ML20058G665

Notice of Violation from Insp on 820121-0301

ML20058G665
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch
Issue date:	05/18/1982
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20058G617	List: IR 05000321/1982009 ML20058G611 ML20058G620 ML20058G630 ML20058G645 ML20058G665 ML20058G679
References
50-321-82-09, 50-321-82-9, 50-366-82-09, 50-366-82-9, NUDOCS 8208030387
Download: ML20058G665 (3)

Text

.--r, q 3 3' , /

- !y ,

l

't , ,os = ,

^

^

l. 'I 5

4

, in .,

s'  !

APPENDIX A . #

- ,~ ,

NOTICE OF VIOLATION r j {' ,

, 2 w

,t ,

, r. ,,

Georgia Power Company Docket Nos. 50-32150-366 _. ..:~ .

(

Hatch I and 2 License Nos'/0,PR-57, NPF-5 As a result of the conducted on January 21 - March 1,1982 ano in accordance with -

theNRCEnforcementPolicy,47FR9987(March 9,fl982),thefollowingDeiolations were identified. , ,

A. Technical Specification 3.3.2 requires thst the isolation e'ctuation instru-mentation cnannels in Table j,32241 be operable with trip seboints con-sistent with the values shewtin' Table 3.3.2-2. If r.at operable, the channel must be restored to opebable status 41 thin 2 houri, or the affectedr system isolated. p ,j ' /

c{

)--

th a,bove,< the isolatfor,' t;utuation instrumentation , , 1

1. Contrary to

.setpoint for the.'high steam flow inciatior ; signal of the'RCIC inboard.

1 isolation valve wasi not set s ,300's of ' rated flow as' pequired by -

Table 3.3.2-2 Item' 5.a. The system was not isolated and declared inoperable as required by Table 3.3.2-2. Item 5.a. This condition had existed for app-ox,imately two and one half years hs a result of a misplaced'dssign chahge request

• DCR (79/376). The misplaced DCR was ~r.

discovered - And tn'e corrected setpoint changes was accor;plished on January 11,'1982 ' ' '

f n; .;-

G '

<t a l - -

2. Contrary to the above Technical Specificat' ion,cthe isolation actuation ~

setpoint for the ' RCIC, inboard stearri line

• isolation valve' was erro-neously set tot a nonconservative value on January 28, 1982 due to the licensee"s 'faGure to properly' implement a charige to proceduro HNP #

3410,RCICStejmLineDeltaPInstruaentfunctionalTestandCalibra- f tion. .,

// / o

/J} fj This is a Severf % Level' IV Violation (Supplement !,). This applies to Unit 4 )

2 only. '

• . ^

+

7 ,

T ';

B. Technical Specifjcation 6:9.1.8.i .' requires when per'formance'6f' components ' I requires remedial-action /or corrective measures to prevent / operation in a #

2 manner less conservativ'e,ithan assumed;in the accident ( ar:alyse's, safety analysis report or;.tcchnical specification bases that it be reported'to the 7 -

regional office within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. f f ,

' t- < ',

Contrary to the aboYe, the existeqce of a non-jonservative settingifor the j-RCIC inboard steam line isolatfor e valve trip setpoint was not reported /

promptly to the regional office wit,hin. 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />sf as; required when it was discovered tw the-fall of 1979 and agai.1 on Januairy 11,1982 (two examples).

s ;j

/ ,\

., ,, f g ., Y 's

~

B20B030387 B20723 / ' 'J . g' -

):

PDR ADOCK 05000321' - >

i G ,PDR -

e I

s i (l 9  % < ,

T m i _

i i

Georgia Power Company 2 Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366

! Notice of Violation License Nos. DPR-57, NPF-5 i

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I). This applies to Unit 2 i only.

C. Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures 1 recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2,

} February 1978 and surveillance and test activities of safety-related 1 equipment.

1. Contrary to the above, on June 14, 1981, plant procedure HNP-801 was not followed in that a nonconformance report was not issued when eight control rod drive mechanisms were unable to satisfy the acceptance criteria stated in HNP-1-9404, Control Rod Drive Timing.

! This applies to Unit 1.

L i

2. Contrary to the above Technical Specification, plant procedure HNP 3410, surveillance of the RCIC Steam Line Delta P Instruments, was not

! properly maintained or reviewed in that an incorrect setpoint value of

+142 inches of water existed in step F.2.0 of the procedure for setting 1 the RCIC high steam flow isolation setpoint for the inboard isolation valve.

] This applies to Units 1 and 2.

\

j 3. Contrary to the above Technical Specification, plant procedure HNP-820, Plant Records Management, paragraph E.2 was not followed in that plant records on control rod drive tests were not forwarded to the docutent control section subsequent to completion of control rod testing on June 14, 1981. On February 2,1982, the records of only 51 of 137 rods tested were plant records. The remaining records were located in an engineers desk drawer.

j This applies to Unit 1.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I).

D. 10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V requires activities af fecting qualit y 3.iall i

be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type l apprcpriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings. Plant procedure HNP-822, Material Inspection Request, Step 6.1.a requires a two part QC hold tag be attached to material to be inspected.

i i

, _. - _ . . . _ . _ . ~ , . _ _ . _ _ . _ . . - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ - . . _ . _

Georgia Power Company 3 Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366 Notice of Violation License Nos. DPR-57, NPF-5 Contrary to the above, on January 21, 1982, QC hold tags were not attached as required to approximately 100 spare Johnson pump parts in the warehouse.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I). This applies to Unit 1 and 2.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, ynu are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tions; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation, M AY 181982 oate:_.

.