Increased Management . . . . . . 6 Attention Index to Safety Enhancemer.t Program (SEP)

Indicators . . .......-.......... 10~

Index to Performance Indicator Graphs . . . . . . . 14 .

Performance Indicator Graphs . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Significant Items of Interest . . . . . . . . . . 105 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106- -

Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Goal s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates . . . .- 125 Production and Operation Records. . . . . . . . . . 127 Data Source . . .-. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 l

l

( l l 1 1

1

-l i

l

. o )

1 I

'l DISTRIBUTION l V. W. Anderson M. J. Guinn J. B. Newhouse i R. L. Andrews E. R. Gundal M. W. Nichols l W. R. Bateman A. L. Gurtis C. W. Norris i K. L. Belek R. H. Guy J. T. O'Connor l A. D. Bilau R. M. Hawkins W. W. Orr l B. H. Blome M. C. Hendrickson L. L. Parent .

C. N. Bloyd R. R. Henning T. L. Patterson 1 J. P. Bobba K. R. Henry R. L. Phelps

, C. E. Boughter J. B. Herman T. M. Reisdorff

M. A. Breuer G. J. Hill B. A. Reneaud C. J. Brennert K. C. Holthaus A. W. Richard >

M. W. Butt L. G. Huliska D. G. Ried i i C. A. Carlson R. L. Jaworski T. J. Sandene J. W. Chase R. A. Johansen C. A. Sayre G. R. Chatfield J. W. Johnson B. A. Schmidt A. G. Christensen W. C. Jones S. T. Schmitz

0. J. Clayton J. D. Kecy F. C. Scofield R. P. Clemens J. D. Keppler L. G. Sealock '

R. G. Conner D. D. Kloock H. J. Sefick J. L. Connolley J. C. Knight P. Sepcenko G. M. Cook D. M. Kobunski J. W. Shannon M. R. Core G. J. Krause R. W. Short S. R. Crites L. J. Kripal J. R. Shuck D. W. Dale J. B. Kuhr C. F. Simmons R. C. DeMeu1meester L. T. Kusek E. L. Skaggs R. D. DeYoung L. E. Labs J. L. Skiles D. C. Dietz M. P. Lazar F. K. Smith D. E. Dirrim R. C. Learch R. L. Sorenson K. S. Dowdy S. E. Lee K. E. Steele J. A. Drahota R. E. Lewis W. Steele T. R. Dukarski R. C. Liebentritt H. F. Sterba R. G. Eurich C. J. Linden R. K. Stultz

~

, H. J. Faulhaber B. R. Livingston G. A. Teeple M. A. Ferdig J. M. Lofshult M.-A. Tesar V. H. Frahm J. H. MacKinnon T. G. Therkildsen F. F. Franco G. D. Mamoran P. L. Thompson H. K. Fraser J. W. Marcil J. W. Tills J. F. W. Friedrichsen N. L. Marfice D.-R. Trausch R. M. Fussell D. J. Matthews P. R.. Turner S. K. Gambhir J. M. Mattice J. M. Uhland J. K. Gasper T. J. McIvor C. F. Vanecek W. G. Gates R. F. Mehaffey G. L. Van Osdel M. O. Gautier R. A. Miser L. P. Walling ,

- J. M. Glantz K. J. Morris- J. M. Wastak J. T. Gleason D. C. Mueller W. 0, Weber L. V. Goldberg R. J. Mueller G.- R. Williams

0. C. Gorer.ce W. L. Neal S. J. Willrett R. E. Gray W. C. Woerner. -

iv y , e3 - , -. _ - - -

-o,,,, er4#-

.j l

PREFACE J

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS Six indicators have been added to the Performance Indicators Report. All "

six of these indicators have been added to the Maintenance Section.

The Emeroenev Diesel Generator Unit Reliability Indicator found on page 35 has been added. This indicator shows the number of failures that were reported during the last 20, 50, and 100 emergency generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correlate

, to a high level of confidence that a unit s diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure  ;

values are below the trigger values.

'The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of -

starts And the respective number of load runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands include 111 valid and inadvertent ,

starts, including all start only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manual initiation.

Load run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following; '

A load run that is a result of a .real load signal.

- A load-run test expected to carry the plant's -load and duration as stated in the test specifications.

Special tests in which a diesel generator was expected to be l operated for a minimum of one hour and to be loaded with at l 1 east 50% of design load.

This indicator follows the definition of NUMARC 87-00, Guideliner, and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors, Appendix D dated April 6,1990. .Because of greatly varied definitions the. Diesel Generator Reliability Indicators that were r previously shown in the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report have been deleted from the Report.

The Percent of Comoleted Scheduled Activities (Electrical Maintenance.

Pressure Eauioment. General Maintenance. Mechanical Maintenance. and Instrumentation & Control) Indicators found on pages 45, 46, 47,_48, and 49 have been added to the Performance Indicators Report. These ,

indicators show the percent- of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities l for each maintenance craft. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, i ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous activities.  ;

1

I L

l PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS l

Five indicators have been changed. Three of these indicators are in the Security Section, one of these indicators is in the Design Engineering Section, and the other indicator is in the Human Resources Section.

1 The Loaanble/Renortable Incidents (Security) Indicator found on page 66

has been changed. This indicator has been separated into two line graphs. The top graph. shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents which occurred during the reporting month concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges, security key control,

, escorting, and access control. The ' bottom graph shows the total number.

of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning security system failures which occurred during the reporting month.-

i The Security Incident Breakdown Indicator found : on page 67 has - been changed. This indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning LDV's, security badges, security key control, escorting, access control, ,!

and security system failures in column graph form. Previously, the percentages of the above categories as compared to the total number of i incidents was presented in pie graph form.

The Security System Failures Indicator found on page 68 has been changed. This indicator still shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month. These items include: alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures, and card reader failures. In. addition  ;

to this information, alarm system failures and CCTV failures will now be divided into two new categories. These new categories include environmental failures and equipment failures. l The Outstandina Enaineerina Assistance -Recuests (EAR's) Indicator found on page 83 (Design Engineering Section) has been changed. This indicator now contains two graphs. The top graph shows the total number of o>en EAR's. The bottom graph shows the age in months of the open EAR's. T11s indicator was changed to show the ages of: EAR's due to the fact that EAR's were meant to be quick turn.around documents. Showing the ages of EAR's should increase the awareness of the number of open EAR's that are older than 6 months.-

The Personnel Turnover Rate Indicator found on page 88 (Human Resources Section). has been changed. This- indicator now- shows the three nuclear  :

divisions' personnel turnover rates for the time in which the Production Engineering Division was classified as a new division.-

1 2-i

. .. .- . - - . . . _ . . . _ _ . . _ ~ . _

, 1 PURPOSE j This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide  !

selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's  !

personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The [

information is presented in a way 'that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track: progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, 'with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some perfomriance indicators show company  ;

goals or industry information. This information can be' used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and' motivation.

T 9

5 l

l o

. .. 'L

l i  !

)

SCOPE l In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this program:

f l Select the data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

l Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques.

Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.

Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter.

This will ensure consistency in future reports' and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people usina the raport. -

i l 'I 4

,,n-- - e .y-- . -._ - _ . ._s. , , - . , , , . _ , + - ,c4 -

ADVERSE TREND REPORT The Adverse Trend Report explains the conditions under which certain -

indicators are showing adverse trends. An indicator that is . defined as AN ADVERSE TREND IS ONE IN WHICH TFE DATA REPRESENTED FOR THREE "

CONSECUTIVE MONTHS IS SHOWING A DECL MNE IN PERFORMANCE for that particular indicator. Indicators which show an apparent three month decline, but are nel considered an adverse ' trend, will display an

explanation which defines the reason why an ' adverse trend does not exist. t Forced Outaae Rate - Page 21 The forced outage rate for the Fort Calhoun . Station has been increasing since July of 1990. One forced outage occurred in the month' of August 1990 and was due to seal problems encountered in reactor coolant pump RC 3A. Another forced outage occurred in September 1990 and continued into .0ctober 1990. This forced outage was due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling.

capabilities.  !

Outstandina Enaineerina Assistance Reauests (EAR's) - Page 83 The number of open EAR's has increased from 59 at the end of May of 1990 to 127 at the end of October of 1990. The major reason for= the increase in the number of open EAR's is the result. of discrepancies ,

l between old procedures and the new procedures which are being upgraded by the Procedure Upgrade Project.

l c

i 5-

'h

- v - ...--,e + w , d- w . - - . _ _ _ . < _ - .

. . i INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED ,

MANAGENENT ATTENTION This section lists the indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper quartile. The indicators will be compared to the industry upper quartile as relevant to.that indicator. .

Forced Outaae Rate - Page 21 The forced outage rate for the month' of October 1990 was reported as

• being higher than the Fort Calhoun goal of 2.4%. The rise in the forced outage rate during the month of August was due to' seal prcblems encountered in reactor coolant pump RC-3A. ' These problems resulted in  :

172.6 forced outage hours. During the month of September and October the  !'

plant was shutdown due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabilities. This forced outage resulted in 212.0 forced outage hours being reported.

Unolanned Safety System Actuations - IINPO Definition) -Paga 23 The Fort Calhoun Station has experienced .an unplanned safety system actuation during 1990. This unplanned actuation was a start and load of DG-2 due to an inadvertent trip of backup lockout relay 86/2BF5. The Fort Calhoun goal for unplanned safety system _ actuations during 1990 was set at zero actuations. .

Gross Heat Rate o Page 25 The monthly gross heat rate for the months of August, September, and e October were reported as being above _ the Fort Calhoun monthly goal.

These high monthly gross heat rates were due to two forced shutdowns of the plant which occurred during August and September and continued into October.

The year to date gross heat rate is co,rently above the _ goal of 10,326 BTV/KWH The gross heat rate vai as far January and February were high due to the fact that the first stage of the high pressure turbine was  ;

removed during the months of Jr.oary and February. During May startup from the 1990 Refueling Outage caused the gross heat rate to be high.

During July, August, September, and October various derates, and two forced outages caused the gross heat rate values for these months to be higher than the Fort Calhoun goal.

Eauivalent Availability Factor'- Page 26 The monthly EAF for October was: below the goal of 93% due to the forced outage which occurred during September and October involving design basis questions. The year to_ date EAF _ is _ currently below the year to date goal of 56.4%. due to various power fluctuations which occurred during the month of June and due to forced outage hours which occurred during the months.of August and September and continued into October.

I

ll INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENTATTENT10h(CONTINUED)

, Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) - Page 27 The FRI has been above the Fort Calhoun goal of 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. The FRI value .for October using the actual plant letdown rate was reported as 2.14 nanocuries/ gram.

Corrective Maintenance Backloa Greater Than 3 Months Cid (Non Outaae) - Page 37 4 The percentage of open corrective non-outage MWO's older than 3 months old is currently above the industry quartile value of 45.8% due to 188 open MWO's that are older than 3 months old.

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance - Page 38 The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 60% and below the - industry upper quartile value of.  !

57.7%. This ratio decreased due to the high number of hours in which maintenance was involved in corrective maintenance activities associated with the forced outage which occurred in September and continued into October.

Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments - Page 41 The number of out-of service control room instruments has been above the Fort Calhoun goal of 7 out-of-service control room instruments and above the industry upper quartile value of 7 out of service control room ,

~

instruments since November of 1989.

Egreent of Comoleted Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 45 (Electrical Maintenance)  !

The percent of completed maintenance activities for Electrical i Maintenance was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 2 of the 4 scheduled weeks which ended in October 1990.

Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 46 (Pressure Eouipment)

The percent of completed maintenance activities for Pressure Equipment was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 2 of the 4 scheduled weeks which ended in October 1990.

Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 47 (General Maintenance)

The percent of completed -maintenance activities for Pressure Equipment was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for the 4 scheduled weeks which ended in October 1990.

I 1

-7= l l

j

INOICATORS NEEDING INCREASED l MANAGEMENTATTENTION(CONTINUED) )

l Percent of Comoleted Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 49 finstrumentation & Control) ,

i The percent of completed. maintenance activities for Instrumentatioh & '

Control was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 1 out of the 4 Scheduled weeks which ended in October 1990.

Qtt k Valve Failure Rate - Page 53 The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate is currently above the industry check valve failure rate. The reason for.the high check valve I failure rate is that the plant is performing maintenance on check valves .

which have not been tested for failures before. The check valve failure  !

l rate is expected to decrease as the check valves are maintained and monitored through the Check Valve Program.

Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index Page 54 The CPI value for the Fort Calhoun Station has been above the industry upper quartile value of 0.24 since the first CPI value was taken after startup in May of 1990. Part of the reason for the high CPI values is .

the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station has been involved in various '

derates and forced outages since startup in May. Another reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station uses ,

morpholin< to control PH. The use of morpholine- also raises the CPI values.

In-line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service - Page 57 The number of instruments out oi service at the end of October was above ,

the goal of 6 out-of-service instruments. The current number of  ;

chemistry instruments that are out-of-service is 7.

Total- Skin and Clothina Contaminations - Page 60 l The total number of skin and clothing contaminations. has been above the l Fort Calhoun goal of 150 contaminations since the month of April 1990, i

The total number of skin and clothing contaminations has been above the I industry upper quartile value of 129 contaminations since the month of l March 1990. The high number of skin and clothing contaminations during .

l the months of March and April 1HO was due to increased activity in the '

L Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated with the 1990- Refueling Outage, i

L 8

o .

t INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED 1 MANAGEMENTATTENTION(CONTINUED)

Decontaminated Auxiliary Buildina'- Page 61  !

The square footage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated is currently below the Fort Calhoun goal of 85% (non outage). This is due to activities which took place in the auxiliary building associated with ,

the forced outage which occurred during September and continued into October. The percentage of decontaminatec auxiliary building is expected i i to increase after the painting of the auxiliary building is completed.

The painting of the auxiliary building will ease the auxiliary ~ building decontamination process. l t

Temocrary Modifications (Excludina Scaffoldina) - Page 82 The number of temporary modifications which are installed in the plant is currently above the Fort Calhoun goal of 15 temporary modifications.

The number of temporary modifications which ar* 4,-+=11ed in the plant has been decreasing and is expected to keep de- -

i l

~9-

4 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP) l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i

l The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators i pages is to list the indicators related to the SEP items with parameters i

, that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15 - Increase HPES and IR Accountability East  !

Through Use of Performance Indicators  :

Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . 43 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's . . . . . . . . . . 87 CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations issued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 104 SEP Reference Numb t r_2.0 - Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, Improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's issued versus

• NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 104 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional Inspections CAR's issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations !ssued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 104

• SEP Reference Number 24 - Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 EReference Number 26 Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for l Safe Work Practice Requirements- 1 l Disabling injury Frequency Rate ................30 Recordable Injury cases Frequency Rate .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 I 1

SEP Reference Number 31 - Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual  !

and Conduct Project Management Training j i

MWO Overall Status (1991 Refueling Outage) . . . . . . . . . . . . v6

! Progress of 1991 Outage Modification Planning. . . . . . . . . . 97 Overall Project Status (1991 Refueling Outage. . . . . . . . . . 92-

. . l 1

SAFETYENHANCEMENTPROGRAM(SEP)  !

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS  !

(CONTINUED)

SEP Reference Number 33 - Develop On Line Maintenance and Modification l Schedule Percant of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activitiet (Electrical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 -

Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities  !

(Pressure Equipment) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,. 46 1 t

Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (General Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Mechanical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 <

Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Instrumentation & Control) . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 49 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance) ...........,..44 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Preventive Maintenance items Overdue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 SEP Reference Number 43 Implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . . 53 SEP Reference Number 44 - Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . 43 SEP Reference Number 46 - Design a Procedures Control and

! Administrative Program Document Revi ew. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 SEP Reference Number 52 - Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

I e , . 1 l

i SAFETY. ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP). ,

, PERFORMANCE ING1CATORS l l (CONTINUED)- /

l SEP Reference Number 54 - Complete Implementation.of Radiological l- Enhancement Program l

l Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . , . . 28-Volume of Low Level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . .- . . . . . .- 29 i l Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . .'. . . . . . . . . ... 61 SEP Reference Number 58 - Revise Physical Security Training and l

Procedure Program _

Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . - . . . . . . . . 66 Security Incident Breakdown ...:....-..-.........z67 .

Security System Failures . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . . : . 68 SEP Reference Number 60 - Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program l

Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in-l Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . 50 I'

SEP Reference Number 61 - Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in-Licensee Event Reports . . . . ... . . . . . . . .-, . . . . .;. . 50 SEP Reference Number 62 - Establish Interim System Engineers 1

Temporert Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 82 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests-(EAR's). . . . ... . .'b3 Engineering Change Notice Status . . . . , . . ._

=. ... . . . . . .

04 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 85 i SEP Reference Number 68 - Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and-Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training ,

SRO Licenn Examination Pass Ratio . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . 90 ,.

R0 License Examination Pass Ratio. . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . 91 '

l' License Candidate Exams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92

(

}

. -. . .-. .. .._.-2

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP)

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINUED) i p

SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications

-Temporary Modifications . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 i

1 4

4 i

d

PERFORMANCE: INDICATORS' INDEX TO GRAPHS  ;

INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS Forced Outage Rate . . . . . 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams ' .iile Critical. . . . . . . 22.

Unplanned Safety System Actuations --(INPO Definition) . . . . ...:23-Unplanned Safety System Actuations (NRC Definition). . . . . . . ;24 I Gross Heat Rate. . . .-, . ... . . . . . . ._. . . .-. . . ... . .L25 l Equivalent Availability Factor . . . _ , .. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . 26 l

Fuel Reliability Indicator . . .-. . . . . . . . . .- . . . . =.1.

- .. 27 j olume of -ee So R d oa tive aste. . . . . ..... 2 -

Disabling- Injury Frequency Rate. . .. . . . . . .- .. . . . . . . . 30 i

1

______m__.___. __ m .

<1

. .- 1 e .- ,

PERFORMANCE. INDICATORS.

L INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED).

OPERATIONS St ation Net Generation . . .. . .= . .. ;. . - . . . . .; . . . . . . 20 L

Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . = . . . . . . . . - . . 21 -

'1 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Sc. rams While Critical. . . . . .. . . 22 .,

Unplanned Safety System Actuations . (INPO Definition) . . . . .. . . . 23 -

Unplanned Safety System Actuations (NRC Definition). . . . . . . .~ 24 G ro s s He at Ra t e . . . . . . . . . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . : 2 5 -

j Equivalent Availability Factor . . . .: . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 26 ' l Fuel Reliability Indicator . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .- 27 ,

Daily Thermal Output . . . . . . . . 1 ...-c. ~. . .- . ... .- 31 q

Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours . . . . . . . . 32 -

Operations and Maintenance Budget. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .-~33 Documen t Rev i ew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,

. . . . . . . 3 4 '-

' MAINTENANCE Emergency Diesel Generator Unit Reliability. . . . . . . . . ._ . 35 Age of Outstanding Maintenance -Work. . - . . . . . . .- . . . . . . . 36 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . .- . . . . . . . . . .. .

~

39 3 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 40  ;

i Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments. . . . . . . . .u41 l l

l; Maintenance Overtime . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . - . . . . . . . 42 1 1

' Procedural Noncompliance Incidents:(Maintenance). . . .. . .. . . . . '43 '

1 i Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) . . . . . . ' 44 L

[.

I PERFORMANCE INDICATORS- I INDEX TO GRAPHS l 9

(CONTlHUED)-

MAINTENANCE ICONTINUED)

Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . .; . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance- Activities (Pressure Equipment) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . , . . .-.l46 Percent of Completed Scheduled. Maintenance Activities ,

1 (General Maintenance) . ... . . . .-. . . . . . . . ... . . . . 47-l.

l Percent of Completed Scheduled' Maintenance Activities i (Mechanical- Maintenance) . . . : . . - . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . 48 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Instrumentation & Control). . , , . . . . . . . . ... . .-. . . 49 Number of Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...-. . .,. . .i. 50-Number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS)

Reportable Fail ures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 i- Maintenance Effectiveness. . .._ . . . . . . . . . . ... . . 52 l

Check Valve Failure Rate . . .- . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 53 l L

p CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . : . . . . . . . . , . ..

28 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste. . -. . . . . . .- . . 29

! Secondary System Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .- . . . 54 i

~

Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours.0ut of Limit'. . . . 55 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry-Hours.0utside Station Limits . . . . 56 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service . . ... . . . . . .:.'57' Hazardous Waste Produced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . 58 l Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59'-

Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . -, . . . . 60 - ,

1 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Radiological Work Practices Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -62; l

1

, _ _ . _ s

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS ~ q (CONTINUED)

CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION (CONTINUED): ,

l Number of Hot Spots. . . . . . . . . ...-. . . . .:. . .

. . . . 634 j Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment. . ' 64' Liquid Radioactive Waste-Being Discharged to the Environment .-.-.. 65.- ,

-l SECURITY  ;

Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . . . - . . . . 66 J Security Incident Rreakdown. ... . . . . . . . . . . . , . . '.-. 67 1

Security System Faileres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68' -

. MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES j Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts. . . .L . . . . . . . . . :. . . . 6 9 Spare Parts Inventory Value. . . . . . . : . . . . . , . . . . ... . .

70 ,

Spare Parts Issued . . . . . . . . , , . . . . ... . . ..... . . 71 Inventory Accuracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

. j Stockout Rate. . . . . . . . . . .=. . . ... . . . . .z. ..... a Warehouse Receipts . ... . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ...-. . . . 74-I Warehou se Is sues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- . . . L 75 -

Warehouse Returns. . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . , . 76 -

Material Requests Awat'.ing Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . 77 .

Expedited Purchases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...-. . . . 78 Invoice Breakdown. . ... . . . .- . . .-.-. -. . . . . . . . .'.3.

. 79-9 Material Request Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . --. . . . .. . ; . . . 80 DESIGN ENGINEERING' Outstanding: Modifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .' . . . . . 81 Temporary Modifications. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . -. 82 l

+

l.

1 ,

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX T0' GRAPHS-(CONTINUED)

DESIGN ENGINEERING (CONTINUED) 3 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's)... .n. . . . . . 83-Engineering Change, Notice Status.. . . . . ... . . . . .. .-. . . .:84:

[

l Engiieering Change Notice Breakdown. . -. . . . . - . . . . .. . . . .

85 1

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY i.

Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . .c. . .. . . . . . . 30.

Recordable Injury Cases Frequency, Rater. . . . - , . . . . . . . . . l 86

'i HUMAN RESOURCES Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs. . . . . . . . . .. ;. 87 Personnet Turnover Rate... . . . .:. . . . . . . .r... .,. .. . . 88 -

Staf fi ng Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . 89 o

i IRAINING AND OVALIFICATION-SRO License Examination Pass Ratio . . . ... . . 1 . . . . . . . c. 90' l

R0. License-Examination Pass Ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . .::.'.- >. 91 u  !

l License Candidate Exams. . . ... . . . . . . . .,. . . .... . . . -

92J Hotlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .m . .... . .-93 >

il Classroom (Instructor)JHours , . . .-. . . . . . .. . ...-. . .

.c. 94 Total ' Hours of Student Training. . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 REFUELING OUTAGE j MWO Overall Status (1991 Refueling Outage) . .. . . . . . . . . . . . -. 96 Progress.of 1991 Outage Modification Planning. . . . . .! . . .-. 19 7 L

Overall' Project Status (1991: Refueling Outage) . . . . . . . . . . 98 1

l

! OUALITY ASSURANCE l

l- Number of Violations per.1000 Inspection Hours. =. . . . . .: . . . . 99 ~ .

1 Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCV's)L. . . .s.. .100' t

I 7:

a

,.m.. . .. . _ , . . . . . _ - . . _ -

.. .. l

.- ,  :/

PERFORMANCE: INDICATORS INDEX T0 GRAPHS' (CONTINUED)- )

OVALITY ASSURANCE (CONTINVED) 1 Percent'of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old . . .:... . . . . . 101-Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports .-. .-. . .-.".-. 102: l l

Corrective Action Reports Current Status 1 . . .- . . . . . . .

103' -

CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR'silssued versus. . . . . . . 104' NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported- ,

.i i

t

.1 L  :!

1

.i k

.c . ..

500000- 1 IStation Net Generation j 1

j 4

l 400000 M

e ,

g a

W 300000-a  ?

t u t 1 3

H 200000-o u ,

r s

100000- '!

O Jan Feb Mar Apr .May Jun Jul. Aug Sep- Oct No'v; Dec 1990' STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort ,

Calhoun Station for the reporting month. '

During the' month of October 1990, a1. net total of j 280,288.3 MWH was ' generated :by the " Fort. Calhoun.

Station. The net' generation far the~ month of August was low due to a forced outage which occurred during the 4 month. This forced outage- was due to seal. problems 'on reactor coolant pump RC-3A. The. net generation for the months of September and October were also low due to 'a forced outage. The ' forced outage was due to: a design -

basis question on containment cooling capabilities.

The. net generation totals for the months of -March and April were zero. and the net generation total- for the month of May was low. due -to - the' plantL being. shutdown 'l for the 1990 Refueling Outage.

Adverse Trend: None

,L . 5 . . - . -, . .

( ..  ;.

! . . , j i

l 1

- Forced-Outage Rate 10 -e- Fort Calhoun Goal j

-eJIndustry Upper 10 Percentile l l

1 8- l GOOD

+ /

R 6-a t

e 4-

,q I;4

. s....e....o....g. 4..._e....e....e ...g . .e....e. 4 -  ;

2- t 1

3 s  !

0 0 j __ .: m m - -B C B 3-G B G--O 0-

'87 '88 '89 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar-- Apr May Jun . Jul Augt. Sepf0ct .

1989 ;1990' l't i

FORCED OUTAGE RATE-The forced outage rate was reported as 4.4% for the month of October 1990. The rise in the forced outage rate for the Fort Calhoun~ "ith i during the month of October was due to the continuation e.' a forced  ;

outage which occurred due to design . basis questions c.i containment cooling capabilities.

The last forced outage a't Fort Calhoun occurred 'in September; and October'of 1990. ,

The industry upper ten percentile value for thet forced : outage rate is s

0.25%.

The 1990 goal for forced outage rate is 2.4% and is Lbased on- seven days of forced outage time.- The -basis for ' establishing' the 1990-performance goals can be found on page 123.

Adverse Trend: The forced outage rate has been rising since. July-1990. This rise in the forced outage:was due to- two forced outages which occurred in August and September and continued into October.

, ~The first. forced' outage was due to seal problems . encountered in reactor coolant pump RC-3A and the second forced outage' was due to:

design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabil.ities.

h

-I.

5- R Reactor Scram

-G- Fort Calhoun Goal .

-e- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-4 i

S GOOD 3

c r f-a .

m  !

2- i a

1 - -

-i g O --- G--- &---G---- G--- .G ----G ---- G ---- O- ---G----O ----O 1-4 1

.i c

- " 0 0 0 '

~l n

0 O C _ m m m m m O' C

/

'86 '87 '88 '89 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar ' Apr : May Jun Jul_ Aug Sep= Oct 1989 1990 1

p UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS ,

WHILE CRITICAL

~

i There : were no . unplannedi automatic reactor-scrams in October.. -It has been 1,582 days since ;the last unplanned automatic reactor-scram which occurred on July 2, 1986.

The '1990 goal for unplanned automatic reactor.

scrams while critical.has been set at 1..

The industry upper tens percentile value ~ is zero _ scrams' per unition an tannual basis. The' - -

Fort Calhoun Station < is currently in the '

upper : ten percentile of nuclear plant) performance in this' area.

Adverse Trend: None a

=l ,

tr r. ,- .

4 R Safety l System Actuations' G- Fort-Calhoun Goal-

-a Industry Upper'10 Percentile 3- ,

A .

C t '

u GOOD k 2- 'O o

n s

1- &---q -

g . .

ep

\

\

\, ti.

0 0 0 0

'87 '88 '89 Nov Dec Jan Feb- Mar Apr! May Jun :Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INP0' DEFINITION)'

There were no unplanned safety 'sy' stem actuations during- the month .of October, 1990.

The 1990 goal for. .the number 'of unpl anned . -safety 4 system actuations" is-zero. This goal. is based . on. past i performance at the Fort Calhoun Station.

The industry upper ten percentileivalue.

for the number of unplanned safety '

system actuations per_ year is zero.

Adverse Trend: None

~

Safety _Syste]Actuations.(SSA's)  ;

- 12 Month l Running Total SSA's

--- Critical HoursE

-1000 l

10 l N 8- -800 N l

u , ,~ , , ..---~, j~ , -- ; - ,, v l U

m m -

/

\

\ / ,

s

(

/ -

I b / s l' '\ / c l \ / b  !

r 6- '\/ I ,'

-600 'r 5 I \' [ V

- o - s e:

o kW 't  ! \ l .f 4- -400 3 f H

' I o-

-S l \'

A -

I \ l u

l \ l r t

s 2- y. ,f -200 s'

({ $ l i nr l 0 l ~

J$g I y -

/ 3 1 Xhi 0 * '

l 0 0

'88 '89 JFMAMJJAS0N-DlJ F n A M.J:JtA'S Oth--D 1989 .1990 UNPLANNED' SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS'- (NRC' DEFINITION)  ;

i ,

This indicator shows: the number of safety . system actuations L(SSA's) which include the High and _ Low Pressure: Safety < Inject _ ion Systems, the Safety--Injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators.1The- NRC' classification of SSA's includes actuations Lwh9n imajoriequipment _is- ,

operated And when the logic systems ,forf thne ~safetyfsystems are challenged.-

The last event of this type occurred in June 1990 when Diesel Generator D-1 was -started due' to a turbine trip. This trip was; a result of a failure to reset the plant output circuit. breaker ,

following an attempt to synchronize the. main-generator.

The majority of SSA's displayed above-were related to;1990 Refueling Outage . activities and are ' currently being reviewed' under= the Safety System Actuation Reduction ' Program. 'The goalH of L this Program' is to reduce the number of SSA's at Fort Calhoun.

Adverse Trend: None.- Program-to reduce th'e number of SSA's is being implemented.

l

- _ _ -. 1 . . . . _ . . .

. a ._ , , - . ,

l: ,

13)00-a l IMonthl,v '.ross Heat Rate 1

- Year-to-Date Gross Heat Rate- l

-G- Fort Calhoun Monthly Goal  !

12000- -+- Fort Calhoun Year-to-.Date Goal B

- & Industry Upper 10 Percentile T ~

U

/

y 11000- i H

1

~

T - .~

Y- i j 10520

~-i =

3 10014 FO-O O-O -

O ~

O ~O ~

N

< - i x

3  :  : sm 9000

'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun! Jul Aug; Sep Oct Nov Dec- >

-1990 I

j GROSS HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for- the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,139 BTV/KWH during the month. of October. This monthly gross heat rate was above the monthly gross heat rate goal- of 10,055 BTU /KWH. The ~high monthly gross heat rate was due to the shutdown of the plant which occurred due to a forced outage during .the months of September and October. The-year-to-date gross heat rate was -reported as 10,370 ; BTU /KWH. _This year-to-date value -was higher than the year-to-date gross. heat rate goal of 10,259 BTU /KWH. The year-to-date gross - heatL rate is -' above the . Fort Calhoun goal due to the fact that the first stage 1of the high pressure turbine was removed prior to the 1990 Refueling :0utage. Additionally,. the gross heat rate values for the months of May, June, and July.1990, were high due to startup after the 1990 Refueling ,0utage and various derates. 1 The ' gross heat rate values for September, cand- October were' due - to 1 start ups after forced outages which occurred in .these months. The. year-to-date gross heat rate value is expected to decrease: as the river; water-temperature decreases. The above monthly and year-to-date Fort CalhounL goals are the best gross heat rate thate can be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station. Currently the plant is above the : year'-to-date gross heat i rate goal. If the, station operates at- 100W for the rest of '1990, this goal will be approached but will not be achieved. The gross heat -rate ' industry upper ten percentile value is' 9,935 BTU /KWH.

Adverse Trends: None l

l

\ \ W

i I l Monthly EAF

- Year-to-Date EAF -4 G- Fort' Calhoun-Monthly Goal l

I

-+- Fort Calhoun Year-to-Date Goal- GOOD ,

.l l -e- Induhtry Upper 10 Percentile ~ j 100-l . .O ----O -- . O---tG---- O ----O t}

B 8 8: -8 ~--8 G G ,O 71 -

77 80 l-B--O B-f >

1

/

66 3

\ -

I^

, . p e 60-

'\, \ \

l .

1. / l g.p~

, 3 (W '\

i

• F s -- " '

7 .

} l 3 4 e

./ p ' ,

fL ]40- l y[j

\,

)

} j - L,

- 1

(;  ;

{;fg 20- 'g j 1

gag f \ l l h

~

e 1 7, $pq i \ '

jL

'O '

'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug;iSep. Oct 1Nov -Dec.  ;

'1990 j

E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR: '

j The EAF was reported .as 76.1% for the monthu of October.

This EAF was lower than ' the Fort Calhoun1 monthly -goalJ of; 93% due to a forced coutage' hours being reported / during- -i' October. This forced outage occurred: dueJ toi design 1 basis.

questions which were raised concerning component cooling l capabilities. 3 L .  !

The ' year-to-date EAF was reported as . 5 4 *. 4 % . Thise i

year-to date value was lower than the year-to-date: goal Lof.: -l" 60.2%. The - low year-to-~date ; EAF ; was' due ! to - various power.

fluctuations which occurred during the month ' of June. and .

the forced outage hours-being reported during the months of

~

August, September, and-October.

~

.The EAF industry upper ten percentile value ist*2.5%..

Adverse Trends: None k

4'  ;.

8 =%- Fuel Reliability Indicator- <

G- Fort Calhoun Goal?

-e- Industry Upper 10 Percentile-

-b- Industry Median 6-n a

n  ;

4

[' L a a -^

u GOOD-  ;

2.4

{ 4- 4 e }

s j

! q g

1.5 [' -

j i

] k 2- , u_ a e a a A A A? I f  ;

7 n <

s 9

j f, ) .

g_ ..e. ...e.__.e. __ e ...g.-.e-_ -- ...e. --- ----e ---e j l s n - A" n -" # - " -

• 0 ^^" ^ C "

'88 '89- Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun: Jul ",

Aug Sep Oct:

1989 ~1990 -

B i

FUEL RELIABILITY' INDICATOR:: 1 The FRI was . reported .as .1.45 nanocuries/ gram _ for the i month of October. This' INPO indicator uses an Lindustry  ;

normalized - letdown purification rate.. The FRI was also -

1 calculated using Fort Calhoun's actual' letdown {

purification rate. The FRI value using-the plant's. actual.-

letdown purification rate was reported' as : 2.14 nanocuries/ gram. _'

The 1990 fuel reliability. goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. ,

The fuel reliability indicator industry upper t e n '-

percentile value u, 0.04 nanocuries/ gram.

Adverse Trend: None l

- Personnel Radiation Exposure 388 400 G- Fort Calhoun Goal

(( -B- Industry Upper 10 Percentile G, M.

GOOD l 1 - 300-272 &

!i T-~ -O - -O....o.- -O

_t if -

p. -e- -4...q

-! " R ,

r y~

E 200-g

a 0-8 078 8 O O G-G-8-8 O rn

) f' g-93 4 M

100-

/

/

1' , l i

' e:

,0 t a -

/  ;

E!!0 kk$ '" i 0 ~

'87 '88 '89 Ja Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE-(CUMULATIVE)

During October 1990, 5.6 man-rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while : working at the Fort Calhoun Station.

t

! The monthly cumulative exposure goal for October  !

was 275.2 man-rem while the actual cumulative exposure throughL October totaled 256.9 ' man-rem.

The exposure cumulated in 1990 has- been: high due '.

to the increased activity in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated ' with the 1990

'efueling Outage.

n The. personnel radiation exposure ' industry upper ten percentile is 166 man-rem per. unit per year. r Adverse Trend: None' SEP 54 l

1

+

i e n

(

Ss . Monthly Radionctive Waste: Shipped )

12500-

- Cumulative. Radioactive Waste Shipped I e- Fort Calhoun Goal' 0-. Industry Upper 10 Percentile C

l u f GOOD

c. 7500- 4 6195 F.

y :t 5000- -

4454 'q o---- e----o --- G----e ---e----&---e----&---e--- o --- $

3#1 he

?" M G- D-O-O O D-G O 8 18 B-O -

5* y 2500 -;

1 1722 4 tR 5 $

Y b h n. %M _

'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar. Apr. May Jun'.Juli Aug Sep. Oct Nov: Dec -

1990 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE-' WASTE h

The above graph shows the amount of low-level radioactive waste shipped off-site for disposal. ' The table below' lists the amount of -

waste actually shipped off-site - for'i disposal:. and the D amount - of.

low-level radioactive waste which is in temporary?stora9e...

The-volume of solid. radioactive waste is (cubic-' feet):i y l

Amount Shipped'in October -

. 158.1 Amount in Temporary Storage -

1141.1 1990 Cumulative Amount Shipped -

1726.7: '

1990 Goal -

5000.0' The industry upper ten percentile value~ is 3,072 cubic 1 feet: per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988.

4 Adverse Trend: None SEP 541 ,

t-

, 1 l

l c .

2- 0 1990 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate

--X- 1989 DisablingL Injury Frequency Rate 1.75- A 5 Year Average Disabling' Injury. Frequency Rate G- Fort Calhoun Goal j 1.5- e Industry Upper 10. Percentile j 1.25- -

f ~

GOOD l t 4 e -

.75- ,

'5- '

' K,,,

,, i

.25-e.-___.e. . . .e. ... . . . ... e . g..e.__..e .....e _.- ..e.-- . .e--- .- .e . 1

~

nA f

~" ' -

g

• ' g* u 0

JIn fib Mar Apr May Jun. Jul :AIg Sep OYt NIv Dec l DISABLING INJURY'FRE0VENCY RATE

~

-(LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the current monthly disabling--injury - rate in column f'orm.. The 1989 disabling injury (frequency rate and7 the Fort.

l Calhoun Station 5 year average disabling 11njury frequencye rate are t also. shown. There were zero- disabling injuries reported at the Fort -

Calhoun Station in October. The total number of disabling injuries in d 1990 is one.

The 1990 disabling injury frequency rate goal'was set at 0.31% and 3 was based on one disabling injury occurring'in.1990.'

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury ~ frequency'. rate is 0%.

.i The year end disabling injury frequency rates for' 1987, 1988, and 1989 were 0.6, 1.6,-and 0.4;respectively.

Adverse Trend: None SEP 26-

-+- Thermal Output

- Technical Specification Limit

-e Fort Calhoun Goal- ,

i 1500c - n - - - - - -

l 1200- 1 H

900/

l/ -

g t a ,

w  ;,

a 600-300

-Of 1 7 14 21 28 October 1990 1 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays .the- daily operating power ,

level, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification '

limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross .

hatched area represents the differencel between the maximum ,

allowable operation and.the actual plant operation. >

The percent power operation of the - Fort Calhoun Station during October 1,1990 through October 5,1990 was approximately 0%. The plant was then operated at epproximately 100%.

It must be noted that normal update oscillations on test point i L XC105 prevent Operations from continually operating the plant above j 1495' thermal megawatts. Because of- these oscillations, power is l

sometimes backed _ down to decrease the risk of violating the 1500  :

thermal megawatt technical specification limit.

Adverse Trend: None 1

.l

- e , , ...

.ol o  :.

,= .  ;

?

2

- + Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.8-1.6-  ;

1,4-1.2 GOOD R

a Y

-3[ ,

t .J

.8-  ;

. .\

.6-

'l

.4- .

.13 .

, .2- -

0 0 ) ' ..

0  : .

'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar, Apr May Jun Jul Aug: Sep' OctJNov ,Dec- ^!

1990 >

i EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES' PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS-There were zero equipment forced outage hours : reported - during the month of October 1990.

1 The last equipment- forced - outage l occurred in- August of 1990 and was - due to seal problems on reactor coolant. pump RC-3A  ;

Adverse Trend: None l

l

?

^

l . .- j

- Actuni Operations Expenditures '!

-M- Operations Budget i

gy100- 1 i

id 75- - <

10 ,

il -

,i ol 50- "'

na s sr '

5 25- 4 j

]

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 'Dec 1990- 1 40- -

- Actual Maintenance Expenditures  !

gy -+- Maintenance Budget i  !

1d -

1 20-11 ol r 10-s

./

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr .May Jun Jul Aug Sep- :Oct Nov; Dec- 1 1990 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET l The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as thel actual expenditures fcgoperations' and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.  !

The budget year-to-date for-Operations was 67.2 million dollars for October. 1 while the actual cumulative expenditures through October. totaled "58.2 '

million dollars.

The budget year-to-date for Maintenance was 22.4 million dollars for October while the actual cumulative expenditures through October totaled 15.7 million dollars.

Although Operations and. Maintenance are currently .15.8 million dollars under budget, a cost. variances study from January - through- September 1990, predicts that Operations' and Maintenance will be approximdely 10 million dollars under budget at_ year end 1990.

Adverse Trends: None 1

, .,- 4 1500- . - Documents Scheduled for . Review

-X- Documents Reviewed l l Overdue Documents- X 1200-l-

ND ,

l m$900' - j '\

bu .!.\

em l \

re j \

, D 600-ot / \

l \'

fs l l \

l 9:

300- / .,

^ s / \

' ~~

A y

"~~~'

,q&: ' ~ '

' N, 3 ,,/

" " ~

0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep. 0ct 1989- 1990-DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows th:: nu :ber of biennial reviews completed .during '

the reporting month, the number of biennial reviews scheduled for the 1 reperting: month, and the number of biennial reviews that are overdue.:

l These document reviews are performed' in house' and. include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, . Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the-Operating Manual.  ;

During October there were 160 document reviews completed - while~ 27 document reviews were scheduled. At the erd of 0ctober, there were 49 document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of i October consisted primarily of maintenance documents.

During the month of October there were 157 new or renamed documents.  ;

reviewed. These new or renamed documents ' will need- to. be reviewed i again in 1992.

The high number of documents scheduled for review for the month of-June 1990 was due to the high number of c document reviews' that were completed during the month of June 1988; TheLreviews that were -

3

-completed during June 1988 were'due to'be reviewed'in June 1990. 4 Adverse Trend: None SEP 46

}

End of Month- _

- Trigger Values For:

L l l Failures /20 Demands 20 Demands- .,

10 _ Failures /50 Demands: 50 Demands m

Failures /100 Demands' - - -

100 Demands 1

i 8 .. .. . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

js N p -

GOOD m* 6- 4_

b) e ' -- - -

u I

r 4' 4 e  !

ys . _. _. _ ,_,. _ ..

2- -

3

=

a 1

0 -s 1 Aug Sep Oct Nov' Dec- Jan Feb Mar Apr May 'Jun Jul 1990 1991 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY Tne Emergency Diesel Generator Unit Reliability . trend has been added to the i Performance Indicators Report. This bar graphs show three-- monthly indicators '

pertaining to the number. of failures that were reported during the last 20,: 50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun -Station. Also.  :

shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of= confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger values. i The demands counted- for this indicator include the respective number of starts And the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The l number of start demands include All valid and inadvertent starts, including all j start-only demands' and all start demands'that are followed by load-run-demands, whether by automatic or manual ~ initiation. Load-run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following; a load-run that is a '

result of .a real load signal; a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated'in the test specifications; special tests in which a diesel ganerator was expected to be operated for a minimum of one hour and to be loaded with at le.st 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section). <

The last 2 demand failures occurred. in the month of June 1990 and were due to problems with DG-l's static exciter voltage regulator.

Adverse Trend: None

. ~ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ .

400 August-1990':

September 1990 0

u I IOctober 1990-t 300-t 8

)

. j n ..

d i 200- ,

r n

9 ==  !

=

W t

==

0 100

1. ' , _..~

. - = .E!

i i

-ei 1lE-

~

=

l$l

-_s-!

3 0-0-3 36. 9 19-12; >12' Age.in Months

[.

AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS  ;

(CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE):

This indicator shows the age of ~ corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MWO's)

, remaining open at the end of ~ the' reporting '

month. '

Adverse Trend: None i

l i

l L August 1990 M S September 1990 l 400- - . . _ _ . .

l l October ~1990 I

[3EEG V

5 51 'l t

g  ;

300- g <

=== -

[N 200- [@hh

==

~::::

=

c=m 555 E35 100- lif 55 h

50 W-

~

M-

C] 5 =3

== 55 0-

1. 1. 1. =i I Total Open Total Ope., Open Open MW0s Open -Safety High-MW0s > 3 Months Safety Related Prior' sty Old Related MW0s Mwo3 MW0s > 3 Honths Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWO's remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a.

breakdown by se.veral key categories.

Adverse. Trend: None l'

i l

, - - - - , . - - ,- - ~ , -

- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old I

+ Industry Upper. Quartile i

80- 1 d

i 60- #

P .  !

4 9 _._.4 p-+-O--O i-C O- O O' O ce 40 s n

t .

GOOD 20- -

Y.

5 0

Nov Dec Jan Feb. Mar. A;;r May Jun - Jul Aug1 Sep Oct 1989 L1990

.)

CORRECTIVEMAINTENANCEB4CKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLDS  !

(NON-0UTAGE)  :

This indicator : hows thet percentage. of open corrective non-outage maintenance -work' orders that are greater.than three months old at' the'end of the reporting month.

The percentage .of open corrective . :non-outage '

maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the' end of October was reported as 52.1%

The industry upper quartile value for correct'ive:

maintenance . backlog greater than 3 months old is:

45.8%.

Adverse Trend:' None i 1

j l

- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 4 - Industry Upper Quartile  :

90 O- Fort Calhoun Goal 80-

.l 70-P 60-g--- g_ -g,-- ---g----- Q----- ----g----g, _---Q _y--g,---- g e .!

. n 50- s L t ,

L 40- 1 GOOD ,i 30-  ;

20 Jun LJul

~

Nov- Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Aug'_ :Sep Oct 1989 1990

(

4 RATIO 0F PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL' MAINTENANCE' (N0N-0UTAGE)

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed-i non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non outage maintenance. .t The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun Station- decreased to 50.2%'i' -October. : The low:

l ratios in August, September, and October were due to , the increased involvement .of maintenance in . corrective maintenance activities associated - with .the. two forced I outages which occurred in August and September.. '

I

, The Fort Calhoun-goal is to have- a ratio of preventive to l total maintenance greater than'60t.

The . industry upper quartile value foi the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7%.

Adverse Trend: None - Reason for trend is g Nen above.

l SEP 41 i l

1 l

o

• j

)

- Preventive Maintenance items Overdue l 3- + - Industry Upper Quartile l l

e- Fort Calh' oun Gotl l 4 GOOD L

p + l e

3' ,

r C

, e a

2  ;

O O - - O----o.,

' O----- G----- O-----O O O ----O O ----O-----O

^

/

0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Kar Apr May Jun Jul- .Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990

.4*

PREVENTlyl fAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitraent to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require.'

During October 1990, 866 PM items were completed. A total  !

of 4 PM items were not completed within the allowable grace period.

The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue. . The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this indicator.

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41

! 40 j

. o i 9 J l

40 as Total Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service

-& Industry Upper Quartile for Total Out of-Service Instruments G- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of Service Instruments 30-mss, vm -,

I GOOD  :#d Nn . + Mne s u$ g'y ,

mt $ye @ - 7 .

br 2M Me SO #: 'M e u 20-  % N ?m: W@@i b  %

y i rm T@~kdwq

~ ,#e a p

s w >

e & W Mi 9% %w#14 ;M oD N bh  ! lib Yh $@e W '$5h

?'

• it s }upf Sp f }

%g, p (

?@g 4 L %q!

g' p 4

Dm euf fx #

10 .. = y? ,[: s %J

k"~~

i p

h. , %v;; M s cy.. p

- ~

@$d A

.p i :

j ..

M;-! 9( ht k [G ih o[*r 4w

$A g/

..- .. ... ... gq ... ... ... ._ -..

( -..

gf egi 4~w 4 ~,

w -

ua n a; w

. >;;) %en v M fy4,, l%)  %

.'Wm

$f W %e

,% A, . A.

w -

S

%g

m-GE c

qu w@

pp*

d,T;N gi@? ':".

y t

g c p' m y

@2; M, o'1

%s, l> ,

0

'# * " " d ",'

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 NUMBER OF OUT OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out-of-service control room instruments, the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal,

! There was a total of 24 out-of-service l control room instruments at the end of October.

l The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of service control room instruments.

The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 7.

l Adverse Trend: None l

\ . .

1 80-

- Maintenance Overtime

! -H- 12 Month Average ]

G- Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD l i 4

i 60- )

i J l  !

! . e-- ..o, ]

P ,',

e g' '~

g rc 40- / \

l

/ _ \,

e / \

n

' / 's ',

t / N, O. . .. . g. . . . . f h.. . . G. ---- G----- G ----- O  !

'# )

20  % :- ,

i 0-Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct i 1989 1990 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors 'the ability to perform-the desired maintenance activities with the allotted resources.

Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and l can lead to errors due to fatigue.

i ,

l The percent of overtime' hours with respect to normal burs was reported as 9.3% during the month of October 1990 The --12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 17.5%.

The high per.entage of overtime hours reported for the months of l February 1990 through May -1990 was due to increased maintenance support associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. The high percentage of overtime. hours reported - for August, September, and October 1990 was due to maintenance activities. associated with the 2 forced outages during these months.

The Fort Calhoun- goal for the percent of maintenance overtime-hours .

worked has been set at 25% for non outage months and 50% for butage months.

Adverse Trend: None I l

l

l

. . j 20- 1 I open IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O Closed IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) l

- Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance)

N 15- j u  !

M <

b '

1 l

e r

1 o lo- '

f 88 1 -

~7 -

R A  ;

8 s 55 Jn 55 5- -,

33 $ l ~

3 ~

3 ci 22 ,i il 2 2 h l '!: 1 s 1 11 E 1 1

[0 ~{i 0

000 1E F lo I c o oo ooo ooo lo Nov oec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1989 1990 i

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

! This indicator shows the number of identified Maintenance Incidents Reports (IR's) that are-related to the use of procedures, the number of l closed IR's that are rel ated to the use of procedures (includes IR's that were caused. by

, procedural noncompliance), and the number of closed l j IR's that were caused by procedural noncompliance. 1

l It should be noted that the second and third l i

columns will lag behind the first column until the  !

l IR's are closed. This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive category codes.

IR's receive their category codes when they' are 1 closed, l l

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 44 1

l

i o .

I l

l 900- ,

i

- Open MWO's

-e- Fort Calhoun Goc 1 1 i 800- ,

l I

o 700-Nf - t u

in M by 600- O--- - - O - ---+---- O -- --& - --- O --- & - -- - G - - - -& --- - O,

'r, eo r'

N s

500- # V b----- O 1

t 400-300 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage maintenance work orders that are open at the end of the reporting month.

At the end of October 1990, there were ' 361~

corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.

The goal for this indicator is to have less than 500 ccrrective non-outage maintenance work orders remain'ing open.

Adverse Ir.RDd: None SEP 36

1 . .

1 . .

Electrical Maintenance

- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities l

O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100  ;

l 80- & - - - - -& -- ---& - - - -4> - -- - -O -- -- - O - -- -- O - -- 10 --- -

• O -- -- - G -- - G-----O ,

P 63-e I l

r ,

c 40-l n t

20- 4 > D Forced Forced .

Outage Outage 0

0 1 2 6 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 5 2 6 2 9 6 3 0 7 4 1 8 A A A S S S S S 0 0 0 0 4 U U U E E E E E C C C C G G G P P P P P T T T T 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTEhANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

The Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities I (Electrical Maintenance) Indicator has been added to the Performance l Indicators Report.

1 This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed

maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Mairtenance.

Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. ,

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIII 10/07/90 46 10/14/90 72 10/21/90 86 10/28/90 85 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33

, - . _ . , . _ . , . . . . _ y y . _ . , ,, ,. .,.m . . . _ . . - ., . - - - . y 4--., . -- --

i .

Pressure Equipment I - Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100-i 80- O- --- - O- - --- @ --- -@ - -- --O -- -- -O --- - - O ----- O - - -- + O - - - u - - -- G - -- - O .

I P 60-e r -

c -

e 40-n i t < y-20- < > ' Forced Forced Outage Outage i-0 , , , , ,

0 1 2 0 0 -1 2 3 0 1 2 2 5 2 6 2 9 6 3 0 7 4 1- 8 A A A S S S S S 0 0 0 0 U U U E E E E E C C C C G G G P P P P- P, T T T T-9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 l

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES l

.(ERE}SURE EQUIPMENTl The Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities -(Pressure Equipment) Indicator has been added to theJ Performance . Indicators Report.

This indicator -shoss the percent of the number 'of completed maintenance activities as compared to -the number of schedJled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance.

Maintenance activities' include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, FM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.-

WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 10/07/90 65-10/14/90 84-10/21/90 67 10/28/90 87 m

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33

--w -

seyiyee-na-o-v+,v<-egv va y

l l . .

General Maintenance

- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities G- fort Calhoun Goal ]

I 100- i

( .

80- O- - -- - G - - -- & -- - - G -- - - G - --- O - ----O -- -- G -- - -+ ---- G--- - e ---- O

<----+ Forced Outage l P

i e 60-r ~

C 40- [

t .

20- 4 >I Forced

- Outage l 0 . - . , , , . - . . . ,

0 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 5 2 6 2 9 6 3 0 7 4 1 8 A A A S S S S S 0- 0 0 0 V U U E E E E E C C C C G G G P P P P P T' T T T 9 9 9 9 9 -9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERCENT OF COMPLETED 3CHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

The Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (General l Maintenance) Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Report.

! This indicator 'shows the percent of the number of ' completed l l

maintenance- activities as- compared to , the - number of scheduled -

maintenance activities concerning General Maintenance. Maintenance -

detivities include MWR's, MWO's,. ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and l miscellaneous maintenance activities. l l l I

I The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES  !

10/07/90 67 j l

10/14/90 29 l 10/21/90 20-10/28/90 45 l

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 t . _ _ . . - - _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _

Mechanical Maintenance I

- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100-l .

80-

& -- - + - - -l+ -- - - -& --- - + ----+ --- e --- b - ,

P 60-e r -

C l e 40-l n

(

t Forced Forced 20 Outage Outage 0 , , . .

0 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 5 2 6 2 9 6 3 0 7 4 1 8 A A A S S S S S 0 0 0 0 i U U U E E E E E C C C C l G G G P P P P P T T T T l 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

The Percent of Completed Scheduled Mainten& ace Activities (Mechanical Maintenance) Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicators Repc-t.

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities :oncerning Mechanical Maintenance.

Maintenance activities include MWR's, MW0's, ST's, PM0's, l

calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 10/07/90 82 '

10/14/90 92 10/21/90 95 10/28/90 84 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33

Instrumentation and Contw1

- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities I

+ Fort Calhoun Goal )

100- i

^ ^'^ ^ '^ ^ ^ ^

80- C s-v v v v vf v v O P 60-e ,

r -

C e 40-n t

< > < y 20 Forced Forced Outage Outage 0 . . . . . . . .

0 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 5 2 6 2 9 6 3 0 7 4 1 8 A A A S S S S S 0 0 0 0 V U U E E E E E C C C C G G G P P P P P T T T T 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

The Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Actwities (Instrumentation & Control) Indicator has been added to the j Performance Indicators Report.

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed i

maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumentation & Control.

Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's , ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

! WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES L 73 10/07/90 10/14/90 91  !

10/21/90 93 10/28/90 91 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 l

l

. c 5- M Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's j

4-r N 3' u .

• l b

e r 2- t 1- ,

0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 NCHBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance. Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the reporting month.

During the month of October 1990, there were no missed ST's that resulted in LER's.

Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61

35- l i

I I Total NPRDS Component Failures 30- a Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 25- 1 I

N uF ma  %

b i 20- g_y g

e1 . 'g Mg y,g gg.

ru .g 4 ty r 15- 3d $5 M

oe fs Mi

^;??

WW1

%ls#

%1 "i >

10 ,

03 m Se.

i

~

3 gbd hb a h!

pgg h

=

5- Ni k k 5 N$ M ffh P a!  % nk; lip . .,8 n 8+

+

g g $

8-

$d fp g

Dg $w;f W<

0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct >

1989 1990 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of l l NPRDS component failures is based upon the number  ;

I of failure reports sent to INPO. The number .of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon l the number of' failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference of these two figures is .the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.

During October 1990, - there was a total of zero confirmed NI MS component failures.

Adverse Trend: None

. . j 15 -+- Components With More Than One Failure

-X- Components With More Than Two Failures i N l I

u

' I m

b GOOD  ;

e  ;

r N'/ '

10- - -

o f ,

C 0

l m -

$ 5- ,K n ' N, j , , ,, , g ,, ,,, g , ,, , ,g , ,

n t -

>( x s

N ,,'X---- - -X-- - -- -X- - - - --X- - -- - -X O

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 198S 1990 i MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory- Comission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (NRC/AE00). The NRC/AEOD 1.1 currently developing and verifying a ,

maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nrclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPFDS) component. failures.  :

This indicator shows the number of NPRDS. components with more than one- failure during the last-twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last  ;

twelve months. The number of NPRDS components.with more than two failures in a twelve-month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. ,

During October 1950, there were 5 NPRDS components with more than one failure and 2 NPRDS components with more than two .

failures. The tag numbers of the 2 NPRDS components with more r than two failures in the last twelve months include: CH 1B and CH-lC.

Adverse Trend: None [

l

'.'. - l 20 - Check Valve Failure Rate Industry Check Valve Failure Rate ,

o 15 F

m a GOOD 1 i lP 1

H V

uj, r f

'inlt10-i p oH

'nou r r 5-6- - 6--6 6 . 6- 6 0

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 ,

CHECK VALVE FAllVRE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check' valve failure rate -

and the industry check valve failure rate.

l The data for .the industry check - valve failure rate is three-months behind the Performance Indicators Report reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

The industry failure rate is based upon failures that have occurred in the previous 18 month interval. .

For July 1990, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a check valve failure rate of 4.78E-6 while the industry reported a failure I

rate of 2.56E-6. At the end of October, the Fort Calhoun Station-reported a check valve failure rate of 3.36E-6. At this present time, the check valve failure rate for Fort Calhoun is higher-than 2he industry check valve failure rate. The reason for the high check valve failure rate is that the plant is performing l

maintenance on check valves - whic'. - have not been tested for I failures before. As time goes on, the check valve failure rate is expected to decrease due to the fact that the check valves are l

now being maintained through the Check Valve Program.

Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 1

- Secondary System CPI ]

+- Secondary System CPI Limit l 1.5- J v Industry Upper Quartile GOOD l

+

1- 4----+---+---+---+---+---+---+----+---+----+---+

,5 . .

I

.38 .5- # N 3

e v-o e o o -o-+-o 0 g" 0 i

0-4 0. t

'88 '89 -Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep  !

1989 1990 1000 - Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines l 757.7 800 H

6 359

@h ki r 400-

G000

+

y( s p6 1 ,.

GO Q- 200-98m %fg y

% /

'87 '88 Oct Nov Dec Jan' Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Ac? Sep 1989 1990 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY ,

The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), 4 5 calculated using three parameters. The three parameters used include; cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The CPI was reported as- 0.41 ,

for the month of September. The CPI values for June, July, and AJgust are j high due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outt.ge, various fluctuations in 1 power which have occurred, and a forced outage ia August. The industry upper  !

quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1989 through- Decen4ber I

1989. The CPI industry value then chanced to 0.24 for 1990.  :

The bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside' Owners Guidelines, tracks the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. The- I number of hours outside owners group guidelines was reported as -72.2' hours  ;

for the month of September.

The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed fer data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.

Adverse Trends: None

, o . ,

10- --. Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit I

8- ,

P 6-e r GOOD ,t, C .

e +

n t 4 2

gq t

i 0 N.+,

Oa ,i

'88 '89 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul A'u'g Sep 1989 1990 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF l.lMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the- primary system chemistry performance by monitoring-s'ix key chemistry

, parameters. .

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 5.5% for the month of September.

The high percent of hours- out of limit for the primary system during Jur.e and July was due to-startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluctuations which occurred during - June and Ji:1y. The high percent of hours out of limit for the month of September 1990 was due a shutdown and a startup which occurred. 100% equates to all six paramet.es being out of limit for the month.

Adverse Trend: None i

b l -

I l

l

j I

w Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit H)- Industry Upper Quartile 4

40-

. GOOD

+ i 30-H i o ,

u 20-r s '

10-0 0 0

0 0--*~~C O.

' '^- ^ ^ ^

'88 '89 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb MIr Air Miy Jun Ji1 Ang Sip 1989 ' 1990 l

AUXILIARY SYSTEM JCCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS I OUTSIDE S7ATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is' one-month behind the-reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as zero for the month of September.

The industry upper- quartile value for l- auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.-The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in ,

the upper quartile of all nuclear power  !

plants for this indicator.

Adverse Trend: None  ;

- . . - - ~ .- .

O .

en Number of Out of-Service Instruments 20- G- Fort Calhoun Goal liU4 a

I EAl M1?! Myli ?Mrs rs=s MEE MMM DXM HM5 Nn 0151 Z+;;5 MT! Eisi ThiM se us g4eg H55 imal= sigg 12 3 gig m t 12- iMM iM M MM M MM y=_= =

br !!Mi = = -

!E;M M Mi

=wn= ==.eum E

W! === MM va= wi ==:.r: ==

HM5 sgs.m 5i Mi

= =

eu -

zimei amm == my ms;= x== === m; rm M WE2 ** W M; M #M M EME M.EM sa=s; #Gtt G5ED ii&&G WiUM s=ess sea DMEGK RE;LE:

u=.au es

&#5=ia e8 M

=au

?EEEE WId EM w=.s =:=

• EE 3 EEE on m MfSi ;gg g g;=gg g"i2 = w yn== == m=

7t .

g;5 gt; :g g ;gg py_.gy. gg =

4 g .

@ gg .

5 MS Ni51 IAS NAs ifM $$$ EEN $$E MI 3R$5 75 Fpisi 4- pggg gMy hijn ]gy pig }y3; gM =; y MIHis p3g w::. ;s ==== its==c === me== r== %= =r== sex .-  ;- =

t@&R Et MtMl 555El *2252 l533G T=D WiW i-l=fi f i?===- 1.T.fli W di QG Mis lii!dii M$$ Mid $15 MlEil HEi M 5% MM NMR 70 0

55 EA * = == **' ** "" "

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 IN-LINE CHEMISTRV INSTRUMENTS OUT 0F-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of service at the end of the reporting month.

The chemistry systems involved in this indicator i include the Secondary System and the Post Accident l SamplingSystem.(PASS).

At the end of October there were a total of 7 in linc chemistry instruments that were out-of service. Four of these instruments were from the Secondary System and three were from PASS.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service has been set at 6. Six out-of-service chemistry instruments make up 10%

l of all the chemistry instruments which are counted for this indicator.

Adverse Trend: None

R Total Waste Produced I

- Federal and State Limit  ;

i 1000-i K B00-10 if .

o gW  !

600-r a a s ,

t m

3 5' 400-r 200-I I ' '

O Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous' waste, and other hazardous waste produced. '

During the month of October, 0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced 20.0 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was ,

produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

Adverse Trend: None

\

j l

5000-1 IMonth i

-Juarter OPPD Limit E Year i

. j 3000-m i

R '

E M

October 1990 t

MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE l During October 1990, an individual accumulated 301 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month. ,

The maximum individual exposure -to date for the fourth quarter of 1990 has been 301 mrem. .

The maximum individu'ai exposure reported to date for 1990 has been 2,090 mrem.

The high maximum individual exposure reported so far for the 1990 year to date value was a contract generator jumper.

The maximum accumulated 1989 individual exposure was 1,165 mrem, received by a Health Physicist.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year.

Adve:se Trend: . None

- 59- l

---,-c-.,mmyv, -w-r v,ww-- r+--.ysyy- .-erw--y q.,--wy-- ,--wae,---w,-

e- rty- _ m.- _ - - ._.m.- _ _ . _ _ m *-___- * - -

• m ws--J. w*- _-_---- - --*'-

a Monthly Contaminations 500 - Cumulative Contaminations ,

G- Fort Calhoun Goal

-O- Industry Upper Quartile 400-P  !

357 e

3a r I

300- i

[

h];1 s 0

GOOD

% n +

m n -

l &W e 200-i f 157 I '

4) m 0---- o --- O-- s--- o ---s ---O --- o ---s --- O --- G----O .

! CW $ O-o-o -O O-O ---O-O-C O-0-0 100-h l

% w -

@@  ?

m$

$@$% -0

-" ## M PE S -

'88 '89 Jan Feb. Har Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS There was a total of 5 skin and clothing contaminations reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during October, 1990.

There has been a total of 217 skin and clothing contaminations so far in 1990. The high number of skin and clothing contaminations which occurred during the months of_ March and April 1990 were related to increased activity in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) during the 1990 Refueling Outage.

There was a total of 157 skin and clothing contaminations in 1989. r l The 1990 goal for skin and clothing is 150 contaminations. This

1990 goal of 150 contaminations includes a Fort Calhoun goal of 23 skin contaminations.

The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing .

contaminations is 129 per unit annually.

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 d

l

- Deconta:inated Auxiliary Building e- Fort Calhoun Goal 100-e m . . .. o., ,,f3. ... n -

7 o l

P 4

$ 60- )

C t

40-  !

h

< GOOD l 20-0-

/ Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr. May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 -i DECONTM INATED AUXILIARY BUILDING This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary ,.

building which is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage and a Fort Calhoun goal of 85%

decontaminated auxiliary building (non outage months) and a goal of. 75% decontaminated auxiliary building l (outagemonths)..

( As of October 31, 1990, 84.5% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was decontaminated.

An increase in the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated -is expected after the auxiliary building painting is completed. This is due

to the fact that after the painting is finished, the i

auxiliary building will be able to be decontaminated easier.

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 -

1

_- _ . . _ _ _ . _ __ _ . _ _ _ . . - . ~ . . .

'I 20-E Number of Identified PRWP's 1 N ,

u 15- )

m 1

b e . .

r  !

y10-I P

R 7 f W 7) '

5- h n

M 2 2 gj w m . . . I 1 1

$#^; N 0 hh RR 0 R 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 1

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWP's) which were identified during the reporting month.

The number of PRWP's which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means-to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.

During the month of October 1990, zero- '

PRWP's were identified.

l Adverse Trend: None SEP 52

- . - -r--. y,, _,-6, _ ,

! 75- 1 ITotal Number of Hot Spots l m Number of Additional Hot Spots Identified i l

l NH uo 50- - -

mt -

b \

e5 ,

I rp -

o ot fs 25-l 0 "" D '

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 1990 1991 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot i spot is defined as a small localized source of high radiation. A hot l spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of  !

equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

At the end of October. 46 hot spott were identified and documented to .

exist in the Fort Calhoun Station. During the month of October, two  !

additional hot spots were identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun i Station. l The Station ALARA committee established a goal to eliminate at least 5 l

hot spots during 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station has exceeded this goal.

Adverse Trend: None l

63-l

I I Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged

- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged G- Cumulative Goal 785 800- ,

If<

GOOD 4

g p', C 600-

? u

- r i i 400-

& ---O --- & ---O --- G--- & --- O --- & ---O --- & -- 4 --- O I '

i*

,y h;)

164 200-f k  !$h Ah A $$% -

0

'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul - Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 i GASEOUS RADIOAC"IVE WASTE BEIMi DISCHARGED TO "HE ENVIRONMENT The gaseous radioactive waste being-l discharged to the environment is shown for i

January 1990 through June 1990. A total of 261 curies have been released to the environment from January through June of 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station = goal is 360 curies for this indicator.

The high value of gaseous radioactive waste that was released to the environment during the month of February 1990 was - due to containment purge associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.

The gaseous radioactive waste being i discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Adverse Trend: None

f S l

l l iMonthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged  ;

- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Dischargeo e- Cumulative Goal 231 300-228 228 7

@h Qm

% M C 9....s.. 9.. 9.. . O ...O ...s .- qy.. O--- G---G--- O 3 @? O2 u 200- -

h W Sq Nh id [ GOOD e

+

h g

b p!@

M (M

s 100-k  ;? $0' n

6,

'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 20000-o T

f h

15000-og u

a s 10000-a +

n)0 _

d s

5000-f 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ,

1990 LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT

, The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for the months of January 1990 through June 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all

sources totaled 55 curies from January through June 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1990 is 256 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has '

been released from the radioactive waste- monitor tanks and steam generators. . The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the- steam generators totaled 11.6 million gallons from January through June 1990.

The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown.

The liquid radioactive ' waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

F Adverse Trend: None

i 30: - - Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Does not Include System Failures) hF25-20 .

l e

I 15-l u e

r 10 ,

e .

fs 5 m +

Jan Feb Mar Apr -May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 120- - Security System Failures Np .

ua m j 80-bi '

eu r

r 40 e

o g .

f 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr Hay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 .

LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The Lo. gable / Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator has been changed.

The tw graph shows the total number of lo incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's)ggable/ reportable

, security badges, security key control, escorting, and access control which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning security system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of October 1990, Security Services has' reevaluated the l

methods previously used to log security system failures. In an effort to provide a more accurate representation of performance indicator trends, a category for environmental failures has been added to the indicator l

definitions. As the two graphs depict, system failures account for the majority of our loggable/ reportable incidents, while all other categories t

have steadily declined. Over half of the failures which occurred- in October were caused by environmental conditions, i.e., rain, sunspots, fog, etc. It is recognized that the number of security system failures has i been increasing since June of 1990, but the new methods being implemented to evaluate security system failures should streamline reporting activities and provide a more accurate view of the number of ' security-system failures.

Myerse Trend: None - Reason given above. SEP 58 l

l

August 1990  :

150- September 1990 l IOctober 1990 100- .

l me bi  ;

ed -

-=. l re i n

50-N [

m ,

I O

LDV's Badges Key Escorting Access System Control Control Failures SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN The Security Incident Breakdown Indicator has been chenged. This '

indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the.following items for the reporting month in column form. These items include: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges,. security key control, escorting, access control, and security system failures. Previously, this indicator was presented in pie chart form. The number of security system failures has been increasing since June 1990, but new methods of reporting:

these failures are expected to decrease. the number of security system incidents. It is recognized that the number of security system failures has been increasing since June of 1990, but the new.1 methods being implemented to evaluate security system failures should streamline reporting activities and provide a more accurate view of the number of security system failures.

Security Items Number of Incidents

. OCT 1EP_. .RL Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's) 0 1 1 Security Badges 0 2 5 Security Key Control 0 0 0 Escorting 0 0 1 Access Control 0 0- 0 Security System Failures R9_ 77 19_

Total 89 80 66 Adverse Trend: None - Reason for trend given above. SEP 58 L

i 1 .g

Environmental Failures 50-System Failures N -

u m 40, b

e ,

r o 30-f F

I a 20- -

=

1 .

~

u F=-

r 10- ,___ p s ,

P -3 M

~

M llll?i ~

0- " -- -lMI --

~~

Alarm System CCTV Comp::ter .Termincl Door- Card Reader-i SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES The Security System Failures Indica +o has been: changed. This : indicator still shows the number of incidents oncerning: the' following' items for the reporting month. These items include: .; alarm v system failures, - CCTV failures, - security computer failures, terminal . failures,, door equipment failures, and card reader failures.-In addition to this-information, alarm-system failures and CCTV failures will be divided into two new categories.

These new categories' include environmental failures .and equipment failures.

l System Failures NumberoLincidents l

SEP 90 AUG 90 l I E ailures F Eauio. Failural Failures Alan Systems 5 22- 31 I ";iV 42 4 40 Computer: N/A 3 2 l 1. 1.

i Terminal N/A-Door Equipment N/A 'll 3 L N/A 1- 0-Card' Reader T-tal 47- 42 77 I

ac._ese Trend: ikne SEP 58 t

le

+

1

'~

15- _p ,' of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 12-GOOD P 9- +

e r

C -

e n

t 6-3-

1 1

0 .

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug ~Sep Oct 1989 1990 l l

AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-00TAGE)

This procurement indicator displays . the amount 'of open, non-outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, 'to the total amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a=

percentage..

The percentage of work on hold' awaiting parts decreased to 3.4% in October.

As of October 31, 1990, thers were a total of 1,016 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 35 of these items' on hold awaiting parts.

Adverse Trend: None I

.l

~ . . . .. -. .. . . - . . . . . - - - . - . - ... .

t-  %' 4 12-

- Spare Parts Inventory Value M -

! .i c 10' n

. '/

s s

[

l- D o

/

1 __

a - -

r S

6 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun' 'Jul Aug- Sep Oct 1989 1990 1

l l-SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE ,

l The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the enu ' 9ctobera1990 was reported ast$10,034,125.

Adverse Trend: None- .;

1 70-i

,-r-,q,- ,wqy s w , g,, ,y g- ,, e - c - q y -e-,p,--ss -y-, - ,, 4

e, .

l l- 750-T

- Spare Parts Issued h -

o

! u 600-

l. s a -

n d 450-

. ),?

o ,

f 300- .;

D '

4 o

1 1 150- .!

a r -

s 0 ~

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug. Sep; Oct l 1989 1990 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during ,

October 1990, totaled $118,933. r Adverse Trend: None I

1 71..

. Inventory Accuracy ,

100- .

a 95-P e -

r C

e 90-n t

85-s

+

80 _.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May? 'Jun. Jul Aug. Sep 0ct Novf Dec,  !

1990-INVENTORY ACCURACY; 1 This indicator shows. the accuracy ofLthe actual parts' count for the warehouse comparedo to- the: counts-.

contained in the MMIS- computer system '.for the -

reporting month.

During October, 770. different line' items were: counted ir, the warehouse. Of the' 770 - linenitems:' counted .-14.

items needed count adjustments. (The inventory accuracy for the' month of> October was reported as-98%.

0  ?

L Adverst. Tr ad:-~None .

l r

. - - . . - . _. . ._ _ - ._ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . . . . . . _ . . . --..~~_.,.._~..J.-_...

5- - Pick Tickets With' Parts' Not. Available 4- l P )

pi -

ec 'I rk 3 C,

ni tc k 2-oe ft s

1-O Jan Feb Mar Apr .May- Jun -Jul ;Aug Sep. Oct. :Nov .Dec 1990 STOCK 00T RATE This indicator shows the percentage.of-the number of ~

Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during i the reporting month. '

During the month- of Octc' - a total of 931 Pick-Tickets were generated. L. ..ie. 931. Pick Tickets l

generated, zero Pick Tickets were: generated; with no ,

parts available.

Adverse Trend: None e

73-

.?

1500 O Total. Receipts:

6- Spare Parts Receipts:  ;

-O- Standard Stores Receipts

--X- Direct Charge Receipts-1200-I N I R

u '

e 900- fi C

b, ej -

Y p -

600-f .

El O

00- x ,0

,, \ ,

2. 'O'--k% g,Ag%

g

,,g;,,..-6---g

-e -

3..

0 Feb Mar Apr May ~ Jun Jul Aug- Sep Oct, Nov Dec Jan 1990- 1991 l

WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS a

This indicator shows 'the total number: of warehouse receipts, the number of spare.. parts receipts, the number of standard stores' receipts, and the number of direct charge receipts 3 during>

the reporting month. ,

L During October the warehouse . received. a total of 498 receipts. Of the 498 receipts received,141 -

were spare, parts receipts, 121 were standard stores receipts,. and - 236 were ; direct charge receipts.

h Adverse Trend: -None y

l 1

l i

~74--

l

- _ , , m

-L& . . , _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . . . . ,

.- . - . - - . - -. .. .. . - - - - = - -

4000- -e- Total Issues 6- Spare Parts Issues

-O- Standard Stores Issues 1 -X- Direct Charge Issues 3000-N u y ,

m 8

b '

8 e 2000-u  ;

r e +

s O ,

o N q N '

r -g 1000- 'o--e'N #

v s, A .

,O' -o y O O 0

f.....f ---V.i Feb Mar Apr 'May- Jun Jul Aug .Sep 'Oct 'Nov. Dec - Jan 1990' . 1991 WAREHOUSE ISSUES l

i This indicator shows- +'s total: number of warehouse l issues, the number -of ,,are parts issues, the. number-l of standard . storesc issues, and 1 the . number direct '

charge issues for the reporting month.- .

l .

During October ithe warehouse ~ completedJaD total;. of-i l

1 1,215 issues. -Of. the 1,215 issues ' completed, 238:

were. spare parts issues, 685 were standard stores - 4

? issues, and 292 were direct charge. issues.

Adverse Trend: None- i

?

t

.m.m . . . , e --r--w. y -

&# = m

• 80- O Total Returns .

6- Spare Parts Returns

-O- Standard Stores Returns

-X- Direct Charge Returns; ,

60-l Po l et .  ;

ra Cl I

• 40-nl a t

ts  :

s '

,A', . '\. - i

/.

l ou '\

'A fe /- -\

s

'y ,/ \ ' '

20- /

B 7 6

. / t

p. ,,,,,.b--~~~Oyo o--O

-O'./ .xo__9 ')

O 9'E[ x x ., m ,s m x ,

Feb Mar Apr- May Jun Jul Aug Sep .Oct Nov Dec- Jan 1990 L 1991- l l

l l

RAREHOUSE RETURNS  :

The' Warehouse -Returns- Indicator .shows the ' percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, . the number. of , -

spare parts returns,; the number of: standard ; stores returns. and L the' number of dir.ect charge . returns l t E comparu : 9 the total number of warehouse: issues. during.

l the repr . ng month.-

During the month of October there were'a t6 tali of.1,215 warehouse- issues. Of the 1,215 issues, ..there were 264

-total returns.' These returns consisted. of - 181. spare' a parts returns and 83' standard stores returns.< <

Adverse Trend: None ,

.o

.- f

. . + . . . - . . . ~ . - . .

...-~-:.......;.:.-- . .~.b

e' .

l 25- l IAugust 1990 E September 1990 l

. October-1990 M 20-a t ,

e .i Nr u i 15-ma J bl ' l e '

rR e 10- I oq '

fu .

e ,

s  : ,

t 5- =

s -

=

f_M_ -

1

'= I 0

0-5 6-10 11-15. . . 16 21-30 >30  :

Age in Days. .

MATERIAL RE00ESTS AWAITING APPROVAL This indicator shows the . number of material-requests. ~ awaiting approval' at the - end ofi the .

l- reporting: month b.roken > down Linto: their. age by . .

! days.

t l At the end of October, 12 ? material';. requests' L- ware awaiting approval.

i Adverse Trend: 'None i

(

,-.we. 9, s , , + , - , + - s , --

2- .

- Percentage of.TotalcPurchases that are Expedited t

1.5-  ;

1

~

P l e __

l r >

c l-e n

t .

.5- ,

R d

0 Jan Feb Mar. Apr May Jun- :Jul- ,Aug 'Sep Oct Nov- Dec 1990 EXPEDITED PURCHASES ' .

This indicator 'shows the percentage of_

l expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During October, there was a total . of t 285 -

r purchase orders generated., OfL the 285-purchase orders generated, there~ was zero l

expedited purchases..

Adverse Trend: None-i I

l a

e a 1.-

l 150- l l- l August 1990 1 l

DE September 1990 l October 1990 120-l l

l N 90- + ,

V -a b

0 Ny e

r i o

e 60- ,

f S f i

~'

f

~

30- ;r  ;

I L.......

Q.

Shelf Life CQE. -Miscellaneous.

e

'r INVOICE BREAKDOWN _ , -,

This indicator. shows the number of  ;

invoices .that .are on hold 'at the!end of

~

the reporting month :due .to shelf life,,

CQE, and miscellaneous reasons.

1 At the end of October, 2 invoices . were i

on hold due to: shelf- life reasons, 57-invoices were onl hold'~ due to - CQE , >

reasons, and 28 invoices' were on hold -

due to miscellaneous reasons. ,

l Adverse Trend: None l

1 s

F 4

49 4 l- a . .

. _ . ~ . . . . < _ . - . _ .. , ,. .

100- 4 Percentage of Material-Requests for Issues-with the Request Date,the same as the Need Date l

80- .,

j

-q P

, 60- '

r C

e m n 40 t

20-

. t Ll I

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep. Oct Nov. Dec 1990 q 1

MATERIAL'RE0 VEST PLANNING {

l This indicator -shows the-percent of material requests (MR's) for= issues. with their ,

request date the same as their need date  !

compared to' the;. total- number of MR's7 for--

issuestfor the reporting mont!.. ~1 u  ;

During the month of October, a total of.931L-MR's were received by- the warehouse.70fithe)  ;

931-total MR's: received Lbycther warehouse, .

708 MR's were for- issues with their crequest, date the same as their need date.

i Adverse Trend: None q

e

^

1 i

00-

- Total Modification Packages Open i

l. 'I' 600-

[.

500-425- 425 384 n

M (9g $ 400- .l 83 f yn

'Tt$

l t

t h

4,9. ,

L{gf 300-un Y

• u

& ,e x. .O J --  ?

'87 '88 '89 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar' Apr May' .Jun Jul Aug' Sep .Oct?

1989 1990 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number out. standing modifications increased by 3 during.

the month of Octob_r, CATEGORY SEP 90 OCT 90' Form FC-ll33 Backlog /In Progress 12 '

13 Mod Requests Being Reviewed l141 -137' Design Engr. Bucklog/In- Progress 84' 90 Construction Backlog /In Progress 44 39 Desian Enor. U J date Backloa/In Prooress E E Total 337 340 As of the end of October, 55 additional : modification requests -have t'een issued this year and 12 modification requests have been. cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) has - completed '.12J backlos modification request 1 reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects .Conraittee  ;

(NPC) has completed 122 backltg modification request reviews: tFis year.

The number of reviews completed -is high "due to"the fact thr.r. 'some of-these requests were reviewed more than once.

Adverse Trend: None.

. . . t. . , .. .. . . .. , .-. -.

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ ____. A

-I 100- Total Temp 8rary Modifications ,

M -

e- Fort Calhoun' Goal o

Nd 80-N-

bi 60-A d ec -

ra 40 t

~~~ ~~

20 w_ _ y .. ..e.._. . _ _ . .._ . . _ ,

0 Nov Dec Jan Feb- Mar. Apr May- - Jun Jul Aug- Sep- . 0ct 1989 1990 S

August'1990' 8- ,=.= September 1990 Nd isE E6

I IOctober 1990 ui 6-mf m

bi Z .

ec 4- -f ra _ =

o 2-

s 0- -

C-3 3-6 6-9 9 > '12 l Age-in Months l

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS l -

(EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING).

The top graph shows the total number of temporary modifications installed in the Fort Calhoun - Station < and ' a Fort . Calhoun goal . .

The number of electrica, temporary modifications and the number  :

~

of mechanical temporary modifications have been' deleted from this indicator because the P1 ant no longer categorizes temporary modifications in this manner.

At the end of 0ctober, thereiwas a total of.18 temporary modificatiota installed in the Fort Calhoun- Station. The : Fort Calhoun goal for the. total number of : installed temporary- -

modifications -is less than 15 installed temporary modifications.

The bottom graph, Aae of Temocrarv Modifications, displays _the age of all temporary modifications by months installed . in the plant.

~~

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 L

82 v>"--# * --

200 -E= Total Number of Open EAR's N 150-u -

" 100-

• ~

e r 50- ,

O .

Jul Aug Sep Oct- .Nov .Dec- Jan Feb Mar. Apr Mayj Jun: i 19901 1991 100-October 1990I '

80 November,1990 m

g l I December 1990 b

40-j r 20-0 "

0-3 3-6 '

>6 Age In Months ,

OUTSTAN91NG ENGINEERINL ASSISTANCE RE00ESTS (EAR's)

The- Outstanding En:1ineering Assistance Requestsi (EAR's)

Indicator'has been changed.

The top graph shows the total number of:openiEAR's at:the end of the reporting month. At the end of October, there was a': total of 127 open EAR's. <

The bottom graph shows the total number . of , open EARs1 broken down by their age in months. '

Adverse Trend: The number of. Jpen EAR's has increased from 59 in May 1990 to 127 in October 1990. The major . reason fora the increase in the number of open EAR's. is .the _ re'sult of discrepancies between old procedures and the new p.dcedures which are being upgraded by the Procedures' Upgrade'Proj at.

'SEP 62 l-3 1'

l

1 150- -e- Tote ~l ECN's Open

--X- ECN's Opened During the Month -

-*- ECN's Completed During the Month 120-m b y e 90 'y l r fg

' 1

/. \. -

o .

l .\

f l \ . i.

60- :o s/ \

E ,

g ' s / j ' s ,, j ,X h

a ,

/

,o

/

['X N'A ,ff g

, a'. 'N

- \ ~,

. i

/

i . -g, . a s

30- X-~~ -N /

I '\\, s,'x,/ ' . ,x'.

'Q'-o-/ ,

1 N 'o, / N/

.k, X 0

Nov Dec Jan- Feb Nar .Apr. Hay Jun Jul- Aug Sep. Oct*  ;

1989 1990 ,

H l ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS l

The indicator shows the total' number of open Engineering. Change Notices- (ECN's) ' the ,

number of ECN's - opened during the: reporting-month, and the number. of. ECN's completed during the reporting month.

l At- the end of October- 1990, there was. a l'

total of 116 open ECN's. During the month!of 1 October, 55 ECN's were opened, and 26. ECN's -

were completed.

Adverse Trend: None- .SEP,62  :

1, u l- l

'1 84-o> ,

l 300 l l Document Change L Substitute Replacement item l

Facility Changes 253 250-204 l 200- -,

==

-4

??FM -

C 150-

= = 126 100-l='

:::

~

50- 44 -42 I -

0 -

Total ECN's ECN's Opened ECN's Completed - Total ECN's 1 Open During the Month During the Month Received ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator breaks down the total number - of . Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain open at the- end of the . reporting' month, the number of ECN's .that were opened during the 4 ri .aorting month, the l number of ECN's that were completed during- thef reporting month, and the number of ECN's received ~ by Design Engineering during the

, reporting month into several categories.. These categories include:

1 ECN's requiring a -document cnange ~ to complete, ECN's requiring substitute replacement items to complete, and ECN's requiring facility changes to complete.

Total _.Qoen Opened Coinoleted Received Document Changes 44 23 14- 253 Substitute Replacement 30 7 6 204 L

l Facility Changes 42 25 6 126 Adverse Trend: None SEP 62  ;

85-t i

l. .. . . . . . . , . . . - . . - - - .-. . , . . . . ~. -. .

..- w 5- y lidh Recordable Injury Frequency Rate-  :

x 1989 Recordable. Injury Frequency Rate

+- 5 Year Average Recordable ' Injury Frequency Rate 4- l

}

3.5-

- GOOD-3-

4-R -

a 2.5- , ,

+\ A M. s' e

2- \, ,,'

ik -s

. 's ,, A<'

' ,' 4 , , 1 s ' ,

~~,.

1.5-N+,

+, ,,..... + ,' - u ....

, ....+.. .+'  !

y i M .

Jan Feb Mar Apr. May Jun- Jul 'Aug : 'Sep Oct Nov Dec L

RECORDABLE' INJURY CASES FREQUENCY PATEl This indicator shows the monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate: ,'

in column form. The above-graph also includes the 1989 recordable injury 1- cases - frequency. rate and 'the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year : average. t recordable injury cases-frequency rate.

A recordable injury case is-- reported if Nuclear ' Operations cDivision personnel are- injured f on the job sand require corrective medical:

l treatment. The recordable cases frequency- rate is computed on -a year-to-data basis. There was one recordable injury case reported during the month if October. There has been a total of 7 L recordable injury '

cases so far in 1990.

There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1989, eleven reported in:

1988, and eight reported in 1987. The year end recordable injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988,: - and 1989 were 2.5, ~-

2.6,1 and - 2.2 respectively. ,

1 Adverse ~ Trend: None SEP 15 &.26

]

2 1

e e +

in Licensee Event. Reports-l l Personnel Errors Reported in LERs

- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports: ,

Cumulative Personnel Errors- Reported _in LERs-50- s 46 '

Q -

39 -

40

.- 3 3 l

..,, i'i

r. i a 31 lj )- p 30

<  ? 26 ?/d f k p["~ IkN

. i a

s, , . f; E

1 m- 20- ,

R 17 "":t f[M '~[j

Lv w $e 12

$ $ 3 _10-

'~~~~~

bb h f ,

p g a gj /*/-- y 9

$ ;9 l -

' A #'

0

'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar -Apr.-May Jun Jul' Aug Sep Oct Nov 1Dec-1990-

F I

NUMBER OF' PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED-IN LER'S l '

1 The Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's IndicatorL l reports the Licensee Event - Reports (LER's)- by their. event -

date..

t In October 1990, there were zero.LER's reported.,

There have. been 25 LER's reported so far in 1990 and 7 LER's have been attributable to personnel errors.

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 -

l l

1 l'

l

20 t'  ;

-B- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate 10-

-& Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate-

-s- Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate l 8 \

i l T u .

r

" 6- ,,,

! v <

, ,. - N.

~~

r .A~. h 4- ,.;

'r'A'.

, , A 6' t

__ g .,_ r

• 2 $,, ~7 "-O *

,,g ' % _ g .

~o- g 9_,9_Q 9 0

j

/  %/ . \ /:

^

A S 0 N D J F M- A M .J J A 5 0 N. D 1989 1990-l

,!SONNEL TURNOVER RATE:

The Personnel Turnover Rate Indicator.has been changed. ,

Data dating from July 1,1988 has 'been assembled- to produce the annual turnover rates for theathree Nuclear Divisions. The turnover rates for. the three. Divisions 1 are calculatedausing-only resignations from OPPD.

DIVISION TURNOVER RATE NOD 6.0%

PED 4.6%:

NSD l.8%

Currently,. the OPPD corporate turnover rate-,is, being reported

,. as approximately 4.0%. ihis OPPD corporate ' turnover rate is.

based on the turnove cate over the last three years.

Adverse Trend: None

e s.

9 9 600 ll9 Actual Staffing 561 l Authorized Staffing l

gg

m. g;'

l(ly k i%* }g

~> u p 400-  !,9@l G ,

e r } "If }j *-

s [e; _ $r "

0 '

',  ? .

n p-e fh;fjyr $ 196 205 i 1 200- r ; . ~+ .

y. y w.ag -

6 .  ;

r 6 y q

. 9 g%g 55 fdbIdb [$ , 52 O

Mbkl$ Io i $$$$$ e Nuclear Operations  : Production Engineering Nuclear- Services -

Division. -Division- ,

' Division j l

STAFFING LEVEL.

l .. .

The-- authorized and actual ' staffing > levels are shown for the'three Nuclear Divisions.

Adverse Trend: None SEP 24:

t

?'

1 e

. w  !

I ISRO Examination Pass Ratio I

100- ,

~l 80-f i 0 P i a 60-s ,

s .

40-t i -

o .

20- i

. 1 No Exams No' Exams -No Exams  !

Administered Administered Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered -NRC Administered-. OPPD: Administered Generic Site Specific Requalification ;Requalification Fundamental Exams Exams' Exams  :

Exams  ;

[

3 SR0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO' The SR0 License Examination Pass ' Ratio. : Indicator shows' the :

number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams. (GFE's)..

the number of NRC administered Site ~ Specific > Exams, the . number of NRC administered ~ license requalification n exams, and the '

number of OPPD administered license requalification exams; 4

No SR0 License . examinations were administered during -October 1990. The table below lists. the- examination pass ratio for- i examinations which have been taken during 1990.-

OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED 1 i

Requal Generic Fund.. Site Spec. Requal.

DATE  % PASS RATIQ'  % PASS RATIO; % PASS RATIO  % PASS RATIO Feb 1990 -

100 - -

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68. ,

a 4

I h

'O e

a e l lRO Examination Pass Ratio ,

100-

. R 80-l- 0

~

P a  :"

s 60-s R

a 40 t

i .

o 20-

- Nol Exams- LNo Exams  :

Administered Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD Administered Generic Site Specific 'Requalification- Requalification i Fundamental Exams- Exams- LExams.

Exams R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS' RATIO .,

The R0 License Examination Pass Ratio.Indicatorishows the number of 4 NRC administered Generic Fundacentals Exams (GFE's), thei number of NRC administered- Site : Specific Exams, 1the: number ofRNRC -

administered license requalification examsi. and. the number of,0 PPD-administered license requalification uxams, No R0 License examinations were administered Eduring the month lof October 1990. The table below. lists- the examination 1 pass ratio Lfor- i e .iinations which have been taken'during 1990.

OPPD ADMINISTEREQ INRC ADMINISTERED ,

Requal G'neric Fund. Site-Spec. Requal..

DATE  % PASS RATIO  % PASS' RATIO  % PASS-RATIO  % PASS RATIO ,

Feb 1990 -

100 -- -

May 1990 - -

100 -

Adverse' Trend: 'None SEP 68 l

4 f r v,, - - - - - , a ...-.--a - . , , . . - - - . . . - , , - - . .

..; . a l I SRO Exams Administered 20- SRO Exams Passd R0 Exams Administered  ;

E R0 Examt Passed 15- l m

b x 3 I

r f

o 10- o 9 f ll 1 ,

E -

x 1

, l f l ,

a r gl l g i m 5-  !

sll W s g ijj y  !

3 '

lll f

[

~

d  ;,I '

-d l 0

N Feb Mar Apr- May Jun. Jul Aug- 1Sep Oct .Nov Dec Jan  ;

1990 '1991 j n

LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS-l i

This indicator shows theEnumber of' SRO and R0 quizzes and exams taken and -passed each month. These internally, administered rquizzes and ~ exams are used ; to plo_t' the.;SRO and/ R0 candidates', monthly progress.

During th'e month of October 1990, no- SR0 exams were administer-d.

During the month -of October 1990, no R0 exams were administered.  !

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 '

l.

J t

l a

i

0 4 n

M Hotlines Initiated 50- Hotlines Closed i

ii; Hotlines Open Under 4 Weeks 45-Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks 40-m ->

b 35-e  !

1 Y 1

o.

o l f 25 l o

?d' E { .,

t  : -

E l 4

1 15- El 8 p- T E i E!i j hi e Ei ,.

:[ g ,.

E 4

h 10- I

{!

3 - l E- E iL @ Ij l 0

Nov

. it Dec Jan

'Feb l l Mar .Apr May- Jun 1

Jul- Aug

!!k Sep. Oct i

1989 1990

-HOTLINES This indicator shows the number of Hotlines-initiated during the reporting month, the '

number of Hotlines closed during - the reporting month, the number of Hotlines that remain open and are less than four weeks cid,- and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks old.

During the month of October 1990, there were 14 Hotlines initiated, 7 Hotlines closed, 6

- Hotline that remained open and.was less than i four weeks old, and 3 Hotline that remained open and was older than four weeks-old.

Adverse Trend: None

. w 4-JV$ Planned Classroom Hours l l Actual Classroom Hours L

h 7 3~

3  %

o u

3W S "N 9 i s S* P D E a

a $~ N -

$N i, a

n q; m v(( g #g  ;

d Q gj g ,f jf 4,4 s 2- 2 h k.' T: 83 My b l1 -k n Q Y o b d - 4 -

g if ij f  % .

g3 ys .ik .\

M 2 fB ..2 si

• 0_

4 i H I$ E I$ lh t o

u l- lff g f]t M sp y..

h-3 ff g i x r lj c fi: e y , 1 <

1},  ;

s f j {  % y g .

J G

~

{j '

4@ j%  :

4 9 . .

r +

5 h $ $ f '

glk  : fi J $

0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May' Jun Jul Aug Sep  ;

1989 1990  !

i I

CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator displays the number of- planned classroom hours .and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.

This indicator is. one month behind the reporting month due to the time to collect and process : the-needed information.

Adverse Trend: None-4 4

j 1

j j

l i

l iOperations llll Maintenance E Chemistry and Radiation Protection ,

30 7 Technical Support N General Employee Training T

h Other -

l o 25- l u I s i a 1 P 20- l J

H  : .

f  : :-::<

o 10- ./ ,

_. j ll :s5*:

u a == ll /

VA g VA r . . . . .....

s

~~

5- -

' I 0 --

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul' Aug Sep 1989 1990 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours: for Operations, l Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, . Technical Support, l General Employee Training, and- Other training conducted , for the Fort l Calhoun Station.

This indicator is -one month behind the reporting month -due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.

Total Hours TRAINING AUG 1990 SEP 1990

, Operations 2,664 2,634

Maintenance 4,660 2,565' l Chemistry and 2,013 1,632 l Radiation Protection l Technical Support 3,293 2,697 l

General Employee Training 4,983 3,855 Qthg.t 443 1.922 Total 18,056 15,305 Adverse Trend: None l

\ . .. . - -- - . .-

,4. -1 e s

- Total Outage MWO's MWO's Ready to Work 500 400- ------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- -

N u

mM 300- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

bW e0 -

r' s 200- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

o 6 a 100- ------------------------------------.------------------------------------------

. 3 0 i Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec hn Feb ' Mar Apr -May Jun .Jul ,

1990 1991 i

MWO OVERALL STATUS (1991 REFUELING OUTAGE)  !

This indicator shows the total number of MWO's that ' ave- h been written over the, past reporting periods for completion 'during. the 1991 Refueling Outage and the number of MWO's that. are ~ ready for work (the Jparts o for

- these MWO's are staged,- the> procedures are. approved, and' the paperwork is ready for field use). _ Any MW0's written after the start of the outage will' be reflected in the indicator labeled- Emeraent MWO's. ~ Approximately 3000 maintenance orders ' were completed during -each . of the l previous two refueling outages.

A - decrease in the number' of MWO's ready to work is a- ~

result of an ongoing review of. outage MW0's. A number of '

MW0's were removed fiom the outage scope.. '

Additional data points will be added. to this indicator as-information becomes available.

1 l

Adverse' Trend: None SEP 31 1

I

.. =.

l

- Total Outage Modifications-a Mods With Planning Document Approved

-e- Mods With Final Design Approved  ;

-c-s Mods With Construction Package Approved 30 -

I M

o Nd I

> ui 20- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~ ~-

l l mf l bi I

GC .

ra t

10- . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

n s-0 1

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul~

1990 1991 PROGRESS OF 1991 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the number of modificationsiapproved' for planning (to determine feasibility) for completion during. the 1991 Refueling Outage. Additional data points.-will be added to this = indicator - as-information becomes available.

The current schedule for . completion of the modification phases of the 1991 Refueling Outage is as follows.

Outage Scope Freeze ............................ OCT 1, 1990 Planning Documents Approved ................... FEB- 22, 1991 Final Designs Approved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APR 24, 1991 Construction Packages Approved ................ JUN 15, 1991 Schedul e Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JUL 26, 1991-Materi al On Si te . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JUL 26, 1991-Construction Started .......................... OCT 21, 1991 Construction Compl ete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOV 4, - 1991 Accepted By SAC ............................... NOV 15,.1991-Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 l .. . . .-.

.- . I 1

- Total Outage Projects -l 50

.i 40- ----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Np u

m r 30- -------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------

bj e, -

I C

t 20- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O s

f .

10- .--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 l

0 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1990 1991 1

OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (1991 REFUELING OUTACE)

This indicator shows the status'of the projects'which affect-the scope of the 1991 Refueling Outage.

The reduction in the number of total outage projects is due to reclassification- of former projects.to ECN's or . Maintenance items.

1 Additional data - points will be added to this indicator as' information becomes available.

l The schedule for the 1991 Refueling Outage projects -is as follows.

All Projects Identified and Outage Scope Frozen ....... OCT 1, 1990 All Projects Scheduled in Detail ...... JUN 28, 1991 Procedures Ready ...................... ' AVG 2, 1991 Parts Staged ..........................-AUG 16, 1991 Adverse Trend: None SEP 31

-98~

a ,

1

- Violations ~per 1000 Inspection Hours  ;

G- Fort Calhoun Goal [

15-11.1 10.6 7 il ' GOOD 71 12-y, j [1 +

hth isf

$3k $j$ 7.I

$ m 'j 9-

%}

gl lgg o.--- e --- e---. --- e --- e --- o---- e----o --- e --- e --- o  !

ns Van h

@' '4 x f1 IU 6-

! :% g; py ip- '1

.,, e ,:. 3-ld g; ,  !

A ( 3 . ?? (%  ;

bJ $jM l. -

0

'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul ~Aug. Sep Oct. Nov Dec 1990 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours.' This indicator was calculated using the number of violations and the number of inspection hours from submitted inspection reports. These inspection feports consisted .of reports from the months of January 1990 Yhrough: September 1990. "

.i This indicator is one. month hehind the reporting month due to the time involved with c9llecting. and processing : the data. .  ;

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indi:ator L was '

reported as 7.6 for the month.of September 1990.

There have been a total of 1,972 inspection hours in 1990 which have resulted in 15 violations.

The goal for the number of violations per .1000 inspection 1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> is less than 8.2. 1 Adverse-Trend: None H

o .

1. .

75- 1 I Number,of Violations During'the Last 12 Months

, M Number of NCV's During the Last 12 Months.

V

~

i o

1 a

t 50-N 47 u'

m0 41 41 bu 38 37-e s . 36 -

34 34-r, 0 8 27' 0

fd 25-N 19 20 2} 2[

y 14 h I i  ! 14 l l H  !

~

$ k (14!- l f_

5 0 t Jan Feb Mar Apr May Ji.n Jul. Aug- Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec 1990 l

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's' i (TWELVE-MONTHRUNNING-_ TOTAL)-

The cumulative Violations and - Non-Cited-Violations (NCV's) -Indicator .shows= the-cumulative number of -- violations for' the last -

twelve months' and -the' cumulative number l of NCV's for the last twelve months.--

During the last twelve months, 27 violations -

have been identified : andL14' NCV's have been-identified..

Adverse Trend: None )

i

~I

-100- ,

l

- Total Outstanding CAR's

$18 Outstanding CAR's > Six Months. 0ld Outstanding CAR's That Are Modification Related  ;

1 200-l l

150-o Nf -

u 100-eR r' 3 s

~

0 abanss$1 Bus Nov Dec Jan Feb' Mar. Apr_ May Jun- Jcl-- Aug. Sep 0ct- 3 1989 1990-OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION-REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of l outstanding Corrective Action Reports I (CAR's), the number o*' nutstanding. CAR's that.- <

are greater than s =

months old, and the number of outstanoing CAR's that are.

modification related.

1 As of the end of October 1990, there were 132 l outstanding CAR's, 50 CAR's that ' are' greater than 'six months old, and 12 CAR's that-- are modification related. i 1

Adverse Trend: None l l

i

-101 . .l l

l

. s <

40- -O- NOD Overdue CAR's N

I u 30- 6- N00 CAR's With Extensions Granted mC 20-bA eR 10 r' pgq _... ---g ,, ,,,,. 6 \A----- A-- --+-- -*- 'O Nov Dec Jan Fib MTr Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oc', i 1989 1990 o 50-O PED Overdue CAR's N f 40-u 6- PED CAR's With Extensions Granted mC 30-bA 20-

'h Y l o. ,

---

b,, 4 ,g -- -

s g

a -.g...--

...ykg - -

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 l 10-8-

0 Other Overdue CAR's N

u 6- Other CAR's With Extensions Granted 6- ,

mC bA 4 eR r' 2-s 0

~~~

' " ^ N~ m N~~ '" e ' b ' " ~

I Nov Dec JTn fe'b dr Ayr MTy Jun JY1 Aug Sep Oct 1989 1990 DyfRDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS!

This indicato" shows the' number of overdue CAR's 'and~ the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization.

OVERDUE CAR's ORGANIZATION AUG 90 SEP'90: OCT 90 l N00 0 1- O l PED 1 1 1 Others -0 0- 0 Total 1 2 1 CAR's WITH EXTENSIONS GRANTED.

ORGANIZATION < AUG 90 'SEP 90 OCT 90 N00 2 3- 6 PED 13 '5 7 Others l' 0 _

0-Total 16 8 13 Adverse Trend: None

-102-

1 Ny150- 0 N00 CAR's >6 Months Old 100 a- NOD CAR's <6 Months Old

$C b"--- 6 50- .

. . . . . s .. .. .$.. . . .&- - -b . . .$ . . ..$ . . ---6. . ..g r'

O U ^

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug' Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 o 150-Nf e PED CAR's >6 Months Old ,

u 100- 6- PED CAR's <6 Months- Old mC bA 50-

'R r

gp -----g g-----6-- - - ----- b-- ~ ~ d s .o Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul -Aug Sep Oct Nov. .

1989 1990 o 40-Nf e Other CAR's >6 Months Old -[

h bA 20-Other CAR's <6 Months Old

'R 10- A . . . . .g,, _ , ,,, g -h .. ,.. . g ... .

-O '

r ,_

s o n " " --

u "

u% m _b t Dec- Jan Feb -Mar Apr May Jun- Jul- Aug Sep Oct ' liov 1989 1990 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS CURRENT STATUS This indicator shows the-number of CAR's that are older than 6 months and the number of CAR's that are less than 6 month's old- broken down i by organization.

V  :

CAR's. GREATER THAN 6 MONTHS OLD l' ORGANIZATION AUG 90' SEP 90 OCT 90

! N0D 6 9- 8 I

PED 48' 45 43 4 01hers 'l 1 1 Total 55 55 52 o CAR's LESS THAN 6 MONTHS OLD-ORGANIZATION AUG 90- SEP 90 OCT 90 N00 45 47 40 PED 35 34 35 Others 13 6 5-Total 93 87 80

!. Adverse Trend: None l

-103-

1 1989 1990 OPPD SIGNIFICANT NRC OPPD SIGNIFICANT NRC SALP F"CTIONAL AREA CAR's CAR's VIOLATIONS LER'S CAR's CAR's VIOLATIONS LER'S A. Plant Ope ntions 11 0 8 2 40 (2) 0 1 9 B. Radiviogical Controls _ 30 1 2 1 23 2 0 0 C. Maintenance / 140 8 2 10 172 (8) 8 6 (1) 4 4

Surveillance D. Emergency 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 Preparedness E. Security 26 2 6- 10 24 (1) 0 4 2 F. tic? ineering/ 134 2 7 7 131 (11) 3 2 (1) 11 Techn: al

' Support G. Safety Assessment / 68 0 1 0 19 (3) 0 0 0

.'. Quality-y Verification

.H. Other 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0~

Total 417 13 26 31 416 (26) 13 15 (2) 26 CAR'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT CAR'S VERSUS NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED VERSUS LER'S REPORTED The- above matrix shows- the number of Corrective Action ' Reports"(CAR's) issued ~ by - the' Nuclear-

- Services Division versus' the number of Significant CAR's -issued by the Nuclear Services Division

- versus . the number of ~ violations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the ' Fort Calhoun Station in iM9. and 199C.; Included in *his table is the. number of Licensee Event Reports (LER's) identifiad by Jhe station each year. The number of NRC violations reported. are one month behind the reporting moath due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

In ' October, ~1990, thera were 26. CAR's issued .. zero Significant CAR's issued, and ~ zero LER's

. identified. During. September 7ero NRC violations were issued."Thus no violations were attributable to personn'el error. F.e monthly distribution ' of CAR's, Significant CAR's, NRC violations, and LER's are.shown in parentheses. . .

SEP 15, 20 & 21

'b

.____ _ __ _ , . ~

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.- ~._ = , _ _ -.___m_..____m. . ~ .- - _,m__

, . 1 1

SIGNIFICANT IitMS OF-INTEREST. >

i This section is intended to provide information on events which are significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and will give a " heads-up" look at what is scheduled in the coming months.-

ti i

The Procedure Upgrade Project and the Plant. have 3 approved and issued 811 safety related, procedures.

This meets a = Safety ' Enhancement Program (SEP) Item  !

Number 48 milestone comitment.

The 1990 Emergency Preparedness Graded Exercise is= d planned for the week of 11/26/90.

i The NRC Maintenance Team Re-Inspection will1be held; the weeks of December 3 and December 10, 1990.

-1

- The Electrical Distribution Safety System < Functional Inspection is planned for March:1990.

The inspection of the ther'nal shield was approved as-  ;

a 1991 Refueling Outage task. As. a result, the Refueling Outage length will be extended. The length of this extension is being netermined.-

J i

-105-j

FORT cal.HOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS-  ;

AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS This indicator tracks the total: - number of ' outstanding corrective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun -Station ve-sus .

their age in months. l J

AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARIS 1 1

This indicator . is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage, i maintenance work orers that are on L hold awaiting. parts, to .the; total number of open, non-outag , maintenance work orders.-  !

AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside '

the station chemistry -limit. :The: hours are accumulated from. the: first- J sample exceeding;the limit until- additional, sampling shows the parameter a to be back within limits. '

l l

CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE The Fort Calhoun . check valve failure rate and the ' industry check valve -

failure rate (failures. per :1 million' component: hours). The data for the' industry failure rate is three months 4 behindL the Performance Indicators .

Report reporting' month. This indicator! tracks" performance for- SEP .. item 43.

CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR)' HOURS The number of planned classroom hours and the' numberf of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.. a

. CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT CURRENT STATUS ~ {

The number of Corrective Action Reports '(CAR's)ithat care' older than 6 months- and the number of CAR's that- are less than 6 monthsLold broken

, down by organization:for.the-last 6 months.

CORRECTIVE MAINTEl@CE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstandingF corrective maintenance items, : not -

requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of- '

the period reported. >

l l y

-106-

'h

- -, - - - - - . . . . . . ~ n - -

L ,, _ ,

=

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NON CITED VIOLATIONS (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL).

The cumulative number of violations and Non-Cited Violations for the last 12 months.

DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT

.he daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts.

Q]M BLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator. is defined as the number of accidents; forJ all utility perso1nel permanently assigned to the station, involving days t away from work per 200,000 man hours worked (100 man-years). - This- does not' include:

contractor personnel. This indicator tracks : personnel < . performance c for Sa'ety Enhancement Program (SEP): Item 26.

DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)

The Document Review Indicator shows the. number of -documents . reviewed' during the reporting month, the number of. documents' scheduled =.for review-during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue. This indicator tracks performance for~ Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Reference Number 46.

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RF t IABILITY The number of failures that we'e reported during the last 20, 50,;and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values wHch correlate to a high level of confidence that- a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability :of: greatei than or equal to 95% when the failure values , are- below the trigger values.

Number of Start Demands . -

All valid and inadvertent start demands, includingL all. ' start-only demands and all start -demands that . are followed by -load-run demands, whether by automatic or manual -initiation. A start-only s demand :is a demand in which the ' emergency generator ris started,- but ,no7 attempt is made to load the generator.

Number of Start Failures Any failure within the emergency generator sytstem that prevents the generator from achieving specified frequency and voltage is ~ classified as a valid start failure. This includes any condition identified in the course of maintenance inspections (with the emergency generator .in standby mode) that definitely would have resulted in a start failure if a demand had occurred.

-107-

. v e e FORT CALHOUN' PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY (CONTINUED)-  !

Number of Load-Run Demands ,

for a valid load run demand to be-counted the load run attempt must  :

meet one or more of the following; '

- A load-run of any duration that- results from a real automatic or manual initiation.

A load-run test to satisfy the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications. }

Other special -tests in which the emergency generator is expected to 1 be operated for at least one hour while loaded with at least 50% of -l its design load. ,

a Number of Load-Run Failures --

l A load-run failure' should be counted for any reason in which t the  ;

emergency generator does not pick up load-and run as predicted. Failures'- i are counted during.any valid load-run demands.

l Exceptions '

Unsuccessful attempts to- start or load-run should not be counted as ,

valid demands or failures: when they can, be attributed to any of- the  ;

following;- '

Spurious trips that would be bypassed in the event.of. an emergency.

1 Malfunction of equipment that is not' required-during an emergency -

Intentional termination of - a test because .of L abnormal conditions-that would not have resulted linL major; dieseligenerator damage or repair. ,

Malfunctions or operating errors which would: have= notiprevented the emergency generator from being restarted and brought' to load within a few minutes. .

A failure to -start because.- a portion ofi the starting . system was  !

disabled for test purpose, if followed by a successful start with the starting system in its nomal alignment.

Each emergency generator failure that results in' the generator being-declared inoperable should- be counted as one demand and one failure. ->

Exploratory tests _ during corrective maintenance and the successful test that follows- repair to - verify ' operability should ;not be counted as demands or failures when the EDG has not been declared operable again.

1

-108- j 1

i

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS '(CONTINVED)

H ENGINEERIffG CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAKDOWN _

The breakdown of the total- number of open ECN's', the numb 9r of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, the number . of ECN's that were --

completed during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received-during the reporting -month into three categories. These categories -

include;- 1) document changes. are required ; to complete the ECN's, 2) substitute or replacement items are required to complete the ECN's, or 3) facility changes are required to complete the ECN's. This indicator tracks performance for SEP item 62.

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS The number of ECN's that remain' open at the end of; the reporting month,  ;

the number of ECN's that were opened during ,the reporting month, and the number of ECN's that are completed during: the: reporting month. This indicator tracks. performance for SEP item 62. -

E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours -is the inverse of the j

mean time between forced outages caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is. critical in a period (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment -

failures in that period.

E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR.

5 This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross -available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can-be produced if the unit is operated'at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory. limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by, a . unit in a given period-if operated continuously at maximum capacity.

EXPEDITED PURCHASES The percentage-of expedited purchases which occurred.during 4? reporting month compared to the total number of purchase orders' generated.

FORCED'0VTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as' the percentage of time that the unit was.

unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced events are failures .or other unplanned a conditions that require . removing the unit from service before the end of _

the next weekend. Forced events include startup- failures and events:

initiated while the' unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is -

available but not in service.

1

-109- gl

Q-~

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate.  ;

Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core-internals from previous defective fuel or is on the surface of: fuel 1 elements from the manufacturing process.present ,

l a

Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power i for at least seven days, i This INP0 ' indicator uses an industry normalized : letdown purification -(

rate. The FRI has also been calculated - using Fort Calhoun's actual-  ;

letdown purification rate. These calculations revealed that- the use L of '

the plant's actual rate would; result in an approximate 45% increase- in FRI data.

GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of- Curies of all gaseous. '

radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station.

GROSS HEAT RATE Gross heat rate .is, defined 'as the ratio of total thermal energy ' in British Thermal Units (BTU) produced by the reactor to;the ' total gross-electrical energy produced by the generator-in kilowatt-hours (KWH).' .i HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The total amount (in Kilograms) -of non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated - hazardous waste, and other hazardous' wasteL produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each-month. '

HOTLINES The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document. sent out for immediate -

review. The Hotline should be' reviewed and signed within. 5 days ' of receipt of the Hotline. ~

HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry . parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. Power operation is defined.as greater than 30% power. The 13 parameters tracked are steam greneretor pH, cation conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, soditm, L feed water pH, '

dissolved oxygen. hydrazine, iron, copper, and conder. sate pJmp dischargeo dissolved oxypn.

-110- '

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)

IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF-SERVICE Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).

INVENTORY ACCURAG1 The percentage of line items that are counted each-month by the warehouse which need count adjustments.

INVOICE BREAKDOWN The number of invoices : that are on hold due to shelf ' life, COE, and miscellaneous-reasons.

LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of SR0 and/or R0 quizzes 'and exams that are administered and passad -each month. The License Candidate Exams Indicator tracks Training performance-for Safety Enhancement Program Item Number 68.

L1001D RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED T0 THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the volume of liquid radioactive- waste released from the radioactive waste ~ monitor tanks. .The curies from all releases from the Fort Calhoun Stetion to the Missouri River are also shown.

LOGGABLE/REPORTABLEINCIDENTS'fSECURIll).

The total number of security ine.idents. for the reporting month.. This indicator tracks security performance for Safety Enhancement.Progran item:

Number 58.

MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data . System (NPRDS)- components with more than one failure and the number' of NPRDS components with more than two failurer. during the last twelve months. -

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non-outage maintenance workL orders that ~ remain open at' the end of the reporting month. ..This indicator was added. to-the Performance Indicators Report to -trend open - corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement - Program (SEP)

Item No. 36.

-111-i . -

' .' ti]

i FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)- l MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN-This- indicator is a breakdown of- corrective non-outage maintenance work l orders by several categories that- remain- open et .the- end of the reporting month.

MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. -

This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel.  !

MATERIAL RE0 VEST PLANNING n

The percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their request _ date the same as their need date compared to the total number of.MR's.,

l MATERIAL'RE0 VESTS AWAITING APPROVAL 1 The number of material requests awaiting ' approval at: the end- of the .

reporting month broken down by their age in days.- 1

. MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamma and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation i received by an individual-person working at Lthe Fort .Calhoun Station;on :a  ;

monthly, quarterly,- and annual basis.

7 MWO OVERALL STATUS (1991 REFUELING OUTAGE)-

The total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWO's) thatihave been written for completion during the 1991 Refueling Outage.- MW0's' which : are -written-after the start of - the Refueling: Outage will be labeled Emergent - MWO's.

This indicator tracks performance for SEP Reference Number 31.

NUMBER OF 10T SPOTS The number of radiological . hot . spots which ' have - been -identified and: 2 documented to - exist at the Fort Calhoun: Station : at - the: end of the j' reporting month. A hot spot is a small -localized source of radiation. A -

hot spot occurs when the contact dose: rate of an item is at least 5' times the ' General Area dose rate- and the item's, dose rate is- equal to or .i greater than 100 mrem / hour.

NUMBER OF NUCLEAR- PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM :(NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED 4

The data . plotted is the total! number .. of ' NPRDS: component failures.

(confirmed and possible) and . the number ' of. confirmed NPRDS component -

failures. ' The total number of NPRDS component failures are based: on the number of failure reports that- have been sent to-the Institute of Nyclear- l Operations (INPO).

-112-l

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)

_

NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY ' DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS E

SUBMITTED (CONTINUED)

Confirmed NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that are still under review by INPO.

NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO~'and E implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station. -

NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function:is' =

considered as out-of-service. - A control room instrument which has . had a '

Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not bee'n repaired by the end of the reporting ~ period is considered out-of-service and will be counted. The duration of the out of-service condition is not considered.

Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments.

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed .to personnel error on the original LER submittal. This indicator trends. personnel performance for SEP ltem No. 15.

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS The number of Surveillance Tests (ST's) -that 1 result in Licensee Event -

Reports (LER's) during the reporting. This indicator tracks missed-ST's for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)' Item Numbers-60.and 61.

QPEfBTIONS AND' MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures.,for operations and maintenance.

OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator displays the total number of outstanding. Corrective Action-Reports (CAR's), the number of CAR's that are older than six months and the number of modification related CAR's.

OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE00ESTS (EAR's).

The total number of open EAR's and the number of open EAR's broken down by their age in months. This indicator. tracks performance for SEP item 62..

-113-

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)'

OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS i.

The number of Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state between e the.

issuance of a Modification Number and' the completion - of the- drawing- l update. .:

Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress '

The Form FC-1133 has not been . plant approved.

3 Modification Requests Being Reviewed 1 This category includes:

l 1.) Modification Requests that are-not yet reviewed j 2.) Modification Requests:being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects-Review Committae (NPRC)- q 3.) Modification Requests being-reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC)-

)

These Modification Requests may' be reviewed several times 4 before they are approved for accomplishment or cancelled. Some .;

of these Modifintion Requests- are returned to' Engineering for-  :

more information, some' approved for evaluation',- some i approved -

for study, and some approved for. planning. Nce planning. is a completed and~ the scope of the> work is clearly defined, these Modification Requests:may; be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they. may be cancelled. All of these different phases require review. g Design Engineering Backlog /In Progress-

• n Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will . {

be completed and design work may be in' progress.

Construction'Backl.og/In Progress-The Construction Package has - been . issued 'or construction has begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Committee (SAC).

Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress -

.. i PED has received the Modification Completion Report- but the drawings have not been updated.

l

-114-

/

.- . f i

FORT CALHOUN PL <0RMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS-(CONTINUED)

DVERALL PROJECT STATUS (1991 REFUELING OUTAGE)  !

The number of projects which affect thel scope of Lthe- 1991' Refueling l Outage. This indicator tracks performance for SEP Reference Number 31.

OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS i The number of overdue Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) and the number of 'l>

CAR's which received extensions broken down .by organization for the last 6 months. ,

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES The percent of the number of completed maintenance activities-as compared l to the number of scheduled maintenance activities each-week. This percent is shown for each craft. ' Maintenance activities -include- MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and other miscellaneous activities. These indicators track Maintenance performance for SEP_ Reference Number 33.

PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

Collective radiation exposure' is the total external' whole-body- dose received by all on-site personnel (including contractors andJ visitors)-

during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent ' dosimeter (TLD). Collective raoiation exposure is reported ~ in units of man-rem.- a This indicator tracks radiological work performance (for Safety-i EnhancementProgram-(SEP)'ItemNumber54. '

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment._A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary resignation from the ' company. - Retirement, death, termination, transfers within the company, < and cart-time: employees are not considered in turnover.

~

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE <

y This indicator is defined as_ the. percentage of . prev'entive . maintenance items in the month that were not : completed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of. the scheduled ' interval. This ,

indicator tracks preventive maintenance' activities for Safety Enhancement ,

Program (SEP) Item Number 41. '

PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF L'MIT The percent of hours out of .11mit' are for six primary. chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours .possible for the month.

The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used.-

0

-115-u

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)  !

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) i The number of identified incidents concerning maintenance procedural

- i problems, the number of closF IR's related: to the- use of procedures  !

(includes the number of closed Ns caused by procedural noncompliance), . I and the number of closed procedeal noncompliance IR's.c This . indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item Numbers 15 and 41~ .

PROGRESS OF 1991 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING The number of modifications approved for planning (to determine feasibility) for. completion during the 1991 Refueling. This indicator tracks performance for SEP Reference Number 31. l RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The number of identified poor radiological- work practices (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks. radiological work performance for Safety Enhancement (SEP) Item Number 52.

RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and i' calibration procedures) =to the sum of _ non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on-man-hours.s This ,

indicator tracks preventive maintenance-activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 41.

RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) y The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item '

No. 15 and SEP Item 26. . i R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO-The R0 license examination. pass ratio for NRC -administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC : administered Site i Specific Exams, NRC administered -license requalification: exams', and OPPD administered' license requalification exams. This' indicator tracks .: Training performance - for.

Safety Enhancement Program Item Number 68.

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance Index~ (CPI)L is a calculation based on the i concentration _ of key impurities in .the secondary- side of. the plant. These

~

' key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power.

-116- )

i J

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX (CONTINUED)

The following equation is how the CPI is calculated:-

CPI = ((Ka/0.8) + (Na/20) + (02 /10)) / 3 Where the following parameters are monthly-averages of; Ka = average blowdown cation conductivity Na = average blowdown sodium concentration 02 = average condensate pump discharge dissolved ~ oxygen concentration ECURITY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN This indicator- shows a percentile' breakdown of the types of Security incidents for the reporting month.-

The following items are the types of Security incidents represented in this indicator.

Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's)

Incidents related to the use of LDV's, e.g. keys left in the vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to return keys.

Security Badges Incidents involving lost / unattended badges, badges. removed from site, or failure to wear badges.

Escorting Incidents involving . escort responsibilities, e.g. improper control or escort of a visitor (s).

Security System Failures Incidents involving alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door' equipment failures, and card reader failures.;

Security Key Control-Incidents involving Security key control, e.g. lost ' Security keys, Security -keys removed from site, or failure: to return Security keys. This type of incident 'does_ not reflect . incidents concerning LDV keys.

-117-

~

4 e c o

l FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)-

f SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN (CONTINUED)-

Access Control '

Incidents involving the inspection and control of personnel, packages, and vehicles, e.g. failure to - properly search personnel, packages, and vehicles. This item also includes the introduction of contraband or prohibited items into the i Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such i_tems.  :!

This indicator tracks security performance for Safety Enhancement Program -

(SEP) Item Number 58.

SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES ,

Incidents involving -alarm system = failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, and card reader failures. Alarm system failures and CCTV failures are further categorized <as follows

'l Alarm System Failure - Detection system events involving false / nuisance  !

alarms.and mechanical failures.

Alarm System Environmental Failures . - Degradations to- detection Lsystem performance - as a result of environmental _ conditions (i.e., rain, snow, frost).

CCTV Failures - Mechanical failures to all CCTV hardware components.

CCTV Environmental Failures - ' Degradations to ,CCTV performance. as .a result of environmental conditions (i.e.,_ rain,. snow,L frost, fog,

~

sunspots, shade). 1 1

In the future, a single ~ environmental event: which causes multiple i failures to the alarm system and/or' CCTV system wili 'be logged' as one q event (i.e., a rain storm which causes -multiple

• alarm 1 system failures, '

the sun rising which degrades multiple CCTV performance).

SPARE PARTS ISSQEQ The dollar value of the spare- parts issued' for, the Fort Calhoun Station i during the reporting period.

SRO OPERATOR LICENSE' EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The SRO -license examination' pass ratio- for : NRC: administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Sitet Specific Exams, NRC administered license requalification. exams, and OPPD -administered license requalification exams.'. This indicator: tracks Training : performance - for Safety Enhancement' Program Item Number 68..

h

-118- -)

. q

O e FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)

I STAFFING LEVEL The actual staffing level and the- authorized staffing. level for the Nuclear Operations Division, the Production Engineering Division, and the Nuclear Services Division.

STATION NET GENERATION '

5 m

The net generation (sum) produced by the Fort Calhoun Station during the j reporting month.

STOCK 0VT RATE The total number of Pick Tickets that were-generated during the reporting -

month and the total number of Pick Tickets that-were generated during-the reporting month with- no parts available.

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The . number of temporary mechanical- and electrical configurations to -the -

plant's systems.

y Temporary configurations are defined as electrical : Jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating- systus and are not shown on the latest revision of ~

the P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams, Jumpers and blocks which' are installed = for -Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special ' Procedures, or-Operating Procedures are- not considered as temporary modificationsiunless the jumper or block remains in- place after the test or = procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in' test or . lab ' instruments are not -

considered as temporary modifications. .

Scaffolding is not considered a. temporary modification.- Jumpers and' blocks which are installed and for which > EEAR's have been submitted,: will1 be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or' is-permanently recorded on the drawings.

This indicator. ' tracks temporary modifications for. SEfety Enhancement

' Program (SEP) Item Number 62 & 71.

TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of training for ' Operations',

Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical- Support, General Employee - Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

-119-e a mima mer am a

n -

4 Q

,0RT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER-DEFINITIONS 60NTINUED)-

TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS  !

Reportable skin and clothing- contaminations . above background levels L greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends ' personnel .:

performance for SEP Item No.15. H UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL; i 1

i This indicator is defined 'as the--number of unplanned ' automatic scrams- .!

(reactor protection system logic actuations)-that occur while the reactor  ;

is critical. The indicator is further defined'as-follows:

Unplanned means that the scram was 'not _ part'.of a. planned test- 1 or evolution.- ,

q Scram means the automatic shutdown -of the reactor by a rapid- d insertion of- all control' rods- that tis caused by actuation of ,

the reactor _ protection system. ;The scram signali may. have resulted from exceeding a setpoint_or may have-been, spurious.-  !

u Automatic means that the initial- signal that' caused: actuation-of the reactor protection system-logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions; rather .

than the manual scram switches f(or_- pushbuttons) in the main .I control room.' '

Critical - means- that' during Jth'e steady state condition of the i reactor prior'to-the scram, the' effective: multiplication factor l (keff) was equal to one.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - lINPO DEFINITION)

I This indicator is defined as the u sum' of: the following; safety? system -

l actuatiors:

the number of unplanned Emergencyf core Cooling System l(ECCS)  !

actuations that resul.t' from reaching. an ECCS-~ actuation setpoint-or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal' .

the : number _ of unplanned emergency: AC _ power system actuations ,

that result' from a loss of power to a: safeguards bus .i An unplanned safety system actuation cccurs when an actuation setpoint -3 for a safety system is reached or whan a. spurious oriinadvertent: signal n is generated (ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated.

Unplanned means that the system actuation was;not' part of a planned: test-or evolution. '

The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations 'of-the high pressure injection system; the low; pressure injection system, or the : safety j 1 injection tanks.

-120- g l

, l

~

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION)

The number of safety system actuations which include (2nly) the High Pressure Safety injection System, the Low Pressure Safety injtetion System, the Safety Injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators.

The NRC classification of safety system actuations includes actuations when major equipment is operated And when the logic systems for the above safety systems are challenged.

VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS

{

This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC inspection j hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspection was i actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the bapection hours.

VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for disposal. This indicator also shows the volume of low +1evel radioactive waste which is in temporary storage.

Low level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance.

Dry active waste includes contami.nated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any othsr material to be disposed of at : low level radioactive waste disporal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by product of speit fuel processing.

This indicator tracks radiological work performance for Safety '

Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 54.

WAREHOUSE ISSUES The total number of warehouse issues, the number of non-CQE stock issues, the number of CQE stock issues, the number of direct charge non-CQE issues, and the number of direct cha ge CQE issues which occurred Jtming the reporting month.

i

-121-  !

I

.I

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)

W,qf,:f0VSE RECEIPTS 1

The total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non CQE stock receipts, the number of CQE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts which occurred during the reportitg month.

WAREHOUSE RETURNS The percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total number of warehouse issues.

i l

-122-i

o .

BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS This section will explain the basis used in est;blishing the 1990 performance goals.

FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1990 to 1992. The following table is a breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next three years.

STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR

.Y,lfa (HOURSi (HOURS 1 (HOURS) !HOURSi (HOURS) ,(1). .(1).

1990(*) 6356 168 172 2064 8760 65.4 2.4 1991(*) 6956 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7

(*) Refueling Outage Years UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The 1990 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past four years of operation.

UtiP.1ANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1990 has been established at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station did not have an unplanned safety system actuation for six years.

GROSS HEAT RATE The 1990 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,200 BTV/KWH. This heat rate goal is based on 10,435 BTV/KWH for the month of January, 10,450 BTV/KWH for the month of February, 10,325 BTV/KWH for the month of May, 10,225 BTV/KWH for the month of June, 10,325 BTV/KWH for the month of July,10,250 BTU /KWH for the month of August, 10,125 BTU /KWH for the month of September, 10,050 BTV/KWH for the month of October, 10,000 BTV/KWH for the month of November, and 9,975 BTV/KWH for the month of December.

-123-

BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR G0ALS (CONTINUED) fyEl RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1990 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for ap)roximately one to two fuel pin failures. Although Cycle 11 was completec without any apparent fuel pin failures, there are a number of Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation (ANF) assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed Fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0 43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels.

PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

The 1990 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 287 man rem.

This goal was based on 234 man rem of cumulative exposure for the 1990 Refueling Outage and approximately 5.9 man rem of cumulative exposure for '

each non outage month.

VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The 1990 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 5,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division.

DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1990 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division during 1990.

i i

1

-124-  ;

N

4 a FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE EVENT fL4 - TO (MWH) (MWH) __

Cycle 1 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961

~

Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/.~3/76

~~

Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77

]

Cycle 4 12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 ._

Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 -

Fifth Refueling 01/18/B0 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 a Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 -

Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/86 -

Cycle 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/87-06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88-01/31/89 ,

Cycle 12 01/31/89-02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 Twelfth Refueling 02/17/90-05/29/90 -

125- --

FORT CALHOUN STATION-OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING DUTAGE DATES (CONTINUED)

PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE EVENT FROM - TO (MWH) (MWH)

Cycle 13 05/29/90 - 09/28/91*

Thirteenth Refueling 09/28/9)*- 11/22/91*

Cycle 14 11/22/91*- 02/12/93*

Fourteenth Refueling 02/12/93*- 05/06/93*

Cycle 15 05/06/93*- 09/30/94*

Fifteenth Refueling 09/30/94*-11/26/94*

i-i 4

l

• - Planned Dates 126-

]

4 a

FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS The following seven items are the current production and operation

" records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.

1. First Sustained Reaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . August 5, 1973 (5:47 p.m.)

2. First Electricity Supplied to the System. . . . . August 25, 1973

3. Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH). . . . . . . . September 26, 1973

4. Achieved Full Power (100%) . . . . . . . . . . . May 4,1974

5. Longest Run (477 days). . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27,1988

6. Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH). October 1987

7. Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH). . . . June 8, 1987 Sept. 27, 1988 (Cycle 11)

-127-

PERFORMANCE 1NDICATOR DATA SOURCES PERFORMANCE INDICA 1?B MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Patterson/Schmitz Amount of n'ork On Hold Awaiting Parts Patterson/ CHAMPS Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Franco /Glantz CAR's Current Status Orr/Gurtis CAR's Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Chase /Simmons Orr/Gurtis j Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Patterson/Schmitz L

Cumulative Violations and NCV's Chase /Simmons Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray.

Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Patterson/Gundal-Diesel Generator Unit Reliability DG Log Disabling Injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Patterson/McKay .

Engineering Change Notice Breakdown Phelps/Bera Engineering Change Notice Status Phelps/Bera <

Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray 4

Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek Expedited Purchases Willrett/Fraser Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lafshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Franco /Stultz l Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray Hazardous Waste Produced Patterson/Sayre

-128-i- .

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)

Hotlines Gasper /Newhouse In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Patterson/Renaud Inventory Accuracy W111 rett /Fussell Invoice Breakdown Willrett/Fussell License Candidate Exams Gasper / Lazar Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment France /Stultz Loggable/ Reportable Security Incidents Sefick/Woerner Maintenance Effectiveness Jaworski/ Dowdy i Meintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non Outage) Patterson/Schmitz Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Patterson/Schmitz Maintenance Overtime Patterson/Schmitz Material Request Planning Willrett/Fussell Material Requests Awaiting Approval Willrett/Fraser Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Patterson/Mattice I MWO Overall Status (1991 Refueling Outage) Patterson/ Hyde Number of Hot Spots Patterson/Mattice Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy Number of Out-of-Service. Control Room Instruments Patterson/ Adams Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Chase /Simmons Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's Plant LER's Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstandit 3 CAR's Orr/Gurtis Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's) Jaworski/VanOsdel Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner

-129-i

r PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)

Overall Project Status (1991 Refueling Outage) Patterson/ Hyde Overdue and Extended CAR's Orr/Gurtis Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities Peterson/Schmitz Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) Patterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Sorenson/ Burke Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Patterson/ Linden Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Franco /Glantz Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) Patterson/McKay .

Progress of 1991 Outage Modification Planning Patterson/ Hyde Radiological Work Practices Program Patterson/Mattice Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Patterson/Schmitz ,

i Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs  !

R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Lazar Secondary System Chemistry Franco /Stultz Security Incident Breakdown Sefick/Woerner Security System Failures Sefick/Woerner Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska Spare Farts Issued Steele/ Miser SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Lazar Staffing level Sorenson/ Burke Stockout Rate Willrett/Fussell' Temporary Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Patterson/Mattice Unplanned' Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Plant LER's

-130- l t -

<0 e PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)

Unplanned Safety System Actuations (INPO) Plant LER's Unplanned Safety System Actuations (NRC) Plant LER's Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Chase /Simmons Volume of low level Solid Radioactive Waste Patterson/Breuer Warehouse Issues Willrett/Fussell

~~

Warehouse Receipts Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Returns Willrett/fussell )

M

-131- __

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87-00, " Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D "EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6, 1990.

-132-t........_............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .

_ . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . .