ML20062C878

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 781005 NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Inspec Repts 50-395/78-16 & 50-395/78-17.Corrective Actions:Fqcp 6.1.5 Rev to Delete Requirement for Volumetric MT of All Welds Over 3/8,weld Stamping Incl in Training
ML20062C878
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 10/26/1978
From: Mary Johnson
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20062C875 List:
References
NUDOCS 7811150062
Download: ML20062C878 (3)


Text

. x. ..AE; _ 2: t. ;4 I1'

.g..  ; w a _ ' -

.4_% '"[Ahul.k '

Xb,25.J)

} .t .

i , . .

h f ':, j] . .

  • = , ,,

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC a GAS COMPANY a

" M C i f. . "

oo.sarrenmonsee s. b -

P h CotumelA,$0UTM CAROLINA 29288

(, M. C. J o Mis so m Ug

_ ..a .. u.u .. ... . . . n u u n..

..u...u...u......c.... '

,,"}<; _d.

r .

October 26, 1978 f

F:w

w. . ,

, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • ' ATTN: Mr. James P. O'Reilly

. ; ,, j Director i fj Region II - Suite 1217 L

j 230 Peachtree Street, Northwest

- , ,j Atlanta, Georgia fM Re: V. C. Summer Nuclear Station 0 Unit #1 Response to NRC Audit Reports h 50-395/78-16 and 50-395/78-17 Gentlemen:

l SCE6G has evaluated the item of non-compliance identified as 78-16-01 in your report 50-395/78-16 and has the following response. In accordance with your wishes, we have included an explicit consideration of cause.

g

1. Cause 4

a) The failure to magnetic particle inspect each h." and final weld over 3/8 inch thickness, has been evaluated by SCE6G/QC with the following results:

QC Inspectors have been accustomed to finding NDE re-quirements detailed on the Construction drawings. The

--l drawings in this case specified only MT and the procedural

, requirement of FQCP 6.1.5 to perform volumetric MT when l MT was specified on the drawing was overlooked.

I j b) The mirsing welder identification stamping for bracket to g

beam st.pport weld of platform XAA-1A-AH has been evaluated by our constructor and SCE6G/QC with the following results:

. The welder failed to stamp his identification number adjacent to the weld. This is believed to be an isolated case. This welder has since been terminated because he was not ameniable n

, t MMW2 a

'W"

  • wT "N'-' ' " - -

--g T- e 7 7 T. -* ^

'lT "W

w> .w ,.

..: :n:.na.m %rus.g,a_%giu[g .

. g3p ,. .g

.hr.' Jamts P. O'R2111y Pagle 2 Mc ' October'26, l'978 l

.l f

to following instructions from 3upervision or the proce-dures. Welding Supervision failed to insure that the weld had been stamped per WE-II-03. At the time of construction gW of platform XAA-1-AH, (Fall 1977) structural steel welding was under supervision of the Ironworkers.

At the time of the inspection, SCE6G/QC was not procedurally

[ required to check for physical ID Stamp on weld. Checks dl,[j were made to certify that the welder was qualified for the

,c ,..; q( , particular type of welding that he was performing.

A

/-s- 2. Immediate Corrective Steps Taken and Results

'N' f_' a) Beam to containment welds on beams 4Bil and 4B8L were confirmed to have had a properly conducted final MT inspection conducted and properly documented. In addition, a visual reinspection was conducted on these welds.

v Q

A review of the specification and a discussion with the Architect / Engineer revealed that the requirement to per-form VMT when MT was specified was intended to apply only to the fabrication specification.

b) In relation to welder identification stamping for beam 4B8L, identification has been stamped adjacent to the weld on 10/18/78. Welding supervision was not responsible for the inspection of structural steel welding prior to February 1978. This was changed in February 1978 with the creation of Craft 65. Craft 65 is ir the process of inspecting all welds made on platform XAA-1A-AH to insure that welder identification is stamped on all welds. This action is being verified by SCE&C/QC and QA.

. 3. Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid Future Noncompliance l- a) In relation to the failure to conduct volumetric MT, with Engineering concurrence, FQCP 6.1.5 was revised to delete the requirement for volumetric MT of all welds over 3/8".

Inspectors have been cautioned on the importance of following all Procedures.

b) In relation to the failure to stamp beam 4B8L - A section on the stamping of welds is being added to the indoctrination and training program for new hire welders. Welding supervision

]

s!-

i

. , .. 3,;.5gy; _. h _Q j{.QQ. , 'g .

.g v.$.

.2- s, , .-

3 .

'Mr. ' Jcmes P O'Reilly-

-- *Pzgi 3

<<- Oc tob'er 26, 1978

,J ' $.

!Q

  • n.i9 has been reindoctrinated as to the requirement of WE-II-03

, ,.;j;;

2.44 with each supervisor docu:nenting his attendance to the

'* - retraining. All welders have been instructed in the

- requirements of stamping the welds and this shall be Y[,Z- ic documented . In additiin, FQCP 6.1.2 has been revised to "M add this ID check as an inspection point as a double C check of welder qualifications.

[- ',,;) u "2N 4. Full Compliance Date

  • R 4..

%f All actions identified as non-recurring actions were complete

,i l/

as of 10/25/78.

  • :,S ta We trust that you will find the above information adequate to resolve item

, 78-16-01. We have reviewed both captioned reports and find no proprietary information contained there-in. Please feel free to contact us if we can provide any further information in relation to this matter.

Very truly yours,

{ - c.fYlDn DAN /MCJ/jls cc: C. J. Fritz G. C. Meetze

'I 4

1 t

1 s

1

+ e+ - w e ,4%.s -s. . ,,,w...e *e***:e-e-- ****s.u* s- '

  • -r- 9 7 *rp--*-*

4+- - ~ = * ' - * ~ ~ - v 1 * == -- < ****--7 y -- ' **7 e d